Ep. 543 - Why Biden's Nationwide Mask Mandate Idea Is Stupid, Arbitrary, and Illegal
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
183.47734
Summary
Joe Biden has proposed a nationwide mask mandate. This idea is very stupid on a number of levels, and we ll dissect each of those levels today. Also, a wave of depression and suicide due in part to the coronavirus lockdowns. And the New York Post reports on something called erotic weight gaining. And of course we have to talk about it.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Today on the Matt Wall Show, Joe Biden has proposed a nationwide mask mandate. This idea
00:00:05.180
is very stupid on a number of levels, and we'll dissect each of those levels today. Also,
00:00:09.180
five headlines, including a wave of depression and suicide due in part to the coronavirus
00:00:13.420
lockdowns. We'll discuss that. And the New York Post reports on something called erotic weight
00:00:18.220
gaining, which is a thing now, apparently. And of course, we have to talk about it. Finally,
00:00:22.480
in our daily cancellation, I will cancel human rights. I have my reasons. I'll explain them.
00:00:28.460
All of that on the way. But we start here. The newly formed Biden-Harris team has presented
00:00:33.840
their first federal mandate proposal, a preview of things to come, should this ticket win.
00:00:37.780
Democrats love nothing more than federal mandates, provided, of course, that they're the ones in
00:00:43.080
charge of the federal government. If they aren't, then naturally actions taken by the federal
00:00:46.920
government are literally fascist, literally tyrannical, literally what literal Nazis would
00:00:51.820
literally do. In any case, their mandated proposal is a nationwide mask requirement. Everyone in the
00:00:58.200
country, all 330 million people, must wear masks outside all over the place. So if you live in
00:01:04.140
like North Dakota with a population density of approximately half a person per 50 square miles,
00:01:09.300
you must wear a mask to walk down the street. That's the idea. And here they are explaining
00:01:14.440
their idea in more detail. This is not about Democrat, Republican or independent. It's about saving
00:01:21.700
Americans' lives. So let's institute a mask mandate nationwide, starting immediately, and we will save
00:01:30.360
lives. The estimates are we'll save over 40,000 lives in the next three months if that is done.
00:01:37.020
Now let me turn it over to my colleague and running mate. She has a few comments to make.
00:01:42.700
Thanks, Joe. That's what real leadership looks like. We just witnessed real leadership,
00:01:49.580
which is Joe Biden said that as a nation, we should all be wearing a mask for the next three months
00:01:58.560
because it will save lives. And the thing about Joe that the American people know is that his role
00:02:06.580
of leadership in our country has always been about doing what's best for the people of our country.
00:02:11.540
And it's also been about racism, right? Isn't that what you said, Kamala? It's about what it's doing
00:02:17.040
what's best, but also racism. I mean, you definitely said the racism part. He's racist. You said that.
00:02:21.060
That was part of it. Only just a few months ago, you said that. Anyway, putting that aside,
00:02:25.580
somehow they are, they are saying three months, everyone wears a mask. If you're a farmer in
00:02:30.440
Nebraska, wear a mask while you milk your cows. If you're hiking the Appalachian trail through West
00:02:34.980
Virginia, wear a mask. Wouldn't want to infect a deer or I don't know, a tree. Now there are a few
00:02:41.120
issues here. The first is a simple fact, rather perhaps irrelevant these days that the federal
00:02:46.000
government doesn't have the authority to require that 330 million people wear a certain article of
00:02:50.860
clothing or a certain accessory. I understand we're way past the point of worrying about
00:02:55.580
silly little things like constitutional authority, but even so, I just want to note for the record,
00:03:00.760
the federal government doesn't have it in this case. Second point, the efficacy of masks is far
00:03:09.700
from settled science, despite the way it's presented in the media. The New England Journal of Medicine,
00:03:16.080
for example, an article published in May says this in part, and this again was in May, so not all that
00:03:21.220
long ago. It says, we know that wearing a mask outside healthcare facilities offers little,
00:03:26.300
if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to
00:03:30.340
COVID-19 as face-to-face contact within six feet with a patient with symptomatic COVID-19 that is
00:03:36.160
sustained for at least a few minutes, and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes.
00:03:40.080
The chance of catching COVID-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal.
00:03:44.540
In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.
00:03:51.620
End quote. And I think the other fact you have to take into account here is,
00:03:56.740
even if you succeed in getting everyone to wear masks, which you won't, but if you do,
00:04:01.460
what you certainly will never succeed in doing is getting everyone to practice good mask hygiene.
00:04:06.260
The CDC says if you have a cloth mask, which most people do, and we've been told not to wear the
00:04:11.520
surgical masks anyway to save them for healthcare providers, then you should be washing it in hot water
00:04:17.560
in your washer or with bleach by hand after each use. How many people are doing that?
00:04:23.960
I have no idea, but it ain't everyone or even close to everyone. I'm sure of that. So
00:04:28.480
by requiring everyone to wear masks, the reality is that a certain large preponderance of people
00:04:33.200
will be walking around with dirty, germ and spittle-soaked pieces of cloth affixed to their faces.
00:04:38.480
How healthy is that? See, all of the studies on masks seem to assume that you're properly wearing
00:04:47.100
a clean mask. Well, what about a dirty one, which is what millions of Americans are wearing and will
00:04:53.640
wear no matter what? That's just the reality. And our policies have to deal with and in reality.
00:05:00.140
Third point, and here's, I think, a basic argument or observation that those in support of these mask
00:05:07.020
measures cannot answer and haven't even really tried to answer. If masks would save whatever,
00:05:13.740
40,000 lives or whatever probably arbitrary figure Biden gave us there, it would save that many,
00:05:20.400
and it would save that many in three months, he says. Then how many lives could we have saved if we'd
00:05:24.560
had a nationwide mask mandate for the last 10 years or 20 or however long to protect against the flu and
00:05:29.500
other illnesses? Yes, COVID has a higher mortality rate than the flu, yes, but you can't deny if masks
00:05:35.300
could save thousands of lives from COVID, then they would also save thousands from the flu, wouldn't
00:05:40.500
they? And a life is a life, isn't it? This is about saving lives, didn't you say? So why didn't anyone
00:05:45.800
anywhere ever at any point even mention the idea of a mask mandate to save lives during flu season?
00:05:51.540
Literally thousands could have been saved. Why wasn't it ever suggested? Why? I mean, let's use some hard
00:05:58.000
numbers to frame this. Arbitrary, yes, but so is the 40,000 figure, I suspect. So let's say just for
00:06:03.420
the sake of argument that a mask mandate over the last three years would have saved 40,000 lives from
00:06:09.480
the flu and another 10,000 from various other illnesses spread through coughing, sneezing,
00:06:13.680
talking, et cetera. So let's say it's 50,000 lives, three years. It seems like a very conservative
00:06:19.780
estimate if Biden is telling us 40,000 can be saved in three months from COVID. So again, let's just say
00:06:24.900
it's 50,000 lives over three years. If you're using the it's worth it to save one life argument
00:06:29.560
for a mask mandate, would that three years of a mask mandate have been worth it to save
00:06:35.580
a life? In fact, 50,000 lives, let's say. If it wouldn't be worth it, then why is it worth
00:06:41.160
it now? And if it would be worth it, then why didn't you ever suggest it? And whatever your
00:06:45.080
reason for not proposing a mask mandate before and thus tacitly supporting the deaths of so many
00:06:49.500
people by your logic, why don't you propose a permanent mask mandate going forward? Because
00:06:55.000
whatever time period you suggest for the mask mandate, three months, six months, whatever it is,
00:07:01.140
what happens when that period is up? Let's, you know, let's say we have a mask mandate for six
00:07:06.220
months, okay? 180 days. What happens on day 181? Are lives not worth saving anymore? Save lives for
00:07:12.980
180 days, but not 181 days? See, this doesn't make sense. Now, I personally don't care that much if
00:07:19.920
people want to wear masks or if individual stores want to choose to require it, their property, their
00:07:24.500
business, their choice. But a mask mandate, especially a federal mask mandate, is absurd, arbitrary,
00:07:31.800
onerous, and almost certainly unconstitutional. And that's the point. Now, let's get to our five
00:07:38.960
headlines. Before we talk news here, I got to tell you about our very good friends at Rock Auto. You
00:07:49.880
know, the last thing anybody wants to do right now is spend hours at an auto parts store. Last
00:07:54.060
thing anyone wants to do anytime is spend hours at an auto parts store, or frankly, any other kind of
00:07:58.360
store. It's so much easier to just go to rockauto.com. You know, it's better to do that than to walk into
00:08:04.400
the store, go through the whole rigmarole, answer all the questions, then just go online, they order the
00:08:08.140
part anyway. You could have done that yourself. Go to rockauto.com. You've got it at your desk,
00:08:12.580
you've got it in your pocket that you carry around, your phone. rockauto.com always offers
00:08:16.640
the lowest prices possible, rather than changing prices based on what the market will bear like
00:08:21.020
airlines do. Why spend, you know, twice as much for the same parts? Why spend twice as much
00:08:27.100
for a smaller selection is an even better question. rockauto.com is a family business serving
00:08:33.780
auto parts customers online for 20 years. Go to rockauto.com to shop for auto and body parts from
00:08:38.600
hundreds of manufacturers. The rockauto.com catalog is unique, very easy to navigate, and you can
00:08:44.860
quickly see all the parts available for your car truck. Go to rockauto.com right now, see all the
00:08:49.960
parts available for your car truck, write Walsh in there, how did you hear about us, box, so that they
00:08:53.660
know that we sent you. Okay, number one, journalists today, journalists today are celebrating another
00:08:59.360
journalist who asked a question. It's a little bit of scare quote overload here, overload, but
00:09:07.160
basically this, it's all bullcrap is what I'm saying, but he asked a question and is being hailed
00:09:12.560
and celebrated for, uh, this question. Listen to it here. After three and a half years, do you regret
00:09:19.720
at all, all the lying you've done to the American people? All the what? All the lying, all the
00:09:24.500
dishonesties. That who has done? You have done. Uh, tens of thousands. Yeah, go ahead, please, please.
00:09:32.600
Go ahead. I wanted to ask about payroll tax. So what we have here is what we've seen for, uh,
00:09:39.820
especially during the Trump. Now it's, it's been this way for, for decades really, but especially
00:09:44.340
during the Trump era, this is journalism as performance. Uh, it's not journalism at all.
00:09:50.680
It's just, it's a performance. He's, he's, he's performing for the camera. What other point would
00:09:55.180
there be to that question? But, but, you know, you're asking the president of the United States
00:09:58.860
a question. You're in a press conference. Um, this is, this is supposed to be a service that you're
00:10:04.200
providing for the people so that we can get answers and that sort of thing. Kind of answer,
00:10:08.080
what kind of answer do you think you're going to get from that? No, what he was hoping for. In fact,
00:10:11.820
this was just antagonism. Uh, this was, he was hoping for some kind of angry response from Trump
00:10:18.400
and then he could mix it up and, uh, try to embarrass Trump and at the same time, elevate
00:10:22.520
himself. Of course, that's what this is all about. But, uh, that's, you know, I didn't go to journalism
00:10:27.140
school, but admittedly, but I don't think that's what journalism is actually supposed to be. Number two,
00:10:32.200
David Blaine is back. The magician, performance artist, uh, I guess that's what we call him. He's got a
00:10:36.280
new stunt planned. Big deal. Hasn't done anything in 10 years. Okay. What has he cooked up for us now?
00:10:42.060
A decade later. He's been working on this. We're told for a decade. What is it? He had, well,
00:10:48.580
what he's going to do is he's going to hold on to some balloons and float really high.
00:11:23.520
All right. I, doesn't it strike you as a bit egotistical to call this stunt the Ascension?
00:11:35.140
But you know, the, the real problem is, is that a guy already did this. Remember there was that guy
00:11:40.160
that tied balloons to his lawn chair and floated up to like Mars or something, I believe, if I remember
00:11:46.340
correctly. Uh, in fact, multiple people have done this. They made a, they made a Pixar movie about this.
00:11:51.860
In fact, which is based on a true story. So this is, this just, I, to me, this is disappointing 10
00:11:57.180
years. And this is what you come up with. I'm going to hold a balloon and float. Cool. I, you know,
00:12:03.220
I would love to do that too, but I just don't know if it quite is worth the hype. Um, number three,
00:12:08.140
reading from the daily wire says more than 25% of, uh, young Americans age 18 to 24 have seriously
00:12:14.520
considered killing themselves during the last month. According to the morbidity and mortality weekly
00:12:18.660
report released on Thursday by the centers for disease control and prevention, uh, says the
00:12:23.240
coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has been associated with mental health challenges related to the
00:12:27.540
morbidity and mortality caused by the disease and to mitigation activities, including the impact of
00:12:31.460
physical distancing and stay at home orders. Um, symptoms of anxiety disorder and depressive
00:12:35.740
disorder increased considerably in the United States during April to June of 2020 compared with
00:12:39.400
the same period in 2019. Now this is many of us warned that this was going to happen. You're not
00:12:45.980
only taking away people's jobs and livelihood, you're isolating them, um, keeping them shut
00:12:51.120
away from contact with other people. And so of course you're going to have now, especially for
00:12:55.660
someone who's already dealing with depression, dealing with, uh, anxiety, mental illness, whatever
00:13:01.440
it is, shutting them away. And on top of that, you're also bombarding them every single day
00:13:07.460
with, uh, with you're going to die. It's a disaster. It's the end of the world type of stuff. So
00:13:11.380
it's just, it, it, it's not surprising. It's tragic and horrible. It's not surprising that
00:13:16.940
it would have this effect. Remember Trump brought this up months ago. And again, the, our truth
00:13:22.780
seeking truth, uh, finding journalists in the media mocked him for it and fact checked him.
00:13:30.720
Trump brought up months ago that this is going to lead to suicide and depression. And then we got all
00:13:35.340
the fact check. Oh, no, it isn't. They said, well, here we are. Although I do think we should also note
00:13:40.660
it, because it's important that, you know, and this is, this is one of the reasons why, um,
00:13:51.040
the, this, the, the lockdowns and the effect on mental health has been so bad is because we,
00:13:56.920
we already live in a culture that is very depressed and much more suicidal than at other
00:14:05.660
points in history. And it's a problem that goes down into very young ages. Um, so this is, this is,
00:14:12.640
this is part of a cultural trend, a longstanding cultural trend, which isn't to downplay it, but
00:14:18.740
precisely the opposite to say that this is, that we've got a, a, a serious problem. And even when
00:14:23.320
we get past the lockdown insanity, there's still going to be this problem. Um, and we could talk
00:14:29.440
about, you know, dissecting this and, but, but one of the, one of the, I think fundamental things
00:14:36.380
feeding it is that we live in a culture, um, that is at its core quite empty and people have
00:14:43.240
no sense of purpose, no sense of any greater reason for existence. Um, it's a, it's a very nihilistic
00:14:53.160
culture. And so that's what is going to lead in part to this as well. Number four, Brett Favre,
00:14:57.880
speaking to the USA today, shows us, uh, shows us what courage truly looks like. This is Brett Favre.
00:15:03.420
He says, um, and he was asked about the kneeling issue. He says, I know from being in an NFL,
00:15:08.480
NFL locker room for 20 years, regardless of race background, money you grew up with,
00:15:12.680
we were all brothers. It didn't matter. Guys got along great. Will that be the same with the
00:15:17.380
kneeling scenario? I don't know. If one guy chooses to stand for his cause, another guy chooses
00:15:21.540
to kneel for his cause is one right and the other wrong. I don't believe so. We tend to be fixed on
00:15:26.380
highs. I don't know what it's like to be black. It's not for me to say what's right and what's
00:15:30.720
wrong. I don't know. We should all be treated. I know we should, I do know we should all be
00:15:34.180
treated equal. If you can't do that, you shouldn't be in America. There's no right answer. Other than
00:15:38.140
that, the right answer is that we all get along. It seems like the more people try, the more damage
00:15:44.020
is done. This is, you know, yeah. What a, what a courageous answer from Brett Favre, but all these,
00:15:48.980
all these athletes are proving they may be physically tough, but, uh, when it comes to moral
00:15:54.820
courage, there's a real deficiency there. Your answer is, oh, no, there's no right. There's no
00:15:59.920
wrong. Here's all I'll say. We should all get along. That's all. I'll take a stand and say we
00:16:05.980
should be getting along. Great insight from Brett Favre. Number five, here's something that I just
00:16:12.100
found out existed, um, proving the old adage that ignorance is bliss. Erotic weight gaining is
00:16:19.640
a thing. Unfortunately, the New York post reports on the important story of a guy named Brian,
00:16:25.300
nicknamed Gainer Bull, who, uh, has intentionally gained over 300 pounds. He eats 10,000 calories a
00:16:32.540
day. One meal for him is like three combo meals, five or six sides now has a stomach the size of a
00:16:39.300
small asteroid. And again, all of this is on purpose, uh, some kind of like fetish. And he
00:16:45.740
apparently has a legions of fans who watch him eat and just enjoy gazing upon his bulbous
00:16:52.660
physique. Uh, one fan on Instagram, for example, left a comment saying you are one perfect inflating,
00:16:59.060
huge, handsome bear. By the way, the words inflating and handsome really don't go together,
00:17:06.060
but, but here's my point. Um, do I have a point? I think I do. The point is that the internet should
00:17:14.840
be destroyed. Uh, it is a cancer. It is a virus. Um, and this is, this is part of the problem.
00:17:21.700
This guy, Brian clearly mentally ill, his fans clearly mentally ill, uh, and, and mentally ill
00:17:30.280
people have always existed. Presumably fat fetishists have always existed in some capacity,
00:17:35.740
but now with the internet, people like this are, are able to congregate. They're able to form
00:17:40.340
communities where they encourage each other in their perversion and their degeneracy.
00:17:45.080
And that's maybe the worst thing about the internet. And there's a lot of competition for
00:17:49.000
that title, but perhaps the worst thing is what it has done to the concept of community. Because it
00:17:55.720
used to be that your community was the neighborhood where you live, uh, or, or you form a community as a
00:18:03.020
church or around some other sort of solid, healthy thing, real world thing. Now a community just
00:18:11.920
becomes a collection of people who enjoy the same thing. And often the thing they enjoy is repulsive
00:18:18.040
and self-destructive and bizarre. So there's no edification. There's no growth. Well, there is
00:18:24.100
growth, just not, not emotional and spiritual growth, uh, is what I'm talking about. There's nothing,
00:18:29.060
nothing positive to come of, of the community other than this mutual encouragement to continue being
00:18:35.300
weirdos. And that's most of the community on the internet. That's really what it is. Just a bunch
00:18:41.620
of weirdos getting together and encouraging each other and telling each other that they're not really
00:18:44.980
weirdos. Um, you know, you, it's, it's, someone has some, some freaky gross thing they're into.
00:18:51.500
They can just Google it and boom, they find a whole collection of other lunatics just like them.
00:18:57.060
Whereas in the past before the internet, you, you know, they would have hidden that part of
00:19:03.160
themselves in shame as they should maybe seek counseling for it. Either of those options are
00:19:08.640
better than what we have now. Um, and it's cause now you can, you can, you know, it's certainly
00:19:14.100
preferable to the, or preferable to go in on Instagram and getting your kicks by watching a morbidly
00:19:19.080
obese man eat a burrito, which is what's where we are now. And, and, and by the way, this cheapening of
00:19:25.180
the idea of community, it doesn't just apply to this fetish type type of stuff. I mean, I think
00:19:30.820
it applies even to, you know, people that say they're in a community because they all like
00:19:36.120
the movie star Wars or something like that. Um, or, you know, communities of people that play video
00:19:42.480
games. There's nothing wrong with playing video games or liking star Wars. That's not really a
00:19:46.700
community though. That's just, you enjoy the same thing. Great. That shouldn't be a community
00:19:52.480
because there's no other, there's no shared value system there. Um, the, the only shared experience
00:19:58.260
is just this recreational thing you like doing. Uh, it's not really what a community is supposed to
00:20:04.320
be. And we, we as humans do need community, but we're finding we are, we are, uh, fulfilling that
00:20:14.320
need in these kinds of communities around some one little thing that we like, even if it's a
00:20:20.460
perfectly fine thing rather than fulfilling that need to a real, real life, um, you know,
00:20:30.040
community. All right. Let's, let's go to our daily cancellation today for our daily cancellation.
00:20:37.640
I will be canceling human rights. Uh, no more human rights. So you don't, you don't get human
00:20:43.100
rights anymore. They're canceled. No, that's not exactly the point. I'm not canceling human rights
00:20:47.020
per se, as much as I'm canceling human rights as the foundation of our moral and political arguments,
00:20:52.180
especially as conservatives. I'm going to suggest that when we're making arguments,
00:20:56.480
advocating our position, we should be grounding our argument in something other than this incessant
00:21:01.140
appeal to human rights to sort of set things up here. I want to go back to Biden at that press
00:21:06.860
conference yesterday to something else that Biden said while pitching his plan to muzzle the country
00:21:10.480
with masks. I didn't play this earlier. Um, but, but this was, this, this was something else he said
00:21:15.340
during that press conference that I thought was interesting. Listen to this today. I want to talk
00:21:20.640
about one thing, very straightforward. Doesn't have anything to do with Democrats, Republicans or
00:21:26.920
independence. It has to do with a simple, simple proposition. Every single American should be wearing
00:21:36.740
a mask when they're outside for the next three months. Every governor should mandate. Every governor
00:21:47.400
should mandate mandatory mask wearing. The estimates by the experts are it will save over 40,000 lives
00:21:57.440
in the next three months, 40,000 lives that people act responsibly. And, uh, it's not about your
00:22:07.360
rights. It's about your responsibilities as an American. It's not about your rights. It's about
00:22:12.920
your responsibility. It's a rather extraordinary thing for a presidential candidate to say, especially
00:22:17.880
one on the left. Now, some on the right, some conservatives are acting quite scandalized and
00:22:23.100
outraged by this comment from Biden. Um, but I'd like for us to, rather than putting our hands up
00:22:27.920
against our foreheads and fainting like Victorian women over this comment, I'd like for us to stop
00:22:31.740
and really think about what's being said here. I obviously disagree with the mask mandate idea.
00:22:37.500
And so I disagree that it's our responsibility to all wear masks all the time everywhere, but, uh, I,
00:22:43.560
I appreciate the framing. And I think this is a good strategy by Biden to flip this rights thing
00:22:48.620
around and focus on the other R word, which is responsibility. And this is exactly what
00:22:54.040
conservatives should be doing, not about masks, but in general, in the battle of ideas, we should
00:22:59.020
be making responsibility much more of the foundation, the centerpiece of our political, uh, and, and
00:23:05.860
moral arguments rather than constantly going on about rights. Because that's all, all it ever it is
00:23:11.080
now. So we're talking about our rights. The problem with human rights is that it's an incredibly
00:23:15.740
vague concept. There's no agreed upon definition of it. And I suspect that the vast majority of
00:23:21.020
people, even on the right who talk about their rights, couldn't offer any definition if you ask
00:23:26.880
them, at least not a coherent one. Now, a conservative will, will tend to give a definition
00:23:31.600
like this. This is, this is usually about the best you could hope for. They'll say, they'll say
00:23:35.540
rights are inalienable and endowed by the creator. Okay. I agree. Uh, I agree with the founding
00:23:41.180
fathers on that, but that's not a definition. That doesn't tell me what sorts of
00:23:45.560
things actually are rights. That's a description of the source of rights, not a definition of
00:23:50.560
the term itself. It's like, if I asked you to define the word flower and you said, well,
00:23:54.420
they're pretty and they grow, they grow out of the ground. That's an accurate description.
00:23:58.020
Yes, but it's not a definition. It doesn't tell me what a flower is. It gives me part of
00:24:02.200
the picture. But if that's all I know about flowers, then I'm liable to walk through a forest
00:24:05.720
and think that everything I see is a flower, a similar problem with human rights. Um, we as a society
00:24:12.600
are walking through the proverbial forest and thinking everything we see is a human right.
00:24:19.120
I mean, we think that human rights literally grow on trees. It seems like rights are inalienable
00:24:24.260
and endowed by the creator. Okay. Um, then is housing a right? What about college? If you say no,
00:24:29.840
how do you know they aren't rights? And don't tell me they aren't outlined in the bill of rights.
00:24:33.000
So what? The bill of rights was never supposed to be a comprehensive list of every right that belongs
00:24:36.960
to man. Don't tell me the creator hasn't endowed us with that right, uh, or, you know, a right to
00:24:41.960
free housing, um, or something like that. How do you know? Did you ask him? Don't tell me it isn't
00:24:46.780
in the Bible. First of all, our laws aren't based on the Bible, uh, specifically because this isn't a
00:24:51.460
theocracy. Second, there's very little in the Bible that could be construed as an endorsement of say
00:24:55.820
free speech rights or due process rights. So how do you know those are rights? And someone,
00:25:01.580
some of the leftist right claims aren't valid. What is a right? This is the problem. And I firmly
00:25:09.360
believe that all of the strife and disagreement in modern society springs at least partially from
00:25:14.320
this dynamic that we all are always and everywhere talking about our rights yet almost none of us can
00:25:19.180
give a coherent definition of the term. And even if we can, it will be impossible to get even just a
00:25:24.600
preponderance of people to agree with it. What about responsibility? Admittedly, you'll never get
00:25:30.840
everyone to agree on what our responsibilities are or how to define the term, but I'm not suggesting
00:25:35.020
that we can ever get universal agreement on anything. What I'm suggesting is that the concept
00:25:40.240
of human rights is especially obscure and, and, and thus not a great foundation for an argument,
00:25:46.800
a position, or even a philosophy. Responsibility is a little better. Um, we can all define it. You know,
00:25:55.260
a responsibility or duty is a simply a moral or legal obligation. According to Webster, it's an
00:26:00.420
obligatory task, conduct service, or function that arises from one's position. Now, again,
00:26:06.140
not saying we've erased all ambiguity here. I'm saying that we're on firmer and more definable
00:26:11.280
ground than we were before with rights. I think wherever possible, we should be making our case,
00:26:17.140
arguing for a particular thing by framing it in these terms. Joe Biden says that, um, arising from
00:26:23.780
our position as Americans, we have a moral obligation to wear a mask to protect other people.
00:26:28.100
I don't agree, but that's a, that's a strong argument actually, and probably persuasive to
00:26:33.620
a lot of people. So let me give you an example of how this could work. If conservatives were to use
00:26:37.900
the same tack, uh, abortion. Generally, what we say is that an unborn child has a right to life.
00:26:44.380
And I agree that the child does, but we run into this problem. What is a right? How do you know that
00:26:49.500
he has a right to life? What are you talking about? And, uh, are you saying that the right to life is
00:26:53.320
universal and immutable? What about death row inmates? What about someone who breaks into your home?
00:26:58.060
What about enemy combatants on the battlefield? Do they have a right to life? Um, there are ways
00:27:03.980
to meet these rejoinders, but you see how we're already lost in the weeds. And in fact, we have to
00:27:09.520
admit that, well, no, your right to life is not in fact immutable. You can in effect lose it or forfeit
00:27:15.300
it just like any other right can be lost or forfeit. You don't have a second amendment right in prison,
00:27:19.440
for example. So you see how opaque this has all become and how far away we are now from the point.
00:27:27.260
We are just lost out way in the weeds out there. What if we try a different approach?
00:27:33.400
The other R word. What if we argue very simply that a parent has a responsibility to their child
00:27:40.380
arising from their position as a parent and from the special relationship between parent and child,
00:27:45.460
the parent has a responsibility to provide for and care for their child or to find someone else who
00:27:50.760
can, this is a lot more solid. And everyone, everyone agrees with it. Actually, to a large
00:27:56.680
extent, everyone agrees that the parent of a five-year-old who leaves a child alone all weekend
00:28:01.900
to go party should go to jail. Why? Because she has a responsibility to that child. Um, but,
00:28:07.840
but why is it that she can't go to a party and leave her kid alone, but her neighbor Jim can?
00:28:12.220
See, if the child is left alone, the mother is arrested, not the neighbor Jim. Why is that?
00:28:18.260
Well, because unless Jim was specifically hired to care for the child, he has almost no responsibility
00:28:23.360
to the child. The mother has almost all of the responsibility to the child. We all agree on this.
00:28:29.400
I've never heard anyone advocate the revocation of child neglect and abuse laws. So all we're doing
00:28:34.360
now as pro-lifers is making the rather logical and reasonable point that the parental responsibility
00:28:39.380
we all agree with and see and acknowledge starts in the womb. That's all. And the really interesting
00:28:47.260
thing is that the responsibility argument completely neutralizes the bodily autonomy argument from the
00:28:53.180
left. When you make the right to life argument, then it becomes a competition between the child's
00:28:58.000
right to life and the mother's right to autonomy. I suggest that we step out of that back and forth
00:29:02.700
entirely and make this not about anyone's rights, but about their responsibility. A woman has a right to
00:29:08.460
her body, sure, but she also has a responsibility to her child. It's that simple. Most debates can be
00:29:15.060
framed this way, I would say. Even gun rights can become gun responsibility. It's not so much that I
00:29:20.200
have a right to a gun for myself, but that I have a responsibility to protect my family and my
00:29:24.380
community. And I may need a gun to do that, especially these days. I think that framing in these
00:29:31.280
times in particular is more persuasive. And it goes in the other direction, okay? You say you have a
00:29:37.540
right to have your college debt paid for. Okay, well, I don't have a responsibility to do that.
00:29:43.600
I don't have a responsibility to do that for you. See, rather than making vague claims about your
00:29:49.100
rights, what you really need to explain is why I have a responsibility to pay for your college.
00:29:56.460
That's going to be a much more difficult case to make. We're so conditioned in this country to think
00:30:02.040
always about our rights, talk about our rights, scream about our rights. Rarely do we even think
00:30:07.520
about responsibility, about duty, about what our obligations are as parents, as people, as Americans.
00:30:13.160
Aside from the ambiguity of human rights and all the problems I've already outlined,
00:30:17.080
the other issue is that this obsessive focus on rights at the expense of responsibility has helped
00:30:20.960
to turn us into a bunch of self-entitled whiny children only ever thinking about what we are owed and
00:30:26.320
never about what we owe. There's quite a lot of focus on what other people owe, especially what
00:30:31.620
other people owe us, certainly. Those rich people, those privileged, et cetera, and so forth, they owe us
00:30:36.740
so much. They owe. They owe. What about you? What do you owe? What are your duties? What are you obliged
00:30:44.140
to do? And this is how we should think and how we should encourage others to think and how we should
00:30:49.180
present our arguments. And so, for now, human rights are canceled. At least we have to stop talking about
00:30:58.080
them. Talk about responsibility instead. That's going to do it for this week, everybody. Have a
00:31:06.360
If you enjoyed this episode, don't forget to subscribe. And if you want to help spread the
00:31:12.640
word, please give us a five-star review. Tell your friends to subscribe as well. We're available on
00:31:17.480
Apple Podcasts, Spotify, wherever you listen to podcasts. We're there. Also, be sure to check out the
00:31:22.180
other Daily Wire podcasts, including The Ben Shapiro Show, Michael Knowles Show, and The Andrew
00:31:25.400
Klavan Show. Thanks for listening. The Matt Wall Show is produced by Sean Hampton, executive producer
00:31:30.180
Jeremy Boring. Our supervising producers are Mathis Glover and Robert Sterling. Our technical producer
00:31:35.400
is Austin Stevens, edited by Danny D'Amico, and our audio is mixed by Robin Fenderson. The Matt Wall
00:31:41.580
Show is a Daily Wire production, copyright Daily Wire 2020. If you prefer facts over feelings, aren't
00:31:47.900
offended by the brutal truth, and you can still laugh at the insanity filling our national news cycle,
00:31:52.660
well, tune in to The Ben Shapiro Show. We'll get a whole lot of that and much more. See you there.