The Matt Walsh Show - November 12, 2026


Ep. 1873 - New Evidence Completely Upends Cornell 7 Case

Ep. 1872 - Only An Idiot Would Fall For The Ole Miss Hate Hoax Friendly Fire： The Making of Confession

Episode Stats


Length

52 minutes

Words per minute

170.15

Word count

8,926

Sentence count

514

Harmful content

Misogyny

39

sentences flagged

Toxicity

45

sentences flagged

Hate speech

34

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00 People keep saying that real communism has never been tried. Well, it was. Moscow, 1938. Arrests in the night. Confessions forced out of innocent people.
00:00:09 The Daily Wire's newest movie, Confession, is a story about just that. It's out right now, only on The Daily Wire.
00:00:14 There is new evidence in the form of text messages suggesting that the Cornell 7, the male Cornell students who were accused of heinous crimes in a now infamous lawsuit
00:00:24 two years after the fact and had their lives destroyed in the process, were the victims of a
00:00:29 false narrative, a hoax that originated with the accuser's sorority sisters who were desperate to
00:00:35 protect the reputation of their sorority. And we're going to talk about the evidence in a moment and
00:00:39 what it means for the case and for the rule of law in this country. But first, on the subject of
00:00:45 how the system is stacked against male defendants in cases like this, there was a moment during
00:00:51 Russell Brand's sentencing earlier this week that we didn't talk about when we discussed the case,
00:00:56 which really should be getting a lot more attention. It's the perfect illustration of
00:01:01 how the legal system, both in the UK and the US, has become a total farce, where kangaroo courts
00:01:07 are operating right out in the open. And particularly when they want to send a conservative
00:01:13 to prison, they will simply forget about basic principles of due process and fairness. And
00:01:19 instead, they'll berate you for even attempting to defend yourself against their onslaught of
00:01:25 allegations. So this is footage of the judge, Justice Benethan, with his nice little wig
00:01:35 and everything, right before he sentenced Russell Brand. And listen to what this guy says.
00:01:42 Finally, before passing sentence, I pause to pay tribute to the determination and bravery
00:01:48 of all the women whose evidence I have been recounting. I do not increase your punishment
00:01:55 because of it but all those women had to face being confronted and being told they'd lied 0.56
00:02:02 or twisted the truth and or they'd agreed to your sexual demands. That was all done because of you
00:02:10 on your instructions. I also commend the Metropolitan Police for their hard work in
00:02:17 gathering evidence and taking great care of all the women who testified.
00:02:25 I actually appreciate there's a charm in the fact that they still do the wig and the robes and all
00:02:29 that kind of stuff. Or I would appreciate it more, but then at the same time, these are all
00:02:34 woke lunatics. So you're woke lunatics, but you're hanging on to the wig and it just doesn't, 0.99
00:02:40 it doesn't choose one or the other. Now, I don't think I've ever heard of a judge 0.97
00:02:45 lecturing a defendant for presenting a defense, but that's exactly what just happened here.
00:02:49 He's attacking Russell Brand for telling his lawyers to cross-examine
00:02:53 the women who were accusing him of serious, horrific crimes. We're supposed to feel bad
00:03:00 that these women had to answer questions on the witness stand where their credibility was
00:03:05 called into question as if they're somehow being re-victimized again or whatever. So in other words, 0.84
00:03:10 He's telling Russell Brand that he, Russell Brand, should have just pled guilty. How dare he point out that there's zero evidence whatsoever, aside from these women's claims, to corroborate any of the charges? How dare he point out that these alleged crimes all occurred nearly two decades ago, and none of these women told the police at the time?
00:03:29 How dare he point out that the supposedly incriminating text messages sent by Russell Brand, which were introduced into evidence, were simply recounted from memory by his accuser because the phone company lost the text messages since it all happened so long ago.
00:03:42 How dare his lawyers observe that the main accuser consented to degenerate sexual activity with Brand on multiple occasions 17 years ago,
00:03:50 and therefore we really have no idea or no way of knowing whether she's telling the truth about one specific sex act
00:03:56 that occurred as part of a larger sexual encounter that she did consent to.
00:04:02 He should have just accepted his fate the moment the British government decided to destroy him for becoming a conservative.
00:04:09 That's what the judge is saying.
00:04:11 Now, keep in mind, the jury acquitted Russell Brand on several of the charges that were
00:04:14 brought against him.
00:04:15 So the cross-examinations were obviously, in part, successful.
00:04:19 What happened is that the jury dismissed the charges where the women's story changed or
00:04:24 where she didn't report it at the time or where the details were hazy, but they convicted
00:04:29 Brand on the charges where the women mostly kept their story straight or told other people 0.98
00:04:34 at the time about what had supposedly happened.
00:04:37 So basically in every case,
00:04:38 the convictions were based solely
00:04:39 on the women's testimony.
00:04:41 Just a question of whether the woman
00:04:43 repeated her claim to other people
00:04:44 and kept it consistent or not.
00:04:47 But if the judge had his way,
00:04:48 Brand would have simply pleaded guilty
00:04:50 to all the charges
00:04:51 and accepted a much longer sentence.
00:04:54 The judge thinks that would be appropriate
00:04:56 to spare these brave women
00:04:58 who he wants to pay tribute to.
00:05:01 Now, perhaps he wanted Brand
00:05:02 to present evidence of his own guilt.
00:05:04 do the prosecution's work for them, and then plead for a longer sentence.
00:05:10 That was apparently the expectation. At least the judge claims he didn't increase Brand's
00:05:16 sentence because he exercised his right to defend himself. So that's something. Begrudgingly,
00:05:21 he won't tack on five years to the sentence because the concept of cross-examination exists.
00:05:27 What a magnanimous gesture. Now, of course, if cross-examination was not a factor in sentencing,
00:05:33 then there's no reason for the judge to mention it at all. The mere fact he said this, as we all
00:05:37 know, is a pretty clear indication that he harbors resentment for Russell Brand for daring to defend
00:05:42 himself, and there's no way he didn't sentence him to a longer sentence because of it. After all,
00:05:47 as we established earlier this week, Brand got a much harsher sentence than murderers and child
00:05:52 predators. You can kill somebody in Britain and get five years in prison. The judge will make
00:05:57 excuses for you, saying you momentarily lost control, especially if you're a Muslim or a
00:06:02 woman or identify as trans. Meanwhile, Russell Brand got 10 years plus a lecture from the judge
00:06:08 about how he's a horrible person for even attempting to defend himself. So the foundational
00:06:14 legal principle that a defendant is allowed to defend himself, it's right there in the name
00:06:17 actually. Defendant was held against Russell Brand. And the other foundational legal principle
00:06:25 of beyond a reasonable doubt was suspended entirely in order to get Russell Brand into a
00:06:31 prison cell. As we discussed earlier, you may believe that he's guilty because in your mind,
00:06:39 he seems like the kind of guy who would do something like what he's accused of doing.
00:06:44 You may subjectively determine that in the game of he said, she said, you tend to believe the
00:06:51 she instead of the he. That's your opinion. I don't agree with it, but you can have whatever
00:06:56 opinion you want, but in no universe, at least not in this one, and especially not in the West
00:07:03 where we're supposed to have a fair and sophisticated judicial system, can it be claimed
00:07:07 that this subjective opinion about the credibility of the accusers and the presumed moral failings
00:07:13 of the defendant amounts to guilt beyond a reasonable doubt? You may think Russell Brand
00:07:20 is guilty, but there are a number of extremely plausible scenarios that explain away all of the
00:07:27 evidence against him, what meager evidence there ever was. And the prosecution did not disprove
00:07:33 any of those scenarios. And yes, all the defense needs to do, in theory, is establish that there
00:07:40 are plausible scenarios where the defendant is not guilty. And it's up to the prosecution to
00:07:46 actively demonstrate that no such scenario exists. They didn't. You know, if the defense can say,
00:07:55 well, you claim I did this, but I also could have just did this could have happened over here.
00:07:59 Here's another thing that also fits the evidence. Can you disparate? And if the prosecution says,
00:08:03 well, yeah, that could have happened too. Who knows? Then it's not guilty. It has to be not
00:08:08 guilty. And the plausible scenario in all these accusations is that it was consensual in the
00:08:13 moment. The woman regretted it later, changed her mind and decided that she was going to destroy 0.85
00:08:18 Russell Brand. That is the very plausible, very possible scenario that exists in all of these
00:08:24 cases. And the prosecution did absolutely nothing to disprove that. They didn't come within a mile
00:08:31 of beyond a reasonable doubt, in other words. So the standard was simply disregarded in his case.
00:08:37 And if it can be disregarded in his case, it can be disregarded in your case.
00:08:43 Whether you live in the U.S. or the U.K., a precedent has been set.
00:08:47 And for good measure, his online presence is also being erased by the big tech platforms.
00:08:52 Meta, the company that owns Facebook and Instagram, has already unpersoned Russell Brand.
00:08:58 They've deleted his Instagram account and prevented anyone from seeing his profile like he never existed.
00:09:04 which as far as I know is not standard procedure if somebody gets convicted of a crime.
00:09:10 Is this what it does? Does Meta do this for anybody? If you get convicted of a crime,
00:09:15 they just take your account down? I'm pretty sure if I checked, I could find like a million
00:09:21 examples where they didn't do that. But especially as the left regains power, this is going to become
00:09:27 much more common. The censorship of 2020 is going to pale in comparison to what they're doing right
00:09:33 now. So this is a travesty of justice. Really, it was a political hit job. It's emblematic
00:09:38 of the justice that you will receive in any Western country if you're accused of a serious
00:09:43 crime and you don't belong to one of the left's preferred demographic groups. Your guilt is
00:09:49 assumed from the outset. Any attempt to defend yourself is seen as further evidence of your guilt.
00:09:56 And even as you uncover evidence that disproves the allegations against you,
00:10:00 even as you conclusively demonstrate that you're innocent, which again is not the standard for
00:10:06 defendants. You don't have to conclusively demonstrate that you're innocent. But even if
00:10:09 you do that, these people will not yield. They're not going to admit they made a mistake. Instead,
00:10:16 they'll double down in their efforts to destroy you. And if possible, they'll use the opportunity
00:10:19 to enact systemic change to empower themselves and disenfranchise their enemies. That's exactly
00:10:25 what's happening in the ongoing saga of the Cornell 7, which has gone even further off the
00:10:30 rails since we last talked about the case. As you may recall, an adult woman voluntarily engaged
00:10:36 in group sexual activity at a Cornell frat house where everybody was under the influence of drugs
00:10:41 and alcohol. Everybody was behaving in a disgusting, barbaric manner. After the fact, 0.97
00:10:47 she repeatedly states in writing that nothing illegal happened, that she felt empowered by
00:10:53 the whole experience. Then she gets disinvited from the fraternity's Halloween party,
00:10:58 which to a sorority girl is the ultimate offense you know because the halloween part halloween is
00:11:04 like christmas new year's uh your birthday all rolled into one and so she decided that she was 1.00
00:11:11 actually a victim she starts sending texts that are designed to entrap the men she goes to the
00:11:15 police who quickly determine that even if all of her allegations were true still no crime had
00:11:20 occurred and then two years later she gets a strip mall lawyer to file a bombshell lawsuit 0.60
00:11:25 complete with tons of lurid and totally unverified claims where she changes her version of events
00:11:30 once again, this time to directly accuse the men of serious criminal conduct, which she had never
00:11:35 done before. So that's the outline of the story. None of those facts are in dispute.
00:11:41 The appropriate response, given this evidence, before we even get into the new stuff,
00:11:45 is to simply ignore this woman because she has no credibility whatsoever. Actually, the best 1.00
00:11:50 response, even based on what we already know, would be to charge her with a crime for making
00:11:55 false accusations. And then after she's convicted, put her in prison. Yeah, but that's never going 0.99
00:12:02 to happen because in the modern justice system, there's essentially no penalty, no disincentive
00:12:05 at all for falsely accusing men of sexual assault. The only thing stopping a woman from accusing a 0.99
00:12:12 man of sexual assault falsely is her own soul. But if she doesn't have one, then all bets are off.
00:12:19 So instead, Cornell has descended into a level of hysteria that rivals the Salem witch trials, except in reverse now, because this time the witches are doing the burning.
00:12:28 Now they're citing a bogus survey about how a third of women at Cornell have supposedly, quote, experienced non-consensual sexual contact involving force or incapacitation. 0.88
00:12:39 So if that's true, it would make Cornell University substantially more dangerous for women than Afghanistan or a Somali refugee camp. 0.81
00:12:49 It would mean that a quiet Ivy League campus is actually more dangerous than the worst third-world hellhole you can find anywhere on Earth. 1.00
00:12:59 And if the women at Cornell actually believed that was true, they would all withdraw from the school immediately. 0.99
00:13:07 What are you doing paying exorbitant fees to spend four years in a rape dungeon? 1.00
00:13:13 Why would you ever do that?
00:13:15 But they haven't withdrawn. 0.62
00:13:18 In fact, in spite of the fact that Cornell is more dangerous than a country run by the Taliban, not only are women not withdrawing from the school, they're still getting hammered and going out to parties, which is probably not something a woman would do or even a man would do in Taliban-controlled territory. 0.80
00:13:35 okay if you really believe there's a there's a 30 chance that you could be sexually assaulted 0.86
00:13:42 or whatever they're saying the statistic is not only are you not leaving the campus you're going
00:13:48 to parties that is a clear indication you don't believe that and no one else does because it's
00:13:56 nonsense and it's not true you know the survey conveniently enough has an extremely low response
00:14:02 rate of just 13 percent, along with a very expansive definition of assault, which is entirely
00:14:05 self-reported. None of the accusations are verified in any way. So our society has gone to great lengths
00:14:11 to convince women that they've been assaulted, and then researchers come along and ask them
00:14:17 if they've been assaulted, and then a lot of them say yes, and we're supposed to go, wow,
00:14:23 well, how could that have happened? So it's completely fake and useless as a statistic.
00:14:29 Nevertheless, based in part on that survey, the Cornell faculty just voted overwhelmingly to pass the following resolution, quote, resolved that the faculty Senate has no confidence in the ability of the central administration to effectively address the ongoing crisis of sexual assault at Cornell University.
00:14:45 Yes, the ongoing crisis of sexual assault at Cornell University is so bad they want the school's entire administration to be fired.
00:14:53 So here's how one Cornell professor, a woman who teaches music, described the vote. Watch.
00:15:01 The majority of the professors said they do not trust the leadership of President Kotlikoff or the administration. What does that mean?
00:15:10 Yeah, it feels great. Actually, it feels like we have sent a really resounding message, as you say, from the majority of the faculty that are demanding change and demanding change now.
00:15:23 As many of us know, this resolution is not actionable. It's not binding in that the passage of it doesn't require or mandate resignations or firings. But we hope that this inspires that because we are the teachers, we are the faculty, we are the people that look after and shepherd these students who need us and who can and should trust us with their voice.
00:15:48 And I think, yes, a 25-point margin is pretty resounding.
00:15:53 And I'm really thrilled that there can be hopefully new inroads made for new leadership to take things into a new direction.
00:16:03 Now, notice how this female music professor does not mention anything about the actual facts of the alleged gang rape or how the administration supposedly mishandled the allegations.
00:16:12 Instead, she talks in very broad emotional terms about providing support for the students and how the resolution feels good.
00:16:20 And there's a reason for this.
00:16:21 At some level, even the leftist music professors at Cornell understand that this moral panic has no basis whatsoever.
00:16:27 It's all nonsense.
00:16:28 And to prove that point, before we get into the new text messages that have surfaced in this case, which further destroyed the official narrative,
00:16:34 We need to spend some time looking at the video from the Cornell faculty meeting last month where they passed this no confidence vote for Cornell leadership.
00:16:44 Credit where it's due. The journalist Michael Tracy was the first to report on these videos.
00:16:48 They're truly a remarkable look into the depravity of leftists, particularly when they're in the majority and emboldened, which is obviously the case on college campuses.
00:16:56 So we'll start with a student who spoke at the faculty meeting to relay her dire concerns.
00:17:02 This is some of the most unhinged, delusional footage you'll ever see.
00:17:07 And keep in mind, she is representative of about 95% or so of students, particularly women, at Cornell.
00:17:15 Watch.
00:17:17 During my first meet-year, I was horrified by the dangerous fraternity culture on this campus.
00:17:23 I remember a young woman was walking alone in college town.
00:17:26 Her steps were slow and shaky.
00:17:29 She was obviously intoxicated.
00:17:31 I came to realize that this was normal at Cornell. 1.00
00:17:34 Freshman women, dangerously intoxicated, 0.99
00:17:37 trekked 30 minutes back to their dorms on North Campus past midnight. 0.99
00:17:42 And no one stops and helps them.
00:17:44 That same year, the number of undergraduate women experiencing non-consensual sexual contact
00:17:50 involving four-spring incapacitation at Cornell
00:17:53 rose from 23% to 35%.
00:17:57 And then in my junior fall,
00:17:59 I, like many of you, heard a horrific article in The Sun
00:18:03 detailing how a young woman was unconsensually brought
00:18:06 and gained weight by seven men for seven hours.
00:18:11 In the days that followed,
00:18:12 this administration published quiet statements on their website
00:18:15 not even bothering to send out a formal email
00:18:18 to the student body.
00:18:20 Many of my professors continued class as usual, not even mentioning the rape case, while me and my fellow students were barely able to go to class.
00:18:33 Yes, students were barely able to go to class over this alleged gang rape that lasted over seven hours.
00:18:39 First of all, it really needs to be said that leftists love to use the most incendiary language they possibly can,
00:18:44 because they know that if someone isn't following the facts closely,
00:18:48 then they'll fill in the blanks with some insane scenario
00:18:51 that doesn't remotely resemble the truth.
00:18:53 They did this with Trump's criminal convictions
00:18:56 when they said he was a felon who was convicted of 34 counts
00:18:59 or whatever it is they said.
00:19:01 And they know that if you mention the actual charges
00:19:03 and how all 34 counts are basically the same fake accounting charge
00:19:07 from a decade ago, then people will realize it's a farce.
00:19:11 So instead they called Trump a 34-time convicted felon
00:19:14 so that if you weren't paying attention, you'd assume he actually committed a real crime.
00:19:18 34 of them, actually.
00:19:20 They do the same thing when they talk about how thugs like Michael Brown were unarmed teenagers
00:19:24 while admitting the fact that they were in the process of violently attacking police officers when they were shot.
00:19:29 And along the same lines, when leftists say that the Cornell incident was a gang rape
00:19:33 and that the students are terrified of walking around campus,
00:19:36 they're trying to get you to imagine a situation where, you know,
00:19:40 women are being snatched off the streets or something.
00:19:42 They want your brain to fill in the blanks and conclude that this woman was kidnapped and somehow held against her will for seven hours. 0.97
00:19:50 But in reality, if you don't get very high and very drunk and then voluntarily and eagerly participate in an orgy, then you're not going to end up in an orgy. 0.93
00:20:07 Now, that's pretty easy to avoid.
00:20:09 It's actually like the easiest thing in the world to avoid.
00:20:11 Did you know that?
00:20:12 it is so easy for it. There's probably nothing easier than avoiding an orgy. 0.95
00:20:20 That's the kind of thing you have to go seek out. Most normal people wouldn't even know where to go 0.91
00:20:26 to find one, okay? So that's how obscure these things are. Easiest thing, you could go your
00:20:32 entire life and never come across an orgy or even see evidence of one, much less be involved in one.
00:20:39 there are no roving gangs of cornell rapists lurking behind the school library waiting to
00:20:46 pounce um upstate new york is not mogadishu at least not yet you know the very leftists
00:20:52 hyperventilating about gang rapes are also busy trying to turn new york into the kind of place
00:20:56 where gang rapes might really start happening with frequency but they haven't happened yet
00:20:59 but in this case we know for a fact because of the accuser's own text messages that she was not
00:21:04 kidnapped or assaulted in any way. Quite the opposite. She was proud of what she had done
00:21:09 until word got out and her reputation began to fall apart. She wrote after the orgy, and I quote,
00:21:15 I love you, King. At the end of the day, none of the sexual stuff was illegal. And honestly, 0.52
00:21:19 I really like being with you and Matt. So anything anyone has to say about the gangbang
00:21:24 is out of their jurisdiction. Insane slash jaw dropping. If you have any regrets or anything
00:21:29 you want to talk about, I'm always here to talk about it because that was a lot. Everyone's just
00:21:33 jealous of us, but also like everyone needs to grow up because sexuality and sex is changing
00:21:39 and stuff like this is going to become more common. Now, again, we just have to leave aside
00:21:46 that these are Ivy. This is an Ivy League student, supposedly, and this is how she's 1.00
00:21:53 speaking or writing more specifically. You know, there's just with the writing alone,
00:22:02 There's no distinction between an Ivy League student and someone who dropped out of high
00:22:09 school or never even went. In fact, the person who dropped out of high school probably might
00:22:13 even be better when it comes to writing. Now, not to put too fine a point on it, but
00:22:18 aside from how illegible and illiterate they are, those texts are not ones that you send
00:22:24 to someone who just kidnapped you and physically abused you for seven hours.
00:22:31 She was offering to help them, probably because she knew that the male students were far more
00:22:36 intoxicated than she was. She explicitly refers the encounter as a gangbang. She uses the terms
00:22:41 insane and jaw-dropping to describe not the gangbang itself, but to describe anyone who
00:22:47 would be critical of it. She thinks it's insane and jaw-dropping that anyone would have a problem
00:22:51 with what happened. And then she tries to comfort the man in case he has any regrets.
00:22:58 Now, the very interesting thing with that full text when you read it is that, if anything,
00:23:02 this is the kind of text that the rapist might send to the person that was raped.
00:23:09 If anything, this sounds like the grooming going on.
00:23:13 You're the one telling them, oh, if you have any regrets, oh, it's okay, everything's fine.
00:23:18 Isn't that what the rapist does?
00:23:22 That makes you seem like the initiator, if not the aggressor.
00:23:27 And you could probably make a better case for that than the reverse.
00:23:33 I don't think anyone was raped here, 0.99
00:23:35 but the men probably have a better case for it than the woman
00:23:40 based on the text messages she was sending initially.
00:23:46 Now, things only change when she discovered, and I quote,
00:23:49 my reputation is destroyed and I'm utterly ashamed.
00:23:53 Which, you know, the appropriate response to that is like,
00:23:56 okay, well, that's your problem. 1.00
00:23:57 You probably shouldn't have behaved like a whore. You behaved disgustingly like a whore, and so that's why you're ashamed. 1.00
00:24:07 You should be. Your reputation actually should be destroyed. 1.00
00:24:12 And then weeks later, they canceled her invite to the Halloween party at the frat, and the rest was history.
00:24:17 Let's say you run a small business, and you've been thinking about expanding for the last couple of years.
00:24:22 You've found the right location. You know there's demand, and you've done the math.
00:24:27 everything makes sense, but you keep putting it off because you want to wait until the timing is
00:24:32 absolutely perfect. You have all the money sitting in the bank. Six months later, someone else opens
00:24:37 a business in that exact location, starts serving the customers you could have been serving. Now,
00:24:41 obviously, you shouldn't make reckless financial decisions, but there's also a cost to waiting
00:24:46 around indefinitely, especially when you already have a successful business and a real opportunity
00:24:50 to grow it. This is why Cardiff is worth considering. Cardiff provides funding for
00:24:55 established small businesses without the endless paperwork and delays associated with traditional
00:24:59 banks. Their application takes just three minutes and applying won't impact your personal credit
00:25:04 score at all. Approval in minutes, funding same-day. Qualified businesses can receive up to
00:25:10 $500,000 in same-day funding. And Cardiff has funded more than $12 billion to American small
00:25:17 businesses. If you've been operating for at least one year, you generate at least $20,000 in monthly
00:25:22 revenue, you can see what funding options may be available to you. You still need to make a smart
00:25:27 business decision. Cardiff simply gives you a way to pursue an opportunity without spending weeks
00:25:32 waiting for the bank to get around to your application. Go to cardiff.co slash Walsh. That's
00:25:36 cardiff.co slash Walsh. Real growth, fast funding, Cardiff, borrow better. Apparently there are only
00:25:43 two acceptable opinions when it comes to college. Either everyone must attend regardless of the cost
00:25:49 Or every college is completely useless and no one should ever go to any of them.
00:25:53 But as usual, both sides are avoiding the most important question.
00:25:56 Is the education you're getting at a particular institution actually worth it?
00:25:59 A lot of higher education deserves the criticism it receives and then some, but Grand Canyon University offers something different.
00:26:05 GCU has more than 100 online undergraduate degrees, giving students the flexibility to begin college or return and finish without putting the rest of their lives on hold.
00:26:14 And affordability isn't just a slogan.
00:26:16 In addition to federal grants and aid, GCU's online students received nearly $200 million in institutional scholarships in 2025 alone.
00:26:25 What I respect about GCU is that it combines practical career preparation with the free market system, a welcoming Christian worldview, and free and open discourse.
00:26:34 It's easy to say higher education is outdated, irrelevant, but at Grand Canyon University, they don't settle for the status quo.
00:26:40 They shatter it.
00:26:41 GCU's accredited MBA program is 100% online and is designed to shape leaders through servant leadership.
00:26:48 GCU can help you take your passion and scale your business to serve your community.
00:26:53 This is purpose-driven education. Take action. Find your purpose. Grand Canyon University. Visit gcu.edu.
00:27:02 Now, the other extraordinary part of that clip is that the student says that she was horrified to see drunk women walking around the campus of Cornell past midnight.
00:27:10 without anyone stopping to help them,
00:27:14 although it's not remotely clear
00:27:15 what help these women needed exactly? 0.98
00:27:18 Do they think all female students need an armed escort 1.00
00:27:21 or else the non-existent roving Cornell rape gangs 1.00
00:27:23 are going to descend on them?
00:27:25 How paternalistic do we need to be 1.00
00:27:27 in order to meet the demands of these feminist nutcases? 1.00
00:27:31 Do women need chaperones whenever they go out in public? 1.00
00:27:35 I mean, if that's what you're advocating, 1.00
00:27:37 if you're advocating to bring back the patriarchy
00:27:40 and women can't be trusted to walk around at night alone 1.00
00:27:43 and can't be trusted to exercise their own agency. 1.00
00:27:47 If that's what you're advocating, then come out and say it. 0.97
00:27:51 Yeah, but I would say that if a woman goes out and decides to get drunk
00:27:54 and then has to walk home, how's that anyone else's problem
00:27:59 or anyone else's fault?
00:28:02 If a random guy's walking by, why is that a problem he has to solve?
00:28:06 You went out to a party, got drunk, and now you got to walk home.
00:28:09 I got to solve that problem for you.
00:28:10 Why?
00:28:11 I got my own problems. 1.00
00:28:12 The woman in the clip saw a female drunkard stumbling around at midnight, 0.99
00:28:18 who there's no indication, by the way, that she even tried to help.
00:28:20 Did you try to help her?
00:28:22 So she's watching this scene and just sitting there.
00:28:24 Someone should help her.
00:28:26 This is disgusting that no one is helping that woman that I'm also not helping. 0.98
00:28:31 But she immediately determined that the drunk woman's behavior is the fault of 0.98
00:28:35 every man on campus.
00:28:38 And by the way, this is not an incidental point. The proliferation of false accusations just make it all the more certain that no man will ever or should ever stop to help a drunk college girl, whatever help even means here.
00:28:56 Okay, if he escorts her home or gives her a ride in his car, God forbid, worst decision of all,
00:29:02 he has just set himself up so that the drunk lady can wake up tomorrow or next year or 30 years from
00:29:08 now and accuse him of assault. And then he goes to jail for 10 years. You know, and suddenly this
00:29:16 act of helping becomes after the fact, you know, kidnapping and rape. So no, there will be no
00:29:22 helping. I would caution any man. I would, my own sons, if they were in college, I would say
00:29:27 in that, no, do not help. Do not help. Sorry, we don't live in that world anymore. You got drunk
00:29:33 and you're a woman, you got to walk home. I guess you're walking. Your dorm is an hour away. I guess, 1.00
00:29:39 you know, well, good luck. You're going to get some cardio tonight because nope, no one is helping.
00:29:46 Now you might be tempted to dismiss this footage because it's just some dumb student, 0.98
00:29:50 but the Cornell faculty was even worse. Watch. Thank you. My name is Julia Chang. I'm an 0.99
00:29:57 associate professor and director of undergraduate studies in the Department of Romance Studies. I am
00:30:02 also the Posse 14 mentor for the College of Arts and Sciences. This semester, I worked exclusively
00:30:09 with first-year, first-semester students who are absolutely terrified. They feel unsafe,
00:30:15 and they are shocked that this case happened in 2024
00:30:19 and that there wasn't an urgency when that happened.
00:30:22 We need to reckon with the fact that trust is completely eroded on this campus
00:30:26 between students and administration.
00:30:29 I would also want to ask a somewhat naive question. 0.66
00:30:32 Maybe I'm dumb, but I really want to go through this. 0.95
00:30:36 Is rape a less destructive, expressive activity 0.98
00:30:41 than protesting against genocide?
00:30:45 I recognize the passion
00:31:00 around this issue
00:31:01 and around the issue
00:31:02 with the honesty
00:31:02 but look
00:31:03 these are two separate
00:31:04 areas here
00:31:05 so the question 1.00
00:31:09 is so idiotic 1.00
00:31:10 that it just left 1.00
00:31:11 this guy speechless
00:31:12 the president of Cornell
00:31:13 couldn't believe
00:31:14 what he was hearing
00:31:14 in case you couldn't hear it, the question which came from a professor in Asian studies was, and I 0.96
00:31:20 quote, maybe I'm dumb. Well, you said it, not me. But I really want an answer to this. Is rape a 0.66
00:31:27 less destructive, expressive activity than protesting against genocide? Well, the answer
00:31:37 to that question is, first of all, the first part of the question is really easy. Yeah, you're dumb. 1.00
00:31:41 okay you're hopelessly stupid we can cover that um that's not much of that's that's not gonna 1.00
00:31:47 that's not a that's not a trick question that's not gonna stump anyone um in fact you're a disgrace 1.00
00:31:52 to the entire country not just cornell uh and it is a disgrace that you are a professor who's 1.00
00:31:56 responsible for educating students when you're that stupid even putting aside the fact that she 1.00
00:32:00 was trying the point she was trying to make the question itself is incoherent it's gibberish 1.00
00:32:04 it's a non-sequitur no one talks like this if you're going to do a gotcha question the words
00:32:10 have to get to gel together in a kind of way that makes sense. People are supposed to hear a gotcha
00:32:14 question and go, oh, she really got him. They're not supposed to say, can this woman speak English?
00:32:21 What? That's the most convoluted way you could possibly phrase a gotcha question. Now, if you 0.99
00:32:26 try to analyze what she's saying, you know, it's supposed to be a catty way to make the claim that
00:32:30 Cornell treats rapists better than the students who protested for Gaza on campus a couple years
00:32:35 ago. Now, of course, the fundamental problem with that reasoning is that the Cornell 7 didn't
00:32:39 actually rape anyone, number one. Meanwhile, the Gaza protesters set up illegal encampments,
00:32:46 assaulted police to face statues of buildings, blocked the entrance to the dining hall and the
00:32:52 library. In other words, they committed obvious, verifiable crimes documented in plain view of
00:32:58 police officers and everybody else. So they were not accused of crimes on the basis of a civil
00:33:03 lawsuit filed two years after the fact, based on the narrative of a woman who has repeatedly
00:33:09 changed her story. Other than that, you know, it's a perfect analogy. The female Asian studies
00:33:16 professor really nailed it. And, you know, not to get sidetracked here, but this is the kind of 1.00
00:33:22 Tourette's syndrome that leftists, especially leftist academics have now, of course, have had
00:33:26 for a long time. Anytime you try to talk about any issue, they'll shout, oh yeah, well, is that worse
00:33:33 than the genocide in Gaza? It doesn't matter. I mean, especially on X, this happens, or you could
00:33:39 post anything. You could post about, oh, I had, you know, I had a hamburger from five guys. It
00:33:44 was good. Oh, well, what about the, can they have five guys in Gaza? Invariably, whatever issue 0.76
00:33:51 you're discussing has nothing to do with what happened in Gaza, you know, genocide or not.
00:33:56 Or my favorite, if you care about any topic or issue, they'll swoop in and demand to know whether
00:34:01 you care more about that topic or issue than what's happening in Gaza. And in my case, I'm
00:34:08 happy to say, yeah. Whenever they're saying, oh, you care more about this than Gaza? Yeah,
00:34:15 I do. I do care more about a great many issues than anything that is happening or has ever
00:34:21 happened or will ever happen in Gaza. Because I actually don't care about Gaza at all. 0.97
00:34:28 It's not my country. It's not my problem. It's not even on my list of my top 500 concerns.
00:34:34 And if you think that sounds cruel or callous or something, you really shouldn't have much trouble understanding it, because I feel about Gaza exactly as you feel about literally thousands of atrocities unfolding on the globe right this moment, all of which you are also ignoring.
00:34:53 You don't stop to think about them ever, because they don't concern you.
00:34:58 And that makes a lot of sense.
00:34:59 anyway then there was the female romance studies professor who reports the uh the first year
00:35:06 students are terrified and feel unsafe presumably because their teachers are telling them that they
00:35:11 should feel terrified and unsafe this is one of the many reasons why it's a bad idea to send your
00:35:16 children to these overwhelmingly left-wing schools especially if you're you know especially if you
00:35:22 have young men if you have sons that's the worst place you could send them these teachers are
00:35:29 mostly hysterical, emotionally incontinent women and low testosterone men, and they go out of their 0.98
00:35:35 way to make their students as unhinged as they are. It's like watching a cult meeting. And by 0.95
00:35:41 the way, although this will shock absolutely no one, the vast majority of the faculty members
00:35:44 who rejected this nonsense and voted against this resolution are in the science and engineering
00:35:48 departments. So it's the humanities teachers who contribute nothing to society who are leading the
00:35:54 charge. Their careers are completely pointless, so they feel a compulsion to be part of something
00:35:58 greater and change the world and resist systemic injustice. And they're willing to invent that
00:36:04 systemic injustice if they have to. Meanwhile, the scientists, for the most part anyway,
00:36:09 tend to be more interested in actual problems rather than doing interviews with the New York
00:36:13 Times. Although there are many exceptions to that. And that's the right approach because the longer
00:36:18 this farce drags on, the more it falls apart. It's already completely collapsed as a narrative,
00:36:23 but somehow new text messages keep getting released, more evidence surfaces to bury the
00:36:28 narrative even further. This is from the free press reporting on new text messages that show
00:36:33 how the accuser's sorority pushed the idea that the woman was assaulted as a way of protecting
00:36:39 the sorority's reputation. Quote, text messages between Jane Doe's sorority sisters paint a
00:36:44 picture of a group of women in crisis mode, having been made vulnerable by association to
00:36:49 the kind of reputational damage that would threaten the entire sorority's status within
00:36:53 the small and precarious ecosystem of Cornell's Greek life-centric social scene. For Jane Doe, 0.97
00:36:59 the fact that she has severely transgressed the norms of her community appears to come as a
00:37:03 surprise and a disappointment. Within a few days of the incident, she wrote to one of the men,
00:37:08 bro, everyone knows I'm incredibly stressed out, but everyone knows I'm incredibly stressed out,
00:37:16 two different sentence. From there, her unease only grows. People are talking. People are
00:37:20 judging. People are telling a version of the story, her story, that is eclipsing her own account
00:37:24 and that strips her of the mantle of the adventurous, branding her instead with the 1.00
00:37:29 scarlet letter of the slut. Even the people who care about her have come up with their own 0.99
00:37:33 countervailing narrative to contradict her own, insisting to anyone who will listen and to Jane
00:37:38 herself that she was the victim of sexual coercion. Now, that passage is referring to texts that were
00:37:43 unearthed by the new york times a few days ago every single one of them is devastating for this
00:37:47 woman's lawsuit and we'll start with a text that was sent on october 21st 2024 around 6 p.m
00:37:53 from one of the fraternity members she's now accusing of rape this is the day after the alleged
00:37:59 assault he writes quote hey i just got your number and heard that i may have said some mean things
00:38:06 when i walked in the room but i truly do not know what i said when i make amends with you because
00:38:10 I'm not a mean person. Scotty also said he's sorry and should have never been in that room.
00:38:15 Then the accuser responds, quote, I really appreciate the text and I didn't think in your
00:38:21 heart you were a mean guy or anything. I figured it was a defense thing because like that was
00:38:26 obviously an insane night. And I think everyone was really confused, drunk, high, and nervous.
00:38:30 I really do still think highly of Chai Phi and I'm not a person to pretend I don't know people
00:38:36 after any sexual affair, no matter the magnitude. So I do look forward to seeing y'all around while
00:38:41 we're all obviously denying what happened to anyone who asks. I hope that we can joke about
00:38:46 all this in private, obviously, later down the line. Also, I do remember there were two Scotties,
00:38:51 unless I was getting effed with, but one of them sat beside me and told me to take a few minutes
00:38:56 before I got up, and I really appreciated his care for my well-being. Sometimes it's easy to
00:39:00 feel a little dehumanized in a heated sexual situation. I appreciated his pausing for me to
00:39:05 collect myself. If you wouldn't mind telling him, I said, thank you. That would be great.
00:39:10 Then a heart emoji. Now, the male student responds that, yes, there were two Scotties present.
00:39:17 She responds, quote, I think we all have a soul bond now because very few people can say they've
00:39:23 had an experience like that. While it's good to keep it away from the public, I don't think it's
00:39:27 something to feel ashamed of in private. Thank God there are two Scotties. That was literally
00:39:31 the trippiest part of the night shortly afterwards she texts another male student she's now accused
00:39:38 of uh she's now accusing of rape she writes quote it'll be funny in a couple months we should smoke
00:39:44 again sometime but like leave out the extra five billion men and ketamine marked it on rice purity
00:39:51 so i'm good i've got all the mom lore i need i had to look this up but when she says marked it
00:39:59 on rice purity. She's referring to an online survey that lists dozens of different sexual
00:40:03 experiences, and people check off the experiences they've had, including apparently group sex.
00:40:09 So she's joking about the whole experience, really bragging about it, saying it was a wild
00:40:13 experience that she can tell her future kids about. That's the mom lore part of the text.
00:40:21 Of course, for a lot of reasons, you feel bad for her future kids, if any ever exist.
00:40:25 this is the kind of thing you're gonna sit down well you sit at the dinner table
00:40:29 tell your kids about the gangbang you had in in college
00:40:34 um and then a week after the incident at the frat house some anonymous comments are posted on the
00:40:41 gossip forum called greek rank uh one of the posts reads archi-fi brothers crips or bloods
00:40:47 because i hear they have been doing hell gang banging another post read uh read they do drugs 0.86
00:40:54 and gang raped a sophomore report them. Okay, supposedly these posts changed the woman's view 0.71
00:40:59 of what happened that night. Of course, since they're anonymous comments and she just happened
00:41:03 to come across them, it's entirely possible that she posted those messages herself. It's also
00:41:06 possible a member of her sorority wrote them. You know, we have no idea. And whoever did write them,
00:41:13 it's not evidence of anything. It's just someone repeating a rumor they heard. You know, I could
00:41:18 sit here and tell you about how great Pure Talk is, or I could just read a comment from one of
00:41:23 their customers named Deanna. She says, we've been with Pure Talk for several years now and
00:41:28 absolutely love it. Great coverage, great customer service, great pricing. Now, if that's not the
00:41:33 experience you're getting from your current wireless company, it's time to switch. And in
00:41:37 honor of providing great coverage, great customer service, and great pricing, Pure Talk decided to
00:41:42 extend their unlimited for life offer for just a little bit longer. Unlimited talk, text, and
00:41:47 unlimited data for just $29.95 a month for the rest of your life. Again, this was their top shelf
00:41:53 plan, normally $65 a month, but you lock it in at just $29.95 a month for life. No contract,
00:42:00 no cancellation fees. Go to puretalk.com slash Walsh and make the switch in as little as 10
00:42:04 minutes. Again, that's puretalk.com slash Walsh for unlimited data for life with Pure Talk. Tax
00:42:11 and fees not included. Some restrictions apply. See puretalk.com for details. What if you could
00:42:17 delay your next two mortgage payments? Imagine putting those two payments in your pocket and
00:42:22 finally getting a little breathing room ahead of the holidays. Well, it's possible when you call
00:42:26 American Financing today. If you're feeling stretched by everyday expenses, groceries, gas,
00:42:32 bills piling up, you're not alone. Most Americans are putting those expenses on credit cards and
00:42:37 credit card rates are insane in the 20s or even 30s in some cases. American Financing can show
00:42:42 you how to use your home equity to pay off that debt. Their salary-based mortgage consultants
00:42:47 are helping homeowners just like you restructure their loans and save money every month. There are
00:42:53 no upfront fees to find out how much you can save. Their customers are saving an average of $800 a
00:42:58 month. It's like a $10,000 raise without having to change jobs to get it. Call today American
00:43:04 Financing 866-569-4711. That's 866-569-4711 or visit AmericanFinancing.net slash Walsh.
00:43:14 NMLS pound 182334, nmlsconsumeraccess.org.
00:43:19 Visit americanfinancing.net slash Walsh or call 866-569-4711.
00:43:25 Average savings based on borrowers who save over $199.99.
00:43:30 Let me get to the key message from the sorority.
00:43:32 This is from October 27th.
00:43:33 The accuser's big sister at her sorority, basically a student mentor, is asked about
00:43:38 the rumors that are circulating about the accuser.
00:43:41 And she writes, quote, yeah, shut it down. 0.86
00:43:44 this is out of control, actually disgusting. It's disgusting that people think this is funny to
00:43:48 talk about when it would be rape if it were to happen. Some pi-fi girl started it. She had a 0.99
00:43:55 threesome, but that's it. Per usual, people love to blame women for being abuse victims or make 1.00
00:44:00 them out to be sluts. Anyway, blaming the victim, not the rapist. Or always blaming the victim, 0.99
00:44:07 not the rapist. Now, reading between the lines, what this text means is that while the accuser
00:44:11 was downplaying what happened, suggesting it was a wild and consensual experience, senior members
00:44:16 of her sorority were becoming frustrated, as the free press reported. They knew that their damage
00:44:21 control wasn't working. No one was buying their story that this woman had merely engaged in a
00:44:26 threesome. And this was reflecting very badly on the whole sorority. So the senior sorority member
00:44:32 in this message floats an alternative, kind of brainstorming. She suggests that even if the
00:44:38 rumors are correct, their sorority is still insulated from responsibility because in that
00:44:43 scenario, quote, it would be rape. Now, she never explains how exactly she'd come to this conclusion
00:44:49 or what facts would justify this change. She had no evidence to support the accusation at all,
00:44:54 but she mentions it in the text thread as a way for the sorority to reclaim the moral high ground.
00:45:00 It's a very common impulse, especially in left-wing circles, where victimhood is the
00:45:03 most important currency. As Kat Rosenfeld, the journalist who wrote the Free Press article,
00:45:08 put it, quote, it is basic human nature in the face of shame or regret to want to reframe what
00:45:14 happened in a way that unburdens you or someone you care about of those feelings. Now, once the
00:45:22 sorority began talking like this, it's natural to assume that the idea eventually filtered down to
00:45:26 the accuser. Her friends and sorority members were giving her an out. And then the fraternity,
00:45:31 in the eyes of the accuser, gave her a reason to take it. And then comes the critical October 30th
00:45:36 text, the night before the Halloween party, where the fraternity president, after initially saying
00:45:42 the accuser was welcome at the frat house, disinvites her from the party, the greatest sin
00:45:48 you can commit against a girl like this, and she's furious about it. Quote, I was uninvited,
00:45:55 but of course it was for me. I knew this was going to happen. The woman will always get the
00:45:59 short end of the stick. Y'all aren't my friends. Y'all are covering your asses. The fraternity 1.00
00:46:04 president can go F himself. I'm done. He is not a friend of mine. Now, the key thing about this is
00:46:10 that she really wanted to go to a party with these guys. So she really wanted to go to a party with
00:46:19 these guys who she now says, so she was supposedly like kidnapped and held against her will and
00:46:26 brutally raped for seven hours. And she desperately wants to go to a party with them and is furious
00:46:31 that she can't. And this is when she goes scorched earth. You know, the guy tries to reach out to
00:46:38 her to patch things up on Halloween day. He even says she's welcome at the party and she refuses
00:46:44 to talk to him. And then on November 3rd, 2024, for the first time, she sends a text where she
00:46:49 suggests that she was assaulted. And this is the first time she does this. Quote, let's be clear
00:46:53 that 90 percent of what happened that night was not consensual. And after that, she goes to the
00:46:59 ER and claims that she was assaulted. This is a sequence of events that obviously does not support
00:47:05 any lawsuit against these Cornell students, much less criminal charges. It's a farce
00:47:09 that the New York Attorney General, Letitia James, was ever appointed to investigate this case.
00:47:16 And it's no accident that she stepped aside, by the way, and appointed a former federal prosecutor
00:47:19 to handle it. One day after the midterm elections, not very subtle, this whole case was a political
00:47:26 operation by the Democrat Party to mobilize female voters ahead of the midterms. And before that,
00:47:32 to all appearances, it was a PR operation that was first suggested by a sorority that was desperate
00:47:37 to control the narrative about one of its members who was completely out of control and destroying
00:47:43 their reputation by extension. Now, it makes you wonder about those allegations about Russell Brand.
00:47:49 and all the other allegations like this, which only surface months or even years after the fact.
00:47:56 A lot of women come to regret their behavior, and when they do, their friends are often very
00:48:02 willing to help them come up with an alternative explanation, alternative facts about what
00:48:09 happened. And if they arrive at this alternative explanation, the legal system will go along
00:48:16 every step of the way.
00:48:18 The normal rules are inverted.
00:48:21 The accuser is presumed to be correct.
00:48:25 Even if she's on the record
00:48:27 with one version of events
00:48:29 and says it wasn't right,
00:48:31 she can come back years later and say,
00:48:32 actually, I think it was.
00:48:34 Even with no additional evidence,
00:48:36 nothing else,
00:48:36 she could just say,
00:48:37 actually, you know what?
00:48:38 Actually, yeah, I think it was.
00:48:41 And the legal system will say,
00:48:42 oh, okay, whatever you think.
00:48:46 The facts are, whatever you happen to say, you are God, and you can change reality retroactively based on your own whim.
00:48:58 The defendant is presumed to be guilty, and if he tries to defend himself, the judge will attack him for it during the sentencing.
00:49:04 One of the biggest successes of the Trump administration has been reforming the Title IX process on college campuses.
00:49:09 As the Cornell case and the Russell Brand case both demonstrate, we need similar reforms for the legal system at large. Give defendants the right to cross-examine accusers about their own history. The right to publicly identify their accusers. Enough with the Jane Doe nonsense.
00:49:26 And above all, we need real consequences for women who make these false accusations. 1.00
00:49:32 Whatever crime they falsely accuse someone of committing, that should be an equivalent punishment for the crime.
00:49:40 Whatever punishment they get should be the punishment that the men would have gotten had they been convicted.
00:49:47 Lock them up and the false allegations will stop.
00:49:50 Start talking about these false accusing women using terms that are appropriate, which is these are dangerous people. 1.00
00:50:00 Women who make false accusations, they are dangerous predators. 1.00
00:50:04 They are a danger. They are a danger to any man they come across. 1.00
00:50:10 And until then, stay far away from college campuses like this.
00:50:14 And of course, avoid these kinds of casual encounters entirely.
00:50:20 if you're a man or if you're a woman. It's not worth it. If they can delete Russell Brand from
00:50:26 the internet and from free society, they can do it to you. They're certainly looking for more lives
00:50:34 to destroy. And after the hysteria over these cases, which somehow is still continuing to this
00:50:39 day, the best decision you can make is to never give them the opportunity. That'll do for the show
00:50:47 today and this week. We'll talk to you on Monday. Have a great weekend. Godspeed.
00:50:58 Father, I used to feel Christ. I cannot feel anything here.
00:51:04 they take me out of my bed and they brought me here and they tell me nothing what have i done
00:51:21 article 58 counter-revolutionary activity that is all i know they have to deal with so many
00:51:28 Enemies of the state all of whom claim their innocence who protest who cry
00:51:41 There are no answers here other than the ones they put in your mouth you'll break
00:51:49 Today is your opportunity to demonstrate your loyalty to the people
00:51:54 I'd like to know why I'm here.
00:51:58 Of course.
00:52:02 But you're already now, don't you?
00:52:03 You must believe in something greater than the party.
00:52:08 You will remember your duty.
00:52:09 I've told you I know nothing.
00:52:11 Leave ground like a feral animal. 1.00
00:52:15 You stink of failure. 0.99
00:52:17 You want me to lie. 1.00
00:52:18 Still a drunk! 1.00
00:52:19 Damn you! 1.00
00:52:20 They all break. 1.00
00:52:26 Maybe.