Ep. 1583 - The Left Uncovers The Sinister Conspiracy Pushing Women To Be Healthy And Happy
Episode Stats
Words per minute
171.32109
Harmful content
Misogyny
45
sentences flagged
Hate speech
43
sentences flagged
Summary
The media has discovered a nefarious right-wing plot to encourage women to be thin and fertile. We ll get into the details of this sinister conspiracy. Also, Facebook officially ends its ban on misgendering, a list of the dirtiest, grossest cities has been released, and an embarrassing scandal involving sports commentator Shannon Sharp proves again why you should just get married.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Today on the Matt Wall Show, the media has discovered a nefarious right-wing plot to
00:00:03.900
encourage women to be thin and fertile. We'll get into the details of this sinister conspiracy.
0.83
00:00:09.540
Also, Facebook officially ends its ban on misgendering. A list of the dirtiest, grossest
00:00:14.600
cities has been released. Unsurprisingly, they're all run by Democrats. And an embarrassing scandal
00:00:19.120
involving sports commentator Shannon Sharp proves again why you should just get married.
00:00:23.720
All of that and more today on the Matt Wall Show.
00:00:30.000
With everything that's happening in the economy, it feels like we're all walking on shaky ground.
00:00:55.740
Prices are stuck at a really high level and it seems like nothing is affordable anymore.
00:00:59.480
It's no wonder many are relying on credit cards to cover the gaps. Credit card debt is skyrocketing
00:01:04.460
and it's leaving a lot of people stressed out. If you're a homeowner, you don't have to face this
00:01:09.260
uncertainty alone. My friends at American Financing can help you take control. They can help you access
00:01:14.140
the equity in your home to help you pay down the high interest credit card debt, giving you peace
00:01:18.580
of mind and real savings. On average, people just like you are saving 800 bucks a month. Plus, they
00:01:24.060
may close your loan in as little as 10 days. Don't let the chaos of the economy get the best of you.
00:01:28.640
Call American Financing right now. It costs you nothing to get started and you may be able to delay
00:01:33.300
your mortgage, to delay two mortgage payments, giving you a cushion in this uncertain time.
00:01:38.220
Call 866-569-4711. That's 866-569-4711. Or visit AmericanFinancing.net slash Walsh.
00:01:47.480
Now, normally, I don't consider myself much of a trendsetter, especially when it comes to the
00:01:53.220
online discourse among middle-aged, cosmopolitan, liberal women. To the extent that these people
00:01:58.920
talk about me at all, it's usually to call me a misogynist or to praise my brief appearance on
00:02:03.840
Dancing with the Stars. In any event, on a typical day, they certainly aren't reading my social media
00:02:08.460
feeds and watching my podcast in order to pick up new lingo. We can be certain of that much, or at least
00:02:14.020
I thought. So, I was more than a little surprised to see an article that was just published by The
00:02:18.620
Guardian entitled, Now Comes the Womanosphere, the Anti-Feminist Media Telling Women to be Thin,
00:02:25.140
Fertile, and Republican. According to this article, the Womanosphere is, quote,
00:02:30.100
an organized effort to create an alternative right-wing media ecosystem targeting young
00:02:34.700
female U.S. audiences, one of the few demographics that has until now lean substantially democratic.
0.97
00:02:39.420
This new Womanosphere includes Brett Cooper's channel, as well as lifestyle magazines like
0.99
00:02:44.600
The Conservator and Evie, Candace Owens' Club Candace, Alex Clark's Maha, Make American Healthy
00:02:50.600
Again, talk show cultural apothecary, conservative Christian influencer Allie Beth Stuckey's Relatable,
0.99
00:02:57.960
and swimmer-turned-anti-transgender activist Riley Gaines' podcast, Gaines for Girls, close quote.
00:03:03.160
Now, before we get into the substance of this article, such as it is, I need to pull up something I wrote.
00:03:08.980
Quote, online a few weeks ago, and here's what I said at the time, quote,
00:03:13.780
we hear a lot about the Manosphere. I think it's time we start talking about the Womanosphere and
00:03:18.640
the corrosive effect that these shrill, toxic feminist influencers are having on the minds of
1.00
00:03:23.500
young women and their marriages. That was from my podcast, also was a piece on Daily Wire.
00:03:28.380
So there you have it. Long before The Guardian demanded that everyone talk about the Womanosphere,
00:03:33.340
I was demanding a public conversation about the Womanosphere. All they did was add an O in the
1.00
00:03:38.480
middle to change Womanosphere to Womanosphere. I like my version better. It flows a little bit
00:03:43.500
better. And then they completely changed the meaning of the word as I was using it. To me,
00:03:47.680
the Womanosphere are the anti-man, bitter feminists on TikTok. And to them, the Womanosphere is a
1.00
00:03:54.480
collection of the most normal and pleasant women you'll ever meet. And of course, the other problem
00:03:59.660
is that no one at The Guardian even knows what the word woman means, of course. But other than that,
00:04:05.080
you can't deny the striking similarity between these two made-up words. If The Guardian actually
00:04:09.280
made any money, this is the part where I'd start demanding royalties. But in this case,
00:04:13.280
I'll let it slide. As the old saying goes, great minds think alike. And the not-so-great minds just
00:04:18.440
steal everything and pass it off as their own. But I don't want to dwell on how much money The Guardian
00:04:22.880
owes me, even though it's obviously substantial. The bigger issue with the article, as with everything
00:04:28.080
else published by The Guardian, is the content. And the tone for this particular hit piece is set
00:04:35.480
right in the headline. We're supposed to see the right-wing womanosphere as somehow nefarious and
00:04:41.060
sinister because it encourages women to be thin and fertile, as The Guardian puts it. These two words,
00:04:47.880
thin and fertile, are like kryptonite to the staff of The Guardian, apparently. Now, you might observe that
00:04:53.920
words like thin and fertile are just ways of describing someone as healthy. And it's like,
00:05:01.360
if you're a woman of childbearing age, there's like two things that you should be, right? Unless
0.95
00:05:06.840
something has gone wrong or you're unhealthy. And you might wonder why, you know, wonder what's so bad
00:05:12.980
about the womanosphere encouraging women to be thin, fertile, and healthy. But all you'll get from The
0.90
00:05:18.520
Guardian is this paragraph, quote, the type of women these commentators valorize is thin, straight,
1.00
00:05:24.720
fertile, traditionally feminine, conventionally attractive to men, and white. Though they tried
0.88
00:05:30.880
to avoid overt racism, anyone who falls outside of this narrow mold is subject to relentless mocking
00:05:37.640
and disparagement, close quote. Now, just to be entirely clear here, the narrow mold that The Guardian
00:05:46.460
is complaining about is simply being healthy, feminine, and attractive to men. They do add that
00:05:53.560
you have to be white as well, but they contradict themselves in the same breath because one of the
00:05:57.260
commentators they attack in the hit piece is Candace, who, last I checked, is not white.
1.00
00:06:01.380
So all we're left with is the narrow lane, the narrow lane that literally billions of women through all of
1.00
00:06:09.220
human history have fit through. You know, that's the virtually impossible standard that you have to
00:06:16.280
meet. If you don't want to be relentlessly mocked and disparaged by the online womanosphere, the impossible
1.00
00:06:23.140
standard is the standard that billions and billions of women have already, like, lived up to without even
1.00
00:06:30.780
trying. Now, we all know why The Guardian believes that only a small subset of the female population can
00:06:37.760
qualify as healthy. For one thing, they believe that men can become women. So that probably skews their
00:06:43.500
perspective a little bit, given that trans-identifying males aren't usually paragons of
00:06:47.700
physical fitness. And additionally, it's long been established that left-leaning individuals,
00:06:52.060
wherever they are in the world, tend to be less healthy. I mean, not too long ago, there was a study
00:06:56.640
from researchers at Harvard and Columbia, which found that, quote, findings from cross-sectional studies
00:07:01.320
conducted in Japan and Europe have reported that individuals expressing a conservative ideology as
00:07:06.080
compared to liberal ideology tend to report better self-rated health. In the USA, it has been reported
00:07:11.160
that Republicans are less likely to report poor health in comparison to Democrats. Now, these
00:07:17.120
findings shouldn't surprise us because an ideology that doesn't care about personal responsibility
00:07:21.580
is not going to have the healthiest followers. The only people who are surprised, apparently,
00:07:27.560
are the writers of The Guardian. But in their confusion, they do manage to hint at one point that I think is
00:07:33.680
worth thinking about, which is this, that the left has decided to give the right a monopoly on advocating
00:07:41.200
for healthy lifestyles. You know, it is true that if someone in this country these days promotes health,
00:07:50.640
fitness, marriage, family life, you know, any of these normal healthy things, then we can assume that
00:07:57.440
they're probably conservative. All of that has become right-wing coded. But that's only because
00:08:03.600
the left has gone to war against everything healthy and normal. You know, the right is not dominating
00:08:08.680
this issue because they're mind-controlling women or something. They're dominating the issue because
1.00
00:08:13.180
the left has abandoned it. Not just abandoned it, but militated against it. As this article continues,
00:08:19.320
The Guardian doubles down on its attempt to make being healthy sound like an act of terrorism.
00:08:24.580
At one point, they quote a piece from Evie, and then they have a coronary over it. So here's the line
00:08:29.840
from Evie followed by The Guardian's meltdown. Quote, our reproductive organs are made for just
1.00
00:08:34.900
that, creating new life, not warding off sperm and altering our insides to make conception close
00:08:39.380
to impossible. Read a recent Evie piece. Though some young women may recoil when conservative men like
00:08:46.180
J.D. Vance and Elon Musk opine on birth rates and fertility, outlets like Evie are able to repackage
0.99
00:08:51.420
a similar message in a more approachable way. Maggie Bullock, a women's magazine veteran who co-writes
00:08:57.120
the spread, a newsletter about the industry, said that she saw outlets like Evie as trying to be
00:09:02.080
something of a gateway drug into more extreme conservative ideologies. Like, we're pretty
00:09:07.100
nice, and we're pretty, and we're not that radical. Don't worry. We're just telling you the truth,
00:09:11.800
she said. It feels like a wolf in sheep's clothing. Yes, these are the women who are saying,
00:09:18.220
like, it's okay to have babies. They're the wolves in sheep's clothing. So here we have Evie
00:09:24.940
magazine stating that women's reproductive organs are intended for reproduction, and the Guardian
00:09:30.660
devotes about a thousand words to declaring how outrageous that statement is, even though it's
00:09:34.720
probably the least controversial thing that anyone can say in the English language. They even bring
00:09:39.480
in an alleged expert, a women's magazine veteran, to establish that Evie magazine is a gateway drug
00:09:45.700
to extremism because they don't think women should sterilize themselves. Now, what's especially amusing
1.00
00:09:51.040
about the accusations that this article makes against Brett Cooper, Riley Gaines, Candace Owens,
00:09:55.700
Allie Bestucki, Alex Clark, and others is that, first of all, the article, again, wants us to see
00:10:01.700
these women as this dark and sinister force, but as someone who knows all of them, Allie I've known for
00:10:06.920
years, Riley I've met a few times, I went on Alex's show a few months ago, Brett and Candace are both
00:10:11.580
friends, and they're some of the nicest, most cheerful people you'll ever meet. The article uses
00:10:17.940
the word scary to describe them, which is just hilarious from my vantage point or the vantage
00:10:24.440
point of anyone who's watched any of their shows, although I will say that Alex forced me to drink
00:10:29.240
raw milk when I was on her show, and that was deeply disturbing and also injurious to my health,
00:10:35.640
I still maintain. But aside from that, it was not a very scary experience until the milk came out.
00:10:41.580
The other thing is that all of them, of course, have jobs, and yet The Guardian concludes that all
00:10:47.080
of these women in reality want women to be nothing but submissive homemakers, quote-unquote,
0.95
00:10:52.120
who never leave the home for any reason, I guess. Quote, while the women behind these outlets all have
1.00
00:10:56.640
different styles and tactics, they are mostly aligned in their desire to return to a gender
0.92
00:11:01.300
essentialist worldview, women as submissive homemakers, men as strong providers. Now, first of all,
0.97
00:11:06.580
anytime you hear a phrase like gender essentialist being used unironically, you can immediately stop
00:11:14.820
paying attention to the person who says it. The term is nonsense because everyone in a sane world
00:11:20.100
is a gender essentialist. Everyone understands, everyone should understand, that gender is an
00:11:27.380
essential concept, or at least sex is, and they use the term interchangeably. This is an essential
00:11:33.720
concept because it's what allows human beings to reproduce. It also dramatically affects human
00:11:37.800
behavior in every significant way. So if somebody calls you a gender essentialist, the appropriate
0.99
00:11:42.960
response is, yeah. And by the way, the left is also gender essentialist, albeit in a completely
00:11:49.320
demented way. They don't understand the concept, but they certainly obsess over it, as you may have
00:11:55.600
noticed. They take their fake genders extremely seriously over there. It is an essential concept in
1.00
00:12:01.480
their worldview, just in a very confused way. And the other irony here is that it's the Guardian
00:12:07.420
that wants these women, like Brett and Candace, to be silent, apparently. They've written a gigantic
00:12:13.920
article about how all these women should, I guess, shut up and stop expressing their views.
1.00
00:12:18.680
Apparently, they can't grasp the idea that, as I've said many times, different people can choose to do
00:12:23.180
different things. I've gone on record many times saying that, in general, women should prioritize
0.99
00:12:27.900
raising families. Men should prioritize providing for their families. That's the system that's been
0.98
00:12:32.560
in place for thousands of years. It works pretty well. That doesn't mean that women should never have
0.99
00:12:37.200
jobs under any circumstances. And obviously, all of the women that the Guardian is attacking in this
0.88
00:12:41.640
article would agree with that statement because they all have lucrative careers of their own.
00:12:47.400
And we could go on for the next hour, you know, picking apart the article, but it's honestly not worth
00:12:52.620
the time. It is worth noticing, though, one aspect of this issue that the Guardian doesn't talk about
00:13:00.600
and that, you know, this side, the feminist side, never talks about. Throughout all of this angst and
00:13:08.000
misdirected, incoherent frustration, the one thing the Guardian doesn't do is grapple with the fact that
00:13:15.240
the alternative, you know, the alternative to the woman-o-sphere has already been tried and it has
0.79
00:13:23.000
completely and utterly failed. The alternative to the quote-unquote narrow lane espoused by Brett
00:13:30.160
Candace and company is the lane of left-wing secular feminism where women find their purpose in the
1.00
00:13:37.780
workplace and either reject family and marriage altogether or place it second in importance to the
00:13:42.980
pursuit of professional success. It's the lane where a woman doesn't submit to her husband but
0.99
00:13:48.040
instead submits to her employer, who, as it happens, is often also a man. It's the lane where a woman is
0.98
00:13:54.180
so committed to her independence and to her supposed autonomy that she will purchase it with the blood of
0.70
00:14:00.720
her own children, which is the whole point of abortion. Now, we've tried this approach, the feminist
1.00
00:14:06.060
approach for a few generations. It is actually the new thing. It is the trendy thing, the narrow thing.
00:14:16.400
And, well, how has it worked out? We don't need to speculate. I mean, we've got two basically,
00:14:23.020
you know, we've got two approaches here, broadly speaking, and they've both been tried. We can take
00:14:29.460
a look at them and see how they've worked out. So how has feminism worked out? Divorce rates have
1.00
00:14:36.280
skyrocketed. The institution of the family is in shambles. And by all available metrics, including
00:14:42.280
the prevalence of antidepressants, women and men are miserable. Here's just one indicator. For more
00:14:48.880
than 20 years, Gallup has asked women if they're happy with how they're being treated by society,
0.67
00:14:53.880
whatever that means exactly. And in 2022, Gallup recorded the lowest level of satisfaction among women
00:14:59.380
since they began asking the question. Yes, after all the alleged advancements in women's rights
0.99
00:15:05.460
over the last 20 years, women seem to believe that they're more oppressed than ever. But you don't
00:15:10.580
need to, you don't need Gallup to tell you that. You can either, you can, you know, either talk to
00:15:15.380
women who made the decision to enter the workforce, or you can go on TikTok. Every day, there's another
0.99
00:15:19.320
viral video of some young woman in tears because she went out into the working world and found it
00:15:25.300
horrifically dreary and depressing and demoralizing. I mean, that's a, that's a whole genre. We've talked
00:15:29.960
about it before on TikTok is women complaining about the fact that they have to work. Um, so we've seen
1.00
00:15:37.680
the alternative to women being thin and fertile and prioritizing their families. And it has been a
0.99
00:15:44.220
disaster. We got millions of broken homes, millions of dead children, and millions of extremely depressed,
00:15:50.800
but allegedly liberated women to show for it. Now the traditional approach has thousands of years of
00:15:58.580
success under its belt. The new approach crashed and burned 30 seconds after takeoff. The Guardian is
00:16:07.080
using the lame new womanosphere branding to suggest the opposite. They want to suggest that this is some
0.80
00:16:12.220
dangerous new trendy right-wing ideology, but it's not. It happens to be the ideology, the approach,
00:16:20.040
not even an ideology, the approach that clearly works best for everyone, including women. It's
00:16:24.540
the philosophy that built human civilization and maintained it and helped it to thrive for
00:16:29.860
millennia up until the last several decades. Now the Guardian might not know what women are or what
1.00
00:16:36.400
they want, but these women do. And the more the left mocks them for wanting to be healthy and to raise
0.86
00:16:41.680
families, the more I think women will turn away from leftism, just as so many men have. And so the only
00:16:48.160
women left supporting Democrats are men with wigs on. I mean, that's the Democrat Party's absolute
0.97
00:16:53.000
worst nightmare. And with every garbage article like this one, the nightmare for Democrats,
00:16:58.080
otherwise known as progress to the rest of us, is becoming more and more real by the day.
00:17:05.160
Have you checked your home title lately? Most homeowners never do, but with the growing amount
00:17:16.820
of digital scams targeting property owners, it's more important than ever. With modern technology,
00:17:22.140
criminals have found an alarming way to steal your home equity. They simply forge your signature on a
00:17:26.860
document, add a fake notary stamp, pay a small county fee, and just like that, your home title gets
00:17:32.380
transferred without your knowledge. Once they control your title, they can take out loans against
00:17:36.180
your equity or even sell your property entirely. The worst part, that you may not discover anything's
00:17:41.500
wrong until you receive an unexpected collection notice or a foreclosure letter. My producer Sean
00:17:46.140
uses home title lock to help protect his home and loves their service and the peace of mind they
00:17:50.500
provide. Don't wait until it's too late. Take a moment right now to verify your home title status and
00:17:54.960
protect what's likely your biggest investment. Use promo code Walsh at hometitlelock.com to make sure your
00:18:00.940
title is still in your name. You'll also get a free title history report plus a free 14-day trial
00:18:06.740
of their million-dollar triple lock protection. That's 24-7 monitoring every title, urgent alerts
00:18:11.480
to any changes, and if fraud should happen, they'll spend up to $1 million to fix it. Go to
00:18:16.900
hometitlelock.com now. Use promo code Walsh. That's hometitlelock.com, promo code Walsh.
00:18:24.020
Daily Wire reports Facebook's parent company, Meta, said that two posts that include misgendering,
00:18:29.060
quote-unquote, were not a violation of its policies in a case that appears to have involved
00:18:33.200
content from The Daily Wire. The social media giant's oversight board ruled that two posts
00:18:37.640
about trans-identifying males do not violate the company's hate speech rules. The oversight board
00:18:43.180
said in a statement, despite the intentionally provocative nature of the posts, which misgender
00:18:47.520
identifiable trans people in ways many would find offensive, the majority of the board found that
00:18:52.160
they related to matters of public concern and would not incite likely and imminent violence or
00:18:57.920
discrimination. Back in September, Meta's oversight board announced it was looking into two posts from
00:19:03.940
last year that involved videos of trans-identifying males. One of the posts appears to be a video
00:19:08.900
posted by Libs of TikTok on Instagram that shows an Oregon high school boy getting booed by the
00:19:13.680
crowd when he finished first place in the girls' 200-meter race. Here's a boy who thinks he's a girl.
00:19:19.700
Libs of TikTok captured the post. Around the same time, The Daily Wire posted the same video on Instagram
00:19:24.780
using male pronouns for the trans-identifying high schooler. And this apparently is the video that
00:19:30.860
they were looking into. So finally, it's been officially ruled after months of deliberation that
00:19:37.080
misgendering is not hate speech. And of course, misgendering is also not misgendering. What they
00:19:42.580
call misgendering is actually correct gendering. It's just gendering. But in any case, quote unquote,
00:19:49.760
misgendering is no longer hate speech, apparently on Facebook. This is, I guess, a new development
00:19:55.980
officially. Facebook is the first platform outside of X to officially say, as far as I know, that
00:20:01.940
they will no longer ban or censor you for so-called misgendering. But in reality, this is a shift that
00:20:11.040
started months ago. Every platform, as far as I know, maybe with the exception of TikTok,
00:20:16.060
has pulled back pretty significantly on the censorship campaign that it was waging against
00:20:22.880
basic biology. And soon, this will be a distant memory. Soon, people won't be able to believe that
00:20:30.900
it even happened. They won't be able to believe that in the 2017 to 2023 era or thereabouts,
00:20:40.940
every single major social media platform would not allow you to point out that a man in a dress is a
0.98
00:20:49.560
man. And it's one of several episodes over the past five or six years that nobody will want to
00:21:02.400
admit that they were a part of or that they supported. Now, we've talked a lot about the
00:21:06.940
collapse of the transagenda, the fact that gender ideology is losing, and it is. It still exists.
0.61
00:21:11.980
It's still a problem that needs to be dealt with. But it is losing. And this is probably the nail in
00:21:17.540
its coffin. The platform's making it legal, you know, to just speak honestly about the subject.
00:21:25.840
This is not what turns the tide, because they're making these changes in response to the tide turning.
00:21:33.380
But now that it has turned, and you're allowed to just be honest about the topic again,
00:21:39.020
the trans activists are even more screwed than they already were. Because this was always their
1.00
00:21:45.040
only hope. They cannot compete on a level playing field. They know that. They can't win or have any
00:21:50.340
hope of winning if the rules are not rigged in their favor. Because our position is so obviously
00:21:56.240
correct, so incontrovertible, so palpably, plainly true, that there's no way to compete with it,
00:22:03.040
except to just shut it down. They can only win the argument by not allowing the other side to make
00:22:09.400
an argument. And even in that case, as we've seen, they still didn't win. I mean, think about that.
00:22:16.280
There was a period of years when we weren't even allowed to make our arguments in most of these
00:22:21.680
public forums, and yet we still won the argument. We had tape over our mouths and two hands tied behind
00:22:29.780
our backs, and we still won the fight. And now the tape is mostly off, and at least one hand is free.
00:22:36.880
And so, you know, they're in big trouble. Postmillennial reports, a new study has revealed
00:22:43.920
that Baltimore, Maryland is the dirtiest city in the country. In determining the nation's dirtiest
00:22:49.120
cities, House Fresh reviewed 12.3 million sanitation-related complaints to 311 over the past year.
00:22:56.640
Cities that had over 250,000 residents were ranked based on the number of sanitation-related reports,
00:23:02.580
such as garbage waste and recycling, per 100,000 residents. And they came up with this list of the
00:23:08.400
dirtiest cities. So Baltimore is the dirtiest city. No big surprise there. Here's another thing that's
00:23:14.800
not a surprise. Let's go down the list of the dirtiest cities and see what they all have in common.
00:23:20.580
So we'll look at the city and then also who runs the city, and we'll see if we can notice any
00:23:26.580
patterns emerging. Baltimore, Maryland, number one, Mayor Brandon Scott, Democrat. Sacramento,
00:23:36.180
Mayor Daryl Steinberg, Democrat. Charlotte, Mayor V. Lyles, Democrat. Los Angeles, Mayor Karen Bass,
00:23:42.940
Democrat. Memphis, Mayor Paul Young, Democrat. Boston, Mayor Michelle Wu, Democrat. San Antonio,
00:23:48.820
Mayor Ron Nierenberg, Democrat. Chicago, Brandon Johnson, Democrat. Philadelphia, Jim Kenney,
00:23:54.160
Democrat. Houston, Sylvester Turner, Democrat. All down the list until we get to Las Vegas,
00:24:00.020
Carolyn Goodman, who's a Republican apparently. So of the 15 dirtiest cities, 14 are run by Democrats.
00:24:06.940
And what that tells us is that the Democrat Party fails at the most basic level of civilization.
00:24:18.560
And that's why I think this is like worth talking about for a moment. Because this is actually,
00:24:24.500
even before crime, before safety, this is the first step, the first thing, really, I think,
00:24:33.960
that distinguishes a first world nation from a third world nation. This is the first test of
00:24:40.220
several. Can you get your trash off the street? Waste management. Can you maintain some level
00:24:48.640
of sanitation? If you go to a third world country, this is the first thing you notice is that it's
00:24:55.380
dirty. Everything is filthy. They leave their trash strewn all over the place. You know, I mean,
00:25:01.400
the ancient Roman Empire 2,000 years ago figured out waste management. And yet there are modern
00:25:10.340
countries who have not figured it out. So this is the first test of civilization. What do you do with
00:25:17.580
your trash? Human beings create a lot of trash. They create a lot of waste. In spite of that,
00:25:24.980
can you have a bunch of humans living together and still keep the trash off the streets? Third world
1.00
00:25:32.520
countries fail this test. They all do. And it's one of the main things that makes them third world
1.00
00:25:36.780
countries, which is what tells you that third world countries will, most of them, always be third world
1.00
00:25:44.440
countries. They are, for the most part, I'm afraid to say, basically hopeless cases.
00:25:49.820
Because when it comes to the most basic things, they are literally thousands of years behind the
00:25:56.080
civilized world. But the tragic thing is that lots of American cities also are increasingly failing
00:26:01.660
this test. Because they have third world populations, thanks in part to mass migration,
0.87
00:26:06.500
and they have leadership that lacks the will or even the ability to maintain basic levels of
00:26:11.060
sanitation. And so everything is filthy. I mean, I'll never forget the first time I went back to Los
00:26:16.640
Angeles. I'd been there like 15 years ago and didn't go back for a while. And then I went back
00:26:20.340
for the first time maybe three or four years ago. And I'll never forget driving from the airport to
00:26:25.400
our hotel downtown and just driving past this sea of trash, just trash everywhere. And it reminded me
00:26:33.640
of driving through Kenya. It reminded me of our five or six hour car ride from Nairobi down to where the
00:26:41.040
Maasai tribe lives when we were filming What is a Woman? And we drive past town after town that had
00:26:46.320
these giant piles of garbage just sitting there in the middle of the town. And you know, traditionally
00:26:52.020
back in the, you go back to like the Middle Ages, and churches were always built in the middle of
00:26:58.820
the town. Each town was built up around a church, which served as the focal point, the literal centerpiece
00:27:04.600
of public life. And I remember thinking about that as I'm driving past all these towns, how instead of a
00:27:10.860
church at the center of the town, they had this temple of trash, this monument of garbage and waste.
00:27:17.280
And now a lot of American cities are exactly the same. And this to me is the number one thing that
00:27:23.760
makes city life these days incredibly unappealing. It's not even the crime primarily. I mean, that's
00:27:29.280
number two on the list. That's also important. And it's not the cost of living. It's the trash.
00:27:35.240
It's the garbage. It's how dirty and depressing it is, how bad it smells, just all of that.
00:27:39.820
How can you live that way? You have to be, to live that way, you have to be like spiritually broken.
00:27:49.740
You just have to be a spiritually, mentally broken down person to live among this filth, to just like
00:27:55.720
walk around every day and just see garbage and smell it. Human beings are not meant to live that way.
00:28:03.920
And it doesn't have to be that way. You know, you can have a highly populated city
00:28:08.800
that is also clean. There's plenty of examples in the world. Tokyo is famously a very clean city.
00:28:16.820
I've never been to it, but this is what you hear. It's a very clean city. How do they achieve that?
00:28:24.920
Well, for one thing, Tokyo is like 95% ethnically Japanese. So they're not importing third world
1.00
00:28:31.080
immigrants who have a culture of just throwing their trash on the ground. Also, you know, in Tokyo,
1.00
00:28:37.100
you can go to prison for five years for illegal dumping, for disposing of your trash improperly.
00:28:42.240
They even got rid of most of their trash cans, most of their public trash cans, and they just make
00:28:46.180
the residents bring their trash home with them. And then they put in place, you know, these
00:28:50.540
potentially very severe punishments and fines and even jail sentences for littering. And, but the
00:28:56.760
truth is that they could probably get rid of those penalties and they'd still be extremely clean
00:29:01.460
because that's their culture. They have a culture of cleanliness. Dumping trash on the ground,
00:29:07.380
throwing, you know, drinking a can of soda and just throwing it on the sidewalk is not something
00:29:13.420
that most Japanese people would ever do, even if they were allowed to do it. And, uh, there are
1.00
00:29:20.800
still places in America that are like that, you know, where there's a culture of cleanliness and
00:29:26.100
orderliness. They're rapidly vanishing, but they do exist. You know, I used to live in a small town
00:29:32.780
out in the country and I remember once at the gas station, we had one small gas station in the town
00:29:37.480
and I remember a trash can had somehow tipped over at the, I don't know if it, whatever,
00:29:42.940
it tipped over and it was like the trash was spilling on the ground. And like four different
00:29:46.880
people, the guy that works there and three other customers, myself included, went over immediately
00:29:51.340
to help clean the trash up. This, you know, just clean it up. And, um, they took the bag out and put
00:29:56.020
a new bag in. So it's a small thing, no great act of service, right? We're not heroes. But my point is
00:30:01.100
that in Baltimore, that's not happening. You know, in Baltimore, the trash spills over and everyone just
00:30:06.660
leaves it there. Certainly you're not going to get all customers at the gas station chipping in
00:30:11.460
unprompted to help clean up the mess. It's just not going to happen because it's a, it's a, it's
00:30:16.840
a culture of disorder. It's a culture of waste. It's a culture of, again, when you're in the city and
00:30:23.720
you, and you're, you're walking down and you see just some bag of trash or some, whatever piece of
00:30:28.440
litter on the sidewalk, that means obviously, right, that somebody was walking along and they just threw
00:30:33.700
the thing on the ground. Think about what kind of mentality it's like, it seems like such a, this
00:30:38.020
is why I'm at, even though I'm not much of an environmentalist, I am on this point when it comes
00:30:41.840
to littering, I'm like an extreme environmentalist when it comes to litter. I, I, I would, I honest
00:30:47.320
to God would be fine if we had five-year prison sentences for littering. Cause I, I think that that
00:30:53.180
behavior is so, it's such an attack on civilized society. It's, it's, it says so, it says so much
00:31:00.620
about you. It like tells me immediately that you are a person who we don't need living in, in, in
0.99
00:31:06.040
society, that you would drink something and throw it on the ground and just keep walking. I can't even
00:31:13.300
wrap my head around that. The total disregard for everybody else around you. Um, I'd be in favor of,
00:31:21.740
of ratchet up the penalties times a hundred for that. I'd be in favor of it. Um, you know,
00:31:30.380
even here in Nashville, I try, this is why you can't, you can't go to the, I love to fish. You
00:31:34.080
can't go fishing at a lot of the lakes here that are close to the city because you just find this
00:31:39.880
trash floating in the water. People, people, they just throw their trash, like a whole bags of trash.
00:31:44.880
It's like, uh, I was, I was at a, one of these lakes last year. It's a, a bag of a McDonald's
00:31:51.520
McDonald's bag float. Someone had McDonald's and threw it in the water. Okay.
00:31:56.900
How about 10 years in prison for that? I, I, I swear to you, I would support it. I don't
00:32:02.240
care who it is. Find whoever that was that threw that in there. 10 years in prison.
00:32:07.560
Um, but in some ways it's like you're, even if you tried to do that, you're fighting this
00:32:13.100
kind of losing battle because, um, you're in these communities that have a culture of,
00:32:17.960
uh, as I said, disorderliness and waste. All right. Uh, here's something not worth talking
00:32:26.280
about it all. Uh, Megan Markle sat down with time magazine to talk about how she introduces
0.99
00:32:33.600
little moments of magic into her life with flower sprinkles. And this is, I don't know,
00:32:40.320
it's pretty inspiring. Uh, I thought this was inspiring. It's like a good little, some,
00:32:45.260
some good advice is this is what she is now. She's a, she's a sage. She's a guru of sorts.
00:32:50.520
Well, I don't know what exactly she is. That's what I wanted to talk about. But first here's the,
00:32:53.800
the clip of Megan Markle giving some important life advice. All things to be talking about for
00:33:00.500
time 100. Let's talk about flower sprinkles. Um, but let's, because I think it speaks to
00:33:05.520
the tiny moments of joy that are so effortless and just create a little bit of magic that we're all
00:33:14.040
craving in our everyday. They're tiny little flower petals that are dried. I started putting
00:33:20.240
them on salads. I started putting them on scrambled eggs. It didn't actually matter on a yogurt parfait.
00:33:27.220
The level of charm that you find people have when they see these tiny little dried petals
00:33:33.600
is something I can't fully wrap my head around, but I appreciate that there is a love for the detail.
00:33:41.120
Uh, flower sprinkles. That's where it's at. And you know, if I had a dime for every time I've
00:33:47.480
sprinkled my food with some flower petals, I'd have no dimes at all. But if Megan wants you to do that,
0.99
00:33:54.580
that's fine. For me, the question with Megan Markle, she's actually kind of fascinating,
00:34:00.440
not fascinating in the way that she wants to be in the way that she tries to be, but in a different
00:34:05.040
sort of psychoanalytical way. Because to me, the question is, is what is Megan? Like, what is she
00:34:12.120
trying to be? Who does she think? Who does she think she is? Uh, it would be one thing if Megan
0.74
00:34:18.620
gave up the royal life, came back to America, started acting in movies or something, maybe started
00:34:26.000
a talk show on a network TV, uh, channel somewhere. And then you'd say, okay, well, she wants to be an
00:34:30.880
actor. She wants to be a TV star. That's not really it. She, she has, she has her various failed
00:34:35.240
Netflix shows or failed podcasts, but she doesn't seem committed to any of those paths specifically.
00:34:39.600
What she wants to be clearly is royalty. She wants to be the first American princess. She essentially
1.00
00:34:45.060
wants to have the job that the royal family has in the place that she dragged her husband away from.
0.99
00:34:49.680
But it doesn't work because as much as I might make fun of the royal family in the UK,
00:34:55.120
at least there's a history there. At least there's, it's rooted in a deep kind of ancient tradition.
00:35:00.880
We don't have that tradition here. So we're supposed to embrace Megan as our princess,
00:35:05.520
our royalty based on what? Based on, based on her winning personality, I guess.
00:35:10.360
Uh, there's a mystique that surrounds the royal family. There's no mystique with, with Megan
00:35:14.520
Markle. She's the most mystique less person. If that's even a word that I've ever seen. Now you can
00:35:21.640
have a job in this country of just being famous. I think those jobs are maybe a little bit harder to
00:35:27.900
come by now than they were at the peak of the reality TV show era. That's, you know,
00:35:33.580
that's what the Kardashians are or were. But if you want that job, if you want that job in this
00:35:39.040
country, you have to be willing to be a sideshow freak. You know, the Kardashians were glorified
00:35:44.320
circus clowns. The whole family is a freak show. So she could do that. Do some kind of reality show
00:35:50.760
where she debases herself and gives people something to gawk at. Um, that's how you become
00:35:56.380
royalty in this country, I guess. But it is interesting. It's an interesting case.
00:36:01.600
Megan Markle is a very boring person, but she's an interesting case. And I think the history books
00:36:05.420
will find her more interesting than we do because her story is tragic and fascinating that she rejected
00:36:10.620
a life of actual royalty in favor of, you know, seeking fame and admiration in the U.S.
00:36:17.320
and instead she was reviled and mocked and she's despised by basically everyone.
0.97
00:36:25.400
Is there, are there any Megan Markle fans? When's the last time you met someone who has a positive
00:36:31.040
view of her? This is one of the, one of the few bipartisan issues that still exists in this country
00:36:38.600
is Megan Markle that everybody hates her. Um, there, there, and even with, there are very few people
00:36:48.100
in this country that everybody can agree on, you know, on the other side too, there, there's like
00:36:55.780
almost nobody who's universally beloved anymore. I think Alex Trebek was probably the last one.
00:37:02.600
Alex Trebek was the last universally beloved person who was not quote unquote problematic
00:37:06.900
according to either side. And, uh, and he's dead. So there's, there's no one left.
00:37:13.500
All we have now, so we can't agree. We can't agree on, on who we admire, but we can agree
00:37:19.380
on hating certain people. That's the only place where we can find, we don't have universally admired,
00:37:26.160
but we do have universally reviled. And, uh, Megan Markle is one. It seems like Katy Perry is another one.
00:37:35.000
Interestingly enough. And so that's what she ended up with. She gave up the life of royalty and she
0.79
00:37:40.740
was, uh, ended up being universe, basically universally reviled and relegated to the C-list.
00:37:45.820
So that's, uh, it is, it's a, it's a, in a way it's a tragic story. Not that I'm shedding any tears
00:37:51.940
over. As Doge continues to surgically cut the fat from decades of bloated government spending and
00:37:57.540
corruption, Pure Talk, the cell phone company that I use for business is cutting the fat from the
00:38:02.700
wireless industry. That's right. Pure Talk says, I don't think so, to $100 a month cell phone plans.
00:38:08.760
That's just wasteful. It's irresponsible. Instead, they're offering America's most dependable 5G
00:38:13.840
network at America's most sensible prices. Listen to this unlimited talk, text, and 15 gigs of data,
00:38:19.720
plus mobile hotspot for just 35 bucks a month. And the best part right now, you get a free one-year
00:38:25.840
membership of Daily Wire Plus. And with Pure Talk's U.S. customer service team, you can switch
00:38:30.720
hassle-free in as little as 10 minutes. You don't need Doge to cut the fat from your wireless bill.
00:38:36.240
You need Pure Talk. I've been using Pure Talk for two, about two or three years now, and I cannot
00:38:40.680
recommend it enough. If you want to be a part of Pure Talk, go to puretalk.com slash Walsh. Switch to
00:38:46.240
Pure Talk at puretalk.com slash Walsh and get a year of Daily Wire Plus for free with a qualifying plan.
00:38:52.280
Pure Talk, wireless by Americans for Americans. At The Daily Wire, we ask the hard questions and we go get
00:38:58.660
the answers. That's why Ben Shapiro went to Ukraine, a nation under fire, for an exclusive sit-down with
00:39:02.880
President Zelensky. From U.S. aid and corruption to Putin's ambitions and the battle for religious
00:39:07.980
freedom, nothing was off limits. This isn't spin. This is clarity in the fog of war. Part two of the
00:39:13.720
Ben Shapiro-President Zelensky interview drops today, an all-new episode of The Ben Shapiro Show,
00:39:19.300
streaming now on Daily Wire Plus. Now let's get to our daily cancellation.
00:39:28.660
If you don't spend much time following celebrity drama, then you are a healthy person and you should
00:39:34.500
be proud. It also means that you may not have heard about the controversy surrounding prominent
00:39:38.280
sports commentator and former NFL star Shannon Sharp. Shannon has, as of yesterday, stepped away
00:39:43.880
from his role on ESPN just a few days after a $50 million lawsuit was filed alleging sexual assault.
00:39:50.320
Now the allegations are coming from an OnlyFans model named, model in quotes, named Gabby, who also
00:39:58.220
apparently goes by Carly, but we'll just call her Gabby. Shannon has stridently denied any wrongdoing
00:40:03.420
and claimed that his relationship with Gabby was entirely consensual. But things took a turn,
00:40:07.600
took a turn earlier in the week when a phone call was released. And in the call, you can hear Shannon
00:40:13.240
threatening to choke this woman, Gabby. Listen.
1.00
00:40:19.320
I'm not really interested in getting choked, so I guess we're going.
00:40:51.520
Not a good look, bitch. You did what you did to me.
1.00
00:40:56.520
Okay. Now, Gabby is obviously recording the call. We don't know what was said earlier on the call or
00:41:03.320
before the call was made. She was clearly recording it for a reason, but even so, telling a woman that
00:41:08.980
you're going to choke her is very bad. It, you know, there's no, like, context that makes that okay.
00:41:14.600
It does not, however, prove that he's guilty of rape. Now, there is apparently some kind of
00:41:19.340
video, a sex tape, that Shannon's legal team has alluded to a few times. They claim that Gabby is
0.73
00:41:25.060
using this video to blackmail Shannon and that it's been taken out of context, possibly edited to make
00:41:29.600
the sexual encounter look non-consensual when it is, in fact, they say, consensual. And attempting to
00:41:35.520
get ahead of this, his team also released a collection of extremely graphic text messages sent
00:41:40.440
by Gabby to Shannon over the course of several months. And, you know, I can't read any of them
00:41:47.340
to you. Even if I could read them, I still wouldn't. They're very sexual. They are very graphic in
00:41:51.500
nature. Gabby repeatedly says that she wants to be abused, wants to be choked, and she wants to have
0.97
00:41:58.480
other things, unspeakable things done to her. Some of these texts were sent after the alleged rape
00:42:06.100
occurred. I think she alleged two incidents, and this was after one of them. Now, Shannon claims
00:42:13.440
that, you know, if he did, in fact, rape this woman, then she wouldn't be sending him graphic
00:42:19.200
texts weeks and months after the fact, saying, among other things, that she wants Shannon to put a,
00:42:25.540
quote, big black baby in her. So what's the truth here? Did Shannon Sharp rape this woman? I have
00:42:33.840
absolutely no idea. If I had to guess, if I was just guessing, I'd say probably not. I mean, assuming
00:42:42.300
that the texts are legitimate, it's hard to believe that a woman who was actually the victim of a
00:42:46.840
violent rape would be texting her rapist and begging for him to come back and violate her again.
1.00
00:42:53.720
Although it wouldn't shock me all that much if he was evil enough to do that awful thing, and if she
00:42:58.240
was twisted enough to start sexting with her rapist. So I have no idea. Now, you know, I cannot
00:43:03.180
personally reach a verdict on this allegation, and that's not my job to, so that's the good news.
00:43:08.900
All I know is that whatever happened, it was weird and bad and gross, and I wish I didn't know about
00:43:15.860
it, but I do, and now so do you. Now, this whole thing, of course, was very avoidable. You know,
00:43:23.880
false accusations can happen, and they're always terrible, assuming that these accusations are false,
00:43:28.200
which they may or may not be. But the fact is that, you know, a great many, not all, but a great
00:43:34.180
many false accusations and questionable accusations could have been very easily avoided. And here's how
00:43:43.880
you avoid them. Get married to one woman. Stay married to that woman. Have zero sexual encounters
1.00
00:43:53.740
outside of your marriage. In fact, don't even spend time alone in the same room as any woman who is not
1.00
00:43:59.840
your wife or a family member. When it comes to women of low character, such as one who, you know,
1.00
00:44:04.960
that you would find on OnlyFans, for example, don't have any interaction with them at all. Don't speak
00:44:11.280
to them. Don't befriend them. Don't text them. Don't call them. Don't have them in your life in any
00:44:18.320
capacity, period, at all. And, you know, it's not hard to put these boundaries up. These are the
00:44:23.760
boundaries that I live within, that many married men live within. It has not intruded on my life or
00:44:29.300
even caused the slightest inconvenience ever. It's very easy for a grown man to not get mixed up with
00:44:37.340
the Gabby's of the world. It's very easy to put yourself in a situation where Gabby could simply
0.94
00:44:43.000
never credibly accuse you of anything. Of course, anyone can accuse you of anything, but you'll have a much
00:44:48.160
easier time clearing your name if you can point out that you've never interacted with this person in
00:44:53.840
any capacity at any point in your entire life. Now, Shannon Sharp's story, though gross and embarrassing,
00:45:02.620
is in a way helpful because it demonstrates two things. And first of all, it reveals that there is
00:45:10.240
a risk of staying single. You know, we often hear about the risks of marriage, the risks like you can end
00:45:16.800
up divorced, you can lose half your stuff, you can lose custody of your children, if you're the man
00:45:22.920
anyway. And all of that can happen, of course. I mean, there are lots of things you can do to greatly
00:45:28.780
reduce your risk of winding up in that position, but it does happen. We all know that. And the fear of
00:45:34.960
that result is what leads some men to avoid marriage entirely. But as Shannon Sharp and many other men have
00:45:39.980
demonstrated, the other option is not without very significant dangers. I mean, unless you plan to be single
00:45:46.780
and also celibate for your whole life, then you'll be getting involved with a succession of women you don't
00:45:52.320
know and who don't love you or necessarily even care about you in the slightest. And that will make you
00:45:58.200
very vulnerable and susceptible. And same goes for the woman, of course, on the other side. There's vulnerability
00:46:03.840
and susceptibility and dangers of a different kind that perhaps if the allegations are true,
00:46:10.760
you know, this woman fell victim to. But either way, you know, it's, it's, this is the point that
00:46:15.940
there are, we talk about the dangers of getting married, dangers for men, dangers of women, for women,
00:46:22.580
many, many dangers, you know, involved in not getting married. Second, Shannon has shown us how pitiful
00:46:30.000
and sad, you know, this kind of lifestyle is, even if he isn't a rapist, even if he isn't,
00:46:36.580
he's still a pathetic, ridiculous man. I mean, Shannon Sharp is 56 years old. This woman would have
0.98
00:46:45.720
been, I guess, about 20 when this relationship, if you can call it that, started. So this is a 56-year-old
00:46:52.460
man, you know, hooking up at best with a 20-year-old OnlyFans prostitute. This is a man who,
00:47:00.380
at his age, you know, should be sitting at his house with his wife, watching his grandchildren
00:47:07.920
play, maybe having a beer with his adult son. But instead, he's wrapped up in an embarrassing,
00:47:14.480
disgraceful public feud with a 20-year-old girl. He should be reading his grandchildren a bedtime story.
00:47:20.920
Instead, he's reading us his sex messages with a chick from OnlyFans. And now he's been disgraced
00:47:27.240
and his career is destroyed. And when he dies, he'll be remembered mostly for this, not for anything
00:47:34.180
he did before it. And whether he's guilty or not, he brought all of that on himself.
00:47:41.380
And that is why he is today canceled. That'll do it for the show today. Thanks for watching.
00:47:47.840
Thanks for listening. Talk to you on Monday. Have a great weekend. Godspeed.