The Matt Walsh Show - Ep. 1378 - Donald Trump Found Guilty Of Running For President

00:00:00.000 Today on the Matt Wall Show, justice is officially dead in this country as Donald Trump is convicted by a kangaroo court in one of the most disgraceful sham trials in American history.

00:00:08.120 I have plenty to say about this today, as you can imagine.

00:00:10.400 Also, another traditional American symbol has been declared problematic and is now being banned, even though nobody can explain what is so problematic about it.

00:00:18.640 And the internet mob gets mad at me because I made the controversial and provocative claim that dieting and exercise are a good way to lose weight.

00:00:25.400 All of that and more today on the Matt Wall Show.

00:00:30.000 Once again, Pure Talk is investing in their customers with their own money and without charging you an extra penny.

00:00:58.380 I'm happy to announce that Pure Talk is now providing international roaming to over 50 countries.

00:01:02.800 As you plan your summer travel, make sure your wireless provider has you covered at home and abroad.

00:01:07.200 Pure Talk already puts you on America's most dependable 5G network, but now they're offering coverage in over 50 countries as well.

00:01:13.040 Enjoy the freedom of unlimited talk, text, and ample 5G data for just $20 a month with Pure Talk.

00:01:17.800 This is a deal that's hard to beat, costing you less than half of what you pay with other networks.

00:01:21.720 Not only is their U.S. customer service team ready to assist you with a seamless switch, but they also have fantastic savings on the latest iPhones and Androids.

00:01:29.780 Ready to make a smart switch? Join my cell phone company, Pure Talk, and start saving today.

00:01:33.920 Visit puretalk.com slash Walsh to explore their offer.

00:01:36.480 When you make the switch, you'll get an additional 50% off your first month.

00:01:40.020 Don't miss out on the opportunity to save on wireless at home and abroad.

00:01:44.060 Visit puretalk.com slash Walsh.

00:01:45.980 That's puretalk.com slash Walsh today.

00:01:48.660 Donald Trump, as you have certainly heard by now, has been convicted.

00:01:53.740 The verdict is in. Guilty. Guilty on all 34 felony counts of running for re-election.

00:01:59.240 Because that, after all, is the actual crime that Trump committed.

00:02:02.940 It's the one and only reason that this case was ever brought.

00:02:05.740 They prosecuted him for trying to be president again.

00:02:08.580 That's the actual reality.

00:02:10.020 That's the real crime, which isn't a crime.

00:02:12.360 But you might still be wondering, on paper, what crime was Trump just convicted of?

00:02:17.580 Somehow, a day after the guilty verdict was read, the actual crime he was guilty of is still very hard to say.

00:02:25.380 Now, one possible theory is that the government of New York really doesn't like it when people overpay their taxes.

00:02:32.280 They're the first government in the history of the universe that actively punishes its citizens for handing over too much cash.

00:02:39.500 It drives Alvin Bragg absolutely crazy when that happens, apparently.

00:02:44.780 If New Yorkers pay the government too much cash, then the full weight of New York's criminal justice system will come crashing down on them.

00:02:52.020 A jury will convict them in a day, and they'll face several years in prison.

00:02:55.580 This is how desperately New York doesn't want money from its citizens.

00:03:00.200 Now, that's what you have to believe if, for some reason, you're still pretending that there was any legitimacy to the show trial of Donald Trump that concluded yesterday in Manhattan.

00:03:11.180 I've been thinking of the best way to illustrate just how unprecedented and disgraceful the trial was.

00:03:17.240 There are so many possibilities to choose from.

00:03:20.040 But I keep coming back to this one point because nobody else is really talking about it.

00:03:23.860 And it puts this whole debacle into perspective.

00:03:26.120 As I outlined last week, in order to convict Donald Trump, it was not enough to show that he had supposedly falsified a business record.

00:03:35.860 The government also had to show that Trump has falsified those records in furtherance of some other crime.

00:03:41.640 But what was the other crime?

00:03:44.280 When I did my monologue on this on Friday, I had no idea because the prosecution hadn't suggested anything.

00:03:49.120 We made it all the way to closing arguments, and still the prosecution had never explained what the crime was that the defendant had supposedly committed.

00:03:58.860 But during those closing arguments this week, a prosecutor named Joshua Steinglass finally offered a theory.

00:04:06.480 He said that Donald Trump had falsified the business records in order to violate a different New York state law that prohibited the use of unlawful means to promote any candidate for office.

00:04:16.820 But that still leaves a key question unanswered.

00:04:20.580 What were those unlawful means that Trump supposedly engaged in?

00:04:24.640 So you keep peeling the onion back to find what the hell crime Trump is supposed to have committed, and you continue to come up empty.

00:04:31.360 So Steinglass didn't say definitely what the unlawful means were, but he did mention a few possibilities.

00:04:37.340 And one of those possibilities was that Trump had violated New York tax law.

00:04:41.160 Now, when you hear that, you might think, well, they're alleging that Trump is engaging in tax evasion.

00:04:48.160 But they're actually alleging the opposite.

00:04:51.080 They're accusing Trump of not evading taxes.

00:04:54.640 Specifically, Steinglass argued that Trump's 1099 form was inaccurate because the payment to Michael Cohen was actually a reimbursement and not compensation as the Trump organization had reported it.

00:05:05.820 But if that were the case, then the government, under its own theory of how Trump's team should have filed the paperwork, would be getting less money out of the deal because they're not owed income tax on reimbursements.

00:05:17.420 They're only owed income tax on compensation.

00:05:20.560 Now, I went through the transcripts and found the quote from the prosecutor because when I heard about it, I couldn't believe it was real, but it is.

00:05:27.300 Here's what he told the jury.

00:05:28.180 Quote, it's true that the result of this improper accounting is that the taxes would have to be paid that weren't owed.

00:05:35.620 You don't have to pay taxes on a reimbursement.

00:05:38.440 So the result of reporting them as income tax is more taxes are getting paid than are owed.

00:05:44.080 But as the judge will tell you, it's a crime to prepare false tax documents.

00:05:48.680 Regardless, even when doing so does not result in the underpayment of taxes.

00:05:55.580 I'll repeat that last line.

00:05:56.660 So translation, it's very possible the jury just convicted Donald Trump for falsifying business records in order to cover up the fact that he overpaid on his taxes.

00:06:17.920 That is one of the three possible grand conspiracies that were alleged here, a dastardly scheme to funnel too much money to the government.

00:06:29.920 This is the villainous behavior that we're supposed to believe is a threat to democracy.

00:06:34.580 That's what justifies potentially imprisoning the man who is leading every major poll to become the next president of the United States.

00:06:41.780 That's what supposedly necessitated doing something that has never been done before in American history, by charging a former president with a crime.

00:06:49.960 Now, just for good measure, if the jury didn't buy that theory, the government and the judge gave them a whole menu of other options they could choose from.

00:06:59.100 And one of them related to covering up violations of campaign finance law, while the other was covering up violations of business record laws.

00:07:06.160 In other words, as Tablet Magazine put it, the jury could have found that, quote,

00:07:09.200 Trump falsified business records to conspire to steal the election by falsifying business records.

00:07:16.800 Now, which circular, incoherent conspiracy did the jury buy?

00:07:20.980 Who knows?

00:07:22.060 The judge didn't require them to make that decision unanimously.

00:07:25.400 Each juror could have picked a different crime to convict Trump of committing.

00:07:31.040 We may never know.

00:07:33.120 So to restate, the upshot is that a former president and the leading presidential candidate right now,

00:07:39.200 was just convicted of 34 felony charges by a jury of his political opponents during an election year based on a novel legal theory

00:07:48.180 where the underlying alleged crime was never clearly explained and might not even make sense.

00:07:54.000 And on top of that, the jury didn't even have to reach a unanimous conclusion about it.

00:07:58.340 So, 12 members of the jury are walking out of the trial with potentially 12 different and opposing ideas about what crime they just convicted a former president of committing.

00:08:13.520 Now, all that's to say, there are not enough words in the English language to describe what a travesty of justice this case was.

00:08:22.780 Trials like this are what define the third world.

00:08:25.820 Show me the man and I'll show you the crime, as the saying goes.

00:08:29.000 With this trial, Alvin Bragg, who ran for office on the platform of going after Donald Trump,

00:08:34.380 managed to come up with a Frankenstein fake crime for the sole purpose of fulfilling that campaign promise.

00:08:41.560 And it wasn't just a promise to New Yorkers that Bragg fulfilled.

00:08:44.000 It was a promise to Washington.

00:08:45.880 Now, if you don't believe that, if you don't believe that Biden's DOJ had anything to do with this case,

00:08:50.540 I would refer you to the video of Alvin Bragg gloating at a press conference yesterday after the verdict was announced.

00:08:57.120 Watch.

00:08:58.340 I did my job.

00:08:59.820 Our job is to follow the facts and the law without fear or favor.

00:09:04.940 And that's exactly what we did here.

00:09:06.620 And what I feel is gratitude to work alongside phenomenal public servants who do that each and every day in matters that you all write about and make the press.

00:09:16.720 And in lots of matters that you don't.

00:09:18.400 I did my job.

00:09:20.320 We did our job.

00:09:22.220 Many voices out there.

00:09:23.740 The only voice that matters is the voice of the jury and the jury has spoken.

00:09:30.340 Now, the man to Alvin Bragg's right in that video is named Matthew Colangelo.

00:09:36.220 He happens to be a former high-ranking Biden DOJ official who left that job in December of 2022 to work as a senior counsel with Alvin Bragg in the Manhattan DA's office.

00:09:45.940 In fact, he was the number three guy in the DOJ before he took a massive demotion to work in a much smaller local prosecutor's office.

00:09:54.980 Why would he do that?

00:09:57.500 Is he just really passionate about impartially enforcing bookkeeping laws in Manhattan?

00:10:03.040 Now, the New York Post did some digging on Colangelo, and that doesn't seem likely.

00:10:08.680 It looks a lot more like Colangelo took the assignment to serve as the Democratic Party's hatchet man to take out Trump.

00:10:14.400 Quoting from the Post, quote,

00:10:16.020 The DNC paid Matthew Colangelo $12,000 in January 2018 for political consulting Federal Election Commission filing show.

00:10:23.900 He was also an Obama donor.

00:10:25.600 And this is the man who went right from Joe Biden's DOJ to Alvin Bragg's office right around the time that Bragg was reportedly waffling about bringing charges against Trump.

00:10:36.200 Now, you could choose to believe that this is all a coincidence.

00:10:40.760 Maybe you'd think Matthew Colangelo would treat a Democrat in exactly the same way as he treated Trump.

00:10:46.280 If a Democrat supposedly falsified some business records, then Colangelo would be hot on their heels.

00:10:52.280 But that really doesn't appear to be likely either.

00:10:54.960 In 2022, while Colangelo was still at the DOJ, the Clinton campaign and the DNC struck a deal with the FEC after the FEC alleged that they had falsified campaign records.

00:11:04.140 Quoting from the AP, quote,

00:11:05.720 Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign at the Democratic National Committee have agreed to pay $113,000 to settle a Federal Election Commission investigation

00:11:13.140 into whether they violated campaign finance law by misreporting spending on research that eventually became the infamous Steele dossier.

00:11:20.960 The Clinton campaign hired Perkins Coe, which then hired Fusion GPS, a research and intelligence firm, to conduct opposition research on Republican candidate Donald Trump's ties to Russia.

00:11:31.400 But on FEC forms, the Clinton campaign classified the spending as illegal services.

00:11:36.520 Well, that sounds a lot like what Donald Trump was accused of doing, except much, much, much worse.

00:11:45.140 The Clinton campaign allegedly falsified records to hide their involvement in spreading the Russiagate lie.

00:11:52.080 That was a lie that dominated the political landscape for, what, six years?

00:11:55.340 It led to thousands of fake news articles and investigations, ruined the lives of several people who worked on the Trump campaign.

00:12:02.980 But no member of the Clinton campaign was ever hauled before a jury for falsifying records or for doing anything else.

00:12:10.140 Matthew Colangelo never even dreamed of prosecuting them.

00:12:13.660 And, of course, neither did Alvin Bragg.

00:12:15.920 The Clinton campaign and the DNC just paid a fine and the matter was resolved.

00:12:19.400 That was it.

00:12:20.260 There was never any criminal prosecution, much less talk of prison time.

00:12:23.280 But in Trump's case, the media is now doing everything it can to convince Americans that, according to established legal precedent,

00:12:31.080 Donald Trump must go to prison for this fake crime.

00:12:34.680 That appears to be the next step here.

00:12:37.120 CNN trotted out several panelists yesterday to make that case.

00:12:40.700 Watch.

00:12:41.620 He could do home arrest.

00:12:42.960 Every option is on the table with a Class E felony like this.

00:12:46.500 But I wanted to just put a perspective for people of what any other defendant,

00:12:51.700 because I worked in the DA's office for about 30 years.

00:12:55.140 I've seen hundreds of thousands of cases and sentences.

00:12:59.080 And those are the factors that would have gone into that equation.

00:13:03.520 And absolutely, without a doubt, any other defendant who was similarly situated to Donald Trump,

00:13:09.500 who is not going to show remorse and who I am sure will push the bounds of the still remaining gag order after this.

00:13:17.520 We'll see what happens.

00:13:19.000 But anyone else in that position would get would get prison.

00:13:21.460 Here's what I discovered.

00:13:22.800 Yes.

00:13:23.180 That in the most serious FBR cases, a sentence of imprisonment is routinely imposed.

00:13:32.060 This is the most serious falsifying business records case in the history of the state of New York.

00:13:37.740 I think Alvin Bragg is going to ask for a sentence of incarceration.

00:13:40.740 And I think Judge Mershon will very seriously weigh that.

00:13:45.740 So the special treatment you're saying would be if he were not given a prison sentence.

00:13:50.600 Right.

00:13:53.240 If you believe anything that you just heard there, then you are too stupid.

00:13:57.720 Then you're just you're well, you're too stupid.

00:14:00.540 You're too stupid to to tie your shoes in the morning.

00:14:03.680 Most likely these panelists want you to believe that Trump is getting special treatments in New York if he doesn't go to prison.

00:14:10.580 Like special treatment as in in a positive way.

00:14:14.580 They're going to do him a favor.

00:14:17.200 This is a city where you don't even go to prison if you pummel old ladies in the street. 0.84

00:14:22.840 This is a city that is profoundly reluctant to send anyone to prison for anything, even and especially for actual violent crimes committed against innocent people.

00:14:34.400 But this business records case is on a whole other level, they say.

00:14:38.900 The most serious business records case in the history of the state.

00:14:44.140 So serious that they can't even tell you what the crime was, even now after he's been convicted of it.

00:14:50.160 Trump didn't show remorse for this fake crime, so he needs to go to prison.

00:14:54.620 That's the logic, as Soviet as it is. 0.97

00:14:56.800 We're supposed to believe that that's the normal outcome in a case like this, but it's not.

00:15:01.760 If you look up recent prosecutions in New York for falsifying business records, you'll find that virtually all of them involve allegations of tax fraud or workers' compensation fraud where the defendant made money.

00:15:13.040 For example, there was a New York v. James Garner, a case from November 2021, in which, quote,

00:15:18.820 a mental health therapy aide was indicted for allegedly defrauding over $35,000 in workers' compensation benefits.

00:15:25.360 There was also a case of New York v. Jasu Aguilar Dubon from October 2022, in which, quote,

00:15:30.420 a Bronx business owner was indicted for failing to report over $1 million in income, avoiding paying $60,000 in taxes.

00:15:38.680 Now, on their website, the outlet Just Security has tallied many other examples like this.

00:15:42.620 But again, the point is that these people allegedly lied to obtain more money.

00:15:47.800 In this case, as I said, Trump overpaid his taxes, if anything.

00:15:52.580 So his prosecution is highly unusual for that reason alone.

00:15:57.000 And that's not the only strange aspect of this case, of course.

00:15:59.720 It's also more than a little odd that the same judge who handled this hush money trial

00:16:04.440 is also handling the criminal case against Steve Bannon and the criminal case against the Trump organization.

00:16:11.640 And this judge just so happens to be a Joe Biden donor.

00:16:15.900 Is that normal?

00:16:17.780 The CNN panelists wouldn't say, but we all know the answer.

00:16:20.920 They gave every Trump-related case to one single judge, and it just so happens to be a judge,

00:16:27.000 who donated to Trump's political opponent.

00:16:30.820 They're not even trying to hide what they're doing.

00:16:32.880 This is the kind of political corruption that you might read about in the Gulag Archipelago. 0.70

00:16:39.200 And up until now, you would read those stories, as I did when I first read the volumes of the Gulag Archipelago several years ago,

00:16:47.820 reading those stories and thinking, wow, well, I mean, thank God,

00:16:51.400 nothing that absurdly corrupt could ever happen here.

00:16:56.080 Here we are.

00:16:57.940 With the Trump trial, the left has trampled every norm that exists in the criminal justice system.

00:17:04.160 They prosecuted the leading presidential candidate in an election year for a seven-year-old fake crime.

00:17:09.340 They assigned a hack judge to the case, who essentially guided the jury to a conviction,

00:17:13.940 and they did it all in front of a jury in one of the most partisan places in the country.

00:17:17.500 A few weeks ago, one prospective juror who disqualified herself from the trial gave an interview

00:17:23.080 in which she explained that after meeting the other jurors, they did not seem completely impartial to her.

00:17:30.980 Listen.

00:17:32.240 This is Kat.

00:17:33.280 She runs a VC fund here in Manhattan for folks that are over 60 years of age.

00:17:38.420 She was just dismissed as a potential juror.

00:17:41.700 What happened?

00:17:42.480 Why were you dismissed?

00:17:43.740 Because I couldn't be impartial.

00:17:45.600 You couldn't be impartial.

00:17:46.320 So when the judge asked that hand, can you be impartial, you raised your hand and you said you cannot.

00:17:50.860 Exactly.

00:17:51.460 Wow.

00:17:51.900 Do you feel like the people that you were speaking with in that jury room that you sat with all day on Tuesday,

00:17:58.560 that they can put together a fair and impartial jury because of that sense of duty?

00:18:03.940 Do you think that's possible?

00:18:06.300 I'm not sure about that.

00:18:08.420 Really? Why?

00:18:09.100 You know, everybody has biases and, you know, stereotypes in their mind.

00:18:16.780 So you have to be a really, you know, deep and, you know, fair person, which is very hard to do, right?

00:18:25.640 Yeah.

00:18:25.880 In order to serve as a jury.

00:18:27.300 I hope they do.

00:18:28.280 I mean, this is justice, right?

00:18:31.940 Now, there's some speculation on social media that this woman might have leaned towards acquitting Trump, but we have no idea.

00:18:37.640 The fact that she's speaking to MSNBC would suggest otherwise.

00:18:40.280 But the key point is her firsthand observation of the jury, which is that they might not be impartial in the case.

00:18:47.800 And we all knew that, of course.

00:18:49.660 It was always impossible, quite literally impossible, that Trump would get an impartial jury.

00:18:56.520 Impossible that he could have a fair trial.

00:18:58.240 Impossible.

00:18:59.160 Nobody on earth is impartial to Donald Trump.

00:19:02.080 And if such a unicorn does exist, they don't live in New York City.

00:19:05.940 But this illustrates a key difference between the left and the right, which is that, in general, the left is committed to winning at all costs.

00:19:14.020 They're happy to seat biased jurors and judges to get what they want.

00:19:18.200 Meanwhile, conservatives are preoccupied with norms that nobody else in the country cares about.

00:19:25.360 Republicans could have arrested and charged Hillary Clinton for any number of crimes at any point in the past decade. 0.99

00:19:32.920 They could have pursued her for the Steele dossier FEC charge.

00:19:35.720 I mentioned earlier, investigated the Clinton Foundation, prosecuted Clinton's retention of classified materials, followed by her lie to the FBI during an interview about those materials.

00:19:45.480 But Republicans didn't do any of that on the basis that if they do that, then Democrats might return fire.

00:19:53.560 And so Republicans continue to cherish our norms while Democrats blow the norms to smithereens with a thousand sticks of dynamite.

00:20:02.660 Now, the necessary response is obvious, although it won't be pleasant.

00:20:09.100 Donald Trump should immediately create and publish a list of 10 high-ranking Democrat criminals who he will have arrested when he takes office.

00:20:17.380 First on the list should be Joe Biden.

00:20:19.020 Second should be Joe Biden's crackhead son.

00:20:21.600 And in the meantime, Republican AGs all over the country should pursue their own indictments.

00:20:25.040 Border states should charge government officials for deliberately contributing to human trafficking at the southern border.

00:20:31.460 And if Donald Trump's hush money, quote unquote, was illegal because it interfered with an election somehow, then so is importing millions of foreign nationals every year.

00:20:40.660 That's the biggest form of election interference imaginable.

00:20:43.260 Time to impanel a grand jury right away in the reddest city, in the reddest state on the map.

00:20:50.680 Better issue a gag order on Joe Biden, too, for good measure.

00:20:54.700 Take corrupt Democrats, corrupt Democrat criminals, put them on trial in front of juries that already hate them before the trial even begins.

00:21:06.140 That's what needs to happen.

00:21:08.260 Now, does that mean that we are stooping to their level?

00:21:11.260 No, it means that we must stop pretending that we live in a country that no longer exists.

00:21:19.280 Now, will any of this ever come to pass?

00:21:22.660 We'll see.

00:21:23.640 It's doubtful.

00:21:25.040 But it's the only viable option.

00:21:28.180 Right-wing lawfare is what's necessary to defeat left-wing lawfare. 0.98

00:21:32.820 There is no other way about it.

00:21:35.700 The entire legal system depends on a series of unstated principles that prosecutors won't pursue political cases, that juries will be impartial, that crimes must be clearly defined.

00:21:48.780 And once one side violates all of these principles, then the principles cease to exist for everyone.

00:21:58.480 They're gone.

00:22:00.340 They do not exist anymore.

00:22:02.240 And now it's mutually assured destruction.

00:22:07.060 But that's a deterrent that only works if there's a real possibility that it's actually enforced.

00:22:13.600 And after what just happened in Manhattan, it's well past time to introduce the left to what mutually assured destruction might look like.

00:22:23.020 So, frankly, I don't want to hear elected Republicans complaining about this verdict.

00:22:29.360 I don't need to see their tweets and their statements condemning it.

00:22:35.880 They've already put out all the statements and all the tweets.

00:22:39.840 I don't care.

00:22:41.360 None of us care.

00:22:42.360 We're not impressed with that.

00:22:44.300 If you're an elected Republican saying, I oppose this, and you're going on Fox News, and you're like, great.

00:22:49.820 Good for you.

00:22:51.800 The only thing that we want to hear from these people is which Democrats they will have arrested.

00:22:59.360 Don't tell us you're sad about the verdict.

00:23:01.140 We don't give a damn about your feelings.

00:23:03.640 We want to see corrupt Democrat criminals frog-marched on camera in handcuffs.

00:23:10.980 Don't whine about the double standard.

00:23:13.240 Force the Democrats' own standards on them.

00:23:18.060 Drag them there kicking and screaming.

00:23:22.280 And if you won't do that, then just shut up.

00:23:27.420 Now let's get to our five headlines.

00:23:29.360 For an exclusive Father's Day treat, choose Good Ranchers.

00:23:37.700 They've just unveiled their limited edition King Cut, available only for this special occasion.

00:23:42.260 The King Cut box is packed with thick-cut, bone-in ribeyes, center-cut filet mignons,

00:23:47.100 and thick-cut, bone-in New York strips, all sourced from local family farms and aged 21 days to perfection.

00:23:53.900 The work of a father never ends, so Good Ranchers is offering free bacon for life with any new subscription.

00:23:58.720 Make sure to use code Walsh to receive two packs of Good Ranchers uncured applewood smoked bacon with every order.

00:24:04.440 Seriously, you won't just get free bacon this year.

00:24:06.300 You'll also get it next year and every single year after that.

00:24:09.340 And if you need any other reason to support Good Ranchers, they're not only amazing partners of my show,

00:24:13.400 but they're supporting the paralyzed veterans of America, too.

00:24:16.700 So every order saves American farms and supports American veterans. 0.90

00:24:20.060 So, knock this Father's Day out of the park.

00:24:22.860 Visit GoodRanchers.com.

00:24:24.160 Use code Walsh to secure their brand-new King Cut box for a dad you know or subscribe to any of their custom-curated box for yourself.

00:24:31.460 Don't forget to use code Walsh at checkout to claim your free applewood smoked bacon for life.

00:24:36.280 That's GoodRanchers.com.

00:24:37.940 Promo code Walsh.

00:24:38.920 ABC 7 News in San Francisco reports a historic but controversial flag that has become a symbol of the far right

00:24:46.180 was taken down in front of San Francisco City Hall over the weekend.

00:24:49.260 According to a city official, the Appeal to Heaven flag was swapped with an American flag on Saturday.

00:24:54.560 Officials say the controversial flag was initially raised on Flag Day in 1964 at Civic Center.

00:24:59.460 It was part of what is known as the Pavilion of American Flags.

00:25:02.840 San Francisco Recreation and Parks Communication Manor Daniel Montez said the flag was originally used during the American Revolutionary War

00:25:08.660 flown by George Washington's cruisers.

00:25:10.760 It was associated with early quest for American independence.

00:25:13.900 It's since been adopted by a different group, one that doesn't represent the city's values,

00:25:17.540 so we made the decision to swap it with the American flag.

00:25:21.020 The Appeal to Heaven flag has made headlines recently after the banner was flown outside U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alita's

00:25:27.400 beach vacation home in New Jersey, according to the New York Times,

00:25:30.240 which obtained several images showing it on different dates in July and September 2023.

00:25:36.100 The Times previously reported that an upside-down American flag had flown outside Alito's Alexandria, Virginia home

00:25:40.460 less than two weeks after the violent January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

00:25:47.880 This is how it works, and we're watching the process in real time,

00:25:53.520 so it's very instructive, and it's worth taking note of this.

00:25:56.560 We are watching as the left takes the next historical symbol, which in this case has existed for 250 years,

00:26:06.640 back to our nation's founding, and just deciding that they're going to turn it into a problem.

00:26:13.200 Just deciding that it's a problem now.

00:26:15.660 This thing that has existed for 250 years hasn't been a problem, and now it's a problem.

00:26:23.640 And they decided it because Alito flew the flag at his vacation home.

00:26:28.340 Turns out that exact same flag had been outside of San Francisco City Hall for 50 years.

00:26:35.300 And so rather than the left saying, well, okay, never mind.

00:26:40.420 I mean, if this flag not only has been around for 250 years, but even for half a century has been flying in San Francisco,

00:26:46.840 then it's clearly not some sort of symbol of far-right extremism.

00:26:51.660 Rather than the left saying that, they're saying, oh, well, no.

00:26:55.320 See, we've decided that it's a symbol of far-right extremism.

00:26:57.700 And so rather than going back on that after we discover that it was actually flying outside of San Francisco City Hall,

00:27:03.840 we're just going to take it down from San Francisco City Hall.

00:27:05.780 So that's the way that works.

00:27:09.000 There was never any controversy around this flag.

00:27:12.840 For 250 years, there was no controversy.

00:27:16.880 For 250 years, up until 14 seconds ago, there was no controversy.

00:27:23.400 And now suddenly, it's a controversial flag.

00:27:27.700 So this is what they do.

00:27:31.840 They took this traditional American symbol and just decided one day on their own

00:27:37.940 that actually it stands for insurrection and right-wing extremism and presumably racism and so on.

00:27:49.600 And now the flag is being taken down from government buildings where, in the case of San Francisco, again, it's flown for 50 years.

00:27:56.960 It was 50 years without a problem until the left made it a problem.

00:28:01.940 And, of course, they've done this with countless American symbols.

00:28:07.040 But here we get to see it happening in real time.

00:28:11.020 We see the birth and the genesis of the false narrative.

00:28:14.580 We see how utterly arbitrary and contrived it is.

00:28:20.760 Let this be a lesson.

00:28:23.040 The next time you hear that some flag or symbol or statue or whatever is problematic,

00:28:28.660 remember that it's problematic simply because the left woke up that morning and decided that it is.

00:28:35.400 They've claimed for themselves the power, the authority to determine what our historical symbols mean.

00:28:45.280 They have claimed the right to imbue our history with whatever meaning they determine.

00:28:50.860 And if they decide one day, well, this is a problem, then it's a problem.

00:28:59.280 Problematizing, as they call it.

00:29:02.560 This is like a leftist term, problematize.

00:29:06.180 And this is exactly what it means.

00:29:07.980 They take something and they rip it apart and they sift through it and they look for a reason for it to be a problem.

00:29:19.140 They take something that is not a problem, that they know is not a problem, and they say,

00:29:23.140 okay, we're going to find a reason to make this a problem.

00:29:29.460 And now they're doing it with this historic American flag.

00:29:33.800 And the pretense, anyway, and it is only pretense, but the pretense is that this flag was flown by somebody on January 6th, supposedly.

00:29:51.520 So just somebody in the crowd happened to have this flag, and that means that now the flag is a symbol of right-wing extremism.

00:29:58.480 Now, as I pointed out before, and others have pointed out, well, you know, American flags, those were the main flags.

00:30:10.600 The Star-Spangled Banner was flown on January 6th by a lot of those people.

00:30:17.540 And so does that make the American flag a right-wing extremist symbol?

00:30:22.960 And, of course, the answer is yes.

00:30:27.200 In the left's mind, they hear that objection and they say, yeah, that's a right-wing extremist symbol too.

00:30:37.580 And I'm telling you right now, we are going to get to the point in the not-too-distant future where there will be a real effort

00:30:44.180 to get rid of the American flag, the actual American flag, and replace it with something.

00:30:49.900 That is going to happen.

00:30:52.960 Now, it's true that when I make political predictions about, like, who's going to win in elections, I'm very often wrong.

00:30:59.760 You should ignore me on that.

00:31:01.360 But when it comes to cultural trends, I'm usually right.

00:31:06.660 And so this is a cultural trend that I'm telling you right now.

00:31:12.400 In the next few years, at least, the American flag itself, there's going to be a real movement to change the flag

00:31:21.200 and get rid of it on the basis that it has become a symbol of, well, not just that it has become a symbol of right-wing extremism,

00:31:30.740 but that, in fact, it has always been.

00:31:32.200 It's a symbol of racism.

00:31:34.320 It's all of this, right?

00:31:35.340 Going back and slavery and everything. 0.85

00:31:39.140 Of course, you wouldn't have to look that hard to find leftists who are openly making that case right now as we speak.

00:31:44.380 But in the next few years, especially if Joe Biden is reelected, or I should say, especially if reelected or not,

00:31:58.760 Joe Biden is still president after this next election,

00:32:03.680 especially then that will sort of turbocharge this movement.

00:32:07.720 And, you know, the real problematizing of the American flag will happen, without a doubt.

00:32:15.860 And they've already set the stage for that with things like this.

00:32:22.420 And if they can do it, if they can do it with this, with the appeal to heaven flag,

00:32:26.460 that's 250 years old,

00:32:29.680 and they can just decide, like, in the span of a week,

00:32:32.680 it goes from totally fine to we have to take it down because it's so controversial.

00:32:37.880 If they can do that in a week with this, well, they can do it with anything.

00:32:44.300 What will replace the American flag when they decide to take it down and rip it up?

00:32:51.020 Yeah, I mean, the obvious choice would be the pride flag, 1.00

00:32:54.020 and I would expect that's where this is headed.

00:32:58.160 Where the pride flag becomes the new American flag.

00:33:02.680 All right, New York Post reports on a new study from the antinatalists

00:33:07.140 continuing their campaign to discourage the human race, 1.00

00:33:11.280 you know, rather, well, rather encourage the human race to embrace its own extinction.

00:33:16.340 Here's the headline.

00:33:18.240 Fatherhood might be bad for your heart.

00:33:22.140 Article says, kids may pull on your heartstrings in more ways than one.

00:33:26.360 Fathers have worse cardiovascular health than men without kids, according to a new study.

00:33:30.460 Researchers from Northwestern University and Ann and Robert H.

00:33:34.160 Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago analyzed data from 2,814 men between ages 45 and 85

00:33:40.520 and found that health outcomes varied considerably by ethnicity

00:33:44.120 and how old the man was when his first kid was born.

00:33:47.180 For example, men who became fathers under age 25

00:33:49.280 seemed to have worse heart health than other fathers.

00:33:53.000 This was especially true among men who were Hispanic or black.

00:33:55.940 The study published in AGPM Focus earlier this month

00:34:00.080 used data from the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.

00:34:06.160 The men were grouped as being fathers or non-fathers

00:34:08.700 and self-identified as black, Chinese, Hispanic, or white.

00:34:11.880 Fathers made up 82% of the group.

00:34:15.840 Black, Chinese, Hispanic, or white.

00:34:20.040 Seems like a really specific category there with Chinese.

00:34:22.720 Why not Asian? I don't know. 0.99

00:34:23.620 The researchers looked at a number of health markers,

00:34:28.160 including diet, exercise, and smoking habits,

00:34:30.260 weight, blood pressure, and glucose levels,

00:34:32.200 and it turns out that it's bad for your heart to be a father.

00:34:36.620 Now, as you hear this, you might be a little confused

00:34:39.280 because maybe you could have sworn that you've heard studies

00:34:42.760 that show that married men and family men tend to be healthier and live longer.

00:34:49.240 So what's up with that?

00:34:50.320 Well, that's true, and in fact, this very same study even acknowledges that.

00:34:55.540 Quote,

00:34:56.460 Fathers might live longer.

00:34:58.360 While the fathers in the study had worse cardiovascular health overall,

00:35:01.240 they were the least likely to die from any cause in the group.

00:35:05.200 Researchers said that this may be because fathers have more social support than non-fathers.

00:35:09.040 Fathers may also be more likely to have someone as their future caretaker

00:35:13.480 to help them attend medical appointments and manage medications.

00:35:16.880 We also found that fathers had lower rates of depressive symptoms than non-fathers,

00:35:20.920 so mental health may be contributing to the lower death rates in fathers.

00:35:23.860 Okay.

00:35:24.820 So fatherhood destroys your heart and helps you live longer.

00:35:29.220 If that finding seems like nonsense, it's because, of course, it is.

00:35:34.760 And studies like this are pointless anyway.

00:35:37.860 Because if you put the effort in to take care of yourself,

00:35:40.260 you'll probably have good heart health.

00:35:42.740 Now, there could be other things that happen, other diseases that

00:35:45.160 crop up that are basically outside of your control.

00:35:49.280 But generally, if you take good care of yourself,

00:35:52.120 you'll have pretty good heart health and good health in general

00:35:54.660 for a long time anyway.

00:35:58.380 And if you don't take good care of yourself, then you won't.

00:36:00.440 And that's the case whether you have 10 kids or no kids.

00:36:04.420 So even if we accept the results here,

00:36:06.400 it doesn't mean that if you have kids,

00:36:08.880 you're more likely to have a bad heart.

00:36:11.600 Your own personal likelihood of having heart problems

00:36:14.680 depends largely on your own eating and exercising habits.

00:36:18.960 And that's what will determine it.

00:36:20.280 And I can say this for my case,

00:36:24.880 that if I was not married and I had no kids

00:36:28.820 at my advanced age of almost 38,

00:36:31.560 I would probably be obese at this point.

00:36:34.580 I mean, I would certainly be pretty flabby and weak.

00:36:37.660 And that's because when I go to work out,

00:36:39.680 at least like 85% of my motivation

00:36:42.020 is that I have a wife and kids

00:36:44.600 and I want to stay strong and healthy for my family.

00:36:48.560 Like, that's what drives me.

00:36:51.360 And the other 15% is that

00:36:53.480 probably that I'm on camera every day

00:36:55.600 and I don't want to be fat.

00:36:57.060 But, you know, I could probably rationalize

00:36:59.940 even, you know, that 15%,

00:37:01.980 I could probably rationalize that away

00:37:03.340 if I didn't have a family.

00:37:05.000 I could probably convince myself that,

00:37:07.740 you know, maybe I could just become a fat guy

00:37:09.580 and that'll be part of my brand.

00:37:12.080 I could even take the stage name, Fat Matt or something.

00:37:14.900 Like, you know, you can work with it.

00:37:15.960 It can work.

00:37:16.440 You can work with the fat thing if you're on camera.

00:37:19.560 But I'm not going to do that

00:37:21.100 because I have a family

00:37:22.100 and I don't want to die of a heart attack

00:37:24.240 when I'm 45.

00:37:25.080 And I also want my children to see me

00:37:27.000 as a strong presence in the home,

00:37:28.840 a source of protection and security.

00:37:30.600 And if you're a flabby little weakling,

00:37:33.060 it's hard to maintain that image

00:37:34.640 in front of your family.

00:37:36.040 And this is how I feel

00:37:37.200 about so many of the supposed drawbacks

00:37:41.120 of having a family.

00:37:43.040 You know, I hear about the drawbacks

00:37:46.080 and they are so foreign to my own experience.

00:37:50.560 They are so often the opposite

00:37:52.400 of what my experience has been

00:37:54.020 because you also hear that having a family

00:37:56.120 will make you poor.

00:37:57.720 And again, for me, it's the opposite.

00:38:00.420 My family is what motivates me

00:38:02.400 to go out every day and try to succeed

00:38:04.280 and earn as much money as I can.

00:38:06.100 It's hard to imagine that I would have

00:38:07.660 anywhere close to the same ambition

00:38:09.620 and success if I was just earning

00:38:12.560 a living for myself.

00:38:14.940 I mean, honestly, if it was just me,

00:38:17.780 I could probably get by pretty easily

00:38:20.060 on, you know, like being like

00:38:21.700 a Walmart assistant manager

00:38:22.880 or something like that.

00:38:23.520 And I don't mean that as an insult

00:38:24.420 to Walmart assistant managers.

00:38:25.520 I'm just saying that a single guy

00:38:27.280 doesn't need much.

00:38:28.980 When I lived alone in my early 20s,

00:38:31.900 I slept on a mattress

00:38:34.160 directly on the floor.

00:38:35.640 Didn't even have a box spring,

00:38:37.200 just a mattress.

00:38:37.980 And I slept like that

00:38:40.300 for like five years.

00:38:41.120 In fact, I had the mattress

00:38:42.160 in my living room.

00:38:43.700 I did.

00:38:43.960 I did.

00:38:44.220 I don't want to brag,

00:38:44.740 but I had two rooms in my apartment,

00:38:46.900 bedroom and a living room.

00:38:49.240 So, you know,

00:38:49.860 I was living pretty high on the hog.

00:38:51.260 But I didn't really use the bedroom.

00:38:52.640 I just dragged the mattress

00:38:53.440 into the living room

00:38:54.120 because I figured like

00:38:54.680 all my stuff is there

00:38:55.480 and I got the TV.

00:38:56.140 I want to watch TV in bed.

00:38:57.460 And so I got my couch

00:38:58.220 and my mattress just lying there

00:38:59.620 and like a little tiny table

00:39:01.060 and a TV.

00:39:04.220 And that's how I lived

00:39:05.060 for like five years.

00:39:05.740 And I could still live that way now

00:39:08.500 at even at my age

00:39:09.960 if I wasn't a husband

00:39:10.860 and a father.

00:39:11.940 If I didn't have any family

00:39:13.200 and it was just me,

00:39:14.880 I'd probably still

00:39:15.960 basically be living that way.

00:39:18.480 So this is the strange position

00:39:20.660 that I'm in

00:39:21.180 and that a lot of

00:39:21.800 that men who have families are in

00:39:25.080 that I'm constantly told

00:39:27.900 that having a family

00:39:29.020 means that I will lose

00:39:32.400 all of the things

00:39:33.620 that I actually gained

00:39:35.520 because I have a family.

00:39:38.800 I'm constantly told

00:39:39.860 that if you have a family,

00:39:41.520 you can't have

00:39:42.920 all the things

00:39:43.780 that I have

00:39:44.740 and not only have

00:39:45.640 but only have

00:39:47.080 because of the fact

00:39:48.480 that I have a family

00:39:49.300 or largely have

00:39:50.700 because of that fact.

00:39:52.360 It's very bizarre.

00:39:53.320 Let's see.

00:39:59.160 Fox LA

00:39:59.920 has a major update

00:40:00.840 to one of the most important

00:40:01.960 stories of the decade

00:40:02.800 and I'll read through

00:40:04.080 this article a bit

00:40:04.860 and then I have

00:40:06.040 some shocking images,

00:40:07.000 some pictures

00:40:07.380 that I'll show you

00:40:07.980 at the end of it

00:40:08.620 and we'll go through those.

00:40:10.560 But

00:40:10.700 so here's the story.

00:40:15.380 There are at least

00:40:16.260 two beings

00:40:17.520 using some sort of

00:40:18.800 cloaking device

00:40:19.760 that landed

00:40:20.240 in a Las Vegas backyard,

00:40:21.900 a veteran crime scene

00:40:23.120 reconstruction analyst said.

00:40:25.600 Scott Roeder

00:40:26.320 who has testified

00:40:26.780 as an expert

00:40:27.340 in some of the most

00:40:27.900 highly publicized

00:40:28.520 criminal cases in the world

00:40:29.360 broke down a video

00:40:30.800 of a reported alien sighting

00:40:32.440 in Los Angeles

00:40:33.120 frame by frame.

00:40:35.320 In one second of real time

00:40:36.800 there are 30 frames

00:40:37.800 that show a head

00:40:38.580 with smoke around it

00:40:39.700 which Roeder called

00:40:40.960 some sort of

00:40:41.760 cloaking device

00:40:42.620 moving into the top

00:40:43.920 right corner of the video

00:40:44.760 and peering over the fence.

00:40:47.240 He said,

00:40:47.560 quote,

00:40:47.960 I apply the same principles

00:40:49.000 that I would apply

00:40:49.640 to any kind of

00:40:50.200 homicide investigations

00:40:51.100 at this particular time

00:40:51.880 with what we've seen here

00:40:53.300 is proof of a couple of things

00:40:54.540 that these entities

00:40:55.180 are real

00:40:55.860 that they're there

00:40:57.180 this is not fake

00:40:58.460 this is not a fraud.

00:41:02.980 So you may remember

00:41:03.920 the story we talked about

00:41:04.640 of course on the show

00:41:05.360 several months ago

00:41:06.980 that there was this story

00:41:08.160 of

00:41:08.580 of aliens

00:41:10.660 that landed

00:41:11.200 in someone's backyard

00:41:12.060 in Las Vegas

00:41:12.660 and

00:41:14.100 they got turned around

00:41:15.600 they were a little bit

00:41:16.240 they were lost

00:41:16.740 they were confused

00:41:17.280 and

00:41:18.500 so they landed

00:41:19.580 in the backyard

00:41:20.080 and

00:41:21.800 at the time

00:41:22.540 many people

00:41:24.440 and there was

00:41:26.400 appeared to be

00:41:27.280 some kind of video

00:41:27.900 that was taken

00:41:28.420 but you couldn't really

00:41:29.080 see the aliens

00:41:29.680 in the video

00:41:30.240 and a lot of people

00:41:31.740 I think quite foolishly

00:41:33.120 just declared

00:41:35.600 that because you can't

00:41:36.780 see the aliens

00:41:37.420 in the video

00:41:38.180 the video is therefore

00:41:40.200 not sufficient evidence

00:41:41.980 that there were

00:41:42.680 any aliens there

00:41:43.660 but Scott Roeder

00:41:46.380 is coming along

00:41:46.900 and he's an expert

00:41:47.560 and he's saying

00:41:49.040 look they have

00:41:49.440 invisibility cloaks

00:41:50.340 that's what this expert

00:41:52.380 is saying

00:41:52.760 and this guy

00:41:53.400 he's an expert

00:41:54.480 in aliens

00:41:56.620 with invisibility cloaks

00:41:57.780 I thought I was the only one

00:41:59.220 I'm also an expert

00:41:59.960 in that subject

00:42:00.540 and I thought

00:42:01.640 I was the only expert

00:42:02.820 in this field

00:42:03.340 it's sort of a

00:42:04.480 it's a burgeoning field

00:42:06.360 it's a growing field

00:42:07.240 but I had been

00:42:08.140 the only expert

00:42:08.760 up until now

00:42:09.460 but now he is as well

00:42:13.000 and I concur with him

00:42:14.240 so there's really

00:42:14.760 expert

00:42:15.280 there's a

00:42:15.780 there's a unanimous

00:42:16.780 the experts

00:42:17.800 unanimously agree

00:42:18.900 that

00:42:20.400 that these aliens

00:42:23.060 aren't

00:42:23.320 have invisibility cloaks

00:42:24.380 and that's why

00:42:24.820 you can't see them

00:42:25.400 so let's look at the photos

00:42:26.620 let's just pull up the photos

00:42:28.720 and take a look at them

00:42:29.420 okay so you see there

00:42:31.100 so you can see

00:42:33.080 so right

00:42:34.400 so you see where the arrow

00:42:35.340 is pointing

00:42:35.780 and it's right

00:42:37.260 it's right there

00:42:38.680 let's go to the next photo

00:42:40.000 oh right here

00:42:41.760 I want you to look

00:42:42.440 at where this arrow

00:42:42.900 points

00:42:43.140 what do you see there

00:42:44.220 what do you see

00:42:45.400 what do you see

00:42:46.260 here where the arrow

00:42:46.920 is pointing

00:42:47.300 you don't see anything

00:42:49.440 you see nothing at all

00:42:51.380 so go back to that

00:42:52.280 first photo

00:42:52.800 go back

00:42:53.740 can we go back again

00:42:54.620 okay

00:42:55.660 look here again

00:42:56.720 what do you see

00:42:58.060 in this

00:42:58.820 in this area

00:42:59.540 right here

00:43:00.000 absolutely nothing

00:43:01.540 you don't see anything

00:43:02.280 this is like literally

00:43:03.660 nothing

00:43:03.960 you can't see a single

00:43:04.800 thing at all

00:43:05.340 that's exactly the point

00:43:07.560 precisely

00:43:08.720 so you can clearly see

00:43:11.160 with those photos

00:43:12.240 that you can't see

00:43:13.300 anything

00:43:13.800 but these are invisible

00:43:17.040 aliens remember

00:43:17.980 so not seeing them

00:43:20.580 is seeing them

00:43:21.200 when you don't see them

00:43:23.180 you are seeing them

00:43:23.900 because they're invisible

00:43:24.480 in fact I would

00:43:25.500 I would go so far

00:43:27.240 as to say this

00:43:27.720 I would say that

00:43:28.320 the photos would be

00:43:29.840 less convincing

00:43:30.940 if you could see aliens

00:43:32.980 because think about it

00:43:35.360 somebody says to you

00:43:37.080 oh there are invisible

00:43:37.840 aliens in my backyard

00:43:38.800 and you say

00:43:39.380 let me see a picture

00:43:40.180 I don't believe you

00:43:40.780 and then they show you

00:43:42.740 a picture

00:43:43.160 of an alien

00:43:44.640 and you would say

00:43:45.900 well you're

00:43:46.680 you're full of

00:43:47.360 I can see the alien

00:43:49.020 is obviously not invisible

00:43:50.040 you see what I'm saying

00:43:51.980 they show you a picture

00:43:53.680 and there's no alien

00:43:54.840 then you go

00:43:55.620 oh well that's

00:43:56.660 clearly

00:43:57.140 he's invisible

00:43:57.900 there's no alien there

00:43:59.700 so that

00:44:01.060 you're saying to yourself

00:44:02.260 well that's exactly

00:44:03.040 what I expected

00:44:03.640 this picture to look like

00:44:04.720 in other words

00:44:06.640 on the theory

00:44:08.800 okay this is science

00:44:09.780 on

00:44:11.540 because

00:44:11.920 what is a science

00:44:13.100 a scientific theory

00:44:13.760 a scientific theory

00:44:14.540 is a way of explaining

00:44:16.240 things that occur

00:44:17.720 in the physical world

00:44:18.420 and so

00:44:18.720 on the theory

00:44:20.140 that there is

00:44:21.180 an invisible alien

00:44:22.420 in your backyard

00:44:23.340 that theory predicts

00:44:25.600 that a photo

00:44:27.560 of the alien

00:44:28.500 will not show anything

00:44:29.980 that's what the theory

00:44:31.880 predicts

00:44:32.300 and then you look

00:44:33.600 at the photo

00:44:34.040 and what do you know

00:44:35.020 there's nothing

00:44:35.520 so the theory

00:44:37.320 has been proven

00:44:38.000 the theory has been

00:44:39.000 confirmed

00:44:39.460 it's confirmed

00:44:39.980 it's actually a fact

00:44:41.700 now

00:44:41.920 it is a fact

00:44:43.160 we now have

00:44:43.940 confirmation

00:44:44.240 we have absolute

00:44:45.400 confirmation

00:44:45.860 you cannot

00:44:46.420 that's 100%

00:44:47.680 evidence

00:44:48.740 reliable evidence

00:44:51.340 that the aliens

00:44:52.480 are there

00:44:52.860 so

00:44:53.260 you know

00:44:55.980 seeing is believing

00:44:57.920 but

00:44:58.980 not seeing

00:45:00.180 is

00:45:01.740 even more

00:45:03.460 believing

00:45:03.900 when it comes

00:45:05.220 to

00:45:05.580 invisible aliens

00:45:06.740 and

00:45:08.040 so that's

00:45:10.300 just

00:45:10.460 anyway

00:45:10.740 I get a little

00:45:12.000 nerdy

00:45:12.300 when we get

00:45:12.620 into the science

00:45:13.260 of it

00:45:13.560 but

00:45:13.820 that's the science

00:45:14.800 there it is

00:45:15.280 Jeremy's

00:45:16.400 second gen

00:45:16.900 razors

00:45:17.260 are here

00:45:17.820 for men

00:45:18.460 conservative men

00:45:19.500 and if you don't

00:45:19.980 think I'm right

00:45:20.600 go listen to

00:45:21.280 the real

00:45:21.860 Jeremy

00:45:22.200 the new

00:45:22.700 second greatest

00:45:23.800 commercial ever

00:45:24.460 which now has

00:45:25.100 over 7.5 million

00:45:26.480 views on YouTube

00:45:27.200 in the meantime

00:45:27.960 make sure you get

00:45:28.780 yourself a new

00:45:29.500 Jeremy second gen

00:45:30.640 razor

00:45:30.920 they're radically

00:45:31.460 redesigned featuring

00:45:32.280 a new ergonomic

00:45:33.280 handle for superior

00:45:34.420 durability and sharper

00:45:35.580 longer lasting blades

00:45:36.800 you can get the

00:45:37.600 brand new Sprint 3

00:45:38.640 for a quick clean

00:45:39.680 shave or the new

00:45:40.560 and improved

00:45:40.920 Precision 5

00:45:41.700 for an exceptionally

00:45:42.440 smooth and close

00:45:43.560 shave

00:45:43.840 head over to

00:45:44.880 jeremysrazors.com

00:45:46.160 to start shaving

00:45:46.980 like a man

00:45:47.740 not a manifesto

00:45:49.140 now let's get to

00:45:50.080 our daily

00:45:50.520 cancellation

00:45:50.960 yesterday before

00:45:58.300 the Trump

00:45:58.880 verdict swept

00:45:59.660 away all of

00:46:00.240 their conversations

00:46:00.880 on social media

00:46:01.640 I had been

00:46:02.280 involved in a

00:46:03.120 debate about

00:46:03.880 obesity

00:46:04.360 and here was

00:46:05.800 the question at

00:46:06.420 the center of

00:46:07.260 this discussion

00:46:07.940 on Twitter

00:46:08.600 can you lose

00:46:10.240 weight simply

00:46:11.760 by eating less

00:46:12.820 and exercising

00:46:13.840 more

00:46:14.240 now if you're

00:46:15.720 a sane person

00:46:16.580 this does not

00:46:18.220 sound like much

00:46:19.040 of a debate

00:46:19.520 at all

00:46:20.060 we might as

00:46:21.000 well debate

00:46:21.360 whether walking

00:46:22.200 is best achieved

00:46:23.180 by putting one

00:46:23.980 foot in front

00:46:24.420 of another

00:46:24.740 or whether

00:46:25.900 there's a

00:46:26.320 noticeable causal

00:46:27.260 link between

00:46:27.960 putting your

00:46:28.820 hand on a hot

00:46:29.520 stove and

00:46:30.180 sustaining a

00:46:31.300 burn on that

00:46:32.140 same hand

00:46:32.780 these do not

00:46:34.400 sound like

00:46:34.900 debatable topics

00:46:36.020 and yet people

00:46:37.080 were debating

00:46:37.880 it lots of

00:46:38.840 people including

00:46:40.160 and especially

00:46:40.700 those who

00:46:41.680 fashion themselves

00:46:42.480 experts

00:46:43.100 now it began

00:46:45.000 when I posted

00:46:45.700 a response to

00:46:46.520 a tweet from

00:46:47.620 the account

00:46:48.060 raw egg

00:46:48.740 nationalists and

00:46:49.620 healing to

00:46:50.060 a study

00:46:50.400 from 1992

00:46:51.140 finding that

00:46:52.280 obese people

00:46:52.940 tend to

00:46:53.520 under report

00:46:54.280 the amount

00:46:54.800 of food

00:46:55.240 they eat

00:46:55.700 and over

00:46:56.700 report the

00:46:57.300 amount of

00:46:57.680 exercise they

00:46:58.480 get and then

00:46:59.620 they complain

00:47:00.140 that they

00:47:00.440 can't lose

00:47:00.880 weight

00:47:01.180 they complain

00:47:04.020 that they're

00:47:04.420 doing everything

00:47:04.880 they can to

00:47:05.360 lose weight

00:47:05.800 according to

00:47:06.820 the study

00:47:07.180 they're actually

00:47:07.560 not doing

00:47:08.660 the things

00:47:09.140 they claim

00:47:09.640 they're doing

00:47:10.060 and so that's

00:47:11.220 why they're

00:47:11.420 not losing

00:47:11.720 weight

00:47:11.960 and I said

00:47:13.960 this a bunch

00:47:15.000 of people on

00:47:15.480 here got mad

00:47:16.040 at me recently

00:47:16.500 because I said

00:47:17.080 that literally

00:47:17.500 anyone can lose

00:47:18.280 weight simply

00:47:18.700 by eating

00:47:19.100 less and

00:47:19.440 exercising

00:47:19.820 more

00:47:20.120 but it's

00:47:20.580 obviously

00:47:20.860 true

00:47:21.180 the idea

00:47:21.720 that overweight

00:47:22.200 people remain

00:47:22.800 overweight even

00:47:23.480 with dieting

00:47:24.020 and exercise

00:47:24.420 is asinine

00:47:25.900 it's actually

00:47:26.480 a scientific

00:47:27.200 impossibility

00:47:28.140 that's what I

00:47:29.600 said

00:47:29.740 pretty straightforward

00:47:30.420 obvious

00:47:31.300 unassailable

00:47:32.060 you might

00:47:32.960 think

00:47:33.240 but then came

00:47:34.800 the indignant

00:47:35.440 responses

00:47:36.100 and we read

00:47:36.660 just there were

00:47:37.280 a lot of them

00:47:37.660 but let me

00:47:37.940 just read a few

00:47:38.540 of them for

00:47:39.160 you

00:47:39.680 and we'll

00:47:41.300 start with

00:47:41.640 this from

00:47:42.400 metabolic health

00:47:43.560 coach and

00:47:44.180 public speaker

00:47:44.840 Valerie Ann

00:47:45.660 Smith

00:47:45.980 she posted

00:47:46.580 quote

00:47:46.960 asinine

00:47:48.520 what's asinine

00:47:50.040 is the

00:47:50.400 patronizing

00:47:51.060 attitude

00:47:51.480 and your

00:47:51.860 poor

00:47:52.140 understanding

00:47:52.660 of the

00:47:53.020 metabolic

00:47:53.360 challenges

00:47:54.060 faced by

00:47:55.000 those struggling

00:47:55.640 with obesity

00:47:56.220 thankfully we

00:47:57.380 have a whole

00:47:57.780 community that

00:47:58.400 cares and can

00:47:59.000 offer real

00:47:59.500 help solutions

00:48:00.220 even in the

00:48:01.240 face of your

00:48:01.780 continued

00:48:02.320 comments

00:48:03.000 yes even in

00:48:05.340 the face of

00:48:05.820 my comments

00:48:06.780 my comments

00:48:10.980 that are

00:48:11.360 such an

00:48:12.880 obstacle

00:48:13.300 in the way

00:48:13.940 even with

00:48:14.880 my comments

00:48:15.700 they're able

00:48:16.160 to somehow

00:48:17.200 find a way

00:48:17.940 to continue

00:48:18.860 on

00:48:19.120 how brave

00:48:19.920 how brave

00:48:20.400 of them

00:48:20.680 there are

00:48:22.400 some themes

00:48:22.860 in this

00:48:23.100 response

00:48:23.460 that we'll

00:48:23.780 notice

00:48:24.100 in all

00:48:24.420 of the

00:48:24.640 others

00:48:24.880 like this

00:48:25.760 one

00:48:25.940 from a

00:48:26.560 guy named

00:48:26.860 Chris Cornell

00:48:27.480 I'm not

00:48:29.000 mad that

00:48:29.440 you appear

00:48:29.900 to have

00:48:30.160 no idea

00:48:30.700 about the

00:48:31.080 challenges

00:48:31.420 faced by

00:48:31.940 a large

00:48:32.240 percentage

00:48:32.600 of people

00:48:33.040 struggling

00:48:33.520 with obesity

00:48:34.100 it can

00:48:34.840 actually be

00:48:35.280 helpful

00:48:35.600 when an

00:48:36.020 influencer

00:48:36.420 with such

00:48:36.760 a poor

00:48:37.140 understanding

00:48:37.620 of an

00:48:37.880 issue

00:48:38.100 confidently

00:48:38.940 speaks out

00:48:39.580 with such

00:48:39.880 patronizing

00:48:40.540 certainty

00:48:40.940 it gives

00:48:41.700 an opportunity

00:48:42.140 for others

00:48:42.680 to offer

00:48:43.160 potentially

00:48:43.620 helpful

00:48:44.060 information

00:48:44.600 meanwhile

00:48:45.760 a professor

00:48:46.160 at Duke

00:48:46.640 named

00:48:47.040 Herman

00:48:47.440 Ponser

00:48:48.020 who by

00:48:48.980 the way

00:48:49.260 looks exactly

00:48:50.420 like a

00:48:50.920 Herman

00:48:51.200 Ponser

00:48:51.660 said this

00:48:52.880 here as in

00:48:54.200 most of his

00:48:54.620 work he

00:48:55.300 misses the

00:48:55.720 point

00:48:55.980 sure calorie

00:48:56.900 deficits

00:48:57.260 will lead

00:48:57.640 to weight

00:48:57.880 loss

00:48:58.120 the problem

00:48:58.740 is achieving

00:48:59.200 that through

00:48:59.580 diet and

00:48:59.980 exercise

00:49:00.280 is incredibly

00:49:00.880 hard

00:49:01.240 so his

00:49:02.020 simply

00:49:02.560 is mathematically

00:49:03.340 correct

00:49:03.820 but there's

00:49:04.600 nothing simple

00:49:05.200 about it

00:49:05.700 also there's

00:49:06.940 this from

00:49:07.240 somebody named

00:49:07.740 Liz

00:49:08.160 I wish it

00:49:09.320 were this

00:49:09.580 simple Matt

00:49:10.060 even if you

00:49:10.620 are thoroughly

00:49:11.140 convinced you're

00:49:11.720 correct

00:49:12.020 imagine for a

00:49:13.020 moment what it

00:49:13.900 would be like

00:49:14.760 if you did

00:49:15.780 eat less

00:49:16.280 weigh less

00:49:16.940 track your

00:49:17.540 intake

00:49:17.880 test for ketones

00:49:19.120 limit carbs

00:49:20.580 exercise

00:49:21.140 including resistance

00:49:21.840 training

00:49:22.160 and you were

00:49:22.860 still obese

00:49:23.640 and not

00:49:24.140 losing

00:49:24.480 sometimes even

00:49:25.340 gaining weight

00:49:26.040 and then imagine

00:49:26.880 the judgment

00:49:27.300 from others

00:49:27.760 who don't

00:49:28.660 believe you

00:49:29.320 PCOS

00:49:30.800 polycystic

00:49:31.600 ovary syndrome

00:49:32.300 is a

00:49:32.980 it will

00:49:33.920 it also

00:49:34.380 often causes

00:49:35.100 infertility

00:49:35.700 would you also

00:49:37.180 insist that

00:49:37.680 someone is just

00:49:38.300 too uptight

00:49:38.980 to get pregnant

00:49:39.560 be grateful

00:49:40.700 that your body

00:49:41.120 works well

00:49:41.620 with the efforts

00:49:42.060 you make

00:49:42.420 reward for

00:49:43.180 the same

00:49:43.600 effort

00:49:43.900 is a gift

00:49:44.540 not everybody

00:49:45.160 is given

00:49:45.540 okay

00:49:46.060 you get the

00:49:48.120 idea

00:49:48.340 so lots

00:49:49.360 more of those

00:49:49.800 came from

00:49:50.280 and lots

00:49:50.740 of people

00:49:50.960 saying that

00:49:51.520 I'm oversimplifying

00:49:53.240 and there's a lot

00:49:53.840 of people

00:49:54.180 that in fact

00:49:55.160 someone just

00:49:55.840 said to me

00:49:56.180 today

00:49:56.520 that there

00:49:58.960 are plenty

00:49:59.220 of people

00:49:59.500 who rigidly

00:50:01.320 stick to a

00:50:01.840 diet and

00:50:02.600 exercise five

00:50:03.800 days a week

00:50:04.480 and yet do

00:50:06.040 not lose a

00:50:06.680 single pound

00:50:07.320 that's a claim

00:50:08.560 that somebody

00:50:08.860 made to me

00:50:09.400 now there's a

00:50:11.320 there's a

00:50:11.820 fundamental

00:50:12.340 confusion on

00:50:13.120 display with

00:50:13.720 all of these

00:50:14.240 people who

00:50:15.000 while suffering

00:50:15.720 from this

00:50:16.500 confusion are

00:50:17.240 nonetheless

00:50:17.560 accusing me

00:50:18.480 of failing to

00:50:19.720 be a

00:50:19.960 sophisticated

00:50:20.480 thinker

00:50:21.140 who can

00:50:21.480 pick up

00:50:21.900 on fine

00:50:22.400 distinctions

00:50:22.940 here's the

00:50:24.040 distinction

00:50:24.420 that they

00:50:25.280 and many

00:50:25.720 other people

00:50:26.100 with their

00:50:26.360 view on

00:50:26.640 this topic

00:50:27.100 somehow miss

00:50:28.580 the words

00:50:30.400 simple

00:50:31.080 and hard

00:50:32.320 are not

00:50:33.800 mutually

00:50:34.300 exclusive

00:50:34.920 just because

00:50:36.360 a thing

00:50:36.700 is hard

00:50:37.280 that doesn't

00:50:38.720 mean that

00:50:39.040 it's

00:50:39.460 complicated

00:50:40.200 this is my

00:50:41.660 point about

00:50:42.220 weight loss

00:50:42.840 it isn't

00:50:43.580 complicated

00:50:44.180 it is very

00:50:45.000 simple

00:50:45.600 in fact it's

00:50:46.420 one of the

00:50:46.820 simplest

00:50:47.180 things in

00:50:48.240 the world

00:50:48.740 burn more

00:50:50.240 calories than

00:50:51.260 you take

00:50:51.740 in you

00:50:52.520 will lose

00:50:53.380 weight you

00:50:54.120 will this

00:50:54.880 is physics

00:50:55.780 it's a law

00:50:56.480 of nature

00:50:57.040 it is true

00:50:58.300 of everyone

00:50:59.100 everywhere for

00:51:00.060 all time

00:51:00.860 okay it's a

00:51:02.220 it's it's a

00:51:03.360 reason why there

00:51:04.360 there has never

00:51:04.880 been a single

00:51:05.480 case of somebody

00:51:06.740 being stranded

00:51:07.400 on a desert

00:51:08.000 island for months

00:51:08.820 with little to

00:51:09.440 no food and

00:51:10.440 then when they're

00:51:10.860 rescued everyone's

00:51:11.820 shocked to see

00:51:12.600 that they somehow

00:51:13.500 have put on

00:51:14.160 weight during the

00:51:15.000 experience never

00:51:15.880 happened once in

00:51:16.580 history it's

00:51:18.060 why everybody is

00:51:18.720 skinny in third

00:51:19.420 world countries

00:51:20.020 it's why every

00:51:20.660 contestant on

00:51:21.400 every survival

00:51:22.140 show ever has

00:51:23.560 lost weight and

00:51:25.760 these examples

00:51:26.360 shouldn't be

00:51:26.980 necessary if you

00:51:27.920 eat less and

00:51:28.860 exercise more you

00:51:30.240 will lose weight

00:51:31.300 you will you

00:51:32.960 will every person

00:51:34.620 who claims to be

00:51:35.120 an exception is

00:51:35.800 lying you are

00:51:36.900 lying you are a 0.98

00:51:38.440 liar all of you

00:51:39.500 and you know it

00:51:41.340 well you say that

00:51:43.100 Matt but no I

00:51:43.760 I exercise five

00:51:45.180 days a week and

00:51:45.780 stuck to a diet

00:51:46.500 originally didn't

00:51:47.480 lose a pound no

00:51:48.400 you didn't you're

00:51:48.900 lying you're just

00:51:49.640 a liar you exercise 0.76

00:51:51.960 five days a week

00:51:52.720 consistently and

00:51:53.740 didn't lose a pound

00:51:54.640 what the hell kind

00:51:56.220 of exercise are you

00:51:56.980 doing exactly I

00:51:59.240 mean I guess we

00:51:59.740 need to really maybe

00:52:01.100 we need to explain

00:52:01.900 what we mean by

00:52:02.620 exercise like are

00:52:06.460 you just driving to

00:52:07.540 the gym and walking

00:52:08.780 in and then turning

00:52:09.640 around and leaving

00:52:10.480 and calling that

00:52:11.240 exercise yeah if

00:52:12.080 that's what you're

00:52:12.360 doing you're not

00:52:12.680 gonna lose weight

00:52:13.140 if you're doing

00:52:15.400 any kind of like

00:52:16.640 actual exercise

00:52:18.180 five days a week

00:52:19.960 or even three

00:52:21.620 days a week even

00:52:22.340 two days a week

00:52:23.320 and you're sticking

00:52:25.040 to a diet yes you

00:52:26.240 will lose weight

00:52:26.740 a hundred percent

00:52:27.840 and I if you

00:52:30.880 claim otherwise I

00:52:31.680 know you're a liar 0.68

00:52:32.500 because here's how

00:52:34.140 I know because you

00:52:36.300 are a human being

00:52:37.440 existing in the

00:52:39.120 same reality as

00:52:40.200 me which means

00:52:41.220 that you are

00:52:42.380 subject to the

00:52:43.440 same laws of

00:52:44.360 nature that I

00:52:45.120 am and this is

00:52:46.380 again an

00:52:47.080 indisputable law

00:52:49.060 of nature eat

00:52:50.680 less exercise

00:52:51.960 more and you

00:52:53.020 lose weight you

00:52:54.380 must lose weight

00:52:55.240 you cannot not

00:52:56.920 lose weight I

00:52:58.640 don't care what's

00:52:59.020 going on with your

00:52:59.560 thyroid your 0.81

00:53:00.260 hormones your

00:53:01.020 whatever diet and

00:53:02.680 exercise will lead

00:53:04.060 to weight loss if

00:53:05.120 you say that you've

00:53:05.780 tried everything and

00:53:06.440 you haven't lost

00:53:06.880 weight I know that

00:53:07.760 you're not telling

00:53:08.200 the truth because

00:53:09.000 you haven't tried

00:53:09.820 everything because

00:53:10.920 you obviously

00:53:11.360 haven't tried the

00:53:12.120 one single and

00:53:13.040 simplest thing that

00:53:13.800 actually works which

00:53:14.520 is to eat less and

00:53:15.360 move more is it

00:53:17.760 hard yes okay if

00:53:21.180 we can move past the

00:53:22.260 like does this work

00:53:23.460 question which is so

00:53:24.920 insane it's like it's

00:53:26.120 it's a it's a the

00:53:27.860 idea that it doesn't

00:53:28.740 work is a fantasy on

00:53:30.420 the level with the

00:53:31.220 tooth fairy okay if

00:53:34.260 we could all move

00:53:34.840 past it if you think

00:53:36.860 I'm not being

00:53:37.100 patronizing I'm only

00:53:38.320 being patronizing

00:53:39.120 about this claim

00:53:40.200 that a person can

00:53:41.740 actually eat a

00:53:42.760 healthy diet and

00:53:43.480 exercise and not

00:53:44.520 lose a single pound

00:53:45.720 yes I'm being

00:53:46.980 patronizing about

00:53:47.700 that because it's

00:53:48.320 insane and you're

00:53:49.180 lying and you need

00:53:49.880 to stop it and

00:53:51.240 you're lying to

00:53:51.800 yourself most of

00:53:52.580 all but if we can

00:53:55.520 move past that if

00:53:56.320 we could all just

00:53:56.780 acknowledge that yes

00:53:58.060 of course that's how

00:53:58.840 it works for everyone

00:53:59.940 ever in history then

00:54:02.600 we can get to the

00:54:03.100 other conversation

00:54:03.700 about the the the

00:54:06.860 the difficulties of

00:54:09.260 actually putting not

00:54:10.180 not the complications

00:54:10.980 but the difficulties the

00:54:12.900 hardships rather maybe

00:54:14.220 is a better word of

00:54:15.320 actually putting that

00:54:16.320 into practice because

00:54:17.460 yes it is hard being

00:54:19.240 disciplined is hard

00:54:20.240 putting an effort into

00:54:21.340 anything is hard not

00:54:23.580 doing something that

00:54:24.680 you want to do like

00:54:27.020 say not gorging

00:54:28.000 yourself on french fries

00:54:29.200 or cheesecake or

00:54:30.040 whatever is hard and

00:54:32.000 it's especially hard

00:54:32.820 when you live in a

00:54:33.420 society that encourages

00:54:34.440 constant and unrestrained

00:54:36.180 consumption in every

00:54:38.080 conceivable form you

00:54:39.480 are encouraged and

00:54:40.500 enabled to be in a

00:54:41.420 constant state of

00:54:42.640 consumption it was a

00:54:44.900 whole lot easier for

00:54:45.720 someone a hundred years

00:54:46.460 ago to not overeat

00:54:47.380 which is also why there

00:54:48.900 weren't very many fat

00:54:49.660 people a hundred years

00:54:50.380 ago and that

00:54:51.440 demonstrates yet again

00:54:52.700 the link between

00:54:53.860 eating exercise and

00:54:55.240 the amount of lard on

00:54:56.380 your body so it is

00:55:00.520 hard yes but it's

00:55:04.420 and I I'll leave it

00:55:05.940 go so far as to

00:55:06.740 admit because it's

00:55:07.420 clearly true that

00:55:08.620 it's harder for some

00:55:09.660 people than it is for

00:55:11.220 others it it might be

00:55:14.340 a lot harder for you

00:55:15.460 than it is for me

00:55:16.400 everyone's metabolism

00:55:18.520 is different you might

00:55:19.540 lose weight at different

00:55:20.660 you will lose weight if

00:55:21.860 you do these things but

00:55:22.520 you might lose it at

00:55:23.160 different rates you

00:55:24.380 might you know uh

00:55:25.340 and all that kind of

00:55:26.080 stuff there are some

00:55:27.180 people who might just

00:55:27.800 be like naturally more

00:55:29.420 disciplined naturally it

00:55:30.880 might be easier for some

00:55:31.880 people to follow a

00:55:32.860 strict diet or um there

00:55:35.040 there are people who uh

00:55:36.980 work out a lot and they

00:55:38.180 and they really enjoy it

00:55:39.920 and so because they

00:55:41.040 enjoy it it's easier for

00:55:42.140 them to do there are

00:55:42.980 other people who might

00:55:44.200 get into a habit of

00:55:44.920 working out and they

00:55:46.120 might stick to it for a

00:55:47.580 year but never really

00:55:49.060 like it while there are

00:55:51.180 other people that go to

00:55:51.760 the gym and they just

00:55:52.400 love every second of it

00:55:53.280 and yes if you love it

00:55:54.440 it's easier to do than

00:55:55.280 if you don't so like all

00:55:56.200 of that is true

00:55:56.900 but it's still simple

00:56:00.400 and in life the simple

00:56:03.920 things are often the

00:56:05.620 hardest to be an all 1.00

00:56:07.620 around decent productive

00:56:09.080 honest hard-working healthy

00:56:10.840 person is hard and it's

00:56:13.000 also again extremely

00:56:14.780 simple we all know how to

00:56:17.600 be that sort of person we

00:56:19.400 all know what sort of

00:56:20.660 choices to make in any

00:56:22.240 given situation to get

00:56:23.500 ourselves closer to that

00:56:24.800 ideal if we don't make

00:56:28.100 those choices it's not

00:56:29.980 because we're confused by

00:56:32.220 complexities and nuances

00:56:33.720 it's because it's hard and

00:56:36.920 we don't want to do the

00:56:37.740 hard thing what you see

00:56:40.700 people doing on this

00:56:41.520 subject it's the same

00:56:42.500 thing that people do in

00:56:43.300 so many other facets of

00:56:44.260 life they try to

00:56:45.520 complicate what should be

00:56:48.340 very uncomplicated when it

00:56:51.080 comes to obesity if you can

00:56:52.480 convince yourself that it's

00:56:53.780 complicated then you have an

00:56:55.760 excuse to remain obese

00:56:56.840 sure you'd like to lose

00:56:59.100 weight but losing weight is

00:57:01.340 such a complex convoluted

00:57:03.200 tangled web you would lose

00:57:06.220 weight if only you could

00:57:06.940 figure out how if only it

00:57:09.240 were possible if only it were

00:57:11.960 that simple but it isn't you

00:57:15.060 say so what can you do but

00:57:16.600 eat another muffin and

00:57:18.440 continue on with your day

00:57:19.520 this is the rationalizing that

00:57:22.240 people do they hide behind

00:57:24.160 imagine complexities they

00:57:26.720 take refuge in the

00:57:28.020 intricacies and complications

00:57:29.520 that they've invented in their

00:57:31.260 heads it's a lie it's all a way

00:57:34.460 to avoid the simple thing and

00:57:38.800 avoiding the simple thing is now

00:57:40.120 the American way at least it has 0.93

00:57:41.540 become the American way which is

00:57:44.040 also how we've become one of the

00:57:45.600 fattest nations to ever exist on

00:57:47.760 the planet and that is why the

00:57:51.100 people pretending that weight

00:57:52.300 loss is complicated are all today

00:57:55.420 canceled that'll do it for the show

00:57:58.100 today thanks for watching thanks

00:57:58.960 for listening talk to you on

00:58:00.540 Monday have a great weekend

00:58:01.680 godspeed

00:58:02.740 you

00:58:03.340 you

The Matt Walsh Show - May 31, 2024

Ep. 1378 - Donald Trump Found Guilty Of Running For President

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript