Ep. 192 - Trump Gives Soaring SOTU Address, Democrats Embarrass Themselves
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
147.04175
Summary
Trump delivers an effective, powerful SOTU. Kamala Harris engages in some inexcusable transphobic bigotry, at least according to the standards set by liberals. And finally, I answer a question about the bizarre Liam Neeson story.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Today on The Matt Wall Show, President Trump gives a very effective, powerful State of the Union address.
00:00:05.080
Meanwhile, the Democrats embarrassed themselves, made fools of themselves, so the night was a big win for Trump.
00:00:10.340
But we'll analyze it a little bit more, kind of dissect the events of the evening.
00:00:15.620
Also, Kamala Harris engages in some inexcusable transphobic bigotry, at least according to the standards set by liberals.
00:00:25.760
So we'll talk about that. And finally, I'll answer your emails, including a question about the very bizarre Liam Neeson story that's been on the news recently.
00:00:33.960
So I'll give my take on that today on The Matt Wall Show.
00:00:42.220
So the State of the Union address was last night, as I'm sure you're aware.
00:00:46.320
It was good. Good speech. Trump did a great job with it.
00:00:50.440
I thought the speech was inspirational, soaring, well delivered, hit the right notes, love the pro-life bit.
00:00:57.700
I'll talk more about that in a minute. I like the part about the wall. We'll talk more about that as well.
00:01:02.300
I thought he made the case for the wall very well.
00:01:05.920
Now, unfortunately, it's not going to matter in the long term.
00:01:08.380
It won't matter really by next week, because nobody is going to remember this speech.
00:01:12.840
By like tomorrow, everyone will have forgotten and moved on.
00:01:15.420
Now, not because the speech was not memorable. I thought it was was memorable or should be memorable,
00:01:24.140
except that nothing is memorable in our culture because nobody remembers anything for more than 24 hours.
00:01:28.960
We just everything moves on and everyone forgets everything.
00:01:37.360
But still, you you have to make the most of the opportunities that you are given.
00:01:41.980
And even if they are fleeting and Trump definitely did a good job with the speech.
00:01:48.440
As I have said many times, Trump is the scripted version of Trump is vastly superior to the unscripted version.
00:02:00.620
And I and it's just I can't believe that anyone would dispute this anymore.
00:02:04.960
Compare something like the State of the Union address or take really any of his scripted speeches.
00:02:10.200
But look, take the State of the Union, compare that to how he is on Twitter, for instance, or to the kind of speech that he would give to a rally somewhere in Pensacola, Florida or whatever.
00:02:25.740
And it's just there's no question that the scripted version is much, much more compelling, more coherent, just much more focused and everything.
00:02:41.740
And I know that when I say that, it seems like an insult because it seems like it's just another way of saying that Trump is only good when he's saying things that other people have written for him to say.
00:02:56.780
And by the way, that's true for probably most people.
00:03:02.340
Most people, you're going to sound better with a speech written by a speechwriter than you will just off the cuff talking into a microphone.
00:03:11.080
That's I say I think pretty much everyone sounds better the other way.
00:03:18.140
And there's something else to it also that the reason why I think Trump is compelling when he's giving scripted speeches is that he is willing to say things in speeches that other Republican presidents won't say.
00:03:35.580
And that's what that's why that's the really could be the very valuable thing about Donald Trump is that he is willing to put out a message.
00:03:50.480
But if he gets help crafting it, he's willing to say this thing.
00:03:52.960
So, for instance, as I mentioned, he talked about the wall.
00:03:55.380
And that whole chunk of the speech was very good.
00:03:59.580
It was also something that you probably wouldn't hear from any other Republican president.
00:04:03.800
We haven't heard from any other Republican president.
00:04:06.300
And this is where Trump is extremely effective when he's delivering a message that is his message, his unique message.
00:04:21.840
My administration has sent to Congress a common sense proposal to end the crisis on the southern border.
00:04:30.380
It includes humanitarian assistance, more law enforcement, drug detection at our ports, closing loopholes that enable child smuggling and plans for a new physical barrier or wall to secure the vast areas between our ports of entry.
00:04:51.840
In the past, most of the people in this room voted for a wall.
00:05:03.620
This is a smart, strategic, see-through steel barrier, not just a simple concrete wall.
00:05:30.580
It will be deployed in the areas identified by the border agents as having the greatest need.
00:05:40.000
And these agents will tell you where walls go up, illegal crossings go way, way down.
00:05:47.820
San Diego used to have the most illegal border crossings in our country.
00:06:07.760
In response, a strong security wall was put in place.
00:06:12.520
In response, this powerful barrier almost completely ended illegal crossings.
00:06:20.580
The border city of El Paso, Texas, used to have extremely high rates of violent crime, one of the highest in the entire country, and considered one of our nation's most dangerous cities.
00:06:38.400
Now, immediately upon its building, with a powerful barrier in place, El Paso is one of the safest cities in our country.
00:07:01.300
So, the kind of wall, the kind of barrier that he's calling for now is so sensible and so modest that Democrats look like absolute lunatics being opposed to it.
00:07:16.760
And this shows, again, how effective Trump can be when he has help crafting his message.
00:07:21.520
Because during the campaign, when he was off the cuff, he was talking about a wall, Mexico's going to pay for it.
00:07:28.860
And so, you had this image in your mind of this huge, 40-foot, concrete, towering, something that looks like from Lord of the Rings or something type structure, stretching across the entire border, like the Great Wall of China.
00:07:44.180
And that's the way he was talking about it on the campaign, off the cuff.
00:07:48.460
And it was very easy for Democrats to oppose that, because they could say, well, that's crazy.
00:07:57.120
Well, there would be billions upon billions upon billions of dollars.
00:08:00.680
He'd be building a wall across stretches of border where nobody's even crossing anyway.
00:08:07.620
But now that he's kind of crafted the message more, it's become something that you really can't oppose.
00:08:15.760
Well, you can, and you just look crazy doing it.
00:08:18.860
Because now he's talking about, all right, we're going to put strategically built, strategically placed steel barriers along the sections of the border that the Border Patrol asks us to put.
00:08:35.660
They'll tell us where they need the barriers, and we'll put them there.
00:08:46.820
There are already sections of the border that have these kinds of barriers.
00:08:50.880
And so, all Trump is really saying is, let's finish it.
00:08:53.760
Let's put those barriers in the other places where it's needed, according to the people who are experts in this kind of stuff.
00:09:11.280
Well, Democrats oppose it because they simply cannot support common sense things anymore, especially if Trump proposes them, or if any Republican proposes them.
00:09:23.280
Speaking of which, at these State of the Union speeches, the fun part, of course, is always to see what people stand to clap for, and then what lines cause them to sit solemnly with their hands folded in their laps.
00:09:37.600
And you can learn a lot about a party or about a politician based on that.
00:09:44.460
Here's a clip of Trump talking about putting an end to child sex trafficking.
00:09:51.020
Now, you would think, when it comes to applause lines, that's the safest applause line you could possibly offer, is we're going to put an end to child sex trafficking.
00:10:09.460
Now, here's the line, and I want you to watch her reaction to it.
00:10:12.480
Today, he leads investigations into the scourge of international sex trafficking.
00:10:22.800
Elvin says that if I can make sure these young girls get their justice, I've really done my job.
00:10:32.360
Thanks to his work and that of his incredible colleagues, more than 300 women and girls have been rescued from the horror of this terrible situation.
00:10:48.180
And more than 1,500 sadistic traffickers have been put behind bars.
00:11:17.220
She begrudgingly stands after a while and doesn't clap.
00:11:22.360
You could see her practically rolling her eyes, like, all right, I'll stand.
00:11:27.560
And then she just sits there with her hands folded, refusing to clap.
00:11:32.840
And I remind you, everyone else is clapping at the idea of fighting child sex trafficking.
00:11:40.000
AOC can't even stand for that or clap for that.
00:11:42.840
But if you really want to see the Democrats looking sullen, then let's check out their reaction to Trump talking about ending late-term abortion.
00:11:52.840
As I said, I thought this was the best part of the speech.
00:11:58.160
And once again, this is something that I think Trump needs help framing and coming up with the words to address this sort of issue.
00:12:13.900
But this is also a message that you're not going to hear it from other Republicans, especially at a State of the Union.
00:12:20.740
And especially in terms this direct and straightforward.
00:12:25.780
Other Republican presidents maybe have spoken briefly about protecting the unborn or protecting life, and then they just quickly move on.
00:12:36.320
So, now what I'm going to do is I want to play the whole bit for you.
00:12:40.360
But I'm going to play first just the beginning of him when he's describing late-term abortion.
00:12:46.200
And I want you to focus on Chuck Schumer's expression.
00:12:52.400
So, here is Trump describing the murder of fully developed infants in the third trimester who can feel pain.
00:12:59.200
And I want, again, I want you to watch Chuck Schumer as he describes it.
00:13:04.700
Lawmakers in New York cheered with delight upon the passage of legislation that would allow a baby to be ripped from the mother's womb.
00:13:18.660
These are living, feeling, beautiful babies who will never get the chance to share their love and their dreams with the world.
00:13:28.400
I mean, the guy, he's literally turned into a Batman villain.
00:13:32.400
I mean, he is like the penguin now from Batman.
00:13:36.380
He's sitting there with this evil grin as Trump talks about children being ripped from their mother's womb.
00:13:48.460
And Chuck Schumer is sitting there with this smile.
00:14:02.980
I would call him a ghoul, but I feel like that would be unfair to ghouls.
00:14:06.460
And then here's the, here's, so here's the rest of Trump's remarks on abortion.
00:14:12.120
And as, as you watch this, I want you to watch, especially the white pantsuit brigade, all of the Democrat women.
00:14:21.540
And then we had the case of the governor of Virginia, where he stated he would execute a baby after birth.
00:14:31.060
To defend the dignity of every person, I am asking Congress to pass legislation to prohibit the late-term abortion of children.
00:14:47.080
Let us work together to build a culture that cherishes innocent life.
00:15:15.320
Now, he's not calling for an end to all abortion here.
00:15:37.240
He was just calling for an end to late-term abortion.
00:15:39.880
The killing of babies who can feel pain and are, in many cases, viable outside of the womb.
00:15:46.360
But the Democrat women are totally bummed by that.
00:15:50.160
They were sitting there completely bummed out about the idea of not killing babies.
00:15:54.560
Because they're so psyched about killing babies that anytime someone talks about not killing babies,
00:16:01.900
When they're on the verge of tears, almost, as Trump is just saying,
00:16:05.040
Hey, let's not kill babies in the third trimester.
00:16:09.520
And all the liberal women are sitting there like, no.
00:16:19.700
Honestly, if you were writing your own comic book,
00:16:23.340
and you decided to invent a political party as the villains of this comic book world,
00:16:31.240
The modern Democrat party is a comic book villain.
00:16:38.240
That they would be scowling at the idea of protecting.
00:16:44.080
You've got Trump saying, we have to protect all innocent life.
00:16:50.040
But it wasn't all sullenness on the part of the Democrats.
00:17:00.040
And this was supposed to be an inspirational moment of unity or whatever.
00:17:07.780
All Americans can be proud that we have more women in the workforce than ever before.
00:17:42.200
And exactly one century after Congress passed the Constitutional Amendment,
00:17:54.620
we also have more women serving in Congress than at any time before.
00:18:35.580
All right. Now they're excited. They're applauding. Why? Because they're applauding
00:18:41.580
themselves. They couldn't applaud protecting babies. They had trouble applauding the end
00:18:47.140
of sex trafficking. They obviously didn't applaud protecting the border, defending our laws,
00:18:53.360
but they'll applaud themselves. Yay, we're women. We got elected. Great. Good for you.
00:18:59.580
Yeah. Awesome. Okay. Personally, I don't care that you're women. I don't care that a bunch
00:19:05.000
of women got elected. I wouldn't care if no women were elected. I wouldn't care if only
00:19:09.040
women were elected. If there were zero women in Congress or only women, it makes no difference
00:19:13.340
to me. I don't care at all in the slightest. It doesn't matter. The only thing that matters
00:19:19.480
to me is, with politicians anyway, it's what laws, what policies do they support? That's
00:19:29.400
the only thing I care about. So excuse me if I'm not welling up with tears of pride and joy
00:19:37.040
because a bunch of infanticidal, self-obsessed, identity-politic-pushing, egomaniacal women
00:19:44.160
got elected, which is what most of them are this time around. I mean, the vast majority
00:19:50.120
of these women that were elected are Democrats, and they all fall into that category because
00:19:55.440
that's what the Democrat Party is now. So there is no, oh yeah, well, they're intent
00:20:01.220
on killing babies, but at least they're women. Okay. So they have two X chromosomes. Who cares?
00:20:07.940
I don't, doesn't matter to me. It's not progress. Okay. When you elect infanticidal people to Congress,
00:20:14.980
it doesn't matter what gender they are. That is not progress. That is a step back. So yeah,
00:20:21.580
if I could replace all those women with pro-life men, I would do it in a heartbeat. Absolutely.
00:20:26.660
Call me misogynist. I don't care. By the way, I don't want to belabor the point too much, but
00:20:32.520
just by way of comparison, here is the white pantsuit brigade applauding a 10-year-old cancer
00:20:41.240
survivor. Watch this. When Grace completed treatment last fall, her doctors and nurses cheered.
00:20:48.720
They loved her. They still love her with tears in their eyes as she hung up a poster that read
00:20:59.800
Thank you very much, Grace. You are a great inspiration to everyone in this room. Thank you very much.
00:21:24.480
Okay. So they applauded, um, kind of unenthusiastic, polite applause, just sort of,
00:21:31.040
you know, the applause for, I just want you to compare the applause for themselves was exponentially
00:21:37.320
more enthusiastic and raucous and congratulatory, self-congratulatory in their case. Um, that's what
00:21:45.300
they're excited. That's why I say self-obsessed egomaniacs. That's what they're excited about.
00:21:48.860
It's about themselves congratulating themselves. So all in all, Trump came off, uh, very well and
00:21:57.280
the Democrats did themselves no favors. So big win for Trump. One other thing I wanted to mention,
00:22:04.420
um, Kamala Harris reacted to Trump's pro-life message last night with a tweet. And the tweet
00:22:11.380
was, uh, your standard Democrat cliche. She said, um, politicians should not tell women what to do
00:22:17.380
with their bodies. Okay. Only it was one of those things where that you see on Twitter, where in
00:22:23.420
between each word, there's a clapping hand emoji. I mean, you've seen that, right? Which, what is that
00:22:29.860
anyway? What, who does that in real life? Who in real life will clap in between each word to emphasize
00:22:37.880
their point? I've never seen it. So how did that become, what would that even look like? Politicians
00:22:42.440
should not tell women. I mean, what is that? Does anyone do that? Putting that aside, I find it
00:22:51.320
interesting that, um, Democrats are still using this talking point. And you see how, you see how, uh,
00:23:00.120
the Democrats, liberals, they just, they are not consistent and they make no effort to be consistent
00:23:10.720
and they hold views that are so crazy and so delusional that they, they can't really apply
00:23:18.300
them consistently. So in this case, if they were actually being consistent, um, well, they can't
00:23:26.080
use slogans like this anymore. Politicians should not tell women what to do with their bodies. Well,
00:23:32.800
according to them, men can get pregnant. Isn't this transphobia? Shouldn't Kamala Harris? This
00:23:38.920
should be a big scandal on the left. Kamala Harris is a transphobic bigot because Trump was talking
00:23:47.180
about abortion. And what is Kamala Harris? She immediately associates that with women. And she says,
00:23:55.380
don't tell women what to do with their bodies. Well, a man can get pregnant, can't he?
00:24:00.640
So this is not, you can't define what we are not defined. We, we, we make up our own genders,
00:24:05.640
right? We're not defined by our biology. I'm not going to have my gender assigned to me at birth.
00:24:13.000
So how dare you Kamala Harris? How dare you associate pregnancy and babies and reproductive health
00:24:20.840
with only women? That is transphobia. So all this stuff, no uterus, no opinion. If you're not a woman,
00:24:28.300
you can't have an opinion about it. Um, women's rights, women's health, all of it. You have to get
00:24:33.040
rid of all of that. You can't say that stuff anymore. According to your own ideology, that is all gone.
00:24:39.060
You can't do that because it doesn't mean anything anymore. Remember there is no women's health.
00:24:45.100
What does that mean? If by women's health, you're referring to, uh, you know, abortion,
00:24:51.940
anything that has to do with, then the phrase women's health is exclusionary, transphobic,
00:24:58.880
right? So you see, they can't, they can't even put all the pieces of their own agenda and their own
00:25:10.180
ideology together. And they don't even try because they know that everything conflicts with everything
00:25:15.600
else. It all contradicts each other because it's all so crazy. So when they're arguing for this,
00:25:22.280
when they're making this argument, then, you know, they'll make one argument over here and then
00:25:25.800
they'll put that argument down on the shelf and put it and just leave it to the side. Then they'll go
00:25:29.300
over here and make a different argument that contradicts that argument, but they keep it all
00:25:33.360
together. They never put it together into one cogent, coherent, um, system of thought because they can't.
00:25:40.180
All right. Um, let's check some of your email. Go to the inbox, mattwalshowatgmail.com,
00:25:49.940
mattwalshowatgmail.com. If you want to chime in with a question, comment, concern, uh, whatever it
00:25:56.000
may be. Insult is fine too. So this is from Ashley. She says, hi, Matt. One interesting thing I noticed
00:26:03.680
about the Washington Post commercial was that they showed footage of D-Day and the landing on the moon,
00:26:08.780
neither of which had journalists even present. Such a dumb commercial. Keep up the good work.
00:26:14.360
That's a good point. Uh, the, yeah, the filming, how was, I didn't even notice that. I, I, I'd have to go
00:26:21.260
back and watch the commercial. I'll take your word for it. They had the, uh, the moon landing. Okay.
00:26:27.440
The moon landing was filmed by the astronauts themselves. So, so apparently the moon landing
00:26:31.340
has become an instance of journalistic courage as well. They had nothing to do with it. All they did
00:26:35.740
was just reported on the news. Great point, Ashley. Um, Derek says, hi, Matt. Hey, Matt. I recall in an
00:26:44.240
episode a few weeks ago, you mentioned you watch competitive bass fishing. Just curious if you are
00:26:48.440
a bass fisherman as well. If so, that's awesome. I strongly encourage you to get involved in the
00:26:52.060
sport. Help spread knowledge of the awesome sport. That's, that's an American made sport. See you on
00:26:57.180
the water. Uh, I do. I, I don't even know if I could call myself a bass fisherman because I feel like
00:27:04.440
you have to get to a certain level of expertise, um, before you can really describe yourself
00:27:10.140
in that way. Much like, you know, if you write a blog post once every two months, you can't
00:27:16.520
really call yourself a writer, right? You've got to write a lot more to, so, um, I don't
00:27:22.480
know if I rise to that level, but I do, I do try to get out on the water and, uh, and, and
00:27:27.180
fish mostly for bass. Um, I can't say that I'm especially good at it, but if you have
00:27:33.260
any tips, Derek, please let me know. Curtis says, Matt, have you heard about the Liam
00:27:39.680
Neeson issue? I was wanting to get your thoughts on the subject. Uh, hi Curtis. Yeah. I have
00:27:43.940
followed that a little bit. Liam Neeson admitted that many years ago, uh, after his friend was
00:27:49.000
raped and she told him about it. This is back in Ireland. Uh, and he, in a follow-up interview,
00:27:55.080
he said this was 40 years, 40 years ago. Um, and she was raped, told him about it, said
00:28:01.060
that it was a black man who did it. And then he admitted in this interview that he then
00:28:05.280
prowled the streets for about a week looking to get into a violent altercation with a black
00:28:11.020
man, um, so that he could get his revenge. And he wanted to take revenge on any person
00:28:16.900
who looked like the rapist, not even just on the rapist himself. So, uh, he says no violence
00:28:23.640
occurred, but that's what he was hoping for for a week because he was so angry about this
00:28:28.000
horrible thing that happened. Um, and he admits that it was terrible. He says it was awful. He's
00:28:32.940
remorseful about it. Uh, he volunteered this whole story, which was not smart, rather a dumb move to
00:28:38.480
do, but, uh, but he volunteered it, said it's an awful, horrible thing. He's expressed great remorse
00:28:46.100
for it. So what's my take? Well, I think there is no take really to have, there's no opinion to have
00:28:51.540
on it. Yes. It's, it's awful. Of course, to consider taking revenge on any person who has the same race
00:28:58.380
as a guy who did a horrible thing that of course is awful and terrible. And, but Neeson knows that
00:29:05.300
he said so himself. It was a very long time ago. He's repented of it, obviously. Um,
00:29:12.720
so what, what, what is there to say about it? I know it's become this big thing, viral thing,
00:29:18.520
and people are, I just don't know what opinion you can offer because we could say, well, that's
00:29:22.760
terrible. That's a horrible thing. You shouldn't do that. And Liam Neeson says, yeah, I know. That's
00:29:27.340
why, that's my point. I was offering this as a story of a thing that I'm, that I feel great regret
00:29:32.760
and remorse for. So, okay. All right. Let's just move on with our lives. I don't know what the,
00:29:38.300
I don't know what else to say. Um, this is from Patty. She says, hi, Matt. I am,
00:29:42.500
familiar with the question of the eternal fate of unbaptized babies, having been troubled by it
00:29:46.480
for years, but I must add a few corrections to the way you presented it. At least in the case
00:29:50.900
of Catholic theology, mid 20th century catechisms explained it as one, a theological supposition
00:29:56.600
that was not doctrine. It did not have to be believed. And two, that babies who died without
00:30:01.460
being baptized would not go to hell, but to limbo, a place of perfect natural happiness. One such as
00:30:06.320
Eden was before the fall and to which the souls of the good went before Christ opened the gates of
00:30:10.400
heaven. It was not a punishment and there was no torment involved. Still, I always rejected
00:30:14.580
the idea that God would not want all his children with him and that he would have to withhold the
00:30:18.660
beat, the beatific vision from souls who were unbaptized through no fault of their own. A learned
00:30:24.280
priest told me that the view of unbaptized babies going to limbo instead of heaven is no longer upheld
00:30:29.520
by Catholic theologians. Right, Patty. Well, I don't think that, I don't think you're correcting
00:30:33.220
anything. I didn't say anything that contradicts that. Uh, I don't think I did anyway.
00:30:37.160
Uh, as far as limbo, it was, as you say, a theological theory based, in my opinion, on
00:30:45.420
nothing other than the imagination of theologians. They constructed this whole realm called limbo
00:30:52.440
basically out of whole cloth. It was just, there's no basis for it. It's just something that
00:30:56.660
they came up with. Um, so in my opinion, we are not only not required to believe it, but I think that
00:31:03.900
we should, we should believe it because it's not based on anything other than the speculations
00:31:09.660
of medieval theologians. And I, I just don't know why that should really carry any weight in this
00:31:16.300
case. Um, and the other problem is it also seems, so I know that if you speculate something like
00:31:24.000
limbo, uh, you think, well, you get around the whole hell thing there because even though you're
00:31:29.060
just, you've just made up this thing called limbo in your mind, you've gotten around, around hell
00:31:33.080
because you're saying, well, maybe, you know, they're not, it's not active suffering and torment,
00:31:36.540
but, um, first of all, if it's eternal, if it's eternal separation from God, not to mention from,
00:31:43.800
I mean, this is placed just for, I mean, if it's eternal separation from God, not to mention all of
00:31:50.140
your loved ones and everything, uh, I don't know how that would not be eternal torment.
00:31:54.900
How is that not suffering? But in any case, um, the other problem with it is that it,
00:32:04.500
it, uh, it kind of, it, it strips power from God. It suggests that God is not powerful enough to
00:32:13.940
figure out a way to get these babies into heaven, that it sort of presents a problem to him that he
00:32:19.020
can't fix. And so he has to cast them out somewhere else. And the other issue is that it takes
00:32:24.800
kind of a, it turns the atonement into some pretty weak sauce, doesn't it? If it can't even cover
00:32:30.660
dead infants, if dead infants are not covered by the atonement, then haven't you just severely
00:32:37.080
mitigated the effect and the power of Christ saving sacrifice? Um, so anyway, I agree with you from
00:32:45.560
Lenny. He says, Matt, I thought your reasoning as to why babies don't go to hell was not good.
00:32:50.060
You said that a just and merciful God wouldn't send babies to hell. How is that your determination?
00:32:56.200
Isn't it possible that you just don't understand justice and mercy? I just don't see how you could
00:33:00.920
presume to make those kinds of declarations. I think it's very possible that some young people,
00:33:05.520
even babies are damned upon death. I would never presume to tell God he can't do that. We are all
00:33:12.180
sinners after all, none are righteous, none at all. Well, Lenny, as I explained yesterday,
00:33:18.700
and here you are talking about, you're not talking about some limbo that you've made up. This is a,
00:33:23.580
you're talking about babies going to hell to be tormented for all eternity. That's what you're
00:33:27.880
talking about. You said damned, right? Um, well, as I explained yesterday, if the word mercy has any,
00:33:40.260
has, has a definition that includes damning infants to trillions of years of torture,
00:33:46.980
um, then the word has no discernible meaning at all. It just, it doesn't mean anything to say
00:33:53.720
mercy. I want you come up. How about this? I'll give you a challenge, Lenny. Come up with a
00:34:00.220
definition of mercy, come up with a discernible, meaningful definition of the word mercy that
00:34:06.280
could possibly include torturing infants for trillions of years. Can you do that? Because if you
00:34:12.060
can't, then that creates a logical problem. So it's not about putting God in a box or anything
00:34:18.620
like that. This becomes more of like, can God make a square circle? And the answer is no, because it's
00:34:24.600
illogical. It is a logical contradiction. Can God make a boulder so big that he can't lift it? No,
00:34:30.940
it's a logical contradiction. I would say that a merciful God damning infants to an eternity of
00:34:43.960
suffering is a logical contradiction. You've just put two opposite things together and you can't do
00:34:51.580
that. Uh, when we call God just and merciful and loving, we must mean something. Okay. These words have
00:34:59.040
to carry some meaning. And if when we say God is merciful, if all we really mean to say is God is
00:35:06.140
what he is, then again, the sentence doesn't mean anything. And we have no guarantee in that case
00:35:11.520
that God is not cruel and unjust and evil. If you're telling me that all we can say about God is,
00:35:19.360
well, he is what he is and whatever he is, that's what he is. True. But if that's all we can say about
00:35:24.600
God, then we have no guarantee at all that he's not, that he's not a cruel monster. Right? Point
00:35:30.640
being, if we, if, if all we can say about God is that he, is that he is what he is, um, then we end
00:35:37.540
up with a sort of like deism, right? Where God is this totally mysterious force that we cannot say
00:35:45.480
anything about. Um, but if you insist, as I'm sure you do, and as I do, and as scripture does,
00:35:57.420
and as Christianity has for thousands of years, um, that God is merciful as opposed to cruel,
00:36:06.720
then we must have some definition of mercy that excludes cruelty. Right?
00:36:15.180
If we include cruelty, such as the cruelty of torturing infants, if we include that in the
00:36:20.720
definition, then again, we're back to this place of deism where we can't say anything about God
00:36:25.960
because none of the words mean anything. So I say that God doesn't damn babies to hell because
00:36:32.860
when I say that I believe that God is merciful and loving, I mean it. I actually mean, I intend for
00:36:40.460
that sentence to mean something. And so that's all. Now, I understand that the, well, a loving God
00:36:50.020
wouldn't do that argument is often used to fallacious effect. Oftentimes you'll have atheists and others
00:36:56.940
who use that argument in, in, in, in illegitimate ways. So I understand that. But there are certain
00:37:05.100
things that we can say a loving God wouldn't do because for the millionth time, if there's nothing
00:37:12.700
that we can rule out, um, then calling God loving means nothing and stop saying it. You don't mean
00:37:21.020
anything when you say it. So there we go. Another example, you know, I, I, that we could say, well,
00:37:32.300
God can't do, God can't lie. Okay. I, I feel very confident saying that God as a, as an all perfect,
00:37:37.860
all good, all loving, uh, being cannot lie. So am I putting God in a box? Am I, am I, am I daring to
00:37:48.320
tell God what he can and can't do? No, I'm not telling him what to do, but I am making a declaration
00:37:55.820
about what he does and doesn't do. Doesn't lie. Because that would be in contradiction with an,
00:38:04.200
an all loving and all perfect being. And I would argue that sending babies
00:38:10.880
two trillions of years of torment is also in a contradiction.
00:38:19.000
It may, you know, either it contradicts, it could contradict, now I say it contradicts his mercy.
00:38:24.700
Uh, the only other option is that it contradicts his, his, um, his omnipotence, his, his, his,
00:38:30.740
his power. Um, because if we're saying that there's like, there's nothing he can do,
00:38:37.360
right? He just, he, for some reason he has to send them there. He can't figure out a way to
00:38:41.620
bring them in. Well then now you've just taken power from him. So by entertaining this idea,
00:38:46.580
you either strip him of mercy or you strip him of power. And I think that that is the presumptuous
00:38:52.240
thing. And also the very damaging thing, because when you go around saying this, uh, it's very
00:38:58.280
scandalizing. And I think it turns many people off of faith and God, and it gives them an impression
00:39:04.160
of God as this utterly monstrous figure. And, uh, I, I don't think that's a good thing to do.
00:39:11.580
All right. We'll leave it there. Thanks for watching everybody. Thanks for listening.
00:39:23.020
Yesterday on daily wire backstage, we had a blast reviewing the state of the union address.
00:39:26.800
There were drinks, there were cigars, there was mockery, all sorts of the stuff that you are
00:39:31.220
looking for in any analysis of the state of the union address. Go check it out. That was yesterday