Ep. 725 - Another Celebrity Comes Out As Two People
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
175.82051
Summary
Another pop star comes out as non-binary and demands that we use they, them pronouns. Also, a 10-year-old boy speaks out eloquently against the masking insanity, and airline passengers are being weighed before boarding.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Today on the Matt Walsh Show, another pop star comes out as non-binary and demands that we use
00:00:04.980
they, them pronouns. Lots of people, even conservatives, seem perfectly willing to go
00:00:08.720
along with the preferred pronoun thing these days, but I'll explain why we shouldn't and why the issue
00:00:13.320
does in fact matter. Also, five headlines including BLM finds its newest martyr, a 10-year-old boy
00:00:19.180
speaks out eloquently against the masking insanity, and airlines will start weighing passengers before
00:00:25.000
boarding. That'll be interesting. In our daily cancellation, I have the distinct honor and
00:00:28.200
privilege of canceling Chris Cuomo again, and I'll explain why all of that and more today on the Matt
00:00:33.560
Walsh Show. Lately, the pop singer Demi Lovato has been on quite the journey for publicity. Sorry,
00:00:48.000
I mean self-discovery. After coming out as queer, her word, and then pansexual, she's now decided that
00:00:54.660
she's actually, no, she's not that, she's non-binary, and she'll be using they, them pronouns
00:00:59.500
from this point forward, or at least until a trendier option presents itself. The mainstream
00:01:03.800
media has been all over this breaking news, and the headlines have been as weird and headache-inducing
00:01:08.260
as you might expect. In an article, CBS News article, confusingly titled, Demi Lovato announces they are
00:01:15.440
non-binary and changing their pronouns, they reported the following. This is a reading from the article now.
00:01:20.400
It says, see if you can follow along. It says, singer Demi Lovato has announced that they are
00:01:26.220
non-binary and are changing their pronouns to they, them. They said that the revelation followed a,
00:01:31.360
quote, a lot of healing and self-reflective work. In a Twitter video early Wednesday morning
00:01:36.060
introducing their new podcast, the pop singer says they don't identify as male or female. On their
00:01:41.440
podcast, Lovato said that, quote, it would mean the world if people used their correct pronouns,
00:01:46.780
but they will be accepting if people accidentally use she, her pronouns, and they just want them to
00:01:54.020
be making the effort. I can't even follow it, and I'm reading it. Now, look, if you went into a coma
00:02:00.160
sometime in the year 2015 or so and had just now woken up, the preceding paragraph would be rather
00:02:05.120
bewildering. You would be forgiven for assuming that Demi Lovato is the name for some sort of group or
00:02:11.320
collective. If you heard someone say, I saw Demi Lovato in concert and they were really good, you would
00:02:18.940
immediately conclude that Demi Lovato is an entire band, not one single person. This conclusion would be
00:02:24.600
justified as it would be based on the rules of the English language. Little would you know that Demi
00:02:29.640
Lovato is a single individual, and also, by the way, that she's not that good in concert. For the record,
00:02:34.760
here is Lovato herself, or themselves, explaining why she slash they has slash have made this change.
00:02:52.680
Living in the fourth dimension means existing consciously in both time and space, but for me,
00:02:57.860
it means having conversations that transcend the typical discourse. I want to take this moment to
00:03:03.080
share something very personal with you. Over the past year and a half, I've been doing some healing
00:03:07.620
and self-reflective work, and through this work, I've had the revelation that I identify as non-binary.
00:03:13.640
With that said, I'll officially be changing my pronouns to they-them. I feel that this best
00:03:18.620
represents the fluidity I feel in my gender expression and allows me to feel most authentic
00:03:22.980
and true to the person I both know I am and still am discovering. In this first episode, I'm excited to
00:03:29.380
share with you what this means to me and what it may look like for other people. I want to make it
00:03:34.280
clear that I'm still learning and coming into myself, and I don't claim to be an expert or a
00:03:40.540
Now, it's helpful that she began her explanation the way that she did so that it would be painfully
00:03:45.480
clear that the whole thing is nothing but ridiculous psychobabble. Living in the fourth
00:03:49.700
dimension means existing consciously in both time and space. What is that supposed to mean?
00:03:54.080
What other option do we have but to exist consciously in both time and space? Can I exist
00:03:59.660
consciously in space but not time? Can I exist in neither space nor time? Can I be a spaceless,
00:04:06.140
timeless, shapeless vapor floating aimlessly through an eternal abyss? I suppose it's only a matter of time
00:04:12.700
before Demi Lovato assumes that identity for herself or for themselves. As I've often argued,
00:04:19.300
the proliferation of these ambiguous alternative identities is really, when it comes down to it,
00:04:24.240
a proliferation of narcissism. Lovato can't explain what identifying as non-binary means.
00:04:31.000
She can't tell us how she arrived at this conclusion about herself. None of this can be made coherent
00:04:36.080
because it doesn't really mean anything. What she's trying to say, actually, is that she is more
00:04:42.200
complex and interesting than the average person. She's not sure who she is exactly, but she's sure
00:04:49.180
that whoever she is, she must not be what everyone else is. Her identity transcends all labels except
00:04:56.860
the 15 different labels she's given herself over the last six months. But look, that's all her concern.
00:05:03.360
She's free to play whatever word game she wants to play. She's free to make whatever claims about
00:05:08.240
herself that she wants to make. The problem is that we are not simply asked to leave people alone
00:05:15.740
and let them live how they want and identify how they want. That used to be the request or what
00:05:22.100
seemed like a request at the time to some people. Just let people live how they want. Let them be,
00:05:28.420
right? It's not the case anymore. It's now demanded that we participate, that we take active roles in
00:05:36.920
affirming and supporting the self-identity of strangers. I'm fine with leaving people alone.
00:05:43.080
If I heard through the grapevine that my neighbor, three doors down, identifies as a cantaloupe,
00:05:48.440
I'm not going to go knock on his door and scream at him to leave his cantaloupe fantasies behind.
00:05:53.220
You're not a cantaloupe, damn it! I wouldn't do that. But if I'm told that I must in any way affirm
00:05:59.980
or reinforce the cantaloupe delusion, then I will have to respectfully decline. He can think whatever he
00:06:07.700
wants, but he can't force me to think it or to pretend that I think it. I'm not intruding on his
00:06:14.380
life when I protest or resist such an imposition. I am stopping him from intruding on mine. He might
00:06:22.180
live in a world where men can be cantaloupes, but I don't. I live in the real world and I'd like to
00:06:28.940
remain here. That's my lifestyle choice and I will insist that it be respected. And so it goes with
00:06:36.320
pronouns. A pronoun is a grammatical construct. It's part of language. It's not a pet that you
00:06:45.200
can own. It's not your pet goldfish. It's not a fashion accessory that you can wear. You don't
00:06:51.340
get your own pronouns just as you don't get your own prepositions or your own adverbs. I suppose a
00:06:58.900
man might have a special affinity for the preposition on, but that doesn't change what
00:07:04.360
the word on means. If he is not sitting on a chair, but says that he identifies as sitting on
00:07:10.920
it because his preferred preposition is on, that wouldn't change his actual physical relationship
00:07:16.680
to the chair in real life. And by demanding that we all pretend that the word on means off and off
00:07:22.780
means on, he is the one trying to impose himself on us or off of us as the case may be. For the sake
00:07:30.840
of preserving language as a tool for conveying meaning, which is the whole reason why language exists
00:07:37.220
in the first place, we would have to resist those efforts. In the English language, the word he
00:07:44.860
is a pronoun that refers to males. She refers to females. That's how it works in English.
00:07:53.140
They refers either to multiple people or to an unknown person. It would be perfectly valid to say,
00:07:59.880
for example, look, someone left their wallet here. I hope they come back for it.
00:08:05.140
Or I hope they don't come back for it if you're a less honest person. But it would not be valid to say,
00:08:10.780
look, my friend George left their wallet here. I hope they come back for it.
00:08:15.320
That doesn't make any sense because I know who George is. I know that he's male.
00:08:21.360
I know that he's only one person, not Siamese twins. The word they in that context would be
00:08:27.160
deceptive and confusing, and it would fail to convey meaning, which again is the entire point of
00:08:33.900
language. In fact, they in that context, let's say that my friend George is non-binary, whatever
00:08:40.380
exactly that means. And I use the word they. What am I actually saying? What meaning am I conveying?
00:08:48.560
Because he's a male and he's only one person. So they in that context is referring to his perception
00:08:55.980
of himself. It's referring to his feelings about himself. But that is not what pronouns are supposed
00:09:05.260
to do. Pronouns are not concerned with your self-perception or how you feel. We have language.
00:09:14.660
We have words that can talk about that. But when we are using pronouns, it is a reference to who an
00:09:23.400
individual actually is. Not how they see themselves. Not how they feel. That's irrelevant to the pronoun.
00:09:30.940
Now, it's true that language evolves over time, but the preferred pronoun phenomenon is not an example
00:09:40.180
of linguistic evolution. Let's be very clear about this. The people pushing this change are indeed
00:09:46.840
pushing it. They're not just observing that it's already happened. It is a top-down change. It's not
00:09:54.040
inorganic development. The cultural powers that be have decided that certain words should no longer
00:10:00.820
mean what they have always meant, though they can't be bothered to tell us what those words
00:10:04.180
should mean now instead. They are, by force and coercion, attempting to remove the meaning from words
00:10:10.140
without replacing the words with new meaning. Language develops naturally over time in order to
00:10:17.020
better convey meaning. In our case, language is being manipulated intentionally in order to make it
00:10:22.600
less meaningful. That is a very, very different thing.
00:10:30.060
Why does all this matter? I would hope it'd be obvious by now. Language matters. We cannot have a human
00:10:37.960
society without it. Truth matters. We cannot have a society worth living in without it. We are witnessing
00:10:46.740
an attack on both language and truth, and thus on society. And that matters.
00:10:54.340
And it only requires a little backbone to oppose it. Now let's get to our five headlines.
00:11:06.640
You know, we talk a lot about cancel culture on this show and over at The Daily Wire in general.
00:11:10.700
We know that the primary agents of cancel culture, the people that have the power to really cancel
00:11:17.260
you, that would be big tech, of course. And how do we stop big tech from doing that to us? Well,
00:11:23.780
that's what you need ExpressVPN for. Instead of letting big tech cancel your right to free speech,
00:11:27.940
how about canceling their access to your private data? That's why I use ExpressVPN, and you should,
00:11:32.600
too. Have you ever wondered how huge tech sites make their money when they're actually
00:11:36.380
supposedly free to use? Well, they do it by tracking your searches, your video history,
00:11:40.940
everything you click on, and then selling your valuable data to third parties. When you use
00:11:44.960
ExpressVPN, your device's IP address gets masked. And this helps, and that's one form of masking that I
00:11:50.240
support, by the way. This helps make your online activity anonymous, and that'll make it much more
00:11:55.360
difficult to trace and sell to advertisers. ExpressVPN also encrypts 100% of your network data
00:12:00.260
to protect you from cyber criminals and hackers. So you've just got to try. You've got to use ExpressVPN
00:12:06.020
and protect yourself, protect your data. It's time to say no to censorship and take back your
00:12:10.280
online privacy at expressvpn.com slash Walsh. Visit my link, and you'll get an extra three months of
00:12:15.300
ExpressVPN service for free. That's expressvpn.com slash Walsh to protect your data today.
00:12:22.260
I want to play this first. This is not a headline, really, but I got to play it anyway. The giant toad,
00:12:29.060
Bill de Blasio. Every other day, he's got a press conference embarrassing himself. And I didn't give
00:12:35.740
him credit, embarrassing himself in new and unexpected and interesting ways. So here's the,
00:12:41.280
if you're not, if you're only listening, you're going to have to go later, watch the video on
00:12:44.100
YouTube or on dailywire.com because you got, you got to, you got to see the visual to get the full
00:12:47.600
effect. But let's, let's play. Here's Bill de Blasio yesterday at his daily press briefing.
00:12:52.100
But the biggest victory for the Nets is yet to come. The Nets are stepping up for Brooklyn,
00:13:01.360
for the whole city of New York. The Nets are now going to be joining the battle against COVID
00:13:06.900
with a mobile vaccination site right outside Barclays Center.
00:13:11.400
He's, uh, so he's wearing, the problem there is not so much what he's saying. It's, it's what he's
00:13:17.580
wearing. He's wearing a ball cap and a Jersey. And, uh, he looks like, like Benjamin Button there
00:13:23.960
or something. He looks like a school guidance counselor at a pep rally. Now, you know what
00:13:29.260
he looks like? He looks like a, what am I looking for? He looks like a massive tool is what he looks
00:13:34.020
like. I can just imagine this guy in that outfit trying to fit in and coming up to you like,
00:13:40.600
Hey bro, did you catch the sports competition yesterday evening? Man, our home team really,
00:13:45.720
really scored some points. It was wild. I've never seen a team make so many touchdowns in one evening
00:13:52.280
in one inning. Incredible. That's, and this guy was, every time I see him, like what if you're,
00:14:00.760
and I know to, to try to get into the, to the mindset of a voter in New York city, it's, it's a
00:14:06.200
fruitless task and rather disturbing to disturbing journey into that mind. But, but what about him
00:14:13.160
when he's running for mayor? What about him made you say, Oh, I gotta, I need that guy in charge of
00:14:20.760
this city that I'm living in. I really want to, I want someone who lives in New York city to explain
00:14:26.480
that to me. If you live in New York city and you voted for Bill de Blasio, I, and I, and I mean this
00:14:32.140
sincerely, I'm not trying to attack you, even though you're an idiot. I, I really want to know
00:14:39.780
why, what, what about him did you like? Maybe, maybe it's me. Maybe I'm not seeing it.
00:14:50.240
All right. Let's move on to our first real headline here. The latest BLM martyr is Andrew
00:14:56.620
Brown. He was a man in North Carolina who was shot and killed by the cops a month or so ago
00:15:02.560
while they were trying to arrest him. He was a drug dealer. He had, as always with these things,
00:15:09.420
he had a long rap sheet arrested dozens of times already. He was convicted of resisting arrest also
00:15:14.020
on like four other occasions, charged with resisting arrest on 10 other occasions. He was
00:15:20.740
shot. The media says while unarmed. And that's been the report. That's what we've been hearing from
00:15:28.060
the media for weeks now that there's another unarmed black man that was shot by the cops,
00:15:33.720
but that's not actually true. The local prosecutor held a press conference yesterday and announced
00:15:37.360
that the cops in the case will not face charges. And that has a lot to do with the fact that Brown
00:15:42.120
was not really unarmed. He was in a vehicle and he was using it as a weapon.
00:15:48.680
So that might technically count in the way that they figure out these statistics. That might
00:15:54.960
technically count as quote unquote unarmed, but in reality, he's not unarmed. He's got a weapon.
00:16:02.200
Which is this large metal contraption that he is sitting in and steering in the direction of
00:16:08.620
officers. Now I would play the body cam footage for you and I would like to play it, but, and it was
00:16:14.180
released yesterday as well during that press conference with the prosecutor. But if I do that,
00:16:19.120
I've learned that YouTube will use it as an excuse to lock the show down and put the, the, uh, put the
00:16:24.340
age lock on it or whatever. So I'm not going to do that. You can go and watch it online easily if
00:16:29.320
you want, but you can clearly see the guy in the body cam footage when the cops show up, whole bunch
00:16:36.320
of them. There's a whole bunch of them and they had their guns drawn because this is a known drug
00:16:40.520
dealer with a long rap sheet. And so they came in, you know, ready. Then he also someone who's,
00:16:45.620
who has resisted arrest many times in the past. So they're prepared for that. Um, they come in,
00:16:50.840
they're screaming at him to surrender. Instead, he gets into his car and drives it right at a group of
00:16:56.380
officers. That's when they opened fire and he was killed in the process. Now, Andrew Brown's family
00:17:01.420
though, is of course, asking the feds to get involved, which I would not be surprised at all
00:17:06.680
if they do. Uh, this is from CNN. It says the attorneys for the family of Andrew Brown Jr.
00:17:11.720
are asking the department of justice to intervene after a North Carolina district attorney.
00:17:15.660
So the deputies would not be charged in connection to his fatal shooting.
00:17:19.560
Uh, the attorney said in a statement on Tuesday, we certainly got neither transparency nor justice today.
00:17:23.960
We request that the federal department of justice intervene immediately.
00:17:28.100
District attorney, Andrew Womble announced Tuesday, the deputies who, who fatally shot Brown last
00:17:33.180
month were justified in using deadly force, a finding that the attorney described as an insult
00:17:37.740
and a slap in the face. Womble also played four body camera, uh, videos to the public for the first
00:17:43.420
time on Tuesday. Brown's family and community have called for a public full public release of the
00:17:48.540
videos since his death on April 21st. And now they've gotten it. It's been released.
00:17:53.960
Um, the three deputies who fired at Brown, a 42 year old black man while attempting to serve
00:17:58.100
warrants will also be reinstated and retrained. Uh, Wooten said, uh, however, he said disciplinary
00:18:05.520
action would be taken against the deputies who responded to the scene quote, while the district
00:18:10.000
attorney concluded that no criminal law was violated, this was a terrible and tragic outcome
00:18:14.100
and we could do better. That doesn't really make a lot of sense to me. If you're saying that
00:18:19.120
no law was violated, they didn't do anything wrong, then I understand he's trying to thread
00:18:24.140
the needle here and make a compromise and give a little bit to both, to both sides. There's
00:18:28.640
no point in doing that because either you arrest all of the officers and charge them with murder
00:18:35.160
and then convict them or anything short of that is not going to be satisfying to BLM.
00:18:43.760
So if you're not going to do that, then you might as well, there's no point in, um, throwing
00:18:50.200
them any kind of bone at all because it's not going to make a difference. And in this case,
00:18:54.460
it's, it's pretty clear. He gets into his car, you drive at a group of officers and he gets
00:19:00.860
shot. That's something that you do, you know, and this is something that I, that I've brought
00:19:06.500
up before, but, uh, it, it isn't discussed very often, but it's worth thinking about and
00:19:13.820
talking about. If we could just for a second, get away from analyzing the behavior of the
00:19:21.160
police officers, there's more than enough of that. We've done, we've done a lot of that
00:19:26.900
of talking about how the police officers respond, but what about getting inside the head of somebody
00:19:32.860
like Andrew Brown? Why would you do that? You're, you are a criminal. They're coming
00:19:41.320
to arrest you. You're committing crimes. Fair is fair. Okay. Um, and you've got, there
00:19:48.020
are, I don't know, five, six, seven, I'm not sure how many police officers there, but, but
00:19:51.960
a whole group of police officers heavily armed and they're rolling up in their vans. They're
00:19:57.440
out there. They got their guns drawn and you get in your car and you try to drive away.
00:20:02.880
What, what do you think is going to happen? What's the best case scenario in your mind?
00:20:08.920
How do you think this is going to play out? You, you must know if you are at all a sane
00:20:15.680
individual, you must know that the moment you make that decision, your chances of dying
00:20:20.640
have just increased 100 fold. If you had stopped right there and got down on the ground, put
00:20:28.260
your hands up and did everything they said, your chances of dying are basically non-existent
00:20:32.080
if you follow all their instructions. Um, you start to resist and then the chances go up.
00:20:40.820
You do something like get into the car and drive towards a group of them, even if you didn't
00:20:44.300
mean to hit them, which of course, as far as they're concerned, like they're not going to
00:20:48.860
know your intentions, you're driving a car towards them. They have every right to assume
00:20:52.740
that you're trying to hit them and you're a deadly threat and they're going to treat
00:20:55.120
you that way. But even if you didn't mean to, even if that wasn't your intention, you
00:21:02.340
must know that your chances of getting shot and killed have gone up dramatically. And if
00:21:07.500
you're not shot and killed, well, what then? So you get into a high speed chase, uh, the police
00:21:12.740
show up, the helicopter comes, you're not going to escape the helicopter. You're not going
00:21:15.700
to get away unless you're a secret CIA agent or something. You've got the whole plan ready
00:21:23.960
to go. You've got your go bag. You've got your, your passports, new identity. And even
00:21:29.600
then, I'm not sure you're getting away, but this is an action movie and you're an action
00:21:34.100
hero and you've got the whole plan in place. Maybe you do, but short of that, you're not
00:21:38.640
going to get away. All you're doing now is at best increasing your coming prison sentence.
00:21:45.840
Significantly. And yet that's the choice that Andrew Brown made. It's the same choice that
00:21:52.120
Dante Wright made. Most of the BLM martyrs, it's the choice that they made. So I think
00:21:58.680
our question should be, why don't they value their own lives? This is not about police officers
00:22:08.120
understanding that black lives matter. Police officers know that everyone knows that, but
00:22:15.980
Andrew Brown didn't seem to think that his own life mattered. So maybe we should be talking
00:22:21.480
about that. Dante Wright didn't seem to value his own life. He was willing to throw it away
00:22:29.160
for nothing. To throw it away in exchange for nothing, gaining nothing from it.
00:22:39.780
Maybe we should be talking, but we can't talk about that because all we can do is talk about
00:22:42.460
the police officers. All right. Number two, this is from Fox News. It says a 10 year old boy,
00:22:47.480
a Florida boy slammed his local school board during a public meeting last week, calling the district's
00:22:51.840
mask mandate unfair to kids during an emergency session on reopening guidelines.
00:22:55.580
The boy later identified as John begins by describing himself as a student at Felix A.
00:23:01.080
Williams Elementary School in Martin County. And we'll play the, some of his remarks in just a
00:23:05.440
second, but not to get, not the spoiler alert here, not to spoil the ending, but following his
00:23:10.140
remarks, the board voted four to one to keep masks mandatory for the remaining days of the current
00:23:16.080
school year. In spite of what he had to say, the kids pleading with them, can we take the masks off?
00:23:20.700
There's no reason for us to have the masks on to begin with. They elected to keep the masks on anyway,
00:23:25.100
but I thought, uh, this kid, I mean, he's 10 years old and, uh, this is pretty eloquent for anyone of
00:23:34.140
any age, let alone a 10 year old. Let's, uh, let's listen.
00:23:37.320
I expected school to be a little bit different in the beginning, but I didn't think it would stay
00:23:43.620
this way all year long. And I was surprised by the rules. A lot of them didn't make any sense to me.
00:23:50.780
Like the fact that we were not allowed to play on the playground or have student council or turn
00:23:56.300
to face each other at lunch. And we also have to wear masks outside at PE and on track.
00:24:03.980
I love my school and all, but my teachers seem really stressed and that makes me feel bad.
00:24:08.780
One teacher walks around with a clipboard full of referrals for any student whose mask isn't on
00:24:13.020
properly. It makes me feel scared. That same teacher yells at us having our mask down to drink
00:24:18.780
water while we are outside in car line. She told us we had to wait until we were in our parents' car
00:24:24.060
to have a drink of water. She had her mask down the entire time while she was yelling at us,
00:24:29.500
which makes me and all my friends very mad. My mask also sticks to my face when it's really hot and it
00:24:35.420
makes it hard to breathe. I feel like I can't catch my breath and that makes me feel claustrophobic and
00:24:40.540
anxious. It's really stressful. I finished taking all of my alpha says and I had a hard time focusing
00:24:47.820
with a mask on. A few weeks ago, I ran into my teacher outside of school. She didn't even recognize
00:24:55.900
That last part there is just sad. It's also sad that this is a 10-year-old boy making a far more
00:25:06.140
compelling argument against wearing masks than any adult on the other side of the issue has made
00:25:11.660
in favor of children wearing the masks. Because they've never made any argument at all, really.
00:25:16.780
It's their own fear and disregard for the kids. That's all it is. There's never really any argument
00:25:24.740
presented. And that was longer than that. He went on for two and a half, three minutes.
00:25:31.620
Again, 10-year-old boy laying out the case. This is why we should be wearing the masks.
00:25:36.340
Trying to explain it to adults four or five times his age. Makes no difference. They keep the masks in
00:25:42.660
place anyway. I was reading some of the responses online to this. And of course, there were people
00:25:48.900
saying, oh, he didn't write that. This is parents. This is mom wrote it and is using him
00:25:55.700
as a prop. I think that's really ironic because I guarantee you
00:26:00.980
most of the people making that claim about that kid that he's being used. He didn't really write
00:26:07.220
it. This isn't his choice. Most of those people are the exact same people who, if that 10-year-old boy
00:26:12.100
was identifying as a girl, they'd be applauding it. If that 10-year-old boy was dressed up as a drag queen,
00:26:17.100
they'd be applauding it. Now, in that case, it's not about the parents making a decision or the
00:26:21.500
parents using the child. But here, they have it exactly backwards, of course. Because normally,
00:26:28.300
I don't like it when kids are used to make statements. Political statements.
00:26:38.120
Statements of any kind, really. I think kids should just be kids. This is different
00:26:42.000
for a really obvious reason. He is the one directly affected. Okay, this is not so often
00:26:50.800
what you get. You get this especially from the left. The parents have their own political and
00:26:55.120
ideological priorities that have nothing to do with the kids. And they use the kid as a mouthpiece
00:26:59.420
or a mascot for their own priorities. It's not helping the kid at all. In this case, though,
00:27:07.000
the kids are the ones affected. They are very much caught up in this.
00:27:14.540
And we haven't really heard from the kids at all. They don't have a voice.
00:27:18.660
It's been all the adults arguing about it. And then finally, a kid gets up there and speaks for
00:27:23.520
himself. And you have a bunch of adults say, shut up, kid. Let the adults talk about
00:27:30.380
whether you should be muzzled for the rest of the school year for no reason.
00:27:37.640
I'm sure his mother, I'm sure his parents probably did help him come up with that. Good for them.
00:27:42.760
You know what they're doing? They're teaching their son
00:27:45.580
to stand up for himself, to speak up for himself.
00:27:52.820
ability for a person to have, for a child to develop.
00:27:57.340
So well, well done to, uh, to the child and the parents, but not so much the members of the
00:28:04.800
school board. And you can't believe that they, they, they, I mean, of course you can believe it, but
00:28:10.140
they said too bad. They had no response to the kid, but too bad. Wear the mask anyway.
00:28:17.800
All right. Moving now reading from raw story, which is a leftist rag online rag. Um,
00:28:24.120
it says Jacob Chansley dubbed the QAnon shaman in the media is among the most famous of the capital
00:28:30.100
rioters who was facing federal criminal charges in connection with the January 6th insurrection.
00:28:34.120
Albert Watkins, Chan Chansley's attorney discussed his clients with talking points memo, talking point
00:28:40.560
memos, Matt Shuham, which talking point points memo is another leftist rag. Um, anyway,
00:28:47.580
so talking points memo has this quote from Matt Shuham or rather Matt Shuham is talking points memo.
00:28:56.400
Albert Watkins is the attorney. Okay. I'm all kinds of confused. Um, has a quote from the lawyer.
00:29:03.940
Again, this is QAnon shaman's lawyer supposed to be representing him in this federal case.
00:29:12.400
And this is what his lawyer says about him. This is the quote as much of it as, as I can read anyway.
00:29:20.960
He says a lot of these defendants, and I'm going to use the colloquial term, perhaps disrespectfully,
00:29:26.060
but they're all effing short bus people. These are people with brain damage. They're effing retarded.
00:29:32.960
They're on the damn spectrum, but there are brothers, our sisters, our neighbors, our coworkers.
00:29:37.500
They're part of our country. These aren't bad people. They don't have a prior criminal history.
00:29:42.920
They were subjected to four plus years of damn propaganda, the likes of which the world has
00:29:48.120
not seen since effing Hitler. Okay. That is the lawyer for Jacob Chansley, the quote unquote QAnon
00:29:57.540
shaman. His lawyer is saying that about him, that he's quote effing retarded and is a short bus person.
00:30:03.780
Um, leaving aside the demeaning and degrading language, uh, to, to people with learning
00:30:12.040
disabilities and so on this, if you want to understand why a lot of these people that were
00:30:18.600
involved in the Capitol riot, uh, why some of them are still languishing in prison, getting hunted down,
00:30:24.840
having these being charged with, uh, crimes that could carry 20 years in prison, clearly way beyond
00:30:32.980
what is, what is justified according to the law. And, uh, it, this, this helps clarify it a little
00:30:39.260
bit because this is, you know, this is the kind of caliber of lawyer they're able to get to represent
00:30:45.120
them. They have the entire system against them so much so that even their lawyer is against them.
00:30:54.840
It does make me wonder, um, speaking of, uh, of these people, where, where is, where is Trump on
00:31:02.340
this? Why isn't he speaking on their behalf? These are his supporters that are being hunted down like
00:31:09.760
dogs and thrown in cages. The federal government wants to, wants to pin decades on them in prison
00:31:17.660
for trespassing. And doing that while BLM rioters, people who burned down police stations,
00:31:28.040
burned down convenience stores, assaulted police officers. Most of them have never even been
00:31:34.320
arrested. They're just out there. Some of them are still out in the street.
00:31:37.100
You have, you know, Antifa anarchists waging an assault on a federal courthouse for months.
00:31:49.200
Many of them never even arrested for it. Not once arrested.
00:31:56.520
While in this case, the entire force of the federal government is coming down.
00:32:00.140
There's no question. This is politically motivated. No doubt about as a political witch hunt. There's
00:32:06.200
no doubt. And it's outrageous. It's unjust. Um, especially when you compare it to the,
00:32:15.580
to the non-response, uh, to the BLM rioters. And so I, I am wondering what, why Trump isn't speaking
00:32:23.860
up on their behalf a little bit more. Has he said anything? And if he said anything, it hasn't been
00:32:31.980
much. All right. This is from, okay. This is from the daily. I'm, I'm almost, I'm regretting them
00:32:41.060
about to read this because it's such an upsetting and horrible story, but I'll read it anyway. It's
00:32:44.600
from the daily wire. It says an 18 year old, uh, an 18 year old snatched a sleeping four-year-old boy
00:32:48.660
from his Dallas home early Saturday morning and brutally beat him to death, leaving his lifeless
00:32:53.460
bloodied body in a street court documents and video surveillance reportedly show the child
00:32:58.720
identified Monday as cash. Gurnan was living with his biological father's former girlfriend.
00:33:03.920
Cash and his twin brother were left in the woman's care after their father disappeared in March.
00:33:07.940
The boy's biological mother says she doesn't did not know her twins were in the care of her former,
00:33:12.400
of the former girlfriend and had been searching for her boys. She is now with cash's twin.
00:33:17.940
Darren Brown, 18 has been arrested and charged with kidnapping and burglary.
00:33:21.500
More charges are expected as forensic is reviewed. The alleged killer's bond is set at 1.5 million.
00:33:28.000
Um, the daily mail reported that Brown was wearing an ankle monitor when he was detained.
00:33:33.900
So he's wearing an ankle monitor. He breaks into the house, kidnaps this kid
00:33:37.540
and brutalizes him and kills him and leaves him bloody on the ground, dead. This is a four-year-old.
00:33:46.500
Um, I'm searching for things I can say about this that won't get me in a lot of trouble.
00:33:55.080
All I will say, and we'll leave it at this, that this is why we need the death penalty for cases like
00:33:59.980
this. Public, a public execution, I think would be really appropriate in a case like this,
00:34:05.600
but certainly at least an execution of some kind.
00:34:12.040
This is, in cases like this, this is what put me over the edge to being pro-death penalty
00:34:18.640
But there are some crimes that are beyond imagining. You, you, you can't even, you can't wrap your head
00:34:28.000
around them. They're so horrific that when a person does it, there, there is no other response
00:34:35.480
from a civilized society, but to rid society of that person permanently.
00:34:40.420
What would be the, anyone who's against capital punishment, what,
00:34:45.680
what would be the better approach? So we take Darren Brown, he's 18. You put him in prison and
00:34:55.560
you're going to need to put him in protective custody for his entire life. Of course, the other
00:35:00.260
option is to put him in general population and to tell the prison guards to just get a little
00:35:04.000
distracted for a few moments and look the other way and let the prison population do what it's going
00:35:09.020
to do. I'd be fine with that too, but assuming you're not going to do that. So you're going to
00:35:12.480
put him in, um, in protective custody, which is more expensive for the taxpayer for the rest of
00:35:19.120
his life. He's 18. He's going to, let's say he lives until he's, you know, he could live another
00:35:22.720
easily another 60 years or more, six decades of taxpayers, not only feeding and housing this guy,
00:35:31.660
but paying extra to protect him. And for what, for what purpose? What, what are we
00:35:38.960
going to gain from that? What does he gain from that? This isn't about rehabilitating him to send
00:35:46.120
him out back out in society. He's never going to be out in society ever again. So it's not that.
00:35:53.980
Is it about redemption? Is it about him, uh, you know, coming to confront the, his, his own heinous
00:36:00.240
crimes that, that, that can happen with a death penalty too. In fact, I think the death penalty
00:36:05.500
facilitates that when you know, when there's a date set and you know that you're going to die on this
00:36:11.200
day, it certainly gives you a chance, um, to confront your own sins. So I just don't see,
00:36:23.900
I don't see the point. I don't see the argument for keeping someone like that alive
00:36:26.300
for six decades in prison, just for them to die naturally. Anyway, I don't see it.
00:36:33.320
All right. Finally, this is from the New York post. Um, in a measure that will likely irk flyers,
00:36:39.500
airlines could soon require plus size passengers to step on the scale or provide their weight
00:36:44.060
before boarding the aircraft. The initiative, which was outlined in a recent federal aviation
00:36:48.920
administration advisory strikes to provide, strives to provide new data on average passenger
00:36:53.940
weights as the current numbers reportedly don't reflect today's sky high obesity rates.
00:36:59.420
And in turn, this would help ensure aircrafts, especially the small ones don't exceed their
00:37:03.260
allowable weight limit. So this is a little disturbing because what we're being told is that,
00:37:08.940
um, there's the standard weight limit for airplanes, but that was all calculated before Americans got
00:37:16.520
really fat. And so now it has to be recalibrated and we need to figure out just how fat everyone is
00:37:20.560
before they get on a flight. And so that's why people need to get, need to get weighed. All I ask,
00:37:25.160
this is the only thing I'm asking is that the weights be announced on the intercom.
00:37:29.540
We could do like a public weigh in before the flight, uh, or else maybe each passenger as they
00:37:34.880
board their weight could be announced almost like a boxer coming, coming to the ring. All right,
00:37:40.380
boarding now it's Mrs. Shelby Johnson weighing in at 195 pounds, something like that. I don't know.
00:37:46.560
And then the good thing is if you, when everyone gets on the, on the flight, if you realize that
00:37:50.660
you're a little bit overweight, then the captain could come over the intercom and say, okay,
00:37:54.740
ladies and gentlemen, we're, we're currently 267 pounds overweight. Fortunately, that means we
00:37:59.700
only need to lose one passenger, passenger in a 12 a you're going to have to leave. You know,
00:38:04.520
it makes it easier. All I'm saying is that the fly experience is already degrading and dehumanizing.
00:38:10.200
So we might as well go all in and it'd be a great incentive to lose weight also. Um, all right,
00:38:17.980
let's move now to reading the YouTube comments. This is from Robert McGregor says three of my
00:38:21.940
favorite thing things shrimp to eat the Matt wall show and Marvel's Avengers dude, you're tearing me
00:38:27.260
apart. Well, Robert, you have to, you have to choose. You can't have us all. I'm drawing a line
00:38:33.580
right here. It's me or the shrimp and the Avengers choose wisely. Autumn says my orthodontist office
00:38:42.540
is still making me wear a mask. Even though I'm fully vaccinated, they told me that they have to
00:38:48.220
wait until the board of dentistry says that they can change policy. Your orthodontist is telling you
00:38:54.000
to wear a mask. Do you have to wear the mask when they're doing, when they're working on your teeth?
00:38:58.700
I wonder how that works or no, because we know that's not it. You have to wear a mask in the waiting
00:39:02.980
room. And when you're walking into, um, you know, the room with the chair, but then you take the mask
00:39:09.540
off and they have, they have their, their hands in your mouth. Makes a lot of sense. Um, Justin
00:39:17.560
Pirro says at least some good has come of all this mayor Lightfoot is going to keep that mug covered for
00:39:23.280
us. And I can't thank her enough for it. Well, listen, that's very rude, but I also say, you know,
00:39:28.960
maybe that is one advantage of the, uh, people who are perpetually masking. Maybe we can assume
00:39:34.120
that they're all ugly and they're trying to hide their shame. So really, if you see someone still
00:39:38.840
masking at this point, cause I believe in empathy and everything, um, and I'm very compassionate
00:39:43.500
persons. I think you could, you know, assume that they're wearing it because they're ugly and just
00:39:48.020
walk up to them and say, listen, um, it's okay to be hideous. You don't have to be ashamed.
00:39:53.000
Take that mask off. I think they'd really appreciate that. Finally, Bill Zussner says,
00:40:00.500
I wonder if Matt knows that being a contrarian doesn't make him better.
00:40:05.160
Well, Bill, I, I totally disagree. I'm going to take a second to tell you about Helix sleep. Uh,
00:40:10.740
you know, I've been telling you about Helix for, for months now, uh, or, or well over a year now.
00:40:16.260
And, uh, we're such big fans of Helix sleep in my house that we now have two Helix mattresses.
00:40:21.160
We've got one, my wife and I have a Helix mattress. My daughter has a Helix mattress.
00:40:25.600
The boys don't have Helix mattresses yet. They'll be fine. Helix sleep has a quiz that takes just
00:40:30.380
two minutes to complete and matches your body type and sleep preferences to the perfect mattress for
00:40:34.220
you. I've been through this process a couple of times now, and, uh, it's very, very easy to find
00:40:38.140
the perfect mattress. If you like a mattress, that's really soft or firm. If you sleep on your side or
00:40:42.220
your back or your stomach, or you sleep really hot, whatever it is with Helix, there's a specific
00:40:45.920
mattress for each and everybody's unique tastes. You don't need to take their word for it. Helix was awarded
00:40:49.880
the number one best overall mattress of 2019 and 2020 by GQ and wired magazine. And also I have
00:40:55.180
awarded them the number one mattress. So I think that's the most important thing. Just go to
00:40:58.420
helix sleep.com slash Walsh, take their two minute sleep quiz, and they'll match you to a customized
00:41:02.480
mattress that will give you the best sleep of your life. You got to do this and actually sleep well
00:41:06.520
at night for a change right now. Helix is offering up to $200 off and free pillows with all mattress
00:41:10.960
orders for our listeners at helix sleep.com slash Walsh. That's helix sleep.com slash Walsh for up to
00:41:16.040
$200 off your mattress order. And if you're interested in winning a trip to the Daily Wire
00:41:20.480
headquarters to walk in the same halls as yours truly, not exactly the same halls, but you know,
00:41:27.200
in the vicinity of the same halls, now's your chance. You are not going to meet me, but you
00:41:31.180
will meet Candace Owens. If you sign up as a Daily Wire member with code VIP, you'll get 20% off your
00:41:36.460
new membership and be automatically entered for a chance to win a trip to the Daily Wire studios to
00:41:40.860
see Candace live. Not only will you be meeting Candace, you'll be getting an inside look at her
00:41:45.620
studio, our office, and front row seats to watch her live and in action on our talk show, Candace.
00:41:50.900
So don't wait. Go enter to win a Candace VIP pass now at dailywire.com slash subscribe using code VIP
00:41:58.320
for 20% off and for an experience that only Joe Biden will forget. I got to stop using that joke at
00:42:03.320
the end. I think we get the joke at the end. Are you guys still laughing at that joke? Anyway,
00:42:07.180
now let's get to our Daily Cancellation. So today we have the great privilege of once again
00:42:15.380
canceling Chris Cuomo. So after the Supreme Court announced on Monday that it would rule on
00:42:21.660
Mississippi's law banning abortion after 15 weeks, potentially putting Roe v. Wade on the chopping
00:42:25.720
block, the left and the media have been trying desperately to explain why we must not infringe
00:42:30.300
on a mother's God-given right to have her children dismembered. They've not done a very good job of making
00:42:35.480
this case, though. And although I should say in fairness to them, it's not really possible to make
00:42:39.840
a good case for such a hideously depraved thing. CNN anchor Chris Cuomo, continuing his lifelong contest
00:42:46.420
with his brother, Andrew, to see who can be the biggest embarrassment in the family, demonstrated this
00:42:51.100
difficulty during a monologue on his show a couple of nights ago. Cuomo spent two minutes laying out his
00:42:55.900
argument in defense of Roe, and the end result is a muddled, indecipherable mess of half-baked
00:43:02.420
talking points and ad hominem attacks. It was exactly the sort of thing we so often hear from
00:43:07.420
people on his side of the issue, which is why it might be worth dissecting in some detail. So we're
00:43:12.200
going to take this piece by piece and watch his monologue, and I'll respond to it. Let's start here.
00:43:18.620
All right, here is a bolo. Be on the lookout. We're about to see if Mitch McConnell's Supreme Court
00:43:23.860
mission pays off. It's now a six to three decidedly conservative court. And it now says the Supreme Court
00:43:30.640
of the United States that it will hear a case that could remove a woman's right to control her own
00:43:34.940
body. Remove a woman's right to control her own body? That might be a fair characterization if
00:43:40.860
Mississippi was mandating that women have chips installed in their brains that would enable the
00:43:45.080
governor to steer them around like remote control cars. But that's not the law at issue here. As far
00:43:50.740
as I know, no such law has been proposed anywhere. And if any law is proposed like that, I will oppose it.
00:43:55.080
The issue here is whether women have the right to destroy someone else's body. Yes, the other body
00:44:03.040
is dependent on their own body for survival. But does a body's dependence on your own give you the
00:44:09.580
moral and legal right to exterminate it? Even if that other body is your own child, do you have that
00:44:15.720
right? And if you say that a mother has the right to destroy any body dependent on her own for survival,
00:44:21.680
then, as we talked about yesterday, you must explain why that logic should not also apply
00:44:26.160
outside of the womb as much as it applies inside it. Born children are just as dependent and helpless,
00:44:32.920
especially at their youngest ages. Why shouldn't their dependence also negate their right to exist?
00:44:38.660
Or perhaps you think it should. However you sort through all of this, we should be clear that this
00:44:44.180
is the question. It is a question about a woman's rights over another human's body.
00:44:49.620
It is not a question about her rights over her own body. Just to be clear. Let's continue.
00:44:58.420
Dobbs v. Jackson, Mississippi, Women's Health Organization. It tests a state law that bans
00:45:04.780
almost all efforts to end a pregnancy after 15 weeks, including pregnancies resulting from incest
00:45:11.280
or rape. Legally, the issue is fetal viability. When does what is inside a woman become a person
00:45:20.340
with rights under the law? You would think we would have impaneled experts on a special commission
00:45:27.800
by now to see what the science says, right? But we don't seem to have the intellectual curiosity
00:45:32.480
about this issue because it's not really about science. It has become a culture war. It's a
00:45:38.060
political lever to use as a distraction from policy and solving problems to allow people to get up in
00:45:44.560
their religion and their righteousness over any sense of what science suggests.
00:45:50.780
Cuomo says that abortion has become a culture war issue, apparently under the impression that there
00:45:56.200
was a time when it was not a culture war issue. Even more absurd, he pegs pro-lifers as the ones who
00:46:02.040
shy away from the personhood debate. What he doesn't realize or pretends not to realize is that
00:46:07.160
we build our whole case around personhood. We advocate for personhood amendments and personhood
00:46:12.840
laws. We want nothing more than to talk about personhood. Though we don't want to leave the
00:46:18.600
issue up to a panel of experts, we've seen what a mess self-appointed experts can make of things,
00:46:23.680
and I'm not quite sure who the experts on personhood would be anyway. Cuomo believes that
00:46:28.340
the scientists can settle it. But all the scientists can tell us is that a person is a human being.
00:46:34.220
If you wish to draw some distinction between human being and person, then you are making a legal and
00:46:41.380
moral case, not a scientific one. You're also attempting the same trick that advocates of
00:46:46.240
slavery pulled, the same trick that has served as the foundation and justification for many of the
00:46:50.220
world's greatest atrocities and genocides throughout history. History proves that nothing good ever happens
00:46:54.860
when you attempt to draw a dividing line between human and person.
00:47:00.160
That is one of the reasons why pro-lifers are happy to stick with a scientific answer on this question.
00:47:04.740
A person is a human being, plain and simple. Anyone claiming otherwise has the burden of proof
00:47:10.260
entirely on their own shoulders. But the pro-abortion side has never tried to meet that burden.
00:47:16.420
They tell us that an unborn human isn't a person, and yet they won't tell us what a person actually is.
00:47:21.600
They're the ones who don't want to talk about personhood. They'd be even less interested in
00:47:27.120
commissioning a panel of experts than even we are. You think Planned Parenthood would welcome
00:47:33.520
an expert commission panel to figure out when personhood begins? You think Planned Parenthood
00:47:41.080
would want that to happen? You think NARAL would want that to happen? So Cuomo has this part of the
00:47:46.040
issue completely backwards, and he has every other part backwards too, of course. Let's keep watching.
00:47:50.120
Though medical capabilities may be moving the point of viability well short of what it was assumed to
00:47:57.220
be in 1973 with Roe v. Wade. So you'd think some of the proponents of harsher measures would want
00:48:03.420
the science involved. Most Americans want the court to uphold Roe v. Wade, which found women have liberty
00:48:12.120
over their own body as a right to privacy, a privacy right under the 14th Amendment. 62 uphold, 24 overturned.
00:48:19.800
But again, it's not about science or consensus. It's about dividing lines.
00:48:24.520
What? He calls for a scientific discussion, and then as if it counts as scientific evidence,
00:48:30.640
he appeals to an ABC News survey. What does that have to do with anything? Who cares what the public
00:48:36.220
thinks? He directly conflates the two, or at least puts them on equal footing, by talking about science
00:48:42.020
or consensus. He's not even referring to a consensus of scientists here, but a narrow and
00:48:47.160
limited consensus of random people who took an ABC News poll. What the hell do I care about? What does
00:48:52.580
that matter at all? What scientific weight does that have? If we're trying to figure out whether
00:49:00.120
an unborn human is a person, what, you want to decide it based on ABC News surveys? So things have gone
00:49:07.260
fully off of the logical rails here. Now it's time for the real train wreck to begin.
00:49:13.000
Legislating to the far right, white fright vote. Flooding the zone with 536 bills that abridge a woman's
00:49:22.120
right to control her own body in 46 states. It's just like voting rights in one way. You see?
00:49:30.500
It seems like the far right only cares about protecting humans before they are born.
00:49:36.220
Sure, why not throw it all in? I mean, the racist label, the voting rights talking point,
00:49:40.660
the thing about pro-lifers only caring about people before they're born. Put it all in the blender,
00:49:44.400
like a rhetorical smoothie. You might as well. Never mind that the voting rights issue has nothing to
00:49:48.580
do with anything. Never mind that pro-life racism is so bizarrely self-sabotaging. Black babies are
00:49:55.480
killed disproportionately by abortion. The end of abortion would mean a dramatic increase in the
00:50:00.260
black population. That is one strange racist conspiracy, you have to admit. Or perhaps it's
00:50:07.260
not a racist conspiracy at all. As for the claim that pro-lifers only care about people before they're
00:50:12.420
born, which is a boring and repetitive talking point we hear all the time, even if that were
00:50:18.480
true, it would still be preferable to the total disregard for human life so often displayed by
00:50:23.080
Chris Cuomo and his ideological compatriots. But it's not true, of course. It doesn't make any sense.
00:50:29.280
The whole reason why pro-lifers care about the unborn is that we draw no moral distinction
00:50:35.740
between them and born humans. That's our argument. If we thought that born humans had no value,
00:50:43.980
as Chris Cuomo suggests, then we'd feel the same about the unborn. Our entire position is based on
00:50:50.320
the premise that human life has inherent value. Inherent means you can't gain it or lose it.
00:50:57.120
You have it always. If we didn't believe that, if we didn't care about human life,
00:51:04.580
then we wouldn't be pro-life. This should be obvious, unless you really have convinced yourself
00:51:10.880
that the pro-life movement is nothing but a handmaid's tale plot to enslave women.
00:51:15.060
Another quite odd plot, we have to say, given that so many pro-lifers are themselves women.
00:51:20.680
I mean, go to the March for Life sometime, go to a fundraising banquet for a pregnancy resource
00:51:24.280
center, go stand a vigil at an abortion clinic. You're going to find a majority of women in all
00:51:28.700
of those places almost every time. It would seem that this is not a plot to control women's bodies
00:51:34.120
after all. It would seem that we pro-lifers just really do oppose the murder of defenseless and
00:51:39.340
innocent human beings. Who would have thought? Who could have imagined? Well, Cuomo didn't think.
00:51:46.920
And he doesn't think in general. But unfortunately, that doesn't stop him from talking.
00:51:52.160
And for that reason today, he is canceled. And we'll leave it there.
00:51:56.920
Thanks for watching. Thanks for listening. Have a great day. Godspeed.
00:51:59.800
Well, if you enjoyed this episode, don't forget to subscribe. And if you want to help spread the
00:52:08.520
word, please give us a five-star review. Also, tell your friends to subscribe as well. We're
00:52:12.900
available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, wherever you listen to podcasts. We're there. Also, be sure to
00:52:17.500
check out the other Daily Wire podcasts, including The Ben Shapiro Show, Michael Knowles Show,
00:52:21.160
The Andrew Klavan Show. Thanks for listening. The Matt Walsh Show is produced by Sean Hampton,
00:52:25.880
executive producer Jeremy Boring. Our supervising producers are Mathis Glover and Robert Sterling.
00:52:30.800
Our technical director is Austin Stevens, production manager Pavel Vadosky. The show is edited by Sasha
00:52:36.500
Tolmachov. Our audio is mixed by Mike Coromina. Hair and makeup is done by Nika Geneva. And our
00:52:42.200
production coordinator is McKenna Waters. The Matt Walsh Show is a Daily Wire production,
00:52:47.640
Today on The Ben Shapiro Show, public health pseudo-experts and their political allies are
00:52:52.240
unmasked as the real science deniers. The Andrew Brown case comes apart and the radical left's mask
00:52:57.460
comes off when it comes to winking at anti-Semitism. That's today on The Ben Shapiro Show. Give it a listen.