The Matt Walsh Show - May 15, 2025


Ep. 1597 - South Africa Doubles Down On Their Anti-White Agenda And The Left Celebrates


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 2 minutes

Words per Minute

175.51215

Word Count

11,052

Sentence Count

737

Misogynist Sentences

14

Hate Speech Sentences

68


Summary

The meltdown over the White South African refugees has reached a fever pitch, and today, we ll talk about it. Also, officials in Minnesota are supposedly preparing for riots in case Derek Chauvin is pardoned, but is that really going to happen? And why are they making a big show of planning for riots? We ll discuss.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Today on the Matt Wall Show, the meltdown over the white South African refugees has
00:00:03.380 reached a fever pitch. This has really been the ultimate mask-off moment. We'll talk about it.
00:00:07.700 Also, officials in Minnesota are supposedly preparing for riots in case Derek Chauvin
00:00:11.740 is pardoned. But is that really going to happen? And why are they actually making a big show of
00:00:16.220 preparing for riots? We'll discuss. And environmentalists are always finding little
00:00:19.820 ways to make everybody's lives worse. The Trump administration will be rolling back at least one
00:00:23.680 of these policies. We'll talk about all that and more today on the Matt Wall Show.
00:00:30.000 If you feel like you keep juggling expensive supplements that are just getting more
00:00:56.400 unaffordable to keep up with, then Everyday Dose will be a lifesaver for you. Everyday Dose
00:01:00.920 transforms your morning coffee into a powerhouse of vitamins, minerals, and amino acids all in one
00:01:06.660 affordable cup. Just 30 seconds to prepare and you're getting your caffeine fix plus all the
00:01:10.680 nutrients your body needs. One delicious cup, one simple solution. Everyday Dose isn't just coffee,
00:01:15.720 it's coffee plus benefits. They've infused their 100% arabica beans with lion's mane chaga collagen
00:01:21.440 protein and brain-boosting nootropics for clean, sustained energy without the crash or jitters.
00:01:27.680 You can choose between their mild coffee plus, which is light, smooth, and gentle on sensitive
00:01:32.100 stomachs, or coffee plus bold, which is a rich, full-bodied medium roast with an extra energy
00:01:37.860 kick. Both deliver the same functional benefits and undergo rigorous third-party testing to ensure
00:01:43.400 that you're getting the best quality. Your brain and body will thank you. I've actually tried this,
00:01:48.940 and I have to tell you that I take my coffee very seriously. I'm very skeptical of any effort to
00:01:54.740 change my coffee routine. I tried it, and I can legitimately say that I like it a lot.
00:02:00.100 Get 45% off your first subscription order of 30 servings of coffee plus or bold plus. You'll also
00:02:06.000 receive a starter kit with over $100 in free gifts, including a rechargeable fronther and gunmetal
00:02:11.920 serving spoon. By going to everydaydose.com slash Walsh or entering Walsh at checkout, you'll also get free
00:02:17.740 gifts throughout the year. That's everydaydose.com slash Walsh for 45% off your first order.
00:02:23.400 Try to imagine that you run South Africa. You're in charge of the African National Congress. Not
00:02:29.100 exactly an enviable position. Your country has the highest unemployment rate in the entire world
00:02:33.600 since the end of apartheid, which was supposedly the greatest evil to ever befall mankind.
00:02:38.040 A lot of bad things have been happening. The power grid has collapsed along with the export markets
00:02:42.300 and any semblance of public safety. Headlines like this one are common. As you can see, it reads,
00:02:48.760 Grandmother 71 dies of shock after she was forced to watch her three granddaughters being raped at
00:02:53.700 gunpoint at her home in South Africa. And there's plenty more where that came from because you have
00:02:58.700 turned your country into the living embodiment of DEI to disastrous results. And then, to your horror,
00:03:04.820 the President of the United States decides to shine an international spotlight on your incompetence.
00:03:09.100 He makes it impossible to hide what's going on in South Africa. Specifically, the President allows
00:03:13.720 white citizens of South Africa to flee to the U.S. so they can escape all the anti-white violence and
00:03:19.000 race-based land seizures that you've implemented in your failing country. And unsurprisingly, a lot
00:03:24.120 of white people take the United States up on the offer. They decide that it's better to uproot their
00:03:27.840 entire families and fly halfway across the world than to spend another second under your rule in South
00:03:33.320 Africa. Now, if you have an ounce of shame, that would have to be extremely, monumentally embarrassing.
00:03:40.720 I mean, there are politicians in Japan who would quit, you know, quite literally commit like
00:03:46.020 ritualistic suicide under those circumstances. The job of any government is to look after the
00:03:51.860 well-being of its own people. And once the most productive members of society start leaving
00:03:56.740 at great personal cost to themselves, then you have failed as a leader and as a government. You are
00:04:03.880 illegitimate and you have no one else to blame. And you should resign in shame at the absolute minimum.
00:04:10.720 But the African National Congress has decided on the opposite course of action. Rather than engage
00:04:14.480 in any kind of introspection, they decided to attack the white refugees who have just fled to
00:04:19.060 America. They're not showing any interest in keeping any of the remaining Afrikaners from fleeing,
00:04:23.620 even though they're responsible for maintaining the vast majority of usable farmland in the country.
00:04:29.160 They're also not interested in contesting the notion that white people are going to be persecuted
00:04:32.720 in their country. Instead, the African National Congress released this statement the other day.
00:04:37.820 As you can see, the statement reads, quote,
00:04:40.980 They flee not from persecution, but from justice, equality, and accountability for historic privilege.
00:04:47.060 The statement goes on to describe the refugees as cowardly and says that they are offended by a
00:04:51.360 democratic society working to redress past injustices. Then there's this concluding line,
00:04:56.160 which really sells the message. Quote,
00:04:58.240 Well, this is one of those things that's less true for having been said, as the saying goes.
00:05:13.400 If you're running a highly functional, stable country, then you're not going to end your press
00:05:18.080 release out of nowhere by declaring that you're not a broken or failing state. No state that isn't a
00:05:24.140 failing state has ever had to clarify in a statement that they aren't a failing state.
00:05:28.680 And it's like walking up to your wife unprompted and announcing that you're not having an affair.
00:05:34.200 But none of these people are especially bright, so they're not aware of the implications of what
00:05:38.060 they're saying, no matter how obvious those implications might be.
00:05:41.600 It also explains why, in effect, their message is essentially an explicit threat to every white
00:05:45.640 person in South Africa. And they're also attempting to coax the refugees back
00:05:50.140 with a promise of giving them the opportunity to be held accountable for historical injustices.
00:05:57.060 They're basically saying, hey, guys, can you come back so we can persecute you?
00:06:00.360 This isn't fair. We were going to persecute you, and then you left. That's not fair.
00:06:04.640 Now, with this statement, they are validating everything the Trump administration says about
00:06:07.780 the country. No person of any race should be subjected to land seizures or violence as part of
00:06:12.960 accountability for historic privilege, whatever the heck that means. But that's what the government of
00:06:17.940 South Africa is now demanding by their own admission. And it's what the political left is
00:06:21.820 demanding in this country, too. In the days since the first 59 white refugees arrived from South
00:06:27.020 Africa, political commentators on the left have been melting down to a degree that's
00:06:31.920 truly hard to comprehend, even given everything we already know about these people.
00:06:35.540 What we're seeing is primal rage and hysteria. I mean, it's a level of anti-white race hatred
00:06:41.200 that needs to be exposed, or else very soon, you know, we're going to start to look
00:06:45.800 a lot like South Africa. So let's start with Don Lemon, who no longer has the need to temper
00:06:51.020 his passion for white genocide now that he's not on cable news. Not that cable news personalities
00:06:56.120 are tempering it very much, as we'll see later on. But anyway, here's Don Lemon.
00:07:00.680 This South African farmer, which is the most blatantly obvious racist ever. It is blatantly obvious
00:07:11.920 the way that we treat white South Africans, who, by the way, for the most part, and I am generalizing
00:07:18.540 here, some of the wealthiest people are well-to-do people in the country. They speak their language.
00:07:24.400 They're not just taking land away from white South African farmers. White South Africans,
00:07:30.220 about 9% of the population owned 87% of the fertile land. Okay? Today, black South Africans make up more
00:07:41.220 than 90% of the population, and they only hold about 4% of all privately owned land. So what they're
00:07:49.500 trying to do is say, hey, we need to fix an historical injustice and figure out if you're not using that
00:07:57.320 land to farm, then we need to have some of that land, not taking all of your entire farm. That's
00:08:03.540 not what's happening. And we need to what? There needs to be equity. And now people are crying because
00:08:08.420 the playing field is being leveled. And so therefore, it is now discrimination.
00:08:13.300 Okay, so notice what is being said here. Notice he says that white people own most of the fertile land
00:08:18.960 in South Africa. The word fertile is doing a lot of work there because, you know, if you know anything
00:08:24.080 about farmland, even if you don't know anything about it, you should still know that it's possible
00:08:29.040 to ruin it. I mean, it's possible to do a very bad job of maintaining it. And it's not as though you
00:08:34.480 could just give a farm to a random person off the street and rest assured that it's going to be
00:08:39.800 fertile in 10 years. And we know that for a few reasons. First of all, it's common sense. Second,
00:08:45.360 Zimbabwe already tried this. Several decades ago, they made the decision to seize farms from whites,
00:08:50.680 give them to black citizens. After all, what could go wrong? Well, you know, I mean, Zimbabwe was the
00:08:56.740 breadbasket of Africa, supposedly. Well, as it turns out, a lot can go wrong, like a whole lot.
00:09:04.480 And before long, Zimbabwe needed to import food because they couldn't make their own.
00:09:10.060 And eventually, the government gave up on the idea. They gave the farmland back to the white people.
00:09:15.320 This is a Bloomberg News article from a few years ago, quote,
00:09:17.820 Zimbabwe gives land back to white farmers after wrecking economy. Two decades after President
00:09:23.800 Robert Mugabe wrecked Zimbabwe's economy by urging black subsistence farmers to violently force white
00:09:29.800 commercial farmers and their workers off the land, his successor has thrown in the towel. The seizures
00:09:35.300 that began in 2000 were ratified by the government, which said they were needed to address colonial
00:09:39.500 imbalances. A vibrant agricultural industry that exported tobacco and roses and grew most of the
00:09:45.500 food the nation needed collapsed. Periodic food shortages ensued. Inflation became the world's
00:09:50.280 highest and the manufacturing industry was decimated. It was one of Africa's richest countries
00:09:54.720 became one of its poorest, close quote. Okay, so in other words, it turns out that
00:09:59.880 when you use the government to redistribute fertile farmland to correct some alleged injustice,
00:10:06.160 what you get is famine. Okay, that's what equity means in practice. It's what always happens
00:10:13.420 when you take land from people who are managing it properly and redistribute it on the basis of race.
00:10:20.760 Competence matters, especially when you're talking about a country's food supply.
00:10:25.060 And make no mistake, the reason those white people control the farmland in South Africa
00:10:29.440 is because historically they're competent. They bought it, they maintained it for generations,
00:10:36.020 nobody handed it to them or maintained it for them. The fact that it's still fertile,
00:10:40.520 again, you can ruin farmland. It's still fertile, even by Don Lemon's own testimony. It's still
00:10:47.020 fertile after generations. What does that mean? It means that they are properly managing the land.
00:10:52.940 And in many cases, they were there long before black South Africans arrived and demanded their
00:10:57.060 property. Now, in this debate, we are well past the point where the left can scream apartheid and just
00:11:02.580 get whatever they want. Post-apartheid South Africa is simply too great of a disaster by every
00:11:06.560 available metric. And by the way, apartheid was nothing like what's currently being enacted in
00:11:11.060 South Africa. As we discussed the other day, there were far fewer race-based laws under apartheid than
00:11:16.440 there are right now in South Africa. And the race-based laws under apartheid, by and large,
00:11:20.720 were directed at enforcing racial separation, not large-scale farm seizures by the government
00:11:26.360 without any limiting principle whatsoever. Activists on the left know they have the losing
00:11:31.100 argument in this debate, which is why they're now resorting to some of the most pathetic tactics
00:11:35.120 imaginable. So the New Republic, for instance, just ran a story in which they dug up the old tweets of
00:11:40.920 one of these white refugees. And we'll get to the bombshell. And let's see if you notice the big
00:11:48.800 problem with this line of attack. Maybe you'll pick up on it. So the headline is,
00:11:53.880 one of Trump's Africana refugees is quite the anti-Semite.
00:11:57.200 So yeah, they went rooting through his tweets to smear him, all because he's white and he's
00:12:02.820 fleeing persecution in South Africa. He's allegedly an anti-Semite, so he needs to go back.
00:12:08.880 Now, of course, if this is the new standard for refugees, then I have very bad news about 90%
00:12:17.200 or more of the refugees that were admitted under the Biden administration. Muslims from the Middle East
00:12:22.100 and Africa are not exactly big fans of Jewish people, generally speaking, okay? Even if a lot
00:12:29.980 of them don't have Twitter, so you can't go look at it. It doesn't take long if you want to know
00:12:33.620 how they feel on that subject. It wouldn't take much digging to find out. But the New Republic
00:12:38.620 probably doesn't seem to realize how this would go, but it's pretty obvious. Meanwhile, other luminaries
00:12:45.620 on the left are reduced to making explicit threats against these refugees. And here's one viral
00:12:51.320 example. Watch.
00:12:53.360 Good morning. This is for the South Africans who are going to be entering the United States. This
00:12:59.040 is just a public service announcement. I just wanted to make you aware that the Black people
00:13:05.420 who were students during apartheid, we're grandmas and grandpas now, and we have the era of Gen Z.
00:13:17.260 One more thing. I also want to let you know that our president, he has secret service and you will not.
00:13:23.740 Mm-hmm. I also want to tell you that Black people over here are empowered. Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm.
00:13:35.580 These are just public service announcements. When you get here, sit your ass down and don't touch nothing
00:13:45.960 because you don't have secret service. Okay. Now have the day you deserve.
00:13:56.860 Now, this is not some random person, by the way. She has more than 100,000 followers on TikTok for some
00:14:02.640 ungodly reason. And she's openly threatening these white refugees with murder solely on the basis of
00:14:09.240 their skin color, which, by the way, is something you just never see. For all the talk about the
00:14:14.000 anti-immigrant rhetoric on the right, there's nobody on the right going out and just threatening
00:14:19.880 to kill immigrants who are coming here. We're saying round them up, deport them if they shouldn't
00:14:30.600 be here, enforce our immigration, enforce our laws. There's nobody saying that. Nothing like this is
00:14:36.020 happening. All it takes is for a few white people to be admitted, and this is the kind of anti-refugee,
00:14:42.740 anti-immigrant rhetoric we get from the left. It's like immediately, all pretense is dropped,
00:14:48.000 and they're saying, yeah, we're going to go out and kill you. There's not even any attempt to
00:14:52.740 sugarcoat it. She thinks that white people should die. And there are a lot of videos like this on
00:14:56.980 TikTok at the moment. Most of them adopt the same gleeful tone. We saw this with Carmelo Anthony.
00:15:01.360 We saw it with Rodney Hinton. And now we're seeing it here. And if you listen really carefully,
00:15:06.880 by the way, the most telling part of the video happens around the 31-second mark. Maybe go back and
00:15:11.940 listen to it again. Turn the volume up. That's the moment where you can hear a very faint smoke
00:15:15.320 alarm chirp in the background while this woman is threatening to murder white people. So
00:15:19.940 the whole thing is just very on the nose. Actually, there is one exception here. Over at CNN,
00:15:26.000 they've managed to fix the smoke detectors at least, but they definitely have not gotten rid of
00:15:32.240 the genocidal anti-white commentators. So this again is on CNN. This is not on TikTok.
00:15:38.000 And listen to what this woman says.
00:15:41.380 The people who are native to that land deserve their rightful land back. That is not what the
00:15:47.580 Afrikaners actually want to have happen, which are the white Africans. And so who are not originally
00:15:54.400 from Africa who colonized South Africa also. And so that is what they are saying is discrimination.
00:16:00.620 Now, if the constitution in South Africa is discriminatory, they have their checks and
00:16:06.260 balances in that land, just like we do. And that is for them to, so if the Afrikaners don't actually
00:16:11.160 like the land, they can leave that country. They are. They're leaving to come here. No.
00:16:16.060 These refugees are coming here. They can actually leave and go to where their native land is,
00:16:20.200 which is probably Germany. Are you against them coming here?
00:16:22.940 Holland probably. Holland.
00:16:24.020 Now, the obvious problem here is that despite being given a national television platform,
00:16:29.420 this woman clearly has no idea what she's talking about. She thinks the Afrikaners came
00:16:32.400 from Germany. She's a complete imbecile, like pretty much everyone else on CNN. All she's
00:16:38.120 interested in doing is demonizing white people. And she's going to do that one way or another
00:16:41.800 every time she gets on television. But there's actually a bigger problem with this woman's response.
00:16:48.280 I mean, let's pretend for a second that the Afrikaners actually did come from Germany.
00:16:51.380 Germany. She's implying that in that scenario, the white people could go back there and she'd
00:16:56.980 be fine with that. But of course, she wouldn't be fine with that. The left would not be fine with
00:17:01.540 that. Take a look at what the left has done to Germany in the last couple of decades. If you
00:17:06.480 don't believe that, I mean, it's unrecognizable. And any white person who complains is immediately
00:17:09.780 labeled far right. They're condemned as white supremacists. The National Security Service has
00:17:14.500 opened counter-terrorist investigations in every single one of them. And the same is true,
00:17:19.740 of course, in this country. So this is the funny thing about who is considered native or
00:17:26.740 not, who is considered an invader or not. CNN commentators have no problem announcing that
00:17:34.040 white people whose ancestors have been in the country for 20 generations should go back home
00:17:39.640 if they're in South Africa. But try telling the Somalis in Minnesota to go back home. You'll
00:17:44.680 be immediately labeled a far right bigot. Even though the Somalis have been here for at
00:17:48.940 most a couple of decades. Some have been here for a couple of hours. But we're told that
00:17:53.700 the Somalis have every right to be here. That we're told the Somalis, the moment they step
00:17:58.260 foot here, they are just as American as anyone else. The moment the Somalis steps foot in this
00:18:05.100 country, they're just as American as you, even if your family's been here for 400 years.
00:18:09.440 And yet the white South Africans are not South African, even after 400 years.
00:18:15.800 And Americans who can trace their lineage back several centuries,
00:18:19.660 they just have to shut up and take it in this country.
00:18:24.120 No matter where they are, maybe you've noticed white people, no matter where they are,
00:18:30.500 are always the colonizers. And have no legitimate claim to whatever land they're on.
00:18:36.640 In other words, under the left's framework, white people are the only demographic on the planet
00:18:43.620 that can never be considered truly at home or native to any country anywhere.
00:18:50.760 You know, we'll be told that a white person's true home is Western Europe.
00:18:55.420 And yet if any white person in the UK claimed that it was a white country, they'd be condemned.
00:19:00.560 They say to us in America that this isn't our land, right? It's stolen. So where is our land?
00:19:09.720 They will not follow that to its conclusion and say that, well, Europe is the white man's land.
00:19:15.460 They're not going to say that. So where is it? The message is that there is literally no place
00:19:22.380 on earth that white people can claim is a legitimate homeland. A white man is native to nowhere.
00:19:27.880 He is indigenous to nowhere. I mean, that's strange, isn't it? How does that work?
00:19:35.880 Like, have you noticed that there's no country on the planet with white indigenous people?
00:19:43.340 How is that possible? Where did the white people come from? Did they fall out of the sky like rain?
00:19:47.600 Did they magically spawn out of thin air? If a white person could trace his roots back to the 17th
00:19:53.680 century in this country, does that make him a Native American? I mean, at what point can the
00:20:00.580 white person say, yeah, I am native to this country? How many centuries does he need to be?
00:20:05.380 Does his family need to be in a country to be native to it? How many generations? 10? Is that enough?
00:20:12.040 No? 15? 20? 25? 30? 40? Is that enough? At that point, can we say we're native to this country?
00:20:17.680 And if the answer is, well, there's no amount of time. If the answer is that, well, it could be a
00:20:23.820 thousand years from now, and a white person who's been here for more than a thousand years, their
00:20:29.000 family's been here for a thousand years, still is not native to this country in America. If that's the
00:20:34.160 answer, then again, where is his native homeland? And if he goes there, can he claim the title of
00:20:44.260 Native or Indigenous? Can he say that the non-natives are invading or stealing? Well, the left has no
00:20:55.780 answer to any of those questions. And the reason is that the terms Native and colonizer and invader
00:21:03.400 and Indigenous are all just tools of manipulation. They don't mean anything. And of course, white people
00:21:11.500 get this treatment, even though they actually bring innovation, advancement, and infrastructure
00:21:14.980 everywhere they go. And then when they're kicked out, what happens? I mean, very often, that
00:21:22.620 infrastructure is not maintained. Look at what happened after Portugal gave back Mozambique or Angola.
00:21:28.400 Look at South Africa. Look at Zimbabwe. Total disrepair has followed when the alleged colonizers are
00:21:33.960 kicked out. And that's just a historical fact. And why might that be? Well, that's a question you're
00:21:40.940 definitely not supposed to ask. But recently, I saw someone who's an African who took a crack at
00:21:47.780 addressing this point. Interesting. Let's watch.
00:21:51.760 What is the one word in Igbo for maintenance?
00:21:56.180 Maintenance? There's no direct English word for that. It doesn't translate directly to
00:22:00.940 maintenance. That's correct. How about you?
00:22:02.980 It doesn't translate. That's correct.
00:22:04.660 But it translates to, like, take care of.
00:22:07.180 No, that's not maintenance. What is the one word for repair in Igbo?
00:22:11.660 Imezi.
00:22:12.380 Exactly. What is the one word for repair in...
00:22:16.020 You see? I'm driving you to somewhere. What is the one word for democracy in Igbo language?
00:22:23.240 You don't. How about you? You don't. You're trying to practice something that is not in the concept
00:22:27.720 of the language. There is no African country, and I've done it through Kenya, through... I've done it all,
00:22:32.980 that has an equivalent of the word maintenance.
00:22:35.660 Well, in order to maintain something, you have to have it first.
00:22:38.640 Correct.
00:22:39.720 No, if I leave it for you, you can maintain it. The British left a lot of things in this country
00:22:43.020 when they left. They established the hospitals, they established the fire stations,
00:22:46.160 the post offices, the railway lines, the roads they built before they left.
00:22:49.260 You are not able to maintain it because you don't have that concept.
00:22:51.780 Because your environment, the tropical environment of Africa, the way you build your houses,
00:22:57.120 the material you use, you don't require maintenance.
00:22:59.280 Every country that is called industrialized countries, today, one of the things you know
00:23:02.960 about them is maintenance of what they have. That's why we have buildings here that are
00:23:06.820 about 250 years old, 300 years old in this country. There are buildings in other countries
00:23:11.060 of Europe that are 700 years ago. The Notre Dame that burned in France was a 13th century building.
00:23:16.400 Do you know what kept it that long till today? Maintenance is a culture.
00:23:22.860 Now, this is one of those conversations that if you were leading South Africa at the moment,
00:23:28.300 you'd probably want to take pretty seriously. Maybe you'd take a step back and wonder if 30 years
00:23:34.140 of black supremacy and white hatred is really an optimal substitute for maintaining the roads
00:23:40.260 and the farms and the power grid. Maybe you'd recognize that if you don't value,
00:23:45.760 if you don't even value the concept of maintenance, then inevitably you're going to have a collapse.
00:23:54.500 That's what inevitably will happen. And it's pretty clear in South Africa that they don't
00:23:58.860 value maintenance at all, which is why they are taking the people who've maintained fertile farmland
00:24:05.800 that everyone recognizes as fertile and expelling them from it without any real plan of like,
00:24:13.020 how are we going to make food now? So this is what happens if you demonize a handful of productive
00:24:18.560 people who are sticking around. But of course, no one in South Africa is asking these questions at
00:24:24.140 the moment. Instead, they're demonizing the white people who are already out the door. And that means
00:24:30.180 that very soon those white people will have a lot of company. I mean, South Africa is about to lose
00:24:36.260 the few farmers it has left. No country in human history has ever survived something like that.
00:24:43.820 And South Africa, the ultimate embodiment of DEI, will be no different. Now let's get to our five
00:24:50.920 headlines. Grand Canyon University is a private Christian university in beautiful Phoenix, Arizona,
00:25:00.840 and it believes that we are endowed by our creator with certain unalienable rights to life, liberty,
00:25:05.880 and the pursuit of happiness. GCU believes in equal opportunity and that the American dream starts
00:25:10.300 with purpose. GCU equips you to serve others in ways that promote human flourishing and create a ripple
00:25:15.300 effect of transformation for generations to come. By honoring your career calling, you impact your family,
00:25:20.160 your friends, and your community. Change the world for good by putting others before yourself to glorify God.
00:25:25.480 Whether your pursuit involves a bachelor's, master's, or doctoral degree, GCU's online, on-campus,
00:25:30.180 and hybrid learning environments are designed to help you achieve your unique academic, personal,
00:25:34.360 and professional goals. With over 340 academic programs as of September 2024, GCU meets you where
00:25:40.260 you are and provides a path to help you fulfill your dreams. The pursuit to serve others is yours. Let
00:25:44.500 it flourish. Find your purpose at Grand Canyon University. Private, Christian, affordable. Visit gcu.edu.
00:25:52.080 Rumors started circulating pretty widely on social media yesterday that Minnesota is preparing for
00:25:57.280 riots in case there is a pardon of Derek Chauvin. Here's the local ABC affiliate with the report.
00:26:06.300 This is what Minneapolis looked like after former MPD officer Derek Chauvin killed George Floyd. And it's
00:26:13.340 something state and city leaders do not want to see happen again. I spoke with six total sources today.
00:26:19.420 They tell me Governor Tim Walz, the Minnesota National Guard, Attorney General Keith Ellison,
00:26:24.400 Mayor Jacob Fry, and Hennepin County Sheriff DeWanna Witt have all been briefed on a potential Chauvin
00:26:29.600 pardon and the possible end to the federal consent decree that called for extensive reform at MPD.
00:26:36.160 And tonight, law enforcement is now preparing for possible civil unrest if those two things happen.
00:26:42.400 Mayor Fry is not talking about those plans, but his Commissioner of Community Safety, Todd Barnett,
00:26:47.780 in a statement says, quote, we've heard the same rumors as everyone else. But the bottom line is that
00:26:53.480 Derek Chauvin would remain behind bars serving his state sentence, even if his federal charges are
00:26:59.560 pardoned. To be clear, we have no credible intelligence about any pardon or planned disruptions here in
00:27:05.140 Minneapolis. So this is kind of a strange story. I mean, pardoning Chauvin isn't strange. I think that
00:27:10.500 should happen. But it doesn't it doesn't appear there's any actual indication that a pardon is coming.
00:27:15.080 And I mean, maybe there is, but there's no indication of it. And yet, the media is talking
00:27:21.720 about all these Democrat officials in Minnesota are preparing for it very, very kind of publicly.
00:27:27.300 Which which leads me to believe this is this is all a charade by the Democrats.
00:27:31.680 Some kind of charade to try to whip up the BLM mob. This is them saying, oh, gee, you know,
00:27:36.940 I hope there aren't more riots in the summer. That would be terrible. That would be really bad.
00:27:41.460 Oh, man, I hope I hope that, you know, the first summer after Donald Trump is elected that we don't
00:27:46.080 have mass riots again. That would be right, guys. That would that would be we wouldn't want that.
00:27:51.640 We're really getting prepared for that. So it just doesn't it doesn't make sense that they have
00:27:57.520 they say they have no intelligence about a pardon coming and yet they're preparing for riots anyway.
00:28:02.420 In case of an event that they have no reason to believe will happen.
00:28:07.640 That doesn't make a lot of sense. Alternatively, they do have intelligence of a pardon coming. And
00:28:12.500 this is their way of signaling to the people who organize and fund these riots that they should
00:28:17.760 start getting ready, you know, rev up your engines and get ready. Because these riots are not organic.
00:28:23.280 Obviously, riots in response to a federal pardon would definitely not spring up organically
00:28:28.500 because the pardon wouldn't even free Derek Chauvin from jail. There's no reason why riots would break
00:28:34.500 out in response to that, except in a coordinated, non-organic way. Now, all that said, there should
00:28:42.760 definitely be a pardon. There should be a pardon because it's the right thing to do. Leaving aside all
00:28:49.660 the strategy, the political strategy, the legal strategy, it's just the right thing to do. Chauvin was
00:28:54.840 railroaded. He's an innocent man. And Trump should do whatever is in his power to rectify however much
00:29:00.200 of the situation he can. Now, he can't free Chauvin from prison at this point, unfortunately. I have
00:29:06.700 seen people, you know, on X coming up with elaborate ways that maybe he could free him. I saw someone
00:29:14.400 suggest, well, can you send Chauvin to El Salvador, to an El Salvador prison, and then have Bukele
00:29:26.460 free him, you know, so he can live out his days in El Salvador. I think it's very unlikely that
00:29:33.460 something like that will happen. So probably Trump cannot free Chauvin from prison at this point,
00:29:39.240 unfortunately. But he can pardon him from some of the charges at least, and he should.
00:29:45.660 Why should he do it? Well, because he's innocent, and those charges are bogus. And so you should get
00:29:51.100 rid of whatever, you should get rid of all the bogus charges that you can. And there's also,
00:29:59.600 I think maybe people are underestimating this factor. There's also the bully pulpit effect.
00:30:05.680 A pardon would be Trump using the bully pulpit of the presidency to both call attention to Chauvin's
00:30:12.800 plight and also give permission, right, to normal people to speak up for Chauvin and to take his
00:30:21.780 side. And when I say, when I say permission, I don't mean literal permission. Nobody needs actual
00:30:28.460 permission from Trump to say that Chauvin is innocent. I mean permission in the sense of giving
00:30:33.440 cover. This is how it always goes. There's, you know, a lot of people know that what happened to
00:30:40.340 Chauvin is wrong, but they're afraid to say it. They're afraid to speak up. And in the first couple
00:30:46.300 of years of all this, like speaking up in defense of Derek Chauvin was the ultimate taboo because
00:30:51.280 George Floyd was a martyr and a saint and had been canonized. And now that's loosened up a little
00:30:57.980 bit. People are a little bit bolder, but I think most people, most normal people still won't say
00:31:03.740 that publicly. If the president of the United States is saying it though, if the president of
00:31:07.380 the United States comes out and says, this was a, this is this, you know, this guy was railroaded.
00:31:11.840 This was a miscarriage of justice. He should be pardoned. If he says it, then it's not that
00:31:17.620 everyone's all, everyone on the right is going to just parrot whatever he says, because they can't
00:31:23.560 think for themselves. It's more that that's cover that gives people cover because now it's like a
00:31:28.440 lot of people already think that the president says it. And now it gives people to cover where
00:31:32.180 they feel like they can say it too. And, um, cause it's not, it's not this kind of like scary edgy
00:31:38.120 thing anymore when the president is saying it. And that would be a significant benefit. I think
00:31:43.580 in giving, uh, in giving this pardon to Derek Chauvin. Another point I saw somebody on X make this
00:31:49.560 point. And this is, uh, this is not my point. I'm stealing it shamelessly. I think it was the
00:31:55.180 account, uh, Fisher King on X. And he made the point that the Menendez brothers shot both of their
00:32:03.660 parents in the face with a shotgun and killed them. And as far as I, I've followed the story very
00:32:09.540 closely, but I have not followed it. I'm saying, but, uh, as far as I know, they at one point had to
00:32:16.400 go and reload the shotgun to finish the job on their mom. Okay. So this was like a, just a,
00:32:26.180 this is first degree murder. I mean, this is a, a, a planned out murder, very deliberate
00:32:33.500 reloading the shotgun, finishing the job. I mean, this is like very methodical plotted sadistic murder.
00:32:42.840 And, uh, like I said, I haven't followed the case very closely, but I know that their original
00:32:49.960 sentence of life without parole was converted to a lighter sentence recently, which would enable a
00:32:55.780 judge to parole them. And they're in California, I think, which will mean that these two guys who
00:33:03.080 executed their own parents could walk free in society. And, uh, you know, there are other
00:33:12.960 aspects of the case. I mean, they're definitely guilty of executing their parents. Nobody disputes
00:33:16.820 that. They don't dispute that. Their claim, I guess, is that the parents were abusive. As far as I'm
00:33:22.100 aware, that has never been proven. What we do know is that they brutally executed two people.
00:33:27.420 And now as, you know, as Fisher King points out, basically because of women who are obsessed with
00:33:34.540 true crime podcasts, they might get to walk free. Even as Derek Chauvin, an actually innocent man
00:33:42.380 rots behind bars. Uh, like who would you rather live next to? Two psychopaths who shot their parents in
00:33:52.940 the face or Derek Chauvin? Who would you be more worried might like break into your house in the
00:34:00.180 middle of the night and butcher you while you're sleeping? Is that, would anyone be concerned that
00:34:04.580 Derek Chauvin, like would anyone be worried? If Derek Chauvin was living next to you, would you have
00:34:07.600 any, would you be worried at all? Would you have any concern that Derek Chauvin is a threat to you?
00:34:13.340 Of course not. Um, sadistic murderers who killed their own parents. Uh, yeah, I don't want to be
00:34:21.120 anywhere, anywhere around those people. I know it's like, who would want to be around them?
00:34:26.640 And, but this is how it usually goes. You know, you got these, you look at these organizations
00:34:31.300 like the Innocence Project or whatever, and, and often taking up the case, taking up the cases of
00:34:37.760 people who very often clearly are not actually innocent, or it's, it's not clear at all that
00:34:44.040 they are innocent. Working to free the kinds of people into society who none of us would ever want
00:34:50.460 to be around. And maybe there were some procedural things that went wrong in the trial. Maybe this
00:34:55.780 or that happened, but it's like, yeah, they're still definitely guilty though. And yet we work to
00:35:02.160 set those kinds of people free. Nobody would want to be around them, right? You wouldn't want to be
00:35:06.960 like alone or an elevator with any of these kinds of people. And then you have people like Derek Chauvin
00:35:12.340 who you would feel perfectly safe with him in your community. And he's, uh, he's still rotting behind
00:35:18.360 bars. So maybe this is what we need. Maybe, maybe there needs to be, uh, I mean, I'm sure there
00:35:24.260 already have been plenty of podcasts and stuff about, of course there have been about Derek Chauvin,
00:35:30.080 but like we need a, I don't know. We need a, we need a true crime podcast specifically targeting
00:35:36.880 women, like middle-aged women, uh, about Derek Chauvin. And that would, we'll probably, that,
00:35:44.120 that's what tips it over the edge. Once the women start listening to a true crime podcast about a
00:35:49.920 trial and they get into it, then those are the people who end up getting set free. So
00:35:56.520 I don't know. What do you, what do you got to do? What do you got to do to get, what's the,
00:36:02.800 what's the secret sauce here? There, there are certain murder trials that women become very obsessed
00:36:09.160 with and then others that they have no interest in at all. And I, what exactly is the, I mean,
00:36:17.540 there's the obvious thing. Is it like, well, if the, if they think that the, uh, that the accused
00:36:22.000 is attractive, I mean, that might be part of it. I don't think that's the entire thing though.
00:36:26.480 There's something else deeply psychological going on that I haven't quite figured out, but
00:36:29.340 that will be Chauvin's salvation. I think is if, uh, if the soccer moms of America can be mobilized
00:36:40.220 to take up his cause because they saw an HBO documentary or a true crime podcast about it.
00:36:46.420 All right. I've been meaning to play this clip. This gets a little bit graphic. So
00:36:50.600 if you have kids around, you can skip this segment. It's another clip from that YouTube series
00:36:55.400 surrounded. And in this one, uh, the guy being surrounded is, I guess, some kind of LGBT
00:37:01.520 activist. And here he is trying to defend the claim that so-called anti-LGBT policies are anti-Christian.
00:37:10.780 So the specific claim that he's making is that Christianity embraces homosexuality.
00:37:16.400 He's attempting to make a religious argument and allegedly Christian argument for the homosexual
00:37:21.020 lifestyle. And here is, uh, Sarah Stock, who we've seen before on this show, making the counter
00:37:26.240 argument. Uh, let's watch a little bit of that. So I'm assuming from everything you're telling me
00:37:32.200 that you think that God is okay with you practicing sodomy with other men. I am saying that God always
00:37:37.520 acts in accordance with love and the sodomy that was written about in the Bible has nothing to do
00:37:40.980 with loving queer and trans relationships because there was no frame of reference for the phrases who
00:37:45.160 created it. Man is imperfect. God's word is perfect. God would support queer and trans existence.
00:37:49.520 Do you want to talk about why it's also anti-American? You don't think that
00:37:52.500 sodomy existed 2000 years ago? I do think it existed 2000 years ago. And the way that it was
00:37:58.220 written about in the Bible was about hateful, unconsensual, pedophilic, ritualistic acts of
00:38:03.960 sodomy. There have been healthy queer and trans relationships all throughout the history and they
00:38:07.340 were not included in the Bible the same way women's rights were not included in the Bible. God did not
00:38:11.960 intend us to treat that like a law that we never move on from. He entreated us to use it like a way to
00:38:16.520 learn love and practice it better. It is not an instruction manual. It is one tool that we can
00:38:21.160 use to live our lives. But to clarify, so you do think that God is okay with you having sex with
00:38:25.920 other men? Yes. Okay. So I think that your definition of love is basically what feels good
00:38:32.240 for you and also being nice to other people. I think love is more complicated than that. For
00:38:37.600 example, you can have a sexual relationship with someone that you might not love, whereas love is a
00:38:41.160 deeper emotion of care. Okay. But basically it's just like this like fluffy feeling of like, oh,
00:38:46.340 like I like you, I'm treating you well, whatever. I think that love is willing the good of another
00:38:50.960 person. Love is a hard action. So you can, you can have consensual sex with someone and that's not
00:38:56.260 loving them because participating in homosexual acts is inherently not loving because it's damaging.
00:39:02.240 They're not inherently damaging. It violates natural law. It doesn't violate natural law.
00:39:05.680 There are over 1000 species that are proven to have queer relationships.
00:39:11.340 Okay. So the old, uh, the old animals do it so we can do it too. Canard, which I always find
00:39:16.740 hilarious because that's the worst. I mean, animals do a lot of stuff that we shouldn't do.
00:39:24.300 And it's funny how often this comes up in these arguments. Um, and the, the gay rights,
00:39:28.840 the gay rights people like they, they think this is a great argument. They love this argument.
00:39:32.220 They say it, it, it, you have any argument with a gay rights activist and within two minutes,
00:39:38.260 I think we got in under two minutes on that one. Within two minutes, they're going to bring up
00:39:41.840 the animal kingdom. Did you know there's homosexuality in the animal kingdom?
00:39:47.360 Okay. What do you, so because animals do it, that in and of itself shows that it's okay to do it.
00:39:52.720 Animals do, animals eat their own young. Okay. Animals, uh, uh, cannibalize each other.
00:39:59.280 Black widow spider mates with the male and then eats the male.
00:40:06.420 Okay. Should we be doing that? I mean, yeah, a lot of feminists might like that plan, but, uh,
00:40:10.040 but there's a species of wasp that lays its eggs inside of a caterpillar. And then when the eggs hatch,
00:40:18.480 the bait, the little baby wasps eat the caterpillar alive from the inside. Is it, should we,
00:40:24.780 I don't know, should we somehow find a way to adopt that strategy for, you know, that's natural in the,
00:40:31.440 in the animal kingdom? So the point is that the animal kingdom is full of just savagery and
00:40:38.580 brutality. It's, it's, it's a, the animal kingdom is just a, and I love nature documentaries as much
00:40:44.180 as the next guy, but, uh, it is a brutal place. Um, and so I, I don't know that I'd be taking my cues
00:40:53.200 from that. Yeah. You know, like a, a, a human family, a human nuclear family is distinct,
00:41:06.200 uh, uh, among life forms on the planet. It is in a sense, unnatural in a sense.
00:41:16.720 And I say unnatural only in the sense that in the way that it's often used, like when, when people
00:41:23.860 say, Oh, this is natural. What they mean is like, it's, it's base. It's like a based,
00:41:28.360 based kind of bestial instinct. And, and that's what is meant by natural a lot of the time.
00:41:36.200 Uh, the nuclear family monogamy, these are unnatural, not in the sense of being lower
00:41:44.400 than nature, but in transcending our animal nature. It is unnatural in a transcendent sense.
00:41:52.680 It is unnatural in that it is higher. It is better. It is bigger than what you find in nature.
00:42:00.220 Because yes, in the animal kingdom, you're not going to find anything like now you might find it's,
00:42:05.020 it's rare, but there are some species where they have, where they, uh, where they pair up for life
00:42:10.220 where they make mating for life is a, is a thing. And that's very rare. And what you're not going to
00:42:17.560 find is like mating for life and then raising the baby animal for years and years and years. And like
00:42:27.620 they, they, they all live together for years and years and years and years, um, that you just don't
00:42:33.380 find, uh, in the, in the, uh, in the animal kingdom because this is, because we're not modeling our
00:42:40.940 society. We're not moderate modeling human society off of what alligators do. Okay. We're not looking
00:42:47.980 at alligators. We're not looking at monkeys. We're not looking at what the, a tree squirrel does and said,
00:42:54.700 and saying, well, let's model our society over that by that we are, we are modeling our society.
00:43:00.020 Our society is grounded in something that is, that transcends, that is transcendent beyond nature.
00:43:05.380 So, um, so that's all ridiculous. And, and then we get to the kind of, uh, the, the, the biblical,
00:43:15.640 uh, such as it is the biblical argument, which is that Christianity somehow condones the homosexual
00:43:22.400 lifestyle. And this is what they do. If you're wondering how anyone could possibly be a pro-gay,
00:43:29.280 pro-LGBT Christian, this is how they square that circle. I mean, there's no disputing what the Bible
00:43:36.540 says about homosexuality. Obviously there are many passages in the old Testament and, and, and there
00:43:42.980 are multiple messages, passages in the new Testament, like the first chapter of Romans, which describes the
00:43:47.480 homosexual act as shameful and dishonorable and debased. That's what the Bible says.
00:43:55.500 Right. And he's bringing up the Bible. So you can't, you can't say, oh, who cares what the Bible
00:44:01.580 says? That's the argument. That's the argument he's making. So he cares about what the Bible says
00:44:06.900 allegedly. So let's talk about what it says. So the first chapter of Romans says that homosexual
00:44:13.320 act is shameful, dishonorable, and debased. It's hard to be more explicit than that.
00:44:19.760 And perhaps even more clear, even more explicit is the fact that the Bible comes right out of the
00:44:23.900 gate in Genesis, describing what a, what a man is supposed to do. And, uh, and it's this to remind
00:44:31.780 you, a man shall leave his father's mother and hold fast to his wife and the two shall become one,
00:44:35.760 one flesh. Again, that's, that's not really a natural setup. That is a, a supernatural setup.
00:44:45.300 I think is the framing is the best way to frame it. It's not natural. It's supernatural. That is a
00:44:50.480 supernatural. The two become one flesh. That doesn't happen in the animal kingdom. Um, so anyway,
00:44:58.240 but it's right there. So what are you going to do about this? If you're an LGBT activist? Well,
00:45:04.060 one thing you could do is just say, well, Christianity is false. It's an ignorant,
00:45:08.240 ancient, you know, bigoted religion. And I reject it totally. You could say that. I think that's
00:45:14.620 wrong. I think that's tragically terribly wrong, but that's one way of dealing with the very clear
00:45:19.840 biblical edicts, both condemning the homosexual lifestyle and prescribing monogamous heterosexual
00:45:25.400 marriage as the correct and healthy form. And, uh, and, and plenty of LGBT activists will just say
00:45:31.340 that. They'll say, well, I don't care what the Bible says. I'm not, you know, it's the Bible's
00:45:34.540 false. But then you've got guys like this who want to cling to the Christian label. They, and these
00:45:39.760 guys are much, much greater threats because they're trying to subvert Christianity from the inside.
00:45:45.040 The guys on the outside, basically the, the Reddit atheists talking about how we believe in a
00:45:50.920 magical sky daddy or whatever they say, they're not much of a threat. Uh, nobody takes them seriously.
00:45:56.680 The greater threat is this. These people who claim to be Christian while holding to a moral
00:46:01.340 framework that is completely anti-Christian. And how do they do it? Well, they do it by just simply
00:46:07.300 declaring that the words in the Bible mean something other than what the words actually mean.
00:46:13.160 So he just states as fact that anytime homosexuality is condemned in the Bible, which it is frequently,
00:46:20.100 it's really condemning rape and pedophilia, which is an interesting argument, right? Like
00:46:26.360 so you're saying that the Bible uses homosexuality as a catch-all term for rape and pedophilia.
00:46:35.080 I'm not sure that really helps your case, but this is what they do. The LGBT activists who
00:46:39.420 pretend to be Christian, this is what they do. Oh, no, no, no, it's no, it's totally fine. Because
00:46:44.120 whenever the Bible talks about gay people or homosexuality, what they really just mean,
00:46:47.520 that's just a word that means sexual violence. Oh, really? Well, have you thought about that?
00:46:58.200 That's interesting, isn't it? Um, and anyway, it's not true. Homosexuality in the Bible meant back
00:47:05.740 then what it means now. Okay. Men having relations with other men. In fact, even that is explained in
00:47:13.280 Romans, as I mentioned, St. Paul says that there are men having relations with men and this is
00:47:17.540 debased and wrong. It can't get more clear than that. So it's not even just saying, oh, homosexuality
00:47:25.120 is, and then you can go, well, what, what did he mean by homosexuality? I wonder what that means.
00:47:30.460 No, he actually says, no, there are, there are men who are having relations with men. That is wrong.
00:47:36.000 Don't do that. It's right there. I mean, it's, it's plain text. Um, but what we get from guys like
00:47:46.120 this is they say, well, yeah, well, Paul says that, but what he really meant to say, I'll tell you what
00:47:53.060 he really meant to say. And if you ask them, well, how do you, where do you, what are you basing that
00:47:58.540 on? What do you mean what he really meant to say? Well, these guys, they treat the Bible like it's
00:48:04.760 some sort of obscure hieroglyphic that they have to translate and not translate. Like we translate
00:48:10.200 a foreign language in English, obviously all of our Bibles. And if we're speak English are
00:48:14.780 translated that way. Um, but no, they translate it like, you know, if you go to some, uh, con artist
00:48:25.760 psychic and you tell her about your dreams and she starts interpreting your dreams for you,
00:48:31.680 you know, and says, Oh, well, a tiger appeared in your dream. And so that means that you're worried
00:48:37.860 that you're going to lose your job or whatever. That's how they treat it. And now there are parts
00:48:44.540 of the Bible that are, that are, that are dreamlike, you know, that are visions and dreams of the
00:48:51.300 apocalyptic literature, revelation and so on. But because the Bible, you know, the Bible is not one
00:48:58.000 book. We call the Bible, a book, but it's, it's not one book as any, anyone who's read the Bible
00:49:04.480 knows. Uh, it's a collection of books and all these different books are doing different things.
00:49:10.120 It's different styles of literature. It's different styles of writing. And they're trying to do
00:49:14.960 different things. It's not, it's not, it's not like one thing. Um, and so you have books, I mean,
00:49:21.740 you have the Psalms, you have poetry, you have all these things, but much of the Bible,
00:49:28.180 particularly in the new Testament is written to be very plain and very clear because you have to
00:49:34.920 look again at what, okay, whatever part of the Bible you're reading, what was the author of this,
00:49:40.720 this portion that I'm reading? What was the author trying to do? What was the point of this?
00:49:46.460 Well, the epistles of Paul are letters that he wrote to various churches
00:49:52.600 and they're, they're meant to be clear as day. He's directly addressing and dealing with, uh,
00:49:59.660 the issues that the communities were facing and some, and often like deep moral theological issues,
00:50:05.120 sometimes more practical day-to-day issues, but that's all it was. It was, he was writing letters.
00:50:09.680 It wasn't meant to be, it was meant to be clearly understood based on the language that was used
00:50:15.940 to deal with these like problems that they were experiencing in their communities.
00:50:21.660 Um, so, but these, these LGBT activists and so-called left, these, these leftists who are
00:50:29.040 so-called Christians, but not real Christians, these subversives, uh, in the church, they look at even
00:50:36.120 stuff like that. They look at the epistles, they look at the, um, the, the, the plain words of the text,
00:50:43.180 the plain words of Christ in the gospels. And they treat even that stuff like it's, well,
00:50:50.400 I know this is the word that's used, but here's what, and they, and they state it.
00:50:58.160 It's not even an argument, it's just an assertion. And you saw in that clip very confidently, he says,
00:51:02.940 well, yeah, but it meant this. Really? How do you know that? Where'd you hear that?
00:51:11.080 Oh no, you heard it because another like subversive left-wing LGBT gay, uh, so-called theologian or
00:51:18.180 whatever told you that's, that's why you know it. You read it in a book that was, that was written
00:51:23.520 three years ago. So they, uh, have no case, just to summarize. As Doge continues to surgically cut
00:51:32.380 the fat from decades of bloated government spending and corruption, Pure Talk, the cell phone company
00:51:36.860 I use for business, is cutting the fat from the wireless industry. That's right. Pure Talk says,
00:51:41.640 I don't think so, to $100 a month cell phone plans. That's just wasteful and irresponsible. Instead,
00:51:47.040 they're offering America's most dependable 5G network at America's most sensible prices.
00:51:51.040 Listen to this unlimited talk, text, and 15 gigs of data plus mobile hotspot for just 35 bucks a
00:51:57.300 month. And the best part right now, you'll get a free one-year membership to Daily Wire Plus.
00:52:02.140 And with Pure Talk's U.S. customer service team, you can switch hassle-free in as little as 10 minutes.
00:52:06.460 You don't need Doge to cut the fat from your wireless bill. You need Pure Talk. In uncertain economic
00:52:11.060 times, everyone can use a little extra savings in their day-to-day. And Pure Talk helps you do just
00:52:16.520 that. Go to puretalk.com slash Walsh. Switch to Pure Talk at puretalk.com slash Walsh.
00:52:20.560 And get a year of Daily Wire Plus for free with a qualifying plan. Pure Talk. Wireless by Americans
00:52:25.800 for Americans. If it feels like the country's on the knife's edge, well, you're right. Daily Wire Plus
00:52:30.200 is where the counterpunch is landing. Unfiltered, ad-free shows every day. Investigations that shake
00:52:35.280 up the system. Films and docs that they don't want you to see. This isn't just commentary. It's a
00:52:39.700 cultural offensive. Be a part of it. Go to dailywire.com slash subscribe right now. Now let's get to our
00:52:45.680 daily cancellation. On January 3rd, 2019, something unthinkable happened at Jeff Bezos's newsletter,
00:52:57.600 which is formerly known as the Washington Post. At the time, the paper was furiously obsessing over
00:53:01.580 every detail of the Russiagate hoax. But amid all the chaos and the P-tape stuff, one man managed to
00:53:07.420 write a worthwhile opinion piece for the Washington Post. And it was a bit like Monet somehow managing
00:53:12.460 to create a decent painting, even though he was pretty much blind. The piece I'm talking about
00:53:16.240 was written by a guy named Sonny Bunch. And here was the headline. Environmentalists make good movie
00:53:20.800 villains because they want to make your real life worse. And the op-ed goes through a number of
00:53:25.760 examples from Thanos, Thanos, Thanos, right? In Avengers Affinity War to King Orm in Aquaman to Samuel
00:53:33.140 Jackson's character in The Kingsman. All movies that I have not seen. And in all these cases,
00:53:39.160 apparently, the villain is motivated by some strain of environmentalism. The Aquaman villain guy was
00:53:45.160 angry about trash being dumped in the water, apparently. Now, admittedly, we're not talking
00:53:50.840 about groundbreaking journalism, but by the Washington Post standards, this is profoundly
00:53:55.320 insightful stuff. And I was reminded of this article recently when I saw this headline from Axios the
00:54:00.220 other day. Quote, EPA administrator targets stop-start vehicle tech. Everyone hates it. The article
00:54:06.900 explains, quote, Trump administration is targeting climate technology that automatically turns a
00:54:10.700 vehicle's engine off when it's stopped to save fuel. Stop-start technology has become a common
00:54:15.560 feature in new vehicles as a way to save a few bucks on gas and reduce emissions. Advocates like
00:54:20.320 it because it helps combat climate change, but critics find it irritating. The article quotes EPA
00:54:25.260 administrator Lee Zeldin as saying, quote, stop-start technology where your car dies at every red light
00:54:29.640 so companies get a climate participation trophy. EPA approved it and everyone hates it, so we're fixing
00:54:34.040 it. Now, currently, the EPA incentivizes automakers to implement stop-start technology by providing
00:54:39.720 them with fuel economy credits. As of 2023, more than 65% of vehicles are equipped with this system,
00:54:46.500 so there's a good chance that unless you're driving an electric car or hybrid, your car has some kind of
00:54:51.120 start-stop functionality. And if that's the case, you should disable it immediately if your car allows
00:54:58.800 you to do so. And in practice, if you don't turn it off or if you can't, the start-stop feature works by
00:55:05.700 shutting down your engine when you come to a stop for any length of time, like at a red light. And for those
00:55:10.560 of us who can't turn this feature off, this is a source of, like, constant unnecessary annoyance.
00:55:16.200 Generally, it means that your air conditioning shuts off as well or doesn't work as well. And it means you're going
00:55:20.640 to accelerate more slowly from a stop. And supposedly, this is all worth it because it cuts down on
00:55:25.580 greenhouse emissions, and therefore, it stops the weather from changing. And as an added bonus,
00:55:31.220 it'll potentially save you a couple of dollars when you fill up your tank, supposedly.
00:55:36.220 Now, in reality, of course, the start-stop feature, it turns out, does not change the weather or prevent
00:55:43.840 hurricanes. And we know that because reports indicate anyway that hurricanes still exist. And it seems that
00:55:50.040 the weather is still changing. And additionally, to the extent that it's saving you a few dollars on fuel
00:55:54.360 costs, it's dramatically increasing the wear and tear on your engine and your battery. And replacing those
00:56:00.280 components is a lot more expensive than spending a few extra dollars at the gas pump. An account called Honest
00:56:05.060 Mechanic Colorado broke down some of the issues involved in this system. Watch.
00:56:09.920 Number one, oil pressure issues. Think about this for a second. Every time your engine starts up, there's a brief
00:56:16.140 moment where oil pressure hasn't fully built up. In a normal car, this happens maybe once or twice a day.
00:56:22.260 But with start-stop, we're talking dozens of times in a single commute. That adds up, especially on turbo
00:56:28.200 engines where that hot oil is crucial for cooling. Number two, battery and starter problems. Yes, these
00:56:34.440 cars use special AGM batteries and heavy-duty starters. But guess what? Those parts cost way more to
00:56:40.140 replace. I'm talking two times more than regular parts. And trust me, they don't last three times longer.
00:56:46.520 Now, it's a worthwhile video because it goes through all the different ways that the geniuses
00:56:51.640 in the federal bureaucracy decided that technology should be made worse. And so it's worthwhile in
00:57:00.920 that sense. But you don't really need it. Common sense tells you that it can't be good for a car's
00:57:04.580 engine to increase the number of times it's turned off and on by like, what, 500% or more? That's
00:57:10.820 exactly what the start-stop system does. It introduces a huge amount of completely unnecessary
00:57:14.440 wear and tear on a system that was not designed for it. There's also a safety problem here.
00:57:18.860 The stop-start thing means that when you accelerate from a stop, there's a brief delay as the engine
00:57:24.500 revs up again. And the delay may only be one second. But if you're making a left turn onto a busy road,
00:57:29.160 for example, a second could be the difference between getting T-boned or not. And none of this
00:57:35.000 is new. The people who created the systems like this all the way back in the 1970s understood that
00:57:38.380 it would cause problems for people's cars. But they did it anyway because the country was
00:57:42.140 experiencing a massive fuel shortage at the time. The Arabs implemented an oil embargo,
00:57:46.180 which meant that gas stations saw long lines and fuel prices quadrupled. So this was pitched as a
00:57:50.280 way to conserve gas, not as a way to save the planet. The saving the planet stuff is the new branding.
00:57:55.860 And only people who have never driven a car in their lives and who don't understand how cars work
00:58:00.060 would think that this is a good pitch. And in that sense, the start-stop debacle is the perfect
00:58:06.780 expression of environmental activism. Because it promises to save the planet, when in reality,
00:58:12.420 it serves only one purpose, which is to make your life a little bit worse. Now, granted,
00:58:17.560 it makes your life worse in a comparatively small way. But that's not the point. The point is that it's
00:58:22.740 totally unnecessary. Your car engine is being destroyed more quickly, and you're sitting at a
00:58:28.800 stoplight without AC for no reason. The old system worked fine. They changed it, increasing a daily
00:58:36.120 annoyance in your life for no reason. And this is what environmentalism has become. Just finding,
00:58:42.760 it's what it always has been. Finding little ways, one after another, to take things that worked fine
00:58:49.400 and to make them worse than they were before, totally arbitrarily. And the way they play the game is
00:58:56.360 that you can never complain about any of it because all of it individually is so small
00:59:00.260 that if you complain about it, then they can always go, what are you freaking out about? It's
00:59:03.900 this little thing. Yeah, but why? It's a little thing, but why did you do it? There was no reason
00:59:09.580 for it. And we've seen a lot of efforts like this, from the attempts to ban gas stoves, to banning
00:59:15.200 disposable plastic bags, the crusade against plastic straws. In the case of plastic straws that we
00:59:19.380 previously discussed, a nine-year-old boy came up with data basically out of his own imagination,
00:59:24.660 suggesting that these straws are somehow a major threat to civilization, and everyone just went
00:59:28.840 with it. The next thing you know, you're drinking out of a paper straw that dissolves inside the
00:59:32.860 drink. A small thing. It's like the smallest thing, but why? Why can't I just use the straws
00:59:41.460 that actually work? Those were fine, but they made the change and introduced another little annoyance
00:59:47.580 into your life for no reason. It would be like if, imagine if one day the powers that be decided
00:59:53.640 that every chair manufacturer in America has to make chairs that have one leg slightly shorter
01:00:00.740 than the others. And imagine that the reason for this policy is something totally fantastical and
01:00:05.740 just made up. Maybe they determined that sitting on a wobbly chair helps to ward off evil invisible
01:00:11.140 fairies or something. I don't know. Now imagine that as a result, every chair you sit in is a little
01:00:18.020 bit wobbly. Now it's true that a wobbly chair is not a major crisis. It's not a huge problem in the
01:00:23.660 grand scheme. If anyone asked you about the greatest struggles in your life and you said that wobbly
01:00:28.840 chairs are at the top of the list, they would conclude rightly that you are the most pampered
01:00:32.580 human who's ever existed. But even so, it would be extremely annoying and it would make your life a
01:00:38.000 little bit worse if every chair was wobbly. And the fact that this was being done on purpose
01:00:43.620 for some totally superstitious, insane reason only makes the annoyance exponentially greater.
01:00:52.540 And that's what it is with these changes made to save the climate. They are very often small
01:00:58.800 annoyances being imposed on us for insane and superstitious reasons. And that just makes it worse.
01:01:06.380 And there are dozens of examples of this. Another one is the effort to ban incandescent lights,
01:01:10.220 for example, which doesn't get a lot of attention. And here's what streets used to look like on the
01:01:15.660 left before environmentalists decided that incandescent lights are going to destroy the
01:01:19.840 planet in 12 years. And that was a lot more than 12 years ago. Planets, well, maybe that's why the
01:01:25.760 planet wasn't destroyed because they made the change. And because environmentalists stepped in and
01:01:30.260 saved all of civilization, now pretty much every city block in the country looks like the photo on
01:01:35.260 the right. We're now treated to this kind of fluorescent looking office space aesthetic
01:01:39.220 everywhere we go. City streets used to have kind of like a cool moody feel to them. Now everything
01:01:43.920 looks like a hospital hallway. And when you confront environmentalists about this, they will say that
01:01:49.140 LED lights can actually display any kind of color and that it's absurd to want light that's less bright.
01:01:53.540 And the picture on the right looks better anyway. But the left is much warmer. It has more character
01:01:58.540 and a lot of people liked it. So why do we have to change it everywhere? Walk down the street on the left
01:02:02.960 and you might be inspired to become the next Edgar Allan Poe. It's contemplative and distinct.
01:02:07.860 And walk down the street on the right and you'll feel a little like Bill Lumberg wondering where the
01:02:12.240 TPS reports are. There's really no comparison. Now, is the Trump administration going to fix
01:02:15.820 streetlights next? We can only hope. But for now, they have done the nation a great service by moving
01:02:21.040 to end the absurdity of these start-stop systems in automobiles. And we should end all of the little
01:02:28.180 revisions that environmentalists have made to our lives against our will. They are small things on
01:02:35.320 their own, but together they make our lives a little bit worse for no reason. And also, as a matter of
01:02:41.400 principle, environmentalists should just simply never get their way about anything ever. And that
01:02:46.160 is why the inventor of start-stop technology, along with every other environmentalist who wants to make
01:02:50.420 our lives worse, are today canceled. That'll do it for the show today. Thanks for watching. Thanks
01:02:55.740 for listening. Talk to you tomorrow. Have a great day. Godspeed.