The Matt Walsh Show - Ep. 1645 - Illegal Immigrant Numbers In America Are FAR Worse Than We’ve Been Told

00:00:00.000 Today on the Matt Walsh Show, it's now been revealed that 55 million foreigners have

00:00:03.540 American visas. If we add the illegal immigrants to that total, how many foreign nationals are

00:00:07.680 currently in the country? Does anyone have any idea? We'll discuss. Also, fallout continues

00:00:11.960 over Cracker Barrel Gates. A British journalist says that the inheritance tax should be 100%

00:00:16.640 because your children have no right to inherit your money. The government should inherit all

00:00:20.420 of it, they say. And Disney is now trying to figure out how to attract a male audience after

00:00:23.580 spending two decades intentionally alienating their male audience. All of that and more today

00:00:27.800 on the Matt Walsh Show.

00:00:30.000 Nothing like firing up the grill for the family on a weekend, but I got tired of wondering

00:00:58.260 if the steaks I was cooking were actually what the label claimed. Turns out over 4 billion

00:01:03.540 pounds of imported meat can still be labeled product of the USA. Not exactly what I want

00:01:08.240 on my grill. So I found Good Ranchers. 100% American meat from actual local farms and ranches.

00:01:14.440 But I'm grilling ribeyes for my wife and kids or making burgers for a camping trip. I know

00:01:18.400 exactly where that meat came from, plain and simple. I've been a Good Rancher subscriber for

00:01:23.060 a long time now, several years, and I can tell you the convenience is unbeatable. I get $25 off every

00:01:28.480 order. Free shipping, plus they throw in extras like bacon or Wagyu burgers. Perfect for those

00:01:34.500 spontaneous family cookouts and dinners. And I can tell you also from experience that to me,

00:01:40.640 best thing about Good Ranchers, yes, it's American meat, but it's also just delicious. These are the

00:01:45.280 best cuts of meat that you'll find. Much better than what you'll find at the grocery store.

00:01:48.660 Sure. And best part on top of that, if we're traveling or I'm stocked up, I can pause deliveries

00:01:53.680 anytime. Again, convenience is key. No hassle, no commitment stress. The difference in taste is

00:01:58.900 real. I notice it. My family notices it. There's no substitute for quality when it comes to the meat

00:02:04.660 that you buy. Support American Ranchers and taste the difference for yourself. Visit GoodRanchers.com.

00:02:09.280 Use my code Walsh for $40 off, plus free meat for life. Again, that's Walsh for $40 off and free

00:02:14.940 meat for life. GoodRanchers.com, welcome to the table. Normally when fraudsters are running a scam

00:02:20.700 where they fudge the numbers or cook the books, they make some minimal effort to hide their tracks.

00:02:25.420 Even the guys in office space understood the concept of salami slicing, meaning they took very

00:02:29.980 small amounts from their employer over time, or at least that was the idea. The number one goal of a

00:02:35.180 scam artist, other than making money, is avoiding detection. You have to make the lie, whatever it may be,

00:02:40.140 somewhat believable. For example, a consultant or technician who wants to falsify his timesheet

00:02:45.780 probably wouldn't claim to have worked exactly 6.5 hours every day on the dot for several months.

00:02:51.600 More likely, he'd claim that he worked, say, six hours one day, seven hours the next,

00:02:56.000 and so on. It's more believable that way. That's the bare minimum of effort that you'd expect.

00:03:01.400 So it's been fascinating to see how, in the case of one of the biggest scams in American history,

00:03:05.480 precisely zero effort has been made to maintain the ruse. I'm talking about the lie that precisely

00:03:12.060 11 million illegal aliens, no more, no less, reside in the United States. This is a number 0.70

00:03:18.560 that you hear all the time from both political parties. It's repeated verbatim on every cable

00:03:22.680 news network. But the number has remained unchanged for more than two decades. It is unquestionably,

00:03:28.940 obviously fraudulent. Now, let's run through the history of this estimate. Here's a

00:03:35.380 direct quote from the Pew Research Center 20 years ago. Quote, as of March 2005, the undocumented

00:03:40.820 population has reached nearly 11 million, including more than 6 million Mexicans.

00:03:45.460 OK, here's a PBS news report from 2013, which, of course, is eight years later. Watch.

00:03:52.320 We return to politics now as lawmakers on Capitol Hill begin to discuss ways to address the estimated

00:03:58.060 11 million undocumented immigrants living in the United States.

00:04:02.320 The hearing came two weeks after President Obama laid out his own goals for immigration reform.

00:04:09.460 They include stronger border security, a pathway to citizenship for some 11 million illegal immigrants

00:04:15.840 already here and expedited visas for highly skilled workers from abroad.

00:04:20.900 OK, that was 2013. Four years later, Pew again estimated the number of illegals in this country.

00:04:28.040 And somehow it was still 11 million. Quote, in 2017, there were 10.5 million unauthorized immigrants

00:04:35.200 in the U.S. Three years after that estimate, Joe Biden asserted once again that the magic number

00:04:40.840 was 11 million.

00:04:42.020 I'm going to from day one, we're going to have a fund. I'm going to send to the United States

00:04:49.880 Congress a a an immigration plan to provide a pathway for legalization for 11 million undocumented

00:04:57.860 people.

00:04:59.460 Now, four years after that, Biden's DHS secretary again went on the record saying that there were

00:05:05.780 11 million illegals in the United States when we took office, I believe the accounting was

00:05:15.520 approximately 11.4 million undocumented people in the United States.

00:05:21.360 We don't have an update to that number now, but it's been millions and millions.

00:05:26.900 So this is the one figure that never changes for any reason. Just from a statistical perspective,

00:05:34.380 even if you know absolutely nothing about anything that's happening in this country,

00:05:37.660 this is obviously a scam. I mean, you couldn't possibly keep any massive population that steady

00:05:42.840 for that long in any context. And of course, if you know anything about Democrats open border

00:05:48.640 policies or if you've noticed that entire neighborhoods have transformed in this country,

00:05:52.820 crime has increased, housing has become extremely expensive, then the numbers become

00:05:56.880 even more absurd. So it's a complete farce. It's intended to obscure just how much demographic

00:06:01.940 replacement has actually taken place in this country in the past three decades. And it worked.

00:06:07.500 No one really has any idea how many illegal aliens are in this country. That's by design. 1.00

00:06:13.140 Is it 20 million? Is it 30? Is it 40? Is it 50 million? We don't know. And that's why last night

00:06:20.520 there was a very strong reaction to this story about the Trump administration's latest

00:06:25.660 immigration crackdown. Watch. Also breaking this afternoon, the Trump administration is

00:06:31.420 reviewing the records of more than 55 million visa holders in the U.S. for potential deportation

00:06:37.220 violations. This includes checking for visa overstays, criminal activity, and ties to terrorism.

00:06:43.280 If found ineligible, visas will be revoked and holders may face deportation. The State Department

00:06:48.480 says this is all part of their continuous vetting process to ensure safety and compliance.

00:06:53.140 So the lead is a little buried there. So I'll say it again. There are 55 million

00:06:58.900 visa holders in the United States, according to the Trump administration.

00:07:03.300 That is more than the entire population of the state of California combined with the population of

00:07:08.360 New York City. It's a number so high that it seems like it can't possibly be correct. But even if you

00:07:14.460 account for the possibility of this number includes, say, tourist visas, including people living abroad

00:07:19.300 right now, as well as people visiting their family in this country, even if that's it, the number is still

00:07:26.740 far, far too high. There is no justifiable reason whatsoever for 55 million people to hold any kind of

00:07:34.740 visa for entry into the United States. For one thing, visa overstays are common, including for tourist visas.

00:07:41.060 There were something like 800,000 reported overstays in a recent fiscal year. Many of them involve business or

00:07:47.060 tourist visas from countries in Africa to the point that the Trump administration has begun requiring these people

00:07:51.940 to pay $15,000 bonds before they can arrive in the US. But even if none of these people were were ever overstaying

00:07:59.540 their visas, 55 million is still an extraordinarily astronomically ridiculously high number. There is no reason to

00:08:08.720 grant anywhere near that number of visas. And it's yet another very strong indication, as anyone could have

00:08:14.620 surmised, that there are far, far more than 11 million illegal aliens and foreign nationals in this

00:08:22.800 country. And as aggressive as the Trump administration's deportation efforts have been, we need to

00:08:28.800 intensify them even more. From a political perspective, this would not be remotely difficult.

00:08:35.060 Every effort by the corporate press to attack the administration for enforcing immigration law

00:08:38.820 has backfired in spectacular fashion. The latest example comes to us from a woman named Amy Cho, 0.75

00:08:45.900 who identifies as a reporter for NBC News. And here's what she wrote, quote,

00:08:49.600 Breaking. Just saw D.C. police and federal agents detain a man on the National Mall. He appeared to try to

00:08:55.060 escape, then was quickly tackled to the ground by several agents and was screaming in Spanish,

00:08:59.080 please, I'm not a criminal. I work here. I want to be with my family. She added, quote,

00:09:03.280 I asked the agents what the man was being charged with. They didn't reply. I've also reached out to

00:09:07.680 ICE for comment. But of course, she didn't wait for the reply from ICE. Instead, Amy Cho posted this

00:09:16.000 video, which had the effect of whipping liberals, especially liberal women, into an absolute frenzy. 0.99

00:09:21.580 Watch.

00:09:51.580 All right.

00:10:18.980 So he goes on screaming for a few more minutes before they haul him away. There's no context

00:10:25.260 beyond the guy's claims that he's supposedly an innocent family man who's being hauled away to

00:10:29.540 alligator Alcatraz simply because he's not white or whatever. But for liberal women, 0.99

00:10:34.640 no context was necessary. The propaganda had its desired effect. Here's how Fox's Jessica Tarlov

00:10:42.760 responded, for example, quote, This doesn't make D.C. safer. It'll just make people not come to D.C.

00:10:48.260 The cruelty is the point. So all the murdering and carjacking wasn't preventing people from coming

00:10:55.140 to D.C. apparently. Instead, according to Jessica Tarlov, a woman who, again, has no idea why this

00:11:00.800 guy was arrested. The reason people are avoiding D.C. is that they might get randomly disappeared by ICE.

00:11:07.540 You know, you can be walking down the street, taking pictures of the Lincoln Memorial,

00:11:10.340 and then bam, you're being hauled away. You're in El Salvador. None of the people who made this claim,

00:11:17.960 including Jessica Tarlov, can point to a single instance in which an American citizen was wrongfully

00:11:22.840 arrested and deported by this administration. It has not happened. The closest example they could come

00:11:27.400 up with is an illegal alien named Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the gangster and alleged wife-beater

00:11:32.200 and human trafficker, who was, again, an illegal alien on top of it. So not exactly a compelling

00:11:38.160 case, but Jessica Tarlov couldn't help herself. Neither could Miami Herald investigative journalist

00:11:44.220 Julie K. Brown. Here's what Brown wrote on social media in response to that video, quote,

00:11:50.600 His crying hits me in the gut, and we will probably never be told who he is, why he was stopped,

00:11:56.940 or if he was here illegally. Now, especially for an investigative journalist, that was a pretty

00:12:03.520 ill-advised tweet. Because, you know, you're an investigative journalist, maybe investigate it

00:12:10.280 before you comment? Well, here's the update that Amy Cho had to append to the video five hours after 1.00

00:12:16.800 she posted it. Quote, update, ICE sent a statement on this man's attention saying his name is David Perez

00:12:22.820 Tiafani, and that he was arrested in Fairfax County in 2024 and charged with aggravated sexual battery

00:12:28.640 against a minor under 13. Well, so much for that narrative. Jessica Tarlov and investigative

00:12:36.640 journalist Julie Brown quietly deleted their posts. Of course, they didn't even pretend to learn

00:12:42.600 anything from their humiliation. They're just going to wait for the next video that they can lie about.

00:12:47.940 Apparently, what happened in this case is that the illegal aliens' charges were dropped by the

00:12:51.420 Fairfax County Commonwealth Attorney's Office when the victim and her mother told police that they

00:12:55.900 didn't want to pursue the case, and they stopped communicating with law enforcement. So the man

00:13:00.740 was not exonerated or anything like that. He was arrested for one of the most serious crimes

00:13:04.820 imaginable, on top of the fact that he's illegally in the United States to begin with. In fact, he

00:13:09.400 entered illegally on three separate occasions. For the most part, even the dumbest commentators on the 0.98

00:13:15.020 left realized how badly this whole situation was going for them. So they deleted their posts, 0.94

00:13:19.340 and they changed the subject. But CNN's Wolf Blitzer did not take that approach. Instead,

00:13:24.680 he doubled down even after DHS's statement, even after we knew this guy was an alleged child rapist. 0.88

00:13:30.540 Still, this is what he said about it. Watch. 0.69

00:13:34.080 New video shows federal officers detaining a man on the National Mall. We want to warn our viewers,

00:13:39.820 some might find this video disturbing. Watch this.

00:13:49.340 He was saying in Spanish he was here to work and not to be arrested. A Homeland Security Department

00:14:07.000 spokesperson said the man is undocumented from Mexico and was arrested before. But NBC4 here in

00:14:13.520 Washington is reporting that a person with the same name who faced similar charges had them dropped

00:14:19.240 without prosecution. I love that. He says, you know, well, he said he's here to work and not to

00:14:25.900 be arrested. Oh, well, he's not here to be arrested. Well, never mind then. He should have just explained

00:14:31.060 that to ICE. Oh, no, gentlemen, I'm not here to be arrested. That's not. No. Oh, no, I didn't. I

00:14:36.860 don't intend to be. I don't. I would. I don't want to be arrested. I would prefer. That's not my

00:14:41.160 intention. Oh, well, OK, then, sir. Well, you go about your day. We thought you wanted to be

00:14:47.240 arrested. We didn't realize this. It's been a. Oh, he doesn't want to be arrested, folks. Never

00:14:51.580 mind. Yeah, go home. Let's back it up. No. Oh, he doesn't. No, he doesn't want to be arrested.

00:14:57.400 That's Wolf Blitzer. So he doesn't even mention what the charge was. DHS went on record describing the

00:15:02.580 nature of the charge. Wolf Blitzer doesn't even mention it. Said he goes out of his way to

00:15:06.560 emphasize that the man wasn't convicted and strongly implies that he's the victim in this

00:15:10.880 scenario. No matter how low your standards are for these people, somehow they continue to lower the

00:15:17.360 bar. Now, it's true that because the witnesses wouldn't testify, David Perez Teofoni has not been

00:15:23.660 convicted in a court of law of the crime of molesting a child. As far as I know, he wasn't convicted of

00:15:28.280 illegal entry either, although he did have removal orders and no one's disputing the fact that he is an 1.00

00:15:32.500 illegal alien. But that's not the relevant standard. When you're talking about non-citizens, 0.53

00:15:37.600 you don't need to wait until they're convicted of anything. They have no right to be in this country, 0.86

00:15:43.080 period. It doesn't matter what other crimes they've committed. But given that we probably have around

00:15:48.060 30 million illegals in this country, not 11, if not more, the administration has to prioritize

00:15:54.400 certain illegals for deportation first. You got to start somewhere. And in that context,

00:15:59.840 it makes complete sense to deport the most dangerous and perverse degenerates as quickly 0.94

00:16:03.080 as possible. And if you've got a guy that was accused of child rape, and the only reason he's 0.75

00:16:07.900 not being charged with it is that the victim's family has decided not to pursue charges for

00:16:13.680 whatever their reason is, yeah, that's someone who needs to get the hell out of our country.

00:16:18.240 You don't let him stay on the off chance that it turns out that, well, let's, you know, there's

00:16:26.440 like a 3% chance that he's not actually a child rapist. Let's just let him stay here until we figure

00:16:32.160 that out. Now, it also makes sense, as we discussed earlier this week, for the administration to

00:16:39.180 eliminate as many job opportunities for illegal aliens as they can. That's another very important 1.00

00:16:44.060 way to approach the problem. American truck drivers are far more reliable and less dangerous

00:16:49.120 than foreigners who can't speak English. And already, it's clear the administration understands

00:16:52.620 that. Yesterday, the Secretary of State announced that the U.S. would stop issuing worker visas for

00:16:57.260 commercial truck drivers after that horrifying crash last week on the Florida Turnpike that we've

00:17:01.140 talked about. These are the kind of steps that should have happened a long time ago. But for more than

00:17:06.920 20 years, pretty much everyone in authority lied to Americans about the extent of the foreign

00:17:11.700 infiltration of this country. They fed us statistics that were obviously false, knowing that nobody

00:17:16.300 would bother to check them. But at this point, the Cook numbers don't matter anymore. Neither do the

00:17:21.720 fake narratives about random Spanish-speaking men in D.C. being thrown to the alligators when those men

00:17:26.580 are actually allegedly pedophiles, it turns out. The real test for this administration, which to my

00:17:32.440 knowledge hasn't happened yet, will come when they publicly defend the forcible deportation of someone

00:17:37.540 who isn't a depraved child predator or a mass murderer or a Somali warlord. 0.97

00:17:44.420 Because we can't allow those people to stay in the country either. 1.00

00:17:47.640 And it would be a massive mistake to prioritize the worst offenders while then ignoring the so-called

00:17:53.500 nonviolent migrants. We know there are far more than 11 million illegal aliens in this country.

00:17:59.100 That's abundantly clear.

00:18:00.040 And as difficult as it may be for women like Jessica Tarlov and Julie Brown to understand,

00:18:06.420 every single one of them has to go back to where they came from.

00:18:12.240 Now let's get to our five headlines.

00:18:19.200 Have you ever wondered why elite athletes, business moguls, and high performers are using

00:18:23.900 Armora colostrum? It's because Armora colostrum packs over 400 natural nutrients that work at the 0.98

00:18:29.420 cellular level to build muscle, speed recovery, and boost performance. No artificial stuff,

00:18:34.700 just pure fuel for whatever you're tackling. Think of it as your body's natural defense

00:18:39.240 system upgrade. It strengthens your immune barriers throughout your entire body while supporting your

00:18:43.220 gut wall system for better digestion and less bloating. Plus, it helps your body absorb nutrients

00:18:48.180 more effectively and keeps your metabolism running smoothly. You'll also notice the difference in your

00:18:53.900 skin's radiance thanks to natural antioxidants and collagen-boosting compounds. Plus, there's a reason

00:18:58.980 elite athletes. I've been using colostrum for years. It enhances endurance, speeds up recovery so that

00:19:03.660 you can bounce back even faster. Bottom line, Armora colostrum gives your body comprehensive support to

00:19:08.880 thrive naturally. We've worked out a special offer for my audience. Receive 30% off your first

00:19:13.840 subscription order. Go to armora.com slash Walsh or enter Walsh to get 30% off your first subscription

00:19:19.380 order. That's armora.com slash Walsh.

00:19:23.460 Okay, a few stories to talk about on what I guess is sort of a bonus episode on a Friday. Usually,

00:19:28.980 usually we're Monday through Thursday, but we miss the Monday show. And so here we are on Friday. So a little

00:19:37.140 extra bonus show for you. Post-Millennial reports, staying on the immigration topic for a moment, U.S.

00:19:44.640 citizenship and immigration services officers are expanding how an applicant's good moral character is

00:19:50.860 evaluated in the naturalization process. The policy outlined in the August 15th memo instructs officers to

00:19:56.820 consider applicants positive contributions to society in a more holistic approach rather than

00:20:00.860 focusing solely on disqualifying factors. The memo stated, becoming a naturalized U.S. citizen means

00:20:06.600 being an active and responsible member of society instead of just having a right to live and work in

00:20:10.440 the U.S. Among other eligibility factors, aliens applying for naturalization must demonstrate that

00:20:15.780 he or she has been and continues to be an individual of good moral character. Evaluating GMC,

00:20:22.180 good moral character, involves more than a cursory mechanical review focused on the absence of

00:20:26.740 wrongdoing. It entails a holistic assessment of an alien's behavior, adherence to societal norms,

00:20:32.020 and positive contributions that affirmatively demonstrate good moral character.

00:20:38.760 U.S. CIS spokesman Matthew Tregeser said in a statement of Fox News that U.S. citizenship is the

00:20:44.880 gold standard and should only be offered to the world's best of the best.

00:20:50.140 Well, I'm obviously hugely in favor of this. And for one thing, it sets everything right. It flips the

00:21:00.600 burden back on the immigrant, which is where it should be. And because the way that we've approached 1.00

00:21:08.880 immigration for many decades now is that the immigrant somehow has a right. So it's like we 0.93

00:21:15.900 owe something to the immigrant. That's the way that we've approached it for decades, is that when 0.95

00:21:20.380 immigrants come here, we owe something to them. They have a right to come and we owe something to

00:21:25.760 them. We owe them a place to live. We owe them food. We owe it to them because they have a right.

00:21:35.380 And the way the Trump administration is approaching it is exactly the opposite.

00:21:41.820 That you have no right to come here.

00:21:46.920 If you want to come, then it's not what can we do for you? It's not what do you have a right to

00:21:54.060 get from us? It's what do we have a right to expect from you? Because the rest of us who are

00:21:58.600 actual Americans, we have expectations for you if you want to be a part of this club.

00:22:07.780 And the term that was used, the gold standard, that's exactly the right attitude. We should 0.95

00:22:12.480 really start thinking about U.S. citizenship as an exclusive club. It's like if you want to join a

00:22:19.820 private club somewhere. I'm not much of a club joiner myself, but in the past, I've looked into

00:22:25.520 a few different cigar lounges around Nashville that offer memberships. And then you get access

00:22:31.460 to the private lounge and all that kind of stuff. And never pulled the trigger because it's not worth

00:22:36.720 the money. But the point is, if you want to become a member of a private club, there's a pretty high

00:22:41.560 barrier to entry. Mostly, in this case, it's like a significant fee that you have to pay. But they

00:22:46.780 also look at what kind of person you are. They want to make sure that you're not some low-class

00:22:50.880 schlub, which is another reason why I don't join any of these clubs, of course. But why don't we 0.94

00:22:57.340 treat U.S. citizenship the same way? Only much more so. U.S. citizenship is the most sought-after,

00:23:05.140 most highly prized membership on the globe. We've got people knocking on our door constantly,

00:23:11.260 wanting to get in. And so the response to that should be to raise the standard significantly.

00:23:21.320 And looking at all these applicants and saying, okay, what do you have to offer?

00:23:27.220 What do you bring into the table? Rather than just assuming that everybody that comes,

00:23:31.320 oh yeah, we need everybody. Everyone that comes, they all have something to bring to the table.

00:23:35.360 They all have something to offer. No, they don't. Most of them don't.

00:23:39.200 I mean, the vast majority of applicants, you could just, you could throw those resumes in the bin

00:23:46.360 right away. You could look at it and say, you're not bringing it. What are you offering us that we

00:23:51.880 don't already have? No platitudes about, oh, we'll do jobs Americans will do. No, like, what do you

00:23:57.940 actually, what do you, why do we need you? That should be the question. When an immigrant comes, 1.00

00:24:03.300 they want to be an American citizen. Our question would be, like, what do we need you for?

00:24:09.200 And if we do need you, then make the case. And if you can't, then why would we invite you in?

00:24:22.200 That should be the approach. And it looks like that's the way Trump administration is handling it.

00:24:26.080 We talked yesterday about Cracker Barrel and its woke rebrand. And actually, I've heard a number of

00:24:31.560 conservatives say that the rebrand isn't woke, that it's kind of silly to call it woke.

00:24:37.240 It's because it's bad and ugly, but it's not woke. You know, all they did was take all the

00:24:41.080 character and personality and history out of the brand and make it generic and soulless, but that's

00:24:44.860 not woke. They took the old guy off the logo, but they didn't replace him with a gay furry or an 0.99

00:24:49.720 indigenous trans bisexual or whatever. So it's not woke is, is the, you know, what some 0.96

00:24:55.440 conservatives are saying. That's a misunderstanding of wokeness. You know, wokeness does not have to be

00:25:02.720 overtly political. Wokeness doesn't have to, it doesn't have to destroy and then replace the thing

00:25:08.740 that it destroyed with a trans person or a gay pride flag. Wokeness is the act of destruction itself. 0.92

00:25:16.560 It's the emptying of the thing. It's the hollowing out of something, making something intentionally

00:25:22.040 uglier is that's, that is wokeness. That is a hundred percent wokeness. So this is indeed a woke

00:25:28.840 rebrand of Cracker Barrel. That is, I think a perfectly valid way of describing it. You have a

00:25:35.620 liberal woman who's never eaten at a Cracker Barrel in her life coming in and getting rid of everything 1.00

00:25:40.080 traditional and old and charming about the place just for the sake of it.

00:25:46.680 That's wokeness to a T. So yeah, this is a woke rebrand for sure.

00:25:51.280 And Fox has the latest Cracker Barrel old country store. Customers have been vocal on social media

00:25:55.020 about their disdain for the recent transformation of the Tennessee-based restaurant chain.

00:25:59.740 Those voices grew even louder after Cracker Barrel unveiled its new logo this week.

00:26:05.940 Cracker Barrel also rolled out a new menu that includes breakfast, lunch, and dinner options,

00:26:09.740 refreshed restaurant remodels. We talked about that.

00:26:12.440 The Cracker Barrel spokesperson told Fox News Digital in a statement,

00:26:15.900 the company is very pleased with the trajectory of our remodeled stores.

00:26:19.520 Feedback from both guests and team members has been overwhelmingly positive

00:26:22.740 and enthusiastic about the refreshed dining and shipping experience.

00:26:26.900 All the elements of our remodel were informed by direct input from our guests and team members like,

00:26:31.020 these changes are for them.

00:26:32.400 So Cracker Barrel is still in denial. 0.96

00:26:35.320 The entire country is pointing at them and saying, this sucks, this is terrible. 0.93

00:26:39.280 And their reaction is to say, wow, everyone seems to love it. 0.98

00:26:42.320 Everyone seems to really like this.

00:26:44.520 Meanwhile, I guarantee the majority of people who work at Cracker Barrel,

00:26:47.520 including probably in the corporate office, know this is a terrible idea.

00:26:51.500 That's the thing when you have these marketing people come in with awful ideas.

00:26:54.620 Because most of the rest of the workforce are all saying to each other in the break room,

00:26:59.380 man, this is awful.

00:27:00.220 This is going to, people are not going to like this.

00:27:03.900 But hey, we need a Cracker Barrel for today is what we were told.

00:27:08.580 Remember, that's what the CEO said on Good Morning America,

00:27:11.240 that we need a Cracker Barrel for today.

00:27:15.100 Cracker Barrel for today.

00:27:16.360 This is the arrogant attitude, and it is woke.

00:27:20.220 This is the arrogant, woke attitude that these people have.

00:27:23.240 It's why everything always has to be updated and remade constantly.

00:27:29.460 Why can't the Cracker Barrel of 30 years ago be the Cracker Barrel of today?

00:27:35.860 Do we need a Cracker?

00:27:36.580 Yeah, if you're a Cracker Barrel customer, you want there to be a Cracker Barrel today,

00:27:40.100 but why can't it be the same one that it's been?

00:27:42.940 Why does it have to change?

00:27:45.000 This is pure chronological snobbery, to use the term coined by, I think, C.S. Lewis.

00:27:50.920 It's the idea that today is automatically superior to yesterday,

00:27:57.140 just because we are farther along in the chronology of events.

00:28:01.700 And therefore, we have to change everything.

00:28:03.480 Not to improve it or fix it or even innovate or anything,

00:28:06.760 but change it just to change it, just to make it different.

00:28:09.360 I remember last week I saw somebody on X, they were talking about the new Harry Potter series.

00:28:15.980 Apparently there's a new, I think on HBO or something, they have a new Harry Potter series coming out.

00:28:22.400 They're just redoing Harry Potter.

00:28:24.420 They're doing it again.

00:28:26.080 They're doing the whole thing again, from what I understand.

00:28:28.860 And somebody was defending it, saying that, well, you know, kids today, they don't have their own Harry Potter.

00:28:35.380 You know, the Harry Potter films came out 20 years ago, and so they didn't grow up with Harry Potter the way that we did.

00:28:42.020 So we need a new one.

00:28:44.060 The old Harry Potter, that's for millennials. 0.99

00:28:47.280 And we need a new Harry Potter.

00:28:49.240 But it's like, hang on, not that I have any attachment to the Harry Potter films, but the movies still exist.

00:28:57.940 It's not like they're being stored in a vault somewhere inside a volcano.

00:29:02.040 The books also exist.

00:29:03.380 They're not out of print.

00:29:05.460 All that stuff is right there.

00:29:07.260 You can find it on Amazon.

00:29:09.360 Why do kids need a new Harry Potter?

00:29:11.300 Why can't they just have the same Harry Potter that we had before?

00:29:14.640 Why do they need their own new version of it?

00:29:16.740 And, again, it's not like they change.

00:29:21.820 When we have the constant remodeling and remaking and, you know, refreshing going on, they're not doing it.

00:29:30.300 They're not improving on it.

00:29:32.400 Yeah, you can have things that have been around for a while, and you need to improve it.

00:29:35.440 You can innovate.

00:29:36.400 There are good changes you can make to things.

00:29:39.000 But that's not what usually happens.

00:29:41.360 They're not improving it.

00:29:42.420 They're not making it better.

00:29:43.440 They're not innovating.

00:29:44.440 They're just making it different.

00:29:47.260 The new Cracker Barrel is not better in any way.

00:29:50.060 It's just different.

00:29:50.940 You walk into a Cracker Barrel now.

00:29:52.460 It doesn't, nothing works.

00:29:54.040 It's not like it works better functionally.

00:29:57.200 It's just different.

00:29:58.240 It's different from what it was before.

00:30:00.100 And that's supposed to automatically be an improvement.

00:30:02.720 Because the attitude is that if it's new, it's automatically better.

00:30:08.800 The fact that Cracker Barrel looked like this 40 years ago means that it is inferior to whatever the new design is.

00:30:17.980 By definition, that's the attitude.

00:30:20.620 And what ends up happening is that, not to make too much of Cracker Barrel, but this is just Harry Potter, Cracker Barrel.

00:30:26.800 These are just examples.

00:30:27.940 These are just, and that's one of the reasons why it's resonated with people, why people are so upset, I think, about the Cracker Barrel thing.

00:30:33.300 If it was just Cracker Barrel on its own doing this, then I think very few people would care.

00:30:39.180 But it's just, it's kind of like, it's a tip of an iceberg.

00:30:45.380 It's a symptom of a much larger problem that people are sick of.

00:30:48.520 And that's what people are responding to.

00:30:50.060 What ends up happening is that every new generation is atomized, is isolated.

00:30:58.880 There's no continuity between generations.

00:31:00.920 Nothing gets passed from one to another.

00:31:03.420 Because every generation has its own version of the thing.

00:31:08.460 A new Harry Potter, a new Cracker Barrel, and a million other examples, of course.

00:31:11.980 Rather than the way that it used to be, which was that each new generation would discover anew, the same, like, you'd have traditions, you'd have things, you'd have stories, you'd have, and they would just get passed down from generation to generation.

00:31:28.860 Not changed just for the sake of it, but the same thing.

00:31:31.680 The same thing, getting passed down, like heirlooms from generation to generation.

00:31:36.100 And now we take the thing and we tear it apart and change it just for the sake of it.

00:31:49.720 Speaking of things getting passed down, there's been some conversation recently about the inheritance tax or the estate tax.

00:31:55.060 Both constitute a form of tax which penalizes you for dying.

00:31:59.280 If you die, you have to pay the government for the privilege of dying.

00:32:02.600 They come in and pilfer your estate after you're dead.

00:32:04.940 They're grave robbers, basically.

00:32:06.560 You know, these are estate tax, inheritance tax.

00:32:08.960 It's a form of grave robbery that the government does.

00:32:12.840 Anyway, this has received some attention.

00:32:14.240 A guy named Lewis Goodall on the British network LBC had a proposal he wanted to share.

00:32:19.780 And let's listen to it.

00:32:22.000 What we've got at the moment is an aristocracy of wealth in this country.

00:32:26.880 It's also true of the United States as well.

00:32:29.240 So what I would do, what I would do, and I wouldn't be opposed to, by the way, I wouldn't be opposed to 100% inheritance tax.

00:32:37.700 Or maybe, let's say, 99%.

00:32:39.540 You know, my rule might be that if you can put it in two pee bags, then you can hand it over.

00:32:44.040 That's fine.

00:32:45.080 99, 95%.

00:32:46.140 I'm being provocative.

00:32:46.820 But you see what I mean?

00:32:47.660 I would not be against a far higher rate of inheritance tax than we have at the moment, which is 40% above a certain threshold.

00:32:54.200 I wouldn't be opposed to putting that to 50%, 60%, 70%.

00:32:57.900 Why?

00:32:59.040 Because I think the quid pro quo should be twofold.

00:33:01.560 One, that helps fund public services, which actually helps level the playing field in achieving a true meritocracy.

00:33:09.040 Two, it will help us reduce taxes on income.

00:33:13.260 Because at the end of the day, I want to incentivize work.

00:33:16.580 I want to incentivize productivity.

00:33:18.560 I want to incentivize people to get up off their backsides and do more.

00:33:22.720 You don't have a right to inherit.

00:33:26.380 You should have a right to work while you're alive and keep more of your own money.

00:33:32.260 That, to me, is more important, way more important than your right to just inherit some money from mommy and daddy that you did nothing to earn.

00:33:42.340 Okay, let's clarify a few things.

00:33:44.040 First of all, the point is not that kids have a universal right to inherit money from their parents.

00:33:51.720 If the parents have nothing to pass down, that doesn't mean that the child's rights have been deprived.

00:33:56.740 So none of us were born necessarily with a God-given universal right to an inheritance, per se.

00:34:03.880 Although, if your parents do have wealth and property, then I would say that you do, in a sense, have a right, a birthright to it.

00:34:14.220 Which is why, if there's no will, if the parents don't specify who gets it, then obviously the children should receive it before any stranger does.

00:34:22.460 So I think we do recognize this kind of birthright.

00:34:26.200 Normally, we do recognize a sort of birthright, a sort of right that the child has to an inheritance, if there is an inheritance to be had.

00:34:33.780 But we don't need to talk about this in terms of the rights of the children.

00:34:39.220 The more important point, the more obvious and direct issue at hand here, is the right of the parents to pass down his wealth to whoever he chooses.

00:34:51.380 Do my children have a right to my money and my property?

00:34:55.740 That's one question.

00:34:58.140 Again, I think, in a sense, they do.

00:35:00.940 But that doesn't really supersede my own right.

00:35:02.880 Like, I have a right to decide who gets what.

00:35:08.640 But more importantly, do I have a right to give my money and my property to my own kids?

00:35:15.320 Do I have that right?

00:35:16.420 And there's no question that I do.

00:35:19.460 Of course I do.

00:35:20.740 It's mine.

00:35:22.300 You heard him say it there.

00:35:23.120 Well, you should keep more of your own money.

00:35:24.680 Okay.

00:35:25.420 Yeah.

00:35:26.040 Agreed.

00:35:28.100 So it's my money.

00:35:30.200 So then I should get to decide who gets it.

00:35:32.740 I have a right to give it to them.

00:35:34.360 I'm working my whole life in order to be able to do that.

00:35:36.700 We talked about this recently.

00:35:38.280 This is one of the primary things that drives me personally, motivates me.

00:35:42.180 It drives many people.

00:35:44.620 It drives, it should drive most people.

00:35:47.660 It should be the primary motivator for most people is the desire to pass down wealth to

00:35:52.300 your children.

00:35:53.900 I'm only going to be alive maybe for another 50 years at most, maybe less than, maybe a

00:35:57.720 lot less than that.

00:35:58.740 I'm not working to provide for my family only during that short time frame.

00:36:03.380 I want to provide for them far beyond that.

00:36:05.280 And I have the right to do that.

00:36:07.260 It's one of the most basic, most fundamental rights that we have as human beings to work

00:36:10.620 hard, acquire wealth, pass it down to the next generation of our families to create generational

00:36:15.820 wealth.

00:36:17.280 Generational wealth is a good thing.

00:36:20.760 This idea that we shouldn't have it, that each generation should start over from scratch

00:36:24.680 is insane.

00:36:27.680 Especially from people who call themselves, and I don't know if this guy calls himself progressive

00:36:30.980 or not, but you hear this from so-called progressives.

00:36:34.180 Well, how do you have progress if you have to start over from scratch with each generation?

00:36:41.840 If I don't have the right to give my money to my kids, then what right supersedes that right?

00:36:46.660 Does the government have a greater right to decide what happens with my estate than I do?

00:36:50.840 Does some government bureaucrat sitting in an office somewhere have a right to decide where my money goes? 0.98

00:36:57.000 A right that supersedes my own right?

00:37:00.800 Where does that right come from?

00:37:04.480 Well, no.

00:37:05.040 What people on the left actually think, and again, I don't know if this guy would call himself on the left.

00:37:08.260 I don't know who he is.

00:37:08.880 But generally, what people on the left believe is that, and this is what makes it all the more absurd.

00:37:17.660 What they believe is that other citizens who are strangers and non-citizens have a right to my money.

00:37:27.320 So they believe that my children have no right to inherit my money, but some obese EBT welfare queen does have a right to my money. 1.00

00:37:41.780 I don't have a right to pass my money down to my kids, but some 350-pound food stamp jockey does have a right to take that money and buy Pringles and Mountain Dew. 1.00

00:37:53.700 That's what they believe.

00:37:56.320 It's total moral madness.

00:38:00.080 You only hear these people that say, oh, you didn't earn that money.

00:38:04.500 This is the kind of thing, you didn't earn that money.

00:38:08.900 You have no right to it.

00:38:10.940 They only will say that about the children of wealthy people.

00:38:17.460 What about the entire welfare system?

00:38:20.340 They didn't earn that money.

00:38:21.620 Did they earn it?

00:38:22.580 How?

00:38:22.800 Now, every single person walking into a Walmart right now with their EBT card, did they earn that?

00:38:32.960 No, they didn't earn it.

00:38:34.220 What did they do to earn it?

00:38:35.080 And if we're talking about earning, like, who would have a better claim to having earned my money?

00:38:51.300 Some random welfare recipient or my kids?

00:38:56.460 Now, I don't think earning is the right way of phrasing it in either case, really, because it's not really about that.

00:39:03.540 Again, it's about who I want to give my money to.

00:39:05.500 It's mine.

00:39:06.760 I should be able to give it to whoever the hell I want.

00:39:08.940 It's not your money.

00:39:10.280 Back off.

00:39:11.800 Well, I think you should distribute it.

00:39:13.120 Oh, well, it's nice that you think that.

00:39:16.820 Okay, if you want to acquire wealth and then distribute it to charity or give it to whatever, then you go make your own money. 0.60

00:39:25.020 Okay, go make your own money, you deadbeat.

00:39:27.440 Rather than sitting there saying, well, I think that your money should go here. 0.99

00:39:29.940 I don't give a shit where you think my money should go. 0.99

00:39:31.680 Go make your own. 0.99

00:39:33.940 How about that?

00:39:37.500 So I don't think we think of it in terms of earning.

00:39:39.620 But if we did, I mean, if that's the word we're using, when all is said and done, the EBT recipient versus my children.

00:39:51.400 Who has a better claim to having earned my money?

00:39:55.000 Well, I think clearly my children.

00:39:56.040 Especially if you raise them right.

00:40:00.680 They're contributing.

00:40:01.660 They're in your family.

00:40:03.080 They make you.

00:40:04.160 They're contributing to your family.

00:40:05.660 They're working for your family.

00:40:07.100 They make sacrifices for your family.

00:40:09.060 I mean, that's what that's what family members should be doing. 0.94

00:40:11.120 And if you raise them right, then they do.

00:40:12.440 As opposed to somebody on welfare who's done absolutely nothing for me whatsoever.

00:40:18.900 At all.

00:40:19.360 Ever.

00:40:19.680 Not one.

00:40:20.060 Not one thing.

00:40:21.560 You haven't earned anything from me.

00:40:23.740 You just haven't.

00:40:24.480 I'm sorry.

00:40:24.780 So if that's the way we want to phrase it, you know, when you start using words like that, well, you didn't earn it.

00:40:40.460 But the thing is, they'll only use those terms in very limited circumstances.

00:40:45.120 They're very careful about when they start using words like earn.

00:40:49.920 Because that is a loaded term.

00:40:51.580 And I don't think you really want to have that conversation.

00:40:56.020 I don't think you really want to have the conversation about who's earning what.

00:41:21.580 Isabel Brown show on September 8th and the Decade of the Daily Wire anniversary special this fall.

00:41:26.300 And when you're watching live, you can jump into the chat, react in real time, debate the big stories,

00:41:31.080 and connect with millions of other Daily Wire Plus members who actually think like you.

00:41:35.640 Don't wait.

00:41:36.140 Go to dailywireplus.com.

00:41:37.420 Use code SUMMER and save 40% today.

00:41:40.580 Now let's get to our daily cancellation.

00:41:41.840 Around a year ago, a freelance journalist named Amelia Tate decided to conduct an unscientific survey of adults

00:41:54.340 who are creepily interested in Disney, otherwise known as Disney adults.

00:41:57.220 We've talked about Disney adults many times before, mainly because they're incredibly easy to mock.

00:42:00.980 But also a great real-life example of a little-known phenomenon called synesthesia.

00:42:05.500 This is when the stimulation of one sensory pathway leads to an involuntary stimulation in a completely different sensory pathway.

00:42:12.400 So for example, you might see a picture of a sewer with your eyes, and then a short time later, you might smell sewage.

00:42:19.260 And similarly, when you see a Disney adult, it can be difficult to suppress your gag reflex

00:42:23.660 as various odors seemingly waft from tick-tock directly into your nostrils.

00:42:27.860 Even though, you know, it's not real, the stench is ultimately unmistakable.

00:42:32.560 But Amelia Tate, in a rare example of bravery in modern journalism, decided to dive headfirst into an investigation 1.00

00:42:37.960 of this repulsive yet fascinating genre of Disney fan.

00:42:41.140 And here's what she did.

00:42:41.880 She surveyed more than 1,300 self-identifying Disney adults from all over the world.

00:42:45.540 She primarily found these people through Facebook pages about Disney, as well as Reddit, of course.

00:42:50.460 According to Tate, of these 1,300 Disney adults, quote,

00:42:53.740 a third said that they first engaged with the company as a baby when asked,

00:42:57.500 do you think you will be a Disney adult until you die?

00:42:59.320 91% said yes.

00:43:00.540 The majority of Disney adults, 71%, are aged between 25 and 44.

00:43:04.300 80% are female.

00:43:05.780 Just under half, 49%, identify themselves as left-wing politically, while a further 9% are centrist.

00:43:11.360 18% are right-wing, including 1.5% who said they are far-right.

00:43:16.020 Now, last part is somewhat interesting.

00:43:18.760 Yes, 1.5% of Disney adults claim to be far-right, whatever that means.

00:43:23.060 You have to imagine that these particular survey respondents were maybe messing with Amelia Tate,

00:43:27.900 or maybe they were undercover FBI agents.

00:43:30.380 It was really the only two options.

00:43:32.620 Either way, these are people who clearly need to be interviewed on national television immediately.

00:43:36.480 This is a Venn diagram that simply can't exist in any way, shape, or form.

00:43:40.440 On the one hand, you're a childless, obese, 40-year-old woman who weeps at the sight of Minnie Mouse and Daisy Duck.

00:43:47.100 Like, you see men in dresses greeting young girls at Disneyland, and you just can't get enough of it.

00:43:51.800 You feel at home in this environment.

00:43:53.940 On the other hand, when you get home, you're frantically refreshing 4chan for the latest intel on the Proud Boys meetup.

00:44:00.260 Makes perfect sense.

00:44:01.720 But then again, who am I to question an unscientific survey?

00:44:04.840 The survey says what it says, so let's pretend it's credible for the sake of argument.

00:44:07.700 The other noteworthy part of the survey is the gender element.

00:44:10.000 Around 80% of Disney adults are female. 0.97

00:44:11.680 In other words, Disney is completely missing out on a very large demographic of losers, 0.98

00:44:17.180 specifically the losers who happen to also be male.

00:44:20.020 It's a sizable share of the market that Disney isn't capturing.

00:44:23.780 And it's not just their theme park attendance that's low among males.

00:44:26.720 The new Indiana Jones movie, which was apparently supposed to appeal to men,

00:44:31.260 even though it was terrible, earned just $380 million on a $300 million budget,

00:44:36.160 not including marketing, which almost certainly destroyed every cent of the slim profits they would have otherwise made.

00:44:41.680 And as Variety pointed out, Disney's live-action film business hasn't had a male-oriented hit

00:44:47.580 that's been comparable to the Pirates of the Caribbean in more than a decade.

00:44:52.040 In the entertainment industry, this qualifies as a crisis that requires all hands on deck.

00:44:56.540 That's precisely how Disney is handling this developing situation.

00:45:00.760 They've decided, having alienated most of their customer base,

00:45:04.240 that they want to appeal to men all of a sudden.

00:45:07.520 And they claim to be serious about it.

00:45:09.280 Variety reports, quote,

00:45:10.080 Leadership at Walt Disney Studios has been pressing Hollywood creators in recent months,

00:45:14.240 multiple sources tell Variety,

00:45:15.980 for movies that will bring young men back into the brand in a meaningful way.

00:45:20.740 Young men is defined here by sources as ages 13 to 28, a.k.a. Gen Z.

00:45:27.040 Article continues, quote,

00:45:27.980 The sources say Disney has been seeking new IP in pitches such as splashy global adventures and treasure hunts,

00:45:33.940 as well as seasonal fare like films for the Halloween corridor.

00:45:37.340 The calls come as the Star Wars machine struggles to produce any film project,

00:45:41.460 and the superhero genre sheds audience by the minute.

00:45:44.420 While two insiders say the mandate to recruit young males goes as high as the C-suite,

00:45:48.640 the task primarily has fallen on David Greenbaum,

00:45:51.260 the former Searchlight Pictures co-head brought on in 2024 to run Disney's live-action film business.

00:45:56.780 Now, not that I'm in the business of offering unsolicited advice to major corporations,

00:46:02.540 but this seems like a very ill-fated approach.

00:46:04.860 There's simply no reason to trust anything Disney's saying here.

00:46:07.240 Disney just blew millions of dollars on their Star Wars hotel,

00:46:10.060 which they also billed as a grand, unique adventure.

00:46:13.420 In the end, it turned out to be a windowless hotel that transported guests around in unmarked trucks,

00:46:18.680 which also had no windows, so that the guests couldn't see that they were in a parking lot.

00:46:23.000 But the other problem here, and this really is the central irony,

00:46:27.840 is that Disney now, they're desperately trying to attract men. 0.84

00:46:33.160 Well, Disney owns both Star Wars and Marvel, as Variety knows.

00:46:39.560 They shouldn't have any trouble with the young male audience.

00:46:43.140 You have Star Wars and superheroes.

00:46:45.820 These are both established franchises with relatable and popular male figures.

00:46:51.300 These are franchises that historically have been very, very popular with young males.

00:46:57.700 But Disney, for ideological reasons, spent nearly two decades trying to scare men away from these franchises

00:47:03.620 and replace them with a female audience. 1.00

00:47:07.120 Kathleen Kennedy accused Star Wars fans of hating women 0.93

00:47:10.120 because they refused to watch lesbian witches parade around in service of a plot that made no sense. 1.00

00:47:14.680 The lesbian showrunner of The Acolyte boasted that it was the gayest Star Wars movie ever, or show. 0.92

00:47:21.820 The lesbian lead actress in The Acolyte recorded a diss track directed at the people watching her show 0.99

00:47:26.380 after she stated that her goal as an actress was to make white people cry. 0.97

00:47:30.700 It's not even getting into the films, which were obviously box-checking exercises

00:47:34.060 by the lead actor's own admission.

00:47:37.020 Meanwhile, in the name of female representation, Disney commanded that we pretend, 0.96

00:47:40.440 against our better judgment, that Brie Larson is capable of acting. 0.92

00:47:43.700 They openly told audiences that they should embrace politics in their films.

00:47:48.020 This was all a conscious choice.

00:47:51.320 Well, it didn't work out, apparently.

00:47:53.700 And now Disney, rather than returning to what it once was,

00:47:57.500 is trying to undo the damage in a very heavy-handed and calculated manner.

00:48:01.840 But if Disney executives actually wanted to appeal to men or to well-adjusted women,

00:48:06.440 they wouldn't approach the problem with demographics and propaganda in mind.

00:48:09.840 That's what created their problem in the first place.

00:48:11.480 Instead, they'd lock every single one of their producers and writers,

00:48:15.640 even the DEI hires, in a dark room and force them to watch, you know,

00:48:19.260 a traditional Disney product.

00:48:20.620 They'd show them something like The Fox and the Hound.

00:48:23.080 Disney made that film almost 45 years ago.

00:48:25.420 There's a lot they could learn from it.

00:48:27.400 And then Disney executives would unlock the door,

00:48:29.700 letting everyone go except the DEI hires.

00:48:32.240 They can stay trapped in there.

00:48:33.780 Tell them it's a windowless ride at the Star Wars hotel,

00:48:36.320 and they probably won't even complain.

00:48:37.280 That's how you could course-correct the historic downfall of a once-beloved entertainment company.

00:48:42.980 But because no one at Disney appears to have any degree of self-awareness,

00:48:46.380 and because they seem to believe that more gender and race obsession

00:48:50.500 is the appropriate remedy to their past gender and race obsession,

00:48:54.720 Disney is very unlikely to pull out of its ongoing death spiral.

00:48:58.480 And that is why Disney, along with Disney adults, for good measure,

00:49:02.380 are again today, canceled.

00:49:04.760 So that'll do it for the show today and this week.

00:49:07.040 Talk to you on Monday.

00:49:07.720 Have a great day.

00:49:08.680 Godspeed.

00:49:19.400 Hey there, I'm Daily Wire executive editor John Bickley.

00:49:22.140 And I'm Georgia Howe, and we're the hosts of Morning Wire.

00:49:25.240 We bring you all the news you need to know in 15 minutes or less.

00:49:28.580 Watch and listen to Morning Wire seven days a week,

00:49:30.920 everywhere you get your podcasts.

00:49:34.760 Sometimes it's a free ride.

00:49:36.660 Hmm.

00:49:37.040 Have a great day.

00:49:37.260 Bye-bye.

00:49:37.460 das-

00:49:38.940 ...

00:49:41.440 ...

00:49:51.080 ...

00:49:51.880 ...

00:49:52.400 ...

The Matt Walsh Show - August 22, 2025

Ep. 1645 - Illegal Immigrant Numbers In America Are FAR Worse Than We’ve Been Told

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript