Ep. 16 - Feminists Hate Men But They Also Want To Be Men
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
173.3179
Summary
Jay Feeley's photo of his daughter and her prom date goes viral, and the reaction to it is nothing short of hysterical. But is there anything to be outraged about here? And why is there so much anger directed at a former NFL kicker?
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Hello, everybody. As you can see, a different studio today. This is our other car or the big
00:00:07.620
car, as our kids call it. Or as my wife, my wife says that it's her car because it has all the car
00:00:13.700
seats in it. And so she's the one driving it around for most of the day. But I strenuously
00:00:18.260
object to that description of it. Anyway, over the course of this past weekend, some controversy
00:00:26.400
erupted. And you know it's a big deal when there's controversy. I mean, in our society,
00:00:34.980
if there's controversy, you know something serious has happened because it's controversy is so rare
00:00:39.740
these days, right? It's like there's hardly ever anything that people are outraged about. So if
00:00:44.860
they're getting outraged, you know that it can't be frivolous, right? So in this case, the outrage,
00:00:51.060
the anger, the hurt, the heartbreak, the sadness was directed at former NFL kicker Jay Feeley.
00:01:00.080
And you see Jay Feeley posted a photo on Twitter. This is a former NFL kicker who posted a photo on
00:01:07.560
Twitter. So we know, as I said, we know it's serious business. And the photo depicted him
00:01:13.440
posing with his daughter and her prom date. And Feeley has his arm around his daughter,
00:01:19.440
kind of protective, in this sort of protective way. And then his other hand is holding a gun.
00:01:26.500
A gun. A shooty thing. Okay. A shooty, shooty, dangerous thing. And so this is a classic dad joke.
00:01:34.180
I mean, this is, it's even cliche. And it's a dad joke that 10 years ago, nobody would have noticed
00:01:40.480
or really cared. Maybe a few people would have laughed. Most people would have rolled their eyes
00:01:44.420
because that, as a dad, I know that that's the, really the appropriate response to a dad joke is
00:01:49.580
just to roll your eyes and move on. But this is not 10 years ago. This is 2018. And so in 2018,
00:01:57.140
the photo went viral with thousands of people expressing their righteous indignation
00:02:03.560
at this terrible, awful, offensive photo. Now, before I go any further, I need to stipulate that
00:02:11.060
when I talk about, when I say people were outraged and they were angry, just keep in mind that there
00:02:15.880
are really, there are quotes around that. There are sarcastic air quotes around outrage and anger,
00:02:21.380
because as I've said before, the main thing about the collective outrage that goes on is that there's
00:02:28.400
very little authentic outrage in it. I mean, I don't think anyone really actually cared that much
00:02:37.580
about what Jay Feely posted. Most of the things, when we get this, this huge outrage, everyone's so
00:02:43.420
angry. Most of the people who are outraged and angry, they are not really outraged or angry. What
00:02:50.000
they're doing is they're just, they're just seizing on this opportunity to make a point and to destroy
00:02:56.120
somebody. And we know that that's not, that's, that's, uh, that's been going on since the dawn of
00:03:00.800
time. What makes it different now is that it used to be, you know, if you were a politician or a
00:03:07.040
political figure of some kind and you said anything at all, then yeah, you're going to have people from
00:03:12.020
the other side who tried to take your words and use it against you to try to win. Right. Um, and I
00:03:18.040
think that used to mainly be reserved for people like that, people who are in controversial jobs
00:03:23.820
or jobs that inherently involved controversy. But now what we find is that anybody at all, it's just
00:03:30.020
any, any old average person, doesn't matter what you do for a living, doesn't matter who you are,
00:03:34.700
it doesn't matter what side you fall on. It doesn't matter if you're completely apolitical,
00:03:39.840
anything, just just anyone at all. If you put something out there publicly, people will seize
00:03:46.100
on it and try to destroy you to the point where even an NFL kicker, he's just a retired NFL kicker.
00:03:53.000
I mean, even if what he did was terribly, you know, even if that photo really was legitimately awful,
00:03:59.620
which of course it isn't, but even if it was, who cares? It's just an NFL kicker. What does it
00:04:05.180
matter? I mean, what, what, why would anyone care what he posts? Just let him be just letting just
00:04:10.080
whatever. So he's got to, who cares? There's what, what are you hoping to win or accomplished by taking
00:04:15.820
this and making a thing out of it? So the anger is, uh, is, is not really authentic, but be that as it
00:04:23.040
may, we will deal with it anyway. So this fake anger seems to be based on two things. One,
00:04:28.440
they say that he's making light of gun violence and it's dangerous to have a gun out like that.
00:04:37.960
They said, because I saw a lot of people say, if that was my son, I would be so, I would, I would
00:04:43.320
be so angry that he put them in harm's way with that gun because these people think that a gun
00:04:49.460
through some mysterious gravitational force could actually load itself and then point itself and,
00:04:55.360
and, and, uh, and pull its own trigger. That's what they think could happen.
00:04:59.760
But in reality, the gun was, did not pose a threat to anybody because it wasn't loaded and
00:05:05.880
he had it pointed down and he didn't even have his finger on the trigger. So really that, that gun
00:05:10.960
posed as much of a threat to the people in that photograph as there would have been a threat if
00:05:16.040
he was holding like a pancake or something. It just, it posed zero threat whatsoever. But the other
00:05:20.720
source of outrage is, uh, the one that I want to focus on. Plenty of feminists were scandalized or
00:05:29.880
pretended to be scandalized because as they put it, Feely was treating his daughter as property
00:05:37.000
and how dare he? Um, just as one example, feminist Lauren Duca or Dusa, I don't know how to pronounce
00:05:43.120
her name, but she's got a lot of Twitter followers and, uh, which means she's important by the way.
00:05:48.700
So the, um, she said that the photo was a violent reminder that Feely considers his daughter to be
00:05:54.740
his property. Now, first of all, Jay Feely did, well, he didn't quite apologize, but he did post
00:06:00.260
something clarifying the tweet and explaining it, which I wish he hadn't even done that much because
00:06:05.840
it required no explanation and it required no clarification. And anybody who was offended by
00:06:10.560
it, their feelings do not matter at all in this case. But I understand why he did, because like I
00:06:16.300
said, he's just, he's not a political figure. He's not, he's not like a pal or even someone like me,
00:06:22.360
where I know that everything I say, there are going to be people who try to take it and, and, uh,
00:06:26.880
and I'm going to get hate mail and everything. I, so I know that I know that's what I do for a living.
00:06:30.620
So I understand that, but Jay Feely, that's not what he's, he wasn't, that's not what he's looking
00:06:35.620
for. He just thought he was posting a funny picture. It turned into a whole thing. So he's like,
00:06:39.620
fine. I'll just post something clarifying. And what he said was, um, the prom picture I posted
00:06:45.260
was obviously intended to be a joke. My daughter has dated her boyfriend for over a year and they
00:06:49.300
knew I was joking. I take gun safety seriously. The gun was not loaded and had no clip in it.
00:06:53.940
And I did not intend to be sensitive to be insensitive to that important issue.
00:06:58.720
So this is where we are now as a society where a guy has to explain that a picture of himself
00:07:04.180
holding a gun in a prom picture with his daughter and her boyfriend is a joke. He has to explain that.
00:07:09.620
To all of these people that again, already know, they know that he's joking, which is the main
00:07:15.760
reason why I think there shouldn't be an explanation. But putting all that aside, I think
00:07:20.500
what we really see here more than an attack on guns, we see an attack on the role of fathers
00:07:27.760
because it's a, it's a father's job to protect and defend his family. And he ought to be protective
00:07:35.140
of his daughter. He ought to be protective of her dignity and protective of her, of her innocence.
00:07:39.620
Obviously Feeley's photo was a deliberately cartoonish, exaggerated, humorous depiction
00:07:45.980
of that role. It wasn't supposed to be serious. But what we see is that feminists are mad or
00:07:52.060
pretending to be mad about the role itself. They hate the idea that a man would protect
00:07:58.040
his family, especially that he would protect his daughter. They hate that idea. So this again
00:08:03.620
goes back to the piece that I wrote a few weeks ago about the challenges that men face in
00:08:07.420
this culture where a man really can't win because a man who is not there for his family,
00:08:12.180
a man who does not protect his family, does not defend his family, a man who has no problem
00:08:16.220
with his daughter shacking up with any old scumbag, that sort of man is still rightfully
00:08:21.280
derided and shamed in our culture. But a man who does the opposite, the opposite sort of man
00:08:25.960
is also derided and shamed in our culture. So again, men are left saying, well, what do you
00:08:30.600
want me to do? How am I supposed to be? What would make you people happy? Now, I don't
00:08:36.600
ask that because I don't care what makes anyone happy. But a man who is concerned with how society
00:08:42.960
views him is going to be very confused because literally no matter what he does, he's going
00:08:49.660
to hear it. And I'm not just drawing all of this from this one reaction to this picture.
00:08:54.780
Uh, I'm drawing it from the, from society in general, but there are also plenty of other
00:08:59.860
examples. For instance, just look at if you really want to get a headache. Okay. If you,
00:09:05.040
if you, if you feel like having a migraine, here's what I recommend go on Google and type in
00:09:11.060
father, daughter dance, and then just see all the blog posts that pop up talking about how problematic
00:09:19.960
and weird and creepy and old fashioned and patriarchal these father, daughter dances are
00:09:28.060
because this is a good example of how the role of the dad has become this, has become this evil,
00:09:34.680
creepy thing. Here's a bit from an article on a romper.com titled father, daughter dances are
00:09:41.760
anything but innocent. We just read you a couple, a few sentences. The writer says, these aren't sweet.
00:09:47.520
They aren't cute. They're creepy. And they seek to enforce patriarchal notions of femininity.
00:09:53.540
These little girls who are taken out on dates by their fathers are taught that men should do
00:09:57.120
everything for them. Men open the door, men pull out the chair, men buy everything. It's incumbent on
00:10:02.480
the man to ask questions and draw her out. This is 2017 and newsflash. Women don't need men to do
00:10:09.980
things for them. We don't need some big, bad patriarchal figure to hold the door or compliment our inner
00:10:15.360
beauty. We deserve men who are equal partners, who share life's journey with us and who treat us as
00:10:21.280
equals. Uh, daddy daughter dates include an, include an implicit power dynamic and it's not in favor of the
00:10:29.900
girl. Now, uh, I mean, just imagine, okay. Imagine being the sort of person who hears about a man
00:10:43.080
taking his, his, his, his little girl out on the father daughter dance. And the first thing they think is
00:10:48.780
implicit power dynamic or imagine being the sort of person who sees this, you know, funny, nice, cliched photo
00:10:57.280
of Jay Feely and sees it as some kind of patriarchal conspiracy and that he, he thinks he owns his daughter
00:11:04.800
like a slave. I mean, this is what I re I, you know, I, I, I, I honestly, I pity, I really have a lot of pity
00:11:10.820
for these people, for feminists and all these people in our culture because they live in such a miserable
00:11:18.540
world. I can't imagine living in the world that they think we live in. I can't imagine having that
00:11:26.800
mindset. So the question is why, why are so many people so hostile to the idea of a man being a
00:11:37.280
figure of protection or security or authority in the home? And I think there are two reasons.
00:11:44.660
The first reason is pretty simple. We have to remember that many feminists are feminists because
00:11:50.340
they had no father in the home. At least they didn't have a good father. Uh, that's not the case in all
00:11:55.620
for all of them. Of course, it's theoretically possible that a good father could produce a
00:12:00.580
feminist. Very unlikely. Probably if your daughter ends up being a radical feminist, it means that you
00:12:08.400
as a dad screwed up big time, most likely, but I mean, it is, I'm saying it's theoretically possible
00:12:14.020
that you could have a good father because people, you know, human beings make their own choices. And
00:12:18.140
even a woman who's raised right could end up, um, unfortunately going down the path of feminism.
00:12:23.040
So most of them had one way or another absent fathers. And there's this certain kind of childish
00:12:30.720
self-centeredness that's really common in our society where people insist on spreading around
00:12:36.720
their misery and they came from broken homes. So they must attack and hate homes that are not broken.
00:12:44.560
It's envy. And it even goes a little bit beyond envy actually, because a really envious person
00:12:50.960
knows that he doesn't have something. And so he covets the people who do have it.
00:12:58.000
But here though, what we see so often in our society are people who don't have a certain good thing.
00:13:05.080
In this case, an intact family. And so they insist that the thing must not be good.
00:13:10.660
So rather than trying to have what other people have, they say, well, nobody should have it.
00:13:17.640
But second, the reason why people, especially feminists, lash out at men who protect and provide
00:13:26.340
is, is really this. And I've said it before. Feminists, they don't really hate masculinity.
00:13:34.340
I think we have it wrong. We don't really understand the motivations behind modern feminism.
00:13:40.760
And I, and I say it myself, just kind of for lack, just kind of for the sake of argument or just
00:13:45.920
sort of laziness. I'll say, well, feminists hate masculinity because in a sense they do. But
00:13:52.660
I think even deeper than that, they, they actually idolize masculinity.
00:13:58.640
So it's more accurate to say they hate men who are masculine because they themselves want to be
00:14:08.240
masculine. It's masculinity itself is what they idolize. They want to be that. So they say,
00:14:14.520
well, we don't need no man to protect us. This is 2018. We don't need that because they have idolized
00:14:20.920
the ability to protect. They have taken this and decided that, well, this is, everyone should have
00:14:27.780
that ability. Um, they want it for themselves. The kind of physical masculine strength that a man
00:14:35.880
has, they want it. They hate it when men show it because they want it. They have idolized it. They
00:14:43.220
have, they have decided that masculinity is really the height of existence. And that's why you get all
00:14:49.800
these silly movies with the kick butt female action heroes who go around beating up men and everything.
00:14:55.020
Um, and it's just, I, again, it's kind of this silly childish thing that feminists do where they
00:15:01.700
say, well, men have all the action heroes. Now we want some, well, one of the reasons why typically
00:15:06.780
men are the action heroes in movies is because men are the action heroes in real life. And you're
00:15:13.100
simply not going to get a woman who's running around just hand to hand combat, beating up, um,
00:15:19.020
a bunch of strong beefy men. That's just, that's, that's not going to happen in real life. And yeah,
00:15:26.180
it is a movie. So fictional things can happen, but, but generally you want a movie, even an action
00:15:30.980
movie to be grounded in some sense in reality. Um, so that's why typically you don't have as many
00:15:35.940
movies like that, but feminists covet the strength of men. They covet masculinity itself
00:15:44.540
and they want to have it or to use the common phrase. Now they want to appropriate it,
00:15:51.020
which is why if a woman had taken that exact same photo that Jay Feeley took holding the gun and
00:16:00.740
everything, feminists would have celebrated it. They would have said it was the greatest thing ever
00:16:05.660
because they don't hate toxic masculinity. They just hate that men are so much better at being
00:16:14.320
masculine and they think they're in a competition with men. Really in the end, we should stop saying
00:16:22.320
that, that feminists hate masculinity. What they really hate is femininity. That's what they hate.
00:16:29.880
They hate themselves. They don't want to be themselves. They want to be men. And so they
00:16:37.700
hate men who are men because they see it as some kind of personal attack on them. So that's what lies
00:16:47.100
underneath all this, uh, all this controversy, which, as I said, it's not even a real controversy.
00:16:52.000
So maybe I didn't even need to spend 20 minutes explaining it, but I just did. So hope you enjoyed
00:16:57.120
it. Uh, I'll talk to you tomorrow. Have a great day, everybody.