The Matt Walsh Show - Ep. 355 - Our Collective Plunge Into Madness

00:00:00.000 You know, on the plus side, we are giving historians and anthropologists of the future

00:00:07.540 a lot to do. They're going to have a very interesting time of it as they discuss and

00:00:13.260 debate the question of when exactly did the once great American civilization of those ancient times

00:00:21.440 go insane? And why did it happen? And how? And I can only imagine a thousand years from now,

00:00:29.160 500 years from now, what conclusions they'll draw about that. As an American citizen myself

00:00:34.640 in the present day, actually bearing witness to the collapse of sanity and reason in real time,

00:00:41.360 just as we all are, I'm not sure that I can answer those questions. And I'm watching it happen.

00:00:46.540 But perhaps hindsight will lend a little bit of clarity for them. What I do know is that this

00:00:52.860 case we've been talking about this week, the case of James Younger, I think will be viewed as a,

00:00:57.740 in the future as a seminal moment in our collective plunge into madness. It may be seen as,

00:01:03.840 at least from a legal standpoint, the point of no return, the crossing of some sort of Rubicon.

00:01:12.320 Now, I want to talk a little more about this case today because if the mass media isn't going to

00:01:17.920 cover it, which they aren't, then that's all the more reason for me to continue to talk about it.

00:01:22.180 In fact, today I want to talk about both of the stories that the mass media has been ignoring

00:01:27.780 this week. And I've covered both of them already, but I want to continue those conversations.

00:01:32.860 But first, just to review, as we talk about this James Younger case,

00:01:36.800 if you didn't catch the show yesterday, just a quick review of what's going on. A man named

00:01:42.220 Jeff Younger has been locked in this bitter court battle with his ex-wife, Ann Georgilis.

00:01:46.320 Despite being a medical professional herself, a pediatrician of all things, God help us,

00:01:53.200 she, and presumably therefore someone who understands basic facts about human biology

00:01:57.820 and child psychology, Georgilis got it into her apparently deranged head that her son James

00:02:03.960 is really a girl named Luna. And there's an interesting fact about that name. I'll get to

00:02:08.940 it in a little bit. The factors that convince Georgilis that her son is really her daughter

00:02:14.420 include, but are not limited to, his affinity for the movie Frozen and his request to get

00:02:21.700 a girl toy from McDonald's. She also says that he started expressing an interest in wearing

00:02:27.560 girls' clothing. But Jeff Younger has explained in multiple interviews that if James, the son,

00:02:34.580 ever had any desire or does have any desire to wear a girl clothing sometimes, it's only because

00:02:40.320 his mother started putting him in dresses and painting his nails and dressing him up essentially

00:02:44.780 like a drag queen when he was three years old. Now, Jeff also claims that other methods of

00:02:50.900 manipulation were used, some pretty insidious methods according to him, including he says,

00:02:56.260 for example, when the child was three years old, he would be locked in his room by his mother

00:03:01.540 in timeout and told that the monsters only eat little boys. Jeff also speculates that Georgilis

00:03:07.840 would withhold affection from the child unless he was wearing girl clothes, which is another way of 0.99

00:03:14.360 manipulating and getting James to, quote, want to dress in girl clothes. So the court case revolved

00:03:20.780 around Jeff's efforts to rescue his sons, James and his twin brother. There's another boy involved in

00:03:27.000 this from the abuse of this sick and twisted woman. However, the decision was passed down yesterday, 0.98

00:03:33.300 as we talked about the court ruled against the father, virtually all control of the child and

00:03:39.180 all decisions were handed over to the mother. Jeff brought this case trying to get sole custody of

00:03:50.600 the kids so that he could prevent this transitioning into a girl that is in the process of happening right 1.00

00:03:56.940 now. So the jury looked at it and they said, yeah, you know what? We are going to give sole custody to

00:04:03.780 somebody, but not you. We're going to give it to the mom so that the kid can become a girl. And now 0.97

00:04:11.640 she is free to continue the, quote, social transition of James into a girl, a process that is well underway

00:04:17.820 already as he goes by Luna and, and wears a girl clothing and poses as a girl at school and so on.

00:04:24.800 And eventually she can, and presumably will start James on drugs to chemically castrate him. 0.99

00:04:30.580 In fact, she, she did say in court that now she was very careful not to say that, yeah, we're

00:04:38.060 definitely going to do this right away because she knows how that sounds. It sounds grotesque

00:04:44.660 and barbaric, which it is, but she did indicate that sure in the future, that is something that

00:04:51.760 we will explore that could happen in the future. And I would say, it seems pretty clear to me that

00:04:56.660 if she has sole custody of the kid, it's going to happen. That's the direction that this is headed.

00:05:01.300 You start the social, the social transition means you're dressing them as a girl. You're 0.99

00:05:05.440 pretending as a girl, you're calling them a girl. You're in other words, is another word for 0.98

00:05:10.200 brainwashing, uh, conditioning. You might better call it social conditioning rather than social

00:05:17.860 transitioning. And then once you've done that, the next step in the process is you start doing

00:05:24.500 the drugs, puberty blockers, and then you give them the hormone drugs, the estrogen and so on.

00:05:30.300 All right. Um, now it should be noted that, and this has been a point of contention in the case that

00:05:36.760 Jeff, the father says that when he is with the boy, he, the boy expresses no interest in being

00:05:42.680 a girl, doesn't want to wear a girl clothing or anything. He refuses to wear a girl clothes. 0.98

00:05:47.640 That's, that's what he says. The mother claims the opposite and says that, no, no, no, no. When,

00:05:52.380 when Luna, uh, comes back to me, she quote unquote is, is relieved to return to her quote unquote

00:06:02.200 identity as a girl. Now, I think both claims are probably true. In a sense, the poor boy realizes

00:06:08.700 that it pleases his mother for him to be Luna. And so he wants to play that role for her.

00:06:16.640 And anyway, in any case, the question of how he really identifies is irrelevant. The point is that

00:06:22.120 James is a boy, plain and simple, whatever confusion he is suffering from confusion that has

00:06:28.960 been painstakingly planted in his head by his mother, his mother, who, in my opinion, should go

00:06:35.800 to prison just as every adult that is involved in this kind of thing, including the doctors and

00:06:42.020 everybody else who is involved in this sort of abusive children should all go to prison. And they

00:06:47.480 would in a sane world, but we don't live in a sane world, but that confusion could be easily alleviated.

00:06:53.040 Um, at most through counseling and therapy, you probably wouldn't even need that.

00:07:01.040 When this child allegedly first started claiming he was a girl at three years old,

00:07:05.820 which is when all this started, all you would have had to do is say, oh, no, no, you're not a girl.

00:07:13.560 You're a boy. And you know something in a week, he'd be over it. You know, it's a, in a week,

00:07:19.960 he'd be past that phase if you responded that way. But if you are a maniac and a three-year-old 0.99

00:07:29.400 comes to you and says, I'm a girl and you go, well, well, oh my goodness, he must be a, 0.98

00:07:35.160 she must be a girl then says he's a girl. It must be a girl. If you respond that way, 0.92

00:07:43.600 what a coincidence, the child is going to persist in that delusion. And they're going to become more

00:07:50.400 and more confused as time goes on. Um, now the jury has decided, as I said, to give Georgia

00:07:59.540 list full custody. We still don't have a full verdict from the judge though. There are many

00:08:02.880 related issues to be ruled on. And I believe that verdict is going to, she's going to, that decision

00:08:08.780 will be made, will be announced tomorrow. There's still, I think there's still maybe some hope.

00:08:15.140 Um, hopefully the outcry from the sane and rational and decent people of America,

00:08:19.280 an outcry that has really been ramped up this week. Thankfully, maybe that will have some effect.

00:08:25.640 Maybe it will have some influence and it might help the judge to see the light on this issue.

00:08:29.320 I'm honestly, I'm, I'm not very hopeful about that. I doubt that that will be the result,

00:08:34.060 but we can, we can always pray and hope and continue to raise awareness about this issue for

00:08:38.880 the next day before the final decision is made. What I did want to do, I wanted to answer a few

00:08:43.220 objections I've heard from people about how people like myself are talking about this case.

00:08:47.940 There are three main objections from what I can tell. Um, the first is easy to deal with.

00:08:56.320 I've got several emails saying that, um, I'm giving a one-sided version of the case

00:09:02.980 when actually the father is, is far from perfect himself. And what is then brought up our court

00:09:10.340 documents showing that one, the father was accused of lying about his income and his work history

00:09:17.240 to his wife before they got married. And two, that, uh, the father was accused of assault.

00:09:23.660 Now, as for the first, the father, Jeff has an explanation for what the wife and says are lies

00:09:32.260 he told before they got married. I don't know who's right and who's wrong, or if it's something

00:09:36.880 in the middle, usually with these things, it is regardless though, who gives a damn? None of this

00:09:42.520 has any bearing on the case whatsoever. And none of it makes him an unfit father or justifies him losing

00:09:47.540 custody. And certainly none of it means that his son is really a girl. And that's the main point

00:09:56.120 here. Now you might say, well, it makes him unreliable. So you can't take his version of

00:10:00.320 events at face value. My answer to that is we don't need to, you don't need to take anyone's

00:10:06.520 version of events at face value. The basic facts are not in dispute. James is a biological boy. He is

00:10:11.960 seven. And for the last several years, at least his mother has been claiming that he's a girl and his

00:10:16.540 mother now wants to transition him into a girl. That's not being disputed by anybody. Everyone

00:10:21.560 agrees on that. And that's all we need to know. We don't need to know anything else.

00:10:26.740 We do know a lot more, which only vindicates the father, in my opinion, but we don't really even

00:10:31.920 need to know any of that. These basic facts tell you basically everything you know. And then as for

00:10:38.520 the alleged assault, Jeff apparently was accused of assaulting his wife in late 2017. This is well after

00:10:45.020 the marriage ended, and this is in the midst of all this stuff with his wife trying to turn the kid

00:10:50.580 into a girl. He was acquitted of the assault. So there's no reason to say anything else about that. But

00:10:56.180 again, that accusation, he was acquitted of it. That has no bearing on this whatsoever.

00:11:02.040 Now, then there's the third point. Defenders of the mom in this case will insist, once they get

00:11:10.800 past trying to discredit the father with accusations that are certainly far from confirmed and I think

00:11:19.260 have largely been debunked, but are also completely irrelevant to this case, defenders of the mom will

00:11:26.800 next go to saying, well, no, the mom is right. She's not forcing James to be a girl because he

00:11:36.020 really is a girl. And we know that he's really a girl because he really does want to wear girl clothes 0.86

00:11:41.440 and he really does want to identify as a girl and so on. Now, let me read a thread, just to give you

00:11:46.960 an example of this line of argumentation. I want to read a thread to you from a guy named Barry Deutsch

00:11:54.440 on Twitter as he makes this case and provides whatever evidence he can to show that, no, the

00:12:01.340 mother is actually right. And there is, as he puts it, there's a panic on the right about this and the

00:12:07.000 panic is completely off base. So let me give you, this is, this is, this is the attempt to vindicate 0.99

00:12:12.020 the mother. Okay. It says a thread on the save James Younger panic on the right. They're claiming

00:12:17.640 that James Younger, as they insist on calling Luna, wants to be a boy and her evil mother is forcing

00:12:23.180 her to identify as a girl and wear a girl clothing. That's not what a CPS investigation 0.98

00:12:27.640 found. What I'm posting here are screenshots of the CPS investigators testimony at trial

00:12:33.100 with no parent present. Luna says she's a girl and denies that anyone's making her be a girl.

00:12:39.940 She also says she's afraid of her dad because he won't let her wear a girl clothes. That's why 1.00

00:12:45.880 quote unquote, she is afraid not because there's any abuse or anything going on, but according to this

00:12:51.860 claim, it's because the boy wants to wear a girl clothes and the dad won't let him.

00:12:58.220 Continues. The CPS investigator also interviewed Luna's teacher. Luna's teacher confirmed what Luna

00:13:03.120 says. Luna identifies as a girl and the teacher doesn't believe anyone's pressuring Luna to do that.

00:13:08.340 The CPS investigator also interviewed Luna's twin brother, Luke. Actually, the twin's brother's name

00:13:14.000 is Jude, not Luke. Jude confirms Luna's story. Luna has always identified as a girl. Their dad forces

00:13:22.540 Luna to dress as a boy, which makes Luna sad. In short, the CPS investigator found absolutely no

00:13:28.480 evidence that Luna's mom is forcing Luna to wear girl clothes or to use the name Luna. But the CPS,

00:13:33.780 and we'll get to that name thing in a second, as I said, because it's very, it's actually, there's,

00:13:38.060 there's something very, there's a very important detail about this name that I'm going to get to.

00:13:41.660 The CPS investigator found evidence, uh, Luna's dad is forcing her to wear boy clothes. You can read

00:13:48.700 the transcript. Um, okay. That's, that's basically it. So there's, there are all the facts laid out

00:13:58.180 that are supposed to vindicate the mother. This is the best anyone can do. Essentially, the argument is

00:14:05.000 that what the mother is doing is not abuse and the jury's decision is not wrong.

00:14:10.220 And all of this is perfectly fine because the boy actually is a girl. Do you see how insane this is?

00:14:19.180 I hope you do. He's not a girl. He's just simply not factually, objectively, scientifically, 0.89

00:14:26.740 he is not a girl. So to dress him like one, to claim he is one, to have him live as one, 0.98

00:14:35.220 to facilitate his transition into one is crazy, is abusive, is deranged, is evil. 0.98

00:14:46.800 I don't give a damn whether the seven-year-old boy really says he wants to wear dresses or not. 0.89

00:14:57.060 It's clear from court documents and from all reports that he sometimes says he wants to,

00:15:01.660 and sometimes says he doesn't. He's confused. Why is he confused? Because he's a child.

00:15:08.900 And because his mother has been claiming he's a girl since he was three. Of course he's confused.

00:15:16.800 Of course he's going to say he wants to wear dresses and so on. All of that is irrelevant.

