Ep. 424 - Time For A 100 Dollar Minimum Wage
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
175.43112
Summary
Tom Steyer has a plan to raise the minimum wage to $22 an hour. Why not $15 an hour? And why not $25 an hour, which is what most Democrats have always wanted to raise to a livable wage?
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Welcome to the show, everybody. So there's this guy, Tom Steyer. I don't know if you've heard of
00:00:04.760
him. According to some reports, he's been running for president since December. And he was having
00:00:09.540
a campaign block party over the weekend, a campaign party that was attended by some of
00:00:14.760
his most high-profile supporters, like his mom and his cousin. And during this campaign event,
00:00:20.520
he announced, apparently, that he wants to raise minimum wage, just like every other Democrat. But
00:00:26.560
most Democrats want to raise it to $15. What he's saying is, forget about a measly $15 an hour.
00:00:32.260
I'm going to raise it to $22. He wants to raise the minimum wage to $22 an hour. If you're keeping
00:00:37.780
track at home, that works out to about $42,000 a year at a minimum. That's the starting guaranteed
00:00:42.620
minimum amount you can make for full-time work. Now, if you're a small business that can't afford
00:00:48.900
to pay full-time employees that amount of money, well, too bad. Guess you don't get to have any
00:00:54.180
full-time employees in that case. And if you can't have a business without employees, well,
00:00:58.080
then you don't get a business. Your business goes out of business. And that's just the way it is.
00:01:02.580
You see, we're going to make sure that everybody has a living wage by shutting down businesses.
00:01:09.820
We're going to make sure everyone has a living wage by making sure that lots of people don't have
00:01:14.200
any wage at all. It makes sense when you think about it. Actually, when you think about it,
00:01:18.960
it doesn't make sense. So don't think about it at all. That's the key.
00:01:21.240
Why am I talking about the campaign pledges of a man who will get fewer votes for the Democratic
00:01:26.940
nomination than I will? Well, because his plan proves a point, not the point that he wants to
00:01:34.320
make. That if we had a real news media, which we don't, but if we did with real journalists,
00:01:41.840
all the Democratic candidates would be asked if they support Steyer's plan. And if not, why not?
00:01:48.780
See, if they say, no, that's too much. I don't support that. Then they're admitting that you
00:01:55.260
can't just shout living wage and demand that employers pay a certain amount to their employees.
00:02:00.740
It's not that simple. They'd be admitting that it's not that simple. They don't want to admit that.
00:02:05.520
After all, 20 to an hour is a much better living wage than 15 an hour. So if this is just about
00:02:11.740
making sure people have a living wage, which is all the Democrats want to talk about when it comes to
00:02:15.940
things like minimum wage, they want to talk about all the, all the benefits, all the good things they
00:02:19.900
want to do. They don't want to talk about the costs. They don't want to talk about the practical
00:02:22.900
implications, logistics, or any of that. This would force them to talk about that. If it's all about
00:02:29.140
the living wage, then they would have to support Steyer's plan. But if there are other practical
00:02:34.660
economic concerns to take into account here, then they're admitting that there are other practical
00:02:40.140
economic concerns to take into account. And now we're having the minimum wage discussion
00:02:43.920
on that playing field, which is on a field they don't want to be on. Because if they admit,
00:02:50.120
look, if you force employers to pay 20 to an hour, lots of them won't be able to do it. Jobs will be
00:02:54.940
lost. Positions will be automated. If they admit that, then the obvious rejoinder is, yes, and that will
00:03:01.200
happen with 15 an hour. And it is happening. So what about that? So it brings the minimum wage discussion
00:03:06.440
into a realm where the Democrats don't want it to be, which is the realm of reality. But then what if
00:03:14.480
they say, okay, sure, 20 to an hour, let's do it. First of all, the question is, why didn't you propose
00:03:19.940
22 an hour to begin with? What, does Steyer care about low-wage employees more than you do?
00:03:26.180
Second, well, if we can do 15, nay, 22, then why not 25? Why not 30? Why not 45? Why not 15?
00:03:39.900
All of a sudden becomes like an auctioneer thing where you just keep going up and up and up. The
00:03:43.740
price keeps going up. Why not? Most small businesses are just as able to do $50 an hour as they are 15
00:03:52.080
an hour, which is to say, not at all. They aren't able at all. So why not? Why not keep raising it?
00:03:59.220
It's all very uncomfortable for the Democrats. It's an uncomfortable position for them to be in,
00:04:05.060
which is why the media won't put them in that position by asking them the question.
00:04:13.260
But I do appreciate Steyer doing his part anyway. Speaking of uncomfortable positions,
00:04:17.560
I'm sure you've heard the Bloomberg audio already, but I'll play it again for you if
00:04:23.600
you haven't. There's leaked audio of Bloomberg that's making the rounds online, going massively
00:04:29.720
viral, talking about stop and frisk and violent crime and all these things. And here's what
00:04:36.180
95% of your murders and murderers and murder victims fit one in a month. You can just take
00:04:44.820
the description and Xerox it and pass it out to all the cops. They are male, minorities, 15,
00:04:50.140
25. That's true in New York. That's true in virtually every city. And that's where the real
00:04:55.900
crime is. You've got to get the guns out of the hands of the people that get killed. If you want to
00:05:01.040
spend the money, put a lot of cops in the street, put those cops where the crime is, which means
00:05:05.880
in a minority neighborhood. So this is one of the unintended consequences is people say,
00:05:12.960
oh my God, you are arresting kids for marijuana. They're all minorities. Yes, that's true. Why?
00:05:20.360
Because we put all the cops in a minority neighborhood. Yes, that's true. Why do we do it? Because that's
00:05:24.980
where all the crime is. And the way you get the guns out of the kids' hands is to throw them
00:05:30.300
against the wall and Frisco. And then they start, they say, oh, I don't want to, I don't want to
00:05:35.500
get caught. So they don't bring the gun. They still have a gun, but they leave it at home.
00:05:39.980
Now, this is of course, trending on Twitter with the hashtag Bloomberg is racist. And that is not
00:05:47.340
the kind of hashtag you want to see as a candidate. There's my searing political insight. That's why,
00:05:53.100
that's why I should be a professional political analyst because of, because of analysis like this.
00:05:57.800
You don't want to have a hashtag calling you racist as a political candidate. That's,
00:06:03.120
that's all I'm saying. Bold, bold suggestion. And Bloomberg has spent a ton of money cultivating
00:06:08.840
a brand online and it has now been undone almost completely in one fell swoop by this.
00:06:16.600
Is it actually racist though? Is Bloomberg really a racist because of what he said there?
00:06:22.540
Of course not. Of course not. He's saying that violent crime disproportionately happens in minority
00:06:29.740
neighborhoods. And that's true. That's an accurate statement. You could argue that stop and frisk
00:06:36.900
is, is, you could argue against that. You could, you could say it's unconstitutional. You could certainly
00:06:42.840
argue against the general tone that Bloomberg is displaying there. But the basic point he's making
00:06:49.680
can't be racist if it's based in statistical realities. Now he says 95%. I don't know if it's
00:06:57.180
that high, uh, in New York, but it's certainly just disproportionate in terms of the violent crime and
00:07:02.520
which neighborhoods that happens in. He probably could have gotten away with, with all of this if
00:07:08.020
he just had not brought up the racial element of it. If he kept it just speaking in geographic terms,
00:07:14.060
um, then, then probably it would have been fine.
00:07:19.680
But he said the other part out loud and that's where the problem comes from.
00:07:24.680
And it's obviously not going to fly in the democratic party in 2020.
00:07:29.040
And Bloomberg decided to try and win the democratic party, uh, democratic nomination in 2020. And that
00:07:34.800
was his choice. And, uh, so here's the thing. I'm, it's, it's not like I'm going to go to the mat for
00:07:41.280
him to defend Bloomberg and defend his honor. No, Bloomberg is a wonderful man. He's a wonderful
00:07:46.860
man. You, you people leave him alone. I'm not going to do that because I don't think he is a
00:07:51.940
wonderful man. I think he's an awful person and would be an awful president. I think he's a,
00:07:56.160
he's a megalomaniac billionaire nanny statist. Uh, and, and I have really nothing good to say about him.
00:08:04.560
However, I'm not going to jump into the fray and say, this is racist because I don't think it is.
00:08:12.120
And I, there's, there've been a lot of conservatives who are taking part in the
00:08:16.620
Bloomberg is racist hashtag and have jumped on that bandwagon. And I understand why they're
00:08:22.260
doing it strategically because they're trying to take Bloomberg out. Okay. I get that.
00:08:25.580
But in the process of trying to take out this particular guy who was never going to win
00:08:30.740
anyway, in the process of taking him out, you're agreeing with the left that it is racist to talk
00:08:37.720
about the statistical realities of violent crime. So you're giving up the argument in order to beat
00:08:44.560
one guy. That is not a good strategy. And this has been my, my gripe with a lot of conservatives for
00:08:52.380
a while now, where in order to, when they get a chance to, to, to score a point against somebody,
00:09:00.000
they, if it, they'll, they'll forfeit their entire position. They'll completely agree with the left
00:09:05.280
in order, in order to, in order to win this one little battle here.
00:09:10.440
But you're, you're, you're giving up the, the gen, the, the greater war in order for the sake of,
00:09:15.660
of winning this battle. That's, that's not a good strategy.
00:09:18.300
See, when you give up the argument for the sake of taking down a person,
00:09:25.420
then fine, you've taken down the person, but you've lost the argument.
00:09:30.640
And the thing that separates the left from the right, and, and oftentimes the separation is,
00:09:38.140
is not always obvious, especially these days. But if anything separates those, if, if, if these two
00:09:42.920
sides mean anything, it comes down to the arguments. We're making different arguments. We believe
00:09:48.320
different things. Well, if you give up the argument and get rid of the people you don't
00:09:54.860
like, then what happens in the end is that you've replaced the people you didn't like with people you
00:10:00.440
do, but it's all leftism anyway. And I don't think that's a good strategy.
00:10:08.120
So what do we say about, about Mike Bloomberg? Well, I don't think we have to say anything.
00:10:16.640
As I said, I don't think we have to come out stridently to defend him at all. But I also don't
00:10:25.100
think we agree with the left on things like this, on points where they're wrong.
00:10:31.720
And, and we know that there are terms of service that come with trying to win the democratic
00:10:39.400
nomination. And according to those terms, when audio like this comes out, you're branded a racist
00:10:45.300
and that's it. Bloomberg played the game and lost. He knew the fine, fine print. He knew what was in
00:10:50.980
it. And, uh, and that's it. And he loses. Okay, fine. I'm not crying any tears for him. All I'm saying
00:10:59.040
is I'm not going to come out now, um, for the sake of, of, of, uh, getting my shot on Bloomberg
00:11:05.480
and say, Oh yeah, that's totally racist to say that kind of stuff. Totally, totally racist. Oh,
00:11:10.260
I'm, I'm so offended. I'm offended by this racism.
00:11:16.140
The problem is, especially as a Trump supporter, um, it gets kind of awkward because if,
00:11:22.500
if Trump's they're coming here, they're bringing drugs, they're rapists line, you know, that he,
00:11:31.680
he was kicked off his campaign in 2016. If that line was not racist and I don't think it was,
00:11:37.580
but if that line wasn't racist, then there's no way this is.
00:11:44.140
And I know that as you know, a lot of times when it comes to Trump, we've, we've gotten used to this
00:11:49.460
notion that he, that he exists in this kind of bubble where he's immune to everything.
00:11:55.840
And so you can have a double standard with him and it's okay. But I, I don't think you want to
00:11:59.880
get too comfortable with that. It's not going to last forever. Uh, and it's not hard for people to
00:12:07.240
say, if you come out as a conservative and say, yeah, Bloomberg is a racist for this. Well, it's,
00:12:11.420
it's, it's not a hard connection for people to make. They're going to say, now, wait a second.
00:12:14.720
Okay, that's racist. Then, okay, let's look at the stuff that Trump said. So now you're saying
00:12:17.880
that's racist too. And your response is, Oh, no, no, no, no, no. That's different. That's
00:12:22.020
totally different. How's it different? It just is. I don't know. It just is not a compelling argument.
00:12:29.860
All right. Um, moving on. We were talking before about, about small businesses.
00:12:36.220
Speaking of small businesses, it's still early in the year, but if you run a small business,
00:12:40.800
you know, 2020 is going to fly by. And that's why you should lose, use legal zoom right now to make
00:12:46.560
sure that you're set up for success over the past 19 years. Legal zoom has helped more than 2 million
00:12:51.440
Americans start their businesses by incorporating forming an LLC and more. Um, but even after your
00:12:58.080
business is set up, legal zoom can still help you out with a lot more things like lease agreements,
00:13:03.860
changing tax laws, reviewing contracts, all that plays a part in running your own business.
00:13:09.600
These are precisely the kinds of costly hurdles that could take time away from growing your business
00:13:14.340
from the things that you really want to be doing. So don't let that happen. Legal zoom's network of
00:13:18.860
independent attorneys and tax professionals can provide advice to address these things and more,
00:13:23.280
and you'll never get charged by the hour since legal zoom is not a law firm. Go to legal zoom.com
00:13:29.360
today and enter promo code Walsh in the box and check out for special savings. That's legal zoom.com
00:13:34.340
code Walsh, legal zoom, where life meets legal. Okay. So we're talking about, uh, things that aren't going to
00:13:41.640
fly in the modern democratic party. Here's another example of such a thing coming from Andrew Yang
00:13:46.900
this time, uh, over the weekend, Yang was at an event talking about so-called reproductive justice.
00:13:54.520
So, so-called reproductive rights. And this is what he had to say. Listen, I think we have to get back
00:14:00.520
to the point where no one is suggesting that we be celebrating an abortion at any point, um, in the
00:14:06.460
pregnancy. That there was a time in democratic circles where we used to talk about it being something
00:14:11.880
that, like, you don't like to see, but that should be within the freedoms of the woman and the mother
00:14:17.540
to decide. And so, to me, I think there is a really important tone to set on this, where you don't just
00:14:24.480
say, like, we're absolutist about it. Though I have to say, I am relatively absolutist on this. Like, I think that it
00:14:31.120
should be completely up to the woman and her doctor and the state should not be intervening all the way, uh, through
00:14:35.840
pregnancy. But it's a tragedy to me if someone decides that they don't want to have a, a child
00:14:44.960
and they're on the fence and that maybe at some point later, I mean, it's a very, very difficult
00:14:48.760
personal decision. Um, and it should be something that we're very, very sensitive to. I think that
00:14:54.100
celebrating children, family, like, these are universal human values. And if we manage to lead on
00:15:02.180
that and then say, but we also stand for women's reproductive rights, I believe we can bring
00:15:06.380
Americans closer together on a really, really important personal issue.
00:15:10.880
Yang is, unsurprisingly, getting a lot of grief for that from the left. And the response from the left
00:15:22.540
is, is, is, seems to be there, there, there are two responses, as always, when this kind of thing is brought
00:15:28.700
up. One is to say, nobody celebrates abortion. What are you talking about? That's crazy. Saying we shouldn't
00:15:35.240
celebrate abortion. Nobody does. So this is a, this is a right-wing talking point that you're engaging in.
00:15:40.720
Nobody celebrates it. That's one strategy. The other strategy is to say, we, yes, we should celebrate it.
00:15:49.880
Yeah, this is horrible for you to say we shouldn't celebrate it. Of course we should celebrate it.
00:15:54.320
And so if you go on, on Twitter where this video is, this clip has gone viral, it's, it's pretty funny
00:16:00.780
actually, in a very irritating sort of way, to look at the comment thread under the, the video clip,
00:16:07.680
because it's kind of this rotating, it rotates between the two talking points, where you have
00:16:11.900
one person saying, no one's celebrating it, and then right below them, you have someone saying,
00:16:15.960
yes, we should celebrate it. The left can't get their talking point straight when it comes to abortion.
00:16:21.480
And they, they don't, they feel like they don't need to, because it's not really about making a
00:16:26.000
rational argument. It's all about emotion and, uh, and, and deception. So it's not about being
00:16:32.900
reasonable, rational, consistent. That doesn't matter. Um, of course the reality is that people
00:16:39.240
do celebrate abortion. That's what the shout your abortion hashtag is all about. It's about people
00:16:43.400
celebrating it. But there was a time, as Yang points out, there was a time when the, the motto on
00:16:54.360
the left with respect to abortion was safe, legal, and rare, safe, legal, rare. Well, they still talk
00:17:02.560
about the, the mythical safe abortion, which doesn't exist because there's no such thing as a, as a safe
00:17:07.780
abortion. In every abortion, at least one person is, is killed. Uh, and the other person, the mother is
00:17:14.200
damaged, uh, sometimes physically in obvious ways, oftentimes physically, but every time emotionally,
00:17:22.800
psychologically, even if she doesn't experience that damage or realize it, or she's able to suppress
00:17:27.500
it for a time. So, but they still say we need a safe abortion. Uh, they still obviously want
00:17:33.020
abortions to be legal. They want all abortions to be legal, but the rare part, you don't hear that
00:17:38.440
anymore. Now, if, um, if the, the leftists who say that, well, we never celebrate abortion, if they're right
00:17:47.080
that it isn't celebrated, then why don't you hear most Democrats or most abortion advocates on the
00:17:55.800
national stage? Why don't they talk about rare abortions, reducing the number of, they don't talk
00:18:01.240
about it. And the reason is that they're saying, this is nothing to be ashamed of. This is something
00:18:07.880
to celebrate. This is an expression of a woman's autonomy. This is an expression of a woman's power
00:18:15.380
over her own body and her own life and her own reproduction. And so, uh, should there be fewer
00:18:23.560
abortions? No, if anything, there should be more abortions. It should happen more often because it
00:18:27.080
is this, this, this, this glorious, beautiful expression of this woman, of a woman's liberty and
00:18:33.220
freedom. That's the attitude now. So Andrew Yang is, is discovering, and it always shocks me when
00:18:42.460
Democrats, when you see Democrats learn this, like they didn't know it already, especially when it's
00:18:47.780
a Democrat running for the Democratic nomination, but he's just now learning that this kind, this,
00:18:57.280
this attempt to be somewhat reasonable as a pro-abortion person, which isn't really possible
00:19:03.940
because the pro-abortion position is inherently unreasonable. But he's trying to inject a little
00:19:10.260
bit of reason and sanity into it, even as he advocates for killing babies legally. He, so he
00:19:17.660
wants to do that, but he also wants to say, okay, guys, all right, fine, I'm with you on that, but
00:19:22.100
let's, let's not take it too far now. He's trying to do that. And what he's discovering is that doesn't
00:19:27.320
work anymore. It may have worked back in the nineties. Okay. But times have changed and it just
00:19:32.060
doesn't fly. That's what Andrew Yang is discovering. All right. Before we move on, a quick word from
00:19:39.800
ZipRecruiter. You know, I hear from employers all the time. It's hard to hire people. You know,
00:19:45.560
it's difficult. Well, hiring people, I guess, is easy in itself, but hiring the right person,
00:19:50.460
how do you do that? That's difficult. You have to find the qualified applicants. You have to go
00:19:53.820
through the process, take all the time, sift through all of the applicants, all the options.
00:19:57.800
It's very tough, but ZipRecruiter makes it easy. You know, a codable founder, Gretchen Huebner,
00:20:04.060
experienced how challenging hiring can be after unsuccessfully searching for a new game artist to
00:20:08.620
grow with her education tech company. But then she switched to ZipRecruiter and saw an immediate
00:20:13.880
difference. And you can too, by signing up for free at ZipRecruiter.com slash Walsh. ZipRecruiter
00:20:19.920
doesn't depend on candidates finding you. It finds them for you. That's the point. And by using ZipRecruiter
00:20:24.960
screening questions to filter candidates, Gretchen found it easier to focus on the best ones and then
00:20:30.780
from there, find the right one. In fact, after posting her job on ZipRecruiter, Gretchen said
00:20:34.980
she was honestly surprised that she found qualified applicants so quickly and hired a new game artist
00:20:41.300
in less than two weeks. She was looking for someone who had difficulty less than two weeks
00:20:45.120
after ZipRecruiter. She found them. With results like that, it's no wonder that four out of five
00:20:48.680
employers who post on ZipRecruiter get a quality candidate within the first day.
00:20:52.480
ZipRecruiter, the smartest way to hire. See why ZipRecruiter is effective for businesses of all
00:20:57.960
sizes. Try ZipRecruiter for free at our web address, ZipRecruiter.com slash Walsh. That's
00:21:03.900
ZipRecruiter.com slash Walsh. So Beto, Beto O'Rourke, if you remember him, he said the other day
00:21:15.260
that, this is what he said, though this is the darkest of times for our country, we cannot give
00:21:22.400
in to despair. We must be honest about the unprecedented threat we face and then do everything
00:21:28.120
within our power to overcome it. I wanted to mention this because this kind of rhetoric,
00:21:35.120
we're in the darkest times, darkest times, the worst times. It's never been worse. Unprecedented.
00:21:43.280
Unprecedented. This kind of rhetoric is obviously very common, but I really wish that we could
00:21:51.820
develop some perspective. I understand the inclination to want to say that we're living
00:21:58.500
in the worst time ever, everything is the worst it's ever been, et cetera and so forth. And no doubt,
00:22:04.900
I've been guilty of that myself on plenty of occasions. And I think that you can legitimately
00:22:10.440
look at certain individual facets of modern life and say, and say about that particular thing
00:22:16.140
that it's unprecedented or for better or worse, you know, the internet is an example of that,
00:22:21.780
certainly. Nothing like the internet has ever existed before. And society has been reshaped
00:22:27.140
around this technology. Many volumes could be written and will be written and some have been
00:22:31.880
written analyzing the effects that it's had on us. And I think that those effects in the end prove to
00:22:37.600
be a net negative and a pretty profound net negative. But that's not the same as saying
00:22:43.700
that generally speaking, these are our darkest times as a country. Yeah, this is what people
00:22:48.600
want to do. People want to always be living in the worst times, the end times, the end of all things,
00:22:54.740
the apocalypse is upon us. This is an impulse, not just among religious people, but against,
00:22:59.380
but among non-religious people too, as the climate doomsayers clearly show. People want
00:23:07.720
the time that they're living in to be the worst and in fact, be the end, be the, with Armageddon
00:23:15.800
around the corner. Why is that? Well, I think partly, of course, there's a political motivation.
00:23:22.980
The opposing party always wants things to be terrible under the president they're trying
00:23:29.540
to get rid of. Republicans do this too, obviously. Trump did this, you know, the way he described
00:23:35.440
America sometimes under Obama, although things weren't great, but the way he described it made
00:23:40.360
it sound like a, like a, like a post-apocalyptic hellscape, like, like the road or something,
00:23:45.560
Cormac McCarthy. And this is what? So part of it's just standard politics. Okay, fine.
00:23:51.240
But there's an even baser impulse, something underneath that. And I think a lot of it is a
00:23:59.980
simple kind of vanity where we don't want to look at things, take things into perspective,
00:24:08.500
into historical context and say, eh, we're living in moderately bad times. Things have been much worse
00:24:14.700
than this. They've, they've also been better, but we're sort of in the middle. No one's going to
00:24:18.660
remember our struggles really, because there's nothing to write home about. It's just, they're
00:24:22.360
not great, but eh, not the worst. Nobody wants to think that. Nobody wants to think that we could,
00:24:28.840
that we're going to, we're going to get like a C plus on our suffering report card. We want our plight
00:24:35.240
to be one of deep earth shattering importance. We want our experiences to be unprecedented in a bad way.
00:24:43.920
And we can't settle for the aspects of our experience that actually are unprecedented. We want the whole
00:24:50.680
thing. We want all of it to be unprecedented. You see this on the personal, on a personal level too.
00:24:54.700
It's like when you see it even in really petty ways. And I'm sure you've had the experience before
00:25:01.300
where you're in a group of people and you happen to mention, just as an aside, you say something like,
00:25:07.100
oh man, I didn't get any sleep last night, right? I didn't sleep much. I'm pretty tired.
00:25:12.560
And then what happens? It immediately becomes a contest to see who has slept the least.
00:25:18.100
So the next person goes to tell me about it. I haven't slept. I haven't slept in two days.
00:25:22.560
Someone else, I haven't slept since last Wednesday. Funny story. I haven't slept since the Carter
00:25:28.100
administration. Oh yeah. Well, I'm a vampire. Okay. I turned into one back in 1783. I've been up
00:25:34.200
every night since then, sucking blood. It's pretty exhausting. For some people, people have this,
00:25:40.080
they can't stomach even admitting that they get enough sleep. They want it. They get, they don't
00:25:46.820
get any sleep. They're so busy. They're so stressed. Everything's the worst. It's so terrible.
00:25:52.000
It's this competitive martyrdom that we all do. It's the weirdest thing. And at the same time,
00:25:58.560
we hate suffering. We do everything in our power to avoid it.
00:26:04.200
But we also crave it. And we envy it. We see something sexy in suffering. Something enticing.
00:26:10.600
We figure it's a personality enhancer. It's a, it's a, it's a resume builder. And then of
00:26:17.400
course, the thing is, you meet someone or you read about someone who has really suffered.
00:26:23.940
I mean, really, really suffered. Been through the worst sort of thing a person can experience. You
00:26:30.380
read like night or a man's search for meaning about concentration camps. Or you talk to someone
00:26:39.360
who's lost a child to cancer or something like that. Unimaginable suffering. And you see very
00:26:46.040
quickly that it's, it's not what we make it out to be when we trivialize it with our martyrdom
00:26:51.840
act. Real suffering is, is bleak and dreary and it can break you. It's not true that this idea that
00:27:02.480
whatever, whatever doesn't kill you makes you stronger. If you, if you suffer, you'll come out
00:27:06.320
stronger at the end of it. It's not true. There are people that come out a lot of most,
00:27:11.740
probably most people who really suffer come out worse in the end because of it. It, it breaks
00:27:18.400
them. It wears them down. They come out as a shell of themselves. Real suffering is the kind
00:27:26.500
of thing that at the end of it, you're probably not going to say it was super hard, but I'm glad
00:27:32.460
I went through it because I'm a stronger person now. Concentration camp survivors aren't saying
00:27:38.300
that. People who lose children certainly aren't saying that. Now you do hear this from cancer
00:27:46.420
survivors themselves sometimes and, and, and having advanced stage cancer obviously qualifies as real
00:27:52.640
serious suffering. Some of the worst suffering I imagine a person can experience, but that I've
00:27:57.900
also, I've also heard from some cancer survivors who say in their opinion that the way that we talk
00:28:03.600
about cancer, the sort of rosy tint that we put on it and we say things like he's fighting,
00:28:09.940
he's a fighter, he'll, he'll, he'll beat cancer, he'll kick cancer's butt, um, is wrong. I've heard
00:28:16.660
from some cancer survivors who say that, that, that, that cancer, um, you know, they'll, they'll point
00:28:22.640
out that cancer is something that, that happens to you and it's miserable and it's horrible and
00:28:27.280
it's not necessarily a matter of fighting. And I was actually, I was talking to somebody recently
00:28:33.260
about this and they were saying this to me and I, and I thought, yeah, you know, I have always felt
00:28:38.740
a little bit uncomfortable with people saying stuff like he beat cancer, you know, he, he fought it,
00:28:46.700
he kicked cancer's butt. Because what about the millions of people who die from it? Were they weak?
00:28:53.780
Were they not fighting hard enough? Is it their fault? In fact, we do often put it like that. We,
00:29:00.060
we, we say, and you read it in the headlines after a famous person dies of cancer, it'll say so-and-so
00:29:05.500
lost his battle with cancer. Putting this oddly, oddly victim blaming sort of spin on it. No, he didn't
00:29:16.680
lose. He just, he died like we all will. He wasn't bested on the field of battle. He is more
00:29:23.760
mortal and he died because he had no choice. Anyway, I'd be interested to know how cancer
00:29:30.480
survivors feel about this kind of rhetoric because I've heard different, I've heard both
00:29:33.860
sides of it and I've never been through it myself, so I can't speak to it. In any case,
00:29:38.160
the point is that maybe we collectively in modern culture don't need to win the suffering Olympics
00:29:46.060
all the time. Maybe we can admit that things, generally speaking, and as, you know, on an
00:29:54.300
individual basis, there certainly are people in this country that are going through the worst kind
00:29:58.100
of suffering imaginable, but generally as a culture, as a society, we can admit that things aren't nearly
00:30:05.180
as bad as they could be. And they've been a whole lot worse. When people talk about how divisive
00:30:13.100
our politics are, things are so divisive and hostile and the way people are to each other,
00:30:19.740
there's just no dignity anymore. Well, if these people would open a history book and skim through
00:30:27.940
it for three seconds, you would see how completely, almost laughably tame things are in comparison
00:30:36.400
to how they've been throughout the entire course of human history, leading up to modern times.
00:30:44.520
It wasn't all that long ago when, as a matter of course, you would settle a dispute with someone
00:30:50.820
by shooting at each other, having a duel. It wasn't all that long ago that politicians would beat each
00:30:57.420
other with canes in Congress, okay? These days, a couple mean tweets are exchanged. There are some
00:31:06.300
mean gifs. And we say, this is unprecedented. This last lack of decorum. The country's never seen this
00:31:14.960
before. Oh, come on. It's actually not that bad at all. But we don't want to say that. It has to be
00:31:23.360
the worst. It always has to be the worst. And I'm not saying we should be complacent or content and we
00:31:27.280
shouldn't try to improve things. We should, but we could do it with some perspective, is my point.
00:31:32.940
All right. Last week, I told you all about this terrific new podcast, The Cold War, What We Saw.
00:31:38.120
Over the weekend, this podcast reached number one in history podcasts, number five on all of Apple
00:31:43.060
podcasts. So you don't have to take my word for it because there are hundreds of reviews out right now
00:31:47.240
that'll tell you the same thing. Go read them for yourself. Be sure to check out The Cold War, What We Saw.
00:31:52.200
Not only is it a very compelling story, but it's also an important reminder of what it's like to
00:31:57.360
live with no future, which is where we end up when the far left takes the presidency. The Cold War,
00:32:04.040
What We Saw captures what it was like to live through major events like the Berlin airlift,
00:32:08.080
the Korean War, the Cuban Missile Crisis, the space race. And the story ties all of these milestones
00:32:13.600
together to create this picture of the apocalypse that never happened. The story is so well told
00:32:19.400
and the setting is so brilliantly descriptive that as you go through these events, you start to
00:32:24.000
understand the battle, not just for capitalism, but for civilization itself. They've released two
00:32:29.320
episodes of this 12 part series already. So this is a perfect time to catch up. Just go to
00:32:33.720
dailywire.com slash cold war and start listening to this incredibly important story. That's dailywire.com
00:32:39.240
slash cold war. One other thing I wanted to mention, um, very important. I, I had been thinking
00:32:49.180
about this, dealing with it internally, praying about it, and I just need to talk about it with
00:32:55.180
someone. I have to tell you what, what I witnessed. I was on a flight yesterday, flying home last night
00:33:05.540
on a, on a, on a prestigious spirit airlines flight. And I'm in the exit row window seat that,
00:33:15.800
which I have paid a $6,000 upcharge for. There's a woman about my age in the aisle seat. There's nobody
00:33:22.760
in the middle. Okay. About 30 minutes into the flight, she suddenly gets out of her seat and then
00:33:30.600
she gets on her knees. Okay. On the plane facing her seat. If you can imagine, picture this.
00:33:38.680
And so she's, she's, she's like in praying position at the, on her knees facing seat in sort of praying
00:33:44.800
position, which, which I would never begrudge anyone praying, especially on a flight, but it did make me
00:33:49.680
a little nervous. It's like the time I was not long ago, I was on a flight and the woman next to me
00:33:54.100
was clutching a rosary and, and, and muttering all throughout the flight. Oh Jesus, Jesus, Jesus,
00:34:01.180
Jesus. Oh Jesus. Like that. And I got a little nervous because I thought, do you know something?
00:34:06.580
I don't know. Have you had a premonition or a vision or something? Anyway, she wasn't praying
00:34:11.520
because she then rested her head directly on the seat, on the butt of the seat, her head on it,
00:34:20.200
rested, and she went to sleep. And she slept like that for an hour, knees on the ground,
00:34:26.680
head on the seat. On the seat were literally thousands of butts. Okay. Thousands upon thousands
00:34:34.520
of butts. Just think of all the, of all the, of all the, the butts, all of the many diverse and often
00:34:39.380
quite large butts that have been pressed with a person's entire body weight against that seat.
00:34:45.540
And she's breathing that in. She's inhaling that. Think of the, excuse me, but butt fumes
00:34:51.440
that have soaked into the cushion over the years. You think they ever wash it? You think after you get
00:34:58.480
off the flight, the flight attendants come by with, with Clorox and, and, and clean all the seats? No,
00:35:03.800
they don't. They never wash the seats. There are things on planes that are never washed.
00:35:09.380
Just for years, the germs accumulate. And there are other things that are washed sparingly every
00:35:16.800
couple of months. The tray tables, by the way, the tray tables that you eat on, they rarely wash
00:35:23.060
those things. Just so you know. So she's got her, her, her head in the butt fumes and in the flight
00:35:31.900
attendants are walking by and, you know, never say anything. Seatbelt sign is on. There's turbulence.
00:35:40.340
She's in the exit row on her knees with her head in the seat. Flight attendants are walking by,
00:35:47.040
say nothing to her. How is that allowed? Could I just, could I stretch out in the aisle if I wanted
00:35:53.120
to? Could I, could I get a, like a pillow and a sleeping bag and just, and maybe, maybe crack the
00:35:58.880
door open a, a smidge just to let some, a breeze in? Can I do that? Make yourself at home, I guess.
00:36:05.940
Apparently the inmates are running the asylum and the asylum is 30,000 feet in the air going 500
00:36:10.420
miles an hour. That's not concerning at all, is it? I was of course horrified by this, but then I also,
00:36:16.880
I, this weird, this, this whole flight I was, I, I was thinking about it. And by the way, I also had the
00:36:22.620
distinct urge and I am, I am steadfastly opposed to the thing that people do online where they take
00:36:28.160
pictures of strangers who are doing weird and awkward things and then post those pictures
00:36:32.960
online to shame the person. I'm steadfastly opposed to that. I've never done it. I was very
00:36:39.520
tempted here to do it because I felt like there needed to be documentation of this. Anthropologists
00:36:44.340
in the future are going to want to see this and study it so they can understand our period of,
00:36:48.840
of, of history. But I, I resisted the urge. Plus I also thought that, uh, what if I forgot to take,
00:36:55.260
it was dark on the plane. What if I forgot to take the, uh, the flash off and then it would be
00:37:00.820
obvious I took a picture and you don't want to deal with that. So anyway, didn't take a picture,
00:37:03.940
but I'm, I'm, I had a lot of time to think about this and I was, I, I was revolted. I was horrified.
00:37:09.580
I was confused. I was scared, honestly. But then I also had this weird admiration that I felt for this,
00:37:15.720
this person. And, and there are people in airports and planes, and this is the worst I've ever seen,
00:37:21.500
but it's common that you see people who seem to have just given up on life. They've given up on
00:37:27.360
life. They've given up on society. They're sprawled out in the terminal, you know, sucking their
00:37:32.660
thumbs, pajamas on, sleeping. Hundreds of strangers are milling about and they're just, they're just
00:37:41.140
camped out, you know, and this is weird, emotionally stunted behavior, but it's also strangely confident.
00:37:47.680
These are people who have utterly disregarded the judgments and opinions of the public. They,
00:37:53.000
they do not care what anybody thinks. So the woman next to me on the plane with her face implanted in
00:37:59.680
the, in the, uh, excuse me, but rectal ejections of, of so many thousands of people, the statement she
00:38:06.860
was making to me was, I could not possibly care less what your opinion of me is. It is of no
00:38:16.400
consequence to me. I know that you're going to judge me for this. I don't care. And though I'm
00:38:22.300
horrified and traumatized by it, I did, I did have a strange respect for it too, uh, because she's
00:38:29.920
exactly right. I, you know, what, what I'm sure she knew was going to happen was definitely happening.
00:38:34.000
I was judging the hell out of her, but what does it matter? And she was comfortable and she slept.
00:38:42.800
So jokes on me, I guess. Let's go to emails. Uh, this is a email address is mattwalshowatgmail.com,
00:38:50.320
mattwalshowatgmail.com. Uh, this is from Tyler says, Hey Matt, love the show. What's your opinion
00:38:58.980
on the morality of eating meat? Or as some people like to put it, killing and devouring
00:39:03.700
innocent animals. Most people like myself say that it's okay to eat meat given that God has
00:39:07.780
granted us dominion over animals. I believe God created animals for our work, our work related
00:39:13.080
uses, enjoyment and consumption. Some people on Twitter will argue that God gave certain
00:39:16.480
commandments in the past that aren't applicable today, such as treating your slaves kindly and
00:39:20.020
the fact that God specifically told us not to eat bacon, um, pork. They also point out that
00:39:26.180
some animals are more emotionally complex than others. The pig, for example, is just as mentally
00:39:30.120
and emotionally aware as a dog. And yet we eat pigs, but not dogs. What would you say to
00:39:34.200
someone that argues that it is more morally appropriate to go vegan than to eat meat? Thanks
00:39:38.420
again. The way I see it, um, the only system of thought, the only belief system, the only worldview
00:39:45.040
that really provides a foundation for being, for claiming that eating meat is immoral objectively
00:39:51.340
would be some of the Eastern religions like Hinduism. Now it depends on which Hindu you talk
00:39:58.140
to, because there are different branches of it, like there are in Christianity. But some
00:40:02.080
Hindus, um, are vegetarian according to their faith on the basis that, as I understand it,
00:40:09.860
you know, there's kind of a life force, a life energy that pervades all, uh, you know, man
00:40:16.480
and animal alike. And so there's an equality that we have with them. And so it would be wrong for them
00:40:21.220
for us to kill them. I may be wrong in my explanation of their belief, but that, but
00:40:25.820
that's how I understand it. My point is in the West where vegetarianism and veganism are gaining
00:40:33.140
ground, there really isn't any available philosophical justification for it. Now, if somebody
00:40:39.480
wants to refrain from eating meat for health reasons or for personal reasons, that that's fine
00:40:45.200
with me. I'm totally fine. I have no problem with that, of course. And, uh, I'm, I'm obviously
00:40:50.440
not arguing that it's, we have a moral obligation to eat meat, but the problem is that here in our
00:40:58.840
country, in the West, generally, most people are either going to be believers in the Judeo-Christian
00:41:04.600
God, or they're going to be basically secular atheist. That's the vast majority. That's almost
00:41:10.420
everybody with, with, with some exceptions. Judeo-Christian people have no foundation to
00:41:16.600
claim that eating meat is objectively immoral, because as you point out, scripture clearly gives
00:41:21.380
man dominion over the animal's authority to use them for meat and labor. God even commands that
00:41:27.100
animals be killed frequently in the, in the Old Testament as sacrifices. Now we don't sacrifice
00:41:32.040
animals anymore, but there's nothing in the Old or New Testament or in the development of Christian
00:41:36.320
thought generally, or as far as I understand it, Jewish thought that would lead us to the conclusion
00:41:40.940
that all meat is suddenly murder, whereas, whereas it wasn't before. Now, obviously Muslims and Jews
00:41:47.500
have dietary restrictions, but that's got nothing to do with the rights of the animal. Far from it.
00:41:52.100
That has to do with the animal not being, you know, being, not being clean. It has to do with the
00:41:55.700
animal being unclean. And then there's the atheist view. And I'm stereotyping here, but I guess that
00:42:01.440
most vegans are probably atheist. Or at least a great number of them are. But here it makes even
00:42:08.300
less sense philosophically, because first of all, there's no basis to say that we are in any way
00:42:13.140
intrinsically superior to other animals. We all evolved out of the same soup. And there hasn't
00:42:20.020
been anything additional added to humans to make them better or superior. You know, there's no immortal
00:42:25.280
soul or anything like that. Now, the fact that we evolved out of the same soup and we're essentially
00:42:30.940
equal, I suppose, is exactly what atheist vegans would point to as a reason not to eat animals,
00:42:35.520
except that the problem is other animals eat animals. And if we're just like them intrinsically,
00:42:42.540
why should we hold ourselves to a higher moral standard? Or maybe why aren't we holding them
00:42:47.480
to a higher moral standard? How can we say that it's arbitrarily wrong for us to do this thing
00:42:53.380
that most other animals do? Now, you could try to argue that we have the capacity to rise above
00:43:00.500
these primitive ways and to do things a better way. But who's to say that this is a better way?
00:43:05.520
Better according to whom? Seems to me that on atheism, we are products of evolution, nothing more.
00:43:15.540
And the highest good, the only purpose really, is to propagate our own species. That's the only thing
00:43:22.360
that other animals are worried about. So why should we be any different?
00:43:26.100
How are we different? We're not different on the atheist view. So I don't see, you know,
00:43:33.600
on the atheistic, Darwinistic view, this idea that we should not eat animals who we have the power to
00:43:43.400
eat and subjugate just as other animals do, it just doesn't make any sense. It seems to be entirely
00:43:52.680
subjective. Which, like I said, if you want to argue that it's not even really an argument. If
00:43:58.120
you're saying subjectively, I don't like it, fine, great. But when you try to go from there to making
00:44:06.080
an objective moral argument, well, now I need to know what is the philosophical foundation,
00:44:12.760
the basis for this objective moral claim. And whether you're going atheism or Judeo-Christian,
00:44:19.100
I don't think there is a basis. This is from Paul, says, as a retired dairy farmer who has
00:44:24.680
artificially inseminated many thousands of dairy cows and stolen too many baby cows from their
00:44:29.000
mothers to count over a long dairying career, I was mortified listening to Joaquin Phoenix's,
00:44:34.360
is that his real name, Oscar speech last night. In my defense, can I tell you that I did what I did
00:44:40.900
in ignorance. I had no idea that my cows were suffering so appallingly. And all this so that I
00:44:45.820
could sip a latte each morning and pour milk all over my cornflakes. Well, actually, so that you
00:44:50.560
could enjoy a latte and pour milk over your cornflakes, Matt. In my defense, can I tell you
00:44:55.780
that I just didn't realize what I was doing to my cows because, you see, every cow I ever stole a
00:45:00.220
calf from was distressed right up until she shoved her nose in the bucket of grain that I offered her
00:45:05.280
as a trade for her loved one. And every calf I ever stole from a cow happily adopted me as its new
00:45:10.700
mother from the first feed I gave it. Also because every cow I ever stole a calf from produced about
00:45:15.480
seven times as much milk per day as her calf was capable of consuming anyway. I thought she
00:45:19.940
wouldn't miss the other 45 liters that her baby couldn't use. Not fully realizing the anguish I
00:45:24.780
was causing, I relentlessly pursued my objectives whilst consoling myself that to the extent that
00:45:29.260
there may have been any anxiety experienced by my cows about their loss of babies, this was balanced
00:45:35.180
by the knowledge that I was allowing you and your friends to enjoy a latte each morning.
00:45:39.200
So, Matt, you are as much to blame for the suffering of my cows as I am. Well, not actually,
00:45:44.380
well, not you actually because I was an Australian dairy farmer and I don't think my cow's milk was
00:45:49.080
finding its way to your breakfast table necessarily, but you know what I mean. Funnily enough, all the
00:45:53.700
cows I milked had four teats. I found this interesting because apart from camels, cows are the only mammals
00:45:58.660
with far more teats than the average number of offspring they produce and far more ability to produce milk
00:46:03.000
than their offspring can use. Because of this fact, I always assumed that God must have created cows to
00:46:07.500
produce milk for more than just their own offspring, so I did not feel too badly about drinking lattes or
00:46:11.720
milkshakes, eating cornflakes, ice creams, cheeses or yogurt. Why putting cream on my peaches was a
00:46:16.340
luxury I was, until last night, still happily enjoying too. I will have to think deeply about
00:46:21.040
Joaquin's concerns and reassess my impact on my environment in the light of his heart-rending
00:46:25.880
speech last night. And when I think that I have only touched on but one of his well-articulated
00:46:31.480
talking points in that speech, well, the mind simply boggles. With renewed determination to make the
00:46:36.520
world a happier, more equitable, cleaner, greener, rainbow-colored, accepting, tolerant, peaceful,
00:46:40.940
victimless, and secure place for cows as well as people, I undertake to never again steal a calf
00:46:45.940
from its mother and to encourage all who cross my path to consider the feelings of all cows before
00:46:51.320
they too decide to steal their calves. That brought a tear to my eye. That was a work of art. Well done.
00:46:59.740
Best email of all time. That was the sarcasm dripping
00:47:06.120
like milk over the cornflakes from every sentence of that email was a thing of beauty. And sir,
00:47:14.620
you have inspired me, Paul. And I thank you for that. And I was, I won't attract from it by rambling
00:47:24.780
myself. So we'll wrap things up here. But before I do, I did want to mention that, you know, January
00:47:29.840
has been a crazy year so far and the election race hasn't even started yet, hate to say. Best way to
00:47:35.760
stay informed on top of all of it as well is, uh, is to become a Daily Wire member with 20% off
00:47:40.140
your membership. This promotion will be going, uh, going away tomorrow. So that's tomorrow. You have
00:47:46.180
it till tomorrow. So you can join now before it's too late. This is 20% off all Daily Wire memberships
00:47:51.920
when using promo code DW2020. Members get our articles ad-free access to all of our live broadcast
00:47:58.440
and show library, the full three hours of the Ben Shapiro show, select bonus content, access to the
00:48:04.520
mailbag, and now Ben Shapiro's election insight op-eds as well. Plus our new all access tier gets you into
00:48:10.300
live online Q&A discussions with me, Ben Shapiro, Andrew Klavan, Michael Knowles. By the way,
00:48:15.940
they've asked me to do a Q&A for Valentine's Day. I have been the one selected. They selected me
00:48:21.560
as the Valentine's Q&A guy. So that should be fun. Uh, but you gotta be, you gotta be a member.
00:48:29.340
Uh, so if you have a question, you can get an answer and download the Daily Wire app, a member
00:48:33.260
exclusive, so you can get push notifications straight to your phone. Again, if you want 20%
00:48:37.340
off your membership, you have to act now before it goes away tomorrow. That's promo code DW2020
00:48:42.080
for 20% off. Trust me, you don't want to miss this and, uh, we will leave it there. Have a great day.
00:48:48.120
If you enjoyed this episode, don't forget to subscribe. And if you want to help spread the
00:48:54.580
word, please give us a five-star review and tell your friends to subscribe as well. We're available
00:48:58.480
on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, wherever you listen to podcasts. Also, be sure to check out the other
00:49:03.640
Daily Wire podcasts, including the Ben Shapiro Show, Michael Knowles Show, and the Andrew Klavan Show.
00:49:09.220
The Matt Wall Show is produced by Sean Hampton, executive producer Jeremy Boring, senior producer
00:49:15.160
Jonathan Hay, supervising producer Mathis Glover, supervising producer Robert Sterling,
00:49:20.360
technical producer Austin Stevens, editor Donovan Fowler, audio mixer Robin Fenderson.
00:49:25.480
The Matt Wall Show is a Daily Wire production, copyright Daily Wire 2020.
00:49:30.000
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who studied economics in college and writes economic policy in Congress,
00:49:36.060
can't name the most prominent economists of the 20th century. MSNBC's Katie Turr doesn't know how
00:49:42.860
senators get elected. And Joe Biden wants to ban guns that don't exist. The problem isn't that our
00:49:47.880
alleged elites are ignorant. It's that they know so much that isn't so. We examine the root of their
00:49:52.980
confusion. Then Biden collapses in the polls, Bloomberg surges, and Snoop Doggy Dog gets the
00:49:58.280
media to expose themselves. Check it out on The Michael Knowles Show.