The Matt Walsh Show - November 13, 2024


Ep. 1485 - The Media Panics Over Trump's Administration Picks


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 3 minutes

Words per Minute

180.1947

Word Count

11,365

Sentence Count

796

Misogynist Sentences

26

Hate Speech Sentences

23


Summary

Trump has begun staffing his next administration, and the media is panicking over his choices. Also, a mother is handcuffed and thrown in jail because her 11-year-old son went for a walk in the neighborhood. This is why the overzealous nanny state isn t just annoying and expensive, but can be downright terrifying.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Today on the Matt Wall Show, Donald Trump has begun staffing his next administration.
00:00:03.620 The media is panicking over his choices, which obviously means he's knocking it out of the park
00:00:07.600 so far. Also, CNN and MSNBC have seen their ratings crater since Trump's election. It turns
00:00:13.120 out that being in the resistance, quote unquote, won't be as profitable this time around, perhaps.
00:00:17.240 And a mother is handcuffed and thrown in jail because her 11-year-old son went for a walk in
00:00:21.760 the neighborhood. This is why the overzealous nanny state isn't just annoying and expensive,
00:00:26.000 but if you're a parent, it can be downright terrifying. All of that and more today on the Matt Wall Show.
00:00:56.000 Am I Racist? broke records in theaters as the decade's number one documentary, and now it's
00:01:00.380 streaming only on Daily Wire Plus with exclusive extras. See it all now on Daily Wire Plus. Go to
00:01:04.740 dailywire.com slash subscribe and use code Trump to get 47% off your new annual membership today.
00:01:11.140 There's something profoundly meaningful about gathering around a Thanksgiving table with the
00:01:14.680 people who matter most. It's one of those rare moments when you can slow down and appreciate
00:01:18.680 the deeper things in life, family, gratitude, the traditions that bind us together. Plus,
00:01:23.240 to be honest, between the holiday chaos and questionable meat quality at grocery stores these
00:01:26.620 days, preparing that perfect meal can feel pretty overwhelming and stressful. That's where Good
00:01:31.840 Rancher steps in to transform your Thanksgiving experience. But not just delivering meat, they're
00:01:36.100 delivering peace of mind. Every cut comes from American farms and ranches, free from antibiotics
00:01:40.800 and hormones. Talking about steakhouse quality meat that's individually vacuum sealed and perfectly
00:01:45.280 trimmed, saving you both time and money. No more settling for imported mystery meat or throwing away
00:01:50.580 freezer burned cuts. And right now, Good Ranchers is offering something really extraordinary.
00:01:55.320 Subscribe to any of their premium meat boxes and they'll add a free Thanksgiving ham to your first
00:02:00.140 delivery. We're talking about a 10-pound spiral cut ham that's a $110 value, absolutely free.
00:02:06.760 Don't wait on this one. Visit goodranchers.com. Use code Walsh at checkout to claim your free
00:02:10.900 Thanksgiving ham. Support American farmers. Skip the grocery store chaos and make this holiday truly
00:02:15.980 special with Good Ranchers. That's goodranchers.com. Use promo code Walsh. Good Ranchers. American meat
00:02:20.860 delivered. Try to think back, if you can, to the transition period of the Biden-Harris administration.
00:02:26.160 I'm talking about the personnel decisions and especially the key cabinet appointments that the
00:02:31.180 incoming administration made in the weeks after the media called the race for Joe Biden back at the
00:02:35.420 end of 2020. Now, those personnel decisions were treated as basically non-stories. They came and went
00:02:40.800 in the media, didn't talk much about them. Wasn't a lot of outrage or debate. Pete Buttigieg, for
00:02:45.740 example, became the transportation secretary because he likes trains and was vaguely interested
00:02:50.900 in airplanes. And he's gay. And those were his qualifications. That was it. So they put him in
00:02:55.420 charge of the Department of Transportation, which has a budget of tens of billions of dollars and
00:02:59.180 oversees the nation's railways and airports. Why not? Made sense to Democrats at the time. What's the
00:03:04.880 worst that could happen? A train carrying toxic chemicals might derail somewhere in Ohio, let's say?
00:03:10.020 What are the odds of that? Well, that was the nomination of Lloyd Austin to lead the Defense
00:03:14.860 Department. And that was really inspiring. You see, Lloyd Austin was serving on the board of Raytheon,
00:03:19.720 one of the biggest defense contractors in the world. Raytheon was paying him a lot of money. And
00:03:23.580 then without much fanfare, the Biden-Harris administration appointed Lloyd Austin to run
00:03:27.560 the Pentagon. What could go wrong? Surely Lloyd Austin wouldn't try to enrich his former colleagues in
00:03:32.820 the defense industry by, say, sending billions of dollars worth of weaponry to a tiny corrupt country in
00:03:38.460 Eastern Europe. That would be unthinkable. Then there was the appointment of someone using the
00:03:42.740 name Rachel Levine, a biological male originally named Richard, who decided in middle age to start
00:03:47.320 wearing a dress and rebrand himself as Rachel. Made perfect sense, we were told, for a man deeply
00:03:52.460 confused about the basic realities of human biology to oversee the nation's healthcare system.
00:03:57.940 Now, sure, he might pressure hospitals to castrate and sterilize as many children as possible.
00:04:01.680 He might pose for some uncomfortable photographs with Sam Britton, the cross-dressing nuclear waste
00:04:07.620 expert and kleptomaniac who'd been terrorizing airport baggage claims all across the Eastern
00:04:12.400 Seaboard for years before also being appointed for a role in the Biden-Harris administration.
00:04:17.360 But that's the cost of human progress, we were told at the time. I'm going through these
00:04:22.920 appointments to make a couple of points. The first point is that all of these appointments and many
00:04:27.420 others like them, including the appointment of an open borders advocate to run the Department of
00:04:31.320 Homeland Security, were grotesque. None of them should have been allowed to go through, but they
00:04:36.100 did. And the country paid the predictable consequences. Biden, you know, he appointed
00:04:41.580 more cross-dressers than we'd been used to seeing in government at that point. But otherwise, his picks
00:04:46.380 were exactly what we come to expect, a bunch of corrupt and useless bureaucrats who went on to do
00:04:51.700 what corrupt and useless bureaucrats always do, which, by the way, is expand their own power and
00:04:56.380 enrich themselves and their friends. That's the whole deal. Well, thankfully, it's clear that Donald
00:05:01.260 Trump is not going to follow that typical strategy. Donald Trump's incoming administration is already
00:05:08.800 unlike any other in American history. I mean, this is a transition team that's making a concerted
00:05:14.160 effort to select competent, independent cabinet officials, people who aren't self-interested cronies
00:05:20.140 or morons who are selected on the basis of identity politics. He's picking people who are actually
00:05:25.140 competent and who might actually advance the agenda that the American people voted for, which is
00:05:30.980 Donald Trump's agenda. Imagine that. So let's start with one of the selections that was announced
00:05:36.680 last night and that has upset a lot of people on the left. Donald Trump revealed that Pete Hegseth,
00:05:43.860 a Bronze Star recipient who served nearly two decades in the military, including in Iraq and Afghanistan,
00:05:48.200 will be nominated as the Secretary of Defense. Now, Hegseth is most recognizable at the moment as a
00:05:56.020 Fox News host, where he often advocates on behalf of veterans. He's also used his platform to outline
00:06:01.040 changes that, in his view, need to be made to the military immediately. And this gives us kind of a
00:06:07.460 preview of hopefully what we can expect now that he's running the Defense Department. Let's watch.
00:06:11.440 The Pentagon is, in the book, the exact amount of years. But in the past X number of years, 10, 12, 15,
00:06:19.520 the Pentagon has a perfect record in all of its war games against China. We lose every time
00:06:26.200 inside the Pentagon war games. We know what our real capability—you see, we didn't even get to this
00:06:32.560 part of the war on warriors. I mean, the military-industrial conflicts, the way we procure
00:06:35.720 weapons systems, you know, we're always—the way our system works, the way our bureaucratic system
00:06:41.660 works, where the speed of weapons procurement works, we're always a decade behind in fighting
00:06:46.760 the last war. Whereas China, we have a—we have, you know, what did Rumsfeld say? You go to the war
00:06:53.240 of the army, you have. We have the—China's building an army specifically dedicated to defeating the
00:06:59.160 United States of America. That is their strategic outset. Take hypersonic missiles. So if our whole—if our
00:07:04.960 our whole power projection platform is aircraft carriers and the ability to project power that
00:07:10.000 way strategically around the globe. And yeah, we have a nuclear triad and all of that, but a big part
00:07:13.440 of it. And if, you know, 15 hypersonic missiles can take out our 10 aircraft carriers in the first 20
00:07:18.480 minutes of a conflict, what does that look like? Well, first of all, you've got to fire, you know,
00:07:24.400 you've got to fire the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, and you've got to fire this—I mean, obviously,
00:07:27.120 you're going to bring in a new Secretary of Defense, but any general that was involved, General Admiral,
00:07:30.880 whatever that was involved in any of the DEI woke—it's got to go. Either you're in for war
00:07:37.440 fighting, and that's it, and that's the only litmus test we care about. You've got to get DEI
00:07:42.560 and CRT out of military academies, so you're not training young officers to be baptized in this
00:07:46.640 type of thinking. And then, you know, whatever the standards—whatever the combat standards were,
00:07:52.080 say in, I don't know, 1995, let's just make those the standards. And as far as recruiting,
00:07:56.720 to hire the guy that, you know, did Top Gun Maverick and create some real ads that motivate
00:08:01.360 people to want to serve. I'm straight up just saying we should not have women in combat roles.
00:08:05.920 It hasn't made us more effective, hasn't made us more lethal, has made fighting more complicated.
00:08:10.640 We've all served with women, and they're great. It's just our institutions don't have to
00:08:15.920 incentivize that in places where traditionally—not traditionally, over human history, men in those
00:08:22.560 positions are more capable. Well, I'm sold. I'm sold on that pick. I don't need to know
00:08:28.400 anything else about the guy, just based on that alone. This is all common sense stuff,
00:08:31.920 but it's the kind of stuff that you just never hear from anyone in a cabinet position,
00:08:38.800 any kind of bureaucrat, until now. And these are the kind of picks, by the way,
00:08:44.480 that probably only Donald Trump would make. Like, Donald Trump's probably the only guy
00:08:48.320 who would select him as Secretary of Defense. But again, all common sense, the overwhelming
00:08:55.920 majority of countries don't allow women in combat for obvious reasons. We are one of only a handful
00:09:02.640 of countries that do that. And no, the military shouldn't be teaching its soldiers about white
00:09:07.440 rage, nor should the Pentagon be focused on recruiting girl bosses or diverse applicants.
00:09:13.280 That strategy isn't working. The military is now regularly missing its recruitment goals,
00:09:17.120 primarily because they've gone out of their way to alienate white men for political reasons.
00:09:22.240 As a result, our military is much smaller than China's. Morale is terrible. We're constantly
00:09:28.080 losing war games, as Pete Hegseth pointed out. And making matters worse, our military leaders are
00:09:34.080 clearly inept, as evidenced by the disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan, and also as evidenced by
00:09:38.640 everything else that's happened over the last 20 or 30 years. So with this track record,
00:09:43.600 the absolute last person you'd want to pick for the job of Defense Secretary is another Lloyd Austin
00:09:49.120 type. The Lloyd Austins of the world are the ones who created the very situation that Hegseth is
00:09:55.040 talking about in those clips. That's why you need someone who's motivated and equipped to make some
00:10:01.280 radical changes, which actually aren't that radical because you're just going back to what was common
00:10:05.440 sense and what was standard, you know, only a few decades ago. But by our standards, it's radical.
00:10:11.840 And you want someone who knows what it's like to be a soldier in a war zone and who hasn't been
00:10:16.560 corrupted by his connections to the military industrial complex. In short, you want somebody like
00:10:21.040 Pete Hegseth. Now, as you'd expect, Democrats don't see it that way. They lost their minds when Trump
00:10:27.760 briefly paused the flow of military weapons to Ukraine. And now they're losing their minds
00:10:31.680 because Pete Hegseth might spurn the defense industry too. Elizabeth Warren, the senator from
00:10:38.000 Massachusetts, was especially enraged. She was sneering last night, along with a lot of her
00:10:41.740 colleagues. She wrote, quote, a Fox and Friends weekend co-host is not qualified to be the secretary
00:10:47.300 of defense. I lead the Senate military personnel panel. All three of my brothers served in uniform.
00:10:54.420 I respect every one of our service members. Donald Trump's pick will make us less safe and must be
00:10:58.360 rejected. So right away, the woman who pretended to be an Indian tries to dismiss Hegseth as a
00:11:03.840 weekend co-host, completely ignoring his military service and his ideas and his advocacy for veterans.
00:11:12.620 And by the way, it's funny that the fact that he is a combat veteran is not relevant.
00:11:19.800 But she's a greater authority because her brothers are veterans. So his own experience doesn't matter.
00:11:25.600 He's just a weekend co-host. But no, she is an authority because her brother, my brothers served.
00:11:31.540 So? How does that apply to you? How does that make you qualified to say anything?
00:11:38.940 Oh, she's also on the military personnel panel. She's on a panel, everybody. I mean, this guy
00:11:45.560 actually served in war zones, but she's on a panel. She sat on so many panels and talked about things.
00:11:53.800 So we're supposed to believe, based on her word, that if Hegseth had served on the board of Raytheon,
00:12:00.620 he would somehow be vastly more equipped for the job. We apparently want defense secretaries who are
00:12:06.000 bureaucrats or defense contractors, first and foremost, because that's obviously worked out
00:12:10.340 really well over the past three decades. And in the context of a second Trump administration,
00:12:14.520 the criticism of Pete Hegseth makes even less sense. Because recall that under the first Trump
00:12:19.700 administration, the Pentagon actively sabotaged Trump's policy objectives. Our envoy to Syria
00:12:26.680 has admitted this. It's one of the most incredible admissions ever printed, but it never got much
00:12:30.240 attention. The envoy stated that officials in the first Trump administration were, quote,
00:12:34.360 always playing shell games in order to hide the actual number of US troops in Syria from Trump.
00:12:40.080 That's an actual quote, shell games. In other words, they were lying to the commander in chief.
00:12:46.820 Trump wanted troops to leave Syria, and they told him the troops were already gone. And it wasn't true.
00:12:53.280 They were lying to undermine his agenda. People should have been put on trial for that. I mean,
00:12:58.920 that's criminal, but it just faded from memory. And it's faded from maybe the media's memory and the
00:13:06.120 public's memory. It hasn't faded from Trump's memory. So given that background, you can understand
00:13:10.540 why this time around Trump wants someone he can actually depend on, someone who agrees with his
00:13:15.300 agenda and will try to enact it. He wants people he can trust. That's the single most important
00:13:22.180 quality that a cabinet pick can have. You've got to be able to trust them. And that's very obvious
00:13:27.040 to Trump now after what he experienced in his first term. But Democrats are still going to resist
00:13:31.760 this nomination anyway for reasons that they can't really articulate. They just know that it'd be a
00:13:36.940 disaster for them if an outsider took control of the Defense Department. That's why one of CNN's
00:13:41.340 hosts tried to push back on Scott Jennings' argument for Hegseth last night on CNN. Let's watch that.
00:13:49.320 You want to have confidence in the current leadership of the Pentagon and the way the defense
00:13:53.540 situation has been operating for the last several years? I mean, from the Afghanistan pullout,
00:13:58.800 which was an extreme debacle for which no one was held accountable. We've had spy balloons flying
00:14:04.020 over the United States. We built a $300 million pier as a public relations stunt, which wound up
00:14:10.260 killing an American service member. I'd say I've had just about enough of the so-called insiders running
00:14:16.180 the Defense Department. I think we ought to give Pete Hegseth a chance because he's got two.
00:14:20.340 All the criticism of him is that he's not the expected Washington pick. And I'm just saying to
00:14:27.620 you that the American people just voted against the expected Washington pick. So he's got 20 years
00:14:32.780 in service, Afghanistan, Iraq, two bronze stars, Princeton, Harvard. Yeah, he's on TV, but so are
00:14:38.560 the rest of us. By the way, that lesson you just gave us really interesting because you highlighted
00:14:45.060 a bunch of things that the civilian leadership of the country decided on. And the military,
00:14:50.900 their job was just to execute. How did it go? I'm just saying. How did it go? In terms of the
00:14:56.520 decision-making, you're assigning decision-making responsibility to the military over things that
00:15:02.600 civilians are responsible for. So you make a good point. The civilian leadership made decisions,
00:15:07.100 and then the people they put in charge of the Pentagon carried it out. And it was all pretty
00:15:11.700 much a disaster. So for starters, it's pretty amusing for starters, as Jennings points out,
00:15:18.140 for television pundits to attack Hegseth for being a TV host when they're all television
00:15:23.940 personalities also. So either being on television makes you an idiot or it doesn't. And if it does,
00:15:30.600 then all these people should quit their jobs now before CNN closes down and fires them anyway,
00:15:34.740 which appears more likely to happen with each passing day. Then the anchor says that civilians
00:15:39.100 give the orders in the military, which is obviously true. But it's the Pentagon, which is also run by
00:15:43.960 civilians, that has the job of carrying out those orders. And as Jennings pointed out,
00:15:47.640 the Pentagon has repeatedly failed to do its job. They were wrong about the spy balloon and what it was
00:15:51.880 doing. They were wrong about the logistics of the Afghanistan pullout, which resulted in the
00:15:55.440 deaths of American service members. Couldn't even build a pier properly. And so what exactly is the
00:16:00.920 argument for keeping those kinds of people in control of the Defense Department? How could
00:16:05.140 we possibly do any worse than they've been doing? That's a point that Tom Homan, the incoming border
00:16:11.720 czar, just made on Fox News. He was asked whether he was worried about having the title of border
00:16:16.680 czar, given that Kamala Harris has done everything she can to run away from that title. And here's how he
00:16:22.200 responded.
00:16:24.140 Hey, Tom, you know, the last person who was border czar, she didn't want to be called border czar.
00:16:28.600 You're proud of it, right? You know what? I'm going to look like a genius because when you
00:16:35.100 follow a failure, you can't help succeed, right? To the American people, President Trump is going
00:16:43.060 to secure this border. He's going to save American lives. He's going to, by securing the border,
00:16:48.480 we're going to drop illegal alien crime, which is skyrocketing. Less people are going to die from
00:16:52.500 fentanyl. Less children are going to be sex trafficked. Less women will be sex assaulted on the southern
00:16:57.220 border. The criminal cartels will be put out of business by this president.
00:17:00.520 Go get them, Tom Homan. Appreciate it.
00:17:03.160 I think that's the right attitude. I'm going to look like a genius because when you follow
00:17:05.980 up failure, you can't help but succeed. And that is true. And also, it's all the more reason to go
00:17:10.800 in there and make radical changes. Can't get any worse. And so go in there and make the changes.
00:17:18.220 And whatever risks are involved in that, politically, take those risks. And that pretty
00:17:25.140 much sums up the entire transition so far. We're so used to administration officials who lie to us,
00:17:30.020 who try to use emotional blackmail and manipulation. That's pretty much impossible to be disappointed by
00:17:35.620 the incoming Trump administration at this point. I mean, just by demonstrating that they don't care
00:17:40.060 about the media's manipulation and false narratives, they're already well ahead of their predecessors.
00:17:44.560 It's also clear that the federal bureaucracy, which functioned to undermine Trump at every
00:17:49.360 possible opportunity the first time around, isn't going to exist in the same form the second time.
00:17:56.440 So last night, Trump officially announced that Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy will be running the
00:18:01.240 Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. Trump said the goal of this new department,
00:18:06.980 which actually is not going to be in the government, but it's going to be an independent
00:18:09.920 outside the government organization. But the goal will be to dismantle government bureaucracy,
00:18:17.180 slash excess regulations, cut wasteful expenditures, and restructure federal agencies.
00:18:23.300 He said they'll be done within two years, what he called the perfect gift to America on the
00:18:27.600 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. And this is good, because the task of,
00:18:34.860 as he says, dismantling government bureaucracy should be the number one focus of Trump's second
00:18:41.460 term. Because nothing else can be done unless that is done first. And Elon Musk is just the guy to do
00:18:49.920 it. He showed up to Twitter and immediately axed 80% of the staff. And of course, as we remember,
00:18:55.600 everybody in the media said it would destroy the company. They said the whole site would crash and
00:19:00.560 burn and be forgotten. And yet, here we are, two years later, place is running better than ever.
00:19:07.160 Now, the problem in the federal government is like what the problem was in Twitter, except
00:19:11.880 multiplied by, you know, about a factor of, let's say, a million. Unlike every other company on the
00:19:18.560 planet, the federal government doesn't undergo mass layoffs. It just grows and grows year after year,
00:19:24.940 siphons more and more money from taxpayers without any accountability. These bureaucrats call themselves
00:19:31.640 public servants, but really the public is serving them. We're the ones who go to work every day to
00:19:35.940 pay their salaries. And what exactly do they do for us? Do we really need these people to spend tens of
00:19:42.380 thousands of dollars on gender equity in places like Honduras? Do we need them to develop new bat
00:19:49.500 coronaviruses and secret labs in Wuhan? Do we need them to use our money to subsidize some of the
00:19:55.440 most useless college degrees in existence? Do we need them to conduct fraudulent criminal trials of
00:20:01.720 the leading presidential candidate? Do we need them to issue insane new regulations, you know, in the name
00:20:08.360 of saving the environment, like banning the sale of gas-powered vehicles or gas stoves or plastic straws
00:20:14.580 or whatever else? Of course we don't. We've never needed any of that. What we have needed for a long
00:20:20.680 time now is for the government to get out of the way of human progress. They need to stop spending and
00:20:25.340 printing money as if it's endless. They need to do what every American in the private sector has to do,
00:20:29.160 which is justify their salaries. They need to explain how exactly they're serving the public instead of
00:20:34.880 the other way around. And this is a reckoning that would have been unthinkable if Kamala had won this
00:20:40.020 election. We'd be dealing with another parade of useless BIPOC, trans-whatever appointees who exist
00:20:45.260 only to check boxes. And now things are different. And giving Musk and Ramaswamy the hacksaw with a
00:20:51.480 directive to go to town on the federal bureaucracy means that maybe, maybe for the first time ever,
00:20:57.940 some real and substantial cuts will actually be made. No Republican president in modern times has ever
00:21:04.460 actually done anything to cut the size of government. They've all talked about it. None of them have done
00:21:09.720 it. Much less have they taken any steps to gut the federal bureaucracy and get rid of all the
00:21:15.140 useless people and their useless departments and programs. In fact, Republicans, of course,
00:21:18.880 have only contributed to that problem. They've added to it. There's pretty good reason to think that
00:21:24.320 this time will be different. Trump has picked the right two guys for the job, which is why the
00:21:29.740 federal bureaucrats are panicking and their panic will only become more unhinged in the days ahead.
00:21:34.660 For everyone else, for people who actually earn their living, it's a time to celebrate something
00:21:39.960 that's never happened before in modern American history. The behemoth federal bureaucracy is
00:21:45.680 hopefully about to get what it deserves, what's been coming to it for decades. If Trump fulfills his
00:21:52.200 promises, and that means simply letting the people he's hiring do the jobs they've been hired to do,
00:21:59.300 if that happens, it will mean ultimately that America becomes a freer, safer, more prosperous place.
00:22:06.780 And if this is the fascism they warned us about, then, well, it can't come soon enough.
00:22:14.580 Now let's get to our five headlines.
00:22:21.700 You know, we talk a lot about putting our money where our values are. Let me tell you about my
00:22:26.300 cell phone company, Pure Talk, and why I made the switch. Pure Talk is veteran-led,
00:22:30.300 and they don't just talk about supporting our veterans. They actually do something about it.
00:22:34.120 They've already alleviated $10 million in veteran debt. Every month, they donate tens of thousands
00:22:38.960 of dollars to prevent veteran suicide. And they just gave $50,000 to Mike Rowe Works to help veterans
00:22:44.120 learn trades after serving our country. Meanwhile, what exactly are Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile doing with
00:22:49.380 your money? Pure Talk gives you the exact same coverage, America's most dependable 5G network for half the
00:22:54.720 cost. You get better service, better values, and you're helping our veterans. It's that simple.
00:22:59.000 Right now, Pure Talk has an incredible offer for my listeners. When you switch to your service to
00:23:03.040 Pure Talk on a qualifying plan, you'll get one year of Daily Wire Plus Insider completely free,
00:23:07.840 where you can stream my new film, Am I Racist? But remember, this deal is exclusive. The only way
00:23:12.220 to get it is by going to puretalk.com slash Walsh. Support Pure Talk, a wireless company who wants to
00:23:17.180 be a wireless company and nothing more. And remember, it takes courage to stand for your values,
00:23:21.280 and it takes even more to stand against those who try to silence you. Puretalk.com slash Walsh. That's
00:23:26.040 puretalk.com slash Walsh. Some more good news from our friends at Outkick. It says,
00:23:31.620 viewership for MSNBC and CNN has tanked since Donald Trump steamrolled Kamala Harris in the
00:23:36.060 2024 presidential election. Mediate obtained viewership data from Thursday to highlight the
00:23:40.700 concerns both channels face. For the day, MSNBC averaged 596,000 viewers, while CNN recorded just
00:23:48.020 419,000. That's a decline of 23% for MSNBC and 40% for CNN year over year. But the primetime numbers
00:23:57.340 are even more concerning. While CNN saw a 30% decline, MSNBC declined an unprecedented 54%.
00:24:03.740 So this is kind of interesting. The conventional view is that left-wing media outlets and news channels
00:24:13.420 should see a surge of ratings after a Trump win because now they're the opposition, right? And for
00:24:22.900 the past four years, they've been in the position of defending the powers that be, and now they get
00:24:27.480 to play the role of the critic, the resistance, right? They get to slide back into that role.
00:24:34.360 And so typically, you'd think that that would help their ratings, not hurt them, but that doesn't seem
00:24:39.400 to be happening. In fact, the situation is so dire for MSNBC that they're, from what I saw,
00:24:44.600 the report I just saw, they're looking at possibly selling the company. That's how bad it is. So why
00:24:50.900 aren't they getting the resistance bump that we've seen in the past? Why aren't they getting bigger
00:24:57.560 ratings as the outsiders, the ones bravely standing up against the fascist regime?
00:25:03.740 I think there are a few reasons. And the first is that they've been obsessively criticizing Trump
00:25:10.340 for almost 10 years now. And with him winning another four years, that means that it'll be
00:25:17.140 another half decade or so of relentless Trump hate on these networks. And I think many in the audience
00:25:23.800 are just tired of it. It's just simple exhaustion and boredom. People are bored of it. How could they not
00:25:30.480 be? By the end, this will be 15 years, right? This will be almost a decade and a half of
00:25:41.240 focusing your programming primarily on attacking one guy, one specific guy. And it's just not
00:25:52.600 interesting. Even if you agree with them, even if you hate Trump at a certain point after 10 years of
00:25:59.020 it, you've kind of heard it all. And you don't need to keep hearing it every day. It just gets
00:26:03.520 boring. It's boring. You know, it's as simple as that. And the second factor, I think the bigger
00:26:07.560 factor is that MSNBC and CNN have just proven themselves to be irrelevant. They had dedicated
00:26:15.020 themselves for the past four years to the project of making sure Trump does not win again. And he won.
00:26:22.940 It was a landslide. And so they failed in historic fashion, thus demonstrating that they have very
00:26:32.260 little influence. They have no real ability anymore to set the narrative and influence people on a
00:26:39.700 national scale. They're just irrelevant. Trump's victory has not so much made them irrelevant as
00:26:47.600 exposed how irrelevant they really are. And that's why the ratings are tanking, I think. Pretty simple.
00:26:57.360 Mayor Adams in New York was asked whether he will cooperate with Trump's mass deportation plan. And
00:27:04.460 well, he didn't say no. We'll put it that way. Let's watch.
00:27:10.240 Will you express concern about mass deportations in the city?
00:27:16.880 My concern is one concern. We keep tinkering around the edges. We keep having this philosophical
00:27:22.400 conversation about it. The voters communicated loudly and clearly. We have a broken immigration
00:27:30.560 system. It needs to be fixed. That's the only conversation I want. New York City was devastated
00:27:35.740 by that broken system. 220,000 migrants and asylum seekers have made their way here.
00:27:41.600 How can migrant New Yorkers be sure that they won't happen here, given that ICE can make arrests
00:27:47.720 in New York City without police cooperation? Why should New Yorkers, including migrant New Yorkers,
00:27:53.420 trust that you will advocate for them with the new Trump administration?
00:27:57.160 But you said, how can I advocate for New Yorkers? So I should only advocate for one type of New Yorker
00:28:03.840 or New Yorkers. So the media wants Adams to say that he will valiantly stand up against Trump's
00:28:10.360 deportation plans, his deportation agenda. But he didn't say that. In fact, he agreed that illegal
00:28:17.180 immigration is a major problem that needs to be addressed. And I think that more Democrat governors
00:28:24.660 and mayors are going to more will cooperate or at least not obstruct than we think. There will be
00:28:32.480 more people in the Mayor Adams camp than maybe you would otherwise anticipate. And yes, some of them
00:28:40.540 have already said that they're not going to cooperate. They're going to try to sabotage Trump's
00:28:45.180 efforts to enforce the border, enforce our immigration laws. We know that. That's been happening.
00:28:51.020 I mean, that's what sanctuary cities are all about. So that's been happening for a long time.
00:28:56.480 And that's fine because Trump doesn't actually need them to cooperate. He can do it without their
00:29:02.100 help. Where there's a will, there's a way. And so if there's the will in the Trump administration
00:29:09.780 to carry this out and enforce our immigration laws, regardless of what any mayor or governor says or
00:29:18.360 things, if there's a will to do it, if there's a willingness to do it, then it can be done.
00:29:25.100 But even so, I think there will be maybe, and maybe I'm just
00:29:30.380 high on the fumes of optimism right now, which rarely happens to me, but I think there will be a
00:29:38.640 surprising amount of cooperation. And the reason is just simple politics. I mean, there is wide public
00:29:44.680 approval for mass deportations. Democrats are on the losing side of this argument.
00:29:53.360 The American people are basically decided on this issue and they're done with it. They want it to be
00:29:59.740 over. They want their borders back. They want their sovereignty back. This is not a far right position
00:30:05.000 anymore. It's not even a conservative position anymore uniquely. And it never was. I mean, never was.
00:30:12.900 It never should have been rather a conservative position. It should just be an American position.
00:30:19.000 Or if you're in this country and you're a citizen, you should want us to have borders that are
00:30:23.160 protected. No matter what else you think about politics, you should want that. And I think that
00:30:28.000 that's where people are now. And people want their communities back and they want their culture back.
00:30:33.500 And they're kind of done with the emotional manipulation. Not everybody. You know,
00:30:38.600 there's always going to be the gullible people, the morons. There's always going to be the dupes
00:30:44.520 who fall for the emotional manipulation tactics. That's always going to happen. But I don't think
00:30:49.540 that's where the culture is anymore. And so all the more reason why this can be done. And look,
00:30:58.000 we all know what will happen. I mean, we can play this out in our heads and we know that
00:31:05.440 the moment they actually start with the deportations, we're going to, I mean, the propaganda machine is
00:31:15.860 going to rev up on the left at a level we haven't even seen before. And we've seen a lot of it
00:31:23.460 you know, with Trump and we've seen a lot of anti-Trump propagandizing and we've seen
00:31:29.180 there've been many hoaxes and all of that. We've seen all that, including on this issue
00:31:35.180 in Trump's first term. Remember what was it? The ridiculous hoax about a border agent whipping
00:31:44.340 an illegal immigrant. That was the story anyway. But he had a whip and he was just, he was whipping
00:31:49.700 them. And it turns out that's not what happened at all. So there's going to be a lot of that kind
00:31:55.660 of thing. And it's going to be, there's going to be a lot more of it. And we know that. And
00:32:00.580 they're going to start, we're going to get all the tear jerking, weepy stories about families being
00:32:06.860 ripped out of their homes and sent back. And we're going to get the videos and the, you know,
00:32:11.340 the cell phone footage and all that's going to happen. And the left is hoping that that will
00:32:18.500 be enough to turn the tide of public opinion. They're hoping that after a few rounds of that,
00:32:23.900 after a few weeks of that, right, when we've seen a few of these videos of the illegal immigrants
00:32:31.000 crying and being sent away and all of that, they're hoping, they're expecting that that will be enough
00:32:37.700 and that the American people say, well, nevermind. I didn't know if deporting illegal immigrants means
00:32:42.500 that they're going to cry. Well, then nevermind. I thought they'd be happy. I thought this would be a
00:32:48.100 cheerful thing. I thought everybody would be happy. I didn't know it would get ugly like this.
00:32:51.460 That's what they're hoping will be the response of most people in the public. And I think they're
00:32:56.680 going to be disappointed. That's, that's, that's my, my theory. I don't think it's going to be that
00:33:02.760 easy. I think it's going to take more. It's going to take more than a few viral videos of illegal
00:33:06.960 immigrants crying because they're getting deported. I don't think that's going to be enough to turn
00:33:10.900 public opinion, uh, against this, but we will see. Um, all right. I want to talk about this
00:33:20.700 for a moment. Um, reading now from the express tribune, it's the name of the outlet,
00:33:28.300 Marla Rose, a Jewish feminist activist has sparked debate following an alleged altercation with far
00:33:34.920 right commentator, Nick Fuentes at his Illinois residence. Over the weekend, Rose reportedly
00:33:40.500 approached Fuentes's home, rang the doorbell and was allegedly met with pepper spray in a physical
00:33:45.480 confrontation. She claims Fuentes pepper sprayed her, kicked her down a flight of stairs and took
00:33:51.120 her phone, which was later returned by the police. Emergency services, including the police and ambulance
00:33:55.520 arrived following the incident. In a Facebook post, Rose elaborated on her motivations, citing Fuentes's
00:34:01.640 controversial reputation. Uh, quote, what would you do if a neo-Nazi white supremacist who called on a
00:34:07.960 holy war against Jews and is allowed proud misogynist lives in your town? She wrote. Encouraged by a
00:34:12.900 friend, Rose explained, so I rang the doorbell. He immediately swung the door open like he was at
00:34:16.960 damn Waco, sprayed me with a burning liquid and pushed me down the stairs into a, onto his sidewalk.
00:34:24.160 Rose noted that a passerby called the police after which EMTs checked for injuries. Um,
00:34:29.280 and, uh, she says she was assaulted and all that. Okay. So just filling in some details here,
00:34:35.200 Fuentes got doxed over the weekend. It was a pretty major doxing. Um, I mean, I saw his address all over
00:34:42.900 my Twitter feed. It was just, it was all over the place and a picture of his home, you know,
00:34:48.720 address, all of that. Very, very thorough, very viral doxing event. Then you started seeing posts
00:34:55.260 from people talking about how they're going to his home or driving by, uh, his home. And, and then
00:35:00.240 you've got, you know, this left-wing activist, Marla Rose shows up. Uh, she posts about it on
00:35:06.860 Twitter and, uh, makes it very clear in her post that she's there to harass him. You know, it's not
00:35:11.920 like she knocked on his door to say hello or to sell door-to-door magazine subscriptions or something.
00:35:17.300 I mean, she was there for a reason. It was very clear what the reason was. Um, and on his property,
00:35:23.880 you know, unless somebody is in an apartment, in most cases, if you're knocking on the door,
00:35:28.280 it means you're already on their property. So she's on his property and, uh, is there to harass him.
00:35:33.860 And, and that's not really debatable, which is, um, which is why it's absurd to take her side in this.
00:35:41.560 As I've seen some people doing, including conservatives, uh, taking her side just because,
00:35:47.900 you know, you don't like Nick Fuentes. Now I admit I'm kind of biased here. I am biased.
00:35:53.340 Uh, I'm very biased in fact. And I take this kind of story perhaps more personally than most people
00:35:58.780 do. And that's because as you know, if you've been listening to the show for a while, I also
00:36:05.640 have been doxed, you know, I mean, really doxed. Like people talk about doxing and sometimes you'll
00:36:10.240 hear that somebody is like an anonymous accounts and their real name is posted somewhere and we call
00:36:16.160 that doxing. And that can be, I mean, that's a form of doxing, but I'm saying doxing like real
00:36:21.520 doxing. Okay. Like here's the person's home address and a picture of their home.
00:36:27.180 Yeah, that's doxing. That's what doxing actually is. And most people just have not had that experience.
00:36:34.820 Uh, and you're lucky if you haven't, most people haven't, you know, you, you probably have not had
00:36:38.940 the experience of having your home address going viral on the internet for millions of people to see.
00:36:45.680 many of whom do not like you. Um, and if you never, if you've never been through that,
00:36:52.840 well, be grateful. Uh, I've been through it more than once and putting someone's home address out
00:36:59.740 there because you don't like their political opinions or because you're mad about their mean
00:37:05.440 tweets or because you think that they're a rude person who says terrible things. I mean, that is
00:37:11.020 just psychotically evil behavior. It's just evil. You are trying to get them killed.
00:37:19.360 You, you, you, a hundred percent. That's what you're doing. So in the past, when this has happened
00:37:23.640 to me, I was like, you were trying to get me and my family killed. That is what you're doing.
00:37:27.560 There's no getting around. It's not dramatic to say that. I mean, what, that's the point.
00:37:31.000 Why else would you put someone's address on the internet? That's why you're doing it.
00:37:34.880 The whole point is that you're, you're trying to send negative attention to the person's home where
00:37:40.080 they live with their families. Um, so yes, you are trying to get them hurt along with anyone else
00:37:48.540 who happens to be in their home. And, uh, and, and in fact, when you get doxed, many of the people
00:37:57.440 doing the doxing are very explicit that this is the reason they're doing it. You know, they're,
00:38:02.640 they're often very clear that like they want people to go to your house and burn it to the ground
00:38:07.540 and kill you. Like this is not, it's not subtle. It's not a subtle thing. So if you do that to
00:38:15.140 someone, you are the bad guy. Uh, you know, I don't care who the other person is. I don't care
00:38:19.400 what they've said. It doesn't matter. And if you actually show up to somebody's house,
00:38:25.240 if you, if you show up, if you show up at all, but especially if you show up in this context,
00:38:34.380 in the midst of a doxing campaign, when the person who is being doxed is necessarily on high alert and
00:38:42.420 in a very defensive posture, and you can say, well, you're scared. You're like, yeah,
00:38:47.580 you're sending whack jobs to my house. Yes. That makes me nervous. I, who wouldn't I,
00:38:54.560 any human being on earth would be. So now I have to, I'm, I'm have to be defensive.
00:38:59.560 And so if you do that and someone's getting doxed and you show up to their house,
00:39:04.960 uh, you get what's coming to you. You put someone's address out there and then you walk
00:39:10.080 onto their property. As far as I'm concerned, they're within their rights to respond. However
00:39:14.740 they feel they need to respond. However they feel they need to respond. They are within their rights
00:39:20.320 to do it. And whatever happens to you, you had it coming. Uh, you had it coming. Like it's not like
00:39:28.380 you just don't go on their property. It's not, you know, it's not, we're not, this is not any,
00:39:32.760 we're not expecting anything. We're not, we're not, we're not expecting much here.
00:39:37.100 This is not some great imposition that I'm, but just, just don't, that's their house. Stay away
00:39:41.260 from their house. You don't belong there. That's their property. Just wandering. I mean,
00:39:46.740 you got these left-wing activists and this is how entitled they feel that like, what the,
00:39:52.360 what the F do you think's going to happen? Someone's in the middle of being doxed.
00:39:58.560 People on the internet are very clear. Hey, go to this house and kill this guy. We hate him.
00:40:02.460 And then you show up. What? And then you're surprised that you get a physical response.
00:40:07.420 What are you doing? How could you respond that way? I don't know. Maybe there's a million crazy
00:40:12.320 people who want to kill me and know where I live. Maybe that's why I'm responding this way.
00:40:18.100 What are you going to do? Open the door and say, Hey, come on in. Let's have a talk. You want some
00:40:23.880 lemonade? So I don't care how you feel about Nick Fuentes. Obviously no love lost between the two of
00:40:31.880 us. It doesn't matter. I mean, doxing is despicable. Coming to someone's house is way, way, way,
00:40:39.280 way outside the bounds of what is appropriate or acceptable. And I'll tell you this, if you're on
00:40:45.280 the right and you're cheering on a doxing campaign against anyone, you are extremely foolish.
00:40:53.400 Okay. You are extremely foolish because eventually they'll get to you. Eventually it'll happen to you.
00:40:59.880 And what are you going to do then? What are you going to do when it happens? What are you going
00:41:03.180 to do when your address is viral on the internet and you start complaining about it? And then people
00:41:08.560 pull up your tweets where you were cheering it on when it happened to somebody else.
00:41:11.420 So, you know, now if that were to happen, I would still be against it. You know, you're,
00:41:18.240 you're a hypocrite in that case, but I'd still be against it. Uh, uh, cause just, it's just what,
00:41:25.260 you don't go to someone's house. You just don't do this. Um, and, uh, and, uh, yeah, this, this,
00:41:34.480 and, and this should be like, it's not even, I'm not even saying you have to be some, uh, great
00:41:39.120 principled, uh, person to take a stand like this. It's just, this is like basic self-preservation.
00:41:46.080 We should all be on the same page here that this is not okay. We're not in favor of this. This is
00:41:51.680 wrong. And you just don't do it to anybody. Um, I don't care who they are and I don't care how much
00:41:56.940 you don't like them. All right. Let's see. Two stories to mention briefly. The post-millennial
00:42:03.640 has this California voters have said no to an initiative that would have amended the state
00:42:08.180 constitution to ban any forced labor in prisons. Forced labor is already banned in the state
00:42:13.320 constitution with the exception that it could be used to punish a crime. The associated press reported,
00:42:18.320 um, 53.8% of Californians voted against the measure. According to the secretary of state's office,
00:42:24.440 prisoner rights advocates opposed the punishment exemption for labor saying they don't think
00:42:29.240 incarcerated people should be forced to do any work while serving their time. They also say the
00:42:33.020 state does not fairly compensate them for work performed, which generally amounts to less than
00:42:37.360 $1 per hour. Prisoners are routinely expected to do cleaning and maintenance work at prisons,
00:42:41.740 manufacturing license plates, or do light gardening at cemeteries. The measure was also part of a larger
00:42:46.800 set of reparations aimed at compensating black Californians for allegedly being subject to racism
00:42:51.900 discrimination over the centuries. Um, and, uh, so this is another initiative that failed. So there's
00:43:00.500 a, you know, we've talked about a few other kind of pro-crime initiatives that, that failed, um,
00:43:07.300 as even in California. And, and, and these are all like baby steps. Uh, it, it does not mean that
00:43:12.360 California is now a bastion of sanity and common sense in the world. Certainly not, but even California
00:43:18.960 has had enough of a lot of this, um, and the forced labor in prison thing, like that's just obvious.
00:43:27.280 I mean, yes, of course there should be forced labor for prisoners that they it's, there's not nearly
00:43:34.360 enough of that. I think we're not, we are not doing nearly enough with, with forced labor for, for
00:43:42.280 prisoners. And if they're compensated a dollar an hour, I'm actually kind of outraged by that because
00:43:48.780 that's too much. They shouldn't be compensated at all. You should get nothing. You should be forced
00:43:53.060 to work for free if you're in prison and work hard. Light gardening is to like, make them do hard labor
00:43:59.840 for free. You're in prison. This is the punishment, right? So, and it's a win-win. It's like, it's,
00:44:09.260 it's, it's, this is a great resource. Prisoners, people in prison, it's a great, it's a great resource
00:44:16.500 that we should be using a lot more. And it's a, it's a win all across the board because you're
00:44:22.780 getting free labor out of it and getting people to do, uh, to do, to do these jobs and you don't
00:44:27.520 have to pay them, which is fantastic. Um, it it's, it's adds to the punishment because prisons are
00:44:36.160 supposed to be punitive. You're getting punished. Well, that's it's, but doing forced labor is hard
00:44:44.520 and it makes them, it's supposed to be, you're being punished. You did something bad. We're
00:44:49.020 punishing you. That's part of the punishment. Um, so it's part of the punishment and, uh, and that's
00:44:54.080 another advantage. And also it's good for them. You know, if we want to talk about rehabilitation
00:44:59.900 or anything like that. And I think that there are a lot of people in prison that basically can't be
00:45:05.360 rehabilitated, or at least we can never trust that they've been rehabilitated, which is why they
00:45:10.400 should just stay in prison forever. Uh, many of them, but if there's any hope of rehab, I mean,
00:45:15.280 rehabilitation can happen. It's not like it's impossible. And it's not as though I think that
00:45:21.000 every crime should be life in prison. I think a lot of them should be, but not all of them.
00:45:24.920 And so if you, if you have someone who's going to be not in prison for the rest of their life,
00:45:29.320 then, uh, then you do hopefully want to hope that they can be rehabilitated.
00:45:34.020 This is one of the best ways to do it. Uh, putting someone to work, giving them,
00:45:37.660 you know, giving them something to do. If you just are having them sit around doing nothing all day,
00:45:41.720 it's just a waste, you know? And by the way, it's not free anyway. It's still not actually free
00:45:47.940 because we as taxpayers are paying to house them. We're paying for their food. We're paying for their
00:45:52.880 lodging. We're paying for all of it. So this is just you giving back to the taxpayers.
00:45:58.680 It's not even free actually. So this is a, to me, a very obvious one.
00:46:05.300 All right. Another quick thing. Postmillennial also another Postmillennial says, um, following a
00:46:09.280 raid on a local raw milk farm, Amish people in Pennsylvania reportedly turned out in unprecedented
00:46:13.900 numbers to vote in the 2024 election. Lancaster Farming reported in January that Lancaster County
00:46:19.800 farmer, Amos Miller was raided by the Pennsylvania department of agriculture on January 4th following
00:46:25.040 reports of illnesses traced back to raw milk. In 2022, Miller reached a deal with the federal
00:46:30.040 government to avoid jail time, but were not complying with food safety laws. And now they're
00:46:35.520 saying that, um, that the Amish turned out in record numbers in part because of this, this raw
00:46:42.480 controversy. And you know what? If raw milk is what inspired the Amish to vote and it helped to flip
00:46:51.340 Pennsylvania for Trump, then, then fine. Raw milk, raw milk is, is fine. I mean, it's not fine.
00:47:00.140 It's not fine. It's disgusting. It's gross E. coli juice still. Uh, it's, it's a disgusting fecal
00:47:06.520 flecked secretion that, uh, but I will tolerate it. Um, I will retract my previous statements that
00:47:15.800 raw milk drinkers should be deported into a volcano. Uh, on second thought that was slightly
00:47:21.600 overboard, a little bit overboard. Maybe like maybe, maybe that was, maybe not, we don't have to go
00:47:26.700 that far. Um, maybe, but what you have to understand is that I always associated raw milk
00:47:31.620 with hippies. So that's what this was all about. I mean, this was my bigotry against hippies,
00:47:36.560 which is totally understandable. I'm sure you would agree. Uh, and, and, you know, and so
00:47:40.520 that's what this all, that's where it all started. Um, and also because it's unsanitary and repulsive,
00:47:47.400 but, but I always thought it was a hippie thing. And so I wanted to throw hippies into a volcano.
00:47:54.160 Turns out I was throwing the Amish also never intended to do that. I love the Amish. I think the Amish
00:47:59.220 are great. I would never throw the Amish into a volcano. I'll be very clear about that. So
00:48:03.260 that's one that I'd take a firm stance on that one. Firm stance. So anyway, uh, raw milk is, uh,
00:48:11.140 I mean, look, you know, if it, if it helped, then it, then it's fine. I mean, it's not fine.
00:48:17.220 It's bad, but it's fine. That's my new position. It's bad, but it's fine. Now, if you tell me that
00:48:23.300 anime flipped one of the swing States too, then I'm really going to be in a moral crisis. I don't know
00:48:28.060 what I do about that. I don't know. I don't know what, but I don't think anime fans are voting for
00:48:33.820 Trump anyway. Um, they weren't voting for anyone. They weren't allowed to, you know, use their mom's
00:48:39.800 car that day to go vote. So anyway, that's a topic for another day. All right, let's talk about
00:48:46.240 something that affects all of us taxes. The October 15th deadline has passed. And if you're not prepared,
00:48:51.140 you could be in for a world of hurt. Do you owe back taxes? Are your returns still unfiled? Did you
00:48:56.040 miss the deadline to file for an extension? Well, now that we're past October 15th, the IRS is
00:49:00.220 probably gearing up for some aggressive enforcement. Trust me, you don't want to be on their radar.
00:49:04.680 We're talking wage garnishments, frozen bank accounts, even property seizures. It's not pretty
00:49:08.820 folks, but before you start panicking, there's still hope. Tax Network USA has helped taxpayers save
00:49:13.720 over a billion dollars in tax debt and filed over 10,000 tax returns. These guys specialize in reducing
00:49:18.980 tax burdens for hardworking Americans like you. Look, I get it. Dealing with the IRS is about as fun as a
00:49:24.060 root canal, but ignoring the problem won't make it go away. So here's what you need to do for a
00:49:28.480 complimentary consultation. Call today at 1-800-958-1000 or visit their website at tnusa.com
00:49:33.820 slash Walsh. Their experts will walk you through a few simple questions to see how much you can save.
00:49:38.380 That's 1-800-958-1000 or visit tnusa.com slash Walsh today. Don't let the IRS take advantage of you.
00:49:47.160 Get the help you need with Tax Network USA. Am I racist? The biggest documentary of the decade in
00:49:53.460 theaters is now Academy Award submitted and streaming exclusively on Daily Wire Plus. If
00:49:58.440 you saw Am I racist in theaters, thank you. You're part of history, but there's even more waiting for
00:50:03.140 you to catch a deleted scene featuring the beloved children's book character, Johnny the Walrus,
00:50:07.100 making a cameo, plus exclusive behind the scenes footage showing exactly how we pulled it all off.
00:50:12.380 The only way to see it is with a Daily Wire Plus membership. If you're not a member yet, go to
00:50:16.220 dailywire.com slash subscribe. Use code TRUMP to get 47% off a new annual membership. Now let's get
00:50:24.120 to our daily cancellation. On the surface, Fannin County, which is located in the Blue Ridge
00:50:34.700 Mountains of Northwest Georgia, isn't exactly a place you'd confuse with a nanny state. For one thing,
00:50:39.780 it's one of the most rural counties in the United States. They're famous for their apple orchards and
00:50:43.880 fishing and scenic railway through the countryside. And it's an overwhelmingly conservative place.
00:50:49.040 In last week's election, Fannin County went for Donald Trump by more than 82%. All that's to say,
00:50:53.960 we're not talking about some highly neurotic sheltered enclave of Brooklyn here. We're talking
00:50:58.500 about people who go outside and think about more important topics than the latest strain of
00:51:04.540 COVID that's been detected in the wastewater. So when something happens in Fannin County that seems like
00:51:08.980 it should have happened in Brooklyn, it's worth taking notice. And that brings me to this new
00:51:12.540 reporting from Reason Magazine, which to many people may seem like it can't possibly be real,
00:51:18.580 but apparently it is. Here's what happened. On the evening of October 30th, according to Reason,
00:51:23.140 police in Fannin County arrested a mother named Brittany Patterson in front of her four children.
00:51:28.320 And they fingerprinted her and put her in an orange jumpsuit and sent her off to jail. She's now facing
00:51:33.660 up to a year in prison and a fine of $1,000. So what was Brittany Patterson's crime exactly?
00:51:39.120 Did she rob a convenience store while high on meth and fentanyl? Did she
00:51:43.440 torch a federal courthouse and assault the guards? Did she follow a random guy around at night and
00:51:48.020 then pound his head into the pavement? Well, you know, Brittany Patterson didn't do any of those
00:51:52.160 things because if she had, the left would be defending her right now. Kamala Harris would
00:51:55.440 probably be raising money to bail her out. What Brittany actually did, and this isn't an exaggeration,
00:52:01.020 is allow her 11-year-old son to go for a walk. That's it. Specifically, he walked to a small town that's
00:52:07.160 less than a mile away from their home. And to give some context here, Brittany lives on a 16-acre
00:52:13.180 property with her children and their father who works in another state. They have family all around
00:52:17.720 the area, including her sisters and mother who live just two minutes away. So this is not a situation
00:52:22.720 where they're living in, say, the south side of Chicago, where they don't know anybody and people
00:52:27.200 get shot every day and it's very dangerous. This is very much a familiar environment, a safe environment
00:52:32.480 environment that we're talking about. And here's what happened. Quote, Patterson had driven her
00:52:36.800 eldest son to a medical appointment. Her youngest son, 11-year-old Soren, intended to come along but
00:52:41.880 wasn't around when it was time to leave. I figured he was in the woods or at grandma's house, says
00:52:46.000 Patterson. Soren, however, was not playing in the woods. He decided to walk to downtown Mineral Bluff,
00:52:50.920 a town of just 370 people. It's not quite a mile from his house. A woman who saw him walking a lot
00:52:56.220 alongside the road, speed limit 25 in some places, 35 in others, asked him if he was okay. He said yes.
00:53:03.940 Nevertheless, she called the police. Now, eventually, a female sheriff showed up, picked up Soren, and
00:53:10.380 dropped him off with his grandmother. She also lectured the mother about how her son could have been
00:53:14.840 kidnapped or been hit by a car. Then the mother scolded her child for leaving home without telling
00:53:19.440 anyone. And then the female sheriff left. Now, already, this is a situation that's escalated well
00:53:25.940 out of proportion. There's nothing out of the ordinary about an 11-year-old going for an unsupervised
00:53:32.320 walk in an area that's familiar and safe. We're talking about a county where the crime rate is well
00:53:37.900 below the national average. So in this scenario, maybe you can understand why a well-meaning bystander
00:53:44.140 would see an unaccompanied child and ask if everything's all right. I mean, even that seems
00:53:49.980 a little overboard. I don't know why. Just because you see an 11-year-old walking, I don't know why you
00:53:53.300 would even think to ask if they're all right. There's no reason why they wouldn't be, unless they
00:53:58.580 look distressed for some reason. But regardless, in no universe does it make sense for that bystander,
00:54:04.440 having heard that everything is fine, to then immediately call the police. I mean, this is a
00:54:09.920 psychotic level of meddling. Also, by the way, the sheriff brought up the child could have been
00:54:15.420 kidnapped. The chances that an 11-year-old gets kidnapped by a stranger in broad daylight
00:54:22.520 is significantly less than a million to one. It's the kind of thing that almost never happens.
00:54:31.360 There are thousands of other horrible things more likely to happen to your child than that.
00:54:36.420 statistically, kidnappings are almost always related to family disputes. They're almost
00:54:41.600 always carried out by family members. They're almost never just random person being, a kid being
00:54:48.060 taken off the street. It does happen very rarely, but it almost never happens. That's just a fact.
00:54:53.120 You know, that's the statistical reality. So a fear of kidnapping should not prevent an 11-year-old
00:54:58.940 from taking a walk in a safe neighborhood. What should prevent him then? What is there to
00:55:04.760 be seriously worried about? Now, this is normally the point where I'd talk about how the fake experts
00:55:10.520 are wildly out of touch on this issue. But in this case, even the fake experts agree with me on this.
00:55:15.680 You can go to the American Academy of Pediatrics, and they'll tell you that in their esteemed opinion,
00:55:20.420 a child older than 10 years old can indeed go outside from location to location and walk around
00:55:26.640 without an adult monitoring their every movement. So in case you were wondering, in case you needed their
00:55:31.440 blessing, you have it. It's not remotely a controversial point. Anyone who has children,
00:55:37.480 who has ever been around children, can probably tell you this. But in this case, the story didn't
00:55:43.280 end there. Quoting again from Reason Magazine, at 6.30 p.m. that night, the sheriff returned with
00:55:48.280 another officer. They told Patterson to turn around and put her hands behind her back. As three of her
00:55:53.680 kids watched, Patterson was handcuffed. The sheriff took her purse and phone, put her in the cruiser,
00:55:58.700 and hauled her off to jail. To Patterson, none of this made sense. She had grown up in the area with
00:56:03.620 plenty of unsupervised time to wander and play and was raising her kids that way too. Patterson was
00:56:08.360 soon released on a $500 bail. The next day, a case manager from the Division of Family and Children
00:56:12.640 Services came out for a home visit and even went to interview Patterson's oldest son at his school.
00:56:18.720 So now we're at the point where the local government is criminalizing parenting practices that were
00:56:23.720 standard for every generation of Americans up until like five seconds ago. In an attempt to
00:56:29.200 supposedly look after the interests of a child, they've decided to arrest that child's mother in
00:56:33.720 front of him. That couldn't possibly cause any issues with the child's mental state or his ability to get
00:56:40.620 to school and live his life. Now sure, his father works out of state, but who cares? Just throw the
00:56:45.440 mother in prison. The state has determined that it's in the best interest of this 11-year-old for his
00:56:50.400 mother to be incarcerated for up to a year. But the story still doesn't end there. Local officials
00:56:56.720 in this tiny county in Georgia kept on going. In Georgia, officials decided that it wasn't enough
00:57:02.000 to arrest this mother and drag her away from her children. They had to go further. This is from
00:57:06.920 Reason Magazine once again, quote, a few days later, the Division of Family and Children Services
00:57:10.480 presented Patterson with a safety plan for her to sign, would require her to delegate a safety person
00:57:16.400 to be a knowing participant and guardian and watch over the children whenever she leaves home.
00:57:21.520 The plan would also require Patterson to download an app on her son's phone,
00:57:25.680 allowing for his location to be monitored. So the government is demanding that this woman
00:57:30.860 agree to conditions that are clearly unconstitutional, not to mention completely unreasonable,
00:57:36.980 not to mention she's being essentially punished without being convicted of any crime,
00:57:41.340 which is how it can often happen, you know, when you've got these sorts of issues.
00:57:48.880 And they think that if they threaten her with jail time, she'll agree to them. But to her credit,
00:57:53.820 she's not doing that. She's telling the government that this is obscene and she's trying to get
00:57:57.440 legislation passed to prevent this kind of thing from ever happening to another parent in Georgia.
00:58:01.820 At the moment, that's where things stand. It's unclear what will happen next. The government will
00:58:05.380 either make good on its threat and jail this mother, or they'll move on and harass people who are
00:58:10.400 actually breaking the law, hopefully. But whatever the government does, there are a few takeaways
00:58:15.420 here that I think are worth keeping in mind. The first takeaway is that no matter where you live,
00:58:21.080 you just, you can't really escape the nanny state. There's all the more reason why,
00:58:24.660 and this is not a federal issue in this case, but still all the more reason why the federal bureaucracy,
00:58:29.420 all the bureaucracy across the board needs to be, is public enemy number one.
00:58:34.320 If the nanny state can come for a mother living in the mountains in northwest Georgia,
00:58:40.860 it can come for you too. Now, we spent so much time over the last few months talking about national
00:58:45.860 politics, but the truth is national politics aren't everything. Local politics aren't everything either.
00:58:51.140 In the end, there's a very real possibility that your freedom and the freedom of your children could
00:58:55.300 come down to the whims of one power-tripping district attorney or one sheriff who's having a bad day.
00:59:00.560 If that sheriff thinks that she can raise your children better than you, then she can throw you in prison.
00:59:06.920 This is the terrifying reality that parents everywhere face, and there are many horror stories just like this one.
00:59:12.260 There are also horror stories of actual criminal abuse being inflicted on children by their evil parents.
00:59:17.500 That does happen, and that is abuse that is often not noticed or not stopped by the people and agencies
00:59:22.980 tasked with noticing and stopping it because they're too busy chasing down good and loving parents
00:59:28.400 who parent in a way that was, again, totally commonplace up until very recently.
00:59:35.260 This mother is certainly not the first to be arrested for something like this.
00:59:38.540 You know, when I was growing up, and anyone my age or older would say the same thing.
00:59:42.280 We all say the same thing. My parents would tell us to leave the house, go play outside,
00:59:47.240 come back at dinnertime.
00:59:48.940 We'd trek all over the neighborhood, we'd go into other neighborhoods, we'd go to the woods,
00:59:52.360 we'd go anywhere we wanted.
00:59:53.660 There were no cell phones, there was no nothing, just my parents said, go have fun.
00:59:58.400 We'll see you in eight hours, just go do whatever you want.
01:00:02.120 And we did, we came back around dark, and this is how most of us grew up.
01:00:06.700 But now, as parents, we face this scenario where if we give our children even a fraction
01:00:13.780 of the independence that we had as children, we face the possibility of arrest and imprisonment.
01:00:19.900 I mean, it's insane. As I said, there are a lot of stories just like this.
01:00:23.820 Take, for example, the mother in Georgia who was jailed a couple of years ago for leaving
01:00:28.400 her 14-year-old daughter to babysit her younger siblings for a few hours while she was at work.
01:00:34.500 And, you know, that, she was arrested for that.
01:00:36.380 Now, I can remember when I was a kid, and my older sisters were left in charge of the house
01:00:41.660 at an age, at that age or even younger.
01:00:44.320 And we all survived. It was normal.
01:00:48.340 Now, it's the kind of thing that could get you handcuffed and thrown in a jail cell.
01:00:53.100 You know, parenting in the modern age is difficult enough.
01:00:57.780 And introducing more independence and responsibility into your children's lives is already stressful
01:01:04.080 and worrisome, though it is necessary.
01:01:06.720 It's part of parenting. You have to do this.
01:01:08.660 But now, as a parent, you face the very real possibility that if you introduce that independence
01:01:13.100 and responsibility in a way that happens to offend the sensibilities of a nosy neighbor
01:01:17.540 who then calls the police or CPS, you could find yourself standing in front of a judge
01:01:22.400 and labeled a child abuser for life because that label never wears off.
01:01:29.120 Now, the good news is that, in this case, the mother, Brittany Patterson, didn't back down.
01:01:32.900 She didn't install some location tracker on a child's phone or cower in the face of the government's
01:01:37.140 threats. She didn't sign the nanny state safety plan they presented her with.
01:01:41.740 Instead, she went out and sought some exposure for her story.
01:01:44.540 Reason Magazine covered it. Now I'm covering it.
01:01:47.160 The Daily Mail has also picked up a story.
01:01:49.620 As a result, a lot of reasonable people are hearing about it.
01:01:52.860 And any reasonable person who hears about the story will be outraged by it.
01:01:56.220 This is at least one recourse that you have in this kind of situation.
01:02:00.680 Although you don't have many recourses, that's at least one.
01:02:03.320 You can expose the tyrants and what they're trying to do to your family.
01:02:07.140 Maybe that makes them back down and slink away.
01:02:09.520 These people are cowards, after all.
01:02:12.120 At the very least, you will have shed more light on the kind of tyranny
01:02:15.560 that many parents face in this country every day.
01:02:20.440 And that is why the nanny state, and in particular the bureaucrats and police officers
01:02:24.120 who are threatening to imprison a woman for allowing her 11-year-old son to go for a walk,
01:02:28.660 are today canceled.
01:02:30.960 That'll do it for the show today.
01:02:31.800 Thanks for watching. Thanks for listening.
01:02:32.840 Talk to you tomorrow. Have a great day.
01:02:34.500 Godspeed.
01:02:34.820 Godspeed.
01:02:37.080 Godspeed.
01:02:50.120 Good noch way.
01:02:51.200 We'll see you tomorrow.
01:02:51.520 See you tomorrow.
01:02:51.880 Thank you.
01:02:52.640 Bye-bye.
01:02:53.100 Bye-bye.
01:02:53.140 Bye-bye.
01:02:53.240 Bye-bye.
01:02:55.040 Bye-bye.
01:02:55.740 Bye-bye.
01:02:58.020 Bye-bye.
01:03:00.240 Bye-bye.
01:03:00.420 Bye-bye.
01:03:01.360 Bye-bye.
01:03:01.580 Bye-bye.
01:03:02.360 Bye-bye.
01:03:03.140 Bye-bye.
01:03:04.200 Bye-bye.