The Matt Walsh Show - May 18, 2021


Ep. 724 - There's A Bug In The House. Grab The Salt And Pepper.


Episode Stats

Length

52 minutes

Words per Minute

177.78712

Word Count

9,294

Sentence Count

622

Misogynist Sentences

28

Hate Speech Sentences

20


Summary

The left screams in horror as a case challenging Roe heads to the Supreme Court. They say that women s rights are under attack, but how can they even talk about women's rights given that, according to them, women don't really exist? Also, is Roe likely to be overturned? And what happens if it is? We ll tackle all that today, plus five headlines, including Fauci finally admitting that he s been masking for symbolic reasons, and the ties between Bill Gates and Jeffrey Epstein come into focus.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Today on the Matt Wall Show, the left screams in horror as a case challenging Roe heads to
00:00:04.640 the Supreme Court. They say that women's rights are under attack, but how can they even talk
00:00:08.060 about women's rights, given that, according to them, women don't really exist? Also,
00:00:11.660 is Roe likely to be overturned? And what happens if it is? We'll tackle all that today. Plus,
00:00:16.440 five headlines, including Fauci finally admitting that he's been masking for symbolic reasons,
00:00:20.980 basically. And the ties between Bill Gates and Jeffrey Epstein come into focus after months of
00:00:25.600 the media canonizing Gates and insisting that we trust and listen to him. Now they're talking
00:00:29.940 about Epstein and all these other things. In our daily cancellation, we will talk about
00:00:33.460 the recent push to convince us to eat bugs. Should we start eating crickets and cockroaches
00:00:38.720 instead of bacon and hamburgers? We'll consider that question today and much more on the Matt Wall
00:00:43.540 Show. In our age of hyperbole, every Supreme Court case is treated as something monumental and history
00:00:58.360 shaping. Occasionally, that's actually true, though. And that might be, this might be one of
00:01:02.760 those occasions. As CNN reported on Monday, quote, the Supreme Court on Monday agreed to take up a key
00:01:07.680 abortion case next term concerning a controversial Mississippi law that banned most abortions after
00:01:12.060 15 weeks, rekindling a potentially major challenge to Roe v. Wade at the majority conservative court,
00:01:18.900 supposedly majority conservative court. We'll get to that in a second. Anyway, CNN says Mississippi's 15-week
00:01:24.040 abortion ban, which then-Governor Phil Bryant, a Republican, signed into law in 2018, made exceptions
00:01:29.200 only for medical emergencies or cases in which there is a, quote, severe fetal abnormality, but not for
00:01:34.780 instances of rape or incest. A federal judge in Mississippi struck down the law in November 2018,
00:01:39.260 and the Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld that ruling in December 2019. After being rescheduled
00:01:44.420 for the court's consideration in conference over a dozen times, the case could present a direct
00:01:49.940 challenge to Roe v. Wade, the 1973 landmark Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion nationwide prior
00:01:55.600 to viability, which can occur at around 24 weeks of pregnancy. All right. Now, of course, viability in
00:02:01.580 this context refers to the unborn child's ability to survive outside the womb. That threshold can be
00:02:07.940 reached at 24 weeks, even earlier than 24 weeks in some cases. And it's being lowered with each passing
00:02:13.800 year as technology improves, because that's really what this is about. The viability, quote, unquote,
00:02:19.000 is about modern technology. It's not about the child. But really, the concept of viability is a
00:02:26.140 misnomer. In truth, no child is truly viable in the sense they can survive on their own until many
00:02:33.680 years after birth. For some people these days, they haven't even reached that point by their, I don't
00:02:38.540 know, 30th birthday. The point is that babies outside of the womb require constant attention and care
00:02:45.740 from their parents. Yeah, they can breathe and that sort of thing on their own. Can they survive on
00:02:51.600 their own? No. And that's that's not a that's that's you know, that's not a small point because
00:02:57.860 parents are obligated by law to provide the care to their children that their children need. And if
00:03:06.000 they don't provide that care, then they have to find someone else who will. If they fail to meet that
00:03:11.280 obligation or certainly if they simply just kill their child to save themselves the burden,
00:03:17.140 they'll go to prison. And that and that kicks in the moment the child is born. That child is born
00:03:25.200 and is, quote, unquote, viable, but still cannot do anything on his own, cannot survive on his own,
00:03:33.140 needs to be cared for every second of the day. And if those parents do not provide that care,
00:03:39.400 refuse to and don't find anyone else who will, they go to jail.
00:03:45.160 Now, there's no reason why we should force parents to care for their born children,
00:03:50.320 but not their pre-born children. It's the same person after all. And they're just as much the
00:03:57.560 parents at both stages. But this is just one of the many arbitrary distinctions that the pro-abortion
00:04:03.160 side has made and rested their legal, their legal case upon. As for that legal case, I must say
00:04:09.420 the pessimist or perhaps just the realist in me is quite skeptical that this court with its current
00:04:15.460 makeup will arrive at any, at any decision that overturns or severely curtails Roe. I pray they do,
00:04:21.560 obviously, but I'm not going to buy the champagne and the confetti ahead of time.
00:04:26.040 Um, that's a financial investment that I think probably won't pay off. The media claims that
00:04:32.420 there are, well, what they tell us is that there are six conservatives on the court. It's a six,
00:04:37.120 three super conservative majority court. In reality, there are only what two with a track record of
00:04:46.080 being a conservative Supreme court justice, perhaps one or two of the three that Trump appointed will
00:04:51.280 be added to that list eventually, but that remains to be seen. There certainly aren't six and almost
00:04:57.420 certainly are not five. Um, you know, I, I, I don't think that the so-called abortion, that so-called
00:05:04.180 abortion rights really hang in the balance for that reason, as much as I wish they did, but we'll see.
00:05:10.940 We should also stipulate, and this shouldn't need to be explained, but it has to be that overturning
00:05:16.940 Roe would not lead automatically to abortion being illegal in every state. Abortion should be
00:05:24.620 illegal in every state, but that's not what would happen as a direct consequence of, of Roe being
00:05:29.500 overturned. If it ever was, all that would happen is that each state would be empowered now to make
00:05:34.400 its own laws on the issue. This is a situation that even a pro-abortion person, if they were honest,
00:05:40.340 and I'm not sure that any such creature actually exists, an honest pro-abortion person, kind of a,
00:05:45.200 uh, you know, a contradiction, contradiction in terms, but even if, if, if such a person did exist,
00:05:51.660 they, they should prefer that because you can be in favor of legal abortion while still recognizing
00:05:57.420 that Roe was a bad decision. The justices managed to locate a right to abortion in the constitution,
00:06:05.760 even though no such right is ever mentioned or even hinted at in the constitution, and they found it
00:06:11.220 within the right to privacy, which is also not mentioned in the constitution. So if you're
00:06:17.720 keeping track at home, that is two degrees of removal from the constitution. The right to abortion
00:06:23.940 is a non-existent constitutional right grounded in another non-existent constitutional right.
00:06:30.180 The justices may have just claimed that they, uh, they may as well just claim that they discovered
00:06:33.680 a secret decoder ring and found the right to abortion written in code or written in invisible ink or
00:06:39.420 something. That would have been somehow more credible than what they actually claimed.
00:06:44.000 It was just a bad decision on legal grounds. Again, no matter how you feel about abortion,
00:06:48.760 it's a bad decision. And that's why Roe should be overturned. Whether or not it actually will be,
00:06:54.020 we'll see. Now, as far as why abortion itself should be illegal everywhere for everyone in all cases,
00:07:01.420 that's simply because unborn humans are human. And abortion is the intentional and direct
00:07:08.800 destruction of those humans. And it's always wrong to intentionally and directly destroy innocent
00:07:15.280 human life. Okay. That's, that's the argument. It's pretty simple. Unborn and every single step of
00:07:21.620 this, this is a self-evident, this is morally and logically self-evident, this argument, because
00:07:27.460 every single step of it is clearly true. Unborn humans are human. That cannot be denied. That's a
00:07:37.320 scientific fact. Abortion directly destroys those humans, kills them. Again, cannot be denied. That's
00:07:44.340 the whole point of the abortion. So if you're going to quibble with any part of this, then I guess what
00:07:49.240 you would have to quibble with is the assertion that it's necessarily wrong to intentionally and
00:07:55.560 directly destroy innocent human life. And if you're going to quibble with that, then that has
00:08:01.900 implications far beyond the womb. I mean, I'd have to ask if, you know, if it actually can be okay to
00:08:08.160 directly and intentionally destroy innocent human life, then what other innocent human life could
00:08:14.520 you destroy? But if you're of the opinion that it's wrong to intentionally and directly destroy
00:08:20.880 innocent human life, and almost everyone on earth would at least claim to believe that,
00:08:25.980 then there's no way to get around the fact that abortion is a moral atrocity.
00:08:30.520 Okay, so that's abortion. That's Roe v. Wade. There's another aspect of this discussion that
00:08:36.260 I think also has to be brought up. In response to the news about the court taking up this case,
00:08:40.840 we've heard all of the panic and outrage and seen all of the performative hand-wringing that you would
00:08:45.780 expect. We've been told this is an assault on women's rights and an evasion of women's
00:08:50.820 privacy and attack on women's bodily autonomy, et cetera, and so forth. The lieutenant governor
00:08:55.840 of Illinois tweeted the typical tripe that we always see. She said, say the word abortion.
00:09:01.040 I'm over these folks who want to legislate my uterus. We know what's best for our bodies and our
00:09:06.580 futures, and it's our choice. Abortion is healthcare. Like Illinois' Reproductive Health Act, we must fight
00:09:12.800 to protect the right to safe legal abortion. Yes, abortion is healthcare in the same way that a
00:09:19.840 meatpacking plant is a veterinary clinic. But that's not the point right now. The point is
00:09:25.960 that the language here, the language that the pro-aborts continue to use.
00:09:33.000 Like Joy Reid, for example, on MSNBC, she invoked in a segment last night, she invoked
00:09:37.360 The Handmaid's Tale, which makes me wonder, by the way, what the country might look like if leftists
00:09:43.320 would read some other book besides that and Harry Potter. But in any case, here's what she said
00:09:48.800 about that. Listen. Terrifying prospect, eerily reminiscent of The Handmaid's Tale,
00:09:53.660 where far-right-wing religious extremists took up arms against America to carve out their own
00:09:58.960 country out of ours, one where women and their bodies were under the complete control of almost
00:10:05.240 extravagantly corrupt and hypocritical men of God, quote-unquote. Now, what's so scary and frankly
00:10:12.180 traumatizing about that show and the book that inspired it is that it starts off in the very place
00:10:17.920 that we live in right now, where women have the right to choose what they do with their bodies
00:10:23.500 until they don't. And then in what seems like a blink of an eye, those rights were just gone.
00:10:29.980 So, what's the problem here? Well, aside from the general inanity and absurdity of these silly
00:10:37.140 feminists who think that they're being enslaved if they aren't allowed to dismember their children,
00:10:42.400 aside from that, the problem, as I feel I must continue to point out whenever given the opportunity,
00:10:46.500 is that they're no longer allowed to make arguments like this, allowed according to their own rules,
00:10:53.840 not mine. Women's rights, women's health, an attack on women, blah, blah, etc. As a feminist on the left,
00:11:02.080 you have lost all of those talking points. You forfeited them. You gave them up. You tossed
00:11:06.540 them out the window. That's what you did. I mean, women aren't the only ones who can get pregnant,
00:11:12.080 remember? This has nothing to do with women specifically. Uterus? Who says that only people
00:11:18.480 with uteruses can get pregnant? Are you suggesting that a trans woman without a uterus somehow
00:11:23.120 fundamentally lacks one of the essential qualities of womanhood? I mean, you need to sit here right
00:11:29.200 now and say that no trans woman can ever get pregnant? How dare you? You can't say that because
00:11:34.940 that would be to admit that there's an essential difference between a trans woman and a regular
00:11:41.780 woman. And that would be to admit that trans women, well, aren't really women at all because
00:11:46.840 there's an essential difference between them and, and, and quote unquote, other women. So you can't do
00:11:53.200 that. You can't admit that. See, your ideological commitments no longer permit you to talk about
00:12:00.120 women's rights at all. There are no women. Or if there are women, they're not in any way
00:12:05.800 fundamentally distinguishable from men. We're all stranded out here in the same ambiguous haze.
00:12:13.620 Now, does that mean that you can't still make a pro-abortion argument? No, you could still be
00:12:17.200 pro-abortion. At the end of the day, all pro-abortion arguments are bad and stupid. So what does it matter
00:12:22.620 which you use? But if you're going to, you are going to have to recalibrate your whole approach.
00:12:27.560 And I'm going to have to insist on that. For decades, your strategy, rather than intellectually
00:12:36.440 engaging with the issue and engaging with the arguments, like the one that I just laid out,
00:12:43.180 the pro-life argument, which is that unborn humans are human and that abortion intentionally
00:12:50.020 and directly destroys them and intentionally directly destroying innocent human life is always
00:12:53.660 wrong. Rather than engaging with that, your strategy has been to cast women as the victims
00:12:59.020 of pro-life efforts, to victimize yourself, identity politics, all of that. That doesn't work anymore.
00:13:09.820 You can't very well be a victim when you don't exist. And I'm afraid to say,
00:13:15.820 women don't exist. Not according to me, according to you. So you're going to have to go back to the
00:13:24.400 drawing board and figure this thing out. Because what you're doing right now, it's just not working
00:13:29.280 anymore. Hate to tell you. Now let's get to our five headlines.
00:13:39.960 Now I want to tell you about ex-chair. You know, when it comes to chairs, I am, I'm a chair snob,
00:13:44.420 I admit. I'm like a princess in the P or Goldilocks. I'm not sure which fairy tale I should be using here.
00:13:50.080 But the point is, I have very specific chair-related needs, especially because I spent so much of the
00:13:54.980 time sitting down, unfortunately. And that's why I'm so happy to finally have an ex-chair.
00:13:59.640 Ex-chair has you covered with all your office chair needs. The secret is not only their patented
00:14:03.800 dynamic variable lumbar support, which offers unbelievable lumbar support to your lower back,
00:14:09.140 but now, thanks to their new ex-HMT technology, you can also get heat and massage therapy while
00:14:14.980 you're sitting at your desk. You get all of that in this chair. It's a massager, it's an office chair,
00:14:19.480 it's everything all rolled into one. Instead of your old, uncomfortable office chair,
00:14:22.300 now you can look forward to spending hours sitting in the ultimate therapeutic massager.
00:14:26.800 The ex-HMT delivers heat and massage technology right to your core, helping increase blood flow,
00:14:31.420 muscle recovery, and energy. All the perks that make working from home or office a joy.
00:14:36.760 Ex-chair is on sale now for $100 off, so go to exchairwalsh.com, that's the letter X,
00:14:42.140 chairwalsh.com, or call 1-844-4X-CHAIR. Ex-chair has a 30-day guarantee of complete comfort,
00:14:48.480 and you can finance your purchase for as little as $30 a month. Go to exchairwalsh.com now,
00:14:52.840 use code XWHEELS for free XWHEEL bladecasters, exchairwalsh.com.
00:14:57.560 I endured a great trial recently. My son is very into superheroes now, which is great,
00:15:03.980 going through a big superhero phase. And I loved superheroes too when I was his age.
00:15:09.380 And, you know, I want to show interest in the things that he's interested in, so I sat down with
00:15:13.980 him on Sunday night to watch the event. We all watched it as a family, actually watched the
00:15:18.360 Avengers, the first one. And I've never seen any of the Avengers movies, and I know that I'm like 10
00:15:24.940 years late, I guess. But I never saw them because I didn't, before now, I didn't have kids that were
00:15:29.480 old enough to watch them. And I wasn't going to go and watch them myself because I'm a, what do you
00:15:34.980 call it, a grown man. So I wasn't expecting much. But man, are these movies terrible. So bad, really,
00:15:45.160 really bad. I thought they'd be bad, but they were even worse than I thought. I didn't say that to my
00:15:51.480 son. But between you and me, long, dull, repetitive, there are no stakes, right? Even
00:15:57.700 though the world is hanging in the balance, there's actually no stakes. Nothing is at stake
00:16:02.400 because everybody is indestructible until the moment when the script needs them to not be
00:16:07.000 indestructible. So like the Hulk, for example, he can pick up a tank and rip it in half and throw a
00:16:13.160 piece of it into orbit. But then he punches Captain America directly in the head, doesn't even cause a
00:16:18.020 concussion. And then at another point, Captain America like slips on a banana peel and is knocked
00:16:23.320 unconscious for three days. I'm paraphrasing the movie slightly, but the point is that their
00:16:27.080 indestructibility fluctuates wildly depending on what is needed for that particular scene.
00:16:33.100 And that just makes it boring. It's like watching a video game and it's long. It's so long too.
00:16:38.880 These long drawn out scenes of these one dimensional cardboard characters whining about their feelings.
00:16:44.220 Because speaking of the Hulk, you know, the movie is 18 hours long and the Hulk is actually the Hulk
00:16:48.880 for 12 seconds. And my son is sitting, all he wants to see is the Hulk break stuff. But instead he's
00:16:53.920 watching Mark Ruffalo take anger management classes. This is not, who is this supposed to appeal to?
00:17:02.440 You don't have the actors or the script to turn this into a character drama. So if it's going to be a
00:17:08.220 mindless orgy of punching and shooting, then just pick a lane and go with that.
00:17:11.960 Really bad. How do adults watch this? They're a grown adults who don't even have a kid. It's not
00:17:18.920 like this is a sacrifice to make it for their kids. They watch it on their own. What are you doing?
00:17:24.980 I will admit the one thing I liked in the movie was Scarlett Johansson's character
00:17:29.260 because she was so useless. It's hilarious. You've got these immortal gods and superhuman creatures.
00:17:36.380 And then they team up with a woman who's as far as I could tell, she just, she's a, she's a moderately
00:17:42.820 athletic woman. Why would you need her on the team? It's like if they're, if the top nine scorers in
00:17:48.280 the NBA were playing pickup basketball and the team with four needed a fifth guy. So they got me to come
00:17:54.300 and play. Like you'd definitely be better off with just four of you than having me on the court
00:17:59.140 because I'd be a liability. But then again, I guess there's the affirmative action and all that,
00:18:04.700 which even with superhero teams, they have to worry about. Um, so just terrible stuff. It's,
00:18:10.500 it's a shame that adults, this, these are, this should be just for kids and even for kids. It's not
00:18:15.500 that great. Okay. Where were we? All right. Number one, a reporter, uh, during the white house press
00:18:22.140 briefing, talking about the masking and everything, the reporter was concerned. And you know, maybe you
00:18:28.820 can, if you could put yourself into the mind of a race obsessed left-wing reporter, maybe you can
00:18:36.500 make sense of this because I really can't, but she's concerned that, that, uh, that telling people
00:18:41.580 they don't have to wear masks anymore might be racist. Let's, let's, let's hear her out.
00:18:47.480 The largest national nurses union is saying that the CDC guidelines on masks is putting frontline
00:18:54.780 workers and especially people of color at risk and that they're, they're calling for the CDC to
00:18:59.580 refer to that. What's the white house's stance on that union in particular saying that they're,
00:19:04.160 they're members and people of color at risk. Well, I would say we don't have any particular
00:19:07.840 response to directly to the union. Uh, I'm not going to show you the whole rambling response from,
00:19:14.300 uh, Jen Psaki there, but it, it puts particularly people of color at risk. Why? In reality, it doesn't
00:19:25.580 put anyone at risk, of course, but if it was going to put anyone at risk, why people of color? This is,
00:19:31.020 it's a rhetorical question on my part. I know the, the why it's, it's, it's instinct on the part of,
00:19:38.540 uh, the media and people on the left. It's just everything. If, if they have a problem with
00:19:44.960 anything, if there's anything they're opposed to, then, or anything they think is bad, they're going
00:19:52.180 to immediately assume that it's also racist. And they're not going to bother even in their own
00:19:57.640 minds to sort that out and figure out, well, why is this racist? They just assume that it is.
00:20:02.380 It's all instinctive. Now, for more masking news, the mayor of Chicago, uh, is, she was interviewed
00:20:11.580 and she said that she, she was on MSNBC and she said that she, she respects, of course, the CDC,
00:20:17.800 um, and, uh, the CDC's guidance, but she's going to reject it. Here's why.
00:20:24.360 You say you will follow the CDC's guidance. What does that mean? Should people in Chicago
00:20:30.380 wear masks or not? Well, I think we've got to get some clarification from the CDC.
00:20:36.880 Um, they roll out obviously as the reporting has been, was a bit abrupt. Um, and I think they've
00:20:42.540 got a lot of clarification that they need to do. Um, I know for me personally, I'm going to continue
00:20:47.860 to wear a mask in public and I'm going to encourage others to do so. Um, we've got to make sure, uh,
00:20:53.620 that people are continuing to follow the public health guidance that has gotten us this far
00:20:57.920 and mask, I think are a big and important part of that to say, well, if you're, if you're vaccinated,
00:21:03.340 you don't have to wear a mask. That's great. But what about all the other people that are out
00:21:07.200 there that aren't vaccinated? And there's no way to know that. So I think for the time being,
00:21:11.660 most people are going to continue to wear masks, um, outside and outside of their homes. And I think
00:21:17.660 that's smart. Well, and she's saying outside of your home. So outdoors, indoors,
00:21:23.620 you leave your home, wear the mask, uh, because of unvaccinated people. Yes, there are unvaccinated
00:21:32.580 people out there, but if you're vaccinated and the vaccines work, which you say they do,
00:21:37.920 then why are you worried about the unvaccinated people? What difference does that make? They're
00:21:44.080 not going to get you sick. You're not going to get them sick. Well, let me clarify. They might
00:21:48.200 still get you sick and you might get them sick. Just not of COVID is that there's a million other
00:21:52.600 things out there. Yeah. I've been saying that all along. Um, we, uh, we think that we conquer
00:22:01.440 COVID and now we're immortal, which is why I do kind of laugh when I'm, and I shouldn't laugh about
00:22:05.900 this at all, but I kind of imagine it would be sort of funny a little bit. If somebody, you know,
00:22:11.500 they go in to get the COVID vaccine and, uh, then CDC makes the announcement and says,
00:22:16.300 you can take the mask off. And yeah, we got past the pandemic. And so I was like,
00:22:19.320 I'm immortal now. I'm fine. And, uh, they just got the vaccine. They walk out
00:22:23.380 of Walgreens and then they immediately get hit by a bus and die. It's like, it's a little funny
00:22:30.100 to imagine a little bit because the threats are still out there. There's still a million threats
00:22:35.040 and something's still going to kill you. But as far as COVID goes, um, why should you worry about
00:22:41.460 the unvaccinated people from your own using your own logic? Now, speaking of people who are still
00:22:47.820 wearing the mask, we talked about this. I, I, I want to read this to you proving the point that I
00:22:51.940 opened the show with yesterday. And I wish I had read this because this was an article in the New
00:22:55.680 York times that was published a couple of days ago. I just didn't see it before I did that monologue
00:22:59.980 yesterday. I wish I had seen it perfectly proving the point. Let me read a little bit of this to you.
00:23:05.040 This is from the New York times. It says quote, whenever Joe Glickman heads out for groceries,
00:23:13.480 he places an N95 mask over his face and tugs a cloth mask on top of it. He then pulls on a pair
00:23:19.140 of goggles. So two masks and goggles. Every time he goes out to go grocery shopping, he has used this
00:23:25.640 safety protocol for the past 14 months. It did not change after he contracted the coronavirus in
00:23:29.980 November. It did not budge when earlier this month, he became fully vaccinated. And even though
00:23:34.180 President Joe Biden said on Thursday that fully vaccinated people do not have to wear a mask,
00:23:38.100 Glickman said he planned to stay the course. In fact, he said he plans to do his grocery run
00:23:42.780 double masked and goggled for at least the next five years. Even as a combination of evolving public
00:23:49.940 health recommendations and pandemic fatigue lead more Americans to toss the masks they have worn for
00:23:54.560 more than a year, Glickman is among those who say they plan to keep their faces covered in public
00:23:58.740 indefinitely. For people like Glickman, a combination of anxiety, murky information about
00:24:03.460 new virus variants and the emergence of a sizable faction of vaccine holdouts means mask-free life is
00:24:09.720 on hold, possibly forever. Glickman, a professional photographer and musician from New York said,
00:24:14.980 quote, I have no problem being one of the only people, but I don't think I'm going to be the only
00:24:19.300 one. And then it continues. But this guy double masked with goggles, fully vaccinated.
00:24:30.800 This is in any other time you saw, just imagine a year and a half ago, seeing a guy like that
00:24:44.020 with goggles and two masks on at the grocery store. And assuming you knew that he had no other major
00:24:51.340 health concerns. What would you think of that guy? You would think that he's insane. You would think
00:24:57.620 that this is someone suffering certainly clinical hypochondria, OCD. This is someone who should be in
00:25:04.360 a mental institution. This is someone who's a danger to himself and others, potentially.
00:25:08.920 This is a mentally unbalanced lunatic.
00:25:15.680 That would be everyone's assumption a year and a half ago. And you know what? It's correct now too.
00:25:24.500 But what I love most about this is that he says he got the virus back in November.
00:25:32.880 So he did all of that and he still got the virus. This guy was walking around in two masks and goggles.
00:25:38.920 For 14 months. And he still got it.
00:25:42.200 And yet it doesn't click. He doesn't make
00:25:43.940 the connection here. Hmm.
00:25:48.400 I still got it. Maybe this, everything I'm doing here isn't really working. It's unnecessary.
00:25:54.640 So he got it. And he was already immune from that.
00:25:57.140 And then he got the virus, the vaccine on top of it.
00:25:59.620 My Lord. It's hard to even, on one hand, you want to laugh at these people because they're absurd.
00:26:10.900 And they deserve to be laughed at. But on the other hand, it's incredibly disturbing.
00:26:15.620 One other thing here on the, on the masking. I just want to play this for you.
00:26:21.220 Dr. Fauci interviewed on TV yet again, his favorite thing to do.
00:26:26.660 He's, he's saying that he's not wearing the mask indoors anymore.
00:26:30.540 And he's asked why, you know, he was wearing it to begin with indoors after getting vaccinated.
00:26:34.880 And this is, this is the reason that he gives.
00:26:38.820 How has it changed what you do? How has it changed your mask wearing practices?
00:26:43.800 Well, you know, George, I'm obviously careful because, I mean, I'm a physician and a healthcare
00:26:49.260 provider. I am now much more comfortable in, in people seeing me indoors without a mask. I mean,
00:26:57.400 before the CDC made the recommendation change, I didn't want to look like I was giving mixed signals.
00:27:03.280 But being a fully vaccinated person, the chances of my getting infected in an indoor setting is
00:27:10.500 extremely low. And that's the reason why in indoor settings now, I feel comfortable about not wearing
00:27:17.200 the mask because I'm fully, man, I'm fully vaccinated. Okay. So he says there that he doesn't
00:27:22.400 need the mask. He's not wearing it now. Why did he wear it before? Because he didn't want to send
00:27:27.100 mixed signals, which is another way of saying that he was wearing it for show. He was wearing it for
00:27:32.520 symbolic reasons. He was wearing it as theater, theatrical. He admits that there. So now I want
00:27:37.920 to go back to the ancient past of two months ago when Rand Paul was questioning Fauci and said that
00:27:49.840 wearing masks when you're fully vaccinated is theater. And at the time, Dr. Fauci wasn't quite
00:27:55.000 ready to admit that. Let's watch that.
00:27:56.400 You're telling everybody to wear a mask, whether they've had an infection or a vaccine. What I'm
00:28:02.440 saying is they have immunity and everybody agrees to have immunity. What studies do you have that
00:28:07.340 people that have had the vaccine or have had the infection are spreading the infection? If we're
00:28:11.680 not spreading the infection, isn't it just theater? No, it's not a vaccine and you're wearing two mask.
00:28:17.220 Isn't that theater? No, that's not. Here we go again with the theater. Let's get down to the facts.
00:28:22.900 Okay. The studies that you quote from Crotty and Sete look at in vitro examination of memory
00:28:31.280 immunity, which in their paper, they specifically say this does not necessarily pertain to the actual
00:28:38.960 protection. It's in vitro. And what study can you point to that shows significant reinfection?
00:28:44.220 There are no studies that show. Just let me finish the response to your question, if you please.
00:28:50.700 The other thing is that when you talk about reinfection and you don't keep in the concept
00:28:56.920 of variance, that's an entirely different ballgame. So that was him two months ago. It's not a year
00:29:03.440 ago. It's two months ago. We're talking about March, 2020. That's March, 2021. And he say, oh,
00:29:08.040 here we go again with the theater. It's not that at all. And then fast forward two months and he say,
00:29:11.460 yeah, it was all theater. It's just a liar. All of these people lying like they breathe. I don't
00:29:20.700 even know if they can tell anymore when they're lying. Okay. Next, moving on here. You may recall
00:29:25.540 how Bill Gates was effectively canonized, certainly over the past year, but probably for much longer
00:29:32.020 than that. We were supposed to listen to Bill Gates about the coronavirus. It was never really
00:29:38.480 explained why we should listen to this guy. Is he an expert on this? What is it? What is his opinion
00:29:43.420 matter? I know he's got a lot of money. He's very rich, but does that make him an expert on,
00:29:49.120 does that make him an epidemiologist also? But we were supposed to listen to him, trust him implicitly,
00:29:55.840 but that all changed and rapidly. So after news that he and his wife were getting divorced,
00:30:01.640 and now there's just an avalanche of stories coming out about Bill Gates, including this one.
00:30:12.660 This is probably the most damning. This is from the New York Post. It says, Jeffrey Epstein,
00:30:17.380 Jeffrey Epstein reportedly gave advice to Bill Gates about ending his marriage with his now estranged
00:30:21.900 wife, Melinda, during meetings the two had at the pedophile's Manhattan townhouse. Epstein,
00:30:27.700 who killed himself in August 2019, allegedly, in a lower Manhattan jail cell, gave Gates some
00:30:33.920 pointers about what the Microsoft co-founder called his toxic marriage to Melinda. Epstein and Gates
00:30:39.600 met dozens of times, but from 2011 to 2014, the report said, with Gates treating the get-togethers
00:30:45.720 as an escape. A person who attended some of the meetings told the publication, most of the
00:30:50.100 gatherings occurred at Epstein's Upper East Side pad. A source told the outlet, quote,
00:30:55.160 it's not an overstatement. Going to Jeffrey's was a respite from his marriage. It was a way of
00:30:59.840 getting away from Melinda. During some of the meetings, Gates spoke to Epstein about possibly
00:31:04.340 getting involved with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. But a spokesperson for Bill Gates
00:31:08.480 denied the allegations in a statement to the Daily Beast, quote, Bill never received or solicited
00:31:12.180 personal advice of any kind from Epstein on marriage or anything else. Bill never complained
00:31:15.700 about Melinda or his marriage to Epstein, according to the spokesperson.
00:31:18.360 Okay, a few things here. Number one, of all people, why are you consulting Jeffrey Epstein for marriage
00:31:26.740 advice? He's a bachelor, a pedophile, sex trafficker, and you're a billionaire and you can consult anyone
00:31:40.880 in the world. And he's the guy you go to for marriage advice. That's interesting. Um, number two,
00:31:47.340 we know that, that all of this stuff, of course, we can assume is coming from Melinda's camp and she's
00:31:52.600 got, she's got a PR team that, um, like if you're, if you're a billionaire getting divorced, find, find
00:31:58.460 Melinda Gates's PR team because they're doing, they're doing some work here. But third, you know,
00:32:03.100 this just goes to show this is the media yet again, as I said, canonizing someone and then
00:32:10.180 changing course. It's not even as though changing course over the, over a period of years or
00:32:17.920 something, there's this gradual change in the way we're supposed to view this person. It's a sudden
00:32:22.800 shift. Here's, this is from the Daily Wire. Uh, it says former Brooklyn center police department
00:32:27.800 officer Kim Potter, who shouted taser moments before fatally shooting a 20 year old man who appeared
00:32:32.960 to be resisting arrest. According to the video of the altercation will stand trial for manslaughter
00:32:36.720 at the end of this year. Um, according to a Hennepin County judge, according to the Washington
00:32:41.740 Post, Hennepin County judge, Regina Chu said that Potter will be scheduled for trial in December in
00:32:46.100 connection with Dante Wright's death. Potter who served on the police force for 26 years before
00:32:50.440 resigning was charged with second degree manslaughter mere days after the fateful altercation with
00:32:55.420 Wright. So they're moving forward with this pretty quickly. Uh, she was the one you remember,
00:32:59.740 we don't need to play the clip again, but she was the one, well, starting with Dante Wright was the
00:33:04.620 one who allegedly, uh, committed an armed robbery of a woman choked her in the process. And, um,
00:33:12.480 there was a warrant out for his arrest and he was stopped for traffic violation. They saw the warrant,
00:33:18.920 tried to arrest him. He resisted arrest, climbed back into his car. And then Kim Potter shouted taser,
00:33:24.440 but didn't pull the taser, shot him and then said, Oh crap. Uh, admitting basically on camera that it
00:33:31.160 was a mistake. And then Dante Wright died. Now she's being charged with, uh, with manslaughter.
00:33:37.560 It, the interesting thing about this case is that it seems to me from a legal perspective,
00:33:44.320 ironically, if it wasn't, if she had done it on purpose and had said from the beginning that she
00:33:53.640 did it on purpose, I think she would have a more persuasive legal case. I think they'd still be
00:34:00.420 bringing her up on charges because that's just the way these things go now. Innocent or not is
00:34:04.160 they're going to, they're going to bring you up on charges. If you're a cop and you kill someone,
00:34:07.380 um, in the course of an arrest. But I think if she, if she had said for the, if it was intentional,
00:34:14.880 if she had said from the beginning, that was intentional, then she'd have a very good case
00:34:18.820 because he's someone wanted for armed robbery. So this is a, uh, alleged violent, a suspected
00:34:26.700 violent criminal. He's resisting arrest. He's climbing back into his car. He could be reaching
00:34:32.660 for, you don't know what he's going to do. He could be reaching for something. Also keep in mind,
00:34:35.880 his vehicle is a weapon. And this happens frequently that vehicles are used as weapons against police
00:34:42.320 officers during the course of an arrest. And not only that, but, um, even if he's not reaching
00:34:49.900 for a weapon, he gets back into the car, goes on a high speed chase. And now the community has put
00:34:54.800 a risk who knows what could happen from there. So I think she could have had a real case for
00:35:00.320 shooting him on purpose for all of those reasons. But she admitted it was an accident. So that goes out
00:35:08.340 the window. And then you think about, okay, well, it was an accident. Uh, does that mean she should
00:35:12.580 be charged with manslaughter? And I would say even there, no, I don't think she should be brought up
00:35:17.060 on charges. It was a mistake. And, um, you know, you could think of it similar to medical mistakes.
00:35:27.140 Thousands of medical mistakes happen every year and people are, people die because of them.
00:35:32.440 And you don't normally hear about surgeons and doctors going to jail because of it,
00:35:36.820 even though somebody died. And it's a terrible thing. A life was lost, but we also understand
00:35:44.340 that these are life or death things. And we, we, we, we have doctors involved in these situations.
00:35:51.500 And if we tell them that, Hey, listen, if anything goes wrong here, you're going to go to prison.
00:35:58.620 Well, then you're, you're, you're probably not gonna end up with a lot of doctors at the end of the day.
00:36:01.720 So I would, I would put it in that category. I think it was a mistake like that. It was clearly
00:36:08.840 a mistake. Um, but why did it happen? Yeah, it was a mistake on her end, but it happened because
00:36:17.780 Dante Wright took it in that. He resisted arrest is again, suspected violent criminal resisting
00:36:24.620 arrest, climbing back into his car. You're taking your life into your hands when you do that.
00:36:31.720 So he is the one who took this situation from a peaceful, non-lethal situation. They were in the
00:36:38.080 process of arresting him and they would have just put him in the car and taken him to jail.
00:36:43.140 And he could, he can fight the charges in court like you're supposed to.
00:36:47.940 His life was not in jeopardy at all until he made the decision that he made.
00:36:53.620 So he is the one who created this situation. He is the one who put Kim Potter in the position
00:37:00.200 where she could make a mistake like that. So if you want to put cops in a position where they could
00:37:06.600 make a fatal mistake, then don't do that. I mean, don't be a violent criminal to begin with is probably
00:37:12.280 the best, best course of action. But then if you are, and they come to arrest you as, as they're
00:37:17.920 supposed to, um, don't resist arrest and start reaching around for things in a fair and just
00:37:25.840 society. I think that's what we would do. You take Kim Potter, you take her off the force,
00:37:29.700 obviously. Do you need to put her in prison? Is she, is she a threat to, to the public? Is anyone
00:37:35.300 worried that she's a danger to the public? You take her off the force. It's not, she's not a danger
00:37:42.720 to the public. I don't see how justice is served by, by sending her to prison. What's achieved by,
00:37:49.700 you know, you put her in prison for 10 years. Okay. What does that achieve?
00:37:54.880 We can assume that she's already distraught by this, that her life is already ruined.
00:38:02.380 Like you, there's probably nothing you could do to make her feel worse about it.
00:38:05.120 And where does the fault lie ultimately, or rather, where does the fault begin? It begins with Dante
00:38:13.780 Wright. Um, all that to say, you know, that's how it should be, but how is it actually going to be?
00:38:22.300 How it actually is going to be is that she's probably going to go to jail for 10 years,
00:38:24.560 if not longer. All right, moving on to, uh, reading the YouTube comments. This is from Andrea.
00:38:30.000 She says, when Matt yells at us to hit the like button, we get a small taste of his kids' lives.
00:38:35.200 Pray for them. Well, you're right, Andrea. I do yell at my kids to like my YouTube videos. Um,
00:38:41.780 that is they're, they're, they, they know that anytime I post a YouTube video, they better go
00:38:45.560 on their accounts and like it immediately. Anytime I see them, Hey kids, did you like my YouTube video?
00:38:51.260 Did you see my new content? You didn't like it yet? No dinner until you like my YouTube videos.
00:38:57.420 That's the way things are run in my house. Uh, another comment says, if you don't want to wear
00:39:04.760 a mask, simply stop wearing one. You'd be surprised how few people will say anything to you,
00:39:09.280 but if they do tell them you have medical reasons not to wear one by law, they're not permitted to
00:39:14.000 question you about your medical status. Um, well, it's, it's been the case all along that people need
00:39:20.800 to take charge of their own lives. Uh, I would say this, especially not just about you, but also your
00:39:25.460 kids, people that are still sending their kids out there wearing masks, claiming that they're
00:39:31.000 following local ordinances or the rules at different establishments. Um, at a certain point, you have to
00:39:36.900 just do the right thing, whether you have permission to or not. Uh, Kimberly says, so now my dating profile
00:39:44.540 will not only say must not love dogs. It will say must not wear masks. Kimberly, you have your head on
00:39:50.960 your shoulders and your priorities straight. Well done. Um, Matthew says, I look forward to a day when my
00:39:58.360 children will not be judged by a mask on their face, but by the content of their character. Well, to be
00:40:03.920 clear, I don't judge children for their mask at all. I judge their parents. And, uh, James says, Hey Matt, I
00:40:11.300 just realized that Bigfoot and the aliens are like the tooth fairy and Santa Claus for adults. How dare you,
00:40:17.360 sir? You are banned from the show. You could say that about that kind of slander is allowed for
00:40:22.280 Bigfoot because I'm pretty sure he doesn't exist, but aliens, and you might want to be really careful
00:40:27.700 what you say, considering they're here and they're listening. Uh, and finally on Bigfoot,
00:40:36.380 neon white says every year over 15 million people buy hunting licenses and go out into the woods with
00:40:41.380 guns to kill things. If Bigfoot was real, there's a 100% chance that someone would have shot one by now.
00:40:46.880 Uh, yeah, not a 100% chance, but I put it at like, there's like an 80% chance at least.
00:40:51.260 So that's one of the reasons among many why I, I, I, unfortunately I can't believe in Bigfoot,
00:40:56.320 but I'm still open to being convinced if anyone wants to try, you know, I don't know about you,
00:41:01.920 but, uh, my idea of a good time is not spending hours at an auto parts store. Sometimes I'm not sure
00:41:09.340 what my idea of a good time actually is, but it's definitely not at an auto parts store. And that's
00:41:13.640 why I'm so happy to have rockauto.com. It's so much easier than walking into a store and someone
00:41:17.580 demanding quick answers, uh, that you might not know the answer to. And, uh, then they usually
00:41:22.840 just have to order the part online anyway, because even if you can answer their questions,
00:41:25.920 they're not going to have what you need. They order the part, cut out the middleman,
00:41:28.700 go to rockauto.com yourself. You've got your phone in your pocket. Just pull it out. Go to
00:41:32.640 rockauto.com. They always offer the lowest prices possible. They're not going to change prices.
00:41:36.760 Um, and, uh, and also it's a really easy site to navigate. You can quickly find what you're
00:41:42.380 looking for and you're going to see all the parts available for your vehicle and choose the brands
00:41:46.560 and specifications and the parts you prefer. And listen, they're a family business. They've been,
00:41:50.380 uh, serving customers online for 20 years. So if you need auto parts, go to rockauto.com right now,
00:41:57.340 see all the parts available for your car or truck. And as always, we tell you, remember to
00:42:00.960 write Walsh in there. How did you hear about us box? So they know that we sent you.
00:42:04.500 And not everyone has the privilege of, uh, getting to know the one and only Candace Owens
00:42:10.500 live and in person, but that might be about to change for you. If you sign up as a Daily Wire
00:42:16.660 member with code VIP, you'll also get 20% off your new membership and be automatically entered for a
00:42:21.700 chance to win a trip to the Daily Wire studios to see Candace live. Not only will we be meeting Candace,
00:42:26.360 you'll be getting an inside look at her studio, our office and front row seats to watch her live
00:42:30.500 and in action on her talk show, Candace. Uh, and also we should mention, if you come here,
00:42:35.460 you're going to be in the general vicinity of one Matt Walsh as well. You're not going to meet me,
00:42:41.340 but I'll be around. You may walk the ground that I walked upon. That's a, that's a perk. You got to
00:42:48.680 admit. So don't wait, go to enter, uh, to win a Candace VIP pass now at dailywire.com slash Walsh,
00:42:54.420 uh, slash subscribe. That is it's dailywire.com slash subscribe. This is all about me. All of a
00:42:59.160 sudden using code VIP for 20% off and for an experience that only Joe Biden could forget.
00:43:05.800 Rim shot. Now let's get to our daily cancellation.
00:43:11.540 One of the most boring news events that we have to endure every 17 years is the emergence of the
00:43:17.080 cicadas. When they crawl out of their underground layer to wreak havoc across the land, all at the
00:43:21.600 behest of the evil wizard Sauron. I may be confusing them with orcs from Lord of the Rings come to think
00:43:26.360 of it, but in any case, the whole thing always ends up being a dud. The cicadas are hyped up for years
00:43:31.160 and then they come out and they fly around for a little bit and they die. The only thing that makes
00:43:35.120 this year's cicada batch a little bit more interesting is that this time there are a bunch
00:43:39.440 of freaks out there in the media trying to convince us to eat them. This headline on wired.com is
00:43:44.980 typical. It says the cicadas are coming. Let's eat them. Why not embrace brood X as the free range
00:43:51.200 sustainable source of protein that it truly is? Popular sciences headline says the brood X cicadas
00:43:57.500 are coming and we should, and you should eat them. Here's how. And the New York post says eating
00:44:02.760 trendy brood X cicadas, what the bug recipes taste like. Now I'm not sure how the cicadas themselves
00:44:09.420 are trendy. I've never really thought of bugs in that way, but if you're wondering what these recipes
00:44:16.280 are, well, WJZ in Baltimore had a report a few days ago featuring a Johns Hopkins doctor giving some
00:44:22.080 tips on how to prepare your cicada snack. So, uh, so here's that. All right, cicadas, look, soon going to be
00:44:29.040 buzzing around everywhere in our area. It's going to be fun. This was inevitable. One expert at Johns Hopkins
00:44:34.500 says they make cicadas, that is, for a very tasty and eco-friendly meal. Stetson Miller has this for us.
00:44:42.360 Cicadas will soon be crawling all over Maryland. Trillions of them in our backyards and trees.
00:44:50.100 And believe it or not, that means a lot of opportunities to try out a new snack,
00:44:54.280 according to one Johns Hopkins professor. They're a lot like shrimp. They're like tree shrimp.
00:44:59.460 Sustainable food expert Jessica Fonzo is planning to collect and eat cicadas herself and wants you to
00:45:05.520 know that they're a great source of protein and also great for the environment. We're in the middle of
00:45:10.160 climate change. Insects, there are a great alternative source to other animal source foods,
00:45:17.340 which, for example, cows, which are producing a lot of greenhouse gas emissions.
00:45:22.060 If you're brave enough to try one, she says you should pick out the nymphs while they're still
00:45:25.740 white. The ones that have just come out of the ground and only eat the females. You can then
00:45:30.360 freeze them in a bag. And then when you're ready to eat, boil them first for two minutes and then cook
00:45:35.040 them to your liking. You can roast them in the oven, put some salt and pepper on there, some
00:45:40.520 some old bay seasoning on them. There's even a free cookbook online dedicated to cicada dishes called
00:45:49.480 cicadalicious. Professor Fonzo is urging people to give them a try as an alternative green source of
00:45:55.460 food. It only comes around once every 17 years. Now, first of all, I have to say claiming that they
00:46:03.960 taste like shrimp is not a selling point to me. Shrimp are hideous, foul tasting, tiny little
00:46:09.560 mutant beasts themselves. They live in the they live in the dark depths of the ocean, 10,000 feet
00:46:14.360 underwater. So they're tiny and gross and ugly. And God put them in the ocean deep down, basically a
00:46:20.280 bright neon sign from heaven saying, don't eat this crap. And yet we didn't catch the hint. We still
00:46:25.020 scoop them up, shovel them into our fat faces. So cicadas are like shrimp, not helping your case,
00:46:29.520 if true. But it's not true. Bugs don't taste like shrimp. They taste like bugs. I've eaten some bugs.
00:46:36.880 I've had crickets. You can go to my Instagram right now and see the video. Do you know what the crickets
00:46:41.380 tasted like? They tasted exactly like you think a cricket would taste. There is no surprise. The moment
00:46:49.900 you eat a bug, your immediate reaction is, yep, that's a bug. And your second reaction is, oh, Lord, all of its
00:46:57.200 limbs are now stuck in my teeth. It's not a pleasant experience. But it's one that our cultural overlords
00:47:03.300 want us to have more often. The push to eat bugs has been going on for a while now. It's got big
00:47:08.900 money behind it. Speaking of Bill Gates, the Bill Gates Foundation has been promoting bug harvesting
00:47:12.900 for a long time, though I sincerely doubt that Gates himself has ever sat down to a bowl of
00:47:17.300 beetle soup. The Guardian had a lengthy article a few days ago titled, if we want to save the planet,
00:47:23.120 the future of food is insects. Fried crickets on the school menu, milk made from fly larva,
00:47:29.220 and mealworm bolognese for dinner. These are the environmentally friendly meals we can look
00:47:33.780 forward to. Bon appétit. Milk made from fly larva. Well, that's only slightly more grotesque than
00:47:41.180 almond milk, at least. But this is what the elites want for us. The UN, too, has come out to promote
00:47:46.480 bug eating. Overall, the future they imagine for us is one where we're living in our pod home the size of
00:47:52.060 a shipping container, eating cockroaches for breakfast, and wearing medical masks whenever
00:47:56.000 we leave the house. They want us all to live like we're the last survivors in a post-apocalyptic
00:48:03.900 hellscape, basically. That's the ideal vision of the future in their minds. And I find their vision
00:48:09.660 repugnant, especially when it comes to the meal plan. First of all, it's not necessary to eat bugs
00:48:15.400 in order to save the planet. You're not going to change the weather by eating bugs. I shouldn't have
00:48:20.820 to say that. The claim being advanced by these people, and this is no straw man, it's actually
00:48:25.540 what they believe. The claim is that if you eat crickets for lunch enough times, there will be
00:48:31.080 fewer hurricanes. It's the weirdest form of magical thinking. Because as the logic goes, cows fart and
00:48:39.400 burp a lot, and that's helping to cause weather-related catastrophes, and it's also melting the ice caps.
00:48:44.360 So we have to look for a less flatulent food source. But not only is this ridiculous, not to mention a
00:48:51.560 form of body shaming towards the poor cows, but it also ignores the tastier solution, which is eat
00:48:58.500 more cows and eat them faster so they have less time to fart. Second, we're told that bugs are a
00:49:05.720 sustainable resource. We don't have to worry about running out. They say that now anyway. We all know
00:49:13.120 that once everyone starts eating bugs, it's only a matter of time before they tell us that our bug
00:49:17.260 chomping ways are causing a bug shortage. And now we have to start getting our nutrients by eating
00:49:22.220 dirt popsicles and drinking smoothies made from pond scum in our own urine or something.
00:49:26.740 But also more to the point, even if bugs are sustainable, so is our current diet. We aren't
00:49:32.840 running out of food. There are people in this country and certainly across the world who need food,
00:49:37.760 but that's a matter of distribution, not supply. It's similar to the idea that the world
00:49:43.000 is overpopulated and we're running out of space. But that's not the case at all. We have plenty
00:49:48.120 of space. In fact, the entire population of the world could fit inside the state of Texas
00:49:52.100 if we wanted to. The problem is in how the space we have is utilized. We tend to crowd ourselves like
00:49:58.420 sardines into cities while leaving huge swaths of land empty. So we're doing a pretty bad job of using
00:50:04.720 the space available. That's the point, just as we may be doing a subpar job in some cases of using
00:50:09.800 resources. But that's not the same thing as running out. Third, most importantly, as already
00:50:15.860 covered, eating bugs is disgusting. It is beneath us as civilized people. We are too high on the food
00:50:23.700 chain to reduce ourselves to that barbarity. The push to make us eat bugs is anti-human and it's
00:50:30.320 degrading. There's a reason why we are viscerally repulsed by the thought of eating bugs or even just
00:50:37.180 the sight of bugs. They're dirty. They're disease infested. They're gross. They are pests, not
00:50:44.720 cuisine. You call an exterminator when you have bugs in your house. You don't look up recipes.
00:50:49.960 When your kid comes to you and tells you there's a spider in his room, you tell him to bring you a
00:50:54.000 shoe, not the garlic powder. In summary, bugs are meant to be stomped on and destroyed,
00:51:00.780 not put into your mouth, you sick freaks. And so eating bugs is canceled today. And we'll leave it
00:51:12.400 there. Thanks for listening. Thanks for watching. Have a great day. Godspeed.
00:51:16.660 We'll see you next time.
00:51:46.660 Robert Sterling. Our technical director is Austin Stevens. Production manager, Pavel Vodosky. The
00:51:52.240 show is edited by Sasha Tolmachov. Our audio is mixed by Mike Coromina. Hair makeup is done by
00:51:57.700 Nika Geneva. And our production coordinator is McKenna Waters. The Matt Wall Show is a Daily Wire
00:52:02.400 production. Copyright Daily Wire 2021. Brazil transforms Christ the Redeemer into a massive
00:52:08.340 Dr. Fauci. Eric Clapton complains of a brutal reaction to the COVID vaccine. And France bans woke
00:52:14.800 language. Check it out on The Michael Knowles Show.