The Matt Walsh Show - Ep. 670 - Pretty Soon We'll All Be Canceled

00:00:00.000 Today on the Matt Wall Show, now that the cancel mob has started canceling dead children's

00:00:04.720 authors, it's clear that eventually everybody will be canceled unless the madness stops.

00:00:09.180 We'll talk about that today. Plus, five headlines, including the FBI director

00:00:12.560 suspiciously refusing to provide any information about the death of Officer Sicknick. Plus,

00:00:17.480 Texas lifts all COVID restrictions. And Joe Biden says that maybe, if we're lucky,

00:00:22.660 we can get back to normal next year. All of that and much more today on the Matt Wall Show.

00:00:30.000 You know, it's bad enough when the cancel vultures descend on some living person and start ripping

00:00:41.200 the flesh off their bones for some perceived offense, whether recent or in the distant past.

00:00:46.860 I hate that kind of cancellation about as much as a person could possibly hate anything,

00:00:50.920 but still not as much as I hate the cancellation of the dead. Though you may say it isn't as bad

00:00:56.700 because at least the person's no longer around to suffer the mob's wrath, there's still something

00:01:00.840 so just supremely arrogant and gratuitous about staging a public show trial of a guy who's not

00:01:08.020 here to defend himself and whose sins are being judged through a modern lens by people who don't

00:01:12.640 understand and have no interest in trying to understand the historical context in which the

00:01:16.900 dead man lived. But such is the fate of Dr. Seuss. As we discussed briefly yesterday,

00:01:22.520 it began with some schools deciding to de-emphasize, not ban, they say, just de-emphasize Dr. Seuss books

00:01:29.680 on the grounds that Seuss had racist views and some of his books contained images with racial

00:01:34.860 undertones. Then the National Education Association, according to USA Today, quote,

00:01:39.860 pivoted from Dr. Seuss to a focus on diverse children's books. Next, Joe Biden broke from

00:01:46.540 presidents Trump and Obama by leaving Seuss's name out of the National Read Across America Day

00:01:52.160 proclamation. And finally, Dr. Seuss Enterprises itself announced that it would stop publishing

00:01:57.800 six Dr. Seuss titles, saying that the books contain images and messages that are, quote,

00:02:03.080 hurtful and wrong. Now, all of this happened in the span of a few days. Dr. Seuss went from

00:02:09.380 a beloved children's author to problematic to pariah in about 48 hours. Now, if you have a

00:02:19.800 problem with any of this, the media is here to inform you that you're wrong and probably stupid. 0.99

00:02:25.000 An NBC article published this morning says critics are condemning a decision to no longer publish 0.99

00:02:30.460 six Dr. Seuss books, but experts say a reckoning with his racist works is long overdue. Well,

00:02:36.620 that settles it. Experts said so. Experts on what, though? Who are the experts that we can call in to

00:02:43.840 settle the question of whether the cat in the hat is turning our kids into white supremacists?

00:02:49.160 Well, NBC explains. Here are the experts. They say, quote, in Dr. Seuss's books, we have a kind of

00:02:56.000 sensibility which is oriented toward centering the white child and de-centering everyone else,

00:03:01.200 said Ebony Thompson, or rather Ebony Thomas, a professor of children's and young adult

00:03:06.240 literature at the University of Pennsylvania. She is the author of The Dark Fantastic Race and

00:03:11.720 the Imagination from Harry Potter to the Hunger Games. She continues, Dr. Seuss was shaped by a

00:03:18.040 completely immersive white supremacist culture. Even during that time, our ancestors and elders

00:03:23.460 were protesting racist works and producing alternative stories for our children. How do we

00:03:28.020 decide what endures and what doesn't endure? It's our responsibility to decide what kind of books

00:03:32.960 to put in front of our kids. The debate is a complicated one because it must tackle the

00:03:38.520 fortitude of classic books while reckoning with the place of such stories in a world of diverse

00:03:42.560 readers. And then it says, a 2019 survey of Seuss's works found that just 2% of the human

00:03:48.840 characters were people of color. 98% were white. Okay, well, the last statistic there seems a little

00:03:56.920 bit odd. 98% of Seuss's human characters are white and 2% are people of color. Is it even obvious who

00:04:03.640 the humans are supposed to be in the Dr. Seuss book? I mean, it's clear where maybe the human,

00:04:10.960 non-human line is drawn in a story like Cat in the Hat. Okay, I get it. It's like, you got the cat,

00:04:15.160 then you got the kids. But what about green eggs and ham? I mean, you tell me. Like many Seuss characters,

00:04:20.820 he appears to be, the main characters here appear to be some sort of monstrous human dog cat alien

00:04:28.360 hybrid in top hats. Do the experts put him under the white umbrella or the person of color umbrella? 0.83

00:04:36.420 Is it racist to call the green eggs and ham thing white? Or is it racist to call it a person of color?

00:04:43.980 These are all questions we must ask now in a country that has completely lost its mind. Now,

00:04:48.940 in a sane country, we could just say, who cares? It's a children's book. Children have been reading

00:04:54.360 this book for decades without a problem. There is no problem here. We don't need to make a problem

00:04:59.780 where it doesn't exist. Yes, Dr. Seuss had some objectionable views. Yes, he drew some offensive

00:05:04.540 pictures at certain points in his life. Who cares? None of that interferes with a child's ability to

00:05:10.500 enjoy a story about the sneetches or the who's and who-ville unless you make it interfere. And we

00:05:18.120 shouldn't. Now, that is what a sane country would say. But again, we don't live in that sort of country

00:05:22.800 anymore. Now, two additional points here. First, we should always keep in mind amid the current rush

00:05:29.840 to posthumously cancel historical figures from presidents all the way down to children's authors

00:05:35.420 that none of the hysteria hinges on new information. It's not as though some series of

00:05:42.180 breathtaking revelations has come to light. Indiana Jones didn't open up a secret vault in some old

00:05:47.980 temple somewhere, uncovering dark truths about the past of Dr. Seuss. The cancel mob justifies

00:05:54.320 tearing down the Thomas Jefferson statue or taking Abraham Lincoln's name off a school or

00:05:58.740 banning the books of a suddenly problematic author and demands that we do it all right now,

00:06:04.460 right this instant, all of a sudden, based on things we've always known.

00:06:09.900 Yes, Abraham Lincoln was a racist. We knew that. Thomas Jefferson had slaves. We knew that too.

00:06:16.820 Dr. Seuss was himself not very racially enlightened by our standards today. Most adults also knew that.

00:06:23.580 So why now, suddenly, is there this frantic rush to cancel all of these long dead people?

00:06:31.600 Well, these efforts are often tied to George Floyd, right? That's what we're told. We're told that

00:06:36.440 Floyd's death was some sort of awakening for the country, and it led us to re-examine

00:06:41.220 these things that we already knew.

00:06:44.020 But why should it have been an awakening? I mean, George Floyd was a career criminal, violent felon,

00:06:49.540 who died in an altercation with police while high on lethal doses of fentanyl.

00:06:54.220 The question of whether Officer Chauvin is legally culpable in his death

00:06:57.520 will be settled in the courts. But why should this unfortunate case have any larger ramifications in society?

00:07:03.020 Why should it prompt us to reconsider Thomas Jefferson?

00:07:08.560 Or think differently about Dr. Seuss?

00:07:12.280 George Floyd died, and now we've got to talk about Dr. Seuss? What?

00:07:16.660 There is no logical connection at all, especially because Floyd's case,

00:07:20.680 whatever else you might say about it, had nothing to do with race.

00:07:23.360 There is zero evidence and zero reason to assume that Chauvin was motivated to any extent

00:07:30.120 or in any way by racial animosity towards George Floyd. Quite literally, zero evidence of that. None.

00:07:39.720 The point is that there is no rational, logical, coherent reason why now, suddenly, in one big, insane rush,

00:07:47.440 we should be tearing down the statues, taking the names off buildings, banning these books, and so on.

00:07:51.680 And when everyone starts, when everyone starts all at once taking drastic and destructive actions

00:07:58.240 based more on emotion than reason, we have a term for that. The term is mass hysteria.

00:08:05.260 This is mass hysteria, prompted and cultivated by powerful cultural forces

00:08:09.720 and fueled on an individual level by anger, rage, and fear.

00:08:13.660 And that's reason enough to oppose it.

00:08:17.720 It is never a good idea to go along with mass hysteria.

00:08:21.460 It is never right to give the hysterical mob what it wants.

00:08:26.480 Reasonable, moral, and intelligent people should resist the mob,

00:08:29.080 if for no other reason than it is a mob.

00:08:33.620 Like I always say with these things, even if for some reason you don't like Dr. Seuss,

00:08:37.220 even if you yourself have been ahead of this particular curve and you've been saying for years

00:08:43.860 that we should cancel Dr. Seuss, you should still stand in disagreement and opposition to the mob.

00:08:52.780 Even though they're saying what you agree with and have always said,

00:08:56.220 you should oppose them because they are a mob.

00:08:59.480 And they're not doing any of this for any good reason at all.

00:09:03.660 It is all anger, hate, fear, cowardice. That is it.

00:09:10.320 Second point, Dr. Seuss lived a hundred years ago.

00:09:14.240 He was born at the start of the 20th century.

00:09:16.220 So he lived over a hundred years ago.

00:09:20.000 Did he have problematic views?

00:09:22.900 Well, I don't even have to look it up on Wikipedia to answer that question.

00:09:26.760 Yeah, of course he did.

00:09:27.980 He lived a hundred years ago.

00:09:30.800 Every single human on earth a hundred years ago

00:09:33.100 had views that would be considered problematic by our standards today.

00:09:36.620 Every single one, with no exception.

00:09:41.060 The vast majority of people who have lived on the planet

00:09:43.740 for the vast majority of human history

00:09:45.680 believed things that supposedly enlightened people in modern Western culture

00:09:49.860 would find abhorrent today.

00:09:51.460 In fact, most of the people currently living on earth hold such views.

00:09:54.800 And most of the rest of the people will be considered backwards bigots

00:10:00.220 by the standards of the people living on earth 50 years from now.

00:10:04.180 So it's perfectly valid and worthwhile to examine

00:10:07.160 what our ancestors got wrong

00:10:09.540 and what they got right.

00:10:11.340 And really, we might want to spend more time on the

00:10:13.640 what they got right part of that equation

00:10:15.740 because they got a lot right.

00:10:17.980 But it's totally absurd to broadly condemn everyone in history

00:10:22.040 for committing the crime of being born before us.

00:10:24.840 Every civilization has its moral blind spots.

00:10:29.640 Every single one.

00:10:31.280 Now, you may think that we have none of our own

00:10:34.000 or that our blind spots aren't as bad.

00:10:37.420 But you see, that's why we call them blind spots

00:10:39.620 because you don't see them or understand them fully.

00:10:43.680 They're blind spots.

00:10:45.980 Chronological snobbery, as C.S. Lewis described it,

00:10:48.100 means that the present generation always thinks

00:10:51.040 that it is the only enlightened generation

00:10:55.000 to have ever lived.

00:10:57.300 Now, Lewis made that observation about his own generation

00:10:59.820 and now, sort of proving his point,

00:11:02.740 we condemn him and his generational peers 1.00

00:11:05.540 as bigots barely more ethically advanced than cavemen. 1.00

00:11:08.760 Listen, this is all driven by stupidity and arrogance. 1.00

00:11:14.260 And so, we have two choices. 1.00

00:11:17.560 We can see it for what it is

00:11:19.120 and try to stop the madness.

00:11:22.760 Or, we can cancel everybody and then ourselves

00:11:26.460 because if we don't stop the madness,

00:11:29.200 that's where this is headed.

00:11:31.400 Now, let's get to five headlines.

00:11:38.760 Now, a quick word from Bambi.

00:11:40.880 You know, when starting a business, HR issues,

00:11:43.260 that's the thing that can really kill you.

00:11:44.380 I hear this from business owners all the time

00:11:46.500 that HR issues, that's what it really comes down to.

00:11:49.260 You got wrongful termination suits,

00:11:51.440 minimum wage requirements, labor regulations,

00:11:53.480 all this kind of red tape.

00:11:54.440 An HR manager, salaries aren't cheap.

00:11:56.200 An average of $70,000 a year.

00:11:58.720 Bambi, spelled B-A-M-B-E-E,

00:12:00.940 was created specifically to solve this problem

00:12:03.220 for small businesses.

00:12:04.460 You can get a dedicated HR manager,

00:12:05.900 craft HR policy, and maintain your compliance

00:12:07.980 all for just $99 a month.

00:12:10.220 With Bambi, you can change HR 0.95

00:12:11.900 from your biggest liability to your biggest asset.

00:12:14.540 Your dedicated HR manager is available by phone,

00:12:16.960 email, real-time chat.

00:12:18.160 They're always on call for you.

00:12:19.620 From onboarding determinations,

00:12:21.060 they customize your policies to fit your business

00:12:23.280 and they're going to take this thing.

00:12:24.900 It was a big hassle, big problem.

00:12:26.880 They're making a big strength now for your company.

00:12:28.580 Month to month, no hidden fees, cancel anytime.

00:12:31.420 You didn't start your business

00:12:32.260 because you wanted to spend time on HR compliance.

00:12:34.100 So this is why you need to go to Bambi.com slash Walsh

00:12:37.120 right now to schedule your free HR audit.

00:12:38.960 That's Bambi.com slash Walsh,

00:12:41.360 spelled B-A-M-B-E-E.com slash Walsh.

00:12:45.900 Well, on the subject of madness,

00:12:47.560 I did want to mention this just right off the top.

00:12:50.460 A tweet from the account Breaking911,

00:12:53.220 it says,

00:12:53.420 just in 2021 CPAC's, quote,

00:12:57.020 Nazi stage was designed by Design Foundry,

00:13:00.440 which is a company that has worked for Biden and MSNBC.

00:13:03.780 98% of the company's political donations

00:13:05.960 have gone to Democrat candidates.

00:13:08.760 So, I don't know.

00:13:10.460 If this is a Nazi company making Nazi stages, 0.57

00:13:15.600 these are new questions that now need to be answered.

00:13:19.700 Why was Joe Biden,

00:13:21.980 why are the Democrats working with a Nazi company? 0.56

00:13:25.560 Why are they accepting donations from a Nazi?

00:13:27.440 Oh, well, because they're not a Nazi company.

00:13:29.000 They just, it was simply a stage

00:13:31.020 that looked like any other stage.

00:13:33.660 Nothing suspicious or weird about it.

00:13:36.340 And if you fell for the Nazi stage hoax, 0.60

00:13:40.040 then you are,

00:13:40.880 I cannot emphasize enough, 1.00

00:13:43.240 extremely, extremely stupid. 1.00

00:13:45.140 All right. 1.00

00:13:47.440 Number one,

00:13:48.660 FBI Director Chris Wray,

00:13:50.260 who is really terrible and bad at his job, 0.51

00:13:54.660 was testifying in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee

00:13:57.120 when he was asked about the cause of,

00:14:01.640 the cause of death for Officer Brian Sicknick.

00:14:04.640 Now, we've talked about this issue on the show several times,

00:14:08.420 that we know that Officer Sicknick was at the riots on January 6th,

00:14:12.140 and then he died, not at the riots,

00:14:14.420 but later on, hours, many hours, several hours later.

00:14:18.720 And the death has always been tied to the riots.

00:14:22.700 We've always been told by the media,

00:14:24.800 and originally even by the police,

00:14:26.100 they said that, oh, he died from injuries.

00:14:28.180 But we've never been told anything else about it.

00:14:30.880 Like, what exactly were the injuries?

00:14:32.680 What happened?

00:14:34.040 How did he actually die?

00:14:35.680 We've never officially been told that.

00:14:37.200 But now the FBI Director was testifying,

00:14:39.740 was asked this question,

00:14:40.780 and here's what he said.

00:14:42.380 There's been conflicting reports about his cause of death.

00:14:47.160 Have you determined the exact cause of death?

00:14:50.140 And is there a homicide investigation?

00:14:55.100 So I'll take the last part of your question first.

00:14:57.740 There is an ongoing investigation into his death.

00:15:01.300 I have to be careful at this age, because it's ongoing,

00:15:04.620 not to get out in front of it.

00:15:06.040 But I certainly understand and respect and appreciate the keen interest in what happened to him.

00:15:12.540 After all, he was here protecting all of you.

00:15:14.940 And as soon as there are information that we can appropriately share,

00:15:18.960 we want to be able to do that.

00:15:20.600 But at the moment, the investigation is still ongoing.

00:15:23.120 So does that mean since the investigation is going on,

00:15:26.400 you have not determined the exact cause of the death?

00:15:29.400 That means we can't yet disclose a cause of death at this stage.

00:15:34.860 But you have determined the cause of death.

00:15:36.800 I didn't say that.

00:15:37.840 We're not at a point where we can disclose or confirm a cause of death. 0.97

00:15:41.480 This guy is such a snake.

00:15:44.580 I mean, all of these, there is no good reason. 0.98

00:15:46.800 You could tell from that answer that, yes, they know the cause of death.

00:15:49.780 If they didn't know the cause of death, he would have said,

00:15:51.920 well, we haven't determined it.

00:15:54.060 Which would be really strange that they haven't determined it.

00:15:57.340 As far as I know, Officer Sicknick was, I believe he was cremated, wasn't he?

00:16:02.780 So if they still hadn't figured out cause of death or anything,

00:16:04.860 it would be strange that that happened so quickly.

00:16:07.560 But regardless, no, he was asked, do you know the cause of death?

00:16:12.980 Or he says, oh, we can't disclose it right now.

00:16:15.980 Okay, so you know.

00:16:17.420 You know.

00:16:18.640 We've already heard unofficial reports that he died of a stroke.

00:16:23.200 That's from anonymous law enforcement sources.

00:16:26.900 And that's certainly based on what little we know.

00:16:30.080 That seems like that's probably something like that is what happened.

00:16:34.640 But he won't tell us.

00:16:35.700 Could there be any good reason not to tell us?

00:16:40.820 Could there be any really valid, honest reason to not tell us?

00:16:46.760 What is this, a national security situation?

00:16:49.380 How could it possibly be?

00:16:54.160 No, they're not telling us.

00:16:55.440 I could only, because we're not being given this really basic information,

00:17:01.340 there's no conceivable reason not to give it to us.

00:17:04.220 We can only speculate.

00:17:08.780 And part of my speculation here is that it would seem like Officer Sicknick was not at all killed by a rioter.

00:17:15.020 There's just no connection between any rioter and Officer Sicknick's death.

00:17:18.600 And they don't want to tell us that.

00:17:20.860 Because it's embarrassing to the media, who for weeks and months now has been claiming, with no evidence, that there is a connection.

00:17:31.180 And the Democrats, during the impeachment proceedings, they're up there talking about Brian Sicknick's death as if they knew that he was killed by a rioter.

00:17:41.920 And they don't want to tell us that for political reasons.

00:17:45.600 Now, meanwhile, Senator Dick Durbin, during this hearing, decided to try to explain why Antifa is not nearly as big a threat as the people who rioted one time in D.C. two months ago.

00:18:00.660 I appreciate at least that he's attempting, because usually the left and the Democrats, they simply ignore this point about Antifa and BLM and all the rioting that they do and have done, continue to do, in fact.

00:18:12.920 But here, at least, he's trying to offer some sort of justification.

00:18:16.420 And here's what he comes up with.

00:18:18.120 I join my Republican colleagues unequivocally in condemning left-wing violence.

00:18:22.740 But let's stop pretending that the threat of Antifa is equivalent to the white supremacist threat.

00:18:30.220 Vandalizing a federal courthouse in Portland is a crime.

00:18:33.720 It should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

00:18:36.040 But it is not equivalent to a violent attempt to overturn the results of elections, nor is it equivalent to mass shootings targeting minority communities.

00:18:45.160 This false equivalency is an insult to the brave police officers who were injured or lost their lives on January 6th, as well as dozens of others who have been murdered in white supremacist attacks.

00:18:56.580 We need to be abundantly clear that the white supremacists and other extremists are the most significant domestic terrorism threat facing the United States today.

00:19:06.980 I hope everyone in this room can look at the facts and acknowledge this, and we can come together on a bipartisan basis to defeat this threat. 0.62

00:19:15.340 We're going to move past the fact that it sounded like you said abundantly queer there.

00:19:19.940 And we're going to move past it, and we're not going to focus on that part of it coming from a Democratic senator.

00:19:25.260 But, you know, what's an insult?

00:19:28.180 He says it's an insult to the police officers.

00:19:30.700 Well, what's an insult is that you're using, you and the other Democrats are callously using Officer Sicknick's death as a pawn, as a political chip that you're throwing down on the table.

00:19:47.200 You know, you're using it as a prop.

00:19:49.820 That's what's insulting.

00:19:50.800 It's also insulting to all of the many thousands of victims of Antifa and BLM rioting across the country over the summer.

00:20:02.180 People who had their businesses burned down, their houses burned down, people who were killed, assaulted.

00:20:08.320 They're terrorized in their neighborhoods, cancer-stricken children at cancer centers.

00:20:13.120 No, it's insulting that you're ignoring them, and you're boiling all of that down to vandalism of a courthouse.

00:20:22.460 All of that.

00:20:24.240 Everything that you watched happen over the summer, you didn't really see any of that.

00:20:27.220 None of that actually happened.

00:20:28.780 You're imagining things.

00:20:30.060 All of that was really vandalism of one single courthouse.

00:20:34.520 I mean, forget about the police station that was invaded and burned to the ground, sending police officers fleeing for their lives.

00:20:46.900 Forget about that.

00:20:47.980 You know, that didn't happen either.

00:20:48.960 None of these things happened.

00:20:49.920 It was all simply vandalism of a courthouse.

00:20:52.620 And, yeah, you're right.

00:20:55.460 If you're comparing the simple vandalism of a courthouse by some crazy kids, you're comparing that to what happened on January 6th, then the thing that happened on January 6th is a lot worse.

00:21:09.420 Unfortunately, Dick Durbin is inventing that.

00:21:12.960 He has created his own version of the Antifa riots.

00:21:16.660 That's not the reality.

00:21:18.920 Even the so-called vandalism, no, they were trying to burn it down.

00:21:22.620 They were shooting, like, fireworks at it.

00:21:25.240 This was a siege that lasted for weeks on end.

00:21:29.560 It was a lot more than graffiti, even to that courthouse.

00:21:33.360 But, of course, the issue is not just the courthouse.

00:21:38.560 And if you were to, you know, I say that at least Dick Durbin made some attempt to explain why January 6th was worse than the BLM rioting, whereas most Democrats will ignore the question.

00:21:53.480 But he didn't really make any attempt at all when you listen to it, because he's not acknowledging what actually happened.

00:22:00.440 And, by the way, trying to overturn the results of the election, was there ever any chance of that happening?

00:22:07.740 Was there ever any, even the slightest threat of that happening?

00:22:11.180 All right.

00:22:16.100 Let's move on to number two here.

00:22:18.560 Kamala Harris still has not commented on the Andrew Cuomo scandal.

00:22:23.460 And that's, you know, an issue because she had plenty to say, of course, about Brett Kavanaugh, about Donald Trump's sexual harassment accusers and so on.

00:22:33.820 She was one of the big believe-all-women people.

00:22:37.060 And she hasn't said anything about the sexual harassment claims against Andrew Cuomo.

00:22:40.080 Jen Psaki was asked about that, and here's what she said.

00:22:44.260 Vice President Kamala Harris is one of the most vocal critics of Justice Brett Kavanaugh, of Senator Al Franken.

00:22:51.260 When they faced similar allegations, she said repeatedly, I believe them, the women.

00:22:57.440 But she hasn't said anything about the three women who are accusing Governor Andrew Cuomo.

00:23:02.720 And now this third accuser, Anna Roosh, she actually worked for the Biden-Harris campaign.

00:23:09.100 So at what point is the first female vice president going to say something about this? 1.00

00:23:14.480 Well, I know that's how the vice president continues to feel.

00:23:18.440 And the benefit of doing a briefing every day is that I can certainly speak on behalf of the president and the vice president.

00:23:24.280 And so let me reiterate that they both believe that every woman coming forward should be heard, should be treated with dignity, and treated with respect.

00:23:32.340 As you all know, the New York attorney general will oversee an independent investigation with subpoena power, and the governor's office said he will fully cooperate.

00:23:40.760 And we certainly support that moving forward.

00:23:43.460 But as you know, it's one thing to hear it from you, and it's appreciated, but it's another thing to hear it from the vice president or the president himself.

00:23:52.140 Can we expect to hear from either of them on this topic anytime soon?

00:23:56.620 Well, again, I'm speaking on their behalf.

00:23:58.720 That's how they feel.

00:23:59.540 They're personally both view this as a situation where all of the women coming forward should be treated with dignity and respect and should have their voices heard.

00:24:09.300 And that's the representation of their points of view.

00:24:12.620 Okay, sure.

00:24:14.360 Now we have to clarify again, we have to stipulate that, of course, every time this comes up, we have to say that this is not the real Andrew Cuomo scandal.

00:24:23.680 This is not even the Andrew Cuomo scandal that we primarily need to hear Kamala Harris talking about.

00:24:29.540 Or condemning.

00:24:30.640 The real scandal are the policies that he put in place that led to the deaths of thousands of elderly people in his state.

00:24:37.940 That's the real scandal, not the fact that he touched a woman's cheek and flirted with some women on the job.

00:24:43.420 That's inappropriate behavior as opposed to killing lots of people.

00:24:48.580 So not the real scandal.

00:24:50.180 But as far as that goes, you notice this shift, pretty obvious.

00:24:54.700 It's not a very nuanced shift, so I'm sure anyone can notice it.

00:24:57.480 But you notice the shift that the Democrats do now.

00:25:02.160 Because originally, you hear what she said.

00:25:05.060 She said, well, we believe that all women should be treated with dignity and respect and they should be heard.

00:25:10.840 So any woman who has an accusation, we should treat them with respect and they should be heard.

00:25:15.400 That's what she says now.

00:25:17.280 Which obviously, yeah, we all agree.

00:25:19.560 We can all agree in principle, in theory, treat people with respect.

00:25:22.940 If someone has a claim, an accusation, we'll hear it.

00:25:26.520 Let's listen.

00:25:28.660 But that's not what they said in the past.

00:25:31.120 What they said in the past was, believe all women.

00:25:33.400 There is a big difference, I'm sure you could probably spot, between hear all women and believe all women.

00:25:43.100 Pretty big difference.

00:25:46.200 And so they're making that little subtle adjustment and hoping we don't notice.

00:25:52.000 Well, it's basically the same thing.

00:25:53.940 No, it's not at all.

00:25:54.740 Because our point all along, and when I say our, I mean the rational people.

00:26:01.280 And increasingly, that is really the real dividing line in American culture now.

00:26:04.340 It's the rational people versus irrational people.

00:26:06.820 But our point all along was, yeah, we'll hear everybody.

00:26:10.180 We'll hear her.

00:26:11.360 You know, if someone has a claim, we'll listen to you.

00:26:13.340 What is it?

00:26:15.180 But we're not going to believe it simply because we heard it.

00:26:18.660 The believing part requires reasons, evidence.

00:26:26.840 That's where that comes in.

00:26:30.900 All right, number three, Governor Abbott of Texas had a big announcement yesterday.

00:26:36.200 And first we'll play the announcement, then we'll talk about the reaction to it.

00:26:38.880 Here he is.

00:26:40.020 So today, I'm issuing a new executive order that rescinds most of the earlier executive orders.

00:26:47.280 Effective next Wednesday, all businesses of any type are allowed to open 100%.

00:26:58.040 That includes any type of entity in Texas.

00:27:08.000 Also, I am ending the statewide mask mandate.

00:27:13.160 Yeah, that's, and of course, the left is reacting as you would expect them to with that, accusing Governor Abbott of being the one who's going to be responsible for thousands of deaths.

00:27:25.500 And this is an act of mass murder and so on and so forth.

00:27:29.800 And so we knew we would get that reaction.

00:27:31.760 That's one thing.

00:27:32.520 Me, I'm a little bit more annoyed and disturbed by many conservatives and, you know, residents of Texas who you heard even there in the reaction, they're applauding.

00:27:44.180 Yeah, go Texas.

00:27:45.500 Go, go Governor Abbott.

00:27:46.600 Thank you so much.

00:27:48.840 Doing it the right way, Governor.

00:27:52.420 Yeah, it's, it's cool that the restrictions are being lifted.

00:27:55.220 Don't get me wrong.

00:27:55.780 No, that's great.

00:27:57.320 But let's not make the mistake of when a, when a public official, when a politician lifts these restrictions, let's not make the mistake of greeting them as liberators, our liberators.

00:28:09.740 When they are lifting restrictions that they put in place and should not have been there to begin with.

00:28:15.000 So now they are reversing a bad thing that they did.

00:28:22.220 So we could be happy about that, obviously, but let's not applaud them.

00:28:26.140 You don't deserve applause for that at all.

00:28:28.560 You should apologize, actually.

00:28:32.120 Because the businesses that were destroyed in the meantime, they're still destroyed.

00:28:35.720 Even if you give them $2,000, they're still going to be destroyed.

00:28:39.220 So it's not really an applause situation.

00:28:41.180 This is, it's about time.

00:28:42.600 And now there needs to be more accountability.

00:28:47.040 So let's not, let's not applaud that.

00:28:48.920 Let's certainly not give Governor Abbott any credit.

00:28:53.320 And, you know, it's, it's a, it's a similar kind of attitude that I talk about during, during, during tax season.

00:29:02.040 When people start getting their refunds and they, you know, they, they're, they're so grateful to the government for giving them a refund.

00:29:07.640 It's like, no, that's your own money that the government took and took too much of your money.

00:29:13.220 They shouldn't have taken that much and they did.

00:29:14.860 And now they're just giving back to you.

00:29:16.820 What is yours?

00:29:18.860 Don't, don't be grateful to them for that.

00:29:22.500 Don't be grateful to the governor for taking off chains that never should have been on you to begin with.

00:29:27.680 Um, meanwhile, Joe Biden was, uh, was, was, was talking about what it'll take to get back to normal.

00:29:35.340 This is the big $6 million question.

00:29:38.720 And, uh, when will we get back to normal?

00:29:41.600 And every time he's asked that question, the answer is like, goes back a little bit.

00:29:47.680 So the first, it was a hundred days and we moved it back.

00:29:50.900 And here's what he's saying now.

00:29:52.820 I've been cautioned not to give an answer to that because we don't know for sure.

00:29:56.980 But my hope is by this time next year, we're going to be back to normal before that.

00:30:01.700 My hope.

00:30:03.100 But again, it depends upon if people continue, continue to be smart and understand that we still can have significant losses.

00:30:13.880 There's a lot we have to do yet.

00:30:15.660 So thank you.

00:30:17.680 Did you receive a briefing about the border today?

00:30:21.940 Uh, yes, I did.

00:30:23.660 What did you learn?

00:30:24.920 A lot.

00:30:25.700 Is there a crisis at the border?

00:30:27.520 That was, that was very specific.

00:30:31.480 What I learned a lot.

00:30:32.420 Um, so this time next year, I think that's the first time we've heard at least that from Joe Biden.

00:30:40.940 Personally, originally it was a hundred days.

00:30:44.020 This, any, any intelligent person knew that it was not really going to be a hundred days.

00:30:48.520 And now he's saying this time next year.

00:30:51.320 All right.

00:30:51.860 Number four from, um, the daily wire.

00:30:54.760 It says, California's assembly is slated to consider a new bill requiring department store children's sections to be largely gender neutral in order to combat prejudice and judgment against gender non-conforming children.

00:31:06.300 Uh, political reported earlier this week, large retailers that sell toys, clothes, and other children's items in California would have to devote floor space to merchandise marketed to both boys and girls under a new bill.

00:31:17.900 Um, stores would be able to sell the same products they do now, as long as they maintain some areas where shoppers can find all toys or clothes, regardless of gender based marketing, uh, under the new bill.

00:31:28.500 Now, all this does, all this accomplishes obviously is making it harder, uh, and more annoying for parents to shop for toys, which is already an annoying thing to do.

00:31:38.720 Especially if you, if you make the mistake of buying toys with kids, when you have kids with you, and I've been dumb enough to do that on more than one occasion, um, all you're doing is making it more difficult for a parent to find the toy that the kid actually wants.

00:31:54.660 Because no matter what, what else we're told, the reality is the majority of kids, the majority of boys prefer toys that are associated with boys.

00:32:04.500 Um, you know, most of the time girls are going for the dolls and the pink stuff and everything. Boys are going for the trucks and superheroes. Yeah, there's crossover. Of course there is, but that's the exception to the rule.

00:32:20.880 Vast majority of boys and girls, they want the toy. That's what they want. They're not conditioned that way. That's just what they want.

00:32:27.420 Because that, those toys, it's not, it's not arbitrary. Those toys, um, speak to something innate, inherent within them.

00:32:37.000 Why do little girls like dolls? Well, because even little girls have that, that kind of burgeoning maternal instinct that boys by and large don't have.

00:32:47.360 Most boys, if you tried with all your might to condition them to like dolls, they still wouldn't because they don't. Now, you know, my sons, they'll, they'll play with dolls because they're going to have the dolls fighting each other.

00:33:01.920 They're going to like rip a doll's head off. They're going to do that kind of thing. They're going to have Spider-Man, you know, they have the doll and they got the small Spider-Man figure.

00:33:08.580 The doll is kind of like a, a baby Godzilla going through the city, Spider-Man's battle. Like that's how they play with dolls. Um, whereas my daughter, she's going to pick up the doll, brush its hair, pretend to feed it, put all, get all the nice outfits and dress the doll.

00:33:25.720 She, that's what she does. It's not conditioning. That's, that's inherent. That's innate. 0.95

00:33:32.560 And I've, I've had a, a somewhat unique view of this, um, as a parent of boy, girl twins. So our first kids, boy, a girl twins, um, they had access to all the same toys.

00:33:49.780 You know, we, we had a toy toy room in the house, the house that we lived in at the time when they were born. And for the first few years of our life, we had a toy room. We had all the toys.

00:33:57.580 And, you know, most of the time the toy room is an absolute disaster. It's like a tornado was, was in there and the toys are strewn all over the place. Um, and it's not like when I, when you bring your, your little two-year-old boy and girl into the, uh, into the playroom, it's not, you're not saying to them, no, those are your toys as a boy.

00:34:13.700 I better not catch you touching that doll over there, son. Even I don't do that. Surprisingly.

00:34:19.820 No, you, you bring the kids into the toy room. You say, have at it, go crazy.

00:34:23.440 And what do they do? Even at the age of two, they gravitate right towards their gender-specific toys with no guidance or instruction from the parents.

00:34:35.060 Isn't that a coincidence? Isn't it such a coincidence that almost every child on earth seems to do that?

00:34:41.060 All right. Um, finally, number five here, Amazon has tweaked the logo for its smartphone app because people thought that the, that the, uh, the other logo looked like Hitler.

00:34:52.580 And so it's a, it's a, this one's just hilarious. I have to say, uh, in, in, in the, in the original smartphone app logo, you've got the, the arrow thing that looks like the, the, the smiley face, the mouth.

00:35:08.660 And then you've got something there that looks kind of like, I guess, the Hitler mustache. 0.68

00:35:14.660 And they had to go back and change it. And on this one, I have to say, yeah, I can kind of see it.

00:35:20.820 Obviously we know the left there, they're finding Hitler everywhere. They look, they're finding Nazis everywhere.

00:35:24.720 They look on that one. Yeah. I can kind of see, I can see Hitler there. I'm not offended by it. It's hilarious, but I guess I won't blame Amazon for making the changes there.

00:35:34.860 All right. Let's move now to reading the comments. Um, this is from Mr. S says, remember kids, the slippery slope fallacy isn't a fallacy whatsoever.

00:35:47.640 That's exactly right. I can keep saying this till I'm blue in the face that there is no such thing as the slippery slope fallacy.

00:35:54.840 There are slippery slope arguments that are made fallaciously. There are bad versions of the slippery slope argument.

00:36:00.720 There are people arguing that something is a slippery slope and it really isn't. So that would be a fallacious slippery slope argument.

00:36:06.800 But the slippery slope argument in and of itself is not a fallacy at all.

00:36:11.560 All it is meant to do is, is to demonstrate how this thing will lead to another thing and then lead to another thing.

00:36:18.400 And the reason that you're doing that is to, to try, to try to, to point out the logical flaws in this course of action.

00:36:26.060 Uh, so yes, thank you. Thank you for that.

00:36:31.800 Vladimir Putin username, apparently a big fan of the show, uh, says, I guess that wouldn't be a big surprise to the left.

00:36:39.120 Says, Mr. Walsh, what is the best board game and why is it battleship?

00:36:44.420 Battleship is the best board game. What are you eight years old?

00:36:47.220 No, the, the best board game is, uh, Settlers of Catan.

00:36:52.400 If you haven't played that game.

00:36:53.580 That's also probably the nerdiest board game, which is, which maybe is why I like it.

00:36:57.880 But that's the best one without a, without a question.

00:37:00.340 Uh, Jacob Bauer says, Matt, who would win in a fight, a gorilla or a, uh, or a grizzly bear?

00:37:04.980 Obviously a gorilla.

00:37:06.780 Um, you got a lot more dexterity, you know, they're much more made for, for fighting than our grizzly bears.

00:37:12.180 Um, and finally, what else do we have here?

00:37:16.380 Benjamin says, Matt, if you can't wrap your head around watching people play video games,

00:37:20.860 what's the difference between Twitch and sports?

00:37:23.960 Got a lot of comments and messages and even some emails about this.

00:37:27.700 Um, because I said that I think this is widely known by now.

00:37:31.560 I'm not a video game fan personally, but also this, this whole idea of people sitting down,

00:37:36.640 I guess on Twitch and watching other people play video games is really hard for me to wrap my head around.

00:37:42.800 I have to say, and this is a common response is, well, it's no difference in watching different than watching sports.

00:37:49.360 Here's the key difference to me, Benjamin.

00:37:52.080 When you're watching sports, those are people actually doing that.

00:37:58.120 You see what I'm saying?

00:37:59.080 Um, so you're, you're, you're, you're seeing athleticism feats of, of strength and agility and all of that on display from, from real humans, not avatars on a screen.

00:38:13.960 So that, I guess I can't do any more to explain the difference.

00:38:18.440 Um, that's all I got.

00:38:20.840 If that's not enough to convince you, then I got nothing.

00:38:23.560 I want to tell you about a new sponsor on the show.

00:38:25.380 We're really excited about open fit.

00:38:26.840 Open fit is a simple streaming service that allows you to work out from the comfort of your own home in as little as 10 minutes a day.

00:38:32.400 What makes it different is that it offers live classes for some of the most famous trainers in the world who can give you personal feedback in real time.

00:38:38.580 Uh, it's absolutely invaluable for that reason.

00:38:40.260 You can take a ton of different classes from beginner to advanced, including strength training, cardio, Pilates, yoga, uh, even meditation.

00:38:47.060 I'm probably not gonna be taking the yoga, but, but many other great things as well.

00:38:49.860 Your trainers are there to keep you motivated and give you direction to help you improve your form.

00:38:54.160 Plus it's the best deal in fitness.

00:38:55.360 You can get a full year of personal training classes for about, uh, the cost of one in-person training class.

00:39:00.580 By turning your camera on, the trainer can see you, you can interact with each other, and you don't even have to leave the comfort of your home.

00:39:06.740 You know, I've been using open fit, uh, looking for gyms around here, decided to use this.

00:39:10.880 And the great thing is that, uh, we talk about 10 minutes a day, even if you don't, it takes away all excuses.

00:39:15.840 So you feel like, well, I don't have time to go to the gym.

00:39:18.060 Yeah, but you still got 10 minutes, 20 minutes to turn on, uh, to, to go and open fit, stream this and take care of fitness for the day.

00:39:25.360 And sometimes that's all it takes.

00:39:26.460 It's just that little bit of commitment.

00:39:27.780 Open fit has changed the way that I work out right now.

00:39:29.660 My listeners can get a free 14 day trial membership to open fit when you text Walsh to 50, 50, 50.

00:39:35.960 And if you decide to keep the service, which I'm sure you will, the entire year is only $96.

00:39:40.100 It truly is the best deal in fitness.

00:39:41.500 You'll get full access to open fit, all the workouts and a nutrition guide, totally free for 14 days.

00:39:46.520 Just text Walsh to 50, 50, 50 standard message and data rates may apply.

00:39:52.820 Also many crazy leftist theories.

00:39:54.840 Uh, and in some cases, outright lies out there need to be called out for what they are.

00:39:58.540 And that's what Ben Shapiro does every day on the daily wire.

00:40:01.200 And that's what he's doing, especially with the new show debunked every Friday.

00:40:04.360 Ben exposes popular fallacies purported by leftist activists and politicians with short mini documentaries that entertain,

00:40:10.340 keep you informed, uh, give you, equip you with knowledge so that you can go out there

00:40:15.220 and maybe do some debunking of your own.

00:40:17.360 In the first episode released last Friday, Ben debunks minimum wage.

00:40:21.060 You've heard about all the arguments for minimum wage.

00:40:23.400 Well, Ben tears all those apart in 15 minutes.

00:40:26.600 Debunked is now available to daily wire members exclusively.

00:40:29.540 If you're not a member yet, go to dailywire.com slash subscribe and use code debunked to get 25% off your new membership

00:40:34.960 and stay tuned for this Friday's episode where Ben will break down unions.

00:40:39.100 Don't want to miss that.

00:40:40.340 Go sign up code debunked 25% off.

00:40:43.640 Now let's get to our daily cancellation.

00:40:48.620 Today, we're going to cancel another cable news doctor.

00:40:51.380 These people have of course been a scourge over the past year as thousands of them feels like thousands.

00:40:57.000 Anyway, I've been hired to sit in front of cameras and offer sweeping public policy recommendations

00:41:01.200 as if their medical degree has made them not only experts in medicine,

00:41:04.200 but in literally all other facets of humans, human existence.

00:41:06.800 And this trend is not likely to go away just because COVID is receding.

00:41:10.300 And that brings us to Dr. Paul Offit.

00:41:13.420 He's a member of the FDA Advisory Committee and director of the Vaccine Education Center at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.

00:41:19.500 And he's been on cable news quite often offering his prognostications and instructions.

00:41:26.260 Most recently, he went on CNN and discussed the question of whether masking and social distancing should now become a permanent part of our lives.

00:41:33.940 You'll never believe what he said.

00:41:37.040 Actually, you'll totally believe it.

00:41:38.960 You probably already know what it is, but here's the clip anyway.

00:41:42.360 As we figure out what flu strains have been circulating in places like Australia or South America,

00:41:46.900 which sort of predicts what strains are likely to come into our country,

00:41:51.320 there's been so little flu in those two areas.

00:41:53.880 I think it's going to be hard for us to try and figure out what flu strains to pick.

00:41:57.380 But you're right.

00:41:58.320 If we mask and social distance every winter, we will see a dramatic reduction in flu,

00:42:03.000 which usually causes hundreds of thousands of hospitalizations and tens of thousands of deaths.

00:42:07.240 I wonder whether that will be the lesson from this.

00:42:11.780 Wear masks every winter.

00:42:14.120 Yeah.

00:42:14.420 Sadly, this idea is not nearly as unpopular as you want it to be.

00:42:18.340 A significant number of people on social media, from what I've seen,

00:42:20.880 have already made plans to wear their masks every winter or even just every season, every year, forever.

00:42:26.020 Pulling one at random here.

00:42:28.460 This is Michael David Smith, who works in sports media, and he made this announcement.

00:42:33.220 He said, I expect to wear a mask every winter for the rest of my life.

00:42:36.880 The flu is nowhere near as bad as COVID-19, but it still kills thousands of Americans every year,

00:42:40.920 and wearing masks dramatically reduces the spread.

00:42:43.860 It's a tiny individual sacrifice for such a major benefit to society.

00:42:48.700 And he's far from alone.

00:42:50.920 And it was always going to be this way.

00:42:52.360 However, some of us, such as yours truly, argued from the beginning that all of the reasons given for wearing the mask during COVID

00:42:59.960 would apply just as much to flu season or to the prevention of many other communicable diseases.

00:43:06.120 If it's such a small sacrifice, if it's the safest thing to do, if we're doing it for others and not for ourselves,

00:43:11.580 if it prevents viruses and germs, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera,

00:43:14.120 then all of those reasons still apply whether COVID is an issue or not.

00:43:18.280 If you say that masks save whatever arbitrary number of lives from COVID,

00:43:23.960 then they would also save whatever arbitrary number of lives from the flu and other illnesses.

00:43:28.840 Even if the second arbitrary number is smaller, those are still human lives that have been saved, supposedly, hypothetically.

00:43:35.880 But, of course, those of us who made this point, who observed how the masking mandates set a precedent,

00:43:43.260 which is never going to go away, we were called crazy.

00:43:45.960 In fact, we were accused of making a slippery slope argument, which we were, and we were right.

00:43:52.120 Somehow we were labeled the paranoid lunatics for saying this, us.

00:43:55.840 You know, not the people wearing two masks and a visor to walk out of their houses and check the mailbox.

00:43:59.780 But now the same people who called us crazy for making that argument are advocating the very thing that we predicted they would advocate.

00:44:09.280 So it goes. So it always goes.

00:44:12.360 But here's the thing.

00:44:14.340 Yes, obviously, if you stay away from other human beings, if you ban large gatherings,

00:44:19.460 if you muzzle yourself when you leave your house,

00:44:21.820 it's going to decrease the chances that you contract any number of viruses.

00:44:26.100 It also seems like it might weaken your immune system to a catastrophic extent.

00:44:29.940 But putting that aside, yes, of course, staying away from people, covering your face like a leper, 0.99

00:44:35.120 all of that will have the effect of potentially warding off certain illnesses.

00:44:40.440 But that's another thing that we already knew, going back to the point we made in the opening monologue.

00:44:45.360 We knew that already. That isn't news.

00:44:48.140 That isn't a recent discovery.

00:44:50.040 We always knew that if we wanted to during flu season,

00:44:53.260 we could reduce cases by shutting everything down, wearing the masks and all of that.

00:44:57.820 Who didn't know that?

00:44:58.820 Who exactly is just learning this now?

00:45:03.060 Nobody. We all knew it.

00:45:05.060 Yet we didn't do it or even seriously consider doing it.

00:45:08.840 And nobody advocated for it, not because we didn't understand the science,

00:45:12.720 but because we judged it as not worth the tradeoff.

00:45:16.580 We, until this past year,

00:45:18.020 we all believe that living a normal human life was worth the risk.

00:45:23.380 Now, many of us don't think that anymore.

00:45:26.220 But those who have changed their minds cannot say they're doing it based on the science.

00:45:31.480 Because again, this is not new data.

00:45:33.480 There's no new scientific data.

00:45:35.480 They're doing it because their priorities changed.

00:45:38.060 So the question is whether their priorities changed for the better or the worse.

00:45:42.700 And I say for the worse.

00:45:45.760 I think we were right before.

00:45:47.920 We were right a year ago, two years ago, all of the years until this past one.

00:45:53.060 Because back then, if I had gone out and said, if I had said to you back then,

00:45:57.840 listen, let's shut society down at least four months out of every year.

00:46:02.440 Wear masks, masks, avoid strangers.

00:46:05.340 Don't see your friends.

00:46:06.100 Don't see your family.

00:46:07.600 Treat everybody like they're radioactive.

00:46:10.020 And let's do this so that we don't get the flu.

00:46:12.320 Let's do this every single year so that we don't get the flu.

00:46:15.260 If I had said that at any point prior to the past 12 months,

00:46:18.840 everybody would have laughed at me.

00:46:21.000 Not because I would have been wrong about the science,

00:46:23.400 but because my priorities would have been seen as wildly out of whack.

00:46:28.280 Yes, there's obviously a risk in going out into society and interacting with people.

00:46:32.020 There's a risk in going to a party with your friends and family.

00:46:34.580 There's a risk in going to a crowded bar to watch the game with other people in your community.

00:46:39.460 There's a risk in speaking to another person face-to-face with no mask

00:46:43.160 so that you can see each other and hear each other.

00:46:46.300 There's a risk in breathing fresh air.

00:46:48.580 But it's worth the risk.

00:46:50.420 It's worth the risk because this is life.

00:46:52.720 This is what living means.

00:46:54.280 If you give up all of the things that make life worthwhile, enjoyable, meaningful,

00:46:58.580 just to extend your life, what's the point?

00:47:00.640 What's the point of making life miserable just so that you can live your miserable life for longer?

00:47:08.220 Is it crazy to say that speaking to another person face-to-face,

00:47:11.620 that breathing fresh air when you walk down the street is so important

00:47:14.780 that we should be willing to risk death to do it?

00:47:18.980 Nobody thought it was crazy until now.

00:47:21.700 Everybody thought the opposite claim was crazy.

00:47:23.380 See, I think we had it right before.

00:47:26.760 We were right the first time.

00:47:28.780 Yes, it is worth it.

00:47:30.320 It is worth it to risk death just to breathe fresh air.

00:47:35.800 It is worth risking illness and death

00:47:40.140 just so that we can go out into society and see other people's faces.

00:47:46.240 Yeah, I believe that.

00:47:47.600 Because that's human life.

00:47:50.600 These are the things that make it human life and make it worth living.

00:47:54.740 And that's why Dr. Offit and everybody advocating for permanent masking is, of course, canceled.

00:48:02.200 And we'll leave it there today.

00:48:03.500 Thanks for watching, everybody.

00:48:04.280 Thanks for listening.

00:48:05.200 Have a great day.

00:48:06.240 Godspeed.

00:48:06.580 We'll see you next time.

00:48:36.580 Our technical director is Austin Stevens.

00:48:40.100 Production manager, Pavel Vadosky.

00:48:41.960 The show is edited by Danny D'Amico.

00:48:43.880 Our audio is mixed by Mike Coromina.

00:48:46.060 Hair and makeup is done by Mika Geneva.

00:48:47.960 And our production coordinator is McKenna Waters.

00:48:50.340 The Matt Wall Show is a Daily Wire production.

00:48:52.240 Copyright Daily Wire 2021.

00:48:54.480 Today on the Ben Shapiro Show 6, Dr. Seuss books are removed from circulation

00:48:58.020 and liberals make excuses for the newfangled book burning.

00:49:01.020 That's today on the Ben Shapiro Show.

00:49:02.320 Give it a listen.

The Matt Walsh Show - March 03, 2021

Ep. 670 - Pretty Soon We'll All Be Canceled

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript