Ep. 1335 - The Mayor Of Baltimore Attacks White People As The City Deals With Bridge Collapse
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 5 minutes
Words per Minute
178.16882
Summary
Still, the city s mayor took the time to go on MSNBC to complain about white people. Also, a school board comes up with the worst imaginable solution to the trans bathroom debate, Philadelphia puts out a tourism ad featuring drag queens, and one of the most popular shows in the UK promotes something called eco-sexuality. We ll talk about all that and more today on the Matt Walsh Show.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Today on the Matt Wall Show, Baltimore is dealing with a major crisis after the bridge
00:00:03.480
collapsed this week. Still, the city's mayor took the time to go on MSNBC to complain about
00:00:06.920
white people. We'll discuss. Also, a school board comes up with the worst imaginable solution to
00:00:11.200
the trans bathroom debate. Philadelphia puts out a tourism ad featuring drag queens, and one of the
00:00:15.720
most popular shows in the UK promotes something called eco-sexuality. We'll talk about all that
00:00:30.000
You know, $20 barely gets you anything these days. You can't get a burger and fries for less than that,
00:00:51.600
but what about at the gas pump? I mean, you can get maybe a quarter tank of gas, but do you know what
00:00:56.340
$20 will get you? From the cell phone company I use, PureTalk, you can get unlimited talk text and
00:01:01.300
plenty of 5G data for just $20 a month. PureTalk gives you the same quality of service as your
00:01:05.800
current cell phone provider, but for half the cost. The average family saves almost $1,000 a year,
00:01:10.440
all with no contracts and no activation fees. You can switch to PureTalk and keep the phone and phone
00:01:15.040
number you currently use, or you can take advantage of their great deals on the latest iPhones and
00:01:19.360
Androids. Making the switch is incredibly easy. Their U.S. customer service team can help you join
00:01:23.780
PureTalk in as little as 10 minutes. Choose to spend your hard-earned money with a wireless
00:01:27.520
company that shares your values, supports our military and veterans, creates American jobs,
00:01:32.200
and refuses to advertise on fake news networks. Stop spending ridiculous amounts on your phone
00:01:37.840
plan. Go to puretalk.com slash Walsh. Right now, my listeners can get an additional 50% off on their
00:01:42.900
first month. That's puretalk.com slash Walsh. Well, I'm sure that I have canceled MSNBC talking head
00:01:49.980
Joy Reid before on the show. I can't remember specifically at this moment. All of the ignoramuses
00:01:54.380
discussed during the Daily Cancellation segment blend together in my mind, forming one big,
00:01:58.900
loud ball of stupid. I can only assume that Joy has been featured multiple times because she is
00:02:03.800
so aggressively, obnoxiously terrible in every way that a person can be terrible. You know,
00:02:08.360
there are evil people who think they're virtuous. There are dumb people who think they're smart.
00:02:12.600
Joy Reid falls into both categories. She even looks the part. With the bleach blonde,
00:02:16.440
short cropped hair and the permanent scowl. She, you know, looks like the kind of middle-aged woman
00:02:21.560
who yells at the pizza delivery guy because the pizza doesn't have pepperoni on it, even though
00:02:25.420
it's not the delivery guy's fault, and even though she didn't order pepperoni. The point is, I'm not
00:02:30.320
especially a fan of Joy Reid, and I'm sure that has come through in the past, but today we have to pay
00:02:33.680
her some special attention once again, unfortunately. And in fact, we're covering this in the opening monologue
00:02:38.240
rather than the closing because the Joy Reid segment in question that we'll talk about takes a certain
00:02:42.840
turn that makes it even more relevant and, in fact, disturbing. So Joy took to her low-rated cable
00:02:50.140
news show last night to call out the alleged racist conservatives who have been engaging in alleged
00:02:54.900
racist conspiracy theories surrounding the Baltimore Bridge collapse. We talked about the conspiracy
00:02:59.600
theory angle yesterday, but Joy takes this in a different direction. It would probably be easiest
00:03:03.820
just to play the segment and walk through all the many ways that she gets things wrong. So here it is.
00:03:08.660
The shame on those people who want to make something out of this that isn't there.
00:03:14.260
They have this boogeyman philosophy, and if it's black or brown, it's something that they've got a
00:03:19.540
target on. I just think that is just totally uncalled for at a time like this.
00:03:24.220
That was Maryland Congressman Kwasin Fumay last night on this very show, talking about the rampant
00:03:29.760
conspiracies being hawked by the right about Tuesday's tragic bridge collapse in Baltimore.
00:03:35.460
It has been a grab bag of right-wing grievances, barely-coded racism, and flat-out lies.
00:03:41.040
Noted Jewish space lasers and QAnon conspiracist Marjorie Taylor Greene suggested the disaster was
00:03:46.940
the result of an intentional attack, perhaps by the space lasers.
00:03:52.440
Well, actually, she didn't suggest that it was an intentional attack, and even if she did,
00:03:56.380
that's not a conspiracy theory. Intentional attacks on infrastructure are a well-known threat.
00:04:00.080
There's nothing outlandish about suggesting that it may have happened, but
00:04:02.740
she's not even suggesting. The tweet that Joy briefly flashes on the screen says,
00:04:07.740
There should be a serious investigation into the horrifying tragedy of the Francis Scott Key
00:04:11.400
Bridge in Maryland. Is this an intentional attack or an accident? Praying for the victims,
00:04:16.280
survivors, and families. Now, which part of that tweet is conspiratorial or outlandish? In fact,
00:04:22.180
I can't imagine a more measured and normal way to respond in a situation like this.
00:04:27.520
Is Joy Reid suggesting that it's inappropriate to even wonder whether the incident was intentional?
00:04:33.120
Well, that's odd, because the people investigating the crash also wondered about that. Now, so far,
00:04:37.760
they're saying that they don't think that it was intentional, but that's obviously an angle
00:04:40.620
they pursued immediately, because that's a normal thing to wonder about. So are they conspiracy
00:04:45.560
theorists, too? Joy doesn't say. Let's continue.
00:04:48.940
But the most idiotic and racist theories had to do with their newest boogeyman, diversity, equity,
00:04:57.620
and inclusion, DEI. A Republican congressional candidate in Florida tweeted that DEI did this.
00:05:06.340
And a right-wing blue check account that's been boosted by Elon Musk in the past just blew straight
00:05:11.600
past the dog whistling, tweeting to its 276,000 followers, quote, Baltimore's DEI mayor commenting
00:05:20.020
on the collapsed Francis Scott Key Bridge. It's going to get so, so much worse. Prepare accordingly.
00:05:26.580
The post included a clip of Baltimore's Black mayor, Brandon Scott. I cannot believe I have to say this.
00:05:33.240
Brandon Scott was elected with 70% of the vote in 2020 in a city that is 61% Black.
00:05:41.880
So by right-wing logic, a diversity hire would have been a white man, which, of course,
00:05:48.640
is what they want. Only the white Christian men may have the things. And at this point,
00:05:52.840
it's evident what they mean by DEI, right? Okay, it means Black people. It's the reason the right
00:05:57.240
complained about critical race theory. It's not fashionable to be openly racist anymore in America,
00:06:01.880
unlike what they call the good old days. So referring to a Black mayor as a DEI mayor gets the point
00:06:07.020
across, right? So fellas, why not just say what you mean? You can't stand Black people.
00:06:14.840
Well, we can't stand you specifically, but you're an individual person. You're not an entire race.
00:06:21.720
Now, a few points here. Number one, it is fashionable to be openly racist in this country,
00:06:29.560
just not against Black people. But Joy Reid herself proves, and what comes next in this very segment
00:06:34.380
that we're watching will again demonstrate, that racism against white people is indeed very
00:06:38.960
fashionable. And second, she's showing us tweets to prove whatever point she's trying to make.
00:06:43.400
And as we've seen, the first tweet that she displayed from Marjorie Taylor Greene totally
00:06:46.900
contradicted her point. She wants to demonstrate that conservatives in the main are being wildly
00:06:51.240
conspiratorial about this. So she showed us a tweet where Marjorie Taylor Greene was completely
00:06:56.180
measured and utterly reasonable. And next, we see a tweet from some congressional candidate I've never
00:07:01.480
heard of. And then we see one from an anonymous account called I am yes, you are no, with a cartoon
00:07:08.040
profile photo. You know, that guy, that world-famous conservative thinker named I am yes, you are no.
00:07:18.100
Now, obviously, Joy is correct that it doesn't require DEI to get a Black man elected mayor in
00:07:23.680
Baltimore. Every Baltimore mayor for the past 30 years, except one, has been Black. They've also all
00:07:28.420
been terrible, by the way, as the city has plunged into decades of crime, violence, and rampant drug
00:07:32.640
use. But that's a topic for another day. But she is right that, you know, the joking nickname given
00:07:36.980
to this guy by an anonymous cartoon Twitter account is not technically accurate. Now, as to the suggestion
00:07:42.660
that DEI might have something to do with the bridge collapse itself, that may also not be accurate.
00:07:49.060
We still don't know. We may never know for sure. There are many factors that played into this
00:07:53.700
incident, factors that are still being investigated. And at this point, it's just not possible to say for
00:07:57.900
sure whether or not DEI policies played a part somewhere along the line. But if people immediately
00:08:04.280
speculate about the role of DEI in incidents like this, it's not because those people are so terrible.
00:08:09.040
It's because DEI is so terrible. The fact remains that DEI policies have deliberately and systematically
00:08:14.560
lowered standards across the board in virtually every industry, all in the name of making every
00:08:18.440
industry less white. That is a fact. It has happened. It is happening. Joy Reid supports and promotes
00:08:24.160
those policies. And now we are witnessing the collapse of competence across the country because
00:08:28.660
of it. Now, that doesn't mean that every catastrophe is linked to this campaign of destruction in the
00:08:33.360
name of diversity. But it does mean that it's perfectly reasonable to wonder whether any particular
00:08:39.060
catastrophe is linked to it. And it also means that inevitably, some people will draw that connection
00:08:44.700
even before it has been factually established. That's what happens when you come up with a racist
00:08:50.220
policy that intentionally makes everything worse in every conceivable way. So the problem here is the
00:08:56.700
policy, not the random Twitter accounts that Joy Reid is crying about. But it wasn't enough to have
00:09:03.180
Joy Reid cry about them on her own. She also brought the mayor of Baltimore on the air to respond to all
00:09:09.140
this. Now, you would think that the man who is the mayor of Baltimore has a crisis to attend to
00:09:17.140
and would be too busy to spend time doing an interview to respond to a joking tweet from an
00:09:22.860
anonymous Twitter account. That's what you would think. That's what you would you would like to hope.
00:09:28.660
But you would be wrong. Watch. Well, I think, listen, I know and we all know and you know very well
00:09:37.040
that black men and young black men in particular have been the boogeyman for those who are racist and
00:09:42.640
think that only straight, wealthy white men should have a saying anything. We've been the boogeyman
00:09:48.360
from them since the first day they brought us to this country. And what they mean by DI, in my opinion,
00:09:54.640
is duly elected incumbent. We know what they want to say, but they don't have the courage to say the
00:09:59.880
n-word. And the fact that I don't believe in their untruthful and wrong ideology and I am very proud of
00:10:07.160
proud of my heritage and who I am and where I come from scares them because me being at my position
00:10:13.240
means that their way of thinking, their way of life for being comfortable and suffering and why
00:10:18.200
everyone else suffers is going to be at risk and they should be afraid because that's my purpose in
00:10:23.300
life. Okay, I'm going to skip right past the mayor's statement that it requires courage to say
00:10:29.360
the n-word. Something tells me that if any white person did say it in his presence, he would have a lot
00:10:34.240
of things to say in response and praising them for their courage would not be one of those things.
00:10:39.280
But we don't have time to harp on that because the bigger headline here is this part. He says,
00:10:43.840
quote, me being in this position means that their way of thinking, their way of life, of being
00:10:47.840
comfortable while everyone else suffers is at risk. And they should be afraid because that's my purpose
00:10:52.800
in life. So just to recap the situation, the mayor of Baltimore in the midst of a major disaster
00:10:58.380
has taken the time to go on a political talk show to play the victim because someone tweeted
00:11:04.200
something mean about him. And then in the middle of this little pageant, he proceeds to issue a threat
00:11:10.400
and even declares that it is his purpose. His purpose is to put at risk the livelihood of these
00:11:17.280
people he's threatening. Now, you might hope that, again, his primary purpose right now, you would hope
00:11:25.300
is to figure out what to do about the fact that a bridge that carried 30,000 commuters a day
00:11:29.300
is now lying at the bottom of the Patapsco River. But apparently not. Apparently that's not his
00:11:34.720
purpose. And who is the they that he's talking about here? Who's the they? Is it that one guy?
00:11:43.180
Is it the one guy with the cartoon profile? Is that who you talk, is that what this is all about? Is that
00:11:47.240
guy? But he said they. I don't think he identifies as non-binary, so he must be talking about more than
00:11:54.280
one person. He says that their way of life is at risk and they should be afraid. Now, I suppose the
00:12:04.380
most charitable interpretation is that he's talking about people that he deems racist. Even that would
00:12:10.700
be disturbing. An elected official, a mayor in particular, should not be threatening anyone for
00:12:16.680
having thoughts he disagrees with. That's what we're talking about here. Much less should he be
00:12:22.740
declaring that they should be afraid, that he intends to put their way of life at risk.
00:12:29.120
But it's worse than that. Because Mayor Brandon Scott of Baltimore has obviously demonstrated
00:12:34.300
himself to be a typical far-left, race-baiting Democrat. And we would know that, even without
00:12:41.620
these statements on MSNBC, simply because that's the only kind of person who gets elected to lead a
00:12:46.640
city like Baltimore these days. Far-left, race-baiting Democrats believe, and we'll tell
00:12:53.820
you this explicitly if they're in an honest mood, which, I mean, most of the time they are, but they
00:12:57.880
will say this explicitly, that all white people are inherently racist. And they certainly believe
00:13:04.280
that all white conservatives are inherently racist, which means that any threat issued obliquely
00:13:09.560
against racists is intended by them for a particular racial group. So this was an anti-white statement.
00:13:17.840
And let's make no mistake about that. Just as DEI is anti-white. Which means that Mayor Scott
00:13:25.960
really has earned the moniker DEI Mayor after all. Just perhaps for a slightly different reason.
00:13:41.260
Do you owe back taxes or still have unfiled returns? Not only is owing back taxes stressful,
00:13:45.520
but the IRS has also become more determined than ever. The IRS's chief data and analytics officer
00:13:50.900
revealed that they're focused on an enforcement project with an average return on investment of
00:13:54.460
about $6 for every $1 spent. They're targeting individuals and businesses that currently owe back
00:13:59.780
taxes or haven't filed their returns first. Tax Network USA, the nation's leading tax relief firm,
00:14:04.940
knows the tax code and will fight for you with a record of negotiating over a billion dollars in tax
00:14:09.540
relief for their clients. Their team is knowledgeable in handling any type of tax issue. Whether you owe
00:14:13.940
$10,000 or $10 million, they can help. Even if you don't have all your personal or business records
00:14:18.580
from over the years, they can get you filed up to date. Facing the IRS without a professional is not a
00:14:23.460
smart move. Contact Tax Network USA for the best strategic advice to help reduce or even eliminate your tax
00:14:28.820
debt. Call today at 1-800-245-6000 or visit their website at tnusa.com slash walsh. They'll give you
00:14:35.240
a free private consultation on how you can settle your tax debt. That's tnusa.com slash walsh.
00:14:42.560
We'll start with this controversy over a decision made by the Edwardsville School Board in Illinois.
00:14:47.840
And I want to play you the local news report so that you can go on the same journey that I went on
00:14:52.040
when I first watched this, uh, this morning. And, uh, uh, because the idea, the idea that you're,
00:14:57.560
you'll hear about, um, it starts out bad and then it gets worse as they continue to explain it.
00:15:05.700
Fiery debate over gender neutral bathrooms tonight. Millions of dollars on the line in
00:15:13.180
Edwardsville as the school board votes to pass the proposal for Edwardsville High.
00:15:18.280
Fox News Max Deetknight was at the meeting, which just wrapped up at Liberty Middle School.
00:15:23.520
A passionate debate over millions of dollars going toward building new gender neutral bathrooms at
00:15:30.620
Edwardsville High School. Some parents and others upset over this idea. Uh, who watches the watchers?
00:15:38.360
But using our tax money, money that I earned to do something I oppose is just so wrong.
00:15:45.560
Shouldn't even be a consideration. Uh, it's, it's wasting the public's time. Thank you.
00:15:51.980
But others, including a current transgender student, argue the opposition is fear mongering and that
00:15:58.420
these bathrooms are safe. From my experience as a transgender man, I rarely have ever felt safe in
00:16:04.660
a public restroom. This is an excellent opportunity to validate them as they are to make education a
00:16:10.520
safe space for them. I commend the board on moving forward with this. I encourage you to do so.
00:16:14.700
And I thank you for your time. Take a look at your screen. These are renderings of the common area
00:16:19.940
bathrooms boys and girls would share at Edwardsville High featuring private fully enclosed stalls for each
00:16:26.940
student. There's a light above each room indicating whether the stall is locked and already in use.
00:16:32.460
District officials say the handwashing stations would be in the center for everyone to use,
00:16:37.240
visible from the lobby and supervised during the busiest parts of the day. Still, some parents
00:16:43.160
fear having teenage boys and girls in the same space like this is a bad idea. Monday night,
00:16:48.820
the board voted to pass. So, so they passed it. So gender neutral bathrooms are the proposal,
00:16:53.540
not just the proposal. I mean, it's been approved. And we've obviously seen the gender neutral bathroom
00:17:00.760
idea put forward many times in many school districts as a way of solving the trans student
00:17:08.800
dilemma. And I've always been opposed to gender neutral bathrooms for the simple reason that there
00:17:14.000
actually is no dilemma. It's a solution to a problem that we have invented. And, you know,
00:17:19.860
the way to solve it is to just stop inventing the problem. The old system worked perfectly well.
00:17:25.000
There was no problem. There was no issue. Everything was fine. Boys use the boys room.
00:17:29.080
Girls use the girls room. It's not a problem. It's fine. This has been the system in public
00:17:33.120
schools for as long as public schools have existed. If something has been done for decades,
00:17:40.700
for centuries, and it's worked fine, and then you're coming along and say, we should radically change
00:17:46.880
this. Then the burden of proof is on you to explain, like, what was the issue? Why is there a problem
00:17:57.240
now if there never has been before? If people have been doing a certain thing forever and it's been
00:18:03.320
fine, and then you come along and you've got a problem with it, then it would seem like the issue
00:18:08.300
is you. The problem is you. If everyone else can do it and they're fine and you have a problem,
00:18:13.720
the problem is you. So that's the issue. It's just that, you know, 15 seconds ago,
00:18:21.380
we decided to start pretending that there is a problem. And in pretending that there's a problem,
00:18:24.700
one was created. But again, it can be solved by simply not pretending that it's a problem anymore.
00:18:29.200
And, you know, just tell the boys to go with the boys, girls with the girls, males with males,
00:18:32.320
females with females. That's it. That's all. We don't need gender-neutral bathrooms. The gendered
00:18:38.240
bathrooms are an absolutely perfect system. I mean, as perfect as a bathroom system can be.
00:18:46.240
There's no issue. But here's the thing. I opposed gender-neutral bathrooms, even though I assumed
00:18:52.600
naively, optimistically, foolishly, it turns out, that the gender-neutral rooms would be single
00:19:01.420
bathrooms. Like, I thought that's what we were talking about. A single bathroom with a single
00:19:07.220
toilet. Like, you know, similar to one that you might see in, you know, a coffee shop or something
00:19:13.980
like that. Where it's just, there's just one bathroom and it's one person uses at a time and
00:19:20.940
it's not labeled for any particular, for male or female, because only one person is using it as a
00:19:24.840
time, at a time. The bathrooms in your home are, quote, gender-neutral in that way. One person uses
00:19:31.680
them at a time. And so, you know, there's no reason to designate male or female. And in those
00:19:37.880
contexts, like at a small little coffee shop or at, you know, at your home, in a context where only one
00:19:44.660
person is using the bathroom at a time, yeah, it makes sense. I mean, you don't even call them
00:19:48.460
gender-neutral. They're just, it's just the bathroom. But still, I would have, I opposed doing
00:19:57.100
that in schools because I don't think we need to go out of our way to build bathrooms like that in
00:20:03.020
schools in order to get around this imaginary issue that we've created. But silly me, I didn't
00:20:09.580
realize that we were talking about an actual communal bathroom with multiple stalls for multiple people
00:20:17.260
where girls and boys will be invited to use it at the same time. And that apparently is what we're
00:20:25.080
talking about. Not just talking about, but it's what they're going to do. Where teenagers in high
00:20:29.120
school will be invited to use the bathroom with the opposite sex. Like, whenever you think the public
00:20:35.480
school system could not possibly get, like, when you think that it's gotten as mind-bogglingly,
00:20:41.720
bogglingly, mind-bogglingly, I think that might be a word. Anyway, when it's gotten as stupid as it
00:20:47.800
possibly can get, it somehow proves that you're wrong. It can get even dumber. Because this is such a bad
00:20:52.960
idea. I mean, it's such a bad idea that it actually, it doesn't even, we'll get to this in a
00:21:02.000
second, but it doesn't even solve the fake problem they've invented. It doesn't solve any real problem
00:21:08.640
because there is no real problem. But even the fake problem is not solved by this. So let's just
00:21:15.380
outline all the reasons why this is the dumbest thing ever conceived. The first and most obvious,
00:21:20.360
course, is that you're putting hormonal teenagers of both sexes into a bathroom together. And
00:21:26.000
obviously that is going to lead to all the things that I don't need to describe because we were all
00:21:30.680
teenagers at one time and we know, and we went to, many of us went to public high schools. And so you
00:21:36.160
know how it's going to go. And it sounds like that's what some of the parents brought up in the
00:21:40.100
meeting that that's like, that's a bad idea. Why would we do that? Why would we do that? That's the
00:21:46.220
stupidest thing. What do you, you're just asking for all kinds of problems when you do that.
00:21:52.380
And that, but that's only the first problem. So it's probably the biggest, but it's only the first.
00:21:58.120
Second problem is that the students who don't welcome the opportunity that, that is afforded to
00:22:04.020
them, uh, by, you know, having, uh, both sexes use the same bathroom, those students will be instead
00:22:12.140
extremely uncomfortable. Um, so, so if public restrooms, especially in school are already
00:22:18.640
kind of awkward, just because of the nature of what the facilities are there for now, you've just
00:22:23.760
made them a hundred times more awkward. And did I hear correct that? I think I did that the communal
00:22:30.760
sinks will be visible from the lobby and there's going to be adults in the bathroom, like supervising
00:22:38.300
when the kids are going into the stall, there's going to be adults standing there watching.
00:22:45.040
Is that, did I get that right? And you can see it from the lobby.
00:22:50.160
So you have found a way somehow against all odds to give these teenagers both more privacy than they
00:22:59.540
should have at school in the sense that you're putting boys and girls together in an inappropriate
00:23:03.600
setting and also not nearly enough privacy at the exact same time. So it's a terrible idea for
00:23:12.280
opposite reasons at the same time. That's how bad it is. And third, and this is, this is the big thing
00:23:19.700
here as I, as alluded to, it doesn't even solve the imaginary problem that it's supposed to solve.
00:23:27.520
There's no real problem being solved because there was no real problem to begin with.
00:23:31.240
Boys with boys, girls with girls in the bathroom. It was fine. It was fine. But even the fake problem
00:23:38.940
isn't being solved because the whole point for the boy who identifies as a girl or for the girl who
00:23:44.180
identifies as a boy, the whole reason that they want access to the opposite sex restroom.
00:23:50.680
Well, the most innocent possible reason that they could want access
00:23:55.420
is to be affirmed, right? As the opposite sex. And that's really what this is all about.
00:24:03.420
But you aren't affirming them by doing this. Like this doesn't affirm anybody.
00:24:09.180
This is no, the whole reason, again, I say the whole reason, there are other reasons, but
00:24:13.920
sort of taking them at their word. The reason why you have a male who wants to use the female restroom,
00:24:19.940
taking him at his word on this, is that, which we shouldn't, but just for the sake of argument,
00:24:29.700
validating, because, okay, now I'm being accepted as a woman.
00:24:36.180
But you're not, this is not, it doesn't validate, it doesn't affirm, it doesn't, you know, you're not being
00:24:43.420
And then, just everyone's being thrown into the same environment now.
00:24:49.000
Now, I'm not saying that we should affirm them.
00:24:54.020
My point is simply that this doesn't even do the bad thing it's supposed to do.
00:25:04.280
Which means either that the pro-trans side will hate this.
00:25:08.640
I know we heard from a few there in the clip that said that they're in favor of it.
00:25:28.280
They don't want, if you come out and do gender-neutral bathrooms,
00:25:37.120
which means that you're doing all this for them,
00:25:50.120
the whole affirmation thing from the bathroom debate,
00:25:52.600
which means we can just go back to the old system.
00:26:23.760
I don't know if you realize that that's my stance.
00:26:48.760
they're being raised by the public school system,