The Matt Walsh Show - Ep. 1585 - The Trump Admin Arrests Dangerous, Power-Hungry Judge & The Media Has A Total Meltdown

00:00:00.000 Today on the Matt Wall Show, we'll dive deeper into the case of the judge who was arrested

00:00:03.340 for helping an illegal immigrant evade arrest. The more you look at the case and the media's

00:00:07.060 reaction to it, the more insane it gets. Also, a new study finds that the abortion pill is

00:00:11.040 significantly more dangerous than we were originally told. The media suddenly started

00:00:15.060 talking about Joe Biden's mental decline three months after he left office. And a disgraced

00:00:19.560 doctor who gave chemical castration drugs to children attacks me. I'll respond to her as

00:00:24.320 politely and charitably as you would expect. All of that and more today on the Matt Wall Show.

00:00:30.000 The Daily Wire is celebrating President Donald Trump's historic first 100 days back in office

00:00:58.900 with a 100 hour flash sale on annual memberships. Go to dailywire.com and use code DW100 to join

00:01:05.800 now. Made in America means something to us. When you invest 700 billion dollars annually in American

00:01:11.680 companies and the 13 million workers and families they support, you're invested in the success of

00:01:16.100 Main Street. Over the last eight years alone, America's private equity investors have contributed

00:01:20.280 five trillion dollars to the U.S. economy. That's money powering growth in manufacturing,

00:01:25.080 tech, energy and innovation. From strengthening supply chains to helping America lead in artificial

00:01:29.760 intelligence, that kind of investment shapes our future. And it starts with private equity

00:01:35.020 backing American ambition. Because investing in our people, our business and our community isn't just

00:01:40.180 good for the economy, it's good for the country. Learn more about how private equity keeps American

00:01:44.640 small business growing and thriving at investmentcouncil.org. Paid for by the American Investment Council.

00:01:51.000 A few years ago in a small courthouse in Cincinnati, Ohio, something unprecedented and unthinkable happened.

00:01:58.380 Something that's never happened before in all of recorded human history. A judge was sentenced to prison

00:02:03.740 for committing a crime. Up until this moment, which took place in the summer of 2019, no judge had ever done

00:02:10.180 anything illegal for any reason. And in any context, you can go back to biblical times if you want to,

00:02:14.980 no judge had ever gone to jail. And that makes sense, of course, because judges are the ones who

00:02:19.640 adjudicate legal problems. So it makes sense that it would make no sense for a judge to cause a legal

00:02:24.820 problem in the first place. That would just be completely backwards. It would be, you know,

00:02:29.180 like a postal worker going postal or a chiropractor breaking someone's neck or a firefighter deciding

00:02:35.040 to commit arson. These are things that by definition are physically impossible. And yet in Cincinnati,

00:02:40.320 of all places, it happened. Somehow in defiance of the laws of physics, a judge named Tracy Hunter

00:02:46.380 was convicted of the crime of corruption. And as you'd expect, especially if you're a student of

00:02:51.840 history, it was a shocking moment for everybody involved. There were gasps both inside and outside

00:02:57.080 the building. Judge Tracy Hunter herself made it clear that she wouldn't stand for the decision,

00:03:02.560 as in she would, she literally would not stand for it, which meant that a bailiff had to drag her out 0.91

00:03:06.620 to the courthouse and place her in a cell. If only for the entertainment value of the footage. 0.92

00:03:11.880 Let's play that again quickly.

00:03:20.640 After a judge sentenced another judge to jail time, chaos erupted in an Ohio courtroom.

00:03:27.680 And taking the defendant into custody wasn't so easy as a court officer had to drag her out.

00:03:33.820 So there it is documented video evidence that as of 2019, it is indeed possible for judges to be

00:03:43.740 arrested, convicted and sentenced. After thousands of years of uninterrupted good conduct by judges,

00:03:49.740 Tracy Hunter blew it all up. But at least she kept her dignity throughout the entire process. So,

00:03:55.280 you know, that's the important thing. Now, actually, to be more precise, Tracy Hunter was not

00:03:59.660 the only judge in the history of the world to commit a crime. In fact, she wasn't even the only

00:04:03.580 judge to commit a crime in the year 2019. In April of that year, a Massachusetts state court judge named

00:04:08.620 Shelly Richmond Joseph helped an illegal alien evade an ICE officer who was waiting to arrest him in the

00:04:14.740 lobby of the courthouse. The judge eventually turned off the court's microphones. But before the audio was

00:04:19.700 cut, she could be heard working out a plan with the defense attorney to help the illegal alien

00:04:24.540 escape out of a back room in the courthouse. Essentially, the judge allowed the criminal to

00:04:29.760 go down to the lockup, supposedly to retrieve some property. But really, the point was to keep him

00:04:34.940 out of the lobby where the ICE officer was. And then when the illegal alien was down in the lockup,

00:04:39.920 a court officer let him out the back door. It wasn't exactly a subtle plan. Federal authorities

00:04:44.400 immediately understood what had happened. And they charged both the judge and the court officer

00:04:48.860 with obstruction. This is all relatively recent history. So to recap, in order to be shocked by

00:04:54.540 the news that a judge had been accused of a crime, you'd have to be extremely confused about two very

00:04:59.160 important facts. First, you'd have to be ignorant of the fact that judges are actually human beings

00:05:04.200 and are not granted magical powers of immunity simply by virtue of their job. They do not have a

00:05:09.500 James Bond style license to kill or anything like that. And secondly, in order to think that judges

00:05:15.000 can't commit a crime, you'd also have to ignore the fact that judges actually commit crimes all

00:05:18.860 the time. So you'd have to stack astronomical ignorance on top of astronomical ignorance.

00:05:24.820 Either that, or you'd have to be so shameless that you don't mind pretending to be monumentally 0.99

00:05:28.980 uninformed and unintelligent. And for most people, being this dumb is a lot of work, in other words. 0.99

00:05:33.960 But for the mainstream press and their allies in the Democrat Party, it's basically second nature 0.99

00:05:39.180 at this point. Shameless and ignorance are the defining features of their existence. And that's why

00:05:43.980 for the past several days, we've been treated to nonstop outrage over the recent arrest

00:05:48.780 of a county judge in Milwaukee named Hannah Dugan. And the way this story is being presented,

00:05:54.080 you think that it's the outrage of the century. Dugan's arrest, according to Rachel Maddow,

00:05:58.760 is tantamount to a declaration of war by the White House against the judicial branch.

00:06:03.560 It's the end of the separation of powers in this country, if not the end of our republic itself.

00:06:09.020 Watch. Well, today, a whole new level. Today, the FBI arrested a county judge in Milwaukee,

00:06:17.380 Wisconsin. According to the FBI, this judge knew that Trump's immigration agents were outside her

00:06:22.040 courtroom waiting to arrest a man who was before her court. They say she sent the immigration agents

00:06:27.060 away from her hearing room and then escorted the man and his lawyer out of the courtroom through a

00:06:32.160 private exit. For that, the Trump administration has arrested her and charged her with two felonies.

00:06:39.180 She herself arrested, brought before a federal court and then released today on her own

00:06:43.620 recognizance. Her attorney says that the judge intends to defend herself vigorously. He says she

00:06:48.860 looks forward to being exonerated. But if this feels like a insane and reckless escalation from the

00:06:55.600 Trump administration arresting a judge, I will tell you, you are not alone. It sure felt like that to

00:07:01.880 lots of people in Wisconsin today, people who showed up outside the federal courthouse in

00:07:07.220 Milwaukee after the judge was arrested. More than 100 people out there today on no notice on a Friday

00:07:12.540 in the middle of the day to emergency spontaneously show up and protest the arrest of this judge in

00:07:19.200 Milwaukee. Just instant reaction to this bright new line that's been crossed by Trump. It's being

00:07:24.500 treated as a crisis by members of Congress, too. This was Maryland Congressman Jamie Raskin today. He said

00:07:30.420 every American should be deeply troubled by this massive escalation. This is an unmistakable dissent

00:07:37.040 further into authoritarian chaos.

00:07:41.300 So it's an unmistakable dissent into authoritarian chaos, the congressman says. It's a whole new level,

00:07:46.460 according to Rachel Maddow. Just look at the 100 people who spontaneously decided to protest on a moment's

00:07:52.860 notice or no notice, she says, at the courthouse without any payment or any connection to a shady

00:07:59.640 Democrat-run nonprofit of any kind. You know, don't ask any questions about how, well, if they didn't

00:08:04.680 have any notice, how did 100 people show up? They all had their signs ready to go with no notice at

00:08:10.520 all. How does that work? But, you know, don't question that at all. This is how you know how

00:08:16.080 serious and unprecedented this development is. People are just spontaneously, you know, materializing

00:08:22.420 with signs ready-made outside the courthouse with no notice. Serious stuff. Now, we've talked a little

00:08:30.060 bit about this case before yesterday, but here are some of the details that Rachel Maddow glosses over.

00:08:35.800 This is a write-up from Fox, which for some reason uses the term undocumented to describe illegal aliens.

00:08:40.800 Quote, federal agents from ICE, FBI, CVP, and DEA attempted to arrest Eduardo Flores Ruiz,

00:08:47.420 an undocumented Mexican national, following his scheduled criminal court appearance before Dugan

00:08:53.120 on April 18th to face three misdemeanor battery charges for allegedly beating two people. Dugan

00:08:58.100 demanded that the officers proceed to the chief's judge's office, and after his hearing ended,

00:09:03.860 escorted Flores Ruiz and his attorney out a restricted jury door, bypassing the public area

00:09:08.680 where agents were waiting in order to help him avoid arrest, per the complaint. Close quote.

00:09:12.980 Now, to be more specific, Eduardo Flores Ruiz is accused of nearly beating a victim to death by

00:09:20.040 punching him around 30 times. One of his victims had to be hospitalized. He also punched a woman who

00:09:25.720 tried to interrupt the fight, knocking her to the ground. Eduardo had already been deported once in

00:09:30.320 2013, but apparently he came back into the country. So already we have a situation where witnesses in this

00:09:34.960 case might be hesitant to testify. They're understandably terrified of this criminal. And the judge,

00:09:40.520 rather than protecting the victims, does everything she can to ensure that the attacker is released.

00:09:46.300 The specifics, as alleged in the federal complaint, are actually worse than you might have heard. So

00:09:50.620 let's put this image up on the screen, which is from the complaint. Quote,

00:09:54.740 members of the arrest team reported the following events after Judge Dugan learned of their presence

00:09:58.860 and left the bench. Judge Dugan approached members of the arrest team in the public hallway.

00:10:03.620 Witnesses uniformly reported that Judge Dugan was visibly upset and had a confrontational,

00:10:08.300 angry demeanor. She then tells the deportation officer that he needs to leave the building, 0.86

00:10:12.860 at which point the officer says that he's there to make an arrest. And then, quote,

00:10:16.540 Judge Dugan asked if deportation officer A had a judicial warrant and deportation officer A

00:10:21.660 responded, no, I have an administrative warrant. Judge Dugan stated that deportation officer A

00:10:26.440 needed a judicial warrant. Then the deportation officer says that she's wrong and that he has the

00:10:31.560 right to arrest someone in a public building with a valid immigration warrant. In response,

00:10:35.080 the judge orders the entire arrest team to report to the chief judge's office. And by the time the

00:10:39.320 chief judge tells the officers that it's fine to arrest the guy in the courthouse, Dugan has

00:10:45.400 apparently accelerated Ruiz's hearing so that it was adjourned while the officers were talking to

00:10:50.600 the chief judge. And by the way, it was adjourned without the prosecutor's knowledge. They just

00:10:54.520 weren't invited to the sidebar where the judge made that decision. In any event, during this process,

00:11:00.200 Ruiz was not in the gallery for reasons that weren't clear to anyone at the time.

00:11:03.560 He was instead sitting in the jury box for his hearing. So let's read on.

00:11:09.300 According to the complaint, when Ruiz was leaving the building with her attorney,

00:11:13.580 the judge said, wait, come with me. Quote, despite having been advised of the administrative

00:11:20.160 warrant for the arrest of Ruiz, Judge Dugan then escorted Ruiz and his counsel out of the courtroom

00:11:25.840 through the jury door, which leads to a non-public area of the courthouse. These events were also

00:11:31.100 unusual for two reasons. First, the courtroom deputy had previously heard Judge Dugan direct people

00:11:36.500 not to sit in the jury box because it was exclusively for the jury's use. Second, according to the

00:11:41.400 courtroom deputy, only deputies, juries, court staff, and in-custody defendants being escorted by

00:11:46.900 deputies used the back jury door. Defense attorneys and defendants who were not in custody never used the

00:11:53.000 jury door. Close quote. Now, to be clear, this judge did not issue any kind of lawful order or ruling

00:12:00.960 as part of her judicial responsibilities. That's not why she was just arrested. Instead,

00:12:06.340 she tipped off a criminal who was about to be arrested and helped him hide from authorities.

00:12:11.860 And if the allegations in this complaint are true, then no matter who you are, that's a crime.

00:12:16.160 And it's not like a close call either. We're not talking about, you know, digging through this

00:12:21.460 judge's business records, let's say, going back eight years, cobbling together some brand new

00:12:26.180 theory for why she belongs in prison because she overpaid her taxes based on some arbitrary 1.00

00:12:30.840 retroactive determination that we're making today. This is nothing like the Trump trial,

00:12:34.700 in other words. Judge Dugan is accused of committing a very straightforward crime,

00:12:39.140 one that's been illegal for a very long time, and which if anyone else did it,

00:12:43.000 they'd be arrested. And yet, the very same people who insisted that nobody is above the law

00:12:49.120 just a year ago are now saying with a straight face that it's a constitutional crisis to arrest

00:12:54.960 a judge for breaking the law. I mean, they had no problem with prosecuting the leading presidential

00:12:59.420 candidate for fake crimes, but prosecuting this random judge for them is a bridge too far.

00:13:05.480 They're losing their minds over it. One account, the Brooklyn dad on X, was particularly unhinged.

00:13:12.260 Quote, for the people celebrating the weaponized arrest of Judge Hannah Dugan by the Trump

00:13:17.020 administration because she broke the law, just remember that it also used to be against the law 1.00

00:13:22.080 to hide folks like Anne Frank. What side of history are you on? Close quote. Now, I'm not cherry

00:13:29.880 picking one insane online reaction here. This is how a lot of mainstream personalities on the left

00:13:34.500 view this issue. They're essentially admitting that the judge committed a crime because there's no way

00:13:39.880 to deny it. If she did what she's accused of doing, that's a crime. You can't deny it. There's

00:13:43.880 no defense of it legally. But at the same time, they're saying that, you know, yeah, it was a

00:13:49.840 crime, but it was justified. Here, for example, was David Brooks of the New York Times the other day.

00:13:55.320 Watch.

00:13:55.600 Well, obviously, they're trying to send a note of intimidation, not only to her, but to all judges

00:14:03.060 and maybe to all Americans. But I don't yet know the specific details of this case, whether she

00:14:08.780 escorted the guy out the jury door or whether she's led him. So that's all, Mark. I don't want to

00:14:12.660 comment on this specific case. But especially on the issue of immigration, there are a lot of people

00:14:17.360 who are appalled by what the administration is doing. And there will be times for civil disobedience.

00:14:24.340 And to me, if she, let's say she did escort this guy out the door. If federal enforcement agencies

00:14:29.260 come to your courtroom and you help a guy escape, that is two things. One, it strikes me as maybe

00:14:35.720 something illegal. But it also strikes me as something heroic. And in times of trouble,

00:14:42.220 then people are sometimes called to do civil disobedience.

00:14:45.200 And in my view, when people do civil disobedience, they have to pay the price. That's part of the

00:14:49.800 heroism of it, frankly. And so you can both think that she shouldn't have legally done this and that

00:14:55.540 morally protecting somebody against, or maybe not even in this case, but in other cases, frankly,

00:15:01.400 a predatory enforcement agency.

00:15:06.020 Predatory enforcement agency. It's heroic. It's heroic to help an illegal alien who's not supposed to be in 0.99

00:15:11.940 this country who is accused of beating two people, one of them nearly to death, putting them in a

00:15:17.440 hospital. It's heroic to help this person evade law enforcement. We're comparing him to Anne Frank.

00:15:28.620 Now, he doesn't want to comment on the specific case, probably because he knows the facts completely

00:15:32.820 disprove everything he's saying. They make him sound like a lunatic, which is what he is. 0.97

00:15:36.780 You know, reality happens to demolish the narrative he's trying to create. Therefore, 0.96

00:15:41.120 he says, let's just ignore reality. Let's pretend the guy's not accused of beating up a woman. Let's

00:15:45.680 pretend the judge didn't deliberately help him evade arrest. Let's focus instead on a fictional world

00:15:50.060 in which judges are being rounded up and sent to the gulag because they make rulings the president

00:15:54.580 doesn't like. And that's preposterous for about a million reasons, of course. But I do have to admit

00:15:59.800 that if Judge Dugan does end up in a gulag, it'd be a fitting punishment. And not just because of this

00:16:04.720 whole situation with the illegal alien who's beating up women, this is apparently a sign from 0.98

00:16:09.520 the door of Dugan's courthouse, according to Fox. Let's put that up on the screen.

00:16:14.500 It says that if any person feels unsafe about showing up to the courthouse, that person can

00:16:19.940 request a Zoom hearing instead. Quote, if any attorney, witness coordinator, or other court official

00:16:24.280 knows or believes that a person feels unsafe coming to the courthouse, please notify the clerk

00:16:27.940 to request appearance via Zoom. Now, as you may know, you know, I was a highly credentialed and

00:16:34.900 well-respected judge for some time. You may have seen my work in a recent Daily Wire series. And

00:16:38.860 if you saw that series, you know that a lot of things happened in my fake courtroom that were

00:16:43.500 embarrassing and frankly demeaning to the very concept of law and order, civil liberties and

00:16:47.100 fundamental human decency and human rights. And yet nothing that occurred during that show can

00:16:51.660 compare to this notice that Judge Dugan put on the door of her courtroom, which again is an actual

00:16:56.040 courtroom. She's openly treating the courthouses like a therapy session for violent thugs and gang 1.00

00:17:00.720 members, many of whom have no right to be in this country in the first place. As it happens, a lot

00:17:05.260 of judges in this country think like this. It's not just Judge Dugan. Here's NBC News. Dugan's arrest

00:17:10.400 came one day after federal authorities arrested a former New Mexico judge, Joel Cano, and his wife on

00:17:17.760 charges related to the Cano's reported harboring of an undocumented immigrant with alleged ties to the

00:17:23.020 notorious gang Tren de Aragua. Federal agencies had received a trip, a tip in January that

00:17:28.940 Christian Ortega, an undocumented immigrant from Venezuela, whom authorities suspected of being a

00:17:35.300 gang member, and others were staying on the Cano's property. Ortega was charged in a separate federal

00:17:39.920 case in New Mexico with possessing a firearm as an illegal alien. Cano, who had served on the bench

00:17:46.560 since 2011, submitted his resignation letter March 3rd, days after Homeland Security raided his home,

00:17:52.680 close quote. Now normally, you know, this gang has to take over apartment buildings by force, which is

00:17:59.540 what they famously did in Colorado. But in this case, a judge allegedly just let one of these gang

00:18:03.860 members live in his home, along with a bunch of other criminal aliens. And if these allegations are

00:18:09.300 true, there's really no way to spin it. He facilitated a foreign invasion in a very direct and deliberate 0.82

00:18:14.520 way, just like Judge Dugan. He's accused of aiding and abetting people who want to destroy this country

00:18:19.940 from within. And as we all know, many more judges are like this. These two judges have just been

00:18:25.960 incredibly obvious about what they're doing. But the smart judges are using their rulings to undermine

00:18:30.820 this country, which is why, as I've said many times before, many of these rulings should simply be

00:18:35.520 ignored. But even the ignoring these rulings won't stop the underlying problem, which is that this

00:18:40.440 country is being invaded in more ways than one. And it's not just the court system that's compromised.

00:18:45.280 Congress has begun to fall as well, as we've seen from representatives like Ilhan Omar, who openly

00:18:50.560 advocate foreign interests over America's. And this week, another congressman joined in the revolution.

00:18:57.000 His name is Sri Thanedar, and he apparently represents Michigan, even though no one's ever heard of him.

00:19:03.540 His biography says that he moved to this country in the 1970s after growing up in India, where he was born.

00:19:08.940 And here's a video that he just put out. And as you watch this, keep in mind that this man is 70 years

00:19:14.600 old. So we're talking about a lot of plastic surgery here. And on top of that, understand that,

00:19:20.560 you know, he has a lot of support in his own party. Watch.

00:19:24.780 This is Congressman Sri Thanedar. Donald Trump has already done real damage to our democracy,

00:19:31.940 but defying a unanimous 9-0 Supreme Court ruling. That has to be the final straw. It's time we impeach

00:19:40.520 Donald J. Trump. The court said the wrongfully deported Kilmer Garcia must be allowed to return

00:19:48.300 and receive due process. Trump ignored it. He ignored the Constitution. He ignored the very

00:19:55.940 checks and balances that keep our democracy intact. This isn't an isolated incident. It's part of a

00:20:04.040 dangerous deliberate pattern. That's why today I introduced a resolution to impeach Donald J.

00:20:13.020 Trump, outlining seven articles of impeachment. In this country, we have presidents, not kings.

00:20:21.420 That's not just misconduct. It's impeachable misconduct. This isn't leadership. It's tyranny.

00:20:31.260 If we let this stand, we are saying the president is above the law.

00:20:38.440 So there's that theme of no one is above the law again. They're very selective about when they deploy

00:20:43.340 that particular cliche. But the bigger issue isn't the hypocrisy. It's that this guy can barely speak

00:20:50.080 English. And yet he's one of our elected representatives. Despite living in this country

00:20:55.540 for decades, it's still hard to understand what he's even saying. And if that doesn't seem completely

00:21:01.500 insane to you, just imagine the absurdity. Imagine just the ridiculousness of a white guy with a thick 0.99

00:21:09.760 southern accent moving to India and then trying to impeach their president. Or imagine if I moved to 0.99

00:21:16.840 India with my flannel shirt and started lecturing them on how to run their country. 0.55

00:21:21.740 I mean, how do you think that would go over? Now, of course, that would never happen. India 1.00

00:21:26.020 wouldn't be crazy enough to allow it. The moment I started telling them that they should remove

00:21:30.100 their president, they just deport me on the spot. In fact, they probably won't even let me into the

00:21:34.140 country in the first place. This is a type of madness you can only find here. Multiple branches of

00:21:40.060 government from Congress to the courts are working in tandem to undermine our national sovereignty.

00:21:44.980 And they're doing it right out in the open. Contrary to what the corporate press is saying,

00:21:49.240 what's remarkable about the situation isn't that the Trump administration has just arrested two

00:21:53.560 corrupt Democrats in positions of power. What's remarkable is that at this point, the Trump

00:21:58.480 administration has only arrested two of them when it's obvious that there's a lot more to go.

00:22:05.180 Now, let's get to our five headlines.

00:22:06.460 Let me tell you about something that doesn't get enough attention, your liver. The powerhouse

00:22:15.760 organ is crushing it 24-7, handling over 500 different bodily functions. It's a hard job,

00:22:21.000 and sometimes your liver just needs a little bit of support. That's where Dose for Your Liver

00:22:25.220 comes in. It's not some weak supplement. This is hard-hitting, science-backed support for your

00:22:29.640 body's most crucial filter. The results speak for themselves. Clinical trials showed over 86% of people

00:22:34.880 got major improvements in their liver enzyme levels. Want to know what makes the difference?

00:22:40.020 Well, one shot of Dose packs the same punch as 17 shots of turmeric juice. It's designed for

00:22:45.480 peak performance, supporting energy levels, digestion, and overall liver function. No BS

00:22:50.020 ingredients either. It's clean, it's sugar-free, and engineered to deliver results. Start giving

00:22:54.260 your liver the support it deserves. Save 30% on your first month of subscription by going to

00:22:58.120 dosedaily.co slash Walsh. We're entering Walsh at checkout. That's D-O-S-E-D-A-I-L-Y dot C-O slash

00:23:06.760 Walsh for 30% off your first month's subscription. Okay, two related stories to kick us off, both of

00:23:13.680 them unfortunately depressing and troubling. So the first one, Breitbart reports, while the abortion pill

00:23:20.720 is touted as safe and effective, shocking new data suggests complications are 22 times higher than

00:23:26.040 previously reported. A study from the Ethics and Public Policy Center released on Monday found that

00:23:31.880 10.93%, about 11% of women who had Mifepristone abortions, the first drug used in a two-drug

00:23:45.800 medication abortion regimen, experienced severe complications including sepsis, infection,

00:23:50.880 hemorrhaging, or another serious adverse event. Within 45 days following the abortion, this percentage

00:23:55.760 is significantly higher than the less than 0.5% in clinical trials reported on the FDA-approved

00:24:01.960 drug label. Then you can go to Breitbart and see the whole report, which is also being reported now

00:24:09.680 in other outlets. The most important point is that the number of adverse reactions to so-called

00:24:15.640 medical abortions, as they call them, are more than 20 times higher than what we have been told.

00:24:21.600 And that's what the report says. And that should not be a surprise. I mean, it's not a surprise

00:24:26.360 because, first of all, the abortion industry lies about everything. And I really do mean everything.

00:24:32.040 So whatever figure they quote, whatever number they give, whatever data they provide or tout,

00:24:37.400 you can assume that it's not true. Or at best, it's only a partial truth. It's only part of the story.

00:24:44.460 You can just assume that they're lying because they lie about everything. These people, I mean,

00:24:48.480 they kill babies for a living. So of course they lie about everything. And, you know, second, 0.99

00:24:55.520 abortion is not actually a medical procedure. It's not a treatment of a disease because pregnancy is 0.95

00:25:01.100 not a disease. Pregnancy is natural. It's healthy. It's what a woman's body is supposed to do. So 0.97

00:25:05.320 anytime you're taking a drug to interfere, in this case, violently interfere with a healthy bodily

00:25:10.900 process, there are going to be consequences. And unfortunately, doctors these days are doing a lot of

00:25:16.180 treatments, quote unquote, like this. Treatments that are meant to interfere with the normal

00:25:21.400 functions of the human body. Gender transitions are another example. Birth control is, you know, 1.00

00:25:27.520 the most common, the most prevalent example. And birth control is where this shift really began,

00:25:35.340 I think you could argue. Certainly that the shift began where medicine was no longer about treating

00:25:42.860 actual diseases, but instead it becomes about interfering with what the body is supposed to

00:25:49.000 actually be doing. Medicine is supposed to cure or treat your body when it's doing what it's not

00:25:54.320 supposed to do. But this is medicine, quote unquote, that cures a body from doing what it is supposed to

00:26:01.720 do. And yes, there will be side effects. In fact, you can hardly call them side effects because

00:26:08.560 the treatments are, are meant to cause damage. They're meant to disrupt the healthy processes in

00:26:17.300 the body. So it's not a side effect. It's just the effect. It's what is intended. Which is why we

00:26:25.120 also need to stipulate with this story that yes, abortion drugs are very dangerous for women and they 1.00

00:26:29.380 do harm women in many cases. But more importantly, abortion drugs harm babies in 100% of all cases.

00:26:35.520 So abortion drugs, you know, they should be banned for what they do to babies, which is why when you

00:26:40.280 see stories like this and, you know, there are some conservatives that are, you know, highlighting

00:26:46.880 this, this study, which we should highlight it. It's what I'm doing. But then you'll hear that,

00:26:52.740 well, you know, see, this is why we need to have regulations on these drugs. This is why these drugs

00:26:55.940 need to be banned because they cause harm to women in 11% of cases. Well, yeah, that's bad. But also,

00:27:04.200 again, they cause harm to babies in 100% of cases. So that's what they're meant to do. And that's

00:27:09.340 what they always do. And, and that just compounds the tragedy. I mean, really think about the tragedy

00:27:19.160 of a woman dying from the side effects of an abortion, which does happen, whether it's an abortion

00:27:25.540 pill or a surgical abortion. The tragedy of it is that her last act on earth was to kill her own 1.00

00:27:32.980 child. She died for the sake of killing her child. It's like this satanic inversion of maternal heroism 0.99

00:27:39.760 because the heroic mother sacrifices her life to save her children. In this case, though,

00:27:44.680 the mother sacrifices her life to kill her children. So it really is a tragedy in so many ways,

00:27:50.680 which brings us to this other very disturbing and depressing story. And, but I'm going to read a

00:27:58.840 little bit of this since we're kind of on the subject. This is from the New York Post. A twisted

00:28:05.240 Nebraska teen was handed a decades-long sentence on Thursday for fatally slashing her newborn son's

00:28:10.460 throat just months, just rather, sorry, just moments after secretly giving birth in her childhood

00:28:17.340 bedroom, according to reports. Chloe Copland Anderson, 18, will spend the next 35 to 60 years 0.69

00:28:23.300 behind bars after pleading no contest to second-degree murder from the heartless killings.

00:28:29.920 And then it goes into detail about the, you know, the actual crime, which we don't need to dwell on,

00:28:34.720 but awful, as I said, awful story. It does bring us to an inevitable point. I can't help but ask the

00:28:44.220 question, and the question is this, what exactly is the difference between what this girl did 0.99

00:28:52.500 and abortion? Like, why is she going to prison? Why is she going to prison if millions of women 1.00

00:29:00.220 who did this, who did something just as barbaric don't go? I mean, you could be upset about the

00:29:07.080 question, but can you answer it? What's actually the difference? What is the inherent moral difference

00:29:12.540 between the two? I'd really like to know. Because here's the fact, if this girl had killed the baby

00:29:20.280 just 30 seconds earlier, and if she had hired an abortionist to do it for her, rather than, you 1.00

00:29:26.660 know, taking matters into her own hands, then she wouldn't be going to prison. Not only would she not

00:29:31.920 be going to prison, but she would be celebrated for exercising her right to choose. Her act of murder

00:29:37.020 would be legitimized as reproductive health care. Democrat presidential candidates would talk about 1.00

00:29:42.740 her case favorably. They'd bring her up on stage. You know, they'd give her an award. 0.67

00:29:50.140 So crushing a baby's skull 30 seconds before birth is health care, but slitting his throat 30 seconds

00:29:55.060 after birth is first degree murder. You're going to go to prison for 40 years for it. How does that

00:29:58.280 make any sense? What's the moral distinction here? Don't complain about the question. Answer it. What

00:30:06.120 is the moral distinction? I mean, by pro-abortion logic, at worst, this girl is guilty of practicing 0.99

00:30:13.940 medicine without a license. I mean, at worst, that's what she's done by their logic.

00:30:22.420 So we all know this is arbitrary. We all know it makes no sense.

00:30:27.220 We all know. I mean, we all know that, right? We all know the distinction between like what this girl

00:30:30.420 did is, is, is this has happened millions of times in this country. And, um, and there, there is no,

00:30:38.040 you can't, there's no moral difference because to say there's a difference, you'd have to say that

00:30:42.960 there's a difference in the, like the, the baby that she, she slaughtered, uh, moments after birth. 0.92

00:30:49.420 If she had done it 30 seconds earlier, it's the same baby. Okay. It, it's the same effect,

00:30:58.000 which is killing the child. And it's the same person. The only thing different with the person,

00:31:03.660 the baby is that it has changed locations, right? But it's the, it's the same person.

00:31:11.100 So it doesn't make any sense. Uh, and, and, and so why keep up the charade? Why, why are,

00:31:19.460 why aren't Democrats rallying around this girl? Why aren't they embracing her as a pioneer for

00:31:24.820 reproductive rights? Uh, what she did is morally identical to what any woman does when she goes to 1.00

00:31:31.040 a clinic for an abortion. So, I mean, if there's any difference, arguably, you could say that what this

00:31:38.060 girl did, uh, if anything is at least more honest, uh, it's, it's, it's a, it's a more honest and

00:31:44.960 straightforward version of what every woman does in a clinic. It's like, it's the same thing. It's 0.98

00:31:50.120 just, this is more, uh, this is, this is, you know, not hiding behind euphemism, let's say.

00:31:58.960 So why aren't they coming to her defense? Well, the answer is that in their minds,

00:32:02.460 uh, you know, this girl committed a different kind of crime. Uh, you know, they don't care 0.99

00:32:09.880 about the baby. Obviously they're not outraged about that, but she broke the illusion.

00:32:15.460 This is why Democrats have not, with a few exceptions, they generally have not started

00:32:19.580 advocating for post-birth abortion. And I don't think that they really ever will. I know that's

00:32:25.280 one of the things that pro-lifers have been predicting for a long time, that we're going to

00:32:30.200 get to a point where post-birth abortions are, um, uh, they already happened. We know that,

00:32:35.520 but where, where they're accepted, where the, you know, in the mainstream, they're accepted and talked

00:32:39.320 about. And I don't, I could be wrong, but I don't think that will happen because, uh, it,

00:32:46.440 it, it breaks the illusion. You know, that's why Democrats won't rail around it. It's, uh, it breaks

00:32:54.760 the illusion. It's, it's, you can't hide anymore from what you're doing because it's out in the

00:33:01.860 open. I mean, literally out in the open, there's no hiding it. You're killing a baby, which, which

00:33:05.600 of course is what an abortion does. But the whole game here is to hide behind euphemisms, 0.96

00:33:10.760 to be able to cloak it in the, in this, you know, in this kind of medical jargon. And, um,

00:33:18.160 and if they were to ever like admit that what this girl did is really no difference in kind from what

00:33:30.780 anyone does in an abortion clinic, uh, if they were to ever do that, they would be, you know,

00:33:35.260 kind of given the game away. So I don't, I don't expect that to happen. All right. So the media

00:33:39.820 recently had been, has been, uh, debating among themselves, the topic of Joe Biden's mental decline

00:33:46.160 now that it doesn't matter anymore. Now that it's a moot point now that admitting that Biden has

00:33:51.340 dementia costs you nothing. Now's the time when the media starts talking about it, but of course

00:33:56.200 they still can't be honest about it or, or, um, certainly not honest about their own role in

00:34:02.640 covering up his mental decline, but there's been a lot of conversation about it in the last week or

00:34:07.720 two, even. So on that note, here is a Chuck Todd. Listen, this is not a media failure. This is a failure

00:34:15.160 of the democratic party. And I just sort of, sort of the virtue signaling that some people have done

00:34:20.520 to try to say that the media missed this story. They didn't miss this story. David Ignatius wrote,

00:34:27.180 I just refuse to accept this, this stupid premise because it's a right-wing manufactured right-wing 1.00

00:34:32.240 premise in order to, to stain the media. The media has got plenty of things to attack them for. 1.00

00:34:36.980 And there are MSNBC and CNN and, and pundits that absolutely carried water for Joe Biden,

00:34:43.060 but that they're not journalists. They're former strategists that carried water for Joe Biden.

00:34:48.840 The journalist, David Ignatius wrote a very high profile column in, in October of 23 saying,

00:34:55.160 is he really running again? This doesn't seem like a good idea. People like me were promoting Dean

00:35:00.220 Phillips's campaign because he was running. So I, you know, it, it's not like this,

00:35:08.040 this isn't WMDs where the white house worked with the mainstream media to manufacture a story that did

00:35:15.360 not exist. That was a press failure, massive press failure. This was not that failure. This is an

00:35:24.560 attempt by some to virtue signal. And it's this horrible sort of pitting different news organizations

00:35:31.040 against each other. When ultimately the people at fault are Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, Jill Biden,

00:35:38.220 Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, every elected member of Congress.

00:35:43.880 Okay. So he says it's not a media failure. It's a failure of the democratic party, but of course,

00:35:48.180 you know, that first of all, it's a distinction without a difference and everything else he says

00:35:52.260 is just nonsense. He's trying to pretend that, you know, uh, the media, the journalists, news anchors

00:35:57.620 didn't just ignore the story of Biden's decline. Uh, they didn't just ignore it. Actually, they,

00:36:04.440 they aggressively buried it. They scolded anyone who talked about it. They flat out denied it right

00:36:10.400 up until they couldn't deny it anymore. So this is a rewriting of history that's going on. It's

00:36:15.000 nonsense. It's insulting to our intelligence and, um, keep something in mind. Why is the media so broken

00:36:22.440 up about this? Why are they obsessing over this topic now, long after everyone else has moved on?

00:36:27.620 They're, they're, they're now litigating the issue of Joe Biden's mental fitness in office

00:36:32.760 in his three months after he leaves. Like why the rest of us, we're not talking about this anymore.

00:36:38.940 This was a topic. This doesn't matter now. It's, it's a moot point. Um, so why are they obsessing

00:36:45.920 about it? Well, it's not because they have a guilty conscience about lying to the public.

00:36:48.960 No, it's because they know they screwed up their chance for a Democrat to win the presidency.

00:36:54.700 That's why they're so, uh, these members of the media are so like emotional about it.

00:37:00.860 They know that if they had shivved Biden a year or two earlier, probably two years earlier,

00:37:05.380 if they'd started talking about his obvious mental decline and asked questions about it

00:37:09.240 two years earlier, then, um, there would have, you know, been a real primary and maybe they would

00:37:16.660 have gotten a real candidate, not Kamala. And then maybe they would have a chance. They would

00:37:21.640 have had a chance to win. Now I still, I still think they would have lost. I don't, I don't know

00:37:25.140 that anyone would have been able to beat Trump, especially after the assassination attempt, but

00:37:30.060 their only chance was to take Biden out politically much earlier than they did.

00:37:37.240 So that's what this whole come to Jesus moment is obviously about, which isn't really a come to

00:37:42.160 Jesus moment because they're not accepting any responsibility or accountability, but the

00:37:45.460 recriminations, the accusations, the finger pointing and so on, it's all about the fact that

00:37:49.360 they screwed up their shot at the white house. And when I say they, I mean the Democrat party,

00:37:53.040 because again, the media and the Democrat party obviously are, uh, the same organism.

00:37:56.760 And we all know this. Uh, and we also know that if, if that debate, if the debate, you know,

00:38:07.960 the infamous debate between Trump and Biden, if it, if it hadn't happened when it did,

00:38:13.380 if the Biden camp hadn't made the politically disastrous decision to accept Trump's early debate

00:38:20.660 challenge, one of, one of the greatest political blunders in American history. And if so, if they

00:38:30.660 had waited, if the debates had, had not happened until after the conventions, which is usually

00:38:35.260 when they happen, then the media never would have admitted that Biden had lost his mind because at

00:38:42.800 that point it would have been too late. It would have been really too late.

00:38:45.500 And if, if somehow Biden had stayed in and then somehow won, which would have been almost impossible,

00:38:54.980 but let's just say if that had happened, then the media would right now still be telling us

00:39:03.880 that Biden is at the top of his game. Everything is fine. Anyone who says differently is a conspiracy

00:39:09.740 theorist. Chuck Todd would be ranting about how, you know, anyone who claims that Joe Biden is,

00:39:17.240 is, is anything but spry and chipper and totally with it is a, is a right-wing conspiracy theorist

00:39:23.560 and is guilty of, of ageism. That's what Chuck Todd would be saying. That's what Jake Tapper

00:39:27.740 would be saying. This little book that Jake Tapper, I guess, is coauthored about Joe Biden's

00:39:34.140 mental decline. That book would not exist. These people were prepared to keep the ruse going for

00:39:41.200 another four years. They were going to keep this thing going until Joe Biden is 86, uh, or until he

00:39:48.360 died, whichever came first. And probably the latter would come first. That's what they were prepared 0.86

00:39:53.560 to do. Uh, and you know, so that's what makes all this so ridiculous. Um, all right, here's another 0.97

00:40:05.220 thing, uh, that we're gonna, we're gonna talk about because, you know, this is my show and I can talk

00:40:11.800 about what I want. So there's a, cause I've been thinking about this and there's a very viral tweet

00:40:17.700 that, uh, that, you know, was posted a couple of days ago. I don't know if you've seen it, but it has

00:40:22.300 like 280 million views. Okay. 280 million last night. I checked yesterday. So it's more than

00:40:27.500 that now, probably 300 million. It's from an account called dream chasin Mike and the tweet,

00:40:34.160 which has sparked intense debate and controversy that lots of people have chimed in on. It says this,

00:40:39.980 I think a hundred N words could beat one gorilla. Everybody just got to be dedicated to the.

00:40:47.360 So that's it. That's the tweet. That's the post got 280 million views, 9,000 comments,

00:40:55.420 a man who claims that a hundred men, men of any race, I assume is what he meant could beat one

00:41:02.540 gorilla in like a fight. And I've thought a lot about this. Uh, I've contemplated, I've deliberated,

00:41:09.320 I've, I've done hours of research over the past day or two. Um, that's not even a joke. Actually,

00:41:16.740 I actually have, I've, I've, I've done, I've looked into this quite a bit, uh, you know,

00:41:21.340 learning a lot about gorillas. I've learned a lot of gorilla facts. Uh, just, just thinking about

00:41:25.760 this. Most people are mocking this man for making this claim. Most people are claiming that he's insane

00:41:31.060 for thinking that a hundred men could beat one gorilla, but I'm on his side. I think he's right.

00:41:36.120 You know, in a hand to hand fight to the death between a hundred men and one gorilla, I'm, uh,

00:41:40.740 I'm, I'm putting my money on, on the men. I am now there's a lot we don't know here. Okay. I mean,

00:41:45.780 a lot has not been stipulated. There's been, there's, uh, uh, for example, his, his scenario

00:41:51.200 doesn't even actually stipulate that these are unarmed men. So, I mean, if they have, if they can

00:41:55.620 use weapons or they can use a gun, then it's over in 10 seconds, but let's just assume it's unarmed.

00:41:59.660 And then the, the 100 men, like what kind of men are they? Are they men, men, or are they,

00:42:06.820 you know, Democrats? Uh, is this a hundred David hogs that we're talking about? If that's the case, 0.84

00:42:11.480 I would not bet on a hundred David hogs to beat a spider monkey, much less a gorilla. 1.00

00:42:16.340 If it was a, if it was a tree squirrel and a hundred David hogs, I'd put my money on the squirrel. 0.77

00:42:20.180 But if we're talking about just normal average men, men who weigh more than 82 pounds, then I'll,

00:42:25.660 uh, I'll take the humans in that matchup. I really will. And here's why you've got to assess

00:42:30.120 our advantages and our disadvantages, right? And we do have disadvantages. The average male 0.99

00:42:34.800 silverback is going to weigh about 400 pounds. They're typically about 20 times stronger than

00:42:38.360 the average man or 200 times stronger than David hog. They can deadlift, uh, 1700 pounds. They

00:42:44.920 have a bite strength of about 1300 PSI. Like I said, I've done the research on this. A pit bull,

00:42:50.080 you know, has a PS has a, has a bite strength of 300 PSI. Okay. So a pit bull can latch

00:42:55.520 on. You can't get them off. A gorilla will just chomp right through your bones and take 0.82

00:42:59.580 your limb clean off. Okay. A human's bite force is 162 PSI. So you're not going to, you can't

00:43:04.960 go bite for bite with this gorilla. You just can't grill a skin is like 12 inches thick.

00:43:09.160 All right. So you can't even break the skin, much less break bones. So those are all the

00:43:12.900 disadvantages, but what do humans have going for them? Well, first of all, in this scenario,

00:43:17.740 we have numbers. Okay. That's the first thing. Second, we have endurance. Gorillas get tired

00:43:21.340 very quickly. Okay. They're, they, they tire out. Like they've got a lot of force. They

00:43:25.280 got a lot of anger, but they tire out. They're like, uh, you know, they're like Amy Schumer

00:43:28.440 running up a flight of steps. So they're going to get tired very quickly. And third, this is

00:43:33.100 important. We have our wits, we have our minds. Okay. And this is the thing that I've thought

00:43:36.160 about when I've, uh, you know, this is really what it comes down to. We have our superior strategic

00:43:40.780 capabilities. So how do we do this? How do we bring down the gorilla? Well, here's how,

00:43:48.100 okay. First of all, you don't try to, I think when people imagine this fight, they're imagining

00:43:52.520 a hundred guys like pouncing on the grill all at once. You don't do that. You're not going

00:43:55.880 to do that. It's like logistically, that's not possible. Plus you're going to sustain heavy

00:43:58.840 losses. The first like 10 waves of guys are getting ripped in half. So if that's the plan

00:44:03.400 and I'm there, I'm, I'm in the back of the line. I'm not, I'm, you know, someone's got

00:44:07.720 to volunteer to be in the first, to be at the, at the front of this line. Cause I'm not

00:44:12.420 going to be in the trenches on this fight. I'll be in the back. I'll be cheering you

00:44:15.200 on. I'll be moral support, but I'm not going to be in the front. So that's not the way

00:44:19.220 to do it. Here's what you got to do. You got to spread out. Okay. You spread out, you

00:44:23.600 form a wide circle. Okay. Around this gorilla and a wide circle play keep away. Okay. And

00:44:32.660 he's not going to know who to attack first. Remember the grill is they're stupid. They're, 1.00

00:44:35.980 they're smart compared to animals, but they're dumb compared to us. At least they're dumb compared 1.00

00:44:39.120 to some of us. And, uh, so they're, they're not going to know, they're going to get frustrated. 0.99

00:44:43.100 He's not going to know who to attack first is what I'm saying. And, uh, so you just play

00:44:46.600 keep away and the gorilla, he's going to charge at someone. You just try to evade him. He's

00:44:50.340 going to charge at someone else back and forth, back and forth, play, keep away, stay spread

00:44:55.280 out, frustrate him, make him tired. Do this for hours, hours. And finally, when he's so exhausted

00:45:03.320 that he can barely move, you know, that's when, well, that's when the plan gets a little bit

00:45:09.160 hazy. I'll be honest, because I have it. I figured out step one, okay. Defeating a gorilla

00:45:13.020 is step one, spread out, make him tired. Step three is, uh, he's dead. Step two. I haven't

00:45:19.960 quite, it's, there's a, it's a little bit, it's a little vague, but I think really what,

00:45:23.800 you know, at that point you need, you know, five or six guys, not everybody to jump on him

00:45:29.380 first. I'd go for the eyes, gouge his eyes, try to blind him. And then when he's blind, now

00:45:34.840 you've got a tired blind gorilla. And that's when it's just a freak, everybody jump on him 0.93

00:45:39.000 and just pulverize him, beat him to death. And this is good. It gets dark. I mean, when 0.98

00:45:43.900 you really start to think about it now, I'm just like, it's, it's, it gets a little dark,

00:45:46.720 it gets a little dark. So, um, now I'm just waiting for YouTube to demonetize me for inciting

00:45:52.860 violence against the primate community. Um, but that's, uh, so, but I think that's basically 1.00

00:45:58.560 how you would do it. Uh, but it could be done. It could be done because gorillas look, 1.00

00:46:02.740 let's face it. Gorillas are not even the most, uh, they're not the most, you know, uh, intimidating

00:46:09.800 in, in the animal. I think a lot of people overestimate gorillas, frankly, like, I know

00:46:14.260 I'm talking a lot of, I'm talking a lot of guff about gorillas from the safety of this

00:46:17.540 room right now. Uh, if I was in a cage with one, it'd be a little bit different, but, but

00:46:21.720 I can say, I think they get a little overestimate. Now, if we're talking about, if it's a hundred

00:46:25.760 men versus a, versus a hippo, okay. Now hippos are actually the most dangerous lamb mammal

00:46:31.220 on earth. Okay. Those things are 9,000 pounds. I can run 20 miles an hour. They have a bite, 0.82

00:46:35.340 uh, bite strength of like 2000 PSI. Okay. So like that, that's different. I wouldn't bet

00:46:40.380 on a hundred guys versus a hippo, but against the gorilla, I would. And, uh, so now that's

00:46:46.040 settled. Glad we could spend way too much time on that. As doge continues to surgically cut

00:46:52.380 the fat from decades of bloated government spending and corruption. Pure talk. The cell phone

00:46:56.620 company I use for business is cutting the fat from wireless industry. Uh, that's right.

00:47:01.620 Pure talk says, I don't think so to $100 a month, cell phone plans. Uh, that's just wasteful.

00:47:06.700 It's irresponsible. And instead they're offering America's most dependable 5g network at America's

00:47:11.400 most sensible prices. Listen to this unlimited talk text and 15 gigs of data plus mobile hotspot

00:47:17.160 for just 35 bucks a month. And the best part right now, you get a free one year membership

00:47:21.800 to daily wire plus and with pure talks, us customer service team get switch hassle-free

00:47:25.880 in as little as 10 minutes. You don't need doge to cut the fat from your wireless bill.

00:47:29.900 You need pure talk, you know, in uncertain economic times, everybody could use a little

00:47:34.420 extra saving in their day to day. And pure talk helps you do just that. So go to pure talk.com

00:47:40.440 slash Walsh switch to pure talk at pure talk.com slash Walsh and get a free year of daily wire

00:47:46.200 plus with qualifying plan. Pure talk wireless by Americans for Americans. Well,

00:47:51.720 the countdown is on the daily wire is celebrating president Donald Trump's historic first 100

00:47:55.860 days back in office, uh, with a 100 hour flash sale on annual memberships, 100 hours only.

00:48:01.720 And the clock is already ticking. Donald Trump is laying a new foundation for America, but

00:48:04.880 it's up to people like you and me to help build the future of this country. Go to dailywire.com

00:48:09.060 and use code DW100 to join the fight. Now let's get to our daily cancellation.

00:48:13.180 For our daily cancellation today, we turn to a woman named Helen Weberle, who calls herself a doctor

00:48:24.740 on her profile on X. She also describes herself as the hormone expert and an international trans

00:48:30.280 rights advocate. Her advocacy for trans rights includes distributing puberty blockers and hormones 0.98

00:48:35.620 to adults and children alike through gender GP, which is an online gender clinic based in Singapore,

00:48:41.000 from its base in Singapore, this organization, which Helen co-founded distributes chemical

00:48:46.000 castration drugs to minors across the world. And we'll have more about that organization and the

00:48:50.260 services it offers in a few minutes. But Helen is very upset at me this week because of a video 0.96

00:48:55.340 where I am debating a trans identified male at one of my college talks a couple of years ago.

00:48:59.920 I don't know why Helen is suddenly reacting to this video now, but she is. So before we get to her

00:49:05.460 response, here's a quick clip of the footage that has made poor Helen so upset. Watch.

00:49:11.000 You've asserted that no one would ever see me as a woman, that nobody would ever see or could see a

00:49:22.000 transgender person as a woman. And yet, I have dozens of friends from diverse backgrounds, women from the

00:49:32.840 reservation, a woman from Japan, several immigrant women, I have my co-workers, I have my boss, my VP, my CEO, all

00:49:43.660 respecting me as a woman, my family, my long-term friends who are actually here with me.

00:49:49.980 All of these people assure me, like, I'm a woman. They'll tell me, girl, like, there is no way you are a man.

00:50:02.200 They see me as a woman. So the question, how can you assert that nobody would ever see me as a woman when my

00:50:11.800 material experience tells me, you're wrong?

00:50:15.640 Okay. It's interesting that that's the part of my talk you chose to ask a question about, because that's not in my talk at all.

00:50:21.520 I don't believe I said that no one would ever see you as a woman. I mean, it's possible, I suppose, that you could fool someone. 0.99

00:50:28.740 Now, you brought this up, so I have to tell you that you brought this up. You've put your identity on the table for conversation.

00:50:34.620 And so I'm going to say, you wouldn't fool me at all. I mean, I see a man 100%. And I think that most people would.

00:50:42.060 Now, the fact that you have people in your life who are saying to you, oh, you're totally a woman, that's exactly what I'm talking about.

00:50:50.020 No one in my life has ever once said to me, you're totally a man, Matt.

00:50:56.180 You know, if a friend of mine called me on the phone and said, listen, Matt, I want you to know, you're really a man.

00:51:02.660 I would think that there was something wrong with him. I would say, why are you saying that at all? It doesn't make any sense.

00:51:08.140 So the fact that this is a conversation to begin with tells me it only it only proves the point that I'm trying to make,

00:51:13.440 that your identity, even in your own mind, is up for it's something that you need to be assured of.

00:51:20.880 So, yeah, very compelling arguments from from that individual exchange actually goes on for seven or eight minutes.

00:51:27.700 I can't play the whole thing, but that's the argument.

00:51:31.460 The argument is, well, how can you say I'm not a woman when I have a friend who's an immigrant and says that I am one?

00:51:37.740 That was, you know, to be honest with you, that's like I said, that was from two years ago.

00:51:40.940 And I haven't even done a college talk in a while now.

00:51:44.800 People have asked me, like, when are you going to get back out there, start doing these talks again?

00:51:47.580 And I haven't done, I don't know, it's been, I don't think I've, I've done not very many over the last couple of years.

00:51:54.240 And this, to be honest with you, this is kind of why, like, it's, it's too easy.

00:51:59.040 I mean, this is the, it's just people just setting themselves up with the weakest possible arguments.

00:52:05.860 It's so easy that, and yeah, it provides a lot of fodder for a lib getting owned.

00:52:13.880 But it just, to me, after a while, after you've done it enough and you just get the same, like, the worst possible arguments framed in the weakest imaginable ways over and over again,

00:52:25.560 I start to get frustrated with them because of how easy it is.

00:52:30.220 You're making it so easy for me to dunk on you right now.

00:52:32.840 Like, give me a challenge.

00:52:34.260 So anyway, that's neither here nor there.

00:52:38.460 But that's the part that I just played there that seems to have especially upset our friend Helen, who on Monday shot back with a video that she captioned this way.

00:52:48.920 This broadcast from Matt Walsh is one of the most revolting displays of public humiliation I've seen in a long time.

00:52:54.740 Denying a woman her identity for claps and clicks is disgusting. 0.87

00:52:58.740 You're hurting real people for sport.

00:53:01.140 This needs to stop.

00:53:02.120 And here is the video from Helen Watch.

00:53:05.300 Hi, Matt.

00:53:07.620 Dr. Helen Webberley here.

00:53:09.240 I just wanted to send you this brief message to tell you that I think that that piece of broadcasting is the most disgusting thing that I have seen in a very long time.

00:53:17.120 To publicly deny that woman her own identity, to publicly humiliate her for your benefit, for your shares and likes and clicks and applause is absolutely revolting.

00:53:28.860 Okay, well, hello, Helen.

00:53:32.480 Unfortunately, I can't call you a doctor because you lost your medical license last summer.

00:53:37.840 Also, the National Health Service issued a safety alert warning doctors against working with your clinic, saying that it presents an ongoing safety risk.

00:53:44.460 Even the Ministry of Health in Singapore, where you're based, has told you to stop providing services to people in Singapore.

00:53:50.120 So for all intents and purposes, you're as much of a doctor as I am.

00:53:53.400 Actually, less, I would argue, because it's better to never have a medical license than to have one and lose it.

00:53:58.340 And you say that the clip of me talking to that dude is the most disgusting thing you've seen in a long time.

00:54:03.300 Well, the most disgusting thing I've seen, or at least the most embarrassing thing I've seen recently, is your entire failed career.

00:54:09.900 All that to say, Helen, I prefer to call people what they are, not what they want to be. 0.99

00:54:14.200 And that's why I call you a deranged, disgraced quack who pretends to be a doctor. 0.84

00:54:19.300 And it's why I called that man a man. 0.99

00:54:21.840 Now, you say that I publicly humiliated a woman.

00:54:24.700 The problem with that claim is, number one, again, he's not a woman.

00:54:26.980 And number two, he came to my event and chose to stand up on camera and ask a question.

00:54:31.520 He presented himself and his personal experience as support for his side of the argument.

00:54:36.120 He entered it into evidence.

00:54:38.220 He chose to make it the focal point of the conversation.

00:54:41.220 I didn't choose that. He did.

00:54:42.740 And this is a game that your side constantly plays.

00:54:44.820 You use anecdotes from your private life as ammunition in a debate, even though personal anecdotes prove nothing.

00:54:51.600 You know, they're irrelevant and unverifiable.

00:54:54.260 The claim that the guy's friends all think he's a woman does nothing at all to prove that he actually is a woman.

00:54:59.280 And even if it did prove that he's a woman, which it doesn't, I have no way of verifying the claim or even knowing if it's true.

00:55:04.120 And then on top of it all, the person who brings up the anecdote from his personal life then becomes offended when you start talking about his personal life.

00:55:10.960 This is the scam, the rule you want us to play by is that is that your side is allowed to use personal experience or lived experience, as you would say, as a cudgel to beat your opponents over the head.

00:55:23.100 But your opponents are not allowed to question, critique or even discuss the point that you have of your own volition introduced into the conversation.

00:55:30.400 Now, you also say that I denied that woman her identity.

00:55:34.460 Well, for the third time, not a woman. 0.98

00:55:36.540 Also, what do you mean by denied?

00:55:39.160 How could I have denied him his identity?

00:55:42.540 So you're not claiming that I denied his identity, which would mean that I am refusing to acknowledge his identity.

00:55:49.860 No, you're saying that I am denying it to him.

00:55:52.900 I am depriving him of his identity somehow.

00:55:57.040 Well, how does that work, Helen?

00:55:58.300 How could I possibly take his identity away?

00:56:02.860 How did I end up in a position to grant or revoke that guy's identity?

00:56:08.160 How did that power end up in my hands?

00:56:10.720 I never claimed to have it.

00:56:12.020 I didn't ask for it.

00:56:12.960 I don't want it.

00:56:14.780 But here's the problem.

00:56:15.860 If your identity is real, if it is objectively true, then it cannot be denied.

00:56:23.040 If that man was actually a woman, I wouldn't be able to take his identity away, even if I wanted to. 0.90

00:56:30.140 If that was actually a woman and I stood there and called her a man, then all that would happen is that I end up embarrassing myself.

00:56:39.060 Well, I'm humiliated in that scenario, not the woman. 1.00

00:56:43.980 If your identity is true, it does not need to be affirmed or confirmed.

00:56:49.280 You don't need to be reminded of it.

00:56:52.020 You don't need and wouldn't want anyone in your life to reinforce it for you.

00:56:56.520 As I said to the guy, I have never had a single person in my entire life affirm my manhood.

00:57:02.440 Nobody's ever told me that they see me as a man.

00:57:06.820 I've never wondered if anyone sees me that way.

00:57:09.380 I've never asked anyone about it.

00:57:11.640 If they did vocally affirm my manhood, I would think that they were insane.

00:57:17.200 Not because they're wrong, but because to point at me and call me a man,

00:57:22.180 it's like pointing at a wall and saying, hey, this is a wall.

00:57:27.240 It doesn't need to be said.

00:57:28.540 It's the kind of thing so obvious that you have to be crazy to bother pointing it out.

00:57:33.000 So if I do have the power to deny his female identity, it's only because he has no female identity.

00:57:40.500 But then again, this isn't really about power.

00:57:42.540 You aren't saying that I have the power to deny him his identity.

00:57:45.300 At least that's not what you're trying to say.

00:57:47.100 What you're trying to say is that I have the responsibility.

00:57:49.460 I have the obligation to participate in the charade of his false identity.

00:57:56.840 You're actually accusing me of failing to play along and read the script that you have written.

00:58:02.200 As far as that goes, you're right.

00:58:05.000 I'm not playing along.

00:58:06.660 I don't accept the obligation that you're trying to saddle me with.

00:58:09.920 I reject it outright.

00:58:11.240 As you've probably noticed, most of the world rejects it.

00:58:14.480 Even most of the Western world has finally woken from its stupor

00:58:17.460 and no longer has any interest in playing this game anymore.

00:58:20.080 We're done with the charade.

00:58:21.440 Some of us have always been done with it.

00:58:24.240 Now, I understand that that's scary for you, Helen.

00:58:28.400 The trans agenda is crumbling.

00:58:31.080 Gender ideology has been exposed.

00:58:33.660 The so-called medical experts like yourself who pushed this madness have been permanently disgraced.

00:58:39.040 Your career is in shambles.

00:58:40.740 Your organization is discredited.

00:58:42.640 You are a laughingstock. 1.00

00:58:43.920 Everybody knows you're a fraud and a fake and a clown. 1.00

00:58:47.600 Your entire worldview is a sham. 1.00

00:58:50.420 You've lost the argument. 0.92

00:58:52.240 You've lost respect.

00:58:54.040 You've even lost your medical license.

00:58:56.980 But you can't turn back now, can you, Helen?

00:58:59.900 You can't admit that everything you said was a lie.

00:59:03.240 You can't admit that, you know, you knowingly harmed countless children by giving them castration drugs.

00:59:08.560 No one believes the lie, but you also can't admit the truth.

00:59:14.480 So you're stuck in limbo.

00:59:17.120 The ship is sinking, but you've tied yourself to the mast.

00:59:21.300 And you secretly hope that somebody will rescue you, but we can't.

00:59:24.740 Because you've done this to yourself.

00:59:27.400 And you know something?

00:59:28.260 Even if we could rescue you, we wouldn't. 0.99

00:59:30.540 Because you deserve to sink. 0.99

00:59:33.940 You deserve to suffer because of what you've done to children. 0.98

00:59:38.620 And so we'll all stand on the shoreline and watch. 0.53

00:59:41.940 And then when the last bit of the ship disappears below the surface, we will walk away and forget that you ever existed.

00:59:48.360 All that to say, no, I'm not sorry.

00:59:51.340 And I take back nothing that I said.

00:59:52.720 And also, you are, of course, just like your medical license, canceled.

00:59:57.900 That'll do it for the show today.

00:59:58.660 Thanks for watching.

00:59:59.440 Thanks for listening.

01:00:00.220 Have a great day.

01:00:00.940 Talk to you tomorrow.

01:00:02.200 Godspeed.

The Matt Walsh Show - April 29, 2025

Ep. 1585 - The Trump Admin Arrests Dangerous, Power-Hungry Judge & The Media Has A Total Meltdown

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript