Ep. 597 - Dems Pretend They Didn't Just Spend Four Years Calling Trump An Illegitimate President
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
181.83873
Summary
The media panics over Trump questioning the integrity of the election, but the media itself has been questioning his election for the past four years. Is there a good reason to suspect fraud, and if so, what should be done about it? Plus, Democrats fight amongst themselves over whether socialism and leftist extremism is the future of their party, and in our daily cancellation we ll discuss the radical sex ed mandate that was just approved by the voters of Washington state.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Today on The Matt Walsh Show, the media panics over Trump questioning the integrity of the
00:00:03.920
election, but the media itself has been questioning the integrity of his election for the past four
00:00:07.520
years. So what do we think about that? Also, we're going to examine the fraud claims that
00:00:12.400
are being made. Is there a good reason to suspect fraud? And if so, what should be done about it?
00:00:16.220
Plus, Democrats fight amongst themselves over whether socialism and leftist extremism is the
00:00:21.640
future of their party. And in our daily cancellation, we'll discuss the radical sex ed
00:00:25.760
mandate that was just approved by the voters of Washington state. All of that coming up. First,
00:00:31.020
a word from LifeLock. You know, unfortunately, we have to tell you news of yet another cyber attack.
00:00:36.200
This time, the victim is Barnes and Noble. The breach potentially exposed customer data,
00:00:40.760
including email addresses, billing and shipping numbers, telephone numbers, transaction histories,
00:00:45.620
all of that. The attack also impacted the Nook e-book services. Some customers have been unable
00:00:50.920
to access their Nook libraries. Their previous purchases have disappeared and others were unable
00:00:55.840
to log into the firm's online platform. This type of stuff happens all the time. And it's important
00:01:00.800
to understand how cybercrime and identity theft are affecting our lives. Every day, we put our
00:01:06.100
information at risk on the internet. We could miss certain identity threats just by monitoring our
00:01:10.680
credit or, you know, taking little steps like that. That's why it's good there's LifeLock. LifeLock
00:01:15.440
helps detect a wide range of identity threats, like your social security number being for sale
00:01:20.420
on the dark web. If they detect your information has been potentially compromised, they're going
00:01:24.700
to send you an alert. They'll help you sort it out. Nobody can prevent all identity theft or monitor
00:01:29.180
all transactions at all businesses. But LifeLock can see threats that you might miss on your own.
00:01:34.240
So join now and save up to 25% off your first year. Go to LifeLock.com slash Walsh. That's
00:01:40.340
LifeLock.com slash Walsh for 25% off. All right. So I want to sort through this and tell you what I'm
00:01:48.420
sort of thinking. I suspect that you won't agree with everything I have to say. That's okay.
00:01:54.620
It'd be weird if you agreed with me all the time. I barely agree with myself all the time.
00:01:59.080
But we're all in a position where we have to pick our way through the weeds, through the
00:02:04.100
misinformation, obfuscation, fake news, out of context news, all of that. As we discussed yesterday,
00:02:09.880
there's a crisis of trust in this country. Ultimately, one way or another, we get much of
00:02:15.380
our information about world events and political events and the election through the media. We
00:02:20.480
can't trust the media. We can't trust most politicians, government officials. So it makes
00:02:25.280
it very hard to know what's real and what isn't. It requires a lot of discernment on our part,
00:02:30.600
a lot of clear thinking, a lot of intellectual honesty. And that's how I'm trying to approach
00:02:36.900
this. And I think how we should all try to approach it. Now, President Trump gave a press
00:02:42.040
conference last night. The media went ballistic over it, calling it an attack on our democracy,
00:02:46.380
the worst thing Trump has ever done since the last worst thing he's ever done. Here's how that
00:02:54.160
Good evening. I'd like to provide the American people with an update on our efforts to protect
00:02:59.960
the integrity of our very important 2020 election. If you count the legal votes, I easily win.
00:03:07.960
If you count the illegal votes, they can try to steal the election from us. If you count the votes that
00:03:16.500
came in late, we're looking at them very strongly. But a lot of votes came in late.
00:03:21.300
As I said, the media reacted to that, the whole thing, the whole press conference with typical
00:03:26.520
dramatic flair. Here for just one example, this is Anderson Cooper, alleged news anchor,
00:03:33.540
offering his quite objective analysis of what Trump had to say.
00:03:38.240
We have never seen really other than, well, I don't think we've ever seen anything like this from
00:03:44.020
a president of the United States. And I think, as Jake said, it is, it's sad and it is truly pathetic.
00:03:49.880
And of course, it is dangerous. And of course, it will go to courts. But you'll notice the president
00:03:54.240
did not have any evidence presented at all. Nothing. No real, actual evidence of any kind
00:04:03.460
of fraud. He talked about people putting up papers in windows. He talked about things that
00:04:07.460
he'd seen on the internet. That is the president of the United States. That is the most powerful
00:04:13.420
person in the world. And we see him like an obese turtle on his back, flailing in the hot sun,
00:04:19.920
realizing his time is over. But he just hasn't accepted it. And he wants to take everybody down
00:04:25.820
with him, including this country. An obese turtle. I bet he was proud of that line. Hilarious stuff.
00:04:32.200
Nice job, Anderson. You know, I could say that you look like a cartoon seagull. If I, if I wanted to
00:04:37.600
stoop to your level, I would say that, but I don't want to stoop to your level. So I'm not going to say
00:04:41.560
that. And anyway, however you feel about Trump's rhetoric, his, his, his, uh, you know, in his
00:04:48.360
response, his fraud claims, all of that, even if you think it's reckless and dangerous and whatever
00:04:52.680
else, you absolutely have no standing at all to condemn Trump, much less get all high and mighty
00:04:59.000
about it. If you're a Democrat, because Democrats for four years accused Trump of being an illegitimate
00:05:03.480
president. They said it multiple times, many times over and over and over again, relentlessly.
00:05:07.040
They accused him of conspiring with Russia to steal our election. Was there any evidence of that? No,
00:05:12.560
none. The most they could do is tell us that Russia was trolling on Facebook and posting memes.
00:05:18.940
That's the most evidence we ever were given. And this was called rigging the election. They said
00:05:24.680
that Trump and Russia conspired to rig the election. They then went on to claim that Trump's Supreme
00:05:30.060
Court justices were illegitimate. They'd been saying that about Amy Coney Barrett. After all of that,
00:05:35.600
you are in simply no position to call Trump a turtle flailing at the sun, unless you want to call
00:05:41.980
yourself the same. Besides, anyway, the only turtle in politics is Mitch McConnell, and he's more of a
00:05:47.260
ninja turtle. The guy's a killer. He just doesn't lose, Mitch McConnell. By the way, Hillary Clinton
00:05:52.000
in particular has been on TV for the past four years calling Trump an illegitimate president.
00:05:56.080
Those words exactly. Here she is in 2019, three years after the election, still calling Trump an
00:06:02.180
illegitimate president. Listen. I believe he knows he's an illegitimate president. He knows. He knows
00:06:09.340
that there were a bunch of different reasons why the election turned out the way it did. And I take
00:06:16.600
responsibility for those parts of it that I should. But Jane, it was like applying for a job and getting
00:06:21.560
66 million letters of recommendation and losing to a corrupt human tornado. And so I know that he knows
00:06:31.700
that this wasn't on the level. I don't know that we'll ever know everything that happened,
00:06:36.020
but clearly we know a lot and are learning more every day. And history will probably sort it all
00:06:41.040
out. So of course he's obsessed with me. And OK, now Trump is going to say the same thing about Biden.
00:06:46.520
And we're going to have to listen to the people who cheered Hillary Clinton react with feigned shock
00:06:52.540
and horror when Trump says the same thing Hillary Clinton said. Speaking of which, here's something I'm
00:06:59.940
wondering. I wonder, throughout the past four years of leftists calling Trump illegitimate,
00:07:05.080
calling his Supreme Court picks illegitimate, advancing baseless claims of stolen elections
00:07:10.320
and election rigging and voter suppression, has any leftist at any point anywhere ever been flagged,
00:07:17.500
censored or suspended by Twitter, Facebook, any other big tech company? Has there been even one example
00:07:23.380
one among the millions of cases of this? Have any of them been punished by Twitter, Facebook,
00:07:29.800
any of the rest? No, of course not. Meanwhile, nearly everything Trump is currently tweeting is
00:07:34.720
censored by Twitter. It's completely absurd, dishonest, double standards. It's wrong, period,
00:07:41.060
obviously. But what about the claims of election fraud? Is there fraud? Are Trump's fraud claims
00:07:46.720
different from Hillary's because his are true? Well, I don't know. This goes back to the crisis of
00:07:52.260
trust. What I can say is that I don't believe every fraud claim I see on social media. You should
00:07:58.420
neither. I also don't think there's some coordinated overarching conspiracy capable of simply fabricating
00:08:04.660
millions of votes out of thin air. If there was, Trump wouldn't have won in 2016. And it wouldn't
00:08:11.020
be so close this year. The Democrats wouldn't have gotten decimated in the House. Also, coordinated
00:08:17.080
overarching conspiracies just aren't how things work in real life. It's also not how voter fraud works.
00:08:21.740
Voter fraud is real and it happens, but it's usually on a small scale and it's disjointed.
00:08:27.380
So to me, the issue isn't conspiracy. And it has little to do with poll workers and the videos
00:08:33.020
that are coming out, grainy videos. That's not the point. I don't think that should be our focus.
00:08:39.000
Here is the point, in my view. I could be wrong, but this is the way that I see it.
00:08:43.820
Mail-in ballots, an unprecedented number of mail-in ballots. Democrats changed the rules at the last
00:08:49.800
minute to get as many mail-in ballots as they could. This was done solely, only, 100% to get rid of
00:08:56.700
Trump. They knew the mail-in ballots would work in their favor. This was not about voter participation
00:09:02.660
for the sake of participation. It was about getting, for the Democrats, the right kind of voters to
00:09:07.540
participate. You saw how many people showed up for Trump on election day. Huge turnout. They knew it
00:09:12.860
would go that way. So they changed the rules in order to involve more of their own voters.
00:09:18.340
This was all done, quote, legally, as in the courts approved it. So you can't overturn the results on
00:09:23.520
that basis, but you can make sure that it doesn't happen again. And you can forbid mass mail-in voting
00:09:29.280
in the future. If we allow it to continue, I'll tell you, a Republican's never going to be president
00:09:33.820
ever again, period. Though that isn't the problem with mail-in voting. It's not that the problem is that
00:09:39.580
it doesn't elect Republicans. It's that it's highly susceptible to mistakes, errors, and outright
00:09:43.880
fraud. And we've seen all of that. It also makes it harder to know if the votes were cast within the
00:09:49.760
deadline. This is all by design. So the whole mail-in system is faulty and should be abolished
00:09:55.440
entirely, with the exception of the military who can still mail-in their ballots. Does that mean that
00:10:00.700
there's no basis to challenge anything or to go to court over this? No, not at all. As I said,
00:10:05.940
unprecedented amounts of mail-in ballots, razor-thin margins, one of the closest elections
00:10:10.360
ever in history. This is reason enough to do recounts, to do audits, even without any notion
00:10:16.600
of fraud. This is reason enough right here. This was a new system, a clunky system, not well-managed,
00:10:22.320
and we need to make sure it worked. Again, I would be saying this even if there were no claims on social
00:10:27.460
media of any fraud at all. But the fact is, we do have indications of potential fraud or irregularities
00:10:33.680
or whatever you want to call it. In Pennsylvania, they allowed ballots that were not postmarked or
00:10:39.620
clearly postmarked to be counted, even if they weren't received until three days after the election
00:10:43.680
had concluded. That's a huge problem. We need to make sure that all of those ballots were mailed
00:10:48.560
on time. If they weren't, they have to be tossed. Any ballot that can't be 100% confirmed as having been
00:10:54.120
sent on time must be tossed. If that means we toss thousands of ballots, so be it. Our election's
00:11:01.060
integrity is at stake. And in other states, too, there have been huge amounts of late ballots.
00:11:06.660
We need to make sure they were filed on time. We need to make sure that they were filed and filled
00:11:10.580
out legitimately. We need to make sure people weren't voting by mail and then in person and
00:11:15.160
that kind of thing. This is all perfectly valid grounds for litigation. Take it to court. And listen,
00:11:21.000
if there's no solid evidence of fraud, that'll come out in court. The Trump team, they can't go to
00:11:26.600
court with tweets and 12-second video clips. They have to produce the goods, right? Show the
00:11:31.620
receipts. If you think they have no goods to produce, well, then you shouldn't be worried about
00:11:35.800
the courts. All the more reason to advocate for getting the courts involved. So that's the only
00:11:44.120
way to do this. All of the legal ballots should be counted. We have to make sure they're legal.
00:11:50.940
Any ballots that were filed late have to be tossed out. We need to make sure everything was done
00:11:55.180
correctly. We have never had an election play out like this. That's not an exaggeration. When you
00:12:01.040
look at the number of people, the number of ballots, mass mail-in voting, taking days to
00:12:07.000
count them all, it has never worked like this before. This is a whole new thing. And if it went
00:12:13.940
like this and it was an absolute landslide in one direction or another, then I think we'd have
00:12:18.340
reason to say, well, we're not going to recount. It's pretty clear. But that's not what happened.
00:12:23.340
But razor thin, tight margins. And so you got to go back, do some recounts, do the audits,
00:12:28.980
litigate it, take it to the courts. If the Trump campaign has evidence of voter fraud,
00:12:34.460
let them present it in a court. If you are against them presenting their case in court,
00:12:41.720
then that only tells me you're scared of the case they might present. If you think it's utterly
00:12:47.680
baseless, then all right. Then you know what's going to happen? The Trump team will be embarrassed
00:12:52.520
in court. And if you don't like Trump, you should embrace that opportunity.
00:12:58.840
So that's the way this should go. Let's get now to our five headlines.
00:13:08.960
I'm excited to tell you about a new sponsor on the show that, you know, we're a homeschool family
00:13:14.300
and I talk about that all the time. And in fact, later on in the show, we're going to talk about
00:13:20.880
some of the more issues that you run into with public schools and government run schools.
00:13:25.680
So I'm a big, big advocate of homeschooling. And there are a lot, I talk to parents all the time
00:13:30.380
who do homeschool or want to homeschool, especially now as more and more parents are exploring it,
00:13:35.780
record numbers of parents exploring homeschooling. And that's why I'm excited to tell you about
00:13:39.640
homeschool magnet. Parents who homeschool or want to homeschool, if you're overwhelmed with all of the
00:13:45.600
work and responsibilities on your shoulders right now, and you know, all homeschool parents feel
00:13:49.420
overwhelmed. And for parents with kids in school, if you've, you know, avoided the need to pull your
00:13:54.940
student out of the public school system, because it just seems too daunting to homeschool. Well,
00:13:58.740
then this is what you need to hear about homeschool magnet. It's for parents, just like you homeschool
00:14:02.480
magnet supports homeschooling families by providing students with instruction from world-class credential
00:14:07.180
teachers in a remote classroom with their peers. Parents choose the best teachers for each student
00:14:11.880
based on the values and the teaching approach to ensure every child is receiving exactly the
00:14:17.120
education that they desire. So that means that's really important. You don't get this in a government
00:14:20.580
run education facility that you send. You don't have that kind of control over. It's whatever,
00:14:26.520
whatever the school system wants, that's what's going to be taught here. You have all the kind,
00:14:29.980
all the control you want. What kind of education do you want your child to receive? Not, not every
00:14:34.840
parent wants their child to receive the same kind of education and not every child should receive the
00:14:39.100
same kind of education. So tailor made for your students. Each student will receive instruction in the four
00:14:44.160
core subject areas of math, English language, arts, science, and social studies. Parents ultimately
00:14:49.400
have the freedom to involve their student in as much or as little learning as they prefer based on
00:14:54.320
each student's learning goals. Magnet includes a robust online learning environment. Each student
00:14:59.420
works from real physical learning materials guided by video instruction from their teacher. So it's kind
00:15:04.460
of the best of both worlds. With homeschool magnet, you get the freedom and control of homeschooling
00:15:07.800
without the burden. It just makes it a lot easier. It takes a lot of the pressure off of you.
00:15:12.060
To learn more about homeschool magnets, student experience, go to homeschoolmagnet.com
00:15:17.180
and join the growing wait list. For interested teachers, if you're a teacher as well, and you
00:15:21.320
want to be involved in this, who want more freedom in your teaching career, homeschool magnet may be
00:15:26.060
perfect for you. They're recruiting new teachers right now. So visit homeschoolmagnet.com
00:15:31.160
slash Matt to learn more and apply. Okay. Five headlines. Actually, I lied. It's not five headlines.
00:15:37.180
I've been sort of playing fast and loose with the format this week because it's a weird week in many ways.
00:15:41.360
So this is one story. And it is the Democrat party trying to deal with and understand
00:15:48.520
why they didn't have the landslide they expected. A few Democrats, here's the update here. A few
00:15:55.800
Democrats have actually come out and given some valuable insight into this question. And they've
00:16:02.480
been predictably ripped to shreds because of it. Most notably, Claire McCaskill on MSNBC
00:16:08.040
talking about this subject. And here she gives, I think this is the smartest analysis that has ever
00:16:15.620
been offered by any Democrat on cable news, perhaps. And here it is right here. Listen.
00:16:22.080
It's hard to pinpoint. I think it began around cultural issues. The Republican party, I think,
00:16:28.200
very adroitly adopted cultural issues as part of their main theme. Whether you're talking guns or
00:16:36.380
issues surrounding the right to abortion in this country or things like gay marriage and the right
00:16:41.700
for transsexuals and other people who we as a party have tried to, quote unquote, look after and
00:16:48.840
make sure that they're treated fairly. As we, you know, circle those issues, we left some voters behind
00:16:55.720
and Republicans dove in with a vengeance and grabbed those voters. And you've seen this shift.
00:17:01.540
You saw it in the South. I've seen it in the rural areas of my state. So we've got to get back to the
00:17:07.000
meat and potatoes issues. We've got to get back to the issues where we are taking care of their families.
00:17:11.960
And we also need to quit acting like we're smarter than everybody else because we're not.
00:17:17.080
Similar thoughts were expressed by Representative Abigail Spanberger in a conference call with House
00:17:22.660
with the House Democratic Caucus, the contents of which were leaked on social media.
00:17:27.020
And here's what she said reportedly in the conference call. She said,
00:17:31.340
the number one concern that people brought to me was defunding the police. And I heard from
00:17:36.260
colleagues who said, oh, it's the language of the streets. We should respect that. We're in Congress.
00:17:40.840
We're professionals. We're supposed to talk about things in a way where we mean what we're talking
00:17:44.580
about. If we don't mean that we should defund police, we shouldn't say that. And we need to not
00:17:49.200
ever use the word socialist or socialism ever again, because while people think it doesn't matter,
00:17:53.280
it does matter. And we lost good members because of that. And if we are classifying Tuesday as a
00:17:58.260
success from a congressional standpoint, we will get effing torn apart in 2022. That's what she said.
00:18:04.260
Part of what she said. The squad, of course, has stepped up valiantly to stand against these bursts
00:18:12.900
of sanity, making it clear that no sanity will be allowed in the Democrat party at all. In fact,
00:18:17.780
Claire McCaskill has already come out and apologized for daring to be rational and reasonable. She's
00:18:23.800
already had to come out and apologize. I'm so sorry about that. I'm so sorry for being reasonable.
00:18:28.080
It'll never happen again, I promise you. It's only happened once in my life that it'll be a
00:18:31.860
one-time deal, I promise. It will never happen again. But these, so this message is not going to
00:18:38.260
be embraced, especially by the squad and that ilk. But this is, of course, exactly right.
00:18:44.460
And we've already talked about some of the reasons why it's right. But here's maybe the
00:18:51.580
primary thing that it comes down to. You have to appeal to families. If you want to be a valid
00:19:00.280
political party and you want to have success, especially down the ballot, you have to appeal
00:19:05.180
to families. Look at President Trump. His strongest demo in 2020, according to exit polling data so far,
00:19:14.460
was married women. And I don't think anyone was predicting that. He didn't do as well with
00:19:20.340
unmarried women, but he did well with married women. That was his strongest demo. Why is that?
00:19:25.060
Well, married women, they have, they are carrying, you know, the burdens and the concerns of their
00:19:30.080
families. And they're bringing those to the ballot box. And you have to speak to that. If you're not
00:19:34.140
speaking to families, you're done, you're toast. And defund the police. Now, uh, Spanberger, exactly
00:19:42.020
right. The defund the police may have been, may be the most suicidal political slogan that's ever
00:19:50.000
been adopted by a major political party. And the Democrat party did adopt it. They full on adopted it.
00:19:54.940
Most mainstream Democrats were going around saying it and the rest who didn't say it at least didn't
00:20:01.180
stand up. Most of them, um, uh, against it. Defund the police. No, no, no. I don't care what
00:20:08.740
race you are. It doesn't matter. No family wants the police defunded in their community.
00:20:14.500
That's not the priority of a family of, of, of someone who has kids and all the rest of this
00:20:21.640
that we get from the Democrat party. They're not, they're not focused on the things that
00:20:24.920
families care about. In fact, often it's quite the opposite. They're talking about tearing down
00:20:31.740
the family, undermining the nuclear family. They treat the family as a patriarchal, archaic
00:20:36.520
institution. As I've been talking about all week, that kind of stuff, very appealing to,
00:20:43.160
you know, people on college campuses, uh, very appealing to some media pundits,
00:20:49.300
very appealing to Antifa radicals marching in the street,
00:20:53.820
presenting the nuclear family as a, as a problem that we have to do something about
00:20:59.500
rather than supporting the nuclear family and encouraging more families.
00:21:02.880
So that that's very appealing to that. So it's not appealing to anyone else.
00:21:07.960
And the thing is the other people, you know, families, married women, they vote.
00:21:13.160
A lot of those radicals in the street, they don't vote.
00:21:18.580
That's, that's the other dirty little secret. A lot of these people that are marching in the
00:21:22.420
street, uh, I'm not even convinced that they really hate Trump as much as they pretend.
00:21:28.040
I just don't think they care about much of anything. Yeah, they are, they are leftist by
00:21:32.460
political persuasion, but at the end of the day, they're also nihilist and empty. And, uh, when you're
00:21:36.980
looting and rioting and burning stuff is doing it because it's something to do.
00:21:41.460
Destroying for the sake of it, empty, lost people.
00:21:46.400
You can have a message that appeals to empty, lost people, but it's not going to appeal to families.
00:21:53.320
If you're in a family, you're not empty and lost. At the very least, you have that meaning in your
00:21:56.880
life. You care about your family and your kids. And that's what you're worried about when you go to
00:22:00.700
the polls. So, uh, but this is, this is not a message that, uh, the Democrat party and leftists
00:22:06.780
will embrace. They're not going to, they certainly won't embrace it for me. They won't even embrace
00:22:10.280
it from their own. So, uh, and I guess that's all the better for Republicans, at least down the ballot.
00:22:15.780
All right, let's get to our daily cancellation. Now for our daily cancellation today, we're canceling
00:22:20.880
the entire state of Washington, a great many potential and excellent reasons could be given
00:22:27.400
for canceling Washington state. But the focus for me today is the first ever voter approved
00:22:33.140
sex ed mandate, which was just passed by referendum on election day. Uh, and there's a lot of other
00:22:38.940
things happening with the election, but we can't lose sight of this voters in Washington approved
00:22:41.960
a measure to mandate that schools in the state teach so-called comprehensive sex ed to all students
00:22:50.040
starting in kindergarten. Now for more on the original bill, which sparked this referendum,
00:22:55.220
uh, let me read some of the, some of life site news's coverage from a few months ago. This is what
00:23:00.060
they say pro-family advocates have sounded the alarm by highlighting the graphic lessons of sex
00:23:05.000
ed curricula that meet the bill standards. A sex ed curriculum by the pro-abortion pro-LGBT group
00:23:11.760
advocates for youth meets the bill standards and is already used in some Washington schools called
00:23:16.720
three R it heavily promotes gender theory, promiscuity, condoms, and contraception and abortion,
00:23:22.980
as well as what is listed at the beginning, uh, the article, the three, uh, the three R curriculum
00:23:27.900
also directs teachers to have 14 year old students role play negotiating for sex. Teachers are warned
00:23:34.640
that if two quote, cisgender heterosexual boys end up randomly being assigned to each other for this
00:23:40.080
exercise, quote, it is possible they will have a homophobic response. A three R lesson plan called
00:23:46.040
creating condom confidence has ninth graders practice putting condoms on bananas or penis models.
00:23:52.160
Their homework assignment is to quote, see what it's actually like to try to try to get them
00:23:59.180
yourselves. Students are told they have a right to access condoms at any age and that adults who make
00:24:05.000
comments about them purchasing condoms can be reminded, uh, can be reminded of that. Other messages
00:24:10.400
contained in the state approved material, she says include instructions on bondage and quote, uh, body fluid
00:24:16.940
play, how males can allegedly have babies and, uh, why they should be allowed on girls sports teams
00:24:23.060
and how to obtain abortions, cross sex hormones, and HPV vaccinations without parental involvement.
00:24:28.460
Now, okay. This is a state approved sex ed curriculum. Uh, defenders of the mandate will point out that
00:24:33.380
the mandate doesn't tell schools they have to adopt that curriculum. Fine. But that's like passing a bill
00:24:39.000
saying everyone has to eat a lump of crap for breakfast. And someone objects and says, I don't want to eat
00:24:44.720
dog crap for breakfast. And you respond, well, you don't have to eat dog crap. You can eat whatever
00:24:48.600
kind of crap you want. Crap is crap. Comprehensive sex education is comprehensive sex education.
00:24:55.240
It is all basically the same. It's all basically like what I just read to you.
00:24:59.640
The bill mandates comprehensive sex ed, and this is what comprehensive sex ed is. This is what it
00:25:05.120
contains. This is the point of it to brainwash kids into this way of thinking and acting to this
00:25:12.020
worldview, this attitude about sex. That means gender identity, transgenderism, the 53 genders,
00:25:18.740
whatever. Uh, all that's part of it too. It's automatically a part of it because again,
00:25:23.900
that's what comprehensive sex ed is. And that's what it means. So think about what the voters of
00:25:29.040
Washington have done here. They have gone to the polls and voted for the government to sexually
00:25:36.340
groom their own children. It's pretty mind boggling. If you think your child should be
00:25:43.100
told about all these things, then why don't you just tell them yourself? I mean, I don't think you
00:25:49.220
should, but, but asking the government to do it willingly passing this whole subject off to the state
00:25:56.080
is lunacy. The voters of Washington are asking the government to corrupt their children. They're
00:26:01.400
saying, please, uncle Sam, please. This is, this is not democracy's finest moment. I guess we could
00:26:07.800
say, nor a great argument for it, to be frank. Now, anytime this conversation about sex ed comes up,
00:26:13.840
I'm always asked, well, Matt, if you don't believe in comprehensive sex ed for kids, then what kind of
00:26:19.100
sex ed do you support? That's an easy answer because for me, the answer is none, nothing. I don't support
00:26:27.920
any form of sex ed in school at all. I'm not advocating abstinence education. No, I, I don't
00:26:34.500
want government schools teaching my kids about how to abstain from sex. I don't want them teaching
00:26:41.220
them anymore, teaching them how to abstain from sex anymore than I want them teaching my kids how to
00:26:45.320
have sex. I want them giving no tips, no advice, no moral lessons, no instruction of any kind on this
00:26:52.340
subject, except for on a purely scientific and biological basis. Teach them about human
00:26:57.660
reproduction. Yes. Fine. This is how babies are made. And that's it. When to have sex,
00:27:03.500
should you have sex, how to have sex, what types of sex to have. None of those topics should be
00:27:07.980
covered or approached by government employees talking to a room full of children. It's not
00:27:12.700
their business. It's not their place. It's not why schools exist. And in fact, talking about the,
00:27:18.700
the, you know, basic birds and bees, ABCs of, of, of sex, human reproduction, the biology. Yeah.
00:27:25.020
That's something that you don't need a sex ed curriculum for that, much less a quote unquote
00:27:29.700
comprehensive sex ed curriculum. And it doesn't need to start in kindergarten either. That's
00:27:37.640
something that you, you cover in science class, biology class. You have a biology lesson. It's
00:27:42.320
going to cover human reproduction. That's all you need to say. Now, the problem is that we're at the
00:27:47.100
point now where I don't trust the government to teach that either. 10 years ago, my argument was
00:27:52.820
they should just teach the basics of biological reproduction. Now, actually, I don't even trust
00:27:58.440
them with that because that means given how the schools are run and the ideology that reigns supreme
00:28:04.980
in schools, uh, that means they're going to be teaching the kids that men can reproduce.
00:28:10.500
Now I, I would like to see that lesson plan in the biology textbook. I'd like to see how they explain
00:28:15.620
that, but that's the view. That's the worldview they're approaching this from.
00:28:20.940
Um, so even that we're, we're getting to a point where even that can't be approached, but
00:28:26.380
I, I, in an ideal scenario, um, the schools would teach the actual biological facts of sex
00:28:34.840
when it, you know, whenever that comes up in the, in the curriculum, in biology class, in science class,
00:28:40.680
uh, and, uh, and then, and then that's it. And then, and then, you know, so it's, it's science.
00:28:45.720
And then you're also teaching math and history and English and writing, uh, and all of that.
00:28:50.720
We don't need to get into anyone's opinions, anyone's worldview about sex. When you, when you
00:28:56.440
attach the word comprehensive in front of it, um, what that means is we are getting,
00:29:03.060
you know, the teacher's worldview, their opinions about sex and sexuality,
00:29:11.040
or the worldview and the opinion of the people who came up with the curriculum and the materials.
00:29:19.520
In this case, Planned Parenthood in Washington state, they've been huge advocates of this,
00:29:24.800
of this referendum, of this bill, this mandate. They, they love it. So this is the Planned Parenthood,
00:29:32.720
far left extreme worldview attached to it. But as I said, I don't think, and this is why it annoys me
00:29:41.500
that the, the debate over sex ed for so long has been, uh, should it be liberal comprehensive sex ed,
00:29:48.400
or should it be abstinence education? No, I, I don't, I don't think the solution here is to,
00:29:54.420
um, give, have the kids sit in a classroom with 30 other kids, have a government employee,
00:30:00.820
talk to them about sex, but instead of approaching it from a leftist worldview,
00:30:04.260
approach it from a conservative Christian worldview. No, no, I don't want my kids sitting
00:30:09.620
there. You know, the, the, the argument or the, um, the reasons why children should abstain from sex.
00:30:20.920
Um, there are a lot of very good reasons for it. You know, the, the reasons why you should
00:30:25.660
wait for marriage to have sex. A lot of great reasons for that. I don't trust my kid's health
00:30:34.600
teacher. If I sent them to public school, which I don't, but I wouldn't trust my kid's health teacher
00:30:38.540
to handle that subject and make those arguments and present that case in a competent way. I just
00:30:44.300
don't trust them to do it far too delicate, far too important. And I don't think, and even if I did
00:30:51.640
trust the teacher, which I don't, I don't think sitting in a classroom with 30 other kids is the
00:30:57.800
right environment for that talk. So get that out of the schools, let parents handle it. Uh, it's,
00:31:06.900
that's something for the family, for the home. It's not for schools. And, but voters in, uh, in
00:31:13.300
Washington state, they want the school to do it. They're saying hands off. I'll just, I'll send my,
00:31:19.680
my five-year-old over to you guys and you do with him what you will turn him into whatever you want
00:31:24.680
to turn him into. I'm hands off. I mean, what am I, the parent? Because of that, they are canceled
00:31:31.180
and we'll leave it there today. Thanks for watching everybody. Thanks for listening. Godspeed.
00:31:39.120
If you enjoyed this episode, don't forget to subscribe. And if you want to help spread the
00:31:42.780
word, please give us a five-star review. Tell your friends to subscribe as well. We're available on
00:31:47.620
Apple Podcasts, Spotify, wherever you listen to podcasts, we're there. Also be sure to check
00:31:52.060
out the other Daily Wire podcasts, including the Ben Shapiro show, Michael Knowles show,
00:31:55.160
and the Andrew Klavan show. Thanks for listening. The Matt Wall show is produced by Sean Hampton,
00:31:59.620
executive producer, Jeremy Boring. Our supervising producers are Mathis Glover and Robert Sterling.
00:32:04.620
Our technical producer is Austin Stevens, edited by Danny D'Amico, and our audio is mixed by Robin
00:32:10.280
Fenderson. The Matt Wall show is a Daily Wire production, copyright Daily Wire 2020.
00:32:15.100
If you prefer facts over feelings, aren't offended by the brutal truth, and you can still laugh at the
00:32:20.620
insanity filling our national news cycle, well, tune in to the Ben Shapiro show. We'll get a whole lot