The Matt Walsh Show - January 28, 2025


Ep. 1524 - Selena Gomez Should Deport Herself In Solidarity With 'Her People'


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 4 minutes

Words per Minute

167.04672

Word Count

10,744

Sentence Count

727

Misogynist Sentences

25

Hate Speech Sentences

41


Summary

Hollywood celebrities are openly weeping over Trump s immigration enforcement. Meanwhile, Trump is more popular than he s ever been in his political career. That tells you pretty much everything you need to know. Also, Trump again floats the possibility of abolishing the income tax. And New York Magazine tries to slander young right-wing Trump supporters.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Today on the Matt Walsh Show, Hollywood celebrities are openly weeping over Trump's immigration
00:00:03.800 enforcement. Meanwhile, Trump is more popular than he's ever been in his political career.
00:00:07.540 That tells you pretty much everything you need to know. Also, Trump again floats the
00:00:10.400 possibility of abolishing the income tax. I'll explain why that would instantly make
00:00:13.860 him at least the second greatest president in U.S. history. And New York Magazine tries
00:00:17.860 to slander young right-wing Trump supporters, but instead accidentally makes them seem cool
00:00:22.220 as hell. And in our daily cancellation, I'm afraid I must cancel a certain prominent Republican
00:00:27.120 Congresswoman. She's left me no choice. All of that and more today on the Matt Walsh Show.
00:00:31.140 Did you know that 80% of resolutions fail by February? Well,
00:00:59.780 this year can be different because I've discovered something that transformed my approach to health.
00:01:04.400 It's called Lumen, the world's first handheld metabolic coach. Now, here's what makes Lumen
00:01:08.880 special. It measures your metabolism through your breath, showing you whether you're burning
00:01:13.340 fats or carbs. Every morning, I take a quick breath into my Lumen, and it gives me personalized
00:01:17.320 nutrition recommendations for the day. I can even check before and after workouts to optimize my
00:01:21.820 fitness routine and make sure I'm staying on track for my 2025 goals. Your metabolism,
00:01:25.780 it's like your body's engine. It's central to everything from energy levels to sleep quality.
00:01:30.180 What I love about Lumen is how it adapts to your body's needs because your metabolism is at the
00:01:34.120 center of everything your body does. Optimal metabolic health translates to a bunch of benefits,
00:01:38.880 including easier weight management, improved energy levels, better fitness results, better sleep,
00:01:43.340 et cetera. And who doesn't want that? Well, the best part, Lumen provides clear insights and
00:01:47.640 guidance to help you make informed decisions about your health. It's not about quick fixes. It's about
00:01:51.720 understanding your body and making sustainable changes. Take the next step to improve your
00:01:55.900 health. Go to lumen.me slash Walsh to get 20% off your Lumen. That's L-U-M-E-N dot me slash Walsh
00:02:03.340 for 20% off your purchase. Thank you, Lumen, for sponsoring this episode.
00:02:07.980 Just over a week into Donald Trump's second term in office, it has to be said that Kamala Harris's
00:02:12.300 talking points from the presidential campaign are not exactly aging well. You might remember that
00:02:17.000 one of Kamala's taglines during the campaign was, Donald Trump has an enemies list. I have a to-do
00:02:23.080 list. And the line was supposed to conjure up a contrast in voters' minds, a contrast between
00:02:27.620 a president who gets rid of his enemies and a president who actually gets things done.
00:02:31.680 But it turns out that Kamala's campaign misunderstood that those two things are
00:02:35.760 not mutually exclusive. A president can indeed punish the enemies of civilization and also
00:02:40.420 get a lot of other stuff done at the same time. And that's exactly what Trump
00:02:44.080 has accomplished so far by all accounts. Now, to be clear, I'm not bringing this up to trash Kamala
00:02:48.920 Harris, who isn't worth thinking about anymore, much less talking about. But as dumb as her campaign
00:02:54.560 slogan was, it's clear that many Democrats thought it made sense. And now that Trump is actually in
00:02:59.060 office, they have no idea what to make of it. They can't comprehend the fact that Trump is destroying
00:03:04.820 America's enemies while advancing American interests, and that voters are responding very favorably
00:03:10.680 to his new administration as a result. So here, for example, was the scene the other day on CNN
00:03:15.120 when the anchor realizes, to her shock and horror, that Trump is now far more popular today than he
00:03:22.520 ever was during his first term. Watch.
00:03:25.400 Take me back in history.
00:03:26.900 Take you back in history.
00:03:28.300 So it was so interesting to me that Donald Trump's first net approval rating of his second term is higher
00:03:33.200 than his entire first term. And I was interested, has that ever happened? Has the second term net approval
00:03:38.420 rating in the first month? Have you ever had a higher rating than any net approval rating during
00:03:42.840 the entire first term? Donald Trump is the only...
00:03:45.060 I have a really hard time believing this.
00:03:46.500 This is 100% true. I went back. I love spreadsheets. Donald Trump's is the first guy ever whose net
00:03:52.560 approval rating in the first month of his second term is higher than any rating that he had is an
00:03:57.020 entire first term, Kate Baldwin. This is true. I don't make stuff up. The numbers are the numbers.
00:04:02.460 So once again, there's the screen guy circling and underlining things for no reason. You don't
00:04:08.580 need to underline the words on the screen. I mean, they're already typed in giant bold letters. We
00:04:12.380 can see them. But anyway, more to the point, the audible gasp from the CNN anchor is a clue that
00:04:19.500 nobody at CNN has any idea how this is happening. How can Trump possibly have a higher approval rating
00:04:25.640 after all of his felony convictions and all the attacks and the most well-funded and consistently
00:04:31.480 sustained smear campaign against a single individual person in the history of American
00:04:36.760 politics? How is that possible? Well, it begins to make sense when you realize that the agenda
00:04:41.380 Trump is aggressively pushing through in his first two weeks in office is not or need not be
00:04:47.200 partisan or ideological. His executive orders and other actions aren't necessarily conservative at
00:04:53.740 all, much less right wing. Instead, Trump is advancing something called common sense. Now,
00:04:59.460 common sense has become right wing by default, but it's still common sense. And it happens to appeal
00:05:04.480 to a lot of Americans, regardless of whether they describe themselves as liberal or conservative.
00:05:09.580 Most Americans agree, for example, that people with serious mental illnesses should not serve in
00:05:14.840 the armed forces. That's an intuitive concept that doesn't need any explanation. Until around 10 years
00:05:20.100 ago, even Democrats would not object to that. So when Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced
00:05:25.560 that trans-identifying individuals would be banned from serving or enlisting the military, as they did
00:05:29.760 the other day, makes a lot of sense to most people. As the White House put it, quote, unit cohesion
00:05:34.460 requires high levels of integrity and stability among service members. And because trans-identifying
00:05:40.060 people don't meet those requirements, they can't serve. Period. End of discussion. It's pretty simple.
00:05:46.280 In just the past few days, the Trump administration has announced a variety of straightforward
00:05:49.380 executive orders like this. And every single one of them comes across as a reasonable solution
00:05:54.700 that normal people would support. So Trump is also getting rid of DEI in the military and all across
00:06:00.720 the federal government. But in the military in particular, the theory is that America's military
00:06:06.460 shouldn't be concerned with quotas or diversity hiring. They should focus instead on one goal,
00:06:13.520 which is fighting America's enemies as effectively as they possibly can. Kill the bad guys. That's your
00:06:19.360 whole job in the military. And again, this is basic stuff. Until 15 seconds ago, it wouldn't even be
00:06:24.920 considered controversial. And also, common sense. One by one. That's what these orders amount to.
00:06:33.300 There's also Trump's planned order of creating an Iron Dome-style missile defense system to protect
00:06:37.920 the United States. We've been funding Israel's Iron Dome for many years now, but we don't have a
00:06:42.040 comparable system here, even though, as recent events make clear, American cities apparently face a
00:06:46.680 variety of imminent short-range threats. We just had a swarm of mysterious drones appear off the East
00:06:51.720 Coast out of nowhere. Never got any explanation. A member of Congress suggested that Iranian ships
00:06:56.500 might be launching them. Who knows? But either way, why shouldn't America's major cities have some
00:07:01.840 kind of protection against threats like that? Once again, simple question. And now the second Trump
00:07:08.940 administration is answering it. Along the same lines, Americans have made it abundantly clear that they
00:07:13.280 don't want millions of illegal aliens in this country. No matter how much the corporate press
00:07:17.980 pretends that they enrich our communities, no serious person thought that the status quo was
00:07:24.340 acceptable, especially as the bodies of innocent men, women, and children began piling up. And so now,
00:07:29.460 as a result, the status quo was changing. The other day, Fox reported that the Del Rio sector of the border
00:07:33.980 has gone from 4,000 illegal crossings per day back in 2023 to just 60 illegal crossings yesterday.
00:07:41.660 So these are actual results. And they're taking place very quickly.
00:07:47.000 Now, for self-appointed members of the elite, particularly in Hollywood, this has been a very
00:07:52.600 difficult series of events to grasp and internalize. They can't muster any kind of rational argument
00:07:59.080 against what the Trump administration is doing. They're stunned by how effective he's been and how
00:08:05.060 popular he is now because of it. And they know that there's no logic behind DEI or open borders or
00:08:10.520 letting criminals off the hook with no consequences. So instead of presenting any kind of cogent
00:08:15.240 argument, they're just melting down. And there's maybe no greater example of this phenomenon than the
00:08:20.500 performance that actress and singer Selena Gomez just put on. She uploaded this video to her Instagram
00:08:26.880 with a caption of, I'm sorry, accompanied by a Mexican flag emoji. And here's what the video,
00:08:33.520 if you haven't seen it yet, looked like much.
00:08:38.240 I'm sorry. All my people are getting attacked. The children.
00:08:46.700 I don't understand. I'm so sorry. I wish I could do something, but I can't. I don't know what to do.
00:09:00.080 I'll try everything, I promise.
00:09:04.080 Now, first of all, before we even get into what she's saying, this is obviously an absurd example
00:09:13.960 of emotional manipulation. Anyone who records a video of herself crying and posted to the
00:09:20.220 internet should be disregarded and ignored automatically. I mean, it's one thing to cry
00:09:25.080 in public, which is a crime that is slightly less offensive when committed by women, though still
00:09:29.280 highly annoying. But it's another thing to film the spectacle yourself and then upload it.
00:09:35.820 So that's bad enough. But there's a more revealing moment that's actually worth talking about.
00:09:41.620 You'll notice that in Selena Gomez's theatrical crying video, she refers to, quote unquote,
00:09:47.040 my people. And she's complaining about the Trump administration deporting her people.
00:09:53.200 Now, if we take my people in the most literal sense, it would seem to indicate that Selena Gomez
00:09:57.840 is herself a criminal alien, considering that only criminal aliens are being deported.
00:10:02.500 In that case, obviously, Selena should be immediately placed on one of those C-17 cargo planes and sent
00:10:08.100 back to her homeland. She's confessed to her crimes, after all. Trump should deport her based on her
00:10:13.500 word alone. Better safe than sorry. Let her go be with her people. And then, of course, we should
00:10:19.460 convert Selena's many multi-million dollar mansions into emergency shelters to house all these
00:10:24.540 illegal migrants that she's weeping over. That would be the humane thing to do, after all.
00:10:29.640 But if we take the statement as she likely intended it, that her people are Hispanic migrants in general,
00:10:38.100 then it proves something else, which is that despite being born in this country, Selena Gomez
00:10:43.920 doesn't see herself as American. Her people are people from another country.
00:10:49.860 You know, it's difficult to imagine somebody like Selena ever using the phrase my people
00:10:55.260 to refer to Americans. That would never happen. It would be a nativist and xenophobic. You can't do
00:11:00.360 that. But Americans are never supposed to identify with each other in that way. So instead, a half
00:11:05.280 Mexican, half Italian billionaire celebrity from Texas identifies with Mexican illegal aliens, many of
00:11:12.120 whom don't even speak our language. And it goes to show how rampant immigration, both illegal and legal,
00:11:17.720 tears at the fabric of our culture and undermines our national identity. That's not the point that
00:11:22.860 Selena Gomez was trying to prove, but it's the point that she did prove. Now, here's the thing,
00:11:26.660 Selena. If you are American, then your people are Americans. And the fact that you do not see it that
00:11:34.320 way, that you do not identify with or feel any loyalty to the country that gave you everything and
00:11:40.220 made you who you are, just goes to show why Trump's border policies are necessary.
00:11:44.360 I mean, Selena, you never made a video hysterically crying when, for example,
00:11:50.020 North Carolina was ravaged by a hurricane and its citizens were left to drown.
00:11:55.060 You never wept over the suffering of your people who'd been abandoned by Joe Biden's government and
00:12:00.740 left to die. That's because you don't see white people in North Carolina as your people.
00:12:06.820 And that's the problem. So immigration enforcement is not just about keeping crime and drugs out of
00:12:13.940 our neighborhoods, though that is a big part of it. At a deeper level, it's about reclaiming a sense of
00:12:19.360 identity and fraternity as a nation. It's about becoming a people again, not just people who happen to all live
00:12:27.060 in the same geographic area, but a people, a nation. And anyone who doesn't want that, anyone who would
00:12:34.520 prefer that we have no identity as a nation is invited and indeed urged to leave. We don't need
00:12:42.720 you here and we don't want you. And a lot of people who are supposedly in Gomez's target audience,
00:12:49.240 namely Hispanics, seem to understand this, by the way. The Venezuelan YouTuber named Dross,
00:12:53.960 for example, responded to Gomez's video by writing, quote, shut up, stupid. That was pretty,
00:12:59.800 I mean, it's all that really needs to be said. And the backlash was pretty much universal,
00:13:03.340 which is why Selena Gomez quickly deleted the post. Then she wrote a passive aggressive follow-up
00:13:07.380 message that read, quote, apparently it's not okay to show empathy for people. And then she
00:13:11.720 deleted that message too. So she clearly didn't have a lot of conviction in what she was saying.
00:13:16.620 The moment her fans let her know that they thought she was acting like an imbecile,
00:13:19.800 she just took the post down. It's yet another indication that the whole emotional blackmail
00:13:23.900 routine is not working like it used to. The fact that Gomez was greeted with near universal
00:13:30.260 mockery as a clear sign that things are changing. A few years ago, a sobbing actress would have
00:13:36.440 probably convinced some people that, say, children were being held in cages at the southern border or
00:13:43.420 whatever, if we remember that. But it doesn't work anymore because we've all been lied to and
00:13:48.460 manipulated far too much. And as a result, we now have a government that, you know, we have leaders
00:13:53.480 now who are not being cowed by these kinds of tactics. Yesterday, when border czar Tom Homan was
00:14:01.180 asked about Selena Gomez's video, he pretty much said that he doesn't care. Watch.
00:14:06.520 We've got over 2 million known goddoways. We've got a 600% increase in sex trafficking. We've got a
00:14:11.000 record number of terrorists crossing the border on the terrorist watch list. We have quarter million
00:14:14.880 Americans diving fentanyl coming across the open border. We're going to do this job and we're going
00:14:19.180 to enforce the laws of this country. If they don't like it, then go to Congress and change the law.
00:14:22.980 We're going to do this operational apology. We're going to make our community safer. We're going
00:14:26.960 to save. Once we lock that border on continuous operation, you're going to see fentanyl, death
00:14:30.980 decrease, illegal alien crime decrease, sex trafficking decrease. It's all for the good of
00:14:35.980 this nation. And we're going to keep going. No apologies. We're moving forward.
00:14:39.620 You know, when entire neighborhoods in North Carolina were destroyed by a hurricane late last
00:14:43.720 year, like we just discussed, the DHS secretary at the time made it very clear that he didn't care
00:14:49.700 about any of the victims. He went shopping for clothes in Georgetown while fiending
00:14:52.980 the agency was supposedly overseeing, denied disaster relief to homes with Trump signs on
00:14:57.480 the lawn. That's the kind of apathy that we're all familiar with when it comes to the federal
00:15:03.240 government. But what the second Trump administration is bringing to the table is a very different
00:15:07.800 kind of apathy. They are apathetic to the lazy emotional blackmail and propaganda that constantly
00:15:14.300 emanates from our so-called elites, whether they're in Hollywood or the media. For the first
00:15:19.600 time in modern history, we have an administration that simply does not care how much liberals are
00:15:26.020 willing to fake cry on camera. To borrow from Kamala Harris's campaign slogan, those people are
00:15:32.720 now on the enemies list in the sense that their opinion doesn't matter. Their crying is irrelevant.
00:15:40.260 What matters now is restoring sanity to this country and to our government. And the more that
00:15:45.580 billionaire actresses like Selena Gomez lose their minds, the more that the rest of us can be sure
00:15:51.220 that after many very dark years, sanity is indeed making a comeback. Now let's get to our five
00:15:59.400 headlines. This country was founded on freedom. Freedom from a country that forced us to buy overpriced tea
00:16:10.700 than try blockading us when we dumped their tea into the ocean. We'll have that work out. Well,
00:16:14.920 you know, it's time to throw your overpriced big wireless contract overboard too. You don't need to
00:16:19.720 pay $100 a month just to get a free phone. Pure Talk, my cell phone company, says no to inflated prices.
00:16:25.780 With a qualifying plan of just $45 a month, you could choose an iPhone 14 or a Samsung Galaxy for
00:16:31.340 $0. And yes, this is for premium service, unlimited talk, texts, 25 gigs of data, and
00:16:37.260 mobile hotspot at a fraction of the price of the big guys, all in America's most dependable 5G
00:16:42.540 network. Get your iPhone 14 or Samsung Galaxy for $0 by visiting puretalk.com slash walsh today.
00:16:49.700 Switching is easy. Again, that's puretalk.com slash walsh to claim your new iPhone or Galaxy
00:16:53.920 with qualifying purchase from Pure Talk, America's wireless company.
00:16:57.940 Donald Trump gave a speech to a conference of congressional Republicans yesterday. And there
00:17:02.640 were two moments in particular from the speech that are worth talking about. Two, I think,
00:17:07.580 quite brilliant suggestions that Trump seemed to make. And the first one has to do with the
00:17:15.540 problem of crime in our neighborhoods, and particularly the fact that this crime is often
00:17:21.520 committed by repeat offenders. So it's the same people committing the crimes over and over again.
00:17:25.780 And Trump had a solution that he proposed for that, which I thought was really interesting.
00:17:30.880 Let's listen to that.
00:17:32.220 They're very dangerous people. They're violent people. I used to say these are more violent than
00:17:37.240 our criminals. In fact, the best part about them is they make our criminals look quite nice,
00:17:41.280 actually, by comparison. They are very violent people. We also have many violent criminals in our
00:17:47.020 country, however, that did not necessarily come here illegally, but have been arrested 30 times,
00:17:53.540 35 times, 41, 42 times in a couple of cases, 25 times, 18 times, many for murder and other heinous
00:18:02.660 charges, such as pushing people into subways. As the train's coming along at 45 miles an hour,
00:18:09.340 boom, you get pushed into the subway. They had it last week, getting them in the head with baseball
00:18:14.740 bats while they're not looking, punching old ladies in the face, knocking them unconscious
00:18:19.320 and stealing their purse. They even break into apartments and rape elderly women and beat up
00:18:24.900 elderly men, beat them to hell. And I don't want these violent repeat offenders in our country
00:18:30.120 anymore than I want illegal aliens from other countries who misbehave.
00:18:34.840 And I say, and this is subject to getting it approved, but if they've been arrested many,
00:18:43.420 many times, they're repeat offenders by many numbers, I want them out of our country. I also
00:18:50.480 will be seeking permission to do so. We're going to get approval, hopefully, to get them the hell out
00:18:57.380 of our country along with others. Let them be brought to a foreign land and maintained by others for a very
00:19:02.500 small fee as opposed to be maintained in our jails for massive amounts of money, including the private
00:19:07.960 prison companies that charge us a fortune. So here Trump is floating the idea of, I guess,
00:19:13.740 bringing back penal colonies. He's talking about shipping repeat offenders off to some foreign
00:19:20.640 country, some foreign land and paying that country to be their jailers. And which means they're going to
00:19:26.880 be housed in, you know, foreign jails somewhere by a country that needs the money. So probably not a
00:19:35.960 very pleasant experience I would expect in a jail like that. And needless to say, I think this is a
00:19:40.860 wonderful idea. I mean, why don't we do that? What's the argument against it? You know, there's a long
00:19:47.580 history of this kind of thing all across the world. It's an effective system. It's effective in many
00:19:52.180 different ways. It's cheaper for one. Also, it, you know, if there's any concerns about overcrowding
00:19:58.500 in prisons or whatever, then, well, this is one way to solve that. And it makes prison far less
00:20:05.840 appealing. You know, it increases, which you would think that prison would be unappealing no matter what.
00:20:13.420 But obviously, for people that go to jail 15 times, they're not as worried about going to prison as
00:20:20.640 they should be. So we have not made the experience as uncomfortable as it needs to be to get the
00:20:27.480 message across to these people. So it has that. It increases dramatically the punitive effect of
00:20:34.660 prison, which increases the deterrence effect. And all of these things are good. The only argument
00:20:42.600 against shipping criminals off to be jailed by some foreign country is that the experience will be
00:20:49.900 less pleasant for the criminals themselves. That's the only argument is about just seeing it from
00:20:54.620 their perspective of the criminals and saying, well, this, this wouldn't be good for them. They're
00:21:00.260 not going to like it. But not only is that not a downside, it is, as I said, an upside. If somebody
00:21:06.600 has been arrested 18 times already, it's very clear that the experience of jail has not been unpleasant
00:21:12.680 enough. So they need to be made to suffer. Okay. There's, there's, there's obviously been a failure
00:21:19.420 to communicate in the words of the, the warden and cool hand Luke, um, who of course I recognize was
00:21:26.940 not supposed to be the good guy of that movie. But, uh, but in this case, I think a little bit of that
00:21:32.620 attitude, a little bit of that approach is, is warranted. So I think it's a great idea, but in the next
00:21:38.620 clip, Trump floats something that is even better, I think. And, uh, he's brought this up before, but,
00:21:45.600 uh, before he was elected, but now he's obviously been elected. He's in office and he's still talking
00:21:51.060 about it, which is a good sign. Let's listen to this. He's going to be very rich again, and it's
00:21:56.340 going to happen very quickly. It's time for the United States to return to the system that made us
00:22:01.700 richer and more powerful than ever before. Do you know the United States in 1870 to 1913,
00:22:08.780 all tariffs, and that was the richest period in the history of the United States, relatively speaking,
00:22:14.520 in other words, relatively. And we, they set up the great tariff commission of 1887.
00:22:23.400 And this commission had one function, what to do with all the money that we took in. It was so
00:22:29.720 enormous that they had no idea. It was a blue ribbon committee was set up 1887 and what to do
00:22:36.080 with all of the money that we had. And again, uh, Teddy Roosevelt was a beneficiary because when
00:22:42.580 McKinley was killed, he took over this vast sum of money and he did all of those national parks and
00:22:49.800 all of the other things. And I'm not knocking him, but he was given a vast amount of money and that was
00:22:55.440 all made through tariffs as we had no income tax. The income tax came in in 1913. As I said in my
00:23:01.900 speech last week, instead of taxing our citizens to enrich foreign nations, we should be tariffing
00:23:07.900 and taxing foreign nations to enrich our citizens. Does that make sense? Right? Okay. So Trump,
00:23:13.800 yet again, talking about abolishing the income tax, replacing with tariffs, um,
00:23:17.480 and his way of looking at it is let's, you know, rather than taxing our citizens to enrich foreign
00:23:23.500 nations, let's tax foreign nations to enrich our citizens. Great, great idea. I mean, that's a,
00:23:29.620 that yes, I, sign me up. Uh, and let me tell you something. Uh, now I still would not put any money
00:23:37.120 on the income tax actually being abolished. You know, that would be a Herculean accomplishment.
00:23:43.420 Um, more importantly, it's an accomplishment that would require the cooperation of Congress,
00:23:48.480 which is the problem. So the odds are just very much against it happening. But,
00:23:53.980 but if Trump were able to achieve this, if, if he were able somehow to, uh, lead, lead the charge to
00:24:03.340 abolishing the income tax, he would automatically become one of the greatest presidents of all time.
00:24:08.720 I think he would be number two, second only to George Washington. Um, you know, by abolishing
00:24:16.140 the income tax, Trump will have done more to restore freedom in America than any president ever
00:24:23.180 next to George Washington. He would deserve to be added to Mount Rushmore, like unironically.
00:24:31.840 Um, and I personally would donate to the cause of, uh, carving his face in Mount Rushmore. I'll carve
00:24:39.820 it myself. I'll go up there and carve it. I, I, you know, I'll look at some YouTube tutorials on get,
00:24:45.660 to get the basics of sculpting down and then I'll go carve his face. Um, and even if he doesn't pull
00:24:52.340 it off, you know, he's already doing something very important by talking about it so openly. So
00:24:56.260 I hope he continues to talk about it. I mean, arguably if he can just get the abolition of the income tax
00:25:01.220 to become a mainstream talking point and position, if he can rally conservatives around this idea,
00:25:07.440 uh, even if it doesn't actually happen in the next four years, then that alone would put him
00:25:12.100 in the top two or three of presidents. Um, because the income tax is, uh, is just flat out oppressive.
00:25:24.860 Like we all live under an oppressive system of the income tax. It is oppression. It actually is.
00:25:33.820 Um, and you know, I've said before that the income tax is kind of proof of, uh, the quote from Ed
00:25:39.300 Harris's character in the Truman show, when he said that we accept the reality of the world that we're
00:25:44.780 presented. And he said that to explain why Truman in the movie didn't question all the surreal,
00:25:50.640 surreal, and kind of bizarre things about his reality. And he didn't question it because it's
00:25:54.940 just the reality he was born into. It's just, it's just the way the world is. And, um, most people
00:26:00.820 don't question that most people, at least not on their own. Most people, if the idea is not planted
00:26:10.840 in their head, then they're just going to accept whatever the world is as it's, they'll present the,
00:26:15.520 they'll accept the basics of it, kind of the framework. Um, but it's like that with the income
00:26:24.620 tax. I mean, which is why somehow the abolition of the income tax has not even been a live political
00:26:35.680 issue for like a century. I mean, it's, it's not even something that's debated. The income tax isn't
00:26:45.100 even controversial. Uh, you know, people just accept it. Um, even though objectively speaking,
00:26:54.920 it is an insane system. It's an insane system to have the government come in and take whatever
00:27:02.520 amount of your paycheck they want, whatever they want, because we actually have no control over it.
00:27:10.100 Uh, and then give you whatever's left over. You get the leftovers of your own paycheck and the
00:27:17.580 government comes in and takes whatever they want. How can we have any semblance of freedom or
00:27:21.660 independence when that's going on? Especially considering that this system has to be run and
00:27:26.180 facilitated by an agency called the IRS, which has in essence, total power over your life.
00:27:34.560 Anyone who's had to deal with the IRS knows this, that, you know, you like to think you have
00:27:40.800 constitutional rights and that you're a free American citizen and all this kind of stuff.
00:27:44.280 Yeah. Well, that's until the IRS gets their sights on you because when they get their sights on you,
00:27:48.000 you have no rights. I mean, they can, they can do whatever they want. They can come in,
00:27:52.780 they can, they can take whatever they want from you. They can look in your bank account. They can look
00:27:56.020 in all your records, everything. They tear your life apart. They can take your car. They can take your
00:28:02.860 house. They can throw you in prison. They can do anything. And these are all unelected bureaucrats,
00:28:08.180 all of them. You have no control over them. No say. They can do whatever the hell they want.
00:28:14.860 And they can do all of that just to ensure that they get your money.
00:28:23.060 In what sense can we even call this a free country with a system like that in place? We can't.
00:28:28.060 And it becomes all the more grotesque when you consider it. We all know that one of the reasons
00:28:40.300 our country exists to begin with was to escape an oppressive tax system. And yet what we have now
00:28:48.420 is so much worse than what, you know, our, our, our founders, uh, had, what, you know, sparked them to,
00:28:59.720 to the point of revolution. What we have now is so much worse. I mean, it's not even close.
00:29:05.420 So the whole thing, it's a mockery. It's a, it's just grotesque. And, uh, it's, you know,
00:29:15.420 yeah, and yet it's been a part of our reality since we were born. And for that reason, and for that
00:29:20.420 reason alone, we allow it to continue. It doesn't even come up. When's the last time it came up in a
00:29:27.220 presidential debate, which is nuts. I don't know how else to put it. Like I, I, and it's one of the
00:29:36.940 things that could happen. You know, there's, there's, there are a few things you can think of
00:29:44.420 that the government could do that if they did it, what it would immediately drastically improve
00:29:54.260 the quality of your life instantly. You know, that's a small list of things that the government
00:30:01.220 could, could do that would have that kind of a media impact. And like at the top of that list
00:30:05.460 would be getting rid of the income tax. Because if you're a working American instantly, you have, uh,
00:30:14.300 significantly more money than you had before. And it's not because anyone is giving it to you.
00:30:19.820 It's just your own money you get to keep. Um, and that's not even to mention, that's not even to
00:30:25.900 get into the, the, uh, freedom and independence over your own life that you now have. That now you're
00:30:33.240 in a spot where, no, there is no government bureaucrat that could just knock on your door
00:30:37.860 and demand to see all of your records, everything and tear your life apart and take everything from
00:30:42.500 you. If they decide you didn't give the government enough money like that, that would no longer be a
00:30:46.680 thing. So at the very least, um, this, uh, I hope Trump keeps talking about this and, uh, it, it needs
00:30:58.000 to, at the very least, become a live political issue. Something we actually talk about. If you're
00:31:03.520 running for president, you should have a position on the income tax. Yeah. You're nay and be able to
00:31:10.380 explain it. All right, here's some more encouraging news. The Daily Mail has this. Teenagers and those
00:31:17.400 in their early twenties are half as likely to identify as atheists than their parents. A new
00:31:21.240 poll has shown those age 18 to 24 who are all Gen Z are the most spiritual age group in the UK with
00:31:27.220 just 13% identifying as atheists. Another 62% describe themselves as very or fairly spiritual.
00:31:33.400 And when asked what the biggest factors in declining Christianity rates in the UK, Gen Z cited the
00:31:37.440 inability to grapple with scandals involving abuse, as well as generational change. In contrast,
00:31:42.400 middle-aged members of Gen X age 45, 45 to 60 are the most likely to be atheists with 25% saying
00:31:48.780 they don't believe in a God or spirituality. So this is just one survey of people in the UK,
00:31:54.120 apparently, but it tracks with trends we've seen in many polls and surveys. We've seen a lot of
00:31:57.300 evidence, including the last election results that in many cases, Gen Z are more conservative,
00:32:01.580 more right-wing, and apparently more religious than their parents. This is especially true of Gen
00:32:07.400 Gen Z males, but you see indications of this trend across the board.
00:32:11.360 And now you have this poll, which tells us that people in their twenties and late teens are
00:32:14.440 significantly less likely to be atheists than their parents and their grandparents, which is,
00:32:20.780 you know, when you think about it for a moment, pretty stunning. And it defies conventional wisdom
00:32:25.800 in many ways, at least the conventional wisdom that, again, the world as we've come to know it,
00:32:33.220 it kind of defies that, what we would expect based on that. I mean, just the idea that you'd have a
00:32:42.440 generation of young people who, on average, are more religious than their grandparents
00:32:47.240 is pretty crazy, but it's the fact. And it's actually not that surprising in the final analysis,
00:32:55.420 because a few things are happening here. The liberal secularism of the boomer generation
00:33:00.800 is fading out. It's dying a death of exhaustion, I think. It's dying of boredom.
00:33:08.440 It's just kind of dissipating, like a fart in the wind, right? It has nothing to offer.
00:33:16.600 And this is the thing about liberal churches. This is a phenomenon that every church-going
00:33:22.660 Christian has observed this, that the most liberal churches are all old. You know, the average age of
00:33:27.940 the congregation is going to be like 67. The pastor is old. The congregation is old. The churches are
00:33:33.700 sparsely attended. There's no life. There's nothing approaching exuberance or awe or reverence.
00:33:39.820 That's because liberal churches have nothing to offer. And I think that something similar is
00:33:45.140 happening with liberalism and secularism in general in the culture. And also, and this is, of course,
00:33:51.580 related, it's just a fact of life that younger generations have this natural rebellious instinct.
00:34:00.820 Every revolution in history, for better or worse, has been led by young people. And now,
00:34:10.680 well, that means rebelling against liberal secularism, because liberal secularism is
00:34:16.000 the dominant cultural position. And it's the thing, it's all of our institutions are defined by it.
00:34:25.980 And so you're seeing that as part of what we're seeing is this, I think, rebellious instinct
00:34:34.180 being used for good for a change. And on a related note, there's also this cover story from New York
00:34:41.260 Magazine that's getting some attention. And I think we have the image we can put up on screen. Yeah, there's
00:34:47.920 the image. So there was a New York Magazine reporter went to some of the Trump inauguration parties last
00:34:55.300 weekend and wrote this cover story. And the headline is, The Cruel Kids Table. And then the caption on
00:35:03.700 the tweet says, For our latest cover story, Brock Collier reported on the young, gleeful, confident,
00:35:09.140 and casually cruel Trumpers who, after conquering Washington, have their sights set on the rest of
00:35:14.880 America. Now, there's a lot of controversy over this image, the picture you see from this Trump
00:35:21.200 inauguration party. Because in the article, the reporter says that the event was almost entirely
00:35:25.980 white. And yet, as people on the internet have discovered, if you pan out a bit on that very
00:35:32.600 photo, you see that there are at least three black people who were cropped out. You know, they're just
00:35:40.020 out of frame. And that was done, of course, on purpose because they had this narrative they wanted
00:35:44.880 to say. And also, a black guy, C.J. Pearson, was one of the hosts of this party. So obviously,
00:35:52.860 no surprise, New York Magazine has an agenda here. But I don't even want to focus on that.
00:35:56.900 Okay, that's the easy part. And I don't care about what the article says, just the image alone,
00:36:02.600 just the cover image is really interesting because New York Magazine presents it to us
00:36:08.340 and wants us to see cruelty somehow. But instead, what any unbiased, normal person sees when they
00:36:16.740 look at that image, what they see are young, vibrant, happy, successful-looking people having
00:36:25.280 a good time. You know, you don't see a bunch of fat, ugly people with pink hair and nose rings and all
00:36:31.680 that. There are no cross-dressers in the photo. Nobody with a severe mental illness that they wear on
00:36:37.900 their sleeve with pride. We don't see that. These look like young, healthy, well-adjusted,
00:36:43.680 successful young people. And this is what the right wing has come to represent. This is the
00:36:51.300 future of the right wing. In a word, the photo is cool. It's a cool picture. And these look like
00:36:57.740 cool people. So being right wing is officially cool now. And truly, it is impossible to overstate
00:37:04.140 the significance of that cultural development. I mean, that's what this really all comes down to.
00:37:09.420 It changes everything. That, you know, they say the cruel kids table, but really it's the cool kids
00:37:16.300 table. If you're one of the cool kids, you're right wing now. And that's why it's significant that,
00:37:23.920 you know, all the right wing parties around the inauguration, they weren't held at like a Texas
00:37:29.820 Roadhouse with everybody listening to Christian rock or country music or whatever. And, um, and I
00:37:35.800 say that by the way, as someone who, you know, would have loved to go to an inauguration party at
00:37:39.780 a Texas Roadhouse, don't get me wrong. But, you know, when I went to these parties and I was actually
00:37:46.380 supposed to be at that party, uh, that they, they reported on, it's probably for the best that I didn't
00:37:51.620 show up because I think my dad vibes would have kind of ruined that picture just way. It wouldn't have
00:37:55.560 worked. So it's probably best that I wasn't there. Um, but you know, I did make it to plenty of the
00:38:01.200 other parties and they all had this same kind of vibe. And even though I love the Texas Roadhouse
00:38:06.780 vibe personally, I also appreciate that being right wing now also might mean that you're wearing a nice
00:38:14.420 suit and you're drinking a cocktail at a party in DC. I mean, that's a good thing.
00:38:19.860 It's not the vibe that I normally gravitate to personally, but it's good that the right has that
00:38:25.180 vibe also. And this is how we truly become culturally dominant. You know, cause look at
00:38:31.540 it this way. Here's, here's the, I think this is the, this kind of tells you everything you need to
00:38:36.020 know, right? That when you see that image of the, uh, of the party of the, you know, the party and
00:38:43.540 it's, it's a bunch of younger people and they're all, it's a black tie affair and everybody looks cool
00:38:48.140 and hip and young and all that. You see that image and it reads as right wing. Now,
00:38:54.500 if you saw that without any context and you didn't know it was a Trump inauguration event
00:38:59.580 and you just looked at that, you would say, yeah, that's probably Republicans.
00:39:04.620 But then also if you see, you know, a dad in flannel drinking a beer at Texas Roadhouse,
00:39:10.480 that also reads as right wing. So both of those images, if you see them, you immediately think,
00:39:17.660 yeah, it's probably kind of conservative. Um, and so that, what that tells you is it's, this is,
00:39:26.020 this is, it runs the gamut. So in other words, basically, I think this is all the way,
00:39:30.060 another way of putting it. If somebody appears to be happy, well-adjusted, um, you know,
00:39:39.760 reasonably successful in their station in life, just like a normal, confident person,
00:39:47.940 healthy, you know, if someone appears to be those things, it reads as right wing.
00:39:55.220 Just imagine like, what would you, again, without any context,
00:39:59.880 what would you need to see in a picture in order to think that this, okay, this codes as left wing,
00:40:06.840 right? If you're looking at a picture of people who are all in some kind of environment,
00:40:12.020 what are the, what are the, the signifiers, right? That would, would tell you that, okay,
00:40:17.720 this is probably a left wing group, but what are they? And that, I mean, if they're overweight,
00:40:25.580 if they've got weird, uh, piercings, if they have strangely colored hair, um, if they, you know,
00:40:36.140 if they are cross-dressing, basically weird, ugly, friendless losers, when you see that,
00:40:46.320 you think, well, that's, they're probably left wing. Uh, anything else, it now reads as right
00:40:55.060 wing. And I think that that, uh, this is, look, it does it every time I talk about this now. And I,
00:41:02.600 I know people in the audience are, uh, a little bit bewildered sometimes listening to the show for
00:41:06.960 the last two weeks, uh, because, uh, I'm strangely positive and optimistic, at least by my standards,
00:41:15.320 by my standards, it's, it's, it's, it's, I understand it's a little bit, it's a little
00:41:19.320 disturbing even if you've been listening to the show for a long time to hear this much sustained
00:41:23.700 optimism from me is, uh, quite, uh, it's even upsetting. I get it. It's like, you just not,
00:41:29.020 it doesn't make any sense coming from me. Um, and, and I don't want it to come across like
00:41:36.600 we're saying, or I'm saying that, well, everything's good. Now we won, let let's all go
00:41:44.480 home. We don't need to think about this anymore. That's not the point. Um, but the point is like
00:41:51.380 assessing where we actually are in the culture. And I think it's important to get a good read on that
00:41:56.360 because the fight does continue in order to be, in order to be in a fight, you have to kind of
00:42:00.740 know where you are and what your position is. And, uh, the fact is that the right wing is culturally
00:42:07.720 ascended. Um, and, uh, and that's a good thing. And, but that, that, those are also, that that's a
00:42:16.340 position and those are gains that we have to defend and build on. All right, let's get to the comment
00:42:22.360 section.
00:42:26.360 Columbia doesn't just export coffee and cocaine. It exports petroleum, bananas, flowers, gold,
00:42:38.100 aluminum, among other things. Okay. But you know, we, we could stop importing from Columbia
00:42:43.340 entirely and it would hardly affect any of our lives. So that's the point. Um, let's see.
00:42:49.340 You forgot to mention the biggest outrage from the Academy Awards. Nosferatu didn't get a best picture
00:42:55.000 nom. Yeah. I got to say, I didn't, I hate to tell you, I didn't like that movie. I just didn't like
00:43:02.860 it. Um, I watched it a few days ago and now I'll say it's a, it's a beautiful film. I mean, the
00:43:11.560 cinematography, the shot selection, the way that it's filmed, it's pretty jaw dropping. So from a purely
00:43:17.900 aesthetic perspective, it's maybe the most artistic movie I've ever seen. I mean, every single shot
00:43:25.100 looks like a painting. It's pretty incredible. Um, on that basis. So I respect the movie for that
00:43:31.640 reason. I respect the director, Robert Eggers, who is a real filmmaker. I mean, the guy's not out there
00:43:36.760 making superhero movies. He's making real movies, real cinema. He made the Northmen, which I, which I
00:43:41.880 thought was a masterpiece. It's one of my favorite movies of the last five or 10 years. But, um, so
00:43:46.280 I watched Nosferatu with some anticipation and I just didn't like it. I wanted to like it, but I
00:43:53.100 didn't. I thought it was too slow to me, way too slow. And to me, there was no real suspense because
00:43:59.320 I knew exactly where it was going, which is maybe an inevitable problem when you make a film based on
00:44:05.800 one of the most famous stories of all time, which was basically Dracula. Uh, but still I didn't feel
00:44:10.900 the suspense, which is a problem in this case because so much of the movie relies on building
00:44:16.160 suspense. And, um, I, I found the whole thing to be a bit, I don't know, heavy handed is maybe the
00:44:23.920 word. You know, there's this viral clip going around for some reason from a clip from family
00:44:29.060 guy from some episode. I don't know when, where Peter Griffin says that he didn't like the Godfather
00:44:34.120 because the movie insists on itself, which is a criticism that doesn't make any sense for
00:44:40.800 the Godfather, but you know, it's fine. It's family guy. It's not supposed to make sense. It's
00:44:44.160 supposed to be funny, but I actually would borrow that phrase for Nosferatu. I actually think that
00:44:48.800 it insists on itself too much. Um, I thought every single frame of the movie from start to finish
00:44:55.440 just is supposed to fill you with dread and horror. Every single frame there, there's no other,
00:45:02.060 there there's, there's no other like a tone. There's no other mood. There's nothing. It's just
00:45:09.540 supposed to be unrelenting draw dread and horror from the very first second of the movie until the
00:45:15.500 end. And, uh, the movie just, it relentlessly insists on it, beats you over the head with it in
00:45:21.980 a way that got kind of tedious. If I'm being honest, the, the lead character, uh, who I forget her name,
00:45:28.120 but the whole, and it was a, it was a good performance. I mean, from an, just a pure acting
00:45:35.140 perspective, but every single, like she, she has this look of horror and kind of confusion
00:45:43.620 in her face for the whole movie. Again, from the very first moment and it never stops.
00:45:54.020 And I don't, it's hard to maintain that. It's just hard to like, I can't watch a movie
00:45:58.720 and the movie wants me to be horrified and experiencing deep dread the whole time, you know,
00:46:05.080 and I just can't, I can't sustain that level of emotional investment, I guess. And, uh, and then
00:46:11.660 spoiler alert, spoiler, spoiler. Okay. I'm just going to tell you, I hated the end. I thought the end
00:46:17.440 was, uh, was bad because in the end, the woman saves the day by selling her soul to the devil.
00:46:22.460 Essentially. Uh, she saves the day by submitting in every sense, in every sense, you know, in,
00:46:27.400 including in a quite grotesquely physical sense, uh, submitting to evil, which I didn't like either.
00:46:33.720 So even if I did like the movie up until that moment, that moment would have ruined the whole
00:46:40.020 movie for me. Um, and, uh, so yeah, I didn't like it. I'll be very interested to see what he does next.
00:46:48.020 I like the film. I find the filmmaker himself to be interesting, but I thought that that was by far
00:46:53.840 and away the least interesting movie he's ever made. Uh, and one of the least interesting movies
00:46:58.860 I've seen recently, afraid to say, um, Matt, this is one of my faves. The most obvious lesson here is
00:47:09.760 that these countries do not appreciate us. They should have to publicly apologize to the American
00:47:14.500 people before they get one more centavo her. Well, we don't know if he was radicalized here.
00:47:19.620 So it's our fault. Ship her to Afghanistan. That's what gets me to the total lack of gratitude,
00:47:25.560 total lack of appreciation that you find from other countries for all the help that we've given all of
00:47:30.940 these hundreds of other countries on the globe that we've given aid to and protection. There's just
00:47:36.080 no gratitude, you know, and then the, the, uh, immigrants when they come here, uh, now there are
00:47:42.360 exceptions to this, but for the most part, you don't get a sense of, of real appreciation and
00:47:51.160 gratitude when they come here. You just get a sense of entitlement. Um, that show was low key out of
00:47:59.460 pocket, Matt, no cap. Well, thanks fam. I mean, you cook, you cooked with that one. I stand your
00:48:05.440 comment, bro. Your comment, your comment is sending me. It's, and look, anyone who doesn't
00:48:14.320 like the show needs to take several seats. Low key needs to low key, take several seats.
00:48:22.540 You're being real extra. If you don't like the show,
00:48:24.760 I'm just like, I'm just connecting with the young people. Like I said, the right wing is cool now.
00:48:30.740 So this is, this is, this is me being cool. Young people, they hear their slang words and they,
00:48:37.120 they just can't. I, my viewership in the last two days, adopting some of this slang,
00:48:42.500 my viewership among Gen Z has increased 95%. They were just telling me, they were just telling me,
00:48:47.340 keep doing it because 95% increase. It's a fact. Look, it's no secret. Legacy,
00:48:54.760 media is collapsing. Why? Well, because Americans are waking up. They're tired of being lied to,
00:48:59.600 tired of the spin, tired of the narratives. At the Daily Wire, we don't tell stories. We show you
00:49:04.620 the truth. From investigative reporting to fearless commentary, we bring the facts straight to you.
00:49:09.540 And it doesn't stop there. We're making movies, documentaries, and series that challenge the
00:49:13.280 woke Hollywood agenda. They reshape the culture. But here's the deal. We can't do it without you.
00:49:17.900 We need your support to keep growing and keep fighting. Now's the time to join the fight. Go to
00:49:22.120 dailywire.com slash subscribe and become a member today. Now let's get to our daily cancellation.
00:49:34.520 Today, I have to cancel Republican Congresswoman Nancy Mace. Congresswoman Mace has been on a
00:49:41.000 crusade as of late over the trans issue. For the last few months, Mace has been speaking out in very
00:49:46.620 forceful language against the scourge of gender ideology, along with authoring a bill to keep men
00:49:52.120 women's bathrooms on Capitol Hill. Mace has also been tweeting things like, quote,
00:49:56.680 your mental illness will not become my new normal. And she stood in front of whatever cameras she can
00:50:02.160 find saying things like this. Watch.
00:50:04.240 Effort in response to Congresswoman McBride coming to Congress?
00:50:09.340 Yes, and absolutely. And then some. I'm not going to stand for a man. You know, if someone with a
00:50:15.180 penis is in the women's locker room, that's not OK. And I'm a victim of abuse myself. I'm a rape
00:50:20.780 survivor. I have PTSD from the abuse I've suffered at the hands of a man. And I know how vulnerable
00:50:26.400 women and girls are in private spaces. So I'm absolutely a hundred percent going to stand in
00:50:32.240 the way of any man who wants to be in a women's restroom, in our locker rooms, in our changing rooms.
00:50:39.700 So very clear and forceful and, of course, totally correct language. In fact, Nancy is so heated about
00:50:46.060 this topic that she recently challenged another Congresswoman, Jasmine Crockett, to, quote,
00:50:50.540 step outside in the middle of a congressional hearing. So this is a woman who will not take
00:50:54.740 any guff from the trans activists and their proponents. And she has, in recent months,
00:50:58.920 made that her brand. She has positioned herself as a leader in the fight against gender ideology.
00:51:03.320 She likes to tweet with the hashtag, hold the line, a slogan that she's adopted because she is,
00:51:07.780 we're supposed to believe, holding the line against the trans madness. But you may notice that
00:51:12.880 even as I've talked about this, I've had to qualify all of these statements by saying,
00:51:17.220 as of late and in the last few months, because oddly enough, less than two years ago,
00:51:23.880 the woman who is now holding the line and leading the charge, she claims, against trans ideology
00:51:29.560 was sitting down for interviews with corporate media outlets and saying stuff like this.
00:51:36.140 So I touch a lot of sensitive subjects because I want to show that as conservatives,
00:51:41.340 we can be compassionate. We can show love.
00:51:43.500 How does that inform your position on transgender rights?
00:51:47.220 Well, I'm pro-transgender rights. I'm pro-LGBTQ. Just don't go to the extreme with our kids.
00:51:55.400 Our kids...
00:51:56.120 Define extremism there for me.
00:51:57.680 Sex change surgery, the hormone blockers that sterilize our children. We shouldn't be doing
00:52:03.700 that when a child is prepubescent or going through puberty. Let that child go through the
00:52:09.680 natural process of life and let them make that permanent decision when they're older. Now,
00:52:15.500 if they want to take on a different pronoun or a different gender identity or grow their hair out
00:52:20.980 or wear a dress or wear pants or do those things as a minor, those are all things that I think
00:52:26.620 most people would support. Be who you want to be, but don't make those permanent changes
00:52:30.980 when it's a child.
00:52:32.740 Okay, so Nancy was bold enough at least to oppose the medical mutilation of minors in 2023, but
00:52:41.420 she did support trans rights and the social transition of children.
00:52:48.720 In fact, she not only supported the idea that a child might have a different gender identity,
00:52:54.640 quote unquote, she said that most people would support it. To her, it was obvious, a given.
00:53:00.220 Right? She's supporting dressing a boy up like a girl and saying that he's a girl and giving him
00:53:05.760 girl pronouns. That's what she supported. In 2023, I must stress again, this was in 2023.
00:53:11.500 Now, to put that into perspective, that was a full year after What Is A Woman came out.
00:53:19.020 Okay, we were already well into the period when it was pretty safe to fundamentally oppose gender
00:53:24.520 ideology. And yet, Nancy Mace didn't oppose it at the time. Does she now? I don't know. In 2023,
00:53:32.760 she supported trans rights in those words. So tell me, Nancy, what do you think trans rights are?
00:53:39.800 What rights specifically fall under that umbrella? Well, I'll tell you. A man using the women's
00:53:47.020 restroom. That is specifically and explicitly what is meant when trans activists talk about
00:53:53.460 trans rights. That is the trans right they're demanding. The right to be fully recognized as
00:54:00.640 the gender they claim to be. That's what trans rights are. So if you support trans rights,
00:54:06.400 you support that. You support men in the women's room. There's no such thing as I support trans
00:54:12.640 rights, but not men in the women's room. That doesn't make any sense. Okay, this is a two that
00:54:18.340 is the same thing. Which means as recently as 2023, you supported men in the women's room.
00:54:25.520 Now, this has not stopped Mace from loudly on a daily basis at this point claiming with a shameless
00:54:32.700 straight face that she has led the charge in the fight against trans ideology. Just yesterday,
00:54:38.420 she posted this claim on X again. And she's saying this. I mean, it's constant. Okay,
00:54:43.440 constant. She's saying this. And so she's probably about to announce a campaign for South Carolina
00:54:48.720 governor. And this post was meant to favorably compare herself against Alan Wilson, who's the AG of
00:54:53.480 South Carolina, who's also probably going to run apparently. And she posted this. They say
00:54:58.080 imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. We led the fight to protect women. Alan Wilson holds
00:55:03.420 a press conference on it. We visit the South Carolina National Guard. Alan Wilson visits the
00:55:07.400 South Carolina National Guard. We speak at Greenwood County GOP. Alan Wilson speaks at Greenwood County
00:55:11.360 GOP. Well, thank you, Alan Wilson. We're flattered. So not only is she claiming to be in the lead,
00:55:17.760 but she's actually accusing someone else of copying her. And then there's a picture of herself with the
00:55:27.040 caption, how it started. Okay, so I must ask, Nancy, how what started? What is it that you think you
00:55:39.660 started? In what way did you lead the fight to protect women? The people who led the fight were
00:55:48.720 in it for years while you were still telling CBS about how deeply you care about trans rights.
00:55:55.880 Okay, while you were telling CBS that it's okay to dress a little boy like a girl and say that he's a
00:56:01.900 girl and give him girl pronouns. While you were doing that, the people who were actually leading the
00:56:06.860 fight were leading it. You came in after, okay? But this is the kind of ego that we're dealing with.
00:56:14.800 This is someone who posted a tribute to the people who started the fight to protect women's sports,
00:56:20.080 and it's literally just three pictures of her. I mean, come on. The woman who only got bold and
00:56:28.100 aggressive on the issue well after the people who had actually led the fight had made it safe for her
00:56:32.360 to do so. But look, that's not the point today. The fact that Nancy Mace explicitly supported trans
00:56:40.600 rights recently and is now pretending to be the leader of the very fight she undermined is annoying,
00:56:46.320 but it's also pretty standard political grandstanding. And I also don't like to get
00:56:51.940 into fights about who deserves credit for things. I'm used to people taking credit for stuff constantly,
00:56:58.060 especially politicians. They do this all the time. Politicians are always out, I led the fight.
00:57:02.840 And it's like, yeah, you came into this fight. No, no, no. You waited until it was super safe,
00:57:08.400 and then you rode a wave. You didn't lead a fight. But if we get into that game, then we'd be here all
00:57:17.140 day. And it's just, there's no point. Which is why I've been firmly biting my tongue for weeks now,
00:57:25.060 while Nancy Mace plays the role of anti-gender ideology crusader. In fact, I've even given her
00:57:31.200 credit on this show for going to bat on this issue recently. Because even of her incredibly
00:57:36.700 self-congratulatory tone and is grating and thoroughly undeserved, she is still right about
00:57:42.460 the bathroom issue. She's right about it now anyway. And so I tried to focus on that.
00:57:47.380 But then she posted this. Quote,
00:57:53.520 I didn't fight like hell to become the first woman to graduate from the Citadel just for some
00:57:58.300 man in a miniskirt to take away that achievement. Protecting women's accomplishments isn't a political
00:58:03.120 talking point. For me, it's personal. Now, this is also something that she says a lot.
00:58:09.440 She constantly brags about being the first woman to graduate from the Citadel Military College.
00:58:13.580 In fact, she bragged about it twice yesterday alone. She also tweeted, quote,
00:58:17.840 when I was first elected, I was told if I didn't fall in line, if I didn't play the Washington
00:58:22.060 political insider game, then I wouldn't fit in. Boy, were they right. When you were the first woman
00:58:27.700 to sit in the Citadel's barber chair to get all your hair chopped off, you don't get your feelings
00:58:31.700 hurt if you don't get invited to fancy cocktail parties in Washington, D.C.
00:58:35.360 I mean, Nancy, you were literally just at the fanciest D.C. cocktail party of the year last
00:58:43.600 Monday night for the inauguration. I was there, too. I'm not judging you for it. But you were just
00:58:49.500 there and you posted a bunch of pictures with yourself and celebrities. So you do get invited
00:58:55.260 to the cocktail parties. But anyway, that's not the point. The point is Nancy Mace's feminist girl
00:59:02.620 boss routine. And that is what is pushing me over the edge and forcing me to do this segment,
00:59:08.980 which I don't really want to do, but I have to. If she would just stick to taking credit for things
00:59:14.420 she didn't do, we wouldn't have to talk about it. I can deal with that, but I can't deal with this.
00:59:20.580 And I'll tell you the reason. You know, Nancy, you say that you fought like hell to be the first
00:59:26.120 female graduate of the Citadel. Well, first of all, your dad was the commandant when you were there.
00:59:30.040 So I imagine, you know, you had some help in that fight. But second, you say that you care so much
00:59:37.260 about protecting female-only spaces. Well, great. The Citadel was a male-only space until it was
00:59:46.660 forced by law to admit females, to admit you, in the name of diversity and inclusion. You were quite
00:59:55.300 literally the beneficiary of a DEI program. You were a DEI graduate. That's what DEI is. Now,
01:00:03.840 they didn't call it that back then, but it's the same thing. Forcing an institution to change their
01:00:08.960 standards in order to admit a more diverse group of people, all in the name of being progressive and
01:00:14.380 inclusive is DEI. And it's also the exact same argument that trans-identifying males use to
01:00:22.420 invade female spaces. So we rightly lament the death of female-only spaces, but the truth that
01:00:29.900 you are so helpfully bringing to light is that male-only spaces died a long time ago.
01:00:35.980 Thanks to people like you, every uniquely masculine and exclusively male space, including those spaces
01:00:43.580 that had very good reason to be uniquely masculine and exclusively male, like the military and related
01:00:48.620 institutions, has been feminized. The feminism that you champion set the stage for trans ideology.
01:00:58.200 It essentially is trans ideology. The feminists were the first ones to deny the fundamental and
01:01:07.080 inherent differences between the sexes and to deny the value of sex segregation in many aspects of
01:01:14.040 society. Who were the first people to come along and say that biological sex is basically irrelevant?
01:01:20.800 It doesn't actually matter. People are the same. There's no meaningful difference between men and
01:01:26.860 women. Who were the first ones to say that? Okay. Pop quiz. Who was it? It was the feminists.
01:01:35.500 It was the feminists who came along, saw that the military was exclusively male, and said,
01:01:40.640 there's no reason why women shouldn't be included too. But there was a reason, Nancy. The reason was
01:01:46.880 biology, which is the same reality that trans activists deny, and for the same reason,
01:01:52.560 so that they can feel included, just like you wanted to feel included.
01:02:00.980 Now, it's not exactly the same thing. The trans male claims to be a woman so that he can be included
01:02:09.100 in women's spaces. The trans male claims that his inclusion actually does not destroy its status as a
01:02:15.060 women's space because he says, falsely, that he is a woman. The feminist, on the other hand,
01:02:20.660 demands to be included in men's spaces, but does not claim to be a man. Instead,
01:02:25.440 she simply says that men's spaces shouldn't exist. So these are different arguments, but they have
01:02:32.340 the same ultimate effect. They are both very bad. They both are based in the same fundamental lie
01:02:39.060 about the human condition and the human species, and they both derive from the same basic level denial
01:02:44.780 of the inherent and immutable and fundamentally significant differences between the sexes.
01:02:51.620 And this is why I can't just sit silently and listen to a prominent voice in the Republican Party
01:02:56.940 try to reframe the fight against gender ideology in feminist terms. I can tolerate the showboating
01:03:03.840 and you taking credit when you should be giving it, but I can't tolerate that because you are hurting
01:03:10.580 the cause that some of us actually have been fighting for and fighting for a long time.
01:03:16.840 A lot longer than you, Nancy. And that is why Nancy Mace is today, I'm afraid to say,
01:03:25.280 canceled. That'll do it for the show today. Thanks for watching. Thanks for listening.
01:03:28.380 Have a great day. Godspeed.
01:03:36.800 Today on the Ben Shapiro Show, China releases a competitive new AI at a fraction of the cost
01:03:41.300 of the American companies. Democrats launch resistance on Trump's illegal immigration crackdown
01:03:45.340 and Trump signs an order to ban gender dysphoric people from the US military. That's today on
01:03:49.300 the Ben Shapiro Show. Give it a listen.
01:03:50.240 Today on the Ben Shapiro Show.
01:04:13.260 Today on the Ben Shapiro Show.