The Matt Walsh Show - November 27, 2024


Ep. 1495 - How Trump’s Border Czar Plans to Put Sanctuary Cities Out of Business


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 5 minutes

Words per Minute

177.28473

Word Count

11,682

Sentence Count

810

Misogynist Sentences

33

Hate Speech Sentences

25


Summary


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Today on the Matt Wall Show is the incoming Trump administration prepares to deport millions of
00:00:03.660 criminal aliens. Democratic governors and mayors around the country are plotting ways to sabotage
00:00:07.780 them. Also, Kamala's former campaign staffers are doing the interview circuit and trying to find
00:00:12.040 somebody to blame for her humiliating loss. And of course, they're looking to blame anyone but
00:00:16.000 themselves specifically. And Sharon Stone goes to Italy to condemn Americans for voting for
00:00:20.580 Donald Trump. The celebrities all promised to leave if he won. Instead, they decided to stay
00:00:24.420 and just whine, I guess. All of that and more today on the Matt Wall Show.
00:00:30.000 Finally, some good news. We can all stop holding our breath. Work can actually begin on the
00:00:57.280 major issues facing our country, particularly our massive national debt. Let me be clear,
00:01:01.020 our nation is completely broke. We're sitting on top of a house of cards that's looking shakier by
00:01:05.080 the day. As long as our economy remains perched on this precarious foundation, there's really only
00:01:09.380 one strategy that makes sense. Diversify your savings. Look, there are so many things that
00:01:13.900 are completely out of our control, even out of our president's control, which is exactly why you need
00:01:18.180 a safe haven for your savings. That's where Birch Gold Group comes in. They'll help you convert your
00:01:22.560 IRA or 401k into an IRA backed by physical gold. Here's the best part. It won't cost you a single
00:01:27.580 penny out of pocket to make the switch. Remember, it only takes one card being pulled for the whole
00:01:31.520 thing to come crashing down. Don't wait until it's too late to protect your savings with gold.
00:01:35.920 Text WALST to 989898 right now. Get your free information kit. Plus, if you act before Black Friday,
00:01:42.200 you'll receive a free one-ounce Silver Eagle for every $5,000 purchase. As Daily Wire's exclusive gold
00:01:48.420 partner for the past eight years, I trust Birch Gold with my own savings, and you can too. That's
00:01:52.440 Walsh to 989898. Text now. We've heard a lot from Tom Homan lately, and for good reason. He's the
00:01:59.540 incoming border czar for the second Trump administration, and he's vowed unapologetically
00:02:03.400 to deport as many illegal aliens as possible and to arrest any local officials who try to intervene.
00:02:10.400 We talked about that promise yesterday in the context of the mayor of Denver, who's suggesting that
00:02:14.580 he's going to defy federal immigration authorities who try to carry out deportations in the second
00:02:19.280 Trump term. Homan's response was the correct one, which is that if the mayor of Denver wants to go
00:02:24.660 to jail, then ICE will happily oblige. This kind of showdown between Tom Homan and local officials
00:02:30.280 has been brewing for a very long time. During the first Trump administration, when Homan served briefly
00:02:34.540 as the acting director of ICE, several local governments announced that they would undermine
00:02:39.920 the work of federal immigration officials. And maybe no single local official was more brazen
00:02:45.420 about her efforts than Libby Schaff, who at the time was the mayor of Oakland, California.
00:02:51.620 This is an incident that's mostly been forgotten, but it's one of the most extraordinary moments
00:02:56.160 in modern American politics. And it's crucial to understanding Tom Homan's origin story as a
00:03:01.120 hardliner in dealing with states that interfere with federal immigration enforcement. It also provides
00:03:05.720 insight into how he's likely to direct immigration enforcement in Trump's second term. So here's how
00:03:11.580 the showdown began. As mayor of Oakland, Schaff somehow got wind of an upcoming ICE raid in the
00:03:17.960 Bay Area. And then she did everything in her power to sabotage the raid in order to protect as many
00:03:23.460 of the illegal aliens as she could. First, she went on social media to announce that the raid was coming.
00:03:29.420 And then she held a press conference to explain that it was her duty to compromise an ongoing
00:03:34.580 federal law enforcement operation. Watch. Yesterday, I learned information from multiple sources
00:03:42.480 that there is potentially an ICE activity planned in the Bay Area that could be starting as soon as
00:03:50.840 today. My priority is to keep this community safe. It is not my wish to panic people, but to ensure
00:04:01.220 that they're prepared with information, that they know their rights as well as their responsibilities
00:04:07.960 and know about the resources that this community offers. Due to the reliability of my sources and the
00:04:14.860 fact that I received this from multiple sources, I felt that it was my duty to share the information.
00:04:21.680 What Libby Schaff was basically doing there was serving as a gang lookout. She heard that the police
00:04:26.540 were coming, so she told everybody to hide with the clear and explicit goal of obstructing law enforcement.
00:04:30.900 And it worked. Following Schaff's early warning, more than 800 illegal aliens with criminal records
00:04:35.320 managed to evade ICE's crackdown in the Bay Area. And as Tom Homan put it at the time, quote,
00:04:41.360 the Oakland mayor's decision to publicize her suspicions about ICE's operation further increased
00:04:45.760 that risk for my officers and alerted criminal aliens, making it clear that this reckless decision
00:04:51.320 was based on her political agenda. Now, to be clear, every single person that ICE was looking for
00:04:56.340 was guilty of multiple crimes. There were people who had no right to be in this country to begin
00:05:00.820 with, for one thing. And they also committed additional crimes when they were here. Among the 150 aliens
00:05:06.460 that were arrested by ICE during the crackdown, for example, was a gang member who had four prior
00:05:11.200 deportations, along with convictions for sex with a minor, DUI, and assault. He apparently wasn't paying
00:05:16.900 attention to the news that day, so Tom Homan's agents were able to find him, fortunately.
00:05:20.060 After the raid, Donald Trump told reporters that he would direct the DOJ to investigate Libby Schaff
00:05:26.420 for obstructing federal agents. And he told his attorney general, Jeff Sessions, to look into it. Watch.
00:05:34.320 They were all set. This was long in the planning. And she said, get out of here. And she's telling that
00:05:41.460 to criminals. And it's certainly something that we're looking at with respect to her individually.
00:05:47.040 What she did is incredible and very dangerous from the standpoint of ICE
00:05:51.540 and Border Patrol. Very dangerous. She really made law enforcement much more dangerous than it had to
00:05:59.140 be. To me, that's obstruction of justice. And perhaps the Department of Justice can look into
00:06:06.240 that with respect to the mayor, because it's a big deal out there. And a lot of people are very angry
00:06:10.700 about what happened. Now, as we all know, in the end, nothing came out of this. Jeff Sessions and
00:06:15.360 everybody else in the room nodded along as Trump made this suggestion. Then they promptly forgot
00:06:19.280 all about it. Instead of prosecuting Schaff for interfering with the enforcement of federal law,
00:06:24.000 the DOJ got to work investigating Trump for things he didn't even do. They were more interested in fake
00:06:28.180 allegations of collusion with Russia than investigating actual videotaped evidence that
00:06:32.540 the mayor of Oakland was colluding with felons to obstruct federal investigations, which you would
00:06:37.800 think would be a pretty serious crime. Now, at the time, the idea of hauling an elected official
00:06:43.180 to a courtroom seemed like a red line to a lot of conservatives. Even when an elected official
00:06:48.780 was clearly and deliberately violating the law, as was the case with Libby Schaff,
00:06:54.200 very few people in power among conservatives had the political will to punish her for it. They didn't
00:06:59.540 want to go on camera and call for her arrest. After all, Republicans thought, well, if we start
00:07:05.280 arresting our political opponents, even ones who have actually committed serious crimes,
00:07:08.780 then the Democrats might try to arrest us. Of course, as it turns out, Democrats didn't need
00:07:14.520 permission from Republicans. They were going to escalate to this level regardless. So Republicans
00:07:20.640 played it safe for fear of the Democrat escalation, but Democrats escalated anyway. It's a tale as old
00:07:25.760 as time. But Tom Homan was the notable exception back then. All the way back in early 2018, even before
00:07:30.960 the mayor of Oakland publicly undermined ICE, Homan said that the leader of every sanctuary city in the
00:07:36.560 country should go to jail. But Homan was apparently outvoted, so that never happened. And Schaff was
00:07:42.360 never investigated, much less prosecuted. Of course, over the past few years, a lot has changed.
