Ep. 604 - Public Health Experts Destroyed Their Own Credibility And Will Never Get It Back
Episode Stats
Words per minute
182.02477
Harmful content
Misogyny
6
sentences flagged
Hate speech
15
sentences flagged
Summary
Public health experts are calling for more lockdowns, while blaming the public for not listening to them and causing a new surge in coronavirus cases. We ll talk about that, plus 5 other headlines including a nurse going on CNN to badmouth her own dying patients, and our daily cancellation.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Today on The Matt Wall Show, public health experts are calling for more lockdowns while blaming the
00:00:04.220
public for not listening to them and causing a new surge in coronavirus cases. But maybe these
00:00:08.240
people should consider that we aren't listening to them because they demolished their own
00:00:11.960
credibility by supporting the BLM riots in the midst of the pandemic. We'll talk about that.
0.67
00:00:15.780
Also, five headlines, including a nurse going on CNN to badmouth her own dying patients.
00:00:21.040
And our daily cancellation, we will, of course, discuss Harry Styles in a dress. You know,
00:00:25.300
we have to talk about that on this show. All that coming up. But first, you know,
00:00:28.560
we love underdog stories in America. And here's one such story. Raised in a trailer park with no
00:00:33.980
clear path to success. Kicked out of high school multiple times. Faced with becoming a father in
00:00:38.340
his teens. All the challenges, you know, that many people have faced. Jason Waller is a definition of
00:00:42.940
a true underdog. After hearing the words no and you can't do that too many times, he unleashed the
00:00:47.940
power within to start three successful companies with his most recent venture, Powerhome Solar,
00:00:52.440
skyrocketing on a path to becoming a billion dollar enterprise. So you could join Waller,
00:00:56.800
a four time entrepreneur of the year as he shares motivational tips, inspiring stories
00:01:02.740
and business building lessons from the ground up. This is someone who's been through it. He's been
00:01:07.520
through the challenges. And so you can listen to him as he teaches you what he went through and he
00:01:11.980
can pass on those lessons to you. As Waller will tell you, there is no elevator to success.
00:01:16.900
The climb only happens one step at a time, you know, one moment at a time.
00:01:20.000
So let every true underdog podcast be the step that elevates you. Scared money won't make money.
00:01:27.260
So this is just, you know, this is, this is America and we love underdog stories. And that's
00:01:31.780
why you need to check out true underdog podcast at true underdog.com or anywhere you get your
00:01:37.340
podcasts. All right. The lockdown plague is sweeping our country yet again with more and more states
00:01:42.880
reverting back to the policies that didn't work the first time. The old cliche about the definition
00:01:47.500
of insanity seems to apply here. Of course, the lockdown policies never fully went away in most
00:01:51.880
places in the first place, but now they're being ramped up and doubled down on, especially with the
00:01:56.440
holiday season upon us. And as we're told, a new surge in cases, Joe Biden was asked yesterday what
00:02:02.400
Americans should do about Thanksgiving. And he echoed the entirely arbitrary 10 person limit, a limit that
0.94
00:02:09.280
somehow remains the same for all dwellings, regardless of size. So here's what Biden had to say.
00:02:14.440
And just, uh, following up on that, especially with many states reporting new highs in terms of
00:02:20.960
the daily number of cases and a lot of public health officials sounding the alarm over the
00:02:26.480
holidays. Would you, what is your message to people who are considering, for example, getting
00:02:31.380
together with their families and others for Thanksgiving? Would you consider, would you
00:02:34.900
urge people to reconsider their plans? Well, here's what I'd do. Let me tell you what the health
00:02:39.620
experts have said to me. Um, and it's not because I'm unique and president elect, it's because my
00:02:46.300
family, they strongly urge that if in fact, uh, we're going to have Thanksgiving with anyone that
00:02:54.860
we limited to a maximum, maximum, they suggest five people, maximum, 10 people socially distanced
00:03:03.200
wearing masks and people who have quarantined. So Jill and I spent this morning, like many of you
00:03:11.340
trying to figure out what are we going to do for Thanksgiving? How are we going to do it? And we've
00:03:16.040
narrowed down which family members and that they were tested recently tested in 24 hours.
00:03:21.740
Now, admittedly, it does seem fun to, you know, sit down with a list and decide which of your in-laws
00:03:27.140
are getting voted off the island. But, you know, we don't personally plan on doing any such thing in
00:03:31.800
our house. Joe Biden says the experts recommend it, the public health experts so-called. But there's a
00:03:37.960
problem with the public health experts and Andrew Cuomo, actually, in a recent speech over the weekend
00:03:45.000
The key is to be strong and secure enough to admit your mistakes and admit your shortcomings. Don't
00:03:54.100
get defensive. Denying the mistake only assures repeating the mistake. We have made mistakes during
00:04:03.920
COVID. I wrote a book on the lessons to be learned from the COVID crisis. I think of COVID as low tide
00:04:12.180
for America. Do you know how when you stand on the beach and you look out at the water and the tide
00:04:20.200
is high and all you see is the surface of the water and the waves and everything looks nice and
00:04:27.420
beautiful. But you stand at the same point at low tide when the water goes out and the sea bottom is
00:04:36.000
revealed and you see rocks and you see debris and you see the ugliness that the water was covering.
00:04:45.280
COVID was low tide in America and it showed us the ugliness and flaws deep down in our society.
00:04:54.600
Now, I have to say I have some conceptual problems with the low tide analogy there that he keeps going
00:04:59.920
back to. I'm not sure if I'd call a beach at low tide ugly. Maybe in New York it is because you can
00:05:06.160
see more of the trash in the sand. So I think this is one of those things we have to say, speak for
00:05:10.520
yourself, Cuomo, and New York. But in any case, Cuomo talks about admitting your mistakes. And he's
00:05:17.600
right. That is important. You can't have credibility if you won't admit your mistakes. The problem is that
00:05:23.120
Cuomo exempts himself from that criticism. The mistake, for example, of sending infected patients into
00:05:29.000
nursing homes, killing thousands of elderly people. That's a huge mistake, but it's not a mistake that
0.68
00:05:33.780
he's willing to admit or apologize for. So when he says admit your mistakes, he means Trump. Trump
00:05:39.100
should admit his mistakes. Doesn't mean himself. And he also doesn't mean the so-called public health
00:05:43.000
experts. But the public health experts who are, you know, we're supposed to listen to now as they push
00:05:48.520
for lockdowns yet again, have never admitted any mistakes, have never apologized for what they got wrong.
00:05:55.000
And I don't just mean the conflicted messaging on masks and other measures or the fact that we're having a
00:06:01.500
second wave at all, even after following their guidelines in the first place. It seems that the
00:06:06.800
recommendations of public health experts are sort of unfalsifiable because if we follow what they have to say
00:06:14.740
and the problem goes away, then it proves they were right. But if we follow it and the problem gets worse, it
00:06:20.800
also proves somehow that they were right. They can't be wrong, which is a good sign that maybe
00:06:26.580
they are. But they've settled on who is to blame. And it isn't them. It's you. This is all your fault,
00:06:33.640
not theirs. Here is public health expert Dr. Jeremy Faust on Twitter a couple days ago. He says,
00:06:40.460
scientists and medical experts are not ruining Thanksgiving. Ignoring us is what achieved that.
00:06:46.420
And Ellie Murray, another so-called expert, equally smug, says, experts three months ago,
00:06:53.600
if you want to have a semi-normal Thanksgiving, follow these simple rules. Public, nah, seems like
00:06:58.640
a hassle. Experts now, in-person Thanksgiving is probably not a good idea. Public, what? How could
00:07:04.640
you let it get this bad? And this is the message. It's your fault, you dumb rubes, you conspiracy
1.00
00:07:11.280
theorists, you science-denying hicks. If you had only listened to us, everything would be okay now.
00:07:17.860
We'd be living in a paradise. Of course, the issue here is that most people did listen. There were
00:07:23.900
lockdowns across the country. Still, there are heavy restrictions in most places. Most people wear
00:07:28.780
masks. And I say that anecdotally from what I've noticed, and also according to the polls, most people
00:07:33.400
wear them. People did listen to the recommendations and the orders. If it didn't work, maybe that's because
00:07:40.820
there was something wrong with the recommendations and the orders. But there's a bigger problem here,
00:07:46.480
I think. You know, it's one thing to simply be wrong, especially when dealing with a novel virus.
00:07:51.880
It's one thing to adjust to new facts as they come in. Okay, you know, that's understandable.
00:07:58.740
It's quite another thing to demonstrate dishonesty. And as a public health official, to reveal yourself
00:08:04.760
to be concerned about politics over health. Now, you'd be a fool if you stopped listening to your
00:08:10.360
doctor forever because he was wrong about one thing. But you'd also be a fool if you still
00:08:14.960
listen to your doctor, even after he's made it obvious that he's dishonest and doesn't really
00:08:19.000
care that much about your health. Fallible people can still be trusted. If they couldn't,
00:08:23.620
we couldn't trust anybody. But dishonest people cannot be trusted, obviously. Many of the people
00:08:28.520
who want us to trust them about COVID and lockdowns fall into that latter category of being dishonest.
00:08:34.260
Now, as you may recall, during the summer, pandemic still raging. Many businesses closed down while,
00:08:41.100
you know, others dealt with strict capacity limits and other restrictions. At that point,
00:08:45.460
thousands of BLM rioters swarmed cities across the country for weeks and weeks on end, mass gatherings
00:08:50.420
nationwide. Gatherings that involved, if you remember, lots of shouting and screaming and chanting,
00:08:55.440
often done in close quarters or directly in the face of passersby. If going to church is dangerous,
00:09:01.020
eating in a restaurant is dangerous, going to the movies is dangerous, visiting your mother on
1.00
00:09:06.660
Thanksgiving is dangerous, then there is no way that gathering in an unruly mob of 5,000 people
00:09:12.520
could possibly be safe. Now, we could debate where on the scale of dangerous to rate it, but it can't be
00:09:19.880
actually safe, especially when outdoor protests had already been condemned by public health experts
00:09:26.920
back when anti-lockdown activists were participating in them. And yet these same so-called experts
00:09:32.460
supported the BLM riots. Remember that 1,200 epidemiologists and disease specialists and other supposed
00:09:38.940
experts published a letter during the height of the riots back in, I think it was June, condoning them,
00:09:44.100
encouraging them on the absurd basis that white supremacy is a bigger threat than COVID.
00:09:48.720
And so it's okay to risk getting COVID in order to combat white supremacy by looting a CVS.
00:09:55.720
The letter didn't say that exactly, but that was the gist. In fact, it's worse than that. The signers
00:10:00.920
of the letter admitted that there will be more infections because of the protests. They said,
00:10:07.040
quote, prepare for an increased number of infections in the days following a protest,
00:10:11.140
provide increased access to testing and care for people in the affected communities,
00:10:14.480
especially when they or their family members put themselves at risk by attending the protests.
00:10:20.280
But this was in the context of encouraging and celebrating the protests. They admitted that
00:10:24.980
people are going to get infected. In fact, both of the experts mentioned a moment ago who are
00:10:30.540
lecturing the public for not listening to them expressed at the time, at least tentative approval
00:10:35.000
of the BLM riots. And so if you're in the public health industry and you're wondering why no one takes
00:10:42.380
you seriously now, and then people aren't listening while you call for more lockdowns, this is it.
00:10:47.700
You torched your own credibility. You tied it to a stake, set it on fire and danced around the flame.
00:10:54.260
Either mass gatherings are not as dangerous as you claim, and that's why you supported the BLM riots,
00:11:01.080
or they are as dangerous as you claim, yet you were willing to support such dangerous activities
00:11:05.920
for political reasons or perhaps out of sheer moral cowardice. Whatever the case, dishonest cowards
00:11:12.880
have no right to expect to be taken seriously. And whether you expect it or not, we don't take
00:11:18.660
you seriously. We never will again. And you have only yourself to blame for that. Let's get to our five
00:11:26.860
headlines. So a South Dakota ER nurse was on CNN last night making some unflattering claims about her
0.66
00:11:41.680
dying patients. Let's listen to some of that. Even now, the hospital is being overrun with COVID
00:11:50.480
patients. They come in, they're horribly ill, they're gasping for breath, and yet they don't
00:11:56.420
believe they have COVID? Yeah, I think the hardest thing to watch is that people are still looking
00:12:03.380
for something else, and they want a magic answer, and they don't want to believe that COVID is real.
00:12:09.000
And the reason I tweeted what I did is it wasn't one particular patient. It's just a culmination of
00:12:14.580
so many people. And their last dying words are, this can't be happening. It's not real. And when they
00:12:22.340
should be spending time FaceTiming their families, they're filled with anger and hatred. And it just
00:12:28.440
made me really sad the other night. And I just can't believe that those are going to be their last
00:12:33.500
thoughts and words. Anger and hatred towards you?
00:12:39.300
You know, I think it's just a belief that it's not real. And nursing happens to be on the receiving
00:12:45.400
end of that. And that's okay. We can take that. That's what you're there for. It's just in the
00:12:51.060
bigger picture when you try to reason with people of, can I call your family, your kids, your wife,
00:12:55.900
your friend, your brother, and they say, no, because I'm going to be fine. And you're watching
00:13:01.140
their oxygen levels, you know, maxed out on what we call vapotherm at 100%, and their oxygen level
00:13:07.180
might be 75. That's not really that compatible with life. And we know where that's going to head.
00:13:12.420
And it just makes you sad and mad and frustrated. And then you know that you're just going to come
00:13:21.420
back and do it all over again. Now, I don't know if I really buy everything that she just said there,
00:13:26.000
to be perfectly honest with you. And this interview went on for like five or six minutes. And I don't
00:13:30.560
know if I buy everything that she said there. But either way, and I rarely call for people to be
00:13:40.760
fired. But I would say that this woman should be fired. Because if you're an ER nurse, and you're
1.00
00:13:46.140
going and bad mouthing your dying patients on CNN, there is no excuse for that. I mean, how would
00:13:54.180
you if you're in South Dakota, and you have to go to the hospital for whatever reason, and this woman
0.78
00:13:59.240
walks in? How are you going to feel about that? You know, am I going to be thinking, am I going to be
00:14:05.840
someone that she talks about on CNN for her next CNN hit? So that's a problem. Also,
00:14:11.560
you know, what she's talking about? And notice that the anchor like this, this smug,
00:14:17.100
half smile on her face, we're talking about people dying. And she's just got this, this,
00:14:23.860
this smug smile, like, what idiots? These are dying people. But the other thing is,
00:14:31.380
what she's talking about, you know, if we trust everything that she's saying, let's just for the
00:14:37.060
sake of argument, let's say that that's all true. She's talking about people who are in denial,
00:14:41.100
right, about the fact that they're dying. Well, that's, that's common. And I'm not an ER nurse,
00:14:46.800
and I haven't been around a lot of dying people. But I have talked, I have, I have nurses in my
00:14:51.380
family. This is a question I've actually asked them about, you know, not, not, not dealing, not
00:14:55.860
specifically about COVID, but in general, you're dealing with someone who's in their final stages of
00:15:01.000
life. And what is that, what is that like to, to, to be around that? And what I've been told is that
00:15:06.280
this is a pretty common thing. And it's not surprising to hear that it is. It's pretty
00:15:09.560
common that people are in denial. People don't like to face the reality of what's happening.
00:15:13.180
It doesn't matter if they're dying of COVID or whatever, the cancer does, whatever it is.
00:15:16.860
People often are in denial about it, or they're, they're hoping to the very last moment that
00:15:20.980
a miracle will happen. Sometimes it does a lot of, most of the time it doesn't though.
00:15:25.720
That's why we call it a miracle. So that's a pretty common thing, I would think. And I would think
00:15:30.500
she's been around that before. Yeah. Now here she is to make a point about COVID insulting these
00:15:38.420
people on CNN. I just, it's absolutely despicable. Um, and get ready. You know, we thought we were
00:15:45.020
past this. So we saw a lot of this kind of thing, these nurses on CNN and MSNBC doing this kind of
00:15:51.080
thing, bringing attention to themselves, making dubious claims, um, revealing a real contempt for
00:15:58.300
their own patients. So we saw a lot of that back in like May and June. I think we're going to still
00:16:04.280
out. No, June's when the BLM riots started. So we, after that, at that point, that's when we stopped
00:16:07.540
hearing about it, but April and May, we saw a lot of it. That's going to start up again, which also
00:16:11.680
means, and I know now you're thinking, Oh God, does that mean that the dancing is going to start again
00:16:16.360
too? I think it is. There's going to be a second wave of dancing nurses. That's the thing I'm really
00:16:24.120
terrified of right now. Okay. Number, uh, number two, that the student debt cancellation idea was
00:16:30.320
trending online yesterday. I think because of this story, here's CNBC's report, uh, says in a recent
00:16:37.720
interview, Senate minority leader, Chuck Schumer suggested that president elect Joe Biden, uh,
00:16:43.540
should issue significant student loan forgiveness through an executive order describing a possible
00:16:48.720
FDR style agenda, uh, during Biden's first 100 days. He said, uh, Schumer said, I have a proposal
00:16:55.560
with Elizabeth Warren that the first $50,000 of debt be vanquished, vanquished, vanquished the debt.
0.51
00:17:03.160
And one way to vanquish debt is to pay it back. I mean, you did sign on the dotted line after all.
00:17:09.620
And, uh, we believe that Joe Biden can do that with the pen as opposed to legislation. So you can just
00:17:15.200
sign something and get rid of $50,000 of debt. If you have student loan debt, that's gotta be nice.
00:17:21.220
Schumer also mentioned policies to address climate change, wealth inequality, immigration reform,
00:17:25.260
criminal justice reform. Uh, it's a big, bold agenda. He said, my job is to get as much of that
00:17:31.360
passed to get the votes for it, which obviously is not something I can snap my fingers and do.
00:17:35.040
Well, he can't snap his fingers and do that, but he can, but Joe Biden can apparently snap his fingers
00:17:39.460
and make $50,000 of debt go away, which, which makes you wonder, well, if he could do that with
00:17:45.760
student loan debt, what about my mortgage? Uh, what about a car loan payment? Can you do that for us
00:17:50.720
too? See, that's, that's one of the many problems with the student debt cancellation idea is that this
00:17:58.180
is just one form of debt that people are dealing with. I don't, I don't, I don't really see why this
00:18:04.200
should be the focus. You know, if, if you want to help people financially by getting rid of debt,
00:18:10.600
you can just make, make the mortgages go away. But here's, here's my real problem with the, with the,
00:18:16.860
um, whole student loan cancellation idea. Well, many problems with it, but here's one of them
00:18:22.080
that the people who are calling for this, you know, they would respond to what I just said a second
00:18:29.660
ago about how, well, you signed on the dotted line. I mean, how can you be a victim of a, an agreement
00:18:34.880
that you entered into willingly? And their response would be, well, these kids were taken
00:18:39.680
advantage of. This was predatory. Um, you know, these were, these were, these were kids basically.
00:18:45.500
I mean, they might, might've been 18 years old, but they're just out of high school and they don't
00:18:49.300
understand what they're doing. And they've been lied to. They've been given false hopes and false ideas
00:18:55.280
about what the future holds and how easy it's going to be to pay all this back. And they don't really
00:18:59.160
understand that they're going to be paying this for two decades or what that means for them
00:19:02.720
financially. And so they're, they're entering into this because they think they have no choice.
00:19:07.180
And the thing is, I agree. That's, that's true. I'm, I'm very sympathetic to that. I do think it's
00:19:12.220
predatory and I do think they're being taken advantage of. And I do think it's a scam.
00:19:18.020
And I do think that a lot of these kids are agreeing to this, not really understanding what
00:19:22.240
they're doing and they're agreeing to it. They're paying exorbitant amounts of money for an education
00:19:28.100
that simply is just not worth it, not worth that kind of money. But the problem is, so I can agree
00:19:34.620
with that, but that means we need to be having a conversation about the university system
00:19:41.880
fundamentally. And the people calling for loan cancellation, they don't want to talk about that.
00:19:48.500
So what they really want to do is they, they, they have, they have identified the beast,
00:19:55.820
which is the university system taking advantage of these kids.
00:20:00.300
But rather than slay the beast, they want to keep feeding the beast.
00:20:06.020
And so I just, I can't take it seriously until we're going to have a conversation about the whole,
00:20:10.120
the whole absurd idea that education should be this expensive in the first place.
00:20:14.320
And also that every single person in the country needs to have, what, 16 years of formal education
00:20:22.920
before they can get started living an adult life. It's ridiculous. It's absolutely ludicrous.
00:20:31.000
And until we're, we're, we're ready to talk about that, um, this situation is not going to get any
00:20:37.320
better. You, you make, you snap your fingers and make the loans go away.
00:20:42.920
Okay. That's not going to cause the universities to charge less for tuition. If anything, it's going
00:20:48.820
to have the opposite effect. Okay. Number three, uh, I want to share this with you, a tweet from
00:20:55.360
Kamala Harris. It's just, it's utterly terrifying, but she says, know that Joe Biden and I will wake up
00:21:02.180
every single day thinking about you and your families.
00:21:05.440
This is exactly the problem. This is what the left doesn't understand. I don't, we don't want
00:21:15.280
that. I mean, I very much doubt it. First of all, I don't, I don't really believe it. First of all,
00:21:21.340
I don't, I don't believe that you're waking up every morning thinking about, uh, what can I do for
00:21:25.140
the American people today? But even if you are, that's not what we want. We don't want you waking up
00:21:33.240
every day thinking about what you can do for us. We want basically to be left alone as much as
00:21:39.140
possible. That's what most Americans want. Um, all right. My producer sent me this, something here
00:21:45.020
from pink news, the LGBT rag. So we'll see how far we can get through this. Um, it says
0.73
00:21:53.560
new call of duty gives players proper non-binary option and the most toxic of gamers are reacting
1.00
00:22:02.940
exactly as you'd expect. The article says, are you non-binary? Have you always dreamt that one day
0.90
00:22:09.360
you could serve Ronald Reagan and join the American military industrial complex and carry out war crimes?
00:22:15.200
I have dreamt. I'm not non-binary, but I, that is something I've dreamt about. If that sounds pretty
00:22:19.700
neat to you, then now's your chance. In call of duty, black ops, cold war players now have the
00:22:24.660
option to, in a first for the series, single player mode, choose their gender, which includes a non-binary
00:22:30.100
option. It comes after early reveals of video game in August by publisher giant Activision revealed
00:22:36.040
that users, uh, were eager to play as imperialist war hungry killers could list their custom characters
00:22:41.920
gender as male, female, or classified. The move sparked a grab bag of reaction from LGBT plus gamers
00:22:48.900
who, uh, wondered why black ops couldn't just provide a dedicated non-binary option.
00:22:55.620
The game's creative director initially sought to clarify during a venture beat round table that,
00:22:59.920
okay, I can't go on this. That's as far as I can go. I thought this was going to,
00:23:04.300
a whole article, but this, this is what people are worried about in America now.
00:23:09.440
Having, having non-binary options for their video games.
00:23:13.480
Here's something that's more important. Okay. This, this is news that actually matters.
00:23:19.340
A lot of headlines over the last day because it, I mean, many headlines. I saw this all over
00:23:25.240
social media. Maybe you saw it too. Because some hunters killed a moose that has pretty colors.
00:23:32.760
So huge scandal here, huge outrage. This is the New York post report. It says first nations in Canada
00:23:39.300
are mourning the loss of a rare white moose, asking why anyone with a license to hunt would
00:23:45.080
choose their ghostly spirit animal. In Ontario, two female moose were found shot and left discarded
00:23:51.320
along a service road, bodies intact, including a sacred white cow. The poachers had evidently
00:23:57.180
ignored the many signs warning against killing the legally protected creatures.
00:24:01.660
The uncommon white moose get their ashen coloring from a recessive gene, are revealed similar to white
00:24:07.420
bison, ravens, and grizzly bears. In 2013, three hunters in Nova Scotia were charged with killing
00:24:12.340
a white moose and were forced to return the animal's pelt to the tribe, though they kept the
00:24:17.260
head as a trophy. Wildlife officials are asking locals to help lead to the killer and Woodhouse and
00:24:23.400
others in the area, including animal activists, have pooled $8,000 for anyone who can lead to the
00:24:28.520
culprit. So I just have two questions here. Number one, why does, why does the color actually matter?
00:24:33.100
I mean, what's the difference between shooting a moose with one kind of fur and a moose with
00:24:40.140
white color? I mean, we can make a joke here about white privilege for mooses, I guess.
0.74
00:24:44.580
But the other interesting thing is that, and you find this a lot on the left,
00:24:49.060
you know, what they tell us is that, well, this is a, it's a sacred moose, according to the
00:24:52.260
indigenous people. And even in this New York Post report, they actually just refer to it as a sacred
00:24:58.360
moose. Not even like they claim it's sacred. It's sacred. It's a sacred moose. That's not really
00:25:04.100
sacred. It's just according to that religion it is. So interesting thing on the left where the only
00:25:09.480
religion they respect or care about are, you know, indigenous religions. If this was something about
00:25:16.600
Christians upset because some sacred thing of theirs was defiled, you know, I don't think the left
0.98
00:25:21.580
would care. I don't think we would see headlines about that. But the moose, yeah, that matters,
00:25:25.600
apparently. All right, we're going to get to our daily cancellation in just a second. But
00:25:29.840
before we do, you know, it's really important, I think, when you're wearing clothes. You want to
00:25:35.360
look good, but you also have to feel comfortable. You want to try to go for both of those. This Black
1.00
00:25:40.020
Friday, if you're on the hunt for men's essentials for yourself or as a gift, the only place you need
00:25:44.700
to shop is Mack Weldon. Right now, Mack Weldon is offering an exclusive all-black pack, which includes
00:25:50.620
a t-shirt, underwear, socks, inside of a packable backpack. The all-black pack comes with more than
00:25:56.320
$150 worth of products, but on Black Friday, you can get them for just $98. That's significant
00:26:01.220
savings. And it's not like fake savings you get on Black Friday a lot, where they're taking something
00:26:05.880
that is worthless and you don't need anyway, marking it down, people go and buy it. This is
00:26:10.260
something you actually need. You know, you need comfortable clothes. And, you know, with Mack Weldon,
00:26:14.040
you've got men's essentials like socks, shirts, hoodies, underwear, polos, active shorts.
00:26:18.200
Mack Weldon promises comfort and a consistent fit. Plus, they have versatility. So, you can
00:26:22.840
look great, you can feel great from working out, going out, you want to go on a date, whatever
00:26:26.560
it is you're doing in your life, Mack Weldon has something for your everyday life. And there's
00:26:31.640
also technology in the clothes. Wide range of customized fabrics that can keep up with
00:26:35.980
you no matter what your day looks like. They've also got, I should tell you about Weldon Blue.
00:26:40.420
It's a totally free loyalty program. Level one gets you free shipping for life. Once you reach
00:26:46.060
level two, by spending $200, you get 20% off every order for the next year. So, that's
00:26:53.180
a hell of a deal there. Look, the saying here is, once you go Mack, you don't go back. Actually,
00:27:00.800
once you go Mack Weldon, you don't go back. But I think take the Weldon out. It sounds better.
00:27:04.700
So, to grab your exclusive all-black pack for just $98 while supplies last, visit
00:27:09.800
MackWeldon.com slash Walsh. Enter promo code Walsh. You'll also get 20% off your first order.
00:27:14.860
That's MackWeldon.com slash Walsh. Promo code Walsh for 20% off. And the all-black pack
0.99
00:27:20.120
for $98. Mack Weldon, reinventing men's basics. Let's get to our daily cancellation.
00:27:27.940
For today's daily cancellation, we begin with Vogue Magazine's latest issue, which features
00:27:33.720
Harry Styles in a dress. The lengthy profile of Styles has many more photos of the man in an array
00:27:40.040
of skirts, dresses, other frilly assortments. We're told by various interview subjects that
00:27:45.600
Styles' cross-dressing represents, quote, the image of a new era, of the way that a man can look.
00:27:51.980
And that the pop star is, quote, redefining what it can mean to be a man with confidence.
00:27:56.480
It is revolutionary, quote-unquote, to see someone who is so, quote, in touch with his feminine side.
00:28:00.960
Now, the actress Olivia Wilde, in the profile, she goes further. She says,
00:28:06.860
I hope that this brand of confidence as a male that Harry has, truly devoid of any traces of toxic
00:28:11.620
masculinity, is indicative of his generation, therefore the future of the world, she says
00:28:16.900
about a guy wearing a blouse. I think he's in many ways championing that, spearheading that.
00:28:22.300
It's pretty powerful and kind of extraordinary to see someone in this position redefining what it
00:28:26.800
can mean to be a man with confidence. Now, not everyone is a fan of this supposed revolution
00:28:32.720
of men wearing dresses. You can count me in the not everyone camp. Also, Candace Owens,
00:28:38.060
whose tweet on the subject sparked a massive online backlash. She wrote in response to the Vogue piece,
00:28:43.320
she says, there is no society that can survive without strong men. The East knows this. In the West,
00:28:47.940
the steady feminization of our men, at the same time that Marxism is being taught to our children,
00:28:52.180
is not a coincidence. It is an outright attack. Bring back manly men, she says.
00:28:58.680
Now, the counter arguments to Owens, myself, Ben Shapiro, who was also trending yesterday for
00:29:03.720
committing the crime of agreeing with Candace Owens, the counter arguments to us and anyone else
00:29:09.400
who questions whether we should be redefining what it can mean to be a man in this way, mostly have
00:29:15.300
revolved around the theme that we're making too big a deal out of it. And it's weird that we care so
00:29:20.920
much. And seriously, it's just a dude in a dress. What's the big deal? This is the tried and true
00:29:26.740
leftist culture war tactic. And we have to really realize what they're doing because it never changes.
00:29:33.660
We've seen the same play countless times already. They mock the other side for supposedly making a
00:29:39.360
big deal out of the very thing they were just insisting is a big deal. They throw a parade to
00:29:46.820
celebrate some ridiculous thing or another. And then they insist that any random straggler who
00:29:51.920
declines to join them is a hysterical weirdo whose sin somehow is caring too much about it.
00:29:58.220
They're the ones throwing the parade. All we're saying is, you know, I'd rather not.
00:30:02.860
And they say, what do you care so much about? What are you making such a big deal out of this?
00:30:06.420
They present one side of the argument and hope to win the dispute by convincing you
00:30:10.500
that only a freakish loser would bother presenting the other side. They try and often succeed in
00:30:16.740
dressing something up as both a revolutionary, world-changing act and a totally banal, normal,
00:30:24.860
everyday occurrence that should barely attract notice. They shout, why are you looking over here?
00:30:30.800
Right after they just shouted, hey, look over here. People who have good arguments don't bother with
00:30:37.000
mind games. And these are mind games. In reality, the fact that Harry Styles himself wears dresses
00:30:43.220
is indeed banal and uninteresting. You know, I would not have elected to publish a 5,000-word
00:30:49.200
cover story on the subject, but that was Vogue's choice, not mine. There is nothing particularly
00:30:53.680
revolutionary or earth-shattering about a pop star dressing in silly outfits. Pop stars have been
00:30:58.240
doing that since the dawn of the genre. But the overall attempt by our culture to redefine
00:31:03.960
masculinity and feminized men is important, and it is certainly worth fighting against.
1.00
00:31:10.200
Different times and places have had slightly different ideas about how men and women ought to
00:31:14.160
look and act, but none have ever declared that men and women are the same and ought to look the same
00:31:21.000
way and do the same things. That is our unique innovation, and the results have already been
00:31:26.520
catastrophic in our culture. A society without a clear idea of what a man is or what a woman is
00:31:31.040
and what a man does is a society that breeds despair individually and decay collectively,
00:31:37.880
and we're witnessing that right now. It's not that one cross-dressing dude can have this effect.
00:31:43.260
There have been cross-dressing dudes since time immemorial, as many on the left have
00:31:47.040
correctly pointed out. The difference is that cross-dressing in times past was seen as bizarre,
00:31:55.000
different, usually done for a laugh. Masculinity itself was not threatened by it because society's
00:32:02.620
recognition of masculinity and its respect for its boundaries is what made the spectacle of a guy in
00:32:08.880
a dress funny in the first place. So in the same way, you know, a guy belching at the dinner table
00:32:14.380
might be funny, depending on your sense of humor, but it doesn't threaten to destroy the rules of
00:32:19.600
etiquette unless we all start pretending that there are no rules to destroy in the first place.
00:32:24.700
Then you'll end up with a lot more people burping at the dinner table, and none of it will be funny
00:32:28.140
anymore. The thing that makes it funny is that it violates the rules. The point is that there's a
00:32:33.680
clear difference between merely crossing a boundary, you know, for a laugh, to make a point, to be a jerk,
00:32:38.440
to get attention, whatever, and erasing the boundary entirely. So when the left is not doing its,
00:32:45.500
aw, shucks, what's the big deal, folks, routine, it will freely admit that it is reaching for the
00:32:51.400
latter goal, to erase the boundaries of masculinity and create a post-gender society where the words
0.99
00:32:57.500
man and woman have no meaning. Now, it can never actually succeed in this task because it's fighting
0.97
00:33:02.600
against biological realities, which can never be fully superseded, but it can settle for making
00:33:07.560
people disoriented, especially children. It can create an environment where boys are made to be
00:33:14.120
more feminine, girls more masculine, and neither has any idea who they really are. Confusion is the
00:33:20.320
ultimate objective, and the left will celebrate anybody who contributes to it in whatever small
00:33:25.900
way. And so Harry Styles is canceled, yes, but more so I'm canceling everyone who wants to
00:33:32.200
revolutionize masculinity and yet refuses to at least be honest about what they're doing.
00:33:37.660
And by the way, even if Styles didn't wear a dress at all, I'd still cancel him for this picture
00:33:42.920
right here. This was also in the Vogue spread. That's a kilt he's wearing, not a skirt, so that's
00:33:48.620
fine. He gets by on the technicality here, but he's also jumping on a trampoline. Men should never
00:33:54.880
be photographed jumping on trampolines, especially when they're wearing kilts, and especially because
00:34:00.200
they had to bring this trampoline out to this field in order for him to jump on it. They brought
00:34:05.540
a trampoline out into a field of flowers, put him in a kilt, and had him jump on it and took pictures.
00:34:10.240
The whole thing is terribly undignified, even more so than the dresses in my view. So that's
00:34:15.160
canceled. Everybody's canceled. And we'll leave it there. Thanks for watching, everybody. Thanks
00:34:26.860
And if you want to help spread the word, please give us a five-star review. Tell your friends to
00:34:31.200
subscribe as well. We're available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, wherever you listen to podcasts. We're
00:34:36.140
there. Also, be sure to check out the other Daily Wire podcasts, including The Ben Shapiro Show,
00:34:39.800
Michael Knowles Show, and The Andrew Klavan Show. Thanks for listening.
00:34:42.540
The Matt Wall Show is produced by Sean Hampton, executive producer Jeremy Boring. Our supervising
00:34:47.520
producers are Mathis Glover and Robert Sterling. Our technical producer is Austin Stevens, edited
00:34:52.480
by Danny D'Amico, and our audio is mixed by Robin Fenderson. The Matt Wall Show is a Daily Wire
00:34:58.320
production, copyright Daily Wire 2020. If you prefer facts over feelings, aren't offended by the brutal
00:35:04.620
truth, and you can still laugh at the insanity filling our national news cycle, well, tune in to The Ben
00:35:09.060
Shapiro Show. We'll get a whole lot of that and much more. See you there.