The Matt Walsh Show - November 12, 2018


Ep. 141 - The Most Barbaric Pro-Abortion Ad Of All Time


Episode Stats

Length

28 minutes

Words per Minute

160.06166

Word Count

4,638

Sentence Count

159

Misogynist Sentences

4

Hate Speech Sentences

11


Summary


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Today on the Matt Walsh Show, the left now claims that Tucker Carlson harassed a gay Latino
00:00:05.140 immigrant at a bar, but there's more to the story. We'll talk about it. Also, a leftist group put out
00:00:10.720 the most horrific, deranged, demented, terrible pro-abortion ad of all time. What does the ad
00:00:15.920 tell us about the pro-abortion position? Finally, embryo swapping is the latest fad in our
00:00:21.920 decaying society. What does it tell us about the state of our culture? All of that coming up on
00:00:27.740 the Matt Walsh Show. Michael Avenatti is the least credible person in the world, I think.
00:00:38.880 It's almost amazing how lacking in credibility. He is so lacking in credibility that you have to
00:00:45.440 almost doubt at this point whether he himself exists. He has so little credibility that even
00:00:52.180 his own existence could now be called into question. But he is investigating claims that
00:00:59.940 Tucker Carlson assaulted a gay Latino immigrant at a restaurant in Virginia a month ago. Now,
00:01:08.120 that, of course, really checks all the boxes, doesn't it? A gay Latino immigrant. Because that's
00:01:15.120 for the left. I mean, having a Fox News host assault a gay Latino immigrant, that's just there.
00:01:20.420 That is a headline from heaven for them. Now, Avenatti, of course, also is the guy that
00:01:27.600 investigated claims that Brett Kavanaugh was the ringleader of a roving band of gang rapists when
00:01:31.780 he was in high school. And he determined that those claims were true, even as everyone else
00:01:35.780 who investigated them determined that they were the insane ramblings of an emotionally unstable woman
00:01:41.320 who never even knew Brett Kavanaugh. But so the point is, you know, you could be a little
00:01:46.540 suspicious of the results of his investigation. There is a video of this altercation. And if you
00:01:54.460 watch the video, it shows no assault occurring. All it shows is Carlson telling the man to get the
00:02:02.100 F out of here repeatedly. He keeps saying, get the F out of here, out of here. Now, so you see that,
00:02:08.300 and you think, well, why is he saying that to the guy? Only in the fevered imagination of a left winger
00:02:13.560 is it at all plausible that Tucker Carlson would have randomly started yelling, get the F out of
00:02:19.780 here to someone because they're gay and Latino, right? I mean, if that's how he reacts to gay people
00:02:25.940 and to Latinos, there should be a video of him screaming at somebody every day. He lives in DC,
00:02:32.280 for God's sake. He lives in, he's, he, he works in media in DC. I think the first time he's ever
00:02:37.440 come across someone in one of, one of those two categories. Um, so any rational person would see
00:02:43.980 the video and think, well, there's gotta be more to this story. And there is Carlson last night
00:02:47.900 filled in the details. He says that he, uh, Carlson was out, out to eat with his family, including his
00:02:54.740 adult daughter and his, uh, and his adult son, his daughter got up to go to the bathroom, at which point
00:03:00.760 the man, having seen that she was at the table with Carlson, cussed her out, called her Carlson's
00:03:05.360 whore, uh, then used other derogatory names, at which point Carlson came over, uh, with his son,
00:03:11.100 his son threw a glass of wine on the guy. Carlson told him to get the F out. Um, and that's what we
00:03:16.220 see in the video. Now, if that is what happened, and I think his story sounds much more plausible than
00:03:24.080 the other dude's story because, because we know that left wingers do, um, have no problem harassing
00:03:33.360 the family members of, of those they dislike. So that's a, that's a totally plausible story.
00:03:38.180 And if, if that is what happened, then Carlson was perfectly justified in his response.
00:03:41.640 He would have been justified. In fact, if I, if I'm, if I'm annoyed at him at all or upset with him,
00:03:46.080 it's only because he didn't punch the guy in the mouth, which he would have been perfectly
00:03:49.720 justified in doing. Um, but we also have to keep something else in mind here. It's just
00:03:54.640 something to remember. Um, the guy, the supposed victim, although the real victim here apparently
00:04:02.080 is Carlson's daughter who was harassed, but the guy whining about being a victim is apparently an
00:04:10.960 LGBT activist. Well, I guess it falls on me sadly to be the one to point out the, that LGBT activists
00:04:19.160 make up stories all the time. They are notorious for fabricating fake hate, hate crimes. Uh, this is
00:04:27.820 something that leftists do. And this is something that, uh, you know, unfortunately LGBT activists
00:04:34.120 do most of all. Um, and you can go, go online and just look up fake hate crime hoaxes. You'll find,
00:04:42.120 you'll find just so many of them. In fact, there's a whole, um, one of my, one of my favorite sub
00:04:48.080 genres of the fake hate crime, uh, category are the, the racist or homophobic notes that are left
00:04:57.580 on receipts. I mean, there are dozens of these kinds of stories, uh, that for some reason left
00:05:02.820 wingers, they love to make up stories where, uh, a racist or homophobic person writes a terrible note
00:05:10.300 on a receipt and leaves it for their waiter or waitress. There was a story recently about
00:05:15.640 a guy. Um, I, I forget what his name was, but an Arab American waiter at a restaurant, um,
00:05:25.280 posted a picture of a receipt of a note that was left on a receipt from one of his tables.
00:05:31.180 And, and, uh, the note said it's, I think it said something like, we don't tip terrorists.
00:05:36.800 And he posts on Facebook, it goes viral. And then of course it comes out later that he,
00:05:41.680 he wrote the note himself. It was made up, but you see that kind of, there was another one. Uh,
00:05:46.280 there's been a lot of these kinds of things. Uh, there've been a bunch of someone allegedly
00:05:50.500 writing N word where the tip line is supposed to go. There was one few years ago of a, um,
00:05:57.380 of a lesbian woman waitress. And she posts a picture of a, of a note on receipt. The note said,
00:06:02.980 we disagree with your lifestyle. And so we're not going to tip. And of course it, it comes out that
00:06:09.220 she, she made up that story. So it's just, look, it's not, it's not impossible that someone could
00:06:15.140 really write a note like that, but, but we would have to believe that whoever wrote that note
00:06:20.640 either has never had a Brown skinned person as a waiter or never had, and I don't even know how
00:06:27.580 they would know that your waitress is a lesbian, but they wouldn't have never had a female who they
00:06:32.300 suspect might be a lesbian as a waitress, or they leave notes like that all the time. And this is
00:06:37.620 the first time we're seeing it on Facebook, but either way, it just doesn't, it's very implausible.
00:06:44.120 And you, with all of these stories, um, it shows you something about it. It reveals how the left
00:06:54.000 views the opposition, where they think of us, uh, they have this cartoonish idea of us where they,
00:07:05.300 they hear a story that Tucker Carlson, because he works at Fox news would randomly just start
00:07:11.100 cussing out a gay Latino at a bar for no reason, other than the fact that he's a gay Latino.
00:07:16.640 And a lot of leftists hear that story apparently and think, yeah, well, that makes sense. Yeah,
00:07:20.740 sure. That's exactly what they would do. No, that's not what they would do.
00:07:25.000 It's possible. There are people in the country who would react that way, but it's, it's in,
00:07:29.220 it's not very plausible. There's probably another explanation. Um,
00:07:35.380 so you have the fact that this is an LGBT activist notorious for making up pay crimes,
00:07:40.740 then you throw a Michael Avenatti on top of it. And, uh, and there's just no reason to believe
00:07:45.720 their version of the story. And I'll say one more thing about this. Uh, if you harass a man's family,
00:07:53.220 if you harass a man's daughter, wife, son, you deserve whatever comes next. If he lays you out
00:07:59.380 on the floor, if he breaks her nose, you deserve that because a man has the moral right to defend
00:08:06.920 his family and to teach a lesson to anyone who would harass them. So this guy should be thanking
00:08:12.820 Tucker Carlson for, for showing such restraint. He should be writing a thank you note to him and
00:08:18.560 saying, thank you for not punching me in the nose. Thank you so much for that, sir. That's what he
00:08:22.620 should be doing. So he's not only a harasser of women, apparently, but he's also rude for not,
00:08:29.420 for not thanking Carlson for reacting the way that a lot of fathers would. Okay. Um, what else?
00:08:37.880 Uh, speaking of far left lunacy, a far left advocacy group called the agenda project in
00:08:46.880 appropriately creepy sounding name, just put out a, a, a, an absolutely demented ad in support of,
00:08:55.900 uh, of Planned Parenthood. And I wrote a piece about this up on the daily wire right now. Now,
00:09:01.780 any advertisement supporting Planned Parenthood is going to be demented and horrible by definition,
00:09:06.440 but this one really goes beyond what you might even expect. The ad is, is titled The Chosen
00:09:12.900 and it's a, it's a 40 second video and it opens with, with, uh, and go to the, go to my article
00:09:20.340 about it. You can see the video itself, but it opens with the image, with this footage of a,
00:09:24.840 of a beautiful smiling baby girl looking right into the camera. She's giggling and, and laughing.
00:09:30.760 And there is, um, kind of a lullaby music playing in the background. Um, and then the words come up
00:09:40.720 on the screen saying she deserves to be loved. And you see that and you think, well, well, yes, I, I,
00:09:47.340 I agree. Yes, indeed. She deserves to be loved. And then next, see a little bit more footage of the
00:09:53.300 girl. And then the words come up. She deserves to be wanted. And again, the viewer must concur. She
00:09:59.120 does indeed deserve to be wanted. And then comes the kicker. She deserves to be a choice.
00:10:09.400 And then we're urged to stand with Planned Parenthood as the picture fades. Um, now
00:10:16.500 let's leave aside the, the most disturbing aspect of this video, which is that somebody apparently
00:10:24.240 allowed their child to be used for it. Assuming this video was, was, was not made under false
00:10:29.720 pretenses or they didn't find some kind of stock footage of a baby or something. But if a parent
00:10:34.580 actually did offer up their kid for this kind of thing, then it seems that this particular child
00:10:40.960 who deserves to be loved is not actually loved by her parents because no parent who loves their
00:10:48.600 child would use their child in that way. But speaking about the message itself, um, what makes
00:10:54.640 the message itself so barbaric, so horrific is, is two things. First of all, and I know this shouldn't
00:11:03.760 even need to be explained, but I'm going to explain it anyway. The first problem here is that a baby's
00:11:09.600 murder, a baby's violent killing is presented as something that the baby deserves. But then we
00:11:20.280 ask, well, well, how could a baby deserve to be executed? What, in what sense are we using the word
00:11:27.360 deserved? Because to deserve something needs to be worthy of it. And so we're talking about either a
00:11:33.720 reward or punishment. So is the child worthy of punishment? What has she done to deserve this,
00:11:40.320 this penalty? Or do we mean reward, deserve in the sense of reward? Well, what sort of reward is that
00:11:47.320 to be killed? And I have to wonder the makers of this video, would they like to be rewarded in a similar
00:11:53.660 way? Would they appreciate it if somebody rewarded them by crushing their skulls?
00:12:02.580 I assume not. So if they wouldn't want to be rewarded this way, then how can they speak for
00:12:08.140 the child on this matter? Now, I can only assume that some text is missing from this. So I can only
00:12:16.020 assume it was supposed to say something like, she deserves to be loved, she deserves to be wanted,
00:12:20.640 but if she isn't, then she deserves to die. But that assumes that everybody who isn't, and this is
00:12:34.900 what pro-abortion people assume and are very clear about when they are very upfront. They assume that
00:12:41.500 everybody who isn't loved or wanted by their biological parents would prefer to forfeit their
00:12:48.040 lives entirely. That's what they assume. And you hear this from all the time. Well, you know, it's an
00:12:54.400 unwanted child. What are we going to do with an unwanted child? They're assuming that if you are a
00:12:59.740 child who is not wanted for whatever reason by their biological parents, well, there's no way that
00:13:06.760 such a child could ever go on to lead a fulfilling and happy life. But in saying that, they're ignoring
00:13:15.460 the testimonies of many millions and millions of people whose biological parents would not or could
00:13:26.900 not care for them, and yet have gone on to be perfectly happy. And yeah, I'm sure that there
00:13:34.140 are some people who were born under those circumstances and did not go on to lead happy
00:13:39.680 lives. I'm sure you could even find me people who were born under those circumstances, went on to lead
00:13:44.000 miserable lives, and then tragically killed themselves. You know, I'm sure you could find me
00:13:47.940 cases like that. But each individual deserves to make a choice between trying to live through
00:13:55.360 difficult circumstances and finding happiness and fulfillment in the midst of it, or giving up.
00:14:00.980 And I certainly hope that nobody makes a choice to give up. But once you're an adult,
00:14:06.100 you know, nobody can stop you if that's the choice you want to make. The vast majority of people,
00:14:10.560 if given the option, will choose the former. They will choose to live through it and find
00:14:16.720 happiness in it. That's what most people do. And so if we want to talk about deserve, what people
00:14:21.580 deserve, every person deserves to make that choice for themselves. But here's the real point here.
00:14:29.980 The second thing that makes this video, this ad so disturbing, is that it's honest.
00:14:36.320 Okay? It shows us, it doesn't show us a clump of cells. It shows us a baby. And it calls the baby
00:14:43.040 she. Okay? It uses that very personal word there, she. Not it. Not that thing. Not fetus. It says she.
00:14:54.900 It seems almost to go out of its way to highlight the beauty and lovability of this adorable child.
00:15:02.620 So it presents human life to us. Wondrous, miraculous human life.
00:15:10.960 And it puts that right in front of our face. And then it says, yes, it is good to kill this person.
00:15:20.480 This is something that you rarely see from pro-abortion people, but every once in a while you do.
00:15:26.000 You see them looking straight into the dark, hideous heart of abortion advocacy and confronting
00:15:38.560 it and not flinching and saying, yep, that's what I support.
00:15:46.040 So that is honesty. They're being forthright about it. Abortion kills babies.
00:15:54.420 So I think we should give the Agenda Project some credit for being open and honest about
00:16:00.460 what they believe and what they support. We could at least give them credit for that.
00:16:08.060 And then we should also condemn them for believing and supporting something so deranged and cruel
00:16:14.140 and horrible.
00:16:15.140 And then we should shudder in terror as we realize that many millions of Americans agree with them.
00:16:25.540 But that's the main takeaway here. What does this tell you?
00:16:28.020 What does it tell you that the pro-abortion position
00:16:31.180 seems so
00:16:35.260 explicitly diabolical
00:16:37.480 when it's stated plainly
00:16:39.580 and honestly?
00:16:40.120 That should tell you something about
00:16:44.600 the position that you hold.
00:16:47.080 If
00:16:47.100 it makes people recoil
00:16:52.440 in shock and horror
00:16:53.960 the moment that you drop the euphemisms
00:16:56.560 well, that
00:16:58.660 should really tell you something.
00:17:03.560 If
00:17:04.120 even people on
00:17:05.260 if even some people on your own side
00:17:07.340 have this visceral gut reaction
00:17:09.800 against it
00:17:10.700 when you drop the euphemisms
00:17:12.440 and take off the mask
00:17:13.340 and just show it for what it is
00:17:14.460 well, again, that should tell you something.
00:17:18.100 All right.
00:17:19.600 One more thing
00:17:20.680 I wanted to talk about.
00:17:23.300 This is
00:17:23.600 an interesting
00:17:25.000 interesting
00:17:25.840 couple interesting cases here
00:17:29.380 not completely disconnected
00:17:30.960 from what we just talked about
00:17:32.560 but
00:17:32.860 there was a story
00:17:34.020 this past week
00:17:34.880 about
00:17:36.340 a couple
00:17:37.780 in
00:17:38.140 Brooklyn
00:17:39.000 of course
00:17:39.920 that is
00:17:41.940 they're
00:17:42.600 they're swapping
00:17:43.500 embryos
00:17:44.220 with someone else
00:17:45.000 there's an
00:17:45.400 an actress
00:17:46.360 had a girl embryo
00:17:48.160 but wanted a boy embryo
00:17:49.880 and then
00:17:50.940 there's a couple
00:17:51.740 who had a boy embryo
00:17:53.020 but wanted a girl
00:17:54.180 embryo
00:17:54.640 so
00:17:55.800 apparently
00:17:56.440 they are
00:17:57.560 trading embryos
00:17:59.560 trading them
00:18:01.800 like kids used to
00:18:02.560 to trade Pokemon cards
00:18:03.820 okay
00:18:04.160 that's what they're
00:18:04.840 do kids still
00:18:05.880 trade Pokemon
00:18:06.960 I have no idea
00:18:07.680 or when I was a kid
00:18:10.960 we used to trade Pogs
00:18:12.180 so
00:18:12.660 for
00:18:13.100 you know
00:18:13.460 that lasted for about six months
00:18:14.760 that fed
00:18:15.180 but
00:18:15.340 so they're
00:18:15.900 that's how they're trading them
00:18:16.940 now there was also a story
00:18:18.800 of
00:18:19.320 of a lesbian couple
00:18:20.500 that's
00:18:21.060 that swapped
00:18:21.880 an embryo
00:18:23.200 between them
00:18:23.920 they took turns
00:18:24.620 carrying
00:18:25.200 an IVF
00:18:26.560 embryo
00:18:28.100 so you had
00:18:28.460 two of these
00:18:29.220 two of these kinds of stories
00:18:30.340 in the last couple of weeks
00:18:31.540 and I think
00:18:33.180 I think what we see here
00:18:35.580 especially with the first story
00:18:36.940 just focusing on that
00:18:38.040 for a moment
00:18:38.500 we see the
00:18:40.520 the continued
00:18:41.280 commodification
00:18:42.300 of human life
00:18:43.160 this
00:18:45.180 this
00:18:45.720 this treating life
00:18:47.000 like a
00:18:47.540 like a commodity
00:18:48.340 like a thing
00:18:49.120 like a
00:18:49.740 like a product
00:18:51.360 an asset
00:18:52.640 and
00:18:55.400 people ask me sometimes
00:18:57.320 about IVF
00:18:57.900 how I feel about it
00:18:58.820 this is why I don't like it
00:19:00.000 this is why I don't like IVF
00:19:01.440 you want to talk about
00:19:03.340 slippery slopes
00:19:04.020 well
00:19:04.320 this is a
00:19:05.100 this
00:19:06.020 very clear
00:19:07.680 that once we start
00:19:08.620 treating human life
00:19:09.640 this way
00:19:10.100 you are on that slope
00:19:11.500 and
00:19:12.720 we can even leave aside
00:19:14.100 the spiritual
00:19:14.920 the religious aspects
00:19:16.000 of this issue
00:19:16.660 those are important
00:19:18.160 but we can leave those aside
00:19:19.240 and just talk about this
00:19:20.520 on
00:19:20.800 on
00:19:21.720 secular terms
00:19:23.580 because even if I were
00:19:25.140 a secular person
00:19:26.140 even if I didn't believe in God
00:19:27.240 I would be saying
00:19:28.920 the same thing
00:19:29.560 that
00:19:32.340 it is a
00:19:33.740 it is a
00:19:34.200 it's a dangerous game
00:19:35.280 that we play
00:19:35.840 when we go down this road
00:19:37.540 of treating people
00:19:39.280 like
00:19:40.680 like items
00:19:41.680 you know
00:19:45.960 there's that
00:19:46.480 I dealt with
00:19:48.060 several months ago
00:19:48.940 someone
00:19:49.320 what's supposed
00:19:51.100 what's supposed to be
00:19:52.400 this
00:19:52.720 this
00:19:53.400 indisputable
00:19:55.760 unanswerable
00:19:56.960 pro-abortion
00:19:57.680 argument
00:20:00.740 where someone says
00:20:01.740 well
00:20:02.060 what if
00:20:02.560 what if
00:20:02.980 there are a bunch
00:20:03.480 of frozen embryos
00:20:04.640 what if
00:20:05.120 what if
00:20:05.140 what if
00:20:05.400 there's a
00:20:05.860 maybe remember
00:20:06.560 when we talk about this
00:20:07.380 talk about this
00:20:08.060 what if there's a
00:20:09.260 a fire
00:20:10.320 in an IVF clinic
00:20:11.580 and there are a bunch
00:20:12.680 of frozen embryos
00:20:13.720 that are
00:20:14.220 you know
00:20:15.220 about to be destroyed
00:20:16.480 and there's also
00:20:17.220 a two-year-old child
00:20:18.580 who happens to be
00:20:19.620 in the IVF clinic
00:20:20.400 as well
00:20:20.860 without his parents
00:20:21.700 and for some reason
00:20:22.600 you can only save one
00:20:23.760 which do you save
00:20:25.080 and they're trying
00:20:26.800 to point out
00:20:27.340 that well clearly
00:20:27.920 you would save
00:20:28.640 the two-year-old child
00:20:30.020 not the embryo
00:20:30.900 so obviously
00:20:31.500 you're admitting
00:20:32.140 by their version
00:20:33.580 of events here
00:20:34.240 you're admitting
00:20:36.460 that the child
00:20:37.140 is more human
00:20:38.080 than the embryo
00:20:39.160 which is
00:20:41.100 which is not
00:20:41.680 what you're admitting
00:20:42.240 because that would
00:20:42.860 just be scientifically
00:20:43.620 inaccurate
00:20:44.140 but the point is
00:20:46.620 when they
00:20:48.580 when they raise
00:20:49.200 that argument
00:20:49.720 what they're really doing
00:20:50.780 is raising an argument
00:20:51.900 against IVF
00:20:52.900 they're raising an argument
00:20:53.760 against treating embryos
00:20:55.100 like this
00:20:55.460 because we shouldn't
00:20:56.780 be in a position
00:20:58.180 we should never be
00:21:00.680 in a position
00:21:01.120 where there are
00:21:01.540 a bunch of
00:21:01.980 leftover human embryos
00:21:03.880 and we have to figure out
00:21:04.740 what to do with them
00:21:06.020 we're
00:21:09.880 you know
00:21:10.500 that hypothetical
00:21:11.340 it's only possible
00:21:12.660 to discuss that hypothetical
00:21:14.120 because this is how
00:21:15.580 we treat human life
00:21:16.800 so I think it's a very
00:21:20.660 I think it's a
00:21:21.240 a very dangerous road
00:21:22.500 to go down
00:21:23.680 and as
00:21:26.260 as science develops
00:21:27.620 I mean
00:21:28.440 maybe
00:21:29.340 maybe a hundred years
00:21:30.280 from now
00:21:30.740 maybe a hundred years
00:21:32.960 from now
00:21:33.300 the
00:21:33.600 the sort of
00:21:34.420 LGBT
00:21:34.840 dream
00:21:36.420 will be fulfilled
00:21:37.340 and maybe
00:21:37.920 they'll be able
00:21:38.520 to implant
00:21:39.520 some sort of
00:21:40.460 artificial uterus
00:21:42.280 into a man
00:21:43.080 who claims to be a woman
00:21:44.100 and then implant
00:21:44.920 an embryo
00:21:46.420 into the uterus
00:21:47.060 and then maybe
00:21:47.620 finally they can have
00:21:48.760 their
00:21:48.940 who knows
00:21:49.660 you know
00:21:49.980 with the way
00:21:51.080 medical science
00:21:51.860 is developing
00:21:52.340 maybe eventually
00:21:53.260 they'll be able
00:21:53.880 to create
00:21:54.460 that kind of
00:21:55.260 Frankenstein
00:21:56.640 monstrosity
00:21:58.340 and bring
00:21:59.700 human life
00:22:00.300 into the world
00:22:00.940 that way
00:22:01.460 well
00:22:01.780 you know
00:22:03.740 even if you don't
00:22:04.380 think we've
00:22:04.880 we've
00:22:05.200 we're on the slippery
00:22:06.600 slope yet
00:22:07.200 with this stuff
00:22:07.860 would you admit
00:22:08.420 that that at least
00:22:09.260 is a slippery slope
00:22:09.980 is there a limit
00:22:11.100 I find it kind of
00:22:13.820 kind of interesting
00:22:14.860 that on the left
00:22:16.220 you know
00:22:18.780 leftists are
00:22:19.620 are typically
00:22:20.720 the ones
00:22:21.180 who are very
00:22:21.700 concerned about
00:22:22.700 organic
00:22:23.760 they're very
00:22:25.060 concerned about
00:22:25.660 doing things
00:22:26.360 the natural way
00:22:27.440 doing things
00:22:29.260 in accordance
00:22:29.720 with nature
00:22:30.800 and all that
00:22:31.460 well why can't
00:22:34.420 we take that
00:22:34.980 philosophy
00:22:35.480 if we
00:22:35.900 if we could
00:22:36.240 take that
00:22:36.600 philosophy
00:22:36.980 and apply it
00:22:37.760 to the produce
00:22:38.260 section
00:22:38.640 if we can
00:22:40.900 apply it
00:22:41.540 if we can
00:22:42.320 live by that
00:22:43.920 code
00:22:44.780 when we're
00:22:45.320 buying stocks
00:22:46.060 of celery
00:22:47.040 from
00:22:48.200 from the supermarket
00:22:49.320 then maybe we
00:22:51.420 should consider
00:22:51.940 the same code
00:22:52.700 when we're
00:22:53.120 deciding how to
00:22:54.040 bring human life
00:22:54.800 into the world
00:22:55.420 you know
00:22:59.240 maybe we should
00:22:59.880 be concerned
00:23:00.380 about
00:23:00.720 about
00:23:01.520 about nature
00:23:02.460 by doing
00:23:04.120 things the
00:23:04.540 organic way
00:23:05.240 because the
00:23:10.020 more that we
00:23:10.480 treat human
00:23:11.260 life this way
00:23:11.840 the more we
00:23:12.280 treat it like
00:23:12.920 an object
00:23:13.700 it has the
00:23:17.080 effect of just
00:23:17.920 debasing
00:23:18.580 life
00:23:19.680 and we start
00:23:23.180 to see human
00:23:23.820 life more and
00:23:24.460 more as
00:23:25.700 as kind of
00:23:26.900 an accessory
00:23:27.560 and you have a
00:23:30.800 kid just for
00:23:31.380 your own sake
00:23:31.880 because you want
00:23:32.520 an accessory
00:23:33.420 because it's a
00:23:34.100 fun thing to do
00:23:34.840 trading it back
00:23:36.400 and forth
00:23:36.940 you know
00:23:37.380 like it's
00:23:37.800 some sort
00:23:38.100 of recreational
00:23:38.720 thing
00:23:39.240 it's not about
00:23:41.280 the child
00:23:42.180 anymore
00:23:42.660 it's about
00:23:43.380 us
00:23:43.780 and then
00:23:46.960 when we can
00:23:47.360 get into
00:23:47.900 genetically
00:23:48.740 modifying kids
00:23:50.100 and you know
00:23:50.540 it's like
00:23:50.840 Gattaca or
00:23:51.420 something
00:23:51.620 if you've
00:23:51.760 ever seen
00:23:51.980 that movie
00:23:52.400 where you
00:23:52.960 can decide
00:23:53.500 specifically
00:23:54.140 what kind
00:23:54.720 of kid
00:23:55.040 you want
00:23:55.460 you can
00:23:55.780 select
00:23:56.180 all these
00:23:56.800 different
00:23:57.040 details
00:23:57.440 about them
00:23:57.980 again
00:23:59.420 now we
00:24:00.080 have made
00:24:00.740 the child
00:24:01.700 we've made
00:24:02.160 this human
00:24:02.880 life
00:24:03.160 into
00:24:03.400 it's
00:24:03.980 completely
00:24:04.480 about us
00:24:05.240 it's like
00:24:07.820 we're
00:24:07.980 building
00:24:08.500 an accessory
00:24:09.240 for our
00:24:09.880 lives
00:24:10.260 rather than
00:24:11.560 confronting
00:24:12.200 the sacred
00:24:13.760 miracle
00:24:14.820 of actual
00:24:17.040 human life
00:24:17.680 all right
00:24:20.440 before I wrap
00:24:23.720 up I did
00:24:24.160 want to
00:24:24.740 since we're
00:24:25.540 on the subject
00:24:25.900 of babies
00:24:26.360 I did want
00:24:26.860 to say
00:24:27.460 happy birthday
00:24:28.000 to my
00:24:28.500 youngest
00:24:29.160 our youngest
00:24:31.660 turned two
00:24:32.160 yesterday
00:24:32.620 his birthday
00:24:33.320 he watches
00:24:34.440 all my
00:24:34.820 videos
00:24:35.060 of course
00:24:35.340 so that's
00:24:35.660 why I'm
00:24:35.880 saying happy
00:24:36.160 birthday
00:24:36.420 to him
00:24:37.080 his favorite
00:24:37.860 present that
00:24:38.440 we got him
00:24:39.080 by the way
00:24:39.680 was a little
00:24:40.340 handheld vacuum
00:24:41.440 and this kid
00:24:42.980 is obsessed
00:24:44.000 with vacuums
00:24:45.320 I mean he's
00:24:45.700 absolutely obsessed
00:24:46.240 I think he
00:24:47.780 mainly just likes
00:24:48.640 machines that
00:24:49.420 make loud
00:24:49.880 noises but he
00:24:50.540 definitely has a
00:24:51.200 specific affection
00:24:53.700 for vacuums
00:24:54.600 like he has to
00:24:55.360 go hug the
00:24:56.280 vacuums in our
00:24:57.040 house before he
00:24:58.920 goes to bed each
00:24:59.560 night so that's
00:25:00.360 where we are
00:25:00.840 just to give
00:25:01.180 you an idea
00:25:01.500 of the extent
00:25:02.120 of his
00:25:03.660 vacuum
00:25:04.060 addiction
00:25:04.520 but so he's
00:25:06.000 two now
00:25:06.480 and I was
00:25:08.480 thinking about
00:25:08.860 this today
00:25:09.240 because people
00:25:09.860 when they hear
00:25:11.240 that you have
00:25:11.500 a two-year-old
00:25:12.040 they'll say
00:25:12.460 oh no
00:25:12.900 the terrible
00:25:13.840 twos
00:25:14.220 watch out
00:25:14.920 watch out
00:25:15.460 for the
00:25:15.720 terrible
00:25:15.960 twos
00:25:16.280 and here's
00:25:18.020 the thing
00:25:18.220 about that
00:25:18.500 we've already
00:25:19.640 done the
00:25:20.040 terrible
00:25:20.320 twos
00:25:20.740 we did them
00:25:21.600 times two
00:25:22.180 because our
00:25:22.620 oldest are
00:25:23.100 twins
00:25:23.540 boy and
00:25:24.140 girl so we
00:25:24.620 had two
00:25:25.020 two-year-olds
00:25:25.480 at the same
00:25:25.760 time
00:25:25.940 that's how
00:25:26.540 it works
00:25:26.820 to have
00:25:27.160 twins
00:25:27.880 and so I
00:25:30.600 think I
00:25:30.900 could say
00:25:31.180 that the
00:25:31.420 terrible
00:25:31.700 twos are
00:25:32.180 fake news
00:25:33.020 totally
00:25:33.900 overrated
00:25:34.440 this anti-two
00:25:37.340 propaganda
00:25:38.040 is ridiculous
00:25:39.720 and it's
00:25:41.480 ageist
00:25:42.120 on top of
00:25:43.020 it
00:25:43.160 these scare
00:25:45.340 tactics that
00:25:46.140 people use
00:25:46.940 when it comes
00:25:49.360 to two-year-olds
00:25:50.000 it's absurd
00:25:50.840 and I want
00:25:51.260 to say this
00:25:51.680 to any new
00:25:52.580 parents
00:25:53.120 or future
00:25:54.000 parents
00:25:54.520 don't worry
00:25:56.000 about two
00:25:56.900 don't worry
00:25:57.440 about toddler
00:25:58.160 I mean kids
00:25:58.740 at two
00:25:59.100 are no
00:25:59.420 problem
00:25:59.820 yeah they
00:26:00.760 have temper
00:26:01.180 tantrums
00:26:02.120 but they
00:26:03.260 don't know
00:26:03.520 what's going
00:26:04.360 on in the
00:26:04.740 world yet
00:26:05.100 you can still
00:26:06.180 get them
00:26:06.520 to stop
00:26:06.960 crying
00:26:07.440 by tickling
00:26:08.240 them
00:26:08.500 you never
00:26:10.160 have to
00:26:10.460 really worry
00:26:11.060 when your
00:26:11.940 kid's still
00:26:12.440 at an age
00:26:13.000 where you
00:26:13.600 could basically
00:26:14.160 get them
00:26:14.500 to stop
00:26:14.780 crying
00:26:15.020 by tickling
00:26:15.520 them
00:26:15.780 or worst
00:26:17.060 case
00:26:17.380 giving them
00:26:17.780 a lollipop
00:26:18.560 or something
00:26:18.880 like that
00:26:19.220 when they're
00:26:19.740 still at that
00:26:20.280 age where
00:26:20.600 they can be
00:26:20.960 satiated with
00:26:21.700 tickles
00:26:22.180 or a lollipop
00:26:22.960 it's you
00:26:23.920 it's not
00:26:24.560 that bad
00:26:24.980 it's pretty
00:26:25.620 good
00:26:25.900 and can I
00:26:28.200 just say
00:26:28.480 that I
00:26:28.720 have known
00:26:29.700 I have known
00:26:31.540 as we all
00:26:32.920 have
00:26:33.180 I have known
00:26:34.120 terrible people
00:26:34.940 in my life
00:26:35.540 okay
00:26:35.920 but none
00:26:37.520 of them
00:26:37.820 were two
00:26:38.400 none of
00:26:39.980 them were
00:26:40.280 kids at
00:26:40.720 all
00:26:40.980 of all
00:26:43.200 the people
00:26:43.480 that I've
00:26:43.740 known
00:26:43.920 that I would
00:26:44.280 describe as
00:26:44.840 terrible
00:26:45.260 none of
00:26:45.800 them were
00:26:46.100 little kids
00:26:46.620 I would
00:26:47.260 not describe
00:26:47.760 any little
00:26:48.160 kid as
00:26:48.500 actually being
00:26:49.240 a terrible
00:26:49.740 person
00:26:49.960 it's not
00:26:50.520 possible for
00:26:51.180 a little
00:26:51.400 kid to be
00:26:51.760 a terrible
00:26:52.060 person
00:26:52.320 the terrible
00:26:53.320 people are
00:26:53.920 adults
00:26:54.380 so why
00:26:55.480 don't we
00:26:55.720 ever refer
00:26:56.260 to the
00:26:56.620 terrible
00:26:56.940 40s
00:26:57.560 or the
00:26:58.840 terrible
00:26:59.120 30s
00:26:59.560 or the
00:26:59.740 terrible
00:27:00.020 60s
00:27:00.820 can you
00:27:02.480 stop a
00:27:02.960 40 year
00:27:03.420 old from
00:27:03.900 throwing a
00:27:04.320 hissy fit
00:27:04.660 by tickling
00:27:05.160 them
00:27:05.380 no you
00:27:05.980 can't
00:27:06.300 and I've
00:27:06.580 tried
00:27:06.880 but when
00:27:09.740 kids are
00:27:12.520 upset
00:27:12.940 okay
00:27:13.960 it only
00:27:14.880 ever
00:27:15.200 stems
00:27:15.860 from
00:27:16.360 one of
00:27:17.560 like four
00:27:18.100 things
00:27:18.480 if a
00:27:18.960 little kid
00:27:19.560 is upset
00:27:20.000 it's
00:27:20.660 because
00:27:20.880 they're
00:27:21.120 tired
00:27:21.500 or it's
00:27:22.580 because
00:27:22.800 they're
00:27:23.040 hungry
00:27:23.400 or it's
00:27:24.320 because
00:27:24.520 they want
00:27:25.100 something
00:27:25.560 like a
00:27:26.720 toy or
00:27:27.520 candy
00:27:27.880 something
00:27:28.180 simple
00:27:28.560 or they
00:27:29.700 want your
00:27:30.080 attention
00:27:30.460 those are
00:27:31.320 really the
00:27:31.620 only four
00:27:32.040 reasons why
00:27:32.600 a kid
00:27:32.840 ever gets
00:27:33.180 upset
00:27:33.480 and most
00:27:34.620 of those
00:27:34.860 are pretty
00:27:35.180 easy to
00:27:35.580 deal with
00:27:35.860 it's pretty
00:27:36.140 easy to
00:27:36.480 you know
00:27:36.920 if they're
00:27:37.320 tired you
00:27:37.760 put them
00:27:37.960 down if
00:27:38.340 they're
00:27:38.460 hungry maybe
00:27:39.040 you give
00:27:39.320 them some
00:27:39.620 food
00:27:40.000 and it
00:27:42.520 can be
00:27:42.820 it can be
00:27:43.220 hard to
00:27:43.660 deal with
00:27:44.100 kids when
00:27:44.720 they want
00:27:45.520 one of
00:27:45.820 those things
00:27:46.520 and obviously
00:27:47.000 you can't
00:27:47.480 always just
00:27:48.020 give them
00:27:48.340 exactly what
00:27:48.880 they want
00:27:49.380 when they
00:27:50.000 want it
00:27:50.420 or eventually
00:27:51.440 they will
00:27:51.900 turn into
00:27:52.340 a legitimately
00:27:53.120 terrible
00:27:53.620 person
00:27:53.980 and it
00:27:55.360 can be
00:27:55.620 annoying
00:27:55.980 it can be
00:27:56.340 exhausting
00:27:56.820 to deal
00:27:57.140 with kids
00:27:57.480 but I
00:27:58.140 wouldn't
00:27:58.300 describe any
00:27:58.900 of this
00:27:59.240 as terrible
00:28:00.260 you know
00:28:01.220 what's
00:28:01.440 terrible
00:28:01.780 maliciousness
00:28:03.140 cruelty
00:28:05.300 passive
00:28:07.420 aggressiveness
00:28:08.320 arrogance
00:28:10.460 arrogance
00:28:10.480 selfish
00:28:13.600 ambition
00:28:14.960 where you're
00:28:16.540 just stepping
00:28:17.200 over people
00:28:17.960 in pursuit
00:28:18.520 of your
00:28:18.900 of your
00:28:19.300 aims
00:28:19.640 and these
00:28:20.760 are all
00:28:21.160 adult traits
00:28:22.040 worst of all
00:28:22.860 adults don't
00:28:23.720 have an
00:28:24.240 excuse
00:28:24.740 children have
00:28:25.580 an excuse
00:28:26.120 to act
00:28:26.500 like children
00:28:27.040 adults
00:28:27.900 don't
00:28:28.740 so if we're
00:28:29.140 going to be
00:28:29.300 using this
00:28:29.720 word terrible
00:28:30.300 to describe
00:28:30.880 anyone
00:28:31.140 I think
00:28:31.560 it should
00:28:31.780 be those
00:28:32.180 kinds
00:28:32.440 it should
00:28:32.740 be people
00:28:33.120 who are
00:28:33.420 capable
00:28:33.820 of actual
00:28:34.680 cruelty
00:28:35.140 there's
00:28:35.440 never been
00:28:35.960 a little
00:28:36.240 kid who's
00:28:36.640 cruel
00:28:36.880 that's never
00:28:37.360 happened
00:28:37.620 I mean
00:28:37.860 there are
00:28:38.060 little kids
00:28:38.420 who can act
00:28:38.780 cruel sometimes
00:28:39.360 but they don't
00:28:39.940 know what
00:28:40.180 they're doing
00:28:40.540 that's an
00:28:41.420 adult thing
00:28:41.980 so there's
00:28:42.960 my PC
00:28:43.480 plea for
00:28:44.000 the day
00:28:44.320 let's stop
00:28:45.160 with the
00:28:45.400 ageism
00:28:45.980 call little
00:28:46.920 kids
00:28:47.160 terrible
00:28:47.560 if we're
00:28:47.900 going to
00:28:48.060 call anyone
00:28:48.400 terrible
00:28:48.740 it should
00:28:49.040 be people
00:28:49.600 like me
00:28:50.080 and you
00:28:50.500 adults
00:28:50.920 right
00:28:51.180 at least
00:28:52.480 we have
00:28:52.680 the capacity
00:28:53.200 to be
00:28:53.540 terrible
00:28:53.800 all right
00:28:54.960 we'll leave
00:28:55.760 it there
00:28:56.020 thanks for
00:28:56.420 watching
00:28:56.680 everybody
00:28:56.900 thanks for
00:28:57.260 listening
00:28:57.540 Godspeed