00:07:47.340 Democrats have decided that there's no problem with prosecuting their political opponents for crimes
00:07:51.960 that are completely fake. They've dispensed with every norm and every principle of jurisprudence,
00:07:58.140 quote unquote, that counsels against these kinds of prosecutions. So now, six years later,
00:08:02.460 there's reason to believe that Homan will have the opportunity to actually follow through
00:08:06.940 on his plan to arrest officials who stand in his way. Homan certainly seems to think that's a distinct
00:08:13.080 possibility based on his comments responding to the mayor of Denver this week. And I played part of
00:08:17.840 this clip yesterday, but here it is again in case you missed it. Watch.
00:08:22.100 Tom, you heard this mayor out there in Colorado. I want to get your reaction to it. And I want you
00:08:31.860 to be clear about who has jurisdiction, the federal government or state and local governments.
00:08:36.600 And if you're a sanctuary state or city, are you breaking the law?
00:08:40.000 Yeah, absolutely breaking the law. All you have to do is look at Arizona versus U.S.
00:08:43.260 You'll see these breaking law. But look, me and the Denver mayor, we agree on one thing.
00:08:47.000 He's willing to go to jail. I'm willing to put him in jail because there's a statue. It's title
00:08:53.080 eight, United States code 1324, triple I. And what it says is it's a felony. If you knowingly
00:08:59.240 harbor and conceal illegal alien from immigration authorities is also a felony to impede a federal
00:09:04.140 law enforcement officer. So if we don't want to help, that's fine. He can get the hell out of the way,
00:09:08.300 but we're going to go do the job. That was Homan's response to the mayor of Denver, Mike Johnson,
00:09:13.340 who was threatening that there would be a Tiananmen Square moment if ICE tried to enforce
00:09:17.860 immigration law in Denver. Johnson implied that Denver police and tens of thousands of Denver
00:09:23.140 residents would obstruct ICE in the same way that the guy stood up to the line of Chinese tanks in
00:09:29.080 that famous photo. So the analogy is equating the enforcement of existing immigration laws,
00:09:34.480 laws that any country needs in order to be defined as a country, with a communist regime's
00:09:39.780 violent crackdown on a pro-democracy protest. He's saying Denver residents are justified in
00:09:45.220 seeing a parallel between these two events. And he's encouraging them along with law enforcement
00:09:50.100 to stand in the way of federal agents enforcing federal law. So fundamentally what's happening here
00:09:56.000 is that the mayor of Denver is assuming that the second Trump administration will function a lot
00:10:01.820 like the first one did. He's betting that Republicans will back off rather than upset the activists
00:10:06.940 and the mothers who are waving the roses and so on. So that's the same approach that the local media
00:10:12.320 and Democrat activists are taking in California, where a similar effort to resist the next Trump
00:10:17.560 administration is underway. As Fox News reported, a city council in Northern California has just voted
00:10:24.360 to resist federal immigration officials in Trump's second term. Quote, the Redwood City Council in
00:10:30.140 California voted four to three in favor of calling for staff to draft an ordinance for consideration
00:10:34.380 that would restrict the city from cooperating with immigration authorities. During discussion of
00:10:39.360 his proposal on Monday, Councilmember Chris Sterkin argued in favor of passing an ordinance to ensure
00:10:45.620 that no city resources may be utilized to cooperate with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
00:10:50.060 unless required under law. Here's how the local CBS affiliate is selling this proposal.
00:10:57.760 Tonight, the Redwood City Council will discuss whether to take the first steps on an ordinance that would
00:11:02.540 restrict the use of city resources to help immigration authorities. President, like Trump's
00:11:07.040 incoming border czar, has promised the slash funding to states that don't assist with mass
00:11:11.840 deportations. And as Jose Martinez reports, those promises have prompted uncertainty and spurred action
00:11:18.380 from Bay Area communities and organizations. On a sunny afternoon in East San Jose, Evelyn Castaneda walks
00:11:25.420 with her daughter, Catherine. The sound of laughter fills the air, but behind Evelyn's smile, there's an
00:11:32.500 undeniable tension.
00:11:41.400 Evelyn's journey as an undocumented immigrant began 15 years ago when she fled violence and poverty in
00:11:48.000 Honduras. The country has long struggled with gay and violence, political instability, and economic
00:11:54.480 hardship. Now, you might have noticed that every time they try to make these emotional appeals where
00:12:00.220 they try to humanize, quote unquote, people who are in this country illegally, they end up sabotaging
00:12:05.680 their own argument. In this case, we apparently have a woman who came to this country illegally more than
00:12:09.820 a decade ago. In that period, she's never bothered to learn conversational English. She's never obtained any
00:12:15.680 kind of legal authorization to be here. But we're supposed to feel sorry for her and allow her to stay in
00:12:20.580 this country because even though she broke the law and seems to be doing nothing at all to fit into
00:12:25.300 the country and assimilate, she seems like a nice person. And that should be enough. That's the
00:12:29.980 argument they're going with in the state of California. And they're not alone. Activists in
00:12:33.800 Arizona are doing the same thing. They're gearing up for the second Trump administration by working on
00:12:39.280 their storytelling skills. Watch.
00:12:41.920 Arizona groups are promising to stand up for the undocumented community as plans for deportation
00:12:48.940 begin to ramp up. We're working on on training up our legal community so that we are all ready.
00:12:55.000 Advocates who gathered on Zoom today say they worry the new Trump administration will try to work
00:13:00.060 quickly. We need to continue to work on documentation and storytelling because on both sides of the border,
00:13:05.620 the narrative will be that these are criminals who are being deported when these are moms and dads,
00:13:10.460 just like me. Joanna Williams is the executive director of Keno Border Initiative in Nogales.
00:13:16.260 The organization helps deported migrants, including asylum seekers. Williams described one of the women
00:13:22.760 she's been helping. She's been in Nogales for six months waiting for an appointment to seek asylum
00:13:28.960 on the CBP1 app. If she doesn't get that in the next two months, there isn't going to be a pathway to
00:13:35.260 asylum for her. So the narrative is that illegal aliens are criminals, according to the activist.
00:13:44.100 And well, that narrative is true because these aliens are in this country illegally.
00:13:49.780 But did you know that some criminals are moms and dads too? Did you realize that? You can't
00:13:54.680 possibly throw moms and dads in jail. You can't possibly make them face consequences for their
00:13:59.800 actions. That would be unthinkable, even though it happens every day in every state, in every country,
00:14:05.560 in the entire world. Then she goes on to say that one of her clients has been in Arizona for six
00:14:11.040 months without filing an asylum claim. And that's part of the problem. Nobody should be in this country
00:14:16.300 while their asylum claim is being processed because the overwhelming majority of asylum claims are
00:14:21.620 fraudulent. These claims are often crafted with the help of NGOs and law firms who include fake stories
00:14:27.300 of political persecution to cover up the fact that these aliens are here seeking economic benefits,
00:14:32.580 which is not asylum. But once you let people into this country to file these bogus claims,
00:14:38.140 as we've learned, it's very hard to get rid of them. They just stay here.
00:14:42.860 It's pretty uncommon that their asylum claim is rejected and they say, okay, well, I'll go home then.
00:14:48.340 That doesn't happen. So again, this is yet another argument from the activist that ends up being
00:14:52.740 self-defeating. They're making our point for us. These are people who have not adapted their strategy
00:14:58.140 in any meaningful way in the past four years. Rather than offering solutions, they're trying and
00:15:03.080 failing to appeal to our emotions. And of course, they're also committing to engaging in even more
00:15:08.000 lawfare. And that's not going to change either. Over in Illinois, for example, they're vowing to take
00:15:13.300 the Trump administration to court over his proposal to use military assets to carry out these deportations.
00:15:19.520 Watch. True, Trump says in response to a post claiming he'll declare a national emergency
00:15:25.680 and use military assets to deport undocumented immigrants. Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker says
00:15:32.100 that's a chilling prospect. The idea of calling out, you know, the army into the domestic confines of
00:15:40.480 the United States is seems uncalled for and may in fact be unconstitutional and illegal.
00:15:47.180 Now, Trump's proposal to use the military is a concerning sign for Democrats, though not for
00:15:52.980 the reasons they're claiming. In reality, they're upset because it's a clear signal that in his
00:15:57.500 second term, Trump is going to use every available means at his disposal to get illegal aliens out of
00:16:02.460 the country. And in terms of tactics, this is an escalation from what we saw in Trump's first term.
00:16:07.340 And so predictably, Democrats are claiming it's somehow illegal. What's missing from their analysis,
00:16:11.920 though, is that Trump never said he'd order troops to remove illegal aliens themselves. He said that
00:16:16.080 military assets could be used, which is in keeping with how every president since Bill Clinton has
00:16:21.700 sent the National Guard and active duty members of the military to the border to perform various
00:16:26.620 support roles. And those roles have included monitoring the border, border fixing equipment
00:16:32.400 and that sort of thing. Trump's incoming Homeland Security Advisor and Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen
00:16:37.860 Miller has previously said that in Trump's second term, the military could build temporary
00:16:42.640 facilities to house illegal aliens prior to their deportation. That's another option that would
00:16:48.540 probably have no problem in the courts. As Ryan Burke, a professor at the U.S. Air Force Academy
00:16:53.460 recently put it, quote, I think that Trump's plan probably won't face a whole lot of successful
00:16:57.460 challenges. There's too much ambiguity in these laws to point to something that says, hey,
00:17:01.480 you absolutely cannot do this. For their part, over in New Mexico, state officials are walking the line
00:17:07.980 between deportations are inhumane and the border needs to be secure somehow. So here's the state's
00:17:15.160 governor explaining that while more border security is good, it's wrong to separate families and use
00:17:22.140 the military in any way to accomplish that goal. Watch. You can't use the military. You can't do mass
00:17:30.400 deportation. So any federal administration. You should expect states. And I think you'll you'll you
00:17:37.360 should expect some bipartisan support, not just by the Democratic governors. Is that violating the
00:17:43.600 Constitution and the law? We're not going to do that. We ought to be working on making sure that violent
00:17:51.000 criminals and criminal activity is stopped everywhere. There isn't a state that isn't interested, whether
00:17:57.140 you're an American citizen or not. And he effectively Trump killed the bipartisan, the bipartisan border
00:18:03.780 deal. Not the first time that he's done that. We need more agents. We need more collective effort
00:18:10.860 so that we're bringing border security and holding people accountable where they are, disrupting family
00:18:16.900 status and the economy, inhumane, cruel, unfair, discriminant policies that, again, are illegal on their face.
00:18:25.160 We are not going to cooperate in any way in that effort. So she says it's illegal to do mass
00:18:32.080 deportations. What? So she's not claiming that deportation. Obviously, deportation is not illegal.
00:18:42.320 She's saying a mass deportation. So you're not allowed to deport a bunch of illegals at once. You have
00:18:46.920 to do it one at a time. Is that is that the is that the rule that she's just invent? Where is that in the
00:18:53.500 Constitution? If you have illegal aliens in the country, you can deport them, but you have to do
00:18:57.640 one at a time. One every hour is what you can't do more than what is. So maybe that's it. Is that
00:19:02.760 what it is? This is the middle ground that some Democrats have apparently decided on ahead of
00:19:08.260 Trump's second term. They recognize that Americans overwhelmingly want border security. They want to
00:19:13.440 see immigration law being enforced. And after the last election, there's no denying that. But then
00:19:17.560 Democrats claim that any immigration enforcement needs to respect the sanctity of the families of
00:19:23.380 illegal aliens. And then they threaten to use the legal system to shut down any practical solutions.
00:19:29.280 And they're going with this approach that makes no sense, because for the most part,
00:19:33.740 it worked during Trump's first term. Politicians like the mayor of Oakland didn't face any consequences
00:19:38.620 for undermining federal immigration policy, complaining about family separations as if family
00:19:43.820 separations don't happen every day in our judicial system was effective at the time. Democrats could
00:19:52.060 claim to care about immigration enforcement while preventing immigration law from actually being
00:19:55.900 enforced. Now, from the response of those various sanctuary cities and states to the incoming Trump
00:20:01.740 administration, it's very apparent that Democrats' tactics probably won't be any different this time
00:20:05.620 around. They think they can derail Trump's deportation agenda with the same lazy appeals to emotion
00:20:11.200 backed up by lawfare. And that's what they're hoping for. It's an act we've all seen before. It's an act
00:20:18.700 that Tom Homan in particular is very familiar with. He's been very consistent over the past eight years
00:20:23.740 about how exactly he'd deal with this particular strategy. He plans to deport anyone who's illegally
00:20:28.660 in this country, whether they're part of a family unit or not. He doesn't seem particularly keen on
00:20:33.720 allowing anyone to stand in his way either. And if there's a reason for Democrats to drop the emotional
00:20:39.820 blackmail and let Tom Homan do his job, it's that no one has any incentive anymore to hold him back.
00:20:49.340 Now, let's get to our five headlines.
00:20:56.420 Let's talk about something that keeps businesses up at night, managing finances. If your current system
00:21:02.260 feels about as useful as a chocolate teapot, I've got a solution that'll make you wonder how you ever
00:21:07.140 lived without it. It's called RAMP. RAMP is a corporate card and spend management software designed
00:21:11.220 to help you save time and put money in your pocket. Picture this. You give every employee a card, but
00:21:16.820 you're in complete control. You can even set tight limits. Plus, you can say goodbye to wasting your
00:21:21.760 life deciphering expense reports at months' end. RAMP categorizes your expenses in real time and collects
00:21:27.000 receipts automatically. You'll be closing your books eight times faster. But RAMP isn't just about saving
00:21:31.100 time. It's about cold, hard cash. The average business saves 5% in their first year with RAMP.
00:21:36.000 Not to mention, RAMP is so easy to use. It's started in less than 15 minutes, whether you have five
00:21:39.920 employees or 5,000. And now get $250 when you join RAMP. Just go to RAMP.com slash Walsh. R-E-M-P.com
00:21:46.940 slash Walsh. That's RAMP.com slash Walsh. Cards issued by Sutton Bank. Members FDIC. Terms and conditions
00:21:53.380 apply. Well, the Harris campaign, the former Harris campaign, may it rest in peace, is now entering the
00:21:59.400 phase of mourning at political loss where they're going around and doing the podcast circuit and
00:22:04.780 trying to figure out who to blame for their loss. Who to blame but themselves, obviously, and their
00:22:09.200 candidate because you can't blame them. So who aside from the people that should be blamed,
00:22:16.660 should we blame? So I'm going to share a couple of clips from a podcast interview. I'm not sure what
00:22:20.840 podcast this is. It's one of them. It's one of the podcasts. They did one of the 800 million
00:22:27.120 podcasts that are out there. This is an interview with Stephanie Cutter, who is a campaign official
00:22:31.700 for the Kamala campaign, or was. And a couple of clips here. We'll start with this. Here she is
00:22:40.300 basically blaming the media for the loss, which is pretty great. You love to see it. Let's watch this.
00:22:46.220 I would say, I mean, look, I am not a media hater by any measure. And I think that, you know,
00:22:56.420 we women don't get far in life talking about double standards. So that's not the point. But
00:23:00.260 I do think a narrative, 107 days, two weeks up because of a hurricane, two weeks talking about
00:23:07.800 how she didn't do interviews, which, you know, she was doing plenty, but we were doing in our own way,
00:23:12.840 we had to, you know, be the nominee, had to find a running mate and do a rollout. I mean,
00:23:18.440 there was all these things that you kind of want to factor in. But real people heard in some way that
00:23:25.020 we were not going to have interviews, which was both not true, and also so counter to any kind of
00:23:33.200 standard that was put on Trump that I think that was a problem. And then on top of that,
00:23:36.960 we would do an interview. And to Stephanie's point, the questions were small and processy and
00:23:44.580 about like, dumb, they weren't, they were not informing a voter who was trying to listen to
00:23:51.060 learn more, or to understand. And I'm not here to say that, that, you know, the whole system was
00:23:56.880 focused on us incorrectly. I'm just saying, like, again, of the things we need to explore as we move
00:24:01.540 forward as a campaign and as a country, that does a disservice to voters. And, you know, I think back
00:24:07.640 and think we should have signaled more of our strategy early on about podcasts and who we were
00:24:12.160 trying to reach. And but we had a limited amount of time to reach the people we're trying to reach,
00:24:16.960 and we were trying to go to them. But being up against a narrative that we weren't doing anything,
00:24:21.580 or we were afraid to have interviews is completely and also like took hold a little bit. And we just gave
00:24:28.180 us another thing we had to fight back for that Trump never had to worry about.
00:24:32.140 So where do we begin? Let's start. Well, let's start at the beginning of the clip where she laments
00:24:38.260 that they only had 107 days, 170 days. Yeah. Well, why is that? It's because Kamala chose to
00:24:44.940 shiv Biden in the neck and steal his nomination that from him. Like that's, that's what happens when
00:24:51.220 you do that. You didn't, you didn't have a lot of time. She could have had more time if she was
00:24:54.560 actually nominated and, and, and voted into that position. She was voted into the position of being
00:25:00.160 the nominee. Then you have more time, but she wanted to steal the thing out from underneath Biden,
00:25:07.220 which means that you have less time. Uh, and if you weren't prepared to actually run a campaign,
00:25:14.780 well, then maybe you shouldn't have stolen it. What about that? And then she complains that
00:25:22.840 they were expected to do interviews, even though Trump was not expected to do interviews, which is
00:25:28.420 just asinine. I mean, it's absolutely insane. Trump was doing marathon interviews, like with all kinds
00:25:35.720 of people. He was doing hostile interviews. He was doing friendly interviews. He was doing,
00:25:39.320 um, you know, he, he was doing live interviews in front of the, in front of audiences. There was the,
00:25:48.000 what the national black, uh, journalist association, whatever the hell it was. He was doing stuff like
00:25:52.600 that. He was holding press conferences of all the things you could hit Trump for being afraid of
00:25:59.080 interviews is just not one of them. That's the last thing on the list of things that you could
00:26:03.840 possibly criticize them for. And then to make matters even more pathetic, she whines about
00:26:08.260 the questions that she got during the interviews because the questions were not informing the voters.
00:26:15.660 She says, well, wait a second. The question isn't supposed to inform the voter. The answer is,
00:26:25.040 okay. If Kamala didn't like the questions, her job is to pivot them in a direction. She does like
00:26:31.440 that's your job. That's what campaigning is. It's your job as the campaign to stay on message,
00:26:38.280 uh, to know what your message is and pivot back to it. It's not the job of an interviewer
00:26:45.100 to, to keep you on message. And as it happens, most of her interviewers were trying to do that
00:26:52.420 for her. They're actually trying to help. Um, and that's why she says the questions were small and
00:26:59.940 a processy, whatever the hell that means. Well, why is that? It's because Kamala couldn't answer
00:27:04.860 big questions without rambling like a dumb ass. So the media did you a favor by asking small
00:27:11.500 questions. They were trying to help you. The, the alternative would have been big questions,
00:27:18.320 relevant questions that she would fumble in humiliating fashion. And then finally,
00:27:23.900 she says that the interview about, um, that rather than narrative about Kamala not doing interviews
00:27:29.260 was just, just another thing, just another thing they had to overcome and deal with that Trump
00:27:36.020 didn't have to deal with. Well, again, Trump didn't have to deal with the narrative that he didn't do
00:27:41.960 interviews for the reason that he was doing interviews. He was doing like 18 hours of interviews
00:27:47.060 every day. It felt like, um, also you want to talk about who was dealing with stuff that the other
00:27:53.920 one didn't have to, um, how about getting shot in the head? How about that? That's a pretty big thing
00:28:02.560 that Trump had to deal with that Kamala didn't. How about multiple criminal trials?
00:28:09.560 How about almost getting shot a second time? And yet she's whining about, he didn't, he didn't have
00:28:15.820 to deal with this kind of thing. What kind of thing? The worst thing Kamala had to deal with is people
00:28:21.080 saying you're not doing interviews because she wasn't and she could just do the interviews and
00:28:26.580 that's how you get rid of it. That's the worst thing. That's the worst challenge she had to
00:28:29.780 overcome was that. Meanwhile, Trump's out there getting shot at and having people trying to throw
00:28:35.240 him in prison. And yet, uh, and yet you have the Kamala campaign, campaign whining about
00:28:41.520 the hardships they faced. Uh, it's no surprise this campaign was a disaster. If this is the people who,
00:28:49.260 who, uh, if these are the people who were running it, it's no surprise, but that wasn't even the
00:28:53.640 best part. The best part of the interview is when, uh, she would, they were asked about
00:28:57.580 Joe Rogan. Why didn't you do, it's been a lot of speculation. Why didn't you do Joe Rogan? And
00:29:03.480 here's the answer they gave. Stephanie, one of the, I'm believed to be the more tedious post-election
00:29:09.040 debates is about should Kamala Harris have gone on Rogan? Can you, can you just not to be tedious
00:29:16.360 about it? Could you talk a little bit about how close you came to doing it? Why it didn't happen?
00:29:21.120 Yeah. There's a lot of intrigue around this. Um, a lot of theories it's, it's pretty simple.
00:29:26.780 We wanted to do it. Um, it, you know, uh, I hate to repeat this over and over, but it was a very short
00:29:33.880 race with a limited number of days. And for a candidate to leave the battleground, to go to
00:29:41.960 Houston, um, which is a day off the playing field in the battleground. Um, you know, getting that
00:29:50.020 timing right, uh, is really important. So, um, we had discussions with Joe Rogan's team. They were
00:29:57.940 great. Uh, they wanted us to come on. We wanted to come on. We tried to get a date to, to make it
00:30:03.200 work. And ultimately we just weren't able to find a date. We did go to Houston. Um, and she gave a
00:30:09.660 great speech at a, an amazing event. Um, the Beyonce event. Yes. Well, I'm going to call it
00:30:15.300 reproductive freedom. Um, and, uh, because Texas is ground zero for the impact of these Trump
00:30:22.340 abortion bans. There's a story out today, in fact, of another young woman who lost her life because
00:30:27.100 of it. Um, and we were hoping to be able to fit it in around that. Um, and ultimately weren't able
00:30:34.040 to do it. As it turns out, that was the day that Trump was taping his Joe Rogan. Um, so, which they
00:30:40.300 had never confirmed to us. We kind of figured that out, um, uh, in the lead up to it, uh, you know,
00:30:46.960 she was ready, willing to, to go on Joe Rogan. Um, would it have changed anything? You know, it would
00:30:54.260 have been, uh, um, it would have broken through not because of the conversation with Joe Rogan,
00:30:59.520 but because the fact that she was doing it and that was really the benefit of it. Will she do it
00:31:04.860 sometime in the future? Maybe, who knows? Um, but, but it, uh, you know, didn't ultimately impact the
00:31:11.840 outcome one way or the other. Um, but she was, she, she was willing to, to do whatever it takes.
00:31:17.680 So there really isn't any good excuse for not doing, uh, Rogan, but of all the bad excuses,
00:31:23.780 I think they chose the worst one, uh, in that it's, I mean, what even is the excuse? It's, it's,
00:31:30.620 first of all, that they didn't want to take Kamala off the campaign trail for a day. Well, you know,
00:31:36.340 fortunately these things called planes exist. And so you could fly down to Austin in a couple of hours
00:31:44.040 and the interview is not actually 19 hours long. It's like two hours. If you even do a full length
00:31:49.800 interview with Rogan, um, and then you leave, he doesn't make you stay the night. You don't have
00:31:55.820 to, you know, you, so you could, you dedicate all of about five hours to this all told at most. And,
00:32:02.300 um, including travel, you still have 10 hours of campaigning you could do. And I'm leaving you
00:32:08.380 nine hours of sleep, sleep and relaxation. And that's, that's, that's a pretty, uh, relaxed,
00:32:15.020 you know, sort of, um, low key schedule to be on a campaign. So then I just fixed the schedule for
00:32:21.620 you. That that's how you figure it out a little late, unfortunately for you, but you could have
00:32:26.360 do it. You could have done it. And the fact is there is no good excuse because if you're being
00:32:32.880 granted access, if you're running a campaign and you're being granted access to a platform like that,
00:32:38.920 especially if it's a platform, not only a massive platform, but a platform, a massive platform that
00:32:44.340 gives you access to an audience that you don't normally have access to and to voters who you
00:32:51.500 need, um, then you drop everything and you do the interview. I mean, it's as simple as that.
00:32:58.500 This is no different from when I was promoting our film. Am I racist? I knew that, you know, we,
00:33:04.600 we, we of course wanted to go on Rogan show to talk about the movie. We would go down and do
00:33:09.900 Rogan show whenever any time. Look, just tell us the time you could tell us. Well, you're only
00:33:16.980 available at 2 a.m. on a Wednesday. I'll be there. It doesn't matter. Give me the time. I'll be there
00:33:21.540 because, uh, I recognize that we have this thing we want to tell people about. He's got this huge
00:33:30.120 platform. It's huge. Those, the, the largest and most powerful platform in all of media is what he has.
00:33:36.000 So you tell, you tell me and I will be, you set the, the, the, uh, guardrails here. You tell me
00:33:41.940 what, what we need to do and we'll be there. Um, and if you're running a presidential campaign,
00:33:49.140 well, you also have something to promote, which is your candidacy for presidents and
00:33:54.180 you should have the same attitude. There's no rally you could do that would be more powerful
00:34:00.400 for your campaign than a Joe Rogan interview. So that's what you would do unless, unless of course,
00:34:08.580 the real reason you didn't do the interview is that you didn't think she could handle it.
00:34:14.840 You didn't think she could handle it intellectually. Okay. So if that's the reason,
00:34:20.040 then it makes sense. And we all know that is the reason it's got nothing to do with scheduling. Oh,
00:34:24.040 we couldn't wait. We couldn't make it work. The most important opportunity that we've been given
00:34:28.400 the entire campaign where you're sitting there complaining. Oh, we only had 107, 107 days. Well,
00:34:33.320 so you don't have a lot of time. It would seem that you want to reach as many people as you
00:34:36.820 possibly can, as quickly as you can. Well, Joe Rogan interview, that's a great way to do that.
00:34:42.040 But you're going to turn it down. Oh no, sorry. We got, we got to do a rally in Ohio, uh, today.
00:34:47.420 So fortunately we can't, we can't make it, you know, we could, we could talk to, uh,
00:34:52.240 300 people at this rally, or we could talk to 30 million, you know,
00:34:59.000 doesn't make any sense from a scheduling. If as a scheduling excuse, it makes no sense. But if your
00:35:05.100 real reason is, yeah, well, she's just dumb and we don't think she can handle this.
00:35:09.320 She cannot handle a two hour conversation with a real human being that isn't scripted and who's
00:35:16.480 going to ask her real questions. She can't handle it. Uh, but they're not going to say that.
00:35:20.780 They all know that, but they're not going to say it, which unfortunately for them,
00:35:27.160 not that I feel sorry for them, but you've got whoever that was, Stephanie, uh, cutter.
00:35:34.720 She basically, as someone who's, you know, a campaign official, she has to basically fall on
00:35:41.440 the sword here because she's got to give this ridiculous answer. It makes her, if you take her
00:35:47.360 answer at face value, um, her and whoever else was talking, speaking there, it makes them look
00:35:54.940 totally incompetent. So that if you're a politician and you're going to, and you're launching your own
00:36:00.600 campaign for Senate or whatever president of 20, 28, you're not going to hire these people
00:36:06.340 because you listen to that answer. You go, but wait a second, you really, you didn't understand the
00:36:11.480 power of this kind of opportunity. And so you, you couldn't fit it in your schedule.
00:36:17.200 It makes you sound totally incompetent because you don't want to give the real reason, which is like,
00:36:22.400 look, we were saddled with an awful candidate who's very stupid and cannot speak. And so that was,
00:36:30.320 that's the reason we lost. That's the issue. That's why we couldn't do the interviews. That's
00:36:34.920 why we couldn't do Rogan. We always had to, we were trying to, Hey, listen, guys, we were trying
00:36:39.600 to figure out a way to get this woman into the white house, even though she's awful and terrible,
00:36:44.000 everybody hates her and she's very dumb. I mean, we, we, you should give us credit that she got
00:36:48.680 any votes at all. I mean, we're, we're geniuses that, that she only lost by the amount that she lost.
00:36:54.140 She lost all the swing States, but you know, the fact that she won any States at all is miraculous.
00:37:00.080 Um, I don't know if I was them, that's what I would be saying. Cause it's actually kind of true.
00:37:07.300 Not that they are, you know, great, uh, great at their jobs, but that's, they could be spinning it
00:37:16.000 that way. Um, but they feel like they can't cause they don't want to upset Kamala. And especially
00:37:22.820 cause Kamala is a, you know, a quote unquote woman of color. And so they don't want to be accused of
00:37:27.800 being sexist and racist themselves. And so now they got to kind of fall on the sword
00:37:32.520 and present themselves as totally incompetent, implicitly taking the blame, uh, for a loss
00:37:39.440 that really does just come down to the fact that Kamala Harris was an awful, really, really terrible
00:37:45.100 candidate. I mean, easily the weakest major party presidential candidate in American history.
00:37:53.020 I mean, there's, there's not even any competition for that title. Um, all right,
00:38:01.300 here's the headline from the daily mail backlash against Miss universe as viral video shows her
00:38:06.940 using N word. So this is the next big controversy. Uh, the woman who was just crowned Miss universe
00:38:12.220 was using, using quote unquote, the N word, the mystical word, the magical, the magical incantation,
00:38:18.520 the combination of two syllables that cannot be uttered under any circumstance in any context,
00:38:24.240 unless you have darker skin, in which case you can use it 50 times per sentence and it's okay.
00:38:29.360 So she used that word supposedly, that's the headline. Um, and before we get into the article,
00:38:35.300 you know, it did feel kind of inevitable that there would be some kind of backlash,
00:38:38.360 some kind of controversy surrounding this woman because she is after all an actual woman,
00:38:45.300 a blonde haired, you know, a white blonde woman just won a beauty pageant. And that's pretty
00:38:51.580 controversial these days because she wasn't trans, not morbidly obese, um, not a quote unquote
00:38:57.720 diverse person, just a blonde woman. You know, the kind of women who are like winning all the beauty
00:39:03.200 pageants for forever, uh, until recently she won one of them. And that's a big problem. That's,
00:39:09.980 that's not okay. So it, it, you kind of knew that they had to find some reason to go after this person.
00:39:15.300 And, uh, they found it. Let's read the article. Newly crowned Miss Universe, Victoria Thielvig
00:39:22.220 is, uh, facing intense criticism after a TikTok video showed her using a racial slur. Thielvig
00:39:28.280 representing Denmark won the 73rd Miss Universe title on November 16th in Mexico City, where she
00:39:33.460 competed against 120 other beauty pageant hopefuls. Her selection as the winner was seen as a victory
00:39:37.800 for the anti-woke after the 2023 competition featured married plus-sized and
00:39:42.020 transgender contestants. Why is married getting thrown in there? You know, that woke 2023 competition
00:39:52.400 that had plus-sized trans and married contestants. Married's not a problem. Let's be clear. That's
00:39:57.480 not, that's great. Um, the other two though, for a beauty pageant, that's where you run into the
00:40:02.320 issues. Anyway, in the video posted from the empire, but you know what? I'm not even going to
00:40:08.540 read this. Let's just play the video. Okay. Um, and then it has some of the comments from people.
00:40:13.900 Well, we'll, okay. So here's some of the comments. Uh, I won't describe the videos. We'll just play it,
00:40:19.360 but skipping ahead. Uh, one disgusted user said, runner up, you're up. This one is done.
00:40:25.880 Talking about the beauty pageant saying she's done because of this shocking video where she uses the
00:40:29.760 n-word supposedly. Uh, another commenter said in that crown at that OMG, someone else says on TikTok,
00:40:39.700 I feel like she, she needs to be decrowned and apology is not enough. Um, and so on and so on.
00:40:47.360 So people are very upset at this video where she quote unquote uses the n-word saying she's had the
00:40:51.340 crown taken away. She needs to be fired. Um, let's just go ahead and play the clip of this, uh,
00:40:58.440 horrifying, controversial incident. Here it is.
00:41:12.700 Okay. So that's it. And if you're listening to the audio podcast and you're confused, she's, um,
00:41:16.780 standing, um, she's in New York looking out over the skyline and she's lip syncing the words
00:41:24.720 to that Jay-Z song. And it's, it's bleeped out, but he says the n-word in the song as,
00:41:30.480 as rappers are known to do. She's lip syncing. She's not even singing. You can't hear that.
00:41:36.020 That's that was what you just heard there. That's not her. That's not miss. That's not
00:41:39.420 miss universe. Miss Stielvig from Denmark. That was Jay-Z that you heard there. And then Alicia Keys,
00:41:45.740 I think that's not her. So she's, she's a lip syncing along to the song.
00:41:51.640 Um, and the song features the n-word. And so that is when you see the headline that she used the n-word,
00:41:58.580 that's what they mean. Doesn't even say the word. Doesn't audibly say it. She mouths it. She lip
00:42:04.220 syncs it. Maybe. It's not even clear if she did that. I don't even know if she lip synced. She might
00:42:08.440 have actually skipped. Even in the lip sync, it looked to me like even when she was lip syncing,
00:42:12.840 she didn't move her mouth for that part. Uh, but let's just assume she did. She lip synced the word
00:42:20.020 while lip syncing a Jay-Z song. And this becomes a source of outrage.
00:42:26.640 There are multiple headlines in major news publications because a beauty pageant winner
00:42:30.380 was lip syncing to a Jay-Z song on TikTok. That's, that's where we are. So is this the rule now?
00:42:39.280 You can't say the word if you're white. You also can't even vaguely move your mouth
00:42:43.600 in the shape of saying the word, even if you're not actually saying it.
00:42:49.500 I mean, at this point, maybe we should say like, are white people even, even allowed to hear the
00:42:53.240 word? Maybe it's offensive for a white person to, to be in the vicinity where someone is saying it
00:42:58.500 just, just from hearing it. If someone else says it and a white person is there, the white person
00:43:04.500 should be condemned as though they said it because they were there and they were like,
00:43:09.500 they were in some way experiencing the word. And that is, that's too far.
00:43:15.320 You can't say it. You can't lip sync it. You can't hear it. You can't think it.
00:43:19.080 You can't talk about it. Not this word, the word, the word of all words, this ineffable,
00:43:27.460 magical, mystical, uh, uh, other worldly supernatural word. Now this is obviously ridiculous. I don't have
00:43:36.740 to explain why I have plenty of times in the past. The idea that a white person can't even lip sync
00:43:40.720 a popular song. The idea that a white person isn't supposed to even, you know, sing along audibly to
00:43:45.620 a song that was, or, or inaudibly to a song that was all over the radio for years. All of that is
00:43:51.040 ridiculous. The idea that any word, any word at all is offensive, regardless of context is also
00:43:57.380 ridiculous. Every single word that's ever been invented in this language or any other can only be
00:44:02.420 judged in the context in which it's used, uh, to say that a word cannot be used in any context, even
00:44:09.120 simply in the context of referring to it and talking about it is to give that word actual magical
00:44:15.420 powers. It is to say that the combination of letters and syllables themselves somehow have some kind of
00:44:23.060 power. There's something inherently evil about the sounds themselves. And, um, like we're living in some
00:44:31.000 sort of horror movie where, you know, the kid finds the, the, the, the book of spells in the attic and
00:44:37.560 dust it off and says some, says some word. And next thing you know, it awakens an evil ancient ghost
00:44:45.540 from 10,000 years ago. Um, that's how this word is treated. And unless you're black, in which case
00:44:51.660 you did just say the word all you want. It has no power at all. So all of that is ridiculous. I think
00:44:55.560 most of us understand that I do want to make another point, which is that this hyper focus
00:45:02.000 on this word, turning it into the taboo of all taboos, uh, giving it more power than any word has
00:45:08.120 ever had in any language ever. Um, and I, I don't think that's an exaggeration because I can't think
00:45:15.320 of any other word. I can't think of a precedent for this where there's, there's any word that
00:45:22.420 cannot be spoken in any context, uh, written, you know, mouth lip sync. Like I, I don't know
00:45:34.140 there's ever been a word like that. So when you do that, there's eventually you get a very predictable
00:45:44.360 backlash and suddenly people start using the word way more often than they would have otherwise,
00:45:49.200 because you turned it into this Uber taboo. That's the way this always goes. I mean,
00:45:55.040 look at what happened. Look at what's happened with the words gay and retarded. Okay. Now, when I was a
00:45:59.960 kid, those were two of the most common words in our lexicon. I'll admit, I mean, they were just,
00:46:04.800 they were almost like verbal crutches. If you grew up in the like late nineties and early two thousands
00:46:10.340 era, it was just, they were used all the time. It was, and they weren't slurs like gay didn't
00:46:18.060 necessarily refer to anything related to homosexuality. Retarded didn't necessarily
00:46:22.200 refer to somebody who was actually mentally disabled. They just, they took on much broader
00:46:26.360 meanings, like very, to the point of like not meaning anything anymore. But then the PC sensors
00:46:31.420 and the woke scolds got to work and they gave these words almost as much power as the N word,
00:46:37.660 like almost, um, for a long time, you know, you started to hear about the R word. Like you can't
00:46:43.640 even say the word when referring to it. And that seemed to work for a time. Like it seemed like
00:46:49.780 for about 15 to 20 years from right around when I graduated high school to a couple of years ago,
00:46:54.780 these words were almost entirely eradicated. Like nobody was using them, but then the backlash came
00:47:01.160 because the, the, the scolds and the, you know, the, the sensors, like they didn't, they didn't let
00:47:06.220 up. They kept putting such emphasis on the word and the backlash comes. And now you have this new
00:47:11.420 generation of kids who became enthralled with those words yet again, precisely because they
00:47:16.880 were told they can't say them. You know, you get these new generation of kids. They're like,
00:47:21.180 Oh, what do you mean? What's so, what's the big deal with these words? Why can't we say these words
00:47:25.520 or just words? And when you say that to kids, especially to young, to, to like boys, they go,
00:47:31.100 okay, well, these are words we need to say a lot. I mean, these are, these are awesome words.
00:47:35.060 Apparently like I show me the words that I absolutely cannot say under any circumstance. And those are
00:47:39.940 the words that I want to say. Now it's like hilarious to say those words. That's, you know,
00:47:43.960 that's, that's the way it works. And suddenly now we're like, it's, we're right back where we were
00:47:47.580 in 1997 or something. And, um, kids are using those two words, gay and retarded constantly.
00:47:53.900 And it seems that something similar is probably happening with the N word, just from what I could
00:47:57.540 see in kind of internet culture. Um, that word seems to be gaining popularity in the same way that
00:48:02.600 the other two are, you know, I imagine that if you went to a public middle school or high school,
00:48:07.160 um, I don't know, I haven't been to one since I graduated, but you probably find that the same
00:48:13.260 thing is starting to happen there. If it's not happening yet, it will, because this is natural.
00:48:17.320 This is what happens when, when you scream in people's faces and you say, don't say this,
00:48:21.660 not this, you must never say this. You must never ever say this. You cannot say this, this word,
00:48:26.800 not this word of all. You can't, you can, you, you can't even whisper it. Don't even, don't even,
00:48:33.540 when you hear it run from the room screaming, when you do that, um, all you do is you make
00:48:39.780 the words enticing, especially again, to younger people, especially to young men in particular.
00:48:44.020 Uh, it, it, you've, you've just made it very easy to like turn something funny because all
00:48:49.900 you have to do is just use that word. And now it's all, it's automatically funny because it's so taboo.
00:48:53.620 And, um, so this is all very predictable. All right. Finally, before we get to daily cancellation,
00:49:00.860 I, I, I can't, we can't get into the, um, Thanksgiving holiday without, without me mentioning
00:49:06.820 this and just a story I wanted to share with you for no particular reason. There's no reason I'm
00:49:11.760 talking about this, so don't read too much into it. I just thought it was interesting. Just an
00:49:15.260 interesting tidbit that I saw it. And I said, Hmm, that's probably passed that along. We go ahead and
00:49:22.380 pass that along to the, to the old audience. So this is from the New York post. The bird flu virus
00:49:28.360 was detected in retail samples of raw milk from a California based dairy farm. As cases continue to
00:49:34.620 rise across the state, according to healthful health officials, the contaminated sample came
00:49:39.560 from the Fresno based raw farm, the largest producer and retailer of raw dairy in California.
00:49:45.200 The tainted sample was detected by officials from the Santa Clara County public health office,
00:49:49.340 which has been testing raw milk already placed in retail stores across the state as a second line
00:49:54.660 of consumer protection. Uh, apparently, so they, they found bird flu in this, in this raw milk. They
00:50:01.080 also have, um, this farm, according to this has also been traced back. Uh, there's been outbreaks of,
00:50:08.180 um, of other things. Uh, I'm trying to find that in here. Uh, E. Coli. Um, so there was a recall
00:50:18.000 in raw cheddar cheese because of E. Coli. So anyway, bird flu in the raw milk. That's fascinating.
00:50:26.640 I don't, you know, it's, that's interesting. Hmm. Who could have, could have ever predicted that?
00:50:33.160 I mean, that's, you know, I, I wasn't there, wasn't there someone I'm trying to remember. Wasn't there
00:50:37.740 someone who was it who recently made a point about how raw milk is unsanitary. And then they got
00:50:46.600 dogpiled by like 50 million angry raw milk hippies on the internet. Who didn't that happen? Who was
00:50:51.820 that? What was that guy's name? I can't, I can't remember. I just know, I don't know who that guy
00:50:56.500 was. I just, I vague, I vaguely remember somebody saying raw milk is gross and you should probably
00:51:03.800 sanitize it. Like there's no reason why you can't. All you're doing is just, it's no different than
00:51:09.020 boiling water you take out of a stream. There's no reason to make this into an ideological thing.
00:51:13.680 Like it's evil somehow. Is it evil to sanitize your water? Wasn't there someone saying that?
00:51:18.860 I don't know. I just, he's like this guy who's constantly vindicated all the time,
00:51:23.140 especially with his takes that the internet judges to be the most outrageous.
00:51:29.420 And he's like, just always right about that stuff. It turns out, I don't know. Can't,
00:51:33.580 I can't remember who that guy was. I just, he had a, you know, he had, he had a great beard.
00:51:37.500 I remember that. It's like almost a majestic, almost a majestic beard. He was a striking good
00:51:42.240 looks. If I may say, I, I, I remember thinking that too about that guy. Anyway, that guy seems
00:51:48.000 to be totally right. Um, what do you know? And so just something to keep in mind when you're
00:51:53.360 going to Thanksgiving. Uh, and if somebody serves you milk, I don't know why you'd be drinking milk
00:51:57.560 in the first place if you're over the age of seven, but certainly not at Thanksgiving. But if
00:52:01.700 somebody does serve you milk, you might want to ask, is this regular milk or is this the bird flu
00:52:08.300 kind? Uh, you might want to just ask that just to be safe. Attention parents. I've got an early
00:52:13.340 holiday gift for you. We've all been there. One minute, your kiddo is bouncing off the walls.
00:52:17.480 An hour later, they're super sick. You can't help but feel helpless. You can turn your plans upside
00:52:22.640 down, especially if you're on vacation. After thousands of customer requests, the wellness
00:52:26.620 company has just launched the kids medical emergency kit. You no longer have to deal with
00:52:31.160 emergency illnesses and panic mode. Now you can have six critical medications at your fingertips
00:52:35.700 to treat 20 plus illnesses for issues like strep throat, ear infections, lice, respiratory illnesses.
00:52:41.400 You can avoid urgent care and hospitals at the same time. The kids emergency kit has been hand
00:52:45.240 selected by the wellness company's medical board and includes chewable amoxicillin, dissolvable
00:52:49.040 ivermectin and optional EpiPen, uh, and also more. This includes a detailed guidebook guiding you
00:52:54.860 step-by-step in emergencies. Ordering this kit is simple. Only parents can order for their children.
00:52:59.760 Fill out an intake form and you'll get a verification call for consent. Then it's
00:53:04.000 delivered to your door. It's that simple. Don't wait until you're in the middle of the crisis and
00:53:07.560 avoid the late night urgent care runs. Also order your kids emergency kit today, remove panic from
00:53:12.320 your life. And if, uh, one or two of the scripts run out, there's a replenishment option to restock
00:53:17.500 only when you need. Go to urgent care kit.com slash Walsh. Use promo code Walsh to save $45
00:53:23.120 plus free shipping. That's urgent care kit.com slash Walsh promo code Walsh. These kits are only
00:53:29.240 available in the USA. Our daily wire plus black Friday sale is alive. Get 50% off new annual
00:53:35.080 memberships right now. Normally this is where I share a code, but not today. No code needed. Just
00:53:40.160 head to dailywire.com slash black Friday. You can claim your new daily wire plus membership for 50%
00:53:46.600 off with daily wire. Plus you get it all uncensored daily shows with limited ads, live breaking news.
00:53:52.000 You can trust premium entertainment, reshaping culture from the decades. Number one documentary
00:53:56.600 and my racist to exclusive series and hit movies. Daily wire plus offers it all and more. Your support
00:54:02.020 makes this fight possible. Don't wait. Join the fight. Save 50% today. Daily wire.com slash black
00:54:08.640 Friday. Now let's get to our daily cancellation. It's been a couple of weeks since the election,
00:54:19.020 so it seems like a good time to check in on all those celebrities who said they'd flee the United
00:54:23.220 States if Donald Trump defeated Kamala Harris. That's a list that includes Barbra Streisand,
00:54:28.140 who said that she wouldn't be able to, quote, live in this country if he becomes president.
00:54:32.020 Said she'd probably move to England. Then there was Cher, who vowed all the way back in 2016 that
00:54:37.480 she'd leave the planet if Trump defeated Hillary Clinton. She apparently decided on reflection that
00:54:42.220 she would simply start presenting as an alien instead of joining them among the stars. But last
00:54:47.620 year, Cher was back with another threat, quote, I almost got an ulcer the last time. If he gets in,
00:54:52.240 who knows? This time I'll leave the country, she said. Not to be outdone, Sharon Stone echoed that
00:54:57.360 same rhetoric. She said that if Trump won, she'd move overseas, quote, I'm certainly considering a
00:55:02.260 house in Italy, she said. Now, so far, as best I can tell, none of these celebrities have actually
00:55:06.920 done what they said they were going to do. They haven't fled the U.S. in the wake of Kamala
00:55:10.720 Harris's crushing defeat. The same is true for all the celebrities who claim that Donald Trump would
00:55:14.540 ensure that America never holds a democratic election in the future. We can only conclude
00:55:19.520 that they're either fine with fascism or they never meant anything they said. Though, to be fair,
00:55:25.440 it's also possible that all those celebrities I mentioned, you know, at the top did leave the country.
00:55:30.340 There's no way for us to know. It's been like 35 years since any of them have been remotely
00:55:34.440 relevant anyway. But in any case, to her credit, Sharon Stone has at least been spending some time
00:55:41.180 in Italy in the wake of the election. So that's something. And the other day, in fact, Sharon
00:55:44.940 Stone spoke at the Torino Film Festival. After receiving some kind of award, she proceeded to explain
00:55:51.520 the real reason that Kamala Harris lost to Trump. Now, according to Sharon Stone, Americans are ignorant
00:55:57.560 and stupid. Unlike Sharon Stone, who, believe it or not, has a reported IQ of 154. That's an actual
00:56:05.840 statistic that Sharon Stone apparently told CBS News at some point. And if CBS News is taking self-reported
00:56:11.440 IQ data and putting it into news articles, then I would like to announce to CBS News that I have an IQ
00:56:16.500 of 207, which is a claim that is at least as plausible as Sharon Stone's 154. So with that stratospheric
00:56:24.560 self-professed IQ in mind, here is what Sharon Stone says when she's explaining what all you dumb
00:56:30.680 people need to do in order to be more like Sharon Stone.
00:56:34.100 My country is in its adolescence. Adolescence is very arrogant. Adolescence thinks it knows
00:56:44.740 everything. Adolescence is naive and ignorant and arrogant. And we are in our ignorant, arrogant
00:56:53.680 adolescence. We haven't seen this before in our country. So Americans who don't travel, who
00:57:04.080 80% don't have a passport, who are uneducated, are in their extraordinary naivete. Now we can't
00:57:14.080 just say that women should help women because that's the only way we have survived so far.
00:57:20.080 We must say that good men must help good men. And those good men must be very aware that a lot
00:57:33.080 of your friends are not good men. And you can't continue to pretend that your friends are good men
00:57:43.080 when they are not good men. And you must be very clear-minded and understand that your friends who are not good men are dangerous, violent men. And you have to keep them away from your daughters, your wives, and your girlfriends. Because this is the time when we know can no longer look away when bad
00:58:11.080 look away when bad men are bad.
00:58:17.080 Bad men are bad, Sharon Stone says. And then the audience erupts in applause. You can't beat it. Armed with her 154 IQ, somehow Sharon Stone is only capable of speaking like a toddler. And the film circuit in Torino just eats it up, of course. Apparently, these people buy her claim that until this very point in history, men have not judged the character traits of other men. Just not something that's ever happened. Women have been doing that. And that's how we have a functioning civilization, according to Sharon Stone. But men have never stopped and used their brains to decide who their friends should be.
00:58:46.080 Men just move in packs, I guess. They go out at dusk and hunt animals and collect firewood without any regard for whether their pack mates are good men. And now, at last, Sharon Stone tells us that change is necessary. Men have to get real serious about disowning all of their friends who don't vote the way Sharon Stone wants. Because, you know, they're dangerous and evil and so on.
00:59:07.080 If your buddy voted for Trump, then you have no choice. You have to keep him away from your family as if he's a rabid raccoon. If you voted for Trump, then I guess you have to also stay away from other people.
00:59:18.580 It may sound a little harsh, but according to 154 IQ Sharon Stone, it's a necessary sacrifice that you'll just have to make. And to prove her point, 154 IQ Sharon Stone dropped the single most obviously fake statistic that's ever been dropped in the history of fake statistics.
00:59:33.580 This is one you don't even need to Google to verify that it's completely and totally made up. Watch.
00:59:37.760 Watching a comedian the other night, and he said, I asked a woman to dinner, and she said yes. And it was such a brave thing for her to do. Because the only real thing, the number one killer of women in the world today, is men. For men, the number one killer is heart disease.
01:00:07.760 The number one killer for women is men. It is very important to remember that, men. It's very important to remember that. Thank you.
01:00:23.580 Well, we're definitely going to remember that statistic. It's going to be hard to forget it because it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
01:00:30.500 She's saying that the leading cause of death among women isn't natural causes. It's not heart disease or cancer or anything. It's men who are killing women.
01:00:38.880 Now, in order to believe that that's true, you'd have to be basically completely and totally enumerate. There's just no way around it.
01:00:45.800 You need to have no common sense or capacity to engage in basic logic. You'd also have to have no understanding of crime statistics, which show that men overwhelmingly tend to kill other men, as you'd expect.
01:01:00.120 But just in case you needed verification, here's the CDC, for example.
01:01:03.740 In other words, the top cause of death among women is the same as the top cause among men.
01:01:19.840 And by the way, it's not like men are the number two cause of death among women.
01:01:23.560 The number two cause of death is cancer.
01:01:25.140 Then there's accidents, respiratory disease, Alzheimer's, diabetes, kidney disease, liver disease, and on and on.
01:01:31.440 Murder by men doesn't even make the list.
01:01:34.760 But I'm picking on poor Sharon Stone a bit too much here.
01:01:38.500 Elsewhere at the same festival, Alec Baldwin spoke to reporters.
01:01:42.000 And while he was there, just like Sharon Stone, he also called Americans stupid and ignorant.
01:01:46.800 But then he went further.
01:01:48.100 He explained that an information gap is the reason Kamala Harris lost the election.
01:01:51.900 And then he announced a solution.
01:01:53.160 This is somehow an even more incredible clip than the one we just played.
01:01:56.940 Watch.
01:01:58.160 In my country, without going into significant detail, half the people in the country are happy and half the people in the country are very unhappy.
01:02:10.940 It's a very difficult time in the United States.
01:02:13.460 But there's a hole.
01:02:14.720 There's a vacuum.
01:02:16.780 There is a gap, if you will, in information for Americans.
01:02:23.160 Americans are very uninformed about reality, what's really going on.
01:02:27.580 With climate change, Ukraine, you name it, all the biggest topics in the world, Americans have an appetite for a little bit of information.
01:02:36.440 That vacuum is filled by the film industry, not just the independent film industry, not just the documentary film industry, which are very important around the world.
01:02:46.800 But by narrative films as well, where the filmmakers and the buyers, the studios and the networks and the streamers are willing to go that way.
01:02:58.360 And they're willing to try to make films that are not only entertaining, but informative as well.
01:03:04.400 So I think right now is probably one of the most significant times in our history.
01:03:09.960 And since film began, since the film experience began, it became an art form, it became a business, a huge business.
01:03:17.960 Because now is probably one of the most important times in our history for us to make films that will teach people about what reality is around the world.
01:03:30.540 Normally a big advocate of the Second Amendment, but I do hope that there were metal detectors at this event.
01:03:36.460 I'm going to make sure Alec Baldwin wasn't armed, because we know how that can turn out.
01:03:40.980 Now, yes, the film industry is going to educate all these dumb Americans who don't respect the political insights of Alec Baldwin, Alec Baldwin says.
01:03:48.280 People are going to flock to movie theaters and Netflix to figure out who they should vote for.
01:03:52.520 They're going to watch Yellowstone, and then they're going to decide that it actually makes sense to castrate children and open the border and all the rest of it.
01:03:58.040 That's the idea.
01:03:59.280 Who needs social media platforms like X or any news sources whatsoever when you have the film industry?
01:04:03.800 All these celebrity tantrums remind me of that infamous quote from Michelle Obama from February of 2008.
01:04:08.880 We all probably remember this.
01:04:11.340 She said she was finally proud of her country for the first time in her life when Barack Obama's presidential bid started to take off.
01:04:18.080 Watch.
01:04:19.340 For the first time in my adult lifetime, I'm really proud of my country.
01:04:25.320 And not just because Barack has done well, but because I think people are hungry for change.
01:04:33.700 This really sums up how these leftist elites see this country and our people.
01:04:38.020 We are good when we do what they want and bad when we don't.
01:04:42.500 I mean, it's really as simple as that.
01:04:43.760 For all the moralizing and lecturing these people do and for all their insistence that Americans are uneducated because they don't travel to Italy to collect useless awards, that's what it comes down to.
01:04:53.060 They demand compliance.
01:04:54.420 And when they don't get it, they feel compelled to complain to the point that they may complete and utter fools of themselves.
01:04:59.540 That's what just happened in Italy.
01:05:02.020 And that is why Sharon Stone, Alec Baldwin, and all the other vapid celebrities who are going overseas to scold Americans for supporting Donald Trump are today canceled.
01:05:12.620 That'll do it for the show today and this week as we take a break for Thanksgiving.
01:05:17.180 Have a blessed Thanksgiving and we'll talk to you next week.
01:05:21.160 Godspeed.
01:05:21.580 Remember when Christmas was Christmas and razors were just razors?
01:05:31.640 While the progressive Grinches running woke corporations are tearing down traditions, Jeremy's Razors is here to help you save them.
01:05:37.740 Black Friday deals are now live.
01:05:39.760 Save 30% stocking stuffers under $15.
01:05:43.540 Shave hair and body bundles under $50.
01:05:46.060 Plus, get free shipping on qualifying orders.
01:05:48.080 Keep Christmas woke free.
01:05:49.960 Order now at jeremysrazors.com.
01:05:52.720 See website for details.