The Matt Walsh Show - January 28, 2021


Ep. 646 - Ten Years In Federal Prison For A Meme


Episode Stats

Length

42 minutes

Words per Minute

180.94666

Word Count

7,619

Sentence Count

523

Misogynist Sentences

23

Hate Speech Sentences

13


Summary

The FBI is now arresting Trump supporters for posting memes. Yes, that s happening. Also, five headlines including the drama on the stock market, and Harriet Tubman replacing Andrew Jackson on the 20th, we ll discuss the expert who was doxed, harassed, and boycotted after it was revealed that she had committed the crime of donating to Donald Trump. That and a whole lot more to cover today on the Matt Welch Show.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Today on the Matt Wall Show, the FBI is now arresting Trump supporters for posting memes.
00:00:05.200 Yes, that's happening. Also, five headlines, including the drama on the stock market and
00:00:08.700 Harriet Tubman replacing Andrew Jackson on the 20. And our daily cancellation, we'll discuss the
00:00:12.840 Instagram baby expert who was doxed, harassed, and boycotted after it was revealed that she
00:00:18.700 had committed the crime of donating to Donald Trump. That and a whole lot more to cover today
00:00:22.620 on the Matt Wall Show.
00:00:30.000 The FBI, apparently having finished its investigation into Bubba Wallace's garage
00:00:35.940 door pull and looking for a new dragon to slay, showed up yesterday at the home of a Trump
00:00:41.620 supporting former Twitter troll and took him into custody on charges of, as a press release from
00:00:47.000 the DOJ puts it, depriving individuals of their constitutional right to vote. The formal criminal
00:00:53.180 complaint alleges more specifically that the accused Douglas Mackey, aka Ricky Vaughn, that's
00:00:59.540 the name of his Twitter account, which has been suspended for years now. They say he conspired
00:01:05.500 to, quote, injure, oppress, threaten, and intimidate persons in the free exercise of a right and
00:01:11.560 privilege secured to them by the Constitution. The rest of the complaint makes it clear that
00:01:16.000 all of this supposed injuring, oppressing, threatening, and intimidating was conducted in the form of
00:01:22.800 memes. Mackey faces 10 years in federal prison for memes. Now, admittedly, it's not a great shock,
00:01:30.800 I guess, to find Joe Biden's government arresting and prosecuting people for posting memes. If there's
00:01:36.180 any surprise here, it's perhaps only that it took less than two weeks to get to this point.
00:01:41.640 The New York Times has some more details on the case. They say federal prosecutors accused Douglas
00:01:46.420 Mackey 31 of coordinating with co-conspirators to spread memes on Twitter, falsely claiming that
00:01:52.840 Hillary Clinton supporters could vote by sending a text message to a specific phone number.
00:01:57.080 As a result of the misinformation campaign, prosecutors said at least 4,900 people, or rather
00:02:02.480 4,900 unique phone numbers, texted the number in a futile effort to cast votes for Mrs. Clinton.
00:02:07.460 Their effort to misinform voters began after the group saw a similar campaign intended to deceive
00:02:12.440 voters in the 2016 referendum in Britain on whether to leave the European Union, also known as Brexit,
00:02:18.040 according to the complaint. Mr. Mackey and his associates created their own version, sharing
00:02:21.940 photos that urged Mrs. Clinton's supporters to vote for her on election day using a hashtag on Twitter
00:02:27.100 or on Facebook. To make the images look more legitimate, they affixed the logo of her campaign
00:02:32.300 and linked to her website. Some of their memes appeared to target Black and Latino voters.
00:02:38.100 One image had a Black woman standing in front of a sign supporting Mrs. Clinton,
00:02:41.760 telling people to vote for Mrs. Clinton by texting a specific number. Mr. Mackey shared a similar
00:02:46.640 image written in Spanish, according to prosecutors. Okay. Now, back when Mackey and his dastardly
00:02:52.900 co-conspirators first hatched this plan to oppress and injure the innocent through memes,
00:02:58.720 BuzzFeed published a report on the plot, which included a screenshot of what those 4,900 people
00:03:04.220 who texted the number apparently would have received in response. The Clinton campaign sent a reply text,
00:03:10.760 because this was a text going to the Clinton campaign. The Clinton campaign sent a reply text
00:03:15.780 informing them that the ad was not legitimate. So there is then no reason to think that all of
00:03:22.980 those 4,900 people or any of them actually did stay home on election day under the assumption that
00:03:28.540 they'd already voted through text. Because according to BuzzFeed's own report, they were given a message
00:03:33.460 back saying that was not legitimate what you saw in the meme. Words to that effect.
00:03:38.040 It would seem difficult for the federal government to prove that anyone was deprived their right to vote
00:03:43.820 when, for all they know, for all we know, the alleged victims did, in fact, vote.
00:03:50.400 That, of course, is all beside the point. The real question is whether it's actually possible for a person
00:03:55.660 to be deprived of their rights or to be injured, much less oppressed, through a meme.
00:04:00.920 And the answer to that would be seemed to be no. At least if there is a meme capable of persecuting
00:04:07.360 all who look upon it, like some sort of horror movie, you just look at the image and you're
00:04:11.940 oppressed. The ones that Mackie posted surely do not fit that bill. I don't know what that meme
00:04:17.040 would look like. I don't know what a persecuting oppressive meme would look like. I just know that
00:04:22.300 it doesn't look like this. A constitutional right is infringed, impeded, or removed when a person is,
00:04:30.360 through force or threat, prevented from exercising it. Nobody was prevented from doing anything in
00:04:36.920 this case. If there are any rights being infringed upon, it's the First Amendment right of Douglas Mackey.
00:04:43.480 And if any individual was so unfathomably stupid as to read a joke meme on Twitter and take its voting
00:04:52.540 guidance seriously without even doing five seconds of additional research, because that's all you
00:04:57.080 would need to do. If you're dumb, you need to be two levels of stupid here. Stupid enough to see that
00:05:01.940 and not immediately recognize it as a joke. And then also so stupid that you don't take five seconds
00:05:06.860 to just Google, can I vote through text message? That's all it would have taken. And if you couldn't put
00:05:12.900 in that effort and you were that stupid, then the fault lies with you. Now, you can't always
00:05:19.980 victim blame in cases of fraud. But when the supposed quote unquote fraud is a silly picture
00:05:26.600 on Twitter telling you to vote in a presidential election with a hashtag or a text message, yeah,
00:05:31.800 the victim does indeed deserve the blame. I am 100% victim blaming. I blame the victims, totally.
00:05:37.540 And I also have zero sympathy for them. If anything, the alleged oppressor has done us a favor by
00:05:44.880 weeding out the sort of terminal morons who shouldn't be voting in the first place.
00:05:49.760 I realize that's not a valid legal defense, however, but just on a personal note, I'm quite glad.
00:05:56.500 Anyone who's stupid enough to fall for something like that, I am happy if they don't vote.
00:06:00.100 Thank God they don't vote. Now, consider the precedent that's quite intentionally being set
00:06:07.080 here. You know, a very common joke on social media around the time of any election is for
00:06:12.260 supporters of one candidate to announce that the supporters of any other are allowed to vote a day
00:06:16.740 late or, you know, something like that. Those jokes are very common. You see them around election day
00:06:21.940 all the time. So is anyone who made a joke like that now guilty of a federal crime? If you've made a
00:06:28.000 joke like that on the internet at any point in your life, are you now liable to go to jail for 10
00:06:33.260 years? I mean, does 10 years in prison sound like a reasonable sentence? Even if you agree that it's
00:06:38.620 a crime, 10 years, which I don't, 10 years in prison for that? And if it's now a felony to post a meme
00:06:48.920 with disinformation that may influence voting behavior, how far does that go? I mean, there are many
00:06:56.580 false or dubious political claims made in the form of memes. Almost all memes have false or dubious
00:07:04.580 information. Almost everything on the internet does. Are we going to prosecute everyone who posts
00:07:10.320 or retweets one? I mean, isn't that the implication here? If you even retweet a meme that has false
00:07:17.440 information that may arguably influence the voting behavior of some people, it's a crime. Go to jail.
00:07:23.100 But if that's what we're doing, why are we not breaking down the doors of people
00:07:27.940 who posted claims about Donald Trump being a Nazi? Why are we frog marching them off to jail?
00:07:34.660 That's disinformation. And if believed, it could very well influence how somebody votes.
00:07:41.100 Of course, my question is rhetorical. Disinformation used against Republicans never has been and never
00:07:47.280 will be prosecuted. Mackey's crime is not that he posted information, disinformation,
00:07:53.400 or that he infringed on anybody's right, but that he did what he did in support of Donald Trump.
00:07:59.760 That's the crime. The only way around this conclusion is to, is, is the only way you could
00:08:04.400 get around this and prove me wrong is if you can point to leftist meme posters who have also been
00:08:11.540 arrested or else to claim that leftists never post dishonest memes. And so that's why they don't
00:08:16.440 get arrested for them. But there are no examples of the former and anyone who claims the latter is
00:08:21.840 guilty of disinformation themselves. In fact, just to prove my point here, here is one example that
00:08:28.080 this just came to my attention right before we went on the air. Christina Wong, she's an alleged
00:08:33.080 comedian. I think there's some disinformation in that claim alone. But let me show you a video that
00:08:39.200 she posted on Twitter. This is on November 8th, 2016. Here's what she posted. Watch.
00:08:44.600 Hey, everybody. This is Christina Wong. And I'm coming out. I'm a Trump supporter. And I just want
00:08:51.820 to remind all my fellow Chinese Americans for Trump, people of color for Trump to vote. Vote for Trump
00:08:57.920 on Wednesday, November 9th. Really important day. We're going to show this country who's boss. And
00:09:03.760 that's our man, Donald Trump. So don't forget to vote Donald Trump on November 9th.
00:09:10.440 Huh. Huh. See, as far as I'm aware, Ms. Wong has not been raided by the FBI. There are no 30-page
00:09:20.540 criminal complaints being filed against this woman. And that's all you need to know. I mean,
00:09:28.180 if there was any doubt in your mind whatsoever about whether or not this new policy, this new law
00:09:35.180 is being enforced equally, well, there you go. And we could sit here all day, post, give you similar
00:09:42.380 examples, similar jokes like that, all kinds of disinformation related to Donald Trump.
00:09:49.460 Much of it not even coming in the form of memes, but coming from the media, coming in the form of
00:09:54.540 headlines, news articles, stories, we're not prosecuting any of that. And that's because
00:10:01.300 there is, there has been for a long time and will especially be now a two-tiered justice system.
00:10:08.160 There's the justice system for the cultural heretics. And if you're on the right, then that's
00:10:14.500 where you belong. You're a cultural heretic. And there's just system for people like Ms. Wong there.
00:10:20.060 Someone who has the correct, who believes in the correct orthodoxy, who has the correct views.
00:10:28.140 There's a lot of things she can do that you cannot anymore because you'll go to prison.
00:10:36.140 And saying there's a two-tiered justice system where we have two-tiered justice, that's just
00:10:39.400 another way of saying we don't have justice in this country. There is no justice. There is no law.
00:10:43.720 There is but the whims of the elite. And that's the way it's going to go now.
00:10:52.500 Anyone who's not, who has not woken up to that reality, time to wake up. Now let's get to our
00:10:58.960 five headlines. Now you've no doubt heard what's happening with Wall Street, the stock market,
00:11:11.500 GameStop. If you haven't heard, well, unfortunately I'm too dumb to explain. So you're kind of out of
00:11:18.540 luck. But let me, I'll read, this is one of the latest, this is from Reuters. The latest on all
00:11:24.620 of this says that almost 60% surge in shares of American airlines led stellar gains for a series
00:11:31.440 of social media hype stocks on Thursday, broadening a battle between small-time traders and major
00:11:35.600 Wall Street institutions that has shaken U.S. and European stock markets. GameStop, the video game
00:11:40.540 chain, whose 1,700% rally has been at the heart of the slugfest the past week, retreated after
00:11:46.600 initially adding another 30% in early trading on Reddit. Now you can tell when I'm reading this, I
00:11:51.520 have very little idea what I'm even reading. I think that comes through, doesn't it? On Reddit,
00:11:56.280 on Reddit thread Wall Street bets, where calls to buy stocks have helped drive the extraordinary
00:12:00.520 moves. Some of its more than 4 million members reported trading platform Robinhood was now
00:12:04.720 preventing investors from buying new shares in GameStop and other companies. Robinhood,
00:12:10.900 one of the biggest of the easy access apps that has spurred the development of a huge online
00:12:14.720 community of amateur traders, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. So now they're
00:12:18.080 preventing it. Now, if I could just break this down, everything that's happening on the stock
00:12:23.200 market, if you don't understand, and I could really break it down for you. Just to simplify,
00:12:28.600 let me explain. So basically what's happening is, just to make it really simple, if I were to really
00:12:36.540 break this down and really simplify everything, and if I'm going to actually explain it, you know,
00:12:43.620 there's a number of things that I would say to explain it, because I totally understand. I do.
00:12:49.980 But in fact, it's too complicated. I can't explain it. I'm not going to bother. Let's go to the White
00:12:53.980 House press conference, though. The question was asked about all of this, and even though I admit
00:13:00.720 I don't understand much about the stock market or anything at all, really, I can listen to this
00:13:06.900 answer, and I can tell that this is completely bogus and ridiculous. Let's listen.
00:13:12.000 If the White House is concerned about the stock market activity we're seeing around GameStop,
00:13:15.920 and now with some other stocks as well, including the subsidiary or whatever, the company that was
00:13:23.940 Blockbuster, and have there been any conversations with the SEC about how to proceed?
00:13:30.520 Well, I'm also happy to repeat that we have the first female Treasury Secretary and a team that's
00:13:36.620 surrounding her, and often questions about market we'll send to them. But our team is, of course,
00:13:41.400 our economic team, including Secretary Yellen and others, are monitoring the situation. It's a good
00:13:46.080 reminder, though, that the stock market isn't the only measure of the health of our economy. It
00:13:50.900 doesn't reflect how working and middle-class families are doing. As you all know from covering
00:13:55.420 this, we're in the midst of a case-shaped recovery. America's workers are struggling to make ends meet,
00:14:00.000 which is why the president has introduced this urgent package to get immediate relief.
00:14:05.240 Yeah, like I said, I'm not a financial expert myself, but I'm pretty sure that the gender of the
00:14:11.140 Treasury Secretary has nothing to do with anything whatsoever. So I can point out that BS, at least.
00:14:18.940 This kind of goes back to what we were talking about before. You think about how stupid you have to be
00:14:22.460 to fall for the means, right? Even if you don't know anything about voting at all,
00:14:29.520 right, you should still be able to pick up on obvious BS, even if you know nothing about the
00:14:37.280 subject. If you have even just a moderately well-tuned BS detector, you should be able to pick
00:14:43.860 up on a joke meme. And so in this case, don't know anything about the stock market, I've got at least
00:14:49.820 a moderately tuned BS detector, so I can listen to that answer and know, okay, that's ridiculous.
00:14:57.840 Of course, it has nothing to do with anything. What I will say, if I were to give any analysis
00:15:01.960 whatsoever of what's happening on the stock market, I don't know much. I do think it's funny. As far as
00:15:07.500 I can tell, it seems pretty funny, and that's all I've got. That's all I can tell you. Let's move on to
00:15:12.060 something I know a little bit more about. Staying with the White House press briefing for a moment.
00:15:15.680 This is from a couple of days ago. I've been wanting to bring this up. The question being asked here is
00:15:20.020 about the plan to put Harriet Tubman on the $20 bill, which means taking Andrew Jackson off,
00:15:26.680 putting her on. Let's listen to that.
00:15:28.780 The Obama administration initially had wanted to put Harriet Tubman on the $20 bill. The Trump
00:15:36.300 administration dragged their feet on that. I wanted to see if the Biden administration has a
00:15:41.420 view of the timeline on whether or not she should be on the paper currency.
00:15:47.260 I was here when we announced that, and it was very exciting. It hasn't moved forward yet, which we
00:15:52.100 would have been surprised to learn at the time. The Treasury Department is taking steps to resume
00:15:56.640 efforts to put Harriet Tubman on the front of the new $20 notes. It's important that our notes,
00:16:03.880 our money, if people don't know what a note is, reflect the history and diversity of our country.
00:16:10.220 And Harriet Tubman's image, gracing the new $20 note, would certainly reflect that. So we're
00:16:15.180 exploring ways to speed up that effort. But any specifics would, of course, come from the Department
00:16:19.840 of Treasury. So this is the kind of thing that we're all supposed to simply support without any
00:16:26.420 protest. And of course, if you don't support it, then you're racist. And I have been disappointed,
00:16:32.500 though not surprised, to find so many conservatives, of course, going along with this and say, oh,
00:16:37.320 I don't, I would never object. I would, maybe some would object to this, but I certainly would not.
00:16:42.500 But Harriet Tubman, put her on all the money. Of course, go ahead. We should honor Harriet Tubman,
00:16:48.920 they say. Well, I agree. I'm all for honoring Harriet Tubman. There are many ways to do that.
00:16:55.860 There are many ways that we have honored her. There are many additional ways that we could.
00:17:00.600 The point here, the question, the issue at hand is not whether to honor Harriet Tubman.
00:17:06.360 On that point, I think there's probably almost universal agreement. The question is actually
00:17:13.180 whether to dishonor, to take the honor away from Andrew Jackson, because that's actually the point.
00:17:20.220 That's why the left wants to do this. It's not about Harriet Tubman. It's about Andrew Jackson.
00:17:26.100 And what is it about him? Well, it's about, it's about the fact that he was an old white guy that
00:17:30.600 lived a long time ago. And we have learned that if you belong to that category, or if you belong to
00:17:36.260 that category, then you have to be erased from the history books and you're not allowed to be
00:17:40.020 honored in any way whatsoever. It's not, it's not like Andrew Jackson is the only one they're
00:17:46.420 targeting. In fact, and we'll maybe talk more about this tomorrow, but San Francisco school board,
00:17:52.680 the latest one, it's decided to rename, I think it's something like 40 different schools,
00:17:58.340 including Lincoln High School, Washington. They got a school named after Washington,
00:18:02.940 taking those down too. So eventually, you know, eventually we're going to be taking all the other
00:18:09.540 money is going to be changed too, taking their faces off the money as well. But that's what this
00:18:15.480 is about. So when I say I'm not in favor of putting Harriet Tubman on the 20, what I really mean is I'm
00:18:21.580 not in favor of taking Andrew Jackson off because I believe he was a great and consequential American.
00:18:27.340 It doesn't mean I think he was a saint in all respects. It doesn't mean that I think he was a
00:18:32.940 perfect, but most great people are not. In fact, no great people are or were, except for Jesus Christ.
00:18:42.580 Anyone outside of that, not perfect. And in fact, the thing we know about great and consequential
00:18:48.000 people is that they often have great and consequential flaws as well.
00:18:52.520 When you are operating on a certain level, you know, your virtues are going to be magnified,
00:19:03.020 but your vices are also going to be magnified. That's the way it goes.
00:19:07.760 That's why I always talk about if we're going to hold, if this is the standard we're applying
00:19:11.280 to one person who lived back in history, to one historical figure, then really you have to apply
00:19:17.760 it to everyone, which means eventually there's going to be nobody left of any race, nation, creed,
00:19:21.680 or gender that we can honor. If they lived, you know, if they lived like 10 years ago or earlier,
00:19:29.560 there's no one left who isn't problematic. So no, this, this is something we should be against
00:19:34.580 and we should, we should protest. We should, we should be against, we should oppose this.
00:19:38.980 Taking Andrew Jackson off. You want to come up with a, with a, you know, a new, a new currency
00:19:45.960 for Harriet Tubman or really anything else. Build her, she's already got statues and monuments,
00:19:50.740 build another one, build 50 of them for all I care. Andrew Jackson should stay on the $20 bill.
00:19:57.680 To my mind. All right. ABC7 New York has this story. It says, target is the latest company to drop
00:20:03.420 Chalco. I think it's Chalco coconut milk over allegations of forced monkey labor.
00:20:10.540 PETA said the retailer will no longer sell the product because of its alleged ties to monkey labor.
00:20:17.120 Chalco's tie suppliers accused of forcing monkeys to pick coconuts from the trees.
00:20:22.100 In a statement to USA Today, Target said it takes those claims seriously and remove the product in
00:20:26.060 November. PETA said in a statement by dropping Chalco, Target is joining thousands of stores that
00:20:33.380 refuse to profit from chained monkeys misery. According to PETA, 26,000 rather stores, including
00:20:40.100 chains, Wegmans, Food Lion, and Stop and Shop have cut ties with the coconut milk brand.
00:20:45.640 A couple of things here. First of all, as I've made clear, coconut milk is not actually a thing.
00:20:50.040 Doesn't, doesn't exist. You don't, you don't get milk as a dairy product. You don't get that from,
00:20:55.160 from coconuts. Second thing is forced monkey labor. I never realized that was a thing until I read this
00:21:02.080 story. And also speaking of dairy products. Okay. So you hear, I don't know what exactly could be
00:21:09.900 entailed in forced monkey labor. How do you force monkeys to climb a tree and pick coconuts?
00:21:18.120 You know, I guess you could domesticate, domesticate monkeys like you do any other animal,
00:21:22.220 but that's the point. So forced monkey labor is, if that's what's happening here, forced monkey labor
00:21:30.180 is some sort of horrible crime. So you're not going to have coconut milk, but you'll still serve regular
00:21:37.020 milk, which comes from cows. What about forced cow labor? Cows, cows don't make the free choice to be
00:21:45.980 on dairy farms, do they? What about the forced labor of horses and pigs and dogs? All that forced,
00:21:56.780 it's all slavery, isn't it? We just, we have this hierarchy in our heads of animals. It's like,
00:22:03.120 there's certain animals you can eat, certain that you can't, certain you can domesticate, certain you
00:22:06.680 can't. A lot of it has to do with how cute we think they are or how much we have anthropomorphized
00:22:14.400 them in our own minds. How often they appear in Disney films. Like these, all these things factor
00:22:21.600 in, and this is what determines in our heads what we can do with these different animals. It's not
00:22:26.020 really based in anything though. So yes, I think I'm coming out in favor of forced monkey labor.
00:22:32.580 I think I'm, I think I'm okay with it. Honestly, I don't know a lot about the practice. I'm not in
00:22:37.340 favor of, you know, abusing monkeys. I wouldn't be in favor of abusing cows. And really when you think
00:22:43.520 about it, yeah, if, if, if you're, you know, a poor villager and you harvest coconuts for a living,
00:22:50.260 well, you got to get up. You might not have equipment to get up in those trees and you got to get up
00:22:56.000 pretty high in the trees, um, which is a dangerous job. And so someone's got to climb up in the trees
00:23:02.280 to get the coconuts. I think I'd rather a monkey be forced to do it rather than a person because a
00:23:06.520 person could climb up there and fall and die. Sure. That happens all the time. So yeah, you can put me
00:23:14.220 in the, put me in the column of pro forced monkey labor. Um, all right. This is from eater.com and says
00:23:21.480 in line with one of president Joe Biden's chief campaign promises, congressional Democrats
00:23:25.760 introduced historic legislation. This is from a couple of days ago that would more than double
00:23:29.840 the hourly minimum wage of the country's most poorly paid workers to $15 an hour. Uh, the measure would
00:23:36.860 also eventually eliminate the lower tipped minimum wage that most waiters, bartenders, and bussers earn
00:23:41.620 in New York and other States. Despite Republican opposition, a process known as budget reconciliation
00:23:46.040 appears to give the so-called raise the wage act, the chance of being signed into law.
00:23:49.540 So $15 an hour, this is just a, of course we've, we, we, we've known about this effort for a long
00:23:56.780 time. Will the Democrats actually manage to pass it through? Um, I would say yes, probably. And the
00:24:05.100 effects will be absolutely disastrous. You look at what the Democrats are doing here. Um, already they've,
00:24:13.160 they have, it was largely, we're talking about Democrat governors and mayors who have had the
00:24:17.800 strictest lockdowns in effect, still in effect in many places, uh, for almost a year now. And so
00:24:24.160 they've wiped out millions of jobs. And now we're just sort of trying to claw back, get the economy
00:24:29.580 back. People are trying to get back to work. Vaccines being rolled out. We're going to get into
00:24:33.660 spring in the warmer months. And now they're coming back and they're kneecapping all the economy.
00:24:38.980 Again, we're shutting down the Keystone pipeline. And now we're going to $15 minimum wage
00:24:43.800 wipe out thousands of jobs all at once.
00:24:50.880 That's why I really wish you talk about the effects of disinformation. I don't really care
00:24:55.520 about memes, but the kind of disinformation that I worry about is for example, the disinformation
00:25:00.100 that makes someone who's let's say a minimum wage worker. And they read about raising the minimum wage
00:25:05.560 because they have been influenced by disinformation from the media. They celebrate it. They say,
00:25:10.280 oh, this is going to be great. I'm going to make $15 an hour. No, what they don't understand is that
00:25:13.920 this probably means that you're not going to have a job. You're going to go from whatever you're
00:25:18.040 making now, $10 an hour, uh, to zero. That's, what's going to happen.
00:25:24.520 Whether you work for a big company or small company, small company, small businesses,
00:25:29.200 especially that have been, that have been in particularly devastated by the lockdowns,
00:25:33.100 they're not going to have the money to, to automatically overnight raise all these wages.
00:25:38.880 So they're going to have to cut down their labor force. If you work at a place like McDonald's
00:25:43.900 already, you go into a McDonald's and, um, the common experience now is that there are a couple
00:25:50.200 of people behind the cash registers and then they've also got the, the touchscreens.
00:25:54.400 And so what's McDonald's going to do? They're going to say, okay, well, we'll just, we'll,
00:25:59.640 we'll go to all touchscreen. What do we don't even need the people at the, you know, you can insert
00:26:03.180 the money or your credit card into the, into the, uh, the console there. What do we need? We don't,
00:26:07.300 we don't even need anybody there. All we need are people, some people in the back to, uh, cook the
00:26:12.460 food and maybe we need some people working the drive-through, but we don't need anybody. So these jobs
00:26:16.100 are just going to get eliminated. The other thing to keep in mind with, um, with the minimum wage,
00:26:21.720 and this is always lost in the conversation, but first of all, a very small number of hourly
00:26:29.680 workers in America are actually getting paid the federal minimum wage. Almost all people who are
00:26:37.060 hourly workers in America are getting paid more than minimum wage already. I don't have the numbers
00:26:43.140 in front of me. The percentage is small. It's like two or 3% of hourly workers that are getting paid
00:26:47.820 the minimum wage. Many of those workers are young. Many of them are teenagers. Uh, many of them at
00:26:56.140 least are under 25. It's not the way this, this, the, the minimum wage is, is, is talked about. This
00:27:02.760 issue is discussed. They make it sound like there are millions of, of, of families, you know, mothers
00:27:08.840 and fathers who've got kids to feed families of five that are trying to subsist on the minimum wage,
00:27:14.280 which is why we're told it has to be a living wage. We have to give them a living wage. That's not the
00:27:17.760 case. In, in, in many, many cases, this again is a small minority of hourly workers. And in many,
00:27:24.860 many cases, these are people, you know, these, these could be kids, college students don't even pay
00:27:29.820 their own bills. They have no dependents. Um, they're not even independent themselves.
00:27:35.680 They don't need a living wage. The companies can't afford them to pay a living wage.
00:27:40.500 The labor they're providing is not really worth $15 an hour.
00:27:48.480 But now you're going to say, Oh yeah, you got to pay $15 an hour to the sick, to the 17 year old
00:27:52.540 kid who lives at home and is working part-time at McDonald's. We got to pay him $15 an hour.
00:27:57.100 And the price is we're going to wipe out thousands of jobs. Great idea. All right. Uh, number five,
00:28:01.880 the Chicago's teachers union, which is refusing to go back to work has been, um, using its free time,
00:28:08.120 free time, free time, but paid time. Taxpayers are paying for it to do other things. And in this
00:28:14.920 case, interpretive dance routines. So they tweeted this out. They said, six of our rank and file
00:28:20.020 dance teachers come together to use their art form as a voice to express their desire to feel safe
00:28:25.620 amidst, uh, CPS's teacher return policy. They stand in solidarity with all educators at risk
00:28:31.520 because no one should have to choose between life and livelihood. I think we have that video.
00:28:35.640 So let's, let's play a little bit of this interpretive dance routine.
00:28:48.860 So these are, these are dance teachers. Now, you know what this is?
00:28:52.720 This is like some sort of hideous super organism where you've got a combination
00:28:56.040 of the dance. What we have now is a combination of the dancing nurses on TikTok
00:29:01.540 and the whiny teachers. And they've come together to form this super organism.
00:29:08.320 And now we have whiny dancing teachers.
00:29:13.060 And I also have to say, these are, these are, this tells you something about the public school
00:29:16.160 system, I guess. Um, these are dance. First of all, why do we have dance teachers in the public
00:29:21.620 school system to begin with? And second question, if we do have dance teachers, who's that? What the
00:29:28.560 person in the middle? What are they doing? It's not a dance at all. I can do that. If we do have
00:29:34.040 dance teachers in the public school system, why is it that they can't dance?
00:29:39.980 Seems to me interpretive dance is, is, uh, kind of like slam poetry in that, you know, slam poetry
00:29:46.480 isn't poetry at all. Interpretive dance is not dance at all. Interpretive dance is just a mildly
00:29:52.340 artistic seizure from what I can tell people flailing their arms around anyway. So the teachers
00:29:59.440 did an interpretive dance to express their fear of going back to school. That's, uh, that's what
00:30:03.980 that's all about. And, uh, I will conclude by for the millionth time saying, get your kids out of the
00:30:11.100 public school system, folks. You know, there's no reason to waste your time. Nobody wants to waste
00:30:16.100 their time. There's no reason to do it. And when you waste time and money, time is money. So you waste
00:30:20.100 time you already spent, you're already wasting money. And what if you're wasting more money on
00:30:22.820 top of that? It's just a mess. What I'm trying to say is use rock auto rock auto.com is the way to
00:30:27.600 go. Uh, it's the way to save time and save money. It's just a win-win situation. Rock auto.com. If
00:30:32.300 you're looking for auto parts, much easier, much quicker, much cheaper than walking into an auto
00:30:36.540 parts store. A rock auto.com. They always offer the lowest prices possible. They're not going to
00:30:41.400 change the prices just because they think they can make more money off you. It's not nothing like
00:30:45.740 that. What, you know, you have the peace of mind when you go to rock auto.com, you know that
00:30:48.960 you're getting the cheapest possible price for this particular part that you're going to
00:30:54.360 find anywhere. And there's no reason to look anywhere else. This is the best you're going
00:30:57.000 to get. Uh, and often, you know, it's, it's really quite, quite affordable. Rock auto.com
00:31:01.740 is a family business. They've been serving auto parts customers online for 20 years.
00:31:05.200 Go to rock auto.com to shop for auto and body parts from hundreds of manufacturers.
00:31:09.020 Best of all, again, rock auto.com prices that are reliably low and they're the same for
00:31:14.040 professionals and do it yourselfers. And on top of all that great selection, everything you could
00:31:18.500 possibly need and very easy to find over at rock auto.com. So go to rock auto.com right
00:31:23.660 now. See all the parts available for your car or truck. And remember to write Walsh in
00:31:27.820 there. How did you hear about us box? So they know where you came from. All right. And also
00:31:33.060 daily wire of course is in this effort, uh, fighting to take back the culture. And a big
00:31:38.060 part of that is about entertainment. You know, it's about creating culture rather than simply
00:31:43.760 commenting on it. We want to do both over here. And that's where a run, hide fight comes
00:31:49.260 from. Run, hide fight is our movie. You've heard a lot about it. You've heard us talking
00:31:52.600 about it and, um, don't, don't trust us though. Don't listen to what we have to say. You can
00:31:56.900 go to rotten tomatoes. You can see it's got a 93% rating with over 2000 reviews. The audience
00:32:01.680 loves it. Mainstream critics. Maybe they don't like it quite as much. I think they're, they're
00:32:05.460 scandalized by it. They think it's distasteful. They don't like that we're attached to it,
00:32:09.720 but the audience likes it. So if you want to watch our latest film, our first film with many
00:32:14.300 more to come, use promo code RHF to get 25% off. That's RHF for 25% off again, RHF 25% off
00:32:21.420 become a daily wire member today. Now let's get to our daily cancellation.
00:32:29.140 So today we have another reverse cancellation. The cancelers will become the canceled. And as we get
00:32:35.040 into the story, if there's any sincere person left in America who still thinks
00:32:39.660 that cancel culture is a myth doesn't exist, they may want to pay attention and seriously consider
00:32:45.660 the case of Cara Dumoplin. She's a popular baby sleep training expert who, you know, I hadn't heard
00:32:52.400 of before this, but, uh, uh, apparently very popular. And she has been ruthlessly attacked,
00:32:58.580 boycotted, doxxed, and smeared over the past week after someone, we'll have more on that someone in a
00:33:04.380 moment, went through FEC records and discovered that she donated to Donald Trump. They went through
00:33:09.860 the records and found this out. Now, many media outlets have reported on the story, eager to
00:33:14.880 amplify the news of a non-political person's private campaign contributions. And most of the coverage
00:33:21.140 has been along the lines of this headline from the cut, which is a New York magazine publication.
00:33:25.960 They say, quote, a boycott is brewing against formerly beloved childcare consultant, Cara Dumoplin,
00:33:30.940 who has reportedly been funneling some of the profits from her pricey classes into the Trump
00:33:35.860 campaign's coffers. Now, this is disgraceful, of course, and also not true. Not only are they
00:33:43.080 straining to make donations sound sinister by using a phrase like funneling the profits,
00:33:48.960 but they assume that the money that was being given to the Trump campaign came from her childcare
00:33:54.960 consultant business. But we have no way of knowing that. We don't know where the money came from.
00:33:58.820 She has a husband, apparently, who works. He's a doctor. It's going to come from him.
00:34:04.340 And it doesn't matter anyway. Cara Dumoplin offers advice on how to care for infants. Very good
00:34:11.080 advice, I have been told. She never chose to publicize her personal views. The small amount
00:34:17.360 of money she donated to a political campaign, about $1,000 over the course of three years, which is what
00:34:22.920 she said in a statement to the Today Show, that's of no one's concern but her own. This is not a case
00:34:29.280 of a public person choosing to air their political views and then experiencing the divided response that
00:34:35.200 any sane person must expect at this point. This is rather a woman in a completely apolitical line of
00:34:41.080 work whose financial records, along with her address, have been dug up and published in order to
00:34:46.840 personally destroy her in an act of collective ideological vengeance. It's cancel culture.
00:34:53.700 That's what cancel culture is. Hit pieces in the media claim that moms across America have somehow
00:34:58.820 been betrayed. They feel betrayed because a woman who gave them advice on how to help their infants sleep
00:35:04.460 happens to hold political views that don't align with their own. Sophia Tesfay in Salon,
00:35:10.040 she wrote an article openly admitting that this is another case of cancel culture, but she says that
00:35:15.100 it's good. It's a good thing because it holds Dumoplin accountable for the sin of possessing a
00:35:20.560 mind and forming opinions of her own. By the way, if you're wondering, if you're not familiar with this
00:35:25.340 woman and you're wondering what sort of content this right-wing extremist was putting out there,
00:35:30.900 here, just as a quick example, to give you a frame of reference, this dangerous person who has to be
00:35:37.100 held accountable, this right-wing extremist, here she is, and this is sort of typical content that she
00:35:41.160 would put out, here she is explaining how to properly burp a newborn. This is the woman
00:35:44.800 that is right now the target of public rage. Let's listen.
00:35:49.660 Lots of times I see parents when they try to burp, they put her right here like this and they do this
00:35:55.340 and they're trying to burp, but she's just not burping. So here's what I want to show you.
00:35:59.960 Take her and put her little chest up and over your shoulder like this and then cup your hand,
00:36:06.040 make a C like this. You want to hear it. Hear that? That doesn't hurt her, but hear how you can hear
00:36:12.480 that noise. That's what's going to get your burp out. Sometimes parents do this and it just doesn't
00:36:17.540 get a burp out. You want to cup it so it doesn't hurt her back and just go like this. So that's
00:36:22.180 one method is up over the shoulder. Again, get her chest up and over your shoulder like that.
00:36:27.540 Wow. What an extremist.
00:36:33.580 Good advice on the burping though, by the way. My favorite method is you sit the baby up. I think
00:36:38.100 she gets into this. You sit the baby up and hold them sort of by the chin and then pat them on the
00:36:41.300 back. I think he gets the burp out a little bit better. But anyway, that's what, that's the kind
00:36:45.700 of, that's it. That's what she does. She just tells you how to care for babies. I am not aware of
00:36:51.240 any video that she's ever put out advocating for a candidate or anything like that. Now the guy who
00:36:58.280 seems to have gotten the cancel ball rolling in this case, his name is Jamie Grayson and he's a
00:37:03.020 fellow parenting influencer on Instagram. And he quite clearly saw this as an opportunity to kneecap his
00:37:08.880 Instagram competition. He's the one who first published, or he's one of the original ones who
00:37:12.680 first published Dumoplin's FEC records, which include her address again, along with a lengthy screed
00:37:17.980 promising that he's a quote, very liberal homosexual male. He doesn't hold any of her heretical
00:37:23.060 views. Not me. I'm not, I'm not like her. And other vultures from the mommy and daddy blogger
00:37:29.760 sphere swooped in to get a piece of the carcass. And that's, that's how this all started. This is
00:37:34.860 one of the primary hallmarks of cancel culture. And it's how you differentiate it from your average
00:37:40.040 boycott or a genuine case of holding somebody accountable. The people who are looking to obscure this
00:37:45.600 issue, that's what they'll always try to equate these things with. And they'll say, well, you know,
00:37:50.680 it's just a regular boycott. It's holding someone accountable. Now this is how you tell the difference
00:37:55.080 because in cancel culture, it's always vindictive and contemptuous. And often the bus is being driven
00:38:02.600 by someone who stands to personally gain from the destruction of the person who's being thrown under
00:38:07.300 it. Now that's not to say that the average member of the outrage mob, you know, the moms claiming to
00:38:13.560 be betrayed and vowing never to use this childcare program again, have self-serving motivations. I
00:38:19.120 don't think they do. They're more like maniacs driven to the edge of insanity by hatred for their
00:38:23.900 fellow Americans and by their fear of people who think differently from themselves. Just consider
00:38:28.960 for a moment what they're actually doing here. I'm talking about the average person. And I was going
00:38:34.180 through some of the comments and it was a dark and twisted journey reading some of the comments of
00:38:38.540 former fans of this woman who now say, oh, I'm done. I can't, I'm not going to use the program
00:38:42.960 anymore. Um, assuming they follow through on their boycott threats, think about what they're doing
00:38:48.360 because Duma Flynn by all accounts is a miracle worker in the field of baby sleep training. That's
00:38:55.380 her expertise. Um, over the last day, I've spoken to a number of people who swear by her methods,
00:39:00.860 say it's a lifesaver. And then anyone who's had an infant who struggles to sleep knows that it can just
00:39:07.220 about wreck your life, at least for as long as the nighttime struggle sessions continue. We have been
00:39:12.100 through this with a few of our kids. It is, it is very, very difficult because it turns out that
00:39:16.680 sleep is a rather crucial human need. When you're being deprived of it, you become desperate pretty
00:39:22.080 quickly. There's a reason that sleep deprivation is considered a form of torture, according to the
00:39:26.320 Geneva convention, whether infants are therefore guilty of human rights abuses is a legal question
00:39:30.900 for another time. But, uh, what all this means is that these betrayed mothers will choose now to
00:39:38.520 suffer with a sleepless baby rather than use the methods and the advice of a woman who donated to
00:39:44.900 Donald Trump. They're choosing ideology over their own health and sanity, and they don't have much of
00:39:51.540 the latter to spare to begin with. It makes you wonder whether these people would intentionally die
00:39:56.700 of thirst if a Trump supporter recommended they drink water. As this episode shows, cancel culture itself
00:40:03.340 is not the underlying problem. It's real, but it's not the problem. It's not the problem. It is a
00:40:11.000 symptom. The disease is a worldview that cannot tolerate any form of dissent from anyone. It sees
00:40:19.360 all things in a political light. It sees all people as political entities. It sees anyone outside of its
00:40:25.500 tribe as an enemy worthy of condemnation and worse. It clamors for diversity, but seeks a world of
00:40:32.800 sameness. It demands tolerance, but never returns the favor. Cancel culture emerges inevitably from
00:40:40.440 this hateful ideology, otherwise known as leftism. And as we have seen, no one, not even this woman,
00:40:48.680 is exempt from its wrath. And that's why the cancelers are canceled. And by the way, quick pitch for her,
00:40:58.460 unpaid, uh, if you're looking for advice on how to get a baby to sleep, maybe this is a woman you
00:41:02.620 should support. And we'll leave it there for today. Thanks for watching, everybody. Thanks for listening.
00:41:06.900 Have a great day. Godspeed.
00:41:07.980 Well, if you enjoyed this episode, don't forget to subscribe. And if you want to help spread the
00:41:16.820 word, please give us a five-star review. Also tell your friends to subscribe as well. We're available
00:41:21.520 on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, wherever you listen to podcasts. We're there. Also be sure to check out
00:41:26.180 the other Daily Wire podcasts, including the Ben Shapiro show, Michael Knowles show, the Andrew
00:41:30.020 Klavan show. Thanks for listening. The Matt Walsh show is produced by Sean Hampton, executive producer,
00:41:35.160 Jeremy Boring. Our supervising producers are Mathis Glover and Robert Sterling. Our technical
00:41:39.800 director is Austin Stevens, production manager, Pavel Vadosky. The show is edited by Danny D'Amico.
00:41:45.320 Our audio is mixed by Mike Coromina. Hair and makeup is done by Nika Geneva. And our production
00:41:50.040 coordinator is McKenna Waters. The Matt Walsh show is a Daily Wire production, copyright Daily Wire 2021.
00:41:55.840 Internet trolls bankrupt hedge funds for the lols. John Kerry tells fossil fuel workers to learn solar.
00:42:01.680 And most Republicans support Trump in 2024. Check it out on the Michael Knowles show.