Ep. 583 - Big Tech Wages An All Out War To Influence The Election
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
186.27618
Summary
The big tech giants are waging an all-out war to suppress damaging stories about Joe Biden right before the election. We re facing a very dangerous moment, and though conservatives like myself don t like to think in these terms, it s time for the government to step in.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Today on the Matt Wall Show, the big tech giants are waging an all-out war to suppress damaging
00:00:04.200
stories about Joe Biden right before the election. We're facing a very dangerous moment.
00:00:08.200
And though conservatives like myself don't like to think in these terms, it is time for the
00:00:12.760
government to step in. It's long been time, in fact. We'll talk about that. Also, five headlines,
00:00:16.500
including more faux controversies coming out of the Amy Coney Barrett hearings. Those are always
00:00:20.340
fun. And in our daily cancellation, it's finally time for me to cancel Barbie. That's a very
00:00:25.680
important segment of the show. We'll get to that soon. But first, maybe less important news than
00:00:30.240
Barbie, but still, two major stories happening here. The first is the series of alleged revelations
00:00:36.460
stemming from, according to New York Post reports, a trove of documents, emails, videos, and other
00:00:41.440
files which were recovered from a laptop, dropped off but never picked up from a computer repair store
00:00:47.180
in Delaware. Here's the New York Post reading now. The computer was dropped off at a repair shop in
00:00:53.940
Biden's home state of Delaware in April 2019, according to the store's owner. The customer
00:00:58.740
who brought in the water damaged MacBook Pro for repair never paid for the service or retrieved it
00:01:03.580
or a hard drive on which its contents were stored, according to the shop owner, who said he tried
00:01:09.020
repeatedly to contact the client. The shop owner couldn't positively identify the customer as Hunter
00:01:14.500
Biden, but said the laptop bore a sticker from the Beau Biden Foundation named after Hunter's late
00:01:20.180
brother and former Delaware attorney general. Photos of a Delaware federal subpoena given to the post
00:01:25.880
show that both the computer and the hard drive were seized by the FBI in December after the shop's
00:01:31.860
owner says he alerted the feds to their existence. But before turning over the gear, the shop owner says
00:01:37.420
he made a copy of the hard drive and later gave it to former Mayor Rudy Giuliani's lawyer, Robert
00:01:43.100
Costello. Steve Bannon, former advisor to President Trump, told the post about the existence of the hard drive
00:01:48.980
in late September. And Giuliani provided the post with the copy of it on Sunday. OK, so that's that's
00:01:55.740
the post report on how the information came to light. As for the information itself, I'll read a
00:02:01.160
little bit of that to you. I can't post this stuff on Twitter or Facebook, but I can read it to you at
00:02:05.620
least. So I'll give you some of it. This in an article titled Smoking Gun Email Reveals How Hunter Biden
00:02:12.460
Introduced Ukrainian Businessman to VP Dad. In this article, we're told, quote, Hunter Biden introduced his
00:02:18.560
father, then Vice President Joe Biden, to a top executive at a Ukrainian energy firm less than a
00:02:23.320
year before the elder Biden pressured government officials in Ukraine into firing a prosecutor who
00:02:28.720
was investigating the company, according to emails obtained by the post. The never before revealed
00:02:34.700
meeting is mentioned in a message of appreciation that Vadim Pozarsky, an advisor to the board of
00:02:41.480
Burisma, allegedly sent Hunter Biden on April 17th, 2015. About a year after Hunter joined the Burisma board at
00:02:48.420
a reported salary of up to $50,000 a month. Pretty nice deal if you can get it. Says, dear Hunter,
00:02:53.380
thank you for inviting me to D.C. and giving an opportunity to meet your father and spend some
00:02:57.060
time together. It's really an honor and pleasure. The email reads an earlier email from May 2014
00:03:03.260
also shows Pozarsky reportedly Burisma's number three executive asking Hunter for advice on how you
00:03:09.720
could use your influence on the company's behalf. The blockbuster correspondence, which flies in the face of
00:03:16.020
Joe Biden's claim that he's never spoken to his son about his overseas business dealings, which never
00:03:20.720
made sense anyway, by the way. I mean, just in general, you're a dad, you never talk to your son
00:03:24.260
about what he's doing in his business. Doesn't make sense. Anyway, back to the report, it says this is
00:03:28.100
all contained in a massive trove of data recovered from a laptop computer. Okay, now another article from
00:03:32.980
New York Post has this headline. Emails reveal how Hunter Biden tried to cash in big on behalf of family
00:03:39.680
with Chinese firm. The report reads, Hunter Biden pursued lucrative deals involving China's largest
00:03:45.540
private energy company, including one that he said would be interesting for me and my family.
00:03:50.740
Emails obtained by the Post show. One email sent to Biden on May 13th, 2017 with the subject line
00:03:56.120
expectations included details of remuneration packages for six people involved in an unspecified
00:04:03.540
business venture. Biden was identified as chair slash vice chair, depending on agreement with CEFC,
00:04:09.180
an apparent reference to the former Shanghai-based conglomerate CEFC China Energy Company. His pay
00:04:15.420
was pegged at 850, and the email also noted that Hunter has some office expectations that he will
00:04:21.700
elaborate. In addition, the email outlined a provisional agreement under which 80% of the equity
00:04:27.480
or shares in the new company would be split equally among four people whose initials correspond to the
00:04:32.400
sender and three recipients, with H apparently referring to Biden. The deal also mentions or lists
00:04:38.760
10 Jim and 10 held by H for the big guy. Neither Jim nor the big guy was identified.
00:04:46.440
All right. Now, there's a lot more to these stories, and I'd suggest going to the New York Post website,
00:04:50.880
reading it for yourself. There are other alleged revelations, too. Lots of stuff about Hunter,
00:04:55.000
you know, allegedly doing drugs and cavorting with hookers and so on. I don't really care about any of
00:05:00.000
that. I do care, and everybody should care, about Hunter leveraging his connections to the vice
00:05:05.460
president and getting involved with China and all of the things that point to real corruption. That
00:05:11.740
matters. And what matters, perhaps even more than that, has been, of course, the response from big
00:05:17.100
tech. Because as the cliche goes, you know, the cover-up is worse than the crime. And that holds here,
00:05:21.840
that holds true here, too, I think. As you've probably heard by now, Twitter and Facebook
00:05:26.860
together have been working overtime to suppress and censor the New York Post reporting about this
00:05:31.940
scandal. And they have punished, suspended, flagged people who share the stories. And that includes
00:05:38.660
not just random accounts, politicians, reporters, officials, prominent people all being targeted by
00:05:45.260
the big social media giants for trying to alert the public to this story. The White House press
00:05:49.820
secretary was the latest this morning to be locked out of her Twitter account for posting the article.
00:05:55.160
Twitter actually disabled the link to the story so that you couldn't read it or share it.
00:06:00.100
I've never seen that before. Facebook announced right away through its spokesman that it would be
00:06:04.960
reducing access to the story. So this has been an all-out, full-court press to suppress credible
00:06:11.880
reporting from a major news publication three weeks out from an election. This is a direct effort by
00:06:17.040
these billion-dollar companies to influence the election. There's no other way to look at it.
00:06:21.620
Now, Jack Dorsey, Twitter's CEO, said last night that Twitter's handling of the situation has been
00:06:27.380
not great, quote-unquote. But they continue doing it. They're still doing it today.
00:06:32.720
The reasons we're given by Twitter and Facebook is that the story is, for one thing, they say,
00:06:38.180
misinformation. Andy Stone, Facebook spokesman, said,
00:06:40.560
this is part of our standard process to reduce the spread of misinformation.
00:06:45.400
We temporarily reduce distribution pending fact-check or review. Standard process, right.
00:06:51.180
Also, we're told that the story violates alleged policies against publishing hacked material
00:06:55.440
and publishing material obtained without consent. The Twitter safety account tweeted,
00:07:01.080
quote, the policy established in 2018 prohibits the use of our service to distribute content
00:07:05.560
without authorization. We don't want to incentivize hacking by allowing Twitter to be used as
00:07:10.980
distribution for possibly illegally obtained materials. Now, notice something, okay? The story
00:07:17.160
is suppressed based both on being misinformation and being hacked material. Well, how can it be both?
00:07:25.000
If Hunter's computer was hacked, then it's not misinformation. It's real. But if the story is made up,
00:07:31.460
then it's not hacked material. In reality, of course, it appears that it's neither hacked nor
00:07:37.060
misinformation. It appears the emails are real. That's what it appears anyway. And they were on
00:07:43.480
a computer that allegedly was abandoned. So that's not hacking. But my point is that it can't be both
00:07:49.820
misinformation and hacked. What is it? Hacked misinformation? So let's look at these excuses
00:07:57.440
one at a time, though. Misinformation. Again, no reason to think that this is misinformation.
00:08:01.460
But regardless, do Facebook and Twitter have a consistent policy and record of suppressing
00:08:08.440
misinformation or claims that are dubiously sourced? Of course not. Not even close. Not
00:08:13.620
remotely. Dozens of examples come immediately to mind. Like, for example, every anonymously sourced
00:08:20.340
Trump story we've ever seen. Every week, there's another claim from some anonymous person alleging this
00:08:26.540
or that about Donald Trump. People in the White House go on the record denying it.
00:08:29.860
Are those reports ever censored, banned, taken down, flagged as harmful?
00:08:35.840
No. But here's an even better example. Every time there's a police shooting, immediately wild claims
00:08:44.600
are made based on no evidence or in direct contradiction of the evidence. This goes all
00:08:49.740
the way back to the debunked hands up, don't shoot stuff and all the way up to now. Every time there's
00:08:55.100
a shooting, social media is used to advance the claim that the cop is a racist serial killer out
00:09:00.320
hunting black men. There's never any evidence of this. It is always, always misinformation. And the
00:09:06.460
direct consequence of the misinformation can be seen in the form of smoldering buildings and dead
00:09:12.020
people. Twitter and Facebook have never flagged any of that. Never suppressed it. What about
00:09:19.260
distributing content obtained without authorization? Again, dozens of examples spring immediately to
00:09:24.660
mind. How about Trump's tax returns? How about secret audio recordings of Melania Trump? Those
00:09:30.900
were not only posted to Twitter, but trended proudly for days. There was no news value to them. None. It
00:09:37.100
was an invasion of privacy and released solely to embarrass the first lady. That's the only reason.
00:09:43.360
Twitter made no attempt at all to restrict access to it. Quite the opposite, in fact. And besides,
00:09:48.700
plenty of legitimate reporting involves content obtained without authorization.
00:09:52.260
By this standard, nearly every major political news story over the last 50 years wouldn't be allowed
00:09:58.820
on the platform. When's the last time a politician explicitly consented to the publication of material
00:10:04.860
that would damage him politically? So this standard is nonsensical and applied unevenly. Very unevenly,
00:10:11.600
to put it mildly. Speaking of unevenly today, guess what was trending on Twitter? While the Hunter Biden
00:10:17.600
story is shut down, one of the top trends was hashtag Eric Trump's Ukraine scandal. Eric Trump's Ukraine
00:10:24.480
scandal. That's insane. That's flat out election interference. Flat out. Listen, I believe in private
00:10:31.180
property rights, but I also believe that billion dollar corporations that control the flow of
00:10:37.200
information should not be allowed to employ fraud and subterfuge in order to influence the outcome of
00:10:42.200
elections. That's where I stand. And I note that many of the people preaching about the rights of
00:10:46.500
Twitter also have spent the last eight years telling us that small town bakeries who don't want to make
00:10:51.420
custom wedding cakes for gay weddings are waging a dangerous assault on freedom and democracy.
00:10:57.480
No, that's exactly the other way around. There is zero danger to the public. Zero danger. If your local
00:11:03.860
baker doesn't want to put figurines of two dudes on top of a wedding cake, you could do it yourself.
00:11:08.280
It causes no harm to anyone. It is completely irrelevant. The only thing it hurts maybe is
00:11:14.480
your fragile feelings. But Twitter and Facebook are multi-billion dollar companies. They are not
00:11:20.000
bakeries. This is much more in line with your phone company cutting off service because it doesn't like
00:11:27.220
the political opinions you express while on the phone. It is that sort of danger, only worse, much worse
00:11:32.500
because people these days do a lot more communicating on social media than they do through telephone
00:11:39.020
calls. And that's why it's time for conservatives like myself to get over our visceral disgust at the
00:11:45.780
idea of government involvement in anything. And we have to just get over that. There is no free market
00:11:51.160
solution to this problem. There isn't. Unless you have $100 billion to throw around, you aren't going
00:11:55.640
to go out and make your own Facebook. It's just not going to happen. It can't happen.
00:11:59.060
So we have to decide whether we want to live in a world where big tech giants run society and decide
00:12:05.700
elections or if measures should be taken to regulate them and hold them to a basic standard of honesty
00:12:11.340
and fairness. That is the question we face. Let's get to our five headlines.
00:12:17.400
Well, you know, nobody likes spending hours at the auto body shop every time you have a problem with
00:12:29.300
your car. You got to go, you got to get in your car, drive over there. And what happens? You get
00:12:33.000
there and they don't have what you need anyway. RockAuto.com is so much easier, so much easier
00:12:37.940
than walking into a store, asking, you know, dealing with all the questions they ask and everything else.
00:12:42.720
And they're not going to have what you want. They're going to have to order it online anyway.
00:12:45.820
Why not cut out the middleman? Go to RockAuto.com. You carry it around in your pocket.
00:12:49.560
You've got it at your desk on your laptop. Just go there. RockAuto.com always offers the lowest
00:12:53.100
prices possible. They're not going to change their prices. They're not going to try to,
00:12:56.720
you know, milk you for all your worth. They're going to give you the lowest, the lowest possible
00:13:01.200
price. If you're getting it on RockAuto.com, you can be confident that it's the best price.
00:13:05.620
This is the best you're going to get. RockAuto.com is a family business. They've been serving
00:13:08.920
auto parts customers online for 20 years. Go to RockAuto.com to shop for auto and body parts from hundreds
00:13:13.600
of manufacturers. Best of all, again, prices at RockAuto.com, reliably low and the same for
00:13:19.360
professionals and do-it-yourselfers. You don't have to spend twice as much for the same parts.
00:13:23.140
Don't spend twice as much for the same parts or twice as much for, you know, a worse selection
00:13:28.200
of parts. Anyway, go to RockAuto.com right now. See all the parts available for your car or truck
00:13:33.420
and write Walsh in their how did you hear about us box so they know that we sent you. Okay.
00:13:38.980
Number one, early voting is underway and record turnouts are being reported. Here's a story from
00:13:45.220
the News Times. It says, with less than three weeks to go before the November 3rd election,
00:13:49.560
more than 14 million Americans have voted in the fall election, reflecting an extraordinary level
00:13:54.460
of participation despite barriers being erected by the coronavirus pandemic. In Georgia this week,
00:14:01.080
voters waited as long as 11 hours to cast their ballots on the first day of early voting.
00:14:04.920
in North Carolina, nearly one in five of roughly 500,000 who have returned mail ballots did not
00:14:10.740
vote in the last presidential election. In Michigan, more than a million people have already voted.
00:14:19.020
And then it goes on to say much of the early voting seems to be driven by enthusiasm among Democrats.
00:14:24.340
So, you know, you could believe that or not take it with a grain of salt. I know a lot of my listeners
00:14:29.800
maybe don't want to, don't want to hear this, but there does appear to be a lot of enthusiasm among
00:14:36.080
voters who hate Trump and want him gone. This, this is what I expected. I expected a massive
00:14:42.220
anti-Trump turnout. That's going to happen. It didn't happen in 2016. There was not a massive
00:14:48.120
anti-Trump turnout. And I think, I think part of the reason for that is that everyone thought he'd lose
00:14:51.920
anyway. And, um, also because Hillary Clinton was so just unappealing as a, as a human being,
00:14:58.540
you might say Biden is unappealing too, but it's, it's not to the level of Hillary. Nobody is at the
00:15:03.860
level of Hillary Clinton when it comes to be, comes to being viscerally unappealing, right?
00:15:08.600
So, um, that's the way things are trending. The good news is that the election isn't over yet.
00:15:14.180
There are still three weeks to go, but as I've been saying for a long time now, Trump needs to do
00:15:19.400
something, make some kind of pitch, have some kind of strategy to mobilize other than just the MAGA
00:15:26.200
crowd. Yeah. You need the MAGA crowd. You've already got them. That's good. You're going to need more
00:15:32.660
than that. There aren't enough people who wear MAGA hats to win the election. You cannot, you cannot,
00:15:38.480
that's your base. That's your core supporters. Great. You need more than that. Um, he needs to reach
00:15:44.180
the sorts of people who don't love him personally, maybe don't even like him personally, but also
00:15:51.160
don't like the Democrats. And right now are trying to decide, and I, I could be wrong. This is just my,
00:15:56.600
my guess. My guess is that there are a lot of people right now who are undecided only because,
00:16:04.440
not because they're trying to choose between Trump and Biden. They're trying to choose between voting for
00:16:08.680
Trump or not voting at all. And so Trump needs to have some sort of a strategy for mobilizing and
00:16:17.300
reaching out to those voters who are on the fence right now between not voting at all at all or
00:16:22.260
voting for him. He has to give them a reason to vote for him. He needs to make those voters feel
00:16:27.040
better about voting for him. He needs to do something. And his norm, his normal routine with
00:16:33.000
the rallies and the tweeting and everything, that's not going to be enough. And so I am worried about
00:16:39.160
this. I'm worried that three weeks from the election, I have no idea what the Trump campaign
00:16:43.700
strategy is other than just do all the same stuff he always does. That's not a campaign strategy.
00:16:51.220
Again, that's a, that's a campaign strategy for the people who are already excited about you.
00:16:55.440
I don't know what his strategy is for the, for the other million, that, that, that whole pool of
00:17:00.060
millions of people who are, who are gettable, you can get them, but they're not going to come to a
00:17:05.680
rally because they're not that excited. What is this strategy for those? Do you know? Does anyone
00:17:10.620
know? It doesn't seem like there is one. And that, that worries me. Um, I know Trump kind of ad-libbed,
00:17:18.720
ad-libbed his way to, to, to the win in 2016. Very impressive. I don't think we should assume it's
00:17:24.460
going to happen a second time. Conditions are very different. So I'm concerned about that.
00:17:28.960
Number two, during day three of the hearing yesterday, uh, Wednesday, there was a moment
00:17:34.220
from Amy Coney Barrett that if she were a liberal, it's only one, I'll play this for you because if
00:17:39.440
she were a liberal, this moment would already be, be turned into merchandise and, and t-shirts and
00:17:45.380
bumper stickers and everything else. Uh, here it is. Listen to this. To be clear, as I said, I think in
00:17:51.000
response to this question yesterday, I do share Justice Scalia's approach to text, originalism and
00:17:56.900
textualism. But in the litany of cases that you've just identified, the particular votes that he's,
00:18:02.380
he cast are a different question of whether I would agree with the way that he applied those
00:18:07.720
principles in particular cases. And I've already said, you know, and I hope that you aren't suggesting
00:18:15.560
that I don't have my own mind or that I couldn't think independently or that I would just decide,
00:18:20.680
like, oh, let me see what Justice Scalia has said about this in the past. Cause I assure you,
00:18:24.280
I have my own mind. Um, but everything that he said, um, is not necessarily what I would agree
00:18:33.180
with or what I would do if I were Justice Barrett, that was Justice Scalia. So I share his philosophy,
00:18:38.540
but I've never said that I would always reach the same outcome as he did.
00:18:43.960
I assure you, I have my own mind. She says that was a good moment from Barrett. I'm not saying that
00:18:48.880
I think it was some kind of epic smackdown of some sort, but, uh, or, or any kind of, uh,
00:18:53.840
empowering feminist anthem. I'm saying that in our vapid culture, if Barrett was liberal,
00:18:59.180
that's how it would be seen. I mean, during the, the, the vice presidential debate,
00:19:03.880
Kamala Harris said, um, I'm speaking and feminists turn that into, you know, the most brilliant comeback
00:19:09.840
and in the history of debates, they turn it into a shirt, like right away, you see the shirt here.
00:19:14.060
Um, so that's the way that goes. Meanwhile, another moment from the hearings. Uh, this one
00:19:19.080
was, uh, also seized upon by the left, um, in an incredibly dishonest way. I know that won't
00:19:26.420
surprise you, but first watch, watch this. Do you think Brown versus board of education,
00:19:32.920
super precedent is that you're not aware of any effort to go back to the good old days of segregation
00:19:38.140
by a legislative body. Is that correct? That is correct. Okay. So what's the news there?
00:19:42.740
Not immediately obvious to a normal person. You see that you think, okay, what's, what's the
00:19:47.360
problem? Well, they're making a big deal out of the fact that Lindsey Graham said good old days of
00:19:53.600
segregation, obviously sarcastically in the same vein that somebody might say, uh, when they're told
00:19:59.020
they need a root canal by the dentist, they might say, Oh, great. Does anyone, you hear that? Do you
00:20:04.060
think, Oh, that person must love root canals. Um, or, you know, if someone says, Oh, just what I,
00:20:09.740
you run into traffic and you say, just what I need the way the left is responding to what Lindsey
00:20:15.220
Graham, I guess if they were in the car with you, they would think, why do you need traffic? What
00:20:18.720
are you talking about? Doesn't compute. Um, so here's Jamie Harrison, Graham's opponent in South
00:20:24.820
Carolina. He said, Lindsey Graham just called segregation. The good old days, the good old
00:20:30.760
days for who Senator it's 2020, not 1920 act like it. And there were articles like this in media.
00:20:37.520
Um, it says Senator Lindsey Graham raised eyebrows during his questioning of judge Amy Coney Barrett
00:20:42.780
when he asked the Supreme court nominee, how much confidence she has in the landmark Brown versus
00:20:47.760
board of education. Um, uh, how much confidence she has in, I don't know that this is phrase.
00:20:56.420
Anyway, if she was asked if this was a super precedent Brown versus board of education. Uh, anyway,
00:21:02.540
it says curiously, however, Senator Graham who finds himself in a hotly contested reelection
00:21:06.200
also asked, um, if it's the, it also referred to the good old days of segregation. The article
00:21:13.060
says, wait, what good old days of segregation. I mean, he could have been joking despite the lack
00:21:18.460
of any facial cue or body language suggesting sarcastic hyperbole. However, Senator Graham got
00:21:24.760
a lot of attention during a recent debate with his political foe, Jamie Harrison, when he said that
00:21:28.500
young black people and immigrants could go anywhere in South Carolina, but added, you just need to be
00:21:32.560
conservative. Um, and then it goes on from there. Just to call this, to call this merely bad faith
00:21:40.360
would be a massive understatement. Yeah. I'm sure you're really confused about this. Aren't you?
00:21:44.980
Well, I don't know. Was he serious or not? I have no idea. Maybe he was really openly and publicly
00:21:50.620
reminiscing in a favorable way about segregation while on TV in a Supreme court hearing during an election.
00:21:56.980
He could have been, who knows? Um, okay, let's see here. There was one other thing.
00:22:06.580
One of the things I wanted to mention from the hearings that I didn't get a chance to yet. This
00:22:09.680
article from CNN, uh, headline is Amy Coney Barrett says she owns a gun, but could fairly judge a case
00:22:17.560
on gun rights. Obvious implication is she can't. If you own, if you, if you own a gun, how can you be
00:22:23.360
fair in judging a case on gun rights? All I'm going to say in response to this is imagine during
00:22:28.220
the Sonia Sotomayor confirmation in 2009, imagine the following headline. Sonia Sotomayor says she's
00:22:34.800
a woman, but could fairly judge a case on women's rights. Something, something tells me, I sort of
00:22:41.620
doubt that you, we would have ever seen that headline. I don't think we did. I could go back
00:22:44.780
and check. Uh, number three, scary stuff here. Tommy Lee, former rockstar speaking with the big issue,
00:22:50.520
uh, has said that he might leave the country if Trump is reelected. Here he is. He says,
00:22:55.600
dude, I swear to God, if that happens that I'm coming over to visit the UK, I'm out of here.
00:22:59.620
I'll go back to my motherland, go back to Greece and get a house on one of the islands.
00:23:04.540
And then he goes on from there talking about how bad Trump is. Um, to me, the big headline here is
00:23:08.440
that Tommy Lee is still alive. I honestly thought that he died years ago. I'm not, I'm not trying to
00:23:13.020
be funny. I really thought that. So congratulations to Tommy Lee. First of all, on not being dead
00:23:17.340
as far as him leaving the country. Well, now that I know he's still alive, you know,
00:23:22.840
I couldn't bear to lose him again. I can't lose him twice. In fact, I'll probably vote for Biden
00:23:29.080
just to keep Tommy Lee here. I am now a single issue voter. And my issue is making sure Tommy Lee
00:23:35.900
does not leave us because I don't want to live in a country like that. I don't know about you.
00:23:39.920
Number four, um, here is, uh, it's always, it's always tough when you take a politician like Kamala
00:23:49.340
Harris and you try to make her seem human. And, uh, but Rachel Maddow, MSNBC, they did what they
00:23:55.680
could to get a human moment out of Kamala Harris. And here's how that went. I just realized that I
00:24:01.620
would kick myself if I didn't just ask you, uh, before I let you go, if you noticed the fly
00:24:08.660
on vice president Pence's head at the time during the, or if that was something that only
00:24:14.000
go, could we could see it at home? Could you see it sitting next to him?
00:24:23.960
Did, did you have feelings about like, did you have the instinct to
00:24:29.660
you know, Rachel? I just, you know, I think that it's important that we kind of, um, find a way
00:24:45.720
all of us to move on and, you know, kind of fly away from this subject onto something else.
00:24:54.440
Yeah. Senator Harris, you are very kind. And let's just spare a thought right now for the
00:25:01.800
people who have to write closed captions for this portion of the interview. Uh, and for those who
00:25:07.060
have to transcribe it, cause they're going to have no idea how to convey what we just communicated.
00:25:10.940
That just, it makes my skin crawl. Doesn't it? It, it, it's, it's all, it's almost as bad as
00:25:15.800
Hillary Clinton trying to pretend to be, to be, you know, not a robot. Um, that's, that's tough to
00:25:23.880
watch. Tough to get through. Okay. Number five, my producer sent me this story. I haven't read it
00:25:27.320
ahead of time. I never read this stuff ahead of time if you can't tell. Um, but here's the story
00:25:32.200
from the Bristol post. It seems promising. Headline is man who farted in Uber ends up in court.
00:25:39.660
Uh, and then says, let's see, breaking, breaking wind in the back of an Uber taxi cost a man a
00:25:47.780
suspended jail term, but the repercussion for the taxi driver was that he is, he has to return to
00:25:52.300
his native Bulgaria. Drunken James Mallett let rip as Alexander Bonchev was driving him to Chaser's
00:26:00.300
nightclub in Kingswood. Bristol crown court heard it was the final straw for the cabbie who after
00:26:05.600
suffering abuse, abuse from other affairs told Mallett to get out of the vehicle because he,
00:26:09.700
you know, he farted to get out of the vehicle. Um, and at that point, Mallett began hitting the
00:26:14.560
driver. And, uh, so then there was a fight. Okay. So he's, so he's not going to jail for farting in
00:26:21.520
the Uber. He's going to jail for first, he farts in the Uber. It sounds like, and then he beats up,
00:26:26.060
starts beating up the Uber driver, um, insult to injury there. And he's in, and so that's,
00:26:31.940
that's what, what gets him prosecuted. So I was hoping, listen, I would, I would be fully in favor
00:26:38.340
of a law that penalizes people for flatulence in certain scenarios. I think in an Uber, you know,
00:26:46.940
is, is one big one on a plane. I've, I have in the past shared my own experience. We've all had
00:26:53.040
experiences like this sitting next to someone with chronic flatulence. Um, it is, it is, it's,
00:27:00.060
it's biological warfare. You shouldn't allow biological terrorism, especially on a plane.
00:27:04.920
And so I'd be in favor of prosecution in, in circumstances like that. It sounds like that's
00:27:08.880
not what happened here, but it gives us something to aspire to in any way. Um, all right, we're
00:27:13.800
going to get to our daily cancellation in just one second, but first, you know, small businesses have
00:27:19.340
really been taking a beating since March with all the lockdowns and everything. And, uh, if you're a
00:27:23.740
business owner, I don't have to tell you, you're feeling the effect, you know how it is. So that's why
00:27:27.700
we're excited to tell you that next Wednesday, the daily wire God King himself, Jeremy Boring
00:27:31.960
is going to be presenting alongside a team of world renowned business leaders at expert ownership
00:27:35.980
live, a two day virtual conference about leading through crisis. Now's the time for that. The
00:27:40.820
conference features a lineup of speakers like leadership author, John Maxwell, uh, the Benham
00:27:45.620
brothers, many others of founders of duck commander and Otterbox, all of them going to be there and
00:27:50.600
they'll share their stories about their businesses and startup journeys, tough times. And more importantly,
00:27:55.140
they're going to tell you how they have navigated the trials and tribulations of being a business
00:28:00.120
owner and, uh, come out stronger on the other side. This conference is one of the kinds of
00:28:03.780
investments that, that is really worth it if you're a business owner. So visit expertownershiplive.com
00:28:08.640
slash Walsh to register for $197. Buy a second ticket for a friend for 50% off. You don't want
00:28:14.340
to miss this lineup. You don't want to miss this event. They want to miss the God King, Jeremy
00:28:17.720
Boring. Again, that's expertownershiplive.com slash Walsh. Buy one ticket for 197, get 150% off.
00:28:23.680
That's expertownershiplive.com slash Walsh. Okay. Daily cancellation. Today for our daily
00:28:28.800
cancellation, something that was sent to me by one of my daily wired colleagues who said that
00:28:32.360
they thought it'd be good fodder for the daily cancellation. And he was right. Uh, it is my
00:28:36.120
pleasure today to cancel Barbie. I've been waiting for an excuse to do that. And here it is. Um,
00:28:41.780
what I'm about to play for you, this is a vlog from Barbie's Instagram account. Yes. The plastic
00:28:47.800
toy has a vlog and an Instagram account. And by the way, if you're wondering, Barbie has 1.8 million
00:28:54.080
followers on Instagram, 1.8 million people decided that they needed to keep up to date about what a
00:28:59.580
plastic toy is thinking and doing. So just more evidence that everybody on Instagram should lose
00:29:04.300
their right to vote. That's my opinion. And TikTok too. Um, okay. So here's the, the Barbie vlog
00:29:09.880
description says on today's vlog, Nikki talks to Barbie about racism and some of the ways that
00:29:15.540
she's been treated unfairly because of the color of her skin. Having conversations like this is one
00:29:19.960
of the first steps in addressing and combating a systemic problem together. Let's keep listening,
00:29:25.320
keep learning and take action to inspire change. Obviously we're in for a treat here. Um, so let's,
00:29:31.320
let's listen to what Barbie and Nikki have to say. Barbie and I had a sticker selling contest on the
00:29:36.660
beach last month. We split up and went different directions to see who could sell the most.
00:29:40.720
Well, while I was on the boardwalk, beach security stopped me three times.
00:29:44.860
What? They asked me all these questions over and over and they even called my mom.
00:29:49.900
I never told you, but that's why I sold a few stickers that day.
00:29:52.940
Okay. First of all, um, uh, a sticker selling contest on the beach. That's the most random
00:29:59.160
collection of things. You know, it's like, it's like I said, if I said I was having a celery eating
00:30:04.200
contest in the woods, like why that? And why there to each their own, I guess, but, but what a weird
00:30:11.420
thing to do with your time. And, and who is on the beach looking to buy stickers anyway?
00:30:16.160
If you only sold a few stickers, it's because every person you approach probably thought to
00:30:19.840
themselves, what, why would I want to buy a sticker? Who sells stickers? I get a free sticker at the
00:30:25.460
dentist or the bank. And even if I was going to buy one, why would I buy it here? Where am I going
00:30:29.920
to put it? I'm about to jump into the ocean. You want me to buy a sticker? You might as well be
00:30:33.500
selling toasters on the beach. It doesn't make any sense. It's the last thing I'm looking to buy in this
00:30:38.460
environment. Listen, if I was working beach security and I saw a couple of weirdos selling
00:30:44.100
stickers, I'd stop them too, because I'd figure there's something else going on here. So I'm not
00:30:48.360
buying this racism claim from Barbie's friend. I just, I'm not buying it. I'm sorry. It's a hoax.
00:30:54.220
Let's see what else she's got. And remember when we were going to join that French honor club at
00:30:58.880
school? Well, I made a perfect score on the entrance test. But when the teacher who didn't know me at all
00:31:04.520
gave me my results, he told me I only did well because I got lucky. He said he knew I couldn't
00:31:10.220
speak French that well. What? You speak French better than all of us. Why didn't you just stay
00:31:15.700
in the club and prove I'm wrong? I don't want to have to constantly prove and reprove myself.
00:31:21.000
I'm starting to get narcissism and entitlement vibes here, frankly, which is what I'd expect from
00:31:27.460
Barbie's crew. Spoiled brats, the lot of them. And okay, let's get to the big conclusion.
00:31:34.720
People did these things to me because I was black and they made the wrong assumptions about me.
00:31:39.040
And they don't make those assumptions about white people like me. And that's not fair because that
00:31:45.980
means that white people get an advantage that they didn't earn and black people get a disadvantage
00:31:50.680
that they don't deserve. Exactly. It's really serious. Some people even get hurt when others
00:31:56.940
think the wrong things about them. That's exactly why people are marching. Because when enough of us
00:32:02.040
stand together, people pay attention. Right. Because when we don't say anything,
00:32:08.040
we're just letting it continue. Yes, a really serious problem, she says. But the only example
00:32:13.980
she can give are the times she only sold a few stickers on the beach and problems in the French
00:32:20.120
club at school. You got to come with more evidence than that, Barbie or Nikki, whatever, whatever the
00:32:25.120
names are. Now, you might say that I am the one who should be canceled because I'm spending my time
00:32:30.940
on this show and your time debunking racism claims made by a cartoon character.
00:32:35.640
And you'd have a point, which is why maybe I'll get away from dissecting the specifics of these
00:32:40.960
claims and instead ask you to reflect on the fact that even your child's toy is repeating Black
00:32:48.800
Lives Matter propaganda. We're getting stuff about systemic racism and white privilege from a
00:32:52.980
children's toy. Pretty soon, we're going to be at a point where you walk through the toy aisle at
00:32:58.300
Target and press a button on a teddy bear's foot where it says, try me. And the bear delivers a monologue
00:33:04.120
about the dangers of heteronormativity and cisgendered privilege. And, you know, of course,
00:33:10.180
we can make jokes about it. And we can always say, well, it's just Barbie, who cares? Which,
00:33:16.040
fair point. But this is one very small symptom and example of a larger cultural reality, which is that
00:33:22.560
radical left ideas have seeped into every nook and cranny of society. In the leftist mind,
00:33:29.920
everything, I mean everything, every last thing is a tool to convert the heathen masses.
00:33:38.000
And that only means that I have to keep canceling more and more things. It's a war of attrition at
00:33:43.600
this point. And Barbie is the latest casualty. And that's it for me today. By the way, before we wrap
00:33:52.460
up, I want to say, make sure to hit subscribe while you're here. If you're watching this on
00:33:57.080
YouTube, hit the subscribe, smash the like button. I have to start saying stuff like this now. I have
00:34:03.100
no choice. Don't judge me. But please do that. And I'll talk to you tomorrow. Have a great day. Godspeed.
00:34:10.900
If you enjoyed this episode, don't forget to subscribe. And if you want to help spread the
00:34:17.280
word, please give us a five-star review. Tell your friends to subscribe as well. We're available on
00:34:22.120
Apple Podcasts, Spotify, wherever you listen to podcasts. We're there. Also, be sure to check out
00:34:26.720
the other Daily Wire podcasts, including The Ben Shapiro Show, Michael Knowles Show, and The Andrew
00:34:30.060
Klavan Show. Thanks for listening. The Matt Wall Show is produced by Sean Hampton, executive producer
00:34:34.820
Jeremy Boring. Our supervising producers are Mathis Glover and Robert Sterling. Our technical producer
00:34:40.040
is Austin Stevens, edited by Danny D'Amico, and our audio is mixed by Robin Fenderson. The Matt Wall
00:34:46.240
Show is a Daily Wire production, copyright Daily Wire 2020. Facebook and Twitter suppress evidence of
00:34:52.460
Joe Biden's corruption, conservatives call to break up big tech, and Democrat politicians keep up the
00:34:58.000
sexual creepiness with Amy Coney Barrett. Check it out on The Michael Knowles Show.