The Matt Walsh Show - May 09, 2019


Ep 256 - Speeding Down The Slippery Slope


Episode Stats


Length

44 minutes

Words per minute

164.39247

Word count

7,329

Sentence count

464

Harmful content

Misogyny

15

sentences flagged

Hate speech

26

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

A horrific college course which seems to essentially be training pedophiles. Also, a man is falsely accused of sexual assault after stopping to help a stranded woman. Is this part of the reason why chivalry is dying in our society? And we ll talk about the 7 dumbest pro-abortion arguments.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Today on The Matt Walsh Show, we'll talk about a horrific college course, which seems to essentially be training pedophiles.
00:00:07.300 So we'll discuss that. Also, a man is falsely accused of sexual assault after stopping to help a stranded woman.
00:00:13.260 Is this part of the reason why chivalry is dying in our society?
00:00:17.500 And we'll talk about the seven dumbest pro-abortion arguments.
00:00:21.480 There are a lot to choose from, but we'll talk about and try to debunk the seven dumbest today on The Matt Walsh Show.
00:00:30.000 I've often bragged that I am immune to poison ivy because I got a really bad case of it years ago and then I became immune.
00:00:42.840 That's what I said. And so yesterday I was I was walking through the woods and I traipsed right through a whole patch of poison ivy because I'm immune to it.
00:00:50.260 Right. And anyway, fast forwarding to the end of the story. I'm not immune, as it turns out.
00:00:56.420 I have I have since discovered over the last day. I don't know.
00:01:01.900 I got it into my head that that's is that even a thing becoming immune to poison ivy?
00:01:05.720 Somehow I got that into my head and I would tell people that and nobody ever corrected me.
00:01:09.700 Why didn't anyone ever tell me like, no, that's not a thing. You're definitely not.
00:01:14.300 No one ever did. So was was everyone just playing along, waiting for this moment?
00:01:18.780 And if that's the case, then then well played. Well played, everybody.
00:01:23.120 But at the very least, I will say that I have suffered this poison ivy rash with quiet, quiet dignity in my house.
00:01:30.460 I've only complained about it incessantly to everybody in this house and now to the whole world.
00:01:35.920 Other than that, I haven't complained about it at all. I've just been I've been very stoic.
00:01:40.600 And so I think in that way, I'm an example to everybody.
00:01:43.820 OK, we begin with just an unbelievable story or maybe it's unfortunately very believable.
00:01:51.440 I don't know. Reported yesterday in the Daily Wire, the report says a professor presented a lesson
00:02:00.100 to students at the University of North Texas titled Sexual Pleasure and Response in Infants.
00:02:07.420 Big League Politics first reported last week. Moreover, as highlighted by the College Fix on Friday,
00:02:12.400 the textbook for the same course, Psychology and Sexual Behavior, suggests that students take
00:02:18.460 take field trips to preschools and elementary schools to observe students' sexual interactions.
00:02:26.080 OK, so this is this is this is real. This is an actual course at a at a at a at an actual
00:02:34.520 university in America. The lesson plan on sexuality and infants, which can be which there's a link to it.
00:02:43.040 If you go and look at this article, you can see the lesson plan. It's from the 13th edition of Our Sexuality.
00:02:49.200 That's the course. The course is listed textbook. That's what Our Sexuality is. 0.99
00:02:55.580 One section of the document, according to the fix titled Teaching Ideas, suggests that instructors
00:03:02.840 take students on a field trip to observe children possibly engaging in sexual interactions during
00:03:08.260 recess hours. The textbook says take the class to a local elementary school playground.
00:03:13.760 Or ask permission for a few of your students to attend various school playgrounds, preschools or
00:03:20.360 daycare centers during recess to observe behaviors of children. Ask students to note interactions
00:03:27.340 between same sex and mixed sex groups. Which group was more frequent? Which behaviors were most
00:03:34.360 frequent? What kind of touching did children engage in? What about teasing behaviors? Were there any
00:03:40.440 overtly sexual interactions? What was the age range of children being observed? Have students write a
00:03:47.600 report comparing their observations with information in the text? It's unclear if the parents of the young
00:03:54.960 students potentially. So we don't know if if when it says ask permission, who is who are we asking
00:04:02.740 permission? The parents or the teacher? Of course, doesn't doesn't whatever the case, it doesn't make it any
00:04:10.160 better. One of the textbooks editors, Carla Bauer, was interviewed by the college fix. And she said
00:04:19.820 that she's, you know, one of the people responsible for this. Although she claims that
00:04:24.940 the the other editor of the textbook who's now deceased, wrote the guide where the field trips
00:04:34.600 were suggested. And so she tried to distance herself from that as she didn't know anything about that.
00:04:41.760 And if you're wondering what the course objectives are, the course objectives read as follows. Number
00:04:46.780 one, to describe human sexuality from historical and multicultural perspectives, to define to define
00:04:53.740 major theoretical perspectives that influence the scientific study of human sexuality, to explain the
00:04:59.500 significant research methodologies within disciplines, to examine the socially constructed nature of
00:05:05.040 sexual identities, to describe how sexuality overlaps with various social institutions, to recognize the
00:05:11.740 changing nature of social norms. Okay, so a couple of things here. First of all, you've noticed that
00:05:25.100 there really seems to be a movement afoot to normalize pedophilia. Yet we're always told that no such
00:05:33.420 movement exists. You know, pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. Our eyes are fooling us. And we
00:05:40.520 see stuff like this. And and and we say, well, it looks like this is a normalization of pedophilia. And yet
00:05:46.280 we're always a no, no, no, that's not happening. That's not happening. Well, I think this makes it pretty clear,
00:05:51.240 doesn't it? And it's, it's not, although I started by calling this unbelievable. I don't mean that in a
00:06:00.680 literal sense, because it is very believable, unfortunately, because this is what happens
00:06:05.800 when you begin to break down sexual boundaries. GK Chesterton talks about, as I've, I've mentioned this
00:06:16.160 quote for him before, because it's so relevant to what we see going on in our culture, especially as
00:06:22.020 it pertains to sexuality. And what he says is, you know, you're walking down the street, and you come
00:06:27.000 across a fence. You're not going to just tear down the fence without knowing why the fence is there and
00:06:36.740 what it is meant to contain. Right? You're not, you're not going to just, just, just announce that
00:06:45.660 we need to take down this fence. First, you want to know, why is that fence there? What's, what purpose
00:06:49.840 does it serve? Is it holding back some sort of rabid dog or something like that? I mean, there could be a
00:06:56.480 lot of good reasons for a fence. Now, the point is, what we've done in our culture with sexual 0.71
00:07:01.540 boundaries is we've just started tearing down fences without ever stopping to consider why those
00:07:10.600 fences were there and what sorts of rabid dogs they were trying to contain. And the other problem
00:07:19.760 is once you begin this project of tearing down sexual boundaries, it becomes really hard to erect
00:07:26.680 them somewhere else. Once you've said, no, we're going to tear down this boundary and that one,
00:07:31.540 right? This is all about social norms where we're getting rid of all the social norms.
00:07:36.200 Well, there are some things are social norms for a reason. And when, when, uh, when a phrase like
00:07:44.000 social norm becomes a dirty word, like it's a bad thing, it's a bad thing to uphold social. Now we
00:07:51.000 need, we need to tear down social norms just because they're norms. Well, it, it was a social norm
00:07:57.600 in our society that pedophilia is wrong, that you don't sexualize children. That was a social norm.
00:08:04.180 That's a good social norm. It's a norm for a reason. But once you start tearing down those fences,
00:08:11.680 uh, and, uh, it, it becomes difficult to go somewhere else and rebuild a fence.
00:08:19.500 And that's what's happening here. And as part of this, so you have the, the tearing down of
00:08:28.840 boundaries, but you also have is, I mean, just reading through the course objectives that I,
00:08:34.040 that I just read through, um, sex, sexuality, sex, sex, sex. There's, there's this obsession with sex
00:08:41.660 and sexuality and in, in, in, in seeing everyone, all people as these inherently sexual beings, 0.89
00:08:51.980 including children. And that's another thing that you find on the left is this upset. Everything is
00:08:58.980 seen in sexual terms. As much as they claim that, Oh, my, my sex life is, is none of your business.
00:09:06.600 Sex is a private thing. As much as they claim that the, they actually believe the exact,
00:09:12.560 the exact opposite. Now I believe that, that your sex life is none of my business, uh, as,
00:09:18.920 as long as you're not abusing or raping or molesting anyone. Um, but other than that, it is,
00:09:26.060 I don't want to know. Don't, don't talk to me about it. You don't, don't advertise it.
00:09:32.280 You don't need to go marching down the street, telling everybody we don't need to know.
00:09:36.600 Now that's how I feel about it. The left, they, they claim that they say that's none of your
00:09:43.900 business, but then they go out in the street and they march and they, and they announce it and
00:09:48.200 they tell everybody they advertise their sexuality. And this is where it ends up. The second thing,
00:09:56.120 um, to note here is, although I believe this is part of a movement in our society to normalize
00:10:03.940 pedophilia, we also have to understand that this is not new. Um, this is the kind of research that
00:10:10.460 Alfred Kinsey used to do in the early part of the 20th century. And Kinsey is considered a pioneer,
00:10:16.940 a hero, even to the left. Alfred Kinsey is, he's, uh, the godfather of modern sex education
00:10:24.200 and, and sex education, modern sex education is, is based on his work, but he was a pervert and a 0.90
00:10:31.200 deviant who, who studied the sexual responses of molested children. Very similar to what you just
00:10:39.220 read here. He would have Alfred Kinsey would have pedophiles rape children and record their experiences
00:10:48.040 in like a journal. And then they would come in and they would have meetings with Kinsey where they
00:10:52.700 would talk about the, their experiences, raping children and how the children responded to it.
00:10:57.400 And Kinsey would study, uh, the, these, these interactions. He didn't, he never reported it
00:11:02.220 to police. He didn't tell police about it. A pedophile would come to him and say, you know,
00:11:07.080 I raped children. And Kinsey would say, okay, great. Here's a notebook. Next time you do it,
00:11:12.220 uh, make sure you take notes. Now I'm not making that up. That's, this was what Alfred Kinsey would
00:11:17.980 do. That's the kind of work, if we can call it that, that this psychopath did. And yet our public
00:11:24.600 school sex education courses are based around his work. And this thing that I just read from this,
00:11:32.760 this, uh, university in, in Texas, that's exactly the kind of thing that he would do.
00:11:38.460 And now we're seeing that come to the forefront again, more explicitly, uh, just completely
00:11:46.340 horrific. All right. Um, speaking of horrific, there's a story, uh, out of, out of Australia,
00:11:54.200 a man, 36 year old man was arrested, put in jail, charged with sexual assault after he stopped to
00:12:02.360 help a woman whose car was broken down. And, uh, and, uh, he stopped and helped her. And then he was
00:12:08.220 later accused of stalking her and assaulting her. The problem is that he did no such thing.
00:12:14.900 Uh, he did stop to help her. He worked on her car for two hours, apparently trying to help this woman
00:12:19.580 who was stranded, but he did not assault her. And evidence, including security cameras revealed,
00:12:24.440 uh, and confirmed that he was innocent. So this guy performed this good deed going out of his way for
00:12:31.640 a fellow human being. And she turned around and accused him of rape. He was put, he spent some
00:12:37.880 time in jail, uh, before he was finally cleared of charges. He lost his relationship. His, his name
00:12:42.980 was, was, was, uh, run through the mud all because he did this good thing for another person.
00:12:52.800 And there was, there's a quote from him. Um, let's see if I can find, there's a quote from him that
00:12:58.960 is just so sad, but also kind of profound. And it sort of sums up where we are. Um,
00:13:07.600 he was, he was interviewed about his experiences after finally being, after finally being, um,
00:13:13.740 vindicated. And he said, I always helped people all my life. Um, and this was the first time a snake
00:13:21.140 bit me. He said, he'll, he'll probably never help again. I don't want that to happen again.
00:13:27.300 I'll probably never help again is what he said. This is a guy who is a good Samaritan used to
00:13:35.740 helping out his fellow human beings. And now he's saying, well, never gonna do that again.
00:13:40.040 I don't blame him. I mean, I, I certainly couldn't possibly blame him for that,
00:13:43.600 but I think you've, that's, that's what we're finding now is, uh, you have a lot of otherwise
00:13:50.860 chivalrous and good men who don't, who are afraid of, uh, of, of, you know, going out of
00:14:02.520 their way, putting themselves out there to help another person, especially a woman,
00:14:05.580 because they don't want to be accused of anything. They don't want to be accused of
00:14:09.720 being a sexist. They don't want to be accused of it. And, and, and worst case scenario, they
00:14:13.200 don't want to be accused with a, with a situation like this. And that's yet another problem with,
00:14:21.840 as I've, as I've pointed out many times with something like the me too movement,
00:14:25.160 but the, this, you know, hysteria, um, that we found in the me too movement is that it engenders
00:14:33.680 suspicion between the sexes on both sides where women begin to believe that, you know, every man 0.87
00:14:43.060 is, uh, is a potential rapist out to assault her and men begin to believe that any woman could 0.93
00:14:49.960 potentially falsely accuse him of something. And so you have this suspicion and both groups kind
00:14:56.240 of avoiding each other and trying not to be around each other. And that's a, not a healthy
00:15:01.380 situation for society. So that's, that's pretty terrible. All right. Um, so I wrote something
00:15:06.120 yesterday that I wanted to, I wanted to go through here. Um, as we talked about on the show yesterday,
00:15:12.420 after that law in Georgia was passed, which makes abortion basically illegal after six weeks with
00:15:19.860 exceptions, the left obviously reacted as you were expecting them to react. And there was a woman on, 1.00
00:15:25.080 on CNN. We played the clip of the, of this woman, uh, Christine Quinn, I believe was her name,
00:15:28.980 who, who, who was so overcome with anger that she, she became delusional. She started screaming about
00:15:35.980 how, uh, unborn babies are not human beings. They're part of the woman's body. And I talked about why 0.94
00:15:42.620 that's obviously a ridiculous and stupid argument. Clearly the unborn child is a human being, but that
00:15:50.060 is one of the really stupid arguments that pro-aborts put forward. Uh, it's only one though.
00:15:56.840 There's a whole list of really bad, dumb pro-abortion arguments. I wrote something yesterday
00:16:02.020 going through what I consider to be sort of the top seven dumbest pro-abortion arguments. I thought
00:16:07.120 I would, I would do that here on the show as well. I'll go through them. Uh, so this is the top seven
00:16:11.800 dumbest pro-abortion arguments, uh, aside from the one about not being a human being, we already
00:16:16.380 covered that. That's probably kind of the Mac daddy of dumb arguments that probably would be number
00:16:21.520 one, but putting that to the side, we'll go through the list, uh, seven to one. So starting
00:16:26.220 at number seven, dumb argument, you can't be against abortion unless you're willing to adopt 0.95
00:16:31.680 unwanted babies. We've talked about this before. Um, uh, that's, that's the argument. And of course,
00:16:38.860 a great many pro-lifers do indeed adopt unwanted babies. Um, but none of us can adopt all of them.
00:16:46.160 And some of us can't adopt any of them. The fact that we are limited in our resources does not
00:16:51.740 prove that we're hypocrites. And even if it did prove that that in itself would not prove that
00:16:57.800 our position is flawed. Even if you could prove that we are hypocrites and we, you know, we,
00:17:02.640 we should be out adopting babies and we're not, um, that doesn't mean anything about what we're
00:17:10.620 claiming about the nature of abortion. But in any case, it doesn't make any sense because if we can
00:17:19.580 only oppose the murder of those who we are able and willing to personally care for and subsidize,
00:17:25.700 that would mean that we cannot oppose the murder of almost anyone on earth because we can't care for
00:17:31.820 and subsidize the vast, vast majority of people who currently live. There are 7 billion people on
00:17:38.080 earth. You cannot care for all 7 billion. So if this is the standard and you know, you or I can
00:17:46.580 only feed and clothe a vanishingly small percentage of people on earth, then that would mean that we
00:17:52.180 can only really care about the fate and oppose the murder of that very small percentage. And that
00:18:00.220 would mean that we have to remain silent about things like genocide and school shootings because,
00:18:04.400 hey, we, you know, we, we're not stepping up to care for those people, but that of course doesn't
00:18:10.280 make any sense whatsoever. So that's a bad argument. Um, number six, no uterus, no opinion. 0.85
00:18:17.080 Now leftists of course, can't really make this argument anymore because they also say that,
00:18:22.040 you know, your possession of a uterus has nothing at all to do with your gender. It means nothing 0.99
00:18:27.020 anyway. So they've already made that. They have neutralized that argument themselves. They've ruled
00:18:31.980 that argument out, which is probably for the best because it's a dumb argument anyway. Um, abortion 0.98
00:18:36.880 is a moral and legal issue. So we use our brains to sort through it, not our reproductive organs. 0.96
00:18:43.220 So what the, what the, what the motto really should be is no brain, no opinion. Now that's true. If you
00:18:48.340 don't have a brain, then you shouldn't be voicing your opinion on this issue or any other. Um, but I'm
00:18:53.520 afraid that that might rule out a large portion of the pro-abortion side. So that's the problem
00:18:57.640 there. Number five, um, you, you, you, you can't force a woman to reproduce. Now I agree with that 0.63
00:19:05.560 statement. It's, it would be, it would be horrific to force women to reproduce. Um, unfortunately
00:19:12.820 that has nothing to do with abortion though, because a woman does not reproduce when she gives birth 0.98
00:19:20.140 in the hospital. Reproduction occurs at conception. So the, the, when a baby is born, that is not an act
00:19:27.460 of reproduction. Reproduction has already happened. It is the product of that reproduction. The thing
00:19:34.620 that has been reproduced, that is what's being born. So the question isn't, should women be required to 0.99
00:19:40.400 reproduce? Obviously they shouldn't. The question is, should a woman be allowed to purposefully kill 1.00
00:19:45.920 that which has already been produced? And the answer to that is no. Uh, number four, pro-lifers want to
00:19:53.540 control women's bodies, right? We hear this all the time. Well, of course the body that's directly 1.00
00:19:58.460 in dispute is not the woman's it's, it's the child's. Um, it's true that the woman uses her 0.98
00:20:04.680 body to sustain the child's body, but that's just as much the case after birth as it is before. I use
00:20:10.420 my body to care for my born children. I use my body to do that. I use my body to, to clothe them,
00:20:18.320 provide for them, feed them. I mean, whatever I do for my kids or for anyone else, I'm using my
00:20:24.240 body to do it. I, because I am my body. I can't do it any other way. I can't just sit back and with
00:20:29.840 the power of my brain, make things move around. And I'm not professor X in X-Men. So, um,
00:20:35.300 I have to do that. Everything I do for my kids, I use my body to do it. What's more, the law requires me
00:20:43.140 to do those things for my kids to care for them, provide for them, which means the, which means the
00:20:49.940 law requires me to use my body to do those things. Um, I'm not allowed to claim bodily autonomy and
00:20:56.440 then just cease all parental activities. If I did that, my body and myself altogether, we would all
00:21:03.160 go to jail if I did that. Uh, now does that mean that the laws against neglect and endangerment
00:21:10.940 control my body? Uh, you know, it may be in a very weird and indirect sense,
00:21:16.880 but the point of the laws certainly is not to control my body. The point of the law is to protect
00:21:23.340 children. And so the point of making abortion illegal is not to control women's bodies. Um,
00:21:30.920 but to protect children. That's, that's the point. Number three, um, this is a classic pro, uh,
00:21:36.960 pro-lifers are only pro-birth, right? They don't care about babies after their 1.00
00:21:40.940 born. Once again, this is irrelevant, even if it's true. Um, but it isn't true. Our whole
00:21:48.440 point is that there's no difference between a baby inside the womb and a baby outside of
00:21:53.660 the womb. We cherish them both. So if we didn't care about babies outside the womb, then we
00:21:58.980 wouldn't be constantly insisting that a child inside the womb is just like a child outside
00:22:03.500 the womb. Now follow the logic here. What we're saying is a child inside the womb is like a child 0.91
00:22:09.120 outside the womb. Therefore the child inside the womb should be treated with value and dignity.
00:22:16.060 This line of reasoning clearly indicates that we think that children outside of the womb have value 0.97
00:22:22.140 and dignity. Our, our whole case is, is that's sort of the linchpin of our entire case. Um, also of
00:22:29.240 course, pro-lifers are exceedingly charitable. They, they, um, we give to people in need all the time.
00:22:34.320 Um, and if you're going to make this claim about pro-lifers don't care about kids after birth,
00:22:39.100 you have to come forward with some sort of data, some information to prove that.
00:22:45.980 Um, prove for instance, that pro-lifers, uh, you know, don't give the charity and don't help the
00:22:53.200 less fortunate. Again, even if you could prove that that would not prove anything about abortion,
00:22:58.920 but you can't even prove that. So this is a, an argument that is not only irrelevant and stupid,
00:23:07.140 but fabricated out of thin air. Number two, um, the pro-life movement is just a bunch of men bossing
00:23:13.880 women around, you know, pro-lifers are a bunch of men. This clearly is, is once again, irrelevant.
00:23:21.300 Um, because either the pro-life position is wrong or it's right. And if it's right, it would still be 0.80
00:23:27.080 right. Even if men were the only ones arguing for it, but men are not the only ones far from it.
00:23:33.360 The pro-life movement is run predominantly by women. Um, it's mostly women working at pregnancy 1.00
00:23:40.080 centers. It's mostly women at the March for life. Um, it's mostly women praying outside of abortion 0.91
00:23:45.600 clinics. And, uh, so it's, it's the idea that the pro-life movement is some sort of male dominated
00:23:51.980 thing is a, once again, completely baseless. Number one, uh, and this is, maybe this is the
00:24:00.100 biggest one of all, even more than unborn babies aren't, aren't human. Um, women have the right to 1.00
00:24:05.740 choose the right to choose. Yeah. We hear that phrase so often that we take it for granted, but
00:24:14.400 it actually is a, is a, is a concept without meaning, without content. It doesn't mean anything.
00:24:21.980 Do women have the right to choose? Uh, no, of course they don't. 1.00
00:24:29.200 It's your, your right to make a choice depends entirely on the nature of the choice. Now,
00:24:36.920 physically you can choose to do whatever you want within the laws of physics, but legally there are
00:24:43.020 hundreds upon hundreds of things you cannot choose to do. Um, you can't choose arson or rape or theft or,
00:24:50.800 or tax evasion or burglary or vandalism. Um, you can't choose murder either, unless your victim
00:24:57.120 happens to be still inside the womb. But when someone insists that women have the right to choose, 1.00
00:25:03.000 you know, that statement, the right to choose is a, is an absolute universal statement. I have the right
00:25:11.360 to choose, but of course in an absolute and universal way, uh, nobody has that right because
00:25:20.520 that would mean that you have the right to choose to do literally anything you want to do. You have
00:25:26.400 the right to make any choice at all, which of course you don't. So when, when someone says women have the 1.00
00:25:32.440 right to choose, what they really mean is they mean it in an, in a very limited sense. They mean
00:25:37.940 specifically in their mind that a woman has the right to choose to end the life of her child
00:25:43.060 before the child emerges from the birth canal. So they put it forward as an absolute unqualified
00:25:50.820 statement, but it actually is a very qualified statement because they are talking about one
00:25:57.280 particular choice that they believe a woman should be able to make. Um, but if that choice to kill a 1.00
00:26:07.080 child is defensible and ethical, it's not defensible and ethical just because it's a choice. The fact
00:26:14.940 that it's a choice is irrelevant. The question with abortion is not whether a woman can choose,
00:26:21.020 but whether an unborn human has a moral claim to existence and personhood. Now, if he doesn't,
00:26:29.180 then a woman can choose abortion. Um, if he does have that claim, then the choice of abortion belongs to
00:26:36.900 the same category as the choice of murder or child molestation. Then that would be a choice that
00:26:44.200 yeah, physically you can do, but you have no moral right to do it. And you shouldn't therefore have
00:26:49.880 a legal right to do it either. Now you'll, you'll notice something, you know, um, gun rights activists
00:26:55.340 will, uh, will, will talk about, uh, their right to bear arms, but they never talk about the right to
00:27:02.500 shoot, right? Gun rights activists aren't going to go around saying I have the right to shoot.
00:27:09.080 They have the right to bear arms, but their right to discharge those arms depends quite significantly
00:27:14.040 on why the arms are being discharged and in what context and at what target. So no, you don't have
00:27:21.640 the right to shoot. Generally speaking, uh, you have the right, you, you, you have the right to bear the
00:27:27.520 arms, but as far as shooting them, that really is, is very qualified. It really depends on why and where
00:27:36.040 and in what direction you're shooting. And a choice is like that. You know, um, your right to choose is
00:27:42.260 contingent, not absolute. So to defend a choice on the basis that it is a choice is very stupid.
00:27:50.360 All of these arguments are very stupid. Uh, but the pro-abortion side, of course, doesn't have any,
00:27:56.300 any other sort of argument at, at its disposal, unfortunately. All right. Um,
00:28:01.840 we'll go to, uh, yeah, we'll go to emails, mattwalshowatgmail.com, mattwalshowatgmail.com.
00:28:10.180 Um, this is from Isaac says, Hey Matt, you said something yesterday that I'm not sure I agree with.
00:28:16.380 Um, in that you said that loving oneself is a by-product of loving others, but doesn't scripture
00:28:23.180 say otherwise in that you need to love others as much as you love yourself. The second greatest
00:28:27.820 commandment, there's a saying that that's a bit of a spinoff of that commandment, which is you grace
00:28:32.680 others as much as you grace yourself. And don't people who struggle with self-hatred also struggle
00:28:37.500 with loving others as a result. Um, love your show and you're down to earth and say it as it is
00:28:41.840 approach. Yeah. Well, I think that there's a misunderstanding, Isaac, about that
00:28:45.560 verse in scripture where it says, uh, love others, you know, as you love yourself. Jesus there is not
00:28:53.140 saying that your, you know, your, that self-love is the foundational love and that you should calibrate
00:29:00.760 your love for other people based on how much you happen to love yourself. That's not what Jesus is
00:29:05.320 saying. What he's saying is, I think more just pretty simple that you, you know, you look out for
00:29:11.820 your own interests. Um, and in a similar way, you should consider other people's interests to be
00:29:18.760 like your own. You know, Thomas Aquinas says love to love is to will the good of the other. Well,
00:29:25.080 you, you kind of naturally will the good for yourself. You want what is good for yourself.
00:29:31.340 You may have some wrong ideas about what's good, but, um, to the extent that you understand what's
00:29:37.280 good. You want that for yourself, right? Um, well, what Jesus is saying is, yeah, do the same for
00:29:44.940 other people too. Want what is best for others and try to help them achieve what is best. That's the
00:29:51.280 point. Um, and so you want what's best for yourself, really regardless of how you happen to feel about
00:30:01.000 yourself. You may be feeling kind of down about yourself. You may be struggling with your self image
00:30:05.440 or whatever, but you still want what's best for yourself. Unless you get to the point of total
00:30:11.400 self-loathing where you're at the, you know, where you're, uh, you know, at the point of, of being
00:30:16.860 almost suicidal. Well, now that's, that of course would be someone who doesn't want what's best for
00:30:20.920 themselves. Um, and that is bad. I mean, I'm not advocating self-loathing. Obviously we don't want to
00:30:25.940 hate ourselves. We should, we shouldn't hate anyone, including ourselves, ourselves. But, um,
00:30:33.440 um, the point is we can't hold other people hostage according to our own emotions, where we're
00:30:42.340 saying, you know, how I treat you is going to depend entirely on how I happen to be feeling.
00:30:49.460 And there are a lot of people who operate that way in relationships and it's deadly for a
00:30:53.860 relationship. And that is not what Jesus is saying. And by the way, keep in mind, that's the second
00:30:59.240 greatest commandment. What was the first greatest? First greatest was love God. So that's the first
00:31:06.340 thing. The foundational love is not the love for yourself or the love for your neighbor. The
00:31:12.560 foundational love is your love for God. And through that love, you know, that love becomes sort of the,
00:31:19.220 the fountain, um, from which our love for ourselves and for other people sort of springs. So that's the
00:31:27.980 way that I would, I would look at it. But I do still believe that if you're struggling with self
00:31:36.280 image, if you're feeling down about yourself, whatever the case may be, I think the best remedy
00:31:42.540 for that is not to sit around trying to conjure good feelings about yourself. The best remedy is to
00:31:49.420 focus on loving other people and loving God, just focus on loving outwardly rather than inwardly.
00:31:55.020 And I think if you do that, you're going to find that you start to feel better too.
00:32:02.900 Um, when you really focus on, you know, you say, I want to put this aside. I'm just going to go play
00:32:06.520 with my kids, spend some time with my kids, focus on loving them, being with them. And I'm not going
00:32:12.820 to think about myself. And in the midst of doing that, of kind of losing yourself in, in, in that
00:32:18.080 moment of, of being with, with, with someone else that you love, you may stop for a second and
00:32:22.540 realize, Oh, wait a second. I'm actually feeling pretty good about myself right now. And the moment
00:32:26.280 that you realize that don't dwell on it, just say, okay, that's great. Put it to the side,
00:32:30.760 focus back on other people. I think the more we focus on how we feel about ourselves, the worse
00:32:36.180 we end up feeling. That's the point. We, we end up kind of caving in on ourselves because we're so
00:32:41.100 inwardly focused. I think we should be more outwardly focused. And, uh, that was the whole point
00:32:46.060 I was trying to make there. Um, this is from Jamie says, hi, Matt, I love your show. Agree with almost
00:32:51.000 everything you say. I have a question though, about homosexuality. C.S. Lewis says that he can't
00:32:55.000 judge gay people because he's never struggled with that issue himself. It seems like a lot of 1.00
00:32:59.160 Christians like to condemn the sins that they've never been tempted to commit. Meanwhile, they say 0.99
00:33:03.560 nothing about the sins they do struggle with. What do you think about C.S. Lewis's attitude? I know
00:33:07.740 you're a big fan of his. Um, hi, Jimmy. I am a big fan of C.S. Lewis and I'm familiar with the
00:33:13.380 passage you're referring to, though. It doesn't say exactly that. Um, here's, here's what he says.
00:33:19.120 This is from surprised by joy. I believe he says, um, I have said the sin in question, homosexuality 0.99
00:33:24.840 is one of the two gambling as the other, which I have never been tempted to commit. I will not
00:33:30.100 indulge in futile philippics against enemies. I have never met in battle. So that's not the same 1.00
00:33:36.280 thing as saying. I can't judge rather. What he's saying is he has no real insight into that struggle
00:33:41.260 because he's never experienced it. And it's rather easy for him to rail against it because it is,
00:33:46.500 as he says, an enemy that he's never met in battle. So it's easy for him. And I think we can
00:33:51.300 and should still stand in opposition to all sin, including the ones that we've never been tempted
00:33:56.280 to commit ourselves. And I don't think C.S. Lewis would disagree with that, but I agree that there
00:34:01.020 is a tendency among Christians and among all people to focus on the sins of others. Uh, that's what the 0.89
00:34:06.760 whole, you know, uh, splint, splinter in your brother's eye beam in your own eye. Um, he without
00:34:14.620 sin, throw the first stone, you know, all of that in the gospels. That's what all that is about. Jesus
00:34:18.380 spends a lot of time on this concept. So here's how I look at it. Every bad thing that you've ever done
00:34:26.020 and we've all done bad things, right? So every bad thing you've ever done,
00:34:30.880 you've done because two factors converged desire and opportunity. You did the bad thing
00:34:40.240 because you had the desire to do it and you had the opportunity to do it. Desire and opportunity.
00:34:47.860 We know what desire means opportunity in this case means not only the chance to do it physically,
00:34:52.820 but the ability to do it, uh, in our minds without consequence. That's what opportunity means.
00:34:59.020 So we've all told lies, right? We've all told lies. Well, why did we tell those lies? We told the lie
00:35:06.620 because we wanted to, because we thought that we would get something out of it.
00:35:11.180 And because we encountered a situation where we believed we could tell the lie and get away with
00:35:16.560 it. And oftentimes we find out in retrospect, we were wrong about that, but, um, but still we,
00:35:22.300 we, that's why we did it. So here's the point. You don't deserve credit
00:35:27.440 for not doing things which you've never had the desire and opportunity to do in the first place.
00:35:36.320 Um, think about all the bad things you haven't done. Think of the worst kinds of things. Murder,
00:35:42.100 for instance. Okay. Why haven't you murdered anyone? Assuming you haven't. Well, you might say,
00:35:47.980 oh, I've never murdered anyone because it's wrong, but is that really why you haven't done it?
00:35:53.220 No, you haven't done it because you never wanted to. You've never once been seriously tempted to
00:36:01.340 kill someone. And that's why you haven't done it. Now it's true that it's wrong and you're aware of
00:36:05.740 that fact, but you've never been in a situation where the only thing stopping you from killing
00:36:12.240 someone is that, you know, it's wrong. The thing that stops you from killing someone every day and
00:36:17.600 every moment of your life is that you, you just, it's not in the cards. You just, you've never had
00:36:23.040 that temptation. Um, so the first sort of dam that holds us back from committing a particular sin
00:36:30.520 is that we don't want to commit that sin. That's the number one thing that stops us from doing
00:36:36.000 most of the bad things we don't do. The second dam, not as strong as the first,
00:36:41.920 especially if the first breaks is opportunity. So there may be a really bad thing that we want to
00:36:49.980 do, but then, so that dam breaks, but then we have that second one holding there of, well,
00:36:56.680 we don't have the opportunity to do it. The problem though is, is once the first dam breaks and the
00:37:02.580 only thing stopping you is that you don't have the opportunity to do it, then eventually you'll find
00:37:06.200 an opportunity. Think about, you know, a guy, an unfaithful man in an unhappy marriage who
00:37:12.440 is a candidate for adultery. Like he, he, he, he would like to commit adultery. He would like to
00:37:18.760 be with another woman. Um, but he just has never found an opportunity where he thinks he could do it
00:37:24.660 and get away with it. Well, then that's what's then in that case, opportunity is what's stopping him,
00:37:29.220 but most likely eventually he'll find an opportunity for himself because that's what people end up doing.
00:37:36.200 And then what happens? Okay. So let's say you want to do the bad thing. You have the opportunity
00:37:43.240 to do it. Now, what's the only thing that can stop you now? Okay. Now this is where morality
00:37:51.500 and virtue come into play. They didn't really come into play before because it, it, it, it didn't
00:37:57.380 really matter because you didn't want to do the thing anyway. Now the, now the, the last and final,
00:38:04.400 uh, the, the fail safe is morality and virtue. And that's going to be the only thing that prevents
00:38:13.420 you from doing that thing because you want to do it. You have the opportunity. Now you, now you need
00:38:19.380 to call on morality and virtue. Um, I think CS Lewis's point is that if on any particular sin,
00:38:28.840 you've never, you know, face those raging waters. You've never been under that waterfall.
00:38:36.180 You've never felt the force of that water or both of those dams break. And the only thing stopping you
00:38:43.660 from drowning in that sin is just your own moral discipline. CS Lewis is saying is if you've never
00:38:50.940 been through that on any particular issue, then you have no right to feel morally superior
00:38:58.940 because it's not your morals that prevented you from doing it. It's not your morals that saved you
00:39:06.460 from drowning. Your morals didn't come into play. What we need to do is think what happens when I do
00:39:16.660 have the desire and opportunity to do a bad thing, even if we're, even if they're just little things,
00:39:21.200 I think for a lot of us, if we're honest, we have to admit that pretty much whenever we really want to
00:39:28.300 do something and we have the chance to do it, we do it, whatever it is. Um, and, and these may be small
00:39:38.340 things most of the time. I think a lot of us have maybe never or almost never made a real moral decision
00:39:49.280 in our lives. I think there are a lot of us who, who have, who have, who have never really committed a
00:39:55.440 moral act. Uh, not all of us, but I think for many of us, every bad thing we haven't done
00:40:03.000 is because we just so happen to never want to do, to do that thing. Um, and every good thing that
00:40:12.020 we've done, it's because we happen to want to do it. We project the appearance of living a moral life,
00:40:20.340 but really we're only living according to our desires. And the problem is, um, it's only by
00:40:29.020 accident then that we aren't committing the most heinous sins. It's just an accident of circumstance
00:40:36.020 that we happen to not want to do those things. What happens when we wake up one day and we find
00:40:43.520 that we really do want to do one of those things. We have gotten into the habit of living according to
00:40:49.460 our desire of living according to desire and opportunity. And once, once you go down that
00:40:57.300 road, um, you're on the same road as murderers and rapists and everyone. I mean, you're, you're,
00:41:06.080 you may not be as far down the road as them, but you know, those are people who are living according
00:41:11.220 to their desires and their desires happen to be heinous. You're living according to your desires too,
00:41:17.320 which are a little bit less heinous, but unless you learn to, uh, resist doing bad things, even when
00:41:30.380 you have the desire and opportunity to do them, then you're just going to drift down and end up over
00:41:34.820 there in that vicinity eventually, unless you die first. Um, I, I think that's kind of what C.S.
00:41:43.640 Lewis is, is, uh, is getting at. And so what should we do? I think we have to get accustomed to acting
00:41:51.200 against our desires and, and against opportunity. And that means not committing the quote unquote,
00:41:59.880 little sins. That's why the little sins are so important because most of us are only ever tempted
00:42:10.080 to the quote unquote, little sins. And so you have to get accustomed to resisting those temptations.
00:42:18.460 Um, and on the other hand too, on the other hand too, when it comes to virtue, it's sort of the inverse
00:42:23.520 where we have to get accustomed to doing good things, even when we really don't want to do them.
00:42:29.120 Um, and when we won't gain much from doing them and when we, when we, we can't do so without
00:42:36.260 sacrifice and inconvenience. So kind of the subverting of desire and opportunity, I think
00:42:43.340 we need to get ourselves accustomed to doing that. And, uh, that's part of what, uh, you know,
00:42:48.040 just, this is just one example, but that's part of what fasting and those sorts of things are about.
00:42:52.600 You know, the point, one of the points of fasting is, yeah, I mean, I, I want to eat,
00:42:59.520 I can eat, uh, in this case, there's nothing wrong with eating. It's not a, it's not an immoral thing,
00:43:03.800 but I'm kind of training myself. It's, it's, this is moral training where I'm training myself to not
00:43:11.420 do something that I want to do. And that's a, just a, a basic ability that we have to be able to
00:43:21.700 um, develop within ourselves. And I think a lot of us just do not have that ability
00:43:29.600 because we have never once refrained from doing something we really wanted to do.
00:43:37.420 All right. Um, so there's that and we'll leave it there tomorrow. Uh, just to remind you,
00:43:45.540 we will be in Philadelphia for the, for the pro-life rally against bullying, uh, 1144 Locust
00:43:52.640 Street. If I remember the address correctly, 11 AM in Philadelphia, there's gonna be a big group of
00:43:56.740 us there and, uh, it's going to be a great event. So I hope to see you there. And, uh, if not,
00:44:01.000 I'll talk to you tomorrow. Godspeed.
00:44:03.100 Hey everybody. It's Andrew Klavan, host of the Andrew Klavan show. So now the Democrats are going
00:44:21.580 to put on a show. It's the impeachment and constitutional crisis show, except without a
00:44:26.500 real impeachment or a real constitutional crisis because they need a show to replace the reality
00:44:31.240 they've lost. That's on the Andrew Klavan show. I'm Andrew Klavan.