The Matt Walsh Show - Ep. 490 - NYT Claims ＂Believe All Women＂ Is A Right Wing Conspiracy

00:00:00.000 Today on the Matt Wall Show, an article in the New York Times now claims that feminists 1.00

00:00:04.740 never said, believe all women, don't believe your lying ears. They didn't say that. They never said

00:00:09.640 it. They didn't say, they haven't spent the last five years saying that. That was all a devious

00:00:15.000 right-wing trick, a conspiracy. That's what the New York Times is claiming and other people on

00:00:21.200 the left are echoing that claim. So we'll talk about that. Also, five headlines, including the

00:00:25.360 extraordinary, not to mention counterproductive and stupid measures that some businesses and people 0.98

00:00:32.700 are putting into place ostensibly to offer protection from the coronavirus. And in our 0.98

00:00:38.040 daily cancellation, the time has finally come, finally, to cancel the UN. And it's long past

00:00:45.800 due. I'll explain why I'm canceling them. All of that coming up. But first, starting with this,

00:00:50.600 you know, I actually had a whole different plan for this show today. But then sort of at the last

00:00:55.680 minute, I happened to see this piece in the New York Times. And now I have to call an audible because

00:01:00.920 this thing pissed me off so much that I have to rant and rave about it right at the top here. I don't

00:01:05.300 have a choice. I have to. So to set the stage here, you know, our friends on the left have been trying

00:01:15.040 very hard over the past several weeks to reconcile their treatment of Tara Reid, who is the Joe Biden,

00:01:21.180 Joe Biden sexual assault accuser, with their previous claims that we should believe women or

00:01:26.840 believe all women. Only it's very hard to reconcile because the believe women champions have discovered 1.00

00:01:35.220 one woman they won't believe. And it just so happens that she's the woman accusing the Democratic

00:01:41.100 candidate for president. What a coincidence, you know? So it very much appears that these people

00:01:47.600 are a bunch of vile, gutless, shameless hypocrites. That's how it seems. You know, it really comes across 1.00

00:01:53.520 that way. How can you go from shouting, believe women for years and years and years to suddenly 1.00

00:02:00.400 don't believe that hussy. She's lying through her teeth. That's that's a pretty tough transition to make 1.00

00:02:07.180 and a noticeable one, a conspicuous one. It's going to make people think that you're full of crap. 1.00

00:02:16.560 So how do you get around it? It's a it's a tough spot that people on the left are in. Now, one way of 0.99

00:02:23.760 getting around it is to just not be a hypocrite and not have a double standard and apply the same 0.92

00:02:29.460 standard to Tara Reid and Joe Biden that you applied to everybody else. That's one thing you could do. 0.89

00:02:35.180 That's the honest approach. But if you're not going to be honest, then what are you going to do?

00:02:41.140 Well, feminists on the left have figured out what their strategy is going to be. 1.00

00:02:46.660 They're going to do what they always do, which is lie and try to rewrite history.

00:02:52.380 So much so that now they are actually claiming that Believe All Women was invented by the right wing.

00:03:00.840 They are trying to. Right now, as we speak, they're trying to rewrite the history books

00:03:06.660 while we watch them do it. They're like right in front of us, pulling the history books out and

00:03:12.340 ripping out pages while claiming they're not doing that. Hoping we'll forget everything they've said

00:03:18.880 and done for the past several years. Which brings us to this New York Times piece written by Susan

00:03:24.560 Faludi, titled Believe All Women is a Right-Wing Trap. How Feminists Got Stuck Answering for a Canard. 0.98

00:03:35.580 Amazing. That's yeah. How did they get stuck answering for the things that they've said?

00:03:40.660 I don't know. We'll find out. Here's what the article says in part. It says,

00:03:45.400 Joe Biden has been accused of sexual assault and conservatives are having a field day, 0.95

00:03:49.280 exultant, that they've caught feminists in a new hypocrisy trap. A woman with no corroboration 1.00

00:03:55.260 beyond contemporaneous accounts charges a powerful man with a decades-old crime? Hmm. Doesn't that

00:04:00.680 sound mighty close to Christine Blasey Ford's complaint about, again, Supreme Court nominee

00:04:05.020 Brett Kavanaugh? Yes. Yet this time, many liberals who've championed the Me Too movement seem

00:04:09.900 skeptical. Gotcha. Yes, gotcha. That's right. I mean, we weren't looking for the gotcha,

00:04:18.740 but you have presented it to us. And yes, this is a gotcha moment that you have created for

00:04:25.500 yourself. But not so fast, because here comes the reversal move from Susan. She says,

00:04:32.300 In fact, Believe All Women does have an asterisk. It's never been feminist boilerplate. What we are

00:04:40.020 witnessing is another instance of the right decrying what it imagines the American women's movement to be.

00:04:45.680 Spend some mind-numbing hours tracking the origins of Believe All Women on social media sites and news

00:04:50.880 databases, as I did, and you'll discover how language, like a virus, can mutate overnight.

00:04:56.080 All of a sudden, yesterday's quotes suffer the insertion of some foreign DNA that makes them

00:05:00.420 easy to weaponize. In this case, the foreign intrusion is a word, is a single word, all. 0.89

00:05:06.360 In my online searches, I encountered some feminists who seemed genuinely to subscribe to the phrase, 1.00

00:05:11.720 but overwhelmingly, the Twitterati deploying the phrase were conservatives, wielding it as a whip.

00:05:18.220 Why? Because the right knows that Me Too activists do well to keep in mind.

00:05:26.240 Peril lies in purity. If the pluralism of the women's movement can be reduced to rigid boilerplate 1.00

00:05:32.520 in the public mind, then the future of Me Too will have more to lose from a single untruthful woman 1.00

00:05:37.740 whom it's sworn to defend than from boatloads of predatory men. This is why Believe All Women 0.61

00:05:43.260 is not an amplification of Believe Women, but its negation. 0.92

00:05:47.140 And so on and so forth.

00:05:52.520 So where does this leave feminists? Feminism has indeed believed many things about all women, 1.00

00:05:57.360 that all women are deserving of equal treatment under the law, equal pay in the workplace,

00:06:01.540 reproductive health, freedom from domestic violence.

00:06:04.460 And feminists have long held that all women should be believed when the all refers to all categories of women, 0.92

00:06:11.020 i.e. equal regardless of race, religion, or economic status.

00:06:14.040 This is what Anita Hill meant when she said in a CNN town hall in 2017,

00:06:19.500 until we can believe all women, every woman's voice has value, none of us really will be seen as equal. 0.99

00:06:27.420 And good luck finding any feminist who thinks we should believe everything all women say, 1.00

00:06:33.420 even what they say about sexual assault.

00:06:35.460 Okay.

00:06:35.600 So there you basically have it.

00:06:39.060 The claim, you know, and you have to sift, it's a lot longer than what I just spent,

00:06:43.320 too long reading, but you have to sift through a lot of diversion tactics and obfuscation and everything

00:06:49.740 to get to what she's trying to claim.

00:06:53.220 The claim being made here incredibly, and it's a claim that has been repeated and amplified

00:06:57.400 by many other left-wing feminists and others on the left, 0.57

00:06:59.940 is that they never said, believe all women.

00:07:03.340 They said, believe women. 1.00

00:07:05.980 And you see, those are two completely different things.

00:07:09.660 So we'll talk more about this in just a second.

00:07:11.880 But first, I want to check in with rockauto.com.

00:07:15.980 You know, when you go into an auto parts store, the problem is, on top of all the other issues

00:07:23.260 you have now going into stores in general these days, they're not guaranteed to have

00:07:29.160 what you want.

00:07:30.940 Even if you call, I've had experience where I call ahead and they say they have the part,

00:07:34.040 you come in, they don't have it, there was a miscommunication.

00:07:37.080 Rockauto.com is so much easier than walking into a store and having to answer all the questions

00:07:41.100 and, you know, finding out what they have, the very limited assortment of things that they

00:07:45.380 have.

00:07:46.100 Rockauto.com always offers the lowest prices possible rather than changing prices based

00:07:50.200 on what the market will bear, much like airlines do.

00:07:52.880 Why spend up to twice as much for the same parts?

00:07:56.140 That's the question.

00:07:57.180 There's no reason.

00:07:57.740 Rockauto.com is a family business serving auto parts customers online for 20 years.

00:08:02.700 Go to rockauto.com to shop for auto and body parts from hundreds of manufacturers.

00:08:07.680 Best of all, prices, I want to emphasize, at rockauto.com are reliably low.

00:08:13.440 And, you know, I'm telling you this all the time.

00:08:15.360 If you don't believe me, just call my bluff.

00:08:16.880 Go check it out.

00:08:17.540 Rockauto.com.

00:08:18.420 Go to rockauto.com right now.

00:08:20.260 See all the parts available for your car or truck.

00:08:22.160 Write Walsh in there.

00:08:23.180 How did you hear about us, Box?

00:08:24.560 So that they know that we sent you.

00:08:28.180 Okay.

00:08:28.600 So it's not believe all women.

00:08:31.640 It's believe women. 1.00

00:08:32.340 That's the basic thing.

00:08:34.020 Jill Filipovich is a prominent feminist writer. 1.00

00:08:38.200 She shared this article on Twitter, approvingly, of course, and summarized the point this way.

00:08:43.840 She says,

00:08:44.760 This from Susan Faludi is so important.

00:08:47.580 Feminists never said believe all women. 1.00

00:08:50.060 The right inserted the all.

00:08:53.040 Feminists said believe women. 1.00

00:08:55.480 That is, start with the assumption that women are telling the truth instead of reflexively doubting them.

00:09:00.020 So, okay, let's just be very clear about a couple of things here.

00:09:06.520 Number one, there is no difference at all between believe women and believe all women.

00:09:15.340 If you said believe women, then you said believe all women. 0.74

00:09:18.500 It's the same thing.

00:09:19.700 The all is implied.

00:09:21.000 When you say believe women, you are saying believe all women. 1.00

00:09:25.860 If people on the right were inclined to use the phrase believe all women, it was only to emphasize, to highlight the danger and absurdity and stupidity of the slogan that feminists came up with. 0.99

00:09:38.360 Believe women is believe all women. 0.99

00:09:40.900 No difference.

00:09:41.700 None at all.

00:09:42.540 You know, it'd be like if I said, if I said, I love dogs, which I don't, but let's just say I did that.

00:09:49.660 And then you came by with your German Shepherd and said, hey, check out Rex. 0.64

00:09:54.000 And I said, ew, I hate that thing.

00:09:55.560 Get it away from me.

00:09:57.500 Now, you would be quite reasonable to respond by saying, hey, you just said you love dogs.

00:10:04.740 And it would be no use for me to say, yeah, but I never said I love all dogs.

00:10:09.920 Because loving dogs means loving all things that are dogs.

00:10:14.360 That's what it means.

00:10:15.200 If there are dogs you don't love, then you don't love dogs.

00:10:19.980 You love certain dogs and not others.

00:10:24.840 So if what you meant was I love certain dogs, then you should have said that rather than saying I love dogs.

00:10:34.040 Now, the statement I love dogs is true, even if you actually hate certain dogs.

00:10:38.720 It's true technically that, you know, you do love dogs, but the all is implied in the statement I love dogs.

00:10:47.860 So if you actually have a deep-seated hatred for certain dogs, then for the sake of clarity and proper communication,

00:10:53.500 you would need to say something like I love certain dogs or I love some dogs or I love most dogs or even I love all dogs but one.

00:11:01.640 Any of those would work and be much clearer and much truer.

00:11:10.680 But you need some kind of qualifier.

00:11:13.760 If you just say it as a blanket statement, then you've made a blanket statement.

00:11:18.020 What feminists are now claiming is that the all was not implied in believe women. 0.83

00:11:25.660 Actually, some was implied.

00:11:27.980 That's what they're telling us now is that they really meant believe some women and we were supposed to understand that that was the implication.

00:11:37.800 But that's nonsense, of course.

00:11:39.160 In fact, if they only ever meant that we should believe some women, then the slogan was totally unnecessary.

00:11:47.740 The whole movement was unnecessary.

00:11:50.880 Yes, of course we should believe some women. 1.00

00:11:53.120 Nobody ever claimed otherwise.

00:11:54.620 There's been nobody anywhere saying that we should believe no women.

00:11:59.260 That was never a position anyone took.

00:12:03.040 Nobody ever said that we can't believe women ever about anything. 0.72

00:12:09.160 What some of us did say is that women should be believed under certain circumstances.

00:12:14.560 If there's good evidence, if there's a good reason, if she's credible, if the accusation is credible, so on and so forth.

00:12:24.620 See, that was the approach that a lot of us were taking.

00:12:29.440 Believe women was a slogan invented in contrast to that approach. 0.56

00:12:33.940 It was literally invented as a response to, a retort to, the believe some women philosophy. 0.97

00:12:42.800 Now they're trying to pretend that it was actually meant to support the philosophy that these feminists have spent years railing against. 1.00

00:12:50.940 Again, amazing. 0.56

00:12:54.040 Just totally shameless.

00:12:56.540 Oh, and by the way, for the record, these people actually did say all.

00:13:03.040 So it wasn't just that the all was implied.

00:13:05.120 They actually said it themselves.

00:13:06.940 So I, you know, I have evidence.

00:13:08.460 I mean, any of us can go online and Google and you can go back and you can look at the rallies.

00:13:12.840 You can see the signs they were holding.

00:13:14.780 You could, you know, you could see the tweets and the things that they said, you know, on cable news and everything.

00:13:19.500 But here's just one example.

00:13:21.100 Take a look at this.

00:13:22.060 That was, this is during the Kavanaugh hearings.

00:13:23.940 We believe all, all, all survivors.

00:13:29.240 We believe all survivors.

00:13:32.000 And before you try to say, oh, it says survivors, not women.

00:13:34.820 Yes.

00:13:35.060 Well, the point is, what are you believing about the survivors?

00:13:39.620 You're believing that they are survivors, right?

00:13:42.060 To say we believe all survivors is to say we believe everyone who claims to be a survivor of sexual assault.

00:13:50.360 Everyone, all, all of them.

00:13:52.300 That is a huge sign that they are holding at the Kavanaugh hearings and that many people are gathered around approvingly endorsing that message.

00:14:01.540 All.

00:14:03.460 Now it's, yes, there's, there's no way to actually live by that.

00:14:07.940 That is an impossible standard that you couldn't actually believe and live by.

00:14:12.900 True.

00:14:13.380 Then just say that.

00:14:16.040 I mean, come out and just say that, oh, you know, yes.

00:14:18.680 I mean, we, we did say this and that was our point, but, but clearly it's crazy.

00:14:22.140 And we, and, you know, we didn't really mean it.

00:14:24.220 We shouldn't have said it.

00:14:26.000 Okay.

00:14:26.480 There needed to be a lot more nuance in this conversation.

00:14:28.860 And we were wrong.

00:14:29.740 You could just say that.

00:14:30.820 Number two, Jill, uh, uh, uh, Philopovich, you know, tried to make believe women seem more reasonable by explaining that what she really meant is that, you know, we, we should start, what, what was she said?

00:14:45.400 She said, we should start with the assumption that women are telling the truth, which, which by the way, is exactly what Biden said almost verbatim during Kavanaugh.

00:14:53.820 He said that we should, uh, something like we should, we should start with the assumption that the essence of what a woman is saying is true when she makes a, an accusation. 0.72

00:15:01.720 Um, yes.

00:15:03.760 Well, that is certainly what believe women or believe all women would entail. 0.88

00:15:08.760 But, but do you not see that spelling it out like that actually makes it sound even worse?

00:15:15.500 That doesn't, that, that's not a clarification that makes it sound better or more reasonable.

00:15:20.620 Okay.

00:15:21.100 No, you can't start with the assumption that what she's saying is true.

00:15:26.040 Of course you can't.

00:15:28.120 Our entire philosophy and system of justice is built on the idea that you start with the assumption, presumption of innocence of the accused.

00:15:38.840 Yes, now you aren't required to do that outside of the context of a courtroom.

00:15:43.320 But it's also, again, not just the system of justice, it's our philosophy, our idea of justice.

00:15:48.140 Is that the most just thing to do, the most just way to approach it, is to start with a presumption of innocence when an accusation is made.

00:15:56.900 That's your starting point.

00:16:00.260 And what that means is, because here's the difference, right?

00:16:05.440 If you're starting with the assumption of innocence of the accused, then what that means is if the person making the accusation, whatever the accusation is, what we're saying to that person is, show me the goods.

00:16:18.780 Okay.

00:16:19.060 Come with some evidence.

00:16:20.240 Give me reason to believe because I'm not just going to believe it on your word.

00:16:24.360 We can't do that.

00:16:26.900 Now, if we're starting with the assumption that the accusation is true, which is what Jill Filopovich right now is saying, that's supposedly her philosophy.

00:16:40.900 Well, if you're starting with the assumption that the accusation is true, then what you're saying to the accused is, you better give me reasons to believe you're innocent.

00:16:48.300 You better come with evidence that you're innocent.

00:16:51.020 Putting the accused in the impossible position of having to prove their innocence, or the nearly impossible position, if not impossible, because you're trying to prove a negative.

00:17:03.300 You're trying to prove that you did not do something, which is almost impossible to do, especially when it was years ago.

00:17:12.580 So, you see what they're doing here.

00:17:20.200 This is the definition of gaslighting.

00:17:22.560 They're saying, no, we didn't say believe all women.

00:17:25.660 We said believe women. 0.95

00:17:27.160 And then, no, we didn't mean that you should literally just believe everything a woman says.

00:17:31.360 We meant that you should start with the assumption that everything she says is true.

00:17:35.480 These are all just a series of distinctions without differences.

00:17:41.140 These are all words that mean the same thing.

00:17:44.120 It's like if I said, no, I didn't say it was a square.

00:17:47.240 I said it was a geometric object with four equal straight sides and four right angles.

00:17:52.460 Same thing.

00:17:53.300 It's just a different way of saying the exact same thing.

00:17:56.560 So, this is gaslighting.

00:17:57.920 Number three, and of course, you know, the big problem here is that whether it's believe all women or believe women or assume that what women say is true, whichever dumb slogan you go with, which all mean the same thing, the problem is that the left did none of those things with respect to Tara Reade.

00:18:18.500 Okay, Jill, you're saying, you know, we just have to assume that what the woman is saying is true.

00:18:23.520 That's all.

00:18:24.020 Okay, well, are you assuming that what Tara Reade said is true?

00:18:26.760 Did you start with that assumption?

00:18:30.040 No.

00:18:30.880 They most certainly did not assume that what Tara Reade is saying is true.

00:18:34.640 They most certainly did not believe her.

00:18:37.480 In fact, from day one, well, actually from day one, from day one to about day 40, they just ignored her.

00:18:43.540 And then finally, when they were forced to acknowledge her existence, they set to work immediately to discredit and destroy her.

00:18:49.540 And you know what?

00:18:51.080 Maybe they're right about her. 1.00

00:18:53.480 Maybe she is a lying scumbag. 1.00

00:18:55.320 It's quite possible. 1.00

00:18:56.380 It might even be probable.

00:18:58.160 Some of the stuff that's come out about Tara Reade is relatively damning.

00:19:05.320 So it's possible that she's making this up.

00:19:07.880 It wouldn't shock me any.

00:19:09.020 I've said all along that my immediate reaction is to doubt anyone who comes with an accusation years later and during a political campaign or a Senate confirmation hearing.

00:19:25.200 Anyone who comes along decades later, when the accused person is in the news for whatever reason, a prominent figure.

00:19:36.660 And now they decide to come out and say, oh, by the way, that person raped me 30 years ago.

00:19:42.240 Anytime someone does that, anytime, my immediate reaction is to doubt, is to be skeptical.

00:19:47.800 It's not to say that it's definitely not true.

00:19:52.260 I'm not going to rule it out.

00:19:53.580 It's just I'm going to have a lot of skepticism.

00:19:55.260 That's my reaction.

00:19:56.040 And I'm allowed to have that attitude because I never said believe all women or believe women.

00:20:03.260 I've said all along that we should believe a woman if there is good reason to. 0.99

00:20:07.580 And if not, then we shouldn't.

00:20:09.660 I think the circumstances of this accusation, like the circumstances of Ford's accusation, are already good enough reason to be skeptical.

00:20:19.240 If a man abuses you and you want to accuse him publicly, maybe do it sometime within 30 years.

00:20:25.960 You know, like at a certain point.

00:20:28.600 I don't think that's too much to expect.

00:20:31.660 And if you're going to do it, don't wait until a presidential campaign or a Supreme Court nomination to come out and say, by the way.

00:20:39.660 I don't think it's too much to expect.

00:20:42.960 Yeah, I mean, if you're abused or assaulted or something by a man, you have every right to come out and you should come out and say it.

00:20:51.520 It's just don't wait 30 years, you know.

00:20:55.860 But again, I can take this approach consistently because I've always said this.

00:21:00.160 It's the left, people like Jill and the writer of this Times piece and the rest of them, who have said many, many, many, many, many times that waiting years to accuse someone is not an indication that a story is false.

00:21:15.660 That's what they've said.

00:21:17.360 And that other examples of a woman being untrustworthy or, you know, manipulative don't mean that she's lying about this particular thing.

00:21:26.520 And they've said many, many, many times that inconsistencies in a story don't mean the story isn't true.

00:21:33.140 Holes in the story don't mean the story isn't true.

00:21:36.100 An inability to remember details.

00:21:38.000 They've said many times, especially about Christine Ford, none of that stuff matters.

00:21:42.500 It's not relevant.

00:21:44.840 That's what they've said.

00:21:46.400 Only now they abandon it wholesale and pretend like they never said any of it. 1.00

00:21:51.240 Because they are, again, lying, shameless, vile hypocrites. 0.99

00:21:55.620 And, you know, the fourth thing, you know, just you find, again, feminists so desperate to be victims that now they're basically claiming to be victims of themselves. 1.00

00:22:10.840 You know, what was the subhead of this article?

00:22:13.080 It said how feminists got stuck answering for a canard. 1.00

00:22:17.100 Yeah, they got stuck answering for a canard they came up with.

00:22:20.240 That's what happens with canards.

00:22:21.360 If you come up with a canard, you've got to answer for it.

00:22:23.400 In other words, you're answering for your own words the standards that you set.

00:22:31.620 And so feminists set these standards, and now we're turning around and saying, what about your standards? 1.00

00:22:37.120 And they're saying, how dare you?

00:22:39.100 Stop it.

00:22:39.780 I'm victimized.

00:22:42.280 They become fainting damsels in distress.

00:22:47.420 The moment they, you know, the moment anyone asks them to be consistent. 1.00

00:22:54.160 It's pathetic. 0.99

00:22:55.820 All right. 0.99

00:22:57.400 Let's move on.

00:22:58.120 I said I had to rant and rave, so there was my rant and rave.

00:23:00.420 Let's go to news headlines.

00:23:02.940 Number one, as we emerge back into society and out of hibernation, some companies and some people are going to rather ridiculous lengths, I think, in an attempt to protect themselves from the virus.

00:23:14.560 And I'm all about, you know, I don't hold it against anybody for taking precautions and being careful.

00:23:23.580 That's great.

00:23:25.220 But there has to be a limit.

00:23:28.980 So I mentioned this on Friday.

00:23:30.080 Here's a cafe that, this is in Germany, actually, a cafe that requires diners to wear pool noodles on their head for social distancing.

00:23:36.860 So you take a look at the picture.

00:23:37.680 That's what, I mean, you've got grown adults sitting at a cafe with pool noodles hanging off their head.

00:23:44.560 And the idea is, you know, that's going to give you the social distancing because if your pool noodle comes within, you know, it touches another person, then you know that you're too close.

00:23:54.020 Or how about you're an adult, okay?

00:23:57.040 You're not a child.

00:23:57.920 And so just don't come within six feet of another person.

00:24:01.540 You should be able to handle that.

00:24:02.640 You don't need a pool noodle on your head.

00:24:04.960 And then here's a bar in Maryland that has a, here's the image of it.

00:24:12.920 There's a bar in Maryland.

00:24:13.760 Maryland has customers in these big inner tube things on wheels.

00:24:21.740 And this is supposed to enforce social distancing.

00:24:24.520 Now, that looks like a bar.

00:24:25.780 I don't know.

00:24:26.060 It doesn't say what bar it is, but it looks like a bar in Ocean City, Maryland.

00:24:28.940 And I've been to Ocean City many times.

00:24:32.600 I guarantee, this is what I can tell you, okay, based on my experience in that environment.

00:24:37.360 I guarantee you all of those things there will be destroyed in a week from drunk people playing bumper cars in them.

00:24:45.060 Guaranteed.

00:24:45.920 I give that one week before all of those things are destroyed.

00:24:50.220 I think about 75% of them will be destroyed from bumper cars.

00:24:52.920 Then you're going to have about 25% that go missing because drunk people steal them and then jump into the ocean with them.

00:24:58.480 That's what's going to happen.

00:25:00.000 I'm just, I'm trying to imagine myself at 22 in Ocean City, Friday night, go to a bar, and they give you one of those.

00:25:11.920 I would have loved it, but not for the reasons that the bar intends.

00:25:16.500 In fact, I still would love it.

00:25:18.020 Right now, today, as a grown man with four kids, if you gave me one of those, I would be running around doing bumper cars.

00:25:24.600 That's what I would do.

00:25:27.740 And then here's this.

00:25:29.240 This is just the saddest thing I've maybe ever seen.

00:25:34.840 Take a look at this report from CNN.

00:25:37.820 Excitement builds.

00:25:39.560 I do not want to.

00:25:40.960 But her great-grandchildren never saw Nana quite like this.

00:25:45.120 Put your arms through the slots.

00:25:46.800 All right.

00:25:48.360 Oh, my goodness.

00:25:49.440 After two months.

00:25:50.820 Oh, I love you.

00:25:52.520 I love you.

00:25:53.040 Of no hugs, 85-year-old Rose Gagnon finally got to wrap her arms around her kitties. 0.95

00:25:59.900 I wanted to cry because I couldn't believe that this was happening.

00:26:04.020 And the kids, too.

00:26:05.380 We wanted to hug Nana.

00:26:07.160 So Rose's adult granddaughter, Carly Marinero of Rockford, Illinois, got to work.

00:26:13.340 I just thought, how can I do this?

00:26:15.520 Not putting bags over my kids or her.

00:26:18.020 For under 50 bucks, she built Hug Time using PVC piping, plastic, and tape.

00:26:25.200 This is a group hug.

00:26:26.340 Oh, yeah.

00:26:27.580 Yes, because having a bunch of people press their faces up against plastic, having a bunch

00:26:32.620 of people in succession press their face up against plastic, that's a lot more sanitary

00:26:37.020 and healthy, right?

00:26:38.800 I can tell you this.

00:26:39.700 If I made a contraption like that so that my parents could hug their grandkids, they would 0.97

00:26:45.860 look at me like I'm a lunatic.

00:26:46.880 And then they would walk right around it and hug their grandkids like normal human beings.

00:26:52.760 So not only are these measures pointless and counterproductive and less safe and less healthy,

00:26:59.880 but they also are, you know what?

00:27:03.560 They're undignified.

00:27:05.880 Have some dignity.

00:27:07.220 It's never okay to lose your dignity.

00:27:09.860 No virus can excuse you of your dignity.

00:27:14.340 A man, a grown man does not wear a pool noodle on his head.

00:27:17.620 I think I could say that.

00:27:21.180 Or walk around in a big inner tube like a toddler and a Fisher-Price walker.

00:27:25.600 And I can't imagine that any grandparent wants to wrap themselves in saran wrap before hugging

00:27:32.480 their grandchildren.

00:27:33.300 It's just, it's actually not worth it.

00:27:37.360 If you told me that the only way for me to avoid coronavirus is to, you know, is to wrap

00:27:46.320 myself in saran wrap like that thing or walk around in the toddler walker thing, I would

00:27:52.280 say, you know, I'd rather have coronavirus, honestly.

00:27:54.280 I don't want coronavirus, but if this is the only way to avoid it, I'll just take the

00:27:58.860 virus.

00:27:59.500 Thank you.

00:28:00.980 Because I want to have my dignity.

00:28:02.440 And I'm, and you know, that's, that's also important to me as a human being.

00:28:06.180 Number two, this got a lot of attention yesterday.

00:28:08.780 Watch this.

00:28:10.280 What's your reaction to the president saying that he's now taking hydroxychloroquine?

00:28:14.820 Um, are you concerned?

00:28:18.320 Well, first let me say how happy I am about your new baby.

00:28:21.960 How lovely.

00:28:23.200 Oh, thank you.

00:28:24.280 Why it, how perfectly named.

00:28:26.680 Uh, we all know why that is and congratulations.

00:28:30.300 And as you, as you know, our father, you see how important it is to keep the world safe for

00:28:36.080 the children, for the children.

00:28:38.440 As far as the president is concerned, um, the, uh, our, he's our president and I would

00:28:45.180 rather he not be taking something that has not been approved, uh, by the scientists, especially

00:28:51.440 in his age group and in his, shall we say weight group, but he's morbidly obese, they say.

00:28:58.000 Um, so I, I, uh, I, uh, I, I think it was, it's not a good idea.

00:29:02.160 Um, I'm sorry, unpopular opinion here, probably unpopular, at least on the right.

00:29:06.120 Um, I find that hilarious.

00:29:09.040 I just do.

00:29:10.260 The, the morbid obesity comment, the delivery, great stuff from Pelosi.

00:29:15.380 And I don't say that often.

00:29:16.880 In fact, that's probably the first time and last time that I have ever said, or will ever

00:29:20.480 say that.

00:29:22.000 Um, but some folks on the right have been upset about this.

00:29:26.320 Uh, they, you know, getting offended on Trump's behalf and everything.

00:29:31.180 But, you know, you, you can't do that guys.

00:29:33.960 You just can't.

00:29:34.840 Trump, Trump insults everyone always, all the time. 0.96

00:29:40.820 He's the king of insults. 0.97

00:29:42.080 He just insults everybody.

00:29:44.700 It's, it's practically the reason he was elected.

00:29:48.340 So he can take it.

00:29:49.680 If you dish it, you're going to have to take it.

00:29:52.620 Um, you, you can't sit there and cackle every time Trump insults someone and then go, why

00:29:57.600 I, I never, whenever someone dishes it back to him, you just, you can't do that.

00:30:02.580 You really can't.

00:30:04.040 Now, I know the claim from people on the right is that this is a double standard because,

00:30:08.580 uh, Pelosi is body shaming the president.

00:30:12.360 And I thought we're supposed to celebrate obese people and, and, and, uh, and, and tell, 0.96

00:30:17.400 you know, say fat is beautiful.

00:30:19.660 So shouldn't she be saying that Donald Trump is a, is a big fat, glorious, beautiful man?

00:30:26.800 And shouldn't, shouldn't, isn't, shouldn't that be what she's saying?

00:30:30.720 That's the claim from the right, right?

00:30:32.080 And I get that.

00:30:32.620 It is a double standard.

00:30:33.520 Yeah, I totally agree.

00:30:34.880 Um, fine.

00:30:36.820 But there's also, when it comes to Trump, clearly, let's be honest with each other.

00:30:42.080 There are a number of rather glaring double standards when it comes to how we approach

00:30:46.960 Trump.

00:30:48.060 And one of them is this, that he, the guy just says whatever he wants to anybody.

00:30:52.120 And, uh, if he ever gets it back, if anyone ever insults him back, then he, along with

00:30:58.160 people on the right, will, you know, they'll, they'll, they'll, they'll, they'll claim they're

00:31:01.340 not offended, but they are definitely acting offended.

00:31:03.680 How dare you say that about the, about our president?

00:31:06.900 Don't say that about my president.

00:31:09.840 They go into that whole routine.

00:31:11.240 Just stop.

00:31:11.900 Just, just, just, just everyone just stop.

00:31:14.460 This is what political discourse has become in America.

00:31:17.120 It's two groups of people with glaring double standards, accusing each other of having glaring

00:31:21.400 double standards.

00:31:22.360 And I just get tired of it.

00:31:26.060 Uh, okay.

00:31:27.880 Number three, I'll give you just the headline here.

00:31:30.800 This is from CBS news.

00:31:31.960 It says some grocery workers scared to death to return to work.

00:31:37.780 And I tell you about that headline because we're going to see a lot of headlines like this.

00:31:40.640 We already have, we're going to see more, um, the media in its last ditch effort to keep

00:31:46.580 everything closed down.

00:31:49.100 And here's my response to that.

00:31:51.400 As I've been saying, you know, all along that if, if a grocery worker is scared to

00:31:57.540 death to return, I don't think there is any reason to be scared to death.

00:32:00.560 In fact, this is one of the rather conspicuous elements of, of, of, of the whole situation

00:32:05.920 that we've got these quote unquote essential workers like at grocery stores and Walmart and

00:32:12.300 Target and everything that have been working this whole time, not just working, but have

00:32:17.660 been dealing with hordes and crowds of people every day, all day, uh, and only recently started

00:32:24.340 wearing masks, most of them.

00:32:26.660 And yet there has not been a, you know, uh, we, we have not seen grocery store workers and

00:32:34.640 quote unquote essential workers dropping like flies left and right.

00:32:37.360 Uh, it, it, it hasn't been a bloodbath of, of essential workers dying from the virus from

00:32:43.100 being exposed to it.

00:32:44.000 Thank God.

00:32:45.640 But based on the way this was portrayed, that's what you would have expected.

00:32:48.720 And it hasn't happened, which I think tells us something.

00:32:52.000 And it also tells us that if you're, you know, if you work at a grocery store, there's probably

00:32:55.960 nothing to be worried about.

00:32:56.880 Um, that's what recent history would tell us, but regardless, you know, if you're scared

00:33:02.760 to go to work, then don't go.

00:33:04.200 Um, I'm, I, I do not believe that we should force anyone.

00:33:08.380 I am not in favor of, and I don't think anyone else is.

00:33:10.660 I haven't heard anyone suggest that we should send guys in to homes, like send, send, uh,

00:33:16.400 cops into people's homes to drag them out and drag them to work.

00:33:19.860 I'm not in favor of that.

00:33:22.180 It's a free country.

00:33:23.180 You want to stay home, you can.

00:33:24.080 The only thing I would add though, in my opinion, if you are a physically capable person who

00:33:31.720 is not in one of these, um, particularly vulnerable groups and you choose not to go to work because

00:33:38.040 you're scared, that's fine.

00:33:40.080 You have every right, but I don't think we should continue to support you.

00:33:44.020 I don't think you should get unemployment.

00:33:46.360 If you want to choose to stay home, we're not going to pay you to hang out on your couch

00:33:51.060 and watch Netflix.

00:33:51.920 And I think that's pretty reasonable.

00:33:57.180 Number four, let's do something positive here.

00:33:59.060 The governor of New Jersey, this isn't the positive part.

00:34:00.880 We'll get to that. 1.00

00:34:01.300 But the governor of New Jersey is a lunatic. 0.98

00:34:03.300 And he's, in fact, he said yesterday that he wants to keep the state locked up. 0.97

00:34:07.120 He said we, that the state will not return to normal until there's a vaccine.

00:34:11.360 That's what he said yesterday.

00:34:12.120 So, um, fortunately, many of his residents, many residents of the state are ignoring him

00:34:18.580 as well they should.

00:34:20.340 And they're continuing with their lives, which is good.

00:34:23.760 A gym in the state opened up yesterday in violation of the governor's dictates.

00:34:28.340 Cops showed up.

00:34:29.140 You think you know where this is going to go, but then it takes a sudden right turn.

00:34:34.060 Watch.

00:34:35.400 We are and we're only here for everybody's safety today.

00:34:39.300 We plan for the worst, hope for the best.

00:34:41.560 And it seems like that's what we have out here today.

00:34:43.880 Yeah.

00:34:45.540 Normally, you are all in violation of the executive order.

00:34:49.580 On that note, on that note, have a good day.

00:34:53.980 Everybody be safe.

00:34:54.680 Thank you.

00:34:58.180 Beautiful.

00:34:59.420 See, that makes me proud to be an American.

00:35:01.220 That's and that's a good cop right there.

00:35:02.760 That's a that's a man doing his duty.

00:35:05.540 I think.

00:35:07.420 And we've seen this from some cops, even from the very beginning, which I which I'm very

00:35:13.260 impressed with.

00:35:14.680 But it also puts into relief the, you know, the police officers who have been enforcing

00:35:20.180 these draconian laws and arresting people for not social distancing or whatever, not wearing

00:35:24.300 their mask right.

00:35:25.380 And the excuse for them is they're just following orders.

00:35:29.240 Well, the excuse doesn't hold because you see these other very good police officers who

00:35:33.740 are saying, I'm not going to enforce this.

00:35:35.440 I'm not.

00:35:35.700 That's that is an order I'm not going to follow.

00:35:39.240 I'm not going to round a bunch of people up and haul them off to jail for going to the

00:35:42.860 gym.

00:35:43.340 Just not going to do it.

00:35:44.440 So.

00:35:46.920 Great, great job from that police officer.

00:35:48.560 Fine.

00:35:49.120 Five.

00:35:49.600 Finally, speaking of embarrassing coronavirus things, I forgot.

00:35:52.180 I forgot to mention this one.

00:35:53.160 This is another one right here.

00:35:55.680 A new invention that allows you to wear a mask while eating.

00:36:00.600 And you see there's a hole there in the mask that opens up so you can eat while wearing

00:36:05.560 a mask.

00:36:06.060 So isn't this kind of like making a bicycle helmet that has a big, a big, huge hole in

00:36:10.080 the back of the head area in case you have to scratch your head?

00:36:12.900 Kind of defeats the purpose of it.

00:36:14.600 Just another, you know, when you see, when you see that kind of thing, if you're wearing

00:36:20.400 a mask with a hole in it, then it really is just sort of about virtue signaling, isn't

00:36:26.740 it? 0.89

00:36:27.000 Because the mask is not doing a damn thing.

00:36:29.560 Now, I'm not one of those people that says that everyone out wearing a mask is virtue signaling.

00:36:33.740 They may be wearing a mask because they have to.

00:36:35.380 If they want to go to the store, they may be wearing a mask because they're in, you know,

00:36:40.060 one of these vulnerable groups.

00:36:41.360 You don't know.

00:36:41.820 You know, you don't know what their situation is.

00:36:44.420 But this kind of thing.

00:36:45.740 Yeah, it's just what's the point?

00:36:48.480 All right.

00:36:48.800 Let's move on.

00:36:49.740 We got emails in a second that I want to have time for.

00:36:51.960 So we'll do this quickly for our daily cancellation.

00:36:55.920 We're going to be canceling the United Nations.

00:36:58.140 Many very good reasons to cancel the UN.

00:37:00.620 This is the one I'm choosing because it's the one that popped up yesterday.

00:37:03.960 Here's the tweet from the UN.

00:37:06.560 It says, what you say matters.

00:37:09.320 Help create a more equal world by using gender neutral language if you're unsure about someone's

00:37:14.620 gender or are referring to a group.

00:37:16.240 And then we get the guide here with the UN instructing us on how we are to speak from

00:37:23.240 now on.

00:37:24.120 It says, if you don't know someone's gender or when talking about a group, use gender

00:37:27.900 neutral language.

00:37:28.960 And then it gives us the old, barbaric, primitive way of saying it and then the new enlightened

00:37:35.440 way.

00:37:35.820 So mankind is crossed out.

00:37:38.220 Instead, we say humankind.

00:37:40.280 Instead of chairman, we say chair.

00:37:42.640 Instead of congressman, we say legislator.

00:37:44.740 Instead of businessman, we say representative.

00:37:48.020 Instead of policeman, we say police officer.

00:37:50.140 Instead of landlord, we say owner.

00:37:52.380 Instead of boyfriend or girlfriend, we say partner.

00:37:55.760 Instead of salesman, we say salesperson.

00:37:58.340 Instead of manpower, we say workforce.

00:38:00.100 Instead of maiden name, we say family name.

00:38:02.040 Instead of fireman, we say firefighter.

00:38:04.260 Instead of husband or wife, we say spouse.

00:38:07.820 Okay.

00:38:09.340 I've got a different idea for the UN.

00:38:13.160 And here's my, so that's one idea.

00:38:16.480 Okay.

00:38:18.120 My idea is, why don't we just continue saying whatever we want to say and using normal words? 0.99

00:38:28.320 And why don't we just not care at all about the fragile feelings of anybody stupid enough to be offended by it? 0.98

00:38:39.300 Because that's the thing. 0.99

00:38:40.460 If you're the kind of person who would actually feel in any way upset, even if you don't say it,

00:38:48.440 if there's any part of your brain that hears the word mankind and feels a little bit upset by that,

00:38:54.140 then your feelings are irrelevant.

00:38:56.080 Don't care.

00:38:56.740 I really don't care.

00:38:57.800 I don't mean, you're totally traumatized by it.

00:39:00.960 You collapse into the fetal position on the floor.

00:39:03.540 Doesn't matter.

00:39:04.340 I have no sympathy at all.

00:39:05.720 I'll just step right over you and I'll laugh.

00:39:07.440 I'll laugh at you.

00:39:08.100 I will laugh at you and step over you and keep walking while saying exactly what I want to say.

00:39:13.020 I think that is the right approach.

00:39:15.180 And that's my suggestion for the UN. 1.00

00:39:17.680 Also, by the way, you idiots, human has the word man in it. 1.00

00:39:25.620 Now, we can't say mankind because it has man. 1.00

00:39:28.620 How about humankind?

00:39:30.780 So you put the hue in front of it and then it's okay.

00:39:33.860 And what about person?

00:39:35.240 It has son in it.

00:39:36.580 Per son.

00:39:38.140 That's kind of masculine, isn't it?

00:39:40.560 In fact, get this.

00:39:43.480 This is going to blow your mind, UN.

00:39:46.000 The word woman has man in it. 0.72

00:39:50.520 Wo-man.

00:39:52.480 In fact, look at this graphic from the UN that we had up on the screen here.

00:39:59.460 At the bottom, it says UN Women.

00:40:02.760 Okay, I guess that's like the organization.

00:40:05.020 UN Women. 0.93

00:40:07.100 Men.

00:40:08.140 Women. 0.81

00:40:09.420 You've got it in your own name.

00:40:10.940 Well, you better, that's pretty bad.

00:40:14.840 You better come up with a different name for women. 1.00

00:40:17.200 You've got to rename them.

00:40:20.120 And what's the problem with boyfriend or girlfriend?

00:40:23.180 You're speaking specifically about somebody.

00:40:27.760 I mean, partner.

00:40:29.720 This is one.

00:40:30.800 Now, you can say whatever you want.

00:40:31.880 It doesn't offend me.

00:40:32.700 But I always cringe a little bit when people say partner.

00:40:36.900 Refer to their spouse or their partner.

00:40:39.680 Makes it sound like a business transaction.

00:40:42.640 I mean, it makes it sound like, you know, it's like someone you work in a law firm with or something.

00:40:51.320 Not someone you're romantically involved with.

00:40:54.000 But use whatever words you want because that's your affair, not mine. 0.83

00:41:00.440 Okay.

00:41:01.780 So, the UN is canceled for that reason and for so many others.

00:41:05.320 Let's go finally to emails.

00:41:07.300 And you can always email the show by having access to the mailbag if you're a Daily Wire member.

00:41:13.400 That's one of the great perks.

00:41:14.700 Probably the greatest perk that you get is you get to send me an email.

00:41:17.900 And we will go to, let's see.

00:41:26.560 Robbie says, Matt, I'm not going to bother debating the trans issue with you because I doubt there's anything anyone can say to change your mind at this point. 0.98

00:41:37.220 Instead, my question is, why do you care so much?

00:41:39.880 Why can't you let people live their lives?

00:41:41.820 Isn't that what you've been preaching with the shutdown?

00:41:44.140 I genuinely agree with you on a lot, but I don't get your obsession with this issue.

00:41:47.780 It doesn't hurt me if someone wants to say they're a woman or whatever.

00:41:52.700 Is it true?

00:41:53.940 Who am I to say?

00:41:55.240 But I'll let them live their lives, and I think you should do the same.

00:41:58.080 Okay.

00:42:00.940 Hi, Robbie. 0.85

00:42:02.380 So, I have to tell you, and I don't mean any offense to this, but this is one of the dumbest and most pointless and boring responses a person can give to any issue.

00:42:16.300 It's common, too, so don't get me wrong. 0.91

00:42:18.280 You know, you're not alone. 0.98

00:42:19.300 You have a lot of dumb, boring company in saying this, if that makes you feel better. 0.98

00:42:27.300 Why do I care so much? 0.99

00:42:29.500 Well, first of all, why do you care that I care so much?

00:42:33.440 What about that?

00:42:34.420 We could do this all day.

00:42:36.680 Why do I care so much?

00:42:38.340 Well, why do you care that I care?

00:42:39.620 Then you can ask why I care that you care that I care.

00:42:42.280 And I can ask why you care that I care that you care that I care.

00:42:45.000 And you can say, why do you care that I care that you care that I care?

00:42:47.000 And we can go back, et cetera, et cetera, unto infinity.

00:42:49.820 Or maybe we could just skip that whole rigmarole and leave it at the fact that I care about this issue for the same reason that I care about anything else.

00:43:00.380 Because I'm a human being with a brain, and my brain forms ideas, okay?

00:43:07.740 And I share those ideas.

00:43:10.100 That's it.

00:43:11.420 That's the whole reason.

00:43:13.040 Do you need more?

00:43:15.000 It's just the most annoying response.

00:43:17.340 Someone is sharing their opinion about anything.

00:43:20.220 And you're like, why do you care about this?

00:43:22.320 Because I do.

00:43:23.720 I just, because I'm a person and I have an opinion, here it is.

00:43:27.240 Do you have a response to it?

00:43:28.460 Yes.

00:43:31.180 Sure.

00:43:32.560 Now I could give you more reasons why I care.

00:43:37.540 See, I'm all about letting people live their lives, okay?

00:43:41.540 The problem is that that's the exact opposite of what the LGBT camp does. 0.95

00:43:47.280 Especially the T in the LGBT camp. 1.00

00:43:50.400 Okay.

00:43:50.700 They're the last ones that are interested in letting people live their lives.

00:43:55.320 I mean, let people live, are you kidding me?

00:43:57.020 They are literally trying to control the language that we use.

00:44:02.680 Not just in their presence, but in general.

00:44:07.320 They're trying to force us to not only accept, but affirm and promote anti-scientific nonsense.

00:44:15.700 They want us all to deny science, to deny biology, to deny common sense.

00:44:21.720 And I say no.

00:44:23.060 And your response is, why do I care?

00:44:25.600 Okay, how about this, Robbie?

00:44:28.700 I demand, okay?

00:44:30.300 I demand, right?

00:44:31.220 It doesn't matter why I demand it.

00:44:32.660 None of your business.

00:44:33.380 I demand that you affirm that two plus two equals five.

00:44:37.760 And I want you to say that, not just to me, not just when you're around me, but anywhere.

00:44:43.800 For the rest of your life, I demand that you pretend that two plus two equals five.

00:44:49.340 What?

00:44:49.780 You won't?

00:44:50.680 You won't do that, Robbie? 0.98

00:44:51.840 Why do you care so much, you freak, you weirdo? 0.95

00:44:55.280 Why do you care? 0.78

00:44:56.540 I mean, it's just two plus two equals five.

00:44:58.260 It's just arithmetic.

00:44:59.160 What do you care?

00:45:00.160 It doesn't affect you.

00:45:00.900 Now, you say that it doesn't hurt you if somebody wants to live as a woman.

00:45:06.940 Well, good for you.

00:45:09.060 That just tells me, though, that you aren't a teenage girl with a boy

00:45:12.480 burging into your locker room or onto your track team

00:45:14.900 and stealing all of your medals and your achievements.

00:45:17.380 That kind of hurts them, I think.

00:45:19.380 Don't you think?

00:45:20.680 Being deprived of privacy, being deprived of the achievements that you've worked for.

00:45:25.820 I don't know.

00:45:26.500 That seems like that might hurt.

00:45:28.120 Now, you're right.

00:45:28.760 That particular part of it doesn't hurt me because I'm not a teenage girl either.

00:45:34.520 Although, according to the left, I could be if I wanted to be.

00:45:38.520 But here's the thing.

00:45:39.740 So it doesn't affect me, but I actually care about people who aren't me.

00:45:45.840 Can you imagine that?

00:45:48.340 Only caring about the stuff that affects you personally, do you know what that's called?

00:45:52.420 It's called narcissism.

00:45:54.460 This is one of the problems I have with libertarianism, with the attitude of,

00:45:57.700 that doesn't affect you.

00:45:58.800 You shouldn't care.

00:45:59.840 That's just very thinly veiled narcissism, where you're claiming that only the things

00:46:05.700 that directly affect you should you care about.

00:46:09.080 It also doesn't really affect me that people are starving in Ethiopia.

00:46:13.280 Does that mean I shouldn't care about it?

00:46:15.500 So basically, your charge against me is that I'm not a narcissist.

00:46:22.180 Guiltiest charge.

00:46:23.180 You got me.

00:46:24.680 Now, here's the thing.

00:46:26.660 If a guy wants to go around claiming that he's a woman, fine.

00:46:31.080 If he wants to claim that he's Cleopatra, fine.

00:46:33.900 He could say he's the Queen of England.

00:46:35.540 I don't care.

00:46:36.180 But if he demands that I affirm it, now we have a problem.

00:46:42.520 If he tries to change the English language to support his delusion, now we have a problem.

00:46:48.280 If he tries to change school curriculum to indoctrinate kids into his fantasy, now we have a problem.

00:46:54.760 If he in any way tries to impose his falsehood on anyone, doesn't have to be me, but any other person,

00:47:03.560 now we have a problem.

00:47:06.180 And I'm going to have something to say about it.

00:47:08.520 And so should you.

00:47:12.480 Okay.

00:47:13.460 But I really appreciate the email, and thank you for listening.

00:47:18.840 And we will leave it there.

00:47:19.820 Thanks, everybody, for watching.

00:47:20.800 Thanks for being a part of another show.

00:47:23.160 I'll talk to you tomorrow.

00:47:24.440 Godspeed.

00:47:27.520 If you enjoyed this episode, don't forget to subscribe.

00:47:30.100 And if you want to help spread the word, please give us a five-star review.

00:47:33.200 Tell your friends to subscribe as well.

00:47:34.940 We're available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, wherever you listen to podcasts, we're there.

00:47:39.460 Also, be sure to check out the other Daily Wire podcasts, including the Ben Shapiro Show,

00:47:42.760 Michael Knowles Show, and the Andrew Klavan Show.

00:47:44.880 Thanks for listening.

00:47:45.960 The Matt Wall Show is produced by Sean Hampton, executive producer Jeremy Boring.

00:47:49.800 Our supervising producers are Mathis Glover and Robert Sterling.

00:47:53.040 Our technical producer is Austin Stevens, edited by Danny D'Amico, and our audio is mixed

00:47:58.100 by Robin Fenderson.

00:47:59.120 The Matt Wall Show is a Daily Wire production, copyright Daily Wire 2020.

The Matt Walsh Show - May 19, 2020

Ep. 490 - NYT Claims ＂Believe All Women＂ Is A Right Wing Conspiracy

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript