The Matt Walsh Show - Ep. 704 - A False Narrative Falls Apart

00:00:00.000 Today on the Matt Walsh Show, officials in D.C. are finally, after four months, telling us the truth about the alleged deadly riot at the Capitol on January 6th.

00:00:08.500 And the truth is the opposite of what we've been told this whole entire time.

00:00:11.340 Also, five headlines, including mainstream media journalists and legal analysts, prove that they don't understand how our court systems work in this country at all.

00:00:19.060 They don't even understand it on a fundamental level.

00:00:21.300 The judge in the Chauvin case also admonishes Maxine Waters.

00:00:24.800 Planned Parenthood faces up to its racist past, sort of.

00:00:28.220 And incest advocates make their case for marriage equality.

00:00:32.280 Why shouldn't we tolerate and accept their alternative lifestyle?

00:00:35.040 We'll talk about that and much more today on the Matt Walsh Show.

00:00:44.560 Now it's time to check in with Policy Genius.

00:00:46.840 Policy Genius can help you compare top insurers in one place and save 50% or more on life insurance.

00:00:51.560 You know, it used to be very hard to, before Policy Genius, if you wanted to get affordable life insurance, it was difficult to know where to look, what's a good deal, what isn't.

00:01:02.020 You've got to go through all the red tape.

00:01:03.660 Well, Policy Genius has taken that complication away.

00:01:05.840 Once you find your best option on Policy Genius, the Policy Genius team will set up your new policy for you and answer any questions you have along the way.

00:01:11.820 And you can feel good knowing that your family has financial protection.

00:01:14.860 Getting started is easy.

00:01:15.680 Okay, first head to policygenius.com so in minutes you can work out how much coverage you need.

00:01:20.320 You can compare quotes to find your best price since their licensed agents work for you, not the insurance companies.

00:01:25.160 There's zero hassle.

00:01:26.140 If you hit any speed bumps along the way, Policy Genius will take care of everything.

00:01:29.400 You know you can trust them.

00:01:31.100 That kind of service has earned Policy Genius a five-star rating across thousands of reviews on Google and Trustpilot.

00:01:37.160 So the best part, all the benefits of Policy Genius, the comparison tool, the handling of paperwork, the unbiased device are totally free to use.

00:01:45.660 You just can't beat it. 0.91

00:01:46.380 So Policy Genius can promise that you won't leave their website feeling like a fool.

00:01:49.640 You could save 50% or more by comparing life insurance quotes and feel good knowing that if something happens, your loved ones will be taken care of.

00:01:55.920 Go to policygenius.com to get started.

00:01:57.760 Policy Genius, when it comes to insurance, it's nice to get it right.

00:02:00.640 So we've been told nearly every day since January 6th that what transpired at the Capitol that day was a deadly riot.

00:02:10.300 Deadly riot.

00:02:11.460 The media and elected Democrats have beaten to our heads that five people died that day because of the riots.

00:02:18.260 Sometimes the death toll is quoted as seven.

00:02:21.060 The riots killed seven people.

00:02:23.280 Now we've known from the beginning that this is at least mostly bogus.

00:02:26.620 Two of the seven were suicides that occurred in the days and weeks after the riot.

00:02:30.300 There was never the slightest indication that the riot had anything to do with those suicides at all.

00:02:35.580 The media drew a line connecting them in order to shamelessly inflate the body count.

00:02:39.360 The fact that they were doing this, that they felt the need to play this grotesque and desperate game of connect the dots,

00:02:45.320 should have been the first clue that something was wrong.

00:02:47.840 Well, scratch that.

00:02:48.540 The first clue that the narrative was false was simply the fact that it was the narrative.

00:02:52.820 I mean, you should at this point question literally anything that the left-wing media tells you.

00:02:57.220 I wouldn't believe them that the sun rose this morning without going out to check myself.

00:03:01.640 That's the point we need to be.

00:03:03.880 We need to have arrived at with these people.

00:03:05.700 What about the other five?

00:03:06.520 Well, we were told that four of those deaths were among the rioters, and one was Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick.

00:03:13.400 Of the latter four, or of the former four, I should say, one was Ashley Babbitt, an unarmed woman shot and killed by an unnamed Capitol Police Officer.

00:03:24.000 That's one death that we could confirm from the beginning because it was caught on video.

00:03:28.060 We know that that happened.

00:03:29.100 The other three were more vague, suspiciously vague.

00:03:33.860 The media wanted us to know that three individuals died during the chaos or after it or sometime in the vicinity of it,

00:03:43.320 and they wanted us to draw from there the conclusion that they were not so subtly pointing us to.

00:03:49.960 They wanted to give us a mental picture of a riot where the participants were beating and trampling each other to death.

00:03:56.240 In fact, it was reported that at least one of the victims was trampled to death.

00:04:00.120 It wasn't until the first part of this month, four months after the riot, that the D.C. medical examiner finally told us the truth or began to tell us the truth.

00:04:11.160 While Ashley Babbitt's death was, of course, a homicide committed again by a Capitol Police Officer, the other three were not.

00:04:18.180 Two died of natural causes, a stroke and a heart attack, and one was an accidental overdose.

00:04:26.240 So already, five of that original tally of seven had been revealed to be false.

00:04:32.700 The deadly riot that claimed seven lives had been reduced to potentially two lives, which leads us to Officer Brian Sicknick.

00:04:40.480 Now, if you listen to the show, you know that I questioned the story about Officer Sicknick from the very beginning.

00:04:45.620 It was reported early on that Officer Sicknick was killed in the riot, murdered.

00:04:50.900 Originally, the media said that he was beaten over the head by a fire extinguisher and basically bludgeoned to death.

00:04:57.640 That gave way to a story that he was sprayed by some foreign chemical, and that's how he was killed.

00:05:03.000 I didn't believe either of these stories, and my reasons were, one, because I'm always going to be suspicious when the media and the left pretends to mourn a dead cop.

00:05:14.380 I mean, they'd never found a dead cop they cared about until this one.

00:05:18.200 That alone makes me question everything they say about the case.

00:05:22.080 His value to them was purely political.

00:05:24.460 That doesn't necessarily mean that they're lying, but it does mean that you can't take them at their word.

00:05:28.700 Number two, the story was far too vague to be true, or to be entirely true.

00:05:34.680 Initially, it was reported that Officer Sicknick was injured, quote, while engaging with protesters.

00:05:40.200 Injured while engaging with protesters.

00:05:42.440 That's what we were, the initial report was that.

00:05:44.720 That's how it was phrased.

00:05:46.260 And then he later died.

00:05:48.860 Now, the phrasing there was far too calculated and careful.

00:05:52.040 It's clearly meant to give us the impression that protesters killed him, but it doesn't say that.

00:05:56.520 It doesn't even say that he was injured by protesters, only that he was injured while engaging with protesters.

00:06:03.860 None of this phrasing makes any sense if he was really beat to death by crazed rioters.

00:06:08.740 If that's what happened, they'd know it, and they'd say it.

00:06:13.000 And also, it would almost certainly be on film.

00:06:15.500 If not the crime itself happening, then at least the aftermath.

00:06:18.380 We'd have some video of this.

00:06:21.580 An officer was beat to death in the middle of a crowd?

00:06:24.020 That would be, if that happened, it'd be very obvious.

00:06:28.660 And you have to believe there'd be some photo, video somewhere.

00:06:34.360 Yet we never saw any video.

00:06:36.560 We were never given any additional information.

00:06:39.660 Nobody was ever arrested for the crime.

00:06:42.100 And this situation maintained for months, even as the media and the left continued to say confidently,

00:06:47.740 as a matter of fact, that Sicknick was killed by protesters.

00:06:51.120 And then finally, yesterday, well, well over now, four months later, the medical examiner tells the truth.

00:07:00.680 Here's the report from Embassy Washington.

00:07:02.480 Again, this came out yesterday.

00:07:05.680 U.S. Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick, who died the day after he defended the Capitol during the January 6th, quote, insurrection,

00:07:13.180 suffered strokes and died of natural causes, according to the D.C.'s chief medical examiner.

00:07:19.040 Sicknick, 42, collapsed hours after the riot and died January 7th in what officials consider a line-of-duty death.

00:07:26.580 Federal authorities have been clear that Sicknick was assaulted with a powerful chemical spray in his face.

00:07:31.320 They've said Sicknick and other officers were overpowered and potentially briefly blinded.

00:07:35.740 Potentially briefly blinded.

00:07:37.740 Notice the phrasing there.

00:07:39.040 By that spray while on the front lines.

00:07:41.520 D.C.'s office of the chief medical examiner said Monday that Sicknick's cause of death was acute brainstem and cerebellar infarcts due to acute basilar artery thrombosis.

00:07:53.700 Probably mispronounced all of that.

00:07:55.660 But the point is, the manner of death was natural, not a homicide.

00:08:00.060 Okay.

00:08:01.260 Natural causes.

00:08:02.720 Not a homicide.

00:08:03.640 Now, to be clear about this, the medical examiner, along with officials in D.C., elected Democrats, the national media, all of them almost certainly knew this very early on.

00:08:17.980 I mean, there were reports to this effect in conservative media and conservative blogs a day later.

00:08:28.400 Are we supposed to believe that the mainstream media didn't know?

00:08:33.560 It would have been extremely clear that Officer Sicknick was not bludgeoned to death.

00:08:37.340 It didn't take them four months to figure out that he died of a stroke.

00:08:39.880 He was cremated three months ago.

00:08:42.500 It's not as though they've been doing a medical examination this whole time.

00:08:46.020 He was cremated three months ago.

00:08:47.980 What have they been doing in the last three months?

00:08:51.280 No, they knew and they didn't tell us.

00:08:54.240 This is not a simple matter of misreporting.

00:08:56.300 This is a matter of information being withheld intentionally and for reasons that we can speculate about.

00:09:03.860 Where does this leave us?

00:09:05.700 It leaves us with this.

00:09:07.960 Protesters on January 6th didn't kill seven people.

00:09:11.420 They didn't kill anyone.

00:09:14.020 They were killed.

00:09:15.800 The only death caused by someone on the scene that day was that of Ashley Babbitt.

00:09:21.760 The rest was lies and misinformation.

00:09:24.420 And many people fell for it.

00:09:25.540 They fell for it because they want to believe that they can believe the most prominent sources of information in this country.

00:09:33.540 They want to believe that they can turn on the TV and basically trust what they're told.

00:09:38.260 They want to believe that in this age of information, the information they receive is reliable.

00:09:42.840 They don't want to believe that they're being lied to all the time, everywhere.

00:09:46.160 And I can understand those desires.

00:09:49.740 But they're not based in reality.

00:09:51.380 The fact is that anytime you turn on the news or go online, you are walking into a whirlwind of propaganda.

00:09:57.820 That's the fact.

00:09:59.420 And this shows it.

00:10:01.180 So keep your head on straight.

00:10:02.880 Bring a healthy dose of skepticism with you all the time.

00:10:05.980 And don't let them lead you astray.

00:10:09.600 Now let's get to our five headlines. 0.99

00:10:16.980 Yeah, my question is, what kind of moron is going to waste their time walking around an auto parts store if they don't have to? 0.99

00:10:23.660 It might be a little aggressive. 1.00

00:10:24.800 Rock Auto didn't tell me to say moron. 0.99

00:10:26.000 That was my own editorial. 0.99

00:10:27.740 RockAuto.com, they're going to say moron or not, there's no reason to go to an auto parts store if you don't have to. 0.98

00:10:32.540 Waste all your time. 0.99

00:10:33.400 Waste your money.

00:10:34.080 You're not getting the kind of selection you could get.

00:10:36.100 You're spending more money than you have to.

00:10:37.400 You're wasting more time than you have to.

00:10:39.200 No reason to do that.

00:10:39.940 You have access to RockAuto.com at your desk and in your pocket.

00:10:42.420 RockAuto.com always offers the lowest price as possible rather than changing prices based on what they think they can get out of you.

00:10:49.000 This is not, you know, whether you're a do-it-yourselfer or professional or somewhere in between.

00:10:53.220 It's going to be the same price for everybody.

00:10:54.940 RockAuto.com is a family business.

00:10:56.660 They've been serving auto parts customers online for 20 years.

00:10:59.180 Go to RockAuto.com to shop for auto and body parts from hundreds of manufacturers.

00:11:03.660 Best of all, prices at RockAuto.com are always reliably low.

00:11:07.520 And again, they're the same for everybody.

00:11:09.040 The RockAuto.com catalog is unique and remarkably easy to navigate.

00:11:12.420 You can quickly see all the parts available and make a decision.

00:11:15.300 Amazing selection, reliably low prices.

00:11:17.200 Go to RockAuto.com right now, see all the parts available for your car or truck.

00:11:21.080 And remember to write Walsh in there, how did you hear about us, Pox, so they know that we sent you.

00:11:24.560 Well, you may be able to tell, I've been losing my voice the last couple of days.

00:11:31.540 And here's the thing.

00:11:33.300 I'm a responsible, I'm a responsible adult.

00:11:36.160 And I need my voice to do my job, you know.

00:11:38.460 So it's like a really important tool for me anyway.

00:11:40.960 And so as a responsible person, I said like last night, I need to make sure that I give my voice a rest, you know, and that I just take it easy.

00:11:52.900 And so I spent the night smoking cigars and drinking whiskey.

00:11:56.840 So that was my responsible way of dealing with it.

00:12:00.080 One of those times when the nighttime version of yourself writes a check that your morning self has to cash in.

00:12:08.780 Well, you know, maybe in your 20s you have a lot of moments like that.

00:12:12.420 One such moment for me.

00:12:14.240 Okay.

00:12:15.040 So I have to share this with you.

00:12:16.540 This is a tweet from Yamiche Alcindor, who's a PBS reporter.

00:12:21.220 A couple here.

00:12:22.480 We're going to go now as we're waiting for the verdict in the Derek Chauvin case.

00:12:27.820 And the media now is left to just analyze and speculate and everything.

00:12:34.300 So we've gotten a lot of legal analysis from the media.

00:12:38.620 And maybe I should stop short of calling it shockingly bad, given everything about the media that we just covered in the opening there.

00:12:45.340 But I mean, this is, it is sort of shockingly bad.

00:12:48.720 So here's Yamiche Alcindor, again, PBS reporter.

00:12:52.460 She tweeted this.

00:12:53.620 This is her analysis.

00:12:56.380 Chauvin's lawyer said it flies in the face of common sense to say that Floyd's death was not caused, at least in part, by his underlying conditions of drug use.

00:13:04.060 This argument is in direct contradiction to the prosecution's case, which says, believe your eyes.

00:13:10.080 Chauvin's knee killed Floyd.

00:13:11.580 In direct contradiction.

00:13:14.700 So the defense is making a case that's in, this is in direct contradiction to what the prosecution is saying.

00:13:21.840 I mean, it's, you got to admit, it's pretty rude of the defense.

00:13:28.440 The prosecution, they spend all their time making their case.

00:13:33.640 They build their case.

00:13:34.500 They bring in their witnesses.

00:13:36.520 They have whatever evidence.

00:13:37.820 In this case, they didn't have a lot of evidence.

00:13:39.180 But whatever they have, they bring.

00:13:41.060 It's all that effort that they put in.

00:13:43.000 And Yamiche Alcindor is kind of upset that the defense would get up there and have a different version of events.

00:13:52.680 After all this, after all this effort, pretty, I don't know, I agree with her, actually.

00:14:02.840 Can we just say, pretty tacky.

00:14:05.620 Pretty tacky for the defense to get up there and have an opposite version of events.

00:14:11.000 You know, the prosecution should have just objected and said, hang on a second.

00:14:16.900 That's not what we said.

00:14:18.420 This is the opposite of what we said.

00:14:20.620 This is, something isn't right here.

00:14:24.140 Meanwhile, if you thought that was bad, this is way worse.

00:14:27.080 Meanwhile, Laura Coates, CNN's senior legal analyst, has this.

00:14:32.420 Here's what she says.

00:14:33.300 Defense begins the closing by defining reasonable doubt, not with why Derek Chauvin is innocent.

00:14:41.780 Think about that.

00:14:43.300 Hashtag Derek Chauvin trial.

00:14:44.780 Hashtag George Floyd.

00:14:46.440 Think about that.

00:14:48.360 The defense is relying on reasonable doubt.

00:14:53.280 That's unheard of.

00:14:54.720 That's almost as unheard of as the defense having a different version of events than the prosecution.

00:15:00.240 Only reasonable doubt and they're not saying innocent.

00:15:03.300 Yeah, that's like every murder trial ever.

00:15:07.720 In America, anyway.

00:15:10.720 That is the defense's whole job is to sow reasonable doubt in the jury.

00:15:19.620 And it would be misconduct on the part of Chauvin's lawyers.

00:15:26.880 If Chauvin's lawyers got up there in the closing and said, we want you to believe that Derek Chauvin is completely innocent and is an innocent, great guy.

00:15:35.440 That's what we want you to believe.

00:15:37.880 No, you're raising the bar farther than you need to.

00:15:43.160 Why would you do that?

00:15:46.440 No, the way it's set up is that the bar is supposed to be lower than that.

00:15:50.880 You don't have to believe that Derek Chauvin is innocent.

00:15:53.980 You don't have to believe that he's innocent.

00:15:56.520 You certainly don't have to like him as a person.

00:15:58.600 But yeah, you don't have to believe he's innocent.

00:16:02.720 You just have to think that there could be a reasonable chance that he may be innocent.

00:16:10.460 And if you think there's a reasonable chance that he may be innocent, then you can't convict.

00:16:15.760 That's what the defense is trying to get across.

00:16:23.040 And that's as far as you can go anyway, because that's what this trial really comes down to, right?

00:16:28.000 There is no way the defense can prove, can categorically, absolutely prove that George Floyd died purely of a drug overdose and not because of the knee on the neck.

00:16:42.160 They can't absolutely prove that, but they don't need to.

00:16:47.000 The prosecution needs to absolutely prove that even though he had a fatal dose of fentanyl in his system, that's not what killed him.

00:16:56.260 That's what they have to prove.

00:17:00.560 And the jury has to decide if they did prove it.

00:17:04.060 Having followed the trial, I don't see how they did.

00:17:06.720 Meanwhile, the judge in the Chauvin case had some words about Maxine Waters.

00:17:12.580 We'll play this for you.

00:17:13.260 First, we know Maxine Waters flew from D.C. to Minneapolis to get the crowd riled up and to intimidate and tamper with the jury.

00:17:25.000 Chauvin's defense raises an objection, actually tried to move for a mistrial, saying that this is intimidating the jury.

00:17:31.560 This is jury tampering.

00:17:32.240 And the judge said there's not going to be a mistrial.

00:17:34.380 He did concede, though, that Maxine Waters may have given a pretense to appeal and overturn the whole trial for the defense, if they want.

00:17:43.860 And then the judge said this.

00:17:45.460 Let's listen.

00:17:46.620 This goes back to what I've been saying from the beginning.

00:17:49.440 I wish elected officials would stop talking about this case, especially in a manner that is disrespectful to the rule of law and to the judicial branch in our function.

00:17:58.180 I think if they want to give their opinions, they should do so in a respectful and in a manner that is consistent with their oath to the Constitution to respect the co-equal branch of government.

00:18:11.160 Their failure to do so, I think, is abhorrent, but I don't think it has prejudiced us with additional material that would prejudice this jury.

00:18:19.340 They have been told not to watch the news.

00:18:20.920 I trust they are following those instructions and that there is not in any way a prejudice to the defense beyond the articles that we're talking specifically about the facts of this case.

00:18:31.640 A congresswoman's opinion really doesn't matter a whole lot. 0.93

00:18:37.160 Anyway, so motion for mistrial is denied.

00:18:40.100 Okay, a congresswoman's opinion doesn't matter a whole lot. 0.99

00:18:42.440 It doesn't matter in terms of changing the reality.

00:18:46.080 It should, and I think what he means to say is it shouldn't matter. 0.99

00:18:51.680 If you're on the jury, it shouldn't matter to you what this crazy, wacky, scumbag politician has to say. 0.99

00:18:59.380 Shouldn't matter, but that's a far cry from saying that it doesn't. 0.99

00:19:05.960 And so we're just, we're just hoping.

00:19:08.080 I don't see why this prejudiced the jury.

00:19:09.580 Well, you know, we told them not to watch the news.

00:19:11.340 So this all, in order for this to really be a fair trial, we have to hope and assume that the jury, first of all, went in without any preconceived biases.

00:19:26.000 That they're not going to make the decision based on emotion, but based on facts.

00:19:28.640 That they're not going to be intimidated, even before Maxine Waters, they're not going to be intimidated by, you know, thoughts that their lives could be ruined, they could be doxxed, they could be hunted down if they find the Chauvin not guilty.

00:19:43.780 They're not going to watch any news throughout the trial.

00:19:45.820 And also, now that there's politicians there trying to rile the rioters up, they're not going to be affected by that.

00:19:55.600 I mean, we are expecting a lot of this jury.

00:20:00.080 You may say expecting an unreasonable amount from this jury.

00:20:06.660 Almost, we're expecting at this point to exercise superhuman restraint and courage.

00:20:16.280 That's really the only way that this ends up being a fair trial, is if these jurors have superhuman restraint and courage.

00:20:24.420 Restraint to not watch the news at all, even though nothing's done to prevent them from doing it.

00:20:29.920 And courage to look at the situation and say, yeah, you know what?

00:20:35.040 If I find him not guilty, my life could be over, but I'm going to do the right thing.

00:20:43.260 It's just not, it's almost certainly not going to happen.

00:20:46.120 If there was ever time for a mistrial, this would be it.

00:20:51.840 And if you have the trial again, you don't have it in Minneapolis.

00:20:55.640 And you sequester the jury.

00:20:57.020 And if any politicians pull that stunt again, it's another mistrial.

00:21:03.700 I mean, the whole, the idea, the claim that what Maxine Waters did was anything but jury intimidation and tampering.

00:21:09.800 What else would it be?

00:21:13.140 What other motivation could you have?

00:21:16.360 If you're Maxine Waters and you're leaving D.C. to go to Minneapolis,

00:21:21.260 before the jury has even begun deliberating,

00:21:28.720 demanding that they come to a certain conclusion,

00:21:32.580 and threatening confrontation if they don't,

00:21:35.040 if that's not jury tampering and intimidation,

00:21:37.880 what qualifies if that doesn't?

00:21:42.920 And what reason?

00:21:43.980 So if her goal was not to intimidate the jury,

00:21:47.320 then what was it?

00:21:48.100 What was she hoping to do?

00:21:51.960 I think we all know.

00:21:53.500 Totally absurd.

00:21:55.040 So this should be a mistrial.

00:21:56.600 It should have been a mistrial from the very beginning,

00:21:58.280 but it's not.

00:21:59.820 And so at this point,

00:22:02.960 I will be floored if they come back with a not guilty verdict.

00:22:07.820 Not because he doesn't, you know,

00:22:09.120 because the not guilty verdict would be incorrect.

00:22:10.940 I think that is the correct verdict.

00:22:12.160 But just, as I said,

00:22:14.060 to get 12 people together

00:22:15.560 and for them all to have that superhuman restraint and courage,

00:22:18.420 very unlikely.

00:22:20.740 Very unlikely.

00:22:22.400 Okay, number two,

00:22:23.000 I've been wanting to play this story,

00:22:24.380 talk about the story for like a week,

00:22:26.220 and I keep putting it off because other things come first.

00:22:28.140 But, you know, I'm part of the problem in doing this

00:22:29.880 because this is really a huge story.

00:22:33.260 And here's a report from the Today Show

00:22:34.820 about the imminent alien invasion.

00:22:37.160 And let's watch that.

00:22:38.760 In night vision video from a Navy destroyer,

00:22:41.560 a mysterious flying triangle above the deck of the ship,

00:22:45.420 the Pentagon confirming the images

00:22:47.320 obtained by documentary filmmaker Jeremy Corbell

00:22:49.800 were taken by Navy personnel

00:22:51.660 expected to be a part of a report

00:22:53.820 on unidentified aerial phenomenon

00:22:55.660 to be presented to Congress this summer.

00:22:58.580 Already online,

00:22:59.540 some skeptics say the images are caused

00:23:01.400 by cameras trying to focus.

00:23:03.380 But some of the objects go beyond

00:23:05.020 just flying in the sky.

00:23:06.560 One shows a spherical object

00:23:08.080 dipping into the ocean,

00:23:09.540 similar to an incident in Puerto Rico

00:23:11.160 where an object was tracked buzzing an airport,

00:23:13.640 then flying into the water,

00:23:15.040 popping back out

00:23:16.020 before appearing to split into two

00:23:17.720 and disappearing.

00:23:19.200 Over the last several weeks,

00:23:20.620 some of the nation's top former intelligence officials

00:23:23.020 have been raising eyebrows.

00:23:24.300 Look at that thing. 0.92

00:23:25.320 It's rotating.

00:23:28.380 Former CIA director R. James Woolsey said

00:23:31.040 he knew of a case where a plane was paused in midair.

00:23:34.240 A friend of mine was able to have his aircraft stop

00:23:39.620 at 40,000 feet or so

00:23:42.620 and not continue operating as a normal aircraft.

00:23:48.560 Yeah, how is this

00:23:50.740 how is this not like the only thing we're talking about?

00:23:56.220 Oh, just

00:23:57.080 the Pentagon confirming

00:23:59.680 sites by pilots of

00:24:01.880 of aircraft doing things

00:24:03.980 that are physically impossible,

00:24:05.180 splitting in two,

00:24:06.400 dipping into the ocean and coming back out?

00:24:10.740 Defying the laws of physics?

00:24:12.640 Well, that's it.

00:24:13.320 No big deal.

00:24:16.840 I mean,

00:24:17.100 right, there are really only two

00:24:19.780 explanations.

00:24:21.880 And one is that

00:24:23.440 there's some other

00:24:25.960 foreign power

00:24:27.140 in our world

00:24:28.780 on Earth

00:24:29.580 that has technological

00:24:32.160 abilities that

00:24:33.940 go way, way beyond

00:24:36.400 anything that we can even conceive of.

00:24:39.080 You know, there's

00:24:39.400 another country

00:24:40.960 on Earth

00:24:41.540 that has technology so advanced

00:24:44.700 that when we see it,

00:24:47.380 we have to entertain the possibility

00:24:48.700 that may be from another planet.

00:24:51.220 Like, there's

00:24:52.440 another country with 0.69

00:24:53.500 literally otherworldly technology.

00:24:56.800 That's one possibility, right?

00:24:58.480 And the other possibility is

00:25:00.020 that it's not from this world.

00:25:02.700 I'm not exactly sure

00:25:03.660 what the third

00:25:04.380 potential possibility would be.

00:25:06.380 You know,

00:25:09.680 if it wasn't,

00:25:10.960 if this wasn't being confirmed

00:25:12.020 by the Pentagon

00:25:12.760 and if it wasn't for the source,

00:25:14.060 these are Navy pilots,

00:25:15.280 military people,

00:25:16.020 people who know

00:25:16.620 what they're looking at.

00:25:18.600 If it wasn't for that,

00:25:19.200 you could say,

00:25:19.660 oh, it might be fake,

00:25:20.600 it might be

00:25:21.180 camera tricks,

00:25:22.920 it might be a bug on the lens,

00:25:24.640 you know,

00:25:24.920 weather balloon,

00:25:26.520 weird weather pattern.

00:25:27.640 You could speculate

00:25:28.440 about all that,

00:25:29.100 but I think those possibilities

00:25:30.340 are really

00:25:30.860 ruled out.

00:25:34.140 So I think we know

00:25:37.440 this is some kind of

00:25:38.880 flying technology

00:25:40.940 and

00:25:42.520 either it's

00:25:44.180 from this planet

00:25:45.000 or it's not,

00:25:45.720 but either way,

00:25:46.720 that's a huge deal.

00:25:50.480 And if there is,

00:25:51.800 you know,

00:25:51.920 if this is from China,

00:25:53.440 let's say,

00:25:54.620 or Russia or something,

00:25:56.480 why haven't they

00:25:58.180 just taken over

00:25:58.780 the whole world?

00:26:00.180 If they can do that,

00:26:01.240 they have aircraft

00:26:04.380 that can split in two,

00:26:06.360 dip into the ocean,

00:26:07.580 go at supersonic speeds

00:26:10.200 and then stop

00:26:11.240 and turn around

00:26:12.220 and go the other way.

00:26:14.800 Why haven't they

00:26:15.340 taken over the whole world yet?

00:26:16.580 If that's the case,

00:26:17.680 maybe they will.

00:26:20.660 And here we are,

00:26:21.660 you know,

00:26:22.020 and even me,

00:26:22.700 I'm part of the problem.

00:26:24.320 I just said,

00:26:25.100 I've had,

00:26:25.680 I've been wanting

00:26:26.160 to talk about this,

00:26:26.720 but I put it off

00:26:27.320 so that I could play

00:26:29.640 TikTok videos 0.99

00:26:30.600 of fat women dancing. 0.97

00:26:33.220 You know, 0.96

00:26:33.400 I'm so much a part

00:26:34.180 of this problem.

00:26:34.780 I'm ashamed.

00:26:35.440 I should be canceled for that.

00:26:38.500 In fact,

00:26:38.900 we have another TikTok video today,

00:26:40.040 I think,

00:26:40.280 that we're going to play 0.99

00:26:40.660 of fat women dancing. 0.98

00:26:43.860 And that is important. 0.99

00:26:44.800 Don't get me wrong.

00:26:45.880 We got to know 0.98

00:26:46.260 what the fat women 1.00

00:26:46.700 are doing on TikTok, 0.97

00:26:47.580 but at the same time,

00:26:48.660 you know,

00:26:49.000 potentially,

00:26:50.340 there's an alien

00:26:52.680 super civilization out there

00:26:54.760 preparing to take over

00:26:55.560 the planet.

00:26:55.900 And we're all like,

00:26:57.320 eh,

00:26:58.640 whatever.

00:27:01.580 Okay,

00:27:02.140 moving on.

00:27:03.580 Moving on from that.

00:27:04.880 This is from the Daily Wire.

00:27:05.860 It says,

00:27:06.220 after years of pro-life criticism,

00:27:08.140 Plant Barinhood's president

00:27:09.080 and chief executive officer,

00:27:10.400 Alex McGill Johnson,

00:27:11.880 now says the abortion provider

00:27:13.100 is reckoning

00:27:13.880 with the legacy

00:27:14.580 of its founder,

00:27:15.220 Margaret Sanger.

00:27:15.900 And they're looking to cancel

00:27:17.120 the early abortion

00:27:18.420 and birth control advocate

00:27:19.180 over her connections 0.66

00:27:19.980 to white supremacist groups

00:27:21.960 and eugenics.

00:27:23.420 The abortion provider

00:27:24.460 has largely avoided evidence

00:27:25.880 that Sanger founded

00:27:26.800 her, quote,

00:27:27.360 family planning crusade

00:27:28.340 because Sanger,

00:27:30.240 a pioneer of the eugenics movement 0.91

00:27:31.280 of the early 20th century,

00:27:32.220 felt it was necessary

00:27:32.780 to prevent the tainted

00:27:33.860 and less desirable

00:27:34.820 from reproducing,

00:27:35.900 as she noted

00:27:36.420 in various publications.

00:27:39.420 Now, though,

00:27:40.040 in a more woke era,

00:27:41.020 Sanger is problematic

00:27:42.380 and Planned Parenthood

00:27:42.880 now hopes to distance itself

00:27:44.200 from its own founding principles

00:27:45.360 in order to erase its history

00:27:46.420 as a racist

00:27:46.900 and ableist institution.

00:27:48.020 Um, and so they're,

00:27:50.480 they're sort of,

00:27:52.760 let's try to move on

00:27:53.480 to what the, um,

00:27:56.420 what Planned Parenthood

00:27:57.100 is now saying about this.

00:27:59.940 Although Johnson stopped short

00:28:01.200 of acknowledging

00:28:01.680 the racial focus

00:28:02.720 of much of Sanger's writing,

00:28:04.720 she says, quote,

00:28:05.480 we can't simply call her racist,

00:28:07.020 scrub her from our history 0.98

00:28:07.820 and move on.

00:28:08.760 She does acknowledge

00:28:09.440 that Sanger spoke

00:28:10.400 to the Ku Klux Klan

00:28:11.920 and that Sanger cheered

00:28:13.000 a Supreme Court decision

00:28:14.140 allowing states

00:28:15.280 to sterilize people

00:28:16.400 deemed unfit

00:28:17.440 without their consent

00:28:18.660 and sometimes

00:28:19.100 without their knowledge.

00:28:21.520 Uh, instead,

00:28:22.020 Johnson said

00:28:22.400 Sanger's primary sin

00:28:23.720 was focusing on

00:28:24.620 white womanhood,

00:28:25.580 which runs afoul

00:28:26.500 of today's

00:28:27.000 intersectional feminism. 1.00

00:28:28.600 She says, quote,

00:28:29.480 we don't know

00:28:30.020 what was in Sanger's heart

00:28:30.920 and we don't need to,

00:28:32.020 we don't need to

00:28:32.580 in order to condemn

00:28:33.300 her, her harmful choices.

00:28:35.160 What we have is a history

00:28:36.100 of focusing on

00:28:36.880 white womanhood relentlessly. 0.99

00:28:38.820 Whether our founder

00:28:39.460 was a racist

00:28:40.180 is not a simple

00:28:41.420 yes or no question.

00:28:42.640 Our reckoning

00:28:43.140 is understanding

00:28:43.900 her full legacy

00:28:44.780 and its impact.

00:28:45.900 Our reckoning

00:28:46.480 is the work

00:28:47.280 that comes next.

00:28:47.920 Okay.

00:28:49.960 Of course,

00:28:50.500 they get no credit

00:28:51.200 for, first of all,

00:28:54.260 pro-lifers have been

00:28:55.300 pointing this out

00:28:56.180 about Margaret Sanger.

00:28:57.900 So it's not like

00:28:58.700 Planned Parenthood

00:28:59.260 could claim,

00:28:59.960 oh, we never noticed.

00:29:01.060 We never noticed

00:29:01.880 what our founder said about,

00:29:03.280 we never noticed

00:29:03.940 that she was an,

00:29:04.540 you know,

00:29:05.380 an out-and-out eugenicist.

00:29:07.520 They can't claim that.

00:29:09.020 It wouldn't be credible

00:29:09.820 under any circumstance,

00:29:11.140 but especially

00:29:11.480 when you had pro-lifers

00:29:12.340 for decades

00:29:13.260 that have been saying this,

00:29:14.780 and Planned Parenthood

00:29:17.500 either ignored it

00:29:18.500 or they would deny it

00:29:20.240 and say,

00:29:20.460 it's not true,

00:29:21.040 you're misinterpreting,

00:29:21.980 you're lying about

00:29:23.300 what she said.

00:29:24.900 They did fact checks

00:29:26.040 and everything.

00:29:29.040 Or they would focus on,

00:29:30.400 like there's,

00:29:31.260 this is one of the,

00:29:32.200 this is a tactic

00:29:32.940 especially of left-wing

00:29:33.740 fact checkers.

00:29:34.280 there's an alleged photo

00:29:37.080 out there

00:29:37.560 of Margaret Sanger

00:29:38.480 speaking to a Ku Klux Klan

00:29:41.300 rally group.

00:29:44.440 And the photo

00:29:45.580 is not real.

00:29:46.260 The photo was doctored

00:29:47.120 by somebody.

00:29:48.980 So that's one of those things

00:29:50.640 where the fact checkers,

00:29:51.500 they say,

00:29:52.040 there's a claim

00:29:53.040 that there's a photo

00:29:54.540 of Margaret Sanger

00:29:55.440 speaking to

00:29:56.560 the KKK rally.

00:29:58.160 That's fact check false.

00:29:59.440 Well, yes,

00:30:01.560 it's false in that

00:30:02.740 there was,

00:30:03.280 the photo is not real,

00:30:04.420 but she did actually

00:30:05.280 do that.

00:30:08.480 So you're focusing

00:30:09.500 on the fact

00:30:10.740 that a photo

00:30:11.360 was made up,

00:30:12.320 fine,

00:30:13.240 but she did do that. 0.96

00:30:14.480 She did go and speak

00:30:15.200 to the KKK.

00:30:16.220 We know that.

00:30:19.280 And we have certainly

00:30:20.340 canceled

00:30:21.080 historical figures

00:30:22.300 for far less than that.

00:30:26.180 But no matter what they do,

00:30:27.320 so they don't deserve

00:30:27.860 credit for it.

00:30:28.540 This is only a matter

00:30:29.840 of self-preservation.

00:30:30.820 It's all politics,

00:30:31.420 obviously.

00:30:32.700 But also,

00:30:34.860 they can't really

00:30:36.200 fully confront

00:30:37.900 the legacy

00:30:39.040 of Margaret Sanger

00:30:39.900 because they are

00:30:41.620 the legacy

00:30:42.200 of Margaret Sanger.

00:30:45.360 Abortion

00:30:46.040 has always been

00:30:48.460 eugenic

00:30:50.500 in nature.

00:30:52.600 It's about getting rid

00:30:53.980 of the unwanted.

00:30:55.520 Unwanted babies

00:30:56.640 or the unwanted

00:30:57.380 quote-unquote fetus.

00:30:59.360 That's what it

00:31:00.760 has always been.

00:31:03.260 So if they're really

00:31:04.360 going to reckon

00:31:04.900 with the legacy

00:31:06.340 of Margaret Sanger

00:31:07.100 and condemn it,

00:31:09.160 distance themselves

00:31:09.920 from it,

00:31:10.440 that would necessitate

00:31:12.080 that they stop

00:31:12.820 aborting the unwanted.

00:31:16.760 They would have

00:31:17.600 to reject the idea

00:31:18.800 that a human being 1.00

00:31:21.020 deserves to be killed 1.00

00:31:22.380 because they're 1.00

00:31:23.100 unwanted.

00:31:23.740 That is a eugenic

00:31:26.500 idea.

00:31:28.540 Margaret Sanger's

00:31:29.120 idea.

00:31:30.560 As long as they

00:31:31.360 keep doing it

00:31:31.920 so they can say

00:31:32.340 all they want,

00:31:32.760 oh yeah,

00:31:33.120 Margaret Sanger,

00:31:33.800 we don't want

00:31:34.400 anything to do

00:31:34.700 with her anymore

00:31:35.180 while they go on 1.00

00:31:37.240 killing 300,000 1.00

00:31:39.840 unwanted children

00:31:40.740 every year.

00:31:41.160 talk about hollow

00:31:43.580 words.

00:31:45.680 All right,

00:31:45.840 let's play this.

00:31:46.480 George W. Bush

00:31:47.520 was interviewed

00:31:47.980 on CBS

00:31:48.480 about his great

00:31:49.280 compassion.

00:31:50.140 The media has

00:31:50.520 recently discovered

00:31:51.180 a newfound love

00:31:52.080 of Bush.

00:31:53.380 This began a few

00:31:54.040 years ago

00:31:54.460 and that's what

00:31:56.000 led to this.

00:31:57.160 You ran as a

00:31:58.260 compassionate

00:31:58.780 conservative.

00:31:59.740 I did.

00:32:01.280 Do you believe

00:32:02.140 there are

00:32:02.460 compassionate

00:32:02.960 conservatives today?

00:32:04.180 Absolutely,

00:32:04.780 I'm one.

00:32:06.000 And I think

00:32:06.380 there are a lot.

00:32:08.160 The problem

00:32:08.960 is with an

00:32:11.080 angry society

00:32:11.960 it's hard 0.58

00:32:14.300 to punch

00:32:14.700 through with 0.98

00:32:15.120 compassion.

00:32:16.280 Is it an

00:32:17.080 angry society

00:32:18.060 or is it

00:32:18.860 certain leaders

00:32:20.240 and people

00:32:20.860 who've stoked

00:32:21.480 that anger

00:32:21.980 and fear?

00:32:23.080 I think

00:32:23.440 that's an

00:32:24.340 interesting

00:32:24.580 question.

00:32:25.820 I'm a big

00:32:26.380 leadership guy

00:32:27.200 and so

00:32:27.940 therefore I

00:32:28.580 think maybe

00:32:29.300 the latter part

00:32:31.160 of your question

00:32:31.660 is true 0.89

00:32:32.160 that people

00:32:32.720 stoke anger

00:32:33.820 in order to

00:32:34.720 advance their

00:32:35.400 apolitical agenda.

00:32:38.000 I do believe

00:32:38.740 there is a

00:32:39.560 more,

00:32:40.440 well my dad

00:32:40.980 spoke of

00:32:41.400 kinder and

00:32:42.040 gentler

00:32:42.400 and he truly

00:32:44.600 believed it

00:32:45.200 and I believed

00:32:46.060 in unifier

00:32:47.640 not divider

00:32:48.440 and they just

00:32:50.640 can't be empty

00:32:51.240 slogans.

00:32:51.820 You have to

00:32:52.120 believe it

00:32:52.620 in order to

00:32:53.240 be credible.

00:32:54.340 I think

00:32:56.700 that yes

00:32:58.540 it's going

00:32:58.860 to require

00:32:59.220 leadership

00:32:59.620 to help

00:33:00.040 heal wounds.

00:33:01.580 This is

00:33:02.380 so hard

00:33:03.980 to watch.

00:33:05.360 You've got

00:33:05.820 CBS

00:33:07.180 reporters

00:33:07.920 interviewing

00:33:09.120 George W.

00:33:10.080 Bush

00:33:10.300 about his

00:33:11.040 compassion.

00:33:11.740 He was such

00:33:12.040 a compassionate

00:33:12.580 guy.

00:33:15.680 That's not

00:33:16.600 just maybe

00:33:17.820 for younger

00:33:18.180 people

00:33:18.520 who don't

00:33:19.900 remember the

00:33:20.280 Bush years 0.92

00:33:20.600 that much.

00:33:20.960 I just

00:33:21.680 tell you

00:33:22.020 that is

00:33:22.940 not what

00:33:23.500 they were

00:33:23.800 saying

00:33:24.120 about

00:33:24.600 George W.

00:33:25.180 Bush

00:33:25.300 at the

00:33:25.560 time.

00:33:26.780 They were

00:33:27.280 calling him

00:33:27.740 a war

00:33:28.000 criminal,

00:33:28.760 saying he

00:33:29.040 was worse,

00:33:29.460 sound familiar,

00:33:31.040 he's worse

00:33:31.440 than Hitler, 0.67

00:33:32.020 all that

00:33:32.240 kind of

00:33:32.420 stuff.

00:33:34.000 I mean,

00:33:34.520 they hated

00:33:34.920 him.

00:33:37.420 Again,

00:33:37.940 maybe if you're

00:33:38.620 younger,

00:33:39.000 you might not

00:33:40.740 remember this

00:33:41.180 or realize it,

00:33:41.720 but I can

00:33:42.860 tell you that

00:33:43.320 Donald Trump

00:33:44.140 is not the

00:33:45.020 first Republican

00:33:45.640 president the

00:33:46.240 media hated.

00:33:46.760 they've hated

00:33:48.720 them all,

00:33:49.380 and George

00:33:50.020 Bush in

00:33:50.480 particular.

00:33:52.080 But now

00:33:52.900 they trot him

00:33:53.860 out because

00:33:54.300 they find him

00:33:55.160 useful.

00:33:56.420 And they can

00:33:57.020 talk about

00:33:57.380 compassion.

00:33:59.940 And as I've

00:34:00.640 said many times

00:34:01.260 about this,

00:34:01.920 about compassion,

00:34:02.740 I believe in

00:34:03.420 compassion.

00:34:05.680 Compassion is

00:34:06.280 a central

00:34:09.220 aspect to

00:34:10.120 living a moral

00:34:10.860 life and being

00:34:11.540 a moral person.

00:34:13.660 But what does

00:34:14.500 compassion mean?

00:34:16.760 It's not,

00:34:17.660 compassion is

00:34:18.340 not to simply

00:34:18.960 sit back and

00:34:20.740 not interfere

00:34:21.700 while your whole

00:34:23.340 civilization crumbles

00:34:24.100 around you.

00:34:26.180 Compassion is

00:34:26.880 not refraining

00:34:28.580 from speaking

00:34:29.180 out when you

00:34:29.660 see evil.

00:34:30.560 That's not,

00:34:30.840 that's the

00:34:31.140 opposite of

00:34:31.520 compassion.

00:34:34.560 You're,

00:34:34.720 you're,

00:34:34.980 you're leaving

00:34:35.520 people to

00:34:36.480 wallow in

00:34:37.240 misery and 0.52

00:34:38.140 death.

00:34:38.580 That's not

00:34:38.980 compassion.

00:34:41.800 Compassion,

00:34:42.520 co-passion,

00:34:43.420 co-suffering.

00:34:44.500 It means when

00:34:45.360 you're,

00:34:45.580 you are sharing

00:34:46.340 in the

00:34:46.920 suffering of

00:34:47.620 another to

00:34:48.100 the extent

00:34:48.500 that you

00:34:48.820 can.

00:34:50.660 That's what

00:34:51.160 compassion means.

00:34:53.640 And so I

00:34:54.400 think for

00:34:54.660 conservatives,

00:34:55.480 it,

00:34:55.600 it,

00:34:55.840 it,

00:34:56.120 it means

00:34:56.600 now,

00:34:57.200 you know,

00:34:58.400 getting down

00:34:59.540 into the

00:34:59.840 trenches

00:35:00.140 culturally and,

00:35:01.440 and,

00:35:01.700 and fighting

00:35:02.160 this fight.

00:35:04.120 There's suffering

00:35:04.820 that comes from

00:35:05.320 that.

00:35:05.560 There's hardship

00:35:06.000 that comes from

00:35:06.540 that.

00:35:08.320 But you're

00:35:08.880 doing it because

00:35:09.300 you're fighting

00:35:09.660 for truth and

00:35:10.680 what is,

00:35:11.040 what is right

00:35:11.500 and moral

00:35:11.980 and just.

00:35:13.440 That's

00:35:13.860 compassionate.

00:35:16.340 And if

00:35:16.920 you use

00:35:17.880 harsh language

00:35:18.480 sometimes while

00:35:19.060 you do it,

00:35:20.380 if you raise

00:35:21.200 your voice a

00:35:21.620 little bit,

00:35:21.960 that doesn't

00:35:22.200 make it any

00:35:22.600 less compassionate.

00:35:25.040 Especially if

00:35:25.640 what's making

00:35:26.140 you angry

00:35:26.760 is your

00:35:28.460 passion for

00:35:29.020 truth and

00:35:31.200 goodness and

00:35:31.700 virtue.

00:35:33.920 So that's

00:35:34.840 what real

00:35:35.340 conservative

00:35:36.160 compassion should

00:35:37.020 look like.

00:35:37.440 Okay,

00:35:40.000 finally,

00:35:40.880 it's time

00:35:41.960 for me again

00:35:42.800 to force you

00:35:43.320 to watch a

00:35:43.820 TikTok video.

00:35:44.740 I do this

00:35:45.220 because it's

00:35:45.540 important.

00:35:46.000 It's important

00:35:46.380 for you to

00:35:46.800 know what's

00:35:47.320 happening on

00:35:47.700 TikTok.

00:35:48.120 Why is that

00:35:48.520 important?

00:35:49.600 Just because.

00:35:50.240 Stop asking

00:35:50.760 questions.

00:35:52.500 You're going to

00:35:52.880 watch this and

00:35:53.920 like it. 1.00

00:35:54.480 Damn it. 1.00

00:35:54.880 Here it is. 1.00

00:35:55.340 I'm a big

00:36:15.400 bad big

00:36:16.000 but big

00:36:16.600 dreams

00:36:16.960 baddie.

00:36:17.620 Two minutes

00:36:18.040 with me and

00:36:18.520 you'll be calling

00:36:19.060 me daddy.

00:36:20.000 Mind I'll pass

00:36:20.480 the presidential

00:36:21.100 fitness test

00:36:22.020 but notify your

00:36:23.000 next of kin

00:36:23.460 I'll put you

00:36:23.880 to rest.

00:36:24.340 Whiny little

00:36:25.320 doots say 0.53

00:36:25.660 I'm concerned

00:36:26.200 for your health

00:36:26.960 and think about

00:36:27.540 my back rolls

00:36:28.100 while they're

00:36:28.400 touching themselves.

00:36:29.460 They comment

00:36:29.880 I legitimately

00:36:30.360 thought this was

00:36:31.000 John Candy

00:36:31.560 then whisper my

00:36:32.400 name as they

00:36:33.180 start to get

00:36:33.740 Randy.

00:36:40.480 On second 0.85

00:36:41.120 thought it

00:36:41.420 probably there

00:36:41.900 was no reason

00:36:42.280 to play that

00:36:42.920 but I did

00:36:46.420 and so you've

00:36:47.360 seen it.

00:36:49.260 I don't know

00:36:49.780 if there's any

00:36:50.080 commentary necessary

00:36:51.300 after

00:36:52.960 witnessing that

00:36:55.200 aside from

00:36:55.980 the fact

00:36:56.360 that

00:36:56.600 you know

00:36:58.040 just to

00:36:58.440 remind everyone 0.55

00:36:58.900 mental illness

00:36:59.740 is an epidemic

00:37:01.280 in this country

00:37:01.940 so is obesity

00:37:03.180 and so is

00:37:05.780 TikTok

00:37:05.980 and sometimes

00:37:06.520 those things

00:37:07.220 all come

00:37:07.540 together in

00:37:08.040 that way

00:37:08.380 and we

00:37:09.300 all suffer

00:37:10.820 because of

00:37:11.280 it so

00:37:11.540 there you

00:37:11.880 go.

00:37:12.580 Alright let's

00:37:12.960 go to

00:37:13.240 reading the

00:37:13.620 YouTube

00:37:13.820 comments.

00:37:14.280 This is

00:37:14.500 from

00:37:14.760 The Masked

00:37:15.360 Man

00:37:15.560 he says

00:37:15.940 I don't

00:37:16.180 know how

00:37:16.420 Matt did

00:37:16.860 it but

00:37:17.080 his voice

00:37:17.420 sounds even

00:37:17.880 manlier

00:37:18.300 during this

00:37:18.720 episode.

00:37:20.380 Unamused

00:37:20.760 caveman says

00:37:21.560 Matt's voice

00:37:22.180 made my

00:37:22.620 beard

00:37:22.960 grow a

00:37:23.440 beard.

00:37:25.220 Emile says

00:37:25.840 Matt's voice

00:37:26.360 hurt my

00:37:26.720 throat.

00:37:27.040 Okay I hope

00:37:27.680 you guys

00:37:27.900 all got

00:37:28.160 did you get

00:37:28.440 that your

00:37:28.620 system?

00:37:29.060 Yeah a lot

00:37:29.460 I got all

00:37:29.820 the voice

00:37:30.500 jokes.

00:37:31.740 You'll have

00:37:31.900 a few more

00:37:32.220 days to do

00:37:32.680 that.

00:37:33.360 Hope you

00:37:33.620 got out

00:37:33.820 of your

00:37:33.960 system.

00:37:35.340 Yes my

00:37:35.640 voice sounds

00:37:36.040 jacked up.

00:37:36.600 That's true.

00:37:39.340 Thank you

00:37:39.840 for establishing

00:37:40.540 that.

00:37:42.060 You big 0.97

00:37:42.820 bullies. 0.97

00:37:44.280 I hope my

00:37:44.940 voice still

00:37:45.360 sounds like

00:37:45.780 this on

00:37:46.060 Friday when I

00:37:46.480 wear the

00:37:46.680 polka dot

00:37:47.000 shirt.

00:37:48.200 That's what

00:37:48.720 you deserve.

00:37:49.460 Another one

00:37:52.640 says hey

00:37:53.020 Matt I

00:37:53.340 watched the

00:37:53.760 Daniel Shaver

00:37:54.460 shooting a

00:37:54.940 couple of

00:37:55.260 times.

00:37:55.920 Did you

00:37:56.100 not notice

00:37:56.540 right before

00:37:57.140 the officer

00:37:57.860 shot Daniel's

00:37:58.780 right hand

00:37:59.280 moved from

00:37:59.800 the floor

00:38:00.260 and towards

00:38:00.700 his back.

00:38:01.460 Watch it

00:38:01.760 again.

00:38:02.680 Yeah I

00:38:03.220 I'm a

00:38:05.420 yes I

00:38:06.060 that is the

00:38:07.440 justification

00:38:07.820 they gave

00:38:08.240 for shooting

00:38:08.620 him.

00:38:10.540 Is that a

00:38:11.340 good justification

00:38:11.940 for shooting

00:38:12.320 him?

00:38:12.700 No.

00:38:13.420 Why did

00:38:13.880 he move

00:38:14.560 his hand?

00:38:15.200 Because his

00:38:15.840 pants were

00:38:16.280 falling down.

00:38:16.980 It's what it

00:38:17.380 seems to me

00:38:17.900 and he was

00:38:18.200 just trying to

00:38:18.600 pull his

00:38:18.800 pants up.

00:38:19.060 It's like a

00:38:19.340 reflexive

00:38:19.880 thing that

00:38:20.200 you do to

00:38:22.060 try to

00:38:22.340 maintain your

00:38:22.840 dignity in

00:38:25.340 whatever way

00:38:26.080 you can when

00:38:26.940 you when

00:38:27.240 there's a

00:38:27.480 man pointing

00:38:27.860 a gun at

00:38:28.300 you and 0.97

00:38:28.580 forcing you

00:38:29.220 to crawl

00:38:30.080 on the

00:38:30.360 ground towards

00:38:31.000 him.

00:38:33.140 But it

00:38:33.600 was clear to

00:38:34.180 that point

00:38:34.620 you know

00:38:34.800 that's why

00:38:35.160 I that's

00:38:36.940 not an

00:38:37.240 excuse for 0.60

00:38:37.640 shooting him 0.98

00:38:37.960 for a 0.85

00:38:38.200 number of

00:38:38.460 reasons.

00:38:39.740 First of

00:38:40.240 all this

00:38:41.860 Daniel Shaver

00:38:43.180 to that

00:38:43.900 point had

00:38:44.520 shown that

00:38:45.320 he is

00:38:45.680 desperate to

00:38:46.780 comply with

00:38:47.380 them.

00:38:47.580 He was

00:38:47.740 trying

00:38:48.000 everything he

00:38:48.640 could to

00:38:49.220 comply with

00:38:49.740 everything they

00:38:50.380 said.

00:38:51.540 His

00:38:52.020 compliance

00:38:52.600 was he was

00:38:53.800 broadcasting that

00:38:54.820 to the point

00:38:56.320 where he was

00:38:56.920 crawling on his

00:38:57.720 hands and knees

00:38:58.140 towards them.

00:38:59.960 A move which

00:39:00.840 by the way I

00:39:01.620 have now I'm no

00:39:02.680 law enforcement

00:39:03.180 expert.

00:39:03.920 I've never seen

00:39:05.080 that before.

00:39:07.100 I've talked to a lot

00:39:08.200 of law enforcement

00:39:08.840 people.

00:39:09.340 They've said they've

00:39:09.840 never been in a

00:39:10.600 situation where

00:39:11.200 they've told

00:39:11.560 someone to crawl

00:39:12.220 towards them.

00:39:12.840 And if there

00:39:15.920 could ever be a

00:39:16.620 situation where

00:39:17.200 you would ask

00:39:17.600 someone to do

00:39:18.200 that or tell

00:39:19.140 them to do

00:39:19.440 it, I don't

00:39:20.520 know why that

00:39:21.020 would be the

00:39:21.300 situation.

00:39:22.960 You told him to

00:39:24.320 get down on the

00:39:24.800 ground, put his

00:39:25.440 hands behind his

00:39:25.900 back, okay,

00:39:27.380 just go up and

00:39:28.320 cuff him. 0.63

00:39:29.060 Why do you need

00:39:29.480 him to crawl to

00:39:30.000 you?

00:39:30.380 It doesn't make

00:39:30.700 any sense.

00:39:34.640 So I don't buy

00:39:35.320 it for that

00:39:35.700 reason.

00:39:36.020 Also, it's

00:39:38.020 just, it was

00:39:38.420 clear, you

00:39:38.900 know, yes, you

00:39:41.500 could never know

00:39:41.940 for sure someone

00:39:42.580 could be hiding a

00:39:43.240 gun, but the

00:39:43.740 chances that he

00:39:45.120 was hiding a gun

00:39:45.920 I think were

00:39:46.400 very, very low.

00:39:48.080 And when he's

00:39:48.960 crawling towards

00:39:49.520 you, yeah, I

00:39:50.280 mean, even if

00:39:51.180 like on the

00:39:53.460 off chance, on

00:39:56.160 the very, very

00:39:57.080 vanishingly small

00:39:58.520 chance that he's

00:39:59.080 actually reaching

00:39:59.540 for a gun, you

00:40:01.480 would have plenty 0.96

00:40:02.040 of time to shoot 1.00

00:40:02.760 him dead before 1.00

00:40:04.180 he could draw it 0.99

00:40:04.880 up and shoot 1.00

00:40:05.280 you. 1.00

00:40:06.240 There were

00:40:06.800 three armed

00:40:07.380 officers in a

00:40:08.120 hallway pointing

00:40:09.920 their guns at

00:40:10.520 him.

00:40:14.160 He's on his

00:40:15.140 hands and knees

00:40:15.880 crawling.

00:40:18.280 Now, I know it

00:40:19.020 can all happen

00:40:19.460 pretty quickly, but

00:40:20.440 on the off

00:40:21.200 chance, on like

00:40:22.760 the 0.1% chance

00:40:24.100 that he was

00:40:24.540 reaching for a

00:40:25.020 gun there, I

00:40:26.180 think you'd have

00:40:27.200 at least a

00:40:28.020 moment to fire

00:40:28.980 your guns before

00:40:30.860 he could draw

00:40:32.980 all the way up

00:40:33.700 from the crawling

00:40:34.560 position and start 0.97

00:40:35.460 firing at you. 0.97

00:40:36.020 And that's why

00:40:38.900 we say, you

00:40:39.440 know, the, I

00:40:42.820 think most

00:40:43.360 unjust police

00:40:44.280 shootings, and

00:40:46.260 most police

00:40:46.680 shootings are not

00:40:47.260 unjust, but the

00:40:47.780 ones that are

00:40:48.320 unjust, it's

00:40:49.020 usually not

00:40:49.820 racism or

00:40:51.260 homicidal mania

00:40:52.580 that drives it.

00:40:53.880 It's self-preservation

00:40:55.220 that drives it.

00:40:56.980 That's also what

00:40:57.680 drives most of the

00:40:58.680 just police

00:40:59.340 shootings.

00:41:00.200 But self-preservation

00:41:01.200 can go too far

00:41:02.280 sometimes for a

00:41:02.880 police officer.

00:41:04.800 I mean, we

00:41:06.920 shouldn't expect

00:41:07.520 them to take

00:41:07.920 unreasonable risks

00:41:09.200 and put their

00:41:09.800 lives on the line

00:41:10.500 unreasonably.

00:41:12.500 But yeah, you do

00:41:13.240 have to take some

00:41:14.180 risk, even a

00:41:14.980 small amount of

00:41:15.540 risk, because if

00:41:16.980 we say that police

00:41:17.520 officers shouldn't

00:41:18.180 have to take any

00:41:18.920 risk at all, well,

00:41:20.740 then they're just 0.99

00:41:21.100 going to kill 1.00

00:41:21.420 everybody. 1.00

00:41:22.940 Right?

00:41:23.500 And so that

00:41:24.020 clearly is not the

00:41:24.600 case.

00:41:26.480 So I guess my

00:41:27.080 point is, if they

00:41:28.920 had refrained from

00:41:29.880 shooting him, and

00:41:30.620 he didn't have a 0.93

00:41:31.060 gun, he was

00:41:31.340 unarmed.

00:41:32.020 So if they had

00:41:32.440 refrained from

00:41:32.760 shooting him, they

00:41:33.140 would have been 0.99

00:41:33.360 fine.

00:41:34.900 But if they had

00:41:35.800 refrained from

00:41:36.320 pulling the trigger

00:41:36.780 in that instant,

00:41:38.960 what are the

00:41:39.740 chances that they

00:41:40.800 would have ended

00:41:41.120 up dead, ended 0.99

00:41:42.220 up dead, you 0.78

00:41:42.960 know, in that

00:41:44.260 scenario?

00:41:44.540 I think very,

00:41:45.460 very, very,

00:41:45.960 very, very,

00:41:46.360 very small.

00:41:50.160 Another way of

00:41:50.700 putting it, that's

00:41:51.620 a chance that I

00:41:52.340 think we should

00:41:52.880 require them to

00:41:53.880 take.

00:41:55.500 Instead of just 0.99

00:41:56.200 killing a guy, just 1.00

00:41:58.080 in case. 1.00

00:41:59.660 Right?

00:42:00.860 We don't want any

00:42:01.740 just-in-case

00:42:02.840 killings. 0.96

00:42:04.460 We want the 1.00

00:42:05.720 police to shoot 0.97

00:42:06.320 when there's no 0.99

00:42:07.160 other choice.

00:42:08.200 And they have to

00:42:08.840 protect their own

00:42:09.300 lives, protect the

00:42:10.360 public.

00:42:11.500 Which, again, most

00:42:12.680 police shootings,

00:42:13.580 that's what it is.

00:42:14.860 They do it because

00:42:15.400 there's no other

00:42:15.880 choice.

00:42:18.560 Okay.

00:42:20.380 Let's see.

00:42:23.000 One other,

00:42:23.480 okay, here's one

00:42:25.040 other thing.

00:42:26.240 Eric Gomez says,

00:42:27.300 day seven of me

00:42:28.240 asking if Matt can

00:42:29.220 read my comment to

00:42:30.340 tell me where he

00:42:31.020 got that sloth.

00:42:31.780 You're talking about

00:42:32.160 the sloth on my 0.84

00:42:33.100 leftist-tears 0.98

00:42:34.500 tumbler here.

00:42:35.260 Thank you for

00:42:35.680 noticing.

00:42:36.240 Very few people

00:42:36.760 notice the sloth,

00:42:37.780 but he's my dear

00:42:38.760 friend here.

00:42:39.880 And you can go to

00:42:40.520 my Instagram to

00:42:41.340 see how I receive

00:42:42.980 that sloth and many 1.00

00:42:43.880 other gifts in this

00:42:44.800 room.

00:42:45.640 So a little

00:42:45.960 Instagram plug for

00:42:46.740 you.

00:42:47.340 Now a quick word

00:42:48.140 from our very good

00:42:49.060 friends at

00:42:49.380 constitutioncoach.com.

00:42:50.860 We all, as

00:42:52.900 conservatives, what

00:42:53.480 do we say we love?

00:42:54.000 The Constitution, we

00:42:55.100 love our Second

00:42:55.500 Amendment rights in

00:42:56.100 particular, but how

00:42:57.740 many of us know

00:42:58.800 enough about the

00:42:59.300 Constitution and are

00:42:59.960 ready to defend it?

00:43:00.660 How many of us have

00:43:02.040 the ability to

00:43:02.840 exercise our Second

00:43:03.620 Amendment rights if

00:43:04.240 we really need to?

00:43:05.100 My friends over at

00:43:05.680 constitutioncoach.com,

00:43:07.120 they've got a lot of

00:43:07.760 great programs that are

00:43:08.580 going to solve that

00:43:09.140 problem, and they're

00:43:09.860 going to equip

00:43:10.260 citizens to defend

00:43:11.340 liberty by studying

00:43:12.220 and living out the

00:43:13.060 Constitution.

00:43:14.300 I've experienced their

00:43:15.200 constitutional defense

00:43:16.000 course.

00:43:16.380 You can experience it,

00:43:17.340 too.

00:43:18.200 There are classes on

00:43:19.500 April 25th.

00:43:20.140 It's filling up fast.

00:43:21.460 You get an amazing

00:43:22.120 combination of

00:43:22.820 intellectual ammunition

00:43:23.680 in live classes with

00:43:24.660 Rick Green, America's

00:43:25.420 Constitution coach, and

00:43:26.280 then you also get the

00:43:26.960 physical training at the

00:43:28.000 premier firearms training

00:43:28.880 facility in the nation.

00:43:30.000 You get all this in the

00:43:30.560 same course.

00:43:31.340 You get to join hundreds

00:43:31.960 of other patriots from

00:43:32.700 across the nation for a

00:43:33.640 time of learning,

00:43:34.380 training, and fellowship

00:43:35.620 with like-minded people.

00:43:37.240 It doesn't matter where

00:43:37.920 you are on the, you

00:43:39.140 know, where your skills

00:43:40.320 are, they're going to

00:43:42.160 take you to a whole new

00:43:42.920 skill level.

00:43:43.420 They're going to make

00:43:43.700 you a lot more

00:43:44.200 confident handling firearms.

00:43:45.460 That's what they did

00:43:45.880 for me.

00:43:46.300 I mean, I was way on one

00:43:48.100 side of the skill level,

00:43:49.020 not the side that I

00:43:49.660 wanted to be on, and

00:43:51.100 felt so much better after

00:43:52.260 doing this course, and

00:43:53.200 you will too.

00:43:54.120 Don't just get a gun.

00:43:54.940 Learn to carry with

00:43:55.560 confidence.

00:43:56.440 Learn how to defend

00:43:57.020 yourself and your

00:43:57.580 family.

00:43:57.860 Go to

00:43:58.060 constitutioncoach.com.

00:43:59.240 Rick and the

00:43:59.540 Constitution Coach team

00:44:00.280 have another class on

00:44:01.560 April 25th, but it will

00:44:02.820 fill up fast, so visit

00:44:03.640 constitutioncoach.com today

00:44:04.940 and find out about how

00:44:06.880 you can be a part of this

00:44:07.540 one-of-a-kind training,

00:44:08.300 constitutioncoach.com.

00:44:10.540 You know, it's almost

00:44:11.220 time for another episode

00:44:12.120 of Candice.

00:44:13.240 This week's special guest

00:44:14.140 is Dana White, president

00:44:15.320 of UFC, of course, which is

00:44:17.680 the largest MMA organization

00:44:19.620 in the world, and he's

00:44:21.080 always got a lot of

00:44:21.560 really interesting things

00:44:22.260 to say.

00:44:22.540 You don't want to miss

00:44:22.860 this.

00:44:23.060 The show streams on

00:44:24.340 Friday at 9 p.m.

00:44:25.860 Eastern, 8 p.m.

00:44:26.700 Central on

00:44:27.880 dailywire.com.

00:44:28.860 If you don't have a

00:44:29.720 membership yet, you can

00:44:30.580 go use code Candice and

00:44:31.720 get 25% off.

00:44:33.380 And also, if you don't

00:44:35.020 know about this yet, you

00:44:35.660 can also get the podcast

00:44:37.200 of Candice, which is

00:44:38.300 available on Apple or

00:44:39.200 Spotify or wherever you

00:44:40.120 get your podcasts.

00:44:40.760 And if you go there,

00:44:41.400 make sure to leave a

00:44:41.980 five-star review.

00:44:42.820 If you like what you hear,

00:44:44.020 now let's get to our

00:44:44.580 daily cancellation.

00:44:48.680 Today for our daily

00:44:49.540 cancellation, we turn

00:44:50.320 again to the slippery

00:44:51.280 slope, the thing that

00:44:52.500 we're all sliding down.

00:44:53.600 We never reach the end

00:44:54.700 of our plummet.

00:44:55.560 We hurtle endlessly into

00:44:56.680 the abyss, never to

00:44:57.520 stop, our misery

00:44:59.100 compounding by the

00:45:00.060 moment, but never

00:45:01.000 ending, never culminating

00:45:02.740 in anything except more

00:45:03.960 insanity and more

00:45:04.820 despair.

00:45:05.820 But the good news is

00:45:06.960 that it gives me plenty

00:45:08.140 of chances to say, I

00:45:09.160 told you so.

00:45:09.840 That's the one good

00:45:10.660 thing.

00:45:11.060 As we're all hurtling

00:45:12.260 down into hell, I can

00:45:14.460 say, hey guys, told 0.97

00:45:15.360 you so.

00:45:15.700 So here's another

00:45:18.180 chance from the New

00:45:18.780 York Post.

00:45:19.820 It says, consensual

00:45:21.100 incest advocates are

00:45:22.920 rooting for an

00:45:23.560 anonymous New York

00:45:24.380 parent who wants to

00:45:25.420 marry their own adult

00:45:26.300 child.

00:45:27.660 Australian Richard

00:45:28.440 Morris, who is

00:45:29.360 pushing to change

00:45:30.120 incest laws in about

00:45:31.120 60 countries, said he

00:45:33.040 supports the legal

00:45:33.800 push in Manhattan

00:45:34.400 Federal Court that

00:45:35.520 such behavior between

00:45:36.420 consenting adults,

00:45:37.420 quote, should not be

00:45:38.120 criminalized.

00:45:39.080 He and other

00:45:39.520 advocates have

00:45:40.100 launched about 130

00:45:41.120 petitions, mostly on

00:45:42.100 change.org, seeking to

00:45:44.020 change incest laws around

00:45:45.340 the world.

00:45:46.020 Most have received

00:45:46.760 little support.

00:45:47.980 We haven't moved any

00:45:48.980 mountains yet, he told

00:45:49.760 the Post.

00:45:50.500 Morris was inspired to

00:45:51.520 fight for those in

00:45:52.160 consenting and sexual

00:45:52.860 relationships, he said

00:45:54.240 after learning about a

00:45:56.420 Scottish case in which a

00:45:57.420 long-separated father and

00:45:58.640 daughter were reunited,

00:46:00.180 started an affair, and

00:46:01.380 were then criminally

00:46:02.180 convicted.

00:46:03.880 Okay.

00:46:04.600 After you've finished

00:46:05.540 vomiting all over

00:46:06.380 yourself, you should

00:46:07.620 stop and consider this.

00:46:09.880 According to the logic

00:46:10.980 of the day, how can we

00:46:14.320 condemn the father and

00:46:16.380 daughter couple just 0.94

00:46:17.340 mentioned?

00:46:18.500 Does the prevailing

00:46:19.540 philosophy in our

00:46:20.620 culture provide us a

00:46:21.520 basis to reject the

00:46:23.520 legitimacy of their

00:46:24.620 viscerally repulsive and

00:46:25.860 disordered union?

00:46:27.300 Well, Richard Morris

00:46:27.960 doesn't think so.

00:46:30.240 More from the Post.

00:46:31.260 He says, fighting for

00:46:32.140 true marriage equality is

00:46:33.460 the right thing to do,

00:46:34.440 isn't it?

00:46:34.760 Morris said.

00:46:35.440 It seems to be as

00:46:36.520 unjust as the law that

00:46:38.600 used to imprison gay

00:46:39.500 people and the law that

00:46:40.620 used to stop people

00:46:41.660 of different races

00:46:42.280 marrying, he added.

00:46:43.900 Keith Pullman, who

00:46:44.720 runs the blog Full

00:46:45.780 Marriage Equality, also

00:46:48.380 cheered on the New York

00:46:49.060 lawsuit.

00:46:49.980 He said, quote, it is

00:46:51.180 absurd to say that an

00:46:52.120 adult can't consent to

00:46:53.400 marry their parent. 0.65

00:46:54.460 The same adult can be

00:46:55.400 sent to war, take on

00:46:56.480 six figures of debt,

00:46:58.100 operate heavy machinery,

00:46:59.500 be sentenced to death

00:47:00.360 by a federal court, and 0.98

00:47:01.160 consent to sex with

00:47:01.940 five strangers and

00:47:02.940 marriage with one of

00:47:03.580 them, but can't consent

00:47:04.660 to marry someone they

00:47:05.480 love, he told the Post.

00:47:07.000 In some of these cases,

00:47:07.840 the genetic parent didn't

00:47:08.840 raise them and

00:47:09.480 they met for the

00:47:10.020 first time two years

00:47:10.820 ago.

00:47:11.560 Allegations of grooming

00:47:12.460 are laughable attempts

00:47:13.400 to deny someone their

00:47:14.300 right, even though it

00:47:15.800 will have no impact on

00:47:16.840 the person objecting.

00:47:18.380 All right.

00:47:19.840 Now, this article was

00:47:20.840 not meant, it was not

00:47:22.060 met with wide acclaim.

00:47:23.980 Most people seem to be

00:47:24.860 reacting with disgust

00:47:26.400 and anger, not just at

00:47:27.580 the incest advocates, but

00:47:28.640 at the Post for giving

00:47:29.600 them a platform to make

00:47:30.600 their case.

00:47:32.300 But what actually is the

00:47:33.780 argument against this?

00:47:36.220 Why can't a father

00:47:37.440 marry his adult

00:47:38.120 daughter?

00:47:39.400 I mean, really think

00:47:39.920 about it.

00:47:40.680 It's not a rhetorical

00:47:41.460 question.

00:47:41.940 Ask yourself why these

00:47:43.340 cases of incestuous

00:47:44.120 relationships are wrong.

00:47:46.740 You might say that the

00:47:47.580 father can't marry his 0.98

00:47:48.420 daughter because even if

00:47:49.360 she's an adult, he's

00:47:51.280 clearly been grooming her.

00:47:53.160 Okay, well that might be a

00:47:54.260 good enough answer in some

00:47:55.420 cases, but the case in

00:47:56.460 question involves a father

00:47:57.420 who was separated from his

00:47:58.400 daughter and then

00:47:59.300 reunited when they were

00:48:00.300 both adults.

00:48:01.600 Assuming there was no

00:48:02.400 grooming and that they

00:48:03.840 linked up again and

00:48:05.040 immediately struck up a

00:48:06.000 sexual relationship with

00:48:06.780 each other, again with

00:48:08.160 full consent, why is that

00:48:10.000 wrong?

00:48:11.560 Why shouldn't we, you

00:48:13.460 know, why shouldn't they

00:48:14.480 be allowed to marry?

00:48:16.560 Why shouldn't we not only

00:48:17.580 allow them to marry, but 0.55

00:48:18.880 celebrate their union,

00:48:19.960 recognize it as holy,

00:48:21.100 valid, and good, and

00:48:21.920 beautiful?

00:48:23.760 Why shouldn't we?

00:48:25.960 This question presents a

00:48:27.560 real problem, I think, for

00:48:28.460 a lot of people in our

00:48:29.180 culture.

00:48:30.220 Most people don't want to

00:48:31.160 think of themselves as

00:48:32.000 incest advocates.

00:48:32.860 They're repulsed by the

00:48:34.340 idea, they want to

00:48:36.000 condemn it, but when they

00:48:37.520 think about it honestly,

00:48:38.260 they realize that they

00:48:39.040 don't have any logical

00:48:39.900 basis to condemn it.

00:48:41.400 They don't have the

00:48:42.160 language to explain why

00:48:43.440 they oppose it.

00:48:44.540 They know they do, but

00:48:45.380 they can't say why.

00:48:47.280 That is because, as I've

00:48:48.280 often observed, we have

00:48:49.260 reduced sexual morality

00:48:50.440 down to a matter of mere

00:48:51.620 consent.

00:48:52.760 Whereas consent used to

00:48:54.020 be but one requirement in

00:48:55.540 order for a sexual act to

00:48:56.540 be considered moral and

00:48:58.020 legitimate and good, now

00:48:59.660 it's the only requirement.

00:49:00.900 Thankfully for the

00:49:02.980 left, this one remaining

00:49:05.400 thread, consent, is

00:49:07.100 enough to rule out things

00:49:08.140 like bestiality.

00:49:09.620 You know, they can always

00:49:10.420 say that bestiality is

00:49:11.260 wrong because an animal

00:49:12.640 can't consent.

00:49:14.320 Though even there, it

00:49:15.440 should disturb you if the

00:49:16.640 only reason you can think

00:49:18.620 to reject sexual

00:49:19.760 relationships between men

00:49:21.200 and goats is that men

00:49:22.980 can't obtain consent from

00:49:24.400 goats.

00:49:25.680 I mean, that should be

00:49:26.320 really the least of your

00:49:27.580 worries when it comes to

00:49:28.480 man-on-goat sex. 0.94

00:49:29.500 You should have a whole 0.94

00:49:31.480 bunch of reasons why

00:49:32.500 you're against it before

00:49:33.380 you even get to consent.

00:49:35.740 But be that as it may,

00:49:36.500 consent does the trick

00:49:37.400 here, basically.

00:49:38.980 It's even enough to rule

00:49:40.040 out many cases of incest,

00:49:41.580 where one or both people

00:49:42.760 are minors or where,

00:49:44.240 again, one was groomed as

00:49:45.860 a minor.

00:49:47.460 But then you run into

00:49:48.340 cases like the one

00:49:49.080 described by the Post.

00:49:50.680 And there, consent is

00:49:52.000 not enough.

00:49:52.820 You're faced with a

00:49:53.520 choice.

00:49:54.460 Either come out and say

00:49:55.500 that actually there's

00:49:56.740 nothing wrong with an

00:49:57.520 adult father marrying his

00:49:58.720 adult daughter, and look

00:50:00.120 at yourself in the mirror

00:50:00.960 when you say it.

00:50:02.180 Face yourself as an 0.68

00:50:03.440 advocate for father-daughter

00:50:05.180 coupling, or admit that

00:50:09.060 there's more to sexual

00:50:10.120 morality than consent.

00:50:12.280 And there's more to

00:50:13.260 marriage than simply two

00:50:14.520 people loving each other.

00:50:16.580 Those are your only two

00:50:18.160 options.

00:50:20.160 Now, I would say that the

00:50:21.300 reason incest is wrong has,

00:50:22.800 in many instances, nothing

00:50:24.400 to do with consent.

00:50:25.380 It's also not a matter of

00:50:27.500 practicality or medical

00:50:28.920 complications.

00:50:30.160 The problem isn't simply

00:50:31.200 that incestuous couples may

00:50:32.380 have deformed children. 0.86

00:50:34.160 If you make that your whole

00:50:35.360 case, well then what about

00:50:36.320 incestuous couples that take

00:50:37.480 whatever steps necessary to

00:50:38.760 ensure that they don't

00:50:39.540 conceive kids?

00:50:41.380 No, the reason this is wrong

00:50:43.020 is because it's intrinsically

00:50:45.520 disordered.

00:50:46.860 It is a severe and grotesque

00:50:48.880 perversion and subversion of 1.00

00:50:51.060 the familial relationship.

00:50:52.740 It is outside of the proper

00:50:55.360 order of things.

00:50:57.680 That's not what families are

00:50:59.040 supposed to do with each

00:51:00.000 other.

00:51:01.740 The real significance of the

00:51:03.080 birth defect issue is that

00:51:04.320 even if the father-daughter

00:51:05.200 couple avoids having kids,

00:51:06.940 the fact that their

00:51:07.800 relationship carries with it

00:51:09.100 an inherent and significant

00:51:10.480 risk of creating birth

00:51:11.760 defects is but one sign

00:51:14.100 among many that the

00:51:14.880 relationship is not what

00:51:15.740 nature intends.

00:51:17.120 Or as I would put it, not

00:51:18.180 what God intends.

00:51:20.320 See, in order to condemn

00:51:21.280 this, you have to introduce

00:51:23.340 concepts like the natural

00:51:24.920 order and human dignity.

00:51:29.040 Incest is an attack on both 0.81

00:51:30.380 of those things.

00:51:30.960 Without those concepts,

00:51:31.900 though, you're defenseless.

00:51:33.360 You can't very well defend the

00:51:34.840 natural order and human

00:51:35.880 dignity if you don't

00:51:37.080 acknowledge their existence

00:51:38.200 and importance.

00:51:39.240 But if you do acknowledge

00:51:40.160 them, even if only to give

00:51:41.920 you ammo to take down the

00:51:43.060 pro-incest talking points,

00:51:45.180 well then you've introduced

00:51:46.000 concepts that have

00:51:47.000 reverberating effects and must

00:51:49.000 now reshape your whole view

00:51:50.340 of sexual morality, if

00:51:51.560 you're intellectually honest.

00:51:53.380 Now you have to re-evaluate

00:51:54.800 all sexual acts and

00:51:56.000 lifestyles and ask yourself

00:51:56.940 whether those are within

00:51:58.660 the natural order, whether

00:52:00.380 those are consistent with

00:52:01.500 human dignity.

00:52:03.640 That's what the kids would

00:52:04.820 call a red pill moment.

00:52:07.120 Most people refuse to take

00:52:08.280 it, refuse to think

00:52:09.020 seriously about these issues,

00:52:10.100 refuse to investigate their

00:52:11.160 own inconsistencies, refuse to

00:52:12.820 ask themselves whether their

00:52:14.260 position on one topic is

00:52:15.420 consistent with their

00:52:16.120 position on others.

00:52:16.840 Most people refuse that.

00:52:20.100 And so those people are

00:52:21.860 canceled.

00:52:23.080 The incest advocates are

00:52:24.340 canceled too, of course, but

00:52:25.300 only because I have the moral

00:52:26.460 framework to cancel them.

00:52:28.600 Many people on the left don't

00:52:29.820 have that moral framework and

00:52:30.960 for that reason, they too are

00:52:32.340 also canceled.

00:52:33.620 A lot of people canceled

00:52:34.580 today.

00:52:35.220 Always my favorite

00:52:35.900 cancellations when I can do

00:52:36.940 that.

00:52:37.940 And we'll leave it there for

00:52:38.620 today.

00:52:39.780 Talk to you tomorrow.

00:52:40.480 Have a great day.

00:52:41.360 Godspeed.

00:52:41.660 Well, if you enjoyed this

00:52:47.780 episode, don't forget to

00:52:48.700 subscribe.

00:52:49.080 And if you want to help

00:52:50.020 spread the word, please give

00:52:51.280 us a five-star review.

00:52:52.620 Also, tell your friends to

00:52:53.600 subscribe as well.

00:52:54.720 We're available on Apple

00:52:55.580 Podcasts, Spotify, wherever

00:52:57.140 you listen to podcasts.

00:52:58.280 We're there.

00:52:58.760 Also, be sure to check out the

00:52:59.880 other Daily Wire podcasts,

00:53:00.980 including The Ben Shapiro

00:53:01.700 Show, Michael Knowles Show,

00:53:03.340 The Andrew Klavan Show.

00:53:04.420 Thanks for listening.

00:53:05.440 The Matt Walsh Show is

00:53:06.200 produced by Sean Hampton,

00:53:07.800 executive producer Jeremy

00:53:08.920 Boring.

00:53:09.740 Our supervising producers are

00:53:10.900 Mathis Glover and Robert

00:53:11.880 Sterling.

00:53:12.720 Our technical director is

00:53:13.880 Austin Stevens.

00:53:15.160 Production manager Pavel

00:53:16.160 Vodosky.

00:53:17.080 The show is edited by Sasha

00:53:18.400 Tolmachov.

00:53:19.460 Our audio is mixed by Mike

00:53:20.660 Coromina.

00:53:21.600 Hair and makeup is done by

00:53:22.700 Nika Geneva. 0.56

00:53:23.780 And our production coordinator

00:53:24.820 is McKenna Waters.

00:53:26.200 The Matt Walsh Show is a

00:53:27.040 Daily Wire production.

00:53:28.100 Copyright Daily Wire 2021.

00:53:30.340 Today on The Ben Shapiro

00:53:31.360 Show, as the Chauvin jury

00:53:32.500 begins its deliberations, the

00:53:33.660 media ratchet up the racial

00:53:35.200 tension and Maxine Waters

00:53:36.680 pushes violence in the

00:53:37.600 streets as Democrats and the

00:53:38.940 media defend her.

00:53:39.840 That's today on The Ben

00:53:40.480 Shapiro Show.

00:53:40.900 Give it a listen.

The Matt Walsh Show - April 20, 2021

Ep. 704 - A False Narrative Falls Apart

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript