The Matt Walsh Show - February 06, 2020


Ep. 421 - The Collapse Of Identity Politics


Episode Stats

Length

47 minutes

Words per Minute

169.85406

Word Count

8,097

Sentence Count

577

Misogynist Sentences

19

Hate Speech Sentences

28


Summary

Trump is now out of office, and we can finally move on from the impeachment process. I talk about why I don t think Mitt Romney is a hero, and why the accusation that he was a coward or a traitor is preposterous. I also talk about a new app I'm using to help me keep track of what I'm doing and where I'm going.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Welcome into the show, everybody. I have to say I'm glad that this impeachment saga is over. I
00:00:05.020 think I probably speak for lots of people right now. And I put so much effort into covering
00:00:10.560 the impeachment thing on my show that it was getting exhausting, and that's why I'm grateful.
00:00:17.580 And by so much effort, I mean that I almost completely ignored it. I mean I put in almost
00:00:22.280 zero effort in covering it, which I actually consider to be perhaps my greatest professional
00:00:27.860 achievement, ignoring impeachment this entire time, and the greatest kindness that I could
00:00:32.720 have possibly bestowed upon you, the audience. So you're welcome for that. Trump is now acquitted,
00:00:38.840 of course, as a result that was absolutely ensured from the very beginning of this extremely pointless
00:00:46.120 spectacle. The only person to vote for conviction, of course, was Mitt Romney. The only person in
00:00:51.860 Trump's party to vote for conviction, I should say, was Mitt Romney, along with every single Democrat.
00:00:56.300 A decision by Romney that I don't personally find especially objectionable. I know that I'm
00:01:07.180 somewhat, maybe not entirely alone, but I know probably most people don't feel that way, at least
00:01:11.500 on the right. I think Mitt Romney did what he thought was the right thing to do, and that's what
00:01:16.120 he's supposed to do. He's supposed to follow your own conscience and judge these things according to
00:01:21.860 your own, according to your own judgment. The idea that he did it for some self-serving reason
00:01:27.420 is, I think, plainly ridiculous, even though I disagree with him. But considering he probably
00:01:36.280 guaranteed he's going to be voted out of office, and he's now persona non grata in his own party,
00:01:41.640 I'm not saying that makes him a hero. So I think we have two versions of Mitt Romney that are being
00:01:50.100 put forward now by either side. You have Mitt Romney, the scum, scoundrel, coward, traitor. And
00:01:58.480 then you have Mitt Romney, the knight in shining armor, the hero, and that's coming from the left.
00:02:04.440 And of course, the irony here is that these are the very same people that when he was running for
00:02:07.680 president in 2012, said that he was racist and sexist with his binders full of women, and so on
00:02:13.080 and so forth. So we know that that's hypocritical, and we know that it'll change on a dime the moment
00:02:17.760 that Mitt Romney does something they don't like. So we understand all of that. My point, though, is
00:02:22.840 I don't really think he's either of those things. I don't think he's a hero, but the accusation that
00:02:28.540 he's a coward or an opportunist is preposterous, unless I completely misunderstand what the word
00:02:36.380 opportunism means, because I don't know what the opportunity is here for him, other than
00:02:40.420 he's ruined his own, his own, at least the latest iteration of his political career.
00:02:48.480 In any case, that's the end of it, and I'm very happy for it to be over, and we can all move on
00:02:54.500 as I will. And there's a lot to discuss today, but before I do, I want to tell you about my friends
00:02:59.680 over at Noom. Look, it's good to take care of other people, obviously, and think about other
00:03:04.560 people. That's what selflessness is all about. But it's going to be hard for you to take care of
00:03:09.020 other people if you're not taking care of your own health and wellness first, and that's what Noom
00:03:13.480 is here for, because everyone is different. Noom adjusts to your lifestyle. They teach you the
00:03:17.940 psychology behind the decisions that you make, and then they help you keep track of everything from
00:03:21.580 workouts and steps to analyzing your diet and recommending healthy recipes. So they've got it all.
00:03:27.120 They've got all the points covered here. Noom also connects you with a personally assigned
00:03:30.780 goal specialist. Noom gives you the tools, and you just have to decide to change your life for
00:03:36.380 the better. They're going to help you do it, but you have to first make that decision.
00:03:39.840 Noom's been great for me personally, and the app has been a lifesaver because my health goals have
00:03:45.020 really been sort of broad in that I want to get healthier. I want to feel healthier. It's very
00:03:50.680 important. And one of my challenges in that regard has always been keeping track and keeping
00:03:54.960 organized, keeping track of what I'm doing. And Noom has helped me with that a lot. Based in
00:04:00.200 psychology, Noom teaches you why you do the things you do and empowers you with the tools you need
00:04:05.440 to break bad habits and replace them with better ones, because that's really what it's all about.
00:04:10.660 I think if you can manage to do that, if you could just form good, healthy habits, then
00:04:16.100 it's almost game, set, match right there. And that's the biggest challenge, is getting out of
00:04:21.780 those bad habits into good ones. And that's why you need Noom. You don't have to change it all in
00:04:27.200 one day. Small steps make big progress. Sign up for your trial today at Noom, N-O-O-M dot com slash
00:04:33.740 Walsh. What do you have to lose? Visit Noom dot com slash Walsh to start your trial today. That's
00:04:38.860 N-O-O-M dot com slash Walsh. Well, if we could go back to very ancient history here, way back to a
00:04:46.880 period of history that archaeologists are just now discovering and uncovering and learning about,
00:04:51.840 that would be this past Tuesday, the State of the Union address. During his State of the Union
00:04:57.160 address on Tuesday night, President Trump called for a ban on late-term abortions. Played that clip
00:05:02.100 yesterday on the show. This plea was made all the more vivid and powerful by the presence of a two-year-old
00:05:08.100 girl in the audience who was born at 22 weeks gestation. And I thought that was a great illustration
00:05:13.580 of what we're talking about here. When we're talking about late-term abortions, we're talking
00:05:18.140 about aborting this child who was born at 22 weeks, which is now viable. Medical advances have
00:05:26.260 made pregnancies, quote, viable well before the third trimester. And there's no reason to think
00:05:32.540 that this trend toward early and earlier viability won't continue. This is yet another example of the
00:05:36.980 way that pro-abortion people are anti-science and anti-medical advancement. Of course, the argument
00:05:44.720 for banning late-term abortion is morally unassailable. There is no clump of cells dodge
00:05:52.460 available to the defender of this practice. Babies in the second trimester are at least the size of an
00:05:58.340 adult's hand. So we're not talking about a microscopic embryo. Okay, we're talking about a child, you know,
00:06:04.920 that's at least that long. And despite what pro-aborts would like to imagine, like us to imagine,
00:06:13.720 of this microscopic, tiny, infinitesimal little thing, no. And midway through the second trimester,
00:06:20.640 they could be safely delivered with all of their limbs intact and other recognizable human features.
00:06:27.340 Abortions at this stage are, therefore, necessarily brutal.
00:06:35.660 The cervix is, and this, as I say, it's brutal, so I'm, I, some content warning here, but I think
00:06:45.320 it's important for us to understand exactly how these, these, these procedures, these quote
00:06:49.120 procedures are done. So I'm going to explain it, if you don't already know. And if you don't want to
00:06:54.020 hear an explanation, you're welcome to mute the show for the next minute. The cervix is pried open,
00:06:59.880 the amniotic fluid around the child is sucked out. The victim, the child, is then ripped apart
00:07:05.920 limb by limb with something called a sofa clamp, which is a, which is a long clamp, almost looks
00:07:12.000 like a long pair of pliers with, with a sharpened edge, with little teeth that allow it to attach
00:07:20.180 itself to the limbs of the child and the child is ripped apart while still alive. Okay. Third,
00:07:25.960 that's second trimester. This is what Donald Trump says we should ban. Third trimester abortions,
00:07:33.100 even more barbaric. A poison needle is stabbed through the mother's abdomen into the baby's skull.
00:07:40.440 Now, humans at this stage obviously have fully developed, fully functioning nervous systems.
00:07:46.120 So this is agonizingly painful for the child. Just imagine how it would feel for you to be stabbed
00:07:54.140 in the head with a poison needle. That's how it would feel for the child. There's no effort made
00:08:00.720 whatsoever to limit the child's suffering because such efforts would acknowledge the humanity of,
00:08:08.060 or at least the life of the child, which is something the abortion industry can't do.
00:08:11.360 And then the mother, and after the child dies, the mother is forced to carry the, the dead baby
00:08:17.340 around in her womb for two days, at which point she will deliver the corpse. Um, and they, they hope
00:08:25.840 in the abortion office, but, uh, oftentimes it ends up, ends up happening in a bathroom at a hotel
00:08:31.940 or something where they're staying. In some cases though, the baby survives the initial injection
00:08:36.700 and so has to be given another. Now I want you to think about the pain that child is in for the two
00:08:42.880 days after he's been stabbed with the poison needle, still alive, suffering in agony, and then two
00:08:50.720 days later, poisoned again. Unless of course you have a Gosnell situation, in which case the baby
00:08:59.580 would just be delivered alive and then killed at that point, which by the way is what Ralph Northam
00:09:06.000 was famously, infamously advocating for. I describe all of that because number one, this is happening
00:09:13.080 in the world and we should know about it. It's happening in our country, not just the world.
00:09:17.220 And I don't think we have the right to turn away from it and say, oh, I don't want to hear about
00:09:20.700 that. That's, that's hard to hear. Yeah, it is hard to hear. That's the point. How hard do you think
00:09:26.480 it is to go through for the child? But also this is what when, this is what Donald Trump is trying
00:09:31.860 to ban. But the abortion industry's minions in the media can't accept any restrictions on abortion
00:09:39.080 at all. And lacking any ethically sound argument in favor of literally tearing viable children apart
00:09:45.200 limb from limb, they resort to lies that are so, so absolutely shameless that they'd be funny if not
00:09:52.240 for the subject matter. In response to Trump's comments last night, a number of abortion advocates
00:09:58.620 went on social media, or two nights ago rather, went on social media and, and, and spread the,
00:10:04.860 the bizarre claim that there's no such thing as late-term abortion. Late-term abortion is quote,
00:10:10.720 not a thing, is what abortion advocates, prominent abortion advocates on social media were saying.
00:10:15.800 This, it would not be any crazier or more delusional for me to rebut Elizabeth Warren's
00:10:24.000 billionaires are evil shtick by claiming that billionaires don't exist. It's, it's the same
00:10:29.540 kind of thing. On the contrary, late-term abortions are most certainly a thing.
00:10:38.160 Even estimates in liberal publications tell us that this quote, very rare, read, existent procedure
00:10:45.260 accounts for, quote, only 1.3% of abortions. This was in, I think the Guardian had an article
00:10:50.960 about it. Liberal publication in the context of advocating for abortion is, oh, it's only
00:10:59.100 1.3%. Okay. Well, 1.3% of abortions, that amounts to over 5,000 babies every single year
00:11:07.020 that are ripped apart limb from limb. 5,000. Now, I want you to think about how we react
00:11:14.200 when there's a school shooting and nine kids are killed, let's say, or 10 or 12. And it's
00:11:23.720 horrific. It's evil. It's terrible. It's a tragedy. It's all of those things. We react exactly as we
00:11:30.440 should to it. My point is, though, 5,000. Think about a mass attack, a mass slaughter of some
00:11:41.800 kind that killed 5,000 people. We wouldn't see that as such a small number. It's only small in
00:11:48.000 comparison to the gargantuan body count that the abortion industry racks up every year. It's all,
00:11:54.380 it's, that's the only reason it seems small. The fact that that's a small number only tells you,
00:11:58.780 it tells you a lot more about the total number of abortions and how large that number is than it
00:12:04.500 does about the actual number of late-term abortions. Now, also, rape and incest account for less than
00:12:15.960 1% of abortions. Yet, pro-abortion people try to bring every abortion discussion back to this
00:12:22.380 minority of cases. Well, you can't have it both ways. Either the 1% of cases are relevant
00:12:27.880 or they aren't. The other lie that is only slightly less egregious is that these abortions
00:12:36.400 are only carried out to save the mother's life. Yet, even former abortionists and current OBGYNs
00:12:43.040 have come out in the past and said that this is simply not true. There's no such thing as a
00:12:49.160 life-saving abortion. To borrow a phrase, that is not a thing. It is never necessary to kill a
00:12:56.480 viable baby in order to save his mother's life. How could it be? If there's a potentially fatal
00:13:02.720 complication with the pregnancy, the child needs to come out of the mother, but he could be simply
00:13:07.620 delivered. In fact, either way, the child has to be delivered, alive or dead. The only thing you're
00:13:13.860 doing with an abortion is you're adding in an extra step of killing the child before you deliver
00:13:17.740 him. There is no reason why that could have any medical value for the mother. In reality,
00:13:26.300 late-term abortions can happen because the mother decides she doesn't want the child. They can happen
00:13:30.240 for the same reason that earlier-term abortions happened. These are not all extreme situations.
00:13:35.960 The procedure, quote-unquote, is extreme, extremely brutal, but it's not always that some extreme
00:13:44.100 position that the mother finds herself in is what leads to the late-term abortion. That's not the
00:13:51.900 case. It could just be that she decides at 25 weeks that she doesn't want to have a kid. Things have
00:14:03.960 changed in her life. She loses a job. She loses a relationship. Okay? Those certainly can be
00:14:11.000 reasons. And there are plenty of, in those 5,000 every year, a not small number of them are going
00:14:16.880 to be situations like that. And then there are going to be other situations where, let's say,
00:14:23.120 the child has some serious ailment or disability of some kind. Or we're often told that, you know,
00:14:31.860 these late-term abortions only happen when the child's going to die anyway. Well, it's simply
00:14:36.540 not true that that accounts for all or even a majority of cases. But that does happen sometimes.
00:14:44.280 But killing a person because he's disabled or because he's going to die anyway is not medically
00:14:53.180 necessary. That's not medicine. And if we call that medicine, if we call that a medical procedure,
00:14:59.860 then we have ventured fully into eugenics territory. And the implications extend far beyond the womb.
00:15:08.820 You know, you simply can't call that a medical treatment. You know what it is? It's a mercy killing,
00:15:15.880 is what it is. And that's a euphemism in itself. And I hate that phrase. But if you're looking for
00:15:22.640 a euphemism that's at least closer to the reality, it's not medical treatment. It's mercy killing.
00:15:31.540 And go ahead and advocate for that. Advocate for the, quote, mercy killing of disabled children.
00:15:41.540 Advocate it for if you want. You're not going to be alone. I mean, there's a long history of you,
00:15:45.880 even in this country. And back 100 years ago, the people who advocated for eugenics were a lot more
00:15:51.840 open about it. And they would have and did, Margaret Sanger being one of them, come out and
00:15:57.540 explicitly advocate for it and say, no, these people, their lives aren't worth anything. It's
00:16:02.020 not worth living. So we should just kill them. You're arguing for the same thing. You're just using
00:16:09.380 different words. So you may as well confront what your position actually is and see if you can stomach
00:16:17.320 it. No matter how you look at it, the talking points offered by the pro-abortion side are
00:16:23.540 ridiculously false. President Trump is right to call for a ban on this barbarity. And I think all
00:16:30.620 decent people in the country agree with him. And that's really what it comes down to.
00:16:35.600 More to talk about, but a quick note from our good friends at Rock Auto.
00:16:42.200 You know, it can be, obviously nobody likes having problems with their cars. And we've,
00:16:46.720 as I mentioned before, we've gone through this recently with both of our cars.
00:16:50.520 Because bad things happen in pairs when it comes to cars. Happen in bundles, really. If one problem
00:16:55.380 leads to another, leads to another. And it can be, you know, it can be a pain to go to the auto parts
00:17:00.420 store and deal with that. And that's why rockauto.com is such a great option that I've been
00:17:06.120 using a lot. Rockauto.com is a family business serving auto parts customers online for 20 years.
00:17:10.800 Go to rockauto.com to shop for auto and body parts from hundreds of manufacturers. They've got
00:17:14.800 everything from engine control modules and brake parts to tail lamps, motor oil, new carpet. No matter
00:17:20.380 what kind of car we're dealing with, whether it's a classic car, your daily driver that you go around
00:17:25.280 and you can get everything you need in a few easy clicks delivered directly to your door.
00:17:29.200 The rockauto.com catalog is unique and remarkably easy to navigate, even for someone like me.
00:17:34.820 And remember, when you go to the auto parts store, most of the time they don't have what
00:17:38.180 you're looking for anyway. They're going to have to order it online. Why even go through all that?
00:17:42.180 Go to rockauto.com for their amazing selection, reliably low prices, all the parts your car will
00:17:46.560 ever need. rockauto.com. Go to rockauto.com right now. See all the parts available for your car or truck.
00:17:52.440 Write Walsh in there. How did you hear about us, Box?
00:17:54.640 So that they know that I sent you. Okay, here's a story. This is a story, all right. Reading from
00:18:02.380 bbc.com. It says, Jamila Jamil has announced she is, quote, queer after receiving criticism for being
00:18:10.480 cast in a new LGBT interest show. U.S. broadcaster HBO announced on Tuesday that the actress and model
00:18:17.180 will be a judge on its new unscripted voguing contest, Legendary. I confess I have no idea what
00:18:23.160 voguing is. The news prompted an online backlash from people who said the Good Place star was not
00:18:29.060 representative of the black LGBT community. That prompted her to issue a statement addressing her
00:18:36.200 sexuality, opening with Twitter is brutal. She explained that she identified as queer and had
00:18:41.440 previously struggled to discuss the topic because it's not easy within the South Asian community to be
00:18:45.400 accepted. She mentioned that nobody in her family was openly out and that, quote, it's also scary as an
00:18:51.220 actor to openly admit your sexuality, especially when you're already a brown female in your 30s.
00:18:57.500 Yes, I'm sure it's really scary to be in the LGBT community in Hollywood.
00:19:03.360 Right. Jamil went on, this is absolutely not how I want her to come out. And adding that she's
00:19:13.700 logging off of Twitter. Oh, and hold on. They actually explain what voguing is. All right. It
00:19:18.760 says, voguing is a genre of dance that originated in New York in the late 1980s. It was founded by
00:19:23.820 black and Latino LGBT people, many of whom were disowned by their families for their sexuality and
00:19:28.600 gender. It came to mainstream attention through Madonna's 1990 hit Vogue and the accompanying video,
00:19:35.140 as well as the documentary Paris is Burning.
00:19:40.600 Okay, hold on a second. But first of all, Madonna is not in the LGBT community, is she?
00:19:47.020 Not as far as I know.
00:19:48.100 No. And so she's the one who started this voguing thing? And now you're not allowed? So it was started
00:19:55.940 by a straight woman and now a straight woman isn't allowed to be involved in it? Or not started by a
00:20:03.520 straight woman. It was popularized, okay? It was brought into mainstream attention through a straight
00:20:08.540 woman. And now we're saying if you're straight, you're not allowed in. All right. So there's a lot
00:20:12.960 that's still mysterious here. And maybe it would be cleared up if I kept reading, but I've lost
00:20:18.900 interest. I don't understand why you need to be gay to go voguing. Are you telling me that I can't
00:20:25.300 Vogue? I could get up in Vogue right now if I wanted to. It's one of my greatest passions after I
00:20:31.560 learned about it 10 seconds ago. In any case, the upshot here is that this Hollywood actress was
00:20:38.140 getting criticized for the crime of hosting a show while straight. She was being attacked for
00:20:43.320 not being gay. And so she came out and said, oh, you know what? Funny thing actually turns out I am
00:20:49.180 gay. Or not gay, but, quote, queer. This actually gives me an idea for what I might do the next time
00:20:57.060 I'm being attacked. I get attacked all the time, as you know. And maybe this is a good way out of it.
00:21:02.880 But notice the brilliance of this move by Jamil here. She comes out as queer, right? Not gay,
00:21:12.600 but queer. So what does queer mean? Well, nobody really knows. It's entirely undefined.
00:21:17.180 It means whatever you want it to mean, basically. So you can claim that the LGBTQ... Now, I believe
00:21:24.760 Q can also mean questioning. So you can be queer, you can be questioning. Anyone can claim that.
00:21:31.760 There's no way to confirm it. You can just wear that label and go about your day like you were
00:21:37.380 before. Don't change anything. So it was a smart move. And nobody's allowed to question her
00:21:44.260 self-identification. Just like when a man comes out as a woman. You can't question it. It's a
00:21:48.880 checkmate. They win. That's all it is to it. Notice also here how my victim pyramid is illustrated
00:21:54.940 once again. Remember on the left, victimhood is currency, right? Whoever has the most victim
00:21:59.700 token wins. But the uber victims, the chief victims, those who have the greatest wealth of
00:22:06.540 victim currency by far are the LGBT folks. Women, even ethnic minority women, are beneath the LGBT
00:22:13.780 people in the hierarchy. So Jamil is a woman, ethnic minority, a feminist. She was just... You may
00:22:21.940 recognize the name because we talked about it on the show last month. She was just last month
00:22:26.140 bragging about her abortion. She was shouting her abortion. So she's an ethnic minority woman
00:22:30.040 who shouts her abortions. You would think that that would get her to the top.
00:22:36.420 But no. She still is beneath the LGBT camp. It doesn't earn her enough identity token points to
00:22:44.520 even host a dancing competition on HBO. Because the LGBT camp decided that she shouldn't be allowed to do
00:22:52.780 that. And what they say goes on the left. If they say it, that's it. They're in charge. If they say
00:22:59.440 you're not allowed to do that, that's it. If they say we're going to do this, we're going to do it.
00:23:07.160 If they say to women, hey, these dudes are going to be coming into your locker rooms now.
00:23:11.260 That's just how it is. They're going to be on your sports teams too. No, no. And it... No, shut up.
00:23:17.720 Shut up. You're not allowed to protest. You bigot. Shut up. They can do that. The LGBT people can do
00:23:23.080 that. They can talk to women like that. And they do talk to women like that. So what does Jamil do?
00:23:30.600 She says, oh, funny story. This is the problem that the left is running into. On one hand,
00:23:38.040 everything comes down to identity politics, right? All that matters is the demographic you fall into.
00:23:43.660 That will determine what you're allowed to do, what you're allowed to say, what you're allowed to
00:23:50.760 think, the reality shows you're allowed to host. It determines everything. It determines what kind
00:23:57.280 of person you are. It determines the value of yourself as a person. But they've also made identity
00:24:05.180 into this nebulous, hazy thing. They blurred the lines of distinction, relativized identity,
00:24:11.020 thrown out all the objective categories, leading now to a mad dash to the top of the hierarchy.
00:24:18.120 Because anyone could be there. All you have to do to be considered a part of any particular category
00:24:23.220 is simply say that you're in that category. And that's it. No other steps required.
00:24:30.080 So now everyone can say they're LGBT, and the hierarchy becomes very top-heavy. So now it's
00:24:35.740 become sort of a ruling class without anybody to rule. Kings and drag queens without any subjects.
00:24:43.380 You've got a bunch of pharaohs and no peasant class, no slaves to maintain the pyramid.
00:24:49.440 Which is quite a predicament. Except you still have white men, for the most part.
00:24:53.600 Okay? We could still all agree that white men like myself are scum. Problem, though,
00:24:57.840 is that a white man like myself, I'm all the way at the bottom of the pyramid.
00:25:01.060 I could, in one fell swoop, leapfrog all the way to the top, just with a simple phrase,
00:25:08.300 I'm a woman. I say that, and now I'm at the top.
00:25:13.580 So even the most reliable, you would think, you would think that at least they can rely
00:25:22.040 on having the white men down there, that they can all turn in hate.
00:25:24.740 Even that's not so reliable.
00:25:30.480 Because we can escape this ghetto any moment, just by saying, oh, you know what?
00:25:35.140 Turns out I'm a woman. Yeah.
00:25:37.680 Oh, I don't look like a woman. I don't have any of the parts of a woman.
00:25:40.580 I've never said I was a woman before. Doesn't matter. Doesn't matter.
00:25:46.620 Just got to take my word for it, I'm afraid.
00:25:48.360 We're going to go to emails in a second, but first, what a year this month has been,
00:25:54.020 and the election race is unfortunately just getting started.
00:25:56.360 The best way to stay informed, and on top of all of it, is to become a Daily Wire member
00:26:01.820 with 20% off of your membership.
00:26:04.580 And I think you really need to, because things move so quickly these days
00:26:07.680 that you need someone to tell you what's going on.
00:26:10.720 So 20% off of all Daily Wire memberships when using promo code DW2020.
00:26:15.580 Members get our articles ad-free, access to all of our live broadcasts and show library,
00:26:20.160 the full three hours of the Ben Shapiro show, select bonus content, access to the mailbag,
00:26:24.760 and now Ben Shapiro's election insight op-eds you also get as well.
00:26:28.720 Plus, our new all-access tier gets you into live online Q&A discussions
00:26:32.760 with Ben Shapiro, Andrew Klavan, myself, Michael Knowles,
00:26:35.700 plus our site's other writers and special guests as well.
00:26:38.920 So, if you have a question, you can get an answer.
00:26:42.480 But first, you've got to download the Daily Wire app, a member exclusive,
00:26:46.520 so you can get push notifications straight to your phone.
00:26:48.900 Again, that's promo code DW2020 for 20% off.
00:26:52.460 Trust me, you don't want to miss it.
00:26:54.260 All right, this is from Rodolfo, mattwalshowatgmail.com.
00:26:59.680 It says, Hi, Matt.
00:27:00.360 I really need your advice on how to navigate the situation.
00:27:02.520 My sister who was in a same-sex relationship,
00:27:06.860 whose partner conceived a baby through IVF, I assume.
00:27:11.260 Before they broke the news to us, she asked me what my thoughts were.
00:27:14.820 I calmly explained how the baby is entitled to a father and mother
00:27:17.480 and how the two contribute different needs to the child.
00:27:20.280 She refused to acknowledge that they provide different needs
00:27:22.500 and kept insisting as long as they have loving parents, they're fine.
00:27:27.100 I completely forgot to insert how the extra frozen fertilized eggs
00:27:30.160 are human beings and deserving of life.
00:27:31.720 But now that her partner has been blessed with a child,
00:27:34.100 I don't know how to go about day-to-day interactions.
00:27:36.580 Do I attend the baby shower pretending I approve of this?
00:27:38.560 Do I tell my daughter?
00:27:39.700 Do I pretend I approve when other families around?
00:27:42.820 Thank you for all you do, Rodolfo.
00:27:45.560 Well, what you tell your daughter really depends on how old she is,
00:27:50.080 and I don't think you mentioned that.
00:27:51.500 If she's very young, if she's like my kid's age,
00:27:54.160 then I would not tell her anything because she wouldn't understand it anyway.
00:27:57.960 Anyway, as for approving of it, look, obviously you're going to accept the child, right?
00:28:07.500 And you're going to love the child as a niece or nephew.
00:28:09.620 You're not going to spurn the child and say, no, you're not going to do that.
00:28:14.260 And you love your sister, even if you don't approve of her choices.
00:28:18.420 So I think on a day-to-day basis, your approval is kind of irrelevant, right?
00:28:23.800 You don't have to act like you approve or you don't approve.
00:28:28.400 You just act like they're family, which they are, and you go about your business.
00:28:34.960 You aren't going to ostracize or disown them, right?
00:28:37.420 I think we would agree that's not going to be an option.
00:28:40.860 And that wouldn't be the right response at all.
00:28:44.120 So what other option is there but to love and accept them?
00:28:47.500 Now, when I say accept, okay, this word acceptance can be a problem
00:28:52.580 given that it has such a broad meaning now to a lot of people.
00:28:57.440 But really, accepting someone as a person and as a family member
00:29:03.080 is not the same thing as approving of their choices.
00:29:06.700 We tend to think of those things as the same, but they're not.
00:29:09.200 So we should accept our family members, accept them in the sense of love them,
00:29:17.460 and embrace them as family members.
00:29:21.420 That's what acceptance would mean here.
00:29:23.860 It doesn't mean approve of everything they do, which is good
00:29:29.540 because I don't think anyone has a family where they approve of everything
00:29:39.040 that everybody in their family does.
00:29:41.420 That's just not how families operate.
00:29:43.980 So I think all of us, or at least many of us, have family members
00:29:47.260 who have made choices we disagree with, maybe that we strongly disagree with.
00:29:51.240 But unless that choice makes them a physical danger to you and your child,
00:29:55.720 I think you still treat them as family because they are.
00:29:59.540 I don't think you should pretend to approve, as you say,
00:30:03.540 but the point is 99% of what you do with your family and how you treat them
00:30:06.700 has nothing to do with approval or disapproval anyway.
00:30:09.420 So it really doesn't come up.
00:30:14.580 I'm not trying to dodge your question, but I think you were asking mainly
00:30:18.760 what do you do on a day-to-day basis, and she's your sister.
00:30:22.040 That's it. That's what you do on a day-to-day basis.
00:30:25.280 This is from Abigail. Abigail says,
00:30:27.100 Hey, Matt, I have an incredibly important question for you.
00:30:29.020 In fact, it may be the most important question you've ever answered,
00:30:31.800 so please don't answer it hastily.
00:30:33.820 My reputation as a college student and relationship with my peers depends on this.
00:30:38.100 Is the correct pronunciation of ramen noodles ramen or ray-man?
00:30:44.580 Well, I guess I already answered that, didn't I?
00:30:46.600 Who says ray-man noodles?
00:30:48.220 Ray-man noodles? Is that a thing?
00:30:50.460 I hope you're not in the ray-man noodle camp.
00:30:53.020 Ray-man noodles sounds like the name of a party clown or something.
00:30:56.620 No, it's definitely ramen noodles.
00:31:01.440 And if you were in the ray-man camp, Abigail, I'm afraid to say that you deserve to have your reputation destroyed
00:31:06.780 and to lose all your friends for an infraction such as that.
00:31:10.540 This is from Ian, says,
00:31:11.740 Why can't you support our president without throwing in your little insults?
00:31:15.120 You said you liked his State of the Union. Great.
00:31:17.580 Why did you need to go on about how he's no good off the script?
00:31:20.980 Trump off the script is exactly what won him the presidency, so your point makes no sense.
00:31:26.040 It seems like you try to play both sides of the fence,
00:31:28.020 sometimes throwing in anti-conservative opinions to appeal to the left.
00:31:31.440 Hey, anything for ratings and acceptance, I guess.
00:31:33.520 It seems like you're really a never-Trumper at heart, and you try to disguise it,
00:31:38.400 and that's too bad because the never-Trumpers are grifters and cowards.
00:31:41.940 I hate to think the same about you, but you make me wonder, and I'm not the only one.
00:31:46.620 Well, Ian, first of all, I didn't say anything yesterday that could possibly be construed as an insult of Donald Trump.
00:31:53.540 I was applauding his performance.
00:31:55.660 It's my opinion that he's better on the script than off,
00:31:59.600 that his rambling routine on the campaign trail and his tweets are, at best, kind of stale at this point,
00:32:05.900 and at worst, extremely off-putting to a lot of people.
00:32:08.860 That's my view, and I've been very consistent about that this entire time.
00:32:13.120 Not an insult, though.
00:32:14.540 Criticism, yeah, but not all criticisms are insults.
00:32:18.120 And anyway, insult or not, how is that anti-conservative?
00:32:24.580 It's anti-conservative now to criticize a Republican president?
00:32:28.500 So the entirety of the conservative cause comes down to your personal feelings about a dude, a guy, the president?
00:32:35.860 He is now the embodiment of everything that it means to be conservative,
00:32:39.200 and all you have to do to be conservative is just to agree with him all the time about everything?
00:32:45.060 Is that your position?
00:32:45.880 Now, I'm being somewhat intentionally obtuse here because I know that is exactly the position that some quote-unquote conservatives have
00:32:56.460 and have had this entire time with regards to Trump, but I find it to be ridiculous, empathetic.
00:33:02.420 And I also think that, at least for me, if being a conservative means anything,
00:33:10.940 one of the most crucial aspects of being conservative is to have a healthy skepticism of the government,
00:33:21.160 which means being critical of the government and not being afraid to criticize the government.
00:33:25.660 Donald Trump runs the government, so he's part of that.
00:33:32.320 So my point is, in my view, to say that you shouldn't criticize or even insult, quote-unquote, the president
00:33:38.220 is one of the most anti-conservative, unconservative positions you could possibly take.
00:33:43.060 And let me just clarify something for you, just so you know.
00:33:48.280 You say that I throw in these little anti-conservative opinions, as you put it.
00:33:53.040 And from the sound of it, you mean more than just the Trump stuff.
00:33:57.060 You are saying that the times when I venture from standard, accepted, right-wing talking points,
00:34:01.940 I'm doing it for ratings, and appeal, and acceptance, and so on.
00:34:08.360 And you say the never-Trumpers, whatever that means, whoever they are, are also in it for personal gain.
00:34:13.940 Okay.
00:34:15.060 Just so you know, in my position as, I guess, a conservative media person,
00:34:23.380 there is nothing at all to be personally gained from straying from the party line.
00:34:29.580 There's nothing to be gained from that.
00:34:31.940 Now, unless you have a full-scale conversion to leftism,
00:34:36.340 and you decide to start parroting left-wing talking points across the board,
00:34:40.580 as some former conservatives like Jen Rubin have actually done under Trump.
00:34:45.540 Now, if you do that, it's still kind of a gamble,
00:34:47.960 because there's no guarantee you're going to be accepted by the left.
00:34:51.800 But if you do that, then yes, that could be a calculation for personal gain.
00:34:55.880 It might earn you a spy gig on MSNBC or CNN as their token, quote, reasonable conservative.
00:35:04.620 Fine.
00:35:05.740 But there is no business advantage, no opportunistic benefit at all to doing anything other than
00:35:13.860 parroting right-wing talking points or left-wing talking points.
00:35:17.780 You could choose one or the other.
00:35:21.880 But if you choose option, you know, C, D, E, or F, or X, or Y, or Z, you know,
00:35:27.840 if you go anywhere besides those two options, there is no real benefit to it
00:35:35.740 other than you're just being honest about what you think.
00:35:38.440 So, A and B, right?
00:35:42.480 Parrot right-wing talking points, left-wing talking points.
00:35:45.080 In my business, those are the safest and most profitable things.
00:35:50.280 Outside of that, however far you venture outside of that, you sacrifice money in ratings.
00:35:57.180 The most profitable thing for a conservative media person by far is to be a diehard Trump fan,
00:36:02.260 to never criticize him, always defend him, and to just sort of put your finger in the air,
00:36:09.040 see which way the wind is blowing with your base, and talk about popular conservative topics,
00:36:14.780 and give popular conservative opinions.
00:36:17.780 Don't go too far, right.
00:36:20.480 Don't go left.
00:36:21.640 Don't go in the middle.
00:36:22.420 Don't go off in that direction.
00:36:23.420 Don't go in any direction except just right there, in that lane.
00:36:28.340 And if you have an audience as a conservative and you stay in that lane,
00:36:32.260 you're guaranteed a job in perpetuity, you're guaranteed an audience, you're guaranteed money.
00:36:38.300 It's a good business.
00:36:40.300 Profitable business anyway.
00:36:45.860 My point is, anyone who does anything other than that, anything other than that,
00:36:51.300 there could only be one reason why they do it, and that is they're just being honest.
00:36:56.180 Now, does that make, it's kind of like I was saying about Mitt Romney, not that I'm comparing myself to him,
00:37:06.660 but am I saying that when I stray outside of the normal talking points, I'm doing something heroic and selfless?
00:37:14.400 No.
00:37:16.220 You know, I'm still doing fine for myself and taking care of my family.
00:37:19.900 It's not like I'm, it's not like I'm making some huge sacrifice, not at all.
00:37:24.740 But I just want to be, just so you understand.
00:37:28.940 I think there are a lot of people who don't understand how this works.
00:37:33.880 Um, you know, saying that someone who strays outside of the talking points is doing it for the money
00:37:40.320 would be like saying that a person became a trash collector because they're a germaphobe
00:37:46.660 or they got into social work for the money.
00:37:49.520 You know, I mean, it's, it's, it's, the accusation is exactly the opposite of the reality.
00:37:55.120 Okay.
00:37:56.640 If you want to know who the potential grifters and opportunists are among conservative media figures,
00:38:03.560 all you have to do is look at the people who never, ever, ever challenge their own audience
00:38:10.320 and are always just right in line with what most people think on the right.
00:38:15.880 Everything is, is, is appealing to the crowd.
00:38:18.400 Everything is, is, uh, you know, everything is crowd pleasing all the time.
00:38:24.000 Look at those people.
00:38:25.200 Now I'm not saying that all of them are grifters and opportunists.
00:38:27.760 I don't know.
00:38:28.100 I can't see inside their heart.
00:38:29.040 It's possible that their views really do just happen to line up.
00:38:33.560 With what most of the audience wants to hear.
00:38:36.040 Extremely unlikely, but it's possible.
00:38:38.320 I can't say for sure.
00:38:41.060 Uh, but those are going to be the potential.
00:38:43.080 That's where you want to look for, for suspected grifting.
00:38:45.840 You want to look over there.
00:38:47.080 Okay.
00:38:49.120 All right.
00:38:49.860 Um, what else here?
00:38:53.300 I wanted to tell you, you know, back in July, um, friend of daily wire, Bill Whittle hosted this
00:38:58.120 excellent four part series podcast called the Apollo 11, what we saw.
00:39:01.940 And, you know, I really enjoyed it.
00:39:04.100 I think it got, a lot of people, um, loved it.
00:39:07.180 Speaking of getting away from normal talking points, this is something entirely different.
00:39:10.320 It's not politics.
00:39:11.520 And this was, uh, Bill taking you back in time, living through it, experiencing the space age again.
00:39:16.980 Now Bill has a new season of a show all about the cold war.
00:39:20.240 Uh, be sure to check out the cold war, what we saw, not only is it a very compelling story,
00:39:24.220 but it's also an important reminder of what it is like to, to live, uh, in back, you know,
00:39:32.000 in those times and to live through that with no future, which is where we all end up.
00:39:35.440 If the far left makes it to the presidency as, uh, the host, Bill captures what it was like to live
00:39:40.460 through major events like the Berlin airlift, the Korean war, the Cuban missile crisis, space race.
00:39:45.580 And the story ties all these milestones together to create this picture of the apocalypse that
00:39:50.340 never happened.
00:39:51.020 The story is so well told and the setting is so brilliantly descriptive that as you go through
00:39:56.200 these events, you start to understand, uh, the battle, not only for capitalism,
00:40:00.480 but for civilization itself, they've released two episodes of this 12 part series already.
00:40:04.600 So this is a perfect time to go catch up.
00:40:06.520 Just go to dailywire.com slash cold war and start listening to this incredibly important story.
00:40:11.480 Uh, that's dailywire.com slash cold war.
00:40:15.500 All right.
00:40:15.960 One more email.
00:40:17.460 This is from Henry says, Hey Matt, I take the issue.
00:40:19.460 I take issue with the idea that there, that there are not any restrictions or that there are
00:40:24.040 any restrictions on free speech.
00:40:25.380 You mentioned that you can't yell fire in a crowded theater.
00:40:27.660 In this case, it's not the speech that's illegal.
00:40:29.600 It's the inciting of a stampede.
00:40:31.000 That's the problem.
00:40:31.800 In the case where the girl convinced her boyfriend to kill himself, it's not the words she said
00:40:35.660 that need to be restricted.
00:40:36.700 It's the act of causing someone to kill themselves.
00:40:39.120 That's illegal.
00:40:40.440 Same thing with Charles Manson.
00:40:41.720 You could repeat every word that Charles Manson ever said, and you would have the right
00:40:44.480 because you have a right to free speech.
00:40:45.880 However, you don't have the right to cause someone to commit murder.
00:40:48.940 The slippery slope that I'm afraid of is that once you can see that there are some restrictions
00:40:52.600 to free speech, why can't we also restrict hate speech?
00:40:55.780 For example, I'm from Canada where we have hate speech laws.
00:40:59.380 And comedians get fined for making offensive jokes.
00:41:01.720 And this is where I think you will inevitably end up if you believe there are restrictions
00:41:04.820 to free speech.
00:41:05.900 Anyway, I think you understand my point.
00:41:08.440 Well, Henry, I think you're trying to play a semantic game to get around the reality that
00:41:12.000 we do and must restrict speech and we always have.
00:41:15.060 But you say it's not speech that's the problem, but the inciting of a stampede or the brainwashing
00:41:24.300 of people to kill people or, you know, or what have you.
00:41:29.880 Yes, but how is the stampede incited?
00:41:34.080 How are the people brainwashed?
00:41:36.040 With speech.
00:41:36.920 So, this would be like if I murdered someone and you said, no, it's not the shooting that's
00:41:44.880 illegal, but the causing of someone to be dead.
00:41:49.460 Yeah, well, that's a distinction without a difference.
00:41:51.760 It's true that shooting people isn't always illegal.
00:41:55.560 You could be shooting in self-defense.
00:41:57.040 But shooting someone to kill them is, you know, to murder them is illegal.
00:42:04.860 So that, the right to shoot, as it were, is restricted for obvious reasons.
00:42:10.700 Just like our right to speech is restricted.
00:42:13.300 Not that I'm comparing saying words to shooting someone, but I think hopefully you get my point.
00:42:18.880 And it must be restricted in the situations I've described and in many other situations
00:42:24.140 besides.
00:42:24.440 Now, I understand your revulsion to and discomfort with the idea that free speech can be restricted
00:42:32.380 because that means, as you seem to realize, that there actually isn't any such thing as
00:42:37.800 free speech.
00:42:38.940 Not in an absolute sense.
00:42:41.780 And if it's not, if speech is not absolutely free, then it's not really free at all.
00:42:46.740 If we're not talking about freedom in an absolute sense, then why are we even using the word?
00:42:51.020 It seems like a, it seems like a word that misses the point, right?
00:42:55.440 And yeah, that is the uncomfortable truth.
00:42:57.820 But it's truth nonetheless.
00:43:00.120 Free speech is, as we've been talking about, a very imprecise phrase.
00:43:03.920 More of a symbolic phrase.
00:43:06.880 Not one that can be taken totally literally.
00:43:09.680 And that goes for all freedoms, really.
00:43:12.200 Because none of them are absolutely absolute.
00:43:15.020 Because anyone can think of exceptions.
00:43:17.240 You have the freedom of religion.
00:43:18.720 I believe in that.
00:43:19.480 Absolutely.
00:43:20.100 But, or not, I certainly believe in that.
00:43:23.400 But what if you belong to the ancient Aztec religion and you want to perform human sacrifices?
00:43:29.620 Well, you better get a job at Planned Parenthood.
00:43:32.040 Otherwise, you're not going to be allowed to do that.
00:43:33.660 Now, you can say all you want.
00:43:37.040 Oh, well, that's not really restricting freedom of religion.
00:43:40.120 That's different.
00:43:41.200 No, it is.
00:43:42.500 That's a religion.
00:43:43.300 And that's a religious practice.
00:43:47.220 And we're saying you shouldn't be allowed to do it.
00:43:49.120 So, it's a restriction on freedom.
00:43:52.020 Yes, the reason you can't do it is because it's going to kill another person.
00:43:56.400 Nonetheless, it is a religious practice that we are saying you cannot do.
00:44:02.540 It is a restriction on religion.
00:44:05.340 There's no way around it.
00:44:06.400 I know we want to find ways around it so we can phrase it a different way.
00:44:09.560 Or maybe start, a lot of times what people will do is they'll, they don't want to admit
00:44:13.520 that there are restrictions on freedom.
00:44:15.040 So, instead, they'll say, well, maybe we need to think about the word religion.
00:44:20.840 Maybe this Aztec religion isn't really a religion.
00:44:23.380 Or maybe the, you know, we don't want to admit that laws against slander are a restriction
00:44:28.260 on free speech.
00:44:29.440 So, maybe slander isn't really speech.
00:44:31.600 Where, you know, we try to adjust the word speech rather than the word free.
00:44:37.260 But that doesn't, that doesn't work.
00:44:38.680 And I don't think it really convinces anybody.
00:44:40.420 I think we all know the truth.
00:44:44.060 Now, the good news is that these restrictions on speech have always been in place.
00:44:52.240 It's never been legal to slander somebody, to libel someone.
00:44:56.920 It's never been legal to tell someone to go kill another person.
00:45:01.560 It's never been legal to do those things.
00:45:04.180 And yet, we still live in a country where you can basically go out and say what you want.
00:45:11.020 Or at least express any idea, any political idea that you want.
00:45:16.240 At least in this country we do.
00:45:17.360 Maybe not in Canada.
00:45:18.020 So, I don't know if the free, if the slippery slope has really, um, has really panned out
00:45:25.340 exactly as you're saying.
00:45:27.140 Which doesn't mean we shouldn't be vigilant.
00:45:28.760 I think we still have to be vigilant.
00:45:30.520 Because there are people who would like to infringe even on our ability to express political
00:45:37.780 views and that sort of thing.
00:45:39.260 And that, that certainly is a problem.
00:45:43.640 Um, but I don't think, I think we have to meet those challenges.
00:45:48.760 I don't think we meet those challenges by pretending to be free speech absolutists.
00:45:54.380 When free speech absolutism is nonsensical.
00:45:57.820 Okay, we'll leave it there.
00:46:00.840 Thanks for the, um, thanks for the email.
00:46:02.940 I did have another email I was, I was going to read.
00:46:05.260 I think I'll save it for tomorrow.
00:46:06.540 But somebody, well, somebody writes me with, I often get, just like the one from Rodolfo,
00:46:13.000 I get, I get questions from people about, uh, family dilemmas where they want my opinion.
00:46:19.300 And on one hand, I'm not sure my opinion really means anything.
00:46:23.580 I don't, you know, I, I, I don't know that I have any insight that's really going to be
00:46:26.900 helpful to people with these situations, but I get the emails anyway.
00:46:29.560 Someone wrote me with a dilemma involving their family.
00:46:34.580 That is certainly the most difficult dilemma anyone's ever emailed me before.
00:46:40.800 And so I think, uh, I was, I'm going to save that for tomorrow because that's going to
00:46:44.080 be a longer conversation and, uh, have a great day.
00:46:47.620 Godspeed.
00:46:50.640 If you enjoyed this episode, don't forget to subscribe.
00:46:52.960 And if you want to help spread the word, please give us a five-star review and tell
00:46:56.180 your friends to subscribe as well.
00:46:57.460 We're available on Apple podcasts, Spotify, wherever you listen to podcasts.
00:47:01.460 Also be sure to check out the other Daily Wire podcasts, including the Ben Shapiro show,
00:47:05.680 Michael Knowles show, and the Andrew Klavan show.
00:47:08.200 Thanks for listening.
00:47:08.840 The Matt Wall show is produced by Sean Hampton, executive producer, Jeremy Boring, senior
00:47:14.400 producer, Jonathan Hay, supervising producer, Mathis Glover, supervising producer, Robert
00:47:18.940 Sterling, technical producer, Austin Stevens, editor, Donovan Fowler, audio mixer, Robin
00:47:24.240 Fenderson.
00:47:25.120 The Matt Wall show is a Daily Wire production, copyright Daily Wire 2020.
00:47:29.520 If you prefer facts over feelings, aren't offended by the brutal truth, and you can still laugh
00:47:33.820 at the insanity filling our national news cycle, well, tune in to the Ben Shapiro show.
00:47:37.680 We'll get a whole lot of that and much more.
00:47:39.800 See you there.