ManoWhisper
Home
Shows
About
Search
The Matt Walsh Show
- June 04, 2019
Ep. 271 - People Are Shocked And Offended That Christians Are Christians
Episode Stats
Length
43 minutes
Words per Minute
167.19774
Word Count
7,311
Sentence Count
508
Misogynist Sentences
11
Hate Speech Sentences
33
Summary
Summaries are generated with
gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ
.
Transcript
Transcript is generated with
Whisper
(
turbo
).
Misogyny classification is done with
MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny
.
Hate speech classification is done with
facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target
.
00:00:00.000
Today on the Matt Wall Show, people in this country don't seem to understand Christianity,
00:00:05.420
in case you haven't noticed. And that's why today there's outrage, because a pastor prayed
00:00:09.600
for the president, and outrage because a Catholic bishop came out against gay pride parades.
00:00:15.240
Nobody should be shocked by either thing, and nobody would be shocked if they had a basic
00:00:19.340
understanding of Christianity. We'll talk about that. Also, Texas has banned red light cameras.
00:00:24.840
This is cause for celebration, even for a parade, maybe. And I'll explain why,
00:00:29.440
plus I'll answer your emails today on the Matt Wall Show.
00:00:35.320
Okay, welcome to the show, everybody. Good to see you again. This is my last show,
00:00:40.180
my last show ever. I'm retiring. I wish. I wish that was true. My last show of the week,
00:00:46.100
actually, is what it is, because I'm going into surgery tomorrow for the torn
00:00:48.880
Achilles situation, which I've been complaining about for the last week. And then they tell me
00:00:54.780
that I'll be bedridden. I'll be bedridden and hopped up on painkillers for a couple of days,
00:01:00.040
which, you know, I thought that maybe I could still do the show laying in bed on Oxycontin. But
00:01:06.640
that'd be very interesting anyway. But I thought maybe at the end of the day,
00:01:11.500
it's probably not the wisest decision. Okay, I want to pause for a minute to tell you about GenuCell.
00:01:17.200
Double chins, sagging jawlines, turkey necks, they are real problems and difficult to deal with if
00:01:22.900
you have it. But you don't have to worry about it anymore. Introducing the new GenuCell jawline
00:01:28.160
treatment formulated with MDL technology and GenuCell's amazing Mother's Day sale, if you happen
00:01:33.600
to miss it. The good news is that it's been extended for a limited time. Robin S. from Lubbock,
00:01:39.740
Texas wrote in with her testimonial, says, I put that jawline cream in my neck like two or three days
00:01:44.880
ago. That is the best my neck has looked at over 20 years. Several people told me my face
00:01:48.680
looks young. I am blown away. Sure, you could, you know, you could experiment with all the expensive
00:01:53.540
and harsh treatments to look younger. But why would you do that when you've got this option
00:01:57.400
instead? For a limited time, get the GenuCell jawline treatment absolutely free when you order
00:02:02.780
the classic GenuCell for eye bags and puffiness. And with its instant effects, you could see results in
00:02:07.660
the first 12 hours guaranteed, or you get your money back. So there's no risk here. Go to GenuCell.com.
00:02:13.440
That's GenuCell.com and enter Matt25 at checkout for my special discount.
00:02:18.720
Visit GenuCell.com. That's GenuCell.com. Enter Matt25 at checkout.
00:02:24.320
All right, let's begin with something that I think is a problem in this country, which is that
00:02:31.260
people don't understand Christianity. That's a common theme these days, right? And we've got a few
00:02:38.320
examples of that today. We'll start with this. President Trump stopped by a McLean Bible Church
00:02:44.440
in Virginia over the weekend to pray with the congregation in the wake of the terrible shooting
00:02:50.680
that happened in Virginia Beach. A shooting that, by the way, it seems like it just, I don't know,
00:03:00.560
we're at the point now where you have a mass shooting, 11 people are killed, and everyone
00:03:07.000
moves on in like a day. I mean, you think back to Columbine, where it was, I think it was 13 people,
00:03:14.740
I believe, were killed at Columbine. And that was the only thing people talked about for two months.
00:03:20.980
It was the biggest story in the world. And now we're at a point where we just move on in a day from it.
00:03:27.340
And I think that's, that's not a good sign. But President Trump showed up at the church
00:03:33.460
to pray with the congregation. And the pastor, David Platt, while the president was in attendance,
00:03:38.980
offered a short prayer for the president. I thought the prayer was beautiful. It was very well done.
00:03:44.720
Not political at all. Nothing partisan about it. Just a biblically sound prayer for a man in a position
00:03:51.140
of leadership. Here's, I'll play a little bit of the prayer. Here's what the prayer sounded like.
00:03:55.460
So, I want to ask us to bow our heads together now and pray for our president.
00:04:05.360
Oh God, we praise you as the one universal king over all. You are our leader and our Lord,
00:04:15.620
and we worship you. There is one God and one Savior. And it's you. And your name is Jesus. And we exalt you,
00:04:26.260
Jesus. And we know, we need your mercy. We need your grace. We need your help. We need your wisdom in our country.
00:04:37.400
And so we stand right now on behalf of our president. And we pray for your grace and your mercy and your wisdom
00:04:49.620
upon him. God, we pray that he would know how much you love him so much that you sent Jesus to die
00:05:03.740
for his sins, for his sins, our sins. So we pray that he would look to you, that he would trust in you,
00:05:14.000
that he would lean on you, that he would govern and make decisions in ways that are good for justice
00:05:21.800
and good for righteousness and good for equity, every good path.
00:05:29.620
Okay, so that's good stuff, right? Well, apparently not. At least not in the minds of people who were
00:05:34.720
offended by the fact that the pastor prayed for Trump. In fact, people were so hurt by this fact
00:05:40.920
that Platt had to issue a lengthy statement defending his decision to pray for the president.
00:05:46.840
It wasn't an apology. I've seen some news reports about it saying pastor apologizes for praying for Trump.
00:05:52.440
He didn't apologize for it, but he did explain why he did it. And I think that's a bad enough,
00:05:58.800
that's a bad sign right there when a pastor has to explain to his own congregation why he offered a prayer
00:06:06.400
for the president who was in attendance at the church. It's now controversial, apparently, for a Christian
00:06:12.020
pastor to pray for the president. Of course, anyone who has even the faintest understanding of
00:06:16.640
Christianity would not be scandalized by this. Christians pray for everybody. Christians are
00:06:21.200
supposed to pray for everybody. Pray for your friends, your foes, your neighbors, your strangers,
00:06:25.780
victims, criminals, murderers, everyone. I mean, you're supposed to pray for everyone. It's very clear,
00:06:31.540
especially our political leaders. The Bible specifically commands us to pray for our leaders.
00:06:37.260
So this, again, just shows how although America is nominally a Christian nation and most people
00:06:42.400
supposedly are Christian or are at least self-professed Christians, still Christianity is
00:06:48.880
little understood in this country. Let's look at another example, perhaps a more dramatic example.
00:06:54.880
On Saturday, a bishop from Rhode Island, Bishop Thomas Tobin, sent out a tweet that has sparked backlash.
00:07:05.000
And you know, it's bad when it sparks backlash. It's got to be bad because, I mean, there are only
00:07:11.980
a thousand different backlashes that happen every day. So, you know, it's not like people are having
00:07:18.540
bad. It's not like we have backlashes over stupid things, right? We choose our backlashes very carefully.
00:07:23.340
We specifically choose a thousand different ones every day. We're very discerning about it.
00:07:29.120
So, but this is a major, this is a worldwide controversy now, people getting very upset.
00:07:35.100
Here's what the tweet said from Bishop Tobin said, a reminder that Catholics should not support or attend
00:07:40.940
LGBTQ pride month events held in June. They promote a culture and encourage activities that are contrary
00:07:47.780
to Catholic faith and morals. They are especially harmful to children. Okay. Now,
00:07:53.580
you may not agree with that. A lot of people don't, obviously, but how could anyone be shocked?
00:08:05.040
That's what I don't get. See, this is where it shows people don't understand Christianity,
00:08:08.520
that you have all these people that are shocked by the statement, scandalized. They can't believe
00:08:13.700
that anyone would come out and say something, at least of all, a bishop.
00:08:18.100
The Catholic Church has always been opposed to pride parades. Always. Why? At least when I say
00:08:30.320
always, as long as pride parades have been a thing, the Catholic Church has been opposed to it. Why is
00:08:35.080
that? Because according to the Bible, marriage is between a man and a woman, and sex is meant to be
00:08:41.220
kept within marriage. That is the biblical understanding. That's the Catholic understanding.
00:08:46.280
That's the Christian understanding. This is standard Christian teaching. As such, of course, an
00:08:52.880
observant Christian will not be in favor of events that celebrate something which they believe to
00:08:59.420
be sinful. And this is not just about gay people, by the way. You know, I'm guessing that if you asked
00:09:07.460
Bishop Tobin, Bishop Tobin, how he feels about, say, you know, these debauched spring break, you know,
00:09:16.100
events, spring break, which has become a celebration of debauchery among heterosexuals and homosexuals,
00:09:25.180
too, that attend. I'm guessing if you asked him how he felt about that, about, you know, a bunch of
00:09:29.560
college kids going down to, you know, going to the beach somewhere, Cancun or whatever, and engaging in all
00:09:40.520
these kinds of activities, I'm guessing that if you asked him how he felt about it, he would say that he's
00:09:44.540
against it. I'm guessing he would tell you that he doesn't like it, because it's a celebration of and an
00:09:51.880
opportunity to participate in sexually immoral behavior. Not specifically gay behavior, it's also
00:10:01.700
heterosexual behavior. But the point is, from the perspective of the bishop and from any devout
00:10:08.200
Catholic, is that this is behavior that ought to be within, kept within marriage, biblical marriage.
00:10:15.100
I'm guessing you that, I'm guessing that he would also tell you that he's against explicit
00:10:21.440
TV shows, like Game of Thrones, which depict and glorify immoral sexuality. I'm guessing that if you
00:10:29.980
asked him how he feels about a heterosexual couple living together before marriage, he would tell you
00:10:35.540
that he's against it. And if there was some weird kind of event, or a bunch of cohabitating heterosexual
00:10:41.700
couples got together and had a parade to talk about how proud they are of living together before
00:10:47.260
marriage, I'm guessing that Bishop Tobin would be against that. And he would say, no, that shouldn't
00:10:52.660
be happening, and you shouldn't participate if you're a Catholic. The point is that he's being
00:10:57.340
consistent. He's a Catholic bishop, and he's being consistent with Catholic teaching. He is expressing
00:11:03.840
a biblically coherent and consistent point of view, and one that does not simply target homosexuals.
00:11:10.680
It is a view that is centered around an idea of chastity and modesty. Again, you're free
00:11:17.640
to disagree. But what is there to be surprised by? How could you be outraged by it? You already,
00:11:27.020
unless you're a total idiot, you know that this is how the Catholic Church, this is what the
00:11:31.060
Catholic Church's teaching is. You must know that by now. So how could you be offended if someone
00:11:37.480
who represents the Catholic Church comes out and says their point of view on the subject?
00:11:46.380
It's so silly. It's just so ridiculous.
00:11:51.000
One other point here. You know, you can't march through the streets literally announcing your
00:11:58.060
sexuality to the world. You can't constantly shove it in front of people's faces. You can't insist
00:12:04.380
that we all look and acknowledge your sexuality and then get offended when someone offers an opinion
00:12:11.000
about it. You brought it up. If you don't want people talking about it, then don't bring it up.
00:12:17.200
If you don't want to know, if you don't want Bishop Tobin's opinion on your sexuality,
00:12:21.760
then why are you marching through the street announcing it?
00:12:24.700
So this is kind of how the conversation goes. The LGB camp, you know, the LGBT camp will say,
00:12:31.680
hey, everyone, look at us. Look at us, everyone. Look, look, look at us. Please look at us. We're
00:12:36.680
marching through the street. Look, look at us. This is what, let us tell you about our sexuality. I know
00:12:42.060
you didn't ask, but we're going to tell you. Look at us. Please, please. We're proud. We're proud.
00:12:47.660
And then someone says, oh, okay, well, here's my opinion about that. How dare you give us your
00:12:52.380
opinion? This is none of your business. Well, if it's none of our business, why are you talking
00:12:58.320
about it? Why are you literally marching in the street announcing it if it's none of our business?
00:13:06.460
See, you can't do that. You can't have it both ways. You can do it. You can march in the street.
00:13:12.020
You're free to do that in America, but you can't have it both ways. Okay. You can't shove this
00:13:18.920
unwanted information in my face and then tell me that I'm, that I'm supposed, how I'm supposed to
00:13:24.860
respond to it. It doesn't work that way because this is America. So America, in America, you have
00:13:31.020
the right to march through the street and tell everybody about your sex life if you want to.
00:13:35.560
I don't know why you want to. I have no interest in doing that, but you can do that, but you don't
00:13:41.300
get to set the rules for the conversation. Okay. You can't bring it up to me and then tell me how I'm
00:13:50.040
supposed to respond. I'll respond however I damn well please. If you don't want to hear my opinion,
00:13:57.240
don't bring it up. Now here, you know, that goes for any topic, literally any topic, any topic you bring
00:14:10.440
up to me, I am well within my rights to offer my opinion on it. I mean, I'm, I'm within my rights
00:14:16.000
to offer my opinion, even if you don't bring it up, but especially if you do, if you don't care about
00:14:22.560
my perspective, then don't tell me about it. There are a lot of things. Um, there are a lot of,
00:14:32.380
uh, details about my life, my personal life that, uh, of which I, I don't care, you know,
00:14:41.640
that, that I don't care what your opinion is about those things. You know, I tend to keep my private
00:14:48.040
life private. And the reason why I keep it private is that the things that are private to me, um,
00:14:57.380
it's just, it's, it's none of your business. And I don't care what your opinion is about it.
00:15:03.380
I don't care what your perspective is about it.
00:15:07.720
You know, things about my family and, you know, how my family works and, and, and, and all of that.
00:15:13.100
I don't care what your opinion is. I don't care what your perspective is. No offense to you,
00:15:17.380
but that's why I don't bring it up. That's why I don't talk about it.
00:15:19.860
Anything about my life that I put out there in the open for general consumption,
00:15:28.820
I must be putting it out there because at some level I do care about your perspective.
00:15:36.740
Now I might hope that you have one particular perspective. You know, I might put it out there
00:15:42.400
because I'm hoping that you'll have an affirming, approving perspective, but I don't get to decide
00:15:48.880
that. That's a risk I take. If I put it out there and, and, and you have a negative perspective,
00:15:52.960
well, that's, you're, that's, that's just the way it goes. Let's take an example. My faith,
00:16:02.340
for example. Okay. Now my faith is a, is a, is a private detail about my life in a sense. You know,
00:16:10.200
it's, it's, it's a, it's a, it's a detail about my personal life, about me, my faith. Yet I do talk
00:16:18.620
about it openly. I do put it out there. Number one, because I feel that as Christians, we're called
00:16:25.540
to do that, that we're not supposed to just keep it private, but I do put it out there. Not because I
00:16:36.340
want you to affirm it or to tell me it's okay to be Christian, but I do want to tell you about it.
00:16:43.780
And I know that when I do that, I open myself up for criticism because I might tell you about my
00:16:50.560
faith and you might not agree with my faith. So you might have criticisms. You might argue against it.
00:16:57.080
I can't, I can't start crying about it when you do that. If I tell you, here's my faith,
00:17:01.300
here's what I believe. And you say, here's what I believe about what you believe. I can't say,
00:17:05.780
well, how dare you? You're offending me. How dare you tell me that? I brought it up.
00:17:14.180
And the thing is for me, when I bring up my faith and you come with your, with your contrary opinions,
00:17:19.800
I'm, I'm excited to have that conversation. I'm more than willing to have that conversation.
00:17:25.600
I would love to have that debate with you. So I just can't conceive of, of, of talking about
00:17:31.700
something, of bringing something up about my life that I don't want to talk about. You're talking
00:17:36.660
about something you don't want to talk about. That doesn't make sense to me. So if, if, if you
00:17:43.360
really think it's, it's none of anyone's business, then just don't, don't bring it up. By the way,
00:17:47.260
one other thing here, Bishop Tobin, in that tweet I just read, he said that pride events harm children,
00:17:54.420
you know, and that's something that is especially offended a lot of people. Well, yeah. I mean,
00:18:00.860
I can't imagine why he would say that, right? It's so offensive. Oh, maybe he said that because of
00:18:05.920
this.
00:18:06.920
You can't help it.
00:18:23.360
Yeah. The headline of that video is, uh, seven-year-old trans child wins LA pride parade
00:18:45.680
with fierce strut in heels. So you've got, you've got a seven-year-old boy strutting,
00:18:55.280
according to this headline in, in high heels and a dress. Um, and, and he's at the, at the head of
00:19:02.420
the, of the pride parade. Yeah. Maybe that's why Bishop Tobin observed that these events can be
00:19:10.540
harmful to children because what you're seeing there, what you just saw in that clip, that is the
00:19:15.600
sexual abuse of a child to put a seven-year-old boy in a dress and high heels and have him strut.
00:19:25.600
That is abusive. It is the, it is the sexualization of a child and it is abusive. And so I would call
00:19:32.940
that sexual abuse of a child. You know what? I would say that if he was a girl, I mean, to have a,
00:19:40.460
why do they even make high heels that a seven-year-old can fit in? If it was a seven-year-old
00:19:47.460
girl strutting in high heels, I would say that's incredibly inappropriate and gross and wrong.
00:19:55.160
The fact that it's a boy makes it even more demented and just deranged. So what kind of
00:20:00.740
message do you think you're sending? If, if you, if you don't want people to think that pride parades
00:20:07.500
are harmful to children, then maybe don't put a seven-year-old boy in a dress and high heels and
00:20:11.460
have him strutting in front of the parade. What the hell do you think people are going to think?
00:20:19.860
Well, it's not about what they think. They're just going to observe that, okay, well, this event
00:20:24.380
in any way is sexualizing a, a seven-year-old boy.
00:20:28.560
But at LA pride parade, the people that put that on, they're the ones who chose to do that.
00:20:38.760
You can't get mad at Bishop Tobin for pointing it out. You can't get mad at me for pointing it out.
00:20:43.620
All right, now let's check in with our friends at Dynamic Solutions. You know, it's, it's summertime
00:20:47.760
and the only thing more annoying than, than all the politics in the news right now is flies and other
00:20:54.240
insects, which invade your home and just make life pretty miserable. And, and, you know, the thing
00:21:00.420
about flies is who knows where they've, where they've been. You see them landing on your hamburger
00:21:04.880
or your sandwich last place. They were probably a dumpster or trash can. So you don't want those
00:21:10.200
disgusting infernal creatures flying around your home, which is why we'd like to thank our sponsors
00:21:16.580
over at Dynatrap. Dynatrap is the leading manufacturer of outdoor mosquito and insect traps.
00:21:22.520
And now they've come up with a solution for indoor pests as well. That's the Dynatrap fly light. The
00:21:28.200
Dynatrap fly light works day and night to attract and trap flies, fruit flies, mosquitoes, any other
00:21:34.740
pesky insect that might fly around your house. And I got to tell you, it really does work. I've got,
00:21:39.580
I've got, uh, the folks at Dynatrap are nice enough to send me a bunch. I've got them all around the
00:21:43.600
house and we have not had any fly problems, any mosquito problems. We can leave the windows open
00:21:48.500
and, um, it's not a problem. And, you know, we don't have to worry about those disgusting fly
00:21:53.860
strips either because the Dynatrap fly light looks like a, it's like a nightlight that's plugged into
00:21:59.360
your, your outlet, but it also does much more than a nightlight does. Trust me. I've been using the
00:22:04.080
Dynatrap fly light for a couple of days now, and it's just, it's insane how many insects these things
00:22:08.740
catch. So get yours at Dynatrap.com. That's D-Y-N-A-T-R-A-P.com. Enter the promo code Walsh
00:22:17.040
and, uh, receive 15% off any of their products. Dynatrap, the safe, silent, and simple solution
00:22:23.560
to household insect control. All right. Uh, let's see. One other thing, Texas, the state of Texas
00:22:29.940
continues to be in my mind, the best state in the union. And I continue to be jealous,
00:22:34.600
very jealous of everyone who lives there. Um, because I, I don't live there myself.
00:22:42.220
And I think Texas has everything going for it culturally and legally and so many other aspects,
00:22:49.160
except the weather is just not the weather and the bugs. Those are the one problem. If you could
00:22:55.740
take Texas and just kind of like, uh, pick, just carve the whole state out and pick it up and transport
00:23:03.060
it by helicopter, maybe 500 miles North. Um, and you know, you could just plop it on top of some
00:23:11.520
other States. No big deal. Then I think it'd be the perfect state. But anyway, Texas continues to,
00:23:16.460
uh, continues to impress Greg Abbott, the governor, um, posted this video over the weekend. Watch this.
00:23:24.820
Hi, Governor Greg Abbott here at the Capitol on Saturday signing bills. I'm about to sign this bill
00:23:30.140
that bans red light cameras in Texas is now law. All right. So he's banning red light cameras.
00:23:49.200
And why did he ban red light cameras? Well, because red light cameras are a money-making scam
00:23:54.200
and nothing more. It's that's all they are. There's no, there's no safe public safety angle to it.
00:24:00.800
It is just about making money. It's public. It's a money-making operation. They profit off of traffic
00:24:06.400
infractions, but do not prevent them. And there have been a lot of studies on that have shown this.
00:24:11.060
There's an article on motorist.org. You can go to that website and check it out, which cites a bunch
00:24:15.900
of studies, uh, too many to list, but like I said, you can go and look at it yourself. All of these studies
00:24:20.960
showing that red light cameras actually increase accidents and certainly don't decrease or prevent
00:24:26.960
them. And it's not hard to see why that would be the case because people end up, end up speeding
00:24:32.720
faster through the intersection. If they know there's a red light camera, because they don't
00:24:36.960
want to be caught by it. That's what ends up happening. Um, I know I've done this myself where
00:24:41.780
I, you know, I've had times where I'm coming up to an intersection and, um, and it goes yellow
00:24:49.400
right at that, you know, there's that, there's that window about, I don't know, 10 or 10 feet
00:24:55.580
or so where it's an awkward window where if the, if the light goes yellow in that moment,
00:25:00.420
you're either going to have to slam on your brakes or speed up to try to get through the
00:25:05.900
intersection. And then you have to kind of choose which ones. And sometimes it could be safer to
00:25:09.780
speed up depending on how close the car is behind you. So, um, uh, now if, if I know that
00:25:18.540
there's a red light camera at that intersection, I'm probably more likely to speed up and try to
00:25:22.400
go through it because I know that if I try to stop for it, but I end up over the line a little
00:25:26.780
bit, I could get ticketed. And so I think that's one of the reasons why these things just create
00:25:32.420
more accidents and maybe that's the wrong choice, but the point remains one way or another that red
00:25:37.060
light cameras don't make anyone safer. They just don't. And the stats speak for themselves.
00:25:42.760
So why have them? What's the point? If you've got all of these studies that have been done over
00:25:47.620
the years and they, so many of them demonstrate seemingly conclusively that red light cameras
00:25:55.360
don't prevent accidents or prevent these traffic infractions, why keep doing them? Because it
00:26:00.420
allows the state to profit from law breaking, which creates a conflict of interest because now the
00:26:06.500
state actually wants people to run the light because they make money from it. You know, these states
00:26:13.360
become dependent on speeding tickets and red light tickets. They fund things with these tickets. So
00:26:21.860
they need you to keep on doing it so they can make money from it. In fact, there have been cities that
00:26:27.620
have actually shortened the yellow light time. This has happened in many cities where they put the red light
00:26:35.660
cameras in and then what do you know magically all of a sudden the yellow lights are shorter and why do
00:26:43.120
they do that? Because they want you to run it. Now it's very clear that longer yellow lights are safer
00:26:49.960
because they give more people more time to prepare to stop or to go through the intersection if they're
00:26:55.660
close enough. You shorten the yellow light time and you're more likely to catch people in the middle of
00:27:00.100
the intersection on a red light. They do that anyway, even though it's dangerous because it means
00:27:05.700
they make more money and they want people to run it. It's the same thing with speeding. Have you ever
00:27:11.520
been, you know, where I live, there are a lot of roads like this. It's very frustrating, but have you
00:27:14.720
ever been on one of those roads? Usually it's a back road, country road type of thing where the speed
00:27:20.380
limit changes randomly back and forth from 50 to 35, back to 50 to 45 to 30, 25, 20, 50. You know,
00:27:28.540
you're going, uh, and the speed limit changes five times in a span of 10 miles. And why is that?
00:27:36.020
Because they want you to speed. And what you're going to find is that so often, you know, when the
00:27:41.240
speed limit goes from 50 to 35 and then back up to 50 and 35 again, at one of those changes, there's
00:27:49.240
going to be a cop a lot of times hidden out there, just waiting, waiting for you to waiting to catch you,
00:27:54.700
right? So they can make some money. Um, it's, it's, uh, the thing that's terrible about is all
00:28:04.000
of this traffic enforcement stuff, which is not really enforcement, but again, it's just making
00:28:10.160
money. But it has, I think, fundamentally changed the nature and purpose of law enforcement because
00:28:16.660
we've turned police officers into tax collectors and into bill collectors, revenue generators,
00:28:21.580
uh, or not even generators, but, but appropriators. And so we have them camped out on the side of the
00:28:27.840
road, waiting for an opportunity to collect rather than out actually fighting crime and looking for
00:28:32.980
real dangerous crime that they can stop. Um, and then the red light camera thing just takes
00:28:39.040
that mentality to the next level where it says, okay, well, why do we even need the police officer?
00:28:44.560
And so it cut out, cuts out the middleman. And instead, if you run the red light, it snaps a picture,
00:28:50.180
sends you a bill to your house, uh, says, Oh, you, you ran a red light. So you owe the state $75.
00:28:55.240
But why though? What even is the correlation? Why should a minor traffic infraction mean that
00:29:00.760
the state gets money? I don't even see the correlation there. It doesn't make sense.
00:29:07.120
And the whole picture just solidifies the impression that people have that the state is
00:29:15.180
this opportunistic money grubbing entity that's hiding around every corner, waiting for you to
00:29:21.640
trip up so that they can reach into your wallet and take some of your money. And that is not the
00:29:26.100
relationship that a citizen should have with his government in a free country. That that's just not
00:29:32.260
it. Uh, so I'm a big fan of getting rid of the red light cameras. They really are. And you know,
00:29:40.180
I was talking about this a few days ago. It's shocking to me that there are actual, there are
00:29:44.700
actually people, regular citizens who are in favor of red light cameras. Uh, you know, it makes me think
00:29:53.520
of that quote from the, the, the, uh, you know, uh, uh, uh, uh, bow down and, and, and lick the chains
00:30:02.020
that bind you or something like I'm, I'm mangling the quote. Um, but that's, that's what people have
00:30:07.940
come, have fallen in love with their chains. I guess that they, they actually are in favor of
00:30:13.480
red light. Again, the red light cameras, they're not there to make you safer. They are just there
00:30:18.780
to make money off you. That's the only reason that they're there. The state puts them in there
00:30:23.360
because they want you to break the law so they can make money off of you doing it. How could you
00:30:28.220
possibly be in favor of that? I just, I, I don't understand it. So I want to take a second to tell you
00:30:33.840
about wise company freeze-dried food. Uh, listen, you never know when you're going to be in an
00:30:39.080
emergency situation. And the thing about an emergency is that you don't have time to prepare
00:30:42.660
for it while it's happening. That's why it's, you know, preparing means ahead of time. You've
00:30:47.120
got to be ready for it. Um, which is why it's so great that wise company freeze-dried food is good
00:30:53.340
for 25 years. So you get 25 years of preparation with, with wise company, which is remarkable.
00:30:59.240
Wise company takes an innovative approach in providing dependable, simple, and affordable freeze-dried
00:31:03.820
food for emergency preparedness and outdoor use. And you get a lot with that. But I think that the
00:31:08.580
number one thing you get is peace of mind. Um, when government resources are strained, it can be days,
00:31:13.900
if not weeks before you can get fresh food and water. So you can't rely on someone else. You got
00:31:19.180
to take care of yourself this week. My listeners get any wise, uh, company emergency or outdoor food
00:31:25.880
product at an extra 25% off the lowest mark price at wise food storage.com. That's wise food
00:31:33.660
storage.com. If you enter Walsh at checkout, or you can call 855-475-3089. Plus to make it even
00:31:42.980
better shipping is free. Wise has a 90 day, no question to ask return policy. So there's no risk
00:31:48.360
in taking the initiative to get yourself and your family more prepared today. That's wise food storage.com
00:31:54.600
promo code Walsh to get any wise emergency or outdoor food product at an extra 25% off and also
00:32:01.680
free shipping. All right. Uh, Matt Walsh show at gmail.com, Matt Walsh show at gmail.com.
00:32:08.720
Let's check some emails. This is from Norm says Walsh, the bearded. I think I found a perfect word
00:32:14.260
to describe anyone who is attracted to anything, all sexual. You're welcome. He asked, please don't
00:32:21.140
execute me when you gain power in the foreseeable future. Um, well, Norm, you think, you know, I can't
00:32:27.000
make that promise on the last point on the first one. Yeah, I think it's pretty good. All sexual.
00:32:31.400
You know, we talked about yesterday that we've got, um, a set, we got a word for it. We have
00:32:35.720
asexual. So those are people who aren't attracted to anything. And then there's, what was a gray
00:32:40.460
sexual are people who are just attracted to some things, which is pretty much everybody. And then I
00:32:45.240
said, well, what about someone who's attracted to every, who's sexually attracted to literally
00:32:49.260
everything in existence? Now, I don't think that such a person exists, but that hasn't stopped us
00:32:55.840
from creating labels in the, in the past. I mean, just because a person doesn't exist doesn't mean
00:33:00.000
we can't have a label for it. So I think we need a label for that just to complete the spectrum
00:33:03.860
and, uh, all sexual. I could go with that. Yeah, we'll do that. All sexual. All right. Um,
00:33:13.400
from Megan says, Hey Matt, just wanted to get your opinion on the ethics behind bodies. The,
00:33:18.120
the exhibition, this is a hugely popular exhibit that's been around since 2007. These exhibits display
00:33:24.160
human corpses that have been preserved and solidified through plastination and outer layers
00:33:29.300
are peeled back to reveal their organs or joints or muscles and the corpses. Uh, some of the corpses
00:33:34.240
are posed to show movement as if they are dancing, playing sports or doing yoga and others give a
00:33:39.840
visual, uh, for various disease states. Copying this right off their website. This is their reasoning
00:33:45.640
for using real bodies says unlike models that idealize the body through the eyes of an artist,
00:33:50.780
the specimens in the exhibition display the body and its parts as they really exist.
00:33:55.360
Idealized models have been used for many years to teach anatomy. However, models do not allow for
00:33:59.640
any variation in structure or pathologies, which is key in learning how lifestyle and disease actually
00:34:04.360
manifests inside the human body. Um, says I am less bothered by the idea of people in the U S
00:34:10.300
following strict, strict, legal, and profusely documented means of donating their body after
00:34:15.960
they die to be used solely by medical professional schools to be studied and then return to families
00:34:20.180
for final burial. However, I think that this crosses the line as these exhibits are profiting
00:34:25.940
immensely from displaying of the corpses of others in the name of education. Um, another big issue is
00:34:31.520
that according to their website, they're using bodies from China that were unclaimed and therefore
00:34:35.520
automatically donated to medical school per Chinese law. Hi Megan. Yeah, it's, it's a,
00:34:41.660
that's a great topic. I, in, in my younger and less discerning days, I did attend one of those
00:34:47.160
exhibits. Um, there was one in Philadelphia, I believe it was, and I think it was 18 or 19.
00:34:51.980
And I went to one of them. It was, it was bizarre and weird and gross. Um, and just something I wish I
00:34:59.320
hadn't been a part of. I do think it's morally problematic to put dead bodies on display, like,
00:35:05.620
like, like art show exhibits. Um, I think we need to uphold the dignity of the human person
00:35:11.900
before, before death and after death, dead bodies should be treated with respect. Organ donation is
00:35:17.940
one thing, um, to give your body up to another person, you know, so that they can continue living.
00:35:23.500
I think it's a beautiful thing, but to give your body as a freak show exhibit for tourists to walk
00:35:29.360
around and gawk at, I, I, I just, I don't see that as noble or, or dignified or, uh, or anything like
00:35:37.080
that. So now you could claim as, as they do apparently that the, that the exhibit is educational
00:35:43.040
and I guess it is sort of, but whatever educating they do, they could do it just as easily with,
00:35:49.760
with, uh, without actual dead bodies. They could come up with anatomical models that are not idealized,
00:35:58.160
that are more realistic if they really want to. Um, and I, I do think it's different if you,
00:36:04.220
of course, donating an organ is one thing and also donating a body being donated to a medical school.
00:36:10.240
I would agree with you. That's different as well, but people who go to a museum exhibit are not at
00:36:16.120
medical school and they're not necessarily future doctors. Okay. They don't need an exact,
00:36:20.700
uh, rendering of what a dead body looks like for whatever you're trying to accomplish with the
00:36:27.740
exhibit. For the most part, as I said, I went to one of them. I know that people are there. It's,
00:36:32.860
it's, it's, it's, it's, uh, isn't, these are tourists, like I said, that, that come here. It's not
00:36:37.340
this, people aren't there with lab coats and, and clipboards taking notes and everything like that.
00:36:43.880
That's not, it's people go there to gawk at the exhibit. That's the primary function. And so I think,
00:36:50.060
um, displaying a dead body for that purpose is, uh, is grotesque. All right. Um,
00:36:59.900
this is from Mark says, I have stumbled upon this question while debating pro-abortionists.
00:37:06.720
Why is it wrong and illegal for my wife to, to, um, drink or do a lot of hard drugs while pregnant?
00:37:14.680
According to them, it is her body and she could do whatever she wants with it. So
00:37:18.680
why can't she do those hard drugs is, uh, addicting her children to drugs and alcohol
00:37:24.020
worse than actually killing them. I never had a pro-choice or make a cohesive argument to this
00:37:28.480
question or any question regarding abortion. Actually, they all think it's wrong, but they
00:37:32.580
don't know why. Uh, yeah, Mark. Well, that's just one of dozens of areas where the pro-choice,
00:37:38.820
the pro-choice in quotes, pro-abortion position is incoherent because you're, you, you will very
00:37:47.080
rarely stumble across a pro-abortion person who would be totally cool with a pregnant woman,
00:37:53.420
you know, doing cocaine and, uh, and chugging six beers, right? You're going to very rarely come
00:37:59.960
across someone like that. Yet, according to them, it's her body. She can do it. Not only is it her
00:38:05.700
body, but the child doesn't exist yet. That thing in the womb is not a child, not a person, not a human.
00:38:13.040
So who cares? Obviously there's an inconsistency there, but don't expect to hear a coherent
00:38:19.640
argument dealing with that because there isn't one. Um, this is from David says, Matt, as someone
00:38:29.520
with a degree in applied mathematics, I'd like to help clarify an issue. You, you briefly mentioned
00:38:33.700
last week when it comes to quantifying victimhood status, the following rules apply. Everyone starts
00:38:40.220
from a, from a base of zero. You can be a victim and oppressor, neither or both, but you can't be
00:38:45.920
negative in either category. Each claim to victimhood comes with a, with both a base point value and a
00:38:52.060
multiplication factor. For example, being black grants you a hundred victim points, but also gives
00:38:57.220
you a multiplier of 1.5. So if your only claim to victimhood is being black, you have 150 total victim
00:39:03.740
points. Multiplication factors are compounding. To continue the example, being female is worth 150
00:39:09.740
points and carries a multiplier of 1.75. So a black female has 250 base points times 1.5 for being black
00:39:16.420
times 1.75 for being female for a total of 656.25 victim points. Using these rules and criteria you
00:39:23.940
mentioned last week, we can make the following evaluation. Temporary physical disability is worth 50
00:39:30.400
points and carries a multiplier of 1. Potential for surgical complications is unfortunately worth
00:39:35.700
no points, but carries a multiplier of 1. One being an undetermined, uh, being an undetermined part
00:39:42.540
Native American carries 75 points. Oh, that's pretty good. With a multiplier of 1.25. Being part Irish is
00:39:49.160
worth 25 points and carries a multiplier of 1. So I'm doing pretty well here. Being part Australian carries
00:39:54.060
no points in a multiplier of 1. In other words, no effect. Unfortunately, being straight, white, male,
00:39:58.520
and Christian are all worth 0 points. And I'm afraid each carries a multiplier of 0.1. So your total is
00:40:05.980
50 plus 75 plus 25 times 1 times 1.1 times 1.25 times 1 times 1 times 0.01 times 0.01 times 0.01 times 0.01
00:40:16.180
equals 0.020625 victim points. When compared with the theoretical maximum score of 50,000 points for a
00:40:24.920
physically and mentally handicapped, uh, uh, uh, gay, transgender, black Muslim female making 30 cents
00:40:31.040
on the dollar doing the same work as a man, you can see that your score pales in comparison. Of
00:40:35.560
course, the major problem with the calculation of victimhood is that point values are arbitrary and
00:40:39.720
subject to change based on current events, democratic talking points, which college, which college
00:40:44.200
campus you're currently on, et cetera. But I hope this helps clarify things to the extent that any
00:40:48.420
leftist idea can be clarified. Um, yeah. Okay. That was way too much math for me. So you've confused
00:40:59.340
me there, but what I zeroed in on here is that you say that I have 0.020625 victim points. So
00:41:06.200
what you're saying is that I am a victim. So you're saying I'm a victim is what you're saying. That's all
00:41:12.340
I really wanted to establish. And I would also now, I think that your calculation is for the most part
00:41:18.580
pretty solid. You did make a few mistakes here. For instance, you said that, um, uh, that being black
00:41:25.820
grants you a hundred victim points, being a female grants you 150 points. Well, you're wrong. I would
00:41:29.880
switch that around. Whereas being a racial minority is worth more victim points certainly than being a
00:41:36.320
female. Um, because if you're a white, straight, heterosexual female, uh, you are, you know,
00:41:45.620
you are a victim and you're certainly higher on the totem pole than a white male, but you're,
00:41:51.660
you can only, the white males right below you. Right. So, um, you're, there's only one,
00:41:57.540
you are one level up as a white heterosexual, um, female. So that's how it goes. You know,
00:42:05.140
you have white males, um, then white females, and then you start, and then you get into the
00:42:10.440
racial minorities. And, but of course I would agree with you. And I think it's important how
00:42:14.520
you factored in that. Now, if you are a female racial minority, then that's going to be worth
00:42:20.880
extra. And you're going to rank above a male racial minority. So that's the way it goes. Remember,
00:42:27.540
basically females are always above males in each kind of subcategory until you get to the very top
00:42:36.280
where you have quote unquote, transgender women who are at the very top, who are the most victimized,
00:42:41.620
but of course they are not female, they're male. So, um, anyway, very interesting discussion. And,
00:42:47.920
um, I think that someone needs to do a paper on this and put it in a science scientific journal of
00:42:53.760
some kind, uh, just to really quantify all the victim points and everything. So I appreciate that,
00:42:59.020
David, and we will leave it there. I will talk to you, um, next week. Hopefully by then I will
00:43:05.280
have an intact Achilles and, um, have a great week, great weekend. Godspeed.
00:43:10.500
Sex sells, sex robs too. We will examine the difference between a casual hookup and assault
00:43:30.220
and robbery. Then in the NBA, players want to get rid of the term owner because apparently everything
00:43:35.900
is racist. Now we'll explain how, when everything is racist, nothing is racist. And finally,
00:43:40.460
president Trump goes to the motherland. Check it out on the Michael Knowles show.
Link copied!