The Matt Walsh Show - Ep. 141 - The Most Barbaric Pro-Abortion Ad Of All Time

00:00:00.000 Today on the Matt Walsh Show, the left now claims that Tucker Carlson harassed a gay Latino

00:00:05.140 immigrant at a bar, but there's more to the story. We'll talk about it. Also, a leftist group put out

00:00:10.720 the most horrific, deranged, demented, terrible pro-abortion ad of all time. What does the ad

00:00:15.920 tell us about the pro-abortion position? Finally, embryo swapping is the latest fad in our

00:00:21.920 decaying society. What does it tell us about the state of our culture? All of that coming up on

00:00:27.740 the Matt Walsh Show. Michael Avenatti is the least credible person in the world, I think.

00:00:38.880 It's almost amazing how lacking in credibility. He is so lacking in credibility that you have to

00:00:45.440 almost doubt at this point whether he himself exists. He has so little credibility that even

00:00:52.180 his own existence could now be called into question. But he is investigating claims that

00:00:59.940 Tucker Carlson assaulted a gay Latino immigrant at a restaurant in Virginia a month ago. Now,

00:01:08.120 that, of course, really checks all the boxes, doesn't it? A gay Latino immigrant. Because that's

00:01:15.120 for the left. I mean, having a Fox News host assault a gay Latino immigrant, that's just there.

00:01:20.420 That is a headline from heaven for them. Now, Avenatti, of course, also is the guy that

00:01:27.600 investigated claims that Brett Kavanaugh was the ringleader of a roving band of gang rapists when

00:01:31.780 he was in high school. And he determined that those claims were true, even as everyone else

00:01:35.780 who investigated them determined that they were the insane ramblings of an emotionally unstable woman

00:01:41.320 who never even knew Brett Kavanaugh. But so the point is, you know, you could be a little

00:01:46.540 suspicious of the results of his investigation. There is a video of this altercation. And if you

00:01:54.460 watch the video, it shows no assault occurring. All it shows is Carlson telling the man to get the

00:02:02.100 F out of here repeatedly. He keeps saying, get the F out of here, out of here. Now, so you see that,

00:02:08.300 and you think, well, why is he saying that to the guy? Only in the fevered imagination of a left winger

00:02:13.560 is it at all plausible that Tucker Carlson would have randomly started yelling, get the F out of

00:02:19.780 here to someone because they're gay and Latino, right? I mean, if that's how he reacts to gay people

00:02:25.940 and to Latinos, there should be a video of him screaming at somebody every day. He lives in DC,

00:02:32.280 for God's sake. He lives in, he's, he, he works in media in DC. I think the first time he's ever

00:02:37.440 come across someone in one of, one of those two categories. Um, so any rational person would see

00:02:43.980 the video and think, well, there's gotta be more to this story. And there is Carlson last night

00:02:47.900 filled in the details. He says that he, uh, Carlson was out, out to eat with his family, including his

00:02:54.740 adult daughter and his, uh, and his adult son, his daughter got up to go to the bathroom, at which point

00:03:00.760 the man, having seen that she was at the table with Carlson, cussed her out, called her Carlson's

00:03:05.360 whore, uh, then used other derogatory names, at which point Carlson came over, uh, with his son,

00:03:11.100 his son threw a glass of wine on the guy. Carlson told him to get the F out. Um, and that's what we

00:03:16.220 see in the video. Now, if that is what happened, and I think his story sounds much more plausible than

00:03:24.080 the other dude's story because, because we know that left wingers do, um, have no problem harassing

00:03:33.360 the family members of, of those they dislike. So that's a, that's a totally plausible story.

00:03:38.180 And if, if that is what happened, then Carlson was perfectly justified in his response.

00:03:41.640 He would have been justified. In fact, if I, if I'm, if I'm annoyed at him at all or upset with him,

00:03:46.080 it's only because he didn't punch the guy in the mouth, which he would have been perfectly

00:03:49.720 justified in doing. Um, but we also have to keep something else in mind here. It's just

00:03:54.640 something to remember. Um, the guy, the supposed victim, although the real victim here apparently

00:04:02.080 is Carlson's daughter who was harassed, but the guy whining about being a victim is apparently an

00:04:10.960 LGBT activist. Well, I guess it falls on me sadly to be the one to point out the, that LGBT activists

00:04:19.160 make up stories all the time. They are notorious for fabricating fake hate, hate crimes. Uh, this is

00:04:27.820 something that leftists do. And this is something that, uh, you know, unfortunately LGBT activists

00:04:34.120 do most of all. Um, and you can go, go online and just look up fake hate crime hoaxes. You'll find,

00:04:42.120 you'll find just so many of them. In fact, there's a whole, um, one of my, one of my favorite sub

00:04:48.080 genres of the fake hate crime, uh, category are the, the racist or homophobic notes that are left

00:04:57.580 on receipts. I mean, there are dozens of these kinds of stories, uh, that for some reason left

00:05:02.820 wingers, they love to make up stories where, uh, a racist or homophobic person writes a terrible note

00:05:10.300 on a receipt and leaves it for their waiter or waitress. There was a story recently about

00:05:15.640 a guy. Um, I, I forget what his name was, but an Arab American waiter at a restaurant, um,

00:05:25.280 posted a picture of a receipt of a note that was left on a receipt from one of his tables.

00:05:31.180 And, and, uh, the note said it's, I think it said something like, we don't tip terrorists.

00:05:36.800 And he posts on Facebook, it goes viral. And then of course it comes out later that he,

00:05:41.680 he wrote the note himself. It was made up, but you see that kind of, there was another one. Uh,

00:05:46.280 there's been a lot of these kinds of things. Uh, there've been a bunch of someone allegedly

00:05:50.500 writing N word where the tip line is supposed to go. There was one few years ago of a, um,

00:05:57.380 of a lesbian woman waitress. And she posts a picture of a, of a note on receipt. The note said,

00:06:02.980 we disagree with your lifestyle. And so we're not going to tip. And of course it, it comes out that

00:06:09.220 she, she made up that story. So it's just, look, it's not, it's not impossible that someone could

00:06:15.140 really write a note like that, but, but we would have to believe that whoever wrote that note

00:06:20.640 either has never had a Brown skinned person as a waiter or never had, and I don't even know how

00:06:27.580 they would know that your waitress is a lesbian, but they wouldn't have never had a female who they

00:06:32.300 suspect might be a lesbian as a waitress, or they leave notes like that all the time. And this is

00:06:37.620 the first time we're seeing it on Facebook, but either way, it just doesn't, it's very implausible.

00:06:44.120 And you, with all of these stories, um, it shows you something about it. It reveals how the left

00:06:54.000 views the opposition, where they think of us, uh, they have this cartoonish idea of us where they,

00:07:05.300 they hear a story that Tucker Carlson, because he works at Fox news would randomly just start

00:07:11.100 cussing out a gay Latino at a bar for no reason, other than the fact that he's a gay Latino.

00:07:16.640 And a lot of leftists hear that story apparently and think, yeah, well, that makes sense. Yeah,

00:07:20.740 sure. That's exactly what they would do. No, that's not what they would do.

00:07:25.000 It's possible. There are people in the country who would react that way, but it's, it's in,

00:07:29.220 it's not very plausible. There's probably another explanation. Um,

00:07:35.380 so you have the fact that this is an LGBT activist notorious for making up pay crimes,

00:07:40.740 then you throw a Michael Avenatti on top of it. And, uh, and there's just no reason to believe

00:07:45.720 their version of the story. And I'll say one more thing about this. Uh, if you harass a man's family,

00:07:53.220 if you harass a man's daughter, wife, son, you deserve whatever comes next. If he lays you out

00:07:59.380 on the floor, if he breaks her nose, you deserve that because a man has the moral right to defend

00:08:06.920 his family and to teach a lesson to anyone who would harass them. So this guy should be thanking

00:08:12.820 Tucker Carlson for, for showing such restraint. He should be writing a thank you note to him and

00:08:18.560 saying, thank you for not punching me in the nose. Thank you so much for that, sir. That's what he

00:08:22.620 should be doing. So he's not only a harasser of women, apparently, but he's also rude for not,

00:08:29.420 for not thanking Carlson for reacting the way that a lot of fathers would. Okay. Um, what else?

00:08:37.880 Uh, speaking of far left lunacy, a far left advocacy group called the agenda project in

00:08:46.880 appropriately creepy sounding name, just put out a, a, a, an absolutely demented ad in support of,

00:08:55.900 uh, of Planned Parenthood. And I wrote a piece about this up on the daily wire right now. Now,

00:09:01.780 any advertisement supporting Planned Parenthood is going to be demented and horrible by definition,

00:09:06.440 but this one really goes beyond what you might even expect. The ad is, is titled The Chosen

00:09:12.900 and it's a, it's a 40 second video and it opens with, with, uh, and go to the, go to my article

00:09:20.340 about it. You can see the video itself, but it opens with the image, with this footage of a,

00:09:24.840 of a beautiful smiling baby girl looking right into the camera. She's giggling and, and laughing.

00:09:30.760 And there is, um, kind of a lullaby music playing in the background. Um, and then the words come up

00:09:40.720 on the screen saying she deserves to be loved. And you see that and you think, well, well, yes, I, I,

00:09:47.340 I agree. Yes, indeed. She deserves to be loved. And then next, see a little bit more footage of the

00:09:53.300 girl. And then the words come up. She deserves to be wanted. And again, the viewer must concur. She

00:09:59.120 does indeed deserve to be wanted. And then comes the kicker. She deserves to be a choice.

00:10:09.400 And then we're urged to stand with Planned Parenthood as the picture fades. Um, now

00:10:16.500 let's leave aside the, the most disturbing aspect of this video, which is that somebody apparently

00:10:24.240 allowed their child to be used for it. Assuming this video was, was, was not made under false

00:10:29.720 pretenses or they didn't find some kind of stock footage of a baby or something. But if a parent

00:10:34.580 actually did offer up their kid for this kind of thing, then it seems that this particular child

00:10:40.960 who deserves to be loved is not actually loved by her parents because no parent who loves their

00:10:48.600 child would use their child in that way. But speaking about the message itself, um, what makes

00:10:54.640 the message itself so barbaric, so horrific is, is two things. First of all, and I know this shouldn't

00:11:03.760 even need to be explained, but I'm going to explain it anyway. The first problem here is that a baby's

00:11:09.600 murder, a baby's violent killing is presented as something that the baby deserves. But then we

00:11:20.280 ask, well, well, how could a baby deserve to be executed? What, in what sense are we using the word

00:11:27.360 deserved? Because to deserve something needs to be worthy of it. And so we're talking about either a

00:11:33.720 reward or punishment. So is the child worthy of punishment? What has she done to deserve this,

00:11:40.320 this penalty? Or do we mean reward, deserve in the sense of reward? Well, what sort of reward is that

00:11:47.320 to be killed? And I have to wonder the makers of this video, would they like to be rewarded in a similar

00:11:53.660 way? Would they appreciate it if somebody rewarded them by crushing their skulls?

00:12:02.580 I assume not. So if they wouldn't want to be rewarded this way, then how can they speak for

00:12:08.140 the child on this matter? Now, I can only assume that some text is missing from this. So I can only

00:12:16.020 assume it was supposed to say something like, she deserves to be loved, she deserves to be wanted,

00:12:20.640 but if she isn't, then she deserves to die. But that assumes that everybody who isn't, and this is

00:12:34.900 what pro-abortion people assume and are very clear about when they are very upfront. They assume that

00:12:41.500 everybody who isn't loved or wanted by their biological parents would prefer to forfeit their

00:12:48.040 lives entirely. That's what they assume. And you hear this from all the time. Well, you know, it's an

00:12:54.400 unwanted child. What are we going to do with an unwanted child? They're assuming that if you are a

00:12:59.740 child who is not wanted for whatever reason by their biological parents, well, there's no way that

00:13:06.760 such a child could ever go on to lead a fulfilling and happy life. But in saying that, they're ignoring

00:13:15.460 the testimonies of many millions and millions of people whose biological parents would not or could

00:13:26.900 not care for them, and yet have gone on to be perfectly happy. And yeah, I'm sure that there

00:13:34.140 are some people who were born under those circumstances and did not go on to lead happy

00:13:39.680 lives. I'm sure you could even find me people who were born under those circumstances, went on to lead

00:13:44.000 miserable lives, and then tragically killed themselves. You know, I'm sure you could find me

00:13:47.940 cases like that. But each individual deserves to make a choice between trying to live through

00:13:55.360 difficult circumstances and finding happiness and fulfillment in the midst of it, or giving up.

00:14:00.980 And I certainly hope that nobody makes a choice to give up. But once you're an adult,

00:14:06.100 you know, nobody can stop you if that's the choice you want to make. The vast majority of people,

00:14:10.560 if given the option, will choose the former. They will choose to live through it and find

00:14:16.720 happiness in it. That's what most people do. And so if we want to talk about deserve, what people

00:14:21.580 deserve, every person deserves to make that choice for themselves. But here's the real point here.

00:14:29.980 The second thing that makes this video, this ad so disturbing, is that it's honest.

00:14:36.320 Okay? It shows us, it doesn't show us a clump of cells. It shows us a baby. And it calls the baby

00:14:43.040 she. Okay? It uses that very personal word there, she. Not it. Not that thing. Not fetus. It says she.

00:14:54.900 It seems almost to go out of its way to highlight the beauty and lovability of this adorable child.

00:15:02.620 So it presents human life to us. Wondrous, miraculous human life.

00:15:10.960 And it puts that right in front of our face. And then it says, yes, it is good to kill this person.

00:15:20.480 This is something that you rarely see from pro-abortion people, but every once in a while you do.

00:15:26.000 You see them looking straight into the dark, hideous heart of abortion advocacy and confronting

00:15:38.560 it and not flinching and saying, yep, that's what I support.

00:15:46.040 So that is honesty. They're being forthright about it. Abortion kills babies.

00:15:54.420 So I think we should give the Agenda Project some credit for being open and honest about

00:16:00.460 what they believe and what they support. We could at least give them credit for that.

00:16:08.060 And then we should also condemn them for believing and supporting something so deranged and cruel

00:16:14.140 and horrible.

00:16:15.140 And then we should shudder in terror as we realize that many millions of Americans agree with them.

00:16:25.540 But that's the main takeaway here. What does this tell you?

00:16:28.020 What does it tell you that the pro-abortion position

00:16:31.180 seems so

00:16:35.260 explicitly diabolical

00:16:37.480 when it's stated plainly

00:16:39.580 and honestly?

00:16:40.120 That should tell you something about

00:16:44.600 the position that you hold.

00:16:47.080 If

00:16:47.100 it makes people recoil

00:16:52.440 in shock and horror

00:16:53.960 the moment that you drop the euphemisms

00:16:56.560 well, that

00:16:58.660 should really tell you something.

00:17:03.560 If

00:17:04.120 even people on

00:17:05.260 if even some people on your own side

00:17:07.340 have this visceral gut reaction

00:17:09.800 against it

00:17:10.700 when you drop the euphemisms

00:17:12.440 and take off the mask

00:17:13.340 and just show it for what it is

00:17:14.460 well, again, that should tell you something.

00:17:18.100 All right.

00:17:19.600 One more thing

00:17:20.680 I wanted to talk about.

00:17:23.300 This is

00:17:23.600 an interesting

00:17:25.000 interesting

00:17:25.840 couple interesting cases here

00:17:29.380 not completely disconnected

00:17:30.960 from what we just talked about

00:17:32.560 but

00:17:32.860 there was a story

00:17:34.020 this past week

00:17:34.880 about

00:17:36.340 a couple

00:17:37.780 in

00:17:38.140 Brooklyn

00:17:39.000 of course

00:17:39.920 that is

00:17:41.940 they're

00:17:42.600 they're swapping

00:17:43.500 embryos

00:17:44.220 with someone else

00:17:45.000 there's an

00:17:45.400 an actress

00:17:46.360 had a girl embryo

00:17:48.160 but wanted a boy embryo

00:17:49.880 and then

00:17:50.940 there's a couple

00:17:51.740 who had a boy embryo

00:17:53.020 but wanted a girl

00:17:54.180 embryo

00:17:54.640 so

00:17:55.800 apparently

00:17:56.440 they are

00:17:57.560 trading embryos

00:17:59.560 trading them

00:18:01.800 like kids used to

00:18:02.560 to trade Pokemon cards

00:18:03.820 okay

00:18:04.160 that's what they're

00:18:04.840 do kids still

00:18:05.880 trade Pokemon

00:18:06.960 I have no idea

00:18:07.680 or when I was a kid

00:18:10.960 we used to trade Pogs

00:18:12.180 so

00:18:12.660 for

00:18:13.100 you know

00:18:13.460 that lasted for about six months

00:18:14.760 that fed

00:18:15.180 but

00:18:15.340 so they're

00:18:15.900 that's how they're trading them

00:18:16.940 now there was also a story

00:18:18.800 of

00:18:19.320 of a lesbian couple

00:18:20.500 that's

00:18:21.060 that swapped

00:18:21.880 an embryo

00:18:23.200 between them

00:18:23.920 they took turns

00:18:24.620 carrying

00:18:25.200 an IVF

00:18:26.560 embryo

00:18:28.100 so you had

00:18:28.460 two of these

00:18:29.220 two of these kinds of stories

00:18:30.340 in the last couple of weeks

00:18:31.540 and I think

00:18:33.180 I think what we see here

00:18:35.580 especially with the first story

00:18:36.940 just focusing on that

00:18:38.040 for a moment

00:18:38.500 we see the

00:18:40.520 the continued

00:18:41.280 commodification

00:18:42.300 of human life

00:18:43.160 this

00:18:45.180 this

00:18:45.720 this treating life

00:18:47.000 like a

00:18:47.540 like a commodity

00:18:48.340 like a thing

00:18:49.120 like a

00:18:49.740 like a product

00:18:51.360 an asset

00:18:52.640 and

00:18:55.400 people ask me sometimes

00:18:57.320 about IVF

00:18:57.900 how I feel about it

00:18:58.820 this is why I don't like it

00:19:00.000 this is why I don't like IVF

00:19:01.440 you want to talk about

00:19:03.340 slippery slopes

00:19:04.020 well

00:19:04.320 this is a

00:19:05.100 this

00:19:06.020 very clear

00:19:07.680 that once we start

00:19:08.620 treating human life

00:19:09.640 this way

00:19:10.100 you are on that slope

00:19:11.500 and

00:19:12.720 we can even leave aside

00:19:14.100 the spiritual

00:19:14.920 the religious aspects

00:19:16.000 of this issue

00:19:16.660 those are important

00:19:18.160 but we can leave those aside

00:19:19.240 and just talk about this

00:19:20.520 on

00:19:20.800 on

00:19:21.720 secular terms

00:19:23.580 because even if I were

00:19:25.140 a secular person

00:19:26.140 even if I didn't believe in God

00:19:27.240 I would be saying

00:19:28.920 the same thing

00:19:29.560 that

00:19:32.340 it is a

00:19:33.740 it is a

00:19:34.200 it's a dangerous game

00:19:35.280 that we play

00:19:35.840 when we go down this road

00:19:37.540 of treating people

00:19:39.280 like

00:19:40.680 like items

00:19:41.680 you know

00:19:45.960 there's that

00:19:46.480 I dealt with

00:19:48.060 several months ago

00:19:48.940 someone

00:19:49.320 what's supposed

00:19:51.100 what's supposed to be

00:19:52.400 this

00:19:52.720 this

00:19:53.400 indisputable

00:19:55.760 unanswerable

00:19:56.960 pro-abortion

00:19:57.680 argument

00:20:00.740 where someone says

00:20:01.740 well

00:20:02.060 what if

00:20:02.560 what if

00:20:02.980 there are a bunch

00:20:03.480 of frozen embryos

00:20:04.640 what if

00:20:05.120 what if

00:20:05.140 what if

00:20:05.400 there's a

00:20:05.860 maybe remember

00:20:06.560 when we talk about this

00:20:07.380 talk about this

00:20:08.060 what if there's a

00:20:09.260 a fire

00:20:10.320 in an IVF clinic

00:20:11.580 and there are a bunch

00:20:12.680 of frozen embryos

00:20:13.720 that are

00:20:14.220 you know

00:20:15.220 about to be destroyed

00:20:16.480 and there's also

00:20:17.220 a two-year-old child

00:20:18.580 who happens to be

00:20:19.620 in the IVF clinic

00:20:20.400 as well

00:20:20.860 without his parents

00:20:21.700 and for some reason

00:20:22.600 you can only save one

00:20:23.760 which do you save

00:20:25.080 and they're trying

00:20:26.800 to point out

00:20:27.340 that well clearly

00:20:27.920 you would save

00:20:28.640 the two-year-old child

00:20:30.020 not the embryo

00:20:30.900 so obviously

00:20:31.500 you're admitting

00:20:32.140 by their version

00:20:33.580 of events here

00:20:34.240 you're admitting

00:20:36.460 that the child

00:20:37.140 is more human

00:20:38.080 than the embryo

00:20:39.160 which is

00:20:41.100 which is not

00:20:41.680 what you're admitting

00:20:42.240 because that would

00:20:42.860 just be scientifically

00:20:43.620 inaccurate

00:20:44.140 but the point is

00:20:46.620 when they

00:20:48.580 when they raise

00:20:49.200 that argument

00:20:49.720 what they're really doing

00:20:50.780 is raising an argument

00:20:51.900 against IVF

00:20:52.900 they're raising an argument

00:20:53.760 against treating embryos

00:20:55.100 like this

00:20:55.460 because we shouldn't

00:20:56.780 be in a position

00:20:58.180 we should never be

00:21:00.680 in a position

00:21:01.120 where there are

00:21:01.540 a bunch of

00:21:01.980 leftover human embryos

00:21:03.880 and we have to figure out

00:21:04.740 what to do with them

00:21:06.020 we're

00:21:09.880 you know

00:21:10.500 that hypothetical

00:21:11.340 it's only possible

00:21:12.660 to discuss that hypothetical

00:21:14.120 because this is how

00:21:15.580 we treat human life

00:21:16.800 so I think it's a very

00:21:20.660 I think it's a

00:21:21.240 a very dangerous road

00:21:22.500 to go down

00:21:23.680 and as

00:21:26.260 as science develops

00:21:27.620 I mean

00:21:28.440 maybe

00:21:29.340 maybe a hundred years

00:21:30.280 from now

00:21:30.740 maybe a hundred years

00:21:32.960 from now

00:21:33.300 the

00:21:33.600 the sort of

00:21:34.420 LGBT

00:21:34.840 dream

00:21:36.420 will be fulfilled

00:21:37.340 and maybe

00:21:37.920 they'll be able

00:21:38.520 to implant

00:21:39.520 some sort of

00:21:40.460 artificial uterus

00:21:42.280 into a man

00:21:43.080 who claims to be a woman

00:21:44.100 and then implant

00:21:44.920 an embryo

00:21:46.420 into the uterus

00:21:47.060 and then maybe

00:21:47.620 finally they can have

00:21:48.760 their

00:21:48.940 who knows

00:21:49.660 you know

00:21:49.980 with the way

00:21:51.080 medical science

00:21:51.860 is developing

00:21:52.340 maybe eventually

00:21:53.260 they'll be able

00:21:53.880 to create

00:21:54.460 that kind of

00:21:55.260 Frankenstein

00:21:56.640 monstrosity

00:21:58.340 and bring

00:21:59.700 human life

00:22:00.300 into the world

00:22:00.940 that way

00:22:01.460 well

00:22:01.780 you know

00:22:03.740 even if you don't

00:22:04.380 think we've

00:22:04.880 we've

00:22:05.200 we're on the slippery

00:22:06.600 slope yet

00:22:07.200 with this stuff

00:22:07.860 would you admit

00:22:08.420 that that at least

00:22:09.260 is a slippery slope

00:22:09.980 is there a limit

00:22:11.100 I find it kind of

00:22:13.820 kind of interesting

00:22:14.860 that on the left

00:22:16.220 you know

00:22:18.780 leftists are

00:22:19.620 are typically

00:22:20.720 the ones

00:22:21.180 who are very

00:22:21.700 concerned about

00:22:22.700 organic

00:22:23.760 they're very

00:22:25.060 concerned about

00:22:25.660 doing things

00:22:26.360 the natural way

00:22:27.440 doing things

00:22:29.260 in accordance

00:22:29.720 with nature

00:22:30.800 and all that

00:22:31.460 well why can't

00:22:34.420 we take that

00:22:34.980 philosophy

00:22:35.480 if we

00:22:35.900 if we could

00:22:36.240 take that

00:22:36.600 philosophy

00:22:36.980 and apply it

00:22:37.760 to the produce

00:22:38.260 section

00:22:38.640 if we can

00:22:40.900 apply it

00:22:41.540 if we can

00:22:42.320 live by that

00:22:43.920 code

00:22:44.780 when we're

00:22:45.320 buying stocks

00:22:46.060 of celery

00:22:47.040 from

00:22:48.200 from the supermarket

00:22:49.320 then maybe we

00:22:51.420 should consider

00:22:51.940 the same code

00:22:52.700 when we're

00:22:53.120 deciding how to

00:22:54.040 bring human life

00:22:54.800 into the world

00:22:55.420 you know

00:22:59.240 maybe we should

00:22:59.880 be concerned

00:23:00.380 about

00:23:00.720 about

00:23:01.520 about nature

00:23:02.460 by doing

00:23:04.120 things the

00:23:04.540 organic way

00:23:05.240 because the

00:23:10.020 more that we

00:23:10.480 treat human

00:23:11.260 life this way

00:23:11.840 the more we

00:23:12.280 treat it like

00:23:12.920 an object

00:23:13.700 it has the

00:23:17.080 effect of just

00:23:17.920 debasing

00:23:18.580 life

00:23:19.680 and we start

00:23:23.180 to see human

00:23:23.820 life more and

00:23:24.460 more as

00:23:25.700 as kind of

00:23:26.900 an accessory

00:23:27.560 and you have a

00:23:30.800 kid just for

00:23:31.380 your own sake

00:23:31.880 because you want

00:23:32.520 an accessory

00:23:33.420 because it's a

00:23:34.100 fun thing to do

00:23:34.840 trading it back

00:23:36.400 and forth

00:23:36.940 you know

00:23:37.380 like it's

00:23:37.800 some sort

00:23:38.100 of recreational

00:23:38.720 thing

00:23:39.240 it's not about

00:23:41.280 the child

00:23:42.180 anymore

00:23:42.660 it's about

00:23:43.380 us

00:23:43.780 and then

00:23:46.960 when we can

00:23:47.360 get into

00:23:47.900 genetically

00:23:48.740 modifying kids

00:23:50.100 and you know

00:23:50.540 it's like

00:23:50.840 Gattaca or

00:23:51.420 something

00:23:51.620 if you've

00:23:51.760 ever seen

00:23:51.980 that movie

00:23:52.400 where you

00:23:52.960 can decide

00:23:53.500 specifically

00:23:54.140 what kind

00:23:54.720 of kid

00:23:55.040 you want

00:23:55.460 you can

00:23:55.780 select

00:23:56.180 all these

00:23:56.800 different

00:23:57.040 details

00:23:57.440 about them

00:23:57.980 again

00:23:59.420 now we

00:24:00.080 have made

00:24:00.740 the child

00:24:01.700 we've made

00:24:02.160 this human

00:24:02.880 life

00:24:03.160 into

00:24:03.400 it's

00:24:03.980 completely

00:24:04.480 about us

00:24:05.240 it's like

00:24:07.820 we're

00:24:07.980 building

00:24:08.500 an accessory

00:24:09.240 for our

00:24:09.880 lives

00:24:10.260 rather than

00:24:11.560 confronting

00:24:12.200 the sacred

00:24:13.760 miracle

00:24:14.820 of actual

00:24:17.040 human life

00:24:17.680 all right

00:24:20.440 before I wrap

00:24:23.720 up I did

00:24:24.160 want to

00:24:24.740 since we're

00:24:25.540 on the subject

00:24:25.900 of babies

00:24:26.360 I did want

00:24:26.860 to say

00:24:27.460 happy birthday

00:24:28.000 to my

00:24:28.500 youngest

00:24:29.160 our youngest

00:24:31.660 turned two

00:24:32.160 yesterday

00:24:32.620 his birthday

00:24:33.320 he watches

00:24:34.440 all my

00:24:34.820 videos

00:24:35.060 of course

00:24:35.340 so that's

00:24:35.660 why I'm

00:24:35.880 saying happy

00:24:36.160 birthday

00:24:36.420 to him

00:24:37.080 his favorite

00:24:37.860 present that

00:24:38.440 we got him

00:24:39.080 by the way

00:24:39.680 was a little

00:24:40.340 handheld vacuum

00:24:41.440 and this kid

00:24:42.980 is obsessed

00:24:44.000 with vacuums

00:24:45.320 I mean he's

00:24:45.700 absolutely obsessed

00:24:46.240 I think he

00:24:47.780 mainly just likes

00:24:48.640 machines that

00:24:49.420 make loud

00:24:49.880 noises but he

00:24:50.540 definitely has a

00:24:51.200 specific affection

00:24:53.700 for vacuums

00:24:54.600 like he has to

00:24:55.360 go hug the

00:24:56.280 vacuums in our

00:24:57.040 house before he

00:24:58.920 goes to bed each

00:24:59.560 night so that's

00:25:00.360 where we are

00:25:00.840 just to give

00:25:01.180 you an idea

00:25:01.500 of the extent

00:25:02.120 of his

00:25:03.660 vacuum

00:25:04.060 addiction

00:25:04.520 but so he's

00:25:06.000 two now

00:25:06.480 and I was

00:25:08.480 thinking about

00:25:08.860 this today

00:25:09.240 because people

00:25:09.860 when they hear

00:25:11.240 that you have

00:25:11.500 a two-year-old

00:25:12.040 they'll say

00:25:12.460 oh no

00:25:12.900 the terrible

00:25:13.840 twos

00:25:14.220 watch out

00:25:14.920 watch out

00:25:15.460 for the

00:25:15.720 terrible

00:25:15.960 twos

00:25:16.280 and here's

00:25:18.020 the thing

00:25:18.220 about that

00:25:18.500 we've already

00:25:19.640 done the

00:25:20.040 terrible

00:25:20.320 twos

00:25:20.740 we did them

00:25:21.600 times two

00:25:22.180 because our

00:25:22.620 oldest are

00:25:23.100 twins

00:25:23.540 boy and

00:25:24.140 girl so we

00:25:24.620 had two

00:25:25.020 two-year-olds

00:25:25.480 at the same

00:25:25.760 time

00:25:25.940 that's how

00:25:26.540 it works

00:25:26.820 to have

00:25:27.160 twins

00:25:27.880 and so I

00:25:30.600 think I

00:25:30.900 could say

00:25:31.180 that the

00:25:31.420 terrible

00:25:31.700 twos are

00:25:32.180 fake news

00:25:33.020 totally

00:25:33.900 overrated

00:25:34.440 this anti-two

00:25:37.340 propaganda

00:25:38.040 is ridiculous

00:25:39.720 and it's

00:25:41.480 ageist

00:25:42.120 on top of

00:25:43.020 it

00:25:43.160 these scare

00:25:45.340 tactics that

00:25:46.140 people use

00:25:46.940 when it comes

00:25:49.360 to two-year-olds

00:25:50.000 it's absurd

00:25:50.840 and I want

00:25:51.260 to say this

00:25:51.680 to any new

00:25:52.580 parents

00:25:53.120 or future

00:25:54.000 parents

00:25:54.520 don't worry

00:25:56.000 about two

00:25:56.900 don't worry

00:25:57.440 about toddler

00:25:58.160 I mean kids

00:25:58.740 at two

00:25:59.100 are no

00:25:59.420 problem

00:25:59.820 yeah they

00:26:00.760 have temper

00:26:01.180 tantrums

00:26:02.120 but they

00:26:03.260 don't know

00:26:03.520 what's going

00:26:04.360 on in the

00:26:04.740 world yet

00:26:05.100 you can still

00:26:06.180 get them

00:26:06.520 to stop

00:26:06.960 crying

00:26:07.440 by tickling

00:26:08.240 them

00:26:08.500 you never

00:26:10.160 have to

00:26:10.460 really worry

00:26:11.060 when your

00:26:11.940 kid's still

00:26:12.440 at an age

00:26:13.000 where you

00:26:13.600 could basically

00:26:14.160 get them

00:26:14.500 to stop

00:26:14.780 crying

00:26:15.020 by tickling

00:26:15.520 them

00:26:15.780 or worst

00:26:17.060 case

00:26:17.380 giving them

00:26:17.780 a lollipop

00:26:18.560 or something

00:26:18.880 like that

00:26:19.220 when they're

00:26:19.740 still at that

00:26:20.280 age where

00:26:20.600 they can be

00:26:20.960 satiated with

00:26:21.700 tickles

00:26:22.180 or a lollipop

00:26:22.960 it's you

00:26:23.920 it's not

00:26:24.560 that bad

00:26:24.980 it's pretty

00:26:25.620 good

00:26:25.900 and can I

00:26:28.200 just say

00:26:28.480 that I

00:26:28.720 have known

00:26:29.700 I have known

00:26:31.540 as we all

00:26:32.920 have

00:26:33.180 I have known

00:26:34.120 terrible people

00:26:34.940 in my life

00:26:35.540 okay

00:26:35.920 but none

00:26:37.520 of them

00:26:37.820 were two

00:26:38.400 none of

00:26:39.980 them were

00:26:40.280 kids at

00:26:40.720 all

00:26:40.980 of all

00:26:43.200 the people

00:26:43.480 that I've

00:26:43.740 known

00:26:43.920 that I would

00:26:44.280 describe as

00:26:44.840 terrible

00:26:45.260 none of

00:26:45.800 them were

00:26:46.100 little kids

00:26:46.620 I would

00:26:47.260 not describe

00:26:47.760 any little

00:26:48.160 kid as

00:26:48.500 actually being

00:26:49.240 a terrible

00:26:49.740 person

00:26:49.960 it's not

00:26:50.520 possible for

00:26:51.180 a little

00:26:51.400 kid to be

00:26:51.760 a terrible

00:26:52.060 person

00:26:52.320 the terrible

00:26:53.320 people are

00:26:53.920 adults

00:26:54.380 so why

00:26:55.480 don't we

00:26:55.720 ever refer

00:26:56.260 to the

00:26:56.620 terrible

00:26:56.940 40s

00:26:57.560 or the

00:26:58.840 terrible

00:26:59.120 30s

00:26:59.560 or the

00:26:59.740 terrible

00:27:00.020 60s

00:27:00.820 can you

00:27:02.480 stop a

00:27:02.960 40 year

00:27:03.420 old from

00:27:03.900 throwing a

00:27:04.320 hissy fit

00:27:04.660 by tickling

00:27:05.160 them

00:27:05.380 no you

00:27:05.980 can't

00:27:06.300 and I've

00:27:06.580 tried

00:27:06.880 but when

00:27:09.740 kids are

00:27:12.520 upset

00:27:12.940 okay

00:27:13.960 it only

00:27:14.880 ever

00:27:15.200 stems

00:27:15.860 from

00:27:16.360 one of

00:27:17.560 like four

00:27:18.100 things

00:27:18.480 if a

00:27:18.960 little kid

00:27:19.560 is upset

00:27:20.000 it's

00:27:20.660 because

00:27:20.880 they're

00:27:21.120 tired

00:27:21.500 or it's

00:27:22.580 because

00:27:22.800 they're

00:27:23.040 hungry

00:27:23.400 or it's

00:27:24.320 because

00:27:24.520 they want

00:27:25.100 something

00:27:25.560 like a

00:27:26.720 toy or

00:27:27.520 candy

00:27:27.880 something

00:27:28.180 simple

00:27:28.560 or they

00:27:29.700 want your

00:27:30.080 attention

00:27:30.460 those are

00:27:31.320 really the

00:27:31.620 only four

00:27:32.040 reasons why

00:27:32.600 a kid

00:27:32.840 ever gets

00:27:33.180 upset

00:27:33.480 and most

00:27:34.620 of those

00:27:34.860 are pretty

00:27:35.180 easy to

00:27:35.580 deal with

00:27:35.860 it's pretty

00:27:36.140 easy to

00:27:36.480 you know

00:27:36.920 if they're

00:27:37.320 tired you

00:27:37.760 put them

00:27:37.960 down if

00:27:38.340 they're

00:27:38.460 hungry maybe

00:27:39.040 you give

00:27:39.320 them some

00:27:39.620 food

00:27:40.000 and it

00:27:42.520 can be

00:27:42.820 it can be

00:27:43.220 hard to

00:27:43.660 deal with

00:27:44.100 kids when

00:27:44.720 they want

00:27:45.520 one of

00:27:45.820 those things

00:27:46.520 and obviously

00:27:47.000 you can't

00:27:47.480 always just

00:27:48.020 give them

00:27:48.340 exactly what

00:27:48.880 they want

00:27:49.380 when they

00:27:50.000 want it

00:27:50.420 or eventually

00:27:51.440 they will

00:27:51.900 turn into

00:27:52.340 a legitimately

00:27:53.120 terrible

00:27:53.620 person

00:27:53.980 and it

00:27:55.360 can be

00:27:55.620 annoying

00:27:55.980 it can be

00:27:56.340 exhausting

00:27:56.820 to deal

00:27:57.140 with kids

00:27:57.480 but I

00:27:58.140 wouldn't

00:27:58.300 describe any

00:27:58.900 of this

00:27:59.240 as terrible

00:28:00.260 you know

00:28:01.220 what's

00:28:01.440 terrible

00:28:01.780 maliciousness

00:28:03.140 cruelty

00:28:05.300 passive

00:28:07.420 aggressiveness

00:28:08.320 arrogance

00:28:10.460 arrogance

00:28:10.480 selfish

00:28:13.600 ambition

00:28:14.960 where you're

00:28:16.540 just stepping

00:28:17.200 over people

00:28:17.960 in pursuit

00:28:18.520 of your

00:28:18.900 of your

00:28:19.300 aims

00:28:19.640 and these

00:28:20.760 are all

00:28:21.160 adult traits

00:28:22.040 worst of all

00:28:22.860 adults don't

00:28:23.720 have an

00:28:24.240 excuse

00:28:24.740 children have

00:28:25.580 an excuse

00:28:26.120 to act

00:28:26.500 like children

00:28:27.040 adults

00:28:27.900 don't

00:28:28.740 so if we're

00:28:29.140 going to be

00:28:29.300 using this

00:28:29.720 word terrible

00:28:30.300 to describe

00:28:30.880 anyone

00:28:31.140 I think

00:28:31.560 it should

00:28:31.780 be those

00:28:32.180 kinds

00:28:32.440 it should

00:28:32.740 be people

00:28:33.120 who are

00:28:33.420 capable

00:28:33.820 of actual

00:28:34.680 cruelty

00:28:35.140 there's

00:28:35.440 never been

00:28:35.960 a little

00:28:36.240 kid who's

00:28:36.640 cruel

00:28:36.880 that's never

00:28:37.360 happened

00:28:37.620 I mean

00:28:37.860 there are

00:28:38.060 little kids

00:28:38.420 who can act

00:28:38.780 cruel sometimes

00:28:39.360 but they don't

00:28:39.940 know what

00:28:40.180 they're doing

00:28:40.540 that's an

00:28:41.420 adult thing

00:28:41.980 so there's

00:28:42.960 my PC

00:28:43.480 plea for

00:28:44.000 the day

00:28:44.320 let's stop

00:28:45.160 with the

00:28:45.400 ageism

00:28:45.980 call little

00:28:46.920 kids

00:28:47.160 terrible

00:28:47.560 if we're

00:28:47.900 going to

00:28:48.060 call anyone

00:28:48.400 terrible

00:28:48.740 it should

00:28:49.040 be people

00:28:49.600 like me

00:28:50.080 and you

00:28:50.500 adults

00:28:50.920 right

00:28:51.180 at least

00:28:52.480 we have

00:28:52.680 the capacity

00:28:53.200 to be

00:28:53.540 terrible

00:28:53.800 all right

00:28:54.960 we'll leave

00:28:55.760 it there

00:28:56.020 thanks for

00:28:56.420 watching

00:28:56.680 everybody

00:28:56.900 thanks for

00:28:57.260 listening

00:28:57.540 Godspeed

The Matt Walsh Show - November 12, 2018

Ep. 141 - The Most Barbaric Pro-Abortion Ad Of All Time

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript