Ep. 426 - The Absurdity Of The Equal Rights Amendment
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
171.47491
Summary
Democrat women on the House floor argue that the Equal Rights Amendment should be reintroduced. Is it time to pick up where Democrats left off in the Seventies and pick it up again? Or should we just start from scratch?
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Welcome to the show, friends, neighbors, companions, consorts. I apologize for my
00:00:05.180
absence yesterday, not to get too graphic, but I did wake up Thursday morning a sweaty,
00:00:10.620
coughing, feverish mess. Fortunately, today I woke up just a sweaty, coughing mess,
00:00:15.360
but without much of a fever. So I think we can get through this. I'm going to give it a go. I
00:00:20.360
think we'll be okay. If I hack up a lung in the process of the show, don't be alarmed. I do have
00:00:25.120
a backup lung, so I should be fine. I really wanted to do the show today because I need to
00:00:32.040
talk about the Democrats in Congress trying to pass, trying to revive, I should say, the Equal
00:00:37.640
Rights Amendment. And you probably know, one of my favorite pastimes is to debunk the silliness of
00:00:44.680
feminists. And there is nothing sillier than the Equal Rights Amendment. Silly being one hell of
00:00:51.720
an understatement here. Before we talk about this, something that you need to understand,
00:00:56.980
if you don't already, which I'm sure you do, is that feminism has become the most vacuous,
00:01:03.780
useless movement known to humanity. These women, these feminists, are desperate to be oppressed,
00:01:12.920
but sadly for them, they live in the freest and most prosperous nation on earth. Very unfortunate for
00:01:19.300
them. Such is their luck. They want to be oppressed, but they can't be because they're free. And even in
00:01:25.760
the context of, even within the context of this free and prosperous nation, they are arguably among
00:01:32.260
the freest and most prosperous inhabitants inside it. So, but they can't abide this. They just can't.
00:01:38.360
They want to be persecuted. They need to be persecuted. And their greatest persecution really is that they
00:01:43.900
aren't persecuted, but they can't say that. So instead they go out looking for boogeymen to fight,
00:01:49.240
which brings us to the Equal Rights Amendment. There was an attempt in the seventies to get this
00:01:54.620
ratified, but it failed. Now Democrats are trying to pick it up again. And they're trying to do it
00:02:00.480
literally by picking up where they left off in the seventies. They needed one more state to ratify
00:02:05.080
in order to, to, to, to, to, to, to pass it. Now they have that state and they want to just
00:02:13.960
take that and run with it rather than going through the whole process of getting all the
00:02:19.100
states, all 38 that are needed, getting them all again. Now this, obviously it seems to me
00:02:24.760
from a procedure standpoint alone is totally illegitimate. It's been five decades. If you want
00:02:32.160
to do this again, you need to start from scratch. In fact, even Ruth Bader Ginsburg,
00:02:35.700
who is a fan of the amendment has said that if you want to do this, you got to start over. You
00:02:40.020
can't just, you can't just pretend the last five decades didn't happen. So that's the procedural end
00:02:44.980
of it. What about the amendment itself? Well, here's what it says. It says equality of rights under the
00:02:51.340
law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.
00:02:56.120
Simple enough. Sounds harmless, right? On its own, except that at a minimum, just to begin with,
00:03:04.580
it's entirely useless and pointless. It's already illegal to discriminate based on sex.
00:03:09.640
This is already illegal. Not only is it illegal, but there are, there are no examples that anyone
00:03:14.520
can provide of actual legal sex-based discrimination against women. Not only that, but women in America
00:03:22.180
today have it very, very good. Better than almost anybody else. Point being, the system and the laws
00:03:30.740
are working quite well for women. So that this amendment, at a minimum, is redundant and useless.
00:03:39.020
But it's worse than that, of course, because it actually opens the door to a number of far-left
00:03:43.640
agenda items, which is why they want to pass it, and we'll talk about that in a minute.
00:03:46.780
Before we get to that, let's actually listen, lest I be accused of making a straw man out of my
00:03:52.780
opposite, or a straw woman, I suppose, out of my opposition in this case. Let's actually listen
00:03:57.000
to the Democrat women on the House floor explaining why we need this amendment. We're going to listen
00:04:01.800
to what they have to say. But before we do that, a quick word from Ancestry.com. You know, it's one of
00:04:10.100
the ways you can understand yourself and who you are and how you ended up here is to go back
00:04:16.440
and look at your ancestry and learn your family history. And that's what's so fascinating about
00:04:21.520
it, is that as you're learning about your family, you're also learning about yourself. Ancestry DNA
00:04:25.300
can reveal ethnic origins and provide historical details that bring unique family stories to life.
00:04:30.720
Ancestry DNA doesn't just tell you which countries you're from, but also can pinpoint the specific
00:04:36.580
regions within those countries, giving you insightful geographic detail about your history. So this is
00:04:41.600
very, this is, we're not, we're not just talking broad brush strokes. We're talking about very specific
00:04:46.240
information about your, your family history. You can trace the paths of your recent ancestors, learn
00:04:51.580
how and why your family moved from place to place around the world. No other DNA test delivers such a
00:04:57.380
unique and sort of interactive experience. It's easy to start making discoveries with Ancestry. You can grab
00:05:03.400
an Ancestry DNA kit, start a free trial to amplify your discoveries. And, you know, I've done this
00:05:10.660
myself and the first thing I could, at least for me, the one, the one thing that jumped out at me,
00:05:15.980
first of all, is how easy it is to do and how quick it is. I thought this would be a long sort
00:05:21.320
of drawn out process, but you send in the package very easy. They make it very easy on you. You get
00:05:25.380
the results back a lot faster than you think you will. And for me, it's been extremely illuminating to
00:05:30.180
see my own Ancestry sort of unfurled in front of me. You could start exploring your, your family story
00:05:36.800
today. Head to my URL at ancestry.com slash Matt to get your Ancestry DNA kit and start your free
00:05:42.940
trial. That's ancestry.com slash Matt. That's ancestry.com slash Matt. Okay. Now here are the
00:05:51.060
Democrat women in Congress explaining why this equal rights amendment is needed. We'll start with
00:05:55.540
the renowned legal scholar, Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Here's what she has to say.
00:06:02.780
After nearly a century, the equal rights amendment is on the cusp of ratification.
00:06:07.880
At America's founding, women were intentionally left out of the Constitution. As second-class
00:06:13.280
citizens, we lack the right to vote, hold most jobs, or even own property. Today, we still receive
00:06:18.880
less pay for the same work, and we face violence and harassment just for being a woman. But the ERA
00:06:24.220
will prohibit all of that. In the eyes of our most sacred document, we will finally be equal.
00:06:29.120
Women's rights should not depend on congressional whims or who occupies the White House.
00:06:33.900
These basic fundamental rights must be guaranteed. But if we want to hand a more perfect union over
00:06:38.700
to our daughters, and I have two of them, we must seize this moment to end sex discrimination.
00:06:44.040
We owe it to the women who sacrificed before us and all of our daughters and sons who deserve a life
00:06:48.300
of true equality. So I urge my colleagues to vote yes on this resolution to remove the arbitrary
00:06:53.040
an outdated deadline for ratifying the ERA. I yield back. Okay, so what reason does she give us?
00:07:00.140
Women are paid less for the same work. Well, that's not true. Okay, that's a lie. And you're
00:07:06.900
going to hear this lie from every Democrat arguing for this amendment. In spite of the fact that even
00:07:12.820
aside from it being a lie, there's already an Equal Pay Act on the books. In fact, sex-based wage
00:07:19.100
discrimination is illegal from about 10 different directions already. And it's not like those laws
00:07:26.860
have proven somehow ineffective. Women are not paid less for the same work. The 70 cents on a dollar or
00:07:34.620
80 cents on a dollar, whatever figure they're pulling out of a hat, the way that they get that,
00:07:39.780
if it's based on any kind of reality at all, it's based on a broad comparison of all females versus
00:07:45.620
all males in all kinds of jobs. In other words, we're looking at the general average of what all
00:07:52.360
women make and comparing it to the general average of what all men make across the board.
00:07:58.280
This is most assuredly not comparing the same work. So when they say, you know, it's an unequal pay for
00:08:06.180
the same work, that is, again, that is a bald-faced lie. That's all it is. They're just lying to your
00:08:12.060
face about it, making no attempt to conform what they're saying with reality.
00:08:21.640
When you actually compare women and men doing the same work, the same kinds of jobs in the same
00:08:29.100
industries, and then you further control for factors like experience level, skill level,
00:08:37.600
hours worked, that sort of thing, the wage gap all but disappears. The only way to get this wage gap
00:08:45.740
is to make a comparison without taking into account the type of work, the industry, hours worked,
00:08:52.520
experience level, skill level, or anything else. The only way to get the wage gap is to ignore all of
00:08:58.300
the things that might reasonably explain a wage gap without sexism. So you have to throw those out
00:09:03.760
to begin with in totality and then look at the wage gap. In other words, the only way to see a sexist
00:09:10.720
wage gap is to assume going in that the only explanation for a wage gap is sexism and thus
00:09:17.840
discard everything else. And then what do you know? Look, we've just proven sexism. In reality, of course,
00:09:23.600
men, generally speaking, tend to work more hours. They tend to take on more dangerous jobs,
00:09:31.020
which often means higher pay. They tend to gravitate towards higher paying jobs. They tend
00:09:37.740
to prioritize higher pay more than women do, whereas women are going to be more focused on
00:09:47.100
having more time with their family and that sort of thing, which is great, by the way.
00:09:51.280
Men also tend to negotiate for more. Women are more reluctant to negotiate for a higher salary
00:10:01.300
during the hiring process. Now, there's nothing preventing a woman from negotiating for a higher
00:10:07.780
salary. There's nothing preventing a woman from taking on more dangerous jobs. There's nothing
00:10:12.000
preventing a woman from moving to North Dakota to work on an oil rig. A woman could do that. It's just
00:10:18.200
that almost no woman does do that because they don't want to. So all of these feminists saying,
00:10:24.320
oh, you know, we don't get paid the same. Okay, I don't see you going out to do these dangerous
00:10:27.880
jobs that men are doing and getting paid for them. You could do them. You just don't want to,
00:10:32.360
and that's fine. But admit that the reason you're not getting paid like that is because you don't want
00:10:37.620
to do the job. So this wage gap thing is absurd. It has nothing to do with sexism whatsoever.
00:10:44.360
By the way, are there examples of industries where, in general, men make more than women,
00:10:52.820
even within the actual industry itself? Sure, probably. There are also examples of industries
00:10:58.940
where women get paid more than men. The modeling industry, for example. The highest paid female
00:11:06.060
model makes like 40 or 50 times what the highest paid male model makes. A similar situation in the
00:11:12.880
reverse can be found in sports. And we hear about this all the time, that if you compare the highest
00:11:19.180
paid WNBA star to the highest paid NBA star, you're going to find a similar disparity, 40 to 50,
00:11:24.940
if not more, you know. Why are these disparities in place? Well, because female models are simply worth
00:11:31.600
more. They bring in more revenue. The market is more interested in them. Same for male athletes.
00:11:39.020
Okay, it's not sexism. It's the marketplace. Now, what else did Schultz mention as evidence that we
00:11:47.040
need an equal rights amendment? Well, she said women are victims of violence in America. Okay, true.
00:11:52.700
Actually, men are victims of at least some forms of violence more often than women are. Men are more
00:11:57.740
likely to be victims of homicide, for example. But in any case, violence against women is illegal.
00:12:04.400
It's already illegal to commit violence against a woman. We don't need an equal rights amendment to
00:12:10.680
prohibit violence against women because it's already prohibited. Yes, it still happens because
00:12:17.640
people break the law, but an amendment to the Constitution is not going to stop people
00:12:21.920
proactively from breaking the law. Okay, next we're going to go to Ayanna Pressley, whose arguments
00:12:28.940
for the equal rights amendment are about as crazy as you might expect. But first, a word from Ring.
00:12:36.020
You know, Ring is, it's so convenient and it gives you such peace of mind and security and protection
00:12:43.280
in the home that it's hard for me to imagine going back to a time when you didn't have it. I mean,
00:12:47.000
imagine going back to this barbaric primitive time when there's someone at your door and you actually
00:12:52.760
have to answer it physically in person. Okay? Imagine that. You have to get up, walk, or if
00:12:59.680
you're not at the house and someone knocks on your door, then that's just it. You'll never know. You'll
00:13:04.160
never know they were there. Well, that's not the case with Ring. Ring's mission is to make
00:13:08.800
neighborhoods safer. You might already know about their smart video doorbells and cameras that protect
00:13:13.240
millions of people everywhere. Ring helps you stay connected to your home anywhere in the world.
00:13:17.240
So if there's a package delivery or surprise visitor, you'll get an alert. You'll be able to hear,
00:13:21.360
speak to them all from your phone, from wherever you are in the world. You could be, you know,
00:13:27.620
8,000 miles away and you'll know there's somebody at your door and you can actually talk to them.
00:13:32.920
And, uh, and that's been, that's been my experience with Ring. It's, it's, you know,
00:13:36.780
one of the great things about it is, is just the simple convenience of it, of being able to
00:13:42.780
communicate with anybody who comes up to your house. Uh, even if you're not able to get to the
00:13:47.780
door, even if you're at home, but you can't get to the door, but there are the
00:13:51.180
plenty of times when there's someone at the door, I'm dealing with the kids. I can't get there. I've
00:13:54.540
got my phone. I can talk to them. That's great. But also again, it's a peace of mind, the security
00:13:58.480
of just knowing that you've got your eyes on what's going on around your house. As a subscriber,
00:14:03.420
you have a special offer on a Ring welcome kit available right now at ring.com slash Walsh.
00:14:08.120
The kit includes a video doorbell and chime pro, which is just what you need to start building a
00:14:12.460
ring of security around your home today. Go to ring.com slash Walsh. That's ring.com slash Walsh. Okay.
00:14:19.560
Okay. Here's a, here's what Ayanna Pressley has to say about the equal rights amendment. Listen,
00:14:26.020
the year is now 2020 and here we women are still in so many ways, not fully free, still shackled
00:14:33.920
today. I rise to affirm the humanity and the dignity of all women. I rise in strong, unapologetic,
00:14:41.740
righteous support of HJ res 79, which will strike the arbitrary deadline for ratification of the equal
00:14:49.040
rights amendment, an amendment that should already be the law of the land. Women are strong,
00:14:55.500
hardworking, bright, and resilient. We are the backbones of our families, our common communities
00:15:02.500
and our democracy. We do not live in checked boxes. We live in an intersectionality of lived
00:15:08.920
experiences and identities. Our issues are everyone's issues because our destinies are all tied.
00:15:16.260
Tomorrow's vote on HJ res 79 is a vote for the preservation of our collective humanity.
00:15:23.720
Despite our commitment to hard work, both within our households and on the job,
00:15:27.940
we're still paid less than our male counterparts. In addition to pay discrimination, we face pregnancy
00:15:33.860
discrimination, discrimination in the criminal legal system, sexual and domestic violence,
00:15:39.020
and inadequate healthcare access. But this isn't an accident. The American constitution is sexist
00:15:46.480
by its very design. First of all, can we just, uh, uh, can we back up? Did you catch where she said
00:15:53.660
we live in an intersectionality of lived experiences and identities? Did you catch that? We live in
00:16:01.720
an intersectionality of lived experiences and identities. Do you know what that sentence means?
00:16:08.160
Nothing. Doesn't mean anything. It has no meaning. It is a sentence without content.
00:16:13.480
These are just words thrown together as a signal. These are just a signal to other far leftists that
00:16:19.540
she's a compatriot of theirs. The phrase intersectionality of lived experiences and identities
00:16:24.100
means nothing other than, I am an enlightened leftist. Please listen to me and take me seriously.
00:16:30.540
Now, really it becomes, it's, that's what it's a signal to other far leftists, but to everybody
00:16:36.660
else, to normal people, to rational people, it becomes a signal of, I am a vapid, empty-headed,
00:16:44.360
um, person just spouting meaningless words to sound intelligent. Please don't take me seriously.
00:16:51.140
That's, that's how everybody else interprets it. But, uh, I mean, the moment you say intersectionality
00:16:56.500
of lived experiences, I'm just, I'm done. I'm not, like, I can't, I couldn't take you seriously at
00:17:00.940
that point. There's no way I could. Is there any such thing as an unlived experience? What's the
00:17:08.840
point of saying lived? What's the point of attaching lived to experience? Considering that by definition,
00:17:14.360
all experiences must be lived. If you had an experience, it means you lived it by definition.
00:17:19.940
Saying lived experience is like saying vehicular automobile. You're just, you're attaching words
00:17:27.600
to other words to sound smart, because you think that if you, if you make, if you use more words
00:17:32.420
than you need to, it's, it's, it's a sign of intelligence. It's actually quite the opposite.
00:17:36.980
In any case, what reasons does she give for the amendment, other than the fact that we live in
00:17:45.660
an intersectionality of lived experiences and identities? Well, she says the equal pay thing,
00:17:49.620
which we've covered. And then she says the constitution is sexist by design. This is false.
00:17:54.660
Again, women have all the same rights that men do, and even some additional rights that we don't have,
00:17:59.600
such as the right to kill their children. If the constitution was sexist, that wouldn't be the case.
00:18:04.460
She also has, she also says that women are discriminated against in the legal system.
00:18:09.080
This is also false. In fact, women receive lighter sentences for the same crimes and are more likely
00:18:14.580
to receive no jail time at all for crimes that send male men to jail. And that is after controlling
00:18:21.500
for things like criminal history. Aside from that, she has a bunch of sort of general platitudes about
00:18:27.480
the horrors of being women in modern America. And I'll respond to those in a minute. But first,
00:18:32.280
let's add Rashida Tlaib into the mix. Thank you so much. I rise very proudly the first Muslim woman
00:18:39.520
ever elected in Congress in support of House Joint Resolution 79. I swear it's what's even more
00:18:46.900
interesting is what I've been hearing about is this obsession to control and oppress women in the
00:18:53.240
United States of America. And I cannot believe it's 2020. We're still debating the merits of equal
00:18:58.380
rights amendment. It's beyond time. I want you all to know this is about women of color, women with
00:19:04.660
disabilities, transgender women, immigrant women, all disproportionate. These women are affected by
00:19:09.720
issues like unequal pay, sexual violence, lack of access for health care and poverty. So much of what
00:19:16.700
we're doing here in trying to promote women's equality is about gender, racial and economic justice.
00:19:21.720
So I would ask you all know this, a no vote today is condoning oppression of women in the United
00:19:27.740
States of America. And I urge support and yield the balance of my time. Okay, so again, the unequal pay
00:19:34.900
thing. That's really all they have. And they don't even have that. She talks about violence against
00:19:40.500
women, which once again, is already illegal. We don't need an amendment for that. Did you know there's
00:19:46.140
also no specific amendment that makes it illegal to attack men? There isn't a specific anti-violence
00:19:55.100
against men amendment. Because that's already covered under the basic concept of human rights.
00:20:03.820
And every state in the country has laws against assault and murder. And there are federal laws
00:20:10.260
against it too. And everybody is covered by that, unless you're an unborn child. In which case,
00:20:16.720
women specifically have the unique power to kill you without any legal repercussions whatsoever.
00:20:23.020
And then she goes on, Rashida Tlaib as well, goes on about this oppression of women saying people are
00:20:28.280
obsessed with oppressing women. Who? Give me an example. Give me a real life, actual example in the
00:20:37.320
United States of oppression against women. Now, you could, of legal, legal oppression against women.
00:20:44.160
Now, you could give me many examples, which Rashida Tlaib seems reluctant to do. But you could give me
00:20:50.320
many, many examples in Muslim countries of legal oppression of women. That's a real problem.
00:20:55.380
But feminists aren't too focused on that. Instead, they want to find it in the United States. They can't
00:21:00.000
find it. Here's the reality. Now that we've heard the feverish fantasies of these ridiculous feminists,
00:21:05.560
the reality is this. Legally, women have, as I said, all of the rights that men have. You cannot
00:21:13.740
give me an example of a right that men have that women don't. I can, on the other hand, and have
00:21:19.940
already given examples in the opposite direction. One that I've already given, a big one, men have no
00:21:27.620
rights at all. They have no parental rights when their children are in the womb. That's a pretty big
00:21:33.360
example. Nothing like that exists on the other end of the spectrum. Discrimination. Well, I already
00:21:42.700
told you that statistics show that in the legal system, women get lighter sentences than men.
00:21:47.280
Can you show me legal discrimination going in the other direction? And this is to say nothing of the
00:21:51.460
family courts, where women are far more likely to be awarded custody in divorce battles than are men.
00:22:00.280
Now, you could argue that there's a reason for that. You could say that it's not about anti-male
00:22:07.060
bias. I mean, you can't deny that women are far more likely to be awarded custody. That's just
00:22:10.460
true. That's the truth. That's the statistical reality. But you could say, oh, it's not about
00:22:15.480
any kind of broad bias against males. It's just that you could argue men are less likely to fight for
00:22:23.260
custody. You could argue that if a child is going to be predominantly raised by one parent or another,
00:22:30.940
it's better, generally speaking, that it be the mother. You could argue these things. But if you
00:22:38.300
do, you'd be admitting, number one, that men and women are different and must therefore be treated
00:22:42.620
differently, even sometimes in a systemic sort of way, a legal way, and that it's possible to do that
00:22:49.980
in a way that is not bigoted. And then you would also be admitting that there could be non-bigoted
00:22:58.320
reasons for gender disparities. But if you admit that, then you have to go back to any gender
00:23:04.260
disparities where women are on the losing end, potentially, and ask yourself if this applies
00:23:09.420
to that as well. So if you're going to, and I have heard this justification from feminists
00:23:15.280
for this family court thing, where they say, for example, well, men are less likely to fight for
00:23:20.760
custody. I don't even know if that's true. But if it is, okay, let's go back to the wage gap.
00:23:26.540
Women are less likely to fight for a higher wage in the hiring process.
00:23:33.160
So if the one is not anti-male bias, then this is not anti-female bias.
00:23:39.420
And in terms of just the general condition of women versus men, here's what else I know.
00:23:45.540
Women, females, are more likely to graduate, more likely to go to college, less likely to get
00:23:52.220
suspended or expelled in school, less likely to be put on drugs for supposed mental disorders like ADHD
00:23:59.120
in their schooling years. Men make up the majority of murder victims, the majority of workplace injuries,
00:24:07.000
the majority of homeless people, the majority of drug addicts, and the majority of suicides.
00:24:14.300
So I'm not saying that women don't have their own challenges in society.
00:24:23.340
And given everything I've just laid out, it's going to be very difficult to actually prove
00:24:30.280
Have it so bad, in fact, that we need a whole new amendment to the Constitution
00:24:39.060
Now, I have given you real, actual, statistical, evidence-based examples
00:24:53.260
If you have similar examples for women, then present them.
00:25:11.720
Now, so what is the Equal Rights Amendment actually going to do?
00:25:17.880
Well, at best, it's just redundant and useless.
00:25:20.820
So at best, you've added an amendment to the Constitution that's redundant and useless.
00:25:24.060
But one thing we know about redundant and useless laws is that they end up getting exploited.
00:25:34.420
Because usually there's a reason why the people who are fighting for the redundant and useless law want it.
00:25:43.740
They intend to do something with it that they haven't been able to do with the current laws that are on the books.
00:25:49.160
So the law looks on the surface to be redundant, but actually it's not.
00:25:54.260
Because they're going to use it as a vehicle for something.
00:25:56.900
What are leftists going to use this as a vehicle for?
00:26:04.060
First of all, this could be used as a justification, a legal basis,
00:26:10.160
for ending all sex segregation in every aspect of life.
00:26:21.720
Now, we know this is something the left has been trying to do with respect to, you know,
00:26:30.460
That would be men who are claiming to be women.
00:26:36.540
and now men don't even have to go through the trouble of claiming to be women
00:26:41.280
Why would feminists want to do that, thereby putting women, you know, in danger?
00:26:55.940
Of course, we know right away that women are going to be eligible for the draft
00:27:07.240
But I think the primary thing they're looking to do with this amendment
00:27:12.140
is to ensure government funding for abortion across the country.
00:27:18.360
Because what they're going to do is they're going to claim that, you know,
00:27:21.320
we have government funding for other medical things,
00:27:25.900
and not allowing it for abortion is now sex discrimination,
00:27:33.540
and it's a legitimate, they say, medical procedure.
00:27:39.180
you're violating this amendment if you don't give government funding for abortion.
00:27:44.720
So I would say that ending sex segregation in bathrooms and sports,
00:27:48.960
putting women in the draft, that's probably more of a side effect.
00:27:53.320
I think there are some feminists who really want to do that.
00:27:56.880
Again, I can't imagine why, because it's going to be very harmful to women.
00:28:00.240
But we know that this is the irony of left-wing feminists,
00:28:07.300
is that they're constantly arguing for policies that are harmful to women.
00:28:17.960
So this would really be the government funding of abortion amendment.
00:28:29.760
Yeah, before emails, because this is a subject that's very important to me,
00:28:44.540
I don't know if you saw this video that was online yesterday.
00:28:46.620
It's a confrontation between two passengers on a flight.
00:28:50.020
The one passenger, the woman, is reclining her seat into a guy's lap.
00:28:55.540
So he's punching the seat to register his protest.
00:29:21.440
Now, you could argue that they're both being jerks.
00:29:27.240
Some people have asked, why didn't the guy simply ask her to put the seat back up
00:29:39.760
We're doing this thing again where we see an out-of-context clip on the internet
00:29:43.360
of an altercation between two people, and it's 10 or 15 seconds long.
00:29:48.600
And we assume there's no other context whatsoever,
00:29:56.520
whether that context will ultimately absolve one person or another.
00:30:01.320
But there's always going to be a context for what you see.
00:30:03.700
It's not like it just happened randomly out of nowhere.
00:30:06.520
So I agree that he should have asked her to put her seat up.
00:30:10.760
If he didn't ask and instead just started punching it at her seat,
00:30:22.300
which is a situation that many of us have been in in the past,
00:30:42.180
he's a pioneer for the equal rights of tall people on planes.
00:30:49.280
Yes, the seats on most planes have a recline function.
00:30:52.740
But most planes also come with no spare legroom,
00:30:57.920
And by taller people, I don't mean seven feet tall.
00:31:03.640
If you recline your seat and there is someone behind you,
00:31:07.660
you are, especially if they're over, let's say, 5'8",
00:31:10.720
you are completely taking away all of their spare legroom.
00:31:15.580
And now their legs are going to be pushed up against your seat.
00:31:19.880
And if they need to, like, do some work on a laptop or something,
00:31:26.680
Because they can't even open up their laptop enough
00:31:36.360
in order to increase your personal comfort by a minimal amount,
00:31:51.100
with your knees jammed up against somebody's seat
00:31:53.000
and tell me that it's not a significant discomfort.
00:31:56.520
So you are increasing your own comfort minimally
00:31:59.640
by removing significantly the comfort of somebody else.
00:32:49.660
Just like if you're sitting on the aisle or window seat
00:34:30.020
everyone who reclines their seats on airplanes,
00:36:00.840
And so you're going through this whole process,
00:36:06.740
serving auto part customers online for 20 years.
00:36:19.640
whether it's the car you drive around every day
00:36:40.300
You're going to find the cheapest options you can
00:36:53.320
See all the parts available for your car or truck.
00:37:13.940
My dad is legit eating peanut butter with mayonnaise.
00:37:29.180
Maybe your dad is engaged in some sort of performance art.
00:37:35.500
So the first thing I would do is I would ask him.
00:38:06.640
I need you to go home and eat peanut butter with mayonnaise.
00:38:11.700
if what you discover is that he's eating peanut butter with mayonnaise
00:38:15.720
well, now it's time to put dad in a home, I think.
00:38:42.260
you would need to get medical professionals involved.
00:38:52.920
my sister has always struggled with her mental health.
00:38:57.240
but us siblings have always managed to stay close throughout adulthood.
00:39:02.440
my sister's declining mental health is getting harder and harder to tolerate.
00:39:06.020
I have a family and I'm happy and I feel more and more
00:39:08.280
that I shouldn't keep justifying the drama she brings into my life.
00:39:14.060
She's actively trying to ruin siblings' marriages.
00:39:18.080
She spreads rumors about infidelity within the family.
00:39:21.820
and she spreads rumors that I'm being forced into it by my husband.
00:39:27.420
She can't go five minutes without telling an obvious lie.
00:39:34.900
telling people she's a psychiatrist when she's never been to school.
00:39:37.940
She's been spiraling and her marriage is ending
00:39:39.900
and she has alienated almost everyone in her life.
00:39:44.040
and I feel immense guilt at the thought of abandoning her,
00:39:52.880
Well, Amanda, I can only go based on what you've told me
00:40:00.700
But I can't imagine what the other side of this would be.
00:40:04.140
But if what you're telling me is totally accurate
00:40:12.560
things get emotional and people can find it difficult
00:40:33.240
but in terms of knowing what the right thing to do is,
00:41:16.100
that's a one-strike-and-you're-out kind of deal.