The Matt Walsh Show - January 19, 2024


Ep. 1297 - UFC Fighter Delivers A Masterclass In How To Deal With The Media


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 4 minutes

Words per minute

175.89636

Word count

11,424

Sentence count

803

Harmful content

Misogyny

27

sentences flagged

Toxicity

49

sentences flagged

Hate speech

38

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

A UFC fighter gives conservatives and especially Republican politicians a masterclass in how to deal with the media and leftist false narratives. Also, a Democratic congresswoman claims that she was the victim of a racist incident at the Capitol. Plus, Democrats work on a new federal law to ensure the humane treatment of rodents. This is from the same party that supports the mass slaughter of human children. In our daily cancellation, a dispute at a drive-thru window has gone viral. We ll talk about all that and more today on The Matt Walsh Show.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Today on The Matt Walsh Show, a UFC fighter gives conservatives and especially Republican
00:00:03.780 politicians a masterclass in how to deal with the media and leftist false narratives. It's a class
00:00:09.340 that a lot of them desperately need. Also, a Democratic congresswoman claims that she was
00:00:13.480 the victim of a racist incident at the Capitol. Her story is a bit dubious, to put it mildly.
00:00:19.200 Plus, Democrats work on a new federal law to ensure the humane treatment of rodents. This
00:00:23.720 is from the same party that, of course, supports the mass slaughter of human children. In our 0.79
00:00:27.880 daily cancellation, a dispute at a drive-thru window has gone viral. Everybody on all sides
00:00:33.140 of this issue is wrong, as usual. We'll talk about all that and more today on The Matt Walsh Show.
00:00:57.880 Grand Canyon University is an affordable, private Christian university based in Phoenix, Arizona.
00:01:07.840 They're dedicated to making education fit into your already busy schedule, which is
00:01:11.920 why they offer 270 of their academic programs online. From scholarships to academic support,
00:01:17.740 GCU's graduation team provides you with the personal support you need to obtain your goals.
00:01:22.520 GCU's online program offers you the freedom to earn your degree on your own time from wherever you
00:01:27.660 are. GCU is praised for its culture of community giving and impact. They integrate the free market
00:01:32.780 system and a welcoming Christian worldview into all of their academic programs. You can achieve your
00:01:37.780 goals with a personalized plan and a supportive team behind you. Find your purpose at Grand Canyon
00:01:42.720 University, private Christian affordable. Visit gcu.edu. That's gcu.edu.
00:01:47.840 So it was just a few days ago that a Republican lawmaker from South Carolina named Nancy Mace 0.99
00:01:53.580 invoked the invented concept of white privilege in a congressional hearing. She was supposedly trying
00:01:58.740 to put Hunter Biden in his place by saying that he's the beneficiary of white privilege because he
00:02:03.520 could ignore subpoenas without suffering any consequences. But as I explained on the show at the
00:02:07.740 time, all Nancy Mace achieved was to legitimize the left's framing, which is fundamentally anti-white
00:02:14.200 and fraudulent. Hunter Biden does not benefit from his skin color. He benefits from the fact that he's
00:02:19.060 the son of the president of the United States. And there's a lot of privilege that goes with that
00:02:23.480 regardless of what your skin color happens to be. And everybody knows that. So all Nancy Mace
00:02:27.280 accomplished was reinforcing a false narrative that demonizes millions of white people and accuses them
00:02:32.420 of having unearned privilege simply because they were born with a certain skin color. She also managed to
00:02:37.600 derail the entire hearing by allowing Democrats to harp on their own personal definitions of white
00:02:42.720 privilege instead of discussing the subject at hand. And they were quite happy to not discuss
00:02:47.080 the subject at hand. So Nancy Mace kind of threw them a lifeline so that they could change the 0.98
00:02:52.220 subject. Now, as counterproductive and idiotic as Mace's stunt was, it wasn't surprising. Mace isn't 1.00
00:02:58.420 exactly a staunch far-right conservative. She raises money for Liz Cheney. She came out in support of the 1.00
00:03:04.480 so-called LGBTQ movement. She voted to hold former Trump advisor Steve Bannon in contempt of Congress.
00:03:10.820 This is the track record of someone you might expect to adopt the left's narrative on white
00:03:17.440 privilege because she's adopted so many of the left's other narratives. Now, the much bigger problem 0.72
00:03:23.140 is that Nancy Mace is just one example of a far larger problem in the Republican Party. And this is
00:03:31.760 one that affects politicians we're told are considerably smarter and more right of center than Nancy
00:03:36.920 Mace. So take Matt Gaetz, for example. Gaetz obviously doesn't comply with the left's new
00:03:42.860 speech code, usually. He publicly humiliated Mark Milley, who was the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
00:03:48.360 Staff at the time, for teaching soldiers about white rage. He also led the effort to oust House Speaker
00:03:56.160 Kevin McCarthy because he wasn't sufficiently committed to the America First movement. Of course, McCarthy was
00:04:01.420 replaced with a guy who also doesn't appear to be all that committed to the America First movement.
00:04:07.440 But all the same, Gaetz is not someone you would normally expect to pull a Nancy Mace and start
00:04:14.040 adopting the left's framing on identity politics. But this week, that's exactly what Matt Gaetz did.
00:04:21.440 Appearing on Newsmax, Gaetz began talking about Donald Trump's big win in Iowa. And he said that based on his
00:04:27.940 experience on the ground in Iowa, Trump is attracting more, quote unquote, diverse voters, meaning, you
00:04:32.920 know, voters who are not white. And Gaetz presents this as a very, a very good thing. Not just that
00:04:38.960 he's happy that there are minorities voting for Trump, but in fact, he's happy that according to him,
00:04:46.860 the white voters are being replaced by non-white voters. Here's how he phrased it. Listen.
00:04:52.180 What I could tell you is like, for every Karen we lose, there's a, there's a Julio and a Jamal ready
00:04:57.340 to sign up for the MAGA movement. And that abodes well for our ability to be more diverse and to be
00:05:03.040 more durable as we head into. So he says for every Karen we lose, there's a Julio and a Jamal 0.55
00:05:08.940 ready to sign up for the MAGA movement. Now, if we decode the language there, Gaetz is saying that
00:05:15.140 in the freezing tundra of Iowa, he apparently didn't see a lot of white women, but he did see tons of 1.00
00:05:21.540 Hispanics and black people coming out for Donald Trump. You know, they were probably waving the 0.99
00:05:26.440 MAGA flag around in the blizzard or whatever. Now, even if you pretend that's true, which it 0.74
00:05:32.360 clearly isn't, the language Gaetz used in that clip tells you a lot. I mean, no Republican, Gaetz
00:05:40.120 included, would ever dream of speaking the same way about black voters in the reverse. It would never 0.78
00:05:47.360 happen. You would never hear Gaetz say of black voters who don't vote Republican, which is the 0.98
00:05:52.640 vast majority of them, by the way. You never hear him say, oh, we don't need those Jamals. We've got 1.00
00:05:56.920 plenty of white people that take their place. He would never say that. Never in a million years would
00:06:01.700 he say that. He's only going to talk like that about white women or Karens, as he calls them.
00:06:07.620 This is a level of contempt and disregard reserved only for white people. And even Republicans join in. 0.94
00:06:14.860 So that's what I would like to ask Matt Gaetz. Well, you would never say the reverse. You would
00:06:21.620 never say, we don't need the Jamals. We've got white people. Never in a million years would you 1.00
00:06:24.920 say that. You feel perfectly fine saying that about white women. Why is that? Why is it? 0.86
00:06:31.820 Like, in your mind, why is it okay to say it about the one group but not the other?
00:06:36.820 Here's one Republican who is even considered to be far right in Matt Gaetz, who, in that snippet anyway,
00:06:43.360 entirely adopted the left's anti-white rhetoric and racial double standards. That's how pervasive
00:06:49.780 this stuff is. He's happy to attack Karens, but he'd never do the same in reverse because then he'd 0.89
00:06:57.400 be called a racist. And, well, we can't have that. And the other remarkable thing about this clip
00:07:05.160 is how it inverts all of the conservative arguments we've been hearing for the past several years.
00:07:10.120 So we went from, you know, Democrats denying that the great replacement was happening to admitting
00:07:16.780 it and saying that it's good to now Republicans also now agreeing that it's good, apparently, and
00:07:22.980 advocating for a great replacement in their own party. But along with being objectionable on a number
00:07:29.740 of levels, this is also politically suicidal. Okay, it actually isn't at all even close to true that every
00:07:36.720 white female voter Republicans lose they're replacing with a black voter. That is not happening. That is 1.00
00:07:41.900 not true. It's a fantasy. White women still support Republicans in far, far, far greater numbers than 1.00
00:07:50.300 black males. It's not even close. In fact, as Ann Coulter has pointed out many times, the only group that
00:07:57.120 Trump lost ground with in 2020 was white people, specifically white men. So they should be trying to win 0.92
00:08:04.740 those voters back. But instead, their messaging is, well, screw them. We don't need them anyway. 0.98
00:08:11.080 Which is just the dumbest, most politically delusional thing I've ever heard. Republicans 1.00
00:08:17.580 have apparently decided that the key to victory is to pander for the minority vote while alienating
00:08:23.340 explicitly their key constituency. Now, whatever explains this self-defeating embrace of identity
00:08:31.800 politics among conservatives, it's definitely catching on. It's not just Nancy Mace or Matt
00:08:35.440 Gaze doing it. In that same hearing where Nancy Mace talked about white privilege, Georgia Congresswoman
00:08:40.620 Marjorie Taylor Greene, who's another one who, according to the media anyway, they certainly wouldn't say
00:08:46.740 that she's a centrist or that she's a moderate Republican. They would say she's far right, according
00:08:51.080 to them. So in that same hearing, she claimed that Hunter Biden was afraid of her because she's a
00:08:56.740 strong, independent woman. Listen. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Excuse me, Hunter. Apparently,
00:09:03.020 you're afraid of my words. I like to reclaim my time, Mr. Chairman.
00:09:16.460 Wow, that's too bad. I think it's clear and obvious for everyone watching this hearing today
00:09:22.880 that Hunter Biden is terrified of strong, conservative Republican women because he can't
00:09:28.820 even face my words as I was about to speak to him. What a coward. Now, I mean, I can barely watch 1.00
00:09:36.200 that clip without cringing to death. And Republican women, I plead with you to stop this. Just stop it. 1.00
00:09:44.760 Don't go the girl boss routine, okay? It's embarrassing as hell when the left does it, 0.94
00:09:51.660 but it's even worse when you do it. Okay, at least that kind of pandering sounds somewhat natural
00:09:57.560 coming from them because they've been doing it for so long and they sort of own that kind of
00:10:01.880 identity, but they own that. But it's still cringy. For you, it's like, what are you trying to achieve?
00:10:08.740 Who do you think that this is appealing to? He's not afraid because he's a criminal. He's afraid
00:10:13.820 because we're girl bosses, independent women. He doesn't want any part of us. It's hard to think of a
00:10:19.540 better way to torpedo the case against Hunter Biden than to use lines like that. Like when you have a
00:10:24.560 strong case against somebody, you don't say they're afraid because you're a woman. You say they're
00:10:28.720 afraid because of the damning facts and evidence that you've assembled. This is the exact opposite
00:10:33.680 of what Republicans should have done in this hearing, but one after another, they did it.
00:10:37.400 They kept committing to these vapid displays of identity politics over and over again. By the way,
00:10:41.780 Nancy Mace played the girl boss card too in that same exact hearing. So this is two Republican women 0.98
00:10:47.080 in the same hearing playing the sexism card for no reason. It's like, you're on the right side here.
00:10:54.640 The other side has nowhere to hide. Hunter Biden's a criminal. So that's all you need to say. You 0.99
00:11:00.180 don't need, this is, this is, what's even the point? Just a humiliating performance all around.
00:11:06.400 And it's not just confined to that one hearing or to that Matt Gaetz interview. By now, we're all
00:11:12.300 familiar at this point with, with Nikki Haley's constant use of this kind of rhetoric. And in
00:11:17.500 case you somehow missed it, here's just a, a, a mercifully short clip. And I'm using this because
00:11:21.440 it's one of the shortest clips, uh, just to show you what I'm talking about. Listen to say is the
00:11:26.320 fact that I think this is exactly why Margaret Thatcher said, if you want something said, ask a
00:11:31.700 man, if you want something done, ask a woman. Now, of course, Nikki Haley says stuff like this 0.99
00:11:36.400 constantly. Uh, just like the remarks from Nancy Mace or Marjorie Taylor Greene or Matt Gaetz,
00:11:41.040 it's totally indistinguishable from something that AOC might say. It's the most cliched form
00:11:46.620 of gender politics imaginable. It's not just stupid. It adopts the left's basic narrative. 1.00
00:11:51.880 And, and what we're hearing over and over is, is left-wing identity politics, which is a narrative,
00:11:57.300 uh, that has cost millions of people jobs and college admissions and contracting jobs and federal
00:12:02.580 financial assistance and so on. It's been a disaster for this country and needs to stop. And instead of
00:12:07.260 saying that Republicans more and more embrace it and reinforce it at every turn. Why is this
00:12:14.180 happening? Well, at some level, this is of course, an attempt to win over voters. You know, it's a
00:12:19.000 political thing, but on that level, it's, it's obviously a terrible idea. It doesn't work.
00:12:25.080 Okay. You may remember, uh, that Donald Trump triumphantly pushed something called the first
00:12:29.400 step act when he was a president, which Gates also promoted. And the Trump team even ran a Superbowl ad
00:12:35.160 featuring a drug trafficker that Trump had let out of prison. The idea, according to Trump's inner
00:12:39.760 circle was to improve the GOP's, uh, voting share among black Americans, uh, by, you know, uh, letting
00:12:47.080 more criminals out of prison. So at a time when crime is rampant and getting worse, the idea was
00:12:52.060 to let more criminals out of jail to win votes. Now, of course it didn't work. Black voters in 2020 did 0.83
00:12:58.280 what they've done in every modern election, which is that they voted overwhelmingly for Democrats
00:13:02.960 and Trump got basically the same percentage of the black vote that George W. Bush did back in
00:13:08.040 2004. So the big win is supposed to be that he got more black votes than Romney or McCain, at least.
00:13:15.260 Well, hooray. What a triumph. So if identity politics is a ploy for votes, it doesn't seem likely to work.
00:13:24.860 It certainly doesn't work at the level you would need it to work to really shift, uh, things politically
00:13:30.820 in this country. Um, because it just doesn't convince anyone. But if you take a few steps
00:13:36.760 back, it's not hard to see that identity politics is just one part of a much larger problem among,
00:13:41.480 among conservatives. Increasingly, uh, conservatives are embracing the narratives of the left wholesale.
00:13:49.900 Identity, left-wing identity politics is just one of those narratives. But this is a problem that
00:13:54.820 is much more far-reaching than that. Uh, you know, we saw when Nikki Haley mourned the death of George
00:14:00.560 Floyd, she immediately bought the official narrative. And then she went on to say, as American cities were
00:14:05.060 burning down, that George Floyd's death needed to be personal and painful for every American.
00:14:11.100 We also saw this from Mitt Romney, who marched with BLM and chanted their slogans. And the guy who
00:14:15.820 replaced Kevin McCarthy, Mike Johnson, did a media tour after George Floyd's overdose death,
00:14:20.340 overdose death, calling it a heinous murder and repeating a bunch of BLM talking points about how
00:14:25.420 racist our country is. In fact, when it comes to 2020 and BLM and George Floyd, it's very difficult
00:14:30.620 to find a single elected Republican anywhere who did not immediately adopt the left's narrative about
00:14:37.360 that incident. Um, so the Republican party is led by people who can't help but adopt the left's premise
00:14:45.560 at every turn. And sometimes people you don't expect fall into this trap. So take this clip of
00:14:50.480 Ron DeSantis at a CNN town hall a couple of days ago. And I want you to watch as CNN's Wolf Blitzer
00:14:55.460 asks DeSantis a question that's premised on a completely false narrative. And then, and then
00:15:01.540 notice, uh, how Ron DeSantis responds or, or, and, and how he doesn't respond. Listen.
00:15:07.720 For the weekend, a woman and two children drowned near Eagle Pass, Texas, as they simply tried to cross
00:15:13.720 the Rio Grande. After the drownings, federal authorities got a distress call about two
00:15:18.480 more migrants in distress, but agents were physically barred by Texas authorities from
00:15:24.120 entering the area. What obligation does the United States have to protect the lives of these migrants?
00:15:30.140 Well, first of all, I think this is part of the problem with an open border because you're
00:15:33.840 incentivizing some really perilous behavior. Um, there's people that are paying large amounts of
00:15:40.060 money to coyotes and drug cartels to be brought into this country. There are people being abused
00:15:45.900 sexually. There are people that are being trafficked. We're in the country. A U S is incentivizing this.
00:15:52.220 It's madness. So stopping the, the, the migration and having a closed border is the humanitarian thing
00:15:59.420 to do. Now I am going to empower the States to be able to enforce immigration law. I don't think that 0.74
00:16:06.260 Texas should have to sit there and deal with all the consequences of the federal government
00:16:11.260 neglecting, uh, their duties. And I think that's been a problem with the Biden administration
00:16:16.560 saying we're not federal immigration laws just for the feds. You can't do it, but they're not doing it.
00:16:22.940 So what we're just supposed to let this happen. So we're going to work together with the States
00:16:27.360 and the local sheriffs. So you're not going to have these conflicts like that exist right now
00:16:31.920 between Biden and Texas or between Biden and local sheriffs and places down in Texas.
00:16:37.840 Now, as Mike Cernovich has pointed out on X, CNN is flat out lying about what happened. And in
00:16:42.680 response, uh, and probably because nobody briefed him on this, which by the way, is inexcusable for
00:16:48.000 his team to not have briefed him. But DeSantis just kind of accepts the premise and he pivots,
00:16:52.040 he pivots from there and he's, but he accepts the premise, which originated from the Biden White House,
00:16:58.360 even though it was completely wrong. What happened is that the White House originally claimed that,
00:17:03.880 quote, a woman and two children drowned near Eagle Pass and Texas officials blocked U.S. Border Patrol
00:17:08.700 from attempting to provide emergency assistance. That was a report that millions of people heard
00:17:12.720 from CBS News, which broadcast the narrative first. But shortly afterwards, Joe Biden's DOJ
00:17:17.440 contradicted that version of events entirely. As Fox's Bill Mulligan pointed out, the DOJ made it
00:17:22.620 clear that, quote, the migrants had already drowned at 8 p.m. and the Border Patrol didn't inform Texas
00:17:26.640 until an hour later at 9 p.m. The DOJ now confirms those migrants had been deceased for an hour
00:17:32.560 before Texas was even alerted about it. So, you know, it's just like the false claims that the
00:17:38.660 Border Patrol had whipped illegal immigrants. As Bill Mulligan pointed out, you know, this is another
00:17:43.120 one. The narrative is a total lie, as the Biden administration has now implicitly admitted. But
00:17:49.680 even after the DOJ admitted that, CNN asked DeSantis about it on the debate stage. And, you know,
00:17:54.260 everybody proceeded to operate under the assumption that it was true. And DeSantis usually does a very
00:18:00.080 good job of not accepting the left's premise, of not taking them at face value or adopting their
00:18:06.400 narrative. But the point is that there are so many lies and there are so many false narratives that even
00:18:12.020 someone like DeSantis can fall into them. And this can happen in even more subtle ways. Like, we live in a
00:18:17.440 culture that is so totally dominated by leftism. Often, even the language we use, our vocabulary,
00:18:24.760 has leftist assumptions embedded into it. So take a phrase like biological male, for example.
00:18:31.680 You hear all the time from conservatives. I've used the term myself plenty of times. And obviously,
00:18:36.520 when we use the term, our intention is not to suggest that there are any other kinds of males
00:18:42.180 besides biological ones. I mean, usually we're arguing the exact opposite. But when you take a
00:18:47.720 second to think about it, you realize that the phrase does imply that. I mean, if you're saying
00:18:51.380 biological male and you're putting that qualifier on it, it would seem to imply that
00:18:56.100 there are non-biological males, which there aren't. So if it requires this much care and precision to
00:19:03.220 avoid implicitly accepting a leftist premise, and if even Republican politicians who are usually very
00:19:09.220 good on that score can trip up in blatant ways, the situation is hopeless for most Republican
00:19:15.780 politicians who are, by and large, not very good and who have not exhibited a capacity for anything
00:19:20.180 close to that level of care and precision. They're too busy running around shouting girl power slogans, 0.97
00:19:26.240 right? But every once in a while, we do get an example of somebody on the right totally refusing to go
00:19:32.400 along with the left's narratives. And it's just that you usually have to look outside of Congress to find it.
00:19:39.220 And I want to show you this because this is what it sounds like when you completely refuse
00:19:46.900 to give these people even an inch to go along with their narrative even a little bit.
00:19:53.240 So you can look this week to UFC fighter Sean Strickland for this example. Strickland is an
00:19:58.460 American who just arrived in Toronto for the UFC fights this weekend. And he's talking to the press
00:20:06.080 at a press conference, the Canadian press, and they tried to corner him and talk about some things
00:20:12.620 that he's tweeted or things that he said in the past that they find to be homophobic or whatever. 0.59
00:20:17.060 So dumb gotcha questions that also, by the way, have nothing to do with UFC, have nothing to do with him 0.97
00:20:23.320 as an athlete. And we know how this normally goes when people are backed into a corner, they're given 0.98
00:20:30.700 these gotcha questions. Know how it usually goes. But let's hear how it went this time.
00:20:35.080 We've got a pretty supportive gay and lesbian community in this city. I did want to ask you
00:20:39.300 about something you wrote a couple of years ago. You said, if I had a gay son, I would think I'd...
00:20:42.920 Oh, look, another, another, each time saying, the swamp, you guys, the swamp. 0.98
00:20:46.900 You become a champion, you become a star, and someone...
00:20:49.040 Let me ask you something. Are you, are you, are you gay? 1.00
00:20:51.680 I haven't had the chance to interact with a more diverse man. 0.99
00:20:53.380 Are you, let me know, are you gay? 0.96
00:20:55.200 Can I hear, could I get an answer? 0.98
00:20:56.080 Well, no, I'm asking, I'm, this is a part of the, are you, are you a gay man?
00:20:58.920 I'm an ally of the community.
00:21:00.140 Okay. If you had a son and he was like, you know, you had a son, he was gay, you'd be like, 1.00
00:21:04.280 oh man, you don't, you don't want a grandkid? 0.91
00:21:05.980 No problem with it. 0.99
00:21:06.820 Oh man, well, dude, you're a weak man, dude. You're like, you're part of the problem. 0.99
00:21:11.360 You elected Justin Trudeau. Like, would you, when he sees the bank accounts, like you're just
00:21:16.840 pathetic. And, and the fact that, the fact that you have no backbone and, and has he shut down 1.00
00:21:24.460 your country and sees bank accounts? You asked me some stupid shit like that. Go yourself. Move 1.00
00:21:29.860 the on, man.
00:21:30.680 I didn't answer the question, but I did want to ask also things you said about the trans community.
00:21:34.240 You said, uh, this past October, when they announced the Bud Light sponsorship, that
00:21:37.540 you'd go so hard on Bud Light in your next fight. They'll have to accept me or denounce me
00:21:41.320 when, uh, when they know what, and we'll know what they stand for.
00:21:44.360 Are you, this guy's like, this Canadian is not that Canadian. 0.63
00:21:47.280 Are you still going to use your fight time to kind of speak on that?
00:21:49.280 Here's the thing about Bud Light. Here's the thing about Bud Light.
00:21:56.720 10 years ago to be trans was a, what? A mental illness. And now all of a sudden people like you 1.00
00:22:02.500 have weaseled your way in the world. You are, you are an infection. You are the definition 1.00
00:22:11.440 of weakness. Everything that is wrong with the world is because of you. And the best thing is, 0.95
00:22:18.580 is the world's not buying it. The world's not buying your bullshit. You're fucking peddling. 1.00
00:22:23.500 The world is not saying, you know what? You're right. Chicks have, the world's not saying that 1.00
00:22:28.900 world say, no, there are two genders. I don't want my kids being taught about, you know, who they 1.00
00:22:34.460 could in school. I don't want my kids being taught about, you know, their sexual preference. Like,
00:22:40.160 this guy's the enemy. You want to look at the enemy to our world? It's that motherfucker right
00:22:46.780 there. We have to ask how many conservative politicians could hold their ground in a 1.00
00:22:51.200 situation like that and affirm in the face of an ally, quote unquote, of the LGBTQIAXYZ plus community 0.99
00:23:00.220 that transgenderism is a mental illness. I mean, how many would do that? You'd probably count the 1.00
00:23:05.780 number on one hand, if that. Most Republicans are faced with that same line of questioning.
00:23:11.500 You know, they would say something like, well, I support and love all people, especially members
00:23:15.240 of our LGBTQ plus community, who so often face persecution and intolerance and blah, blah, blah,
00:23:20.420 et cetera. But notice how Strickland doesn't even remotely accept the premise of this hack's
00:23:26.060 questions. He doesn't concede that he was wrong to speak his mind or to think unimproved thoughts.
00:23:32.000 He treats this person with contempt and scorn and the person deserves it because he understands what
00:23:38.700 this person's trying to do. These are not innocent questions. This is not a normal interview where
00:23:42.780 he's, hey, gee, what do you think about the fight? It's not anything like that. Like, this guy's just
00:23:46.680 trying to destroy him. He's trying to embarrass him. This guy's trying to embarrass Sean Strickland.
00:23:51.420 He's got bad intentions. And so Strickland responds accordingly. You know, he immediately identifies
00:24:02.200 the reporter as a propagandist and laughs in his face. And he reaffirms what he said before because
00:24:08.200 it's what he believes is true. It's his view on the matter. He's not going to change it now just
00:24:13.860 because someone's upset about it. And then afterwards, at his second press conference in Toronto,
00:24:18.700 after there had been full, you know, media cycle about this and a lot of outrage, and it came up
00:24:23.320 again, here's how Sean Strickland responded the second time. He's told a lot of things about Canada,
00:24:30.020 but coming in here to that ovation, what does it feel like to be a hero to these people?
00:24:34.840 You know, man, no, let me, let me tell you, let me tell you, let me tell you guys something.
00:24:44.620 And this is what the media doesn't understand when it comes to me and you guys and Australian
00:24:51.400 fans. Let me tell you guys something. You guys don't care about me fighting. Yeah, me and
00:24:59.460 Dreykus, we're going to have a death match. Someone's going to get their hand raised. Someone's
00:25:05.280 going to get their hand raised. But when have you ever seen a UFC champion, George St. Pierre,
00:25:13.440 or anybody else, stick up for you guys. I do it. I do it. I am not chasing the Chinese checkmark
00:25:24.220 of Nike. I don't give a about that. I care about you guys. I care about you guys being free.
00:25:32.220 I care about you guys having freedom of speech. I give a about you guys. And I'll tell you what,
00:25:39.280 you guys are awesome. And I cannot wait to make this man go to war for you guys. Let's go.
00:25:49.520 Now you can hear the crowd loves it. I mean, at one point, a guy runs up to the stage to shake his
00:25:56.400 hand. So he doesn't back down. Everyone in the audience recognizes that, appreciates it.
00:26:01.800 He makes a mockery of the people who wanted him to cower and apologize. And there were a lot of them
00:26:06.600 in Canada, particularly in the media. He makes it clear that hate speech isn't real. It does not.
00:26:12.360 But, which is bold to say in Canada, where transphobia, quote unquote, can get you charged
00:26:16.920 with a crime. And so there you have a UFC fighter who's a more vocal supporter of freedom of speech
00:26:22.300 than pretty much any conservative politician in America. You're not going to find him talking
00:26:27.900 about white privilege or strong conservative women. This is what resonates now. If the Republican 0.99
00:26:33.120 Party wants to win elections, this is the path it needs to take. If they reject all of the ways
00:26:38.680 that the left wields skin color and gender and sexuality, reject that, rather than trying to
00:26:45.020 play that same game themselves, then voters will respond. You know, we don't need another first step
00:26:51.280 act or any pandering to quote unquote, Julio and Jamal, as Matt Gaetz would put it. We need politicians
00:26:58.520 who are capable of acting like normal people and of just standing on the truth. And if a UFC fighter
00:27:05.700 can do it, we should expect and demand the exact same of the people that we have elected to
00:27:13.320 represent us. Now let's get to our five headlines. Are you one of the millions of American men and
00:27:24.160 women dealing with premature hair loss? Maybe you're scared about inheriting that thinning look 1.00
00:27:28.400 because it runs in the family. Well, you can start 2024 off the right way with a real solution that
00:27:32.980 delivers on its promise without the harsh side effects, unwanted chemicals, and no need for a
00:27:37.840 prescription. Provia uses a safe natural ingredient called Procapil to effectively target the three
00:27:43.360 main causes of premature hair thinning and loss by supporting healthy scalp circulation, the delivery
00:27:47.940 of nourishing nutrients, and healthy hair follicle anchoring to your scalp. Provia guarantees more hair
00:27:54.240 on your head than in the shower or on your comb, and it's effective for men and women of any age
00:27:59.220 and safe on colored, treated, and styled hair. It's that easy. And right now, new customers save
00:28:04.400 over 50% plus free shipping on Provia's introductory package at ProviaHair.com slash Walsh. Every package
00:28:10.080 includes a full 60-day supply of Provia Serum for daily use, plus the Provia Super Concentrate for
00:28:16.300 faster, more noticeable results, and every order includes your choice of free gift right now at checkout.
00:28:22.180 Provia works guaranteed or 100% of your money back. Don't wait. Order now and save an extra 10%
00:28:27.200 and free shipping at ProviaHair.com slash Walsh. That's ProviaHair.com slash Walsh.
00:28:33.580 Okay, we were just talking about false narratives, which leads us quite smoothly into our top
00:28:37.440 headline, and this is a big headline because apparently, if you can believe it, a United
00:28:41.080 States Congresswoman was a victim of a racist incident inside the Capitol building. I mean,
00:28:47.620 you really can't go anywhere these days to escape from racism, can you? It's just, it's everywhere.
00:28:52.080 So here's Democratic Representative Barbara Lee last night. Listen.
00:28:57.040 These are not little kinks, first of all. Racism, institutional racism is in the DNA of this
00:29:04.580 country. When you look at what has taken place, look at our Native Americans, the genocide of Native
00:29:10.420 Americans. When you look at what has taken place as it relates to African Americans, 250 years plus of
00:29:16.120 enslaving African Americans. And then you look at the disparities now in our community in terms of
00:29:22.120 health care, unemployment, the wealth gap, housing. You can't tell me that systemic racism does not
00:29:28.820 exist. It's not just a little kink. I do want to cut that off just for a second. We haven't gotten
00:29:34.040 to her personal story of racist victimization yet, and it's quite a, it's a doozy. So we'll get there
00:29:40.260 in a second. But we have to note that the preamble she offers here about systemic racism is totally
00:29:48.180 false. Speaking again of leftist premises, you know, that are false, we hear this familiar trope
00:29:54.760 about the genocide of Native Americans. There was no genocide of Native Americans. We are the only
00:30:01.940 country in the world that would invent a genocide that we perpetrated. Okay? Like our modern fables
00:30:10.200 of American history are all centered around making us the bad guys. Our new sort of foundational myths
00:30:17.060 are all centered around making us the bad guys. And that's the exact opposite of how these myths and
00:30:22.520 fables usually work. But, you know, we're the most self-loathing society that's ever existed on
00:30:27.760 earth. It's a sickness. And that's where you get this Native American genocide thing. European settlers 1.00
00:30:34.320 and later Americans fought wars against the Indians. These wars lasted for many, many years. These were
00:30:41.000 wars with lots of hostility on both sides. It was a war. It was a battle. Many, many battles. Hundreds of
00:30:48.200 years, really. It was a series of battles. It was, it was, and that's it. You know, it wasn't, it wasn't like
00:30:54.800 one war. It wasn't a constant state of all-out war all over the country, all over the continent,
00:30:59.900 rather. But this land was conquered partly through a series of battles over many years. That's not a
00:31:06.500 genocide. That's how a land is conquered, fair and square. It's how the Native tribes conquered it 1.00
00:31:12.100 themselves. And then it's how they themselves were conquered. And, and also besides, you know,
00:31:16.940 more Indians died by disease than anything else. And that also is not a genocide. It's not,
00:31:21.380 these were not biological weapons. They weren't dropping bombs or whatever. They were, this is
00:31:26.380 not that they weren't, they weren't making viruses in a lab in Wuhan. A lot of this was happening
00:31:31.780 before the germ theory of disease had been fully devised anyway. So, so it's not a genocide. All
00:31:37.600 right. And speaking of things that didn't happen, but speaking of things that, that also didn't happen,
00:31:43.180 let's continue. Secondly, you have personal racism, which is hard to address, but I'll give you one
00:31:49.440 little story that shows you why we need to understand that I don't think she really understands
00:31:54.440 racism. I was walking from the house building on Capitol Hill to the Capitol and a man, a white guy
00:32:01.500 stopped me and told me I could not get into the members elevator. And you know, we have pens and I
00:32:06.580 was going to vote. And he blocked me from getting into the elevator and told me I was not a member of
00:32:11.740 Congress and it was for members only. I said, sir, I'm a member of Congress. And he, I showed him my pen
00:32:16.760 and he said, whose pen did you steal? Now, this is an example of what personal racism is and how
00:32:23.300 people of color constantly have to deal with this each and every day. But systemic racism is in the
00:32:29.200 policies of this country. And just look at what they're trying to do in terms of eliminating diversity,
00:32:34.180 equity, and inclusion. They're trying to not allow for an equal and level playing field. And so it's a
00:32:41.580 very dangerous position that she has. She's clueless. Well, that's a shame. And I'm sorry that you had
00:32:48.260 to deal with that, Congresswoman. Thank you for sharing that with us. Now, of course, Caitlin
00:32:52.640 Collins, the anchor, just sits there staring blankly and doesn't ask any follow-up questions at all.
00:32:58.480 It's almost like she knows the story is completely made up. So she doesn't want to pry. Because actually,
00:33:05.320 if you believed it, then you'd have a lot of questions. Like, who was this random white guy
00:33:12.380 blocking the elevator? Just a guy? Was that? Was it a security guard? And if it was a security guard,
00:33:19.840 did you report this incident to his superiors? Is the guy fired? And if he's a security guard that he,
00:33:27.600 when he works there, how could he not recognize you and know that you're a representative of,
00:33:32.820 and I mean, was this his first day on the job? And if it was, was he stopping every non-white member 0.98
00:33:40.800 of Congress who walked by? Like, did he not know? Is this a security guard working on Capitol Hill
00:33:47.540 who is not aware that non-white people are also representatives? Was this a security guard who came
00:33:53.700 here in a time portal from the year 1803 and just was unfamiliar with the concept of non-white
00:33:59.520 congressional representatives? I mean, we've had black people in Congress since like 1870. Okay.
00:34:05.780 So this guy would, I guess he came from before that. This is a, you know, he came in a time machine
00:34:14.480 from a, or maybe the guy's like 200 years old. He's a 200 year old rookie security guard who was looking
00:34:20.220 for a change of career later in life. And he got to Congress and he looked around. He said,
00:34:24.820 what's going on here? Maybe it wasn't a security guard. Was it a staffer? Did some white staffer
00:34:33.360 go up to a black Congresswoman and accuse her of stealing her pin? Is that it? So, so this is
00:34:41.820 someone who just decided randomly out of nowhere to completely nuke their own future political career.
00:34:47.080 Did some staffer decide to commit a suicide bombing of his own career?
00:34:51.020 That seems very strange. Or what, or was it another member of Congress? And if so, who? Are we
00:34:59.600 supposed to believe that Barbara Lee was accosted by some racist Congressman? And, and what through
00:35:04.440 her, through her abiding sense of mercy, she's decided to not tell us the guy's name? Really? Is that
00:35:10.880 what we're supposed to believe? So a white Republican racist Congressman accosted her and, but she's not 0.96
00:35:19.120 going to tell us who she's, you know, I don't want to get the guy in trouble. Right. Of course, 0.92
00:35:24.440 it's impossible to believe any of these scenarios. Um, uh, or at least, well, I'm not gonna say it's
00:35:30.500 impossible to believe because, uh, you know, it's, it is technically possible. Like anything's technically
00:35:37.480 possible. She could have told me that, um, she was walking through the halls of Congress and she saw
00:35:43.840 somebody, uh, levitating, you know, off the ground. It's like, I mean, it's, it's not, it's technically
00:35:52.380 possible in the sense that anything that's logically possible is, is therefore possible.
00:35:59.520 It's like, well, that's actually even more because that's, that, that would bring to mind
00:36:02.420 demonic possession or something. And I, so that, in fact, I would probably readily believe that.
00:36:07.500 So maybe that's not the best example to prove my point, but you get it. So anyway, uh, are any of
00:36:12.360 these scenarios, here's the real question. Are any of these scenarios remotely close to as likely
00:36:16.840 as the far more plausible scenario that Barbara Lee just made it up? You know, so you've got
00:36:22.940 all these, it could have been a Congress, it could have been a security guard from, uh, from,
00:36:27.900 from a time machine from the past. Could be like, I can't, it's, it's, it's positive. Time machines
00:36:33.100 could exist. Maybe, uh, could be a staffer who just decided like I'm going to ruin my entire career
00:36:38.420 for no reason. Um, could have been a Congressman whose identity she's protecting because she's just
00:36:44.600 so kind. Uh, or, or it could be that she just made this up. Um, and of course that's what,
00:36:54.660 what's happening that she made it up. Like none of this happened. She made it up. Uh, so what could
00:37:00.420 possibly, the more interesting question, the question of whether or not that happened is not
00:37:04.840 interesting because we all know that it just flat out didn't, um, I mean, I'll bet $10,000 right now
00:37:10.460 that it didn't happen. But the more interesting question is what could possibly possess her
00:37:16.440 to randomly invent this racist incident that definitely didn't happen? That to me is the
00:37:25.120 interesting question. And I think the answer is that it's a reflex at this point. Like on the left,
00:37:29.680 inventing stories of victimhood is, is instinct. It's reflexive. It's like, uh, it's, it's like a
00:37:36.260 hiccup. Okay. It's this almost involuntary physiological response. They blurred out race
00:37:41.820 hoaxes without even thinking about them. That's how severe the self-victimhood obsession has become.
00:37:47.060 It's how ingrained their desire for victimhood is. And that's why, that's why it must be great,
00:37:53.920 you know, to be a black person in a room full of libs. It's gotta be great. I'm a little bit
00:38:01.480 jealous. I have to admit, because the trolling opportunities are tremendous because if you're
00:38:06.860 a black person in a room full of libs, you can, you can make up any story that you want and they
00:38:12.940 will accept it at face value with no further questions, which is amazing. But you could walk 0.90
00:38:19.460 in and say, Hey guys, sorry, I'm late. Uh, I was, uh, I was, uh, I was just assaulted by a group of
00:38:25.460 five racist Nazi ninjas on the way in here. And, uh, fortunately I was able to fight them off with 0.94
00:38:32.460 my superior swordsmanship, uh, which I learned from my years studying, uh, martial arts in Japan. And,
00:38:38.480 and no matter what you say, they'll, they'll accept it. And without, without any follow-up questions at
00:38:46.140 level. And, um, and it's possible to do because this kind of victim is this self-victimization,
00:38:57.480 whether it's racial, whether it's race-based self-victimization, uh, it's gender-based,
00:39:03.680 sexual orientation-based, whatever it is, it's, it's just reflexive. Like I don't even,
00:39:08.560 it's interesting to, to, to think like, did, did Barbara Lee go into that interview having already
00:39:18.500 invented this fake story and planning on saying it? That's possible. But I also think it's quite
00:39:25.100 possible that she didn't even plan on making that up. She just did. She could hear herself making this
00:39:31.080 up while she was saying it. And then she said, okay, I guess this is what we're doing because it's
00:39:35.400 such a reflex for them. Um, pretty amazing. It's, it's also, you know, you, you look at,
00:39:41.140 you go on Twitter or, or, uh, in fact, Caitlin Collins tweeted out this, um, this video herself,
00:39:46.680 obviously in a non-skeptical way. And I mean, every single comment is from people saying,
00:39:54.260 oh, did they yell, uh, did he yell, this is MAGA country too? Barbara Smollett, like that's 0.88
00:40:00.240 every comment. Like nobody believes this stuff anymore. No one falls for it. Um,
00:40:06.600 and it also shows you how out of touch the media is that like Caitlin Collins,
00:40:10.980 if she had any kind of awareness, she would know that most people are not going to believe that
00:40:17.460 nonsense. And so she wouldn't tweet out the clip. She would rather just pretend it never happened
00:40:23.660 because it's embarrassing. But she, Caitlin Collins lives in a world where people still buy this
00:40:29.960 garbage. All right. Here's something, uh, important tweet from representative Ted Lieu. 1.00
00:40:36.680 Glue traps are among the cruelest ways to eliminate rodents. They're inhumane and can be dangerous to
00:40:42.180 humans and their pets. Pleased to introduce a bill today to place a national ban on glue traps.
00:40:50.240 Okay. So we've got members of Congress making up racism stories while others are working on a bill
00:40:55.660 banning glue traps. And it really tells you everything you need to know, doesn't it?
00:41:01.660 Americans are suffering. American humans are suffering. And Congress is busy working on
00:41:06.800 protecting the wellbeing and dignity of rats. Like, nevermind the fact that, that obviously this
00:41:13.420 does not fall under the purview of the federal government. Clearly the federal government shouldn't
00:41:17.940 be in the business of legislating what sort of methods we use to catch rodents. If anybody should be,
00:41:23.880 uh, policing that. And I'm not convinced that anyone should be, but it should be local and state
00:41:29.000 authorities if anyone, but, but that's not the important takeaway. The most important takeaway is
00:41:34.780 that Democrats are pushing this bill to protect rats and mice from inhumane treatment. And, and, uh,
00:41:43.060 and what does inhumane mean? It means like literally means non-human, unhuman. Um, and so we're
00:41:50.180 treating them in a, what it means like we're treating them like they're not humans, which they
00:41:54.040 aren't. And yet these are the same people who support the killing of human beings in the womb 0.79
00:42:01.160 at every stage of development. So in the mind of a Democrat, this, and this is, this is a fact,
00:42:06.800 this is not hyperbole. They really do believe that rats, actual rats have more rights, are entitled to 0.83
00:42:14.660 better treatment, more humane treatment than actual human beings in the womb. Now think about this,
00:42:21.960 even if you think that abortion should be legal, you're wrong if you think that, but, but if you do,
00:42:29.300 well, when's the last time you heard any of these people ever say that we need to have more humane
00:42:35.580 abortion practices for the babies themselves? So again, you go along for a second, for the sake of
00:42:42.400 argument, if you were to go along with their, um, position on abortion, um, wouldn't you at least
00:42:53.760 be concerned about the, about, uh, the humane, quote unquote, termination of human life, given that
00:43:05.440 you are when it comes to rats? But when have you ever heard any of them express one word of concern?
00:43:12.400 They care about that ever. They care about humanely killing convicted criminals. They care
00:43:19.000 about that. We got to be humane in the way we kill convicted criminals. They care about humanely 0.94
00:43:22.040 killing rats, but babies in the womb, well, they could be dismembered and tossed in a hazardous waste
00:43:27.640 dumpster, which is exactly what happens. Nobody on that side has, I've never heard any of them my whole,
00:43:34.200 and I've been, and I've been in the pro-life movement, uh, essentially my entire life.
00:43:38.700 And I've talked to a lot of people on the other side, and I've never heard any of them
00:43:43.340 even whisper a single word of concern about at least, um, preventing the babies in the womb from
00:43:53.020 feeling pain while they're being killed. And not that that would make it okay to do, obviously,
00:43:59.660 but my point is simply, it's like, you're not telling us not to kill rats, but you, but you're
00:44:05.460 saying we got to be humane in how we kill rats. And you care so much about it. We have to have a
00:44:08.100 national ban on glue traps. But so like, so you have that, at least that, that small amount of
00:44:15.720 concern that you have for rats, you don't, but you don't have that for humans, at least that much.
00:44:21.320 No, they don't. They, they really do put rodents above, because the way they look at it, the human
00:44:29.160 in the womb has zero rights, zero, uh, not just zero legal rights, legal rights, but also zero moral 0.88
00:44:35.780 rights. The human in the womb is not a moral entity. We don't have to take that individual into account
00:44:44.580 at all. And look, I know there are plenty of people on the right who, um, foolishly want to
00:44:52.360 move on from the abortion issue and, and, um, they don't want to talk about it. Uh, you're scared of
00:44:58.180 it. You're intimidated. You think it's a political loser. Um, I mean, talk about adopting the left's
00:45:03.660 narrative. There's a lot of people on the right who have done that with this issue, but you tell me,
00:45:08.120 how do we move on from this? How do we do it? Our leaders quite literally believe, and have put
00:45:16.440 into law, or trying to put into law, the idea that rats are entitled to more humane treatment
00:45:22.420 than human children. How, how do you move on from that? Like, how do you put that to the side?
00:45:30.620 How do you worry about anything else when we haven't at first established at a minimum
00:45:36.860 that human life is more precious than rodent life? If we can't, like, how do you, how do you say,
00:45:44.040 uh, is human life, we'll worry about that later. Let's move on. Any other issue that you claim to
00:45:50.780 care about is going to be premised on, or based on the assumption that human life is more valuable
00:45:59.280 than rodent life. Because everything else, whether you want to move on to, uh, taxes, you want to move
00:46:04.800 on to the border, you want to move on to, uh, the economy, you want to move on to gun rights,
00:46:09.760 you want to move on to anything else. Foreign policy. If human life is not more valuable
00:46:15.800 fundamentally from its inception than rodent life, then none of that other stuff matters.
00:46:19.820 Who cares about any of that? Oh, we got to protect the border. Why? Well, because it's hurting Americans.
00:46:24.780 What do Americans matter? It's like, fundamentally, you're no better than a rat. Who gives a, who gives a 1.00
00:46:29.320 about you? Who cares? Oh, we need gun rights. Why? I got to protect my family. What does your 0.98
00:46:34.080 family matter? Family doesn't matter. I mean, you, you, from birth, you, your children are no better
00:46:39.980 than rats, which means inherently they're no better than rats, right? That's, that's the assumption 0.98
00:46:46.340 we're working with. Um, and if that's not your assumption, which if you're on the right, I certainly
00:46:54.180 hope it isn't, then you can't just abandon that argument or surrender it or give it up or try to
00:47:01.500 table it for now. It's all, that's a battle that has to continue to be fought. The bad doesn't mean
00:47:10.920 it's the only thing we talk about. Okay. There's not, there's no risk of that. Okay. So there's no
00:47:15.720 risk of abortion being the only thing that conservatives talk about. Um, it's, it's, you know, it's increasingly
00:47:21.680 becoming the only thing we don't talk about, but it is a battle that has to continue to be fought,
00:47:28.000 um, protecting the intrinsic value because that's why abortion matters. And if you can't see that and
00:47:34.100 you're on the right, then I don't know, you're hopeless. You really are. If you can't see that
00:47:38.780 what it actually is about is it's a fight over the intrinsic value of human life. Um, and, and really
00:47:48.420 whether human life has any intrinsic value. And that, that, that is, that is, uh, a battleground
00:47:59.560 that we simply cannot surrender. You surrender that battleground, you've given up everything.
00:48:03.420 Everything falls if you give that up. Uh, okay. Briefly, a daily wire report, Star Trek actor
00:48:13.320 LeVar Burton was shocked to discover that one of his ancestors was a white Confederate soldier
00:48:18.020 soldier. The 66 year old star was told the surprising fact about his lineage during an
00:48:22.720 episode of the PBS series, Finding Your Roots. The former reading rainbow star, uh, told show host
00:48:28.500 Henry Louis Gates Jr. That he didn't know much about his family tree as he was estranged from his
00:48:32.700 father. Uh, but it turns out that, uh, he's got white in his background. He's got Confederate 0.56
00:48:36.940 background. Here's, uh, Burton getting the news. Wow. That's him. You are looking at your great,
00:48:44.000 great grandfather, James Henry Dixon. It's difficult to make out, but that's, that is your biological
00:48:52.160 great, great grandfather. Now, I'd have fought you five minutes ago if you told me that I had a white
00:49:02.700 great, great, great grandfather. You do. You can fight me, but it's the truth. And ain't nothing
00:49:08.940 you can do about it. What? Kunta. Kunta. Got white ancestry. That's right. What? Yeah. Come on now, 0.97
00:49:18.860 Skip. You know, you took two DNA tests. The two major commercial DNA tests almost never have tested
00:49:25.820 an African-American who was a hundred percent sub-Saharan African. Wow. We all have white 0.98
00:49:30.200 ancestors, but this is close. That's right. But this is close. And by name. So LeVar Burton is,
00:49:39.940 uh, just for the background on this, he's of course a big time leftist. He's a race grifter type. Uh, 0.88
00:49:45.540 he's a fan of quote, racial justice, as they put it. Um, he's, he's tweeted in the past that racism
00:49:51.420 and xenophobia, quote unquote, preside over every aspect of America. And that's where he's coming
00:49:58.260 from. And now he's found out that he's partially white and also, uh, Confederate at the same time,
00:50:03.860 which is hilarious. You know, I don't know why, like if you are a famous person or marginally, uh,
00:50:11.180 LeVar Burton, I don't know. Like if you're even marginally, you know, if you're a, uh, a, uh,
00:50:16.260 an F list celebrity, whatever it is, what, or even if you're not a celebrity, like why would you
00:50:23.360 want, what would, what would possess you to take part in this? Like why, I understand you want to
00:50:27.640 know your family lineage, but why do you want to find out the news on camera? You know, not only are
00:50:33.840 you giving these, this, uh, TV show, like you're giving them the, the, the, the, your blessing to go
00:50:42.180 through your family ancestry, but then you're going to, it's like, you know, let them tell you
00:50:46.980 about it and frame it however they want live on camera. It's like, I, I, I, for the life of me,
00:50:52.320 I cannot understand why you would want to do that. Uh, I don't know how much they're paying people to
00:50:59.000 appear. I guess LeVar Burton is probably pretty desperate these days. So they put themselves in
00:51:03.640 this, in this position. Uh, and there have been others. I forget, forget who it was, but there was
00:51:09.120 another, there have been a few incidents like this of someone kind of like LeVar Burton finding out
00:51:14.760 that if the, you know, their great, great grandfather was a slave owner, was a confederate
00:51:19.480 or whatever. Um, which is very funny, but, but then also the point that we take away from it is
00:51:25.100 I think pretty obvious. Uh, those are a few points, but, um, like one of the big ones is how this relates
00:51:31.680 to, uh, the, the reparations, you know, debate or, or really any, any debate, the white guilt in
00:51:39.600 general, all the things that, that grow from that route. Um, that, you know, if you were to start
00:51:47.940 assigning, uh, handing out money and, uh, compensating people for their quote, for their
00:51:54.940 supposed ancestral trauma, how does that even work? Like, what do you do with somebody like LeVar Burton?
00:52:01.220 What do you do with someone, whoever it was that, you know, the great, great grandfather was a slave 0.94
00:52:07.040 owner? Do they, do they get a pay, do they pay themselves? Do you like take money from them and
00:52:12.840 give it back to them? How does it work? Well, of course it doesn't work, which is why the only real
00:52:19.420 answer is, uh, to let the past stay in the past and to move on from it. Um, to, to, to learn lessons of
00:52:26.980 the past, which is an important thing to do, uh, to honor our ancestors. And it's also important for
00:52:33.960 you to know about your own ancestry and your own bloodline. All that is great.
00:52:38.800 But, uh, other than that, living in the present and certainly not trying to cash in on the suffering
00:52:44.600 and persecution of people in the past, suffering persecution that you yourself have never experienced.
00:52:48.720 I think that's the lesson. Lady Ballers is the hilarious story about how a group of 1.00
00:52:53.140 male losers who can't win against other men decide to identify as women and join a women's
00:52:58.600 basketball league. Yes, it's absurd. It's ridiculous. It's laughable. And it's happening 0.99
00:53:02.920 right now in the world. So here's a quick look at what's being called the most triggering movie
00:53:06.640 of the decade. Watch.
00:53:08.060 Leftists are losing it over Lady Ballers. Nothing's changed. This movie is a straight 0.80
00:53:14.320 up and intentional transphobic hate crime. What? I see you. The Lady Ballers movie needs
00:53:21.020 to be banned. I'll cancel you. I can get the blinds, please. Code 11. The most toxic BS you've
00:53:28.700 ever seen. You're a monster. Yeah. Next level hate speech propaganda. That's it. That's the pitch. 1.00
00:53:34.760 Watch the most triggering comedy of the decade. Lady Ballers. Streaming exclusively on Daily
00:53:43.400 Wire Plus. Don't wait. Watch Lady Ballers, the movie that Hollywood didn't make, so we did
00:53:48.220 exclusively on DailyWirePlus.com right now. Now let's get to our daily cancellation.
00:53:54.240 So our daily cancellation today on a Friday is all about a dispute at a drive-thru lane. And needless
00:54:06.580 to say, this is a deeply important issue. And it's one that has evoked strong feelings from the public.
00:54:12.360 There's a lot to say about this random video of two people arguing in a drive-thru lane. And yet,
00:54:17.280 still, most people seem to be missing some of the nuances and complexities of this issue. So we'll
00:54:24.580 go through them today. As the New York Post reports this week, a video has gone viral of a mom at a
00:54:28.940 Panera Bread drive-thru trying to order her meal, while the Panera Bread employee on the other end 0.52
00:54:33.900 refuses to take the order because the woman's daughter is allegedly screaming. And I should tell
00:54:39.120 you that, perhaps as you'd already expect, thousands of people have reacted to this clip. And the peanut
00:54:44.300 gallery's verdict is almost unanimously on the Panera Bread employee's side. So everybody agrees
00:54:51.060 that the customer, who some have dubbed Panera Bread Karen, is in the wrong here. And let's
00:54:57.580 watch the video and see if the internet got this one right, which of course they didn't, but let's
00:55:01.620 watch it. So you are going to refuse to take my order because my child was screaming? Yes, I have the
00:55:07.660 right to do that. You're more than welcome to come inside or you can place an order online and we'll make
00:55:10.740 it for you. And what is really like, you're going to not take my order? Yes, ma'am. That is what I'm
00:55:16.900 saying. Okay. All right. Well, I do have this on video and I will be emailing corporate because
00:55:21.700 that's just like completely rude. I cannot come inside because my daughter does not have shoes on. 0.91
00:55:27.620 Do you understand that? No, I understand, but you're also more than welcome to order through
00:55:31.280 online as well. So you want me to take an extra 20 minutes and order online?
00:55:40.880 That's not convenient to me. It's your job to take orders and stuff and this is ridiculous. 0.98
00:55:47.200 So I'd like you to take my order, please.
00:55:58.880 Okay. I will be happy to take your order as long as your daughter doesn't scream, all right?
00:56:03.200 I think that's a pretty good decision on your part. Okay. I don't need this attitude.
00:56:08.320 Okay. Now let's walk through this. Three points of analysis. First of all, we can't even talk about
00:56:15.840 the dispute until we deal with the fact that this woman went to a Panera Bread drive-thru in the first 1.00
00:56:22.000 place. There's simply no good reason, there's no valid excuse to ever go to a Panera Bread drive-thru.
00:56:29.520 Panera sells high school cafeteria caliber food at sit-down restaurant prices. I mean,
00:56:34.960 it's the worst of all worlds. You get the prices of a sit-down restaurant place
00:56:39.360 with sub-fast food quality meals. The sandwiches are bland. The baked goods are stale and depressing.
00:56:50.400 The soups are Campbell's tier at best. I mean, they taste like something that was in a can that's
00:56:55.520 been sitting in your pantry. The salads are salads. So it's a disaster all around. And Panera is awful for
00:57:01.600 every meal, but I think breakfast is the worst. Panera breakfast tastes like the continental breakfast that
00:57:07.040 you would get at like the Comfort Inn down the street. Except that the Comfort Inn, the breakfast is
00:57:12.240 complimentary at least. And also the Comfort Inn coffee would be far better than what they serve at Panera.
00:57:17.120 Panera coffee is an abomination that cries out to God for vengeance. If I served you, and I think this is true,
00:57:24.640 if I served you Panera coffee and I didn't tell you it was coffee, you wouldn't know what it was supposed to be.
00:57:29.120 You would be flummoxed. You would have no idea what you're ingesting. It's this lukewarm, dull, weak,
00:57:36.160 uninspired, sort of vaguely caffeinated liquid substance. And again, Panera commits all of these
00:57:44.240 culinary sins while charging premium prices for them. So that's what makes it so bad. So Panera is
00:57:50.480 terrible. That's the first thing. You shouldn't be there. Second, with that established, we move to
00:57:58.080 the employee. Now, as mentioned, most people are on his side. And that's no surprise, given that most
00:58:06.640 people are stupid. And now the woman is not blameless here, which I'll explain in a moment. 1.00
00:58:11.760 But neither is the employee. OK, we can't know for sure what was happening before the video began.
00:58:17.200 We can't know how much screaming the child was doing. But I think it's fair to assume that it was on
00:58:22.800 par with what we heard in the video. And yes, we can hear a couple of outbursts from the child
00:58:29.360 in the background. And children do that sometimes. They're known to do that. But it's nowhere near
00:58:36.480 a level of noise that would make it impossible to take the woman's order. 0.99
00:58:41.280 It's a little annoying and slightly distracting, but you can still do your job. You can still do the
00:58:46.240 thing you're paid to do. The only thing you're paid to do is to stand there and take the orders
00:58:50.720 of the customers. And the idea that you could have someone say, well, I'd rather not. I'd rather not
00:58:57.360 with you. You displease me. You displease me. Please continue on. I'm displeased. I won't take your order.
00:59:05.680 And the fact that everyone's on this guy's side, are you kidding me? Even if the screaming was a little
00:59:10.640 worse before the video started, that's also possible. Still, it seems unlikely that the
00:59:16.080 drive-through worker was literally unable to complete the order. All signs point to the fact
00:59:22.000 that the Panera employee simply found the child's whining irritating. And so he decided that he wasn't
00:59:26.320 going to do his job. And he says, I have the right to not take your order. No, you don't. But actually,
00:59:31.600 you don't have the right. It's Panera Bread decides. You work for them. They decide. And I'm pretty
00:59:36.160 sure Panera Bread, does Panera Bread have a policy that you don't have to take an order if there's a child
00:59:40.240 crying in the background. Is that their policy really? I'm pretty sure it's not. So no,
00:59:43.920 you don't have the right. Do your freaking job. That's just not how it works, or at least not how 0.99
00:59:49.280 it should work. But increasingly, it does work this way because the sense of entitlement in this
00:59:54.320 country is out of control. And it's particularly glaring in the service industry where, and nobody
00:59:59.040 wants to call this out or talk about it because you sound elitist or something, but we all know it.
01:00:03.200 So you go into these places that the workers are visibly and audibly angry. They're already angry
01:00:10.880 that you showed up in the first place to make them do their job. And everyone demands a tip for
01:00:16.160 everything, no matter how shoddy the performance is. And employees think nothing of openly complaining
01:00:21.360 about their customers and lecturing them, sometimes on social media. And so I see this incident as part of
01:00:27.760 that whole picture. Now, I'm more old school, as you know. I have a traditional mentality about
01:00:33.680 these things, which is to say I have the right mentality about these things. And my mentality is
01:00:38.800 this. Do your damn job. Just do your job. Yeah, it's difficult. The kid's crying. I don't care. Do 1.00
01:00:45.600 your job anyway. It's still your job. Just do it. You're annoyed. You're sad. You're upset. Your tummy
01:00:50.560 hurts. I don't care. Do your job. I say this as a general principle. It applies to everybody,
01:00:55.040 all industries. We have reached a crisis level of people not simply doing their damned jobs. 0.97
01:01:01.600 You know, but this is how I was raised. In fact, I can remember when I first started working as a 0.95
01:01:06.320 teenager and I would work these kind of service jobs. I did a lot of them. And I would come home
01:01:11.280 after my shift and I'd complain to my parents about all the annoying customers and the incompetent
01:01:16.640 managers and how unhappy I was in my job and I don't want to go. And my dad would look at me and say,
01:01:21.440 like, do you think the point of your job is to make you happy? Do you think that's why you're
01:01:26.000 there? No. The point of your job is to fulfill your responsibilities, to do what your boss asks
01:01:30.080 you to do and to earn a paycheck. So it doesn't matter whether it makes you happy or not. That's
01:01:35.200 what you're supposed to do. News for you is millions of people go to work every day and they're not happy
01:01:40.800 doing what they do, but they do it anyway because it's their responsibility. But you know,
01:01:45.680 this is what I would hear growing up. It's glaringly apparent that many people today do
01:01:51.600 not have dads at home who will give speeches like that. So instead, we end up in exactly the
01:01:57.440 situation we find ourselves in. You know, like that guy, I don't know who that guy was. It sounded like
01:02:03.840 a younger guy. Sounded like he's probably a teenager or something. I would hope that if he's got a dad at
01:02:09.840 home, like if that was my son and I heard that video, that kid's going to have problems when he
01:02:14.160 gets home with me. Okay. Because I would say, first of all, do your job. Second of all, don't speak
01:02:19.360 that disrespectfully to someone. This woman, do not disrespect her that way. Telling her to adjust 0.99
01:02:26.160 her attitude. Who the hell do you think you are? Like, this is the kind of thing, the kind of message 1.00
01:02:31.200 that kids need to hear and they don't. Third, with all that said,
01:02:36.080 I still cannot take this woman's side. My contrarianism can only take me so far on this 1.00
01:02:44.720 one. Now, yes, I think she's right to expect that her order should be taken. Yes, I understand why
01:02:50.120 she doesn't want to go in in order because her kid doesn't have shoes. And I know there are some
01:02:54.400 people online who were saying, why does your kid have shoes? You know, because if you're a non-parent,
01:03:00.220 you might be judgmental about that. But parents understand that sometimes you need to leave the house.
01:03:04.320 Your kid has lost her shoes for the 97th time this week and you got to go and you're not going to be
01:03:09.520 going inside anywhere anyway. So you're like, forget it. Never mind. You don't need your shoes.
01:03:12.640 We've all been there. So I'm with this woman every shoeless step of the way, except for one point. 0.98
01:03:20.800 She recorded and posted it. You know, not every minor dispute with a stranger needs to become
01:03:27.320 content for public consumption. It is possible, believe it or not, to simply have a disagreement with
01:03:32.240 another person. One where they are wrong and have a contentious back and forth. And then it ends
01:03:40.720 and you move on with your life and that's it. It's like, it's possible to do that. And before the
01:03:48.220 internet, that's what everyone did all the time. Can you believe it? People would have, you get into
01:03:52.960 conflicts, you get into arguments, you would get, you know, someone would wrong you in some small way. 0.62
01:03:57.220 And it just happened and you experienced it and it kind of sucked. And then you kept a living and
01:04:05.460 that was it. And it was over. Not everything needs to live forever on the internet. Not everything needs
01:04:11.300 to be discussed. Not everything needs to be content. And recording it and posting, it's like the adult
01:04:16.260 version of being a tattletale. You know, oh yeah, I'm telling TikTok on you. So the moment you do that,
01:04:23.040 you automatically become the bad guy or at least one of the bad guys. So in this case, as far as I
01:04:28.980 can tell, they're both the bad guys. The employee is wrong for not taking the order. The woman is wrong 1.00
01:04:33.460 for recording it and snitching to the internet. The internet is wrong for siding with the employee.
01:04:40.320 Panera Bread sucks. Everyone is wrong. Everything is bad. Everyone involved is canceled. 0.99
01:04:47.020 Happy Friday. And that'll do it for the show today. On that note and this week,
01:04:54.220 hope you have a great weekend. Talk to you on Monday. Godspeed.