00:00:00.000Today on the Matt Walsh Show, prosecutors tried to throw an elderly man in prison for defending his property against illegal alien criminals.
00:00:06.120They didn't succeed, but you need to hear the details of this case to understand just how egregious and malicious this prosecution was.
00:00:11.660Also, protesters, quote-unquote, at Columbia University have now broken through windows and occupied a building on campus.
00:00:17.580Drew Barrymore and Kamala Harris combined forces for the cringiest moment of 2024 so far.
00:00:21.940And experts now say that for the sake of public health, we should stop taking showers.
00:00:26.380All of that and more today on the Matt Walsh Show.
00:02:57.180We already knew, like, enough to know that this is a total miscarriage of justice.
00:03:01.760But I have to admit that until I looked more closely into the trial, I had no idea exactly how outrageous this prosecution was.
00:03:11.420I didn't fully understand the extent of the depravity that motivated these prosecutors to try to ruin the life of a rancher in his 70s
00:03:19.040because he exercised his right of self-defense.
00:03:21.100So however unjust you think this case is, it's even worse than that.
00:03:26.860As I'll explain in a moment, at trial, the prosecution couldn't even prove that Kelly was responsible for killing Gabriel.
00:03:34.160In other words, it's not just that the prosecution failed to disprove self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt, which is their burden.
00:03:41.720The prosecution also failed to prove that Kelly had committed any form of homicide at all.
00:03:45.980Apparently, a single lone juror is the only reason that George Allen Kelly wasn't acquitted outright.
00:03:52.620And after you hear what happened in this case, the idea that even one guy on the jury or member of the jury would want to convict at all is truly unbelievable.
00:04:00.460So let's begin with the prosecution's opening statement.
00:04:04.800This is where the state had the opportunity to tease its star witness, a Honduran national named Daniel Ramirez.
00:04:11.360Supposedly Ramirez, who was also illegally on Kelly's property, witnessed Kelly murder Gabriel in cold blood.
00:04:19.080And Ramirez's testimony, the prosecutor suggested, would be airtight, like conclusive.
00:05:16.060Gabriel's companion, quote unquote, not his criminal accomplice, but his companion, the prosecutor says, saw Gabriel get shot in the back because this maniac rancher was shooting wildly at them.
00:05:28.620And she says that is the state versus George Allen Kelly in a nutshell.
00:05:31.960And, well, that turned out to be true, although not in the way that the prosecutor intended.
00:05:37.460So behold, the testimony of star witness Daniel Ramirez here.
00:05:42.460And so you told investigators in this case that you knew someone or you recognized someone who was in the group.
00:05:51.460And that was this person named Ramon, right?
00:05:54.140So right before we left for lunch, you testified that you had a conversation with investigators.
00:06:18.100And there was a person who accompanied you in this group, and his name was Ramon, and that that person was with you.
00:07:11.720He's just like, doesn't appear to be even fully conscious.
00:07:15.200But through the translator, we learn that Ramirez can't remember much of anything, including what he said under oath during the trial right before the lunch break.
00:07:25.320This is the companion, quote unquote, who was supposed to convince us that he remembers everything about the day that George Kelly murdered his buddy for no reason out of the blue.
00:07:34.720Now, I'm not going to show you all the testimony because, you know, it's just too long, but also it's just excruciating to listen to.
00:07:41.920So suffice it to say, there were so many inconsistencies with what Ramirez said that he was worse than useless as a witness.
00:07:50.680And remember, this is their whole case in a nutshell is this guy.
00:07:56.800For example, Ramirez testified that he was with Gabriel just a few meters away from the house when the shooting happened.
00:08:02.320But the body was found more than 100 yards away from the house.
00:08:06.180And additionally, Ramirez said that the shots went towards the house, which makes no sense.
00:08:11.060And when he spoke to police, Ramirez first said the shooting occurred west of Nogales, only to change his mind when he was told where the rancher actually lives.
00:08:19.080And on top of all that, Ramirez insisted that he saw his companion fall backward, but the body was discovered face down.
00:08:25.480Oh, and Ramirez happens to be a drug smuggler, although he initially lied about that as well, of course.
00:08:31.000And he's been caught trying to illegally enter this country between eight and ten times.
00:08:35.660Now, if you want to give the prosecution the benefit of the doubt for some reason, you might discount all of that.
00:08:43.140You might say that, well, this was one unreliable witness.
00:08:48.140Sure, it's their star witness, the one they said that their whole case in a nutshell is this guy.
00:08:52.400But, you know, surely the rest of their case was solid.
00:08:55.520But actually, the fact that their star witness has the memory of a goldfish was just the beginning of the state's problems.
00:09:02.160The larger issue was that under the prosecution's theory of the case, none of George Allen Kelly's actions on the day of the shooting made any sense whatsoever under their theory of the case.
00:09:12.000In early January 2023, a Border Patrol agent and liaison who frequently speaks to ranchers in the area advised Kelly by text message several times that illegal aliens were traveling through the area in large groups.
00:09:24.260Quote, some may have had narcotics, the agent texted to Kelly.
00:10:17.660And that's, again, not exactly consistent with the theory that Kelly is a murderer who just shot somebody in cold blood.
00:10:22.380Normally, murderers don't call the police and tell them to come search their remote property so they can find a body.
00:10:29.240And then if police miss the body, murderers don't call the cops again to inform them that they missed it and invite them back onto their remote property again.
00:10:38.920That's not normally how murderers operate.
00:10:41.780But that's the prosecution's theory here.
00:10:44.540The police came back to the ranch and decided very quickly that Kelly must have killed Gabriel, even though they couldn't find the fatal bullet anywhere.
00:10:51.100Now, this isn't exactly solid logic, so instead of explaining it, the prosecution spent the rest of their opening statement lying about the 911 call about the body.
00:11:02.500This is a photograph of Gabriel Quinn with the man.
00:11:06.700And I'm going to ask you to do something in this case that George Allen Kelly's own words tell you that he did not do.
00:11:13.380I'm going to ask you to consider Gabriel Quinn with the man as a person, as a human being, and not, as George Kelly described him, as an animal.
00:11:27.280So he says that Kelly called the guy an animal, which sounds bad, I guess, is how the jury's supposed to see that.
00:11:38.380Supposedly, when Kelly was calling 911 to report that he had found a dead body, he called the man an animal.
00:11:44.220The implication, of course, is that he's, I guess, a bigoted MAGA Republican, one of those dastardly folks who thinks that everybody from Mexico isn't human.
00:11:51.440But the problem with this argument is that even if Kelly had called Gabriel an animal, it would, first of all, be an understandable thing to say based solely on his actions.
00:12:01.360This guy was a criminal, a repeat offender who continually and illegally trespassed onto his property, into the country, and then onto his property in this case.
00:12:10.040And so it would be understandable if Kelly was angry and used unkind words to describe the dead intruder.
00:12:15.620But even if it's not, it doesn't prove that he was guilty of felony homicide.
00:12:20.380Even if he said something really terrible about this guy after the fact, it doesn't prove anything at all.
00:12:24.720It doesn't prove that he's guilty. It doesn't prove anything.
00:12:26.980But if you listen to the full 911 tape, you discover that actually Kelly wasn't calling this guy an animal because of his actions or because of his nationality or ethnicity or anything like that.
00:12:38.200What happened is that Kelly very clearly didn't want to provide any more statements to the police than he needed to.
00:12:42.980He had a vague idea, which would later prove to be very correct, that the police would seek to use everything he said against him.
00:12:49.500So he didn't want to be specific. He just wanted an officer to be dispatched to his property.
00:12:54.080So this is a longer clip than we would normally play, but it's important to get the context, understand how deranged the prosecutor's lies were.
00:14:33.240In that, in that I only approached the body to make sure that the animal, it's not a vegetable or a mineral, the animal wasn't alive and it was not alive.
00:15:05.880It's a body and you know what I'm talking about.
00:15:08.180I understand what you're talking about, George.
00:15:09.600So, um, it's kind of a strange call to listen to, there's no doubt about it, but it's clear from that audio that Kelly is not making any kind of commentary on the person he just shot.
00:15:21.340He's not saying illegals are animals or whatever.
00:15:23.640However, the way the prosecutor put it in the opening statement makes it sound like he said, I just shot this animal, this dirty Mexican, whatever.
00:15:30.660That's, that's what they want you to conjure in your mind.
00:15:33.040But that's not what he's saying, nor is he trying to hide that there's a dead human body on the property.
00:15:39.180He's trying to get somebody out there.
00:15:40.880Instead, he's trying, albeit clumsily, to get police to the property while not admitting anything that in his mind might incriminate him.
00:15:46.540He's not trying, he doesn't want to say much in the 911 call knowing that it's being recorded.
00:15:51.160We can assume that that's part of what his thinking was.
00:15:54.180And so he's just, he's just trying to get, in fact, he even clarifies that when he says animal, he means it like in the biological scientific sense that we are animals in that sense.
00:16:43.840But maybe the lowest point was prosecutors' attempt to question Kelly's wife, Wanda.
00:16:47.800It was important for prosecutors to try to discredit Wanda because she testified that she saw the trespassers on the property with firearms and camo backpacks.
00:24:06.220Anti-Israel protesters involved in an encampment at Columbia University took over an administrative building early on Tuesday morning.
00:24:12.660Video footage posted to X showed anti-Israel protesters carrying barricades into Hamilton Hall, an academic building on the university's campus.
00:24:20.720And its Telegram channel, Within Our Lifetime, Palestine, posted an announcement calling for protection of the anti-Israel encampment on the campus.
00:24:30.440So, student organizers have called on everyone to come to Columbia tonight and defend the encampment after administrators' threats this morning.
00:24:37.320Other videos posted to X showed anti-Israel protesters smashing the glass doors of Hamilton Hall.
00:25:17.920They're invading private buildings where they don't belong and they have no right to be.
00:25:21.500These are spoiled, entitled, Ivy League, rich kid brats who deserve to be locked up in prison and have their college careers and their future careers destroyed because of it.
00:26:29.060And now they're pretending to protest and stand up against the man or whatever, only because the man has given them this little space here to play pretend.
00:26:41.360Like, the man is standing by and watching and patting their heads and saying, oh, very good.
00:26:46.940Aren't you a bunch of cute little revolutionaries?
00:26:50.680I mean, they literally have professors at the school are with them, are joining with them.
00:26:56.160So, it's like, who are you even protesting at this point?
00:27:23.360Um, so that, that's, it's like, on one hand, I'd like to see the encampments torn down, police come in, arrest them, drag them away, order and calm restored.
00:46:41.100So it's way over the top and ridiculous.
00:46:44.600And it doesn't, if I were to make a list of the things that I care about right now and the issues that I think should be top, you know, headline news and should get everyone's attention.
00:46:55.340And I were to make a list and a ranking, Christy Noem's dead dog 20 years ago would not, the list, you would get to number one million on the list and we wouldn't even be close to Cricket making the list yet.
00:47:09.320With all due respect to Cricket, I'm sure Cricket wasn't a great dog.
00:47:12.420Well, apparently she wasn't a very good dog, but even so, with all due respect to the fallen, I, it would not make the list.
00:47:20.300So, you know, let's not, let's not get too bad out of shape.
00:47:24.540It's not like I'm crying tears about it.
00:47:26.060However, if someone asks me and like presents it as just an ethical question, do you think, like, what are the circumstances where it's okay to put down a dog?
00:47:36.780I think there are plenty of circumstances where it's okay.
00:47:38.720Uh, and then you tell me the specifics of this case and you, and, and you asked me to make a judgment call.
00:47:45.140I would say, yeah, probably not that, uh, probably not, probably not because of how young the dog was.
00:47:50.160And, uh, it, it sounds like the dog needed more training and 14 months.
00:47:59.920So, uh, or hunt at all, frankly, but it seems to me that 14 months is a little young for that.
00:48:07.900And, uh, and it just more time needed to be put into training.
00:48:12.140And yeah, I don't, uh, I don't think it's necessarily ethically right to, uh, to kill an animal rather than put the proper energy into training the animal.
00:48:22.680That's, that's what I, that's how I would break this down.
00:48:26.300Um, and then after saying that, I will just move on with my life and probably never think about it again.
00:48:31.360Because as I said, there are many other things for us to be worried about right now.
00:48:48.240I think that, I think that there are, first of all, it's hard to break it down.
00:48:53.960It's, it's hard to separate all these things all the time.
00:48:56.040Um, and as we've been talking about the rise in male virginity, declining birth rates, as we discussed to start the show yesterday, uh, there are, there are many factors that go into it.
00:49:07.380One of them that I mentioned was porn specifically, specifically on, you know, because, uh, rising male virginity is, is itself one of the factors leading into the declining birth rates.
00:49:21.480And then what is the main factor leading into that factor?
00:49:25.360Well, I would say that porn is the main one, but certainly not the only one.
00:49:30.100Now you, you could point out as many people did in comments that, okay, yeah, porn is a major factor, maybe even be the main factor, but why is it that porn is so prevalent?
00:49:40.360Why is it that men are, uh, turning to porn as much as they are?
00:49:44.960Okay, well then, then you can continue the conversation and we could talk about this for hours and not reach the end of it.
00:49:50.280Um, and feminism certainly has not helped any of this and has been, not only hasn't helped, but has been a, uh, just a toxic, uh, as you say, toxic is the right word, a poisonous, degrading influence on the culture in just about every respect to my mind.
00:50:11.360Um, but the fact is that you've got, you know, I looked up a study, we were talking about this yesterday, uh, and it, it kind of changes depending on the study you're looking at.
00:50:26.960The one study I saw, which I think is a pretty conservative estimate says that the first, first exposure to pornography for children is 12 years old.
00:50:35.140Now I've read eight years old, I've read nine years old, I've read 10, so it kind of depends, but let's just go with that really conservative, the most conservative estimate, which is let's say 12, still, uh, 12 years old.
00:50:48.160And you've got boys at the age of 12 and, and girls too, but more often boys that are exposed to hardcore pornography at the age of 12, which, which is something that just, it almost never happened prior to the internet age.
00:51:07.660It almost never happened. A 12 year old being exposed to this kind of content would almost never happen. And I know that people will say, Oh, well, what about, uh, what about your, you know, the kid finds his dad's porn magazines.
00:51:25.300People bring this up all the time. Like, first of all, if your dad was leaving porn magazines around the house, then your dad was, was a creep. Like that's, you know, uh, I didn't, my dad wasn't looking at porn magazines. We didn't have porn magazines in the house at all.
00:51:37.180I don't think that that was all that common. If it seems common to you, then that says something about the way that you were raised and you should be asking some serious questions about the way that you were raised.
00:51:46.000But, um, but even with that, like that would be the only real circumstance where a child will be exposed to anything like this. And that was not nearly as common.
00:51:56.380And most of the time, the images that they, if they were exposed to anything, the images would not be, would not be anything like what kids are exposed to now.
00:52:06.920And also just the, the ubiquity of it. It's, it's so pervasive. It's everywhere.
00:52:11.620The other thing too, also with, with pornography is that, yes, you've got millions of people that are seeking it out every single day and spending hours every single day, um, consuming hardcore pornography.
00:52:24.800Which again, prior to the internet age, even if some, even if an adult was subscribed to a magazine, like they were not, they probably were not spending hours every day with pornography.
00:52:40.060It just wasn't enough of it. Um, but the other thing too, is that, again, prior to the internet age, you, you also would, there was almost no scenario where you would be accidentally exposed to pornographic images.
00:52:59.200It, it, it, it, it, it's hard to imagine a scenario where that would happen, that where you would accidentally, you would have to seek it out, um, or put yourself in a position, in a situation where you might
00:53:09.780encounter it. But these days, like anyone on social media, you can go on Twitter and anyone could go to Twitter. Any kid can go on Twitter and just scroll down a newsfeed and see, and see explicit pornography just pop up.
00:53:25.940Um, that's how pervasive it is. And we could talk about other things too, but there is no conversation about declining birth rates, male virginity, male loneliness, uh, the decline in marriage.
00:53:39.780All that, there is no conversation about, about that sort of thing that can skip over this factor of, uh, of pornography.
00:53:48.940Court reconvenes tonight at 8 p.m. Eastern, and it's in fact your civic duty, your moral obligation, and legal obligation to watch my new Daily Wire Plus series, Judge by Matt Walsh.
00:53:57.700Now, to the astonishment, perhaps a dismay to some, my, my rulings are indeed legally binding. They are legal rulings.
00:54:03.720Step into my courtroom with your petty grievances, and you'll find my verdicts are final, as they rightfully should be.
00:54:08.740In tonight's episode, you'll see a sibling duo that takes the old adage, sharing is caring, to ludicrous extremes, plus a flirtatious Santa who may just find himself on his own naughty list.
00:54:19.160Remember, the courtroom is my domain, but entry is exclusive to Daily Wire Plus members, so make your wise decision.
00:54:25.580Get your membership now at dailywireplus.com, and witness the gavel of justice in action tonight at 8 p.m. Eastern, only on Daily Wire Plus.
00:54:33.200Remember, if you don't enjoy it, well, there's something wrong with you.
00:54:37.460Now let's get to our daily cancellation.
00:54:45.180So here's another one of those headlines that starts out crazy and then gets even more insane somehow as it goes on.
00:56:00.360Experts say the daily shower has no proven health benefit, dismissing the dousing as a socially accepted practice geared towards staving off accusations of funkiness.
00:56:08.480As A-listers from Jake Gyllenhaal to Mila Kunis admit that they've been saying no to the nozzle.
00:56:16.160Mostly because we're afraid somebody else will tell us that we're smelling.
00:56:19.420Environmentalist Danakta McCarthy tells the BBC,
00:56:22.680The prostitute state author only hoses off once per month to help the environment.
00:56:27.100A lifestyle choice inspired by spending two weeks in the Amazon with the indigenous Yanomami tribe, he said.
00:56:33.480So as you get that, this guy has picked up his personal grooming habits from a primitive jungle tribe in the Amazon.
00:56:41.420That's like telling us that your perspective on dental hygiene was transformed by spending a week in London.
00:56:47.340Like if anything, it should have the effect of making you more inspired to be hygienic.
00:56:51.320I myself have had a brief encounter with the traditional tribal culture, and I will tell you that, and they were very welcoming and it was quite wonderful in many ways.
00:56:59.880And I, but I never appreciated a shower so much as the one that I took when I got home from that experience.
00:57:06.360And, by the way, primitive tribes, they don't bathe very often, but it's not because of some deep ancestral knowledge of hygiene.
00:57:14.100It's because, first of all, they don't have running water.
00:57:16.780And second, they don't really know much about germs and bacteria.
00:57:20.060So the lack of showers comes purely from a place of ignorance and deprivation, not something we really want to emulate in the first world, I would think.
00:57:26.780But anyway, continuing, it says, quote, every other morning, McCarthy told a reporter he opts instead for a wash at the sink, using a cloth to give his body a good scrub.
00:57:36.340And while abstaining from daily showers might seem like antisocial behavior, medical experts are inclined to lean toward agreeing with earthy types like McCarthy,
00:57:43.960saying that the modern obsession with cleanliness can actually be hazardous to one's health.
00:57:48.140Manhattan dermatologist Dr. Julie Rusak previously told the Post that prolonged daily showers could strip away the skin's microbiome,
00:57:55.160which plays a role in protecting the skin and is also extremely important in overall health.
00:57:59.520Chemist David Whitlock was so adamant about preserving this dermal barrier that the bathing abstainer didn't shower for 12 years.