00:15:21.800 He's a child who doesn't know what's going on. And as I will point out, for the 40 millionth time,

00:15:29.860 he doesn't know what a girl is. He literally doesn't know what he's saying.

00:15:37.060 He can't possibly identify as a girl because he doesn't know what that is. You can't identify as

00:15:41.520 something when you don't know what it is. This all started when he was three years old. Again,

00:15:45.980 that's not under dispute. You heard from the brother saying, oh, he's always identified as a

00:15:51.700 girl. Well, what the brother means is, for as long as I can remember, this has been going on.

00:15:59.520 Which makes sense because generally you start forming memories when you're three years old.

00:16:03.180 This goes back to when he was three.

00:16:04.580 And the mother says, oh, he first started saying he was a girl when he was three.

00:16:11.200 Three. Three years old, you lunatic. Three years old. Do you know what a three-year-old knows about 1.00

00:16:19.140 being a girl? Nothing. Nothing. Not a single thing. Nothing. Now, even if a three-year-old did know 0.52

00:16:30.000 something about being a girl, the biological reality would still remain. So that even if a 0.92

00:16:35.440 child that young did actually have a substantive understanding of biological sex so as to make this

00:16:42.220 choice, it still wouldn't matter because you can't choose your sex. It's impossible. But this is 0.91

00:16:48.660 doubly insane because a child at three years old has no clue what that means. I have a three-year-old.

00:16:58.500 Okay? And I've had two other three-year-olds who are now six. It's just, if you've ever spent any

00:17:07.680 time around a three-year-old, particularly if you've ever been a parent of a three-year-old,

00:17:11.900 you know this. These kids don't know anything.

00:17:16.000 So a three-year-old says, I'm a girl. All you have to follow up with is, what's that? What do you

00:17:27.900 mean? They don't mean anything. At most, what they mean is, I like pretty pink things.

00:17:36.420 Great. No problem. Three-year-olds can like pretty pink things. Nothing wrong with that. 0.96

00:17:43.860 The suggestion that that actually means that this boy at three years old is a girl and has somehow

00:17:52.620 mystically recognized this inner truth of this girl that is magically trapped inside the shell of

00:17:59.680 their boy body. You have educated people who think this way.

00:18:09.300 Now, I mentioned the thing about the name. Here's an interesting tidbit from the Texan.

00:18:17.760 And this is a publication down in Texas where this is happening. They've been on top of this case.

00:18:22.920 A lot of great information. When James first started

00:18:27.100 identifying as a girl, do you know what name he wanted

00:18:30.880 for himself? He goes by Luna now, according to the mom.

00:18:35.000 But it wasn't Luna originally. You know what it was?

00:18:39.500 The name was Starfire.

00:18:41.860 That's the name he wanted. I actually think this is

00:18:45.860 maybe one of the most important facts that came out in this case.

00:18:49.240 He wanted to be called Starfire. And any parents of children might know that Starfire is a cartoon

00:18:56.980 character from the show Teen Titans Go. My kids don't watch that show, so I don't know.

00:19:05.700 Okay. He wanted his name to be Starfire, cartoon character from a cartoon show.

00:19:12.400 What does that tell you?

00:19:13.520 It tells you that James was literally identifying as a cartoon character

00:19:20.360 because he's a child.

00:19:24.200 My sons have identified as many fictional characters

00:19:27.500 where they really, in some sense, in some way,

00:19:33.280 believe that they are that character.

00:19:35.900 My, I know it's a, you hear this as a classic response to all this madness

00:19:40.100 when someone says, oh, my son identifies as a dinosaur.

00:19:43.120 I guess I should send him to Jurassic Park.

00:19:46.500 And that might be a cliched response at this point,

00:19:50.020 but it's a cliche for a reason. It's true.

00:19:54.800 My son, my three-year-old son,

00:19:56.880 also thinks that he's a, he thinks that he's Rexy,

00:19:59.640 a T-Rex.

00:20:01.580 Now, what does that mean?

00:20:03.380 Well, let's really think about this for a second.

00:20:04.940 When my three-year-old son goes around saying he's a T-Rex,

00:20:08.880 is he joking?

00:20:10.860 No, he's not joking.

00:20:12.260 Three-year-olds don't know how to joke. 0.78

00:20:14.180 Three-year-olds have no concept of humor.

00:20:16.120 They don't tell jokes.

00:20:18.420 To have a concept of humor,

00:20:19.780 you need a concept of irony in these things,

00:20:21.540 and three-year-olds are not sophisticated enough for that.

00:20:24.340 So he's not joking.

00:20:26.380 Is he lying?

00:20:28.000 No, he's not lying.

00:20:29.120 Three-year-olds can't lie either.

00:20:31.060 Three-year-olds are incapable of telling a real lie.

00:20:33.440 Now, they might say things that aren't true,

00:20:36.480 but they're not capable of lying

00:20:38.800 because they don't understand the difference

00:20:41.920 between truth and falsehood,

00:20:45.680 between reality and fantasy.

00:20:49.000 So when my three-year-old says that he's a T-Rex,

00:20:53.260 he really does think,

00:20:55.020 at some level,

00:20:56.140 he really believes that he's a T-Rex.

00:20:58.660 Now, if my three-year-old were 30 years old

00:21:03.800 and saying that and believing it, 0.99

00:21:05.240 then it'd be a sign that he's mentally ill. 0.84

00:21:07.780 No matter what age he is,

00:21:09.160 it could never be a sign

00:21:10.280 that he is really a T-Rex trapped inside a human body.

00:21:13.700 We can be pretty confident of that.

00:21:15.800 If he was older,

00:21:16.860 then we would say, 0.98

00:21:17.760 now we've got a mental disorder on our hands of some kind.

00:21:20.060 Let's get him some counseling.

00:21:20.940 But at three years old,

00:21:25.320 it's just cute.

00:21:27.520 It's funny.

00:21:29.120 You play along with it a little bit.

00:21:31.100 You have fun.

00:21:32.000 You play dinosaurs.

00:21:32.920 I'll chase my son around the house.

00:21:34.420 He plays the dinosaur.

00:21:35.340 He's chasing me.

00:21:35.960 I'm chasing him

00:21:36.620 because he's three.

00:21:38.520 So, when you've got a human being

00:21:45.780 with the kind of psychology

00:21:48.980 where they can really be convinced at some level

00:21:53.480 that they are a dinosaur

00:21:55.160 or a superhero

00:21:56.820 or a dog

00:21:59.760 or a lion

00:22:00.520 or a dragon

00:22:01.400 or anything,

00:22:02.260 and my kids have been all of those things

00:22:03.900 sometimes in the same day.

00:22:05.640 When you've got a person

00:22:08.740 with that kind of psychology as a child,

00:22:11.820 how could you possibly take them seriously

00:22:16.180 when they say that they're the opposite gender?

00:22:19.660 It's the exact same kind of thing.

00:22:22.840 They're not identifying some internal truth.

00:22:26.200 It's just a fantasy.

00:22:27.680 It's just a kid being a kid

00:22:30.360 and not understanding

00:22:31.560 what is real and what isn't.

00:22:33.640 So, kids, again,

00:22:37.600 literally do not know the difference

00:22:40.660 between reality and fiction.

00:22:44.780 There are a lot of adults these days

00:22:46.380 who don't know it either,

00:22:47.260 but they don't have an excuse.

00:22:48.400 A kid at three years old doesn't know.

00:22:52.240 So, when a three-year-old thinks

00:22:55.300 that Spider-Man is really out there,

00:22:58.820 not just out there,

00:22:59.700 but when a three-year-old watches TV

00:23:01.820 and sees a cartoon,

00:23:03.320 they really think that that cartoon is real.

00:23:06.380 Now, how could they possibly think that?

00:23:07.720 It's a cartoon in a little box.

00:23:10.120 What do they think?

00:23:11.380 Well, I'm not even sure

00:23:12.860 because I can't remember

00:23:14.320 being three years old enough

00:23:15.440 to understand what they're really thinking

00:23:18.180 in their head,

00:23:18.480 but they do think.

00:23:19.420 You know, if you ask a three-year-old,

00:23:23.100 does Bugs Bunny exist?

00:23:24.880 Is Bugs Bunny real?

00:23:26.660 They're going to say yes.

00:23:29.200 And if you then, 1.00

00:23:30.340 if you really wanted to be a jerk 1.00

00:23:31.920 and spoil their fantasy, 0.99

00:23:34.020 and you said,

00:23:34.880 no, Bugs Bunny isn't real,

00:23:35.880 he's fake.

00:23:36.900 Well, you couldn't spoil the fantasy

00:23:38.500 because that wouldn't mean anything to them.

00:23:41.140 They would say,

00:23:41.900 what does that mean?

00:23:43.320 The concept of something not being real

00:23:48.180 means nothing

00:23:49.080 to a child at that age,

00:23:51.880 which is why

00:23:54.120 they are not empowered

00:23:56.400 to make important decisions for themselves.

00:23:58.940 It's why, in fact,

00:23:59.920 they're not really empowered

00:24:00.620 to make any decisions for themselves.

00:24:03.660 And it's why their declarations

00:24:06.440 about their own self-identity

00:24:08.340 are meaningless,

00:24:10.460 completely meaningless.

00:24:11.980 Except as a fun little game

00:24:15.580 that maybe you play along with,

00:24:18.520 and if it gets too out of hand

00:24:19.720 and they start taking it too seriously,

00:24:21.320 then maybe you stop playing along with it.

00:24:29.080 One last,

00:24:29.920 I actually,

00:24:30.620 one last point about this quickly,

00:24:32.040 that on this name thing,

00:24:35.680 so the kid wanted to be Starfire.

00:24:37.420 The mom said,

00:24:38.220 no, let's pick something else.

00:24:40.260 And they settled on Luna.

00:24:41.980 It's interesting

00:24:43.060 that all of these

00:24:44.800 painfully progressive parents

00:24:46.480 who let their kids

00:24:49.220 choose their own gender,

00:24:50.980 none of them

00:24:52.340 let the kid choose their own name.

00:24:55.520 And I know that's the case

00:24:57.280 because they always settle

00:24:58.380 on some trendy,

00:25:00.580 gender-neutral name.

00:25:02.900 You think the kid came up with that?

00:25:05.320 You think the kid came up with Luna

00:25:07.120 or Jazz

00:25:08.200 or Sky?

00:25:09.880 You think the kid went on Google

00:25:12.020 to look up?

00:25:12.820 No.

00:25:14.980 If you say to a three-year-old,

00:25:16.560 pick any name you want,

00:25:18.420 they're going to end up with Starfire

00:25:20.700 or T-Rex

00:25:21.900 or Spider-Man

00:25:22.620 or Wonder Woman 0.87

00:25:23.500 or something like that.

00:25:26.480 So that's how you know.

00:25:27.940 You know,

00:25:28.320 you got these trans, 1.00

00:25:29.300 these quote, 0.98

00:25:29.840 transgender kids running around. 0.81

00:25:31.160 None of them are named Wonder Woman. 0.59

00:25:32.860 None of them

00:25:33.340 are legally named Wonder Woman.

00:25:34.980 Why is that?

00:25:36.840 Because the parents choose the name.

00:25:38.980 Why do the parents choose the name?

00:25:41.340 Because the parents know

00:25:42.620 even though a name

00:25:43.680 really is a social construct,

00:25:45.640 really is a cultural thing,

00:25:47.940 really is arbitrary,

00:25:49.120 really can be anything

00:25:50.080 you want it to be,

00:25:51.040 they choose the name

00:25:51.880 because the parents realize

00:25:52.840 that a name is an important decision

00:25:54.180 that a kid is not mature enough to make

00:25:55.760 and that a kid will think

00:25:57.260 that a certain name is cool

00:25:58.240 when he's three

00:25:58.880 but won't think it's cool anymore

00:26:00.420 when he's 30

00:26:01.040 so they don't want to curse the kid

00:26:02.500 with a name when he's 30

00:26:03.780 that he chose when he was three.

00:26:07.540 Hmm.

00:26:09.180 Yes.

00:26:10.320 Now take that logic

00:26:11.720 and apply it to gender

00:26:13.640 and maybe now you start to understand.

00:26:17.640 All right.

00:26:19.520 So on Monday,

00:26:20.340 I told you about the case

00:26:21.120 of Democratic Congresswoman Katie Hill.

00:26:23.300 A report in Red State

00:26:24.540 said that Hill

00:26:25.280 allegedly had a sexual relationship

00:26:28.120 with a 22-year-old female staffer 1.00

00:26:31.740 and also an affair

00:26:33.660 with another member

00:26:34.560 of her staff

00:26:36.600 though this one was a man.

00:26:38.060 The media has showed

00:26:39.000 no interest in this case whatsoever

00:26:40.500 because she's a woman mainly 0.99

00:26:42.360 and as I have pointed out

00:26:43.960 the fact that she's a Democrat

00:26:46.280 obviously helps her 0.99

00:26:47.500 and if she was a Republican

00:26:49.460 probably they'd be more likely

00:26:50.680 to report on it.

00:26:52.640 I mean they'd certainly be more likely

00:26:53.880 to report on it of course

00:26:54.740 but the main thing

00:26:57.080 that gets her off the hook 0.99

00:26:58.020 for this is that she's a woman

00:26:59.360 and women

00:27:00.720 when it comes to sexual indiscretions

00:27:02.400 are just not held

00:27:04.360 to the same standard

00:27:05.200 and accusations

00:27:07.020 against women 1.00

00:27:08.060 of sexually inappropriate behavior

00:27:10.760 just are not taken seriously

00:27:12.320 by almost anybody

00:27:13.280 because there seems to be

00:27:15.000 this general attitude of

00:27:16.300 well if a woman does it 1.00

00:27:17.460 it's not as bad.

00:27:18.760 Nobody will come out

00:27:19.460 and say that

00:27:20.120 but I gave the example

00:27:22.880 when you have for example

00:27:24.400 all these teachers

00:27:25.460 these female teachers 1.00

00:27:26.400 who are having sex 1.00

00:27:28.080 with 13 year old boys 0.99

00:27:29.160 in their class

00:27:29.800 the attitude of almost everybody

00:27:33.300 seems to be

00:27:34.000 that's not quite as bad

00:27:35.160 because it's a woman. 0.95

00:27:36.520 Again nobody will say it

00:27:37.700 no one will say that

00:27:38.520 but that's apparently

00:27:39.720 how almost everyone feels about it

00:27:41.540 because that's why

00:27:42.660 there's very little outrage

00:27:43.820 about these cases

00:27:44.520 and usually what anyone does

00:27:45.640 they just crack jokes about it.

00:27:47.760 In fact

00:27:47.900 oftentimes the media

00:27:51.800 if the media does report

00:27:53.080 and the media will report

00:27:54.380 on the cases of teachers

00:27:55.540 and students

00:27:56.340 because that's salacious

00:27:57.340 and it gets clicked

00:27:58.620 so they can't help

00:27:59.520 but report on it

00:28:00.620 but when they do

00:28:01.780 very often

00:28:02.640 what they'll call it

00:28:04.260 in the headline

00:28:04.940 they'll say something like

00:28:06.700 with this exact phrase

00:28:07.700 it'll be

00:28:08.900 teacher

00:28:11.120 teacher caught in

00:28:12.760 sex romp 0.74

00:28:13.960 with 13 year old student 1.00

00:28:16.460 that phrase sex romp 0.99

00:28:18.140 that exact phrase

00:28:19.240 has often been used

00:28:21.180 in headlines

00:28:21.720 by the media

00:28:22.280 to describe

00:28:22.880 the sexual abuse

00:28:24.380 of adult females

00:28:26.400 or by adult females

00:28:28.840 of male children.

00:28:31.500 You're never going to see

00:28:32.820 the phrase sex romp

00:28:34.160 used to describe

00:28:36.140 abuse

00:28:37.520 when the genders are flipped.

00:28:39.300 Anyway

00:28:39.560 in this case

00:28:41.380 there are all kinds of

00:28:42.700 now there's no minors involved

00:28:44.200 okay

00:28:44.540 there are all kinds of ethical

00:28:46.180 and potentially legal

00:28:47.060 issues here

00:28:47.600 related to her having sex 0.90

00:28:48.860 with people 0.97

00:28:50.240 who are on her payroll

00:28:51.360 paying her sex partners

00:28:53.240 with campaign funds

00:28:54.540 and all of the ethical issues

00:28:56.440 wrapped up in a person

00:28:57.420 in a position of power

00:28:58.440 a person in Congress

00:28:59.520 getting sexually involved

00:29:00.560 with a young staffer

00:29:01.520 just out of college.

00:29:03.160 There are also pictures

00:29:04.340 that are floating around

00:29:05.760 out there

00:29:06.000 one picture is

00:29:06.860 Katie Hill

00:29:07.980 appears to be

00:29:10.800 Katie Hill

00:29:11.560 nude

00:29:12.560 and brushing the hair

00:29:14.400 of what appears

00:29:15.580 to be her young staffer

00:29:16.640 although the face

00:29:17.760 is blurred out

00:29:18.400 of the staffer.

00:29:20.180 Now we all know

00:29:21.580 if that was

00:29:23.640 a picture

00:29:25.380 of a male congressman

00:29:27.800 naked

00:29:29.120 and brushing the hair

00:29:30.880 of some 22 year old staffer

00:29:32.680 that would be

00:29:34.300 headline news everywhere

00:29:35.480 huge controversy

00:29:36.840 they would be holding

00:29:37.920 a press conference

00:29:38.660 they would have already

00:29:39.300 resigned by now

00:29:40.300 in disgrace.

00:29:42.540 Katie Hill does it 0.98

00:29:43.640 and nobody cares

00:29:44.780 media doesn't talk about it.

00:29:47.320 There's more

00:29:48.040 more information

00:29:49.240 though now

00:29:49.580 the Daily Wire

00:29:50.260 has a report now

00:29:51.200 you go to dailywire.com

00:29:52.140 and see this

00:29:52.700 more information

00:29:54.420 and this is coming again

00:29:56.620 from Red State

00:29:57.360 and Red State

00:29:57.920 has been on top of this

00:29:58.900 and one thing about that

00:30:00.080 also

00:30:00.420 so the site Red State

00:30:03.020 a conservative website

00:30:04.120 they've been on top

00:30:06.380 of this story

00:30:06.920 and that fact

00:30:08.640 has been used

00:30:09.240 to discredit the story

00:30:10.300 people saying

00:30:11.880 well it's a conservative

00:30:13.520 but just a conservative rag

00:30:15.200 propaganda

00:30:15.940 reporting on this

00:30:17.080 no one else

00:30:17.500 is talking about it

00:30:18.280 I've also heard

00:30:18.960 a similar thing

00:30:19.580 with the James Young

00:30:20.280 story

00:30:20.860 where some liberals

00:30:23.120 say oh it's only been

00:30:23.900 conservative sites

00:30:24.580 talking about it

00:30:25.540 that's because the liberal

00:30:26.540 sites refuse to talk

00:30:27.900 about it

00:30:28.300 and with something

00:30:30.160 like this Katie Hill case

00:30:31.320 she's a congresswoman 1.00

00:30:33.260 in California

00:30:33.960 there are pictures

00:30:36.360 and text messages

00:30:37.300 that somebody

00:30:39.240 had

00:30:41.700 and was releasing

00:30:42.940 to the media

00:30:43.500 do you

00:30:45.420 do you really think

00:30:47.280 that Red State

00:30:49.200 the person who had

00:30:50.880 this information

00:30:51.560 about Katie Hill

00:30:52.420 you think Red State

00:30:53.500 is the first place

00:30:54.540 that person went

00:30:55.300 there is no way

00:30:57.520 the first

00:31:00.260 the first people in media

00:31:01.380 to hear about this

00:31:02.420 would have been

00:31:03.280 the local media

00:31:04.240 in California

00:31:04.980 they would have been

00:31:06.980 the first people

00:31:07.540 to catch wind of it

00:31:08.280 and so the fact

00:31:09.920 that Red State

00:31:10.460 is publishing

00:31:10.960 it means that

00:31:11.440 they passed on it

00:31:12.420 and it means

00:31:13.840 it must mean

00:31:14.760 that all of the major

00:31:16.420 mass media

00:31:17.840 left-wing outlets

00:31:18.780 passed on it

00:31:19.740 because I just

00:31:22.780 it's just impossible

00:31:23.820 to believe that

00:31:24.600 Red State

00:31:25.220 would be the first ones

00:31:26.620 to get this information

00:31:27.560 to get this bombshell

00:31:29.400 about Katie Hill

00:31:31.460 anyway

00:31:32.400 but Red State

00:31:33.000 they've been doing

00:31:33.460 a good job

00:31:33.840 reporting on it

00:31:34.540 and the Daily Wire

00:31:37.260 well let me quote

00:31:38.260 the Daily Wire now

00:31:39.100 as they are talking

00:31:40.400 about the Red State report

00:31:41.100 so as the young

00:31:41.840 female campaign staffer

00:31:43.360 who described

00:31:43.820 the relationship

00:31:44.320 as being toxic

00:31:45.380 reportedly wrote

00:31:47.600 Hill a message

00:31:48.240 in 2019

00:31:48.900 June 2019

00:31:49.680 saying in part

00:31:50.400 I am terrified

00:31:51.340 of pushing back

00:31:52.020 against you

00:31:52.440 or upsetting you

00:31:53.060 I have seen

00:31:53.840 how you treat Kenny

00:31:54.620 and I think that

00:31:55.380 if I cause any issues

00:31:56.480 even if I am

00:31:57.660 worried about

00:31:58.600 how you were acting

00:31:59.440 that very quickly

00:32:00.220 you will decide

00:32:01.220 you don't want me

00:32:02.060 in your life

00:32:02.580 in a message

00:32:04.560 to Heslop

00:32:05.160 the staffer

00:32:06.460 reportedly said

00:32:07.500 I don't know

00:32:09.020 I was getting ready

00:32:09.940 and I was thinking

00:32:10.680 about how much

00:32:11.120 Katie liked to watch me

00:32:12.520 then reference

00:32:14.080 to a hobby

00:32:14.720 watch me do

00:32:15.540 some kind of hobby

00:32:16.260 I don't know

00:32:16.740 it's okay

00:32:18.780 she can't take

00:32:19.520 this from me

00:32:20.160 she can ruin politics 1.00

00:32:21.620 take all my friends

00:32:23.060 and isolate me

00:32:24.020 but she can't have this

00:32:25.340 then Red State added

00:32:27.240 the staffer

00:32:27.740 continued her work

00:32:28.460 on the campaign

00:32:29.060 despite the awkwardness

00:32:30.060 and emotional distress

00:32:30.880 it caused

00:32:31.400 Hill however

00:32:32.500 seemed tone deaf

00:32:33.460 asking her former lover

00:32:35.260 to apply sunscreen

00:32:36.220 on her prior to an event

00:32:37.460 in front of the rest

00:32:38.600 of the staff

00:32:39.060 the young woman

00:32:40.020 later texted Hill

00:32:40.940 to express her displeasure

00:32:43.380 what's the point here

00:32:44.780 the point here

00:32:45.440 is that what we're

00:32:47.620 what we have been told

00:32:48.580 by the left

00:32:49.360 what we've been told

00:32:50.420 by the Me Too movement

00:32:51.540 for years now

00:32:52.800 is that

00:32:54.440 sexual relationships

00:32:56.400 even if they are

00:32:57.480 quote unquote

00:32:58.020 consensual

00:32:58.640 even if they're ostensibly

00:33:00.040 supposedly on the surface

00:33:01.600 anyway

00:33:02.020 consensual

00:33:02.940 relationships between

00:33:04.500 a person in a position

00:33:05.900 of power

00:33:06.500 to a person

00:33:08.240 who is

00:33:08.880 a subordinate

00:33:09.980 and in this case

00:33:12.800 a very

00:33:13.140 a very junior subordinate

00:33:14.760 you've got a congresswoman

00:33:15.800 to a staffer

00:33:16.920 just out of college

00:33:17.640 that those relationships

00:33:20.880 according to the Me Too movement

00:33:22.820 and according to what

00:33:23.740 the left has been saying

00:33:24.740 up until this moment

00:33:25.460 with Katie Hill

00:33:25.980 those relationships

00:33:27.020 cannot really be consensual

00:33:29.120 because of the power dynamic

00:33:31.160 because of the disparity

00:33:32.220 because the other person

00:33:34.000 in the relationship

00:33:34.900 is going to feel

00:33:36.280 potentially threatened

00:33:37.460 they're going to feel like

00:33:38.240 they can't get out of it

00:33:40.060 if they want to

00:33:40.620 they're going to feel like

00:33:41.160 they can't be themselves

00:33:41.940 they can't express themselves

00:33:42.720 that they have to just go along

00:33:44.140 with whatever this other person wants

00:33:45.080 because of the power

00:33:45.940 they have over them

00:33:47.040 they're going to feel threatened

00:33:48.180 they're going to feel intimidated

00:33:49.160 and what do you know

00:33:52.360 you see these text messages

00:33:53.600 allegedly from this person

00:33:55.240 expressing just that feeling

00:33:57.720 that yes

00:33:59.060 I'm intimidated

00:34:00.120 I can't

00:34:00.720 and what do you know

00:34:03.320 you have Katie Hill

00:34:04.560 it would seem

00:34:05.400 potentially

00:34:09.220 taking advantage

00:34:10.780 of that discomfort

00:34:12.460 or at least

00:34:14.380 now as

00:34:14.820 as the red state says

00:34:16.580 she was tone deaf

00:34:17.720 I think that's a generous interpretation

00:34:20.140 where you've got the staffer

00:34:22.640 expressing discomfort

00:34:23.700 and everything

00:34:24.320 intimidation

00:34:25.000 and then

00:34:26.720 Katie Hill

00:34:27.820 after they'd already broken up

00:34:31.340 goes to the staffer

00:34:33.000 and says

00:34:33.380 put some sunscreen on

00:34:34.900 in front of everybody

00:34:35.620 now you can interpret that

00:34:37.860 as her being tone deaf

00:34:39.020 I personally

00:34:40.120 my perspective

00:34:40.840 I interpret that as

00:34:42.340 malicious

00:34:42.980 and a power move

00:34:44.600 because there's just no way

00:34:46.900 you've got

00:34:47.320 you've got this history

00:34:48.300 with this person

00:34:48.960 you're looking for someone

00:34:50.000 to apply sunscreen to you

00:34:51.360 and you choose her

00:34:52.140 of all people

00:34:52.720 that's

00:34:55.600 no that's not

00:34:56.180 in my opinion

00:34:57.060 that's not tone deaf

00:34:57.920 that's not

00:34:58.640 a coincidence

00:34:59.960 that's

00:35:01.000 you're doing that on purpose

00:35:01.980 that's manipulation

00:35:02.760 and that is certainly

00:35:05.560 how it would be interpreted

00:35:06.920 if

00:35:08.500 this was a man

00:35:10.660 we're talking about

00:35:11.420 so even if the media

00:35:13.640 wants to ignore this

00:35:14.600 this is still

00:35:15.800 a huge story

00:35:16.560 it is still

00:35:17.660 a scandal

00:35:18.260 it does matter

00:35:20.180 Katie Hill

00:35:22.760 finally

00:35:23.320 after days

00:35:24.420 came out

00:35:25.800 with a statement

00:35:26.340 addressing some of this

00:35:27.460 now the fact that

00:35:28.860 she was able to get away

00:35:29.840 with saying nothing

00:35:30.900 about it for several days

00:35:32.440 just shows you again

00:35:33.520 how she's not being

00:35:34.360 held accountable

00:35:34.940 how the media

00:35:36.460 is running cover for her

00:35:37.440 but she came out

00:35:38.360 and predictably

00:35:38.980 there was no apology

00:35:40.280 nothing

00:35:40.660 she made herself the victim

00:35:41.640 she said she was the victim

00:35:42.900 because all this information

00:35:43.760 was coming out about her

00:35:44.820 and so it's really all about her

00:35:46.580 she's the victim 0.88

00:35:47.100 and she'll get away with that 0.98

00:35:50.180 that's it

00:35:51.680 she could come out

00:35:52.480 she's the victim 0.88

00:35:53.060 and move on

00:35:54.560 that is what we call

00:35:57.500 female privilege 0.99

00:35:58.400 okay let's go to emails

00:36:01.180 Matt Wall show

00:36:01.860 oh actually before emails

00:36:03.100 this doesn't require

00:36:06.100 really any commentary

00:36:06.800 I just wanted to play this

00:36:07.600 if you haven't seen this clip

00:36:08.680 we gotta play it

00:36:10.820 because

00:36:11.140 as you know

00:36:12.300 the NBA

00:36:13.160 NBA players

00:36:14.120 many of them

00:36:14.960 LeBron James

00:36:15.980 among them

00:36:17.100 but not the only one

00:36:17.820 have been embarrassing themselves

00:36:19.420 by falling to their knees

00:36:22.140 and licking the boots 0.99

00:36:24.120 of the Chinese government 0.99

00:36:25.380 as we have seen

00:36:26.080 over the last few weeks

00:36:27.060 finally we've got someone

00:36:29.180 not a current NBA player

00:36:30.920 but someone associated

00:36:31.820 with the NBA

00:36:32.460 someone who works

00:36:33.320 in professional basketball

00:36:34.660 as a commentator now

00:36:35.940 Shaquille O'Neal

00:36:36.960 I knew we could count on him

00:36:40.040 to have the right take on this

00:36:42.140 and he shared his take

00:36:43.560 on the China thing

00:36:44.300 and he for one

00:36:45.800 at least

00:36:46.180 was not doing

00:36:46.860 any boot licking

00:36:47.920 listen to this

00:36:48.640 we as American people

00:36:50.080 we do a lot of business

00:36:51.140 in China

00:36:51.640 and they know

00:36:52.700 and understand our values

00:36:53.980 and we understand

00:36:55.240 their values

00:36:55.940 and one of our best values

00:36:57.540 here in America

00:36:58.380 is free speech

00:36:59.280 we're allowed to say

00:37:00.620 what we want to say

00:37:01.440 and we're allowed to speak

00:37:02.440 up about injustices

00:37:03.780 and that's just how it goes

00:37:05.420 and if people don't understand

00:37:06.540 that

00:37:06.900 that's something

00:37:07.840 that they have to deal with

00:37:08.900 but you know

00:37:09.580 I just think

00:37:10.200 I thought it was unfortunate

00:37:11.460 for you know

00:37:12.060 both parties

00:37:12.760 and then

00:37:13.200 you got people speaking

00:37:14.620 when they don't know

00:37:15.180 what they're talking about

00:37:16.040 but Daryl Morey was right

00:37:18.580 whenever you see

00:37:19.200 something wrong

00:37:19.900 going on

00:37:20.440 anywhere in the world

00:37:21.260 you should have the right

00:37:22.560 to say

00:37:23.000 that's not right

00:37:23.800 and that's what he did

00:37:24.620 and but again

00:37:25.880 you know

00:37:26.120 when it comes to business

00:37:26.900 sometimes you have to

00:37:27.740 tiptoe around things

00:37:28.700 but again

00:37:29.540 they understand our values

00:37:30.660 we understand our values

00:37:31.680 and here

00:37:32.060 we have the right to speak

00:37:33.500 especially with the social media

00:37:34.580 we're going to say

00:37:35.140 whatever we want to say

00:37:36.120 when we want to say it

00:37:37.460 there you go

00:37:38.580 Shaq 0.81

00:37:38.980 see Shaq is a legend

00:37:40.800 for a reason

00:37:41.340 that was a great

00:37:42.540 the fact that

00:37:44.420 he's the first one

00:37:45.740 associated with the NBA

00:37:47.260 to say that

00:37:48.080 and the fact that

00:37:49.100 it actually required

00:37:49.700 courage on his part

00:37:50.620 to say it

00:37:51.240 all he did was

00:37:52.720 come out in favor

00:37:53.360 of free speech

00:37:54.000 and stipulate

00:37:56.320 that we are not

00:37:56.940 a communist regime

00:37:57.780 and we have free speech

00:37:58.500 and we can say

00:37:58.840 what we want

00:37:59.200 the fact that

00:38:00.640 it took courage

00:38:01.360 and it did take courage

00:38:02.240 for him to say that

00:38:02.920 is just

00:38:03.460 just tells you

00:38:04.000 how sad

00:38:04.440 it's gotten in the NBA

00:38:05.780 but good for him

00:38:06.480 okay

00:38:07.320 do we have time

00:38:07.860 for emails

00:38:08.360 I guess we'll do

00:38:09.080 maybe one

00:38:09.840 mattwalshowatgmail.com

00:38:11.800 mattwalshowatgmail.com

00:38:14.540 talked about

00:38:15.200 put pitbulls

00:38:16.100 in the email portion

00:38:17.000 yesterday

00:38:17.260 I got a lot of

00:38:17.740 pitbull related email

00:38:19.040 I haven't got a chance

00:38:20.420 to go through

00:38:20.860 a lot of it

00:38:21.680 this isn't pitbull related

00:38:26.740 but from Rich

00:38:27.380 says

00:38:27.600 dear Matt

00:38:28.020 I agree with your take

00:38:28.900 on airplane

00:38:29.520 slash bus seating arrangements

00:38:30.940 if you're sitting next

00:38:32.180 to someone

00:38:32.560 but the opportunity

00:38:33.100 to move

00:38:33.520 and give both of you

00:38:34.680 more space arises

00:38:35.660 you should take it

00:38:36.480 here's an interesting

00:38:37.560 wrinkle though

00:38:38.200 what about at a bar

00:38:39.780 what if you're sitting

00:38:40.420 at a crowded bar

00:38:41.140 by yourself

00:38:41.780 and all the other seats

00:38:42.640 are taken

00:38:43.040 but people start leaving

00:38:44.040 except the guy next to you

00:38:45.680 doesn't leave

00:38:46.360 so now you two

00:38:47.540 are sitting next to each other

00:38:48.620 at a mostly empty bar

00:38:49.880 do you move in that situation

00:38:51.840 or would it be insulting

00:38:52.920 now I like this

00:38:55.780 first of all

00:38:57.340 of all the emails

00:38:58.080 dealing with serious issues

00:38:59.580 making interesting points

00:39:00.880 this is the one

00:39:01.560 I decide to answer

00:39:02.340 but but but

00:39:02.980 because

00:39:03.560 actually I was

00:39:04.940 I was in this exact

00:39:06.000 situation recently

00:39:06.860 and you know

00:39:10.440 when you're an antisocial

00:39:11.300 person like I am

00:39:12.000 there's a lot of

00:39:13.040 there's a lot of calculus

00:39:13.920 that goes into things

00:39:14.920 you're constantly

00:39:15.920 working out equations

00:39:16.920 and figuring out

00:39:18.440 and mostly you're figuring out

00:39:19.640 how can I

00:39:20.480 just avoid being around

00:39:21.900 people in any

00:39:22.640 in any given situation

00:39:23.560 so this presented

00:39:25.800 now this is

00:39:26.260 this is

00:39:26.620 as we have talked about

00:39:27.940 you know

00:39:29.920 you're sitting next to

00:39:30.500 someone on a plane

00:39:31.260 the airplane ends up

00:39:33.020 being half full

00:39:33.740 the door's shut

00:39:34.960 you know no one else

00:39:36.000 is coming

00:39:36.280 and you have a chance

00:39:37.080 to move

00:39:37.820 and give them more space

00:39:39.440 move all the way

00:39:40.200 to another aisle

00:39:40.800 if you can

00:39:41.360 so you both get

00:39:42.660 to another row

00:39:43.920 if you can

00:39:44.300 to get a whole row

00:39:45.060 to yourself

00:39:45.300 then you should do that

00:39:46.360 Rich brings up

00:39:48.420 an interesting wrinkle

00:39:49.180 to that

00:39:49.440 so I was in

00:39:51.620 a similar situation

00:39:52.580 I was at the bar

00:39:53.180 I was at the bar

00:39:53.800 recently watching

00:39:54.740 Ravens game

00:39:55.720 bar was full

00:39:57.200 so we're all packed

00:39:58.840 in like sardines

00:39:59.700 around halftime though

00:40:01.660 there was a mass exodus

00:40:03.520 for some reason

00:40:04.020 people started leaving

00:40:05.160 even though it was

00:40:07.140 a good game

00:40:07.560 about 10 of the people

00:40:09.720 that were at the bar

00:40:10.900 left

00:40:11.340 so now it's mostly empty

00:40:13.400 just like you said

00:40:14.740 Rich

00:40:14.980 except the guy next to me

00:40:16.800 did not leave

00:40:17.540 he's still there

00:40:19.380 so now we're in

00:40:21.000 that exact spot

00:40:21.960 where we're sitting

00:40:22.860 at a mostly empty bar

00:40:24.200 but the two of us

00:40:25.660 are sitting right next

00:40:26.660 to each other

00:40:27.220 and I'm thinking this

00:40:28.940 I'm thinking

00:40:29.220 okay do I move

00:40:30.480 and this is a little bit

00:40:32.480 more difficult

00:40:32.920 because yes

00:40:33.540 we should give

00:40:34.380 ourselves more space

00:40:35.360 but then in that

00:40:36.160 situation at the bar

00:40:37.080 if I move

00:40:37.700 does it make it

00:40:38.420 does it look

00:40:38.900 is it too conspicuous

00:40:40.180 does it look like

00:40:41.460 I'm making some

00:40:41.980 sort of statement

00:40:42.500 against him

00:40:43.140 like I don't want

00:40:43.500 to be around him

00:40:44.280 and I didn't want

00:40:46.400 to come off that way

00:40:47.020 because he was a nice guy

00:40:47.880 it's just I enjoy

00:40:48.720 my personal space

00:40:49.580 and so I was

00:40:51.620 I was turning this

00:40:52.520 over in my head

00:40:53.380 I was deliberating

00:40:54.540 about it

00:40:55.040 and as I was

00:40:56.860 thinking about it

00:40:57.520 the guy got up

00:40:58.380 and just moved

00:40:59.000 across the bar

00:40:59.920 and the funny

00:41:01.800 thing is

00:41:02.340 that even though

00:41:03.840 I was probably

00:41:04.940 just about to do

00:41:05.600 the same thing

00:41:06.080 I was slightly

00:41:06.900 offended

00:41:07.280 I would

00:41:08.160 I slightly

00:41:08.860 in my head

00:41:09.420 I thought

00:41:09.840 well what's

00:41:10.280 what's that guy's

00:41:11.180 problem

00:41:11.500 what

00:41:12.920 you got a problem

00:41:13.720 with me

00:41:14.100 so to answer

00:41:16.680 your question

00:41:17.220 I guess

00:41:18.000 yes it is

00:41:19.140 slightly offensive

00:41:19.900 to move in that

00:41:20.620 case

00:41:20.960 but you should

00:41:21.980 do it anyway

00:41:22.500 the guiding

00:41:24.360 principle is this

00:41:25.200 anytime you have

00:41:26.200 an opportunity

00:41:26.780 to be antisocial

00:41:29.000 you should take it

00:41:31.520 at least that's

00:41:33.420 how I operate

00:41:34.080 I can't promise

00:41:35.920 it's a key to

00:41:36.720 success and happiness

00:41:37.560 in life

00:41:37.940 but anyway

00:41:38.860 that's one way

00:41:39.620 to live at least

00:41:40.220 and we will

00:41:42.220 leave it there

00:41:42.720 thanks everybody

00:41:43.200 for watching

00:41:43.620 thanks for listening

00:41:44.480 godspeed

00:41:45.500 if you enjoyed

00:41:49.680 this episode

00:41:50.180 don't forget

00:41:50.700 to subscribe

00:41:51.180 and if you want

00:41:51.860 to help spread

00:41:52.300 the word

00:41:52.580 please give us

00:41:53.120 a five star review

00:41:54.120 and tell your friends

00:41:54.780 to subscribe as well

00:41:55.600 we're available

00:41:56.320 on Apple Podcasts

00:41:57.580 Spotify

00:41:57.900 wherever you listen

00:41:59.160 to podcasts

00:41:59.680 also be sure

00:42:00.640 to check out

00:42:01.080 the other

00:42:01.480 Daily Wire podcasts

00:42:02.460 including the Ben Shapiro show

00:42:03.640 Michael Knowles show

00:42:04.580 and the Andrew Klavan show

00:42:06.000 thanks for listening

00:42:07.080 the Matt Wall show

00:42:08.160 is produced by

00:42:08.820 Robert Sterling

00:42:09.640 associate producer

00:42:10.500 Alexia Garcia Del Rio

00:42:11.880 executive producer

00:42:13.140 Jeremy Boring

00:42:13.860 senior producer

00:42:14.900 Jonathan Hay

00:42:15.580 our supervising producer

00:42:16.960 is Mathis Glover

00:42:17.920 and our technical producer

00:42:19.460 is Austin Stevens

00:42:20.520 edited by Donovan Fowler

00:42:21.980 audio is mixed

00:42:23.320 by Mike Coromina

00:42:24.260 the Matt Wall show

00:42:25.360 is a Daily Wire production

00:42:26.360 copyright Daily Wire 2019

00:42:27.800 if you prefer facts

00:42:29.860 over feelings

00:42:30.560 if you aren't offended

00:42:31.540 by the brutal truth

00:42:32.820 if you can still laugh

00:42:33.860 at the nuttiness

00:42:34.780 filling our national news cycle

00:42:36.020 well tune on in

00:42:37.000 to the Ben Shapiro show

00:42:37.900 where you'll get a whole lot

00:42:39.060 of that and much more

00:42:39.980 we'll see you there

The Matt Walsh Show - October 23, 2019

Ep. 355 - Our Collective Plunge Into Madness

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript