Ep. 596 - A Crisis Of Trust And A Close Election
Episode Stats
Summary
Today on The Matt Wall Show, Matt talks about the chaos and uncertainty surrounding the election, and why we need to go back and count the votes. Also, 5 headlines of the day: Move across the country to legalize marijuana, Is it time for the GOP to make marijuana legalization part of its platform? National Geographic speculates that prehistoric people 9,000 years ago may have been proponents of left-wing gender theory, and much more.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Today on The Matt Wall Show, chaos and uncertainty around the election.
00:00:03.300
This is the inevitable result of a confused and haphazard voting system combined with a total
00:00:08.700
lack of trust in the media and our institutions. The media now scolds Americans who question the
00:00:13.840
election results, but it's their own fault for giving us so many reasons to doubt everything
00:00:18.120
they tell us. Also, five headlines, including moves all across the country to legalize drugs.
00:00:23.220
Is it time for the GOP to make marijuana legalization part of its platform? And in
00:00:27.740
our daily cancellation, I will cancel National Geographic for speculating that prehistoric
00:00:33.420
people 9,000 years ago may have been proponents of left-wing gender theory. All of that and much
00:00:39.440
more coming up. But let's begin here with something very simple. Here's my radical position, okay?
00:00:44.600
All of the legal and valid votes should be counted. And we should make sure that they're counted
00:00:50.720
correctly. That's it. That's my whole position. It should be uncontroversial, bipartisan.
00:00:56.520
But apparently it's not. Apparently, it's an extreme right-wing talking point to advocate for
00:01:02.740
careful and correct tabulation of the results. Somehow, in fact, it undermines the legitimacy
00:01:07.900
of our election. It undermines the legitimacy of our election to make sure that the election is
00:01:12.920
legitimate. This is what we're being told. And we're being told this, again, by the same people
00:01:17.060
who for years called Trump an illegitimate president with no evidence or reason for that claim.
00:01:23.020
So here's the reality. Even without any indication of malfeasance, even if there were no hints of
00:01:31.400
possible subterfuge, I would still be saying that there should be recounts and audits for three rather
00:01:37.460
important reasons. Number one, it's an extremely close election with the results in some states
00:01:42.060
coming down to less than one percentage point separation between the candidates, which puts it
00:01:46.680
in the range where recounts can be done already. If only a comparatively few votes determine the outcome
00:01:51.780
of a hotly contested election, there is reason to go back and make sure everything was done right.
00:01:57.240
Very simple. Number two, we have never seen so many ballots mailed in and sent early. This is an
00:02:03.400
entirely new world we're in now. Elections have never been done like this. They shouldn't be done
00:02:08.400
like this now. It's obviously led to confusion already. There have been problems at a minimum.
00:02:14.100
And that's just from what we know. Massive delays, ballots seeming to appear out of nowhere.
00:02:18.400
Just this morning, it was announced that Georgia has 50,000 to 60,000 uncounted ballots,
00:02:23.180
which was, quote, more than initially thought. We need to understand what's happening here.
00:02:29.920
It would be insane to just take the results as they're first reported when the states have to
00:02:35.760
keep backtracking and they don't seem to know what they're doing as they do it. Number three,
00:02:40.720
as discussed yesterday, there is a widespread belief that Donald Trump is a real-life fascist dictator
00:02:46.840
who has effectively murdered hundreds of thousands of Americans and wants to murder
00:02:50.880
thousands more. This is false, obviously ridiculous, but it's what people believe. It's
00:02:56.480
what they've been told, which creates an enormous, perhaps overwhelming incentive to cheat.
00:03:01.960
And it's another reason to go back and check again. These are the reasons, again, for better
00:03:07.460
oversight and double-checking that would stand even if you didn't have indications of possible fraud
00:03:12.540
happening. But we do have those indications on top of everything else. For example, they taped up
00:03:17.400
the windows in Michigan where people were counting ballots, taped up the windows so that nobody could
00:03:21.400
look in and see. What's the reason for that? Is there a good reason? Is there an honest reason?
00:03:29.520
In North Carolina, they're now saying that they're not going to update their total vote count until next
00:03:33.920
week, November 12th. In Pennsylvania, they're allowing ballots to be counted even if they don't arrive
00:03:40.440
until three days after the election. And even if they're not clearly postmarked for before the
00:03:44.920
deadline, they will count ballots that could have been mailed after the election. They will. That's
00:03:51.960
true. There is reason to be suspicious about some of this stuff, especially that last point about
00:03:56.920
Pennsylvania. And especially because Pennsylvania officials are in the can for Biden and they're not
00:04:01.760
hiding it. The Pennsylvania attorney general announced a day before the election that Biden would
00:04:07.000
win. The secretary of state in Pennsylvania, who's in charge of the vote count, said on Twitter a
00:04:12.540
couple of years ago that, quote, using the title president before the word Trump really demeans the
00:04:17.880
office of the presidency. This is an extremely partisan person who hates Trump so much that to
00:04:24.520
simply call him president demeans the office in her mind. Is there at least reason to suspect that
00:04:29.680
maybe those late ballots are being allowed and the rules are being loosened and changed at the last
00:04:34.440
minute because these people who hate Trump hate Trump and want him gone? Is there a reason to
00:04:40.340
maybe possibly consider that? Yes, there is, to put it very mildly. Listen, this is what it comes down
00:04:47.400
to. We are, as Americans, in a position where we are being asked and told to trust what we're told,
00:04:55.260
right? But trust what and who? Well, trust information disseminated by hyper-partisan officials
00:05:01.360
through the mouthpiece of a hyper-partisan media. And we're told that it's our fault if we don't
00:05:07.840
trust them. We're conspiracy theorists, that we somehow are the ones undermining the integrity and
00:05:13.840
legitimacy of our system. No, it isn't us, you damned liars, you snakes. It is not us. It's you.
00:05:21.520
These people, by these people I referred to the whole Democrat media complex, the ones who
00:05:26.060
we're being asked to trust right now, these people have spent years openly lying. And this goes way
00:05:32.200
back before Trump, but has been significantly worse, more obvious, more pronounced, more relentless
00:05:36.740
under Trump. They said Trump was a Russian spy. They ran with every ridiculous, unverified claim
00:05:42.200
they could. They tried to take down Kavanaugh by calling him a serial gang rapist. They say even now
00:05:47.380
that Amy Coney Barrett is an illegitimate Supreme Court justice. Nancy Pelosi said that a few days ago.
00:05:51.860
No basis for that. No justification. It's a straight out lie. Insidious, reprehensible,
00:05:57.440
immoral, told for the sake of gaining power. Like all the other lies they tell. And this is just in
00:06:03.920
the political realm. The Democrat media complex has also encouraged and defended and justified
00:06:08.820
rioting in the streets, pouring fuel on the fire, literally, continuously, by blowing every out-of-context
00:06:14.560
police shooting wildly out of proportion, telling us that there's a conspiracy of racist cops out
00:06:19.820
hunting and killing black men. They do this. They know it's not true. They know the damage
00:06:25.180
it causes. They know that it's getting people killed, but they do it anyway because it's about
00:06:29.160
power. Ends justify the means. And now they have the audacity to demand trust and the audacity to act
00:06:38.000
offended and hurt if we suggest that maybe these people would cheat. Maybe these people who have been
00:06:45.480
cheating already would continue cheating on election day. No. Go to hell. Don't give me that. You did
00:06:53.280
this. You deserve it. This is your fault. We don't trust you. We never will. We need evidence. We need
00:06:59.360
receipts. Your word is nothing. Your word is trash. You have trashed it. You have made this country what
00:07:07.480
it is now. You have planted these seeds. And now you will reap them. And that's just how it's going to be.
00:07:16.300
Blame yourself. It's all your fault. Let's get to our five headlines.
00:07:27.620
Well, you know, with all the craziness happening in the world right now, maybe it makes you start
00:07:31.480
thinking about, you know, you have to be prepared for anything that might happen. It's all. I think
00:07:36.640
we should be thinking in terms of getting prepared. And one thing that you should do to be prepared is
00:07:42.220
to have life insurance. And the problem is that, you know, shopping for life insurance can seem like
00:07:46.560
a daunting task. It seems like the kind of thing, you know, you don't know where to start, where to go.
00:07:50.620
But if you've got loved ones, then it's really important that you do it. And that's why policy
00:07:55.940
genius is around. And that's why they make it very easy to do. They combine a cutting edge insurance
00:08:00.260
marketplace with help from licensed experts to save you time and money. And just because it's
00:08:04.360
cutting edge doesn't mean it's difficult to do. Right now, you could save 50% or more by using
00:08:08.180
policy genius to compare life insurance. When you're shopping for a policy that could last for
00:08:11.680
more than a decade, those savings really start to add up. You could save a lot of money. So
00:08:15.360
head to policygenius.com. In minutes, you can work out how much coverage you need,
00:08:19.920
compare quotes from top insurers to find your best price. Policy genius will compare policies
00:08:23.960
starting as at as little as $1 a day. You might even be eligible to skip the in-person medical exam,
00:08:29.640
you know, but you got to go to policy genius and figure that out. So once you apply,
00:08:33.840
the policy genius will handle team will handle all the red tape, all the paperwork and everything.
00:08:38.240
They're going to take care of that. All you got to do is go there and apply very, very easy.
00:08:42.040
So if you need life insurance, head to policygenius.com right now to get started.
00:08:46.320
You can save 50% or more by comparing quotes policy genius. When it comes to insurance,
00:08:52.040
it's important to get it right. All right. So reading from the hill, it says,
00:08:59.500
stung by their party's dispiriting showing at the polls on Tuesday, two moderate house Democrats say
00:09:06.100
they and other centrists are privately discussing a plan that was unthinkable just 24 hours earlier,
00:09:12.260
throwing their support behind a challenger to speaker, Nancy Pelosi. The two Democrats told
00:09:16.100
the hill on Wednesday that they were reaching out to their colleagues about backing one of Pelosi's
00:09:20.100
top lieutenants, house democratic caucus chairman, Hakeem Jeffries for speaker in the house Congress.
00:09:25.340
He's the only one prepared and positioned to be speaker. So one of the democratic lawmakers,
00:09:29.140
he bridges moderates and progressives better than anybody. And most importantly, he's not Pelosi.
00:09:34.360
Although apparently Jeffrey shot down the idea and said he's focused on, you know,
00:09:38.380
on keeping his current spot. Of course, he has to say that here's, and I've been reading more about
00:09:44.100
this and you were seeing this more and more that while Democrats need to moderate a little bit,
00:09:49.600
they need to start elevating the centrists and moderates in their party. The problem
00:09:55.140
is that, and this is a, this is a pretty big logistical problem. There are no centrists and
00:10:01.360
moderates in the Democrat party to elevate. I mean, we, we might be down to like in the entire
00:10:08.440
Democrat party across the entire country, there might be literally a hand. Well, not literally a
00:10:12.400
handful. There might be, you know, two or three or four or five. I mean, it's, it's, there are very,
00:10:17.780
very few of them because this is what the Democrat party has become is even the so-called anytime you
00:10:25.800
hear that someone is a moderate Democrat, well, ask them, do they believe in any restrictions for
00:10:33.560
abortions whatsoever? Do they believe in that? It's okay to kill infants up until the moment of birth
00:10:39.220
because you'll find even the moderate ones hold that view, which is an extreme view.
00:10:44.080
Do they believe in pregnant men? Do they think that men can get pregnant?
00:10:48.800
Even the moderate ones hold that view. These are radical extreme viewpoints that even the so-called
00:10:55.760
moderate Democrats subscribe to. And that's going to be a problem for the Democrat party. If they want
00:11:00.580
to moderate, they're always moderating in relation to how far left they've gone. So what is centrist and
00:11:09.600
moderate in a moderate in a modern Democrat party would have been wildly extreme left wing 25, 30 years
00:11:16.060
ago? Um, number two, election protests all across the country. And here's how it went in New York.
00:11:23.760
As you can see there, she spits in the officer's face, uh, is arrested. It's quite satisfying at least
00:11:51.860
to see her taken down and arrested. Hopefully that disgusting trashy woman will be locked in a cage
00:11:57.640
for a long time. You know, spitting on a police officer, already a crime doing it during a pandemic
00:12:02.160
should be even more of a crime. Uh, you know, charger is a biological terrorist thrower in Gitmo.
00:12:08.580
I'd be fine with that. This is what we talked about yesterday, feminism and the effect it has on
00:12:13.880
women. Well, you know, when you see videos like this, here you go, crass, vulgar, gross, uh, the
00:12:22.460
obliteration of anything that is truly feminine. That's, that's what you get from feminism. Number
00:12:28.320
three, uh, hilarious stuff here. The daily wire reports that Bloomberg spent a hundred million dollars
00:12:33.640
in Florida, well, Florida, Ohio, and Texas spent a hundred million dollars total in all those states
00:12:38.960
for Joe Biden. And all of those states went to Trump handily comfortably. Um, this, after the
00:12:45.600
guy blew through like a billion dollars on his own campaign, a campaign that lasted about 17 seconds
00:12:52.240
or so, that's how much he's wasted. It really is amazing. Have we ever seen anything? Have we ever
00:12:59.520
seen money wasted like this so quickly with nothing to show for it? Well, I guess we see it all the time
00:13:06.560
with our government. They blow through trillions with nothing to show for it, but on a private level,
00:13:10.400
on a private scale, have we seen it? I don't know. Uh, just a billion, 1.1 billion up in flames, even
00:13:16.640
worse than up in flames. It would have been better for him to literally burn it because then at least
00:13:20.620
he'd have the ashes that he could compost and use it to grow tomatoes and cucumbers. He'd get a nice salad
00:13:27.600
out of the deal, kind of an expensive salad. But, um, for that, he doesn't even have a salad for this.
00:13:32.340
Nothing at all. This was all for nothing, but I think that's great and, uh, quite hilarious. I mean,
00:13:38.100
it's, he's the kind of guy that you enjoy seeing humiliated. Might not be the most charitable thing
00:13:42.580
to say, but that's where I'm at right now. Um, and, uh, in other election news with a lot of
00:13:48.060
uncertainty about which candidates Americans chose, it does seem certain that Americans chose something
00:13:54.180
else, uh, drugs. We don't know which candidate they prefer, but, um, it does seem like Americans are
00:14:00.520
big fans of drugs. Here's a, here's the Vox article. It says in every state where a ballot
00:14:05.080
measure asked Americans to reconsider the drug war voters cited with reformers in Arizona,
00:14:11.540
Montana, New Jersey, and South Dakota voters legalized marijuana for recreational purposes
00:14:15.240
in Mississippi and South Dakota, separate from the full legalization measure, uh, voters legalized
00:14:20.160
medical marijuana in Oregon voters decriminalized, but not legalized all drugs is a decriminalization
00:14:28.940
of all drugs, including cocaine and heroin. Actually, the only thing that surprises me there
00:14:32.640
is that that hadn't already happened. You mean that up until now, heroin and cocaine was,
00:14:39.820
was technically criminalized in Oregon. You never know it when you look at the footage out of Portland,
00:14:45.200
also in Oregon voters, uh, legalized the use of, um, a psychedelic drug found in magic mushrooms
00:14:50.560
for supervised therapeutic uses in Washington, DC voters in effect, decriminalized psychedelic plants
00:14:56.920
following the lead of several other cities. Um, and with its vote, Oregon became the first state
00:15:02.120
in the U S in modern times to decriminalize all drugs. And marijuana is now legalized in 15 states
00:15:08.400
and DC, although DC still, uh, allows, doesn't allow sale of marijuana. So it's legal, but you can't
00:15:14.960
sell it. That makes a lot of sense. So this is, um, with, with everything else happening, I think this
00:15:20.980
isn't getting a whole lot of attention, but this is a pretty significant shift. Um, I mean, you want
00:15:27.160
to talk about the way things have shifted. You go back 20 or 25 years, uh, you know, marijuana was
00:15:33.640
illegal, I think everywhere. And, uh, but, but also I think if you look at the opinion polls,
00:15:39.180
almost everyone would be against all forms of, of drug legalization. And now it's a totally mainstream
00:15:44.500
view. And the thing is, you know, I don't feel, I've never felt especially strong about this.
00:15:50.260
A couple of lines I will draw, I think pretty easily. Uh, I, I think to legalize or decriminalize
00:15:55.920
hard drugs like heroin, it's crazy. Um, I also, but I also think on the other end of it,
00:16:02.180
legalizing medicinal marijuana, obviously, I mean the whole idea that the situation that's been in many
00:16:08.540
states for so long where, you know, you weren't allowed to use medicinal marijuana. If you had,
00:16:14.500
chronic pain or terminal cancer, uh, something like that, you couldn't use medicinal marijuana.
00:16:19.300
You could use medicinal heroin and you, you, you, you could go get Oxycontin or something
00:16:23.800
extremely addictive. Lots of people get addicted to it. Lots of people overdose on it. So that's okay,
00:16:30.820
but not medicinal marijuana, which is much less addictive, much safer. Some would say more
00:16:36.360
effective. Uh, that never made any sense. So it seems to me two obvious things, two obvious lines
00:16:41.040
you could draw would seem to me. Uh, no heroin, heroin should not be legal, should be criminalized.
00:16:47.320
Uh, medicinal marijuana should be legalized. And then in the middle, you know, where do you go
00:16:51.900
there? And I've kind of, I've kind of gone back and forth on it, but I think, um, I really, and I,
00:17:00.460
and I would admit this that I, I still can't fully bring myself on board with the idea of legalizing
00:17:07.860
marijuana, but it's more just on a visceral level. I don't have a great argument against it because
00:17:13.460
any, any argument, and I would, I, I, I admit this, any argument I would make against legalizing
00:17:20.740
marijuana would apply, you know, the social harm and all that sort of thing would apply just as well
00:17:30.040
to alcohol, if not more so. And yet I certainly am not in favor of alcohol prohibition.
00:17:36.480
And I think that's the effective argument that pro marijuana legalization people have always made,
00:17:41.920
which is, look, if you're making these arguments against marijuana, then why isn't everything
00:17:46.280
prohibited? It doesn't make, you're drawing a very arbitrary line here. And it seems like you're just
00:17:49.500
doing it on a visceral level because it's something that you smoke and, uh, you know, and you just don't
00:17:54.220
like it. And so you're okay. You don't want that, but you're okay with, uh, with people going and
00:17:59.000
buying hard liquor at the liquor store. And I think that's basically true. So I kind of,
00:18:03.960
even though I can't, I can't quite emotionally bring myself there. Um, I think that the, uh,
00:18:08.800
pro legalization people have intellectually, they have the, uh, they have the intellectual arguments
00:18:17.000
on their side, I would say, even though they're a bunch of potheads. Uh, so this is probably
00:18:23.100
something that the, you know, the Republican party should think about getting behind. I mean, it's a,
00:18:27.160
it's a, it's probably the right view and it's popular view.
00:18:35.880
And, uh, it's all about being popular, I suppose. All right, let's go to our daily cancellation
00:18:40.400
today for our daily cancellation. If I may dare to talk about something other than the election
00:18:45.920
for a few minutes, I'm afraid I have to cancel national geographic. Really? I can cancel national
00:18:51.680
geographic just for their decision several years ago to change the name of their TV channel to
00:18:56.740
Nat Geo. Yes. They have to go by Nat Geo because apparently it's too difficult and confusing for
00:19:01.880
people to people to say national geographic. No words above two syllables are allowed anymore in
00:19:07.060
society. You especially can't combine two words of three syllables or, or more that that scares
00:19:12.840
people. You can't do that. And this has been the trajectory of human language for a long time.
00:19:17.140
Words become shorter and simpler, eventually getting replaced with indecipherable grunting.
00:19:21.720
So in 10 years, Nat Geo will be called Nat and it's top rated show will be a documentary series
00:19:29.420
about how different types of monkeys sound when they fart, which come to think of it, I would
00:19:34.280
actually watch. But in any case, the reason we're canceling national geographic today is for an article
00:19:39.800
just published on its website, written by Maya Waihas with the title prehistoric female hunter discovery
00:19:46.040
upends gender role assumptions. Now you already know it's going to be bad, but trust me, it's way,
00:19:53.780
way worse than you think. So let's read a little bit here before we really get to the stupidity
00:19:59.140
fireworks at the end. But it says, Randall Haas, an archeologist at University of California, Davis,
00:20:05.520
recalls the moment in 2018 when his team of researchers gathered around the excavated burial of an
00:20:09.800
individual laying to rest in the Andes mountain of Peru, some 9,000 years ago, along with the bones of
00:20:15.060
what appeared to be a human adult was an impressive and extensive kit of stone tools. An ancient hunter
00:20:20.420
would need to take down big game from engaging the hunt to preparing the hide. It's said, this quoting
00:20:26.680
now from Haas says, he must have been a really great hunter, a really important person in society. Haas
00:20:31.180
says that's what he and his team were thinking at the time. But further analysis reveals a surprise.
00:20:36.300
The remains found alongside the toolkit were from a biological female. When archeologists excavated the
00:20:41.680
burial, they found a colorful array of 24 stone tools, among them projectile points for taking
00:20:48.280
down a large mammal, hefty rocks likely for cracking bones or stripping hides, small rounded
00:20:53.860
stony bits for scraping fat from pelts, tiny flakes with extra sharp edges that could have chopped the
00:20:59.760
meat, and nodules of red that could help preserve the hide. Scattered around the site were fragments of
00:21:06.800
bones of animals, including ancient llama relatives and deer. Back in the lab, close inspection of the
00:21:12.860
bones suggested the physiology of a biological woman. To confirm, they analyzed the protein that forms tooth
00:21:18.400
enamel and is linked to sex. Okay. Now, we haven't gotten to the cancelable part here, but maybe you
00:21:27.160
can guess what's coming there. Though I will say, you know, I'm not an archeologist. It seems to me that
00:21:32.460
mostly what they found are tools to prepare the meat. Often the person preparing the meat is not
00:21:38.000
the person who killed it. It doesn't necessarily mean this is a hunter. Also, just because someone
00:21:41.680
was buried with a toolkit, that doesn't mean they used the toolkit. You know, it could be some kind
00:21:46.620
of symbolic thing, part of a religious ritual, which the article does acknowledge later on.
00:21:51.480
And also, you know, these are rocks we're talking about. I mean, they could have been used for
00:21:55.040
anything, but whatever, fine. Let's say that this was a, this was a badass independent woman of the
00:22:00.280
year 7,000 BC who didn't need no man. I'm okay with that. No problem. But then here comes the
00:22:06.240
idiocy avalanche. Okay. The article says, quote, importantly, the team cannot know the individual's
00:22:13.120
gender identity, but rather only biological sex, which like gender doesn't always exist on a binary.
00:22:18.960
In other words, they can't say whether the individual lived their life 9,000 years ago in a
00:22:23.000
way that would identify them within their society as a woman. This is not parody folks. Yes. National
00:22:29.160
Geographic is really suggesting that the prehistoric woman may have been non-binary.
00:22:35.300
And yeah, I guess we don't know. Maybe she was a genderqueer, non-binary bisexual. Maybe she had
00:22:41.400
short cropped hair, spent her Friday nights performing feminist slam poetry at her local
00:22:45.880
coffee shop. Maybe she would go around to the other huts and explain to the other prehistoric people
00:22:50.460
in her clan that, you know, they need to break free from their heteronormative thinking and examine
00:22:55.380
their cis privilege. Maybe she played the keyboard in an experimental indie rock band called the
00:23:01.080
anachronisms. I mean, I can't disprove any of that. It's all technically possible, but it's also all a
00:23:07.780
bunch of arbitrary, insane, nonsensical speculation. As we have talked about on the show, the whole idea
00:23:16.560
of gender identity as distinct from biological sex was invented in the 1950s by an insane creep named
00:23:23.240
John Money. So I feel fairly confident in assuming that a concept invented out of whole cloth 70 years
00:23:29.580
ago did not exist 9,000 years ago. In fact, history shows that for the entirety of human civilization
00:23:36.020
until very recently, everyone thought that men were men, women were women, and all societies
00:23:41.960
everywhere had ideas about the roles that men and women should play in society. Those ideas weren't
00:23:47.560
always the same, but there was always a recognition of the difference and an acknowledgement that the
00:23:53.860
difference matters. We in modern times are the only ones so dumb as to be confused about this.
00:24:01.840
Prehistoric people weren't advanced enough to be as stupid as us. And I can imagine prehistoric
00:24:08.400
people looking on from the great beyond, hearing about this National Geographic article and saying,
00:24:13.480
whoa, hey man, don't drag us into this. We know what men and women are. Okay, so speak for yourselves
00:24:18.680
here. All right. Also notice how National Geographic, an alleged scientific publication, says that sex,
00:24:24.620
not just gender, sex is not on a binary. And to support this wild claim, it gives us a link to a
00:24:31.900
World Health Organization article. And that article says, quote, humans are born with 46 chromosomes
00:24:37.100
in 23 pairs. The X and Y chromosomes determine a person's sex. Most women are 46 XX and most men are
00:24:44.020
46 XY. Research suggests, however, that in a few births per thousand, some individuals will be born
00:24:49.260
with a single sex chromosome, 45X or 45Y, and some with three or more sex chromosomes. In addition,
00:24:56.060
some males are born 46 XX due to the translocation of a tiny section of the sex-determining region of the
00:25:02.520
Y chromosome. Similarly, some females are also born 46 XY due to the mutations in the Y chromosome.
00:25:09.760
Clearly, there are not only females who are XX and males who are XY, but rather, there is a range of chromosomes.
00:25:16.180
Or rather, chromosome complements, hormone balances, and phonetic variations that determine sex. Okay.
00:25:23.180
That's what the World Health Organization said. A couple of things there. First, even if I were to accept
00:25:29.600
that these few per thousand cases represent a breakdown of the sex binary, and that the people who fall into
00:25:35.680
this tiny fraction of the population are neither men nor women, or are some combination of the two,
00:25:40.480
that still wouldn't at all justify or legitimize the leftist claims about gender. Because they say that
00:25:46.940
biological men, fully biological men, XY chromosomes, no abnormalities, can be women. That's their claim.
00:25:53.220
That claim is not proven or at all advanced by the existence of these abnormalities. But second,
00:26:00.800
note how this is phrased. It says some males are born 46 XX due to the translocation of a tiny section
00:26:06.800
of the chromosome. Similarly, some females are also born 46 XY. So that's the phrasing. So they're
00:26:15.260
calling them males and females. That's what who is saying. They're still males or females,
00:26:23.480
according to the World Health Organization. What we're talking about are males and females who suffer
00:26:27.880
from rare mutations. But these are still males or females. A male with a mutation is a male with a
00:26:35.140
mutation. It's like a person born with one arm is not a whole new species or type of human. It's just
00:26:40.980
someone who should have had two arms but doesn't. Nothing confusing or particularly strange is
00:26:46.260
happening here, even if it is rare. So this from National Geographic, excuse me, Nat Geo,
00:26:52.560
is scientifically false, absurd, laughable, embarrassing. And it makes me think they really
00:26:59.900
should just stick with farting monkeys. Science just isn't their bag anymore. And that's why they are
00:27:08.440
canceled. Good to get that in. Little non-election cancellation. Still, I still make time. You
00:27:16.700
know, you got to make time for the cancellations, even when there's so much else going on in the
00:27:20.620
world. So I'm glad we could do that. That's going to do it for us today. Thanks for watching,
00:27:28.060
If you enjoyed this episode, don't forget to subscribe. And if you want to help spread the word,
00:27:32.080
please give us a five-star review. Tell your friends to subscribe as well. We're available on Apple
00:27:36.860
Podcasts, Spotify, wherever you listen to podcasts. We're there. Also, be sure to check out the other
00:27:41.480
Daily Wire podcasts, including the Ben Shapiro Show, Michael Knowles Show, and the Andrew Klavan
00:27:44.800
Show. Thanks for listening. The Matt Wall Show is produced by Sean Hampton, executive producer
00:27:49.340
Jeremy Boring. Our supervising producers are Mathis Glover and Robert Sterling. Our technical producer
00:27:54.540
is Austin Stevens, edited by Danny D'Amico, and our audio is mixed by Robin Fenderson. The Matt
00:28:00.540
Wall Show is a Daily Wire production, copyright Daily Wire 2020.
00:28:04.120
Lots of irregularities in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona. Accusations of unprecedented
00:28:11.340
fraud. Some accusations of precedented fraud. We will go through all of the claims. Check it out