The Matt Walsh Show - March 19, 2024


Ep. 1328 - The Children's Entertainment Industry Is Infested With Groomers And Pedophiles


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 7 minutes

Words per minute

181.50418

Word count

12,279

Sentence count

767

Harmful content

Misogyny

33

sentences flagged

Toxicity

72

sentences flagged

Hate speech

34

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

A new documentary exposes the behind-the-scenes grooming, exploitation, and abuse that was rampant at Nickelodeon during its heyday. Also, Justice Kandaji Brown-Jackson worries that the First Amendment may be hamstringing the government. A new study finds that woke people tend to be anxious and miserable, no surprise there. And, in our daily cancellation, the campaign to de-stigmatize cannibalism is finally underway. We ll talk about all that and more today on The Matt Wall Show.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Today on the Matt Wall Show, a new documentary exposes the behind-the-scenes grooming, exploitation, and abuse that was rampant at Nickelodeon during its heyday.
00:00:07.180 Also, Justice Kandaji Brown-Jackson worries that the First Amendment may be hamstringing the government.
00:00:11.620 Of course, that's the whole point of the First Amendment.
00:00:13.400 A new study finds that woke people tend to be anxious and miserable, no surprise there.
00:00:17.320 In our daily cancellation, the campaign to de-stigmatize cannibalism is finally underway.
00:00:22.900 We'll talk about all that and more today on the Matt Wall Show.
00:00:30.000 We'll talk about all that and more today on the Matt Wall Show.
00:01:00.220 And yet, we keep printing money, which pushes the prices you pay every day even higher.
00:01:04.460 So, you can bury your head in the sand, or you could do something about it.
00:01:07.740 Diversify a portion of your savings into gold with Birch Gold Group.
00:01:10.860 Gold is your hedge against inflation, and Birch Gold makes it easy to own.
00:01:14.500 They'll help you convert your existing IRA or 401k into a tax-sheltered IRA in gold.
00:01:18.860 And you won't pay a penny out of pocket.
00:01:20.660 Make gold part of your savings strategy and buy it from Birch Gold.
00:01:24.360 They've been the exclusive gold partner of The Daily Wire for over seven years now, helping thousands of our listeners.
00:01:28.480 And they can help you, too.
00:01:30.360 Text Walsh to 989898 and get your free info kit on gold.
00:01:35.320 Then talk to a precious metal specialist about protecting your savings from inflation with gold.
00:01:40.520 Text Walsh to 989898 now.
00:01:43.420 You can always tell that somebody has real power when they do something that's obviously wrong, maybe even illegal, for a very long time.
00:01:50.340 And yet, they make no effort to hide it whatsoever.
00:01:52.620 In the entertainment industry, Harvey Weinstein is, of course, one of the most prominent examples of that.
00:01:57.120 His behavior was an open secret in Hollywood for three decades to the point that, you know, they were making jokes about it during the Oscars.
00:02:02.820 But nothing was done about it until just a few years ago.
00:02:05.360 And unfortunately, the process of taking down Harvey Weinstein involved a much larger, extraordinarily destructive movement called Me Too, which did far more harm than good.
00:02:14.940 I'm not going to recount all the problems of that particular movement.
00:02:17.500 I've discussed all of that before many times.
00:02:19.960 But one major issue with Me Too is coming to light very plainly right now, which is that the movement conspicuously left pedophiles pretty much unscathed.
00:02:29.540 And you know that because, to this day, you still aren't allowed to talk about the pedophilia that's rampant in elite circles.
00:02:37.740 You know, you can complain about so-called toxic masculinity, quote-unquote, and misogyny all you want.
00:02:43.000 But if you bring up the topic of pedophilia, the left treats you as a QAnon conspiracy theorist.
00:02:49.360 Using words like groomer is prohibited on many social media platforms.
00:02:53.520 How dare you suggest that pedophiles have infested Hollywood, the education system, the media, etc.?
00:02:59.140 You must be crazy. That's hate speech. 1.00
00:03:02.020 But make that claim, despite the fact that the sexualization and mistreatment of children has been on display for decades in mainstream children's entertainment.
00:03:10.300 And now it's getting a lot of new exposure.
00:03:12.760 The first episodes of a new documentary series exposing the inner workings of Nickelodeon,
00:03:17.880 which, of course, is the children's network that most people my age grew up watching in the 90s and early 2000s,
00:03:23.360 called Quiet on the Set, The Dark Side of Kids TV, just premiered.
00:03:27.260 It's worth watching because it's one of the few well-researched, effectively produced looks into how the entertainment industry abuses children.
00:03:34.980 And in a moment, I'll show you some of the new clips from this documentary,
00:03:37.880 the ones that involve behind-the-scenes insights and interviews.
00:03:41.300 But the incredible thing is that Nickelodeon wasn't really hiding what they were doing.
00:03:44.780 Some of the most perverse parts of this documentary are scenes that Nickelodeon aired publicly or uploaded to the Internet many years ago.
00:03:51.880 For example, take a look at these sequences from a show called Victorious, featuring a young Ariana Grande.
00:03:56.880 It's a teen sitcom created by former Nickelodeon bigwig Dan Schneider that premiered more than a decade ago on Nickelodeon.
00:04:05.620 And the videos received a lot of attention when they resurfaced in 2019.
00:04:08.660 But it's important to see them again to understand the new accusations against Schneider,
00:04:13.340 who also created many other hit shows like iCarly.
00:04:17.320 But these are incredibly disturbing.
00:04:19.720 And once again, this is stuff that was put on the air, put on the Internet for the public to see at the time.
00:04:24.660 Let's watch some of this.
00:04:26.880 Have you ever tried to get your whole big toe in your mouth?
00:04:30.100 Check this out.
00:04:36.160 Sometimes I wonder if you can get juice from a potato.
00:04:48.700 Is it possible for a teenage girl to drink water upside down?
00:04:53.480 I'm thirsty.
00:04:54.480 It's not possible.
00:04:55.480 It's not possible.
00:04:56.480 This has been me in a video.
00:05:10.760 Come on, give up the juice.
00:05:17.760 Give up the juice.
00:05:19.980 Okay, so to be clear, these videos were posted online by Nickelodeon, which has a core audience of young children.
00:05:33.580 And apparently they were posted online with little objection from anyone until years later.
00:05:40.040 And they created this content to promote their show on the Internet.
00:05:44.320 And these videos are unambiguously, deliberately intended to be as suggestive as possible.
00:05:50.600 They're well past any pretense of plausible deniability.
00:05:53.760 That's how brazen this operation was.
00:05:58.040 But even after the uproar a few years ago, there still wasn't a whole lot of in-depth reporting about what exactly Dan Schneider was doing in Nickelodeon.
00:06:05.600 One of Grande's co-stars, Jeanette McCurdy, wrote a memoir describing her abuse in Nickelodeon.
00:06:11.720 But generally speaking, Schneider himself escaped in-depth scrutiny.
00:06:15.500 And that was a big oversight because anyone who's willing to produce this kind of content for young children is obviously someone who needs to be investigated very thoroughly.
00:06:23.800 Firing him should not have been the end of it, but for a while it was.
00:06:27.620 Now, though, we have a better idea of what was going on.
00:06:31.080 And one of the sequences that Quiet on the Set has highlighted is this behind-the-scenes footage from 2002,
00:06:37.100 in which Schneider sits in a jacuzzi with Amanda Bynes, who was 16 years old at the time.
00:06:42.280 In the footage, Schneider is fully clothed while Bynes is in a bathing suit.
00:06:47.320 Let's watch a bit of this.
00:06:53.400 I'm the executive producer of the American show, Dan Schneider.
00:06:56.020 Hi.
00:06:56.940 I'm the executive producer of the show.
00:06:59.320 Yes, I'm the executive producer and the head writer.
00:07:02.200 We actually wrote the words for saying to each other right now.
00:07:05.180 Yeah, yes.
00:07:06.760 Actually, I wrote this whole conversation that we're having right now.
00:07:10.540 Since then, you're the executive producer.
00:07:12.280 Give me an IC.
00:07:14.020 Have you ever an IC before since then, the executive producer?
00:07:16.540 I see.
00:07:17.800 Now since then, you're kissing.
00:07:18.680 Now since then, you're kissing, now since then.
00:07:19.580 I see, now since then, you're the executive.
00:07:22.080 Hi, welcome to my jacuzzi.
00:07:25.320 Say my special guest.
00:07:27.600 It continues, and eventually they start eating spaghetti in the jacuzzi for some reason.
00:07:32.660 But this was what Dan Schneider wanted to do.
00:07:35.420 He said to this 16-year-old girl to put on a bathing suit and get in the jacuzzi,
00:07:40.300 and he got in there with her, and they filmed this little whatever it was.
00:07:44.240 As they talk about in the documentary at some length, this is a very twisted kind of power
00:07:48.480 play.
00:07:48.800 There's no legitimate reason for the executive producer of this show to be in a jacuzzi with
00:07:52.460 an underage actress, having her explain to the camera that he controls everything she
00:07:56.120 says.
00:07:56.440 There's certainly no reason for him to eat spaghetti with her, even if he does happen
00:07:59.700 to be morbidly obese.
00:08:01.440 But as you watch the documentary, it becomes clear that this kind of behavior was open and
00:08:04.860 notorious on Nickelodeon sets.
00:08:06.700 There are extensive interviews with cast members and staff of shows like All That and The Amanda
00:08:11.020 Show, which go into extensive details about how pervasive this problem was.
00:08:14.840 At one point in the film, or the documentary series, former Nickelodeon employees describe
00:08:20.380 how Schneider thought it would be funny to have a young actress use the name Taint on air.
00:08:25.280 Watch.
00:08:26.800 Hello, citizens.
00:08:28.380 My name is Penelope Taint.
00:08:30.160 So Penelope Taint is a character that Dan created.
00:08:35.300 My name is Penelope Taint.
00:08:36.740 Yeah, I know.
00:08:37.380 He came up with the name Penelope Taint. 0.99
00:08:39.940 The taint is the part of the body that's between the penis and the anus. 0.99
00:08:43.400 It's that skin there. 1.00
00:08:44.140 That's the taint.
00:08:45.500 And Dan had said to us in the writer's room, don't tell what this word really means.
00:08:50.800 He wanted us to keep that a secret.
00:08:52.480 I remember someone from Nickelodeon sitting with us and saying like, oh, does this mean,
00:08:57.800 you know, this dirty thing?
00:08:59.980 And Dan was like, no.
00:09:01.680 Why would you think that's like tainted like you've tainted something?
00:09:05.240 And they were like, okay.
00:09:06.080 Man, that is power.
00:09:09.960 That is power.
00:09:11.220 That you can just say you want something and it's done.
00:09:15.700 That's what I thought.
00:09:17.560 So it got on the show.
00:09:19.320 And it's one of those things where it's like, oh, you know, like, it's a young girl.
00:09:24.320 Yeah, one of those things.
00:09:27.200 It always amazes me when you see these kinds of documentaries. 0.96
00:09:30.400 It's just the, well, yeah, you have the disgusting pervert who's being exposed and whose behavior 0.94
00:09:35.680 is sort of the story. 0.97
00:09:38.320 But also just the incredible cowardice of everybody around this person is the amount of cowardice
00:09:47.320 that's required to have somebody doing this sort of thing that nobody would speak up and
00:09:51.840 say, you know what?
00:09:52.380 No, we're not going to do that.
00:09:53.240 We're not going to give a young girl actress the name Taint because you want to make some 1.00
00:09:59.380 disgusting perverted joke. 1.00
00:10:01.140 You pervert. 1.00
00:10:02.120 We're not doing it. 0.98
00:10:03.460 Nobody said that.
00:10:04.300 Instead, they're all like, okay, well, if you want to.
00:10:06.300 And then after the fact, they can be in the documentary as like the good guys.
00:10:10.800 Well, he wanted to, and I didn't know what to do. 0.99
00:10:12.900 Speak up, you freaking cowards. 0.99
00:10:15.540 What is he going to do? 1.00
00:10:16.480 Shoot you?
00:10:17.540 What are you afraid is going to happen? 1.00
00:10:20.660 But this is Schneider's MO.
00:10:23.120 If you watch just the first episode of this documentary series, that would become very clear.
00:10:27.360 For example, employees also discuss how he instructed his subordinates to describe themselves 0.95
00:10:30.900 in demeaning terms, including as sluts, for his personal amusement. 0.99
00:10:34.740 Watch. 0.99
00:10:36.300 It was clear that there was a permissibility around these sexualized jokes with children.
00:10:42.740 It was par for the course.
00:10:44.260 Like, strange things amused Dan.
00:10:46.560 And that was just one of the things he thought was funny.
00:10:49.340 He liked to play pranks and jokes, which at first seemed fun.
00:10:54.240 In the beginning, I would see, you know, instant message pop up.
00:10:59.180 Dan would send a message for you to say out loud, scream hammers.
00:11:05.220 And you scream it. 1.00
00:11:07.420 And then it would be, you know, more degrading, like scream, I'm an idiot or slut. 1.00
00:11:13.060 And if you didn't, he would send you the message again, caps, exclamation points. 1.00
00:11:18.760 He would scream out, say it until you did.
00:11:21.120 Once again, my question is, like, why didn't you refuse?
00:11:25.280 Why didn't you say something?
00:11:27.400 You know, that's an interesting, but they don't really explain that part of it.
00:11:32.400 And as the segment goes on, the employees claim that Schneider would often offer money to induce
00:11:36.380 his subordinates to do degrading tasks like gorging themselves on gallons of ice cream,
00:11:40.060 only to refuse payment when they tried to collect.
00:11:43.000 And for his part, not surprisingly, Schneider denies all these accusations.
00:11:46.200 He hasn't been charged or convicted of any crime as of yet.
00:11:49.100 But even so, there's clear evidence that serious child abuse did occur at the company.
00:11:54.960 The documentary covers all of that as well.
00:11:57.300 For example, in later episodes of the documentary, former Nickelodeon star Drake Bell comes forward
00:12:01.780 on camera to say that he was sexually assaulted when he was 15 years old by Brian Peck,
00:12:07.500 also known as Pickle Boy, who worked on the Amanda show, the same show as the jacuzzi scene.
00:12:13.160 Peck was arrested back in 2003 on 11 charges relating to this abuse, including
00:12:16.800 sodomy and committing a lewd act upon a child aged 14 or 15 by a person 10 years older.
00:12:23.800 There was also a charge for oral copulation by anesthesia or controlled substance.
00:12:29.300 Peck pleaded no contest to the charges, was sentenced to only 16 months in prison at the time.
00:12:33.560 I'll say that again. He spent less than two years in prison for child sexual abuse.
00:12:38.920 Bell's name was concealed during the trial, but now many years later, he's come forward to identify himself.
00:12:45.280 And in the second episode of the documentary, Brian Peck is described as doing something similar
00:12:49.820 to what Schneider did, trying to get profane jokes on air at the expense of children.
00:12:55.220 Watch.
00:12:55.400 Pickle Boy was this, like, character that returned again and again and again throughout the seasons of all that.
00:13:06.380 Pickle Boy appeared in every episode, and he's often interacting with a celebrity.
00:13:10.540 Hello? Anyone? I gotta get something to eat!
00:13:17.020 A pickle!
00:13:26.880 We just went with it.
00:13:30.420 Pickles? Look, this is the mind of Dan Schneider. You gotta ask him.
00:13:34.000 There was this referencing to, like, oh, yeah, Dan just has a weird sense of humor. 0.99
00:13:39.360 That was like, the pickles don't look like penises to you? 0.98
00:13:43.380 This is a children's television show. 0.97
00:13:52.940 Wait, why is this in the show? What is the joke here exactly?
00:13:57.940 There's this weird element of, like, they all were able to, like, pull a fast one and get away with it.
00:14:03.400 Um, so, and that's another one where, you know, of course, the kids, this is, these are kids on the show,
00:14:12.060 and they don't know what's going on any more than those of us who were kids watching all that at the time.
00:14:17.380 I can remember I watched every episode of that show, like any kid in the 90s did.
00:14:20.620 I didn't pick up on any of that.
00:14:22.680 And the kids who are on the show also didn't know what was going on.
00:14:25.100 Uh, however, there are a lot of adults running the show, writing the show.
00:14:29.720 They would have known exactly what that was all about.
00:14:32.500 And, uh, and apparently none of them spoke up.
00:14:35.220 So, it's, this is what's required for this sort of thing to go on.
00:14:38.640 It's not just one or two perverts who can, who, who make this all happen.
00:14:43.920 Uh, it's also, it's the perverts along with the, again, the incredible cowardice of all the other adults involved.
00:14:49.280 Now, the final episodes of the documentary aren't available yet, so we don't have the full details of what Peck did.
00:14:53.980 We, um, don't have the interview with his alleged victim yet.
00:14:57.480 But it is suggested in the episode that after Peck was arrested, Nickelodeon higher-ups, not including Schneider himself, apparently,
00:15:03.740 called a meeting with the child actors.
00:15:05.800 They didn't let their parents participate in this meeting.
00:15:08.000 They had the children alone and told them that Peck wasn't going to be around anymore.
00:15:12.380 They, they asked if anyone had anything to say, almost as if they wanted to get the jump on any misconduct allegations.
00:15:18.640 And there was reason for those executives to be worried, because Peck wasn't the only sexual abuser at Nickelodeon during this period.
00:15:25.440 The documentary also goes into some detail about the disturbing case of Jason Handy,
00:15:29.660 who worked as a production assistant on both The Amanda Show and all that.
00:15:34.100 Handy allegedly sent a picture of himself masturbating to an 11-year-old girl he was working with,
00:15:38.180 who was working on The Amanda Show at the time.
00:15:40.780 Handy, like Peck, was arrested in 2003.
00:15:43.900 Watch.
00:15:44.180 Law enforcement had been tipped off about Jason Handy's inappropriate behavior towards children.
00:15:50.960 So in 2003, they searched his home.
00:15:54.180 They find this enormous trove of child pornography.
00:15:58.140 Over 10,000 images of children, including 1,768 images of young girls in erotic poses,
00:16:07.820 238 images of young girls in sexually explicit poses,
00:16:12.040 and two images of girls engaged in bondage activity.
00:16:16.000 One of the CDs included seven video files of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct.
00:16:20.620 One of the most disturbing things that law enforcement found when they searched Jason Handy's home was Handy's own journals,
00:16:27.120 where he spells out how he feels about these young children.
00:16:33.100 Quote, 0.81
00:16:33.620 I am a pedophile full-blown.
00:16:36.800 I really have been giving in to my desire for little girls these past few weeks, 0.99
00:16:41.540 and I even struggle on a day-to-day basis of how I can find a victim to rape if I have to.
00:16:47.980 Now, these are accusations that are far more serious than what Dan Schneider is even accused of,
00:16:55.680 but they're part of the same general pattern of behavior that involves demeaning and sexualizing and abusing children.
00:17:01.020 This is what was going on internally at the most popular children's channel on the planet.
00:17:05.500 And it's still an extremely popular network,
00:17:08.120 although its popularity has declined precipitously in the intervening years.
00:17:13.240 But that leaves reasonable people to wonder whether sexual perverts are still trying to pollute the minds of children over at Nickelodeon.
00:17:20.040 Previously, I've covered Nickelodeon's Paw Patrol spinoff,
00:17:22.440 which recently hired a radical leftist writer who likes to teach children about abortions, among other things.
00:17:28.020 And maybe in 20 years, we'll learn the inside story as to why exactly that woman was hired.
00:17:32.260 But really, we don't need to wait that long.
00:17:34.580 Simply put, there's no way a man like Dan Schneider could operate so openly for so long
00:17:38.520 if he wasn't part of a much larger systemic problem as we've been discussing.
00:17:42.160 This is a problem that can't be solved by arresting a couple of production assistants and firing Dan Schneider,
00:17:48.200 although that's a good place to start.
00:17:50.440 The only way to really solve it is to do what the parents of these child actors should have done a long time ago,
00:17:55.860 which is to keep your children as far away from corporate children's programming as possible.
00:18:02.380 Now let's get to our five headlines.
00:18:04.020 Well, as you know, Easter is just around the corner.
00:18:11.900 Instead of filling your child's Easter baskets with candy, consider Lux Blocks.
00:18:16.820 My kids love all the different options Lux Blocks offers.
00:18:20.360 They have spaceships, American flags, dinosaur cars, and anything else your kids can dream up to create.
00:18:25.260 And you can also just create fun little stretchy things like this.
00:18:28.080 In fact, I have, and this is really true, I'm not just saying this for the commercial,
00:18:31.220 but I've spent hours playing with these toys with my kids, and I quite enjoy them as well.
00:18:36.420 And oftentimes, especially my four-year-old will ask me to create something very elaborate,
00:18:41.300 and I'll spend like 45 minutes making it, and I'll hand it to her, and she'll say,
00:18:44.400 cool, and then she'll immediately tear it apart, which is heartbreaking every single time.
00:18:48.720 But it's not just their innovative designs, but the story of their creators, Heather and Mike, that's so important.
00:18:53.560 They've invested their savings into this venture, and their vision for a better future.
00:18:57.340 Lux Blocks is made right here in America.
00:19:00.080 They wanted to create something that positively empowered kids to think, create, and dream big.
00:19:04.640 So, whether you're looking for a gift for a child who loves to build,
00:19:08.360 or just a unique addition to your family game night, Lux Blocks is a perfect choice.
00:19:13.260 Check them out at luxblocks.com and use promo code MATT25 for 25% off.
00:19:17.780 That's luxblocks.com. Use promo code MATT25 for 25% off.
00:19:22.220 Okay, NPR has this.
00:19:24.320 In a major case testing the role of First Amendment in the Internet age,
00:19:27.560 the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday hears arguments focused on the federal government's ability to combat
00:19:31.780 what it sees as false, misleading, or dangerous information online.
00:19:35.980 Last September, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals,
00:19:38.940 the most conservative federal appeals court in the U.S.,
00:19:41.020 issued a broad ruling that barred key government officials from contacts with social media companies.
00:19:46.140 Among the personnel targeted in the order were officials of the White House,
00:19:49.280 the Centers for Disease Control Prevention, the Office of the Surgeon General,
00:19:51.980 the FBI, and an important cyber security agency.
00:19:55.580 The appeals court said that individuals at those agencies likely violated the First Amendment
00:19:59.180 by seeking to coerce social media platforms into moderating or changing their content about COVID-19,
00:20:04.920 foreign interference in elections, and even Hunter Biden's laptop.
00:20:08.000 The Supreme Court has put that ruling on hold while it examines the tricky issues in the case.
00:20:12.560 The plaintiffs in the lawsuit are two states, Missouri and Louisiana,
00:20:15.060 and five individuals, including vaccine opponents,
00:20:17.700 who either were banned from some Internet platforms at the height of COVID-19,
00:20:22.320 or whose posts, they say, were not prominently featured on social media sites,
00:20:26.480 such as Facebook, YouTube, and X, formerly known as Twitter.
00:20:29.820 Not prominently featured, otherwise known as, you know,
00:20:32.900 the algorithm was suppressing.
00:20:36.260 These content was being suppressed by the algorithms.
00:20:39.020 The Biden administration notes that under established First Amendment precedent,
00:20:41.560 the government itself is entitled to express its views and to try to persuade others.
00:20:45.340 As the government says in its brief,
00:20:47.580 quote, essential dimension of presidential power is the use of the office bully pulpit 0.70
00:20:50.880 to seek to persuade Americans and American companies to act in a way
00:20:54.580 that would advance the public interest.
00:20:57.840 Now, first of all, despite what the Biden administration is claiming,
00:21:00.700 you know, nobody is saying that the government itself can't try to persuade people of its own position.
00:21:05.120 So if they want to put out a PSA or whatever about the dangers of, quote, unquote, misinformation,
00:21:11.500 they can do that.
00:21:12.980 No one is saying they can't.
00:21:14.220 I haven't heard anyone say that.
00:21:15.160 But the thing about a PSA or an argument presented in any other form
00:21:19.100 is that we are free to disagree with it or ignore it entirely,
00:21:24.060 which is why the Biden administration is not satisfied to express its view
00:21:28.140 and try to persuade others.
00:21:29.440 That's not what this is about at all.
00:21:31.400 Again, if that's all they wanted to do,
00:21:32.600 then this would not be an issue and it wouldn't be at the Supreme Court
00:21:35.040 because no one is no one is like suggesting that that President Biden can't come out and say,
00:21:40.960 you know, here's what I think misinformation is and I'm opposed to it and you shouldn't share it.
00:21:45.860 He can say that if he wants to say it.
00:21:47.640 And again, we are we are perfectly free to just ignore it.
00:21:52.200 What are you saying completely, which is what I would do.
00:21:55.420 But instead, of course, the Biden administration wants to use social media platforms
00:21:58.820 as censorship proxies to shut down the speech that they don't like
00:22:03.260 and ban and de-platform the purveyors of what they claim is, quote unquote, misinformation.
00:22:10.960 And that's the problem.
00:22:12.360 You know, their way of persuading the public is by ensuring that the public only hears their side of the story.
00:22:17.880 That's the persuasion technique that they want to use,
00:22:20.940 which is a blatant violation of the First Amendment.
00:22:22.780 And that's the entire issue.
00:22:25.580 And it all centers around this idea of misinformation,
00:22:27.720 which is just not something that the government should be in the business of combating,
00:22:32.560 at least beyond issuing PSAs if they want to and and trying to persuade people.
00:22:41.260 If it's simply making arguments, that's one thing.
00:22:44.120 But beyond that, it has no role because information in this context
00:22:48.300 is simply the substance of what is conveyed through methods of communication.
00:22:55.620 All of the stuff online is information.
00:22:58.280 And there's billions of bits of information flying every which way at the speed of light every second.
00:23:03.860 And some of the information reflects reality.
00:23:05.940 Some of the information reflects what someone wishes was the reality.
00:23:09.140 Some of the information is good.
00:23:10.480 Some of it is bad.
00:23:11.340 Some of it is useless. 0.78
00:23:12.400 Much of it is useless.
00:23:13.600 Much of it is distracting.
00:23:14.720 Much of it is unimportant.
00:23:15.720 And this is the age we live in.
00:23:19.600 And it's almost certainly a net negative in the grand scheme of things.
00:23:23.760 All of this information, it's too much.
00:23:26.420 You know, we're exposed to far too much of it.
00:23:28.180 We can't process most of it.
00:23:31.840 And most people lack the discernment to effectively distinguish
00:23:34.980 between what is real and what is fantasy
00:23:37.060 and what is important and what isn't and so on and so on.
00:23:41.280 So, yeah, it's a, I think, a net negative.
00:23:44.020 It'd be better if, you know, we were not all surrounded by all this information all the time.
00:23:48.640 But this is the reality of the world we live in.
00:23:51.020 And even if it has its pitfalls, massive, gaping pitfalls,
00:23:55.680 we cannot fill those holes in or make anything better by giving the government the power
00:24:00.780 to act as a giant filter deciding which pieces of information are good or bad
00:24:05.800 and which pieces we should see and which we shouldn't see and all the rest of it.
00:24:09.940 So that's not how we can solve this problem.
00:24:12.220 We live in the information age regardless,
00:24:14.400 which means it's an age dominated and driven by information.
00:24:18.900 To give the government that kind of power to be the filter
00:24:23.540 is then to give them essentially absolute power over our lives and our minds.
00:24:28.860 And we cannot do that.
00:24:30.720 And we especially can't do it with an administration like this one.
00:24:34.560 Like, how can we give them the power to determine what counts as misinformation
00:24:38.520 when we already know that they believe or at least pretend to believe
00:24:42.920 many things that are wildly untrue and which do not reflect reality
00:24:47.500 and which contradict the facts in an extreme way?
00:24:51.600 I mean, certainly anyone who believes that men can get pregnant, for example, 0.99
00:24:55.260 is unqualified to be the judge and jury ruling over the flow of information.
00:24:59.520 Um, but really no one is qualified for that position.
00:25:04.060 And that's the point.
00:25:05.960 Um, although it's a point that not all of the justices seem to understand.
00:25:10.000 So for example, here is Ketanji Brown Jackson revealing some, uh, very fundamental confusion
00:25:16.800 about, uh, the constitution and the government and what their exact role is.
00:25:21.780 She can't define what a woman is. 1.00
00:25:23.160 We already know that.
00:25:24.160 And, uh, now she also has revealed that she doesn't know what the constitution is.
00:25:27.540 Let's, uh, although she revealed that she's revealed that many times in the past,
00:25:30.920 but this is a pretty, um, stark example.
00:25:33.260 Let's watch.
00:25:34.700 Justice Jackson.
00:25:35.720 So my biggest concern is that your view has the first amendment hamstringing the government
00:25:42.240 in significant ways in the most important time periods.
00:25:47.960 Um, I mean, what would, what would you have the government do?
00:25:50.540 I've heard you say a couple of times that the government can post its own speech,
00:25:54.800 but in my hypothetical, um, you know, kids, this is not safe, don't do it, um, is not
00:26:00.540 going to get it done.
00:26:01.940 And so I guess some might say that the government actually has a duty to take steps to protect
00:26:10.820 the citizens of this country.
00:26:12.140 And you seem to be suggesting that that duty cannot manifest itself in the government encouraging
00:26:17.900 or even pressuring, um, platforms to take down harmful information.
00:26:23.640 So can you help me?
00:26:25.300 Cause I'm really, I'm really worried about that.
00:26:27.760 Um, because you've got the first amendment operating, um, in an environment of threatening
00:26:33.920 circumstances from the government's perspective.
00:26:36.280 And you're saying that the government can't interact with the source of those problems.
00:26:43.420 So she's worried that the first amendment may hamstring the government. 0.99
00:26:47.660 Uh, that's what she's worried will happen.
00:26:49.520 And yes, Kattanji, uh, it will.
00:26:51.960 I mean, it does, it should.
00:26:54.780 That's the point that is literally quite literally the whole point of the first amendment.
00:27:00.360 Uh, that's the whole point of the bill of rights.
00:27:01.920 It's in fact, it's to hamstring the government, to limit the scope of the government's authority
00:27:06.940 to say, these things are off limits.
00:27:08.940 You cannot touch these things and, um, uh, to, to, to prevent it from infringing on our
00:27:15.080 basic human rights.
00:27:16.240 That's why the first amendment exists. 1.00
00:27:18.960 So, and this is a, this is a Supreme court justice who is not clear on that fact.
00:27:23.920 In fact, is worried.
00:27:25.060 She's very worried that she's worried that the first amendment might do what it's supposed
00:27:30.780 to do.
00:27:31.200 That's what she's worried about.
00:27:33.260 And she's a Supreme court justice.
00:27:35.620 And, but she's part, you know, uh, she's, she's really part of the whole regime, part
00:27:41.760 of the whole system that, um, that only proves why these people, like if, if anybody was equipped
00:27:50.160 to be the filter of information, to decide what information people should see and shouldn't
00:27:55.720 see to decide what is misinformation and what isn't, if there's anybody equipped to do
00:28:00.060 that.
00:28:01.400 And I don't think anybody is, but if there was anybody, it's not these people like they
00:28:04.960 can't, they don't know what a woman is. 1.00
00:28:06.060 They can't, they don't know.
00:28:07.560 They've got Supreme court justices that don't even know what the constitution is or what
00:28:10.740 it's supposed to do.
00:28:11.520 They're just, just, just deeply confused or at least presenting themselves as deeply confused,
00:28:18.020 which really it's the same thing.
00:28:19.980 So they deeply confused about the most basic fundamental facts.
00:28:24.900 And these are the exact same people who want to decide what counts as misinformation and,
00:28:31.660 uh, and, and what doesn't, um, and that just cannot be allowed.
00:28:38.240 Uh, I wanted to mention this.
00:28:41.380 This is an interesting story.
00:28:42.580 The New York post, uh, has this, this, this is the headline woke people are more likely to
00:28:48.480 be unhappy, anxious, and depressed.
00:28:50.720 A new study suggests the article says, psychological researchers in Finland have created an assessment
00:28:56.480 to help measure an individual's commitment to principles of social justice and have made
00:29:01.240 some surprising findings across the Finnish population, including a negative correlation
00:29:04.640 between progressive ideals and levels of happiness.
00:29:07.860 Their findings published in the Scandinavian journal of psychology suggest other Western nations
00:29:11.720 may see similar patterns among their socially conscious citizens.
00:29:15.360 Study author Asghari, uh, Latinin, a senior researcher at Inves Research flagship center
00:29:21.520 at the University of Turku remarked that the woke discourse has since worked its way
00:29:26.080 into Finnish discourse, uh, so on and so forth.
00:29:28.620 We don't really care about that.
00:29:30.060 Um, however, the concerning, the most concerning finding was the relationship between mental health
00:29:33.960 and agreement with the, uh, with, you know, woke ideals.
00:29:38.220 Specifically, researchers found a high prevalence of anxiety and depression in people
00:29:41.420 who believe the statement, quote,
00:29:43.480 If white people have, on average, a higher income than black people, it is because of 1.00
00:29:48.020 racism.
00:29:48.900 More broadly, they found that those who identified as less left-wing were most likely to report
00:29:53.240 lower mental well-being.
00:29:55.900 Now, um, so this is, this is interesting.
00:29:59.040 There's, there's a sort of an obvious chicken or egg dilemma here, which others have pointed
00:30:03.460 to.
00:30:03.760 Um, and so you have to ask yourself, is it, is it that people become unhappy because they're
00:30:09.660 woke?
00:30:09.960 Or is it that they become woke because they're unhappy?
00:30:13.720 You know, and that's a fascinating question that would impact our analysis of the findings.
00:30:18.620 But even without having that sorted out, I think we can say a few things here because
00:30:22.820 really the answer, the answer, the answer is both.
00:30:25.940 It's both the chicken and the egg.
00:30:27.400 Wokeness attracts unhappy people and it also makes people unhappy.
00:30:31.380 And then it also makes unhappy people unhappier.
00:30:34.380 So that's kind of the, that's, that's the way the cycle works.
00:30:38.180 And with that in mind, why does it do this?
00:30:42.220 Um, and there are myriad reasons and we're told there's a lot of depression and anxiety
00:30:47.100 in people who agree with the statement that white people have an average, have a higher
00:30:51.200 income on average because of racism.
00:30:53.420 Uh, well, why would that be the case?
00:30:54.720 Well, because, because these ideas destroy agency.
00:30:57.740 They take away your willpower, um, your free will, your ability to choose your own path
00:31:02.960 in life.
00:31:04.100 Everything is predetermined by the structures of oppression and racism, according to wokeness.
00:31:09.260 So if you're successful, it's because of racism.
00:31:11.300 If you're not successful, it's because of racism.
00:31:13.480 And that means that for the white person, this creates a sense of guilt, a sense of hopelessness,
00:31:18.040 a sense of, of, of passiveness, of shame. 0.93
00:31:21.120 And for the black person, it's also passiveness, helplessness, resentment, hatred, scorn. 1.00
00:31:28.960 Um, that's what all of this creates.
00:31:31.440 Feeling like you aren't in control, feeling entirely swept along by the currents.
00:31:37.280 I mean, that's really the source of all anxiety at some level, I would argue.
00:31:41.620 And wokeness breeds that feeling.
00:31:43.760 It is that feeling.
00:31:45.040 The, the removal of human agency is the whole point.
00:31:48.420 It's the whole point of the, of, of it.
00:31:50.420 Um, there's always this question of, well, how do you define wokeness?
00:31:54.260 And I mean, really wokeness is just the word we're using for leftism.
00:31:57.860 It's just a new term.
00:31:58.980 Um, I'd be fine going back to talking about leftism, but, you know, if you want to come
00:32:03.180 up with it with a, with a definition of it, you could do worse than this.
00:32:07.680 It's, it's the effort to remove human agency, um, to take away, to take away human agency
00:32:12.420 from all aspects of life.
00:32:14.720 Um, and, and then what do you get in exchange for it?
00:32:17.700 So you give up your sense of agency, your sense that like, you are at least to some
00:32:23.080 significant degree responsible for your own place in life.
00:32:27.100 You take that away.
00:32:28.300 And then what do you get in exchange?
00:32:30.440 Um, I mean, you end up depressed, passive, resentful, guilt-ridden, emasculated, all of
00:32:37.980 that.
00:32:38.280 So that's one thing you get.
00:32:41.100 Um, but do you get any benefit from it?
00:32:43.080 Like why, why do people fall into this given that it makes them so unhappy?
00:32:48.180 Well, I think you, you do get, and I wouldn't really call this a benefit, but for the people
00:32:52.540 that make this deal, they see it as a benefit.
00:32:54.980 You get an excuse, you know, that's, that's what you get.
00:32:57.580 You get an excuse.
00:32:58.240 You also get an unearned sense of virtue.
00:33:00.280 You get to, you get to have the feeling that you're a good person without doing anything
00:33:03.840 at all to earn that feeling.
00:33:06.880 Um, and that's it.
00:33:08.060 That's what you get.
00:33:08.740 But, but the main thing is you get an excuse.
00:33:11.440 That's what people are really after.
00:33:13.500 That's all of the, the victimology and everything.
00:33:16.480 That's, that's what it's really about for the, on the individual level.
00:33:19.760 The reason why people find it attractive is yes, it makes them depressed, anxious, everything
00:33:23.720 else.
00:33:24.260 Yes, it removes purpose and meaning from life.
00:33:26.400 It makes life basically pointless, but it also takes, it gives you an excuse.
00:33:30.480 And so wherever you are in life, it's, it's not your fault.
00:33:34.700 Um, you can just find, find your victim group that you belong to because anyone can find
00:33:38.540 one. 0.76
00:33:38.880 You know, if you're white, you can't, you don't get to be in the, in the black victim 1.00
00:33:42.460 group, but you can find another victim group to fall into.
00:33:45.820 Um, LGBT is always there at the ever expanding alphabet. 1.00
00:33:48.760 You can find a place somewhere in there.
00:33:51.020 And, and then it gives you an excuse, wherever you are in life, whatever your, whatever your
00:33:54.680 faults are, whatever your, um, shortcomings, uh, whatever aspects of your life
00:33:58.620 you, that, that you're dealing with that you don't like, it's not your fault.
00:34:03.300 You know, nothing is your fault.
00:34:04.980 And, uh, now I, the way that I'm, I'm wired.
00:34:09.620 And I think any healthy person is wired is I'd rather go the other way.
00:34:12.500 Like I I'd rather, I'd rather err on the opposite extreme.
00:34:16.260 I I'd rather take, uh, blame for things that like, aren't even my fault.
00:34:19.700 I would rather have, um, you know, a, a, uh, I would rather, I would rather go the other
00:34:26.980 way in seeing that, that things are in my control when they really aren't.
00:34:32.760 Um, I'd rather, if I have to err on one side or the other, I'd rather be on that side because
00:34:37.460 the idea of having no agency of not being in control of my life at all, um, is deeply
00:34:43.580 unappealing to me.
00:34:44.540 Um, so if I'm in a bad spot in life or I'm dealing with something and someone comes along
00:34:49.960 and, and, uh, and says, well, that's all your fault.
00:34:53.260 I would rather, I would rather think it's all entirely my fault, even if there are aspects
00:34:57.000 of it that really aren't, even if there are aspects of it that are out of my control.
00:35:00.400 I'd rather accept that, um, and realize that I have agency over my life.
00:35:07.040 I'd rather, I'd rather accept that and retain a sense of agency than, uh, then take the excuse
00:35:13.240 and say, oh, it's not my, it's not my fault at all and lose that sense of agency.
00:35:16.300 But I think, um, for people who fall into the woke cult, um, they just getting that excuse
00:35:25.620 is incredibly appealing to them and they'll, they'll give up everything just to have the
00:35:30.660 excuse.
00:35:32.040 And there's more to wokeness.
00:35:33.400 Of course, it also destroys family bonds.
00:35:35.320 It breeds resentments, not just between races, but even worse between families, between generations,
00:35:40.400 possibly worst of all, it makes you, uh, you know, sort of unstuck in time to borrow a
00:35:47.820 phrase from some book.
00:35:49.860 I don't remember which, I think Slaughterhouse-Five, Unstuck in Time, um, it unmoors you or it removes
00:35:55.820 all connection to your past, to your family, to your ancestors, to your culture, uh, particularly
00:36:01.400 if you're white, uh, it, it takes all that away and, and that creates more despair, more 0.98
00:36:06.720 depression, more anxiety. 0.65
00:36:08.380 And the ultimate goal is to remove, is to take away meaning, take away meaning for your
00:36:11.960 life.
00:36:12.220 A woke life is a life without meaning.
00:36:13.920 It's, you know, it's, and it's not even that, I think we get this wrong sometimes because
00:36:18.140 we would say that people who are woke leftist, um, they, uh, kind of relativist and they, they
00:36:24.960 believe that you can make your own meaning for your own life.
00:36:28.140 Um, meaning is something that you create for yourself.
00:36:31.120 I don't even think that's the case.
00:36:32.540 That's, that's kind of an existentialist approach is that meaning is what you, is what you, is
00:36:37.720 what you make, you know, you make your own meaning.
00:36:39.960 Um, but on the left, that's not really what they believe.
00:36:44.060 Uh, the woke religion rejects meaning altogether.
00:36:47.100 There is, there is no meaning.
00:36:48.460 There is no purpose.
00:36:49.400 There's just pure existence for its own sake.
00:36:53.420 And it's an existence defined by oppression and self-victimization.
00:36:57.900 And so does it make people unhappy?
00:37:01.240 Yes.
00:37:01.560 And does it attract unhappy people who are looking for excuses?
00:37:04.860 Unhappy, passive, emasculated people who are looking for excuses?
00:37:07.580 Yes, it does.
00:37:08.180 It does both of those things.
00:37:10.460 Um, finally, let's go to a situation up in Washington state.
00:37:13.540 We'll start with this recent report from the post-millennial.
00:37:17.920 So as a landlord in an upscale neighborhood in Washington state is out of, is out thousands
00:37:21.180 of dollars as a result of a deadbeat tenant.
00:37:23.180 He can't evict because of the county's eviction backlog.
00:37:27.380 Jaskaran Singh owns a rental property he bought two years ago in Woodridge, um, of Bellevue,
00:37:32.760 Washington's, one of Bellevue, Washington's most desirable neighborhoods.
00:37:36.180 He thought that Sang Kim, along with his wife and kids, were going to be ideal tenants.
00:37:40.660 That is, until the Kims allegedly started skipping out on rent. 1.00
00:37:43.600 He thought Sang Kim, along with his wife and kids, uh, well, repeating that same sentence.
00:37:47.380 Um, he added, he lied for everything.
00:37:49.220 He simply, he simply exploited the system.
00:37:51.160 Um, Singh attempted mediation through the city.
00:37:53.320 And when that failed, he began the eviction process, which has now been dragging on for
00:37:56.400 months.
00:37:56.820 One of the main issues causing the delays is that King County courts are behind on at
00:38:00.460 least 600 eviction cases.
00:38:02.120 Uh, Singh says there's no law protecting the landlord.
00:38:04.600 Justice delayed is justice denied.
00:38:07.320 So, and there are many such cases, especially in Washington state and, uh, states like Washington,
00:38:13.800 where you've got situations like this, where somebody, you know, rents a property, stops paying
00:38:19.740 rent, refuse to pay rent.
00:38:21.380 Then the landlord says, okay, if you're not going to pay to be here, get the hell out.
00:38:25.120 And the tenant says, no, I don't think I will.
00:38:27.180 I think I'll just stay.
00:38:28.640 And you would think if you're, you know, uh, a sane person, you, you would think, well,
00:38:34.060 that, that, okay, well then, then you're gone.
00:38:35.680 Like, and if the person won't leave, then you could call the cops.
00:38:38.280 Like that person is there now a trespasser on your property.
00:38:40.960 The cops just come and drag them out.
00:38:42.700 End of discussion.
00:38:43.420 Well, that's not how it works.
00:38:45.820 Um, in particular in Washington state, that's not how it works.
00:38:49.340 Now the person who is living there and we use the term squatting.
00:38:54.520 Uh, I don't even, I, I, I think that, that, I think you need a stronger term.
00:38:59.860 This is, this is like grand theft for one thing.
00:39:02.900 You're stealing, you are, you are stealing this home.
00:39:05.700 You're, you're, you're stealing an entire home now is what you're doing.
00:39:08.660 Uh, you're guilty of home invasion, the burglary of, you know, every second you're in that
00:39:13.460 property that you don't belong in that property.
00:39:15.280 They don't want you there.
00:39:16.020 That's, that's the way the law should look at it.
00:39:18.120 But anyway, we, you know, for lack of a better term, call them squatting.
00:39:22.500 And then, uh, now if you're in Washington state, the squatter has, uh, rights.
00:39:29.000 And as we'll see here in a second, actually has more rights than you as the homeowner.
00:39:34.560 And so that's the background of this particular case.
00:39:36.680 And that led to this week when the homeowner saying organized a protest at his own house
00:39:41.960 against the guy who lives there and won't leave.
00:39:44.960 This is what it's, what it's come to now.
00:39:46.300 If you live in Washington state and you're renting properties, uh, and somebody you have
00:39:50.340 to, you have to organize a picket line, right.
00:39:52.720 To, to, to get just to protest the fact that somebody is in your house and they don't belong.
00:39:57.660 That's what you're left with.
00:39:58.540 You're left with holding signs and marching and chanting, uh, because the law is not on your,
00:40:03.160 on your side.
00:40:04.320 So there's a protest.
00:40:05.340 The cops show up to throw the homeowner off of his own property in defense of the guy
00:40:11.300 who doesn't live there.
00:40:12.180 Let's watch.
00:40:14.500 Open the door now.
00:40:17.080 I mean, you've got angry neighbors here.
00:40:20.560 If you do not leave, I will call the police for the trespassing.
00:40:24.260 Mr. Kim, just want your side of the story.
00:40:26.800 What are your thoughts on the protesters?
00:40:29.760 Stop laughing on the door.
00:40:31.260 The police are here.
00:40:32.020 It's not your house.
00:40:33.180 Stop laughing on the door.
00:40:33.840 It's not your house either.
00:40:34.680 Do you want to comment on the protest?
00:40:36.600 Get out of my- 0.96
00:40:37.800 I already paid visit-
00:40:38.800 We're not doing that.
00:40:39.300 We're not doing that.
00:40:39.800 Guys, back up.
00:40:40.800 Off the property, man.
00:40:42.260 No, we're not doing that.
00:40:43.800 We're not doing that.
00:40:44.180 Off the property, man.
00:40:44.680 I'm just not-
00:40:45.180 Off the property, man.
00:40:47.220 We're not doing that.
00:40:47.800 It's like, the officer-
00:40:49.300 I'm asking you a question-
00:40:50.380 Fair enough.
00:40:50.760 To get off-
00:40:51.900 This guy brought his-
00:40:53.760 I need you off the property, okay?
00:40:56.760 All I'm trying to do is keep the peace.
00:40:58.760 Okay, I'm just trying to keep the peace, man.
00:41:00.480 Okay?
00:41:00.820 That's all I'm trying to do.
00:41:01.840 That's a messed up system, man.
00:41:03.300 Yeah, the system is broken.
00:41:04.540 Oh, my-
00:41:05.020 So the cops kick off the protesters.
00:41:07.800 The guy, the squatter in the house, tells them they're trespassing.
00:41:15.360 I mean, he's trespassing.
00:41:16.440 It's not his house, and he's living there illegally, accusing them of trespassing.
00:41:21.760 And if that's not bad enough, the squatter, Sang Kim, was- 0.61
00:41:25.300 This is the most recent development.
00:41:26.580 It happened in the last couple days.
00:41:28.140 He was granted a protection order against the guy who owns the house.
00:41:32.440 He went to a judge and said,
00:41:34.340 The guy who owns this house that I'm living in illegally is harassing me.
00:41:38.280 He gets a protection order, which means that the guy who owns the house has to stay away from his own house
00:41:42.840 so that Sang Kim, who does not own it and is not supposed to be there, can stay.
00:41:47.980 It's just total madness all around.
00:41:49.680 And this is what happens when you live in a morally inverted society.
00:41:54.500 You end up in a situation where squatters have more rights than the people who own the homes they're squatting in.
00:42:00.020 When left-wing victimology becomes the defining principle of the justice system,
00:42:04.340 this is what happens.
00:42:05.380 It turns everything on its head.
00:42:07.260 And the result is that life becomes harder for everybody else.
00:42:12.660 Life becomes harder for normal, law-abiding, hard-working people. 0.99
00:42:16.480 For the sake of this scumbag, the Kim guy, for his sake, so that he could be just a degenerate, good-for-nothing, 0.99
00:42:32.400 for his sake, everyone's life becomes harder. 0.99
00:42:35.920 So you want to complain about, say, the lack of affordable housing?
00:42:39.720 Well, the more impossible you make it for landlords, the more expensive and onerous and difficult you make it for them,
00:42:45.760 the more expensive it becomes for everybody else.
00:42:48.800 I don't know how anyone can rent properties in Washington State anymore at all.
00:42:52.500 I mean, I certainly wouldn't.
00:42:53.700 But if they do, they need to protect themselves.
00:42:56.100 They need to ensure that they have the financial resources to deal with the court system.
00:42:59.580 Because you know if you're renting, if you're a renter, rather, if you're a landlord,
00:43:05.300 the person who is putting the properties up for rent, in Washington State,
00:43:08.760 you know you're going to end up in the court system perpetually.
00:43:12.080 And so the more expensive you make it for the landlords, the more expensive it is for the tenants.
00:43:16.820 But after a while, there probably won't be any landlords left in Washington State.
00:43:20.260 Which, of course, is something that you say that, you know, after a while,
00:43:23.540 there won't be landlords left in Washington State.
00:43:25.000 Right. Well, left-wing morons will hear a statement like that and they'll say, 1.00
00:43:29.000 good, landlords are bad. That's good. Kick them all out. 1.00
00:43:33.620 Okay, well, then have fun dealing with mortgages and banks and property taxes and utility companies, 1.00
00:43:42.180 you idiots. 0.99
00:43:44.240 And look, I'm a proponent of home ownership. 1.00
00:43:45.980 I think you absolutely should buy a home if you can, rather than renting.
00:43:49.580 But my point is that if you want to get rid of landlords because you think that they're evil or whatever,
00:43:53.560 you know, they're the evil fat cats who have power over you. 1.00
00:43:58.620 Well, then wait till you have to deal with the banks, you dumbasses. 1.00
00:44:02.520 Like, that leaves you with all these other institutions that you have to deal with as a homeowner 0.99
00:44:06.300 who have power and control over you.
00:44:09.120 You're not going to be at the mercy of a landlord,
00:44:10.460 but you will be at the mercy of the banks and realtors and taxes and utility companies
00:44:14.000 and so on and so on and so on.
00:44:16.440 And if you don't have the money to buy a house,
00:44:18.360 if you aren't in the right situation for home ownership,
00:44:20.540 if you have $1,000 in your bank account and you make $30,000 a year
00:44:23.860 and you probably won't be in your current location for very long
00:44:26.840 because you're still kind of moving around a lot,
00:44:28.840 which makes buying a house, you know, not practical and probably not even possible.
00:44:33.620 Well, what then?
00:44:35.240 If you live in Washington State, they chase all the landlords out.
00:44:37.740 What do you do then?
00:44:39.780 That's where renting is the most sensible option.
00:44:41.780 And it's where making it impossible for landlords to exist and to operate
00:44:48.240 will make your life much more difficult.
00:44:52.080 But you're going to have plenty of people who see stuff like this,
00:44:54.620 see these kinds of stories, 0.87
00:44:55.980 and somehow in their twisted, perverted heads, 0.83
00:45:00.760 find a way to side with the guy who's stealing the house. 0.81
00:45:04.580 And they'll side with him not realizing that he is making their,
00:45:12.360 that he is actively making their own lives more difficult. 1.00
00:45:16.600 And they're too stupid to see it. 1.00
00:45:18.800 And then all these people in Washington State, 1.00
00:45:20.740 once all the rent, once all the landlords have been chased out
00:45:23.640 because they just simply can't be in that state anymore,
00:45:26.580 it's not possible.
00:45:27.520 How can you?
00:45:29.280 And they're going to look around and have nowhere to live.
00:45:31.120 If, you know, they were the people who would provide them houses.
00:45:35.780 Well, why is anyone providing housing for me? 1.00
00:45:37.380 Because you chased them all out, you idiots. 1.00
00:45:39.540 It's your fault. 1.00
00:45:40.300 They were there and you chased them out of the state.
00:45:44.940 And now you've got nowhere to live.
00:45:46.680 And all those people that cheer on the squatters,
00:45:48.720 you know, if they all end up living on the street homeless,
00:45:50.800 they deserve it.
00:45:52.060 I hope they all do end up homeless.
00:45:53.940 Anyone who sees a video like that and sides with a squatter,
00:45:55.800 I hope you end up homeless.
00:45:57.160 I hope that's how you end up. 0.98
00:45:58.980 Because you deserve it.
00:45:59.860 That's justice.
00:46:01.840 You don't deserve to live in a home.
00:46:03.940 You don't.
00:46:05.100 All right.
00:46:05.620 On that note, let's get to our daily,
00:46:07.020 or let's get to what's Walsh wrong.
00:46:12.280 Do you owe back taxes or still have unfiled returns?
00:46:15.360 Not only is owing back taxes stressful,
00:46:17.100 but the IRS has also become more determined than ever.
00:46:20.080 The IRS's chief data and analytics officer revealed
00:46:22.540 that they're focused on enforcement project
00:46:24.260 with an average return on investment of about $6
00:46:26.520 for every $1 spent.
00:46:28.440 They're targeting individuals and businesses
00:46:30.340 that currently owe back taxes
00:46:32.040 or haven't filed their returns first.
00:46:33.720 Tax Network USA, the nation's leading tax relief firm,
00:46:36.880 knows the tax code and will fight for you.
00:46:39.420 With a record of negotiating over a billion dollars
00:46:41.640 in tax relief for their clients,
00:46:43.360 their team is knowledgeable in handling any type of tax issue.
00:46:46.120 Whether you owe $10,000 or $10 million,
00:46:48.500 they can help.
00:46:49.400 Even if you don't have all your personal or business records
00:46:51.680 from over the years,
00:46:52.440 they can get you filed up to date.
00:46:55.100 Facing the IRS without a professional is not a smart move.
00:46:58.280 Contact Tax Network USA for the best strategic advice
00:47:01.260 to help reduce or even eliminate your tax debt.
00:47:03.640 Call today at 1-800-245-6000
00:47:06.240 or visit their website at tnusa.com slash Walsh.
00:47:08.800 They'll give you a free private consultation
00:47:10.160 on how you can settle your tax debt today.
00:47:12.840 That's tnusa.com slash Walsh.
00:47:16.060 Okay, a few comments here about the issue
00:47:17.960 of reducing standards for policing
00:47:19.720 to get more women involved. 0.94
00:47:21.080 We talked yesterday about,
00:47:22.300 well, this is an initiative
00:47:24.120 that hundreds of police departments across the country
00:47:26.860 have taken on,
00:47:29.880 in particular here in Nashville,
00:47:31.880 where they are very determined
00:47:33.680 to get a 30% female police force 1.00
00:47:36.200 and they have basically obliterated
00:47:38.140 the physical fitness requirements.
00:47:39.780 Physical fitness requirements essentially don't,
00:47:42.000 there are no requirements,
00:47:42.840 essentially, effectively,
00:47:44.960 in order to make that happen.
00:47:47.560 And I'm against that.
00:47:48.660 I think that's a bad thing.
00:47:50.220 But some people disagreed with me,
00:47:51.900 if you can imagine.
00:47:54.200 First comment says,
00:47:54.940 I won't disagree with you,
00:47:55.780 but I'll, well, okay.
00:47:57.420 He's saying he doesn't disagree with me,
00:47:58.600 but I'll say this.
00:47:59.220 Women's sports are not separate from men's
00:48:00.980 only because men are bigger and stronger.
00:48:02.420 It actually is a different game.
00:48:03.560 They play differently
00:48:04.180 and approach the sport differently.
00:48:05.800 Same with policing.
00:48:06.760 No, reducing standards is a bad idea,
00:48:08.440 but we're doing a disservice
00:48:09.500 to the differences between men and women
00:48:10.580 if we make things all about those differences.
00:48:12.840 What about physical standards
00:48:14.720 and also creating a place in policing
00:48:16.180 for the feminine qualities,
00:48:17.560 which women seem to have a greater share of, 0.96
00:48:20.080 like negotiation?
00:48:22.740 Well, the thing I'll say about that is,
00:48:25.980 first of all,
00:48:28.260 I think the premise here is wrong.
00:48:30.300 I don't think that negotiation is a feminine, 1.00
00:48:33.920 I wouldn't call that a feminine task. 0.87
00:48:37.980 And I don't think there is any evidence
00:48:39.440 that women are better at negotiation. 1.00
00:48:40.720 In fact, and you can check me on this,
00:48:43.460 but I'm pretty sure all the evidence
00:48:45.160 is to the contrary,
00:48:46.700 that men tend to be better negotiators.
00:48:49.240 That's one of the reasons why women can, 1.00
00:48:53.400 even though all the stuff we hear
00:48:55.160 about the gender pay gap is all made up,
00:48:56.720 there can be cases where a woman ends up 1.00
00:49:00.060 making a little bit less than a man 0.90
00:49:01.120 for doing the same job.
00:49:01.860 But the reason is,
00:49:03.580 and there have been studies that have shown this,
00:49:04.840 that women don't negotiate, 1.00
00:49:06.360 or they do it poorly for their own,
00:49:09.540 they don't negotiate for their own pay.
00:49:11.160 So I don't think that there's any evidence
00:49:13.620 that women would make better negotiators. 0.99
00:49:17.240 But with all that said,
00:49:19.880 so I'm not sure,
00:49:20.640 I think negotiation is probably a bad example
00:49:23.820 to make your point.
00:49:26.340 But at the same time,
00:49:27.680 am I saying that there is nothing
00:49:30.880 that a woman can do in the sort of police world? 1.00
00:49:34.420 No.
00:49:35.580 But the problem is that this is not how it works.
00:49:40.080 Like they're not increasing the number of women cops 1.00
00:49:43.000 and then saying,
00:49:43.700 okay, well,
00:49:44.640 women have particular talents, 1.00
00:49:47.340 but not so much on the physical side of things.
00:49:49.340 So let's find things for them to do
00:49:50.720 that don't involve,
00:49:53.180 you know,
00:49:54.160 physically demanding work.
00:49:57.900 That's not what happens.
00:50:00.300 Okay?
00:50:01.140 Because the whole point here
00:50:02.200 is they're not recognizing the differences
00:50:03.900 between men and women.
00:50:07.000 So what ends up happening
00:50:08.260 is that they take these woman cops 1.00
00:50:09.920 and they put them on the street
00:50:10.840 on patrol,
00:50:12.780 which is just, 0.73
00:50:13.360 it's just ridiculous. 0.73
00:50:14.940 It's like absurd. 0.75
00:50:17.160 It's an absurdity.
00:50:19.060 Most of the time
00:50:19.940 when you see female cops out on patrol, 1.00
00:50:22.340 it's just like,
00:50:22.940 what happens?
00:50:24.380 What happens if you're alone
00:50:25.740 and you see a man breaking the law?
00:50:28.700 What are you going to do about it?
00:50:29.640 You can't do anything about it.
00:50:31.800 Like just me as a random guy
00:50:34.340 walking down the street,
00:50:35.020 I would be better equipped
00:50:36.040 than a highly trained female officer 0.99
00:50:38.440 to deal with another man 0.50
00:50:40.560 breaking the law.
00:50:42.120 Or to put it another way,
00:50:43.560 like if you are going to deal with it,
00:50:45.260 you almost automatically
00:50:46.620 have to resort
00:50:47.440 to harsher physical means,
00:50:49.400 tasers, gun.
00:50:52.020 Because you're not going to be able
00:50:52.840 to on your own
00:50:53.700 take this guy down
00:50:54.520 and restrain him.
00:50:55.600 Not going to be able to do it.
00:50:57.360 Another comment says,
00:50:57.940 Matt, while I was a cop,
00:50:58.740 I never did 1.5 mile runs
00:51:00.260 in pursuit, pull-ups,
00:51:01.320 or stopped to do push-ups.
00:51:02.480 I did agility movements
00:51:03.660 like they're doing here.
00:51:04.700 Scaling fences,
00:51:05.640 finding cover,
00:51:06.640 engaging in foot pursuits,
00:51:07.580 et cetera.
00:51:08.440 I'm actually for these modifications
00:51:09.740 being done to become
00:51:10.480 a more practical testing process
00:51:12.120 of who can do these things.
00:51:13.500 Some people can run five miles,
00:51:15.080 but they can't drag a body
00:51:16.540 if they need to.
00:51:18.320 Okay, but obviously
00:51:19.180 that's the reason
00:51:20.560 they have push-ups
00:51:21.300 on a physical fitness test.
00:51:22.260 It's not because
00:51:22.740 you're going to be doing push-ups
00:51:24.040 out on patrol.
00:51:25.840 It's not because
00:51:26.300 you're going to find yourself
00:51:27.440 in a push-up contest
00:51:28.280 with the bad guys.
00:51:29.480 That's not the point.
00:51:30.960 It's just a way,
00:51:31.580 it's an exercise
00:51:32.440 to show that you have
00:51:33.900 the requisite
00:51:35.680 upper body strength.
00:51:37.500 So you might not
00:51:38.580 be doing push-ups,
00:51:39.800 but you are going
00:51:41.580 to be doing things
00:51:42.040 that require
00:51:42.420 upper body strength.
00:51:43.440 I'm sure you would agree.
00:51:45.620 You may not be running
00:51:47.140 one and a half miles
00:51:48.620 at a time,
00:51:49.520 most of the time
00:51:50.220 when you're a cop,
00:51:50.980 but you are going
00:51:52.120 to be doing things
00:51:52.660 that require endurance,
00:51:54.240 and that's what that tests.
00:51:56.880 That's the whole point
00:51:57.660 of the physical fitness test.
00:51:58.780 And so if you want to add,
00:52:04.920 if they decided that,
00:52:06.540 okay, we're going to add
00:52:07.440 to the physical fitness test
00:52:09.080 because we want
00:52:10.560 to incorporate more things
00:52:12.240 that involve agility
00:52:13.140 and so on,
00:52:14.160 fantastic,
00:52:14.880 then go ahead and do that.
00:52:16.760 But instead,
00:52:17.480 they're getting rid
00:52:18.200 of endurance,
00:52:20.940 upper body strength,
00:52:21.840 all the things
00:52:22.460 that women, 0.99
00:52:23.640 all the areas of testing
00:52:25.480 that women will likely fail, 0.97
00:52:26.960 they're taking those out.
00:52:27.860 And what they're doing
00:52:30.700 is they're specifically
00:52:31.440 looking for things
00:52:32.400 that women, 0.99
00:52:33.140 that the average,
00:52:34.520 it's not even just like
00:52:35.260 they're looking for things
00:52:36.380 that a very in-shape woman 1.00
00:52:37.640 will be able to do.
00:52:38.420 They're looking for things
00:52:39.060 that the average
00:52:39.860 out-of-shape woman 1.00
00:52:41.020 could do.
00:52:42.680 And that's how you end up
00:52:43.620 with a test
00:52:44.400 that involves hopping over
00:52:45.700 a fence
00:52:46.780 that's three and a half feet high. 0.94
00:52:48.940 It's ridiculous. 0.90
00:52:50.780 And as I said yesterday, 0.96
00:52:51.580 I'm not exaggerating
00:52:52.620 when I say,
00:52:53.560 you know,
00:52:53.680 you look at the
00:52:54.520 physical fitness test
00:52:56.060 as it currently is
00:52:56.900 and as it's currently
00:52:58.060 operated here in Nashville
00:52:59.420 for the cops.
00:53:00.940 I'm not exaggerating
00:53:01.940 when I say that
00:53:02.460 all of my kids,
00:53:05.000 well,
00:53:05.300 maybe with the exception
00:53:05.960 of our one-year-old twins,
00:53:08.140 they might struggle,
00:53:09.600 but from our four-year-old daughter
00:53:12.020 up until our 10-year-old twins,
00:53:13.860 all of them
00:53:14.520 would kill that course. 0.92
00:53:16.320 I mean, 0.98
00:53:16.580 they would annihilate that course,
00:53:18.540 especially my 10-year-old,
00:53:19.840 my 10-year-old son,
00:53:20.560 he would annihilate it.
00:53:22.120 And that shouldn't be the case.
00:53:24.420 You know,
00:53:24.580 I don't think
00:53:24.880 this is a radical suggestion.
00:53:27.900 If you have a physical fitness test
00:53:29.440 for law enforcement officers
00:53:31.140 who are tasked
00:53:32.440 with going out
00:53:33.300 and physically detaining
00:53:34.940 dangerous people, 0.62
00:53:37.460 if you have a physical fitness test
00:53:38.660 that my 10-year-old son
00:53:40.260 could easily pass
00:53:41.660 and would be like
00:53:43.100 near the top of the class,
00:53:44.380 probably,
00:53:45.380 then there's a problem
00:53:46.520 with the physical fitness test.
00:53:48.540 Finally,
00:53:49.380 fair enough, 0.99
00:53:51.000 but how many fat male cops 0.98
00:53:52.320 can do this? 0.94
00:53:53.180 Why do we accept people
00:53:54.440 for police duty
00:53:54.980 that are obese
00:53:55.660 and out of shape?
00:53:56.460 Yeah,
00:53:56.840 I mean,
00:53:57.280 I totally agree.
00:53:58.640 There are plenty
00:53:59.380 of out-of-shape male cops,
00:54:01.280 and that's why I said
00:54:03.300 we should be raising
00:54:04.020 the standards,
00:54:04.620 not lowering them.
00:54:06.620 Okay,
00:54:06.880 rather than looking around
00:54:07.820 and saying,
00:54:08.060 well,
00:54:08.100 we've got a lot
00:54:08.420 of out-of-shape male cops,
00:54:09.420 might as well have some,
00:54:10.280 you know,
00:54:10.520 we might as well
00:54:10.840 throw some female cops in too. 1.00
00:54:12.860 Rather than doing that,
00:54:13.720 we should be going
00:54:14.100 the other direction
00:54:14.720 and saying,
00:54:15.180 well,
00:54:15.240 we've got a lot
00:54:15.660 of out-of-shape
00:54:16.220 police officers.
00:54:17.580 How do we fix that problem?
00:54:21.180 You know,
00:54:21.300 how do we raise
00:54:21.840 the standards here
00:54:22.700 to make sure
00:54:23.200 that police officers
00:54:23.860 are in better physical shape?
00:54:25.980 Which,
00:54:26.660 and that is the thing,
00:54:27.580 if you're worried
00:54:28.100 about stuff like
00:54:29.020 excessive use of force,
00:54:30.940 police brutality,
00:54:31.920 if you're worried
00:54:32.360 especially about
00:54:33.820 the gun
00:54:35.160 or the taser
00:54:35.760 being pulled out
00:54:36.560 in situations
00:54:37.160 where it wasn't necessary,
00:54:38.080 if you're worried
00:54:38.740 about that,
00:54:39.960 the number one thing
00:54:40.780 you could do about it
00:54:41.640 is to make sure
00:54:42.800 that police officers
00:54:43.660 are physically fit,
00:54:45.300 are strong enough
00:54:46.760 that they don't have
00:54:47.980 to resort
00:54:48.500 to those measures
00:54:49.280 in situations
00:54:50.380 where it is not
00:54:51.380 absolutely necessary.
00:54:53.360 Is the future
00:54:53.940 of America doomed?
00:54:55.520 A majority of Gen Z
00:54:56.400 supports left-wing policies
00:54:57.820 like open borders
00:54:58.580 and socialism.
00:54:59.680 If we don't reach them
00:55:00.600 and change their minds,
00:55:01.720 the country we know and love
00:55:02.740 will be lost forever.
00:55:04.360 PragerU is the leading
00:55:05.220 non-profit
00:55:05.740 when it comes to
00:55:06.260 influencing young people.
00:55:07.380 Their educational,
00:55:08.040 entertaining,
00:55:08.540 pro-American videos
00:55:09.440 meet young people
00:55:10.820 where they are
00:55:11.500 and open their minds
00:55:12.300 to the truth.
00:55:12.920 But they need your help.
00:55:14.240 Go to PragerU.com
00:55:15.200 and make a tax-deductible donation
00:55:16.440 whatever you give
00:55:17.280 right now
00:55:17.720 will be tripled
00:55:18.800 and have three times
00:55:19.760 the impact.
00:55:20.280 Donate $10,
00:55:20.920 it triples to $30.
00:55:21.940 Give $100,
00:55:22.620 it triples to $300.
00:55:24.000 PragerU is 100% free
00:55:26.000 to everyone
00:55:26.560 with no fees
00:55:27.240 or subscriptions.
00:55:28.200 They don't rely on ads
00:55:29.060 or clickbait headlines.
00:55:30.080 Contrary to what
00:55:30.620 the left says,
00:55:31.840 PragerU isn't funded
00:55:32.920 by a handful of billionaires.
00:55:34.760 It's funded by people
00:55:35.500 just like you.
00:55:36.540 To keep making
00:55:37.060 great content,
00:55:38.020 reaching millions
00:55:38.720 and changing minds,
00:55:39.660 PragerU needs our help.
00:55:41.340 So go to PragerU.com
00:55:43.140 to donate today.
00:55:44.860 Ladies and gentlemen,
00:55:45.400 the iconic Leftist Tears Tumblr
00:55:47.360 is back
00:55:48.080 and sending shivers
00:55:49.060 down the spines
00:55:49.840 of woke baristas
00:55:50.740 everywhere.
00:55:51.400 But wait,
00:55:52.040 because there's a twist.
00:55:53.100 It's yours for free
00:55:54.060 when you become
00:55:54.520 a Daily Wire Plus
00:55:55.480 annual member.
00:55:56.900 Now,
00:55:57.240 I know what you're thinking,
00:55:58.020 membership,
00:55:58.820 but I just want
00:55:59.460 the legendary
00:56:00.060 Leftist Tears Tumblr
00:56:01.020 for myself.
00:56:01.740 Sure,
00:56:02.020 unlimited access
00:56:02.720 to ad-free,
00:56:03.840 uncensored shows
00:56:04.440 from the Daily Wire
00:56:04.960 hosts you love
00:56:05.760 is great.
00:56:06.600 Having hit movies,
00:56:07.460 series,
00:56:07.720 and groundbreaking documentaries
00:56:08.600 on demand is awesome.
00:56:09.600 But what you've really
00:56:10.600 been waiting for
00:56:11.180 is the Leftist Tears Tumblr
00:56:12.520 and now it's yours
00:56:14.080 for free
00:56:14.660 with an insider
00:56:15.800 annual membership.
00:56:16.740 Want more?
00:56:17.500 Well,
00:56:17.740 new all access members
00:56:18.680 get two Leftist Tears Tumblrs
00:56:20.120 free.
00:56:20.640 That's right,
00:56:21.140 double the cred,
00:56:22.200 double the liberal meltdowns.
00:56:23.280 Become an annual member
00:56:24.240 today at
00:56:24.720 DailyWirePlus.com
00:56:25.760 for your iconic
00:56:26.660 Leftist Tears Tumblr
00:56:27.700 and drink to
00:56:28.400 triggering the left.
00:56:29.480 Now let's get to
00:56:29.940 our daily cancellation.
00:56:30.840 It's been a big month
00:56:38.240 for cannibalism.
00:56:39.540 First,
00:56:39.860 there were the reports
00:56:40.580 of cannibal gangs
00:56:41.600 running wild
00:56:42.340 in the failed state of Haiti.
00:56:43.780 These are reports
00:56:44.380 that Elon Musk,
00:56:45.240 myself,
00:56:45.640 and others
00:56:45.940 have discussed
00:56:46.440 over the past few weeks
00:56:47.300 which led,
00:56:47.760 of course,
00:56:48.420 to the media
00:56:48.880 scolding us
00:56:49.660 for discussing it.
00:56:50.640 On Wednesday last week,
00:56:51.700 NBC News published
00:56:52.540 an article
00:56:53.020 with this headline,
00:56:54.520 quote,
00:56:54.720 Elon Musk
00:56:55.220 and right-wing influencers
00:56:56.160 use cannibal claims
00:56:57.360 to smear Haitian migrants
00:56:58.900 amid crisis.
00:57:00.280 The article begins
00:57:00.820 this way,
00:57:01.220 quote,
00:57:02.480 as Haiti faces
00:57:03.300 an extreme political
00:57:04.100 and societal crisis
00:57:04.880 amid a wave
00:57:05.400 of intense violence,
00:57:06.700 tech billionaire
00:57:07.220 Elon Musk
00:57:07.840 and right-wing pundits
00:57:08.640 online are weaponizing
00:57:09.680 unverified claims
00:57:10.700 of cannibalism
00:57:11.460 coming out of the conflict
00:57:12.840 to advance a political
00:57:13.760 agenda on immigration.
00:57:15.080 And later,
00:57:15.440 it continues,
00:57:15.920 quote,
00:57:16.360 Musk shared a video
00:57:17.120 from far-right commentator
00:57:18.220 Matt Walsh
00:57:18.800 about cannibal hordes 0.83
00:57:19.900 of Haitians
00:57:20.880 potentially migrating
00:57:22.300 to the U.S.
00:57:22.900 And as of late Tuesday,
00:57:23.880 it had received
00:57:24.420 more than 10 million views.
00:57:25.740 Musk has also boosted
00:57:26.660 some of Ian Miles Chong's
00:57:29.100 posts about alleged
00:57:30.320 Haitian cannibalism 0.90
00:57:31.260 with replies and likes.
00:57:32.880 Representatives for Musk
00:57:33.720 and Walsh
00:57:34.200 did not respond
00:57:35.180 to requests for comment.
00:57:36.880 Based on the reporting here,
00:57:38.000 it seems like
00:57:38.840 we're just making up
00:57:39.960 the stuff about cannibals
00:57:41.340 in Haiti.
00:57:41.900 This is all some kind
00:57:42.640 of far-right fever dream
00:57:43.960 by the sound of it.
00:57:45.120 But then you continue on
00:57:46.000 to paragraph four
00:57:47.560 of this article
00:57:48.420 and you find this,
00:57:50.100 quote,
00:57:50.980 the accusations
00:57:51.620 of widespread cannibalism
00:57:52.760 are based on what
00:57:53.360 experts said
00:57:53.920 was a likely intimidation
00:57:55.760 tactic from select
00:57:56.880 gang members.
00:57:57.700 In some videos,
00:57:58.340 the most prominent examples
00:57:59.300 being at least two years old,
00:58:00.800 alleged members
00:58:01.380 of violent gangs
00:58:02.060 in Haiti appear
00:58:02.680 to bite into human flesh.
00:58:04.200 Experts said,
00:58:04.980 these videos are likely
00:58:05.720 part of propaganda campaigns
00:58:07.060 designed to scare rivals
00:58:08.400 and terrorize local Haitians 1.00
00:58:09.700 rather than a reflection
00:58:11.220 of common
00:58:12.000 or normalized behavior.
00:58:13.960 One former armed group
00:58:15.120 went by the name
00:58:15.860 Cannibal Army.
00:58:16.840 So in other words,
00:58:18.760 the claims of cannibalism
00:58:19.940 are unverified
00:58:20.780 until NBC News
00:58:21.860 verifies the claims
00:58:23.140 themselves
00:58:23.760 in the very same article
00:58:25.020 where they call
00:58:26.060 the claims unverified.
00:58:27.780 In fact,
00:58:28.140 according to this article
00:58:28.860 meant to debunk
00:58:29.600 claims of cannibalism
00:58:30.560 in Haiti,
00:58:30.840 it turns out
00:58:31.300 that cannibalism in Haiti 1.00
00:58:32.680 is even worse
00:58:33.480 than I thought
00:58:34.040 because when I did
00:58:34.860 that monologue,
00:58:35.540 I didn't know
00:58:36.100 that there was an army,
00:58:37.300 there was an armed gang
00:58:38.380 in Haiti
00:58:39.000 literally called
00:58:40.160 the Cannibal Army.
00:58:41.800 I didn't even know that.
00:58:43.240 I regret that I didn't know that.
00:58:44.620 Otherwise,
00:58:45.020 I would have put it
00:58:45.720 in the title of the episode.
00:58:47.640 And don't worry, though.
00:58:48.620 These are not
00:58:49.640 the bad kinds of cannibals, 1.00
00:58:51.260 right?
00:58:51.500 These cannibals, 1.00
00:58:52.760 you know,
00:58:52.940 they're only eating people
00:58:54.040 in order to send a message.
00:58:55.580 It's just a gag,
00:58:56.620 a big prank,
00:58:57.840 maybe even a form
00:58:58.840 of artistic expression,
00:58:59.860 you might say.
00:59:00.620 They're just trying
00:59:01.300 to make a point.
00:59:02.480 And the point
00:59:03.320 is that they're cannibals.
00:59:05.700 But as I mentioned
00:59:06.560 at the top,
00:59:07.080 Haiti's Cannibal Army 0.98
00:59:07.980 and NBC's defense of them
00:59:09.640 isn't the only big cannibal news
00:59:11.720 of the past month.
00:59:12.760 There's also been
00:59:13.240 a much more explicit
00:59:14.320 and full-throated defense 0.98
00:59:16.280 offered by a website
00:59:17.600 called New Scientist.
00:59:19.240 And the science here
00:59:20.920 that they're talking about,
00:59:22.140 I must say,
00:59:22.800 is very,
00:59:23.780 very new indeed.
00:59:25.120 A few weeks ago
00:59:25.940 on Valentine's Day
00:59:26.660 of all days,
00:59:27.560 the supposed science news outlet
00:59:28.720 published an article
00:59:29.440 with this darkly hilarious headline,
00:59:31.840 quote,
00:59:32.040 Is it time for a more subtle view
00:59:34.900 on the ultimate taboo,
00:59:36.680 cannibalism?
00:59:38.340 Yes, because when you think
00:59:39.480 of cannibalism,
00:59:40.280 the first word that comes
00:59:41.060 to mind is subtle.
00:59:42.980 You don't want to be
00:59:43.680 an obnoxious, 0.96
00:59:44.580 over-the-top cannibal, right? 0.99
00:59:46.300 Rather, you should be subtle 0.57
00:59:47.680 and refined
00:59:48.880 and nuanced
00:59:49.720 in your cannibalism.
00:59:51.480 Because cannibalism itself
00:59:52.440 really isn't all that bad,
00:59:53.600 says the New Scientist
00:59:54.460 in an article that is,
00:59:55.960 as you can imagine,
00:59:57.060 very tough to swallow,
00:59:58.160 pun intended.
00:59:58.740 Reading on,
00:59:59.820 It is the ultimate taboo.
01:00:01.020 In most societies,
01:00:01.960 the idea of one human
01:00:03.260 eating another
01:00:03.820 is morally repugnant.
01:00:05.400 Even in circumstances
01:00:06.300 where it could arguably
01:00:07.460 be justified,
01:00:08.180 such as when a plane crashed
01:00:09.300 in the Andes in 1972
01:00:10.420 and starving passengers
01:00:12.040 ate the dead to survive,
01:00:13.440 we still have a deep
01:00:14.380 aversion to cannibalism.
01:00:15.760 One of the survivors,
01:00:16.560 Roberto Canessa,
01:00:17.740 has since described
01:00:18.580 the passengers' actions
01:00:19.500 as a descent
01:00:20.340 towards our ultimate indignity.
01:00:22.760 Now, this part
01:00:23.320 is the requisite preamble
01:00:25.600 acknowledging that,
01:00:26.560 sure,
01:00:26.880 most people think
01:00:27.680 cannibalism is bad,
01:00:29.520 but the writer
01:00:29.920 doesn't waste much time
01:00:30.980 on this.
01:00:31.400 And side note,
01:00:31.940 speaking of the writer,
01:00:33.020 there is no byline
01:00:34.020 on this article.
01:00:34.900 There is no author named.
01:00:36.680 Probably because
01:00:37.440 the author,
01:00:37.940 whoever it is,
01:00:38.860 doesn't want to ruin
01:00:39.520 the surprise
01:00:40.120 for his dinner party
01:00:40.960 guests this weekend.
01:00:42.380 And anyway,
01:00:42.860 as I said,
01:00:43.240 he doesn't waste much time
01:00:44.320 before getting into
01:00:45.080 the meat of the issue,
01:00:46.120 pun intended.
01:00:46.800 Quote,
01:00:47.520 ethically,
01:00:48.120 cannibalism poses
01:00:48.880 fewer issues
01:00:49.660 than you might imagine.
01:00:51.140 If a body can be
01:00:52.060 bequeathed with consent
01:00:53.220 to medical science,
01:00:54.300 why can't it be left
01:00:55.080 to feed the hungry?
01:00:56.300 Our aversion
01:00:56.780 has been explained
01:00:57.420 in various ways.
01:00:58.260 Perhaps it is down
01:00:58.900 to the fact that
01:00:59.520 in Western religious traditions,
01:01:01.220 bodies are seen
01:01:01.860 as the seat of the soul
01:01:02.980 and have a whiff
01:01:03.600 of the sacred.
01:01:04.680 Or maybe it is
01:01:05.520 culturally ingrained
01:01:06.420 with roots in early
01:01:07.340 modern colonialism,
01:01:08.780 when racist stereotypes
01:01:09.780 of the cannibal
01:01:10.500 were concocted
01:01:11.240 to justify subjugation.
01:01:12.820 These came to represent
01:01:13.880 the other
01:01:14.480 to Western societies,
01:01:15.660 and revulsion
01:01:16.100 towards cannibalism
01:01:16.820 became a tenet
01:01:17.600 of their moral conscience.
01:01:19.280 Now,
01:01:20.780 I want you to think
01:01:22.340 about that sentence again.
01:01:24.000 Racist stereotypes
01:01:25.000 of the cannibal
01:01:26.040 were concocted
01:01:27.620 to justify subjugation.
01:01:29.940 To be clear,
01:01:30.840 the writer,
01:01:31.420 who for no reason
01:01:32.300 will just nickname
01:01:33.100 Jeffrey Dahmer
01:01:33.800 since there is no byline,
01:01:35.620 the writer,
01:01:36.120 Dahmer,
01:01:36.700 isn't claiming
01:01:37.880 that people were called
01:01:39.320 cannibals
01:01:40.060 for racist reasons.
01:01:41.060 He isn't saying
01:01:41.560 that the label
01:01:42.580 was placed unfairly
01:01:44.260 on people
01:01:44.880 because those
01:01:46.120 doing the label
01:01:46.740 were racist. 0.61
01:01:47.240 That's not what he's saying.
01:01:47.720 Rather, Dahmer here 0.95
01:01:49.060 is arguing
01:01:49.500 that actual cannibals
01:01:51.300 were viewed
01:01:51.940 in a negative light
01:01:53.080 because of racism.
01:01:54.700 To see cannibalism
01:01:56.100 in a negative light
01:01:57.080 is racist
01:01:57.980 is what is being argued.
01:02:00.460 So if early settlers
01:02:01.480 had been more progressive
01:02:02.640 and open-minded,
01:02:03.820 they would have celebrated
01:02:05.000 the cannibalism
01:02:05.680 of primitive tribes.
01:02:06.840 They would have even
01:02:07.500 offered themselves up
01:02:08.600 as dinner
01:02:09.060 just to be equitable.
01:02:10.620 That's how you avoid
01:02:11.380 stereotyping cannibals,
01:02:12.520 I suppose.
01:02:14.000 Except the problem is that
01:02:14.980 there's really only
01:02:16.320 one stereotype
01:02:17.360 of cannibals
01:02:18.340 that anyone
01:02:18.800 has in their minds
01:02:19.660 and it's one
01:02:21.080 that is inherently
01:02:21.880 negative.
01:02:23.200 The stereotype
01:02:23.840 of cannibals
01:02:24.680 is that they engage
01:02:25.760 in cannibalism.
01:02:27.020 That's really
01:02:27.520 the only stereotype.
01:02:28.300 It's the only one
01:02:28.720 you need.
01:02:29.700 It's enough reason
01:02:30.620 to condemn them.
01:02:32.080 There's really no reason
01:02:32.840 to add to the list
01:02:33.680 from there.
01:02:34.760 The article wraps up
01:02:35.820 this way
01:02:36.860 with some more
01:02:37.540 food for thought,
01:02:38.300 pun intended.
01:02:38.940 Quote,
01:02:39.480 a slew of recent
01:02:40.280 archaeological discoveries
01:02:41.340 is now further
01:02:42.140 complicating how we
01:02:43.280 think about human
01:02:43.880 cannibalism.
01:02:45.140 Researchers have
01:02:45.800 unearthed evidence
01:02:46.620 suggesting that our
01:02:47.400 hominem ancestors 0.92
01:02:48.620 ate each other
01:02:49.660 surprisingly often.
01:02:51.240 What's more,
01:02:51.680 it seems,
01:02:52.260 that they weren't
01:02:52.720 always doing so
01:02:53.440 for the reasons
01:02:53.940 you might expect,
01:02:54.660 for sustenance
01:02:55.300 or to compete
01:02:55.840 against and intimidate
01:02:57.060 rivals,
01:02:57.560 but often as funerary
01:02:59.720 rituals to honor
01:03:00.540 the dead.
01:03:01.620 Like it or not,
01:03:02.800 then cannibalism
01:03:03.720 is an important
01:03:04.220 part of our story.
01:03:06.020 This isn't to say
01:03:06.640 that we should change
01:03:07.500 our attitudes towards it,
01:03:08.660 but understanding
01:03:09.360 its deep roots
01:03:10.100 might shift our
01:03:10.980 perspective on the
01:03:11.760 few cultures that
01:03:12.420 still practice
01:03:13.040 cannibalism today,
01:03:13.980 albeit only occasionally,
01:03:15.000 such as the Aghori, 1.00
01:03:16.580 a Hinduist
01:03:17.160 aesthetic sect
01:03:17.940 in India
01:03:18.400 that does it
01:03:19.360 in pursuit of
01:03:19.820 transcendence.
01:03:20.740 Above all,
01:03:21.460 these discoveries
01:03:22.000 invite us to
01:03:22.580 reconsider our
01:03:23.440 revulsion to
01:03:24.060 cannibalism in the
01:03:24.820 context of our
01:03:25.660 evolutionary past.
01:03:27.560 By the way,
01:03:28.320 before we respond
01:03:29.780 to this,
01:03:30.180 I should mention
01:03:30.860 that there is
01:03:31.860 a second article
01:03:32.760 on this website
01:03:33.660 making the same
01:03:34.620 argument for
01:03:35.220 cannibalism.
01:03:35.860 It was published
01:03:36.520 on the same day
01:03:37.520 and seems to be
01:03:38.780 a version of the
01:03:39.440 same article,
01:03:40.240 and I don't know
01:03:40.680 exactly what's going
01:03:41.200 on there,
01:03:41.560 but it adds this,
01:03:42.340 quote,
01:03:42.460 today cannibalism
01:03:44.080 is a taboo
01:03:44.680 subject in many
01:03:45.320 societies.
01:03:46.320 We see it as
01:03:46.780 aberrant,
01:03:47.340 as it is clear
01:03:48.240 in films such as
01:03:48.960 the Texas Chainsaw
01:03:49.820 Massacre.
01:03:50.780 We associate it
01:03:51.420 with zombies,
01:03:52.340 psychopaths,
01:03:53.040 and serial killers 0.93
01:03:53.680 like the fictional
01:03:54.500 Hannibal Lecter.
01:03:55.880 Positive stories
01:03:56.760 of cannibals
01:03:57.360 are few and far
01:03:58.100 between,
01:03:59.140 but perhaps it's
01:03:59.740 time for a rethink
01:04:00.720 because despite
01:04:01.460 our preconceptions,
01:04:02.460 evidence is
01:04:02.820 accumulating that
01:04:03.880 cannibalism was a
01:04:04.620 common human
01:04:05.160 behavior.
01:04:06.040 Our ancestors
01:04:06.500 have been eating
01:04:07.080 each other for a
01:04:07.800 million years or
01:04:08.460 more.
01:04:08.720 In fact,
01:04:09.280 it seems that
01:04:09.800 down the ages
01:04:10.400 around a fifth of
01:04:11.680 societies
01:04:12.040 have practiced
01:04:12.980 cannibalism.
01:04:14.000 While some of
01:04:14.440 this people eating
01:04:15.520 may have been
01:04:16.080 done simply to
01:04:16.700 survive,
01:04:17.040 in many cases,
01:04:17.840 the reasons look
01:04:18.400 more complex.
01:04:19.480 In places like
01:04:19.980 Go's Cave,
01:04:21.300 for example,
01:04:22.760 consuming the
01:04:23.320 bodies of the
01:04:23.920 dead seems to
01:04:24.800 have been a
01:04:25.280 funerary ritual.
01:04:26.260 Far from a
01:04:26.700 monstrous affront
01:04:27.300 to nature,
01:04:27.780 cannibalism may be
01:04:28.540 a way of showing
01:04:29.100 respect and love
01:04:30.040 for the dead,
01:04:31.440 say some
01:04:32.000 archaeologists.
01:04:33.760 There's another
01:04:34.440 Hall of Fame
01:04:34.940 sentence for you.
01:04:36.180 Positive stories
01:04:37.160 of cannibals
01:04:38.000 are few and
01:04:39.120 far between.
01:04:39.780 I mean,
01:04:41.140 there's no
01:04:41.380 denying the
01:04:41.800 truth in that
01:04:42.240 statement,
01:04:42.600 you must admit.
01:04:44.260 I mean,
01:04:44.600 think about the
01:04:45.800 film industry
01:04:46.400 and the bias.
01:04:48.180 Popular depictions
01:04:48.860 of cannibals in
01:04:49.580 movies are almost
01:04:50.440 always negative.
01:04:52.120 Cannibals only ever
01:04:52.880 show up in horror
01:04:53.600 movies or extremely
01:04:55.200 depressing stories
01:04:56.040 about people in
01:04:56.600 survival situations
01:04:57.440 forced into
01:04:58.000 cannibalism.
01:04:59.340 When's the last
01:04:59.700 time you saw
01:05:00.180 cannibalism in a
01:05:01.200 more fun and
01:05:02.120 sort of positive
01:05:02.820 light?
01:05:04.100 Have you ever
01:05:04.500 seen, say,
01:05:05.100 a romantic comedy
01:05:06.040 about an uptight
01:05:06.880 guy from the
01:05:07.520 corporate world
01:05:08.080 falling in love
01:05:08.840 with a fun,
01:05:09.580 free-spirited
01:05:10.220 cannibal?
01:05:11.420 The two eventually
01:05:12.000 learn to see past
01:05:12.920 their differences.
01:05:13.680 The man learns to
01:05:14.420 appreciate the
01:05:15.520 woman's spontaneity. 0.94
01:05:17.280 The woman learns to 0.99
01:05:18.100 appreciate the man,
01:05:19.160 especially when he
01:05:19.700 serves with a side
01:05:20.460 of sweet potato
01:05:21.080 fries.
01:05:22.060 You never see a
01:05:22.900 movie like that,
01:05:23.920 probably because it
01:05:25.300 would be completely
01:05:25.800 insane.
01:05:27.100 Now, I don't think
01:05:28.420 I need to offer a
01:05:29.980 counter-argument to
01:05:32.040 explain why
01:05:32.600 cannibalism is bad,
01:05:33.640 actually.
01:05:34.600 If we get to the
01:05:35.260 point where a
01:05:35.700 sizable preponderance
01:05:36.580 of people actually
01:05:37.440 need to hear the
01:05:38.980 anti-cannibalism
01:05:39.800 argument, then it's
01:05:41.080 safe to say that
01:05:41.620 society is finished
01:05:42.360 anyway.
01:05:43.340 All I will say is
01:05:44.240 that this must be
01:05:46.560 okay because some
01:05:48.020 people did it in the
01:05:48.920 Stone Age is not a
01:05:50.900 compelling justification
01:05:51.580 for anything, least of
01:05:53.300 all cannibalism.
01:05:55.100 Primitive societies also
01:05:56.340 practice slavery, they 1.00
01:05:57.380 practice torture, they 0.99
01:05:58.440 practice rape as a 0.99
01:05:59.600 matter of course. 0.98
01:06:01.520 The only thing this
01:06:02.480 article has achieved,
01:06:03.420 aside from filling us
01:06:04.260 with a deep sense of
01:06:05.020 revulsion, is helping
01:06:06.120 to dispel the myth of
01:06:07.660 the noble savage.
01:06:09.400 Now, I don't think
01:06:10.180 that cannibalism was
01:06:10.940 quite as common as
01:06:11.660 they're making it seem
01:06:12.440 here, but it is true
01:06:14.180 that primitive cultures
01:06:14.980 were often quite savage
01:06:16.440 and barbaric.
01:06:17.360 In fact, primitive
01:06:17.940 cultures still exist,
01:06:19.360 and they are still
01:06:20.520 savage and barbaric.
01:06:22.480 Often these cultures 1.00
01:06:23.140 did not recognize the
01:06:24.440 dignity and sanctity of
01:06:25.500 the human person.
01:06:27.060 I mean, these are
01:06:27.440 cultures that would
01:06:27.940 worship trees and
01:06:29.040 rocks while treating
01:06:30.540 their fellow humans
01:06:31.520 with a level of
01:06:32.200 brutality that shocks
01:06:33.240 the conscience, or
01:06:34.940 shocks it anyway, if
01:06:36.260 you have a conscience,
01:06:37.040 to be shocked.
01:06:38.440 And this is where the
01:06:39.200 de-stigmatizing agenda
01:06:40.540 leads.
01:06:41.980 You know, some in our
01:06:42.560 culture have become
01:06:43.540 obsessed with rooting
01:06:44.440 out stigma wherever
01:06:45.360 they find it and
01:06:46.080 attempting to reprogram
01:06:47.260 society to celebrate
01:06:48.920 whatever the stigma
01:06:49.840 abhors.
01:06:50.520 But in most cases,
01:06:51.900 there is a reason why
01:06:53.180 the stigma was there.
01:06:54.620 And usually it's there
01:06:55.740 because we are
01:06:56.820 supposed to be
01:06:57.340 civilized people,
01:06:58.880 and the stigmatized
01:07:00.320 behavior makes us
01:07:01.460 uncivilized.
01:07:03.140 That's the main
01:07:03.860 reason why
01:07:04.940 civilization stigmatized
01:07:06.600 behavior.
01:07:08.540 And therefore, the
01:07:09.140 de-stigmatizing campaign
01:07:10.660 is almost always a
01:07:11.680 campaign to
01:07:12.340 uncivilize civilization,
01:07:14.580 which is to undo
01:07:15.880 civilization, to
01:07:16.740 destroy it, to drag 0.57
01:07:18.760 us back into
01:07:19.860 brutality and moral
01:07:21.220 chaos.
01:07:23.140 It's an effort that
01:07:24.060 should always be
01:07:24.540 resisted, especially
01:07:26.000 now that it has led
01:07:26.760 to this rather
01:07:27.880 stomach-churning
01:07:28.820 result, pun
01:07:29.800 intended.
01:07:30.100 And that is why
01:07:31.000 New Scientist
01:07:32.460 is today
01:07:33.580 canceled.
01:07:35.400 That'll do it for the
01:07:35.980 show today.
01:07:36.320 Thanks for watching.
01:07:36.820 Thanks for listening.
01:07:37.460 Talk to you tomorrow.
01:07:38.760 Godspeed.