The Matt Walsh Show - April 16, 2020


Ep. 467 - Saving Adults While Killing Children


Episode Stats

Length

38 minutes

Words per Minute

172.17776

Word Count

6,599

Sentence Count

290

Misogynist Sentences

1

Hate Speech Sentences

8


Summary

Today on the Matt W. show, we are told that the shutdowns are worth it because they're allegedly saving lives. In fact, we've been told that even if the shutdown saves just one life, that's enough to justify the destruction of the economy. Well, on that note, I've been thinking about it and it occurs to me that there's one type of business that we could shut down permanently and save a million lives a year just by shutting down this one type business.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Today on the Matt Wall Show, we are told that the shutdowns are worth it because they're
00:00:04.360 allegedly saving lives. In fact, we've been told that even if the shutdowns save just one life,
00:00:09.640 that would be enough to justify the destruction of the economy. Well, on that note, I've been
00:00:13.320 thinking about it, and it occurs to me that there's one type of business, just one type
00:00:17.480 of business that we could shut down permanently and save a million lives a year just by shutting
00:00:22.360 down this one type of business. So if you are in favor of shutdowns to save lives, then you should
00:00:27.460 agree with me on this point. We'll talk about that. Also, five headlines, including the governor
00:00:31.180 of New Jersey admitting that he, quote, didn't think about the Bill of Rights when he was crafting
00:00:36.600 his stay-at-home order, which is, of course, not a surprise. We already knew that. But to hear him
00:00:41.160 say it out loud is maybe a little bit surprising. And in our daily cancellation, we will examine the
00:00:46.220 idea that only white people can be racist. This is what kids are taught in school these days,
00:00:50.560 especially in college. But events in China would seem to very much contradict that claim. So we'll
00:00:55.680 talk about that also. But first, a word from our friends over at ZipRecruiter. And I want to begin
00:01:01.420 just by giving a thank you to ZipRecruiter and all of the sponsors of this show. It's a very
00:01:06.460 difficult time for all companies, for everybody in general. And so that's why I want to especially
00:01:12.860 thank the sponsors of this show and of all of our advertising partners at The Daily Wire who are
00:01:18.440 helping to keep us going through this time. Now, ZipRecruiter is one of our longest standing
00:01:22.540 advertiser partners, and we're really proud to work with them. The service they provide is
00:01:27.980 indispensable, especially in a time like this. Today, they wanted to do something a little bit
00:01:31.460 different than the type of ads you're used to hearing. So here's a message from our sponsor
00:01:35.840 at ZipRecruiter to you. It says, right now, we cannot be overwhelmed. We have to work to keep our
00:01:42.140 loved ones safe and protect our communities. We have to work to stay strong, to stay connected,
00:01:46.680 to stay focused. We have to work to inspire, to innovate, to build new solutions. But for all this to
00:01:52.200 work, we have to work together. At ZipRecruiter, we connect employers and people every day.
00:01:58.060 But today is different. We are partnering with first responders, government officials,
00:02:01.680 the medical community, the innovators in the manufacturing, transportation, and food distribution
00:02:05.940 industries to make sure that we are finding the right people for the right jobs right now.
00:02:11.540 Let's work together. ZipRecruiter.com slash work together is where you want to go.
00:02:17.400 Okay. A common retort to conservatives who advocate for opening up the economy is that we are betraying
00:02:26.740 our pro-life principles. I'm sure you've heard this. This charge is, and it's clearly absurd for a
00:02:32.660 number of reasons. First of all, one of our primary arguments is that shutting down society is probably
00:02:39.380 not the most effective way of saving lives. Many people are still dying of the virus even during the
00:02:46.400 shutdown. Many will likely die once the shutdown is lifted. And even the most ardent supporter of
00:02:52.600 shutdowns must agree that we have to lift the shutdowns eventually. I mean, eventually we have
00:02:57.420 to go back to our lives. And the virus is still going to be there when we go back to our lives.
00:03:02.740 So we may not even be saving any lives at all when all is said and done. And on top of that toll,
00:03:08.140 we now have to add to it the lives that are destroyed, ruined, ended, in some cases,
00:03:13.560 by the collapse of the economy. All told, it is reasonable to worry that the cost in human death
00:03:20.480 and suffering will be greater because of the shutdown than it would have been had we not
00:03:26.680 shut down and had we adopted preventive measures while still allowing the economy to continue.
00:03:31.500 Now, you may disagree with that argument, okay? But it's obviously not an argument that denies the
00:03:37.580 value of human life. That's not what the argument is doing. The argument is saying that human life is
00:03:42.660 extraordinarily valuable, infinitely valuable, but our method right now of protecting human life is
00:03:48.340 not a good method. Here's a better one. That's the argument, okay? Also, nobody who criticizes the
00:03:55.620 strategy of willfully plunging the nation into a Great Depression is suggesting that the elderly and
00:04:01.960 others who are most vulnerable to the virus should be directly killed, okay? None of us are saying that.
00:04:08.220 This is not like a eugenics argument. We're merely suggesting that there are other and better ways of
00:04:15.640 protecting those populations and that the enormous cost of our current method is far too high and the payoff
00:04:22.900 is far too uncertain. Now, by contrast, advocates of abortion support the direct and purposeful killing of
00:04:33.220 vulnerable people at the earliest stages of life. That is a very different sort of position to take.
00:04:40.940 Even if, okay, even if the anti-shutdown people were to argue that the elderly aren't worth protecting
00:04:48.380 and we shouldn't bother protecting them, which that is most emphatically not what we're arguing,
00:04:54.060 but what I'm saying is even if we took that stance, that stance would look positively Gandhian
00:05:01.320 in comparison to those who openly celebrate and advocate the medical execution of infants.
00:05:07.740 Which brings us to an important point. The flip side of the erroneous, you know, you anti-shutdown
00:05:14.580 people are contradicting your pro-life views accusation is that a great many of the pro-shutdown
00:05:20.320 people actually are contradicting their pro-abortion views. As I've explained, it is possible for a
00:05:28.720 reasonable person to affirm the inherent value of human life while also arguing that the shutdowns
00:05:34.440 are unwise. That is possible to do. It's very reasonable. Indeed, a reasonable person can argue
00:05:38.980 that, you know, it's the inherent value of human life is the reason why we should not have the
00:05:47.860 shutdowns. So it's not just that, you know, in spite of that, but it's because of that that we shouldn't
00:05:52.640 have the shutdowns. That's a reasonable argument. You don't have, again, you don't have to agree,
00:05:57.000 but it's a reasonable argument. But there's the other side of that. And what I can't see,
00:06:05.860 on the other hand, is how a person can argue that it is just and proper to intentionally kill a million
00:06:13.020 human lives every single year for the sake of preserving the lifestyle of the parents, and then
00:06:17.980 also argue that we must destroy the lifestyles and livelihoods of millions of people in order to
00:06:23.580 preserve human life. So there seems to be a logical disconnect there. The latter argument can
00:06:30.540 only potentially make sense if human life has inherent value, while the former argument can
00:06:36.480 only potentially make sense if human life has subjective and conditional value that is not
00:06:40.540 inherent value. So which is it? The pro-shutdown camp declares that every life has value.
00:06:49.320 Every life is worth saving. I agree with them. But the odd thing is that so many of them don't
00:06:57.520 really agree with them. They don't appear to have a coherent perspective on human life and its value.
00:07:03.880 And that's one of the reasons why this debate has been so fruitless and doesn't go anywhere.
00:07:09.260 Because we don't have an agreement on the inherent value of human life. And there are people who are
00:07:15.760 making claims as if they believe that human life has inherent value, when in fact they don't believe
00:07:20.800 that. And that's how we end up in this morbidly ironic situation where a society that kills a
00:07:28.540 million babies a year for convenience has shut itself down to prevent the elderly from dying.
00:07:34.200 If there's any principle here that can be found, it would seem that the principle is that adult life
00:07:43.940 is more valuable and more worthy of protection than the lives of children. Which of course is
00:07:49.600 incoherent, not to mention backwards and evil. All life has value. But a healthy society, I would say,
00:08:00.420 should be far more willing to accept the death of adults than the death of children.
00:08:06.860 Which isn't to say that we shouldn't do anything to protect adults. I'm not saying that.
00:08:10.640 But adults must die eventually, after all. Children should not.
00:08:16.660 Least of all, should they die by our own hands, which is what's happening.
00:08:21.140 A properly ordered and healthy society would see the death of an adult as a tragedy, which it is.
00:08:27.700 But the death of a child, it would see as something so unspeakable that the word tragedy doesn't even
00:08:34.100 cover it. We seem to have flipped those things around. Flipped it on its head.
00:08:41.700 And that doesn't make sense to me. But look, perhaps I'm being too cynical. I have to leave
00:08:48.740 open the possibility that all the pro-abortion people who are now applauding the ruination of our economy,
00:08:54.620 because even a sacrifice as extraordinary as that is worth it to save just one life, supposedly,
00:09:01.060 they say. Maybe all these people have experienced a dramatic change of heart.
00:09:06.720 Maybe this is not hypocrisy or inconsistency, but it's a sign that a new leaf has been turned in our
00:09:12.140 culture. Maybe these people have discovered within themselves for the first time a real passion for
00:09:17.300 defending the worth and dignity of human life. In that case, you know, I welcome them to the pro-life
00:09:23.920 team. Welcome aboard. Glad to have you. And I would just like to suggest that if we're pursuing a policy
00:09:30.620 of shutdowns to save lives, we only really need to close one type of business. It's the one type of
00:09:39.140 business that kills a million babies a year in this country. Now, we can argue about the other
00:09:43.860 shutdowns. We can argue about the wisdom of the other shutdowns and whether or not we should be
00:09:47.640 shutting down other businesses like restaurants and retail shops and so on. But anybody who really
00:09:53.000 wants to protect human life should agree that this is the best place to start. This at least is one type
00:09:58.340 of business, abortion clinics, that we should certainly shut down. And there is no doubt that we could save
00:10:05.380 many, many lives just by doing that. So I'm glad we could come to this understanding. Now let's move on
00:10:13.540 to headlines. Number one, and thousands of people in Michigan, the Michigan, Michigan, there's, what is
00:10:21.980 it? Michiganites? Michiganies? But anyway, thousands of them showed up at the state capitol yesterday to
00:10:29.460 protest the onerous, tyrannical orders coming from the emperor of Michigan, Emperor Whitmer. And first
00:10:38.080 of all, these patriots deserve to be applauded for standing up. And I hope this is the start of a trend.
00:10:42.560 It's just very beautiful. It's a beautiful thing to see. Meanwhile, the emperor herself appeared on NBC
00:10:46.880 to justify her policies. And she explained, I'm not making this up. I'll play you the clip. She explained
00:10:52.900 that it's snowing in Michigan anyway. And so you don't really need your liberties because it's snowing.
00:10:58.040 Watch this. We just had snow. I've got snow on the ground here in Michigan right now in Lansing.
00:11:02.000 We're expecting up to 30 inches in the Upper Peninsula. The fact that we're cracking down on
00:11:07.380 people traveling between homes or planting or landscaping or golfing really for a couple more
00:11:14.480 weeks isn't going to meaningfully impact people's ability to do it because the snow will do that in
00:11:19.300 and of itself. We're cracking down on people planting. That's actually what she said. Think about that.
00:11:25.700 Cracking down on people planting. But that's okay because it's snowing, so you can't do this stuff
00:11:32.720 anyway, which of course raises a question. Well, it raises many questions, one of which is this.
00:11:37.220 If you're saying that nobody can do these things anyway, then why are you banning them?
00:11:43.840 What's the point of saying, you know, you're forbidden from doing this, but you can't do this
00:11:49.320 anyway, so you shouldn't worry about the fact that you're forbidden from doing it. Well,
00:11:52.240 then why are you bothering to forbid them from doing it? Of course, in reality, you still can do
00:11:59.640 all of those things. For example, you could still plant, even in Michigan, you could still buy seeds
00:12:04.520 and plant them. You just, you do it indoors. We have plants growing inside our house right now.
00:12:09.140 Many people do, even though I don't live in Michigan. But so that it's, it's not true,
00:12:15.340 first of all. But even if it, even if it was, the excuse makes no sense.
00:12:22.120 Number two, the new unemployment numbers have been released. Five million Americans applied for
00:12:26.660 unemployment last week. That makes the total number of unemployed since this, since this all began
00:12:32.080 about 22 million or 15% of the labor force. We have officially lost 15% of the labor force in a
00:12:42.340 month, which it goes without saying is unprecedented. It has never happened before.
00:12:47.300 So we are on entirely, we are in uncharted waters at the moment. But really these numbers,
00:12:54.400 we have to, we have to remember, I have to keep reminding people when we talk about this,
00:12:58.360 that these numbers are almost meaningless. Almost meaningless, not because they don't matter,
00:13:04.440 but because the actual numbers are much, much higher than this. Okay. All this tells us is the
00:13:11.120 number of people who successfully applied for unemployment. It does not include the many
00:13:15.380 millions of people who tried to apply and couldn't get through because the systems were down. And
00:13:20.480 also all the people who don't qualify for unemployment in the first place, even though
00:13:24.060 they're with, they are without a job right now. So we talk about 22 million. That is, I mean,
00:13:30.220 not even the tip of the iceberg. That is just, that's a, that's a minimal starting point.
00:13:35.540 Um, but we have to remember that it's much higher than that. And this is also, it's important to note
00:13:42.940 because I've seen some people this morning, um, all but celebrating because, well, 5 million people
00:13:51.360 filed for unemployment, but that's down from 6 million the week before. So it's only 5 million,
00:13:57.480 only 5 million people, which even if it was just the 5 million, um, there's, there's nothing to
00:14:04.280 celebrate there. That's not an improvement. That is 5 million additional people who don't have jobs
00:14:09.040 now. But in fact, it's a lot more than 5 million. That's the point. Number three, Joe Biden was on
00:14:13.980 morning Joe, uh, today and, and offered a very touching story. Well, I think it was a touching
00:14:18.980 story. I couldn't really tell, but maybe let's see if you can make heads or tails of this.
00:14:23.720 I sat with a guy yesterday on, on a telephone and he's telling me, he said, I don't know. He said,
00:14:29.360 look, I, I, I, I, I, I worked at the hospital and he said, then I, I got, I got myself in a position
00:14:35.220 where I got the virus. So they quarantined me and, and they put me in the hospital and I made it out.
00:14:40.360 And so I'm out, but they don't want me with my family. I'm on the third floor. I spent 15 minutes
00:14:45.980 on the phone with them saying, he said, I have a three-year-old and a four-year-old and they come
00:14:49.780 to the door outside and they just knock on the door and say, daddy, daddy, can I see you? Daddy? Can I see
00:14:55.300 you daddy? So we spent time going through it. I used to do with my kids when they were little
00:14:59.640 and I couldn't see them. And we'd play games. I said, knock, make up a game, knock, knock on the
00:15:05.040 door and say, this is, you know, practical things. The guy's scared to death and he's, he's worried
00:15:11.700 about his children. He's worried about his wife. I mean, these are practical things. And the president
00:15:16.280 talks about this, like, okay, it's going to be okay. We're going to open tomorrow. We're going to do
00:15:21.840 this. I mean, it just, I must tell you, it drives me crazy. I don't know what he doesn't understand
00:15:29.000 about people's fears. So I'm not sure. I don't know exactly what's going on there. It seems like
00:15:33.500 he was starting to say that he, what was he, he was in quarantine or something once when he was with,
00:15:39.980 when he was a parent of young children or I don't know exactly. I was kind of distracted because I
00:15:45.400 was more paying attention to his wife sitting next to him. And you could see the expression on her face
00:15:50.640 where she was, she was sort of thinking like, where is this going, Joe? Where is this going?
00:15:57.080 It's actually a look I'm very familiar with because my, I get that from my wife sometimes,
00:16:01.440 but I start saying something publicly and she kind of has this look like, okay, where is this headed?
00:16:09.080 Um, all right, let's, uh, let's stay on the theme of bizarre cable news interviews because these are,
00:16:14.200 these are fun. Here's the emperor of New Jersey, Emperor Murphy on Tucker Carlson last night. He made
00:16:20.000 a rather stunning admission. Watch. You made that decision. And as I noted before, 15 congregants
00:16:26.700 at a synagogue in New Jersey were arrested and charged for being in a synagogue together. Now,
00:16:33.260 the bill of rights, as you well know, protects Americans, right? And shrines their right to
00:16:39.640 practice their religion as they see fit and to congregate together to assemble peacefully.
00:16:44.800 By what authority did you nullify the bill of rights in issuing this order? How do you have
00:16:51.300 the power to do that? That's above my peg rate, Tucker. So I wasn't, uh, I wasn't thinking of the
00:16:56.940 bill of rights when we did this. We went to all, first of all, we looked at the data and the science
00:17:01.840 and it says, I wasn't thinking about the bill of rights. When I did this, that is, uh,
00:17:11.980 so that that's, that's some honesty right there. I appreciate the honesty. And of course I, we already
00:17:16.520 knew that it's, it's very clear that they're not thinking about the bill of rights when they come up
00:17:19.620 with these shutdowns. The fact that he, that he feels so, um, safe in, in saying that he has no
00:17:28.420 problem coming out and saying, I wasn't thinking about the bill of rights, bill of rights, schmill of
00:17:31.820 rights. That should concern us though. But it tells you exactly where, I mean, for all the people who
00:17:40.520 are still denying that our, our basic civil liberties are being infringed upon, uh, you know,
00:17:46.680 maybe just open your eyes and also your ears. Listen to what these people are saying.
00:17:51.880 They will tell you they are all, but telling us, yes, we are infringing on your civil liberties.
00:17:57.440 We are doing it. They're basically announcing it as they do it. And yet you still have morons out
00:18:03.500 there saying, what are you talking about? Our liberties aren't being infringed upon. He just
00:18:07.980 said, yeah, I didn't think about the bill of rights. So it's not relevant to what I'm doing.
00:18:13.780 Just like we've had cops saying, uh, you know, first amendment is non-essential.
00:18:18.460 Your rights are suspended. Five. Finally, Dr. Fauci did an interview on Snapchat's good luck
00:18:27.240 America, which is evidently a thing, uh, reading now from the New York post. It says toward the end
00:18:33.120 of the taped segment, Fauci was asked if you're swiping on a dating app like Tinder or Bumble or
00:18:37.780 Grindr, and you match with someone that you think is hot and you're just kind of like, maybe it's
00:18:43.460 fine. If this one stranger comes over, what do you say to that person? Okay. So we're asking,
00:18:48.160 um, Dr. Fauci for, uh, dating advice now, which why not? We, we, we already, we get economic
00:18:54.060 advice from him. We get all kinds of advice. Dr. Fauci is now our national guru who we go to for
00:18:59.680 advice on all topics because he's an all knowing, all seeing, omnipotent being. Um,
00:19:05.980 and, uh, he replied, you know, that's tough because that's what's called relative risk.
00:19:14.400 Then, then he dropped the bombshell. If you're willing to take a risk and you know, everybody
00:19:19.300 has their own tolerance for risks, you could figure out if you want to meet somebody. And then he added,
00:19:24.200 if you want to go a little bit more intimate, well, then that's your choice regarding a risk.
00:19:28.300 Okay. So first of all, Dr. Fauci has given you permission to have sexual relations with strangers.
00:19:34.480 So he's, he's given you, if you're going to him for permission, he's given it to you. Um,
00:19:38.300 because as I said, then of course we go to Dr. Fauci for really anything you want to do. Now you have
00:19:42.420 to go to Dr. Fauci. He'll tell you if you can do it or not. Um, is this consistent with everything
00:19:47.700 else he said? No, but you know, we can't expect him to be consistent. That's, that's no, he's,
00:19:53.840 he'll decide in the moment what's, what's the safest thing and what isn't. So we've got Dr.
00:19:59.280 Fauci saying, yeah, you know, if you want to have sex with a stranger, uh, you go ahead and do that.
00:20:05.460 Meanwhile, in some States, like in Michigan, you're not allowed to have your own family members
00:20:09.760 over just to visit for dinner. So you can't have, um, your parents over for dinner, but you can invite,
00:20:15.800 or we're told it's safe to invite a stranger over to have sex. That's makes a lot of sense, right?
00:20:21.680 Now let's, let's move on to your, uh, daily cancellation, but before we do, uh, a note
00:20:28.840 about the daily wire quarantine, you know, might not be any fun, but you know, what is fun? The
00:20:32.660 daily wire deal I'm about to share with you. When you become a daily wire insider plus or all access
00:20:38.040 member, then you will get not one, but two of the highly coveted leftist tears tumblers. Rumor has it
00:20:44.760 that's, uh, this tumbler completely eliminates the threat of thirst. If you fill it with
00:20:51.420 some sort of liquid and then drink the liquid that is the, not just rumor, but in fact,
00:20:56.240 that's a scientific fact. Daily wire members get many amazing benefits, including of course,
00:21:01.440 the magnificent, the irreplaceable singular leftist tears tumbler. You also get an ad
00:21:05.240 free website experience, access to all of our live broadcast and show library, the full three
00:21:10.320 hours of the Ben Shapiro show access to the mailbag and now exclusive election insight op-eds
00:21:14.640 from Ben Shapiro as well. Uh, daily wire members also get to ask us questions during backstage and
00:21:19.600 our new all access tier allows you to join in live online Q and A's with me and the other hosts as
00:21:25.080 well. So there's a ton of stuff you get. And again, that's two leftist tears tumblers, not just one,
00:21:29.820 but two when you become a daily wire insider plus or all access, uh, member. Okay. Today we're
00:21:37.720 canceling the people who claim that only white people can be racist. That whole school of thought
00:21:46.080 is officially canceled. And just to be clear, that is a very real school of thought. There are people
00:21:52.320 out there who not only believe this, but teach it. It's taught in schools. Um, many leftists believe
00:21:59.420 and will tell you if you ask them that racism is power plus prejudice. That's the equation.
00:22:05.620 And, um, only white people have power allegedly. So only they can be racist. And this holds true.
00:22:12.700 It doesn't matter. I mean, even when Barack Obama was president, according to this formulation,
00:22:18.660 he had no power. He was the most powerful man in the world, but he actually had no power because of
00:22:23.100 the color of his skin. And so you could be racist to him, but he couldn't be racist to you,
00:22:28.900 even though he's the president and you're just a peon. Right now, of course, all you have to do
00:22:36.060 really is open your eyes and look around and you can see that this is not the case and it's totally
00:22:40.500 insane. In fact, the very claim that racism is exclusive to white people is itself racism against
00:22:47.280 whites. So it's not hard to disprove, but here's one thing, one example that will be especially hard,
00:22:54.800 I think, for the only whites are racist crowd to navigate around. And that is China. Um, since,
00:23:02.300 you know, dumping on China is, is, is the popular thing to do right now. And for good reason,
00:23:06.240 they, they certainly deserve it. Let's, uh, let's add this into the mix. A McDonald's in China
00:23:11.280 actually recently tried to ban black people from entering the restaurant. Okay. Here's the BBC
00:23:17.340 report about the incident. It says, uh, McDonald's in China has apologized after a branch in the
00:23:22.780 industrial city of Guangzhou barred black people from entering a video shared on social media showed
00:23:29.240 a notice that read, we've been informed that from now on black people are not allowed to enter the
00:23:34.160 restaurant. McDonald's said that when it found out about the notice, it temporarily closed the
00:23:38.440 restaurant. Tensions have been running high between Africans and local people in the city.
00:23:42.560 Last week, hundreds of Africans in Guangzhou were evicted from hotels and apartments after online
00:23:47.460 rumors that coronavirus was spreading among African people. Guangzhou is a hub for African traders buying
00:23:53.200 and selling goods and is home to one of China's largest African communities. Um, and, uh, so on.
00:24:00.380 And it goes up there. Yeah, this, this is not very surprising. There have been many reports of
00:24:05.280 anti-black bigotry and violence, um, in response to the pandemic in China, which of course makes no
00:24:11.140 sense on a number of levels, starting with the fact that the virus started in China and because of
00:24:15.760 China, not in Africa, but then bigotry of course never really does make sense. But this is all in the
00:24:22.300 context of Chinese culture, which has a huge problem with racism, especially anti-black racism,
00:24:29.340 but, but also just racism in general. And Chinese culture is very racist. And this extends beyond
00:24:36.480 China. Anti-black bigotry is all over East Asia, South Asia, India, you know, um, anyone who has any
00:24:43.000 experience with any of these countries knows this and will tell you. It's the very large elephant in
00:24:49.100 the room. Whenever somebody is preaching about the unique evils of white racism, you've got Asia,
00:24:55.500 you know, the very big elephant in the room or on the globe anyway, where racism is extremely common
00:25:02.560 and socially acceptable. Um, here's another example. This is a, a Chinese ad for a, a laundry detergent.
00:25:11.220 Um, now I want you to watch this and think what kind of culture produces an ad like this watch.
00:25:18.720 uh,
00:25:30.320 uh,
00:25:35.620 uh,
00:25:37.200 uh,
00:25:39.780 uh,
00:25:43.360 now for anybody listening on itunes or soundcloud or something and you couldn't see the ad
00:26:04.680 just to describe it to you that was an ad chinese detergent and in the ad a black man
00:26:11.760 is um stuffed into a washing machine and when he's lifted out he's now chinese okay now um can you
00:26:21.920 imagine an ad like that in this country can you imagine like thai detergent putting out an ad like
00:26:28.120 that no you can't it could never happen i mean that could only exist in a country where racism
00:26:33.660 is open and acceptable a country like china and uh it's not just china by the way it's not just
00:26:41.040 asia either i mean the the the fact is while the left tries to make the the claim that the u.s
00:26:46.740 is is somehow the most racist country on earth the truth is probably exactly the opposite of that
00:26:52.600 now racism exists in this country obviously like it exists everywhere and always will but
00:26:57.940 it's not acceptable and being openly racist will get you ostracized in this country
00:27:03.400 and this is also in a country with more ethnic diversity than any other so it's not like it's
00:27:09.140 easy for us not to be racist because we're all the same race anyway now it's not something like
00:27:12.760 that it's we got a whole bunch of of ethnicities and races living in this country and um we do a
00:27:19.340 better job uh of uh with that and of of promoting diversity and of uh you know um getting rid of
00:27:32.620 racism than any other country does but you know of course you're not going to hear that from from
00:27:39.720 the left and and you need a they've got this very simplistic narrative and it's really easy and it's
00:27:47.240 convenient white people are evil white people are racist and so they have no choice but to ignore
00:27:53.120 you know the racism that happens all across the world among you know billions of people all across
00:27:58.460 the world all right uh let's go to emails and if you become a daily wire member you can always email
00:28:06.640 the show through the mailbag this is from tinus is the name that's with a t tinus i don't know if
00:28:16.340 that's his god if that's his christian name or not i'm not sure but he says dear matt i actually
00:28:22.160 don't mind the whole state-enforced mandatory mask wearing because they're just trying to keep us safe
00:28:26.360 and healthy but i don't wear one myself because they get in the way of my cigarettes so i i appreciate
00:28:32.660 that tinus and you know what i i also think that i i've said before we you know i think we can reopen
00:28:40.120 the economy and i think it makes sense at least in certain contexts and in certain industries for
00:28:46.420 there to be masks and you know even if you want to have a you know laws and policies in individual
00:28:52.340 places that require masks uh i don't i don't necessarily see a problem with that
00:28:57.680 as long as it's not overly onerous and as long as it makes sense now requiring somebody to have a mask
00:29:04.280 when they're walking down the street that doesn't make sense but in certain industries it might make
00:29:10.060 sense uh i mean the restaurant industry for example maybe so i don't have i don't really have a problem
00:29:16.500 with that but one of the the issues that i have one of the big issues is that only a month ago
00:29:24.760 the government was telling us don't wear masks not just telling us not to but scolding us for wearing
00:29:30.240 them and now they want to mandate them let's go to uh this is from sp it says i'm a homeschooling
00:29:37.760 parent going on two years do you think there's going to be a backlash against homeschooling due to
00:29:41.880 all the parents who have been currently forced into homeschooling because of covet 19 school closures
00:29:45.580 i recognize this issue is already under attack under normal circumstances and fear possible long-term
00:29:51.520 policy repercussions uh well there's you talk about a backlash from government policy or just from
00:30:00.720 the from society in general i think uh i think i think looking on the bright side of it i think that
00:30:07.700 there are going to be people who've been homeschooling during this and discover that you know it's not as
00:30:13.420 hard as they thought maybe they actually enjoy it i've actually heard from quite a few parents who've
00:30:18.060 told me this that they've been forced into becoming homeschool parents as all parents have across the
00:30:23.160 country and they said they they actually enjoy it and it's made them rethink the idea of homeschooling
00:30:29.660 so i think you might probably would be the opposite you're going to see an increase in homeschooling
00:30:34.480 it's going to become more popular um now will the government try to counteract that when they see
00:30:41.640 people they see parents pulling kids out of government schools is the government going to try to tamp down
00:30:47.380 on that to try to get their to try to get the their subjects back into the school classrooms i think
00:30:55.200 that's a very real possibility from chuck says hi matt you've been spending a lot of time criticizing the
00:30:59.780 government which i understand but i haven't heard you grapple with what the bible says about this to
00:31:03.400 remind you then he quotes let everyone be subject to the governing authorities for there is no authority
00:31:09.060 except that which god has established the authorities that exist have been established by god consequently
00:31:13.780 whoever rebels against the authority is rebelling against what god has instituted and those who do so
00:31:19.200 will be bring to judgment on themselves isn't it our responsibility he continues to listen to respect and
00:31:26.460 yes obey these shutdown orders even if we disagree with them isn't that what the bible says
00:31:31.560 all right well and that's uh romans 13 that he's quoting there of course
00:31:36.180 so chuck what i would say is i think there are two ways to interpret that passage that you just quoted
00:31:46.220 one is to interpret it broadly universally very literally and say it applies across the board
00:31:54.940 and uh basically every government is instituted instituted by god every government has the
00:32:00.440 authority of has divine authority in effect and so it is always wrong to disobey and to rebel against
00:32:07.480 the government you know you could interpret it that way all right the other way of interpreting it
00:32:12.920 is to understand it as something with limitations and um and to understand that the government can
00:32:19.940 actually lose its god-given authority and its moral authority and by losing its moral authority
00:32:26.600 it loses its god-given authority so those are the two ways generally speaking of interpreting it
00:32:30.940 now the problem yes if you interpret it the first way
00:32:35.040 then that would obviously apply to all these shutdowns
00:32:38.460 and all we could really do is now we could complain i guess but we have to go along with it
00:32:43.880 um you certainly can't defy it and i guess really we shouldn't even complain about it or speak out
00:32:50.040 against it because we have to believe that this you know these this is god-given authority and uh
00:32:54.920 they're doing what's best for us and so just cooperate and go along if you're going to go with the first
00:32:59.900 interpretation yes that is how you would approach the shutdowns the problem though i think is rather
00:33:04.620 obvious because if that's the case then that would apply that would have applied to the nazi government
00:33:10.760 in germany germany in the 1940s and we would have to say we would have to say that the nazi government
00:33:18.500 was instituted by god it had divine authority and anyone who disobeyed or rebelled against
00:33:25.420 you know the jews in the ghettos who rebelled against the government they were doing the wrong
00:33:30.700 thing they were doing something that was morally wrong and that their responsibility was just to get on
00:33:36.180 the the train cars and go to the concentration camp that's what you would have to say if you're
00:33:40.960 going with that first interpretation you would also have to say of course that our this country was
00:33:48.580 founded illegitimately because this country was founded on a rebellion against a governing authority
00:33:55.040 and that raises all kinds of questions because if that's the case then our government i guess is not
00:34:01.420 legitimate so does it have governing i i think by that interpretation maybe you would say this
00:34:05.880 government has no authority whatsoever because it was founded illegitimately by rebelling against
00:34:10.900 um the authorities that it was supposed to be subjected to so i i think this interpretation
00:34:20.640 becomes just morally obscene and illogical i think it's very clear it's self-evident that for example
00:34:31.680 the nazi government had no god-given authority whatsoever and that to rebel against it was
00:34:37.140 uh not only acceptable but was the morally right thing to do and was courageous
00:34:41.660 and um it's what god wanted
00:34:47.300 uh so that that to me just if if you want to make that argument you can
00:34:54.440 but um i think you're you're you're interpreting a biblical passage in a way that is morally obscene
00:35:00.260 and i i think we have to avoid doing that which leaves us with the second interpretation which
00:35:06.020 is there are some limitations on that and the government can lose its god-given authority
00:35:10.140 another example our government says that uh it's okay to kill babies like we talked about the
00:35:16.020 beginning of the show a million babies a year are killed legally and uh according to the interpretation
00:35:21.740 you're going with here it would seem that uh you know we we can't really defy that or rebel against it
00:35:27.300 and we just have to accept it because the government says it's okay to kill babies so therefore it is
00:35:32.940 i don't believe that i don't believe it for a second
00:35:36.660 there is an authority higher than the government right now we know that under normal circumstances
00:35:45.160 the government derives its authority from god but that means that god is of course above the government
00:35:48.940 and the government cannot overturn basic moral laws
00:35:54.320 so i i go with the fact that that there are limitations on that authority
00:36:00.240 and then it becomes a question of uh do these shutdowns exceed those limitations
00:36:07.500 and that's you know that's a that's a question open for debate
00:36:11.380 i think it does and my answer is yes i think it does
00:36:14.880 because the government itself is acting unlawfully
00:36:20.300 we know the way that our the way that our system is set up
00:36:25.160 the ultimate supreme legal authority is not just the opinion or the whim of a governor or a bureaucrat
00:36:31.880 or a senator or the president the ultimate legal authority is the constitution united states
00:36:37.080 and they are defying that so they are acting unlawfully
00:36:42.260 and therefore forfeiting their authority in my view
00:36:45.880 uh but it's uh it's an interesting discussion to have so i thank you for the email thanks
00:36:51.280 everybody for watching and listening have a great day godspeed
00:36:53.960 if you enjoyed this episode don't forget to subscribe and if you want to help spread the word
00:37:00.480 please give us a five-star review tell your friends to subscribe as well
00:37:04.080 we're available on apple podcasts spotify wherever you listen to podcasts we're there
00:37:08.480 also be sure to check out the other daily wire podcasts including the ben shapiro show
00:37:11.820 michael noel show and the andrew clavin show thanks for listening
00:37:14.660 the matt wall show is produced by sean hampton executive producer jeremy boring
00:37:18.600 our supervising producers are mathis glover and robert sterling
00:37:21.800 our technical producer is austin stevens edited by danny domico
00:37:25.700 and our audio is mixed by robin fenderson the matt wall show is a daily wire production
00:37:30.960 copyright daily wire 2020 hey everyone it's andrew clavin host of the andrew clavin show
00:37:36.320 the time is coming to start getting back to work trump says we can get it done
00:37:41.320 the new york times says despair and die which advice should we follow hard to figure
00:37:46.940 but we'll try on the andrew clavin show
00:37:51.800 the new york times where the andrew clavinia
00:38:04.660 the new york times vayson to indefazium
00:38:09.040 so
00:38:10.080 the new york times vayson vayson