ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
The Matt Walsh Show
- November 13, 2024
Ep. 1485 - The Media Panics Over Trump's Administration Picks
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 3 minutes
Words per Minute
180.1947
Word Count
11,365
Sentence Count
796
Misogynist Sentences
26
Hate Speech Sentences
23
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
Misogyny classification is done with
MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny
.
Hate speech classification is done with
facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target
.
00:00:00.000
Today on the Matt Wall Show, Donald Trump has begun staffing his next administration.
00:00:03.620
The media is panicking over his choices, which obviously means he's knocking it out of the park
00:00:07.600
so far. Also, CNN and MSNBC have seen their ratings crater since Trump's election. It turns
00:00:13.120
out that being in the resistance, quote unquote, won't be as profitable this time around, perhaps.
00:00:17.240
And a mother is handcuffed and thrown in jail because her 11-year-old son went for a walk in
00:00:21.760
the neighborhood. This is why the overzealous nanny state isn't just annoying and expensive,
00:00:26.000
but if you're a parent, it can be downright terrifying. All of that and more today on the Matt Wall Show.
00:00:56.000
Am I Racist? broke records in theaters as the decade's number one documentary, and now it's
00:01:00.380
streaming only on Daily Wire Plus with exclusive extras. See it all now on Daily Wire Plus. Go to
00:01:04.740
dailywire.com slash subscribe and use code Trump to get 47% off your new annual membership today.
00:01:11.140
There's something profoundly meaningful about gathering around a Thanksgiving table with the
00:01:14.680
people who matter most. It's one of those rare moments when you can slow down and appreciate
00:01:18.680
the deeper things in life, family, gratitude, the traditions that bind us together. Plus,
00:01:23.240
to be honest, between the holiday chaos and questionable meat quality at grocery stores these
00:01:26.620
days, preparing that perfect meal can feel pretty overwhelming and stressful. That's where Good
00:01:31.840
Rancher steps in to transform your Thanksgiving experience. But not just delivering meat, they're
00:01:36.100
delivering peace of mind. Every cut comes from American farms and ranches, free from antibiotics
00:01:40.800
and hormones. Talking about steakhouse quality meat that's individually vacuum sealed and perfectly
00:01:45.280
trimmed, saving you both time and money. No more settling for imported mystery meat or throwing away
00:01:50.580
freezer burned cuts. And right now, Good Ranchers is offering something really extraordinary.
00:01:55.320
Subscribe to any of their premium meat boxes and they'll add a free Thanksgiving ham to your first
00:02:00.140
delivery. We're talking about a 10-pound spiral cut ham that's a $110 value, absolutely free.
00:02:06.760
Don't wait on this one. Visit goodranchers.com. Use code Walsh at checkout to claim your free
00:02:10.900
Thanksgiving ham. Support American farmers. Skip the grocery store chaos and make this holiday truly
00:02:15.980
special with Good Ranchers. That's goodranchers.com. Use promo code Walsh. Good Ranchers. American meat
00:02:20.860
delivered. Try to think back, if you can, to the transition period of the Biden-Harris administration.
00:02:26.160
I'm talking about the personnel decisions and especially the key cabinet appointments that the
00:02:31.180
incoming administration made in the weeks after the media called the race for Joe Biden back at the
00:02:35.420
end of 2020. Now, those personnel decisions were treated as basically non-stories. They came and went
00:02:40.800
in the media, didn't talk much about them. Wasn't a lot of outrage or debate. Pete Buttigieg, for
00:02:45.740
example, became the transportation secretary because he likes trains and was vaguely interested
00:02:50.900
in airplanes. And he's gay. And those were his qualifications. That was it. So they put him in
00:02:55.420
charge of the Department of Transportation, which has a budget of tens of billions of dollars and
00:02:59.180
oversees the nation's railways and airports. Why not? Made sense to Democrats at the time. What's the
00:03:04.880
worst that could happen? A train carrying toxic chemicals might derail somewhere in Ohio, let's say?
00:03:10.020
What are the odds of that? Well, that was the nomination of Lloyd Austin to lead the Defense
00:03:14.860
Department. And that was really inspiring. You see, Lloyd Austin was serving on the board of Raytheon,
00:03:19.720
one of the biggest defense contractors in the world. Raytheon was paying him a lot of money. And
00:03:23.580
then without much fanfare, the Biden-Harris administration appointed Lloyd Austin to run
00:03:27.560
the Pentagon. What could go wrong? Surely Lloyd Austin wouldn't try to enrich his former colleagues in
00:03:32.820
the defense industry by, say, sending billions of dollars worth of weaponry to a tiny corrupt country in
00:03:38.460
Eastern Europe. That would be unthinkable. Then there was the appointment of someone using the
00:03:42.740
name Rachel Levine, a biological male originally named Richard, who decided in middle age to start
00:03:47.320
wearing a dress and rebrand himself as Rachel. Made perfect sense, we were told, for a man deeply
00:03:52.460
confused about the basic realities of human biology to oversee the nation's healthcare system.
00:03:57.940
Now, sure, he might pressure hospitals to castrate and sterilize as many children as possible.
00:04:01.680
He might pose for some uncomfortable photographs with Sam Britton, the cross-dressing nuclear waste
00:04:07.620
expert and kleptomaniac who'd been terrorizing airport baggage claims all across the Eastern
00:04:12.400
Seaboard for years before also being appointed for a role in the Biden-Harris administration.
00:04:17.360
But that's the cost of human progress, we were told at the time. I'm going through these
00:04:22.920
appointments to make a couple of points. The first point is that all of these appointments and many
00:04:27.420
others like them, including the appointment of an open borders advocate to run the Department of
00:04:31.320
Homeland Security, were grotesque. None of them should have been allowed to go through, but they
00:04:36.100
did. And the country paid the predictable consequences. Biden, you know, he appointed
00:04:41.580
more cross-dressers than we'd been used to seeing in government at that point. But otherwise, his picks
00:04:46.380
were exactly what we come to expect, a bunch of corrupt and useless bureaucrats who went on to do
00:04:51.700
what corrupt and useless bureaucrats always do, which, by the way, is expand their own power and
00:04:56.380
enrich themselves and their friends. That's the whole deal. Well, thankfully, it's clear that Donald
00:05:01.260
Trump is not going to follow that typical strategy. Donald Trump's incoming administration is already
00:05:08.800
unlike any other in American history. I mean, this is a transition team that's making a concerted
00:05:14.160
effort to select competent, independent cabinet officials, people who aren't self-interested cronies
00:05:20.140
or morons who are selected on the basis of identity politics. He's picking people who are actually
00:05:25.140
competent and who might actually advance the agenda that the American people voted for, which is
00:05:30.980
Donald Trump's agenda. Imagine that. So let's start with one of the selections that was announced
00:05:36.680
last night and that has upset a lot of people on the left. Donald Trump revealed that Pete Hegseth,
00:05:43.860
a Bronze Star recipient who served nearly two decades in the military, including in Iraq and Afghanistan,
00:05:48.200
will be nominated as the Secretary of Defense. Now, Hegseth is most recognizable at the moment as a
00:05:56.020
Fox News host, where he often advocates on behalf of veterans. He's also used his platform to outline
00:06:01.040
changes that, in his view, need to be made to the military immediately. And this gives us kind of a
00:06:07.460
preview of hopefully what we can expect now that he's running the Defense Department. Let's watch.
00:06:11.440
The Pentagon is, in the book, the exact amount of years. But in the past X number of years, 10, 12, 15,
00:06:19.520
the Pentagon has a perfect record in all of its war games against China. We lose every time
00:06:26.200
inside the Pentagon war games. We know what our real capability—you see, we didn't even get to this
00:06:32.560
part of the war on warriors. I mean, the military-industrial conflicts, the way we procure
00:06:35.720
weapons systems, you know, we're always—the way our system works, the way our bureaucratic system
00:06:41.660
works, where the speed of weapons procurement works, we're always a decade behind in fighting
00:06:46.760
the last war. Whereas China, we have a—we have, you know, what did Rumsfeld say? You go to the war
00:06:53.240
of the army, you have. We have the—China's building an army specifically dedicated to defeating the
00:06:59.160
United States of America. That is their strategic outset. Take hypersonic missiles. So if our whole—if our
00:07:04.960
our whole power projection platform is aircraft carriers and the ability to project power that
00:07:10.000
way strategically around the globe. And yeah, we have a nuclear triad and all of that, but a big part
00:07:13.440
of it. And if, you know, 15 hypersonic missiles can take out our 10 aircraft carriers in the first 20
00:07:18.480
minutes of a conflict, what does that look like? Well, first of all, you've got to fire, you know,
00:07:24.400
you've got to fire the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, and you've got to fire this—I mean, obviously,
00:07:27.120
you're going to bring in a new Secretary of Defense, but any general that was involved, General Admiral,
00:07:30.880
whatever that was involved in any of the DEI woke—it's got to go. Either you're in for war
00:07:37.440
fighting, and that's it, and that's the only litmus test we care about. You've got to get DEI
00:07:42.560
and CRT out of military academies, so you're not training young officers to be baptized in this
00:07:46.640
type of thinking. And then, you know, whatever the standards—whatever the combat standards were,
00:07:52.080
say in, I don't know, 1995, let's just make those the standards. And as far as recruiting,
00:07:56.720
to hire the guy that, you know, did Top Gun Maverick and create some real ads that motivate
00:08:01.360
people to want to serve. I'm straight up just saying we should not have women in combat roles.
00:08:05.920
It hasn't made us more effective, hasn't made us more lethal, has made fighting more complicated.
00:08:10.640
We've all served with women, and they're great. It's just our institutions don't have to
00:08:15.920
incentivize that in places where traditionally—not traditionally, over human history, men in those
00:08:22.560
positions are more capable. Well, I'm sold. I'm sold on that pick. I don't need to know
00:08:28.400
anything else about the guy, just based on that alone. This is all common sense stuff,
00:08:31.920
but it's the kind of stuff that you just never hear from anyone in a cabinet position,
00:08:38.800
any kind of bureaucrat, until now. And these are the kind of picks, by the way,
00:08:44.480
that probably only Donald Trump would make. Like, Donald Trump's probably the only guy
00:08:48.320
who would select him as Secretary of Defense. But again, all common sense, the overwhelming
00:08:55.920
majority of countries don't allow women in combat for obvious reasons. We are one of only a handful
00:09:02.640
of countries that do that. And no, the military shouldn't be teaching its soldiers about white
00:09:07.440
rage, nor should the Pentagon be focused on recruiting girl bosses or diverse applicants.
00:09:13.280
That strategy isn't working. The military is now regularly missing its recruitment goals,
00:09:17.120
primarily because they've gone out of their way to alienate white men for political reasons.
00:09:22.240
As a result, our military is much smaller than China's. Morale is terrible. We're constantly
00:09:28.080
losing war games, as Pete Hegseth pointed out. And making matters worse, our military leaders are
00:09:34.080
clearly inept, as evidenced by the disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan, and also as evidenced by
00:09:38.640
everything else that's happened over the last 20 or 30 years. So with this track record,
00:09:43.600
the absolute last person you'd want to pick for the job of Defense Secretary is another Lloyd Austin
00:09:49.120
type. The Lloyd Austins of the world are the ones who created the very situation that Hegseth is
00:09:55.040
talking about in those clips. That's why you need someone who's motivated and equipped to make some
00:10:01.280
radical changes, which actually aren't that radical because you're just going back to what was common
00:10:05.440
sense and what was standard, you know, only a few decades ago. But by our standards, it's radical.
00:10:11.840
And you want someone who knows what it's like to be a soldier in a war zone and who hasn't been
00:10:16.560
corrupted by his connections to the military industrial complex. In short, you want somebody like
00:10:21.040
Pete Hegseth. Now, as you'd expect, Democrats don't see it that way. They lost their minds when Trump
00:10:27.760
briefly paused the flow of military weapons to Ukraine. And now they're losing their minds
00:10:31.680
because Pete Hegseth might spurn the defense industry too. Elizabeth Warren, the senator from
00:10:38.000
Massachusetts, was especially enraged. She was sneering last night, along with a lot of her
00:10:41.740
colleagues. She wrote, quote, a Fox and Friends weekend co-host is not qualified to be the secretary
00:10:47.300
of defense. I lead the Senate military personnel panel. All three of my brothers served in uniform.
00:10:54.420
I respect every one of our service members. Donald Trump's pick will make us less safe and must be
00:10:58.360
rejected. So right away, the woman who pretended to be an Indian tries to dismiss Hegseth as a
00:11:03.840
weekend co-host, completely ignoring his military service and his ideas and his advocacy for veterans.
00:11:12.620
And by the way, it's funny that the fact that he is a combat veteran is not relevant.
00:11:19.800
But she's a greater authority because her brothers are veterans. So his own experience doesn't matter.
00:11:25.600
He's just a weekend co-host. But no, she is an authority because her brother, my brothers served.
00:11:31.540
So? How does that apply to you? How does that make you qualified to say anything?
00:11:38.940
Oh, she's also on the military personnel panel. She's on a panel, everybody. I mean, this guy
00:11:45.560
actually served in war zones, but she's on a panel. She sat on so many panels and talked about things.
00:11:53.800
So we're supposed to believe, based on her word, that if Hegseth had served on the board of Raytheon,
00:12:00.620
he would somehow be vastly more equipped for the job. We apparently want defense secretaries who are
00:12:06.000
bureaucrats or defense contractors, first and foremost, because that's obviously worked out
00:12:10.340
really well over the past three decades. And in the context of a second Trump administration,
00:12:14.520
the criticism of Pete Hegseth makes even less sense. Because recall that under the first Trump
00:12:19.700
administration, the Pentagon actively sabotaged Trump's policy objectives. Our envoy to Syria
00:12:26.680
has admitted this. It's one of the most incredible admissions ever printed, but it never got much
00:12:30.240
attention. The envoy stated that officials in the first Trump administration were, quote,
00:12:34.360
always playing shell games in order to hide the actual number of US troops in Syria from Trump.
00:12:40.080
That's an actual quote, shell games. In other words, they were lying to the commander in chief.
00:12:46.820
Trump wanted troops to leave Syria, and they told him the troops were already gone. And it wasn't true.
00:12:53.280
They were lying to undermine his agenda. People should have been put on trial for that. I mean,
00:12:58.920
that's criminal, but it just faded from memory. And it's faded from maybe the media's memory and the
00:13:06.120
public's memory. It hasn't faded from Trump's memory. So given that background, you can understand
00:13:10.540
why this time around Trump wants someone he can actually depend on, someone who agrees with his
00:13:15.300
agenda and will try to enact it. He wants people he can trust. That's the single most important
00:13:22.180
quality that a cabinet pick can have. You've got to be able to trust them. And that's very obvious
00:13:27.040
to Trump now after what he experienced in his first term. But Democrats are still going to resist
00:13:31.760
this nomination anyway for reasons that they can't really articulate. They just know that it'd be a
00:13:36.940
disaster for them if an outsider took control of the Defense Department. That's why one of CNN's
00:13:41.340
hosts tried to push back on Scott Jennings' argument for Hegseth last night on CNN. Let's watch that.
00:13:49.320
You want to have confidence in the current leadership of the Pentagon and the way the defense
00:13:53.540
situation has been operating for the last several years? I mean, from the Afghanistan pullout,
00:13:58.800
which was an extreme debacle for which no one was held accountable. We've had spy balloons flying
00:14:04.020
over the United States. We built a $300 million pier as a public relations stunt, which wound up
00:14:10.260
killing an American service member. I'd say I've had just about enough of the so-called insiders running
00:14:16.180
the Defense Department. I think we ought to give Pete Hegseth a chance because he's got two.
00:14:20.340
All the criticism of him is that he's not the expected Washington pick. And I'm just saying to
00:14:27.620
you that the American people just voted against the expected Washington pick. So he's got 20 years
00:14:32.780
in service, Afghanistan, Iraq, two bronze stars, Princeton, Harvard. Yeah, he's on TV, but so are
00:14:38.560
the rest of us. By the way, that lesson you just gave us really interesting because you highlighted
00:14:45.060
a bunch of things that the civilian leadership of the country decided on. And the military,
00:14:50.900
their job was just to execute. How did it go? I'm just saying. How did it go? In terms of the
00:14:56.520
decision-making, you're assigning decision-making responsibility to the military over things that
00:15:02.600
civilians are responsible for. So you make a good point. The civilian leadership made decisions,
00:15:07.100
and then the people they put in charge of the Pentagon carried it out. And it was all pretty
00:15:11.700
much a disaster. So for starters, it's pretty amusing for starters, as Jennings points out,
00:15:18.140
for television pundits to attack Hegseth for being a TV host when they're all television
00:15:23.940
personalities also. So either being on television makes you an idiot or it doesn't. And if it does,
00:15:30.600
then all these people should quit their jobs now before CNN closes down and fires them anyway,
00:15:34.740
which appears more likely to happen with each passing day. Then the anchor says that civilians
00:15:39.100
give the orders in the military, which is obviously true. But it's the Pentagon, which is also run by
00:15:43.960
civilians, that has the job of carrying out those orders. And as Jennings pointed out,
00:15:47.640
the Pentagon has repeatedly failed to do its job. They were wrong about the spy balloon and what it was
00:15:51.880
doing. They were wrong about the logistics of the Afghanistan pullout, which resulted in the
00:15:55.440
deaths of American service members. Couldn't even build a pier properly. And so what exactly is the
00:16:00.920
argument for keeping those kinds of people in control of the Defense Department? How could
00:16:05.140
we possibly do any worse than they've been doing? That's a point that Tom Homan, the incoming border
00:16:11.720
czar, just made on Fox News. He was asked whether he was worried about having the title of border
00:16:16.680
czar, given that Kamala Harris has done everything she can to run away from that title. And here's how he
00:16:22.200
responded.
00:16:24.140
Hey, Tom, you know, the last person who was border czar, she didn't want to be called border czar.
00:16:28.600
You're proud of it, right? You know what? I'm going to look like a genius because when you
00:16:35.100
follow a failure, you can't help succeed, right? To the American people, President Trump is going
00:16:43.060
to secure this border. He's going to save American lives. He's going to, by securing the border,
00:16:48.480
we're going to drop illegal alien crime, which is skyrocketing. Less people are going to die from
00:16:52.500
fentanyl. Less children are going to be sex trafficked. Less women will be sex assaulted on the southern
00:16:57.220
border. The criminal cartels will be put out of business by this president.
00:17:00.520
Go get them, Tom Homan. Appreciate it.
00:17:03.160
I think that's the right attitude. I'm going to look like a genius because when you follow
00:17:05.980
up failure, you can't help but succeed. And that is true. And also, it's all the more reason to go
00:17:10.800
in there and make radical changes. Can't get any worse. And so go in there and make the changes.
00:17:18.220
And whatever risks are involved in that, politically, take those risks. And that pretty
00:17:25.140
much sums up the entire transition so far. We're so used to administration officials who lie to us,
00:17:30.020
who try to use emotional blackmail and manipulation. That's pretty much impossible to be disappointed by
00:17:35.620
the incoming Trump administration at this point. I mean, just by demonstrating that they don't care
00:17:40.060
about the media's manipulation and false narratives, they're already well ahead of their predecessors.
00:17:44.560
It's also clear that the federal bureaucracy, which functioned to undermine Trump at every
00:17:49.360
possible opportunity the first time around, isn't going to exist in the same form the second time.
00:17:56.440
So last night, Trump officially announced that Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy will be running the
00:18:01.240
Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. Trump said the goal of this new department,
00:18:06.980
which actually is not going to be in the government, but it's going to be an independent
00:18:09.920
outside the government organization. But the goal will be to dismantle government bureaucracy,
00:18:17.180
slash excess regulations, cut wasteful expenditures, and restructure federal agencies.
00:18:23.300
He said they'll be done within two years, what he called the perfect gift to America on the
00:18:27.600
250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. And this is good, because the task of,
00:18:34.860
as he says, dismantling government bureaucracy should be the number one focus of Trump's second
00:18:41.460
term. Because nothing else can be done unless that is done first. And Elon Musk is just the guy to do
00:18:49.920
it. He showed up to Twitter and immediately axed 80% of the staff. And of course, as we remember,
00:18:55.600
everybody in the media said it would destroy the company. They said the whole site would crash and
00:19:00.560
burn and be forgotten. And yet, here we are, two years later, place is running better than ever.
00:19:07.160
Now, the problem in the federal government is like what the problem was in Twitter, except
00:19:11.880
multiplied by, you know, about a factor of, let's say, a million. Unlike every other company on the
00:19:18.560
planet, the federal government doesn't undergo mass layoffs. It just grows and grows year after year,
00:19:24.940
siphons more and more money from taxpayers without any accountability. These bureaucrats call themselves
00:19:31.640
public servants, but really the public is serving them. We're the ones who go to work every day to
00:19:35.940
pay their salaries. And what exactly do they do for us? Do we really need these people to spend tens of
00:19:42.380
thousands of dollars on gender equity in places like Honduras? Do we need them to develop new bat
00:19:49.500
coronaviruses and secret labs in Wuhan? Do we need them to use our money to subsidize some of the
00:19:55.440
most useless college degrees in existence? Do we need them to conduct fraudulent criminal trials of
00:20:01.720
the leading presidential candidate? Do we need them to issue insane new regulations, you know, in the name
00:20:08.360
of saving the environment, like banning the sale of gas-powered vehicles or gas stoves or plastic straws
00:20:14.580
or whatever else? Of course we don't. We've never needed any of that. What we have needed for a long
00:20:20.680
time now is for the government to get out of the way of human progress. They need to stop spending and
00:20:25.340
printing money as if it's endless. They need to do what every American in the private sector has to do,
00:20:29.160
which is justify their salaries. They need to explain how exactly they're serving the public instead of
00:20:34.880
the other way around. And this is a reckoning that would have been unthinkable if Kamala had won this
00:20:40.020
election. We'd be dealing with another parade of useless BIPOC, trans-whatever appointees who exist
00:20:45.260
only to check boxes. And now things are different. And giving Musk and Ramaswamy the hacksaw with a
00:20:51.480
directive to go to town on the federal bureaucracy means that maybe, maybe for the first time ever,
00:20:57.940
some real and substantial cuts will actually be made. No Republican president in modern times has ever
00:21:04.460
actually done anything to cut the size of government. They've all talked about it. None of them have done
00:21:09.720
it. Much less have they taken any steps to gut the federal bureaucracy and get rid of all the
00:21:15.140
useless people and their useless departments and programs. In fact, Republicans, of course,
00:21:18.880
have only contributed to that problem. They've added to it. There's pretty good reason to think that
00:21:24.320
this time will be different. Trump has picked the right two guys for the job, which is why the
00:21:29.740
federal bureaucrats are panicking and their panic will only become more unhinged in the days ahead.
00:21:34.660
For everyone else, for people who actually earn their living, it's a time to celebrate something
00:21:39.960
that's never happened before in modern American history. The behemoth federal bureaucracy is
00:21:45.680
hopefully about to get what it deserves, what's been coming to it for decades. If Trump fulfills his
00:21:52.200
promises, and that means simply letting the people he's hiring do the jobs they've been hired to do,
00:21:59.300
if that happens, it will mean ultimately that America becomes a freer, safer, more prosperous place.
00:22:06.780
And if this is the fascism they warned us about, then, well, it can't come soon enough.
00:22:14.580
Now let's get to our five headlines.
00:22:21.700
You know, we talk a lot about putting our money where our values are. Let me tell you about my
00:22:26.300
cell phone company, Pure Talk, and why I made the switch. Pure Talk is veteran-led,
00:22:30.300
and they don't just talk about supporting our veterans. They actually do something about it.
00:22:34.120
They've already alleviated $10 million in veteran debt. Every month, they donate tens of thousands
00:22:38.960
of dollars to prevent veteran suicide. And they just gave $50,000 to Mike Rowe Works to help veterans
00:22:44.120
learn trades after serving our country. Meanwhile, what exactly are Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile doing with
00:22:49.380
your money? Pure Talk gives you the exact same coverage, America's most dependable 5G network for half the
00:22:54.720
cost. You get better service, better values, and you're helping our veterans. It's that simple.
00:22:59.000
Right now, Pure Talk has an incredible offer for my listeners. When you switch to your service to
00:23:03.040
Pure Talk on a qualifying plan, you'll get one year of Daily Wire Plus Insider completely free,
00:23:07.840
where you can stream my new film, Am I Racist? But remember, this deal is exclusive. The only way
00:23:12.220
to get it is by going to puretalk.com slash Walsh. Support Pure Talk, a wireless company who wants to
00:23:17.180
be a wireless company and nothing more. And remember, it takes courage to stand for your values,
00:23:21.280
and it takes even more to stand against those who try to silence you. Puretalk.com slash Walsh. That's
00:23:26.040
puretalk.com slash Walsh. Some more good news from our friends at Outkick. It says,
00:23:31.620
viewership for MSNBC and CNN has tanked since Donald Trump steamrolled Kamala Harris in the
00:23:36.060
2024 presidential election. Mediate obtained viewership data from Thursday to highlight the
00:23:40.700
concerns both channels face. For the day, MSNBC averaged 596,000 viewers, while CNN recorded just
00:23:48.020
419,000. That's a decline of 23% for MSNBC and 40% for CNN year over year. But the primetime numbers
00:23:57.340
are even more concerning. While CNN saw a 30% decline, MSNBC declined an unprecedented 54%.
00:24:03.740
So this is kind of interesting. The conventional view is that left-wing media outlets and news channels
00:24:13.420
should see a surge of ratings after a Trump win because now they're the opposition, right? And for
00:24:22.900
the past four years, they've been in the position of defending the powers that be, and now they get
00:24:27.480
to play the role of the critic, the resistance, right? They get to slide back into that role.
00:24:34.360
And so typically, you'd think that that would help their ratings, not hurt them, but that doesn't seem
00:24:39.400
to be happening. In fact, the situation is so dire for MSNBC that they're, from what I saw,
00:24:44.600
the report I just saw, they're looking at possibly selling the company. That's how bad it is. So why
00:24:50.900
aren't they getting the resistance bump that we've seen in the past? Why aren't they getting bigger
00:24:57.560
ratings as the outsiders, the ones bravely standing up against the fascist regime?
00:25:03.740
I think there are a few reasons. And the first is that they've been obsessively criticizing Trump
00:25:10.340
for almost 10 years now. And with him winning another four years, that means that it'll be
00:25:17.140
another half decade or so of relentless Trump hate on these networks. And I think many in the audience
00:25:23.800
are just tired of it. It's just simple exhaustion and boredom. People are bored of it. How could they not
00:25:30.480
be? By the end, this will be 15 years, right? This will be almost a decade and a half of
00:25:41.240
focusing your programming primarily on attacking one guy, one specific guy. And it's just not
00:25:52.600
interesting. Even if you agree with them, even if you hate Trump at a certain point after 10 years of
00:25:59.020
it, you've kind of heard it all. And you don't need to keep hearing it every day. It just gets
00:26:03.520
boring. It's boring. You know, it's as simple as that. And the second factor, I think the bigger
00:26:07.560
factor is that MSNBC and CNN have just proven themselves to be irrelevant. They had dedicated
00:26:15.020
themselves for the past four years to the project of making sure Trump does not win again. And he won.
00:26:22.940
It was a landslide. And so they failed in historic fashion, thus demonstrating that they have very
00:26:32.260
little influence. They have no real ability anymore to set the narrative and influence people on a
00:26:39.700
national scale. They're just irrelevant. Trump's victory has not so much made them irrelevant as
00:26:47.600
exposed how irrelevant they really are. And that's why the ratings are tanking, I think. Pretty simple.
00:26:57.360
Mayor Adams in New York was asked whether he will cooperate with Trump's mass deportation plan. And
00:27:04.460
well, he didn't say no. We'll put it that way. Let's watch.
00:27:10.240
Will you express concern about mass deportations in the city?
00:27:16.880
My concern is one concern. We keep tinkering around the edges. We keep having this philosophical
00:27:22.400
conversation about it. The voters communicated loudly and clearly. We have a broken immigration
00:27:30.560
system. It needs to be fixed. That's the only conversation I want. New York City was devastated
00:27:35.740
by that broken system. 220,000 migrants and asylum seekers have made their way here.
00:27:41.600
How can migrant New Yorkers be sure that they won't happen here, given that ICE can make arrests
00:27:47.720
in New York City without police cooperation? Why should New Yorkers, including migrant New Yorkers,
00:27:53.420
trust that you will advocate for them with the new Trump administration?
00:27:57.160
But you said, how can I advocate for New Yorkers? So I should only advocate for one type of New Yorker
00:28:03.840
or New Yorkers. So the media wants Adams to say that he will valiantly stand up against Trump's
00:28:10.360
deportation plans, his deportation agenda. But he didn't say that. In fact, he agreed that illegal
00:28:17.180
immigration is a major problem that needs to be addressed. And I think that more Democrat governors
00:28:24.660
and mayors are going to more will cooperate or at least not obstruct than we think. There will be
00:28:32.480
more people in the Mayor Adams camp than maybe you would otherwise anticipate. And yes, some of them
00:28:40.540
have already said that they're not going to cooperate. They're going to try to sabotage Trump's
00:28:45.180
efforts to enforce the border, enforce our immigration laws. We know that. That's been happening.
00:28:51.020
I mean, that's what sanctuary cities are all about. So that's been happening for a long time.
00:28:56.480
And that's fine because Trump doesn't actually need them to cooperate. He can do it without their
00:29:02.100
help. Where there's a will, there's a way. And so if there's the will in the Trump administration
00:29:09.780
to carry this out and enforce our immigration laws, regardless of what any mayor or governor says or
00:29:18.360
things, if there's a will to do it, if there's a willingness to do it, then it can be done.
00:29:25.100
But even so, I think there will be maybe, and maybe I'm just
00:29:30.380
high on the fumes of optimism right now, which rarely happens to me, but I think there will be a
00:29:38.640
surprising amount of cooperation. And the reason is just simple politics. I mean, there is wide public
00:29:44.680
approval for mass deportations. Democrats are on the losing side of this argument.
00:29:53.360
The American people are basically decided on this issue and they're done with it. They want it to be
00:29:59.740
over. They want their borders back. They want their sovereignty back. This is not a far right position
00:30:05.000
anymore. It's not even a conservative position anymore uniquely. And it never was. I mean, never was.
00:30:12.900
It never should have been rather a conservative position. It should just be an American position.
00:30:19.000
Or if you're in this country and you're a citizen, you should want us to have borders that are
00:30:23.160
protected. No matter what else you think about politics, you should want that. And I think that
00:30:28.000
that's where people are now. And people want their communities back and they want their culture back.
00:30:33.500
And they're kind of done with the emotional manipulation. Not everybody. You know,
00:30:38.600
there's always going to be the gullible people, the morons. There's always going to be the dupes
00:30:44.520
who fall for the emotional manipulation tactics. That's always going to happen. But I don't think
00:30:49.540
that's where the culture is anymore. And so all the more reason why this can be done. And look,
00:30:58.000
we all know what will happen. I mean, we can play this out in our heads and we know that
00:31:05.440
the moment they actually start with the deportations, we're going to, I mean, the propaganda machine is
00:31:15.860
going to rev up on the left at a level we haven't even seen before. And we've seen a lot of it
00:31:23.460
you know, with Trump and we've seen a lot of anti-Trump propagandizing and we've seen
00:31:29.180
there've been many hoaxes and all of that. We've seen all that, including on this issue
00:31:35.180
in Trump's first term. Remember what was it? The ridiculous hoax about a border agent whipping
00:31:44.340
an illegal immigrant. That was the story anyway. But he had a whip and he was just, he was whipping
00:31:49.700
them. And it turns out that's not what happened at all. So there's going to be a lot of that kind
00:31:55.660
of thing. And it's going to be, there's going to be a lot more of it. And we know that. And
00:32:00.580
they're going to start, we're going to get all the tear jerking, weepy stories about families being
00:32:06.860
ripped out of their homes and sent back. And we're going to get the videos and the, you know,
00:32:11.340
the cell phone footage and all that's going to happen. And the left is hoping that that will
00:32:18.500
be enough to turn the tide of public opinion. They're hoping that after a few rounds of that,
00:32:23.900
after a few weeks of that, right, when we've seen a few of these videos of the illegal immigrants
00:32:31.000
crying and being sent away and all of that, they're hoping, they're expecting that that will be enough
00:32:37.700
and that the American people say, well, nevermind. I didn't know if deporting illegal immigrants means
00:32:42.500
that they're going to cry. Well, then nevermind. I thought they'd be happy. I thought this would be a
00:32:48.100
cheerful thing. I thought everybody would be happy. I didn't know it would get ugly like this.
00:32:51.460
That's what they're hoping will be the response of most people in the public. And I think they're
00:32:56.680
going to be disappointed. That's, that's, that's my, my theory. I don't think it's going to be that
00:33:02.760
easy. I think it's going to take more. It's going to take more than a few viral videos of illegal
00:33:06.960
immigrants crying because they're getting deported. I don't think that's going to be enough to turn
00:33:10.900
public opinion, uh, against this, but we will see. Um, all right. I want to talk about this
00:33:20.700
for a moment. Um, reading now from the express tribune, it's the name of the outlet,
00:33:28.300
Marla Rose, a Jewish feminist activist has sparked debate following an alleged altercation with far
00:33:34.920
right commentator, Nick Fuentes at his Illinois residence. Over the weekend, Rose reportedly
00:33:40.500
approached Fuentes's home, rang the doorbell and was allegedly met with pepper spray in a physical
00:33:45.480
confrontation. She claims Fuentes pepper sprayed her, kicked her down a flight of stairs and took
00:33:51.120
her phone, which was later returned by the police. Emergency services, including the police and ambulance
00:33:55.520
arrived following the incident. In a Facebook post, Rose elaborated on her motivations, citing Fuentes's
00:34:01.640
controversial reputation. Uh, quote, what would you do if a neo-Nazi white supremacist who called on a
00:34:07.960
holy war against Jews and is allowed proud misogynist lives in your town? She wrote. Encouraged by a
00:34:12.900
friend, Rose explained, so I rang the doorbell. He immediately swung the door open like he was at
00:34:16.960
damn Waco, sprayed me with a burning liquid and pushed me down the stairs into a, onto his sidewalk.
00:34:24.160
Rose noted that a passerby called the police after which EMTs checked for injuries. Um,
00:34:29.280
and, uh, she says she was assaulted and all that. Okay. So just filling in some details here,
00:34:35.200
Fuentes got doxed over the weekend. It was a pretty major doxing. Um, I mean, I saw his address all over
00:34:42.900
my Twitter feed. It was just, it was all over the place and a picture of his home, you know,
00:34:48.720
address, all of that. Very, very thorough, very viral doxing event. Then you started seeing posts
00:34:55.260
from people talking about how they're going to his home or driving by, uh, his home. And, and then
00:35:00.240
you've got, you know, this left-wing activist, Marla Rose shows up. Uh, she posts about it on
00:35:06.860
Twitter and, uh, makes it very clear in her post that she's there to harass him. You know, it's not
00:35:11.920
like she knocked on his door to say hello or to sell door-to-door magazine subscriptions or something.
00:35:17.300
I mean, she was there for a reason. It was very clear what the reason was. Um, and on his property,
00:35:23.880
you know, unless somebody is in an apartment, in most cases, if you're knocking on the door,
00:35:28.280
it means you're already on their property. So she's on his property and, uh, is there to harass him.
00:35:33.860
And, and that's not really debatable, which is, um, which is why it's absurd to take her side in this.
00:35:41.560
As I've seen some people doing, including conservatives, uh, taking her side just because,
00:35:47.900
you know, you don't like Nick Fuentes. Now I admit I'm kind of biased here. I am biased.
00:35:53.340
Uh, I'm very biased in fact. And I take this kind of story perhaps more personally than most people
00:35:58.780
do. And that's because as you know, if you've been listening to the show for a while, I also
00:36:05.640
have been doxed, you know, I mean, really doxed. Like people talk about doxing and sometimes you'll
00:36:10.240
hear that somebody is like an anonymous accounts and their real name is posted somewhere and we call
00:36:16.160
that doxing. And that can be, I mean, that's a form of doxing, but I'm saying doxing like real
00:36:21.520
doxing. Okay. Like here's the person's home address and a picture of their home.
00:36:27.180
Yeah, that's doxing. That's what doxing actually is. And most people just have not had that experience.
00:36:34.820
Uh, and you're lucky if you haven't, most people haven't, you know, you, you probably have not had
00:36:38.940
the experience of having your home address going viral on the internet for millions of people to see.
00:36:45.680
many of whom do not like you. Um, and if you never, if you've never been through that,
00:36:52.840
well, be grateful. Uh, I've been through it more than once and putting someone's home address out
00:36:59.740
there because you don't like their political opinions or because you're mad about their mean
00:37:05.440
tweets or because you think that they're a rude person who says terrible things. I mean, that is
00:37:11.020
just psychotically evil behavior. It's just evil. You are trying to get them killed.
00:37:19.360
You, you, you, a hundred percent. That's what you're doing. So in the past, when this has happened
00:37:23.640
to me, I was like, you were trying to get me and my family killed. That is what you're doing.
00:37:27.560
There's no getting around. It's not dramatic to say that. I mean, what, that's the point.
00:37:31.000
Why else would you put someone's address on the internet? That's why you're doing it.
00:37:34.880
The whole point is that you're, you're trying to send negative attention to the person's home where
00:37:40.080
they live with their families. Um, so yes, you are trying to get them hurt along with anyone else
00:37:48.540
who happens to be in their home. And, uh, and, and in fact, when you get doxed, many of the people
00:37:57.440
doing the doxing are very explicit that this is the reason they're doing it. You know, they're,
00:38:02.640
they're often very clear that like they want people to go to your house and burn it to the ground
00:38:07.540
and kill you. Like this is not, it's not subtle. It's not a subtle thing. So if you do that to
00:38:15.140
someone, you are the bad guy. Uh, you know, I don't care who the other person is. I don't care
00:38:19.400
what they've said. It doesn't matter. And if you actually show up to somebody's house,
00:38:25.240
if you, if you show up, if you show up at all, but especially if you show up in this context,
00:38:34.380
in the midst of a doxing campaign, when the person who is being doxed is necessarily on high alert and
00:38:42.420
in a very defensive posture, and you can say, well, you're scared. You're like, yeah,
00:38:47.580
you're sending whack jobs to my house. Yes. That makes me nervous. I, who wouldn't I,
00:38:54.560
any human being on earth would be. So now I have to, I'm, I'm have to be defensive.
00:38:59.560
And so if you do that and someone's getting doxed and you show up to their house,
00:39:04.960
uh, you get what's coming to you. You put someone's address out there and then you walk
00:39:10.080
onto their property. As far as I'm concerned, they're within their rights to respond. However
00:39:14.740
they feel they need to respond. However they feel they need to respond. They are within their rights
00:39:20.320
to do it. And whatever happens to you, you had it coming. Uh, you had it coming. Like it's not like
00:39:28.380
you just don't go on their property. It's not, you know, it's not, we're not, this is not any,
00:39:32.760
we're not expecting anything. We're not, we're not, we're not expecting much here.
00:39:37.100
This is not some great imposition that I'm, but just, just don't, that's their house. Stay away
00:39:41.260
from their house. You don't belong there. That's their property. Just wandering. I mean,
00:39:46.740
you got these left-wing activists and this is how entitled they feel that like, what the,
00:39:52.360
what the F do you think's going to happen? Someone's in the middle of being doxed.
00:39:58.560
People on the internet are very clear. Hey, go to this house and kill this guy. We hate him.
00:40:02.460
And then you show up. What? And then you're surprised that you get a physical response.
00:40:07.420
What are you doing? How could you respond that way? I don't know. Maybe there's a million crazy
00:40:12.320
people who want to kill me and know where I live. Maybe that's why I'm responding this way.
00:40:18.100
What are you going to do? Open the door and say, Hey, come on in. Let's have a talk. You want some
00:40:23.880
lemonade? So I don't care how you feel about Nick Fuentes. Obviously no love lost between the two of
00:40:31.880
us. It doesn't matter. I mean, doxing is despicable. Coming to someone's house is way, way, way,
00:40:39.280
way outside the bounds of what is appropriate or acceptable. And I'll tell you this, if you're on
00:40:45.280
the right and you're cheering on a doxing campaign against anyone, you are extremely foolish.
00:40:53.400
Okay. You are extremely foolish because eventually they'll get to you. Eventually it'll happen to you.
00:40:59.880
And what are you going to do then? What are you going to do when it happens? What are you going
00:41:03.180
to do when your address is viral on the internet and you start complaining about it? And then people
00:41:08.560
pull up your tweets where you were cheering it on when it happened to somebody else.
00:41:11.420
So, you know, now if that were to happen, I would still be against it. You know, you're,
00:41:18.240
you're a hypocrite in that case, but I'd still be against it. Uh, uh, cause just, it's just what,
00:41:25.260
you don't go to someone's house. You just don't do this. Um, and, uh, and, uh, yeah, this, this,
00:41:34.480
and, and this should be like, it's not even, I'm not even saying you have to be some, uh, great
00:41:39.120
principled, uh, person to take a stand like this. It's just, this is like basic self-preservation.
00:41:46.080
We should all be on the same page here that this is not okay. We're not in favor of this. This is
00:41:51.680
wrong. And you just don't do it to anybody. Um, I don't care who they are and I don't care how much
00:41:56.940
you don't like them. All right. Let's see. Two stories to mention briefly. The post-millennial
00:42:03.640
has this California voters have said no to an initiative that would have amended the state
00:42:08.180
constitution to ban any forced labor in prisons. Forced labor is already banned in the state
00:42:13.320
constitution with the exception that it could be used to punish a crime. The associated press reported,
00:42:18.320
um, 53.8% of Californians voted against the measure. According to the secretary of state's office,
00:42:24.440
prisoner rights advocates opposed the punishment exemption for labor saying they don't think
00:42:29.240
incarcerated people should be forced to do any work while serving their time. They also say the
00:42:33.020
state does not fairly compensate them for work performed, which generally amounts to less than
00:42:37.360
$1 per hour. Prisoners are routinely expected to do cleaning and maintenance work at prisons,
00:42:41.740
manufacturing license plates, or do light gardening at cemeteries. The measure was also part of a larger
00:42:46.800
set of reparations aimed at compensating black Californians for allegedly being subject to racism
00:42:51.900
discrimination over the centuries. Um, and, uh, so this is another initiative that failed. So there's
00:43:00.500
a, you know, we've talked about a few other kind of pro-crime initiatives that, that failed, um,
00:43:07.300
as even in California. And, and, and these are all like baby steps. Uh, it, it does not mean that
00:43:12.360
California is now a bastion of sanity and common sense in the world. Certainly not, but even California
00:43:18.960
has had enough of a lot of this, um, and the forced labor in prison thing, like that's just obvious.
00:43:27.280
I mean, yes, of course there should be forced labor for prisoners that they it's, there's not nearly
00:43:34.360
enough of that. I think we're not, we are not doing nearly enough with, with forced labor for, for
00:43:42.280
prisoners. And if they're compensated a dollar an hour, I'm actually kind of outraged by that because
00:43:48.780
that's too much. They shouldn't be compensated at all. You should get nothing. You should be forced
00:43:53.060
to work for free if you're in prison and work hard. Light gardening is to like, make them do hard labor
00:43:59.840
for free. You're in prison. This is the punishment, right? So, and it's a win-win. It's like, it's,
00:44:09.260
it's, it's, this is a great resource. Prisoners, people in prison, it's a great, it's a great resource
00:44:16.500
that we should be using a lot more. And it's a, it's a win all across the board because you're
00:44:22.780
getting free labor out of it and getting people to do, uh, to do, to do these jobs and you don't
00:44:27.520
have to pay them, which is fantastic. Um, it it's, it's adds to the punishment because prisons are
00:44:36.160
supposed to be punitive. You're getting punished. Well, that's it's, but doing forced labor is hard
00:44:44.520
and it makes them, it's supposed to be, you're being punished. You did something bad. We're
00:44:49.020
punishing you. That's part of the punishment. Um, so it's part of the punishment and, uh, and that's
00:44:54.080
another advantage. And also it's good for them. You know, if we want to talk about rehabilitation
00:44:59.900
or anything like that. And I think that there are a lot of people in prison that basically can't be
00:45:05.360
rehabilitated, or at least we can never trust that they've been rehabilitated, which is why they
00:45:10.400
should just stay in prison forever. Uh, many of them, but if there's any hope of rehab, I mean,
00:45:15.280
rehabilitation can happen. It's not like it's impossible. And it's not as though I think that
00:45:21.000
every crime should be life in prison. I think a lot of them should be, but not all of them.
00:45:24.920
And so if you, if you have someone who's going to be not in prison for the rest of their life,
00:45:29.320
then, uh, then you do hopefully want to hope that they can be rehabilitated.
00:45:34.020
This is one of the best ways to do it. Uh, putting someone to work, giving them,
00:45:37.660
you know, giving them something to do. If you just are having them sit around doing nothing all day,
00:45:41.720
it's just a waste, you know? And by the way, it's not free anyway. It's still not actually free
00:45:47.940
because we as taxpayers are paying to house them. We're paying for their food. We're paying for their
00:45:52.880
lodging. We're paying for all of it. So this is just you giving back to the taxpayers.
00:45:58.680
It's not even free actually. So this is a, to me, a very obvious one.
00:46:05.300
All right. Another quick thing. Postmillennial also another Postmillennial says, um, following a
00:46:09.280
raid on a local raw milk farm, Amish people in Pennsylvania reportedly turned out in unprecedented
00:46:13.900
numbers to vote in the 2024 election. Lancaster Farming reported in January that Lancaster County
00:46:19.800
farmer, Amos Miller was raided by the Pennsylvania department of agriculture on January 4th following
00:46:25.040
reports of illnesses traced back to raw milk. In 2022, Miller reached a deal with the federal
00:46:30.040
government to avoid jail time, but were not complying with food safety laws. And now they're
00:46:35.520
saying that, um, that the Amish turned out in record numbers in part because of this, this raw
00:46:42.480
controversy. And you know what? If raw milk is what inspired the Amish to vote and it helped to flip
00:46:51.340
Pennsylvania for Trump, then, then fine. Raw milk, raw milk is, is fine. I mean, it's not fine.
00:47:00.140
It's not fine. It's disgusting. It's gross E. coli juice still. Uh, it's, it's a disgusting fecal
00:47:06.520
flecked secretion that, uh, but I will tolerate it. Um, I will retract my previous statements that
00:47:15.800
raw milk drinkers should be deported into a volcano. Uh, on second thought that was slightly
00:47:21.600
overboard, a little bit overboard. Maybe like maybe, maybe that was, maybe not, we don't have to go
00:47:26.700
that far. Um, maybe, but what you have to understand is that I always associated raw milk
00:47:31.620
with hippies. So that's what this was all about. I mean, this was my bigotry against hippies,
00:47:36.560
which is totally understandable. I'm sure you would agree. Uh, and, and, you know, and so
00:47:40.520
that's what this all, that's where it all started. Um, and also because it's unsanitary and repulsive,
00:47:47.400
but, but I always thought it was a hippie thing. And so I wanted to throw hippies into a volcano.
00:47:54.160
Turns out I was throwing the Amish also never intended to do that. I love the Amish. I think the Amish
00:47:59.220
are great. I would never throw the Amish into a volcano. I'll be very clear about that. So
00:48:03.260
that's one that I'd take a firm stance on that one. Firm stance. So anyway, uh, raw milk is, uh,
00:48:11.140
I mean, look, you know, if it, if it helped, then it, then it's fine. I mean, it's not fine.
00:48:17.220
It's bad, but it's fine. That's my new position. It's bad, but it's fine. Now, if you tell me that
00:48:23.300
anime flipped one of the swing States too, then I'm really going to be in a moral crisis. I don't know
00:48:28.060
what I do about that. I don't know. I don't know what, but I don't think anime fans are voting for
00:48:33.820
Trump anyway. Um, they weren't voting for anyone. They weren't allowed to, you know, use their mom's
00:48:39.800
car that day to go vote. So anyway, that's a topic for another day. All right, let's talk about
00:48:46.240
something that affects all of us taxes. The October 15th deadline has passed. And if you're not prepared,
00:48:51.140
you could be in for a world of hurt. Do you owe back taxes? Are your returns still unfiled? Did you
00:48:56.040
miss the deadline to file for an extension? Well, now that we're past October 15th, the IRS is
00:49:00.220
probably gearing up for some aggressive enforcement. Trust me, you don't want to be on their radar.
00:49:04.680
We're talking wage garnishments, frozen bank accounts, even property seizures. It's not pretty
00:49:08.820
folks, but before you start panicking, there's still hope. Tax Network USA has helped taxpayers save
00:49:13.720
over a billion dollars in tax debt and filed over 10,000 tax returns. These guys specialize in reducing
00:49:18.980
tax burdens for hardworking Americans like you. Look, I get it. Dealing with the IRS is about as fun as a
00:49:24.060
root canal, but ignoring the problem won't make it go away. So here's what you need to do for a
00:49:28.480
complimentary consultation. Call today at 1-800-958-1000 or visit their website at tnusa.com
00:49:33.820
slash Walsh. Their experts will walk you through a few simple questions to see how much you can save.
00:49:38.380
That's 1-800-958-1000 or visit tnusa.com slash Walsh today. Don't let the IRS take advantage of you.
00:49:47.160
Get the help you need with Tax Network USA. Am I racist? The biggest documentary of the decade in
00:49:53.460
theaters is now Academy Award submitted and streaming exclusively on Daily Wire Plus. If
00:49:58.440
you saw Am I racist in theaters, thank you. You're part of history, but there's even more waiting for
00:50:03.140
you to catch a deleted scene featuring the beloved children's book character, Johnny the Walrus,
00:50:07.100
making a cameo, plus exclusive behind the scenes footage showing exactly how we pulled it all off.
00:50:12.380
The only way to see it is with a Daily Wire Plus membership. If you're not a member yet, go to
00:50:16.220
dailywire.com slash subscribe. Use code TRUMP to get 47% off a new annual membership. Now let's get
00:50:24.120
to our daily cancellation. On the surface, Fannin County, which is located in the Blue Ridge
00:50:34.700
Mountains of Northwest Georgia, isn't exactly a place you'd confuse with a nanny state. For one thing,
00:50:39.780
it's one of the most rural counties in the United States. They're famous for their apple orchards and
00:50:43.880
fishing and scenic railway through the countryside. And it's an overwhelmingly conservative place.
00:50:49.040
In last week's election, Fannin County went for Donald Trump by more than 82%. All that's to say,
00:50:53.960
we're not talking about some highly neurotic sheltered enclave of Brooklyn here. We're talking
00:50:58.500
about people who go outside and think about more important topics than the latest strain of
00:51:04.540
COVID that's been detected in the wastewater. So when something happens in Fannin County that seems like
00:51:08.980
it should have happened in Brooklyn, it's worth taking notice. And that brings me to this new
00:51:12.540
reporting from Reason Magazine, which to many people may seem like it can't possibly be real,
00:51:18.580
but apparently it is. Here's what happened. On the evening of October 30th, according to Reason,
00:51:23.140
police in Fannin County arrested a mother named Brittany Patterson in front of her four children.
00:51:28.320
And they fingerprinted her and put her in an orange jumpsuit and sent her off to jail. She's now facing
00:51:33.660
up to a year in prison and a fine of $1,000. So what was Brittany Patterson's crime exactly?
00:51:39.120
Did she rob a convenience store while high on meth and fentanyl? Did she
00:51:43.440
torch a federal courthouse and assault the guards? Did she follow a random guy around at night and
00:51:48.020
then pound his head into the pavement? Well, you know, Brittany Patterson didn't do any of those
00:51:52.160
things because if she had, the left would be defending her right now. Kamala Harris would
00:51:55.440
probably be raising money to bail her out. What Brittany actually did, and this isn't an exaggeration,
00:52:01.020
is allow her 11-year-old son to go for a walk. That's it. Specifically, he walked to a small town that's
00:52:07.160
less than a mile away from their home. And to give some context here, Brittany lives on a 16-acre
00:52:13.180
property with her children and their father who works in another state. They have family all around
00:52:17.720
the area, including her sisters and mother who live just two minutes away. So this is not a situation
00:52:22.720
where they're living in, say, the south side of Chicago, where they don't know anybody and people
00:52:27.200
get shot every day and it's very dangerous. This is very much a familiar environment, a safe environment
00:52:32.480
environment that we're talking about. And here's what happened. Quote, Patterson had driven her
00:52:36.800
eldest son to a medical appointment. Her youngest son, 11-year-old Soren, intended to come along but
00:52:41.880
wasn't around when it was time to leave. I figured he was in the woods or at grandma's house, says
00:52:46.000
Patterson. Soren, however, was not playing in the woods. He decided to walk to downtown Mineral Bluff,
00:52:50.920
a town of just 370 people. It's not quite a mile from his house. A woman who saw him walking a lot
00:52:56.220
alongside the road, speed limit 25 in some places, 35 in others, asked him if he was okay. He said yes.
00:53:03.940
Nevertheless, she called the police. Now, eventually, a female sheriff showed up, picked up Soren, and
00:53:10.380
dropped him off with his grandmother. She also lectured the mother about how her son could have been
00:53:14.840
kidnapped or been hit by a car. Then the mother scolded her child for leaving home without telling
00:53:19.440
anyone. And then the female sheriff left. Now, already, this is a situation that's escalated well
00:53:25.940
out of proportion. There's nothing out of the ordinary about an 11-year-old going for an unsupervised
00:53:32.320
walk in an area that's familiar and safe. We're talking about a county where the crime rate is well
00:53:37.900
below the national average. So in this scenario, maybe you can understand why a well-meaning bystander
00:53:44.140
would see an unaccompanied child and ask if everything's all right. I mean, even that seems
00:53:49.980
a little overboard. I don't know why. Just because you see an 11-year-old walking, I don't know why you
00:53:53.300
would even think to ask if they're all right. There's no reason why they wouldn't be, unless they
00:53:58.580
look distressed for some reason. But regardless, in no universe does it make sense for that bystander,
00:54:04.440
having heard that everything is fine, to then immediately call the police. I mean, this is a
00:54:09.920
psychotic level of meddling. Also, by the way, the sheriff brought up the child could have been
00:54:15.420
kidnapped. The chances that an 11-year-old gets kidnapped by a stranger in broad daylight
00:54:22.520
is significantly less than a million to one. It's the kind of thing that almost never happens.
00:54:31.360
There are thousands of other horrible things more likely to happen to your child than that.
00:54:36.420
statistically, kidnappings are almost always related to family disputes. They're almost
00:54:41.600
always carried out by family members. They're almost never just random person being, a kid being
00:54:48.060
taken off the street. It does happen very rarely, but it almost never happens. That's just a fact.
00:54:53.120
You know, that's the statistical reality. So a fear of kidnapping should not prevent an 11-year-old
00:54:58.940
from taking a walk in a safe neighborhood. What should prevent him then? What is there to
00:55:04.760
be seriously worried about? Now, this is normally the point where I'd talk about how the fake experts
00:55:10.520
are wildly out of touch on this issue. But in this case, even the fake experts agree with me on this.
00:55:15.680
You can go to the American Academy of Pediatrics, and they'll tell you that in their esteemed opinion,
00:55:20.420
a child older than 10 years old can indeed go outside from location to location and walk around
00:55:26.640
without an adult monitoring their every movement. So in case you were wondering, in case you needed their
00:55:31.440
blessing, you have it. It's not remotely a controversial point. Anyone who has children,
00:55:37.480
who has ever been around children, can probably tell you this. But in this case, the story didn't
00:55:43.280
end there. Quoting again from Reason Magazine, at 6.30 p.m. that night, the sheriff returned with
00:55:48.280
another officer. They told Patterson to turn around and put her hands behind her back. As three of her
00:55:53.680
kids watched, Patterson was handcuffed. The sheriff took her purse and phone, put her in the cruiser,
00:55:58.700
and hauled her off to jail. To Patterson, none of this made sense. She had grown up in the area with
00:56:03.620
plenty of unsupervised time to wander and play and was raising her kids that way too. Patterson was
00:56:08.360
soon released on a $500 bail. The next day, a case manager from the Division of Family and Children
00:56:12.640
Services came out for a home visit and even went to interview Patterson's oldest son at his school.
00:56:18.720
So now we're at the point where the local government is criminalizing parenting practices that were
00:56:23.720
standard for every generation of Americans up until like five seconds ago. In an attempt to
00:56:29.200
supposedly look after the interests of a child, they've decided to arrest that child's mother in
00:56:33.720
front of him. That couldn't possibly cause any issues with the child's mental state or his ability to get
00:56:40.620
to school and live his life. Now sure, his father works out of state, but who cares? Just throw the
00:56:45.440
mother in prison. The state has determined that it's in the best interest of this 11-year-old for his
00:56:50.400
mother to be incarcerated for up to a year. But the story still doesn't end there. Local officials
00:56:56.720
in this tiny county in Georgia kept on going. In Georgia, officials decided that it wasn't enough
00:57:02.000
to arrest this mother and drag her away from her children. They had to go further. This is from
00:57:06.920
Reason Magazine once again, quote, a few days later, the Division of Family and Children Services
00:57:10.480
presented Patterson with a safety plan for her to sign, would require her to delegate a safety person
00:57:16.400
to be a knowing participant and guardian and watch over the children whenever she leaves home.
00:57:21.520
The plan would also require Patterson to download an app on her son's phone,
00:57:25.680
allowing for his location to be monitored. So the government is demanding that this woman
00:57:30.860
agree to conditions that are clearly unconstitutional, not to mention completely unreasonable,
00:57:36.980
not to mention she's being essentially punished without being convicted of any crime,
00:57:41.340
which is how it can often happen, you know, when you've got these sorts of issues.
00:57:48.880
And they think that if they threaten her with jail time, she'll agree to them. But to her credit,
00:57:53.820
she's not doing that. She's telling the government that this is obscene and she's trying to get
00:57:57.440
legislation passed to prevent this kind of thing from ever happening to another parent in Georgia.
00:58:01.820
At the moment, that's where things stand. It's unclear what will happen next. The government will
00:58:05.380
either make good on its threat and jail this mother, or they'll move on and harass people who are
00:58:10.400
actually breaking the law, hopefully. But whatever the government does, there are a few takeaways
00:58:15.420
here that I think are worth keeping in mind. The first takeaway is that no matter where you live,
00:58:21.080
you just, you can't really escape the nanny state. There's all the more reason why,
00:58:24.660
and this is not a federal issue in this case, but still all the more reason why the federal bureaucracy,
00:58:29.420
all the bureaucracy across the board needs to be, is public enemy number one.
00:58:34.320
If the nanny state can come for a mother living in the mountains in northwest Georgia,
00:58:40.860
it can come for you too. Now, we spent so much time over the last few months talking about national
00:58:45.860
politics, but the truth is national politics aren't everything. Local politics aren't everything either.
00:58:51.140
In the end, there's a very real possibility that your freedom and the freedom of your children could
00:58:55.300
come down to the whims of one power-tripping district attorney or one sheriff who's having a bad day.
00:59:00.560
If that sheriff thinks that she can raise your children better than you, then she can throw you in prison.
00:59:06.920
This is the terrifying reality that parents everywhere face, and there are many horror stories just like this one.
00:59:12.260
There are also horror stories of actual criminal abuse being inflicted on children by their evil parents.
00:59:17.500
That does happen, and that is abuse that is often not noticed or not stopped by the people and agencies
00:59:22.980
tasked with noticing and stopping it because they're too busy chasing down good and loving parents
00:59:28.400
who parent in a way that was, again, totally commonplace up until very recently.
00:59:35.260
This mother is certainly not the first to be arrested for something like this.
00:59:38.540
You know, when I was growing up, and anyone my age or older would say the same thing.
00:59:42.280
We all say the same thing. My parents would tell us to leave the house, go play outside,
00:59:47.240
come back at dinnertime.
00:59:48.940
We'd trek all over the neighborhood, we'd go into other neighborhoods, we'd go to the woods,
00:59:52.360
we'd go anywhere we wanted.
00:59:53.660
There were no cell phones, there was no nothing, just my parents said, go have fun.
00:59:58.400
We'll see you in eight hours, just go do whatever you want.
01:00:02.120
And we did, we came back around dark, and this is how most of us grew up.
01:00:06.700
But now, as parents, we face this scenario where if we give our children even a fraction
01:00:13.780
of the independence that we had as children, we face the possibility of arrest and imprisonment.
01:00:19.900
I mean, it's insane. As I said, there are a lot of stories just like this.
01:00:23.820
Take, for example, the mother in Georgia who was jailed a couple of years ago for leaving
01:00:28.400
her 14-year-old daughter to babysit her younger siblings for a few hours while she was at work.
01:00:34.500
And, you know, that, she was arrested for that.
01:00:36.380
Now, I can remember when I was a kid, and my older sisters were left in charge of the house
01:00:41.660
at an age, at that age or even younger.
01:00:44.320
And we all survived. It was normal.
01:00:48.340
Now, it's the kind of thing that could get you handcuffed and thrown in a jail cell.
01:00:53.100
You know, parenting in the modern age is difficult enough.
01:00:57.780
And introducing more independence and responsibility into your children's lives is already stressful
01:01:04.080
and worrisome, though it is necessary.
01:01:06.720
It's part of parenting. You have to do this.
01:01:08.660
But now, as a parent, you face the very real possibility that if you introduce that independence
01:01:13.100
and responsibility in a way that happens to offend the sensibilities of a nosy neighbor
01:01:17.540
who then calls the police or CPS, you could find yourself standing in front of a judge
01:01:22.400
and labeled a child abuser for life because that label never wears off.
01:01:29.120
Now, the good news is that, in this case, the mother, Brittany Patterson, didn't back down.
01:01:32.900
She didn't install some location tracker on a child's phone or cower in the face of the government's
01:01:37.140
threats. She didn't sign the nanny state safety plan they presented her with.
01:01:41.740
Instead, she went out and sought some exposure for her story.
01:01:44.540
Reason Magazine covered it. Now I'm covering it.
01:01:47.160
The Daily Mail has also picked up a story.
01:01:49.620
As a result, a lot of reasonable people are hearing about it.
01:01:52.860
And any reasonable person who hears about the story will be outraged by it.
01:01:56.220
This is at least one recourse that you have in this kind of situation.
01:02:00.680
Although you don't have many recourses, that's at least one.
01:02:03.320
You can expose the tyrants and what they're trying to do to your family.
01:02:07.140
Maybe that makes them back down and slink away.
01:02:09.520
These people are cowards, after all.
01:02:12.120
At the very least, you will have shed more light on the kind of tyranny
01:02:15.560
that many parents face in this country every day.
01:02:20.440
And that is why the nanny state, and in particular the bureaucrats and police officers
01:02:24.120
who are threatening to imprison a woman for allowing her 11-year-old son to go for a walk,
01:02:28.660
are today canceled.
01:02:30.960
That'll do it for the show today.
01:02:31.800
Thanks for watching. Thanks for listening.
01:02:32.840
Talk to you tomorrow. Have a great day.
01:02:34.500
Godspeed.
01:02:34.820
Godspeed.
01:02:37.080
Godspeed.
01:02:50.120
Good noch way.
01:02:51.200
We'll see you tomorrow.
01:02:51.520
See you tomorrow.
01:02:51.880
Thank you.
01:02:52.640
Bye-bye.
01:02:53.100
Bye-bye.
01:02:53.140
Bye-bye.
01:02:53.240
Bye-bye.
01:02:55.040
Bye-bye.
01:02:55.740
Bye-bye.
01:02:58.020
Bye-bye.
01:03:00.240
Bye-bye.
01:03:00.420
Bye-bye.
01:03:01.360
Bye-bye.
01:03:01.580
Bye-bye.
01:03:02.360
Bye-bye.
01:03:03.140
Bye-bye.
01:03:04.200
Bye-bye.
Link copied!