ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
The Matt Walsh Show
- March 04, 2025
Ep. 1548 - Democrats Ignore The Will Of The People With This Insane Move
Episode Stats
Length
55 minutes
Words per Minute
183.23354
Word Count
10,251
Sentence Count
685
Misogynist Sentences
31
Hate Speech Sentences
25
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
Misogyny classification is done with
MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny
.
Hate speech classification is done with
facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target
.
00:00:00.000
Today on the Matt Wall Show, Democrats vote down a measure to prohibit men from women's sports.
00:00:03.660
Not a single Democrat was willing to break party lines and take the side of sanity and
00:00:07.280
common sense. Also, the mayor of Boston tries to do some PR cleanup after offering her heartfelt
00:00:11.280
condolences to a crazed assailant who tried to stab random people. A Hollywood actor shocks
00:00:15.420
the world by expressing a desire to have more than 1.5 kids. And this year's Best Picture
00:00:19.420
winner has sparked another conversation about quote unquote sex work. The director and star
00:00:24.100
of the film say that we need to be allies to prostitutes. What does that mean exactly?
00:00:27.500
We'll talk about all that more today on the Matt Wall Show.
00:00:30.000
Tonight, Daily Wire backstage returns live for President Donald Trump's address to Congress
00:00:59.440
and we're covering it like never before with Ben Shapiro and myself live from DC. Don't miss
00:01:05.000
the exclusive pre-show at 8.30 p.m. Eastern followed by the full address completely uninterrupted.
00:01:11.020
When he's done, we're back with a breakdown of what it all means. Watch with us tonight
00:01:14.680
at 8.30 p.m. Eastern on Daily Wire+.
00:01:18.240
What you do online is not private. Far from it. Data brokers, the savvy collectors of big tech
00:01:23.040
are tracking and creating a profile of your online activities, your spending habits, even your values
00:01:28.900
and beliefs. And in the U.S., they are legally allowed to sell that information to whoever wants
00:01:33.000
to buy it. That means big corporations can buy and sell your info to feed you more advertisements.
00:01:38.240
Tech companies like Facebook can use your info to determine what kind of content you see.
00:01:41.820
It's a subtle way that they try to turn us all into followers, but there's a way to push back
00:01:46.300
and hold on to your values and your autonomy and your freedom, and that is with ExpressVPN.
00:01:51.020
With ExpressVPN, 100% of my online activity is rerouted through secure encrypted servers,
00:01:55.480
which makes it impossible for my internet provider to know what I'm doing online.
00:01:58.580
I personally use it every time I travel for work. It gives me peace of mind
00:02:01.160
when I know that my sensitive emails and financial information are safe, even on
00:02:05.480
sketchy hotel or airport Wi-Fi. ExpressVPN hides your IP address, preventing data brokers from
00:02:11.000
identifying you online, tracking your activity, or building a profile to sell. ExpressVPN is easy
00:02:16.360
to use. It just takes one click, and it works on all your devices, on up to eight of them all at
00:02:21.040
once, in fact. So right now, you can get an extra four months for free when you use my special
00:02:25.460
link. Go to expressvpn.com slash Walsh. Get four extra months of ExpressVPN. That's
00:02:29.740
e-x-p-r-e-s-s-v-p-n dot com slash Walsh.
00:02:33.700
One of the things you're generally not supposed to do when you're in the commentary business is
00:02:37.920
draw any sweeping conclusions about public sentiment based on reading YouTube comments.
00:02:42.760
You can't usually review YouTube comments and determine how people generally feel about
00:02:47.340
something. But there's been a trend lately across various comment sections that, at this point,
00:02:52.940
you simply can't ignore. If you pull up news reports about Republicans' efforts to ban men
00:02:57.560
from competing in women's sports, you'll find in every single instance, without exception,
00:03:02.780
that the comments overwhelmingly support the Republicans. Even if you go to the channels of
00:03:07.560
left-wing news stations, the pattern remains the same. And not just on YouTube. Read the comments
00:03:11.480
under any article on the topic, anywhere. Read the comments on X or Facebook or Instagram.
00:03:16.880
There is everywhere on every major platform wide agreement on this issue. There just isn't any
00:03:21.320
debate among reasonable people about the topic. Everybody is tired of seeing men dominate women's
00:03:27.900
sports by pretending to be women. Take, for example, this footage from NBC News report last
00:03:33.300
month. It's about a bill that passed in the House, which would codify one of Donald Trump's executive
00:03:37.640
orders. The bill is called the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act. And the terms of legislation
00:03:43.180
are pretty simple. It would ban any school that receives federal funding from, quote,
00:03:46.820
permitting a person whose sex is male to participate in an athletic program or activity
00:03:50.980
that is designated for women or girls. And the bill goes on to define sex as solely on a person's
00:03:56.240
reproductive biology and genetics at birth. Just in case there was any doubt about that,
00:04:00.520
that's what sex means. Now, this is the kind of legislation we need to see more of. It's a
00:04:05.420
meaningful step by Republicans in Congress to give some backbone to an executive order that's
00:04:10.400
very important. And with that in mind, here's how NBC News covered the House vote on this
00:04:15.580
legislation back in January. Watch.
00:04:18.700
The House passing a bill that would ban transgender girls and women from competing in women's sports.
00:04:24.460
The legislation would impact transgender athletes in federally funded schools,
00:04:28.320
grades elementary through college, and would result in a school losing funding if violated.
00:04:33.320
Transgender students in sports became a top issue on the 2024 campaign trail and now a top priority
00:04:38.180
of House Republicans in the new Congress.
00:04:40.020
Now, right away, you could see that they're framing this legislation as a bill that would ban
00:04:46.680
transgender girls and women from competing in women's sports. So they're not reporting the truth,
00:04:50.960
which is that transgender girls and women, quote unquote, are men. They're not going into any
00:04:56.260
detail about how obviously unfair it is for men to compete against women in sports because they are
00:05:01.020
men. Instead, they're trying to portray this law as some kind of mean-spirited,
00:05:05.140
you know, bigoted effort by Republican lawmakers and so on. And even on NBC News' YouTube channel,
00:05:11.220
which has a very left-leaning audience, obviously, this framing did not fly. Instead of condemning
00:05:15.200
the ban, pretty much every single comment supports it. For example, the top comment reads,
00:05:19.080
can't believe this is even being discussed. Common sense is underrated. Then someone says,
00:05:22.920
finally, the nonsense ends. And another user replies, as a woman and mother of a girl,
00:05:26.140
I'm happy and grateful. I go through about a dozen other videos like this Forbes example has a
00:05:31.520
similar video. One of the top comments puts it this way. As a former Democrat, even if I'm liberal
00:05:35.720
on certain subjects, it's dumb S like this that has driven me and a lot of other folks away from
00:05:41.140
this party. Embarrassing. And again, every comment is like this. So the pattern is familiar. Left-wing
00:05:45.280
media outlets try to portray the Republicans as the villain of this story. And despite the framing,
00:05:50.860
the comment section revolts. And none of this is surprising when you take a look at the polling data
00:05:57.160
on the topic. Just a couple of weeks ago, a New York Times poll found that, quote,
00:06:01.380
the vast majority of Americans, including a majority of Democrats, don't think transgender
00:06:05.180
athletes should be permitted to compete in women's sports. Roughly 80% of respondents said that men who
00:06:10.860
identify as women should be banned from women's sports. And among Democrats, the number was 67%.
00:06:16.500
And by the way, 80% agreement is, I mean, it should go without saying that 80% agreement in this climate
00:06:22.540
these days where we can't agree on anything, a fractured culture that's fractured in a million
00:06:27.400
pieces. To get 80% agreement on anything is almost impossible. I mean, that's as wide an agreement as
00:06:32.660
you could possibly get on anything. And that's what you have on this issue. So it might as well be
00:06:37.820
everyone. I mean, 80% is effectively 100% when you consider where we are in the culture.
00:06:43.780
And just to put these numbers in perspective, something like 4% of Democrats voted for Donald Trump
00:06:48.840
in the last election. This is a demographic that disagrees with Trump on pretty much everything.
00:06:53.580
But when it comes to the farce of men competing in women's sports, even most Democrats are forced
00:06:59.600
to agree with him. Most. In fact, a wide majority. And that's why the vote that just took place in the
00:07:05.700
Senate is so remarkable. Every single Democrat in the Senate, all 45 of them, every single one just
00:07:11.420
voted against the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act. In other words, 100% of the Democrat
00:07:17.260
Party in the Senate still endorses the insanity of men competing against women. There was not one
00:07:23.980
single defector. For all we hear about there being certain Democrat politicians who are the good ones,
00:07:29.400
the reasonable ones, they're not the crazy ones. None of them showed up this time. Every single one
00:07:36.580
came out in support of men and women's sports, despite the overwhelming number of voters, including
00:07:41.700
Democrat voters who are tired of this nonsense. In spite of that, Democrats in Washington are
00:07:47.700
in complete lockstep on this issue and they're proud of it. So this is footage of Elizabeth Warren
00:07:53.320
casting her vote. And to give you some idea of how the day went, she makes sure that everyone sees that
00:07:58.440
she's giving the big thumbs down for the cameras. This was so confusing that I went looking through the
00:08:05.600
floor debates on this bill. I wanted to know what exactly could motivate the party of democracy that
00:08:11.240
loves democracy so much to flagrantly disregard the clear desires of their own voters. I wanted to see
00:08:18.540
what arguments they put forward. And I came across this speech from Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois. And
00:08:24.360
here's how it began. This is Dick Durbin's argument for why the Senate should not pass a bill that bans men
00:08:30.800
for competing against women in sports. Here it is. I also want to say a word about what we're going to
00:08:35.440
vote on today, an issue that's going to come before us. I might ask my colleagues if they could answer
00:08:45.800
the following question. How many athletes in some NCAA athletes are there in the United States?
00:08:53.520
I asked Mr. Baker, former governor of Massachusetts that question. And he said, over 500,000.
00:09:05.200
500,000. And I said, of all those athletes, what percentage are transgender? Oh, fewer than 10.
00:09:15.580
I said, fewer than 10%? No, fewer than 10 total out of 500,000 are transgender. And yet we're going to
00:09:23.500
come to the floor with a proposal from Senator Tuberville to vote on this issue.
00:09:28.800
Okay, so according to him, it affects basically no one. So why wouldn't you support it?
00:09:33.260
What's the argument against it? What's especially funny about this line of argument is that Durbin
00:09:36.800
supported Democrats' anti-lynching law a few years back. As you may remember, the Biden administration
00:09:42.280
made a big deal about signing that bill, even though lynching and all other forms of murder,
00:09:46.900
outside the womb anyway, have been illegal for some time in this country.
00:09:51.180
So somehow the fact that no black people have been lynched in several decades, and the fact that
00:09:56.700
it's already illegal on like five different levels to do it, did not deter Durbin from supporting that
00:10:02.800
law. But now we're supposed to conclude that because there aren't thousands of men playing
00:10:07.920
women's sports, the whole issue is moot. And this is the stock argument you hear all the time from
00:10:13.220
trans activists. Of course, even assuming that Durbin's numbers are accurate, which of course,
00:10:17.700
we should not assume that is almost certainly more than 10. But still, this is an argument that
00:10:23.900
completely sidesteps two very important issues. The first is that women are indeed losing opportunities
00:10:29.640
and being degraded in order to affirm the delusions of pathological narcissists. That's not something we
00:10:34.340
should allow regardless of how many women are being affected. It doesn't matter if it's 10 or 10,000.
00:10:40.780
The other issue, of course, is that a functioning society has to be able to accept the reality of
00:10:45.220
basic human biology. Even if you don't care about the injustices that athletes like Riley
00:10:50.220
Gaines have endured, and you obviously should care about those injustices, then you still have to
00:10:55.280
explain some basic terms. You have to explain, for example, what a woman is. You have to explain what
00:10:59.700
a man is. And as we all know, Democrats are incapable of doing this. This is why the women in sports
00:11:04.000
issue matters so much. It's not even about women's sports specifically. At least that's not the
00:11:09.580
fundamental issue. The fundamental issue is one of truth, basic truth. And that's why it matters.
00:11:17.120
Now, I want to play the rest of Durbin's speech because he eventually gets around to making another
00:11:21.080
argument. And in some ways, this is even more revealing than the last one. Here it is.
00:11:25.340
The bill, which has no enforcement mechanism, could subject women and girls to physical inspection
00:11:33.740
by an adult if someone from an opposing team accused them of being transgender. Think about
00:11:39.420
that for a second. Your daughter, someone in your family going to play a sport, and someone
00:11:46.400
on the other team challenges them. That's not a little girl. That's a transgender boy.
00:11:52.240
This bill that we're about to vote on gives authority to someone to make a physical inspection
00:12:00.960
of that little girl if someone from the opposing team accuses them of being transgender.
00:12:06.520
Does that sound a little extreme to you? Well, it sure does to me, too.
00:12:13.640
Well, you know, I went back and read the legislation that he's talking about, and contrary that he
00:12:18.720
himself has obviously not read, contrary to what Durbin says, there is nothing in the law that
00:12:24.200
permits a random adult or any adult to look at the private parts of a student athlete who's accused
00:12:28.980
of pretending to be a woman. So what he's saying is that Republicans are secretly obsessed with this
00:12:34.420
kind of perversion when, in fact, he's the only one thinking along these lines. That's not what
00:12:38.080
Republicans are thinking about. And this is what you always get from Democrats. He's like,
00:12:42.060
oh, you want to run into the locker room and check people's genitals? That's you.
00:12:45.380
That's where your mind goes. That's the way you're thinking, okay? No one on the side of sanity is
00:12:52.020
saying any of that. That's entirely your own imagination. So this is maybe a window into the
00:12:58.460
sordid mental state of Dick Durbin and Democrats like him. In reality, the bill simply bans men from
00:13:04.000
competing against women. That's it. You know, that's it. And everyone understands exactly how that
00:13:11.760
would be enforced because it's extremely painfully obvious when men are playing in women's sports.
00:13:17.860
You don't need any kind of examination. You don't need to test their chromosomes or do blood tests.
00:13:22.900
You just look at them. In every single case involving a man playing in women's sports,
00:13:27.300
that has been true. It has never been a close call. So when Democrats say, well,
00:13:31.560
how could you possibly know? How could you know if that man is really a woman? I don't know.
00:13:36.540
You can know just by looking at them for a second. I can look at them for a second from 100 yards away
00:13:42.420
and I can tell, okay? Just like everybody else can. It's not fooling anyone. That's how. That's how we
00:13:49.920
know. Of course, Democrats like Dick Durbin have to pretend otherwise. They'll watch a basketball game
00:13:56.080
and see one athlete towering over everybody else. You know, a foot taller, gigantic Adam's apple,
00:14:02.500
twice the muscle mass, James Earl Jones voice. And they'll conclude that there's just no way of
00:14:07.760
knowing, no way of knowing the athlete's gender. You know, you put a wig on Shaquille O'Neal and
00:14:13.680
there'd be no way. Who could be a woman? There's no way. How could we possibly know whether that's a man
00:14:19.480
or a woman? They act like it's a mystery known only to perverted gender inspectors who are going
00:14:25.620
around pantsing student athletes at every opportunity. But even though Durbin's side of
00:14:30.780
this argument was in the minority, Democrats have succeeded in killing the legislation.
00:14:35.520
That's because laws like this won't have to overcome a filibuster, which requires 60 votes. And
00:14:39.360
because the vote on this legislation was 51 in favor and 45 opposed, it won't pass.
00:14:44.740
Republicans have the majority, but they're not able to pass a law like this one,
00:14:48.240
which has the wide majority support of the American people. And so it's enough to make
00:14:53.900
you wonder why Republicans don't eliminate the filibuster just entirely at this point.
00:14:58.000
We all know Democrats will do the same thing the moment they have the opportunity.
00:15:01.240
They've done it before after all. And if Democrats are now so unhinged and so unreasonable
00:15:05.440
that they're willing to defend the idea of men playing in women's sports, then it's safe to say
00:15:09.700
the filibuster has drifted very far from its original purpose.
00:15:13.440
The point of the filibuster was to enable careful deliberation.
00:15:16.640
That was the point. Instead, at the moment, it's enabling insanity and it's enabling the
00:15:21.060
Democrats to stop a bill that almost every American agrees with.
00:15:27.020
So getting rid of the filibuster would also make it much easier to pass a pass this and
00:15:31.680
also pass a federal ban on child castration and mutilation in the name of so-called gender
00:15:35.920
affirming care, which is something that I've obviously been pushing for, especially since
00:15:39.860
the beginning of the second Trump administration.
00:15:41.640
And a couple of days ago, one of the most prominent Republicans in the Senate, Josh Hawley,
00:15:46.380
endorsed my proposal. He wrote, quote, and not just this, but when is Congress going to give victims
00:15:52.040
of these transition surgeries and treatments the right to sue the people who carried them out
00:15:56.260
needs to happen now, close quote.
00:15:59.340
This is the kind of legislation that Republicans need to enact as quickly as they possibly can.
00:16:03.840
Whatever procedural roadblocks are in the way just need to be cleared.
00:16:07.440
When Democrats are using the filibuster to obstruct the will of the vast majority of Americans,
00:16:13.740
of 80% of Americans, including their own voters, it's a very clear sign that the filibuster
00:16:20.220
needs to go. It has outlived whatever usefulness it allegedly had.
00:16:25.680
And once the filibuster is gone, we need to start passing laws that affirm the reality of basic
00:16:30.540
fundamental human biology. For the benefit of all young people and to restore some semblance
00:16:36.780
of sanity in this country, we now have no other choice. Now let's get to our five headlines.
00:16:48.780
Nothing says peaceful slumber quite like waking up feeling like you've been in hand-to-hand combat
00:16:53.520
with a pile of discarded metal springs that have personal vendettas against your spine.
00:16:58.320
Luckily, that's where Helix Sleep comes in. I never realized how badly I needed a new mattress
00:17:03.540
until I finally got one. My Helix mattress always supports me, supports my body the way it should,
00:17:09.380
and I'm sleeping straight through the night for the first time in years. The best part
00:17:12.540
is waking up actually feeling refreshed instead of dragging myself out of bed. What makes Helix
00:17:16.740
different is that they don't just sell you a random mattress. They actually customize and match you
00:17:20.540
with the perfect one for your body and sleep style. Whether you're a side sleeper, back sleeper,
00:17:24.620
or somewhere in between, they've got you covered. Helix has a sleep quiz that'll match you
00:17:28.240
with your perfect mattress in under two minutes so you can get better sleep and better start to
00:17:32.860
each day. Trust me, when you find the right match, you'll wonder how you ever slept on anything else.
00:17:37.160
Right now is actually the perfect time to upgrade your sleep because Helix is offering an incredible
00:17:41.420
March madness sale. Go to helixsleep.com slash Walsh to get 20% off site-wide. That's helixsleep.com
00:17:46.720
slash Walsh for 20% off site-wide. Helixsleep.com slash Walsh. Yesterday, we talked about the
00:17:53.620
psychopathic mayor of Boston who offered her heartfelt condolences to a man who was killed by an off-duty cop
00:18:01.640
after he tried to stab a bunch of random people outside of a Chick-fil-A. And Mayor Wu, Chairman Wu,
00:18:09.860
as I've seen some people online refer to her, which I kind of like. Chairman Wu was deeply upset by this
00:18:15.140
turn of events. She wishes that the crazed stabber had not been killed. She wishes that he was, I guess,
00:18:21.720
able to carry out his stabbing spree because that's his right. That's the right of, you know,
00:18:26.540
we know that according to Democrat mayors, mentally ill vagrants have a human right to inflict whatever
00:18:31.920
carnage they want for as long as they want until they get tired. You know, what should stop somebody
00:18:36.880
from stabbing people to death is just when your arm gets tired. That's what should stop them.
00:18:40.940
But as long as they have strength, they should be able to stab as many people as they want.
00:18:43.620
That's basically the position that these Democratic mayors have and Democratic DAs and,
00:18:48.740
you know, every Democrat elected Democrat in the country. So there was a lot of backlash
00:18:53.080
after these insane comments from Chairman Wu. And now here she is yesterday addressing the backlash.
00:19:01.520
What do you say to those types of critiques, her critique and those online?
00:19:05.300
You know, it's unfortunate to politicize being at the scene of a tragic incident. Our officers are in
00:19:17.580
extremely difficult and dangerous situations every single day, keeping our residents safe. And I
00:19:24.360
express condolences along with our police commissioner and district attorney, because every loss of life
00:19:31.980
is a horrible tragedy. I'm also grateful every hour of every day for the work of our Boston police
00:19:40.720
officers. And in this case, we had an off duty officer who saw something happening. His training kicked in
00:19:49.100
and took action and surely saved even more lives.
00:19:52.560
Every loss of life is a horrible tragedy. No, it's not. No, it's definitely not. The loss of life,
00:20:02.940
when we lose someone who's trying to stab people to death, that's not a horrible tragedy. That's
00:20:09.200
the opposite of a tragedy. That's good. Okay, I'm happy that he's dead. If I lived in Boston,
00:20:17.380
I'd be happier. If I could choose between having a crazed person who tries to stab people, if I could
00:20:23.980
choose between them being able to walk around free or be dead, I prefer dead for them. That's what I'd
00:20:32.460
prefer that. And that's obvious to those of us who are sane people. Now, as a reporter points out
00:20:43.360
next, she, as the conversation goes on, she didn't say any of this at the time. The bit at the end
00:20:49.460
about how the off duty cop was a hero and he saved lives. Even there, she didn't call him a hero,
00:20:55.040
I don't think. But she at least acknowledged that he saved lives. She didn't say that the day before.
00:21:01.380
When this happened, she didn't say that. She did not praise the officer at all.
00:21:04.920
She did not acknowledge that he saved lives or express any relief about that fact. She didn't
00:21:14.820
say anything about his heroism. She spent more time mourning the dead assailant than she did
00:21:18.940
praising the officer because she is, again, a psychopath. But let's go back again to what
00:21:24.160
she said to justify all this. She says that any loss of life is a horrible tragedy. And here's the
00:21:34.020
thing. If she actually believed that, which is not true, not every loss of life is a horrible
00:21:41.520
tragedy. The horrible tragedy on 9-11 is not that we lost the 9-11 hijackers. It's everyone else who
00:21:49.000
died, right? If somebody is killed in the process of trying to murder innocent people, the tragedy is
00:21:54.940
the innocent people if they were killed, not the guy. But if she actually believed that, if she really
00:21:59.380
valued all human life and valued it so deeply that she even mourns the loss of a guy who was trying
00:22:04.740
to stab people at a Chick-fil-A, if that was the case, then you could almost give her a pass.
00:22:11.540
But it isn't the case. And here's how I know that it's not the case. Watch this.
00:22:18.880
Across the country, we see that access to women's reproductive health care is under attack.
00:22:24.440
People think that we're leading the way on access to care, as we are in so many other areas. But the
00:22:30.320
fact is, we're not. Women seeking abortion are making a deeply personal decision. And that conversation
00:22:35.500
should be between the patient and her doctor. Our laws are getting in the way of that conversation.
00:22:41.660
I don't think that it is, that it should be a mass decision or a political decision.
00:22:49.020
What I can and can't do for my family in my body.
00:23:00.800
Massachusetts, we have to do better. Health care decisions should be made between a patient and her doctor.
00:23:06.380
That was Michelle Wu, a few years ago, appearing in a video to advocate for the Roe Act in Massachusetts.
00:23:14.700
That's a law that did eventually pass in the state, which enshrines the right to an abortion
00:23:20.460
at any stage of development. It enshrines a late term abortion. Okay. And, and this law allows
00:23:28.820
minors, children as young as 16, to get abortions without parental consent.
00:23:32.980
Now, Michelle Wu, of course, supported and advocated for that law. She is a far left Democrat,
00:23:38.880
which means that she is a vocal proponent of abortions for everyone at every stage up to the
00:23:43.940
moment of birth and probably beyond it. And everyone includes children without parental consent. I mean,
00:23:49.500
just think about that for a second. Think about, think about a 16 year old girl. And this is happening
00:23:53.940
right now in Massachusetts and in other states. A 16 year old girl going to an abortion clinic
00:24:00.120
and consulting with an abortionist without her parents being involved at all, or even aware
00:24:07.720
that it's happening. Who do we trust to have a child's best interests at heart in this situation?
00:24:16.680
The parent or the abortionist? Who's more trustworthy? Who's more likely? Who's more likely to care about
00:24:28.080
this child? Well, Michelle Wu trusts the abortionist. She's never met an abortion that she didn't like.
00:24:38.420
She's never met an abortionist she didn't trust. And so in that scenario, when you've got a, an
00:24:43.740
abortionist who has a financial incentive is going to charge hundreds of dollars, going to make hundreds
00:24:49.060
of dollars off of this transaction, financial incentive to do the abortion. We're supposed to
00:24:54.000
believe that that's the person that we trust. And that's how Michelle Wu feels about it. She says,
00:25:01.560
kill the babies, kill them all, kill them at any stage for any reason. That's her position.
00:25:05.880
And yet, and yet we're supposed to take her seriously when she says that the loss of human
00:25:10.740
life is always a tragedy. Always. There's a, there's a big asterisk on always there. You know,
00:25:19.080
there's quite a, quite a qualifier on always, because when she says always all human life,
00:25:24.240
she means all human life, except for the millions upon millions of unborn humans who have been
00:25:30.420
slaughtered systematically, uh, for the last many decades in this country. Speaking of, um, speaking of
00:25:40.560
which, uh, Casey Anthony has reemerged for some reason and kind of doing a bit of a rebrand here.
00:25:50.580
And she, uh, had an announcement the other day about her new career path and her career goals.
00:25:57.000
Let's, let's hear it.
00:25:59.720
The whole point of this is for me to begin to reintroduce myself. I'm doing this both personally
00:26:06.520
for me, but in a professional capacity, moving forward. The majority of what you will see will
00:26:12.360
be me speaking in a professional capacity. My goal is to continue to help give a voice to people
00:26:19.020
to give people tools and resources that they can utilize. So they actually know where they can turn
00:26:25.760
to. So with that, please join me on sub stack. If you have questions, I will set up an email address
00:26:34.800
where we can correspond directly up until this point that has never happened. And it's only
00:26:39.840
going to be on a limited basis regarding legal issues, legal matters. Um, one of the main reasons
00:26:46.320
that I'm doing this, there are people close to me who have been targeted and attacked recently. There
00:26:52.320
are also people close to me who have had some, some recent things occur and when necessary, people
00:26:59.600
needed to step up myself included. So as a proponent for the LGBTQ community, for our legal community,
00:27:07.920
women's rights, I feel that it's important that I use this platform that was thrust upon me and now look
00:27:16.400
at it as a blessing as opposed to the curse that it has been since 2008.
00:27:24.160
She wants to, uh, use her platform as a blessing. She wants to see it as a blessing. And just to be
00:27:30.320
totally clear about this, her, as you're probably aware, her platform exists because her daughter died
00:27:37.200
and her daughter, her young daughter didn't just die. Her daughter was killed, killed by Casey Anthony.
00:27:43.840
Uh, in my opinion, it is my opinion and the opinion of millions of other people, the opinion of
00:27:52.320
anyone who's looked at the evidence and has eyes that she's guilty. I mean, she was acquitted. Yes,
00:27:57.920
but acquitted doesn't mean innocent. I mean, she's, she's as innocent as OJ Simpson was. I'll put it that
00:28:03.680
way. Uh, I mean, this is a woman who actually had a Google search for full, full proof, proof
00:28:09.280
suffocation, full proof suffocation methods was a, a Google search on in her browser history.
00:28:17.920
Somebody made, somebody made that search on her computer on the last day that her daughter was
00:28:22.960
seen alive. That's just one of the many, many pieces of evidence. Uh, they found traces of chloroform
00:28:27.680
in the trunk of her car along with her daughter's hair and traces of, um, human decomposition.
00:28:34.320
So again, there were many pieces of evidence and it's obscene that she's walking free, but she is.
00:28:40.000
And now she's rebranding herself as an LGBTQ and women's rights advocate. And needless to say,
00:28:48.560
the LGBTQ camp and the feminists, you guys can have her. She's yours. She's on your team.
00:28:53.520
Congratulations. Um, and frankly, and I say this not as a joke at all because I wouldn't joke about
00:29:00.720
something as horrifying as this, that, that her history makes her perfectly qualified for, you
00:29:06.240
know, the, for that team because the Democrat party is the party of baby killers and, uh, and Casey
00:29:12.960
Anthony sadly fits right in. Okay. Let's brighten the mood a little bit. You've, um, uh, you almost
00:29:19.440
certainly seen this by now, but I did want to talk about it briefly. It's, uh, it is, it's right up my
00:29:24.560
alley in many ways. So Kieran Culkin, uh, won the Oscar for best supporting actor on Sunday for his
00:29:30.080
role in a movie called a real pain, which I saw. I saw that movie. There's a, uh, I think I saw
00:29:35.920
three or four of the Oscar nominated films this year, which is a record for me. At least it's
00:29:41.520
in recent times in the last couple of decades, that's a record for me. And so I saw that movie.
00:29:45.200
Um, it's about Kieran Culkin and Jesse Eisenberg, their characters touring Poland in honor of their
00:29:50.660
grandmother who had just died and was a Holocaust survivor. And the movie is, uh, it's, it's fine.
00:29:57.840
It's a fine movie. I didn't, it's, I don't think, I didn't think it was great. I don't think anyone
00:30:01.920
watched the movie and go, that was a great film. Uh, but it wasn't bad. Culkin's performance was
00:30:06.700
pretty good. He's a good actor. He was great in succession. Um, you know, if, if the movie business
00:30:14.080
that the film industry was in good shape, it's not the kind of movie that would win awards
00:30:17.640
because it's just like fine. You know, you give a solid B minus, um, you give it a 82%
00:30:24.000
on the report card, but kind of by default, it ends up winning some awards. Anyway, he's gotten a lot
00:30:30.340
of attention over the last day because of this moment from his acceptance speech. And in case
00:30:34.220
you haven't seen it, let's watch. This is, um, I have to thank my wife, Jess, uh, for absolutely
00:30:39.700
everything for giving my favorite people in the world. This is, please don't play the music
00:30:42.720
because I want to tell a really quick story about Jess. About a year ago, I was on a stage
00:30:46.160
like this and I very stupidly publicly said that I won a third kid from her because she
00:30:50.000
said if I won the award, I would, she would give me the kid. Uh, it turns out she said
00:30:54.780
that because she didn't think I was going to win. Um, but after, and people came up to her
00:31:00.020
and were like, you know, uh, really annoying her. I think, I think it got to her. But anyway,
00:31:05.420
uh, after the show, we're walking through a parking lot. She's holding the Emmy. We're trying
00:31:08.440
to find our car. Emily, you were there. So you're a witness. And she goes,
00:31:10.740
oh God, I did say that. I guess I owe you a third kid. And I turned to her and I said,
00:31:15.540
really, I want four. And she turned to me, I swear to God, this happened. It was just
00:31:20.380
over a year ago. She said, I will give you four when you win an Oscar.
00:31:27.240
I held my hand out. She shook it. And I have not brought it up once until just now. You
00:31:32.300
remember that, honey? You do? Okay. Then I just have this to say to you, Jess, love of my
00:31:36.600
life. Eve, little faith. No pressure. I love you. I'm really sorry. I did this again.
00:31:46.880
And let's get cracking on those kids. What do you say?
00:31:48.760
So it was a great moment. Very pro family. Um, a man who not only wants kids, but actually wants
00:31:54.620
an above average number of kids, if you can imagine. And, uh, we're just not used to seeing
00:31:59.500
that kind of thing from Hollywood. On the other hand, the fact that this is so notable and
00:32:03.240
encouraging is, uh, you know, it's kind of a sad statement in itself. It should not be shocking
00:32:07.180
that a man wants a bunch of kids, especially shouldn't be shocking that, that a wealthy man
00:32:11.140
wants a bunch of kids. Not that you need to be wealthy to have a lot of kids. You definitely
00:32:15.040
don't. So don't get me wrong. But if you are rich, then there's really nothing stopping
00:32:20.600
you. You don't, you don't need to worry at all about how you're going to afford it.
00:32:24.120
So why wouldn't you, I mean, why wouldn't you have a boatload of kids? And again, that's
00:32:30.220
really true regardless of your income level. And also objectively, it is just great having
00:32:37.200
a large family. It's a great thing. I know it won't surprise you to hear me say that I'm
00:32:41.260
certainly biased with six of my own, but it is, it is great. You should, you know, you,
00:32:46.060
you should have a lot of kids if you can. Uh, if, if, if you have a few, you should have
00:32:50.980
more. If you have no kids, well, get to work because it is great. And, um, you know, I was
00:32:56.900
thinking about this the other day. Well, I think about it all the time, of course, but the other
00:32:59.780
day, uh, when I came home from work and my five-year-old daughter was sitting at the kitchen
00:33:04.640
counter and she was coloring one of her princess coloring books or whatever. And then when I came
00:33:09.200
in, she popped down off of the stool and ran over and, uh, jumped into my arms. And then
00:33:14.320
my eight-year-old son was in the other room playing with his action figures. And my 11-year-old
00:33:18.040
son was outside shooting his bow and arrow. And my 11-year-old daughter was upstairs reading
00:33:22.460
and my two-year-old twins were riding their plastic cars around the house because we let
00:33:28.380
them ride it around the house and they've totally scratched up the floors, but it's fine. So it was
00:33:31.480
just so much life, you know, it was just so much life in the house. And it's an incredible
00:33:36.460
thing. How could it not bring you joy? How could it not be, uh, anyone's goal? And, uh,
00:33:44.180
I've had it both ways. I've come home to an empty house and I've come home to one full of energy and
00:33:49.040
life and love. And, uh, I am so much happier with the second option. I'm just so much happier.
00:33:53.760
It's so much better. It's so much better in every way. I cannot recommend it highly enough.
00:33:58.800
So Karen Culkin has, has the right idea. And you think about the comparison, Megan Basham
00:34:03.380
made this point on X when this video went viral that think about the comparison between this,
00:34:10.840
this video of him saying, Hey, let's have more kids. And the Hollywood actresses who credit their
00:34:18.500
abortions with their success. I think, uh, she mentioned the one, um, Michelle Williams,
00:34:25.200
I think was one back a couple of years ago. It was either at the Oscars or the Golden Globes.
00:34:29.460
And she got up there and talked about how, you know, getting an abortion, she wouldn't have been
00:34:33.120
able to do this without having gotten an abortion. Uh, you just, which is the more heartwarming story?
00:34:40.340
Okay. I don't care where you stand politically. I don't care what your position on abortion is.
00:34:46.580
Uh, it's, it's, what's more heartwarming. What's more encouraging?
00:34:50.200
It, it, to hear a man, to hear someone say, Hey, let's have more babies. This is great.
00:34:56.520
Or to hear someone say, well, I'm glad that I killed my child because otherwise I wouldn't
00:34:59.800
have had the success. And this is also kind of a rebuke. And I don't, I don't think he intended
00:35:06.860
it to be a rebuke. I don't know what his own politics are. I assume he's probably liberal
00:35:09.820
because he's in Hollywood, but it is, it stands as a rebuke of Michelle Williams because Michelle
00:35:16.080
Williams says, well, I wouldn't have been able to do this without having a bunch of kids
00:35:19.340
with it, without having killed my kid. If I had kids, I wouldn't have been able to accomplish
00:35:23.300
all this. And then you see people who did accomplish the same thing or more and they have
00:35:29.360
kids. So it is, it is actually possible. Um, all right. There are two subjects we discussed
00:35:38.460
prominently last week for some reason, and that would be Joy Reed and Lord of the Rings. And, uh,
00:35:44.080
now those two have come together in a, in a strange way. So I feel like I have to make
00:35:50.200
mention of it. It's actually kind of bizarre. You know, I was, I was ranting about both separately
00:35:54.240
last week and now they've come together in one story. What are the chances of that? So Joy
00:35:59.620
Reed over the weekend posted on blue sky, which is the little social media app where they go,
00:36:05.320
the left goes and talks to themselves. And, um, here's what she posted. She posted this.
00:36:10.740
We will never be a monarchy. Know that to quote the Lord of the Rings, uh, the Lord of the Rings
00:36:17.740
trilogy. Gondor has no King. Gondor needs no King.
00:36:25.100
Yes. The, the Lord of the Rings famously, famously the anti-monarchist screed, the Lord
00:36:31.000
of the Rings. That's why the third book in the trilogy is called, you know, the return of the
00:36:35.040
democratically elected president who will serve for four years and then be done at the conclusion
00:36:39.760
of his term. Right. Remember that? Remember that book when they made it a movie, that was a good
00:36:43.540
one. And as everyone knows at the end of that book and movie Aragorn, you know, he shows up to claim
00:36:49.060
his crown and they're like, sorry, Aragorn, we're a democracy now. So then Aragorn has to, he says,
00:36:54.920
okay, oh man. So he has to launch a campaign and he, he takes on, uh, Legolas as his campaign
00:37:02.980
manager and Frodo as his spokesman. And there's a series of debates and eventually Aragorn is elected
00:37:09.260
with a narrow electoral college victory. Uh, but then he's defeated, um, in, in, when he runs for
00:37:15.720
reelection by the Dorf guy, by who's the, uh, Gimli, which was a big moment for Gondor because it
00:37:21.480
was their first Dorf elected to national political office, kind of a, you know, sort of a break in the
00:37:26.220
glass ceiling there. It was a weird end, weird end of the book, to be honest, um, explains why it's so
00:37:30.220
long. Or maybe none of that actually happened. Maybe if Joy Reid had checked, not even because
00:37:35.940
when she tweeted this, a lot of people said, well, if you actually watch the movie or read the book,
00:37:38.880
you don't even need to do that. Just look at the titles, at least check the titles because the third
00:37:45.660
movie is in fact called the return of the king, because it turns out that Gondor not only gets a
00:37:51.500
king, but part of the whole point is that it did need one. That's like a key point in the whole story
00:37:58.540
is that it, is that it, it, in fact did need a king. It was his destiny to be the king.
00:38:04.160
And in fact, the, the quote Gondor needs no king is from Boromir. And in, in the movie,
00:38:10.040
when he says that phrase, there's ominous music playing in the background, which is a signal that
00:38:14.540
we're not supposed to agree with it, right? This is not supposed to be an inspirational moment.
00:38:19.360
And that's because he said that before betraying his friends and trying to seize the ring for himself.
00:38:23.940
And that is the character that Joy Reid apparently identifies with, which of course is no surprise.
00:38:30.880
And this is what happens. Joy Reid is so dumb that she has me doing the nerdy fact check. Okay. She has
00:38:37.740
me like pushing up my glasses, you know, well, actually Aragorn did, uh, become the, the rightful
00:38:45.960
ruler of the kingdom of Gondor. Actually, when I'm the one calling you out for butchering mythology,
00:38:52.700
then, uh, you, you know, you screwed up big time. So that's, that's Joy Reid. You know,
00:38:57.700
I was worried. I, as you know, last week, I was very worried that the end of her show would mean
00:39:02.860
that her stupidity could no longer be content for my show. And, uh, it, it, it were, you know,
00:39:09.860
a week later and she's back in the show. And so I think, I think we're going to be fine guys.
00:39:14.540
I think we're going to be okay. Let's get to the comment section.
00:39:21.540
You know, what's fascinating when your metabolism is working properly, you feel the benefits in
00:39:30.940
literally every aspect of your life. I've discovered myself an incredible tool that gives me insights
00:39:35.600
to create a healthy metabolism for my body. It's called Lumen. Lumen is the world's first handheld
00:39:41.200
metabolic coach. It measures your metabolism through your breath. And the app tells you if
00:39:45.540
you're running, if you're burning fat or carbs, it then provides personalized guidance to improve
00:39:49.420
your nutrition, workout, sleep, and even stress management. Using it couldn't be simpler. I
00:39:54.560
breathe in my Lumen first thing in the morning to understand my metabolism and get a personalized
00:39:58.020
nutrition plan for the day. I can also check before and after workouts and meals to know exactly
00:40:02.980
what's happening in my body in real time. Here's why it matters. Your metabolism is your body's
00:40:07.200
engine. It's how your body turns food into fuel. When it's optimized, you'll experience better energy
00:40:12.140
levels, improved fitness results, and even better sleep. Lumen gives you all the recommendations you
00:40:16.600
need to improve your metabolic health, helping you make informed decisions about your nutrition and
00:40:20.840
lifestyle. Take the next step to improve your health. Go to lumen.me slash walls to get 20% off
00:40:26.140
your Lumen. That's L-U-M-E-N dot me slash walls for 20% off your purchase. Thank you Lumen for sponsoring
00:40:32.820
this episode. The snub of Am I Racist will go down as the greatest snub in Oscars history.
00:40:39.800
Yeah. Well, I mean, Stanley Kubrick and Alfred Hitchcock never won Oscars. And I would say that
00:40:48.580
my snub was greater. I think we can all agree with that. Or maybe not, because it's hard to call
00:40:57.980
Am I Racist actually a snub, considering that it never had a real chance at all. It was never really
00:41:02.880
in the running. I mean, it should have been, but in actuality, there was never any chance.
00:41:09.540
Because obviously, they're going to give the best documentary to whichever documentary was
00:41:13.900
most politically acceptable to the Academy voters. There was just zero chance of it working out
00:41:21.160
any other way. But by all rights, by all rights, we should have been nominated. So even if it's not
00:41:28.640
the greatest snub, even if it's not quite, you know, even if it doesn't quite beat Kubrick and
00:41:34.520
Hitchcock, it's still a snub. Let's see, another comment says, oh, you're terrified of losing Trumpy
00:41:44.340
subscribers too, aren't you? There goes your intellectual integrity. Well, I assume this comment
00:41:48.180
is about my take on Zelensky, which is funny because I've had the same take on Ukraine and
00:41:54.060
Zelensky since day one. Since day one of this story and the invasion, I've been saying basically
00:41:59.460
the same thing. So there's no history of me kind of calibrating, of me triangulating, trying to
00:42:06.980
figure out, you know, where Trump is, where MAGA is, and I'll decide what. It's not the case. I've had
00:42:12.180
the same take the entire time. But this is yet again, obviously just impugning my motives rather
00:42:19.240
than addressing the point, which is, which is all that political debate on the internet ever is now.
00:42:26.420
It's just, it's just that it's always, you know, we've talked about this. It's always now,
00:42:30.500
which is the laziest form of argument. It's the laziest and most useless form of argument
00:42:36.040
because there's no way to really respond to it when you say, well, you're only saying that because
00:42:42.120
of this. Well, there's no way you're, what you're trying to do is read my mind and there's no way
00:42:48.020
for me to, I'm the only one with access to my mind. And so, so the, the only evidence of what I'm
00:42:54.480
really thinking is just what I say about what I'm thinking. You kind of got to take that or leave it.
00:42:59.160
Um, but it also doesn't matter. Whatever my motives are for saying it, it doesn't really
00:43:06.960
matter. What matters, is it true or not? That's, that's what should, should concern.
00:43:12.460
Um, Zelensky is severely underdressed for the meeting, but he's still not as ridiculous looking
00:43:16.660
as John Fetterman. Oh, definitely. I completely agree. Um, well, the hoodie thing, you know,
00:43:22.800
because he walks around in hoodies and gym shorts and he's an American. So I would expect him
00:43:29.100
to have more respect for our customs and, uh, for the office that he occupies.
00:43:36.340
Matt, I've always admired you, but if you're prepared to label a man who's doing his best to
00:43:40.040
preserve his people in his country, a welfare queen, because he asks for help in the face of
00:43:43.680
cruel, violent, murderous aggression, then my admiration is severely diminished. I had thought
00:43:48.940
you an honorable man. Well, I must not be. I mean, how could I be an honorable man and disagree
00:43:54.620
with you? Uh, my, my, my, my, the, my honor depends entirely on agreeing with you about
00:44:00.340
everything it turns out. And, uh, so yes, I, well then I guess I'm not honorable. Look,
00:44:04.540
you can think whatever you want of me. Um, it doesn't matter to me. Uh, Zelensky cares about
00:44:11.180
his country. Great. I don't hold that against him. I care about mine. And what I know is that
00:44:19.720
he, Zelensky is not only demanding and taking hundreds of billions of dollars out of the
00:44:26.880
pockets of American citizens, but he is trying to pull us into a war that could easily turn into
00:44:33.240
a global conflict that ends in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans. That's what
00:44:37.960
I know. So yeah, I'm going to have unkind things to say about somebody like that because my priority
00:44:45.460
is my country. I understand it's not his priority. I don't expect it to be. I expect his priority to
00:44:51.760
be, to be Ukraine, but my priority is America. And when he comes over here and tells us that we
00:44:58.520
should prioritize his country, even though he doesn't give a damn about ours, that I don't,
00:45:03.080
that I take exception to. And when you, and when that's your position, you're only going to get
00:45:07.920
contempt from me. That's all you're getting. I'm not, I won't even dignify that with anything else
00:45:11.380
other than contempt. When you come from another country, you're a foreigner and you come here
00:45:16.160
and you dare to say, well, this is what you owe us. You should care about us. Well, you know,
00:45:20.700
what the hell, what has Zelensky ever done for America? What has Zelensky ever done for America,
00:45:24.680
for Americans? When has he ever demonstrated the slightest concern ever in his entire life?
00:45:28.820
What, can you give me one example, one time? No, but you, cause you want it to always be one,
00:45:33.560
it's supposed to always be one sided. We're supposed to care about every other country and go to war to
00:45:37.620
protect them and spend billions and trillions of dollars on all these other people. We never
00:45:42.260
expect to say, but we're never supposed to get anything in return ever. Um, we are supposed to
00:45:48.660
value, uh, the citizens of other countries in ways that those same citizens and the leaders of those
00:45:57.060
countries don't value us. We are, we are supposed to carry this expectation and this burden that no one
00:46:04.560
has ever carried. It's this, it's never worked this way for anyone ever. It's like you, you care
00:46:12.700
about your own country and the welfare and safety of your own country and your own countrymen. That's
00:46:16.180
how it's always worked. Except now, except in, except for modern America specifically, we're supposed
00:46:23.840
to be the only ones who, uh, value everyone equally or, or in fact, value foreigners even more than we
00:46:32.160
value our own people. And I just don't. So no, I don't want to see a single American life lost in
00:46:39.800
defense of Ukraine. And I would rather see Ukraine conquered. I would rather see it cease to exist as
00:46:48.140
a political entity, um, than see a single American die over it. Like definitely. I mean, of course that,
00:46:59.920
that should be the position of every single American. That's a completely rational position
00:47:03.500
tonight at 9 PM Eastern president Donald Trump addresses Congress. A moment, uh, this big demands
00:47:09.260
coverage that actually rises to the occasion. That's exactly what we're delivering for the first
00:47:13.160
time ever. Ben Shapiro and myself will be live from DC covering Trump's address from the nation's
00:47:18.020
capital. This is a connection between, uh, the daily wire and presidential administration like never
00:47:22.220
before. This isn't just coverage of the event. It's coverage from where it's happening. It all kicks
00:47:26.420
off with our exclusive pre-show at 8 30 PM Eastern on daily wire plus setting the stage for Trump's
00:47:31.360
address. Then watch history unfold live with us only on daily wire plus don't go anywhere afterwards.
00:47:36.400
It's backstage live breaking down what it all means for America's future. This is coverage.
00:47:40.880
The media won't give you watch it all tonight exclusively on daily wire plus. Now let's get to
00:47:45.760
our daily cancellation.
00:47:46.580
It probably won't come as much of a shock for you to learn that I did not see and have no plans to
00:47:57.500
see the film Anora, which apparently won best picture at the Oscars the other day. This is a
00:48:01.540
film that was a pretty low on my radar for obvious reasons. And if we're being honest,
00:48:04.560
it was low on the Academy's radar too. In all likelihood, it was their backup plan,
00:48:08.600
kind of their plan B for best picture after the lead actor and Amelia Perez summarily took that film
00:48:14.700
out of consideration by bad mouthing the patron saint of violent drug addicted felons who assault
00:48:19.480
women and try to rob convenience stores. After that whole debacle, the Academy presumably had
00:48:24.120
to spend a few days looking through the old tweets of everybody in the cast of Anora just to make sure
00:48:28.220
that they too didn't make the mistake of besmirching the good name of St. George Floyd.
00:48:33.320
And then when the background check came back clear, they decided to just go with that. So
00:48:37.120
if you're not familiar with Anora, because like everyone else in the country, you've never seen it.
00:48:41.420
Here's the synopsis. It's a tragic comedy about a prostitute or sex worker, as the euphemism goes,
00:48:48.200
who's hired by the son of a Russian oligarch who lives in a waterfront mansion. And then after they
00:48:52.680
party for a while and do other things, I suppose, they elope. There's a lot of scenes along the way
00:48:58.380
that can be fairly described as pornographic in nature, as you might imagine. In fact, that's most
00:49:03.080
of the film. And then, spoiler alert, the marriage doesn't end well. Somehow the sudden union of a
00:49:07.480
prostitute with the son of a Russian oligarch wasn't meant to be. Doesn't work out great.
00:49:13.020
So Anora is cast aside to her great shock and dismay. And then there's some drama with some
00:49:17.280
Armenian henchmen who kidnapped the prostitute and tie her up and gag her and offer her $10,000 to
00:49:23.520
annul the marriage, which is only natural in a situation like this. I mean, who among us hasn't
00:49:28.580
been kidnapped by Armenian henchmen after our impromptu marriages with the sons of Russian
00:49:33.180
oligarchs goes south. Relatable stuff we're talking about. And then it gets even more relatable
00:49:37.500
when one of the Armenian thugs develops some affection for the prostitute. And the film
00:49:41.460
ends with her trying to have sex with him. But then she changes her mind and begins crying because,
00:49:46.060
of course, affection is difficult under those circumstances, you know, circumstances that
00:49:49.640
are rather emotionally fraught. And and sort of that's the end. So for the record, if there are
00:49:54.420
any inaccuracies in my synopsis that I just recited, you should know that very honestly, I don't care.
00:50:00.240
This film is one of the lowest grossing best picture winners in the history of the Oscars.
00:50:04.280
So the odds are pretty low that anyone's going to call me out on it because no one's seen it,
00:50:07.400
even if I'm wrong about something. The larger point is that at the Oscars,
00:50:11.180
this film became a rallying cry for prostitutes, actors and actresses, along with many others who
00:50:16.420
are associated with this film, went out of their way to make this point as explicit as possible.
00:50:21.220
Here, for example, is the star of the film, Mikey Madison, explaining that she wants to,
00:50:25.400
quote, honor the sex worker community. Watch. Also, thank you to Kennedy Schneider. Thank you to
00:50:32.620
our incredible consultants. I also just want to, again, recognize and honor the sex worker community.
00:50:40.820
I will. I will continue to support and be an ally. All of the incredible people,
00:50:48.820
the women that I've had the privilege of meeting from that community has been one of the highlights
00:50:53.980
of this incredible, of this entire incredible experience. Big cheer, big cheer for prostitutes
00:51:00.140
there. So she begins by praising the incredible consultants involved in the film. And then she
00:51:05.220
expresses her affection for the so-called sex worker community as if they're two distinct categories.
00:51:09.960
Apparently in this one moment, we're meant to assume that consultants are morally distinct in
00:51:14.680
some way for prostitutes. Personally, I don't know what's worse to be a prostitute or a consultant
00:51:20.440
or a prostitute consultant. I mean, that's, I mean, that combines two of the most disreputable
00:51:26.600
professions into one. And then we're supposed to conclude that it's important to be a, quote,
00:51:30.560
ally of the sex worker community, which is a statement that that's so demented that you'd
00:51:36.240
probably be embarrassed to even joke about it in private. But at the Oscars, which were broadcast to
00:51:39.980
literally hundreds of viewers, it was an applause line. Yes, the message from this year's Academy
00:51:44.520
Awards is that we're supposed to be allies to prostitutes. We're supposed to watch about two
00:51:49.480
hours of soft core pornography, which is the film, and conclude that we're on the prostitute side.
00:51:54.520
That's supposed to be the brave stand that we take after watching this film. That's the grand
00:51:58.900
message they wanted to communicate to make us all enlightened. Of course, every pathetic,
00:52:03.500
sex-starved, lonely man on the planet is more than happy to demonstrate his allyship to hookers.
00:52:09.200
And those men don't need a film to make them think that way. But just in case they needed it,
00:52:14.460
Anora is currently available to rent on the internet for about $5. And things somehow
00:52:19.380
get even creepier when you realize that the director of this film, Sean Baker,
00:52:23.180
has pretty much spent his entire career making films about prostitutes. He's directed at least
00:52:27.500
five films about prostitutes by my count. And when he's asked about this, he said that his goal is
00:52:33.600
to legalize prostitution for reasons that he wasn't exactly clear about, but that's his goal.
00:52:37.460
I've been pretty outspoken about my stance on sex work. It's our oldest profession, yet it has an
00:52:46.780
incredible unfair stigma applied to it. And what I've been trying to do with my films is sort of
00:52:52.740
chip away at that very unfair stigma. Personally, I think it should be decriminalized. And I guess
00:53:00.860
through my work, through hopefully humanizing my characters that are usually seen as perhaps
00:53:07.220
caricatures in most film and television, it will help do that.
00:53:13.420
This is a guy who just won four Oscars for this film. He won for the original screenplay,
00:53:17.840
film editing, directing, and best picture, all for a single film about how important it is to legalize
00:53:22.260
prostitution. If you keep me track, that sets a record for most Oscars won by a single person for
00:53:27.280
one film. Walt Disney didn't even do that. Walt Disney apparently won four Oscars in one night,
00:53:32.300
but not for the same movie. So this is how the Academy is making history. They couldn't give the
00:53:38.300
best actress award to a man because that man was not a fan of George Floyd. So instead of doing that,
00:53:43.660
they'll shower the porno film with awards instead. Now you'll see various conservative commentators
00:53:48.560
online defending an aura and saying that it's actually critical of prostitution. And they'll point
00:53:53.000
to the fact that in the film, the prostitute is obviously broken and unhappy by the end of it.
00:53:57.280
And that may be true if Wikipedia's synopsis is to be believed, but the actual point of the film,
00:54:02.140
according to the people who made it, who I think are probably authorities on the subject,
00:54:05.860
is that we need to sympathize more with these prostitutes and legalize what they're doing.
00:54:09.520
I mean, that is their motivation. And in that light, it's clear that Anora isn't really a film so
00:54:15.140
much as part of a broader campaign to normalize and celebrate prostitution. It's not really a movie
00:54:19.780
that's supposed to impress you with its plot or characters or anything like that. It's a political
00:54:22.780
statement. In fact, it's as explicit a political statement as it could possibly be.
00:54:26.780
The problem is that the leftists who campaign to humanize sex workers, as we heard from Mikey
00:54:33.340
Madison use those words, when they say that, they have it only half right. Yes, we should humanize
00:54:42.240
them. I mean, they are human beings and their human dignity should be respected. But the way we humanize
00:54:48.660
and ultimately help quote unquote sex workers is to condemn, prohibit and abolish quote unquote sex
00:54:56.440
work. You cannot legitimize prostitution while at the same time trying to be an ally to prostitutes.
00:55:02.900
The way to be an ally to help them is to delegitimize prostitution and to drive it out of
00:55:08.760
polite society and as far back onto the fringes as we can possibly get it. You hear this slogan,
00:55:14.160
sex work is real work all the time. And that is a slogan that you champion if you're trying to
00:55:21.920
convince women to remain prostitutes forever. It's like saying that a drug habit is a habit just as
00:55:28.340
legitimate as the habit of gardening or stamp collecting. When you say that, you're not helping
00:55:33.160
alcoholics. You're abandoning them. You are consigning them to a life of misery and failure.
00:55:38.620
The people who made Anora wouldn't win an Oscar with that kind of message, of course, but it's
00:55:45.940
obviously the right one, which is why no one bothered to see this film in the first place. And that is
00:55:49.740
why Anora is today canceled. That'll do it for the show today. Thanks for watching. Thanks for
00:55:54.620
listening. Talk to you tomorrow. Have a great day. Godspeed.
Link copied!