Ep. 1320 - The Unabashed Demonization Of Poor White Americans
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 4 minutes
Words per Minute
177.1186
Summary
Today on the Matt Wall Show, the media launches an all-out assault on the true enemies of democracy: poor, white, rural Americans. They say, The Biden administration struggles to evade questions and accountability as yet another American citizen is murdered by an illegal immigrant. A school in Oklahoma holds a fundraising event featuring a display so revolting and grotesque that I don t even want to describe it. And a large group of scientists are asked whether sex is binary, and the answer should have been yes from 100% of respondents, but that s not what happened.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Today on the Matt Wall Show, the media launches an all-out assault on the true enemies of
00:00:03.800
democracy, they say. Poor white Americans. Also, the Biden administration struggles to
00:00:08.240
evade questions and accountability as yet another American citizen is murdered by an
00:00:11.980
illegal alien. A school in Oklahoma holds a fundraising event featuring a display so
00:00:15.920
revolting and grotesque that I don't even want to describe it, but we'll play the video
00:00:20.080
for you. And a large group of scientists are asked whether sex is binary. The answer should
00:00:24.320
have been yes from 100% of respondents, but that's not what happened. We'll talk about
00:00:28.780
all of that and more today on the Matt Wall Show.
00:00:30.560
This episode is brought to you by Preborn. To donate securely, dial pound 250.
00:01:00.540
and say the keyword baby or go to preborn.com slash Matt. A lot of the discussion you'll
00:01:06.680
hear about identity politics focuses on how immoral and destructive it is, and for good
00:01:11.880
reason. Judging people on the basis of characteristics they can't control is wrong. Decent people
00:01:16.020
understand that, but a lesser known side effect of identity politics is that it leaves the
00:01:20.540
people who believe in it, the daytime anchors of MSNBC, for example, completely bewildered
00:01:26.020
by major political events. Identity politics makes its adherents significantly dumber, basically.
00:01:32.780
There's no other way to put it. That's what it does. So take the election of Donald Trump in 2016,
00:01:36.660
for example. This was eight years ago, and by now most of us have a pretty good idea why it happened.
00:01:41.720
Trump, unlike Hillary Clinton, did not tell coal miners that he was going to put them out of
00:01:45.680
business. He didn't describe half the country as deplorable or extol the virtues of free trade in
00:01:50.600
towns where all the good jobs have moved overseas. Instead, Trump's message, not his skin color, his
00:01:55.460
gender, or any other aspect of his identity, resonated with tens of millions of Americans.
00:02:00.120
Whether you disagree with his message or you agree with it, that's just it. It should be obvious.
00:02:06.460
But somehow it's not obvious to MSNBC. As of this week, in the year 2024, they're still very much
00:02:13.380
unsure why Donald Trump won in 2016 and why he's leading in every major presidential poll today.
00:02:19.500
Watch. And as we barrel toward a likely rematch of the 2020 election, one candidate continues to
00:02:27.340
have a hold over white rural voters. But it's not Joe Biden, seen here as a boy on the right side of
00:02:35.040
your screen who went to public school, is the son of a used car salesman, and was born to a middle
00:02:41.100
class family in Scranton, Pennsylvania. Instead, it is Trump here on the left side, a private school
00:02:48.780
educated son of a New York City real estate tycoon who became a millionaire at eight years old and
00:02:55.500
didn't have to serve because he claimed he had bone spurs in his little feet. So why is it that
00:03:02.800
Trump appeals so much to a group he couldn't be more different from?
00:03:08.760
I do like when they show the childhood photos because it looks like they were both taken in
00:03:12.820
like the Civil War era, which I don't think is what they meant to highlight, but they did.
00:03:17.240
Anyway, the premise of this intro is that by default, you'd expect Joe Biden to be dominating
00:03:22.880
the vote among white rural voters because unlike Donald Trump, Joe Biden's dad was a used car
00:03:28.460
salesman and his family was middle class growing up. This is how MSNBC anchors and their viewers see
00:03:34.640
the world. They vote on the basis of identity, that is characteristics the candidates can't control.
00:03:38.700
And because the essence of modern liberalism is projection, they think that everyone else must
00:03:43.100
vote the same way too, or that they should anyway. It doesn't matter to them that Biden devoted his
00:03:48.700
entire professional life to representing the interests of banks and credit card issuers in
00:03:53.640
the Senate to the point that a bank hired Biden's son, just as Biden was pushing major legislation that
00:03:58.760
would benefit that same bank. They don't care that Biden somehow owns multiple mansions, despite the
00:04:03.500
fact that he's supposedly been earning a politician's salary his whole life. They don't even care about
00:04:07.780
anything that Trump campaigned on or delivered in office. All they can process is the respective
00:04:13.060
identities of the two candidates, which were determined at birth. Now, the problem with this
00:04:18.080
level of ignorance is that a critical mass of Americans now subscribe to it. So at this point,
00:04:22.620
one of two options is possible. Either the left can renounce identity politics and they can start
00:04:27.260
debating ideas, or they can double down on identity politics, which inevitably means declaring war
00:04:33.340
against the identities that they see as the enemy. Now, as this MSNBC segment went on, it became very
00:04:39.260
clear which option they're obviously going to choose. Mika Brzezinski introduces two authors who
00:04:45.360
just wrote a book entitled White Rural Rage, The Threat to American Democracy. I want you to watch as
00:04:51.040
the authors describe the supposed threats that these dastardly voters pose to America. Watch.
00:04:58.160
Joining us now, Professor of Political Science at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County,
00:05:04.320
Tom Schaller, and journalist and opinion writer, Paul Waldman. Their new book, Out Tomorrow,
00:05:09.740
is entitled White Rural Rage, The Threat to American Democracy. And Tom, we'll start with you.
00:05:17.660
Why are white rural voters a threat to democracy at this point? You would think, as we pointed out,
00:05:22.720
looking at Joe Biden's background and Donald Trump's, that the opposite would be true?
00:05:28.480
I mean, we lay out the fourfold interconnected threat that white rural voters pose to the country.
00:05:33.400
First of all, and we show 30 polls and national studies to demonstrate this. So we provide the
00:05:37.860
receipts in Chapter 6. They're the most racist, xenophobic, anti-immigrant, anti-gay
00:05:43.500
geodemographic group in the country. Second, they're the most conspiracist group. QAnon support and
00:05:48.140
subscribers. Election denialism, COVID denialism, and scientific skepticism. Obama birtherism.
00:05:54.680
Yeah, why not? I mean, you know, you want to demonize an entire group of people. So
00:05:57.740
the two guys you should bring in are two guys who have never, like, even driven through the country.
00:06:03.120
These guys have never even seen a cow in their lives. And they're the ones that are going to
00:06:07.380
bring in to be the experts on white rural voters. And, you know, and we'll even leave aside
00:06:13.940
the whole idea that a group of voters could be a threat to democracy simply by participating in it.
00:06:21.000
But be that as it may, and we'll play the rest of the answer in a second, but we need to stop to
00:06:26.940
make a few points. And first is this, that it needs to be said that when they use the term
00:06:31.720
white rural voter, they really just mean, of course, white poor voter. Now, throughout the book,
00:06:37.700
these white rural voters are described as being beleaguered, having stagnant incomes,
00:06:42.520
having high rates of poverty, unemployment, and homelessness. They just as easily could have
00:06:47.400
titled their book, White Poor Rage, if they wanted to. That's pretty obvious, of course,
00:06:53.060
but it's notable that they still feel the need to cloak their elitism in this little bit of euphemism.
00:06:59.620
Presumably, they realize that if they start complaining about the behavior of poor white
00:07:03.300
people, then it'd be pretty easy to point to the behavior of poor black people in this country,
00:07:07.560
which doesn't compare particularly well by any objective metric, including most notably rates of
00:07:12.240
violent crime. In fact, both poor black males and wealthy black males have a greater chance of
00:07:17.360
committing a felony in their lifetimes than white males of any income level, which is a very
00:07:22.580
interesting statistic. But these are the kinds of comparisons you can avoid when you use euphemisms
00:07:27.220
like poor or rather white rural Americans instead of poor white Americans. You also have some plausible
00:07:34.040
deniability when people accuse you of just being an elitist snob who finds a lower income people
00:07:39.860
repugnant, which is obviously the case here. But they can deny it because it's not lower income
00:07:45.440
people they're mad at after all. It's just those pesky rural whites that they don't like.
00:07:50.900
Let's put the euphemism aside for a second and get into the substance of what you just heard.
00:07:55.380
According to the author of this book, which is really more like an anti-white screed,
00:07:58.980
quote, we show 30 polls in national studies and we provide the receipts in chapter six.
00:08:04.420
Now, supposedly these receipts, call them receipts because everybody talks like they're
00:08:08.740
posting on Twitter now, clearly demonstrate that white rural voters are a threat to the country,
00:08:13.580
he says. And for example, according to the writers, quote, they're the most conspiracist
00:08:17.400
group, QAnon supporters and subscribers and COVID denialism. Well, that sounds pretty bad,
00:08:23.560
COVID denialism. But what exactly is QAnon support and COVID denialism? Those terms are never defined
00:08:29.820
in that interview. So I got a copy of the book and I looked through it as painful as that was.
00:08:35.140
And somewhere in chapter six, I found this, I found this, quote, 85% of QAnon believers say
00:08:40.900
the COVID-19 virus was human made in a foreign lab. And QAnon believers are one and a half times
00:08:46.260
more likely to live in rural than in urban areas. So as you catch that, in other words,
00:08:51.260
these white poor voters are supposedly nuts because they believe in the crazy QAnon theory
00:08:56.340
that COVID was made in a foreign lab. In the case of keeping track at home, this happens to be the
00:09:01.920
same unhinged QAnon conspiracy theory that the FBI director has publicly stated is likely to be
00:09:07.960
true. More importantly, it's the same theory that any reasonable person would concede and has conceded
00:09:13.260
all along is very plausible at a minimum. We've all listened to the, as the virologists on Tony
00:09:19.480
Fauci's payroll changed their stories about the origins of COVID. We've seen the warnings before the
00:09:23.920
pandemic about the lack of security, the Wuhan lab. We followed the funding going from the NIH to
00:09:29.520
Wuhan for gain of function experiments. We've all noticed that the outbreak began practically down
00:09:34.340
the street from the Wuhan lab. In fact, these white rural Americans apparently noticed that
00:09:40.680
very early on. They noticed it before people like this noticed it. But noticing these facts does not
00:09:46.260
make you a threat to democracy, despite what they may say, even if you happen to be white or poor or you
00:09:52.660
live out in the country. And you get a sense that the authors of this book know that because in this
00:09:57.060
interview, they're very careful to avoid specifying the details of the conspiracy theories that they're
00:10:02.360
complaining about. Instead, they just call it COVID denialism, and then they just hope you won't
00:10:06.440
check. Along the same lines, the authors claim that it's a lunatic conspiracy theory to suggest that
00:10:13.120
global elites are pedophiles who participate in a sex trafficking operation, which, you know, I guess
00:10:18.540
would seem crazy if you haven't heard the name Jeffrey Epstein at any point in the past decade.
00:10:23.920
And of course, as you've probably guessed, there's also the implication in this book that anyone who
00:10:28.200
believes that the 2020 election wasn't completely on the up and up, anybody who has any issue with
00:10:32.920
mail-in ballots or ballot harvesting or Biden getting 10 million more votes than Barack Obama by
00:10:38.020
campaigning from his basement, must be lunatics. These are the conspiracy theories and the threats
00:10:43.660
to democracy that these authors are referencing in this segment. And as unbelievable as all this is,
00:10:49.320
it gets worse somehow. I interrupted rudely this guy's answer in the MSNBC interview, so let's hear
00:10:55.560
the rest of it. Third, anti-democratic sentiments. They don't believe in an independent press,
00:11:00.820
free speech. They're most likely to say the president should be able to act unilaterally
00:11:04.020
without any checks from Congress or the courts or their bureaucracy. They're also the most strongly
00:11:09.540
white nationalists and white Christian nationalists. And fourth, they are most likely to
00:11:13.100
excuse or justify violence as an acceptable alternative to peaceful public discourse.
00:11:18.380
So you mentioned a lot of negative factors about this demographic.
00:11:24.560
Yeah. You know, he can barely contain himself. He's practically frothing at the mouth to accuse
00:11:29.840
poor white people of doing exactly what the Democratic Party has been doing for the last several years.
00:11:34.220
It's kind of astonishing to watch. He claims that it's poor white voters who are the enemies of the
00:11:39.500
freedom of speech, as if every power center in the Biden administration hasn't united to destroy Elon
00:11:45.100
Musk for committing the crime of allowing people to talk on the internet, as if every major university
00:11:50.600
in this country won't punish students for stating out loud that they believe in, you know, things like
00:11:55.600
biological reality, as if affirming the basic truth that all lives matter won't get you fired from
00:12:01.740
every major corporation on the planet right now. No, it's the poor white voters who are at war with the
00:12:07.280
independent press and the freedom of speech, we're told. That's what MSNBC would have you believe
00:12:12.680
anyway. And the fact they can say with a straight face is the most revealing part. That's how committed
00:12:16.960
they are to this fantasy. The whole answer you just saw was one absurdity after another. It's poor
00:12:23.840
white voters, we're told, who supposedly want the president to act unilaterally without any checks
00:12:28.500
from Congress or, you know, from the all-important unelected bureaucracy in Washington, according to these
00:12:33.920
authors. And again, that might be a compelling argument if you were not alive to see Barack
00:12:40.540
Obama in the Rose Garden announcing a unilateral amnesty for millions of illegal aliens in an
00:12:46.240
election year. It might be a compelling argument if you were literally born yesterday and therefore
00:12:50.380
didn't notice when Biden decided to ignore the Supreme Court and nationalize this country's rental
00:12:55.400
properties and forgive, quote unquote, billions of dollars in student loan debt, which is to offload it to
00:13:01.920
taxpayers. And in fact, to brag about the fact that he's doing it on his own without any permission
00:13:07.600
from anyone, to brag about it frequently, including as recently as a week ago. It might be a compelling
00:13:14.040
argument if you somehow missed the bombs that every administration in modern history has dropped
00:13:18.160
without bothering to consult with Congress, much less seek their approval. So they're lying to your face
00:13:25.420
again and again, and they're doing it for a reason. It's the same reason that the authors claim it's
00:13:30.300
poor white people who excuse or justify violence as alternatives to peaceful public discourse. And to
00:13:36.720
believe this, you would have had to miss the torching of churches and police stations and small businesses
00:13:42.080
during the George Floyd riots. You'd have to ignore the fact that as people were being murdered in the
00:13:46.840
name of civil rights, Kamala Harris was raising bail money for violent thugs. You have to focus entirely on
00:13:53.540
January 6th as the singular act of so-called political violence, quote unquote, in the past decade,
00:13:59.060
even though it's the one act of, quote, political violence in which only one person was killed and
00:14:04.280
it was a protester. You would have to subscribe without reservation to an alternate reality.
00:14:10.560
All in the name of demonizing white, poor, predominantly Christian voters who don't want
00:14:14.660
to support Joe Biden. Joe Biden, that humble child born into a middle-class family who turned out to be
00:14:20.580
as corrupt a politician as the state of Delaware has ever seen, which if you know Delaware is really
00:14:26.420
saying something. Now, there's one more clip from this interview that I want to show you because
00:14:30.580
it underscores how little these people care about poor white people, even though they're, you know,
00:14:35.080
even when they're, they're dying by the tens of thousands. So watch this. Here it is.
00:14:43.720
Tom, Tom, wouldn't you also say that it is in the interest of those like Donald Trump to put the
00:14:52.360
blame on people who are likely to be going through the same kinds of challenges in maybe a different
00:14:59.080
part of the country, like blacks, like browns, like migrants. And he channels this rage that they
00:15:06.800
rightfully have in rural areas toward the wrong people and those that could do something about
00:15:12.960
it, escape without having to make change. Because if those rural whites and blacks and migrants and
00:15:20.080
browns came together, they could really force real change. Isn't it a diversion to the wrong people based
00:15:30.400
Absolutely. Reverend Allen, as you probably know, 24% of rural America is non-white now.
00:15:36.160
And we have had eight years since Trump came down the escalator in June, 2015,
00:15:39.920
of focusing on rural whites, the heartland fly over people and what their economic anxieties are.
00:15:44.320
But with the exception of two things that we've, we can find opioid deaths and gun deaths on every
00:15:50.080
other measure in rural America, rural Latinos, rural African-Americans and native Americans,
00:15:54.480
the most rural population in America are doing worse and nobody cares about their economic anxieties.
00:15:58.800
I know it's not really the point, but I did enjoy Al Sharpton referring to blacks and browns.
00:16:05.440
You know, you don't hear that very often. Yeah, you got the blacks, the browns.
00:16:09.760
Apparently you can say that now you can, which, okay, fine. But it's really an incredible statement
00:16:14.800
there basically amounts to this. If you discount the fact that poor white people are killing themselves
00:16:19.120
far more often than any other demographic group. And if you ignore the fact that they're overdosing on
00:16:23.200
fentanyl far more than any other demographic group, basically, if you ignore the two leading causes
00:16:27.280
of death among young people, then poor white people have it pretty good. That's basically what
00:16:33.040
he just said. This is the level of visceral disdain that the corporate press and the mainstream left
00:16:38.080
has for white Americans. The point of going through all this is not to just rip apart the dumb arguments
00:16:44.720
in some stupid book. The point is to ask, why exactly did the authors go to these lengths to lie about
00:16:50.880
a very specific racial demographic? And why did one of the biggest media conglomerates on the planet
00:16:56.640
decide to promote their lies and their overt racial disdain? And the truth is that in spite of the
00:17:02.720
euphemisms about rural whites that these authors use, they're actually being very direct
00:17:09.440
in their dehumanization and villainization of a class that they see as undesirable.
00:17:14.800
The corporate media has always hated poor whites, of course, but now they're almost
00:17:18.720
as close to coming out and saying it. This is as close to just coming out and saying it as we've
00:17:24.560
seen. This MSNBC segment is as clear a declaration as we've ever seen, clearer even than Barack Obama's
00:17:31.200
demonization of Pennsylvania voters clinging to guns and religion, clearer than Hillary Clinton's
00:17:36.000
complaints about deplorables, that the left now stands for the unabashed hatred of poor white Americans
00:17:42.720
who already have been stripped of status, who have been discriminated against at every turn,
00:17:47.120
who've lost their economic security at the altar of globalization.
00:17:52.640
But it's still not enough. Still not enough demoralization, I guess.
00:17:57.840
And you know that's why they see it, because no publisher would ever sell a book titled
00:18:04.960
Like that book could not exist. There would be no shelf that it could sit on.
00:18:10.640
Instead of addressing that topic, they're more likely to excuse
00:18:13.440
black crime and violence as a symptom of late stage capitalism. In fact,
00:18:16.960
that's precisely what the Washington Post just did. Around the same time this segment is airing,
00:18:21.200
they published this image of the CVS in Columbia Heights of Washington, D.C.
00:18:26.080
And here's how the story begins in the Washington Post. It says, quote,
00:18:30.000
There's almost nothing left to steal at the CVS in Columbia Heights.
00:18:33.040
And that gives you an idea of which items have actual value. Blank CDs, for example,
00:18:37.840
the thieves don't even bother with them. The greeting card section has been left alone.
00:18:42.000
Everything else that remains in the store in Northwest D.C., which is not much, is under plexiglass.
00:18:46.560
It's been like this since at least October, when the legend of the empty CVS of Washington
00:18:50.720
began to spread beyond the district's borders. It became a horror story of late capitalism.
00:18:57.040
Okay, so when poor white people point out that COVID came from a lab, they're the enemies of
00:19:04.400
democracy. When poor black people steal so much from a local CBS that toothpaste has to go behind
00:19:10.080
plexiglass, then the issue is late capitalism. Now, obviously, where this all leads is racial
00:19:17.760
resentment and ultimately racial violence. And for all their projection, that's what they want.
00:19:22.880
They're not really afraid of poor white voters. That's not what they're afraid of. They're afraid
00:19:29.520
that in less than a year, for the first time in several years, somebody in power might actually
00:19:35.760
care what all these poor white people have to say. Now, let's get to our five headlines.
00:19:47.840
Financial experts thought we were in the clear. While experts anticipated rate cuts,
00:19:51.440
inflation in the United States is still a significant economic concern. Think about it.
00:19:55.040
The U.S. is in the hole by $34 trillion, and yet we keep printing money, which pushes the prices you
00:20:00.800
pay every day even higher. So you can bury your head in the sand, or you can do something about it.
00:20:05.360
Diversify a portion of your savings into gold with Birch Gold Group. Gold is your hedge against
00:20:09.840
inflation, and Birch Gold makes it easy to own. They'll help you convert your existing IRA or 401k into a
00:20:15.200
tax-sheltered IRA in gold, and you won't pay a penny out of pocket. Make gold part of your
00:20:19.600
savings strategy and buy it from Birch Gold. They've been the exclusive gold partner of
00:20:23.120
The Daily Wire for over seven years now, literally helping thousands of listeners,
00:20:27.120
and they can help you too. Text Walsh to 989898 and get your free info kit on gold,
00:20:32.320
then talk to a precious metal specialist about protecting your savings from persistent inflation
00:20:42.160
Are you struggling with back taxes or unfiled returns this year? The IRS is escalating collections
00:20:46.720
by adding 20,000 new agents. In these challenging times, your best defense is to use Tax Network USA.
00:20:52.640
Along with hiring thousands of new agents and field officers, the IRS has kicked off 2024 by sending
00:20:57.120
over 5 million pay-up letters to those who have unfiled tax returns or balances owed. These guys are not
00:21:03.120
your friends. Do not waive your rights and speak with these agents on your own without backup.
00:21:08.240
Tax Network USA, a trusted tax relief firm, has saved over a billion dollars in back taxes for their
00:21:12.720
clients. They can help you secure the best deal possible. Whether you owe $10,000 or $10 million,
00:21:18.560
they can help. Whether it's businesses or personal taxes, whether you have the means to pay or you're
00:21:23.040
on a fixed income, Tax Network USA can help finally resolve your tax burdens once and for all. Seize
00:21:29.200
control of your financial future now and don't let tax issues overpower you. Contact Tax Network USA
00:21:34.400
for immediate relief and expert guidance. Call 1-800-245-6000 or visit TNUSA.com slash Walsh.
00:21:40.800
Turn to Tax Network USA and find your path to financial peace of mind. That's TNUSA.com slash Walsh.
00:21:48.000
Daily Wire has a report. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas called out over
00:21:52.800
the weekend after he rejected the notion that the federal government bore responsibility for the murder
00:21:58.400
of a student in Georgia last month who was allegedly killed by an illegal alien. Police arrested 26-year-old
00:22:04.640
Jose Antonio Ibarra, a Venezuelan national, late last month for allegedly murdering 22-year-old Augusta
00:22:10.720
University nursing student Lakin Riley. He was on Face the Nation on CBS, was Mayorkas, and he was asked
00:22:18.080
about this. And we'll just go right to the clip here. Well, we can't really call this an answer,
00:22:24.240
but here's how it went down. Let's watch. But I want to ask you about a criminal case that has become
00:22:31.120
a political rallying point. You heard Donald Trump use this phrase, migrant crime. A 22-year-old
00:22:37.280
nursing student, I know you've been following this, Lakin Riley in the state of Georgia was murdered
00:22:42.720
allegedly by an undocumented Venezuelan migrant. The suspect had been detained by porter patrol upon
00:22:49.840
crossing, released with temporary permission to stay in the country. He then went on allegedly to
00:22:55.120
commit crimes twice, once in New York for driving a scooter without a license and once in connection
00:23:01.840
with a shoplifting case in Georgia. Did those states and their law enforcement communicate to
00:23:08.720
the federal government that this had happened? Should this man have been deported? A few thoughts.
00:23:15.920
First, Margaret, first and foremost, an absolute tragedy. And our hearts break for and our prayers
00:23:22.560
are with the family, number one. Number two, and importantly, as a prosecutor, having prosecuted
00:23:29.200
violent crime and other crimes for 12 years, one individual is responsible for the murder,
00:23:34.880
and that is the murderer. And we work very closely with state and local law enforcement
00:23:41.760
to ensure that individuals who pose a threat to public safety are indeed our highest priority
00:23:47.600
for detention and removal. Let's just pause it there for a second. We're going to keep playing it
00:23:52.320
because there's more to see. But taking note of a few things, first of all, and this is perhaps,
00:24:01.440
you know, neither here nor there, but Mayorkas is the perfect bureaucrat. He really is. He's like,
00:24:05.920
and by that I mean the very manifestation of the federal bureaucracy. If you want to know what a
00:24:13.440
federal bureaucrat is, then just watch this guy and listen to him speak for 10 seconds. And that's
00:24:20.960
what it is. This smarmy, shriveled little worm of a man. I mean, he looks a little, you know,
00:24:27.440
he looks a little bit like, what is it from the little mermaid when Ursula, uh, puts a curse on,
00:24:32.960
on the people and turns them into like those sea worm things. I think I have this right. It
00:24:38.800
looks like a little, like one of those, like the little, little shriveled worm. And, um, and so when
00:24:45.120
I say he's the perfect bureaucrat, I mean it that way, not as a compliment, not as a compliment.
00:24:48.560
And the point is that he's a, he's this sniveling, snide, pretentious, spineless little
00:24:57.040
nothing of a person. If you were to look up the word impressive in the dictionary, there'd be a
00:25:02.240
picture of him and the caption would say the opposite of this guy. And, and yet these are
00:25:08.960
the kinds of people. That's why I say he's a, he's a, the perfect representation. It's not just him,
00:25:13.120
our entire government is run by, by these kinds of people. Um, and so it's not, it's no surprise
00:25:22.400
that this is how he's answering the question and he's answering the question by not answering it
00:25:27.320
because the question he was asked was very simple. Uh, this illegal alien killer had already been
00:25:34.480
arrested for committing multiple crimes in this country in multiple jurisdictions. And the question
00:25:40.560
was, uh, before he murdered Lake and Riley. And the question was whether the federal government
00:25:46.160
had been notified about this. It's actually very, it's like a yes or no question. Either they were
00:25:52.320
or they weren't. Did they know that he was in the country? Did they know he was committing multiple
00:25:57.640
crimes? Uh, did they, were they aware of him, but decided not to deport him for some reason? That
00:26:02.160
was the question, a simple question, good question, but he doesn't answer it. And, and even
00:26:07.880
you, you notice how he talks about the murder. He says that it's a tragedy. Um, but, but he can't
00:26:16.160
even bring himself to say Lake and Riley's name. He says his heart goes out to the family. He doesn't
00:26:22.920
say Lake Riley's family. He doesn't say the Riley family. He just says, uh, my heart goes out to the
00:26:28.080
family. And I think some people have speculated it's because he doesn't want to say her name. He
00:26:33.720
doesn't want to acknowledge her existence to that extent. And that could easily be the case. I also
00:26:38.740
think it's, it might be true that he doesn't even remember. Like he doesn't care. Like in that moment,
00:26:43.040
he didn't even remember the person's name because it doesn't matter to him. He doesn't care. Um,
00:26:49.120
and then he says that the murder is only the fault of the murderer. And that's not true.
00:26:56.600
Now the murderer is 100% to blame for what they've done. So they get 100%. They get all of
00:27:06.260
the blame that they could possibly hold, which is a hundred percent of it. Um, but the great thing
00:27:12.420
about blame is that you don't have to stop at a hundred percent. Actually, you can keep going
00:27:17.180
because the murderer can be a hundred percent responsible for his own actions. While at the
00:27:22.660
same time, we can acknowledge that other entities, other individuals were also to blame because there
00:27:30.180
were other individuals that if they had done their job, this never would have happened. So they are
00:27:35.340
also 100% to blame. Uh, Alejandro Mayorkas himself is to blame. He's a hundred percent to blame.
00:27:44.920
100%. He may as well have murdered her himself. That's how much of the blame he has, because if
00:27:52.760
you do your job, this doesn't happen. You decide not to do your job, knowing this sort of thing will
00:27:56.920
happen and it happens. So you're to blame, you know, in a different, in a different country,
00:28:02.560
in a different universe, we, he'd be on trial right now. We would start trying these people for murder
00:28:07.180
for, for mass murder. When you've got government officials who obviously are aware that there are
00:28:15.540
a violent, illegal criminals that are coming into the country and they choose not to deport these
00:28:20.600
people, then really they should be held legally responsible for everything that happens after.
00:28:26.500
So they should be charged with whatever it is, charge a thousand counts of murder, whatever,
00:28:32.180
you know, it's just, just, just add it up. And that's what they should be charged with.
00:28:37.180
But again, he still hasn't answered the question. So will he answer it? Let's,
00:28:42.880
let's keep listening and find out. Are you saying there that the federal government had been informed
00:28:48.280
about this individual and the alleged crimes he had committed in those states? Because he could
00:28:53.800
have been deported if that was the case. Was there a breakdown in the system? So, Margaret,
00:28:59.260
there are a number of cities around the country that have varying degrees of cooperation with the
00:29:08.380
immigration authorities. We firmly believe that if- And New York did not?
00:29:12.900
We firmly believe that if a city is aware of an individual who poses a threat to public safety,
00:29:20.260
then we would request that they provide us with that information so that we can ensure that that
00:29:26.300
individual is detained if the facts so warrant. And it sounds like they were not coordinating.
00:29:32.420
Well, different cities have different levels of cooperation. We were not notified in this instance.
00:29:40.660
Well, Margaret, so you see, Margaret, there are different situations and occurrences and
00:29:46.220
different things happen and different happenstances that, that, that, that, that happen. And well,
00:29:54.940
Margaret, he finally gets around to saying at the end, after, after two minutes of ducking and
00:30:01.940
dodging, he finally gets around to claiming that the federal government was not notified about this
00:30:07.560
guy. But we know that's not true because if it was true, you would state that from the beginning.
00:30:12.060
Like if the federal government was never told that this guy was in the country,
00:30:15.400
if he's committing multiple crimes and it was never reported, that never went up the chain,
00:30:20.140
then the very first thing you would do is say, no, we were, we were not told. And if we were told,
00:30:25.100
he would have been out of here. Now that wouldn't be true, but at least there's no way of disproving
00:30:29.220
it. Like it's, it's, you know, you're talking about a hypothetical. So that's what you would say.
00:30:35.040
But it takes him two minutes because it's not the case because we, we can, we can know for a fact,
00:30:41.060
based on his response, the federal government was aware and, uh, and they decided not to do anything.
00:30:47.800
And that's how incompetent again, this douchebag is that he tries to evade the question
00:30:54.460
instead of just outright lying. Cause he could have done that too. He could have just said,
00:30:58.800
no, from the very beginning, you could have, you could have lied. Uh, but he tries to evade the
00:31:02.580
question because maybe he doesn't want to outright lie, not because he has any ethical qualm,
00:31:07.480
but just because it's safer to not outright lie. Uh, and he evades, but then he ends up just
00:31:12.660
telling the lie anyway, after two minutes, after doing so much equivocating, that's obvious that
00:31:16.880
he's lying. Um, and we ultimately end up with the truth, which is that again, of course they knew
00:31:26.260
and of course they don't care. Um, and you know, when we talk about the great replacement,
00:31:37.480
this is part of the, of the replacement. You know, we, now often we talk about that in terms
00:31:43.960
of voters where they're, as we know, they're importing all of these third world voters and
00:31:51.820
then giving them, you know, putting them on the, the, the, the taxpayer dole and using that to,
00:31:57.180
you know, as essentially buying their votes. Um, and that's, and they're trying to drown out the votes
00:32:04.040
of actual American citizens of those poor whites or those rural whites that they're so afraid of,
00:32:10.820
the threat to democracy. Well, what do you do about that? When you've got, when you've got
00:32:14.440
millions of Americans who are just living their lives and have committed the crime of living out
00:32:19.780
in the country, like they've committed the crime of not living in a city and being white,
00:32:23.500
which automatically makes them an enemy. And, and, and now the, the, the elites are coming out and
00:32:29.200
just saying that directly, but what do you do about them? How do you stop them? Uh, can you just
00:32:34.640
round them up and send them to a camp somewhere? I'm sure they'd like to, these people would like
00:32:38.500
to do that, but they're not at a point yet where they can quite do that. So what do you do? Well,
00:32:42.640
you drown out their votes with all of these third world immigrants that when we talk about the
00:32:49.240
replacement, that is often what we mean, replacing the votes, but there's also this very, uh, there's
00:32:59.860
a much more violence and sort of physical replacement that's happening. And this is obviously far from the
00:33:06.380
first case of it. When you have the dregs of humanity who are allowed into this country
00:33:13.120
and then prove themselves to be the dregs of humanity by how they conduct themselves. And
00:33:17.260
they're allowed to stay here. And eventually they victimize some American citizen, someone who's like
00:33:23.920
just a normal, you know, a productive member of society, law abiding, and they kill them. So what
00:33:30.920
we've done is we've swapped. And when I say we, I don't mean we, I mean, they, people like my
00:33:36.360
there's been a swap. That's like, it's like, okay, uh, rather than Lake and Riley, we're going
00:33:41.480
to have this guy. What's his name again? Uh, Jose Antonio Ibarra. There's a swap. We swapped,
00:33:47.820
uh, Lake and Riley for Jose Antonio Ibarra because she's dead now. And now we have him.
00:33:56.860
Um, that, that is very much a part of the replacement that's happening. All right, let's move to this.
00:34:04.380
If you thought the, um, my Orcas story was the most disgusting and disturbing site you would
00:34:08.940
have to see on the show today. I have bad news for you because, um, here's a report from
00:34:14.400
Fox 25 in Oklahoma that I hope you're not eating right now, but if you are fair warning, uh,
00:34:24.500
This is an event at Deer Creek High School. Fox 25's David Chasanoff has reaction from the
00:34:30.840
district and its parents tonight. David, what are you hearing?
00:34:36.020
Adam Owende, a parent whose child attended the event, calls it deeply disturbing. And we do want
00:34:41.200
to warn you, the video you're about to see may be graphic to some viewers.
00:34:44.940
This video shows Deer Creek High School students licking toes at a fundraising event Thursday.
00:34:55.740
We have blurred their faces to hide their identity.
00:34:58.460
It was surprising. I didn't think we were going to do all that. I was just shocked. I didn't
00:35:05.380
really have, like, a feeling. I was, like, kind of disgusted, building my, kind of glad I wasn't over
00:35:13.880
Whatever she told me yesterday that was happening, I had to ask her, like, wait, what?
00:35:20.540
They're licking peanut butter off their toes. What?
00:35:22.980
The Deer Creek School District confirmed the video with Fox 25, saying the students
00:35:27.900
volunteered in challenges to help raise money during their philanthropy week.
00:35:31.940
I am all for fundraising and all for really fun and silly things, but that right there just
00:35:43.700
Deer Creek Schools says every student who participated signed up for the games they played ahead of time
00:35:49.100
and that no faculty or staff were involved during the assembly.
00:35:52.980
They note that the fundraising week helped raise more than $152,000.
00:35:57.860
It's really great that they raised a lot of money. I feel like maybe they could have done a little
00:36:02.500
bit more accountability and ownership in that statement for, hey, you know, maybe we didn't
00:36:09.780
So just to review here, this school, Deer Creek High School, decided to have a fundraising event,
00:36:16.740
and so far, so far, so good fundraising event. Nothing wrong with that. When I was a kid, we did
00:36:25.780
fundraisers all the time in school. You know, we sold candy bars, we did walk-a-thons, we had bake
00:36:32.660
sales, we did car washes, that sort of thing. Where it all goes off the rails is that they decided for
00:36:38.340
their fundraising activity that they were going to have students lick, apparently lick peanut butter
00:36:44.660
off of each other's feet in front of an entire gymnasium. And it's one of those, it's hard,
00:36:56.100
it's really, if you're a normal person, you can't wrap your mind around it exactly because
00:37:00.820
this was an idea that someone at the school had and proposed, right? And then it was organized.
00:37:11.540
It's like multiple people are involved here. I don't know how many, but the involvement,
00:37:16.580
it goes beyond just one person. And they're organizing this. And at no point before or during
00:37:23.620
did anybody stop and say, um, you know, I don't know if we should do the toe licking thing. I don't
00:37:31.300
know if that, maybe we shouldn't. That might, that might be a hard, it might actually, that might make
00:37:36.100
us look like sicko pedophiles with foot fetishes if we do that. So maybe we shouldn't. Nobody said
00:37:42.020
that apparently. And they just charged right ahead. And then, um, when the video of this event goes viral,
00:37:48.900
as it was destined to, the school district doesn't apologize. They don't accept
00:37:53.460
any responsibility at all. Don't hold themselves accountable. They don't even admit that it was
00:37:58.980
probably a bad idea. So that's what you have to understand. The school district is standing behind
00:38:03.700
this. They're standing behind the toe sucking video. They, they will not acknowledge even in
00:38:11.460
hindsight, they won't acknowledge that there was anything wrong with it. Uh, this is from,
00:38:15.220
so they read a little bit of the statement, but it's just, it's so incredible that let me read the
00:38:20.980
statement to you. This afternoon, Deer Creek High School announced a grand total of $152,830
00:38:26.500
raised for Not Your Average Joe Coffee, an organization created to inspire our community
00:38:30.980
by including students and adults with intellectual, developmental, and physical disabilities,
00:38:35.460
according to their website. This total was raised through a week of events and activities at both
00:38:39.260
Deer Creek High School and Deer Creek Middle School, all designed to bring our community together
00:38:42.740
for an extremely impactful organization. On Thursday, January, or February 29th, Deer Creek High School
00:38:48.660
hosted an assembly called the Clash of Classes for students who paid to attend. During this assembly,
00:38:54.020
ninth through twelfth grade students volunteered to participate in various student organized class
00:38:58.500
competitions in the spirit of raising money for NYAJ. All participants in the assembly were students who
00:39:05.700
signed up for the game that they played ahead of time. No Deer Creek faculty or staff participated in any
00:39:10.900
of the games during this Clash of Classes assembly. Many dedicated students gave generously of their personal
00:39:16.020
time to achieve this momentous accomplishment, which will serve communities beyond the boundaries of
00:39:21.780
Deer Creek. That's it. There's no apology there. Nothing. They are not convinced yet that the foot fetish
00:39:32.980
festival was a miscalculation. In fact, they defend it on the basis that it raised a lot of money.
00:39:38.980
This momentous accomplishment of, uh, of licking peanut butter off of toes was, uh, is a great,
00:39:45.360
it was a great achievement. And they also say, you know, they also defended by saying that the
00:39:50.240
students weren't, were not, they volunteered for it. So they were not held at gunpoint. Okay. Well,
00:39:55.060
that's good news, I guess. And, and they, they have to stipulate that, uh, there were no teachers
00:39:59.440
involved. So it was not teachers having their, uh, toes sucked by students. This was a student. These
00:40:04.740
were all students. And if that makes this any better, it makes it better by about an inch.
00:40:11.620
However, we're still approximately 95 billion miles away from anything that could be considered
00:40:17.640
appropriate or, or worthwhile, uh, for a school activity. Um, and you know, most people will hear
00:40:25.280
about this story and they'll immediately start projectile vomiting, which is the right reaction.
00:40:30.420
Fortunately, I got this out of my system. I saw this story earlier in the morning, so I got it in my
00:40:34.180
system already. Uh, and the next thing most normal people will do is focus on the, the sort of
00:40:39.120
degenerate perverse nature of this, uh, of this activity. And again, that's, that's the right
00:40:46.420
thing to focus on. Our schools are infested with perverts. We have to face that. I've been warning
00:40:51.060
you about that for many years. Schools have become hotbeds for sexual deviance. Uh, that was the case
00:40:56.360
all the way back in 2004 when the department of education released their report, commissioned their
00:41:01.340
own report and in their own report. They found that at that time in 2004, 20 years ago, five million
00:41:09.620
students, uh, in the school system at that time had been the victims of, uh, of, of sexual abuse or
00:41:16.200
sexual harassment by an educator. Five million, according to the department of education, 20 years ago.
00:41:24.980
Now, do we think it's gotten any better since then? No, we know that it hasn't. If anything, of course,
00:41:32.660
it's gotten worse. Uh, but even still, we don't, we don't, we don't talk about that. Nobody, we just,
00:41:38.020
we don't talk about it. It's, it's not an issue that anyone, uh, seems to care that much about, but
00:41:42.600
that is the case. So, so all that's a major problem. When you see stuff like this and you think like,
00:41:47.680
this is, uh, you, what kind of perverts were behind this? And you assume that there's some
00:41:52.780
sort of perversion. Well, of course you, that's, that's a very safe assumption given the nature of
00:41:57.780
what, of, of the event, but also the fact that we know there are perverts all over the school system.
00:42:04.380
But it's also worth thinking about just the total lack of judgment on display here. I mean,
00:42:09.620
even if we can somehow move past again, the perversion and degeneracy on display, uh, which we can't,
00:42:15.140
but, but if we do just for a moment, we can marvel at how none of the adults in charge at the school
00:42:20.840
have any common sense or, or any ability to exercise basic judgment.
00:42:27.380
Because look, do I think that the entire staff of this school are a bunch of pervert foot fetishists?
00:42:33.660
Probably not. I mean, it's just like statistically that seems unlikely. Um, it seems like some of them
00:42:40.500
are, but probably not all. So, so that means that most likely there were staff members
00:42:45.800
who don't get any sick thrill out of this and yet knew about it and, uh, and, and said nothing.
00:42:56.300
And even the parents, you know, I'm watching that video and I'm thinking,
00:42:59.040
you got these interviews with the parents at, and the parents are speaking anonymously
00:43:06.160
and we're changing their voices like they're informants on the mob. Like, like, like they're
00:43:12.560
coming out and giving us secrets about how the mob works because you're a parent. Why are you afraid
00:43:19.820
to like, you're afraid to put your name behind it? As a parent, you're afraid to stand up and say,
00:43:25.460
yeah, I'm a parent of the school. I think that's the most disgusting thing I've ever seen.
00:43:29.040
Every adult involved should be fired. Yes. Here's my face and my name. I'm not,
00:43:34.360
I'm not embarrassed to say that. So even the parents who are speaking out are afraid to do
00:43:39.300
it publicly. You're afraid to publicly say that you're opposed to events where the students lick
00:43:45.100
each other's feet. You, you won't even say that publicly. That's how afraid you are.
00:43:54.140
Well, that's one of the ways that these schools, that the school system has become just a disaster
00:43:58.400
is that, uh, this is, this is symptomatic of, uh, of, you know, the general problem, which is that
00:44:05.120
not only do you have a total lack of judgment among the adults running these schools, not only do you
00:44:09.960
have a lot of sex, sexual perverts in the schools, but, but then also, and again, this is not, this is
00:44:15.140
not the case with all, you know, this is not a, this is not a universal statement, but it is a general
00:44:18.360
statement that, you know, generally parents are not nearly as involved as they should be. And they don't
00:44:26.080
care nearly as much as they should when things like this happen. Um, and, and so often they're
00:44:34.360
afraid, you know, they're like at every school, when anytime you have something like this, that
00:44:37.800
happens, um, you have some parents who will speak out forcefully vocally. They're not afraid
00:44:45.920
and they're going to speak up. It's just like, you know, anytime there's a, there's a boy, you know,
00:44:51.620
racing against the girls or whatever, you know, volleyball, whatever the event is swimming.
00:44:56.080
You have some, have a few parents who will speak up and they're going to, but, but then, uh, as
00:45:01.540
always, it's like the majority of parents either say nothing or if they say anything, it's like
00:45:06.500
anonymously, they're whispering. They don't want to come out and say it publicly. And to have that
00:45:13.140
kind of cowardice on this is like mind boggling. How is it that they could do that report and they
00:45:20.320
couldn't find a single parent who was willing to say publicly that they oppose it? It's, uh,
00:45:28.800
again, uh, mind boggling is only a word that comes to mind. All right.
00:45:34.980
Well, I mentioned this quickly from the daily mail taxpayer funded guaranteed income programs that
00:45:39.880
hand struggling families up to $36,000 with no strings attached are being rolled out across the
00:45:44.800
country. According to the daily mail, the schemes whose total value exceeds $125 million have emerged
00:45:51.140
in popularity since the, uh, have surged in popularity rather since the pandemic has progressive
00:45:54.840
leaders embrace cash handouts to support Americans below the poverty line. But the radical projects
00:46:00.020
have been criticized after it emerged that one mother of three in Washington DC spent more than half of
00:46:05.140
a $10,000, uh, $10,800 lump sum payment on a luxury holiday to Miami, along with a new wardrobe for
00:46:12.140
her children and a glow up for herself. Kenecia Miller, 27, spent $6,000 on the vacation for herself,
00:46:20.340
her partner, and their three children, purchased 15 new outfits for the children, and spent $180 on a
00:46:25.400
haircut. She was given the money through the first project in the country to offer money as a lump sum
00:46:30.980
rather than monthly payments. Similar programs in cities from Los Angeles to New York offer payments
00:46:35.840
of up to $1,000 per month for three years with no conditions on how the cash is spent.
00:46:42.140
Um, ongoing projects will deliver more than $125 million to nearly 10,000 Americans nationwide
00:46:47.460
across more than 30 programs. Um, and again, these are all, so we know that there are plenty of
00:46:54.280
welfare programs out there, but these are no strings attached cash payments where we're just given the
00:47:02.220
cash and saying, do whatever you want with it. And obviously it's a terrible idea. Um, well,
00:47:07.660
it's terrible if your goal is to actually lift people out of poverty and to make the country a
00:47:13.060
better and more prosperous place and so on. If that's your goal, then this is the worst possible
00:47:17.460
thing you could do in pursuit of that goal. But if your goal is to demoralize the population and make
00:47:22.560
people even more helpless and dependent and vulnerable and utterly incapable of caring for
00:47:27.020
themselves than they already are, then, uh, this is a fantastic way of, of achieving that objective.
00:47:32.600
Uh, and as we know, for, for the politicians who come up with these schemes, their goal is very much
00:47:37.900
the latter. And, and there, there are two basic reasons why this sort of ideas is terrible. Um,
00:47:44.380
terrible again, if you care about the future of the country and you want to make people's lives
00:47:48.460
better. The first is that obviously giving someone a $10,000 check with no strings attached is only
00:47:56.660
going to help them in the longterm. If they have a lot of discipline and if they budget smartly and
00:48:03.300
if they save or invest a large portion of the check while using the rest on essential items that they
00:48:09.040
need for themselves or their children. So, you know, something like this could be a big help to
00:48:14.320
somebody. If, uh, if, if they take it and they go, okay, well, um, so I'm going to, I got eight,
00:48:20.560
I got $10,000 lump sum from the taxpayers. Thank you very much. I'm going to take $8,000 and I'm going
00:48:29.060
to, I'm going to save it right away. I'm going to put that away. I'm going to save it. And, um,
00:48:34.500
and then I'm going to use a thousand dollars and I'm going to buy a whole bunch of non-perishable
00:48:38.720
food items. Okay. So I'll, I'll build like a stockpile of, of food. So we have,
00:48:43.700
so we have extra food. Uh, and then, and then I'm going to take the rest and I'm going to pay
00:48:48.480
off some overdue bills, uh, maybe credit card debt, whatever. I'm going to try to get myself
00:48:53.360
out of, uh, whatever hole I'm in right now. So let's say people do something like that. Well,
00:49:00.260
if that's how it's spent, then in that individual case, we could say that the money has really helped
00:49:05.600
that person. And they're now in a better long-term spot today than they were before the money was
00:49:10.600
given to them. The problem is that not everyone is going to use the money that way. Uh, in fact,
00:49:15.380
it's highly unlikely that even a majority will use it that way. Um, and I find it hard to believe
00:49:21.720
that, that a significant minority will use it that way. Like if you give $10,000 to 10,000 of the
00:49:31.340
lowest earning people in any given area, I would be shocked if even a thousand of them, uh, were to use
00:49:39.520
the money that way in a way that's like planning for the future in a way where we're not just blowing
00:49:45.820
it all right off the, right off the bat. You know, I'd be shocked if a thousand did. And by the way,
00:49:51.740
this has nothing to do with the fact that they're poor. If you gave $10,000 in quote free money to
00:49:57.700
10,000 people, regardless of their income level, if you just choose totally at random. And so you've
00:50:02.240
got poor people and rich people and people in between, and you, and you just give them all $10,000.
00:50:06.420
Say, here you go. You still are going to get only a very small minority who use the money in a smart
00:50:13.660
way, according to a wise long-term plan. And why is that? Well, because human nature is what it is.
00:50:19.440
And we also happen to live in a consumerist culture where people are wired to spend money
00:50:23.060
in this economy. We're also required to spend money more than we want to, but regardless of the state
00:50:27.980
of the economy, we're always looking for ways to spend what we have. And we're surrounded all the
00:50:33.040
time by messaging, you know, it's like everywhere you go, every, everything you look at, it's always
00:50:37.280
by this, by that, by this, by that. So it's constant. And so it takes an extraordinary amount
00:50:42.920
of self-discipline to not basically spend all you, everything you have the moment you get it.
00:50:50.680
And most people don't have that kind of self-discipline because that's just, if self-discipline
00:50:55.500
was like, if self-discipline was in, if we had a surplus of self-discipline in this culture,
00:51:03.100
we would, we'd live in a utopia, but we don't. So the point is we act like, you know, the woman
00:51:10.120
who blows it on a vacation is an outlier or she's abusing the system or whatever, but she's actually
00:51:14.580
not. That's what the system wants her to do. Take it, spend it, keep nothing, save nothing,
00:51:21.280
and, uh, and have a nice couple of weeks and then revert right back to the state of dependency
00:51:27.920
that you were in before the money was given to you. That's exactly what they want. That's how it
00:51:31.520
is designed, which is also, by the way, why they offer a lump sum payment in the first place. I mean,
00:51:37.100
the whole idea is terrible, but if you're going to do it, why would you even have a lump sum option?
00:51:45.300
If somebody wants a lump sum payment, it's clear right away that they just want, they just want to
00:51:49.240
have all the money they want to spend it. And second, aside from how the money is spent,
00:51:53.660
aside from the fact that almost everyone just blows through free money when you give it to them,
00:51:58.900
uh, the greater point is that of course the free money is not free money. It didn't fall out of
00:52:04.140
the sky. It did not appear out of thin air. Uh, it was taken. It was taken from American families
00:52:09.900
and it was given to other people. And that is theft. And I don't care who does it. I don't care what
00:52:16.040
the supposed reason is for it. Um, I wouldn't even care if the politicians who came up with these
00:52:22.540
schemes were really driven by their deep desire to help the less fortunate. They're not,
00:52:27.280
but I wouldn't care if they were because you have no right to take this money.
00:52:31.520
You have no right to take it and give it away like it's wheel of fortune.
00:52:36.380
Okay. There's just a difference between the, the, you know,
00:52:40.800
taking tax money and in theory, using it to build roads and that sort of thing and using it
00:52:47.260
for, for things that everybody in theory could benefit from. Like that's, that's a, that's a
00:52:53.180
legitimate, uh, form of, of, uh, of taxation, but taking money from an individual and just giving it to
00:53:01.920
another individual, um, that will, that so, so you, it's a, it's to, to the detriment of the one
00:53:08.940
individual and the benefit of the other individual doing that is theft. And, uh, I would say every
00:53:16.580
form of that is theft. I don't know how else to look at it. And it's a, it's an indirect form of
00:53:25.080
theft, at least for the person who's benefiting from it. It's, it's indirect. Like they're not just
00:53:31.060
reaching into your pocket. They're going through politicians to do it, but it is theft and it's wrong,
00:53:36.380
uh, every single time. I'm here today because my mother chose life and you're here today because
00:53:41.920
your mother chose life too. The miracle of life is a gift everyone deserves because every life is
00:53:46.200
precious. That's why we've partnered with Preborn's network of clinics. Preborn introduces unborn
00:53:51.200
babies to their mothers through ultrasound. After hearing her baby's heartbeat and seeing her
00:53:55.400
precious baby, she could be twice as likely to choose life through love, compassion, and free
00:54:00.220
ultrasounds. Preborn has rescued over 280,000 unborn babies and every day their clinics rescue 200
00:54:05.860
unborn babies. Now that is a miracle. One ultrasound is just 28 bucks, the cost of a dinner, or you can
00:54:11.680
sponsor five ultrasounds for $140 helping to rescue five unborn babies' lives. Any amount will help. All
00:54:17.880
gifts are tax deductible and a hundred percent of your donation will save babies to donate securely.
00:54:23.220
Dial pound 250 and say the keyword baby. That's pound 250 and say the keyword baby, or go to
00:54:30.140
preborn.com slash matt. That's preborn.com slash matt. One year ago, Hershey's announced that a man would
00:54:38.080
be leading their Women's Day campaign. As everybody rolled their eyes thinking they would have to buy
00:54:42.500
from yet another company that believes men can be women, we had a different idea. In 24 hours, we
00:54:46.940
launched Jeremy's Chocolate because you should be able to buy delicious chocolate from a company that
00:54:51.000
shares your values. And now Jeremy's Chocolate is turning one year old today. To celebrate, make sure you
00:54:56.660
it to get yourself some Jeremy's Chocolate. We have he, him, with nuts, and she, her nutless chocolate
00:55:01.120
bars, also in microaggression size. Get yours at jeremyschocolate.com today. Now let's get to our
00:55:07.320
daily cancellation. Well, we've known for quite some time that trust the science is, at a minimum, very bad
00:55:18.940
advice. Now, to be clear, it would be bad advice at any time, in any era. In fact, any time your trust
00:55:24.200
is demanded, you should be all the more skeptical of the thing you're supposed to be trusting.
00:55:30.020
Trustworthy things never have to tell you to trust them, right? And that goes for people, too. If your
00:55:36.260
girlfriend won't let you look at her phone because, according to her, you should trust her,
00:55:41.400
that's all the confirmation you need that you should not be trusting her, which means you shouldn't be
00:55:45.640
dating her. But this logic applies to institutions as much as it applies to individuals and relationships.
00:55:50.460
The most trustworthy people and institutions are those that are the least defensive in the face of
00:55:57.040
skepticism. Now, granted, science is not a person, nor is it an institution. Science is a process. It's
00:56:04.400
a method used to better understand the physical world. That's exactly the problem. When someone
00:56:08.380
talks about the science, they aren't referring to a method or a process. They're referring to an
00:56:12.440
institution. They're treating science like it's some sort of organization, like it's a thing,
00:56:17.400
like it's an entity. And they're saying that we should trust this entity rather than question it.
00:56:24.700
But science is all about questions. And real scientists, the ones who, you know, you can
00:56:28.960
actually trust, though they would never tell you, they never demand that you trust them.
00:56:33.700
Real scientists, they invite and welcome questions. The problem is that there's a shortage of real
00:56:40.100
scientists, though no shortage of people calling themselves scientists. And that brings us to one of the
00:56:44.640
most depressing, though revealing and emblematic headlines you'll probably read in your lifetime.
00:56:53.620
Sex is binary, say majority of scientists polled. Now, the problem with this headline may not be
00:57:01.400
immediately apparent. And indeed, many conservatives have shared the news, this headline on social media,
00:57:07.700
and they've celebrated it as a win for the cause of sanity and common sense. They say, you know,
00:57:13.200
a majority of scientists have affirmed a basic biological reality, a majority. Hooray, the truth
00:57:18.180
prevails. Another crushing blow for the gender ideologue, supposedly. And maybe it could be, except that the
00:57:24.060
word majority is rather broad. And anything that falls between 51% and 100% is a majority. That's a
00:57:29.940
window of 49 percentage points. So it's a good start. The majority of scientists agreeing with a basic
00:57:36.140
indisputable scientific fact is certainly better than a majority disagreeing with that fact. But
00:57:40.140
now we have to ask, how large is this majority? It should be 100%. Anything less than 100% is
00:57:46.600
troubling. Although, sure, maybe we could accept 99%. Even 98% we could maybe accept. 97% would be the
00:57:54.800
absolute lowest that we could go before we have to start asking serious questions about the scientific
00:57:59.020
field as a whole. And if we're landing under 90%, then we have a problem on our hands. Under 80% is a
00:58:06.420
crisis. Under 70% is unthinkable. Or should be. So how do these numbers actually break down? Well,
00:58:12.680
let's go to the article and find out. Quote, sex is binary, according to the majority of British
00:58:17.440
scientists in a poll. The difference between sex and gender has become an increasingly incendiary topic
00:58:21.700
as activists, scientists, and politicians all debate the terms and the implications they have for
00:58:25.480
policy. But a survey of almost 200 scientists at British universities conducted by The Telegraph and
00:58:30.040
census-wide found 58% of respondents think sex is binary, except in rare cases such as intersex
00:58:37.640
individuals. Oh, dear God. 58%. That is barely a majority. Only 58% of scientists employed in the
00:58:48.240
British university system could bring themselves to acknowledge one of the most rudimentary of all
00:58:53.340
biological facts. I mean, this is really no different. It's no different than 58% of
00:58:58.860
mathematicians agreeing that two plus two equals four. Okay? And if you heard that poll, you wouldn't
00:59:05.360
celebrate and say, well, the majority, a majority got it right. Yes, it's a majority, but we should be
00:59:11.640
looking at something far greater than a mere majority. This should be universal agreement.
00:59:17.000
And even a portion of the 58% in this case are wrong. Some of them seem to think that intersex
00:59:23.720
people are an exception to the idea that sex is binary. They aren't. Intersex people still exist
00:59:28.720
within the sex binary. It's just that their place in the binary can be, in some very rare circumstances,
00:59:33.620
more difficult to determine because of their physical deformities. But they're still in the binary.
00:59:40.280
So only 58% got the answer right, but it turns out that even some of the 58% who got the answer right
00:59:45.580
didn't get the answer right. Let's keep reading. Um, less than a third, 29% agreed with the statement
00:59:53.340
sex is not binary. Well, one in eight people, 13% had no views or preferred not to answer.
01:00:00.740
Now, the only difficulty here is deciding which of these two groups is more depressing and pathetic.
01:00:07.460
On the one hand, we have 29% of alleged scientists who definitively state that sex is not binary.
01:00:12.520
That is, they actively affirm an outlandish scientific falsehood. This is like if 29% of
01:00:19.400
scientists said that when caterpillars go into their cocoons, they turn into hot dogs. Although
01:00:25.720
that example is, of course, far less crazy because there is a greater chance of hot dogs emerging from
01:00:32.960
cocoons than there is that a third human sex will be discovered. But I still somehow find this 29%
01:00:39.680
contingent less pitiful than the 13% who profess to have no view on the subject, or at least no view
01:00:47.280
they're willing to say out loud. Even in spite of the fact that this was, it would appear, an anonymous
01:00:52.900
survey. So it's one thing for a scientist to be a brain dead zombie whose mind has been eaten alive
01:00:59.360
by leftism. That's obviously bad enough. It's another thing for a scientist to still have a functioning
01:01:04.220
brain and yet be too afraid to use it. It's terrible to be insane, especially when you're supposed to be
01:01:11.080
a scientist. It's even worse to be so cowardly that you present yourself as insane when you actually
01:01:17.680
aren't. Now, unsurprisingly, the waters get even more muddied and confused when these alleged scientists
01:01:24.260
are asked about gender as opposed to sex. The Telegraph says, quote, however, almost two thirds of
01:01:29.780
scientists. 64% said gender was fluid, while 22% said gender is binary, and 14% gave no answer.
01:01:37.640
Now, as we know, gender is an amorphous, intentionally ambiguous, fundamentally useless
01:01:42.760
concept. It's fluid only in the sense that all nonsense is fluid. Gibberish can mean pretty much
01:01:48.960
anything because it doesn't mean anything. Human beings have a sex. We don't have a gender. Your sex
01:01:53.620
is male or female, and that's it. Your perception of yourself, your personal sense of style, your way of
01:01:58.160
expressing yourself, your whatever. None of that is relevant. We don't need a separate category of
01:02:03.860
gender to account for any of that. We already have the concept of personality, which covers all of that
01:02:07.660
anyway. And besides, even if we agreed that gender is a meaningful concept and that it's somehow distinct
01:02:15.860
from sex, still, actually, it would only be a binary. A person could say that they feel like a man or
01:02:22.580
they feel like a woman, which is what gender is supposed to be, or they can say that they feel like
01:02:26.780
neither, or they feel like both. Now, as we know, this feels like concept is nonsensical. You can't
01:02:31.920
feel like something that you aren't, because if you aren't that thing, then you have no idea what
01:02:36.500
it feels like to be that thing, and you have no frame of reference. But even if we ignore this
01:02:41.460
glaring logical problem, still, you notice that even in this ambiguous, arbitrary world of gender,
01:02:47.280
you're still stuck with the two basic categories of man and woman. The gender ideologues may have come up
01:02:53.760
with a bunch of other names and labels in order to build out this artifice of 98 genders or whatever
01:02:58.460
we're up to now, but they still haven't come up with, even conceptually, a distinct and coherent
01:03:04.920
third gender. So, as a matter of pure fantasy, as fiction, they can't create a third gender.
01:03:13.900
All they can do is mix and match from the only two that exist, and have ever existed, or will ever exist.
01:03:19.680
Now, do these scientists not understand the points I'm making right now? Are they actually
01:03:25.280
confused? Do they need me to educate them? Or again, are they such pathetic, spineless, weak,
01:03:33.440
little cowards that they're pretending to be ignorant of these basic scientific and logical
01:03:38.580
concepts? I suppose there's no way to know for sure. All we can say, and can know, is that the
01:03:46.820
scientific community has totally discredited itself? The entire field has become a sham.
01:03:54.980
So, trust the science? How can we? These people are lunatics. Or at least, they're acting that way.
01:04:03.920
Which is just as bad, if not worse. And in either case, the scientific community is today
01:04:10.140
canceled. That'll do it for the show today. Thanks for watching. Thanks for listening. Talk to you