The Matt Walsh Show - Ep. 1226 - 'Paw Patrol' Indoctrinates Pre-Schoolers With Radical LGBT Propaganda

00:00:00.060 Today on the Matt Wall Show, the makers of Paw Patrol have hired a new writer who happens to be an LGBT extremist activist.

00:00:05.800 That's why her first move was to invent Paw Patrol's first non-binary character.

00:00:09.800 This is blatant and radical LGBT indoctrination in one of the most popular children's shows in the world, so it really does matter.

00:00:15.560 We'll discuss. Also, the left is touting a new poll that supposedly proves that most Americans agree with them on the trans issue.

00:00:21.060 But the truth, as always, is the opposite of what they're claiming.

00:00:23.200 Plus, the Senate has relaxed its dress code so that John Fetterman can still dress like a slovenly bum.

00:00:28.220 In our daily cancellation, should men care about a woman's quote-unquote body count?

00:00:32.860 Yes, of course they should. We'll discuss that and much more today on the Matt Wall Show.

00:00:58.220 You know a company's looking out for you when they actually upgrade your service and don't charge you for it.

00:01:05.780 This is great news for new and current Pure Talk customers.

00:01:09.140 Pure Talk just added data to every plan and includes a mobile hotspot with no price increase whatsoever.

00:01:14.940 If you've considered Pure Talk before but haven't made the switch, take a look again.

00:01:17.820 For just $20 a month, you'll get unlimited talk, text, and now 50% more 5G data, plus their new mobile hotspot.

00:01:23.820 This is why I love Pure Talk. They're veteran-owned and only hire the best customer service team located right here in the great USA.

00:01:30.140 Most families are saving almost $1,000 a year while enjoying the most dependable 5G network in America.

00:01:35.080 Remember, you vote with how you spend your money, so stop supporting woke wireless companies that don't support you.

00:01:39.420 When you go to puretalk.com slash Walsh, you'll save an additional 50% off your first month because they actually value you.

00:01:45.000 That's puretalk.com slash Walsh.

00:01:46.760 Pure Talk, wireless for Americans by Americans.

00:01:49.160 One of the biggest distinctions between shows that are made for adults and shows that are made for children is that you rarely hear much about the people who make shows for children.

00:01:58.120 Studios go out of their way to promote the latest Christopher Nolan film or the latest action movie directed by James Cameron or whoever.

00:02:05.940 Adults are expected to buy tickets to see these films primarily on the basis of the famous people who worked on them.

00:02:11.880 But when it comes to productions that are intended for children, you're left oftentimes in the dark.

00:02:16.780 You're really not supposed to know anything about the people producing these shows.

00:02:20.800 Instead, those productions are marketed directly towards children, usually with the help of cutting-edge animation and CGI and all the rest of it.

00:02:28.560 Parents aren't told anything about who's putting this stuff together behind the curtain.

00:02:33.020 And that's why the other day I decided to take a close look at someone named Linz Amir.

00:02:38.040 Linz Amir is not a household name.

00:02:40.340 Very few people have ever heard of this person.

00:02:42.240 But recently, Linz was hired by Nickelodeon to help write for a spinoff of the hugely popular children's show Paw Patrol.

00:02:49.960 And if you're not familiar with Paw Patrol, chances are that you don't have kids because every child under the age of seven has seen this show, sadly, for the most part.

00:02:58.500 And that's not an exaggeration, by the way.

00:03:00.340 According to Paramount, worldwide, more than 350 million households tune in to this show.

00:03:07.280 So very, very popular.

00:03:09.060 Now, for the record, just to get my own biases out of the way, I've already banned Paw Patrol in my house simply because it's an incredibly annoying, obnoxious children's show with dull, lifeless animation.

00:03:22.840 And before we even get to the wokeness, it's already everything that's wrong with children's entertainment.

00:03:28.200 There's no heart to this show.

00:03:29.480 It has no soul.

00:03:30.540 There's no creativity.

00:03:31.500 There's no art.

00:03:32.500 There's just nothing.

00:03:33.540 It is, at best, mindless amusement for preschoolers.

00:03:36.700 Just lights and sounds and stimulation.

00:03:38.480 Not the kind of thing that I want to hear in the background at my house and not the kind of content that any child benefits from consuming.

00:03:44.480 But most families do allow Paw Patrol into their homes, along with its spinoff, which is called Rubble and Crew.

00:03:50.860 And as a result, with every episode, tens of millions of children are being exposed to content written and produced, not just by soulless automatons, but also by hyper left-wing ideologues, like this person, Linz Amir.

00:04:05.620 So it's important to ask a basic question, which Nickelodeon and Paramount desperately don't want you to ask.

00:04:11.340 And that simple question is, who are these people?

00:04:14.240 Who is this person in particular?

00:04:16.720 Now, before I get into what I learned by reading Linz Amir's book, here's a video that Amir uploaded recently to the internet for everyone to see.

00:04:24.180 This is footage from a key writer in one of the most popular children's television shows on the planet.

00:04:29.860 And to be clear, this is totally unedited. Here it is.

00:04:37.860 Hi, friends. Welcome to Queer Kid Stuff. I'm Linz.

00:04:41.620 And I'm Teddy.

00:04:43.700 And this is my best stuff friend, Teddy.

00:04:46.480 And this is Teddy's Book Club, where we're reading LGBTQ plus picture books with you all every Saturday morning.

00:04:54.080 This week, we are reading a book called What's an Abortion Anyway?

00:05:00.000 Linz, what is an abortion anyway?

00:05:03.500 Well, we're just going to have to find out in the book, Teddy.

00:05:06.800 This is What's an Abortion Anyway? by Carly Maines and Emulsify.

00:05:11.120 And I'm really excited to read this book because I don't think there are any other picture books that talk about what an abortion is.

00:05:17.980 And it's a really important idea to understand right now.

00:05:21.960 Isn't it, Teddy?

00:05:23.160 Yeah, that's right.

00:05:25.520 My God. I mean, it's just a horror film.

00:05:28.460 And the reading level for this book, which is called What's an Abortion Anyway, is for children ages 7 and up.

00:05:34.600 So the point, of course, is to indoctrinate children who can't possibly understand the ramifications of abortion as early as possible before they know what they're talking about.

00:05:42.960 And if you read this book, of course, it's the most overt pro-abortion propaganda you can possibly imagine.

00:05:49.080 It includes lines like this, for example, quote,

00:05:52.900 Some people have abortions because their doctors say pregnancy could make them sick.

00:05:56.840 Another page contains this line, quote,

00:05:58.660 Some people have abortions because they can't take care of a new baby right now.

00:06:03.000 Imagine actually saying this to a 7-year-old.

00:06:06.060 Like, imagine saying, Mommy loves you, but sometimes mommies don't love their children, so they kill them.

00:06:10.620 Isn't that wonderful?

00:06:11.720 I mean, this is depraved on the deepest possible level.

00:06:16.700 This is serial killer level crazy.

00:06:20.180 As for the arguments presented for abortion in the book, if you're 7 years old, they might seem compelling, if not also extremely disconcerting.

00:06:29.020 After all, you're not told anything about what abortion actually is.

00:06:31.540 You're not informed that abortion means dismembering a child.

00:06:34.620 Instead, you're told that abortion makes life easier for the cartoon women in the pages you're reading.

00:06:38.880 And this is the kind of book that Linz Amir, the new Nicolaitan writer, is pushing.

00:06:44.440 And that made me wonder, what does Linz Amir write about in her own book?

00:06:48.380 That book is called Rainbow Parenting, Your Guide to Raising Queer Kids and Their Allies.

00:06:53.900 So here's a paragraph from the first chapter of that book.

00:06:57.020 Quote, we'll start at the very beginning, infancy.

00:07:00.300 I know it might seem silly to start so early.

00:07:02.240 Babies can barely say baba, let alone tell you their pronouns.

00:07:05.740 But I encourage you to think of infancy as a practice round.

00:07:09.240 You can create a queer and gender-affirming environment in their nursery.

00:07:13.300 Babble to them about consent while you're changing their diaper.

00:07:15.520 And start up your well-rounded book collection.

00:07:20.220 A practice round.

00:07:22.280 It's great parenting advice.

00:07:23.720 You know, I mean, leaving the LGBT stuff aside for a second.

00:07:27.600 Already, even if you leave that aside, that's the worst parenting advice I've ever heard in my life.

00:07:31.860 You know, infancy, it's a practice round.

00:07:33.680 It's just, this is the rough draft.

00:07:34.980 Don't worry about it.

00:07:35.560 You can try out different things.

00:07:36.480 It doesn't make a difference.

00:07:37.200 They're only infants.

00:07:37.780 But, of course, this person wants you to babble about sex and transgenderism with children who are in a nursery.

00:07:45.660 This is not some fleeting thought that Lynn Zemir had.

00:07:48.300 She wrote it in her book.

00:07:49.880 And it was published.

00:07:51.420 And it goes from there.

00:07:52.280 Quote, you can introduce toddlers to big abstract concepts like queerness and difference and develop healthy skills like body kindness and consent.

00:07:59.320 Maybe infancy and toddlerhood seem a little early to introduce ideas about consent and body kindness, but it will help you build a strong and confident foundation.

00:08:05.600 So let's pause here for a second to make one thing absolutely clear.

00:08:08.420 If you're talking about topics like queerness with a toddler, you belong in a straitjacket or in a prison or both.

00:08:16.740 There's no way to spin that to be healthy or remotely appropriate.

00:08:20.620 But that's what this Nickelodeon writer is doing.

00:08:23.200 She's talking about the idea that toddlers who don't know anything about the world can benefit from a conversation about queerness.

00:08:31.120 It's incredible this was edited and published, but it was.

00:08:33.580 And this author was not banished from civilization.

00:08:37.080 She got a promotion writing for one of the top kids cartoon franchises in the country.

00:08:42.880 Lynn Zemir will deny that there's anything radical about what she's doing, of course.

00:08:45.700 But if you look at her YouTube channel, which is called Queer Kids Stuff, you'll quickly notice a pattern, which is that Lynn Zemir is bent on sexualizing kids.

00:08:54.100 She even sings a whole song about kids being drag queens.

00:08:57.640 Watch.

00:08:58.000 If you're a drag queen and you know it, blow a kiss.

00:09:06.940 If you're a drag queen and you know it, blow a kiss.

00:09:13.380 If you're a drag queen and you know it, and you really want to show.

00:09:17.840 If you're a drag queen and you know it, blow a kiss.

00:09:20.380 If you're a drag queen and you know it, strike a pose.

00:09:28.320 If you're a drag queen and you know it, strike a pose.

00:09:33.500 If you're a drag queen and you know it, and you really want to show.

00:09:39.660 If you're a drag queen and you know it, strike a pose.

00:09:43.960 Nice poses, everyone.

00:09:45.780 All right, the next one is say ta-da.

00:09:48.940 If you're a drag queen and you know it, say ta-da.

00:09:52.780 Ta-da!

00:09:53.240 Okay, so Lynn Zemir has a bunch of videos like this.

00:09:58.140 And to be clear, again, this is not just her normalizing the concept of drag queens, which is bad enough.

00:10:04.940 Exposing kids to drag queens.

00:10:06.220 This is encouraging kids to be drag queens.

00:10:09.600 And instead of being denounced and condemned for this insanity, now she's writing for the Paw Patrol spinoff.

00:10:15.420 In that capacity, Amir has created the first non-binary character in Paw Patrol history.

00:10:20.460 This character is called River, and he, him, they, them, whatever, quote,

00:10:25.580 rides a skateboard in the episode and wears socks and shoes that are the colors of the transgender flag.

00:10:30.420 Now on Twitter, Robbie Starbuck has spotted this, and here's what he noticed about the character.

00:10:35.040 Watch.

00:10:36.060 Having been a director for some of the biggest stars in Hollywood, I feel like I have a duty to warn parents about something.

00:10:41.880 They're coming for your children.

00:10:43.600 They want your kids to be indoctrinated into far-left voters who believe anything the media feeds them.

00:10:49.300 And a lot of parents don't even realize it's happening.

00:10:52.120 Here's the most recent example.

00:10:53.820 This is the Paw Patrol spinoff called Rubble and Crew.

00:10:57.040 Sounds like no big deal, right?

00:10:58.840 So in this new Paw Patrol spinoff, they've got a new non-binary character.

00:11:02.680 Look at the socks and shoes.

00:11:03.980 This was intentional, and the writer admitted it.

00:11:06.260 Yeah, those were shoes and socks in the trans pride colors.

00:11:09.700 Now you might be asking, who was the writer?

00:11:11.840 The writer is somebody named Linz Amir, who runs a YouTube channel called Queer Kid Stuff.

00:11:16.240 And it's as bad as it sounds.

00:11:18.400 They indoctrinate kids and provide, quote-unquote, LGBTQ plus resources for them.

00:11:23.160 These are the types of people spending time alone with your child, indoctrinating them into this woke mass hysteria.

00:11:28.920 If you don't want people like this indoctrinating your kids and reaching the inside of your home with their woke far-left hysteria,

00:11:35.900 it's time to turn the TV off, guys.

00:11:38.180 Rubble and Crew isn't alone.

00:11:39.800 Netflix did the same thing.

00:11:41.160 So did Transformers.

00:11:42.520 So did Blue's Clues.

00:11:43.620 They want to sexualize your kids.

00:11:46.380 This is a grooming pipeline.

00:11:48.120 It starts here with these subtle references in TV shows your kids get indoctrinated with.

00:11:52.340 Then they head off to public school where their teacher indoctrinates them further.

00:11:55.360 And before you know it, you have a child that is fully indoctrinated into the woke cult.

00:12:00.600 You know now, so you can stop it.

00:12:02.580 Turn the TV off.

00:12:03.440 So there you go.

00:12:05.640 And, of course, again, it is worth emphasizing that in a just and sane society, which, of course, is not the kind of society we live in,

00:12:12.980 but if we did live in such a society, then someone like Linz Amir would be put under arrest.

00:12:17.460 There would be federal agents going to her house.

00:12:21.060 And rather than going to the homes of, like, pro-lifers who protest at an abortion clinic,

00:12:26.120 they'd be going to her house and they'd be carting her away in handcuffs.

00:12:28.860 And then, you know, what they'd be doing next is they'd be checking her basement to see for bodies down there,

00:12:33.420 because this is pure, depraved, serial killer behavior happening.

00:12:40.140 Now, a couple things to note here.

00:12:42.500 First, this is not the first time that Paw Patrol has pushed this kind of propaganda on children.

00:12:46.620 Even back in 2020, they were, as you can see here, displaying the so-called non-binary flag by adorning a boat in the colors of the flag.

00:12:55.680 And this is not subtle at all, you know, unless you're in preschool.

00:12:58.900 And for that audience, the idea is to get them used to seeing these colors and associating them with something good and fun and welcoming

00:13:05.380 so that when they encounter the non-binary flag in real life, they will draw that association.

00:13:10.780 Subliminal messaging is a big part of kids' cartoons these days.

00:13:13.780 As Robbie noted, it's part of virtually all children's entertainment now.

00:13:17.060 Now, if you've ever had a conversation with a proponent of this non-binary concept,

00:13:22.740 you'll quickly notice that they struggle mightily to explain it or defend it.

00:13:26.940 They cannot answer any skeptical questions about it.

00:13:29.940 When they talk about non-binary, if you just ask them simply, what do you mean by that?

00:13:36.860 What do you mean non-binary?

00:13:38.040 How can someone be non-binary?

00:13:39.800 They can't answer.

00:13:40.460 They claim that some people are not on the sex binary, that they exist in some sort of state beyond male or female.

00:13:46.720 But if you ask them, for example, to name the third and fourth and fifth sexes, which they're claiming exists,

00:13:54.340 if you ask them to give more information about these people who possess this transcendent identity,

00:13:59.940 they can't do it.

00:14:02.780 So how do you get people to buy into this concept, one that you can't defend or even answer any questions about?

00:14:09.060 The only way to do it is to indoctrinate them at a young age before they can think for themselves

00:14:12.780 or ask these kinds of questions.

00:14:15.620 That's exactly what's happening.

00:14:17.440 It's why Nickelodeon and Paramount have enlisted Linz to write for them.

00:14:21.920 Now, they think they can get away with all of this because many people on social media,

00:14:25.920 some of them conservatives, still like to claim that it's somehow frivolous or silly

00:14:30.260 to complain about something like an LGBT character in a children's show.

00:14:34.080 This very segment that I'm doing right now is sure to be mocked later today on social media

00:14:38.420 by leftists scoffing that I open my show by complaining about Paw Patrol.

00:14:42.500 But the truth, the truth that the people scoffing know very well is that this is far more important

00:14:50.500 than most of the topics that will make the top of a Fox News or CNN broadcast.

00:14:54.880 Because this is an explicit campaign to brainwash children when they are the most susceptible to it.

00:15:01.220 Under the guise of harmless entertainment using shows with innocuous names like Paw Patrol,

00:15:05.840 adults are trying to brainwash children into a radical and sexualized ideology

00:15:10.000 that those children cannot possibly understand or question.

00:15:14.680 Now, there's a reason why the left, following their usual paradoxical routine,

00:15:19.720 will mock conservatives who object to including a non-binary character in a show for preschoolers,

00:15:25.100 but then also, in the very next breath, tearfully celebrates the inclusion of that character.

00:15:30.580 This is what they always do.

00:15:32.460 They insist that we should care about something, and then they mock us for caring about it.

00:15:36.400 I'm pointing this out all the time.

00:15:37.640 This is the playbook.

00:15:38.980 They say, you know, look at this non-binary character in Paw Patrol.

00:15:41.980 Isn't this amazing?

00:15:42.700 It's a historic moment.

00:15:43.720 Everyone, look at this.

00:15:44.420 You should celebrate this.

00:15:46.600 And then when we object, they respond by saying, well, why do you care anyway?

00:15:49.940 It's just a kid's show, you weirdo.

00:15:52.500 Well, you just told us to care.

00:15:53.880 You said it's a big deal.

00:15:55.440 And we believe you.

00:15:56.360 It is a big deal.

00:15:57.120 It's just that we don't think it's a big deal in the same way.

00:16:00.800 This is the game they constantly play, and they expect us not to notice.

00:16:04.080 What they expect most of all, what they demand, is that we take our children and put them in front of the television and then get out of the way.

00:16:16.940 Once your kid is sitting there, the entertainment industry says, okay, we'll take it from here.

00:16:21.460 Go sit in the other room and stare at your phone or something.

00:16:23.720 We got it.

00:16:24.200 Don't worry.

00:16:25.480 We'll take care of it.

00:16:26.320 They want us to pay no attention to the man behind the curtain or even what's happening in front of the curtain.

00:16:33.840 Just let them decide what our kids are exposed to, what ideas are presented to them, what values are inculcated.

00:16:40.960 That's what they demand.

00:16:42.840 And if you step in as a parent and say, no, I'm not going to let you expose my kids to this.

00:16:47.880 I'm not going to give you unfettered access to my child's brain and soul.

00:16:52.260 Then they'll kick and scream and mock and belittle you.

00:16:55.160 And so be it.

00:16:56.320 They can kick and scream away.

00:16:59.780 They aren't getting anywhere near my kids, I can tell you that.

00:17:03.140 I will protect them from this madness at all costs.

00:17:07.320 And that's the attitude that all parents need to have.

00:17:11.940 Now let's get to our five headlines.

00:17:19.020 In a world filled with uncertainties, one shocking headline spreads panic like wildfire and grocery stores are empty within hours.

00:17:24.480 So it's crucial to be ready for whatever comes your way.

00:17:27.580 Having a reliable food storage system can provide you with peace of mind and the assurance that you and your loved ones will be well taken care of.

00:17:33.680 Right now, My Patriot Supply is giving you 25% off a three-month emergency food kit to help you start growing your supply.

00:17:41.060 Go to preparewithwalsh.com and grab this special price.

00:17:43.600 Before it ends, your one-week emergency food kit provides over 2,000 calories each day for optimal strength and energy in stressful situations.

00:17:50.640 You can enjoy a wide variety of My Patriot Supply food from buttermilk pancakes and chicken alfredo to rice pudding.

00:17:56.660 And their meals have you covered for every part of your day.

00:17:58.440 The best part is each meal is delicious.

00:18:00.640 Don't wait for disaster to strike before taking action.

00:18:02.940 Invest in your safety and well-being by securing your food storage today.

00:18:06.440 Go to preparewithwalsh.com and save 25% off a three-month supply.

00:18:11.060 That's preparewithwalsh.com.

00:18:12.460 Well, you know, there's nothing the media loves more than talking about new polling data that supports whatever narrative they're pushing.

00:18:19.800 And you also know that there's nothing I love more than pointing out how the polling data is bogus.

00:18:25.780 So case in point, the media is pumping up this latest poll.

00:18:28.720 And I'll read the headline from The Advocate, which is a gay propaganda site.

00:18:32.460 The headline is, Americans don't want politicians focusing on transgender issues, survey finds.

00:18:38.340 The article says, most Americans are not concerned with legislation around transgender issues

00:18:42.660 and harbor doubts about whether lawmakers are informed enough on matters related to trans lives

00:18:46.720 to create fair policies about access to gender-affirming care, according to a survey released on Monday.

00:18:51.340 In their second annual The State of Our Nation poll, the 19th and Survey Monkey examined the state of women in America

00:18:56.080 with a particular focus on women of color and LGBTQ individuals.

00:19:00.160 Respondents were asked about attitudes towards the economy, abortion, health care, guns in the workplace,

00:19:04.300 as well as attitudes towards gender-affirming care and trans rights.

00:19:07.260 Transgender issues don't feature prominently in most Americans' political priorities,

00:19:10.760 according to the online survey of more than 20,000 adults conducted in late August.

00:19:15.380 Just 17% believe politicians should focus on restricting gender-affirming care,

00:19:19.520 while 33% thought that they should protect transgender individuals.

00:19:23.380 While Republicans were more likely to support limiting trans rights,

00:19:27.960 they oppose politicians focusing on transgender issues.

00:19:31.900 58% of Republicans oppose a focus on transgender issues compared to 49% of independents

00:19:36.820 and 32% of Democrats.

00:19:38.780 When it comes to gender-affirming care, Americans are divided.

00:19:40.920 More than 57% of survey respondents expressed their support for the rights of transgender adults

00:19:45.180 to access gender-affirming care.

00:19:47.020 However, a significantly smaller percentage, 39%, indicated their support for gender-affirming care for minors,

00:19:52.280 revealing a complex public opinion landscape on this critical issue.

00:19:55.780 Okay, so this is a poll of 20,000 adults.

00:20:00.000 Sounds like a large sample size.

00:20:02.000 Sounds impressive.

00:20:02.600 And according to the reporting here, most Americans don't want politicians to focus on this issue,

00:20:07.620 and most Americans support gender-affirming care, for adults anyway.

00:20:13.300 Now, it's interesting that even in this poll that a gay news site is touting,

00:20:18.080 even this poll finds that most Americans, a significant majority,

00:20:21.580 are opposed to so-called gender-affirming care for minors.

00:20:24.240 So this is the absolute best poll they can find for their site,

00:20:27.840 and it finds that only 39% support doing this to minors, which is still way too high.

00:20:34.920 It shouldn't be 39%.

00:20:35.760 It should be 0%, but it's not a majority.

00:20:38.860 And it's certainly smaller now than it would have been two years ago.

00:20:43.960 So it does show extraordinary progress on this issue.

00:20:47.720 And that's significant because, again, even in the polls that the left conducts and touts and promotes,

00:20:55.000 if you actually get into the details, you find that even in those polls,

00:20:59.060 they're losing.

00:21:01.820 You know, they're on the losing side of this.

00:21:04.320 Now, the rest is supposed to be a victory for the pro-trans side.

00:21:06.800 Supposedly, most Americans don't care about this issue.

00:21:09.300 They generally support gender-affirming care, at least for adults.

00:21:11.840 But this is where you have to actually go to the poll itself and read the questions.

00:21:19.300 Always do this.

00:21:20.080 Anytime you hear about a poll, go and read the actual questions that they were asked.

00:21:25.080 And if you can't find the actual questions,

00:21:26.460 anytime you hear a poll, a survey, 75% of Americans say this.

00:21:31.960 Well, in the headline, it's always a paraphrase, at best,

00:21:34.520 of what Americans in the poll allegedly said.

00:21:37.760 So you want to look at the poll itself, the actual language.

00:21:40.020 What question were they asked specifically, verbatim?

00:21:42.940 If you can't find that, then just ignore the poll completely.

00:21:46.080 It doesn't mean anything, if they won't tell you what question was really asked.

00:21:49.860 In this case, I clicked through a few times,

00:21:52.460 but eventually I got to the Survey Monkey poll itself.

00:21:55.320 And here's how they phrase the trans questions.

00:21:58.200 Here's the phrasing.

00:22:00.840 Gender-affirming care for transgender adults includes any kind of care

00:22:03.980 designed to support and affirm their gender identity,

00:22:05.980 including therapy, consultations with doctors, hormones, or other medication, and surgery.

00:22:10.460 In general, do you favor or oppose the right of transgender adults

00:22:13.600 to have access to gender-affirming care?

00:22:16.440 So there it is.

00:22:19.300 This is the case with the left in general,

00:22:21.060 but especially when it comes to LGBT and especially then with trans,

00:22:25.800 everything they say is a lie.

00:22:29.080 You have to understand that everything they say is a lie.

00:22:32.200 They lie about everything.

00:22:33.640 They're not honest about a single damn thing.

00:22:35.800 Everything is skewed.

00:22:39.760 Everything is biased that comes from them.

00:22:43.260 And that's especially...

00:22:44.420 So when you look at what the actual poll,

00:22:47.300 how they're framing these questions,

00:22:48.680 you see how ridiculous this is.

00:22:51.460 The polls automatically bunk.

00:22:53.920 Because it is, of course, using left-wing propaganda language

00:22:57.840 to describe the issue, to set up the questions.

00:23:01.220 So anyone who's not fully informed will read that and think,

00:23:05.000 oh, so, okay, so it's care to affirm someone's gender.

00:23:10.380 Well, that sounds okay, I guess.

00:23:12.340 Because the beautiful thing for them and the way that you phrase that

00:23:16.260 is no matter where you stand on the trans issue,

00:23:18.500 if you don't know any better and you think,

00:23:19.980 well, affirming the gender, well, that's so.

00:23:21.880 Yeah, sure, we should affirm the gender.

00:23:24.100 Even people who don't believe you can change genders.

00:23:27.580 Well, they think, yeah, we should affirm.

00:23:28.960 If a man's a man, we should affirm that.

00:23:30.700 Okay, yeah, okay.

00:23:33.640 The actual honest way to ask the question

00:23:35.900 would be something like,

00:23:37.360 doctors want to give people who are confused about their sex

00:23:41.380 sterilization and castration drugs

00:23:43.260 or cosmetically alter their genitals

00:23:44.900 all in an effort to make the confused person

00:23:46.800 look something like the opposite sex.

00:23:49.160 Do you support the right of doctors

00:23:51.260 to do this to people who are confused?

00:23:55.280 That is honest phrasing of the question.

00:23:58.420 It's not biased.

00:23:59.240 That is actually what's going on.

00:24:01.040 You have people who are confused

00:24:02.180 and then you have doctors who are doing these things to them,

00:24:05.140 including sterilization and castration.

00:24:07.580 That is literally what is happening.

00:24:09.160 That's what these drugs are designed to do.

00:24:13.180 And so that's an honest portrayal of the issue.

00:24:17.960 Now, it sounds wildly biased on the anti-side

00:24:21.820 only because what's happening in reality is so horrific.

00:24:26.080 So if you describe it honestly,

00:24:28.140 it sounds like you're biased against it.

00:24:31.500 And of course, you are biased against it

00:24:32.860 if you're just a decent, sane person.

00:24:35.480 It's like if you describe abortion honestly,

00:24:39.180 automatically it's going to sound like pro-life propaganda

00:24:42.560 because abortion is a horrific thing.

00:24:46.620 There's no way to describe it honestly

00:24:48.600 that doesn't sound horrific.

00:24:51.400 Now, you have to ask yourself,

00:24:53.520 you take the question that I just presented

00:24:56.860 and you put that in front of people's faces

00:25:01.140 and you ask them that question,

00:25:03.500 do doctors have the right to do this to confuse people?

00:25:07.900 You're probably going to get 90% no, 95%.

00:25:11.780 But again, the funny thing is that they frame this

00:25:15.420 in a way that was as biased as humanly possible

00:25:17.740 in the other direction and as dishonest possible.

00:25:19.500 And still, they couldn't rally significant support

00:25:22.420 for their point of view.

00:25:23.340 They still can't do it.

00:25:26.660 No matter how they frame it.

00:25:29.220 And I think that speaks partially

00:25:31.200 to how insane their position is,

00:25:35.900 that there's only so much you can do to cover it up

00:25:38.840 because ultimately it is what it is.

00:25:41.120 It speaks to the success of people on the right

00:25:46.420 to make people more informed on this issue.

00:25:50.600 I think going back, say, two or three years ago,

00:25:53.960 probably the average person had never even heard

00:25:56.860 the phrase gender-affirming care.

00:25:59.320 Gender-affirming was not something

00:26:00.740 that most people had even encountered.

00:26:02.940 And now I think you've got a large percentage of people

00:26:05.400 who are familiar with that phrase

00:26:07.200 and they do understand what it means.

00:26:11.120 Because we have been able to draw these associations

00:26:13.460 in the minds of average people.

00:26:14.920 Gender-affirming care actually means something

00:26:17.460 evil and disgusting.

00:26:19.080 And gender-affirming care is butchery.

00:26:21.620 So we've been able to create this honest

00:26:24.740 and correct association in the minds of most people.

00:26:26.780 I think that's being reflected in a lot of these polls.

00:26:31.600 And by the way, the other thing, too, to keep in mind

00:26:33.340 is when you get polling on so-called

00:26:35.500 gender-affirming care for adults,

00:26:37.780 many of the people who say that,

00:26:40.620 yeah, okay, I support that kind of care for adults.

00:26:44.080 Many of them, and I know this

00:26:45.500 because I talk to people all the time

00:26:46.400 that have this position, I think it's wrong.

00:26:48.660 But many of them, they think that it's horrible.

00:26:53.040 They're totally, they don't think that anyone,

00:26:54.700 they think it's a terrible thing.

00:26:56.460 Like, they're fully aware that a man who says

00:26:58.240 a woman is actually a man

00:26:59.240 and that for doctors to do that to him is terrible.

00:27:01.560 They think it's disgusting and awful,

00:27:03.520 but they also just think that there's no way to stop it.

00:27:07.560 And so, you know, it's a disgusting and awful thing,

00:27:10.400 but we should let people do

00:27:11.140 the disgusting and awful thing.

00:27:13.120 That's a large percentage of the people

00:27:15.480 who support gender-affirming care for adults.

00:27:17.100 That's the kind of support they're lending to it.

00:27:19.740 Their support is, this is terrible,

00:27:22.220 but I don't think we have any right to stop people.

00:27:24.340 And so they can do a terrible thing.

00:27:27.040 I think they're wrong about that.

00:27:28.080 I think it's terrible

00:27:28.860 and we should stop people from doing it.

00:27:30.420 But that is the, that's the support

00:27:32.520 that the trans side is bragging about.

00:27:37.240 Okay, NBC News has this report.

00:27:38.700 Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer

00:27:40.080 has quietly changed the Senate's informal dress code

00:27:42.940 to allow senators to wear whatever they want on the floor,

00:27:45.760 a person with direct knowledge said.

00:27:47.260 A notice went out to the Senate Sergeant-at-Arms

00:27:49.000 and relevant staff members late Friday,

00:27:50.740 and the change will go into effect starting Monday.

00:27:52.880 The change will let Senator John Fetterman,

00:27:54.640 who is often seen wearing a hoodie and baseball shorts,

00:27:57.240 wear his casual attire on the Senate floor

00:27:58.760 whenever he wants.

00:27:59.560 Fetterman, who was elected in late,

00:28:01.180 in last year's midterm elections,

00:28:02.880 wore a suit and tie at his swearing-in in January,

00:28:05.560 but I guess has not worn it since.

00:28:09.680 However, he's worn his casual clothes

00:28:10.900 after he returned to the Senate

00:28:11.740 following treatment for clinical depression this year.

00:28:15.500 So there's been a lot of conversation about this,

00:28:17.500 including over on The View.

00:28:19.200 And as always, we know there's great insight

00:28:20.500 being provided by those women

00:28:21.560 who I think are, you know,

00:28:24.720 in many ways the philosophers of our age.

00:28:26.900 Principal among them would be Whoopi Goldberg.

00:28:28.700 And here's what she had to say about it.

00:28:31.080 So yesterday, Chuck Schumer

00:28:33.480 ended the dress code

00:28:35.920 in Washington

00:28:38.240 because they all have to

00:28:39.500 wear suits and skirts

00:28:42.180 and dresses and stuff

00:28:43.060 and really did kind of a really wonderful thing

00:28:47.720 for John Fetterman.

00:28:52.160 And people are upset on the other side of the aisle.

00:28:55.120 They think this is not something

00:28:56.500 that should have been done,

00:28:57.480 that it shouldn't have been changed.

00:28:58.840 Now, what's interesting is

00:29:01.560 this kind of, for me,

00:29:03.940 highlights an issue

00:29:05.700 that the other side often has

00:29:08.280 because...

00:29:09.840 Which is?

00:29:10.580 Which is...

00:29:11.840 It's okay if you don't want to wear

00:29:15.020 shorts and a sweatsuit.

00:29:17.520 You're not obligated to.

00:29:18.900 You're not obligated to.

00:29:19.900 But this is a guy who votes

00:29:23.300 with one leg in and one leg out

00:29:25.500 because he doesn't want to interrupt

00:29:27.460 the flow of good-looking people

00:29:28.900 in their suits and dresses.

00:29:29.900 And Schumer said,

00:29:33.560 you know what?

00:29:34.080 Let me be thoughtful.

00:29:35.940 Let's lighten it up

00:29:37.020 so you can be more comfortable here.

00:29:40.020 I think that's great

00:29:41.360 because it's not saying

00:29:42.600 that everybody has to do it.

00:29:44.340 It's saying you can do it.

00:29:47.380 You can if you don't.

00:29:48.800 If you've been feeling,

00:29:49.740 my God, I'd just rather wear pants.

00:29:52.060 So more great insight there

00:29:53.460 from the view.

00:29:54.500 And I mean, look,

00:29:55.800 on the one hand,

00:29:57.000 with this dress code thing,

00:29:58.060 you could make the argument

00:29:59.180 that these D.C. politicians

00:30:01.200 are a bunch of scumbags

00:30:02.160 and whores anyway,

00:30:03.080 so why even bother

00:30:04.000 with the formality?

00:30:05.360 You might as well abolish

00:30:06.420 the dress code

00:30:07.040 because most of them

00:30:08.880 are absolute scum,

00:30:09.860 like the dregs of humanity.

00:30:11.720 Not all of them,

00:30:12.520 but most of them.

00:30:13.520 And maybe there's like three

00:30:15.280 that aren't.

00:30:17.420 So you could say,

00:30:19.680 well, yeah,

00:30:21.080 just have them all look

00:30:21.680 like slovenly bums

00:30:22.880 as John Fetterman does

00:30:24.320 all the time.

00:30:25.680 Why not?

00:30:26.180 And you can make that argument,

00:30:27.040 but that's not the argument

00:30:27.780 that I will make

00:30:28.420 because I happen

00:30:29.540 to believe in dress codes.

00:30:31.040 And even though

00:30:31.440 I wear flannel every day

00:30:32.500 on this show,

00:30:32.960 but there are environments

00:30:34.220 where you're supposed

00:30:35.140 to put in more effort

00:30:36.640 and you're supposed

00:30:38.360 to meet a certain

00:30:39.020 standard of dress.

00:30:40.500 And if you're elected

00:30:41.100 to the Senate,

00:30:41.700 then you should be held

00:30:42.860 to that standard.

00:30:44.920 You know,

00:30:45.220 the idea that the most

00:30:45.980 important thing in the world

00:30:46.840 is for people

00:30:47.260 to be comfortable

00:30:47.900 is just absolutely

00:30:49.580 wrongheaded and stupid.

00:30:52.200 And I always like

00:30:55.020 to flip this around

00:30:55.700 because people like

00:30:56.740 to say,

00:30:57.140 oh, well,

00:30:57.680 what do you need

00:30:58.820 a dress code?

00:30:59.660 What do you need

00:31:00.180 a dress code for?

00:31:01.300 Well, how about this?

00:31:02.980 Why can't you abide by it?

00:31:05.200 What's so difficult?

00:31:08.580 No, we don't have to,

00:31:10.720 you've got something

00:31:11.200 like a dress code

00:31:11.800 that's been in place

00:31:12.560 forever,

00:31:14.240 and everybody abides by it,

00:31:15.400 and then you come along

00:31:16.240 and say,

00:31:16.540 what do we need this for?

00:31:18.080 No, we're not the ones

00:31:19.040 who have to explain

00:31:19.880 ourselves to you.

00:31:21.600 People always get this wrong

00:31:22.620 when it comes to dress codes

00:31:23.360 or anything else.

00:31:24.460 When there's a tradition,

00:31:25.980 a custom,

00:31:26.400 a way that things are done,

00:31:27.920 and everybody's doing it

00:31:28.620 that way,

00:31:28.860 and then you come along,

00:31:30.340 they say,

00:31:30.560 why should I have to do it?

00:31:32.760 No, you're putting

00:31:33.740 the burden of proof on us.

00:31:34.820 We have to explain

00:31:35.500 ourselves to you?

00:31:36.340 No, no, no.

00:31:36.760 No, you need to explain

00:31:38.200 yourself.

00:31:39.020 Why shouldn't you do it?

00:31:41.900 Okay, why shouldn't you?

00:31:44.120 Why can't you?

00:31:47.140 Why can't John Fetterman

00:31:48.160 put a damn suit on?

00:31:49.300 Is he a child?

00:31:50.740 Is he a big,

00:31:51.520 oafish,

00:31:52.020 overgrown child,

00:31:52.920 or is he a grown man

00:31:54.000 and an elected official?

00:31:56.840 You know,

00:31:57.080 we know he's making

00:31:57.540 six figures.

00:31:58.780 He can afford a suit.

00:31:59.700 He can at least afford

00:32:00.160 to run down to a men's warehouse

00:32:01.320 and buy a few suits.

00:32:03.700 They've always got a special,

00:32:04.740 like,

00:32:04.840 buy 10 suits for,

00:32:06.180 you know,

00:32:06.720 $95 and get the

00:32:07.960 11th one free.

00:32:09.660 So he could go out

00:32:10.200 and he could buy some suits.

00:32:11.960 He just doesn't feel like it.

00:32:13.000 He doesn't want to.

00:32:14.320 He wants to walk around

00:32:15.140 every day looking like,

00:32:16.080 looking like I look

00:32:17.120 when I make an 11.30 p.m.

00:32:18.880 run to Walmart.

00:32:19.500 And yeah,

00:32:21.320 if you're at Walmart

00:32:23.100 at 11.30 p.m.,

00:32:23.940 or really any time of day,

00:32:25.600 you can look

00:32:26.420 as disheveled as you want

00:32:27.600 because per tradition

00:32:28.980 in that institution,

00:32:30.280 that's the tradition

00:32:31.200 at Walmart.

00:32:32.840 If anything,

00:32:33.780 it goes the other way.

00:32:34.660 If you look too formal

00:32:35.680 at Walmart,

00:32:36.240 then it's,

00:32:37.080 you know,

00:32:37.420 you're out of dress code.

00:32:39.160 So,

00:32:40.680 but if you can't be

00:32:41.960 bothered to abide

00:32:43.100 by a simple dress code

00:32:45.020 in the Senate,

00:32:45.680 then you don't deserve

00:32:48.460 to be there.

00:32:50.320 And if you can't treat,

00:32:52.140 you know,

00:32:52.280 it's funny that we,

00:32:52.880 we hear so much

00:32:53.760 about the sacred halls

00:32:54.680 after January 6th.

00:32:55.760 The sacred halls

00:32:56.880 at Capitol Hill

00:32:57.700 and Congress

00:32:58.580 and it's a sacred,

00:33:00.440 it's a sacred place.

00:33:02.420 Sacred.

00:33:04.420 It's so sacred

00:33:05.220 you can't even bother

00:33:05.840 to put a suit on.

00:33:08.660 And it just,

00:33:10.000 it blows my mind

00:33:11.060 with John Fetterman

00:33:12.520 in particular.

00:33:13.000 The way that we

00:33:15.400 talk about him

00:33:16.600 and treat this guy,

00:33:17.860 we treat him

00:33:18.620 literally like

00:33:19.420 he's a child.

00:33:20.640 The guy's

00:33:21.040 a United States center

00:33:22.080 and Whoopi Goldberg

00:33:23.080 is sitting there

00:33:24.360 saying,

00:33:24.860 oh,

00:33:25.020 good for him.

00:33:25.860 He can wear his shorts.

00:33:27.720 That'll make him comfortable.

00:33:28.940 He's a good boy.

00:33:30.040 You're a good boy,

00:33:30.820 Johnny.

00:33:31.940 Just wear what you want.

00:33:33.920 As long as,

00:33:34.480 as long as you're comfortable.

00:33:35.680 Are you having fun?

00:33:36.700 You want a juice box?

00:33:38.180 Are you a little hungry?

00:33:39.040 Did you bring your lunch today?

00:33:39.860 You need a lunchable?

00:33:40.720 Did your mommy pack you?

00:33:41.720 Did your mommy pack you a lunch?

00:33:43.360 Johnny?

00:33:46.000 We treat this guy

00:33:46.820 like he's a,

00:33:47.480 you know,

00:33:48.780 special needs.

00:33:51.100 It's,

00:33:51.220 it's ridiculous.

00:33:51.880 A United States senator.

00:33:54.020 And this,

00:33:54.860 by the way,

00:33:55.180 is,

00:33:55.540 is,

00:33:56.220 I believe that

00:33:57.240 this was part of the reason

00:33:58.220 why the stay at the hospital,

00:34:00.140 I think this was part of,

00:34:01.000 call me cynical.

00:34:02.620 I am.

00:34:03.840 But the moment

00:34:04.740 John Fetterman got elected

00:34:05.800 and everybody was talking about,

00:34:07.100 is this guy even capable

00:34:08.120 of,

00:34:09.260 of performing the functions

00:34:11.340 of the office?

00:34:12.300 And then,

00:34:12.720 and then he gets elected

00:34:13.760 and the moment he gets elected

00:34:14.880 pretty much,

00:34:15.340 he's checking into a hospital

00:34:16.660 with mental issues

00:34:17.820 and depression.

00:34:19.460 And,

00:34:19.680 and the thing is,

00:34:20.540 the moment that happened,

00:34:21.740 it was like this hush,

00:34:23.780 this silence

00:34:24.900 fell over him

00:34:25.840 and suddenly you're not allowed

00:34:27.100 to criticize him anymore.

00:34:28.220 You're not allowed to hold him

00:34:29.560 to any kind of standard.

00:34:31.960 And he's in the hospital

00:34:33.020 for,

00:34:33.560 for days on end.

00:34:35.120 And he's a United States senator

00:34:37.100 who just got elected.

00:34:38.740 And he's in the hospital

00:34:39.680 with depression.

00:34:40.300 And no one's allowed

00:34:41.360 to ask any questions about it.

00:34:42.900 Like,

00:34:43.100 what the hell,

00:34:43.780 what's going on?

00:34:44.440 You can't,

00:34:45.480 you should step down

00:34:46.960 if you can't do the job,

00:34:48.820 if you're not emotionally capable.

00:34:50.460 Like,

00:34:50.620 what's happening here?

00:34:52.100 How is this okay?

00:34:55.120 No,

00:34:55.440 if you're,

00:34:55.940 if you're elected

00:34:56.620 as a senator,

00:34:57.700 you,

00:34:57.880 you cannot be checking yourself in

00:34:59.680 to hospitals

00:35:00.940 for mental health problems.

00:35:02.660 You need to step down

00:35:04.180 from your position

00:35:05.340 if you're doing that.

00:35:06.380 And that is so obvious

00:35:07.820 and no one would say it.

00:35:09.540 Like,

00:35:09.960 we all know that.

00:35:12.600 But the moment that happens,

00:35:13.860 the moment,

00:35:14.180 because,

00:35:14.300 you know,

00:35:14.400 once you claim depression

00:35:15.240 or something,

00:35:15.840 it's like,

00:35:16.240 oh,

00:35:16.960 well,

00:35:17.160 it's weak.

00:35:17.700 We can't say anything

00:35:18.420 that's insensitive.

00:35:20.840 And so I think

00:35:21.660 that this was,

00:35:22.340 it was,

00:35:22.640 it was at least

00:35:23.300 partially calculated

00:35:24.660 because now we treat this guy

00:35:26.480 like he's a damn toddler.

00:35:29.020 And it was at least

00:35:30.040 partially calculated.

00:35:30.840 There was a calculation,

00:35:32.720 I believe.

00:35:34.440 Put him in the hospital,

00:35:35.240 get the sympathy points up

00:35:36.340 and then,

00:35:36.860 and then next thing you know,

00:35:38.540 we're changing the dress code

00:35:40.080 for this guy.

00:35:41.080 And he's walking around

00:35:41.960 babbling nonsense.

00:35:43.020 He's babbling nonsense.

00:35:44.040 He cannot string.

00:35:45.080 He literally cannot.

00:35:46.300 Listening to him talk,

00:35:47.320 you feel like you're having a stroke

00:35:48.540 because it doesn't,

00:35:50.720 what he's saying

00:35:51.120 doesn't even make any sense.

00:35:54.260 And that we're not supposed

00:35:55.180 to notice either.

00:35:57.280 You can't,

00:35:57.700 can't notice,

00:35:58.320 can't comment.

00:35:59.120 It's insensitive.

00:36:00.860 You say too many mean things,

00:36:02.080 you might end up back

00:36:02.720 in the hospital

00:36:03.420 with a mental health issue

00:36:04.140 and that'll be your fault.

00:36:06.300 It is such an embarrassment.

00:36:07.760 I mean,

00:36:08.140 and I know in some ways

00:36:10.360 it seems like,

00:36:10.880 this seems like a moot point also

00:36:12.000 because,

00:36:13.880 I mean,

00:36:14.240 all these people

00:36:14.760 are embarrassing us

00:36:15.460 all the time.

00:36:15.980 But this thing

00:36:16.500 with Fetterman in particular,

00:36:17.700 it is,

00:36:18.160 it's the kind of thing

00:36:21.120 that historians

00:36:21.640 are going to look back on

00:36:22.600 and they're going to note

00:36:24.720 that that's going to be

00:36:25.440 one of those moments

00:36:26.560 when they're tracing

00:36:27.160 the decline and collapse

00:36:28.400 of,

00:36:29.040 you know,

00:36:30.140 United States,

00:36:31.700 American society.

00:36:32.940 It's going to be

00:36:33.500 one of the sort of

00:36:34.580 landmark moments

00:36:35.400 is when this guy

00:36:35.920 was elected

00:36:36.320 and allowed to stay in office

00:36:37.520 even though he's,

00:36:38.980 has lost his mind completely.

00:36:40.900 Okay,

00:36:44.180 one other thing

00:36:45.740 that I thought

00:36:45.980 was interesting.

00:36:46.820 NPR has this report.

00:36:49.060 Some women

00:36:49.460 and non-binary drivers

00:36:50.680 for Lyft

00:36:51.420 can now match up

00:36:52.540 with women

00:36:52.940 and non-binary riders

00:36:54.140 using a new feature

00:36:55.060 launched by the

00:36:55.820 Rideshare Service

00:36:56.720 earlier this week.

00:36:57.980 The in-app option

00:36:58.840 called Women Plus Connect

00:37:00.120 was added to Lyft service

00:37:01.300 in a move

00:37:01.700 to improve safety

00:37:02.800 after a raft of lawsuits

00:37:04.000 in recent years

00:37:04.520 accused the company

00:37:05.140 of failing to protect

00:37:05.780 passengers and drivers.

00:37:07.700 It's also designed

00:37:08.320 to boost the number

00:37:08.940 of women

00:37:09.240 and non-binary drivers

00:37:10.020 working for the

00:37:10.860 San Francisco-based company.

00:37:12.320 Currently,

00:37:12.600 they make up

00:37:12.980 just 23% of the drivers

00:37:14.760 on the platform

00:37:15.360 according to Lyft.

00:37:17.360 This highly requested

00:37:18.320 feature offers

00:37:19.000 more control

00:37:20.100 over the driving experience

00:37:21.160 for women

00:37:21.500 and non-binary people

00:37:22.280 allowing them to feel

00:37:23.700 that much more confident

00:37:24.700 and with fewer barriers

00:37:25.980 to driving,

00:37:26.580 more women can access

00:37:27.300 flexible earning opportunities

00:37:28.680 Lyft said in a statement.

00:37:29.480 So this creates

00:37:31.660 a situation

00:37:32.520 where I believe

00:37:33.940 it's both driver

00:37:34.620 and rider

00:37:35.280 can match up

00:37:36.840 with women

00:37:37.420 or non-binary

00:37:38.980 if they so choose

00:37:40.740 and I think

00:37:42.100 the other ride-sharing

00:37:42.800 apps have something

00:37:43.500 like this

00:37:44.100 or they will

00:37:45.560 if they don't

00:37:46.320 already.

00:37:48.240 Now this is

00:37:49.160 funny for a few reasons.

00:37:51.900 The first one being

00:37:53.080 like

00:37:54.100 if you're saying

00:37:55.900 that women

00:37:56.640 are at special risk

00:37:58.460 when they drive

00:38:00.080 for these services

00:38:01.160 then why are you

00:38:02.900 trying to increase

00:38:03.820 the number

00:38:04.300 of women driving?

00:38:05.180 So on one hand

00:38:08.060 they have this feature

00:38:08.700 because women

00:38:09.080 are at risk

00:38:10.240 we're told

00:38:11.060 and

00:38:12.240 actually that part

00:38:15.040 I would

00:38:16.760 you know

00:38:17.880 if you're doing

00:38:19.020 something like

00:38:19.480 driving for

00:38:20.700 a cab service

00:38:21.980 a glorified cab service

00:38:23.260 like

00:38:24.740 you're better off

00:38:26.000 being a man

00:38:26.420 than a woman.

00:38:26.920 I think as a woman

00:38:27.500 there's more danger

00:38:28.640 involved.

00:38:29.040 There's danger

00:38:29.720 you're interacting

00:38:30.460 with strangers

00:38:30.920 in cars

00:38:31.460 so there's danger

00:38:32.400 no matter

00:38:32.700 if you're a man

00:38:33.360 or a woman

00:38:33.740 there's going to be

00:38:35.200 more danger

00:38:35.720 for a woman

00:38:36.140 than for a man.

00:38:37.560 So I don't deny that

00:38:38.800 but if that's the case

00:38:41.500 then why

00:38:42.020 why is

00:38:42.640 why is your next

00:38:43.780 sentence

00:38:44.360 that you're trying

00:38:44.940 to bring in

00:38:45.580 more women drivers?

00:38:47.520 If anything

00:38:48.100 you should be trying

00:38:48.600 to have less

00:38:49.220 so that they're

00:38:50.120 not put in danger.

00:38:53.360 And then the second thing

00:38:54.300 of course

00:38:54.540 the irony

00:38:54.940 is that

00:38:55.640 in this effort

00:38:57.420 to protect women

00:38:58.460 you're actually

00:38:59.140 just putting them

00:39:00.340 in more danger

00:39:00.860 you're enabling

00:39:01.600 perverts.

00:39:02.700 so now

00:39:05.420 you can match up

00:39:06.360 with women

00:39:08.060 whether it's a driver

00:39:08.940 or a rider

00:39:10.060 you can match up

00:39:11.980 and say

00:39:12.140 oh I want a woman.

00:39:15.080 Well

00:39:15.200 clearly

00:39:16.020 that can

00:39:17.120 easily be abused

00:39:18.340 like

00:39:18.980 the sort of people

00:39:20.140 that you're worried

00:39:21.080 about

00:39:21.440 getting in the car

00:39:22.860 with a woman driver

00:39:23.620 well those people

00:39:25.660 that you're worried

00:39:26.400 about

00:39:26.680 men presumably

00:39:27.680 they know

00:39:28.960 about this system

00:39:29.800 and so they can

00:39:30.660 easily game it

00:39:31.660 by just

00:39:32.400 declaring themselves

00:39:33.600 on the app

00:39:34.280 to either be a woman

00:39:35.740 or be non-binary

00:39:36.520 it's like literally

00:39:37.480 all you have to do

00:39:37.780 is just click a button

00:39:38.460 I assume

00:39:38.900 and that's it

00:39:41.220 and so those very people

00:39:42.680 that you know

00:39:43.820 small minority of people

00:39:44.900 who would potentially

00:39:45.560 be a danger

00:39:46.260 to women drivers

00:39:47.440 all you're telling them

00:39:49.240 is now

00:39:49.520 now you can be

00:39:50.400 now you

00:39:51.340 dangerous men

00:39:53.400 you can exclusively

00:39:54.620 have women drivers

00:39:56.020 picking you up

00:39:56.780 by plugging yourself

00:39:58.740 into this

00:39:59.260 women connect

00:40:00.000 thing

00:40:00.620 because

00:40:02.900 now

00:40:03.820 if it was some way

00:40:04.760 where it was

00:40:05.200 really just women

00:40:06.480 actual women

00:40:07.420 who are allowed

00:40:08.020 to take part

00:40:08.680 in this women connect

00:40:09.740 program

00:40:10.900 then that's one thing

00:40:12.580 but they can't

00:40:14.800 they want to limit it

00:40:16.580 to women

00:40:16.940 for the safety of women

00:40:17.840 but they can't

00:40:18.780 ideologically

00:40:19.400 and so it's not

00:40:20.580 women connect

00:40:21.280 it's women plus connect

00:40:23.000 right

00:40:23.960 so we're including

00:40:25.040 non-binary

00:40:25.520 we're including trans

00:40:26.320 which means

00:40:27.520 just any man

00:40:28.520 the kind of man

00:40:30.940 who again

00:40:31.680 vast majority of men

00:40:33.640 are going to get

00:40:33.960 picked up for a Lyft

00:40:34.680 or an Uber

00:40:35.040 and there's not

00:40:36.980 going to be any problem

00:40:37.620 and they're going

00:40:38.840 to be like me

00:40:39.340 they're going to sit back

00:40:39.920 they're not going

00:40:40.260 to even say a word

00:40:41.020 except for hi

00:40:41.780 and you know

00:40:42.340 when they get out

00:40:42.740 they're going to say thanks

00:40:43.360 and that's going

00:40:43.680 to be the end of it

00:40:44.120 that small portion

00:40:45.940 of men

00:40:46.400 who are a danger

00:40:48.820 now they're saying

00:40:49.660 oh okay

00:40:50.160 well this is great

00:40:51.120 now I can only be

00:40:53.320 matched with women

00:40:53.880 drivers

00:40:54.120 I'll just say

00:40:54.820 that I'm non-binary

00:40:55.480 it's like no one

00:40:56.120 can

00:40:56.300 there's no

00:40:56.980 it's not like

00:40:57.600 there's any litmus test

00:40:58.300 here

00:40:58.540 no one can tell me

00:40:59.420 that I'm not

00:40:59.980 and then that goes

00:41:02.160 to the final problem

00:41:02.920 of course

00:41:03.220 which is the most

00:41:03.800 obvious one

00:41:04.480 which is that

00:41:05.940 Lyft wants to have

00:41:07.560 this program for women

00:41:08.800 but of course

00:41:09.660 they cannot define

00:41:11.760 what a woman is

00:41:12.640 and so it's just

00:41:13.480 it doesn't work

00:41:14.420 it's impossible

00:41:15.020 it's impossible

00:41:15.560 to make it work

00:41:16.260 you can't do anything

00:41:18.600 it turns out

00:41:19.120 you can't do anything

00:41:20.280 for women

00:41:20.920 you cannot help women

00:41:22.420 if you cannot define

00:41:27.400 what it means

00:41:28.480 which is unfortunate

00:41:29.220 because in theory

00:41:31.920 again

00:41:32.660 something like this

00:41:34.020 could make a lot of sense

00:41:35.140 if my wife

00:41:38.560 was ever to take

00:41:39.640 an Uber

00:41:39.960 or a Lyft

00:41:40.540 which I very rarely

00:41:41.700 has she ever

00:41:42.360 had to do that

00:41:44.220 but

00:41:44.400 if she did

00:41:46.140 like I would prefer

00:41:47.200 to have a woman

00:41:48.140 pick her up

00:41:48.880 I'd you know

00:41:50.140 if for some reason

00:41:50.820 I'm out of town

00:41:51.540 and I can't be there

00:41:52.760 to you know

00:41:53.280 help

00:41:53.560 I'd prefer to have

00:41:55.140 a woman pick her up

00:41:56.020 because I'd feel

00:41:56.580 safer about that

00:41:57.380 but because you can't

00:41:59.800 define woman

00:42:00.220 it doesn't mean anything

00:42:01.000 it means absolutely

00:42:01.900 nothing

00:42:02.420 as always

00:42:04.920 let's get to

00:42:06.640 Was Walsh Wrong?

00:42:07.580 Are you one of the

00:42:12.080 millions of American

00:42:12.880 men and women

00:42:13.600 dealing with

00:42:14.000 premature hair thinning

00:42:15.080 and hair loss?

00:42:16.140 Maybe you're scared

00:42:16.760 about inheriting

00:42:17.360 that thinning look

00:42:18.120 because it runs

00:42:18.740 in the family

00:42:19.160 well finally

00:42:19.700 there's a real solution

00:42:20.920 that delivers

00:42:21.320 honest promise

00:42:21.860 without the harsh

00:42:22.660 side effects

00:42:23.160 unwanted chemicals

00:42:24.080 and unpleasant smells

00:42:25.160 Provia Hair Care

00:42:26.440 uses a safe

00:42:27.180 natural ingredient

00:42:27.940 called Procapil

00:42:28.900 to effectively target

00:42:30.520 the three main causes

00:42:32.000 of premature hair thinning

00:42:33.140 and loss

00:42:33.540 Provia supports

00:42:34.580 healthy scalp circulation

00:42:35.720 and delivers nourishing

00:42:36.680 nutrients to strengthen

00:42:38.220 hair follicles

00:42:38.820 and anchor them

00:42:39.460 to your scalp

00:42:39.980 Provia guarantees

00:42:41.140 more hair on your head

00:42:42.160 than in the shower drain

00:42:43.340 Provia is effective

00:42:44.340 for men and women

00:42:45.160 of any age

00:42:45.720 and safe on color

00:42:46.440 treated and styled hair

00:42:47.360 Provia works guaranteed

00:42:48.700 or 100% of your money back

00:42:50.100 it's that easy

00:42:51.020 right now

00:42:51.800 new customers save

00:42:52.620 over 50% off

00:42:53.540 Provia's introductory package

00:42:54.920 at ProviaHair.com

00:42:56.200 slash Walsh

00:42:56.940 see results for yourself

00:42:58.300 right now

00:42:58.980 don't wait

00:42:59.900 that's ProviaHair.com

00:43:01.560 slash Walsh

00:43:02.400 so we got a few comments

00:43:03.820 here all having to do

00:43:04.600 with the topic

00:43:05.120 of drug legalization

00:43:06.660 or drug criminalization

00:43:08.160 you know

00:43:09.140 on either end

00:43:10.320 of the issue

00:43:11.380 and some people

00:43:12.920 that thought I was wrong

00:43:13.820 in my opinion on that

00:43:14.720 Ricky says

00:43:15.180 sorry no drug

00:43:15.960 should be illegal

00:43:16.540 to an adult

00:43:17.260 this is where

00:43:18.140 the Republican Party

00:43:18.760 goes off the rails

00:43:19.480 hypocrisy is palpable

00:43:20.420 small government

00:43:21.060 is the goal

00:43:21.500 except when it restricts

00:43:22.500 personal private behavior

00:43:23.440 then it's just fine

00:43:24.480 to have a big government

00:43:25.280 to watch the druggies

00:43:26.420 another says

00:43:27.540 I think the supervised

00:43:28.160 drug sites are stupid

00:43:29.060 but I also think

00:43:29.580 it's stupid

00:43:29.940 to try to control

00:43:30.540 what people put

00:43:31.020 in their bodies

00:43:31.500 Leslie says

00:43:33.100 what is

00:43:33.540 what is the war

00:43:34.520 on drugs accomplished

00:43:35.400 the government

00:43:36.220 has no right

00:43:36.720 to tell people

00:43:37.180 what drugs

00:43:37.560 they can take

00:43:37.980 okay

00:43:38.420 first of all

00:43:42.820 to the big government

00:43:43.600 small government

00:43:44.200 thing

00:43:44.520 you notice that

00:43:45.660 I don't often

00:43:46.600 these days

00:43:48.540 talk about

00:43:50.180 well the goal

00:43:51.380 is small government

00:43:52.140 I don't talk about

00:43:53.140 that as much

00:43:53.560 because

00:43:53.920 not because

00:43:55.120 I don't want

00:43:55.840 small government

00:43:56.320 in a certain sense

00:43:57.880 but because

00:43:58.860 it doesn't mean

00:43:59.440 anything anymore

00:44:00.140 like what do you mean

00:44:01.140 small big

00:44:01.940 what do these words

00:44:02.740 even mean

00:44:03.100 when it comes

00:44:03.440 to government

00:44:03.840 it's just

00:44:04.500 that used to be

00:44:07.080 the slogan

00:44:07.600 on the right

00:44:09.260 it was one

00:44:09.600 of the big things

00:44:10.320 going back

00:44:11.020 to the tea party

00:44:11.520 days

00:44:11.860 all the signs

00:44:13.180 saying

00:44:13.300 we want

00:44:13.580 small government

00:44:14.120 but

00:44:15.620 that movement

00:44:17.180 never achieved

00:44:17.760 anything

00:44:17.980 the government

00:44:18.380 has only gotten

00:44:19.020 bigger and bigger

00:44:19.620 and bigger

00:44:19.860 with each passing

00:44:20.420 year

00:44:20.700 including under

00:44:22.060 Republicans

00:44:22.460 every Republican

00:44:23.080 president

00:44:24.500 has increased

00:44:24.940 the size

00:44:25.240 of government

00:44:25.600 exponentially

00:44:26.320 increased spending

00:44:28.180 increased all

00:44:28.800 the rest of it

00:44:29.220 and I think

00:44:29.480 part of the reason

00:44:30.060 for that

00:44:30.420 is because

00:44:30.640 we always said

00:44:31.780 small governments

00:44:32.300 we never

00:44:33.020 define what

00:44:34.640 we meant

00:44:35.020 by that

00:44:35.480 it's just

00:44:36.260 a slogan

00:44:36.760 and then

00:44:37.840 it's used

00:44:38.960 and abused

00:44:39.540 in contexts

00:44:40.320 like this

00:44:40.920 where

00:44:42.580 trying to stop

00:44:43.760 people from

00:44:44.540 selling poison

00:44:45.380 on the street

00:44:45.920 corner

00:44:46.240 is now

00:44:46.920 we can't do

00:44:48.360 that because

00:44:48.820 that's big

00:44:49.520 government

00:44:50.000 so I guess

00:44:52.000 what I'm saying

00:44:52.480 Ricky

00:44:53.060 is that

00:44:53.740 we have big

00:44:55.220 government

00:44:55.480 we don't have

00:44:55.880 small government

00:44:56.380 and you're

00:44:56.700 one of the

00:44:56.940 reasons why

00:44:57.380 people like you

00:44:58.000 that have

00:44:58.880 taken the

00:44:59.840 anti-big

00:45:00.820 government

00:45:01.140 label

00:45:01.940 and you've

00:45:02.480 abused it

00:45:03.720 and you

00:45:04.740 have

00:45:05.000 just

00:45:05.960 expanded it

00:45:07.540 to the point

00:45:08.420 where it doesn't

00:45:09.240 mean anything

00:45:09.700 anymore

00:45:10.000 now

00:45:12.340 it's also

00:45:14.120 asked

00:45:14.880 what has the

00:45:15.360 war on drugs

00:45:15.900 accomplished

00:45:16.320 well I would

00:45:17.040 like to flip

00:45:17.400 that around

00:45:17.980 Leslie

00:45:18.980 and ask you

00:45:19.560 what has

00:45:20.520 legalization

00:45:21.220 accomplished

00:45:21.680 what has

00:45:23.360 the decriminalization

00:45:24.340 of drugs

00:45:24.680 accomplished

00:45:25.140 what has

00:45:26.020 lax

00:45:26.560 drug

00:45:27.040 enforcement

00:45:28.340 which is what

00:45:29.240 we're seeing

00:45:29.560 in cities

00:45:29.860 all across the

00:45:30.280 country

00:45:30.360 what has

00:45:30.580 that

00:45:30.700 accomplished

00:45:31.140 the

00:45:32.480 legalization

00:45:33.240 of marijuana

00:45:33.820 what has

00:45:35.000 that ultimately

00:45:35.540 accomplished

00:45:36.100 you know

00:45:38.560 that's

00:45:39.000 that's a

00:45:39.420 question

00:45:40.460 that you

00:45:42.220 should ask

00:45:42.780 and be able

00:45:44.600 to answer

00:45:44.980 what is that

00:45:46.340 doing for

00:45:46.720 society

00:45:47.140 how is that

00:45:48.140 making society

00:45:48.760 any better

00:45:49.200 you look around

00:45:51.260 at any city

00:45:51.740 and you see

00:45:52.100 cities where

00:45:52.540 they're

00:45:54.040 very relaxed

00:45:54.860 in their

00:45:55.080 drug

00:45:55.260 enforcement

00:45:55.680 that's

00:45:58.080 all across

00:45:58.460 the country

00:45:58.920 what is that

00:46:00.160 is that

00:46:00.420 helping

00:46:00.680 is that

00:46:01.320 doing

00:46:01.500 anything

00:46:01.700 for us

00:46:02.180 is that

00:46:02.540 making

00:46:02.720 society

00:46:03.140 a better

00:46:03.440 place

00:46:03.820 because I

00:46:06.400 don't see

00:46:06.680 it

00:46:06.900 but the

00:46:09.060 one thing

00:46:09.900 that all

00:46:10.580 of these

00:46:10.820 comments

00:46:11.080 always

00:46:11.400 ignore

00:46:11.760 it's the

00:46:13.340 same thing

00:46:13.600 when we

00:46:13.780 talk about

00:46:14.120 so-called

00:46:14.400 gender

00:46:14.680 affirming

00:46:14.960 care

00:46:15.260 and we

00:46:19.120 always hear

00:46:19.340 the same

00:46:19.620 argument

00:46:19.940 even from

00:46:20.480 conservatives

00:46:20.840 on that

00:46:21.160 that

00:46:21.380 well

00:46:21.780 adults

00:46:22.120 should be

00:46:23.200 able to

00:46:23.380 do

00:46:23.500 whatever

00:46:23.640 they want

00:46:23.900 with their

00:46:24.080 bodies

00:46:24.360 now I

00:46:26.420 don't agree

00:46:26.980 with that

00:46:27.760 statement

00:46:28.140 I don't

00:46:28.700 agree with

00:46:29.000 that generalized

00:46:29.420 statement

00:46:29.700 I don't

00:46:30.040 think

00:46:30.140 just because

00:46:30.660 you're doing

00:46:31.040 something to

00:46:31.400 your own

00:46:31.640 body

00:46:31.880 doesn't

00:46:32.920 automatically

00:46:33.620 mean that

00:46:34.440 it should

00:46:34.680 always be

00:46:35.260 legal

00:46:35.520 now it's

00:46:36.080 true

00:46:36.400 but I

00:46:37.260 think you

00:46:37.400 have a lot

00:46:37.720 more leeway

00:46:38.480 with what

00:46:39.280 you do

00:46:39.620 to your

00:46:39.900 own body

00:46:40.280 and to

00:46:40.480 yourself

00:46:40.760 than you

00:46:41.000 do with

00:46:41.280 what you

00:46:41.500 do to

00:46:41.700 other

00:46:41.920 people

00:46:42.320 so there

00:46:43.300 are going

00:46:43.440 to be

00:46:43.540 many more

00:46:45.080 laws

00:46:45.660 governing

00:46:46.160 what you

00:46:47.160 can do

00:46:47.660 to someone

00:46:48.240 else

00:46:48.700 than there

00:46:49.260 are

00:46:49.540 governing

00:46:49.980 what you

00:46:50.720 can do

00:46:51.040 to yourself

00:46:51.720 but does

00:46:52.260 that mean

00:46:52.480 there should

00:46:52.820 be no

00:46:53.460 laws

00:46:53.880 governing

00:46:54.260 what you

00:46:54.540 do to

00:46:54.740 yourself

00:46:55.060 anything

00:46:55.880 at all

00:46:56.380 is fine

00:46:57.880 I don't

00:46:59.540 agree with

00:46:59.900 that

00:47:00.200 and once

00:47:01.500 again I

00:47:01.720 would ask

00:47:01.960 you how

00:47:02.200 does that

00:47:02.700 make society

00:47:03.600 a better

00:47:04.020 place

00:47:04.400 what does

00:47:05.100 that achieve

00:47:05.860 you know

00:47:06.960 to have

00:47:09.140 that kind

00:47:09.460 of attitude

00:47:09.880 but we

00:47:11.740 can almost

00:47:12.000 put that

00:47:12.320 conversation

00:47:12.740 to the

00:47:13.040 side

00:47:13.260 because

00:47:13.640 as I

00:47:14.980 do with

00:47:15.280 the issue

00:47:16.400 of the

00:47:17.360 gender

00:47:17.580 transition

00:47:17.980 industry

00:47:18.360 what am I

00:47:19.420 always pointing

00:47:19.800 out there

00:47:20.220 I'm saying

00:47:20.620 yeah I

00:47:21.980 think that

00:47:22.520 that

00:47:22.840 gender

00:47:23.600 transition

00:47:24.180 medical

00:47:24.740 gender

00:47:25.000 transition

00:47:25.400 of adults

00:47:25.880 should be

00:47:26.880 illegal

00:47:27.340 but that

00:47:29.360 is a

00:47:29.640 restriction

00:47:30.200 not on

00:47:31.840 the gender

00:47:32.220 confused

00:47:32.560 adults

00:47:32.840 but on

00:47:33.400 the medical

00:47:34.000 industry

00:47:34.620 the restriction

00:47:35.740 I am saying

00:47:36.380 that doctors

00:47:37.560 should not

00:47:38.600 be allowed

00:47:39.240 to do

00:47:39.840 that

00:47:40.260 to people

00:47:41.000 okay

00:47:42.680 and that's

00:47:43.560 gonna be a

00:47:43.840 much harder

00:47:44.300 argument for

00:47:44.940 you to get

00:47:45.300 over with

00:47:45.680 your libertarian

00:47:46.360 attitude

00:47:47.440 because

00:47:48.960 if we're just

00:47:49.740 talking about

00:47:50.000 what someone

00:47:50.260 does to

00:47:50.540 themselves

00:47:50.880 and you

00:47:51.100 can always

00:47:51.380 say well

00:47:51.700 that's

00:47:51.980 what always

00:47:52.200 we're not

00:47:53.340 talking about

00:47:53.880 that

00:47:54.240 yeah if a

00:47:55.860 man goes

00:47:56.240 out and

00:47:57.340 just you know

00:47:58.120 stands up one

00:47:58.780 day and says

00:47:59.080 I'm a woman

00:47:59.520 like there's no

00:48:00.040 law that can

00:48:00.400 stop him from

00:48:00.740 saying that

00:48:01.180 there's no

00:48:01.440 law that can

00:48:02.000 stop him from

00:48:02.480 believing that

00:48:03.000 about himself

00:48:03.340 there's no

00:48:03.960 law that can

00:48:04.960 stop him in

00:48:05.440 most contexts

00:48:05.980 from you know

00:48:07.180 putting on

00:48:07.560 women's clothes

00:48:08.140 in most contexts

00:48:09.360 I mean there

00:48:12.560 are laws that

00:48:13.100 can and should

00:48:13.560 stop drag shows

00:48:14.840 in front of

00:48:15.080 children and that

00:48:15.500 sort of thing

00:48:15.820 but if a woman

00:48:17.100 if a man

00:48:17.900 wants to like

00:48:18.480 play dress up

00:48:19.060 and play pretend

00:48:19.700 there's not a

00:48:21.000 lot of laws

00:48:21.400 that can or

00:48:22.200 are stopping

00:48:22.740 from doing

00:48:23.000 that but the

00:48:24.360 gender transition

00:48:24.940 that's when

00:48:25.320 you're bringing

00:48:25.800 in another

00:48:26.440 party that is

00:48:28.160 doing something

00:48:29.100 to that person

00:48:30.140 and the thing

00:48:31.000 they're doing

00:48:31.540 to that person

00:48:32.120 is abjectly

00:48:33.720 destructive and

00:48:34.700 harmful and so

00:48:35.940 there should be

00:48:36.380 laws that stop

00:48:38.040 that other party

00:48:38.980 from doing that

00:48:39.720 to the person

00:48:40.220 and just because

00:48:41.520 the person says

00:48:42.100 they want it

00:48:42.820 doesn't automatically

00:48:44.780 make it okay

00:48:45.220 do you want to

00:48:45.720 go there do you

00:48:46.320 want to say that

00:48:46.860 not only should

00:48:48.360 you be allowed to

00:48:49.000 do whatever you

00:48:49.380 want to yourself

00:48:49.960 but you should

00:48:52.000 be able to do

00:48:52.920 anything you

00:48:54.560 want to another

00:48:55.560 person as long

00:48:57.780 as that other

00:48:58.120 person agrees to

00:48:58.860 it do you want

00:49:00.680 to go that

00:49:01.060 far because

00:49:02.860 now we're not

00:49:03.220 talking about

00:49:03.780 bodily autonomy

00:49:04.500 and people doing

00:49:04.980 what they want

00:49:05.280 to themselves

00:49:05.440 now you're

00:49:06.180 saying that

00:49:06.660 now you're

00:49:07.240 giving carte

00:49:07.720 blanche on

00:49:08.520 what people do

00:49:09.200 to other

00:49:09.580 people as long

00:49:10.660 as that other

00:49:11.160 person quote

00:49:12.100 unquote agrees

00:49:12.540 to it I

00:49:13.880 don't think

00:49:14.080 you'd want to

00:49:14.500 I don't think

00:49:14.800 you'd want to

00:49:15.080 go along with

00:49:15.400 I don't think

00:49:15.820 that's a

00:49:16.040 statement you'd

00:49:16.400 want to make

00:49:16.800 because I

00:49:18.420 think you

00:49:18.640 understand that

00:49:19.200 well there

00:49:19.460 could be

00:49:19.660 people who

00:49:20.020 are confused

00:49:20.560 there could

00:49:20.760 be people who

00:49:21.220 are in a

00:49:22.080 state of

00:49:22.320 desperation

00:49:22.880 there could

00:49:23.260 be people who

00:49:23.640 are manipulated

00:49:24.180 and coerced

00:49:24.920 and you know

00:49:25.500 there are many

00:49:25.900 contexts where

00:49:26.480 someone might say

00:49:27.060 they want something

00:49:27.680 done to them

00:49:28.380 and it's but

00:49:29.640 but it should not

00:49:30.800 be done to them

00:49:31.420 because because

00:49:32.220 you know we

00:49:32.560 should not abide

00:49:33.140 by those wishes

00:49:33.700 so going back

00:49:35.580 to the drug

00:49:36.000 issue

00:49:36.640 you're focused

00:49:40.080 on the users

00:49:40.820 because that's

00:49:41.520 the easy thing

00:49:42.120 for you

00:49:42.520 when you're

00:49:42.920 a libertarian

00:49:43.460 what about

00:49:45.000 the dealers

00:49:45.800 okay

00:49:46.800 the people

00:49:47.480 who are selling

00:49:48.180 the poison

00:49:48.840 that's the issue

00:49:51.360 here

00:49:51.640 so

00:49:53.440 now I think

00:49:54.400 that there should

00:49:54.780 be laws

00:49:55.100 and there should

00:49:55.380 be punishments

00:49:55.860 for users

00:49:56.240 and dealers

00:49:56.640 personally

00:49:57.000 but would you

00:49:58.060 accept this

00:49:58.520 compromise

00:49:58.920 okay we're

00:50:00.200 not going to

00:50:00.540 put if you're

00:50:00.960 a user

00:50:01.340 your hair

00:50:01.760 and I

00:50:01.940 we're not

00:50:02.100 going to

00:50:02.180 put you

00:50:02.340 in jail

00:50:02.580 but

00:50:04.100 if you are

00:50:05.280 selling this

00:50:06.020 stuff

00:50:06.260 if you are

00:50:06.640 selling poison

00:50:07.660 that kills

00:50:08.480 people

00:50:08.920 and you're

00:50:09.680 only doing it

00:50:10.180 because you

00:50:10.460 make money

00:50:10.920 off of it

00:50:11.480 and they're

00:50:13.480 an addict

00:50:13.940 and that's

00:50:14.660 their excuse

00:50:15.280 but you're

00:50:15.660 not addicted

00:50:16.300 to selling

00:50:16.840 drugs

00:50:17.260 there's no

00:50:17.660 drug selling

00:50:18.740 addiction

00:50:19.220 you're doing

00:50:20.900 it purely

00:50:21.320 for profit

00:50:21.980 selling what

00:50:23.240 you know

00:50:23.680 is poison

00:50:24.340 so the

00:50:26.740 sellers

00:50:27.160 let's take

00:50:27.980 them and

00:50:28.320 let's charge

00:50:28.740 them with

00:50:29.040 capital crimes

00:50:30.300 mass murder

00:50:31.700 because that's

00:50:32.440 what they're

00:50:32.640 doing

00:50:32.880 would you

00:50:33.400 agree with

00:50:33.900 that

00:50:34.100 compromise

00:50:35.400 harsh

00:50:38.300 penalty

00:50:38.600 the drug

00:50:40.120 trade is

00:50:40.440 illegal

00:50:40.780 you can't

00:50:41.140 sell the

00:50:41.680 drugs

00:50:42.000 and so

00:50:42.880 that is

00:50:43.440 a law

00:50:45.420 that governs

00:50:46.540 the people

00:50:46.800 that are

00:50:47.020 selling

00:50:47.240 it's not

00:50:48.380 about what

00:50:48.560 people are

00:50:48.800 doing to

00:50:49.120 their own

00:50:49.360 bodies

00:50:49.680 it's actually

00:50:50.740 about what

00:50:51.080 people are

00:50:51.420 doing to

00:50:51.960 other people's

00:50:52.560 bodies

00:50:52.840 but I think

00:50:55.160 the people

00:50:56.380 on the right

00:50:56.720 who are

00:50:56.880 critics of

00:50:57.280 the so-called

00:50:57.640 war on drugs

00:50:58.080 they wouldn't

00:50:58.360 even agree

00:50:58.660 with that

00:50:59.060 because the

00:50:59.760 whole thing

00:51:00.140 of do what

00:51:00.420 you want

00:51:00.600 to your

00:51:00.760 body

00:51:00.940 that's all

00:51:01.240 a smokescreen

00:51:01.760 because they

00:51:02.900 actually think

00:51:03.280 that not only

00:51:03.640 should be able

00:51:03.920 to do what

00:51:04.140 you want

00:51:04.320 to your own

00:51:04.520 body

00:51:04.760 but that

00:51:05.280 drug dealers

00:51:05.640 should be able

00:51:05.920 to do

00:51:06.140 whatever they

00:51:06.500 want

00:51:06.860 to other

00:51:07.420 people's

00:51:07.700 bodies

00:51:08.000 which is a

00:51:10.720 crazy point

00:51:11.260 of view

00:51:11.500 I mean

00:51:13.040 just imagine

00:51:13.500 for a second

00:51:13.940 what if

00:51:14.360 what if

00:51:16.360 there was

00:51:16.620 a corporation

00:51:17.860 that was

00:51:19.620 selling

00:51:20.100 what it

00:51:20.640 knew to

00:51:21.080 be poison

00:51:21.820 to people

00:51:23.500 and you have

00:51:24.420 a CEO

00:51:24.860 of the

00:51:25.140 corporation

00:51:25.560 who knows

00:51:26.500 that this

00:51:26.880 stuff is

00:51:27.380 poison

00:51:27.920 and it

00:51:28.440 is directly

00:51:29.200 killing

00:51:29.700 people

00:51:30.160 and that

00:51:31.100 there is

00:51:31.380 no benefit

00:51:32.160 of this

00:51:32.420 stuff

00:51:32.580 there's no

00:51:33.460 benefit

00:51:33.800 it is all

00:51:34.400 harm

00:51:34.700 and it is

00:51:35.060 directly

00:51:35.340 killing

00:51:35.540 people

00:51:35.700 and the

00:51:36.460 CEO knows

00:51:36.840 that and he

00:51:37.160 sells it anyway

00:51:37.680 he makes

00:51:37.940 billions of

00:51:38.320 dollars

00:51:38.540 now I know

00:51:39.360 you're gonna

00:51:39.580 say well

00:51:39.960 that kind

00:51:41.500 of thing

00:51:41.680 does go

00:51:42.080 on

00:51:42.300 okay

00:51:42.580 there's plenty

00:51:43.440 of pharmaceutical

00:51:43.820 companies that have

00:51:44.340 done that sort

00:51:44.640 of thing

00:51:44.840 and you're

00:51:45.400 right

00:51:45.580 but wouldn't

00:51:47.760 you agree

00:51:48.220 that ideally

00:51:49.060 we should be

00:51:49.700 taking

00:51:50.060 if there's a

00:51:51.320 CEO who's

00:51:51.900 selling poison

00:51:52.500 he knows it's

00:51:53.000 poison

00:51:53.240 that that person

00:51:53.900 should be

00:51:54.100 going to prison

00:51:54.540 that should be

00:51:55.240 illegal to do

00:51:55.900 and that person

00:51:56.280 should go to

00:51:56.620 prison

00:51:56.860 and the CEO

00:51:58.780 should not be

00:51:59.320 able to say

00:51:59.960 when he's a

00:52:01.400 defendant in court

00:52:02.220 he shouldn't be

00:52:02.540 able to say

00:52:02.800 well what

00:52:03.200 they wanted to

00:52:03.740 buy it

00:52:04.160 yeah I knew

00:52:04.780 it was killing

00:52:05.120 them but

00:52:05.660 and they didn't

00:52:06.260 you know

00:52:06.460 really fully

00:52:06.960 understand that

00:52:07.480 but they

00:52:08.160 wanted it

00:52:08.520 so I gave

00:52:08.780 it to them

00:52:09.180 would you

00:52:11.380 accept that

00:52:11.900 excuse

00:52:12.360 no you say

00:52:13.720 that guy

00:52:14.040 should be

00:52:15.080 charged with

00:52:15.760 capital crimes

00:52:16.660 so why

00:52:19.080 would we

00:52:19.280 not have

00:52:19.540 the same

00:52:20.020 approach

00:52:22.360 to drug

00:52:22.740 dealers

00:52:23.000 on the

00:52:23.380 street

00:52:23.540 corner

00:52:23.740 that's

00:52:25.480 the

00:52:25.580 question

00:52:25.860 have

00:52:26.860 you

00:52:27.020 held

00:52:27.480 out

00:52:27.700 on

00:52:27.880 joining

00:52:28.200 Jeremy's

00:52:28.680 Razors

00:52:28.960 well

00:52:29.200 now's

00:52:29.580 your

00:52:29.680 chance

00:52:29.960 to

00:52:30.120 enter

00:52:30.380 the

00:52:30.620 woke

00:52:30.960 free

00:52:31.300 economy

00:52:31.740 with

00:52:31.960 the

00:52:32.080 precision

00:52:32.460 five

00:52:32.940 trial

00:52:33.400 set

00:52:33.700 one

00:52:34.440 weighted

00:52:34.740 handle

00:52:35.080 one

00:52:35.320 precision

00:52:35.600 five

00:52:35.860 razor

00:52:36.120 with

00:52:36.300 flip

00:52:36.520 back

00:52:36.760 trimmer

00:52:37.060 one

00:52:37.620 low

00:52:37.880 price

00:52:38.220 there's

00:52:38.480 never

00:52:38.660 been

00:52:38.800 a

00:52:38.900 better

00:52:39.020 time

00:52:39.320 to

00:52:39.460 stop

00:52:39.680 giving

00:52:39.880 your

00:52:40.000 money

00:52:40.120 to

00:52:40.260 woke

00:52:40.440 corporations

00:52:40.880 that

00:52:41.120 hate

00:52:41.300 you

00:52:41.440 go to

00:52:41.660 jeremysrazors.com

00:52:42.820 and make

00:52:43.760 the switch

00:52:44.180 today

00:52:44.500 now let's

00:52:44.880 get to

00:52:45.080 our

00:52:45.200 daily

00:52:45.420 cancellation

00:52:45.940 in recent

00:52:52.920 years but

00:52:53.340 especially

00:52:53.640 over the

00:52:53.960 past year

00:52:54.420 we've

00:52:54.660 seen the

00:52:55.100 rise in

00:52:55.720 what some

00:52:56.080 have called

00:52:56.580 the body

00:52:57.120 count

00:52:57.480 discourse

00:52:58.040 and this

00:52:58.420 is a

00:52:58.640 discussion

00:52:58.980 about

00:52:59.300 body

00:53:00.040 counts

00:53:00.320 specifically

00:53:00.720 the body

00:53:01.120 counts

00:53:01.380 of women

00:53:01.780 more

00:53:02.560 specifically

00:53:02.960 whether

00:53:03.580 a man

00:53:04.320 should

00:53:04.640 care

00:53:05.100 if

00:53:05.720 the

00:53:06.180 woman

00:53:06.380 he's

00:53:06.580 dating

00:53:06.800 has

00:53:07.100 a

00:53:07.240 high

00:53:07.560 body

00:53:07.880 count

00:53:08.100 and of

00:53:08.320 course

00:53:08.460 when we

00:53:08.700 say

00:53:08.860 body

00:53:09.180 count

00:53:09.480 we don't

00:53:10.300 mean

00:53:10.460 that a

00:53:10.660 man is

00:53:10.960 dating

00:53:11.220 a woman

00:53:11.740 who's

00:53:12.040 a former

00:53:12.400 marine

00:53:12.720 corps

00:53:12.900 sniper

00:53:13.220 with 87

00:53:13.760 confirmed

00:53:14.280 kills

00:53:14.680 if you're

00:53:15.360 below the

00:53:15.660 age of

00:53:15.900 40

00:53:16.120 you probably

00:53:16.780 already know

00:53:17.200 that body

00:53:17.660 count in this

00:53:18.140 context means

00:53:18.720 the number

00:53:19.160 of people

00:53:19.600 you've slept

00:53:20.180 with

00:53:20.460 a woman

00:53:21.140 with a

00:53:21.440 high

00:53:21.700 body

00:53:21.960 count

00:53:22.180 is a

00:53:22.400 woman

00:53:22.580 who has

00:53:22.940 had

00:53:23.120 sex

00:53:23.420 with

00:53:23.640 lots

00:53:23.980 of

00:53:24.140 men

00:53:24.360 accompanying

00:53:25.560 these

00:53:25.820 conversations

00:53:26.200 are usually

00:53:26.740 videos

00:53:27.240 where random

00:53:27.840 youtubers

00:53:28.240 go out

00:53:28.720 into the

00:53:29.060 street

00:53:29.320 or out

00:53:29.800 to some

00:53:30.060 college

00:53:30.260 campus

00:53:30.540 and they

00:53:30.740 ask

00:53:30.900 people

00:53:31.140 about

00:53:31.340 their

00:53:31.460 body

00:53:31.660 counts

00:53:31.960 and

00:53:32.140 in many

00:53:32.780 videos

00:53:33.060 you can

00:53:33.280 see

00:53:33.540 young

00:53:33.940 women

00:53:34.140 proudly

00:53:34.480 declare

00:53:34.820 body

00:53:35.140 counts

00:53:35.440 in the

00:53:35.640 dozens

00:53:35.900 or even

00:53:36.260 hundreds

00:53:36.640 some men

00:53:38.540 including

00:53:38.840 a number

00:53:39.300 of

00:53:39.420 influential

00:53:39.820 men

00:53:40.240 have been

00:53:40.700 pointing

00:53:40.980 out

00:53:41.200 that

00:53:41.380 these

00:53:42.120 sky

00:53:42.460 high

00:53:42.700 numbers

00:53:43.060 these

00:53:43.360 Ted

00:53:43.800 Bundy

00:53:44.180 level

00:53:44.480 body

00:53:44.800 counts

00:53:45.120 are

00:53:45.380 pretty

00:53:45.880 disgusting

00:53:46.540 and

00:53:47.620 speaking

00:53:47.840 of

00:53:48.000 Ted

00:53:48.160 Bundy

00:53:48.420 I

00:53:48.860 could

00:53:50.040 probably

00:53:50.240 do

00:53:50.400 an

00:53:50.520 hour

00:53:50.700 long

00:53:51.000 segment

00:53:51.380 simply

00:53:52.100 on

00:53:52.360 the

00:53:52.480 fact

00:53:52.720 that

00:53:52.920 the

00:53:53.080 phrase

00:53:53.520 body

00:53:53.940 count

00:53:54.300 has

00:53:54.540 come

00:53:54.780 to

00:53:54.960 refer

00:53:55.260 to

00:53:55.600 sexual

00:53:56.420 conquest

00:53:56.900 there

00:53:57.220 is

00:53:57.340 immense

00:53:57.740 psychological

00:53:58.860 significance

00:53:59.900 to be

00:54:00.260 found

00:54:00.460 in the

00:54:03.280 now

00:54:04.260 in

00:54:04.460 modern

00:54:04.700 society

00:54:05.120 applies

00:54:05.580 to

00:54:05.860 sex

00:54:06.260 that's

00:54:07.560 a

00:54:07.760 different

00:54:08.200 conversation

00:54:08.720 though

00:54:09.000 suffice

00:54:09.660 to say

00:54:09.940 for now

00:54:10.260 that

00:54:10.460 it's

00:54:11.160 not

00:54:11.280 a

00:54:11.420 positive

00:54:11.780 development

00:54:12.480 doesn't

00:54:12.900 say

00:54:13.040 anything

00:54:13.240 good

00:54:13.620 about

00:54:13.820 modern

00:54:14.100 culture

00:54:14.440 in

00:54:15.760 any

00:54:15.940 case

00:54:16.140 all

00:54:16.800 of

00:54:16.920 this

00:54:17.040 discussion

00:54:17.380 about

00:54:17.580 body

00:54:17.780 count

00:54:17.940 has

00:54:18.100 led

00:54:18.280 to

00:54:18.400 a

00:54:18.540 backlash

00:54:18.900 from

00:54:19.320 the

00:54:19.460 other

00:54:19.680 side

00:54:20.080 where

00:54:20.280 feminists

00:54:20.760 and

00:54:20.860 other

00:54:21.040 assorted

00:54:21.420 ne'er-do-wells

00:54:22.180 have

00:54:22.720 admonished

00:54:23.840 men for

00:54:24.340 having this

00:54:24.800 conversation

00:54:25.320 at all

00:54:25.720 and insisted

00:54:26.160 that we

00:54:26.540 shouldn't

00:54:26.840 care about

00:54:27.260 body

00:54:27.480 counts

00:54:27.700 in the

00:54:27.860 first

00:54:28.020 place

00:54:28.300 that

00:54:28.980 was

00:54:29.100 the

00:54:29.200 case

00:54:29.380 made

00:54:29.600 this

00:54:29.780 week

00:54:29.960 in

00:54:30.040 the

00:54:30.140 atlantic

00:54:30.520 by

00:54:30.720 feminist

00:54:31.040 writer

00:54:31.280 helen

00:54:31.640 lewis

00:54:32.040 in her

00:54:32.280 article

00:54:32.560 titled

00:54:32.840 nobody

00:54:33.560 should

00:54:33.760 care

00:54:34.080 about

00:54:34.420 a

00:54:34.540 woman's

00:54:34.800 body

00:54:34.980 count

00:54:35.240 and

00:54:35.840 she

00:54:35.940 begins

00:54:36.180 by

00:54:36.420 setting

00:54:36.860 the

00:54:37.060 stage

00:54:37.480 with

00:54:37.620 a

00:54:37.760 story

00:54:38.100 of

00:54:38.420 rising

00:54:38.880 misogyny

00:54:39.580 quote

00:54:39.880 ever

00:54:40.860 since

00:54:41.200 elon

00:54:41.600 musk's

00:54:41.980 lackeys

00:54:42.380 began

00:54:42.760 fiddling

00:54:43.140 with

00:54:43.280 the

00:54:43.380 algorithms

00:54:43.780 of

00:54:44.040 x

00:54:44.300 formerly

00:54:44.600 twitter

00:54:44.880 i've

00:54:45.460 noticed

00:54:45.640 a

00:54:45.820 distinct

00:54:46.320 shift

00:54:46.780 in

00:54:46.920 the

00:54:47.240 content

00:54:47.580 that

00:54:47.740 is

00:54:47.840 pushed

00:54:48.080 onto

00:54:48.320 users

00:54:48.760 my

00:54:49.140 for

00:54:49.480 you

00:54:49.700 tab

00:54:50.000 is

00:54:50.120 now

00:54:50.260 a

00:54:50.420 nest

00:54:50.660 of

00:54:50.820 trad

00:54:51.180 wives

00:54:51.580 shoplifting

00:54:52.460 videos

00:54:52.840 and

00:54:53.120 that

00:54:53.500 guy

00:54:53.700 who

00:54:53.820 has

00:54:53.960 strong

00:54:54.220 opinions

00:54:54.620 on

00:54:54.820 trouser

00:54:55.240 creases

00:54:55.620 it's

00:54:56.240 also

00:54:56.440 home

00:54:56.660 to

00:54:56.800 the

00:54:56.920 kind

00:54:57.080 of

00:54:57.180 old

00:54:57.480 fashioned

00:54:57.780 misogyny

00:54:58.420 that

00:54:58.940 I

00:54:59.060 once

00:54:59.320 thought

00:54:59.620 was

00:54:59.860 on

00:55:00.020 the

00:55:00.120 decline

00:55:00.520 now

00:55:01.600 let me

00:55:01.760 step

00:55:01.900 to the

00:55:02.060 side

00:55:02.200 here

00:55:02.300 to

00:55:02.420 say

00:55:02.540 that

00:55:02.760 I

00:55:03.540 can

00:55:03.680 translate

00:55:04.280 this

00:55:05.420 paragraph

00:55:05.800 from

00:55:06.140 feminist

00:55:06.560 into

00:55:06.960 English

00:55:07.440 prior

00:55:08.360 to

00:55:08.620 musk

00:55:08.880 taking

00:55:09.160 over

00:55:09.380 twitter

00:55:09.660 every

00:55:10.040 social

00:55:10.320 media

00:55:10.480 company

00:55:18.080 of

00:55:18.340 normal

00:55:18.700 common

00:55:19.000 sense

00:55:19.220 people

00:55:19.540 but

00:55:20.120 in

00:55:20.200 the

00:55:20.320 musk

00:55:20.560 era

00:55:20.800 twitter

00:55:21.100 no

00:55:21.380 longer

00:55:21.600 does

00:55:21.860 that

00:55:22.040 which

00:55:22.180 means

00:55:22.420 that

00:55:22.620 she

00:55:23.020 has

00:55:23.180 to

00:55:23.880 encounter

00:55:24.380 those

00:55:24.720 perspectives

00:55:25.180 again

00:55:25.580 she

00:55:26.460 thought

00:55:26.700 they

00:55:26.840 were

00:55:26.980 on

00:55:27.280 the

00:55:27.400 decline

00:55:27.860 because

00:55:28.540 that's

00:55:28.800 the

00:55:28.960 fantasy

00:55:29.400 world

00:55:29.740 that

00:55:29.920 big

00:55:30.160 tech

00:55:30.360 had

00:55:30.520 created

00:55:31.000 for

00:55:31.320 her

00:55:31.540 and

00:55:32.320 she

00:55:32.420 was

00:55:32.540 never

00:55:32.700 smart

00:55:33.060 enough

00:55:33.300 or

00:55:33.460 skeptical

00:55:33.760 enough

00:55:34.000 to

00:55:34.140 question

00:55:34.460 it

00:55:34.720 so

00:55:35.320 that's

00:55:35.420 really

00:55:35.580 what's

00:55:35.780 going

00:55:35.940 on

00:55:36.140 here

00:55:36.280 continuing

00:55:36.980 one

00:55:37.660 of

00:55:37.760 the

00:55:37.840 obsessions

00:55:38.220 of

00:55:38.380 the

00:55:38.500 worst

00:55:38.700 parts

00:55:39.060 of

00:55:39.180 this

00:55:39.320 group

00:55:39.560 call

00:55:39.920 them

00:55:40.540 the

00:55:40.720 influential

00:55:41.220 jerk

00:55:41.700 web

00:55:41.980 is

00:55:42.700 body

00:55:43.060 count

00:55:43.380 discourse

00:55:43.860 in

00:55:44.040 which

00:55:44.160 women

00:55:44.460 are

00:55:45.200 shamed

00:55:45.620 for

00:55:45.760 the

00:55:45.860 number

00:55:46.020 of

00:55:46.160 sexual

00:55:46.460 partners

00:55:46.840 they've

00:55:47.120 had

00:55:47.420 the

00:55:47.940 phrase

00:55:48.120 has

00:55:48.240 gained

00:55:49.940 popularity

00:55:50.360 so

00:55:50.580 quickly

00:55:50.840 that

00:55:51.040 Jason

00:55:51.360 Derulo

00:55:51.740 has

00:55:51.980 just

00:55:52.180 released

00:55:52.440 a

00:55:52.560 new

00:55:52.700 song

00:55:52.960 about

00:55:53.180 it

00:55:53.360 now

00:55:53.880 Derulo

00:55:54.180 is

00:55:54.420 okay

00:55:54.720 with

00:55:54.880 a

00:55:54.980 high

00:55:55.140 body

00:55:55.380 count

00:55:55.680 all

00:55:56.460 that

00:55:56.680 ass

00:55:57.000 must

00:55:57.240 be

00:55:57.420 good

00:55:57.580 at

00:55:57.700 math

00:55:58.040 he

00:55:58.240 observes

00:55:58.640 but

00:55:59.260 others

00:55:59.480 are

00:55:59.600 not

00:55:59.840 a

00:56:01.040 lot

00:56:01.500 of

00:56:01.620 the

00:56:01.720 world's

00:56:09.060 clip

00:56:09.200 these

00:56:09.920 men

00:56:10.100 provide

00:56:10.420 Gen Z

00:56:10.860 and

00:56:11.060 younger

00:56:11.360 millennials

00:56:11.840 with

00:56:12.100 a

00:56:12.220 very

00:56:12.380 old

00:56:12.700 template

00:56:13.060 for

00:56:13.240 masculinity

00:56:13.640 filtered

00:56:14.000 through

00:56:14.220 the

00:56:14.360 new

00:56:14.580 visual

00:56:14.960 grammar

00:56:15.360 and

00:56:15.560 vocabulary

00:56:16.020 of

00:56:16.600 YouTube

00:56:16.920 Twitch

00:56:17.300 and

00:56:17.520 TikTok

00:56:17.800 now

00:56:19.200 she

00:56:19.340 goes

00:56:19.500 on

00:56:19.640 for

00:56:19.740 a

00:56:19.840 while

00:56:20.120 longer

00:56:20.740 talking

00:56:21.100 about

00:56:21.260 all

00:56:21.400 the

00:56:21.560 dastardly

00:56:22.740 men

00:56:23.040 who

00:56:23.220 have

00:56:23.360 made

00:56:23.640 an

00:56:23.760 issue

00:56:24.020 out

00:56:24.200 of

00:56:24.260 the

00:56:24.360 fact

00:56:24.560 that

00:56:24.680 a

00:56:24.800 certain

00:56:24.940 significant

00:56:25.440 preponderance

00:56:25.980 of

00:56:26.100 modern

00:56:26.380 single

00:56:26.660 women

00:56:26.960 have

00:56:27.880 had

00:56:28.440 sex

00:56:28.920 with

00:56:29.180 entire

00:56:29.700 stadiums

00:56:30.520 full

00:56:30.700 of

00:56:30.840 men

00:56:31.100 but

00:56:32.080 she

00:56:32.200 does

00:56:32.380 find

00:56:32.660 a

00:56:32.800 bright

00:56:33.040 spot

00:56:33.440 a

00:56:33.820 glimmer

00:56:34.120 of

00:56:34.320 hope

00:56:34.600 towards

00:56:34.940 the

00:56:35.100 end

00:56:35.280 quote

00:56:35.600 two

00:56:36.460 other

00:56:36.680 things

00:56:36.940 are worth

00:56:37.240 noting

00:56:37.520 about

00:56:37.640 the

00:56:37.740 body

00:56:37.880 count

00:56:38.060 discourse

00:56:38.380 the

00:56:39.200 first

00:56:39.460 is that

00:56:39.720 some

00:56:39.940 people

00:56:40.200 on

00:56:40.420 the

00:56:40.580 edges

00:56:40.880 of

00:56:41.060 the

00:56:41.160 influential

00:56:41.540 jerk

00:56:41.880 web

00:56:42.080 have

00:56:42.620 consciously

00:56:43.040 rejected

00:56:43.580 its

00:56:43.800 exhausting

00:56:44.320 sexual

00:56:44.920 monitoring

00:56:45.420 of

00:56:45.640 women

00:56:45.880 the

00:56:46.480 left-wing

00:56:46.820 streamer

00:56:47.260 destiny

00:56:47.720 for

00:56:47.940 example

00:56:48.260 was

00:56:48.820 raised

00:56:49.060 catholic

00:56:49.460 but

00:56:49.640 is

00:56:49.760 now

00:56:50.040 in

00:56:50.240 an

00:56:50.400 open

00:56:50.680 relationship

00:56:51.220 yes

00:56:52.580 if

00:56:52.720 only

00:56:52.900 more

00:56:53.160 men

00:56:53.460 could

00:56:53.640 be

00:56:53.780 pathetic

00:56:54.220 disgraced

00:56:54.860 cuckolds

00:56:55.380 like

00:56:55.700 left-wing

00:56:56.420 streamer

00:56:56.900 destiny

00:56:57.360 if

00:56:57.960 only

00:56:58.120 we

00:56:58.260 could

00:56:58.420 live

00:57:01.700 in

00:57:02.400 the

00:57:02.500 world

00:57:02.760 that

00:57:02.960 Helen

00:57:03.180 thought

00:57:03.620 we

00:57:03.820 lived

00:57:04.100 in

00:57:04.400 before

00:57:05.080 Elon

00:57:05.460 Musk

00:57:05.740 destroyed

00:57:06.300 the

00:57:06.460 illusion

00:57:06.820 by

00:57:07.100 lifting

00:57:07.400 all

00:57:07.600 the

00:57:07.760 shadow

00:57:08.040 bands

00:57:08.440 if

00:57:09.060 only

00:57:09.360 now

00:57:10.720 if

00:57:10.880 you're

00:57:11.000 the

00:57:11.120 perceptive

00:57:11.600 type

00:57:11.960 at

00:57:12.360 least

00:57:12.500 more

00:57:12.680 perceptive

00:57:13.220 than

00:57:13.480 Helen

00:57:13.780 Lewis

00:57:14.040 you

00:57:14.560 might

00:57:14.780 notice

00:57:15.040 that

00:57:15.260 although

00:57:15.640 we've

00:57:15.920 read

00:57:16.080 chunks

00:57:16.440 of

00:57:16.580 this

00:57:16.740 article

00:57:16.980 we

00:57:17.140 haven't

00:57:17.380 gotten

00:57:17.540 to

00:57:17.640 the

00:57:17.740 part

00:57:17.940 where

00:57:18.520 Helen

00:57:18.800 explains

00:57:19.380 why

00:57:19.980 men

00:57:20.820 shouldn't

00:57:21.220 care

00:57:21.420 about

00:57:21.600 body

00:57:21.860 counts

00:57:22.200 that's

00:57:23.020 because

00:57:23.180 she

00:57:23.380 never

00:57:23.580 does

00:57:23.900 explain

00:57:24.300 it

00:57:24.520 she

00:57:25.340 makes

00:57:25.640 not

00:57:25.920 one

00:57:26.340 single

00:57:26.800 argument

00:57:27.240 to

00:57:27.480 support

00:57:27.820 her

00:57:27.980 assertion

00:57:28.960 that

00:57:29.460 nobody

00:57:29.820 should

00:57:30.080 care

00:57:30.280 about

00:57:30.440 a

00:57:30.520 woman's

00:57:30.780 body

00:57:30.980 count

00:57:31.260 she

00:57:32.120 simply

00:57:32.480 asserts

00:57:33.000 it

00:57:33.140 she

00:57:33.300 declares

00:57:33.800 it

00:57:34.080 and

00:57:34.880 expects

00:57:35.260 that

00:57:35.440 assertion

00:57:35.880 to

00:57:36.020 somehow

00:57:36.280 carry

00:57:36.660 weight

00:57:36.980 and

00:57:37.940 this

00:57:38.080 is

00:57:38.180 always

00:57:38.400 the

00:57:38.580 strategy

00:57:38.940 of

00:57:39.160 left-wing

00:57:39.460 feminists

00:57:39.900 they

00:57:40.580 act

00:57:40.780 as

00:57:40.920 though

00:57:41.080 their

00:57:41.400 viewpoints

00:57:42.060 no matter

00:57:42.320 how

00:57:42.500 deranged

00:57:42.980 or stupid

00:57:43.500 are

00:57:44.200 self-evident

00:57:45.140 and therefore

00:57:45.660 don't need

00:57:46.200 explaining

00:57:46.760 or

00:57:47.020 defending

00:57:47.420 they

00:57:48.680 just

00:57:48.940 rappel

00:57:49.760 down

00:57:50.040 into

00:57:50.220 the

00:57:50.380 middle

00:57:50.500 of

00:57:50.600 the

00:57:50.660 conversation

00:57:51.080 and

00:57:51.280 declare

00:57:51.560 no

00:57:52.020 you're

00:57:52.200 all

00:57:52.340 wrong

00:57:52.620 here's

00:57:52.900 what

00:57:52.980 you

00:57:53.080 really

00:57:53.260 should

00:57:53.500 think

00:57:53.820 and then

00:57:54.320 they

00:57:55.400 leave

00:57:56.100 and they

00:57:56.340 expect

00:57:56.640 us

00:57:56.820 to

00:57:56.940 respond

00:57:57.260 by saying

00:57:57.520 oh

00:57:58.060 that's

00:57:58.520 what

00:57:58.640 we

00:57:58.760 should

00:57:58.920 think

00:57:59.120 well

00:57:59.280 okay

00:57:59.580 then

00:57:59.880 we'll

00:58:00.780 change

00:58:01.040 our

00:58:01.180 viewpoints

00:58:01.560 immediately

00:58:01.980 if

00:58:02.880 that's

00:58:03.060 what

00:58:03.160 Helen

00:58:03.340 says

00:58:03.620 then

00:58:03.740 it

00:58:03.820 must

00:58:03.940 be

00:58:04.120 true

00:58:04.440 Helen

00:58:05.420 would

00:58:05.560 never

00:58:05.700 lie

00:58:05.880 to

00:58:06.020 us

00:58:06.320 but

00:58:08.420 unfortunately

00:58:08.740 for

00:58:08.940 Helen

00:58:09.140 it

00:58:09.380 doesn't

00:58:09.580 work

00:58:09.740 that

00:58:09.900 way

00:58:10.080 and

00:58:10.620 this

00:58:10.740 is

00:58:10.840 the

00:58:10.960 first

00:58:11.160 point

00:58:11.380 before

00:58:11.560 we

00:58:11.700 talk

00:58:11.920 about

00:58:12.100 why

00:58:12.460 men

00:58:12.740 care

00:58:12.980 about

00:58:13.140 body

00:58:13.400 count

00:58:13.600 the

00:58:13.980 most

00:58:14.180 important

00:58:14.520 thing

00:58:14.680 to

00:58:14.780 understand

00:58:15.080 is

00:58:15.360 that

00:58:15.600 they

00:58:15.800 do

00:58:16.100 they

00:58:16.740 simply

00:58:17.180 do

00:58:17.600 this

00:58:18.220 is

00:58:18.340 something

00:58:18.580 that

00:58:18.820 men

00:58:19.180 care

00:58:19.700 about

00:58:20.020 you

00:58:21.040 might

00:58:21.220 think

00:58:21.400 that

00:58:21.560 they

00:58:21.900 we

00:58:22.300 shouldn't

00:58:23.080 care

00:58:23.260 about

00:58:23.520 it

00:58:23.720 you

00:58:24.720 might

00:58:24.880 demand

00:58:25.320 that

00:58:25.500 we

00:58:25.620 not

00:58:25.820 care

00:58:26.060 about

00:58:26.320 it

00:58:26.520 but

00:58:27.340 people

00:58:27.540 can't

00:58:27.800 be

00:58:27.940 hectored

00:58:28.380 into

00:58:28.540 not

00:58:28.940 caring

00:58:29.340 about

00:58:29.580 something

00:58:29.920 it's

00:58:30.800 hard

00:58:30.920 enough

00:58:31.100 to

00:58:31.280 convince

00:58:31.720 someone

00:58:32.120 to

00:58:32.300 not

00:58:32.480 care

00:58:32.660 about

00:58:32.840 something

00:58:33.080 but

00:58:33.240 the

00:58:33.580 feminists

00:58:33.940 as

00:58:34.080 established

00:58:34.440 aren't

00:58:34.740 even

00:58:34.900 trying

00:58:35.180 to

00:58:35.300 do

00:58:35.420 that

00:58:35.580 they're

00:58:35.740 just

00:58:35.980 issuing

00:58:36.480 demands

00:58:37.180 and

00:58:38.480 those

00:58:38.700 demands

00:58:39.080 can't

00:58:39.580 be

00:58:39.760 met

00:58:40.080 even

00:58:40.400 if

00:58:40.580 we

00:58:40.720 wanted

00:58:41.000 to

00:58:41.180 meet

00:58:41.340 them

00:58:41.480 which

00:58:41.660 we

00:58:41.820 don't

00:58:43.300 you

00:58:43.520 can't

00:58:44.460 just

00:58:44.600 tell

00:58:44.860 someone

00:58:45.220 don't

00:58:46.140 care

00:58:46.300 about

00:58:46.480 that

00:58:46.660 anymore

00:58:46.960 oh

00:58:47.760 okay

00:58:48.060 I'll

00:58:48.380 just

00:58:48.540 stop

00:58:48.760 caring

00:58:49.020 about

00:58:49.260 it

00:58:49.400 what

00:58:49.680 we

00:58:50.160 care

00:58:50.380 about

00:58:51.680 what

00:58:51.840 we

00:58:52.000 care

00:58:52.180 about

00:58:52.400 you

00:58:52.980 don't

00:58:53.100 have

00:58:53.240 to

00:58:53.340 like

00:58:53.600 it

00:58:53.800 you

00:59:01.280 the

00:59:01.440 other

00:59:01.580 side

00:59:01.780 of

00:59:01.860 this

00:59:01.960 discussion

00:59:02.300 especially

00:59:02.640 because

00:59:02.920 they're

00:59:03.380 not

00:59:03.500 making

00:59:03.700 any

00:59:03.880 kind

00:59:04.040 of

00:59:04.120 actual

00:59:04.400 argument

00:59:04.760 when

00:59:05.260 a

00:59:05.360 feminist

00:59:05.580 starts

00:59:05.860 screeching

00:59:06.360 that

00:59:06.580 men

00:59:06.800 shouldn't

00:59:07.100 care

00:59:07.260 about

00:59:07.460 this

00:59:07.640 perhaps

00:59:08.200 all

00:59:08.460 we

00:59:08.620 should

00:59:08.840 say

00:59:09.300 in

00:59:09.520 response

00:59:09.920 is

00:59:10.240 okay

00:59:11.300 but

00:59:11.480 we

00:59:11.600 do

00:59:11.820 deal

00:59:12.600 with

00:59:12.740 it

00:59:13.060 like

00:59:13.580 we

00:59:13.780 just

00:59:14.020 do

00:59:14.320 that's

00:59:15.260 it

00:59:15.460 but

00:59:16.800 this

00:59:16.920 is

00:59:17.000 a

00:59:17.120 podcast

00:59:17.420 so

00:59:17.920 I

00:59:18.240 can't

00:59:18.460 just

00:59:18.600 leave

00:59:18.780 it

00:59:18.880 there

00:59:19.020 especially

00:59:19.320 because

00:59:19.600 there

00:59:20.180 are

00:59:20.300 many

00:59:20.500 valid

00:59:20.900 reasons

00:59:21.380 why

00:59:21.620 so

00:59:21.820 many

00:59:22.000 men

00:59:22.240 do

00:59:22.500 care

00:59:22.780 about

00:59:23.000 this

00:59:23.240 and

00:59:23.440 why

00:59:23.700 the

00:59:23.860 ones

00:59:24.100 who

00:59:24.260 don't

00:59:24.640 or

00:59:24.840 claim

00:59:25.140 they

00:59:25.500 don't

00:59:26.320 should

00:59:26.660 and

00:59:27.660 first

00:59:27.860 of

00:59:27.960 all

00:59:28.080 it

00:59:28.420 should

00:59:28.580 be

00:59:28.680 understood

00:59:28.900 that

00:59:29.140 the

00:59:29.640 issue

00:59:29.960 is

00:59:30.160 oftentimes

00:59:30.600 not

00:59:31.460 just

00:59:32.100 a

00:59:32.560 woman's

00:59:32.860 body

00:59:33.060 count

00:59:33.260 but

00:59:33.480 also

00:59:33.720 her

00:59:34.140 current

00:59:34.600 attitude

00:59:35.120 about

00:59:35.900 her

00:59:36.320 body

00:59:36.540 count

00:59:36.780 so

00:59:37.640 what

00:59:37.860 is

00:59:37.980 most

00:59:38.340 revolting

00:59:38.740 to

00:59:38.880 a

00:59:39.000 man

00:59:39.220 is

00:59:39.580 a

00:59:39.860 woman

00:59:40.100 who

00:59:40.280 has

00:59:40.400 slept

00:59:40.640 with

00:59:40.800 many

00:59:40.980 men

00:59:41.200 and

00:59:41.760 rather

00:59:41.960 than

00:59:42.140 repenting

00:59:42.620 of

00:59:42.740 those

00:59:42.900 ways

00:59:43.100 instead

00:59:43.680 has

00:59:44.120 this

00:59:44.640 attitude

00:59:45.060 about

00:59:45.340 it

00:59:45.600 watch

01:00:15.600 so

01:00:16.100 what do

01:00:17.260 you think

01:00:17.500 about

01:00:17.700 the

01:00:17.860 analogy

01:00:18.280 if

01:00:19.360 one

01:00:20.180 key

01:00:20.400 can

01:00:20.600 open

01:00:20.900 many

01:00:21.220 locks

01:00:21.600 it's

01:00:22.020 known

01:00:22.200 as

01:00:22.360 a

01:00:22.500 master

01:00:22.860 key

01:00:23.200 as

01:00:24.120 opposed

01:00:24.420 to

01:00:24.620 if

01:00:24.780 you

01:00:24.900 have

01:00:25.160 a

01:00:25.380 lock

01:00:25.580 that

01:00:25.780 can

01:00:25.920 be

01:00:26.060 opened

01:00:26.300 by

01:00:26.500 any

01:00:26.760 key

01:00:26.980 it's

01:00:27.640 a

01:00:27.720 lock

01:00:28.340 I

01:00:29.340 think

01:00:29.600 that

01:00:29.760 if

01:00:29.900 a

01:00:30.560 woman

01:00:30.800 is

01:00:31.080 an

01:00:31.240 analogy

01:00:31.700 to

01:00:32.000 you

01:00:32.240 then

01:00:32.500 you're

01:00:32.700 not

01:00:33.200 ready

01:00:33.820 to

01:00:34.020 be

01:00:34.180 talking

01:00:34.460 to

01:00:34.660 a

01:00:34.820 woman

01:00:35.140 and

01:00:35.520 you

01:00:35.640 should

01:00:35.800 probably

01:00:36.240 get

01:00:36.540 so

01:00:37.340 if

01:00:37.920 a

01:00:38.040 woman

01:00:38.220 is

01:00:38.420 the

01:00:38.540 key

01:00:38.700 to

01:00:38.860 you

01:00:39.140 talk

01:00:40.140 to

01:00:40.260 your

01:00:40.400 mom

01:00:40.660 talk

01:00:41.380 to

01:00:41.500 your

01:00:41.680 sister

01:00:42.020 talk

01:00:42.340 to

01:00:42.460 your

01:00:42.600 cousin

01:00:42.940 I

01:00:43.360 don't

01:00:43.500 know

01:00:43.740 get

01:00:44.100 a

01:00:44.220 real

01:00:44.400 life

01:00:45.040 and

01:00:47.060 get

01:00:47.280 thank

01:00:48.520 you

01:00:48.820 and

01:00:49.740 a

01:00:49.860 woman

01:00:50.040 is

01:00:50.240 not

01:00:50.420 a

01:00:50.540 key

01:00:50.780 thank

01:00:52.400 you

01:00:52.720 the

01:00:56.040 man

01:00:56.320 can

01:00:56.500 get

01:00:56.680 effed

01:00:57.100 she

01:00:57.260 says

01:00:57.540 repeatedly

01:00:57.940 and

01:00:58.200 it's

01:00:58.360 true

01:00:58.600 that

01:00:58.840 if

01:00:59.040 the

01:00:59.140 man

01:00:59.320 is

01:00:59.420 talking

01:00:59.680 to

01:00:59.820 her

01:00:59.960 he

01:01:00.100 probably

01:01:00.440 can

01:01:00.740 because

01:01:01.420 it

01:01:01.660 sounds

01:01:02.080 like

01:01:02.240 she's

01:01:02.480 probably

01:01:02.820 doing

01:01:03.100 a

01:01:03.220 lot

01:01:03.320 of

01:01:03.420 that

01:01:03.580 now

01:01:04.260 that

01:01:05.080 right

01:01:05.260 there

01:01:05.460 is

01:01:05.660 the

01:01:05.800 absolute

01:01:06.160 worst

01:01:06.600 combination

01:01:07.180 for

01:01:08.100 a

01:01:08.680 man

01:01:08.900 you

01:01:09.360 have

01:01:09.480 a

01:01:09.580 woman

01:01:09.800 who

01:01:10.160 we

01:01:10.400 can

01:01:10.520 assume

01:01:10.840 based

01:01:11.560 on

01:01:11.640 her

01:01:11.740 defensiveness

01:01:12.200 has

01:01:12.500 had

01:01:12.700 sex

01:01:12.980 with

01:01:13.100 a

01:01:13.200 significant

01:01:13.500 number

01:01:13.800 of

01:01:13.940 men

01:01:14.100 and

01:01:14.940 who

01:01:15.180 far

01:01:15.480 from

01:01:15.620 repenting

01:01:16.020 of

01:01:16.180 it

01:01:16.280 instead

01:01:16.640 flaunts

01:01:17.100 it

01:01:17.220 proudly

01:01:17.580 defending

01:01:18.560 it

01:01:18.720 in

01:01:18.820 that

01:01:18.960 screeching

01:01:19.560 vulgar

01:01:20.060 tone

01:01:20.480 that

01:01:21.240 men

01:01:21.540 find

01:01:22.040 utterly

01:01:23.320 disgusting

01:01:25.120 really

01:01:25.460 everything

01:01:26.620 about

01:01:26.960 the

01:01:27.220 video

01:01:27.420 is

01:01:27.600 repulsive

01:01:27.980 to

01:01:28.180 most

01:01:28.360 men

01:01:28.560 it's

01:01:28.720 in

01:01:29.120 a

01:01:29.240 literal

01:01:29.420 sense

01:01:29.720 disgusting

01:01:30.140 it

01:01:30.300 triggers

01:01:30.780 our

01:01:31.000 disgust

01:01:31.560 reflex

01:01:32.100 and

01:01:32.900 once

01:01:33.020 again

01:01:33.140 that's

01:01:33.320 simply

01:01:33.520 not

01:01:33.780 something

01:01:34.000 you

01:01:34.140 can

01:01:34.300 scold

01:01:34.800 us

01:01:35.040 into

01:01:35.320 changing

01:01:35.800 why

01:01:37.920 is it

01:01:38.180 disgusting

01:01:38.560 why

01:01:38.840 do

01:01:38.980 men

01:01:39.120 care

01:01:39.320 about

01:01:39.480 body

01:01:39.660 count

01:01:39.800 well

01:01:39.920 let's

01:01:40.100 go

01:01:40.220 through

01:01:40.360 a

01:01:40.500 brief

01:01:40.740 list

01:01:41.100 of

01:01:41.200 a

01:01:41.300 few

01:01:41.420 key

01:01:41.620 reasons

01:01:41.860 number

01:01:42.060 one

01:01:42.340 number

01:01:42.960 one

01:01:43.140 is

01:01:43.680 the

01:01:44.420 most

01:01:44.920 practical

01:01:45.340 concern

01:01:45.880 probably

01:01:46.380 if a

01:01:46.880 woman

01:01:47.040 has

01:01:47.220 been

01:01:47.340 with

01:01:47.520 lots

01:01:47.740 of

01:01:47.900 men

01:01:48.100 the

01:01:49.120 chance

01:01:49.380 that

01:01:49.500 she

01:01:49.580 has

01:01:49.700 some

01:01:49.840 kind

01:01:50.040 of

01:01:50.160 disease

01:01:50.560 is

01:01:51.160 much

01:01:51.400 higher

01:01:51.680 the

01:01:51.840 association

01:01:52.320 with

01:01:52.580 promiscuity

01:01:53.260 and

01:01:53.600 dirtiness

01:01:54.160 uncleanliness

01:02:02.900 connotation

01:02:03.560 to these

01:02:03.820 things

01:02:04.000 of

01:02:04.160 course

01:02:04.320 but

01:02:04.460 there's

01:02:04.620 also

01:02:04.800 the

01:02:05.020 physical

01:02:05.400 sense

01:02:05.780 as

01:02:06.020 well

01:02:06.300 so

01:02:06.960 when

01:02:07.060 a

01:02:07.160 man

01:02:07.320 hears

01:02:07.540 that

01:02:07.660 a

01:02:07.740 woman

01:02:07.880 has

01:02:08.040 been

01:02:08.140 with

01:02:08.280 25

01:02:08.580 guys

01:02:08.920 or

01:02:09.040 whatever

01:02:09.260 one

01:02:09.820 of

01:02:09.900 the

01:02:09.980 very

01:02:10.180 first

01:02:10.460 things

01:02:10.700 he

01:02:10.820 will

01:02:10.960 think

01:02:11.200 is

01:02:11.360 that

01:02:11.480 the

01:02:11.600 woman

01:02:11.780 probably

01:02:12.140 has

01:02:12.320 herpes

01:02:12.620 or

01:02:12.800 something

01:02:13.080 and

01:02:14.180 this

01:02:14.300 is

01:02:14.420 not

01:02:14.580 an

01:02:14.740 unreasonable

01:02:15.280 assumption

01:02:15.820 now

01:02:17.220 beyond

01:02:17.460 these

01:02:17.640 practical

01:02:18.060 and

01:02:18.220 medical

01:02:18.440 concerns

01:02:18.840 when a

01:02:19.080 man

01:02:19.260 hears

01:02:19.480 that

01:02:19.600 a

01:02:19.660 woman

01:02:19.800 is

01:02:19.940 promiscuous

01:02:20.460 this

01:02:21.160 will

01:02:21.280 lead

01:02:21.440 him

01:02:21.560 to

01:02:21.680 rightly

01:02:21.980 question

01:02:22.420 her

01:02:22.640 loyalty

01:02:23.020 if

01:02:24.000 she

01:02:24.120 has

01:02:24.240 a

01:02:24.360 habit

01:02:24.700 or

01:02:26.000 maybe

01:02:26.420 I

01:02:26.540 should

01:02:26.660 say

01:02:26.800 her

01:02:26.980 capacity

01:02:27.460 for

01:02:27.760 loyalty

01:02:28.080 if

01:02:29.540 she

01:02:29.680 has

01:02:29.840 a

01:02:29.940 habit

01:02:30.160 of

01:02:30.300 jumping

01:02:30.540 into

01:02:30.740 bed

01:02:30.940 with

01:02:31.100 every

01:02:31.280 other

01:02:31.440 guy

01:02:31.640 she

01:02:31.820 needs

01:02:32.040 then

01:02:32.220 he's

01:02:33.080 going

01:02:33.220 to

01:02:33.340 worry

01:02:33.580 that

01:02:33.780 this

01:02:33.960 low

01:02:34.260 impulse

01:02:34.720 control

01:02:35.180 this

01:02:35.400 habit

01:02:35.700 of

01:02:35.880 following

01:02:36.200 her

01:02:36.420 carnal

01:02:36.720 desires

01:02:37.160 above

01:02:37.400 all

01:02:37.620 will

01:02:38.000 increase

01:02:38.320 the

01:02:38.520 likelihood

01:02:38.880 that

01:02:39.700 she'll

01:02:39.940 continue

01:02:40.380 in

01:02:40.640 that

01:02:40.820 behavior

01:02:41.180 even

01:02:41.460 after

01:02:41.720 making

01:02:42.040 a

01:02:42.200 commitment

01:02:42.540 to

01:02:43.240 him

01:02:43.580 so

01:02:44.080 a

01:02:51.440 bed

01:02:51.720 with

01:02:51.860 some

01:02:52.060 random

01:02:52.380 guy

01:02:52.640 she

01:02:52.800 meets

01:02:52.980 at

01:02:53.080 the

01:02:53.200 gym

01:02:53.360 or

01:02:53.480 whatever

01:02:53.780 even

01:02:55.120 if

01:02:55.300 she

01:02:55.420 was

01:02:55.620 single

01:02:56.000 she

01:02:56.200 wouldn't

01:02:56.420 do

01:02:56.560 that

01:02:56.820 that's

01:02:57.340 what

01:02:57.400 a

01:02:57.500 man

01:02:57.660 wants

01:02:57.940 to

01:02:58.060 be

01:02:58.180 able

01:02:58.280 to

01:02:58.380 say

01:02:58.480 that

01:02:58.600 even

01:02:58.880 if

01:02:59.040 she

01:02:59.140 was

01:02:59.300 single

01:02:59.580 she

01:02:59.720 wouldn't

01:02:59.860 do

01:02:59.980 that

01:03:00.180 that

01:03:00.200 she

01:03:00.500 would

01:03:00.980 do

01:03:05.260 that

01:03:05.740 then

01:03:06.960 the

01:03:07.080 man

01:03:07.260 will

01:03:07.400 worry

01:03:07.700 justifiably

01:03:08.300 so

01:03:08.620 that

01:03:09.440 she

01:03:09.640 will

01:03:09.860 do

01:03:10.180 that

01:03:10.460 even

01:03:10.720 when

01:03:10.880 she's

01:03:11.020 not

01:03:11.180 single

01:03:11.460 but

01:03:13.320 even

01:03:15.680 if

01:03:15.840 she

01:03:15.960 refrains

01:03:16.480 from

01:03:16.740 hooking

01:03:17.180 up

01:03:21.440 calls

01:03:21.740 into

01:03:21.880 question

01:03:22.200 her

01:03:22.420 morals

01:03:22.800 and

01:03:23.000 her

01:03:23.120 values

01:03:23.580 a

01:03:24.740 man

01:03:24.980 wants

01:03:25.240 a

01:03:25.380 woman

01:03:25.580 who

01:03:25.740 is

01:03:25.900 chaste

01:03:26.340 self

01:03:26.680 controlled

01:03:27.040 dignified

01:03:27.620 classy

01:03:28.100 and

01:03:29.760 not

01:03:30.220 just

01:03:30.380 because

01:03:30.620 that

01:03:30.780 makes

01:03:30.960 it

01:03:31.060 less

01:03:31.240 likely

01:03:31.500 that

01:03:31.680 she's

01:03:31.940 diseased

01:03:32.520 and

01:03:32.740 not

01:03:32.860 just

01:03:33.000 because

01:03:33.240 that

01:03:33.380 makes

01:03:33.520 it

01:03:33.620 less

01:03:33.800 likely

01:03:34.020 that

01:03:34.180 she'll

01:03:34.340 cheat

01:03:34.580 on

01:03:34.760 him

01:03:34.940 even

01:03:35.420 though

01:03:35.540 those

01:03:35.740 are

01:03:35.900 two

01:03:36.080 big

01:03:36.220 factors

01:03:36.520 but

01:03:37.340 also

01:03:37.500 even

01:03:37.700 more

01:03:37.920 fundamentally

01:03:38.240 because

01:03:38.480 that's

01:03:38.740 simply

01:03:38.980 the

01:03:39.180 right

01:03:39.460 way

01:03:39.700 to

01:03:39.880 be

01:03:40.140 a

01:03:40.900 licentious

01:03:41.620 woman

01:03:42.020 is

01:03:42.280 a

01:03:42.460 disordered

01:03:43.040 woman

01:03:43.340 it's

01:03:43.520 a

01:03:43.620 woman

01:03:43.800 who

01:03:44.420 does

01:03:44.820 not

01:03:45.020 have

01:03:45.220 the

01:03:45.360 value

01:03:45.700 system

01:03:46.100 that

01:03:46.300 men

01:03:46.500 admire

01:03:46.940 and

01:03:47.120 find

01:03:47.280 attractive

01:03:47.800 now

01:03:49.020 it's

01:03:49.320 a

01:03:49.440 cliche

01:03:49.720 perhaps

01:03:50.160 but

01:03:50.320 a

01:03:50.440 man

01:03:50.740 really

01:03:51.780 does

01:03:52.240 want

01:03:52.460 a

01:03:52.560 woman

01:03:52.740 that

01:03:52.880 he

01:03:52.960 can

01:03:53.100 bring

01:03:53.340 home

01:03:53.520 and

01:03:53.600 introduce

01:03:53.860 to

01:03:54.040 his

01:03:54.160 mom

01:03:54.400 when

01:03:55.920 I

01:03:56.040 first

01:03:56.380 introduced

01:03:56.920 my

01:03:57.240 now

01:03:57.740 wife

01:03:58.060 to

01:03:58.220 my

01:03:58.400 parents

01:03:58.740 years

01:03:58.940 ago

01:03:59.180 my

01:04:00.040 mom

01:04:00.480 pulled

01:04:01.120 me

01:04:01.260 aside

01:04:01.580 within

01:04:01.780 about

01:04:02.180 an

01:04:02.340 hour

01:04:02.640 of

01:04:02.840 meeting

01:04:03.040 her

01:04:03.280 and

01:04:03.540 said

01:04:03.800 we

01:04:04.560 really

01:04:04.780 like

01:04:05.080 her

01:04:05.220 she's

01:04:05.600 great

01:04:05.880 and

01:04:07.080 that's

01:04:07.240 when

01:04:07.320 I

01:04:07.400 knew

01:04:07.500 I

01:04:07.600 wanted

01:04:07.740 to

01:04:07.860 marry

01:04:08.040 her

01:04:08.160 because

01:04:08.420 I'd

01:04:09.620 only

01:04:09.760 known

01:04:09.920 her

01:04:10.020 for

01:04:10.120 a

01:04:10.240 few

01:04:10.360 weeks

01:04:10.560 at

01:04:10.660 that

01:04:10.780 point

01:04:11.000 but

01:04:11.780 you

01:04:11.900 get

01:04:12.020 that

01:04:12.160 kind

01:04:12.280 of

01:04:12.360 endorsement

01:04:12.820 from

01:04:12.940 the

01:04:13.040 people

01:04:13.260 in

01:04:13.420 your

01:04:13.540 life

01:04:13.740 that

01:04:13.860 you

01:04:14.000 look

01:04:14.200 to

01:04:14.360 for

01:04:14.540 advice

01:04:14.900 and

01:04:15.520 they

01:04:15.660 see

01:04:15.940 this

01:04:16.240 woman

01:04:16.460 and

01:04:16.580 they

01:04:16.660 say

01:04:16.760 this

01:04:16.900 is

01:04:16.980 a

01:04:17.120 very

01:04:17.320 good

01:04:17.520 woman

01:04:17.780 that

01:04:19.040 means

01:04:19.480 a

01:04:19.720 lot

01:04:19.960 to

01:04:20.200 a

01:04:20.320 man

01:04:20.500 now

01:04:22.020 the

01:04:22.100 other

01:04:22.220 thing

01:04:22.320 to keep

01:04:22.520 in

01:04:22.640 mind

01:04:22.820 is

01:04:22.960 that

01:04:23.120 men

01:04:23.600 are

01:04:23.740 competitive

01:04:24.160 by

01:04:24.500 nature

01:04:24.780 so

01:04:24.940 we

01:04:25.060 want

01:04:25.200 to

01:04:25.300 pursue

01:04:25.600 a

01:04:25.800 woman

01:04:26.000 and

01:04:26.320 if

01:04:26.500 we

01:04:27.060 win

01:04:27.320 her

01:04:27.480 affection

01:04:27.880 we

01:04:28.760 want

01:04:28.920 to

01:04:29.040 feel

01:04:29.320 as

01:04:29.500 though

01:04:29.660 we've

01:04:29.840 won

01:04:30.020 a

01:04:30.120 great

01:04:30.360 prize

01:04:30.880 this

01:04:31.680 kind

01:04:31.820 of

01:04:31.900 works

01:04:32.040 out

01:04:32.180 because

01:04:32.340 women

01:04:32.580 on

01:04:32.720 the

01:04:32.820 other

01:04:32.960 end

01:04:33.240 want

01:04:33.720 to

01:04:33.860 be

01:04:34.000 treated

01:04:34.300 as

01:04:34.580 a

01:04:34.720 great

01:04:34.940 prize

01:04:35.220 you

01:04:35.520 know

01:04:35.580 the

01:04:35.700 term

01:04:35.880 trophy

01:04:36.320 wife

01:04:36.640 has

01:04:36.860 a

01:04:37.020 negative

01:04:37.320 connotation

01:04:38.080 but

01:04:38.200 the

01:04:38.300 truth

01:04:38.500 is

01:04:38.660 that

01:04:38.880 in

01:04:39.120 a

01:04:39.280 sense

01:04:39.560 every

01:04:39.940 man

01:04:40.340 wants

01:04:40.980 a

01:04:41.380 trophy

01:04:41.640 wife

01:04:41.920 and

01:04:42.080 every

01:04:42.280 woman

01:04:42.520 wants

01:04:42.800 to

01:04:42.980 be

01:04:43.240 a

01:04:43.420 trophy

01:04:43.680 that

01:04:43.840 is

01:04:43.960 to

01:04:44.060 say

01:04:44.200 a

01:04:44.360 man

01:04:44.720 wants

01:04:45.380 to

01:04:45.480 be

01:04:45.620 proud

01:04:45.980 of

01:04:46.160 his

01:04:46.300 wife

01:04:46.640 wants

01:04:47.540 to

01:04:47.620 be

01:04:47.740 seen

01:04:48.500 with

01:04:48.720 her

01:04:48.880 and

01:04:49.560 a

01:04:49.680 wife

01:04:49.960 wants

01:04:50.540 her

01:04:50.660 husband

01:04:50.920 to

01:04:51.080 be

01:04:51.220 proud

01:04:51.500 in

01:04:51.820 that

01:04:52.020 way

01:04:52.300 but

01:04:53.520 a

01:04:53.880 man

01:04:54.160 will

01:04:54.420 feel

01:04:54.600 that

01:04:54.740 he

01:04:54.860 can't

01:04:55.300 have

01:04:55.500 this

01:04:55.680 kind

01:04:55.860 of

01:04:55.980 pride

01:04:56.220 in

01:04:56.340 a

01:04:56.460 promiscuous

01:04:56.920 woman

01:04:57.160 because

01:04:57.400 for

01:04:57.560 one

01:04:57.720 thing

01:04:57.920 her

01:04:58.420 promiscuity

01:04:58.860 has

01:04:59.020 likely

01:04:59.240 damaged

01:04:59.680 her

01:04:59.840 reputation

01:05:00.300 the

01:05:01.520 man

01:05:01.740 will

01:05:01.860 feel

01:05:02.060 ashamed

01:05:02.540 to

01:05:02.720 put

01:05:02.840 a

01:05:02.980 ring

01:05:03.200 on

01:05:03.340 the

01:05:03.460 finger

01:05:03.680 of

01:05:03.800 a

01:05:03.880 woman

01:05:04.040 who

01:05:04.200 half

01:05:04.420 the

01:05:04.560 guys

01:05:04.760 in

01:05:04.880 town

01:05:05.020 have

01:05:05.140 already

01:05:05.300 had

01:05:05.440 a

01:05:05.540 turn

01:05:05.760 with

01:05:06.020 it's

01:05:06.640 a

01:05:06.740 shameful

01:05:07.360 thing

01:05:07.600 it's

01:05:07.740 embarrassing

01:05:08.240 to

01:05:08.460 him

01:05:08.640 and

01:05:10.180 more

01:05:11.060 deeply

01:05:11.360 still

01:05:11.700 if a

01:05:12.020 woman

01:05:12.240 does

01:05:13.080 not

01:05:13.380 treat

01:05:13.720 herself

01:05:14.480 as

01:05:14.980 a

01:05:15.120 great

01:05:15.360 prize

01:05:15.760 if

01:05:16.480 she

01:05:16.580 has

01:05:16.740 given

01:05:17.000 herself

01:05:17.420 away

01:05:17.740 for

01:05:17.940 nothing

01:05:18.460 over

01:05:19.580 and

01:05:19.740 over

01:05:19.980 again

01:05:20.340 then

01:05:21.280 how

01:05:21.400 can

01:05:21.560 the

01:05:21.660 man

01:05:21.860 see

01:05:22.040 her

01:05:22.120 any

01:05:22.260 differently

01:05:22.600 if

01:05:23.700 you

01:05:23.820 treat

01:05:24.060 yourself

01:05:24.500 as

01:05:24.700 cheap

01:05:25.120 other

01:05:26.140 people

01:05:26.460 are

01:05:32.720 along

01:05:33.140 are

01:05:34.200 sending

01:05:34.460 a

01:05:34.620 message

01:05:34.840 about

01:05:35.040 how

01:05:35.220 they

01:05:35.400 perceive

01:05:35.780 their

01:05:35.980 own

01:05:36.220 value

01:05:36.680 and

01:05:38.280 men

01:05:38.540 hear

01:05:38.820 that

01:05:39.060 message

01:05:39.500 and

01:05:39.780 they

01:05:39.920 respond

01:05:40.360 accordingly

01:05:40.840 now

01:05:42.560 we

01:05:43.980 spent

01:05:44.220 all

01:05:44.400 this

01:05:44.600 time

01:05:44.880 talking

01:05:45.200 about

01:05:45.440 the

01:05:45.620 body

01:05:45.820 counts

01:05:46.080 of

01:05:46.200 women

01:05:46.360 but

01:05:46.560 you

01:05:47.660 know

01:05:47.800 you

01:05:48.320 might

01:05:48.500 ask

01:05:48.680 what

01:05:48.820 about

01:05:48.940 the

01:05:49.060 body

01:05:49.260 counts

01:05:49.500 of

01:05:49.640 men

01:05:49.880 should

01:05:50.640 women

01:05:50.860 care

01:05:51.120 if

01:05:51.240 a

01:05:51.320 man

01:05:51.520 has

01:05:51.680 a

01:05:51.740 high

01:05:51.860 body

01:05:52.040 count

01:05:52.280 and

01:05:52.520 yes

01:05:52.960 they

01:05:53.140 should

01:05:53.380 most

01:05:54.420 of

01:05:54.520 these

01:05:54.640 same

01:05:54.860 arguments

01:05:55.240 apply

01:05:55.540 in

01:05:55.680 the

01:05:55.760 reverse

01:05:56.120 but

01:05:58.100 here

01:05:58.320 we're

01:05:58.580 specifically

01:05:58.940 talking

01:05:59.380 about

01:05:59.640 what

01:05:59.880 men

01:06:00.160 value

01:06:00.600 and

01:06:01.280 should

01:06:01.500 value

01:06:01.840 in

01:06:02.040 a

01:06:02.120 woman

01:06:02.300 that's

01:06:02.600 the

01:06:02.720 conversation

01:06:03.200 and

01:06:04.900 I'm

01:06:05.080 here

01:06:05.160 to

01:06:05.280 tell

01:06:05.440 you

01:06:05.620 that

01:06:06.320 men

01:06:06.560 value

01:06:07.000 loyalty

01:06:07.540 they

01:06:08.360 value

01:06:08.660 good

01:06:08.900 morals

01:06:09.220 they

01:06:09.400 value

01:06:09.620 virtue

01:06:09.960 they

01:06:10.220 value

01:06:10.800 dignity

01:06:11.400 they

01:06:11.980 value

01:06:12.240 class

01:06:12.680 they

01:06:12.960 value

01:06:13.240 grace

01:06:13.640 they

01:06:14.100 value

01:06:14.400 beauty

01:06:14.800 they

01:06:16.240 want

01:06:16.460 a

01:06:16.600 high

01:06:16.900 value

01:06:17.300 woman

01:06:17.620 who

01:06:18.060 treats

01:06:18.380 herself

01:06:18.860 that

01:06:19.320 way

01:06:19.580 and

01:06:20.420 projects

01:06:20.940 that

01:06:21.240 to

01:06:21.400 the

01:06:21.540 world

01:06:21.800 they

01:06:23.200 want

01:06:23.400 a

01:06:23.500 woman

01:06:23.660 they

01:06:23.820 can

01:06:23.940 show

01:06:24.160 off

01:06:24.380 they

01:06:24.520 want

01:06:24.620 a

01:06:28.320 woman

01:06:28.440 and

01:06:29.140 you

01:06:29.240 want

01:06:29.360 to

01:06:29.440 be

01:06:29.580 all

01:06:29.760 those

01:06:29.920 things

01:06:30.140 to

01:06:30.260 a

01:06:30.380 man

01:06:30.560 then

01:06:30.840 don't

01:06:31.200 go

01:06:31.340 around

01:06:31.540 sleeping

01:06:31.880 with

01:06:32.160 random

01:06:32.420 guys

01:06:32.700 pretty

01:06:33.620 simple

01:06:33.880 so

01:06:35.720 this

01:06:35.860 is

01:06:35.960 all

01:06:36.140 why

01:06:36.400 the

01:06:36.560 people

01:06:36.760 who

01:06:36.940 deny

01:06:37.560 that

01:06:38.380 body

01:06:39.240 count

01:06:39.560 matters

01:06:40.040 are

01:06:41.120 today

01:06:41.500 cancelled

01:06:42.540 that'll

01:06:43.640 do it

01:06:43.840 for

01:06:44.080 the

01:06:44.380 show

01:06:44.540 today

01:06:44.700 thanks

01:06:44.900 for

01:06:45.020 watching

01:06:45.180 thanks

01:06:45.360 for

01:06:45.460 listening

01:06:45.680 have

01:06:45.940 a

01:06:46.000 great

01:06:46.120 day

01:06:46.380 god

01:06:46.880 speed

The Matt Walsh Show - September 20, 2023

Ep. 1226 - 'Paw Patrol' Indoctrinates Pre-Schoolers With Radical LGBT Propaganda

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript