Ep. 183 - It's Time To Excommunicate Pro-Abortion Catholics
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
159.28659
Summary
New York just passed a law that makes abortion legal at all stages of pregnancy, up to and including birth, for any reason. What does this mean for post-birth abortions? And why should Andrew Cuomo, the governor of New York, be excommunicated?
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Today on the Matt Wall Show, we'll talk more about that awful abortion law in New York,
00:00:04.060
and I'll explain why the arguments made to support that law and every poor pro-abortion law
00:00:13.700
Also, why hasn't Andrew Cuomo, the governor of New York, been excommunicated yet?
00:00:17.980
Finally, we'll talk about why the State of the Union address is a disgrace and an embarrassment
00:00:25.460
We'll talk about that today on the Matt Wall Show.
00:00:30.000
Hello and welcome to the Matt Wall Show. Thanks for being here.
00:00:36.080
Remember to subscribe, subscribe, subscribe, subscribe on iTunes,
00:00:39.320
become a premium member of The Daily Wire. You can subscribe that way as well.
00:00:44.360
Now, yesterday we talked about the barbarous, inhuman law that was just passed by the New York State Legislature,
00:00:52.060
which makes abortion legal through every stage of pregnancy.
00:00:55.320
And I explained yesterday how this law indeed will give women the ability, the power to get an abortion at any time,
00:01:04.220
at any point in their pregnancy, up till birth for any reason.
00:01:10.000
Now, the language of the law does stipulate that late-term abortions are reserved for women who have health concerns
00:01:18.240
or in order to protect a woman's, a mother's health.
00:01:20.960
But that language is so intentionally vague that it could apply to any situation at all.
00:01:26.580
As I said, you know, are we talking physical health, emotional health, psychological health, financial health, spiritual health?
00:01:32.740
It seems like any and all of those could qualify.
00:01:36.160
Besides, abortion is never actually necessary to protect a woman's health or her life.
00:01:42.820
So anytime that qualifier is put into the law, that means that there's something else going on,
00:01:50.880
because that category of abortion doesn't actually exist.
00:01:56.580
Obviously, they're just providing a very kind of vague way for anyone to get an abortion.
00:02:02.560
As long as they—so maybe in New York, if you're a woman, you want to get an abortion at 30 weeks or 32 weeks or whatever.
00:02:09.760
You might have to couch your reason in terms of health, but that's really it.
00:02:22.220
I know that I hammered it yesterday, so I'm not going to spend a lot of time on it today,
00:02:25.400
but it's important that we stop and appreciate just how gratuitous and how unnecessary late-term abortion actually is.
00:02:34.160
Because the way that the left talks about it, the way that abortion advocates talk about it,
00:02:38.800
they're going to say that, well, nobody even gets late-term abortions unless they really need it.
00:02:44.760
So this is—they act like late-term abortions are the most necessary forms of abortion,
00:02:51.320
as in nobody would ever get something like that unless they absolutely needed it.
00:03:00.160
Of course, all abortion is gratuitous, and all abortion at any stage in any form is unnecessary and evil.
00:03:07.380
But that's especially the case with a late-term abortion, because—here's the reason why.
00:03:17.640
Because a woman in the third trimester, if she wanted to or needed to end her pregnancy,
00:03:25.220
she could easily do it without killing the baby.
00:03:29.160
So even with an abortion, if she's getting an abortion in the third trimester,
00:03:39.240
she's going to have to go into labor and delivery either way.
00:03:43.580
If she gets an abortion, that means that the baby's going to be killed one or two days before labor and delivery.
00:03:51.500
But you could just cut that step out, which is a dangerous step for the mother as well, by the way.
00:03:56.200
You could just cut that out and deliver the baby.
00:03:58.640
You could have a C-section, and you're good to go.
00:04:00.860
Take the baby out, and boom, the pregnancy's over.
00:04:08.540
That extra step of killing the baby is completely unnecessary.
00:04:17.300
Even in a situation where a woman legitimately does have to end her pregnancy
00:04:27.200
There's no reason, though, to directly kill the baby ahead of time.
00:04:36.960
anyone who's, or any nurse who's worked in the labor and delivery departments of a hospital,
00:04:47.300
they've plenty of situations where you have these emergency situations
00:04:55.320
It's rare in any individual case, but overall, it happens kind of frequently.
00:05:02.160
But what they'll tell you, if they're being honest,
00:05:03.780
is that there's never been a situation where they had to directly kill the baby in the process.
00:05:10.880
There may be plenty of situations where you can't save the baby, sadly, tragically,
00:05:16.700
despite your best efforts, but you have to directly kill it.
00:05:24.320
not only is it evil and terrible and awful, which all abortion is,
00:05:31.160
but it's also, it's just as evil and just as unnecessary and just as egregious
00:05:47.640
There is not even a slight difference between late-term abortion and post-birth abortion.
00:05:52.520
And I would challenge any pro-abortion person to come up with an argument against post-birth abortion
00:05:59.760
that would not also apply to late-term abortion.
00:06:04.380
Or come up with an argument for late-term abortion that would not also apply to post-birth abortion.
00:06:12.000
In fact, you really can't come up with an argument for abortion at any stage
00:06:27.840
And they're all bad arguments, but these are the arguments, okay?
00:06:34.260
Number one, the number one main argument now is the woman's autonomy has to be respected.
00:06:43.320
The baby is dependent on her and on her body and on her life, and she has a right to autonomy,
00:06:52.540
so she should be able to express that right, enjoy that right whenever she wants.
00:06:58.640
And so if she decides that, you know what, I don't want this baby being dependent on me anymore,
00:07:06.060
Number two, they'll say that the fetus, scare quotes around fetus,
00:07:10.420
is not fully developed, and thus it's not a real person.
00:07:14.700
Number three, they'll say the fetus is dependent on his mother, and thus not a person.
00:07:20.420
And number four, they'll say sometimes the other argument is,
00:07:23.560
well, if the fetus is not aborted, it will just become an unwanted child,
00:07:30.100
and we already have enough of those to deal with, right?
00:07:35.560
Autonomy, not fully developed, thus not a person, dependent, thus not a person, overpopulation.
00:07:46.620
Every single one of those arguments, every single one,
00:07:51.060
applies just as much, if not even more, to post-birth procedures, let's call them.
00:08:05.800
And the point that pro-lifers have been making all along is that we've got to draw the line somewhere.
00:08:10.720
The only sensible place to draw the line is at conception.
00:08:16.280
To draw the line there and say you cannot kill the babies in the womb.
00:08:20.460
Once conception has occurred, now you have a distinct, separate, living entity,
00:08:28.820
which in the first few moments and days and weeks after conception
00:08:33.700
might not look like a fully grown and developed person,
00:08:45.960
And that's the only sensible place to draw the line.
00:08:48.660
Once you have that human living entity, you've got to draw the line there.
00:08:56.700
If you don't draw the line there, then you're left with,
00:09:03.140
there is no other non-arbitrary place to draw it.
00:09:08.960
And if you're not going to draw it at conception,
00:09:16.380
Nothing really changes at birth other than now the baby is in a different location.
00:09:23.260
It was inside the mother before, now it's outside.
00:09:33.520
There's no reason to draw it in the moments after birth either.
00:09:38.560
If a woman decides to keep her post-birth fetus for a while,
00:09:46.960
she's still going to discover that this creature is an enormous strain on her body,
00:09:56.000
In fact, the infant is much more an imposition on her autonomy
00:10:08.400
When you have an infant in the house, do you feel like an autonomous person?
00:10:14.560
No, because you've got this infant that you have to take care of constantly.
00:10:17.940
At least while the baby's inside your body, you don't have to...
00:10:21.680
The process mostly takes care of itself, right?
00:10:27.100
But with an infant, it's like every waking moment,
00:10:33.560
You've got to wake up in the middle of the night and feed it.
00:10:44.960
An infant is as much, as I said, as much an imposition
00:10:48.260
on a woman's autonomy and the father's autonomy,
00:10:55.440
as the baby was while it was still inside the mother's body.
00:11:03.440
what if she comes to the conclusion after, say, two months or six months
00:11:07.280
that motherhood actually is not the best decision for her?
00:11:10.260
What if she decides that she doesn't want to do this?
00:11:31.200
makes it difficult for her to thrive in her new position?
00:11:44.300
Don't want a post-birth abortion, don't get one.
00:11:48.820
So arguments one, two, three, and four that I outlined above,
00:12:04.920
it has become a member of an overcrowded category.
00:12:08.200
So why shouldn't she be able to consult with a licensed physician
00:12:13.980
Besides, post-birth abortions happen all the time anyway.
00:12:22.300
but it's not going to stop them from happening.
00:12:27.600
Isn't it better for there to be a safe and sanitary facility provided
00:12:30.780
rather than for her to have to do it in a back alley
00:12:41.580
if we're going to allow abortions of infants in the womb,
00:12:45.540
there's no reason to not allow them of infants outside of the womb.
00:12:48.220
And there's also no reason to disallow abortions of toddlers
00:12:54.240
or, you know, toddler fetuses or adolescent fetuses
00:12:58.220
because these fetuses also continue to make demands on a woman's autonomy.
00:13:03.880
They are also wholly dependent on their parents.
00:13:11.420
Thus, apparently, they're not people in the strictest sense.
00:13:14.500
So what if a woman discovers that motherhood is the wrong choice for her
00:13:20.240
when her, you know, fetus turns four or six or eight
00:13:26.140
If we don't draw the line anywhere in the child's utero development,
00:13:31.200
then why draw it during its post-utero development?
00:13:37.760
Now, am I suggesting that if we accept abortion,
00:13:41.300
then we may as well allow a woman to abort her fetus at any age whatsoever?
00:14:00.800
that we could consider it a person, but only a possibility.
00:14:06.360
that personhood is based on a fetus's physical development
00:14:13.260
So what about, for example, a 23-year-old disabled individual?
00:14:32.280
that could rightly afford them a claim to personhood?
00:14:39.400
we cannot in good conscience continue to consider
00:14:46.940
By the way, remember, fetus is just Latin for offspring.
00:15:05.160
Now, it's easy to say that I'm making a straw man here,
00:15:13.660
Well, it is a slippery slope, but it's not a fallacy.
00:15:18.340
that every slippery slope argument is a fallacy.
00:15:26.440
And the point here that I'm trying to illustrate is
00:15:30.400
that I can take all of the arguments for abortion,
00:15:41.480
preserving their integrity, if I can call it that,
00:16:24.040
then that means that either your arguments are bad,
00:16:31.220
That's the whole point of a slippery slope argument.
00:16:54.340
then there's something wrong with your argument.
00:17:02.600
there are no other arguments available for abortion,
00:17:43.360
It seems like they should have something to say