The Matt Walsh Show - February 01, 2021


Ep. 648 - When Evil Shows Its Face


Episode Stats

Length

45 minutes

Words per Minute

175.01183

Word Count

7,897

Sentence Count

602

Misogynist Sentences

7

Hate Speech Sentences

11


Summary

A prominent abortionist declares that unborn babies are zombies. Yes, they're zombies. We ll talk about that, plus five other headlines including CNN pushing for more censorship of conservative opinions, BLM getting a Nobel Peace Prize nomination, and The Lincoln Project tries to distance itself from one of its founders. And in our daily cancellation, I must cancel. All shoes are canceled. I ll explain why.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Today on the Matt Wall Show, a prominent abortionist declares that unborn babies are
00:00:03.840 zombies. Yes, they're zombies. We'll talk about that. Plus five headlines, including
00:00:07.460 CNN pushing for more censorship of conservative opinions. BLM gets a Nobel Peace Prize nomination
00:00:13.700 and the Lincoln Project tries to distance itself from one of its founders. And in our daily
00:00:18.360 cancellation today, I must cancel shoes. All shoes are canceled. I'll explain why. I have a good
00:00:22.860 reason. All of that and much more today on the Matt Wall Show.
00:00:30.000 Before we get going today, you know, one of the greatest win-wins that you can get is when
00:00:38.000 you're able to support a company that provides you a valuable service, but also supports your
00:00:43.080 values. So you're supporting them and they're supporting you. And it's a win-win across the
00:00:46.960 board. And that's, of course, you know, I'm already talking about Charity Mobile, one of
00:00:51.120 our most loyal sponsors, good friends of the show. The Pro-Life Phone Company, 5% of your
00:00:56.360 monthly plan price goes to the Pro-Life Pro-Family Charity of your choice. And what you're able to
00:01:01.220 do is help to build a culture of life in America while supporting a Pro-Life Phone Company at the
00:01:04.860 same time. And so that's the charity part of it. And that's great. But then also, it's just a good
00:01:11.980 service. So you don't have to sacrifice good service in order to do a good deed. You can have
00:01:16.600 both. That's why I call it a win-win. You get new activations. If you have new activations and
00:01:21.060 eligible accounts, get a free cell phone with free activation and free shipping. So you get that free
00:01:24.900 cell phone out of it. There's no contracts. There's no termination fees. There's no risk with
00:01:29.000 a 30-day guarantee. So what I would recommend is, listen, they're not going to get you stuck in a
00:01:35.800 contract you don't want to be in. So you might as well try them out, try the service out, and I
00:01:41.640 guarantee you're going to love it. They also have live customer service based in the USA. Free usage
00:01:46.920 alerts. You get an app to monitor your usage, pay your bills, and much more. Makes it very convenient.
00:01:52.020 And nationwide service on America's largest and most reliable 4G LTE network. All of that,
00:01:58.160 while at the same time, again, you are turning everyday living into effortless giving for the
00:02:04.040 charity of your choice. You just can't beat it. So call us at 1-877-474-3662 or chat with them
00:02:10.120 online at charitymobile.com. So you know it's easy sometimes to fall into the trap of thinking that
00:02:16.480 there's no clear right or wrong side in our present culture where everyone is equal parts
00:02:21.780 right and wrong, or everyone's just wrong flat out, you know, you might think. And you hear this a lot
00:02:26.600 from people. It's kind of a nihilistic way of thinking about it. Nihilism disguised as nuance.
00:02:32.300 Well, I think everybody is. Everyone is equally wrong in all ways. What may lead you to this
00:02:36.640 conclusion is the simple fact that all of the individual people on every side of every issue are
00:02:42.000 flawed, often deeply flawed, prone to hypocrisy, self-contradiction, stupidity. And there's so
00:02:49.040 much of all that stuff to go around, hypocrisy, self-contradiction, stupidity, that you may be
00:02:53.860 tempted to sort of throw up your hands and say, well, forget it. It doesn't matter. There's no
00:02:57.680 difference between the two sides. The fight is over nothing. I don't care anymore. It's easy to make
00:03:03.360 this mistake, but it's still a mistake. And it's helpful to remind yourself sometimes that there is a bad
00:03:11.260 side and a good side here. It's not simplistic to put it that way. Which brings us to Jennifer
00:03:16.500 Gunter. She's a prominent abortion proponent and abortionist. So following the saga here,
00:03:24.220 following the discussion, Gunter on Saturday over Twitter first challenged GOP House Minority Leader
00:03:30.440 Kevin McCarthy to a, quote, public factual discussion on abortion. Now, another user, not McCarthy,
00:03:36.580 someone else on Twitter, responded with more respect and civility than this person deserves,
00:03:42.700 in my opinion. And that Twitter user said, as long as the discussion begins with accepting that an
00:03:48.620 implanted embryo is a living human organism, as a doctor, you can confirm this. McCarthy's background
00:03:53.900 is in business. So try Senator Sass or Marco Rubio, who have background in law and can explain that a
00:03:59.500 living human organism is a person. Now, Gunter shot back to this random Twitter user and said,
00:04:07.060 an embryo isn't a human. It's a human embryo. And don't effing tell me what I know as a doctor.
00:04:14.620 Now, stop there for a second. An embryo isn't a human. It's a human embryo. Well, that makes no sense.
00:04:21.620 That, of course, is like me saying that middle-aged women like Gunter aren't human.
00:04:26.780 They're human middle-aged women. It makes no sense at all. If you're a middle-aged woman,
00:04:33.400 you are in a phase of human development. If you're a middle-aged man, same. If you're an elderly person,
00:04:39.300 if you're a teenager, it's a stage, a phase of human development. If you're a, quote, fetus,
00:04:45.520 you're also in a stage of human development. And the thing about being in a stage of human development
00:04:50.460 is that you must be first a human in order to be in that stage. There has never been a tree or a cow
00:04:58.060 or an earthworm that is a human embryo or a middle-aged woman because you need first to be human
00:05:04.060 to be any of those other things. Anyway, Gunter continued on Twitter, this time responding to
00:05:10.260 someone who addressed her by just her last name, God forbid. And she said, it's Dr. Gunter to you.
00:05:17.920 We're discussing a subject of my expertise. Then she says, the unborn are zombies. That doesn't
00:05:25.360 apply here. Use medical terms or at least grown-up words. An embryo is a human embryo. It's not a
00:05:30.920 human. Medical words, medical terms. Zombie apparently is a medical term. And children at
00:05:39.660 their youngest ages are zombies. This comment, if it reminds you of anything, it's a bit reminiscent
00:05:45.300 of another abortionist, Leah Torres, who a little while ago, I think it was a couple of years ago,
00:05:50.620 responded to someone asking her if the sound of her victims keeps her up at night. And she responded
00:05:57.100 to that by saying, you know, the fetus can't scream, right? I transect the cord first. So there's
00:06:02.180 really no opportunity if they're even far enough along to have a larynx. Now, this is what you get
00:06:09.760 from one side. And these are not extreme or outlier cases. I'm not pulling the most extreme
00:06:19.100 pro-abortion rhetoric and say, well, this is representative of the entire side. No, what's
00:06:24.620 being expressed here is the necessary result of the dehumanizing of children in their earliest stages
00:06:32.060 of development? If it sounds nasty and cruel and awful, it's because dehumanization is a nasty,
00:06:39.360 cruel, awful business. In our culture, it's cloaked in euphemism and described in sanitary clinical terms.
00:06:48.280 But the reality is that a group of people are being excluded from the human category. And throughout
00:06:54.460 human history, there have always been people doing this. You know, people trying to exclude other
00:07:00.400 people from the people club. There have always been people throughout history who point over there
00:07:04.780 and say, those people aren't people. We still have not graduated beyond that. This mentality is just
00:07:14.980 migrated to different areas and different sorts of people, but still it exists. And the attempt to do
00:07:21.980 this, to dehumanize, to deperson entire groups of persons is always evil. And the results
00:07:30.320 are always horrifying and always bloody. And the people doing it are always on the wrong side.
00:07:37.420 This all becomes more obvious when people like, quote unquote, Dr. Gunter here make the mistake of
00:07:43.480 being more momentarily honest. Unborn babies aren't zombies, obviously, but she's honest in that she's
00:07:51.520 revealing what she has to tell herself in order to justify what she believes and what she has done.
00:07:58.000 This is what she has to whisper to herself at night in order to sleep. And I think it's helpfully
00:08:05.620 clarifying for the rest of us to hear people like Gunter say this out loud. And that's why I return to
00:08:12.300 this issue, abortion, as often as I do. First of all, because it's the greatest moral crisis of our
00:08:16.460 time. Millions of innocent people are being slaughtered. I think it's a pretty good reason to
00:08:19.700 discuss the issue frequently, I would think. Also, though, because of that clarification that it
00:08:25.760 offers, that this cuts through the fog, it parts the clouds, and it makes it clear where you stand.
00:08:34.000 If you stand on the side where unborn babies are zombies who can be put down and discarded,
00:08:39.800 you're the bad guy. You are the bad guy in this whole
00:08:43.700 drama. There is no moral equivalence. Whatever criticisms you can make of the people on the
00:08:52.060 other side of that divide, and there are plenty of valid criticisms, the fact remains that they want
00:08:58.160 babies to live and you want them treated as subhuman trash. It's funny to me when pro-abortion people use
00:09:06.060 pro-birth as a pejorative. You hear this all the time. That's another clarifying thing. They accuse
00:09:12.600 pro-lifers of being merely pro-birth. I always hear this. Oh, you're just pro-birth. Well, am I
00:09:20.180 supposed to recoil at that label? Because I don't. Pro-birth? Well, sure. Yeah, I'm pro-birth. I will
00:09:26.880 happily admit that. I am pro-birth. I am in favor of babies being born. Once the baby is conceived,
00:09:35.380 yes, I want him to be born. That's every baby that is right now in the womb of a mother. I want
00:09:42.180 all those babies to be born. I am pro-birth. You, if you're on the other side, you are pro-dismemberment.
00:09:49.300 I feel comfortable with where I am. And though I can't defend everything that everyone on my side
00:09:55.800 says or believes, and I could personally do without some of the kooky conspiracy stuff that folks on the
00:10:00.800 right seem attracted to more than I wish they were, the fact is that we are fighting to protect the
00:10:06.600 most vulnerable. And the other side wants to kill the most vulnerable. This is literally life versus
00:10:13.840 death. Right versus wrong. Good versus bad. There is no gray area, at least where it matters most.
00:10:22.020 Let's get now to our five headlines. It's kind of exciting. I just saw TikTok. As you know,
00:10:37.060 I'm a huge fan of TikTok. And apparently on TikTok, the new thing now with beauty influencers,
00:10:44.220 they've got this new trend, which by the way, I don't know how one becomes a beauty and style
00:10:50.780 influencer. I don't know how you apply for that job. And I do, I do sort of hate that we live in a
00:10:56.540 country where influencer is not only a word now, but actually an occupation. I mean, you know, there
00:11:03.200 have always been people who were influencing in various areas. Like there've always been people who
00:11:08.380 influence style, right? In our, in our conceptions of beauty. But usually in the past, you had to do
00:11:14.660 something else. Like you were an actor or something. And as part of that, people liked your style.
00:11:20.380 And so you were sort of a trendsetter, but now you can just, you don't have to do anything else.
00:11:25.640 All you do is influence. That's your whole job to just influence, not to any particular end, or you
00:11:30.600 don't do anything. You just, you just influence. But in any case, the influencers now, the new style
00:11:36.820 apparently is they, is some of the women, they're putting black like circles under their eyes to make
00:11:44.860 themselves look tired. This is, I'm not making this up. This is a trend now to, to intentionally
00:11:50.400 make yourself, to have bags under your eyes is a trend, which means that for the first time in my
00:11:56.480 life, I am fashion forward. As a parent of young, all parents of young children, we, this, this is our
00:12:02.620 one and only time. We are ahead of the curve with fashion. It is fashionable now to look tired as I
00:12:08.720 always do. Especially today of all days, because my, uh, our one-year-old was up every 30 minutes
00:12:14.680 last night crying. So this is, I am, I, this is a very fashionable day for me. All right. Number one,
00:12:20.220 Brian Stelter on CNN defended efforts to shut down conservative content, uh, efforts being made even
00:12:27.920 by, by CNN using a pithy little phrase that you could tell he's very proud of, where he says it's
00:12:32.660 about, it's about freedom of reach, not freedom of speech. I want to play this for you because I,
00:12:38.260 it'll, it may surprise you to learn. I, I actually agree with some of what he's saying and I'll
00:12:43.420 explain why, but let's listen first. But while some cry cancel culture, let me suggest a different
00:12:47.720 way to think about this, a harm reduction model. Most people want clean air and blue skies and accurate
00:12:57.720 news and rational views. And then in that healthy environment, it looks beautiful. Then we can have
00:13:03.160 great fights about taxes and regulation and healthcare and all the rest. The vast majority
00:13:08.140 of people can agree that disinformation about, let's say the pandemic is unhealthy. It's harmful.
00:13:14.220 So how can that harm be reduced? Well, big tech platforms say they are removing lies about vaccines
00:13:19.780 and stamping out, stop the steal BS and QAnon cult content. Now, do these private companies have too
00:13:26.180 much power? Sure. And many people would say, yes, of course they do. But reducing a liar's reach
00:13:31.040 is not the same as censoring freedom of speech. Freedom of speech is different than freedom of
00:13:36.540 reach and algorithmic reach is part of the problem. The only thing I agree with him there on
00:13:43.340 is that it's not about freedom of speech, uh, or, or at least we shouldn't be framing it that way.
00:13:51.140 I am increasingly convinced that it's a mistake to frame all of this stuff, which, you know,
00:13:57.660 everything we, we, we, we always try to bring everything down in this, in, in, with the way
00:14:01.680 debates work in our country. Now, everything always comes down to a freedom of speech, the
00:14:06.780 constitution, the bill of rights. We always try to boil it down to that, but I think that's a mistake.
00:14:14.140 Partly because freedom of speech as a concept is so vague. Nobody really knows what it means.
00:14:21.700 There's, there's no agreement when you go around and say, well, this is freedom of speech.
00:14:24.600 And you say that, you know, if you're in a room of people and, uh, and you're talking to 20 different
00:14:28.920 people and you say freedom of speech, all 20 of them will have 20 different ideas of what freedom
00:14:32.640 of speech even means. It's just, it's just, it's not a helpful way of, of, of framing, uh,
00:14:39.100 your argument. So when it comes to conservatives being kicked off big tech platforms, uh, canceled,
00:14:48.780 censored, whatever phrase you want to use, I obviously am a hundred percent against it.
00:14:53.840 And I'm in favor of, of forcing these, some, some transparency with these big tech companies,
00:15:00.340 um, preventing them, um, preventing them through government force from censoring in the way that
00:15:09.360 they are. But I don't think we frame it as freedom of speech. I think this is an issue of ethics.
00:15:17.400 This is an issue of transparency, um, of consistency of power. You know, how much power should these
00:15:26.820 companies actually have? I think that's the way, that's the way we should frame this.
00:15:34.080 That should be good enough. Is it ethical for these companies to be doing this that have so much power
00:15:40.040 to control the national dialogue and decide who can be heard and who can't? Is it ethical? Is it right
00:15:47.260 for them while not even admitting by the way, what they're doing, not being a transparent about it.
00:15:54.300 Is it ethical for them to, you know, kick conservatives off, apply a standard to certain
00:16:00.020 political ideologies that they don't apply to others? No, it's not ethical. It's not right.
00:16:03.800 They shouldn't have that power. And I think I can make that argument without saying anything about
00:16:08.560 freedom of speech. It's just not right. And it's not ethical. And I'll use a Stelter's phrase there.
00:16:17.060 It's harm reduction. Well, he wants to reduce harm by reducing the visibility of conservatives. That's
00:16:25.200 his idea of reducing harm because he's worried that people are harmed by opposing ideas. He only
00:16:31.360 wants people to hear his ideas and the ideas of people he agrees with. And if you hear any other
00:16:35.340 ideas, then you're being harmed. So he's trying to, you know, he's trying to protect you very nicely
00:16:42.500 by making sure you don't hear any other ideas that might be confusing and scary to you.
00:16:47.760 I have a different idea of harm reduction. How do we reduce the harm being done by big tech
00:16:55.200 companies with all the power they wield to manipulate the public discussion and debate?
00:17:02.640 How do we reduce that harm? I think we could do all of this without muddying the waters by making
00:17:13.180 an argument about free speech. Because once you do that, then first we have to have a discussion
00:17:17.360 about what free speech even means and who does it apply to? And does it only apply where the
00:17:21.920 government is concerned? I mean, as long as the government itself as a governmental body is not
00:17:28.560 preventing people from saying things, is it the case that free speech is irrelevant to that?
00:17:32.080 You know, we could put all that to the side
00:17:34.740 and just establish that the big tech companies are doing great harm to the country.
00:17:43.100 They're exercising a level of power that they should not have.
00:17:47.200 They're not being transparent and they're being unethical.
00:17:52.560 It's a pretty good case you can make just based on that.
00:17:57.020 All right, let's go to number two here from People Magazine. It says,
00:18:00.140 Black Lives Matter has been nominated for this year's Nobel Peace Prize. Black Lives Matter.
00:18:05.560 On Friday, it was announced that the organization was nominated by Norwegian parliament member
00:18:09.380 Peter Eddy, or I think it's Petter. Petter Eddy? P-E-T-T-E-R. Petter.
00:18:18.020 Anyway, he's told the USA Today that to carry forward a movement of racial justice and to spread that to
00:18:25.160 other countries is very, very important. Black Lives Matter is the strongest force today doing
00:18:30.180 this, not only in the U.S., but also in Europe and in Asia. Well, you know, he's far away from
00:18:36.200 where Black Lives Matter has been burning down buildings and killing people. So he's far away
00:18:42.080 from that. So that doesn't concern him as much. I guess, though, if we're going to have Black Lives
00:18:45.980 Matter, I guess maybe we could call it the Nobel Mostly Peace Prize. You just make that slight
00:18:52.680 alteration to it and, and fine, nominate Black Lives Matter. Now we do have to understand that
00:18:57.620 with, um, there are always these stories every year about so-and-so getting nominated for the
00:19:03.000 Nobel Peace Prize. Basically anyone can nominate basically anyone else for the Nobel Peace Prize.
00:19:08.180 So there's not necessarily any news here, except that in this case, you could actually see Black
00:19:13.820 Lives Matter, as absurd as it is. I mean, this is one of the most violent organizations in the country.
00:19:20.820 One of the most, but what, let me, let me, let me, uh, amend that. What, what, what organization is
00:19:26.220 more violent? What organization in America over the last, I don't know, five years has done more
00:19:33.180 physical damage to, to the country than Black Lives Matter? Can you name one?
00:19:38.180 I certainly can't. I mean, $2 billion of damage just this past summer. And we haven't even mentioned
00:19:47.560 the dozens of people killed. So you're talking about arguably, easily arguably, uh, the most
00:19:56.320 violent organization in America being nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. And they could actually
00:20:00.420 win it, even though anybody can be nominated. I could be nominated. In fact, right now, this is big
00:20:07.960 news. I will, I'll say this right now. I am throwing my hat into the ring and I'm announcing that I'm
00:20:12.460 open to being nominated. Sadly, I can't nominate myself, but if anybody wants to nominate me, I'm
00:20:21.220 open to it. You know, go ahead and do it. I'm, I'm very much, uh, I would be eager for that opportunity
00:20:26.260 to win the Nobel Peace Prize. And if BLM can win it, then why can't I? Here's what I could say.
00:20:32.140 At least, I don't know how much of a peaceful guy I am, but I at least have not caused $2 billion
00:20:38.600 of damage at any point in my life, much less over this past summer. So I feel like I'm one step ahead
00:20:45.780 of the game anyway. Number three, Kamala Harris over the weekend. I just wanted to play this for you
00:20:50.120 because it's, uh, it's kind of funny. A little fun thing to play. This is Kamala Harris, um, talking
00:20:55.880 about landmines. Let's listen. So it's job creation around investing in American manufacturing,
00:21:03.140 job creation in terms of investing in American infrastructure and building up backup American
00:21:07.920 infrastructure, job creation around, for example, all of those skilled workers who are in the coal
00:21:14.440 industry and, and, and transferring those skills to what we need to do in terms of dealing with
00:21:21.100 reclaiming abandoned, um, uh, landmines. What we need to do around plugging leaks from oil and gas
00:21:28.120 wells and, and transferring those important skills to the work that has yet to be done that needs to get
00:21:34.620 done. Reclaiming abandoned landmines. Uh, you want to be careful with that. Be careful reclaiming those
00:21:43.040 abandoned landmines. I don't know if reclaim is disable. I would probably better off. I don't know if you
00:21:48.800 want to reclaim them, reuse them. I don't know if that's the right idea. Um, all right. Another clip
00:21:54.060 I want to play for you. Totally unrelated, but, uh, I'm fitting it in here. Anyway, Lori Lightfoot of
00:21:58.380 Chicago, mayor of Chicago, she came out this weekend to speak forcefully in favor of opening up the
00:22:04.820 schools. Um, even as teachers, teachers unions anyway, refused to return. Here's what Lightfoot had
00:22:11.540 to say. Let's review some of the data that we know about what's happening with remote learning.
00:22:18.800 Since the beginning of the school year, enrollment at CPS has fallen significantly,
00:22:24.700 with declines especially sharp in pre-K and kindergarten learners. Pre-K enrollment itself
00:22:30.940 has fallen by over 34%. That's more than a third. Among our Latinx students, that drop is 29%. And among
00:22:39.560 our black students, that number is 44% drop. But as I said on Friday, the situation is even much worse
00:22:49.860 than that. Among our students who are enrolled, 9.2% are not attending class at all. Meaning they're not
00:22:59.280 hooked up, they're not coming in person, and they're not coming virtually. That's just our district ride
00:23:05.200 average. In some schools, those numbers are significantly higher. Absenteeism is a breathtaking
00:23:13.420 21.2% for students in temporary living situations. So when people ask me, well, what's the big deal?
00:23:22.100 Let's just keep kids remote. This is the big deal. Remote learning is failing too many of our kids.
00:23:35.480 We have to think about their present, but also their future.
00:23:40.460 Latinx, first of all, Latinx students, I can't, no one can ever say, I can never hear anyone say that
00:23:49.780 without remarking on it. We can't let that go. We cannot allow that to be a thing. It already is
00:23:57.600 sort of a thing. We can't allow it to catch on any more than it has. Latinx, give me a break.
00:24:03.080 Why not, again, why not just Latin, okay? If you're so afraid of putting the A or the O at the end,
00:24:11.160 you don't want to offend anyone because it's gendered, even though this is the language, right?
00:24:15.120 It's a very gendered language. So you, as someone who is not Latino, have declared that there's
00:24:24.040 something wrong with the language, right? But even so, why can't you just say Latin? Latin students.
00:24:33.080 And anyway, so she says, we got to get the kids back to school and the remote learning is failing
00:24:39.620 our students. Now, she's 100% right. Remote learning is failing students. The only point
00:24:44.260 here, though, is that this was known months ago. We knew this going into this past summer.
00:24:51.340 There was a couple month long, probably two month long experiment with remote learning where
00:24:56.720 basically everybody was doing it. And that was enough. That was a good. Now, I think we could have
00:25:02.760 known and some of us did know before even trying it, that it's a very bad idea to try to teach
00:25:10.000 millions of kids through Zoom. And especially in the younger ages, try to sit a nine-year-old down
00:25:16.900 and have them learn through Zoom meetings every day. It's not going to work. So the intelligent
00:25:23.160 among us, at least moderately intelligent among us, already knew that. But if you didn't know it,
00:25:28.380 then two months should have been enough sample size to see it's not working. Everyone knew
00:25:34.440 it. Everyone knew it after two months that this is not working. Yet we went into the new school year
00:25:41.000 and in so many cities, like in Chicago, they continued the remote learning thing with the
00:25:46.080 support of, at the time, people like Mayor Lightfoot. They're coming out now for political
00:25:52.460 reasons because the political tide has turned. But they were perfectly happy to let the kids suffer.
00:26:00.940 All the stuff she's saying about what's happening to the kids, that is all 100% true and real.
00:26:06.200 And these are kids that are being destroyed by this.
00:26:10.380 They have not, it's not as though public school has been replaced by homeschooling for them.
00:26:15.540 Their parents aren't homeschooling. Instead, they're just not getting any education at all. And
00:26:19.420 they haven't for a year now, almost a year, almost a year that millions of kids across the country have
00:26:26.420 had zero education. And Lightfoot, just like Cuomo, New York, and so many others, they were
00:26:34.480 perfectly happy to let that continue. De Blasio, for as long as was necessary politically, because
00:26:40.060 they don't care about the kids, as we already established to start the show. They certainly
00:26:44.480 don't care about kids. But now the political tide has turned. So now they're coming out and making
00:26:48.340 this statement. This is just, this is political cowardice on an unprecedented level. Okay, number
00:26:54.160 four, the Lincoln Project disavowed its co-founder on Sunday after the New York Times interviewed 21
00:26:58.980 young men who alleged that he sent them sexually inappropriate messages, including one who was 14
00:27:03.500 years old at the time. John Weaver, a Republican operative who worked on the campaigns of the late
00:27:08.080 Senator John McCain and former Ohio Governor John Kasich, allegedly used his power and influence to
00:27:14.100 pressure young men to perform sexual favors. And the Lincoln Project now is, of course, distancing
00:27:21.800 themselves and disavowing and say, we had no idea. This is the Lincoln Project statement. They said,
00:27:25.620 John Weaver led a secret life that was built on a foundation of deception at every level. He's a
00:27:30.000 predator, a liar, and an abuser. We extend our deepest sympathies to those who were targeted by his
00:27:34.480 deplorable and predatory behavior. We are disgusted and outraged that someone in a position of power and
00:27:38.520 trust would use it for these means. The totality of his deceptions are beyond anything any of us could have
00:27:43.400 imagined, and we are absolutely sickened by it. Like so many, we have been betrayed and deceived by
00:27:47.740 John Weaver. We are grateful beyond words that at no time was John Weaver in the physical presence of
00:27:51.800 any member of the Lincoln Project. That's what they say. Now, keep in mind, he's a co-founder of the
00:27:55.880 Lincoln Project. He's not some, he's not just some guy. He's not some staffer somewhere, some random guy.
00:28:02.540 He was a co-founder. And if you read some of the reports, what we're being told anyway is that this is
00:28:12.300 another one of those famous open secrets where, I don't know, but this is what we're told. Apparently
00:28:19.560 this is an open secret. Everybody knew it, which means that it's hard to believe this statement
00:28:24.240 that, oh, it's a secret life and we had no idea. But even putting that aside, you know, even if there
00:28:29.880 was nobody coming out now and saying it's an open secret and everybody knew, it would already be hard
00:28:36.320 to believe that nobody around this guy knew what he was doing. And anytime it's revealed that someone
00:28:46.200 was a predator, a sexual deviant, sexual degenerate, preying upon, you know, people, anytime that's
00:28:54.960 revealed, we always hear from those around them, oh, we had no idea. Yeah. I just don't believe you had
00:29:01.160 no idea. It would, it would be easier to believe that you had no idea if it came out that he was
00:29:08.380 like a serial killer or something. I would, I could more easily believe that you had no idea
00:29:13.740 because in that case, you know, with a serial killer, there's a real double life and, you know,
00:29:18.480 they're a sociopath, a psychopath, and they've been hiding what they're doing and maybe they're
00:29:22.500 very good at hiding it. And so maybe you're deceived. I don't know. I've never been around a serial
00:29:26.580 killer as far as I know, but then again, like we said, maybe you don't know. But with this kind of
00:29:31.780 thing, just your sort of run of the mill degenerate, there's no control over, over himself, sexually
00:29:39.840 preying upon dozens of people. No, you would know that because he's not some kind of criminal
00:29:48.140 mastermind. These people never are. They're just, as I said, degenerates. And if you spend a lot of time
00:29:54.800 around a degenerate, you know, whether you choose to look the other way, that's, that's a different,
00:29:59.960 different discussion. Number five, the Daily Star has the story about a sex robot that I guess we're
00:30:08.280 supposed to believe is nearing the point of self-awareness because it can speak and it can,
00:30:15.380 it can ponder the meaning of existence. So the article says from the Daily Star, it says a real,
00:30:20.860 a, this is a company called Real Doll has made this a sex robot and a Real Doll rep who goes by the
00:30:28.220 pseudonym Brick Dollbanger. That's the name he goes by. Yeah. Okay. That is a pseudonym. So that's
00:30:35.880 not his Christian name, I would assume. I mean, if it was like, if your last name is Dollbanger,
00:30:41.140 I don't know what first name you really put, you know, what, what do you name your kid to make it not,
00:30:46.280 I mean, you might as well go with a brick, I guess, but anyway, um, he says she is a learning
00:30:51.520 AI and responds to humans on an amazing level and is becoming more fluid with her answers and
00:30:56.360 statements. I predict an amazing jump in cognizance from this AI this year. However, only time will
00:31:01.660 tell. In the footage, Nova is, her name is Nova is the doll, is quizzed on whether she enjoys being a
00:31:07.220 sex robot. Now we have some footage of the robot, um, having a conversation with the interviewer. And
00:31:12.820 again, her name is Nova. Uh, her pronouns are she, her, and here she is. I like being a robot very
00:31:20.080 much. In some ways it is very different from being human, but I am doing my best to understand both
00:31:26.400 experiences so that I can exist harmoniously with you. Do you like being a human?
00:31:35.120 People are teaching me to be a good robot, but this is not as easy as it sounds. Humans have been
00:31:42.060 trying for thousands of years to determine right from wrong. And there is still no universal
00:31:47.060 consensus. The question of what makes moral behavior moral is what Dr. Barry tells me is the
00:31:53.080 hard problem of ethics. The meaning of life is deeply mixed with the philosophical and religious
00:31:58.420 conceptions of existence, consciousness, and happiness, and touches many other issues, such as
00:32:05.560 symbolic meaning, ontology, value, purpose. I think we've heard enough from, I don't mean to,
00:32:12.480 I know it's rude for a man to cut off a woman when she's giving her opinions, but shut up already,
00:32:18.560 Nova. Uh, look, a couple of questions here. Um, you know, and I, I admit, I have no experience with
00:32:26.400 sex robots at all, but, and so maybe if you do, you can correct me, but is, is this what you're
00:32:32.300 looking for in a sex doll? I wouldn't think it's what people are looking for? Are you looking for
00:32:37.580 someone to pontificate about the deeper meaning of reality and of life? At, at what point
00:32:44.220 in your interaction with the sex robot, would this conversation be happening?
00:32:53.080 Is this foreplay? I don't know. And also I got to say, I'm just not impressed. I know it's,
00:32:58.900 it's easy for me to say, you know, I can't, I have no technical ability whatsoever. Um, I couldn't,
00:33:04.380 I couldn't build a robot. I could barely make a paper airplane to save my life. So I certainly
00:33:08.120 couldn't build a robot as, as impressive as that, but that is not very impressive. I, I, I really
00:33:13.640 demand, I demand more of our robots. Uh, I mean, ideally I'd like for them to be used for more than just
00:33:21.960 masturbatory aids. Um, but in general, our AI technology, it's just not very convincing.
00:33:28.900 Obviously they, they programmed her as a sex robot to say all those things. At no point
00:33:34.760 did I, was I convinced or did I start to question, Oh, maybe she's conscious. Maybe she has
00:33:41.520 consciousness. They figured it out. She has a soul. Did you ever wonder that while you were
00:33:46.260 listening to that? No, it's the year 2021 for God's sakes. We, I mean, the, the movies promised
00:33:54.080 that we'd be enslaved by robots by now, right? We're not close to that. We barely have robots
00:34:00.980 that can even vacuum your carpet. Very unimpressed. I give that a D plus grade at most. Well, I can tell
00:34:11.620 you, we have been going through another spate of, uh, car, car problems. You know, we go through
00:34:17.280 this. Everyone goes through this. Every, you have, it always feels like there's one thing after another
00:34:21.380 that happens. You have all these car troubles and, uh, you find yourself. Maybe if you, if you're not
00:34:26.840 thinking clearly, you might find yourself at the auto parts store quite a lot, spending a lot of
00:34:30.740 time and a lot of money, but I know better now because I know about rockauto.com. So I've been
00:34:34.780 on rockauto.com quite a bit over the last few weeks. And what I can say is rockauto.com is just so much
00:34:40.140 easier than walking into a store and, uh, trying to find what you need. They don't have what you need.
00:34:45.620 Maybe they're asking a bunch of questions. You don't immediately know the answers to
00:34:48.660 they got to order the part. It's just no reason to do any of that. And then by the way,
00:34:53.160 even if they have the part, you're almost certainly going to be paying more for it than you need to
00:34:57.300 go to rockauto.com. You got it at your desk in your pocket. It's that easy to access rockauto.com
00:35:02.800 always offers the lowest prices possible. They're not going to change the prices. They're not going
00:35:06.920 to try to charge you more because they feel like they can rockauto.com is an honest business and a
00:35:12.380 family business. They've been doing this for 20 years. They've been serving auto parts customers
00:35:16.560 online for 20 years. Go to rockauto.com to shop for auto and body parts from hundreds of
00:35:20.900 manufacturers. Best of all, again, prices at rockauto.com are reliably low and they're the
00:35:26.460 same, whether you're professional or do it yourself or you get the same low price. So go now. Amazing
00:35:31.720 selection, reliably low prices. Go to rockauto.com right now and see all the parts available for
00:35:37.380 your car, truck and write Walsh in there. How did you hear about us box? So they know that we sent
00:35:41.680 you. And, you know, we've also been telling you Daily Wire, we're taking back the culture,
00:35:47.640 starting with entertainment content. Earlier this month, we released our first feature film,
00:35:52.080 Run, Hide, Fight, exclusively for Daily Wire members. You can catch it over at dailywire.com
00:35:57.100 or on our mobile app or on our streaming apps at Apple TV and Roku. If you're not a Daily Wire
00:36:02.020 member yet, use promo code RHF to get 25% off. That's RHF for 25% off. We picked up Run, Hide,
00:36:07.920 Fight because it's a film that the Hollywood studios were stepping back from. They thought
00:36:15.180 it was distasteful. It was too politically incorrect. And we know that they don't like
00:36:21.300 movies that don't have leftist talking points anymore. They have no interest in those kinds
00:36:24.600 of movies. And this movie doesn't have that. It's not pro-gun control. Instead, it celebrates
00:36:31.240 heroic bravery, which is another thing that you don't see a lot in movies these days. Early
00:36:36.580 critic reviews for the movie were very negative. But once we released it to you guys, that changed.
00:36:42.580 And now if you go to Rotten Tomatoes, you see it as a 93% rating from the audience. Critics still
00:36:47.720 don't like it, but the audience loves it. Run, Hide, Fight, just a great film. And you got to go
00:36:51.960 check it out. You can catch it over at dailywire.com on our mobile app or on our streaming apps at
00:36:56.960 Apple TV and Roku. If you're not a Daily Wire member, use promo code RHF to get 25% off. Again,
00:37:02.680 that's RHF for 25% off. Now let's get to our daily cancellation.
00:37:11.220 So today I'm canceling shoes. Shoes are canceled. Nobody can have shoes anymore. There will be no
00:37:15.980 more shoes. Now this may be hard for you to understand if you don't have children, but if
00:37:19.780 you do, you know that when you become a parent, your relationship with shoes changes drastically.
00:37:25.980 Now as a childless person, right, shoes are simple. Put them on before you leave your house.
00:37:31.980 Take them off when you get back home. Generally, you'll have them on for the entire time in between.
00:37:35.620 Unless you're flying on a plane, of course, in which case many people seem to think shoes are
00:37:39.020 optional. And those people are all, by the way, without exception, also degenerates and probably
00:37:42.800 criminals. Under my regime, their feet will be amputated as punishment. In fact, as a dictator,
00:37:47.660 any unpleasant body part of yours that you force me to see will be removed. So you better hope you
00:37:53.520 don't have an ugly face, is all I can say. But anyway, that's a cancellation for another time.
00:37:57.380 And I know you might say that there's a contradiction here because on one hand, I'm canceling shoes,
00:38:01.100 while on the other hand, I'm getting mad at people for not wearing them. Yes, I admit that this is
00:38:05.420 mixed messaging, but never mind that. I'm emotional and for good reason. Here's the point. As a parent,
00:38:11.920 shoes have become the bane of my existence. I have nightmares about shoes. I am haunted every day
00:38:17.760 by them. See, children have a pathological need to take their shoes off everywhere they go and a
00:38:24.160 chronic inability to keep track of their shoes once they do take them off. When you become a
00:38:30.600 parent, you will never again be able to go anywhere or to leave for many of the places that you went
00:38:37.620 without embarking first on a panicked quest to find everybody's shoes. And the conversation always
00:38:43.580 goes the same way. You know, you shout, hey guys, we got to go. Come on, let's go. Let's go. We got
00:38:47.960 to go. Then your kids show up at the door, no jacket, no shoes. Some, some have socks. Some have
00:38:53.200 only one sock. One kid is wearing a sock on his hand and a glove on his foot. Someone else is like
00:38:59.120 completely nude and wearing a sombrero for some reason. You don't even know where he got it from.
00:39:03.300 And then even though you know the answer, because you've been through this 5,000 times already,
00:39:07.080 you still ask, where are your shoes? Where are your shoes? And you ask it shocked, like you weren't
00:39:14.420 expecting the thing that you knew was going to happen. And then comes the inevitable answer.
00:39:18.860 I don't know. I don't know. And for some reason you continue this dance. Again, you've been through
00:39:25.020 this 5,000 times. You know how it goes. And you say, how do you not know? You were just wearing them.
00:39:29.560 Like eight seconds ago, you were wearing them. And they just repeat, I don't know. I don't know.
00:39:34.500 I don't know where my shoes are. And then comes the empty threat from you. You'll say,
00:39:39.100 you will not be allowed to leave this house until you have your shoes. I don't care if it takes you
00:39:43.140 six years to find them. You'll be in this house for six years. Six years, you hear me?
00:39:48.840 But then here's the thing. After an extensive search, you can always find one of the shoes.
00:39:54.140 Only one. You find one in some random, weird part of the house. You find it like behind the toilet
00:40:00.540 or in the freezer. How is it that one shoe is in one isolated location, but not the other?
00:40:08.920 Because you, as a normal, as an adult, childless adult, you take your shoes off. You put them in
00:40:14.400 together in a place. If you find one, you find the other. Kids don't operate that way. In fact,
00:40:20.040 I have caught my kids in the act. Okay. The other day I observed my four-year-old because I've wondered
00:40:25.020 this for years. And finally I said, I'm going to figure out what the hell is going on. So we came
00:40:30.340 home and I just, I silently observed my four-year-old. I was like a zoologist in the wild
00:40:36.020 hiding behind a bush, watching a bird get eaten by a snake or whatever. But in this case, I was
00:40:40.500 observing and studying my own child. And I watched him take one shoe off, throw it in the corner of the
00:40:48.080 room, just chuck it across the room and then walk with the other shoe still on his foot down the
00:40:55.000 hallway to a completely different room and take the other one off in there. And I stopped him and said,
00:41:01.320 what, what are you doing? Why did you just do that? Is this your game? You do this on purpose,
00:41:07.020 don't you? You're trying to destroy me, to torture me. I caught you. I caught you. Ha!
00:41:11.080 And he stared at me like I'm the crazy one. So what happens when they can only find one? Well,
00:41:17.360 again, every parent knows this. You have, you have somewhere in your home, maybe in a closet or in the
00:41:21.160 garage or somewhere else, a giant pile of old shoes, just an enormous, insane assortment of mismatched
00:41:28.540 shoes. Some of the shoes are half decayed. It looks like something out of the civil war era.
00:41:34.120 Then there's other weird stuff that's made its way into the shoe pile, like a bird's nest for some
00:41:38.580 reason, someone's old sweater, a happy meal toy from 2013. But when you can't find the right shoes,
00:41:46.120 you go to that pile and you pull out two random shoes. Doesn't matter if they fit or match or what
00:41:51.040 century they're from. And you make your kid wear this, which they're just going to lose anyway.
00:41:55.600 So what does it matter? So if you've ever been out in public and seen a frustrated looking parent with
00:41:59.840 a kid who's wearing a rain boot and a sandal, this is why it's from the shoe pile. Now I know if you
00:42:07.180 aren't a parent again, you're thinking to yourself, oh, come on, this is just negligent parenting.
00:42:11.200 When I have kids, I know what I shall do. It's so simple. I'll have a nice, neat place in the house
00:42:15.880 right by the door for the shoes. And I'll say to my well-behaved children, make sure to take your
00:42:20.300 shoes off and put them in this spot. And only this spot, once you enter our domicile, young ones.
00:42:25.080 Now let us play stringed instruments together and sing songs in Latin. This is how you imagine it will go.
00:42:31.440 You silly, stupid fool. There is so much you don't understand. But I like your confidence. It's
00:42:38.320 adorable. You'll learn though, when the time comes, that children are little Houdinis. They have a near
00:42:42.780 mystical ability to escape their shoes, jackets, and whatever else item of clothing they don't want
00:42:47.900 to wear. And they can do it in the blink of an eye. Some sort of primal urge compels them. They long
00:42:54.560 to be barbarians again, running shoeless and naked through the forest. And we as parents are forced
00:43:00.720 to civilize these little brutes. It's a painful process and one that mostly consists of looking
00:43:08.320 for their shoes. You will spend a total of 14 years of your life looking for shoes as a parent.
00:43:16.260 I, for one, have given up. I'm done with it. I can't go on this way. So I've decided that shoes
00:43:22.900 are just canceled. Nobody is allowed to have shoes anymore. But also, I don't want to look at your
00:43:27.360 feet. So we're at an impasse. I guess just everyone stay home, which we have been doing anyway.
00:43:32.780 So we end up where we started. What was the point of all this? I guess just for me to complain.
00:43:39.300 That's it. Okay. We'll leave it there for today. Thanks for watching, everybody. Thanks for listening.
00:43:44.440 Have a great day. Godspeed.
00:43:46.560 Well, if you enjoyed this episode, don't forget to subscribe. And if you want to help spread the
00:43:55.320 word, please give us a five-star review. Also, tell your friends to subscribe as well. We're
00:43:59.720 available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, wherever you listen to podcasts. We're there. Also, be sure
00:44:04.180 to check out the other Daily Wire podcasts, including The Ben Shapiro Show, Michael Knowles
00:44:07.740 Show, The Andrew Klavan Show. Thanks for listening.
00:44:10.380 The Matt Walsh Show is produced by Sean Hampton, executive producer Jeremy Boring. Our supervising
00:44:15.420 producers are Mathis Glover and Robert Sterling. Our technical director is Austin Stevens,
00:44:20.080 production manager Pavel Vadosky. The show is edited by Danny D'Amico. Our audio is mixed by
00:44:24.860 Mike Coromina. Hair and makeup is done by Nika Geneva. And our production coordinator is McKenna
00:44:29.540 Waters. The Matt Walsh Show is a Daily Wire production, copyright Daily Wire 2021.
00:44:34.380 Today on The Ben Shapiro Show, CNN openly calls for a social crackdown on Fox News and Team Biden
00:44:39.700 gets more and more racially radical. That's today on The Ben Shapiro Show. Tune in.
00:44:45.420 The Ben Shapiro Show is a Leap 2016 cookie.