The Matt Walsh Show - Ep. 1565 - Democrats Reveal How They Will Change The Rules To Take Back Power

00:00:00.000 Today on the Matt Walsh Show, the Democrat Party has lost touch with the voters completely.

00:00:03.580 Their only hope of regaining power is to rig the system in their favor.

00:00:07.120 That's what the Wisconsin Supreme Court election next week is all about.

00:00:09.660 And speaking of losing touch, Tim Walz declares that Democrats need to proudly embrace DEI and wokeness.

00:00:15.220 I, for one, think that's a great idea for them.

00:00:17.760 And Thomas Massey introduces a bill requiring lawmakers to divulge if they're dual citizens with another country.

00:00:23.080 How is that not already the law?

00:00:24.420 We'll talk about all that and more today on the Matt Walsh Show.

00:00:30.000 We'll be right back.

00:01:00.000 And that's why I want to tell you about Armra Colostrum.

00:01:03.820 Colostrum isn't some laboratory creation.

00:01:05.660 It's literally the first food nature provides to every mammal at birth.

00:01:09.100 We're talking about nature's original superfood packed with over 400 bioactive nutrients that your body instinctively knows how to use.

00:01:15.280 And Armra has perfected a way to deliver this incredible substance in its purest form.

00:01:19.480 The secret is in their proprietary cold chain biopotent pasteurization technology.

00:01:23.460 While other supplements lose their potency through processing, Armra's method preserves these vital nutrients exactly as nature intended.

00:01:30.420 Plus, they source everything from grass-fed cows and American family farms supporting our agricultural communities while delivering a premium product.

00:01:37.780 In times when we're surrounded by synthetic solutions and processed products, isn't it refreshing to find something that's both innovative and completely natural?

00:01:43.960 This is the kind of advancement we should champion, one that enhances what nature has already perfected.

00:01:49.180 We've worked out a special offer from my audience.

00:01:51.120 Receive 15% off your first order when you go to tryarmra.com slash Walsh or enter code Walsh.

00:01:57.300 That's T-R-Y-A-R-M-R-A dot com slash Walsh.

00:02:01.280 We've now established about a million different ways that Democrats have no intention of learning anything substantive from their defeat in November.

00:02:08.820 First, there was the disastrous meeting to select new leadership of the DNC, which resembled a bad American Idol audition more than anything else.

00:02:16.580 The various non-binary and BIPOC candidates spent all their time singing and complaining about how oppressed they are instead of reflecting in any way on how they just lost the election.

00:02:25.380 And then Democrats encouraged a domestic terror campaign against Tesla, which is obviously a surefire way to demonstrate your commitment to a stable, functioning democracy.

00:02:34.480 Now, on top of that, Democrats also decided to go to federal court on behalf of Venezuelan terrorists who had just been deported because, as we all know, that's what swing voters are really passionate about, you know, getting all the violent gang members back into the country.

00:02:47.540 It would be a pretty significant understatement to say that this is not a winning strategy for the next election.

00:02:52.520 To any objective observer, Democrats are acting like a party that badly wants to go extinct.

00:02:58.320 But, of course, Democrats have no intention of going extinct.

00:03:01.340 Their sole purpose is obtaining as much power as possible.

00:03:03.980 So it's worth asking, as we watch Democrats double down on every single one of their policy positions from the last election cycle, what exactly their plan is going forward?

00:03:14.400 If they don't intend to appeal to voters, what are they going to do?

00:03:18.220 How are they going to regain power?

00:03:19.700 However, recently, the Democrats leader in the House, Hakeem Jeffries, answered that question because Jeffries is one of those people who's simply too dumb to keep a secret.

00:03:29.660 We have this footage that makes one thing very clear.

00:03:32.180 Democrats do not intend to persuade voters based on ideas or policies or anything like that.

00:03:37.260 That's not a major part of their strategy.

00:03:39.340 Instead, Democrats want to change the rules.

00:03:41.980 That's the winning strategy they've settled on.

00:03:44.620 Specifically, they're going all in on a Supreme Court race that's taking place on Tuesday in Wisconsin.

00:03:50.420 And if the Democrats win the race, they'll retain control of the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

00:03:54.040 And then Democrats intend to use the Wisconsin Supreme Court to redraw congressional districts in the state so that more Democrats are elected, which, if successful, would ultimately swing control of the House of Representatives back to the Democrat Party.

00:04:05.680 So this is a statewide race that will have major implications for the entire country.

00:04:11.840 And watch as Hakeem Jeffries explains.

00:04:14.840 There are gerrymandered congressional lines right now in Wisconsin.

00:04:20.020 Wisconsin's a 50-50 state, as I mentioned.

00:04:22.340 But there are six Republicans and only two Democrats out of an eight-person delegation because the lines are broken.

00:04:29.640 And as soon as possible, we need to be able to revisit that and have fair lines.

00:04:37.860 The only way for that to be even a significant possibility is if you have an enlightened Supreme Court.

00:04:46.740 That's one of the creepier uses of the word enlightened that you'll ever hear.

00:04:50.800 The Supreme Court of Wisconsin needs to be enlightened, says Hakeem Jeffries.

00:04:54.600 And by that, he means the Supreme Court should be composed of left-wing operatives who will do everything in their power to benefit the Democrat Party.

00:05:02.080 This is how Democrats think about judges in every context.

00:05:04.580 Republicans select judges who will be faithful to the law, supposedly, which inevitably means that they routinely betray conservative principles and vote with Democrats half the time.

00:05:13.680 But Democrats, on the other hand, select judges who vote in lockstep with their party.

00:05:17.620 That's the only thing that matters to them.

00:05:19.220 That's what they've done in the U.S. Supreme Court, and it's what they're doing in Wisconsin as well.

00:05:22.480 If you're confused about exactly what Jeffries is talking about, I'll try to explain the general idea.

00:05:29.260 So Democrats are claiming that Republicans have gerrymandered Wisconsin congressional districts by drawing the districts in an artificial way so that Democrats are only capable of winning two districts out of eight total in the state.

00:05:43.240 So in other words, they're saying that districts are currently drawn so that all of the Democrat voters are jammed into two districts.

00:05:49.520 And now Democrats are promising to use the Supreme Court to redraw those districts in such a way as to guarantee the Democrat voters are spread across more districts.

00:05:58.780 And in the end, the goal is to seat more Democrats in the House of Representatives and then unseat Mike Johnson and and unseat the Republicans from power.

00:06:06.540 Now, one of the many problems here is that Wisconsin's congressional districts, as they stand right now, are completely reasonable.

00:06:14.260 There is no reason to redraw them unless you're trying to find some artificial way to get more Democrats into power.

00:06:20.540 So here's an image of what the districts look like at the moment.

00:06:24.240 You can see it there. And as you can see, the Milwaukee and Madison areas in the southern portion of the state each have their own district.

00:06:31.340 And those are the two congressional districts that Democrats control at the moment, districts two and four.

00:06:37.340 Now, if you compare that district map to the results in Wisconsin from the last presidential election, you'll immediately notice that the Democrats have a problem.

00:06:45.740 You can take a look at it here.

00:06:46.920 As you can see, the overwhelming number of counties in the state are Republican.

00:06:52.500 Pretty much all of them voted for Trump.

00:06:55.080 Democrats' strongest base support in Wisconsin is in the southern portion of the state by far in places like Milwaukee and Madison.

00:07:02.060 Those are the urban centers. So that makes sense.

00:07:04.860 And this is why Republicans have control of six out of the eight districts in Wisconsin, even though Donald Trump defeated Kamala Harris in Wisconsin by less than one percent.

00:07:12.840 Again, the Democrat voters happen to be extremely concentrated in those two places.

00:07:17.940 And each of these two places is represented by a distinct congressional district, which, again, all of that makes sense.

00:07:24.720 That's how it's supposed to work.

00:07:26.380 In order to accomplish the result of Democrats like Hakeem Jeffries won, which is something like a 50-50 split in the congressional districts, you need to start carving up districts two and four.

00:07:38.080 There's just no other way to do it, given that the rest of the state is reliably conservative.

00:07:41.640 That's what Democrats will have the Wisconsin Supreme Court do if they win the election on Tuesday.

00:07:47.080 Milwaukee and Madison would be divided in various ad hoc, arbitrary ways just for the purpose of creating more districts for Democrats to win.

00:07:57.920 But this is not how congressional districts are supposed to work.

00:08:02.380 Congressional districts aren't supposed to be drawn so that they produce the same results as statewide elections.

00:08:08.840 They're supposed to be drawn to give a voice to these specific needs of various districts, including rural areas, which don't have a lot in common with cities like Milwaukee.

00:08:18.460 It's a similar reason why we have the Electoral College, which, of course, Democrats are also trying to abolish.

00:08:23.940 We want congressional districts to reflect the unique nature of a particular area.

00:08:27.900 That's the whole point of them.

00:08:28.940 But for many years now, Democrats in Wisconsin have attempted to use redistricting for a very different purpose.

00:08:36.060 And they've been having a lot of success.

00:08:38.260 In late 2023, Democrats in Wisconsin installed a judge on the state Supreme Court who had openly campaigned on the platform of redrawing the state's electoral maps for state and local elections.

00:08:49.880 This is apparently the kind of thing that judges do in Wisconsin.

00:08:51.940 They tell voters how they'll decide cases once they become a judge.

00:08:57.600 And that judge won.

00:08:58.540 And indeed, the maps for state-level elections were ultimately redrawn.

00:09:02.500 And the results were immediate.

00:09:04.440 In the November election, which, again, Donald Trump won in Wisconsin, Democrats flipped 14 state Senate and Assembly seats in Wisconsin.

00:09:12.820 Yes, in an election where the Republican candidate for president was victorious in the statewide vote in Wisconsin, Republicans nevertheless suffered major losses in the state government.

00:09:22.720 And without any irony whatsoever, Democrats celebrated this outcome as a major victory for democracy.

00:09:29.340 And now that they've rigged the statewide districts, Democrats are taking aim at Wisconsin's federal congressional districts so that they can retake the House and obstruct Donald Trump in Congress.

00:09:39.360 And it's not just Hakeem Jeffries who's admitting this.

00:09:41.120 I watched a little bit of the debate between Brad Schimmel, the Republican candidate for the Supreme Court seat, and Susan Crawford, who's a Democrat candidate.

00:09:50.180 And it turns out that Crawford received an email invitation for an event about how she can help Democrats gain two seats in the House of Representatives.

00:09:58.860 And then she attended the event via Zoom.

00:10:01.760 And watch how she tried to explain this.

00:10:04.660 Judge Crawford, you were recently on a call with Democratic donors who have given to your campaign.

00:10:09.100 The meeting was billed as a chance to put two more House seats in play for 2026.

00:10:14.180 No matter how long you were on that call, how was that appropriate?

00:10:17.740 Well, I don't think that the email that was sent out was an appropriate way to announce a judicial candidate, to be frank.

00:10:24.520 I appeared in a short Zoom appearance with that group.

00:10:29.060 No mention was made of the congressional maps while I was in the meeting.

00:10:33.600 I don't know what they discussed for the rest of it, but certainly no mention was made of the congressional maps while I was in the meeting.

00:10:39.660 You still chose to join that meeting.

00:10:41.300 Right.

00:10:41.460 I also did not see that email or the way it was being billed before I participated.

00:10:47.600 I only found out about that after the fact.

00:10:49.540 I'm going to note this.

00:10:50.520 We have to take my opponent's word for it about what happened on that phone call because we've never had any evidence of just what happened except the email that went out.

00:10:58.960 And it's hard for me to accept that she didn't see the email invitation that was inviting them to come on this call with her and find out how you can get her on the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

00:11:11.100 And they can turn two Republican congressional seats into Democrat congressional seats.

00:11:16.320 So this is the level of corruption and shamelessness that Democrats are bringing to this race.

00:11:20.580 Their candidate for the Wisconsin Supreme Court gets caught attending a planning session for how she's going to use her position as a supposedly nonpartisan judge who follows the law to help Democrats in the House.

00:11:33.880 That's what this event was about.

00:11:36.240 And then she lies about it during a televised debate.

00:11:39.080 And somehow she's still ahead in the polls.

00:11:41.740 And I watched some more of this debate and she rattles off the usual lies about abortion and how important it is for women to be able to murder their children for any reason.

00:11:49.180 And then she lies about heartbeat bills and so on.

00:11:52.240 She is in every respect an atrocious candidate and very dishonest.

00:11:56.260 She's acting exactly like a generic Democrat partisan operative because that's exactly what she is.

00:12:02.060 Republicans simply should not lose this race.

00:12:05.020 But at the moment, roughly 95% of Kamala Harris voters are backing Crawford, while only around 87% of Trump voters are supporting Schimmel.

00:12:14.140 And that needs to change between now and Tuesday or else Crawford will win.

00:12:18.080 And that can potentially be a disaster for Republicans at the national level, at least in the short term.

00:12:23.960 Now, at the same time, because it's Friday, it's worth ending on a note of optimism here.

00:12:28.020 Regardless of what happens in Wisconsin, it looks like Democrats' representation in the House of Representatives is going to decline significantly by 2030 when the next census kicks in.

00:12:37.320 And that's because, as this map demonstrates, you can see on the screen here, people are leaving states like California, New York, Illinois, and they're flooding into states like Texas and Florida.

00:12:48.740 Democrats have forced millions of people to leave the states that they've mismanaged.

00:12:53.700 And that affects representation in the House, which is based on population, whether those residents are legal or illegal.

00:12:59.120 And on balance, that likely means that Republicans will pick up around 12 seats in the House by 2030, which is more than three times the size of the GOP's current majority.

00:13:08.900 And because the Trump administration is sharply cutting down on the number of illegal aliens in this country, it's going to be difficult for Democrats to compensate by flooding the zone with foreign nationals, which is their usual strategy.

00:13:18.800 So, in other words, the broader indicators for conservatives are very strong right now.

00:13:24.260 Democrats are doubling down on their most insane and alienating positions, and they're resorting to gerrymandering and promoting judges who are obviously corrupt in an attempt to claw back a couple of House seats.

00:13:34.960 But whether Democrats win those seats or not, the fact remains that Democrats' constituency is shrinking by the day.

00:13:42.760 That's also why they lost the popular vote in the last election, to their great shock and horror.

00:13:46.820 No matter how much lawfare these people engage in, it remains true that, in this country, voters, not judges, have the power.

00:13:55.300 What we're seeing is that Democrats, both in Wisconsin and in Washington, apparently believe otherwise.

00:14:01.000 They think judges get to run the executive branch just like they think judges get to award Democrats another two seats in the House of Representatives.

00:14:07.060 But on Tuesday, with the entire country watching, voters in the state of Wisconsin have an opportunity to prove them wrong.

00:14:13.400 And for the sake of the rule of law in this country and for the Republicans' control of the House, let's hope they do so.

00:14:21.560 Now let's get to our five headlines.

00:14:22.800 Congratulations, you are the unwitting star of the Internet's most invasive reality show,

00:14:33.500 where data brokers are auctioning off your personal information to whoever's got pocket chains and Internet connection.

00:14:38.720 Your name, address, Social Security number are all floating around out there like a chain email from 2002 that just won't die.

00:14:44.340 Luckily, Delete.me makes it easy, quick, and safe to remove your personal data online at a time when surveillance and data breaches are common enough to make everybody vulnerable.

00:14:53.560 For anybody with an active online presence, privacy should be really important.

00:14:57.520 You may need to be visible for work, but that doesn't mean that your home address and phone number should be available to anyone who searches for you.

00:15:03.460 That's why I'm so glad Delete.me exists.

00:15:05.480 My producer, McKenna, signed up for an accountant.

00:15:08.280 Knowing Delete.me is there to monitor her personal data when needed is such a great asset for her.

00:15:12.920 They can really give you the peace of mind you need in today's digital world.

00:15:16.040 Delete.me values your privacy and ensures its protection.

00:15:19.240 Tell their experts exactly what personal information you want removed, and they'll handle the entire deletion process for you,

00:15:24.320 which is great because you probably have better things to do with your time and chase personal information across the Internet's endless databases.

00:15:30.600 Take control of your data and keep your private life private by signing up for Delete.me.

00:15:34.340 Now at a special discount for our listeners today, get 20% off your Delete.me plan by texting Walsh to 64000.

00:15:41.700 The only way to get 20% off is to text Walsh to 64000.

00:15:45.860 That's Walsh to 64000.

00:15:48.040 Message and data rates may apply.

00:15:50.180 So speaking of Democrats not learning any lessons, Tim Walz has been on tour, I guess.

00:15:56.840 I don't know what he's doing exactly.

00:15:58.860 Well, I know what he's doing.

00:15:59.780 He thinks he's running for president in 2028, which I very much hope he does, especially given this video and his political insights.

00:16:11.500 So listen to what he said here and also watch the visuals.

00:16:16.040 If you're watching the video podcast, the visuals are important because look at the audience that he's speaking to.

00:16:21.580 Here it is.

00:16:23.360 That our strength is our diversity.

00:16:26.660 We've been talking about this for years as a country of immigrants, and we let them define the issue on immigration.

00:16:33.560 We let them define the issue on DNI, DEI, and we let them define what woke is.

00:16:39.520 We got ourselves in this mess because we weren't bold enough to stand up and say, you're damn right we're proud of these policies.

00:16:47.180 We're going to put them in, and we're going to execute them.

00:16:51.300 Now, before we get into what he actually said, as I said, note the audience.

00:16:58.420 You look at that audience, and it looks downright geriatric.

00:17:03.980 I mean, I see maybe two people in the crowd who appear to be under the age of 45, potentially.

00:17:10.480 I don't see anybody that looks like they're under the age of 30.

00:17:13.860 Most are over the age of 60.

00:17:17.160 And I know you might say, well, yeah, who else is going to go to a Tim Walls?

00:17:20.780 It's a non-election year.

00:17:22.340 Tim Walls is having some sort of rally for unclear reasons.

00:17:28.980 Who the hell would go to that?

00:17:32.300 Well, yes, exactly.

00:17:33.380 That's exactly the problem.

00:17:36.540 Tim Walls is, he's one of the Democrats' big stars, and he's not a star at all.

00:17:45.460 But if you were to ask yourself, who are the Democrat Party's biggest stars right now, right?

00:17:52.080 The people that have the most name recognition, the largest base of support, who's on that list?

00:18:01.460 Tim Walls has to make the list.

00:18:04.800 Just by attrition, he has to make the list, because by default, he's on the list.

00:18:08.560 He's on the list of, like, the top five or ten biggest stars in the Democrat Party, which, again, shows you the problem they're having.

00:18:14.700 And something very significant has shifted here.

00:18:17.660 And I don't think it even shows up in the polls and surveys to the full extent.

00:18:22.800 You do see it there, too.

00:18:24.100 But I don't—you see it more just when you watch videos like this.

00:18:29.040 And it's the vibe.

00:18:29.840 It's the overall vibe that young people are not interested in this.

00:18:34.800 The Democrat Party feels old and decrepit now and very uncool.

00:18:41.580 It does not feel like a cool—these are not—it's lame.

00:18:44.940 It feels very lame.

00:18:46.360 And then there's what he actually said, which is that Democrats should proudly embrace their love of illegal immigration, DEI, wokeness.

00:18:53.380 I hope they take his advice.

00:18:56.700 I think that is great advice for them.

00:18:59.940 I absolutely think that they should.

00:19:01.800 And one other note, too, that he said—Tim Walls, talking about conservatives, said,

00:19:10.680 we have to stop letting them define the terms.

00:19:14.420 They're defining the terms.

00:19:15.620 They're defining the terms of debate.

00:19:19.240 And that is also a really significant statement, because he's right.

00:19:24.000 And, you know, if I had been in a coma for the last three, four, or five years,

00:19:28.660 and I had no context, and I didn't know who Tim Walls was,

00:19:33.860 and I saw that clip, just that part, where he said,

00:19:38.460 we've got to stop letting the other side define the terms.

00:19:41.380 If I listened to that clip, and also I saw the audience he was talking to,

00:19:45.300 I would assume, well, that's got to be a Republican.

00:19:47.660 Because it's an older audience.

00:19:53.940 And that problem of the other side is defining the terms,

00:19:58.040 that has been the problem that Republicans and conservatives have had for decades.

00:20:02.600 And this is something that I've said many, many times, and many conservatives have said,

00:20:08.140 over and over, we've said, we've got to stop letting them define the terms.

00:20:11.860 Because we're having all these debates using terms that have been defined by the left.

00:20:17.920 Well, that's the other thing that's shifted here.

00:20:19.560 And Tim Walls is correct, that for the first time, like in my lifetime,

00:20:29.920 conservatives are, we are having success defining some of these terms.

00:20:36.920 And it's less defining and more branding.

00:20:41.160 So we have, so DEI, for example, we have branded it.

00:20:45.300 When you hear DEI, you think, lame, bad, it's toxic.

00:20:52.220 It is a toxic brand.

00:20:55.260 We did the same thing with CRT.

00:20:58.540 Woke, right?

00:21:00.380 It's easy to forget that woke was something that the left came up with

00:21:03.800 to describe themselves.

00:21:08.000 We took that term for them,

00:21:11.220 rebranded it,

00:21:12.120 made it a bad thing that now they want to run away from.

00:21:18.040 That, again, is something that conservatives never did.

00:21:21.920 Ten years ago, that was never happening.

00:21:24.680 Every term used in political discourse was one that the left came up with and defined.

00:21:31.160 So, he's exactly right.

00:21:33.640 That, yeah, that's a problem for you.

00:21:34.760 And I don't, I don't, I don't see any solution for Democrats at the present moment.

00:21:43.800 All right.

00:21:46.280 Congressman Thomas Massey, who's one of my favorite members of Congress,

00:21:49.980 and I don't have very many that I would describe as favorites,

00:21:52.360 but he tweeted this yesterday.

00:21:53.820 He said,

00:21:53.920 Now, the only thing shocking or outrageous about this

00:22:13.940 is that apparently it isn't already a requirement that they disclose

00:22:17.380 this kind of information,

00:22:19.200 but it isn't, evidently.

00:22:21.300 So, obviously, yes,

00:22:22.680 any elected official who holds federal office

00:22:25.280 or office at any level

00:22:27.000 should be required to disclose

00:22:29.600 if they are dual citizens of some other country.

00:22:32.820 It's insane that we don't,

00:22:34.860 we don't even know how many of our members of Congress

00:22:37.860 are citizens of a foreign country.

00:22:39.460 We don't know that.

00:22:40.000 I found that hard to believe.

00:22:43.760 I looked it up,

00:22:44.740 and sure enough,

00:22:45.940 that information is not available.

00:22:48.000 We don't know.

00:22:51.540 Yeah, you'd think that that would be information

00:22:53.280 that you could find somewhere,

00:22:54.940 but apparently not.

00:22:59.240 It's not available.

00:23:00.440 They don't,

00:23:00.980 that information is not,

00:23:02.280 so we are not allowed to know.

00:23:03.760 We are not allowed to know

00:23:05.000 how many members of Congress

00:23:08.140 are citizens of another country

00:23:10.800 aside from our own.

00:23:13.960 They're not mandated to disclose it,

00:23:16.200 and they're not mandated

00:23:16.980 to renounce their citizenship

00:23:18.600 in another country.

00:23:20.400 How is that even possible?

00:23:21.900 I mean, if you have dual loyalty,

00:23:23.540 if you consider yourself

00:23:24.680 and are considered legally to be

00:23:26.940 a citizen of some other country,

00:23:29.080 we need to know that as voters.

00:23:31.560 That is just a basic level

00:23:32.920 of accountability and transparency

00:23:34.260 that we should have.

00:23:35.600 And the fact that we don't,

00:23:38.640 the fact that this law likely won't even,

00:23:40.320 it won't be passed

00:23:41.080 or even come up for a vote,

00:23:43.120 most likely,

00:23:44.560 that really makes you wonder

00:23:46.800 how pervasive the problem is.

00:23:48.820 What are they trying to hide here?

00:23:51.120 How many members of Congress

00:23:52.400 are citizens of a foreign country?

00:23:55.620 And in fact,

00:23:56.320 I'll take it a step further.

00:23:57.260 If you're a dual citizen,

00:23:59.020 you should not be allowed

00:24:00.980 to hold public office at all.

00:24:02.820 A requirement of running for office

00:24:04.480 in this country should be

00:24:05.920 or being appointed

00:24:07.100 to a position in government

00:24:09.840 should be that you renounce

00:24:12.000 your citizenship

00:24:12.620 in any other country.

00:24:13.840 Well, of course,

00:24:15.560 why would we allow this?

00:24:18.200 And I'll take it a step further than that.

00:24:20.020 Dual citizens should not be allowed

00:24:21.320 to hold elected office

00:24:22.300 and they should not be allowed

00:24:24.360 to vote

00:24:25.000 and decide who holds elected office.

00:24:29.100 If you're a citizen

00:24:30.420 of another country,

00:24:31.280 you should not be allowed

00:24:32.100 to vote here.

00:24:32.580 If you have the interests

00:24:33.600 of another country in mind,

00:24:35.120 if you are loyal

00:24:36.240 to some other foreign country,

00:24:37.780 you should not be given

00:24:38.500 any say in our elections.

00:24:41.300 If you want to vote here,

00:24:42.520 renounce your dual citizenship.

00:24:45.100 Go all in.

00:24:46.640 Be an American.

00:24:48.480 If you won't renounce it,

00:24:49.840 that tells us that you

00:24:50.720 have at least a split loyalty

00:24:52.700 to the other country,

00:24:53.940 which should disqualify you

00:24:55.840 from taking part

00:24:56.540 in our elections at all,

00:24:57.440 either as a voter

00:24:58.140 or as a candidate.

00:24:59.140 So the whole thing

00:25:00.860 is just insane to me.

00:25:04.040 I mean,

00:25:04.660 forget elections and voting.

00:25:06.480 I don't know why,

00:25:07.000 why do we allow the concept

00:25:08.240 of a dual citizenship

00:25:09.400 at all?

00:25:11.460 I mean,

00:25:11.940 there are people out there,

00:25:13.740 lots of people,

00:25:15.000 we don't know how many,

00:25:16.260 who live in another country,

00:25:18.680 have lived there

00:25:20.300 their whole lives,

00:25:21.640 have never even been here

00:25:24.000 or have been here,

00:25:25.980 spent very minimal time here,

00:25:27.040 and yet are citizens

00:25:29.040 of the US

00:25:30.460 and their vote counts

00:25:32.280 just as much as mine does.

00:25:35.460 How do we allow that?

00:25:37.980 Born in another country,

00:25:39.060 live in another country,

00:25:40.040 citizen of another country,

00:25:41.340 and yet you can vote here?

00:25:42.680 What?

00:25:45.280 It truly is.

00:25:47.100 It's like,

00:25:47.460 it's baffling.

00:25:48.340 It's,

00:25:50.460 I can't even conceive

00:25:51.980 what the argument

00:25:52.740 for it would be.

00:25:53.500 I understand why

00:25:56.700 for a dual citizen

00:25:57.580 it's a nice little perk.

00:25:59.320 As I understand,

00:26:00.280 the dual citizens argument

00:26:01.400 is like,

00:26:01.840 yeah,

00:26:01.980 but it's cool to be a citizen

00:26:02.880 of two different countries.

00:26:05.020 Okay,

00:26:05.160 but how does it help,

00:26:05.740 how does it help America?

00:26:07.180 How does it help our country?

00:26:08.680 How is our country stronger

00:26:10.060 by allowing anyone

00:26:12.060 to have a dual loyalty,

00:26:14.920 much less an elected representative?

00:26:17.320 It's just crazy.

00:26:19.120 Should not be allowed,

00:26:20.080 it's crazy.

00:26:20.560 Let's move to this.

00:26:27.000 Democrat Pennsylvania

00:26:27.800 State Senator Lindsey Williams

00:26:29.680 delivered some remarks

00:26:31.160 ahead of a vote

00:26:32.440 on the Save Women's Sports Act

00:26:35.220 in Pennsylvania.

00:26:37.220 And this is kind of

00:26:37.900 along the lines of what,

00:26:39.340 of Tim Walz,

00:26:40.260 yet again,

00:26:40.840 so yet again,

00:26:41.360 we have Democrats

00:26:41.940 not learning anything.

00:26:43.460 She's opposed to the bill

00:26:44.480 to save women's sports,

00:26:45.320 of course,

00:26:45.760 and here's the argument

00:26:46.980 that she presented.

00:26:47.760 Female bodies are just as strong

00:26:51.080 as fast and capable

00:26:53.900 as male bodies.

00:26:56.760 For what reason,

00:26:58.720 other than political gain,

00:27:00.440 are we spending time

00:27:01.780 and taxpayer dollars

00:27:03.060 on a completely made-up issue?

00:27:06.200 There are 8 million

00:27:07.440 high school athletes

00:27:08.740 across the country

00:27:09.500 and maybe 160 of them

00:27:12.420 are trans.

00:27:13.640 This is the fifth time

00:27:15.200 we are voting on this bill

00:27:16.300 that targets less than

00:27:17.440 .002% of high school athletes.

00:27:21.180 I was a three-sport athlete

00:27:23.280 in high school.

00:27:24.800 Participating in sports

00:27:25.980 gave me the confidence,

00:27:27.560 time management skills,

00:27:29.040 and ability

00:27:29.520 to work collaboratively

00:27:30.880 that led me

00:27:31.860 to run for office.

00:27:34.100 Absolutely nothing,

00:27:35.320 nothing about having

00:27:37.440 a trans teammate

00:27:38.200 or competitor

00:27:39.180 would have taken

00:27:40.620 those things

00:27:41.300 away from me.

00:27:44.440 Female bodies

00:27:45.280 are just as strong,

00:27:46.380 fast, and capable

00:27:47.160 as male bodies,

00:27:48.140 she says.

00:27:50.020 Now, it's just not possible

00:27:51.400 to have a conversation

00:27:52.500 at all

00:27:53.980 once the other side

00:27:55.120 is reduced

00:27:55.640 to saying stuff like this.

00:27:57.180 If they're willing

00:27:58.180 to just come out

00:27:59.140 and make a demonstrably

00:28:00.400 false claim

00:28:01.120 that contradicts

00:28:01.880 everything we know

00:28:02.620 about biology

00:28:03.320 and human anatomy,

00:28:04.000 then the conversation's over.

00:28:06.680 There's nowhere

00:28:07.400 to take it from there.

00:28:08.620 We can't talk about

00:28:09.580 anything at that point

00:28:10.500 because, you know,

00:28:13.320 when you have a debate

00:28:13.920 with somebody,

00:28:14.900 you assume at the outset

00:28:16.380 as a basic parameter

00:28:17.660 for the debate

00:28:18.280 that the other party

00:28:19.360 is essentially sane,

00:28:22.520 reasonable,

00:28:23.560 has a fundamental grasp

00:28:24.660 on reality,

00:28:25.840 has a certain minimal level

00:28:27.500 of self-respect.

00:28:29.120 These are the kinds

00:28:30.460 of boundaries

00:28:30.880 that keep the debate

00:28:32.080 coherent

00:28:32.560 and which make it possible

00:28:34.340 for one party

00:28:35.080 or the other

00:28:35.480 to win the debate.

00:28:37.560 People always say,

00:28:38.360 oh, you can't win a debate.

00:28:40.060 It's pointless to debate.

00:28:41.600 You can't win.

00:28:42.180 Oh, you can win a debate.

00:28:43.620 It's quite possible.

00:28:45.180 If we're both sane,

00:28:46.980 reasonable people

00:28:47.700 living in reality,

00:28:49.180 then I can win the debate

00:28:51.360 by showing you

00:28:52.880 that your position

00:28:54.300 leads to absurdity.

00:28:56.760 If I can say to you,

00:28:59.540 well, yeah,

00:29:00.020 but what you're claiming,

00:29:01.220 you know,

00:29:01.380 if that's true,

00:29:02.460 then it would make,

00:29:03.340 then it would mean

00:29:03.840 that XYZ is also true.

00:29:06.160 And XYZ,

00:29:06.800 we both know,

00:29:07.320 is absurd,

00:29:07.900 so therefore,

00:29:08.380 your argument is wrong.

00:29:10.220 Or I can say,

00:29:11.120 hey, but if that's true,

00:29:11.980 if that's what you want to do,

00:29:12.760 well, that would lead

00:29:13.480 logically to this result.

00:29:16.480 And we obviously

00:29:16.980 don't want that result

00:29:17.720 to happen,

00:29:18.340 so that, you know,

00:29:19.420 these are the kinds of,

00:29:21.200 this is the kind of

00:29:22.100 logical process

00:29:23.440 you can take someone through

00:29:24.420 to show them

00:29:25.240 that their argument is wrong.

00:29:28.960 But what happens

00:29:30.040 when you're debating someone

00:29:31.100 who has or pretends

00:29:32.300 to have no grasp

00:29:33.620 on reality at all

00:29:34.740 and who does not hesitate

00:29:35.640 to make even

00:29:36.400 the wildest claims

00:29:37.720 that contradict

00:29:39.500 everything we know

00:29:40.380 about human existence?

00:29:42.400 What happens

00:29:43.020 when they have no shame

00:29:43.860 and will say things

00:29:46.180 that they know

00:29:46.700 are outrageously untrue?

00:29:50.780 Well,

00:29:51.460 then you've already

00:29:53.460 won the debate.

00:29:54.080 It's not that you can't win.

00:29:55.280 You've already,

00:29:55.780 you've won it, right?

00:29:57.640 Once the other side says,

00:29:59.140 oh, female and male bodies

00:30:00.200 are exactly the same.

00:30:01.300 Male bodies are not

00:30:02.080 any stronger or faster

00:30:03.260 than female bodies.

00:30:04.680 Once the other side

00:30:05.500 says that,

00:30:06.140 okay, debate's up.

00:30:07.120 We won.

00:30:07.600 We won the argument.

00:30:09.300 You have just been reduced

00:30:10.700 to making a claim

00:30:11.580 that every person

00:30:12.920 who's ever lived

00:30:14.240 on the planet

00:30:14.860 knows is not true.

00:30:17.100 Literally all of the evidence

00:30:18.320 is on our side.

00:30:20.200 All of it.

00:30:21.380 You have not a shred

00:30:22.100 of evidence on your side.

00:30:23.040 So you're contradicting

00:30:25.160 all of the evidence,

00:30:26.420 all of human experience,

00:30:28.060 everything that we all know

00:30:28.960 is true,

00:30:29.300 you're contradicting.

00:30:30.240 Once you do that,

00:30:31.780 we've won.

00:30:32.780 The debate's over.

00:30:33.500 There's nothing else.

00:30:34.720 It can't go anywhere else.

00:30:36.500 That's the end of the race,

00:30:37.720 right?

00:30:38.000 We've reached the conclusion.

00:30:42.360 So,

00:30:43.200 and that's where we are.

00:30:43.980 I mean,

00:30:44.080 we've been there,

00:30:44.540 of course,

00:30:44.740 on this issue

00:30:45.180 the entire time.

00:30:45.880 And this is what

00:30:47.760 the Democrat Party

00:30:48.600 has reduced itself to.

00:30:49.700 They don't have to.

00:30:50.620 They don't have to do this.

00:30:52.700 They could just stop.

00:30:54.840 You don't have to do this.

00:30:56.640 You don't have to sit there.

00:30:59.080 This woman,

00:30:59.680 whatever her name was,

00:31:00.340 I forget,

00:31:02.280 Lindsay Williams,

00:31:05.160 you don't have to,

00:31:07.100 you don't have to embarrass

00:31:08.220 yourself like this.

00:31:09.700 You know that's not true.

00:31:11.220 You know that makes no sense.

00:31:12.660 You know that you're,

00:31:13.260 you're defeating

00:31:14.520 your own arguments.

00:31:16.280 You can say,

00:31:16.880 well,

00:31:17.060 male bodies and women bodies

00:31:18.240 are the same.

00:31:19.740 Men are not any stronger.

00:31:21.800 And then you talk about

00:31:22.480 your experience

00:31:23.020 being a female athlete.

00:31:24.100 Well,

00:31:24.300 by your logic,

00:31:25.200 then we shouldn't even have

00:31:26.520 women's sports

00:31:27.600 or men's sports.

00:31:28.980 Why do we have that

00:31:30.200 in that case?

00:31:30.880 If,

00:31:31.080 if men are no stronger

00:31:32.360 than women,

00:31:34.160 why do we have

00:31:35.380 the distinction?

00:31:37.660 Right?

00:31:39.400 Why do you have a,

00:31:40.640 at any,

00:31:41.220 every high school,

00:31:41.780 you got a,

00:31:42.120 a girls basketball team

00:31:43.460 and a boys basketball team.

00:31:44.520 Why do that?

00:31:45.320 Just have a basketball team.

00:31:48.700 Right?

00:31:49.120 You said that men and women

00:31:50.200 are,

00:31:50.480 are equal,

00:31:52.060 that males are not

00:31:53.560 any stronger than females.

00:31:57.040 So why don't we just

00:31:57.820 get rid of the distinction

00:31:58.680 entirely and just have,

00:32:00.380 right?

00:32:00.620 That would solve the problem.

00:32:02.620 Let's not even worry about

00:32:04.040 boys sports,

00:32:05.960 girls sports.

00:32:06.780 Oh,

00:32:06.920 well,

00:32:07.020 no,

00:32:07.140 we can't do that

00:32:07.900 because you know

00:32:08.680 that if we,

00:32:09.200 if we had that policy

00:32:10.240 that no girl

00:32:12.240 would make it onto

00:32:13.420 any basketball team

00:32:14.760 at any level

00:32:15.840 anywhere in the country,

00:32:17.240 it would be the end

00:32:18.660 of girls playing basketball

00:32:20.160 in any organized league

00:32:22.100 anywhere,

00:32:23.080 at any age,

00:32:24.680 at any level.

00:32:27.080 Okay?

00:32:28.060 And so,

00:32:28.760 but you know that,

00:32:29.480 so which is why

00:32:30.020 you still want there

00:32:30.580 to be girl and boy sports

00:32:31.620 while at the same time

00:32:32.940 rejecting the whole basis

00:32:35.200 for there being

00:32:36.420 girls and boys sports.

00:32:40.660 It's just a total,

00:32:41.860 it's total inanity

00:32:43.720 and everyone sees it,

00:32:46.520 everyone knows it

00:32:47.300 and the Democrats,

00:32:50.860 they could help themselves

00:32:51.600 so much

00:32:52.320 if they just dropped it.

00:32:54.500 Just stop.

00:32:56.380 Let,

00:32:56.920 let the point,

00:32:58.780 whatever percent

00:32:59.700 of trans people

00:33:00.620 in the country,

00:33:01.300 they'll be upset about it.

00:33:03.420 Everyone,

00:33:03.880 no one else will care.

00:33:06.180 You are humiliating yourselves

00:33:08.420 every single day

00:33:10.100 for the sake

00:33:11.100 of this,

00:33:11.560 of this small minority,

00:33:13.340 the tiniest little sliver

00:33:14.920 of the population.

00:33:16.400 You've totally destroyed yourselves

00:33:18.920 and all of your credibility,

00:33:21.140 all of your political capital,

00:33:22.900 your political future,

00:33:24.020 you've sacrificed all of it

00:33:25.560 for their sake.

00:33:27.860 I mean,

00:33:28.680 don't let me stop you.

00:33:29.900 Don't let me stop you.

00:33:31.000 But,

00:33:32.420 it,

00:33:33.320 I,

00:33:33.580 it's truly,

00:33:36.500 truly,

00:33:36.840 like,

00:33:37.900 jaw-dropping to behold

00:33:39.060 every time.

00:33:39.560 I'm used to it by now,

00:33:40.600 of course,

00:33:40.940 but,

00:33:41.300 we've never seen anything

00:33:43.140 like this.

00:33:45.700 All right,

00:33:45.920 let me play this

00:33:46.680 video for you.

00:33:48.060 I saw this,

00:33:48.700 well,

00:33:49.920 I saw this on my,

00:33:50.680 on my feed after it was posted

00:33:51.880 by Tim Miller,

00:33:52.840 who's an MSNBC contributor,

00:33:54.140 and he captured it with this.

00:33:55.420 He said,

00:33:56.080 this is the sickest I've ever seen

00:33:58.840 in my life.

00:33:59.540 Oh my God.

00:34:00.180 And so,

00:34:01.840 he's saying that this video

00:34:02.720 I'm going to play

00:34:03.100 is very sick and twisted.

00:34:04.020 It's terrible.

00:34:04.820 It's the worst thing

00:34:05.380 he's ever seen

00:34:05.860 in his life.

00:34:08.100 In his life.

00:34:09.080 The worst thing

00:34:09.880 in his life

00:34:10.540 he's ever seen.

00:34:12.220 And,

00:34:12.880 we all know,

00:34:13.560 if you spend any time

00:34:14.260 on X these days,

00:34:15.660 if you spend any time

00:34:16.260 on social media,

00:34:18.100 there are a lot

00:34:18.840 of terrible videos

00:34:19.940 that are circulating

00:34:20.720 all the time.

00:34:22.440 So,

00:34:23.200 and this is worse

00:34:24.360 than any of that.

00:34:25.840 Turns out the video

00:34:26.620 is Christy Noem,

00:34:27.700 who's the DHS secretary,

00:34:28.760 of course,

00:34:29.320 at a prison

00:34:29.980 in El Salvador,

00:34:32.280 showing us

00:34:32.940 where they house

00:34:33.680 all the criminal

00:34:34.400 gang member

00:34:35.140 illegal aliens

00:34:35.900 who come to the country.

00:34:37.420 Let's watch that.

00:34:38.900 Here at Seacott today

00:34:40.140 and visiting this facility,

00:34:42.500 and first of all,

00:34:42.960 I want to thank

00:34:43.500 El Salvador

00:34:44.120 and their president

00:34:44.860 for their partnership

00:34:45.780 with the United States

00:34:46.560 of America

00:34:47.000 to bring our terrorists

00:34:48.100 here and to incarcerate them

00:34:50.060 and have consequences

00:34:51.020 for the violence

00:34:52.180 that they have perpetuated

00:34:53.180 in our communities.

00:34:54.460 I also want everybody

00:34:55.540 to know,

00:34:56.000 if you come to our country

00:34:56.820 illegally,

00:34:57.520 this is one of the

00:34:58.260 consequences you could face.

00:34:59.980 First of all,

00:35:00.980 do not come to our country

00:35:02.040 illegally.

00:35:03.120 You will be removed

00:35:04.280 and you will be prosecuted.

00:35:05.760 But know that this facility

00:35:07.220 is one of the tools

00:35:08.180 in our toolkit

00:35:08.740 that we will use

00:35:09.860 if you commit crimes

00:35:10.960 against the American people.

00:35:12.980 It's impressive

00:35:13.680 that they got the prisoners

00:35:14.840 to behave like that.

00:35:15.840 I mean,

00:35:15.960 they're just standing there.

00:35:16.980 They told them to stand

00:35:17.960 basically at attention

00:35:19.100 quietly

00:35:19.660 so they could be paraded

00:35:21.640 in front of the camera

00:35:22.440 and shamed,

00:35:23.180 and they did so.

00:35:23.960 So it kind of shows you

00:35:25.140 I mean,

00:35:27.620 these are not the most

00:35:28.340 cooperative people

00:35:29.540 normally.

00:35:30.340 So one can only imagine

00:35:32.560 what kinds of methods

00:35:34.060 they're using

00:35:34.560 down there in El Salvador

00:35:35.400 to get these prisoners

00:35:36.520 to behave.

00:35:37.120 But that's sick and disturbing,

00:35:40.880 Tim Miller says.

00:35:42.100 Imagine seeing gang members,

00:35:45.760 murderers, and rapists

00:35:46.780 in prison

00:35:47.960 and saying,

00:35:49.980 that's sick.

00:35:51.800 But you aren't referring

00:35:53.280 to the fact that they are

00:35:54.440 gang members,

00:35:55.240 murderers, and rapists.

00:35:56.260 You're referring to the fact

00:35:56.980 that they're in prison.

00:35:59.300 Just imagine having that mentality.

00:36:00.980 It's impossible to imagine.

00:36:02.060 It's impossible for a sane person

00:36:03.460 to put themselves

00:36:04.040 in that state of mind.

00:36:05.000 But as a sane person myself,

00:36:08.000 I think it's great.

00:36:10.820 And to be honest with you,

00:36:12.260 I haven't been a fan

00:36:13.600 of some of the

00:36:14.960 stunts

00:36:17.600 from Kristi Noem

00:36:18.980 since she's been

00:36:21.640 defense,

00:36:23.120 the DHS secretary.

00:36:24.860 You know,

00:36:24.980 she's always out

00:36:25.800 wearing the uniform

00:36:29.740 as if she's able to,

00:36:31.340 as if she's about to go

00:36:32.160 personally knock on doors.

00:36:33.400 We see these,

00:36:34.520 when she first

00:36:35.000 took the position,

00:36:36.620 she'd be doing these videos

00:36:37.520 where she's in the,

00:36:38.700 right,

00:36:38.920 she's got all the gear on

00:36:40.340 and she said

00:36:41.260 they're going to do

00:36:41.740 some immigration raid

00:36:42.840 or whatever.

00:36:43.940 But she's still got the makeup

00:36:45.100 and the hair all perfectly done.

00:36:46.900 And I think some of that

00:36:47.980 is quite silly.

00:36:49.960 This is not.

00:36:51.260 This is what

00:36:52.100 she should be doing.

00:36:54.200 She doesn't need to be

00:36:55.160 on the scene

00:36:56.000 for a raid

00:36:57.040 of illegal immigrant gang members.

00:36:59.040 We know that she's not

00:36:59.940 actually going to be going out

00:37:00.840 beating up the bad guys.

00:37:01.840 You don't need to pretend

00:37:02.480 that you are.

00:37:03.120 We know that.

00:37:04.980 But this is different.

00:37:05.980 This is simply known

00:37:06.780 as the face of this agency

00:37:08.460 basically, yeah,

00:37:10.060 parading these criminals

00:37:11.080 in front of the camera,

00:37:12.760 making an example out of them,

00:37:14.140 shaming them,

00:37:15.100 and using them

00:37:16.260 as a warning

00:37:16.800 to any future gang members

00:37:18.240 that this is what might happen

00:37:20.280 if you come here.

00:37:21.900 And I think that's great.

00:37:23.080 That's exactly

00:37:23.680 what we should be doing.

00:37:27.760 All right,

00:37:28.200 let's get to the comment section.

00:37:29.700 If you're a man,

00:37:31.180 it's required

00:37:31.900 that you grow up in A

00:37:33.880 with a sweet baby gang.

00:37:39.620 I want a raccoon so badly,

00:37:41.780 but my husband's not giving in.

00:37:43.660 You've now given me hope

00:37:44.600 for my dream

00:37:45.160 of an adorable raccoon

00:37:46.280 in my future,

00:37:47.160 so thank you, Matt.

00:37:49.060 Why would you want a raccoon

00:37:50.240 inside your house?

00:37:51.200 What is it about a raccoon

00:37:52.480 that makes you think

00:37:53.360 it'd be a suitable roommate?

00:37:55.620 What part of it

00:37:56.520 do you find appealing?

00:37:57.240 When you see a raccoon

00:37:59.860 out in the wild,

00:38:00.500 what part of you thinks

00:38:01.160 I want that in my house?

00:38:02.000 Is it the part

00:38:02.340 where he rips through the trash?

00:38:03.520 The part where he has rabies?

00:38:04.620 Are you a rabies fan?

00:38:05.540 Big fan of rabies?

00:38:07.420 This is what I don't get.

00:38:08.320 You know,

00:38:08.460 I am not anti-animal.

00:38:11.760 I like animals.

00:38:12.680 Actually, I am.

00:38:13.300 I said before,

00:38:13.760 I'm not an animal lover

00:38:14.520 like my family.

00:38:15.980 That's not even true.

00:38:16.700 I do love animals

00:38:17.920 in the same sense that

00:38:20.140 I love, you know,

00:38:22.580 the ocean.

00:38:23.900 I love the ocean.

00:38:25.260 I like to go to the ocean.

00:38:26.060 I think the ocean is beautiful.

00:38:28.320 I don't want it in my house.

00:38:30.400 You understand?

00:38:31.440 Okay, I don't.

00:38:32.400 If I live near the ocean

00:38:33.840 and suddenly the ocean

00:38:34.880 ended up in my house,

00:38:36.520 I would be upset.

00:38:39.440 And then you might say,

00:38:40.340 oh, but you're a hypocrite, Matt.

00:38:41.240 You say you love the ocean,

00:38:42.220 but you don't want it

00:38:42.960 in your house?

00:38:43.420 You hypocrite.

00:38:43.920 No, I love it out there.

00:38:45.200 I love it out there.

00:38:46.120 I want it like out there.

00:38:47.320 It's great.

00:38:48.180 I just, I don't need to,

00:38:49.060 I don't need it

00:38:49.600 in my living room.

00:38:50.600 Okay.

00:38:51.580 And it's the same thing

00:38:52.420 with animals.

00:38:53.560 I let's go.

00:38:54.240 I'd like to go for hikes

00:38:55.340 in the woods.

00:38:56.080 I like to see the wildlife.

00:38:57.400 I like going to the zoo.

00:38:58.680 I'm a big zoo fan,

00:39:00.320 in fact.

00:39:01.220 Okay, I love,

00:39:01.820 I like the zoo more

00:39:02.500 than my kids do.

00:39:03.600 We take my kids to the zoo.

00:39:04.440 It's more for me

00:39:05.480 than it is for them.

00:39:07.940 I really enjoy

00:39:08.700 the polar bear exhibit at the zoo.

00:39:10.460 I think it's a great exhibit.

00:39:11.700 But I don't need

00:39:12.740 that thing in my house.

00:39:14.120 I like it behind the glass.

00:39:15.720 It's in the,

00:39:16.220 it's swimming in the water.

00:39:17.540 It's having a good time.

00:39:18.500 Right, it's playing

00:39:19.100 with a beach ball.

00:39:19.760 All that, that's fantastic.

00:39:20.880 I don't need,

00:39:21.900 that's as close

00:39:23.100 as I need to be.

00:39:23.820 And then I get to leave.

00:39:26.360 And so I have access

00:39:27.320 to the polar bear

00:39:27.900 and tell me,

00:39:28.200 I can just go to the zoo.

00:39:29.580 I don't,

00:39:29.860 why would I want it

00:39:30.780 in my house?

00:39:32.000 Okay?

00:39:33.000 That's how I feel

00:39:33.580 with all animals.

00:39:35.340 I like dogs.

00:39:36.180 I actually like,

00:39:37.060 I don't,

00:39:37.600 I don't hate dogs.

00:39:39.080 Right?

00:39:39.480 If I,

00:39:39.860 if someone,

00:39:41.120 if a family member

00:39:42.040 or a friend has a dog,

00:39:43.700 you visit the house,

00:39:44.560 you pet the dog.

00:39:45.660 That's a lot.

00:39:46.260 It's great.

00:39:47.880 And then I get to leave.

00:39:48.660 I don't need

00:39:48.980 to bring the dog away.

00:39:49.560 You take care

00:39:50.420 of all the stuff.

00:39:51.140 You buy the food,

00:39:51.880 you feed it,

00:39:52.380 you take it out to poop.

00:39:54.660 I'd rather you do all that.

00:39:55.840 I don't,

00:39:56.140 I don't need that part of it.

00:39:59.160 So,

00:39:59.860 that's the way

00:40:01.380 I look at it.

00:40:04.880 Of course you think

00:40:05.700 your husband.

00:40:06.240 Men are simple

00:40:06.820 and need the three A's.

00:40:08.040 Acknowledgement,

00:40:08.440 affection,

00:40:08.840 and appreciation.

00:40:09.780 That might explain

00:40:10.460 why mine has stuck around

00:40:11.480 for almost 40 years.

00:40:12.840 Yeah,

00:40:12.980 and women need the same,

00:40:13.780 of course.

00:40:14.520 I think that's,

00:40:15.320 but I think that's

00:40:16.160 generally acknowledged.

00:40:17.020 You know,

00:40:17.300 we talked yesterday

00:40:17.860 about gratitude

00:40:21.140 in a marriage

00:40:21.720 and in particular

00:40:23.380 the kind of emotional burden

00:40:25.860 that men carry

00:40:27.260 that is not talked about.

00:40:30.020 And that's kind of

00:40:31.120 the difference

00:40:31.580 because

00:40:32.180 even if women

00:40:34.860 don't always actually

00:40:36.120 receive the three A's

00:40:37.500 as you say,

00:40:38.820 everybody understands

00:40:40.000 at least in theory

00:40:41.000 that you should

00:40:41.840 acknowledge and appreciate

00:40:43.000 and be affectionate

00:40:43.880 towards your wife,

00:40:44.960 right?

00:40:45.160 Like there's not,

00:40:45.960 that's at least

00:40:46.620 understood conceptually.

00:40:49.640 But that need

00:40:51.560 going the other direction

00:40:52.360 I think is not

00:40:52.980 acknowledged as much.

00:40:56.160 Your point about men

00:40:56.900 not even mentioning

00:40:57.640 the catastrophes

00:40:58.400 they're avoiding

00:40:58.900 is worth dwelling on.

00:41:00.140 Men are cautious

00:41:00.720 about emoting their stress

00:41:02.140 for fear of escalating

00:41:03.120 it in their wives.

00:41:04.680 It's a stabilizing instinct.

00:41:07.800 Right,

00:41:08.280 and it's a good thing

00:41:08.900 by the way.

00:41:09.920 When I said that men

00:41:10.980 are bearing all these burdens

00:41:12.300 that they don't talk about,

00:41:13.600 I generally think

00:41:14.800 it's good

00:41:15.420 certainly a good instinct

00:41:17.400 to not talk about them.

00:41:19.800 To not try to

00:41:21.200 offload the burden

00:41:22.240 onto their wives

00:41:23.320 which

00:41:23.720 which doesn't mean

00:41:25.940 that you should

00:41:26.380 never talk about

00:41:27.420 the burdens

00:41:29.400 or never share them

00:41:30.400 but the point,

00:41:31.000 my point is that

00:41:31.720 women,

00:41:33.260 women should know

00:41:34.020 that men do this,

00:41:34.840 that they carry

00:41:35.380 these unseen burdens

00:41:36.280 and that they

00:41:37.260 shoulder things

00:41:38.780 for your sake

00:41:39.520 and they don't tell you.

00:41:40.560 that's just something

00:41:42.520 that you should know

00:41:43.540 even if you don't

00:41:44.060 always know

00:41:44.440 what the thing is.

00:41:46.680 And

00:41:46.840 we could

00:41:48.500 there's the kind

00:41:51.100 of dramatic things

00:41:51.980 that I mentioned

00:41:52.940 one example of this.

00:41:55.320 You have a man

00:41:56.100 at his job,

00:41:57.020 let's say he's worried

00:41:57.600 he's going to get fired

00:41:58.320 or laid off,

00:41:59.220 you know,

00:41:59.400 he's reading the tea leaves

00:42:01.060 and all that kind of thing.

00:42:01.860 But most men

00:42:05.100 when they come home

00:42:07.040 from work

00:42:07.880 if they have this

00:42:09.220 worry,

00:42:10.900 you know,

00:42:11.180 if this is

00:42:11.720 the kind of

00:42:12.220 this specter

00:42:13.280 this possibility

00:42:14.160 of this bad thing

00:42:15.120 happening in the future

00:42:15.940 they're not going to

00:42:16.900 tell their wives that

00:42:17.600 and again

00:42:18.500 they probably shouldn't

00:42:20.200 because coming home

00:42:21.680 and saying

00:42:22.060 yeah I think this

00:42:22.700 horrible thing

00:42:23.340 might happen

00:42:24.060 but I don't know

00:42:24.980 I'm not sure

00:42:26.540 I just want to let you know

00:42:27.940 that there's this

00:42:28.560 horrible thing

00:42:29.040 that might happen

00:42:29.560 just so you know

00:42:30.040 most men

00:42:31.200 are not inclined

00:42:31.880 to offload

00:42:33.120 the burden

00:42:33.480 in that way

00:42:33.880 they're just going

00:42:34.200 to carry it themselves

00:42:34.760 which again

00:42:35.180 they should

00:42:35.440 but those are

00:42:38.140 the dramatic examples

00:42:39.100 that a lot of men

00:42:40.380 have dealt with

00:42:41.080 but there are

00:42:41.880 little things too

00:42:42.620 little examples

00:42:44.400 of this

00:42:44.700 like little things

00:42:46.480 like I don't know

00:42:46.980 maybe you're

00:42:47.560 if you're the wife

00:42:48.540 you're in the car

00:42:49.260 he's driving

00:42:50.000 suddenly the weather

00:42:51.320 is really bad

00:42:52.100 conditions are hazardous

00:42:53.220 and you as the woman

00:42:55.300 are freaked out

00:42:56.620 and because you're a woman

00:42:57.960 you're probably

00:42:58.340 verbalizing your concern

00:42:59.740 and you look

00:43:00.800 at your husband

00:43:01.300 and he's not

00:43:01.860 saying anything

00:43:02.540 not showing

00:43:03.240 any signs of concern

00:43:04.240 and you think

00:43:04.780 maybe it's because

00:43:05.280 he doesn't care

00:43:05.880 or because he's not

00:43:06.600 taking the situation

00:43:07.360 seriously or whatever

00:43:08.440 no what's actually

00:43:09.420 happening is that

00:43:10.300 in his head

00:43:10.940 he's just as freaked

00:43:12.700 out as you are

00:43:13.360 and so when you're

00:43:13.820 saying oh no

00:43:14.180 we're going to get

00:43:14.440 an accident

00:43:14.820 everyone's going to die

00:43:15.460 he's thinking

00:43:16.420 the same thing

00:43:17.240 but he's just not

00:43:17.760 going to say it

00:43:18.320 he's not going to

00:43:18.660 say that out loud

00:43:19.340 because he wants

00:43:21.180 to remain calm

00:43:21.920 for your sake

00:43:22.620 so what you might

00:43:23.720 interpret as a lack

00:43:24.620 of concern

00:43:25.180 and a lack of

00:43:25.760 taking it seriously

00:43:26.440 is actually him

00:43:27.160 trying to be

00:43:27.840 a calming presence

00:43:28.780 for you

00:43:29.420 and there's a million

00:43:31.300 I mean it's the same

00:43:31.980 thing that happens

00:43:32.500 if you hear a strange

00:43:33.380 noise right

00:43:34.040 in the middle

00:43:34.360 of the night

00:43:34.840 and you wake

00:43:36.760 your husband up

00:43:37.380 and he says

00:43:37.780 I heard a noise

00:43:38.440 and you will say

00:43:39.920 as the woman

00:43:40.480 you'll probably

00:43:40.960 say something

00:43:41.600 like oh

00:43:42.020 there might be

00:43:43.100 somebody in the house

00:43:43.800 right

00:43:44.040 you'll verbalize

00:43:45.680 that worry

00:43:48.220 that you have

00:43:48.900 and he will

00:43:49.940 probably say

00:43:50.740 that's fine

00:43:51.560 it's fine

00:43:51.960 just wait here

00:43:52.440 I'll go check it out

00:43:53.160 he says it's fine

00:43:55.100 but in his head

00:43:55.900 he's definitely

00:43:56.760 also thinking

00:43:57.640 that there might

00:43:58.780 be somebody

00:43:59.160 in the house

00:43:59.680 who's going to

00:44:00.180 try to kill

00:44:00.560 the whole family

00:44:01.020 like that is

00:44:01.940 in his head

00:44:02.280 he's certainly

00:44:02.780 thinking he's

00:44:03.220 just not going

00:44:03.500 to say that

00:44:03.920 to you

00:44:04.200 but in his head

00:44:05.620 he's prepared

00:44:06.460 to go fight

00:44:07.160 this person

00:44:07.600 to the death

00:44:08.120 if they're in

00:44:08.640 the house

00:44:08.940 which hopefully

00:44:10.040 he's more prepared

00:44:10.660 to do if he

00:44:11.060 has a firearm

00:44:11.640 but

00:44:11.900 and anyway

00:44:15.880 so I think

00:44:17.320 because women

00:44:18.160 are women

00:44:18.920 women are different

00:44:19.460 from men

00:44:19.900 they don't

00:44:22.460 right

00:44:22.680 women have

00:44:23.060 their own

00:44:23.320 way of

00:44:23.660 thinking

00:44:24.020 and dealing

00:44:24.380 with things

00:44:24.780 they

00:44:26.300 the mistake

00:44:27.900 well there's

00:44:28.740 two mistakes

00:44:29.120 we talked about

00:44:29.540 yesterday

00:44:29.840 there could be

00:44:30.600 a lack of

00:44:31.000 gratitude

00:44:31.320 because you

00:44:31.600 don't understand

00:44:32.240 everything that

00:44:32.900 your husband's

00:44:33.720 doing exactly

00:44:34.280 but also

00:44:35.420 even worse

00:44:35.960 than that

00:44:36.500 what is actually

00:44:38.300 a very positive

00:44:39.040 thing where he

00:44:39.840 is being strong

00:44:41.160 for you

00:44:41.760 can as I said

00:44:43.700 be interpreted

00:44:44.340 sometimes by the

00:44:45.320 woman as like

00:44:46.160 the opposite

00:44:46.580 as he's not

00:44:47.700 concerned

00:44:48.120 he's not taking

00:44:49.060 this seriously

00:44:49.640 and so that's

00:44:53.080 where some of

00:44:53.520 the friction

00:44:55.740 can come in

00:44:56.820 let's see

00:44:58.700 I love the fact

00:45:02.100 that Matt just

00:45:02.540 got done saying

00:45:03.200 that when you're

00:45:03.600 getting paid

00:45:04.060 to do a job

00:45:04.600 you have the

00:45:04.860 responsibility

00:45:05.280 to put aside

00:45:05.840 your own

00:45:06.080 opinions

00:45:06.420 and do the

00:45:06.900 job

00:45:07.200 then goes on

00:45:07.980 to tell his

00:45:08.380 listeners

00:45:08.660 to not buy

00:45:09.560 a candle

00:45:10.100 that he's

00:45:10.480 paid to

00:45:10.940 advertise

00:45:11.260 that's

00:45:11.800 hilarious

00:45:12.120 that's

00:45:13.020 different though

00:45:13.420 that's a

00:45:13.800 candle that

00:45:14.180 exists only

00:45:14.800 to troll me

00:45:15.420 they made

00:45:16.780 a candle

00:45:17.100 called waffles

00:45:17.780 named after

00:45:18.320 the damned

00:45:18.940 goat that

00:45:19.540 my wife

00:45:19.880 bought

00:45:20.180 and I

00:45:21.380 don't think

00:45:21.720 you should

00:45:21.920 buy it

00:45:22.160 I object

00:45:22.540 to its

00:45:22.800 existence

00:45:23.220 don't buy

00:45:24.420 the waffles

00:45:24.820 candle

00:45:25.140 it's too

00:45:25.440 expensive

00:45:25.780 anyway

00:45:26.100 like it

00:45:26.520 really is

00:45:26.960 so I'm

00:45:27.560 dead serious

00:45:27.980 don't buy

00:45:29.020 it

00:45:29.320 it's at

00:45:30.280 dailywire.com

00:45:30.940 slash shop

00:45:31.420 if you want

00:45:31.740 to buy it

00:45:32.020 but you

00:45:32.280 shouldn't

00:45:33.260 and finally

00:45:34.020 a bunch

00:45:34.260 of comments

00:45:34.620 all in the

00:45:34.900 same lines

00:45:35.500 Matt that

00:45:36.740 vest is really

00:45:37.320 making you look

00:45:37.920 like a farmer

00:45:38.440 today enjoying

00:45:39.280 the goats

00:45:39.700 are we

00:45:40.120 Matt that

00:45:41.660 vest though

00:45:42.200 you're gonna

00:45:42.500 fish right after

00:45:43.540 the show

00:45:43.820 or what bud

00:45:44.360 is that a

00:45:45.780 goat skin

00:45:46.260 vest

00:45:46.700 waffles

00:45:47.300 is that

00:45:47.660 you

00:45:47.940 cool vest

00:45:50.080 Matt

00:45:50.340 I remember

00:45:50.720 my first

00:45:51.220 fishing trip

00:45:51.920 yeah you know

00:45:52.900 I knew this

00:45:53.400 was gonna

00:45:53.600 happen

00:45:53.960 so wardrobe

00:45:55.580 picked out

00:45:56.120 some new

00:45:56.460 outfits for

00:45:57.000 the show

00:45:57.660 and this

00:45:59.320 isn't new

00:45:59.780 but yesterday

00:46:00.160 it was

00:46:00.600 it was

00:46:00.940 new

00:46:01.120 and so

00:46:02.240 they're

00:46:02.380 sprucing

00:46:02.620 things up

00:46:03.040 a bit

00:46:03.300 I guess

00:46:03.800 and

00:46:04.380 adding a

00:46:06.260 few new

00:46:06.560 elements

00:46:06.920 here and

00:46:07.260 there

00:46:07.440 and I

00:46:08.700 just knew

00:46:09.320 I knew

00:46:09.820 that if I

00:46:10.300 wore

00:46:10.620 anything

00:46:11.100 but a

00:46:11.900 simple

00:46:12.220 flannel

00:46:12.660 if I wore

00:46:13.720 anything but

00:46:14.460 a Walmart

00:46:15.080 flannel

00:46:15.640 I'm gonna

00:46:16.740 get ripped

00:46:17.140 to shreds

00:46:17.640 and sure

00:46:18.020 enough

00:46:18.320 that's

00:46:19.080 exactly

00:46:19.380 what

00:46:19.540 happened

00:46:19.820 but you

00:46:21.020 know what

00:46:21.260 I like

00:46:21.600 the vest

00:46:21.980 thought it was

00:46:22.840 a nice

00:46:23.060 vest

00:46:23.360 I think

00:46:23.880 it's practical

00:46:24.500 and fashionable

00:46:25.800 I think

00:46:26.900 it's pretty

00:46:27.180 snazzy

00:46:27.620 I think

00:46:28.280 it looks

00:46:28.600 nice

00:46:28.960 it's got

00:46:29.760 a bunch

00:46:29.960 of pockets

00:46:30.480 I can

00:46:30.760 I can

00:46:31.080 put different

00:46:31.640 items in

00:46:32.120 them

00:46:32.300 any items

00:46:33.160 that I

00:46:33.400 might want

00:46:33.660 to store

00:46:34.060 I got

00:46:34.300 plenty

00:46:34.720 of pockets

00:46:35.180 for storing

00:46:35.680 all my

00:46:36.060 various

00:46:36.380 items

00:46:36.740 that I

00:46:36.960 might pick

00:46:37.360 up along

00:46:37.740 the way

00:46:38.060 and so

00:46:38.920 I think

00:46:39.100 it's great

00:46:39.480 they showed

00:46:40.820 me the vest

00:46:41.180 a couple

00:46:41.400 of days

00:46:41.620 ago

00:46:41.740 I said

00:46:42.000 that's a

00:46:42.260 cool vest

00:46:42.600 I'll wear

00:46:42.940 that

00:46:43.220 so

00:46:44.080 you people

00:46:45.920 can make

00:46:46.220 fun of the

00:46:46.540 vest all

00:46:46.840 you want

00:46:47.180 I thought

00:46:48.720 it was

00:46:48.880 nice

00:46:49.100 I'm a

00:46:49.700 vest guy

00:46:50.060 I like

00:46:50.420 vests

00:46:50.740 and I

00:46:51.200 don't

00:46:51.300 make any

00:46:51.740 and guess

00:46:52.040 what

00:46:52.240 there are

00:46:53.360 other

00:46:53.680 vests

00:46:54.160 that you're

00:46:55.520 gonna see

00:46:55.920 we got a

00:46:56.480 whole array

00:46:59.060 of vests

00:46:59.800 that we're

00:47:00.100 about to

00:47:00.480 roll out

00:47:01.160 so we're

00:47:02.740 going all

00:47:03.500 in on

00:47:03.880 vests

00:47:04.280 there's gonna

00:47:05.500 be jackets

00:47:06.080 there's a

00:47:06.480 whole lineup

00:47:06.900 so

00:47:09.560 they said

00:47:10.740 that I'm

00:47:10.980 gonna start

00:47:11.320 layering

00:47:11.780 there's gonna

00:47:12.160 be layers

00:47:12.700 that's a

00:47:13.340 big step

00:47:13.680 it's a

00:47:13.980 major step

00:47:14.660 forward

00:47:15.080 in my

00:47:15.520 fashion

00:47:15.900 journey

00:47:16.340 is with

00:47:17.480 layering

00:47:17.900 and I'd

00:47:19.320 appreciate a

00:47:19.760 little bit

00:47:19.980 of moral

00:47:20.280 support

00:47:20.680 instead of

00:47:22.060 being relentlessly

00:47:22.860 bullied

00:47:23.340 you jerks

00:47:25.000 but at the

00:47:26.580 same time

00:47:26.880 I would have

00:47:27.160 been disappointed

00:47:27.720 if you didn't

00:47:28.880 roast me

00:47:29.360 for the vest

00:47:29.880 I would have

00:47:31.080 actually been

00:47:31.380 let down

00:47:31.800 by that

00:47:32.180 so

00:47:32.480 I don't

00:47:33.900 know

00:47:34.060 it worked

00:47:34.560 out I guess

00:47:34.960 America

00:47:35.980 is on the

00:47:36.560 comeback

00:47:36.900 but the

00:47:37.380 fight

00:47:37.700 for the

00:47:38.500 truth

00:47:38.800 is far

00:47:39.180 from over

00:47:39.560 while the

00:47:40.000 left tries

00:47:40.580 desperately

00:47:40.940 to keep

00:47:41.260 its grip

00:47:41.620 on media

00:47:42.240 education

00:47:42.920 and the

00:47:43.420 courts

00:47:43.640 Daily Wire

00:47:44.140 is leading

00:47:44.580 the charge

00:47:45.060 for free

00:47:45.560 speech

00:47:45.920 fearless

00:47:46.340 journalism

00:47:46.800 and the

00:47:47.520 values

00:47:47.920 that made

00:47:48.320 our country

00:47:48.720 great

00:47:48.980 now's the

00:47:49.680 time to

00:47:49.960 join us

00:47:50.280 stream

00:47:50.840 my show

00:47:51.600 ad free

00:47:52.280 and watch

00:47:53.060 along with

00:47:53.400 my producers

00:47:53.820 in the chat

00:47:54.360 plus get

00:47:55.100 exclusive content

00:47:55.960 you won't

00:47:56.400 find anywhere

00:47:56.820 else

00:47:57.020 access premium

00:47:58.160 entertainment

00:47:58.560 join a

00:47:59.260 community

00:47:59.540 of thinkers

00:48:00.020 not followers

00:48:00.840 watch anytime

00:48:01.440 anywhere on

00:48:01.960 desktop mobile

00:48:02.860 and TV

00:48:03.400 with the

00:48:03.800 Daily Wire Plus

00:48:04.280 app

00:48:04.520 don't just

00:48:05.160 watch the

00:48:05.520 culture war

00:48:06.900 be part of the

00:48:07.580 movement

00:48:07.800 subscribe now

00:48:08.540 at dailywire.com

00:48:09.740 slash subscribe

00:48:10.760 now let's get to

00:48:11.880 our daily

00:48:12.240 cancellation

00:48:12.760 Scott Shamblin

00:48:20.160 a radio host

00:48:20.960 in Colorado

00:48:21.400 posted this

00:48:22.080 clip from a

00:48:22.800 hearing in the

00:48:23.580 state legislature

00:48:24.360 yesterday in

00:48:26.340 Colorado

00:48:26.640 this is speaker

00:48:27.420 Julie McCluskey

00:48:28.480 in Colorado

00:48:29.180 talking about

00:48:30.580 the cost

00:48:31.240 saving benefits

00:48:32.340 of abortion

00:48:33.560 listen

00:48:33.900 that savings

00:48:35.760 comes from

00:48:36.800 the averted

00:48:37.420 births that

00:48:38.160 will not

00:48:38.600 occur

00:48:39.080 because

00:48:40.040 abortions

00:48:41.080 happened

00:48:42.020 instead

00:48:42.640 so a

00:48:44.040 birth is

00:48:44.740 more expensive

00:48:45.500 than an

00:48:46.340 abortion

00:48:46.720 so the

00:48:48.180 savings

00:48:48.800 comes in

00:48:50.260 Medicaid

00:48:51.240 births that

00:48:52.660 will not

00:48:53.240 occur

00:48:53.760 this bill

00:48:55.080 will actually

00:48:56.020 decrease

00:48:56.960 costs for

00:48:58.080 our health

00:48:58.660 care policy

00:48:59.440 and financing

00:49:00.180 department

00:49:00.780 our Medicaid

00:49:01.520 expenditures

00:49:02.300 in both

00:49:03.440 this year

00:49:04.060 and out

00:49:04.760 year

00:49:05.140 out years

00:49:06.300 as the

00:49:06.780 savings

00:49:07.280 from

00:49:07.760 averted

00:49:08.260 births

00:49:09.000 outweigh

00:49:09.520 the cost

00:49:10.260 of covering

00:49:11.260 reproductive

00:49:11.880 health care

00:49:12.660 for all

00:49:13.280 Coloradans

00:49:14.140 this bill

00:49:15.220 requires all

00:49:16.200 abortion services

00:49:17.240 to be

00:49:17.840 state funded

00:49:18.640 the bill

00:49:18.980 requires an

00:49:19.840 increase

00:49:20.440 to general

00:49:21.260 fund of

00:49:21.840 1.5

00:49:22.620 million to

00:49:23.260 cover the

00:49:23.760 cost for

00:49:24.340 care

00:49:24.680 but again

00:49:25.480 a reminder

00:49:25.980 that ultimately

00:49:26.740 the state

00:49:27.380 will see

00:49:27.920 a cost

00:49:28.420 savings

00:49:28.920 and ultimately

00:49:30.320 it is

00:49:31.040 truly an

00:49:31.940 honor

00:49:32.260 to be

00:49:32.700 here

00:49:32.940 carrying

00:49:33.240 this bill

00:49:33.680 alongside

00:49:34.200 Rep.

00:49:34.540 Garcia

00:49:34.980 and I

00:49:35.400 ask for

00:49:36.140 your support

00:49:36.860 of Senate

00:49:37.300 Bill 183

00:49:38.180 Savings

00:49:40.420 from

00:49:40.820 averted

00:49:41.460 births

00:49:42.720 a birth

00:49:43.180 is more

00:49:43.520 expensive

00:49:43.980 than an

00:49:44.340 abortion

00:49:44.620 this is

00:49:44.940 her argument

00:49:45.400 we can

00:49:46.420 save money

00:49:46.940 by killing

00:49:47.360 babies

00:49:47.680 rather than

00:49:48.080 allowing

00:49:48.380 them to

00:49:48.660 be born

00:49:48.980 or by

00:49:49.460 as she

00:49:49.780 says

00:49:50.060 averting

00:49:51.440 their

00:49:51.980 births

00:49:52.660 this is

00:49:53.680 an argument

00:49:53.980 that you

00:49:54.180 hear all

00:49:54.420 the time

00:49:54.780 the left

00:49:55.100 often talks

00:49:55.620 about the

00:49:55.940 cost saving

00:49:56.440 benefits

00:49:56.800 of abortion

00:49:57.320 after

00:49:58.060 Roe

00:49:58.280 was overturned

00:49:58.820 there were

00:49:59.140 a million

00:49:59.620 articles

00:50:00.060 like this

00:50:01.020 one in the

00:50:01.340 New Yorker

00:50:01.700 headline

00:50:02.040 another likely

00:50:03.260 effect of

00:50:03.760 the Roe

00:50:04.100 reversal

00:50:04.440 higher

00:50:05.120 health care

00:50:05.560 costs

00:50:05.980 article

00:50:06.980 goes on

00:50:07.340 to explain

00:50:07.700 that carrying

00:50:08.160 a pregnancy

00:50:08.620 to term

00:50:09.120 and then

00:50:09.580 delivering

00:50:09.980 a living

00:50:10.440 baby

00:50:10.820 rather than

00:50:11.220 killing

00:50:11.440 the baby

00:50:11.720 ahead of

00:50:12.000 time

00:50:12.220 requires

00:50:13.380 more

00:50:14.000 health care

00:50:14.400 resources

00:50:14.920 and is

00:50:15.360 quote unquote

00:50:15.840 higher risk

00:50:16.860 which will

00:50:18.080 make health care

00:50:18.860 more expensive

00:50:19.400 for everybody

00:50:19.860 PBS published

00:50:20.540 an article

00:50:20.840 around the

00:50:21.220 same time

00:50:21.580 lamenting

00:50:22.120 how much

00:50:22.780 money

00:50:22.980 it would

00:50:23.180 cost

00:50:23.460 to birth

00:50:24.080 and raise

00:50:24.680 all of

00:50:24.980 these

00:50:25.160 extra kids

00:50:26.120 the article

00:50:26.860 says

00:50:27.260 quote

00:50:27.580 the out-of-pocket

00:50:28.520 cost of giving

00:50:29.200 birth with

00:50:29.740 insurance

00:50:30.200 is $2,854

00:50:31.860 giving birth

00:50:33.120 is only the

00:50:33.660 first expense

00:50:34.560 raising a child

00:50:35.560 poses its own

00:50:36.320 financial burden

00:50:37.180 and previous

00:50:38.100 research has shown

00:50:38.900 that people who

00:50:39.460 are denied an

00:50:40.120 abortion

00:50:40.480 face significant

00:50:41.940 economic harm

00:50:43.080 the significant

00:50:45.260 economic harm

00:50:46.000 to be clear

00:50:46.560 is that their

00:50:47.140 children are alive

00:50:48.400 rather than dead

00:50:49.800 so it's better

00:50:51.300 to save money

00:50:52.100 by killing the

00:50:53.140 kids

00:50:53.340 this is the

00:50:53.820 argument being

00:50:54.520 made very

00:50:55.040 explicitly

00:50:55.500 and as we

00:50:56.440 saw from

00:50:56.860 Julie McCluskey

00:50:57.540 they are not

00:50:58.260 ashamed of it

00:50:58.880 so

00:51:00.060 it makes me

00:51:01.860 wonder

00:51:02.160 if we're okay

00:51:04.040 with killing

00:51:05.020 human beings

00:51:05.580 in order to

00:51:06.040 save money

00:51:06.680 then why do

00:51:08.620 we stop

00:51:09.220 at babies

00:51:10.100 why do we

00:51:11.280 start there

00:51:11.920 why do we

00:51:12.700 start or

00:51:13.120 stop there

00:51:13.620 why are we

00:51:14.820 talking about

00:51:15.300 babies at all

00:51:16.060 I wonder what

00:51:17.880 Julie would say

00:51:18.580 or what PBS

00:51:19.280 or the New Yorker

00:51:20.120 would say

00:51:20.520 to this

00:51:21.920 modest proposal

00:51:22.860 if we're going

00:51:23.860 to kill babies

00:51:24.600 to save money

00:51:25.200 couldn't we

00:51:25.840 use the exact

00:51:26.440 same argument

00:51:26.960 to save money

00:51:28.500 by killing

00:51:29.460 the homeless

00:51:29.920 and hear me

00:51:31.700 out of this

00:51:32.000 I'm not

00:51:32.300 encouraging anyone

00:51:32.900 to run out

00:51:33.360 and commit

00:51:33.660 any acts

00:51:34.060 of violence

00:51:34.420 I'm saying

00:51:34.900 by the

00:51:35.400 pro-abortion

00:51:35.820 logic

00:51:36.240 why don't

00:51:37.400 we pass

00:51:37.780 a law

00:51:38.080 and put

00:51:38.460 a system

00:51:38.800 in place

00:51:39.280 for doing

00:51:40.380 this humanely

00:51:41.080 which is

00:51:41.880 very important

00:51:42.300 to me

00:51:42.540 I wouldn't

00:51:42.940 want any

00:51:43.280 back alley

00:51:43.900 homeless

00:51:44.300 terminations

00:51:44.860 to take

00:51:45.200 place

00:51:45.480 I want to

00:51:46.300 make sure

00:51:46.480 it's done

00:51:46.800 very safely

00:51:47.360 I mean

00:51:48.100 it's not

00:51:48.300 gonna be

00:51:48.500 safe for

00:51:48.780 the homeless

00:51:49.040 person

00:51:49.280 but it's

00:51:49.600 safe for

00:51:49.900 everybody

00:51:50.140 else

00:51:50.420 so just

00:51:51.320 think about

00:51:51.660 this

00:51:51.840 homeless

00:51:52.140 people

00:51:52.400 cost

00:51:52.800 taxpayers

00:51:53.260 upwards

00:51:53.740 of

00:51:54.060 $50,000

00:51:54.960 per year

00:51:55.800 so the

00:51:57.420 cost savings

00:51:58.100 by averting

00:51:59.040 all of these

00:51:59.640 homeless lives

00:52:00.700 would be

00:52:02.200 very significant

00:52:03.020 so if you

00:52:04.500 advocate for

00:52:05.100 the mass

00:52:05.480 extermination

00:52:06.100 of the

00:52:06.380 unborn

00:52:06.760 on the

00:52:06.980 basis

00:52:07.200 of cost

00:52:07.640 savings

00:52:08.000 I mean

00:52:08.940 you must

00:52:09.520 support

00:52:09.820 this proposal

00:52:10.400 as well

00:52:10.880 now you

00:52:11.940 might want

00:52:12.300 to object

00:52:12.680 and say

00:52:13.100 well no

00:52:13.820 abortion

00:52:14.140 is totally

00:52:14.440 different

00:52:14.740 after all

00:52:15.200 the homeless

00:52:15.720 are human

00:52:16.300 beings

00:52:16.760 well yeah

00:52:18.180 you're correct

00:52:18.780 human is

00:52:19.440 a species

00:52:20.140 what species

00:52:22.100 do you think

00:52:22.700 a fetus

00:52:23.480 quote unquote

00:52:24.040 is

00:52:24.560 fetus means

00:52:25.800 offspring in

00:52:26.800 latin so

00:52:27.640 he is the

00:52:28.500 offspring of

00:52:29.380 two human

00:52:30.260 parents

00:52:30.800 evidence would

00:52:31.480 suggest that

00:52:32.000 the unborn

00:52:32.380 child is

00:52:33.220 also then

00:52:34.040 a human

00:52:34.480 being

00:52:34.840 we're pretty

00:52:36.240 sure that

00:52:36.560 he's not

00:52:36.780 an elephant

00:52:37.140 or an

00:52:38.160 oak tree

00:52:38.660 now maybe

00:52:40.100 you'll object

00:52:40.580 and say

00:52:40.980 that sure

00:52:42.680 the unborn

00:52:43.340 child is a

00:52:43.860 human being

00:52:44.280 just like a

00:52:44.920 homeless person

00:52:45.420 but the

00:52:46.260 homeless person

00:52:46.720 is alive

00:52:47.520 whereas the

00:52:48.920 unborn child

00:52:49.460 is not

00:52:49.960 well but then

00:52:52.320 what is the

00:52:52.940 abortion doing

00:52:53.660 precisely if the

00:52:54.520 child is not

00:52:55.200 alive before the

00:52:56.420 abortion is

00:52:56.960 performed

00:52:57.480 is the abortion

00:52:59.180 killing something

00:52:59.900 that's already

00:53:00.360 dead

00:53:00.740 is it killing

00:53:01.640 an inanimate

00:53:02.240 object

00:53:02.800 they call an

00:53:04.280 abortion a

00:53:04.740 termination

00:53:05.280 well what is

00:53:05.960 being terminated

00:53:06.740 if a woman

00:53:08.120 went in for an

00:53:08.860 abortion and then

00:53:09.520 shortly after she

00:53:10.500 gave birth to a

00:53:11.240 live baby

00:53:12.060 that would tell

00:53:13.700 her that the

00:53:14.140 abortion was botched

00:53:15.260 that it didn't

00:53:15.860 work

00:53:16.240 how would she

00:53:17.120 know that

00:53:17.600 well because

00:53:18.020 the abortion

00:53:18.500 is supposed to

00:53:19.140 convert a

00:53:19.880 living baby

00:53:20.800 into a dead

00:53:21.840 one because

00:53:22.540 the unborn baby

00:53:23.420 is living

00:53:24.380 it is a life

00:53:26.060 it is a human

00:53:26.920 life by any

00:53:28.360 definition of the

00:53:29.260 term so both

00:53:30.540 homeless people

00:53:31.220 and unborn children

00:53:32.160 are human lives

00:53:33.220 who happen to

00:53:34.980 cost a lot of

00:53:35.920 money which

00:53:37.180 brings us back to

00:53:37.800 the original

00:53:38.160 question why

00:53:39.000 aren't we

00:53:39.740 mass executing

00:53:41.120 the homeless

00:53:41.600 serious question

00:53:44.160 now maybe next

00:53:45.640 you'll object and

00:53:46.220 say that unborn

00:53:46.880 children are a

00:53:47.700 different case

00:53:48.220 because they're

00:53:48.740 fully dependent

00:53:49.540 on their mothers

00:53:50.280 for survival

00:53:51.020 well yeah but the

00:53:52.540 homeless are fully

00:53:53.420 dependent also

00:53:54.200 if we withdrew all

00:53:56.140 tax funding from

00:53:57.100 the homeless

00:53:57.500 tomorrow

00:53:57.940 we would be told

00:53:59.740 in very panicked

00:54:00.580 terms that

00:54:01.980 thousands of

00:54:02.680 homeless will die

00:54:03.520 why is that

00:54:05.540 well because

00:54:06.840 they're fully

00:54:07.400 dependent on us

00:54:08.660 for their survival

00:54:09.560 if dependence

00:54:10.720 makes you less

00:54:11.540 human or takes

00:54:12.380 away your moral

00:54:13.080 right to existence

00:54:14.000 then the homeless

00:54:15.280 are in the same

00:54:15.900 boat as the

00:54:16.440 unborn they have

00:54:17.100 no moral right

00:54:17.980 to exist

00:54:18.520 in fact they're

00:54:19.860 in a worse boat

00:54:20.680 after all in the

00:54:21.440 vast majority of

00:54:22.080 cases a woman is

00:54:23.320 pregnant because

00:54:23.920 she chose to

00:54:24.760 participate in the

00:54:25.600 reproductive act

00:54:26.300 both her and the

00:54:27.000 father chose to

00:54:28.180 do the thing that

00:54:28.860 is biologically

00:54:29.600 designed to

00:54:30.580 create children

00:54:31.220 and which has

00:54:31.620 created children

00:54:32.280 literally billions

00:54:33.300 of times before

00:54:34.060 in history

00:54:34.480 that child exists

00:54:36.280 because of them

00:54:37.100 and because of

00:54:38.340 their actions

00:54:38.960 and for no other

00:54:40.680 reason

00:54:41.060 but the homeless

00:54:42.820 guy down the

00:54:43.340 street isn't

00:54:43.940 homeless because

00:54:44.520 of me

00:54:45.000 I had nothing

00:54:46.200 to do with it

00:54:46.720 he's dependent

00:54:48.020 on me as a

00:54:48.780 taxpayer completely

00:54:50.000 apart from my

00:54:50.820 own involvement

00:54:51.420 indeed he's

00:54:52.900 almost certainly

00:54:53.560 homeless because

00:54:54.280 of his own

00:54:54.780 actions his own

00:54:55.580 choices the

00:54:56.440 unborn child did

00:54:57.340 not choose to

00:54:58.020 be conceived

00:54:58.620 the unborn child

00:54:59.800 did not put it

00:55:00.480 didn't do a single

00:55:01.320 thing to put

00:55:01.840 himself in that

00:55:02.480 position the

00:55:03.520 homeless guy did

00:55:04.280 he started smoking

00:55:06.080 crack or something

00:55:06.860 and now he's

00:55:07.320 homeless and now

00:55:09.340 as a taxpayer I

00:55:10.160 gotta pay for it

00:55:11.140 so if anything

00:55:12.900 that would make

00:55:13.460 him even more

00:55:14.480 eligible for

00:55:15.200 abortion by the

00:55:15.880 logic of pro

00:55:16.480 abortion people

00:55:17.120 now you might

00:55:18.220 try to offer

00:55:18.620 one last objection

00:55:19.520 you might say

00:55:20.180 that sure the

00:55:21.160 homeless are

00:55:21.680 expensive just

00:55:22.460 like children

00:55:22.940 sure we could

00:55:23.680 save money by

00:55:24.440 aborting the

00:55:24.960 homeless just as

00:55:25.600 we save money

00:55:26.180 by aborting

00:55:26.740 babies sure

00:55:27.820 unborn children

00:55:28.480 are just as

00:55:29.120 human and just

00:55:29.720 as alive as

00:55:30.320 the homeless or

00:55:30.860 anyone else

00:55:31.340 sure the

00:55:32.180 homeless are

00:55:32.680 dependent just

00:55:33.580 as the unborn

00:55:34.140 are dependent

00:55:34.620 but the difference

00:55:35.380 is that the

00:55:36.540 unborn have no

00:55:37.320 conscious experience

00:55:38.520 whereas the

00:55:39.020 homeless do

00:55:39.520 in other words

00:55:39.940 babies don't

00:55:41.040 know that they're

00:55:41.560 being killed

00:55:42.040 but the

00:55:42.540 homeless would

00:55:43.120 know it

00:55:43.540 now I find

00:55:44.800 that to be a

00:55:45.520 rather demented

00:55:46.560 and morbid

00:55:47.280 argument the

00:55:47.880 idea that it's

00:55:48.400 okay to kill

00:55:49.100 someone as long

00:55:49.660 as they don't

00:55:50.080 know you're

00:55:50.480 doing it seems

00:55:51.120 fraught with all

00:55:51.860 kinds of difficult

00:55:52.980 implications it

00:55:54.100 would seem to

00:55:54.440 be bad news for

00:55:55.380 anyone who's ever

00:55:55.820 been under

00:55:56.200 anesthesia or I

00:55:57.640 don't know just

00:55:58.040 gone to sleep at

00:55:58.920 night be that as

00:56:00.280 it may this

00:56:01.580 argument doesn't

00:56:02.320 rescue the

00:56:02.880 homeless I mean

00:56:04.460 we don't know

00:56:04.920 what sort of

00:56:05.280 conscious experience

00:56:06.040 the unborn have

00:56:06.840 or don't have

00:56:07.420 but we do know

00:56:08.220 that a great

00:56:09.100 many homeless

00:56:09.680 people are

00:56:10.260 barely self

00:56:11.180 aware or aware

00:56:12.280 of anything at

00:56:13.080 all frankly I

00:56:13.720 mean the other

00:56:13.940 day I saw a

00:56:14.480 homeless guy having

00:56:15.480 a full-on

00:56:16.060 argument with an

00:56:16.720 ATM machine is

00:56:18.480 that guy more

00:56:19.420 aware than an

00:56:20.480 unborn child would

00:56:22.360 he even know

00:56:23.180 what's going on if

00:56:24.180 he were aborted

00:56:24.980 highly debatable

00:56:27.120 and we also know

00:56:30.080 that the homeless

00:56:30.700 guy who has lost

00:56:31.880 his mind will

00:56:33.280 likely never get

00:56:34.160 it back whereas

00:56:34.800 the unborn child if

00:56:35.900 he is unaware will

00:56:37.460 soon be aware if

00:56:38.960 we only leave him

00:56:39.880 alone the unborn

00:56:40.540 child is at worst

00:56:41.980 unconscious or

00:56:43.760 semi-conscious on

00:56:44.980 his way to being

00:56:46.140 fully conscious the

00:56:47.760 homeless man is

00:56:48.680 semi-conscious on

00:56:49.800 his way to being

00:56:50.680 even less conscious

00:56:51.660 so it seems clear to

00:56:53.600 me literally every

00:56:55.760 argument that you

00:56:56.460 can make for

00:56:57.000 aborting children

00:56:57.720 would not would

00:56:59.160 not only just

00:56:59.820 apply to the

00:57:00.540 homeless but would

00:57:01.180 apply to them even

00:57:02.240 more so why don't

00:57:04.820 we abort the

00:57:05.280 homeless then why

00:57:06.880 don't we save a

00:57:07.420 whole lot of money

00:57:08.060 and trouble by

00:57:08.760 just rounding them

00:57:09.440 all up bringing

00:57:10.840 them to their

00:57:11.360 local Planned

00:57:12.220 Parenthood clinic

00:57:12.880 I mean often

00:57:14.360 abortions are

00:57:14.840 justified on the

00:57:15.380 basis that the

00:57:15.900 child is unwanted

00:57:16.820 and might end up

00:57:17.740 on the streets and

00:57:18.560 forsaken by society

00:57:19.960 if they're allowed

00:57:20.460 to be born well

00:57:22.080 the homeless guy is

00:57:22.920 actually already on

00:57:23.940 the street and

00:57:24.480 forsaken there's no

00:57:26.060 might here we don't

00:57:27.640 need to speculate at

00:57:29.500 least the quote

00:57:29.960 unquote unwanted

00:57:30.760 child has a chance

00:57:31.880 of becoming a

00:57:32.440 productive member of

00:57:33.140 society the homeless

00:57:33.980 guy has already not

00:57:35.000 become a productive

00:57:35.920 member of society

00:57:36.680 so again why don't

00:57:39.160 we just abort them

00:57:40.140 all we've aborted

00:57:41.680 60 million children

00:57:42.800 why not throw

00:57:43.240 800,000 or so

00:57:44.120 homeless into that

00:57:44.720 mix like what

00:57:46.420 barely even leaves a

00:57:47.900 dent compared to

00:57:48.940 60 million why don't

00:57:51.500 we do it well the

00:57:53.160 reason of course is

00:57:54.120 that it would be

00:57:54.760 horrifically

00:57:55.620 unspeakably evil to

00:57:57.500 exterminate the

00:57:58.300 homeless that is the

00:58:00.800 only reason we don't

00:58:02.080 do it the only reason

00:58:04.600 is that it would be

00:58:05.720 really really bad to

00:58:06.840 do we don't do it

00:58:08.500 and we shouldn't

00:58:09.320 because the homeless

00:58:11.240 are human beings

00:58:12.020 even if it costs us

00:58:14.480 money even if they

00:58:15.660 cause a lot of

00:58:16.780 problems for society

00:58:18.140 even if they're

00:58:19.320 unwanted even if they

00:58:20.920 are burdens which

00:58:22.100 they are we as

00:58:23.300 decent and humane

00:58:24.180 people would never

00:58:25.600 consider mass murder

00:58:27.540 as an acceptable

00:58:28.920 solution to the

00:58:30.260 homeless problem

00:58:30.880 and we shouldn't

00:58:32.960 so then why is

00:58:35.260 it a solution for

00:58:36.800 babies

00:58:37.440 now I understand

00:58:41.200 of course that one

00:58:42.060 of the hazards of

00:58:42.880 taking this kind of

00:58:44.140 Jonathan Swift

00:58:45.200 rhetorical approach

00:58:46.560 to the abortion

00:58:47.180 issue is that the

00:58:50.760 abortion industry has

00:58:51.660 been rooted in

00:58:52.440 eugenics from the

00:58:53.340 very beginning so

00:58:54.060 there's always the

00:58:54.620 risk that a pro

00:58:55.260 abortion person will

00:58:56.460 listen to my just

00:58:57.860 to be clear satirical

00:58:59.200 argument for mass

00:59:00.260 murdering the homeless

00:59:00.960 and actually agree

00:59:02.480 with it I mean some

00:59:04.160 western countries are

00:59:05.020 already well on their

00:59:06.260 way getting rid of

00:59:07.640 the undesirables later

00:59:08.940 in life with

00:59:09.480 euthanasia but I guess

00:59:12.100 I'm very hopefully

00:59:13.600 betting that the

00:59:14.520 majority of pro

00:59:15.420 abortion people in

00:59:16.160 this country have at

00:59:16.940 least enough humanity

00:59:18.020 and decency and

00:59:18.620 understand that you

00:59:19.280 can't solve the

00:59:20.180 homeless problem by

00:59:21.480 killing all of them

00:59:22.240 although with somebody

00:59:25.480 like Julie McCluskey

00:59:26.720 that assumption may

00:59:28.900 well be too

00:59:29.960 optimistic which is

00:59:30.780 why she is today

00:59:32.640 finally canceled

00:59:35.200 that'll do it for the

00:59:37.240 show today and this

00:59:38.320 week have a great

00:59:39.540 weekend talk to you on

00:59:40.300 Monday Godspeed

00:59:41.560 good

00:59:46.480 good

00:59:48.280 you

00:59:49.220 you

00:59:53.260 you

00:59:55.700 you

The Matt Walsh Show - March 28, 2025

Ep. 1565 - Democrats Reveal How They Will Change The Rules To Take Back Power

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript