The Matt Walsh Show - Ep. 752 - The War On American History

00:00:00.000 Today on The Matt Walsh Show, the war in American history continues and now it's moved way beyond simply removing statues of Confederate generals.

00:00:06.520 We'll discuss the latest on that front today. Also, five headlines, including Democrats in Texas leaving the state in order to prevent the passage of bills they oppose.

00:00:14.320 These are the same people who complain about obstructionism usually. And will the Biden administration be fact checking your text messages?

00:00:19.780 A new report makes that claim. Also, in our daily cancellation, we'll talk about an article in a scientific journal claiming that geology is racist.

00:00:26.940 And the reason they give for this claim is so unbelievably insane and stupid that it may actually succeed in shocking you. 0.93

00:00:33.680 We'll find out all of that and more today on The Matt Walsh Show. 0.99

00:00:45.840 After a very long buildup, the town of Charlottesville, Virginia, finally removed the statues of Confederate generals Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson this past weekend.

00:00:54.280 And in the midst of the mindless statue toppling craze that has infected our country for several years, this event was all but inevitable.

00:01:03.880 According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, a group I normally would not cite as any sort of authority or reference at all, but whose numbers here are probably basically reliable.

00:01:12.780 A total of 168 Confederate symbols were torn down and removed in the year 2020 alone, including 94 monuments.

00:01:22.200 Now, virtually all of these statues were removed following the death of George Floyd.

00:01:26.880 Nobody's ever offered a coherent explanation as to why the death of a violent felon and drug addict who was resisting arrest should have precipitated a reevaluation of anything, let alone historical monuments.

00:01:38.620 I mean, what precisely is the connection between George Floyd's demise and a statue of a Confederate general?

00:01:45.180 That hasn't been made clear.

00:01:46.880 It's even less clear how the mad rush to eliminate these statues represents cultural progress.

00:01:52.480 A sign that we had made progress and had healed the deep wounds from the Civil War was that many Americans could remember and recognize men who fought on both sides.

00:02:02.680 We were able to view it with a mature and nuanced perspective in the light of historical context.

00:02:09.260 The fact that we are less able to do that today as we are further away from the event itself,

00:02:16.580 the fact that we can't even bear to see an image of any man who lived in and fought for the South would seem to indicate that we've gone backwards, not forwards.

00:02:24.420 You know, it's a mark of maturity and growth when a married couple can talk civilly or even laugh about old arguments they've had or past offenses that they caused one another.

00:02:35.700 But if they find that suddenly those old arguments and offenses are becoming the source of contention yet again,

00:02:41.420 that's a sign that their relationship has regressed, not progressed.

00:02:46.560 But Lee and Jackson were not the only historical figures to be toppled in Charlottesville over the weekend.

00:02:50.880 On the same day, the city council convened in an emergency meeting, quote unquote, with only 20 minutes notice

00:02:58.080 and decided to tear down a beautiful statue of the great explorers Lewis and Clark,

00:03:02.580 which had been proudly standing in its spot on Main Street in Charlottesville for over 100 years.

00:03:08.660 Now the priceless work of art has been removed from view with no specific plans for where it may go or what might happen to it.

00:03:16.560 Now, what did the statue do to deserve this fate?

00:03:19.340 What exactly was offensive about it?

00:03:22.260 This is Lewis and Clark.

00:03:24.320 They're not Confederate generals.

00:03:26.580 Why was it taken down?

00:03:28.540 Well, there's the stated reason and then there's the actual reason.

00:03:31.940 And where the left is concerned, those two things rarely align.

00:03:36.100 The stated reason is that the Lewis and Clark monument caused offense to Native Americans

00:03:40.740 because of how it depicts their Indian guide and translator, Sacagawea.

00:03:44.540 The sculpture features Lewis and Clark standing triumphantly and looking off into the distance

00:03:49.760 while Sacagawea is crouched behind them looking down.

00:03:53.780 It was decided by activists, including a descendant of Sacagawea, who for some reason was consulted in this matter.

00:03:59.800 I'm not sure why.

00:04:01.720 She's a distant relative, you know, over 200 years later.

00:04:06.220 And her opinion matters.

00:04:09.040 Why?

00:04:10.140 But it was decided by all of these people that the positioning of the figures on the statue is offensive

00:04:14.700 because Sacagawea is in a subservient and submissive pose, supposedly.

00:04:20.620 Not that this matters at all to the activists, but their interpretation of the statue is simply incorrect.

00:04:28.040 The guy who sculpted it, Charles Keck, first of all, he talked about what he was doing and why he did it that way.

00:04:35.140 And you can go and look at what he said.

00:04:37.120 He was also originally commissioned only to produce a statue of Lewis and Clark.

00:04:40.960 He made a special point to include Sacagawea.

00:04:44.740 And obviously not because he wanted to disrespect her.

00:04:47.220 He explained why he positioned the figures the way that he did.

00:04:50.840 And this is what he said, quote,

00:04:52.700 The guide Sacagawea is at their side, a little to the rear, so that she shall not compete too much in the composition with Lewis and Clark.

00:04:59.560 Remember, this was supposed to be a statue of Lewis and Clark.

00:05:03.180 He's including this other figure.

00:05:06.260 He continues,

00:05:07.080 By making her look down, I have tried to suggest that they were on a high prominence,

00:05:10.860 and she was more interested in the immediate surroundings and not aware of what was in the minds of the explorers.

00:05:15.580 Okay, so this is not about subservience or submission or subordinance.

00:05:20.800 This is about focus.

00:05:22.680 By the artist's interpretation, Lewis and Clark, as the leaders of the expedition, were focused on the long view, you know, the ultimate goal.

00:05:29.400 While Sacagawea, as the 16-year-old guide, tracker, and translator, was concentrating on the immediate surroundings.

00:05:35.220 It's very clear that the artist, who made a point, again, of including Sacagawea, even though she was not in the original plans for the monument,

00:05:42.680 did not intend to insult her by memorializing her.

00:05:46.760 She's being honored, not demeaned.

00:05:48.780 And the irony here is that the activists, supposedly seeking to protect her good name,

00:05:52.940 are doing so by tearing down a statue that honors her.

00:05:55.800 And besides, even if the piece is outdated in its depictions, or slightly offensive, or whatever,

00:06:03.760 and I don't think it qualifies as any of that.

00:06:05.460 I don't think it's outdated or offensive or anything.

00:06:07.000 But even if it was, are we at the point where all works of art produced by people who lacked our modern mindset

00:06:16.620 must now be removed from our sight?

00:06:18.500 Have we reached a point where no art can be timeless?

00:06:23.600 Because any that fails to align entirely with our contemporary view of things must be destroyed?

00:06:29.520 Yeah, we have reached that point indeed.

00:06:32.300 This is a war on our history as a nation, and it's not just happening in Charlottesville.

00:06:37.460 Though Charlottesville has perhaps become ground zero for some of this,

00:06:40.200 and we haven't even discussed the other statue that came down in that city on Saturday.

00:06:43.840 In all, in one day, not one, not two, not three, but four beautiful historic sculptures were yanked down by demolition crews.

00:06:53.560 And we talk, by the way, we talk about the historical significance of these statues,

00:06:57.580 and why it's a travesty that they're torn down for that reason.

00:07:02.260 And it is.

00:07:03.760 But these are also works of art.

00:07:06.060 These are priceless works of art that someone spent years making,

00:07:11.380 and that have stood there proudly for decades or centuries in some cases.

00:07:18.120 And we're tearing all this stuff down like it's nothing.

00:07:23.200 But the fourth statue was a depiction of Revolutionary War General George Rogers Clark,

00:07:28.800 labeled on the statue itself and in history as the conqueror of the Northwest.

00:07:32.940 Clark is the older brother of William Clark of Lewis and Clark fame,

00:07:36.340 so a bad weekend for the Clark family, all told.

00:07:38.420 And he is hailed, or at least had been hailed, for his victories against the British in the Northwest Territory.

00:07:44.880 The statue depicts Clark on a horse, confronting or speaking to a group of Indians.

00:07:51.860 Why is that offensive?

00:07:53.800 Well, left-wing activists, who are now the authorities on art interpretation, apparently,

00:07:58.240 have their stated reasons.

00:08:00.420 And here's the Washington Post explaining their reasoning.

00:08:03.220 The removals can be traced to years of activism, said Anthony Guy Lopez,

00:08:09.340 a UVA graduate and Crow Creek Sioux tribal member who began petitioning the city to take down

00:08:14.580 the Lewis, Clark, and Sacagawea statue in 2009.

00:08:17.960 He called the twin takedowns an exorcism of state violence against Native Americans.

00:08:23.040 If art can be evil, these were evil, Lopez said.

00:08:28.160 What this says to American Indians is that violence is part of our lives,

00:08:31.880 and that we have to not only accept, but glorify it.

00:08:36.480 Now, of course, violence was very much a part of life for Native American tribes,

00:08:42.300 and really for all people everywhere during that time period,

00:08:45.560 which is depicted in the statues and throughout all of history before that,

00:08:48.540 and for much of the time after that up until now.

00:08:50.880 And for a lot of people in the world today, it's still, violence is still a part of their lives.

00:08:58.280 But perhaps more importantly here, neither statue actually depicts violence.

00:09:03.360 There is nothing remotely violent happening in the Lewis and Clark statue.

00:09:08.380 And you've got this activist saying, this is violence.

00:09:11.260 What? Where? Where is the violence on this statue?

00:09:16.700 Lewis, Clark, and Sacagawea, they're all on the same team,

00:09:19.120 standing there, looking out.

00:09:22.460 Violent?

00:09:24.940 And the George Clark statue may imply a larger context of violence.

00:09:28.760 He was a general engaged in battle, after all,

00:09:30.940 but there's nothing violent being displayed or portrayed by the work of art in question.

00:09:36.120 So what's the real problem?

00:09:38.580 I mean, that can't be the real problem with these statues.

00:09:42.560 What is the real problem?

00:09:43.560 I think this paragraph from an article about the removals on UVA's website captures it nicely.

00:09:50.880 This is what it says there.

00:09:51.880 The Clark statue had long been a source of pain for Native Americans at UVA and in the community.

00:09:59.840 UVA history professor Christian McMillan wrote in July 2020 that both the George Rogers Clark statue

00:10:05.820 and the statue of Lewis Clark in Sacagawea were, quote,

00:10:08.760 instrumental in creating and perpetuating the myth of brave white men conquering supposedly unknown and unclaimed land.

00:10:18.600 Ah, yes.

00:10:19.320 Well, we wouldn't want statues that perpetuate the myth of brave white men.

00:10:25.120 Wouldn't want that.

00:10:26.940 That really is the problem, right?

00:10:29.320 Never mind the fact that Lewis and Clark were, in fact, brave white men.

00:10:33.820 You would have to be, in order to forge ahead into a wilderness that is unknown to you.

00:10:41.400 That's what someone means when they talk about going into an unknown wilderness.

00:10:45.620 It means that they don't know it.

00:10:48.640 So there's no sense in you saying, well, it's unknown to you, but not to people that might live there.

00:10:53.440 Well, obviously.

00:10:55.000 But I'm me, talking from my perspective.

00:10:57.820 I don't know this wilderness.

00:10:59.300 And so that's why it requires bravery for me to go out into it.

00:11:03.820 Where dangers of all kinds lay ahead.

00:11:07.420 And where you know that there is a very good chance you'll die.

00:11:10.360 And whether you survive or not, it is certain that you will suffer.

00:11:14.380 That takes bravery. 1.00

00:11:16.880 That is more bravery than has ever been exhibited or will ever be exhibited by any of the morons and the cowards and infantile babies who are tearing these statues down. 1.00

00:11:28.860 Every single historical figure that they have torn down, all of them, more important, have contributed more to society than any of those losers ever will. 0.99

00:11:43.620 Yeah, Lewis and Clark were brave.

00:11:44.960 So was George Rogers Clark.

00:11:47.360 Guess what?

00:11:48.080 So were Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson, for that matter.

00:11:50.500 They were brave men.

00:11:52.000 Yeah, I said it.

00:11:52.800 Charging into battle takes bravery.

00:11:56.920 It does.

00:11:59.480 And, you know, the former group, the explorers, they did in fact claim or conquer land that was unknown to them and oftentimes unclaimed.

00:12:07.520 Yes, sometimes the land was occupied by Indian tribes.

00:12:11.760 Not all the time.

00:12:13.440 By the way, you're talking about a smattering of Indian tribes dispersed over the entire continent.

00:12:23.360 It's not like every square mile was claimed or owned by Indian tribes.

00:12:29.460 What, do they own the whole hemisphere?

00:12:31.140 Nobody was supposed to come here?

00:12:34.280 Absurd.

00:12:34.720 Some of the land, though, was occupied by Indian tribes.

00:12:38.760 And as I've tried to explain many times, these tribes themselves live by the law of conquest.

00:12:43.660 They claim that land through violent force.

00:12:46.960 They were not innocent turtle doves living lives of peaceful serenity.

00:12:50.380 This land, like the land all over the globe, was up for grabs for anyone with the will and might to take it.

00:12:57.680 Might make your tummy hurt when you hear it phrased that way in modern society, but that's the reality.

00:13:02.820 That's how Indian tribes operated.

00:13:04.440 It's how everyone operated at that time. 0.93

00:13:07.800 And yet it's been decided that white men are the villains of history and the villains of the present day.

00:13:15.020 And what that means is that no white man in history is allowed to be honored or remembered or celebrated. 0.88

00:13:21.480 It's not a coincidence that nearly every single statue or monument that's been toppled over the past year or two has been a depiction of a white man.

00:13:27.820 It's not like there aren't other kinds of statues out there.

00:13:31.820 Is it a coincidence?

00:13:33.600 Almost every single one just so happens to be a white historical figure?

00:13:38.140 It's not.

00:13:40.140 It's not. 0.89

00:13:40.780 Now, that isn't to say that they won't eventually, the mob, I'm not saying they won't eventually move on to other targets once all of the white men of history have been thrown on the incinerator. 0.69

00:13:50.400 I think they will.

00:13:51.060 I've said that I think eventually they're going to be tearing down Martin Luther King Jr.

00:13:54.580 for his, for the, shall we say, problematic aspects of his life and biography and personality.

00:14:06.240 Eventually, they'll get to that.

00:14:09.000 This is, after all, as I have said, a war on American history in its entirety.

00:14:14.960 And it is the inevitable result of critical race theory, the result of a narrative of history that casts all of our historical triumphs as moral failures, all of our heroes as bullies and tyrants, and all of our sources of pride as sources of shame.

00:14:34.240 This is where it all leads.

00:14:37.240 And it's far from over.

00:14:40.140 Now let's get to our five headlines.

00:14:44.960 Now we check in with our very good friends over at Charity Mobile.

00:14:51.780 I've been a Charity Mobile customer for a while now, and I'm proud to support.

00:14:55.680 It's not very often that you can say, as a customer of a company, that you're proud to support them.

00:15:00.580 I think, as conservatives, we do a lot of sort of holding of our nose when we're shopping or supporting companies, because so many companies are against us in the culture, but Charity Mobile is not.

00:15:12.640 They're the Pro-Life phone company. 5% of your monthly plan price goes to the Pro-Life, Pro-Family charity of your choice.

00:15:18.200 There's a lot of other perks that come with this, too.

00:15:19.860 It's just a great service all around.

00:15:21.400 You get new activations and eligible accounts.

00:15:23.240 Get a free cell phone with free activation and free shipping.

00:15:26.740 And there's no contracts.

00:15:27.840 You don't have to worry about termination fees or any of that nonsense.

00:15:30.360 There's also no risk with a 30-day guarantee.

00:15:32.240 And you also get, if you need it, live customer service based right here in the USA, which I really appreciate.

00:15:38.500 And free usage alerts.

00:15:40.380 You get free apps to make everything easier.

00:15:41.880 All that kind of stuff.

00:15:42.620 But the main thing is you're helping to build a culture of life in America while supporting a Pro-Life phone company.

00:15:47.500 So call them at 1-877-474-3662 or chat with them online at charitymobile.com.

00:15:53.860 All right.

00:15:55.420 So I've got to show you this just to start with.

00:15:58.300 I don't know if I'd call this headline news, but my wife saw this while running errands just here in town.

00:16:07.300 So if you're watching the video podcast, you've got to take a look at this car.

00:16:12.940 I don't know what the deal is with this, but it's covered in green fur and baby dolls and stuffed horses.

00:16:18.300 This is maybe among the top five most terrifying things I've ever seen in my life.

00:16:25.040 And I want to be careful because I say that the owner of this car lives somewhere around us.

00:16:29.740 So I don't want to upset whoever that is.

00:16:33.520 But, and in fairness, they may have just accidentally crashed into a serial killer's basement and ended up with all that stuff all over the car.

00:16:40.880 I don't know.

00:16:41.560 I really don't.

00:16:42.600 But the good news, at least, is that you never, you have a car like that.

00:16:46.880 You never have to worry about not being able to find your car in a parking lot.

00:16:54.120 That you don't have to worry about.

00:16:56.700 You're not going to do like what I see.

00:16:58.120 I run it.

00:16:58.740 I got to get used to the fact that I drive a pickup now and I'm in Tennessee.

00:17:03.060 So anytime I park and go into a store, if I don't, in my, if I don't like take a picture of where I'm parked, as soon as I walk out into the parking lot, I'm, I'm lost.

00:17:13.620 It's, it's a, it's a bewildering sight because all of the cars in a parking lot look exactly like mine.

00:17:18.860 So I'm just walking through with my key, you know, seeing which one will set the alarm off.

00:17:23.300 You don't have to worry about that with this car.

00:17:24.460 That's the one advantage.

00:17:26.480 And that's all I'm going to say about it for fear of my own life.

00:17:29.800 But I had to show you because, come on.

00:17:33.500 My God.

00:17:34.120 All right.

00:17:36.360 Joe Biden is giving a speech on voting rights today at some point.

00:17:41.700 And Jen Psaki previewed the speech on Monday. 0.98

00:17:45.780 She was asked in the White House press conference what she, what the speech is going to be all about.

00:17:50.360 And here's what she says about the, you know, about the speech and also the issue of voting rights today.

00:17:56.640 Let's listen.

00:17:56.980 Well, first, well, thank you for the question, because he's very focused on this speech tomorrow, one that he himself wanted to deliver.

00:18:05.060 He'll lay out the moral case for why denying the right to vote is a form of suppression and a form of silencing.

00:18:10.620 And how he will use, he will redouble his commitment to using every tool at his disposal to continue to fight to protect the fundamental right of Americans to vote against the onslaught of voter suppression laws based on a dangerous and discredited conspiracy theory that culminated in assault on our Capitol.

00:18:28.040 He'll call out the greatest irony of the big lie is that no election in our history has met such a high standard with over 80 judges, including those appointed by his predecessor, throwing out all challenges.

00:18:38.580 He'll also decry efforts to strip the right to vote as authoritarian and anti-American and stand up against the notion that politicians should be allowed to choose their voters or to subvert our system by replacing independent election authorities with partisan ones.

00:18:53.640 And he will highlight the work of the administration against this, the necessity of passing the For the People Act and the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act and how we need to work together with civil rights organizations to build as broad a turnout and voter education system to overcome the worst challenge to our democracy since the Civil War.

00:19:10.960 The worst challenge to our democracy since the Civil War. So apparently the January 6th, quote unquote, insurrection has been demoted. It is no longer the worst thing that's happened since the Civil War. I thought that it was. That's what we've been told. But now it's, I know, it's these voting rights laws or laws that are meant to deny people the right to vote, which, look, the term gaslighting is used far too often, just like the word grifter is used far too often in the

00:19:40.960 in discourse today. But it really does apply. It's just one long stream of gaslighting from her. Anytime we hear from the Democrats about the voting rights issue, this, this, these laws to deny voting rights. There are no such laws being passed anywhere. Nobody is attempting to do that. Those laws do not exist.

00:20:04.100 And as I always remind you, I say this as someone who would support those kinds of laws if they did exist. I wish they did. Every time I hear Democrats say, there's this law in this state that want to deny people the right to vote, I get my hopes up. I say, really? Thank God, finally. I'm moving to that state. And then I look into the law and it's like, no, okay, you just have to have a photocopy of your ID. That's it.

00:20:32.760 Because in reality, there actually isn't any universal God-given right to vote. It's not inherent to our humanity to have this right to participate in the democratic process. It's not.

00:20:54.300 Which is why already we deny lots of people the right to vote. If you're a felon, you're denied the right to vote. If you're under the age of 18, as it stands right now, anyway, you're denied the right to vote.

00:21:06.580 That's a lot of people. So we can't claim that it's a universal right and, you know, inherent to us as God-given.

00:21:13.000 And it's something that you have to qualify for and it can be taken away. That's already the system everywhere or nearly everywhere.

00:21:24.580 The question is only, should we have, should there be more of an effort, you know, to protect the voting process by making sure that the people who are participating in it are qualified to participate?

00:21:50.020 I say yes. And I say that that is protect. If you really value the right to vote, who are the people who really value the right to vote, who really cherish it, who really take it seriously?

00:22:03.860 We hear so much about the right to vote is a sacred, it's a sacred right. I personally wouldn't call it sacred, but I think my position, if it is sacred, protects that sanctity.

00:22:16.520 More than the people who say, oh yeah, let anyone do it. Open up the floodgates, just let anyone vote. Doesn't matter.

00:22:23.500 They could be, you know, whatever. They've been in a Cheeto and Netflix-induced coma for the last four years.

00:22:30.140 Just shake them awake, carry them in the cradle position over to the polls and just dump them in a voting booth and say, yeah, but, you know, hit one of them. Hit a name, Randall. It doesn't matter.

00:22:44.040 That's how you protect the sanctity of voting rights that way?

00:22:47.380 I don't think so, but I am taking a position that almost no one else takes, at least among elected Republicans. There's not any that I'm aware of. I've not heard any elected Republican suggest that we should actually start actively and purposefully excluding people from the voting booth.

00:23:11.760 I wish elected Republicans would advocate that, but they're not.

00:23:19.140 In fact, and we're going to talk more about this in a minute, but I guess we'll go ahead and talk about it now, as a matter of fact.

00:23:25.940 I think what you're hearing from Republicans on voting rights is quite the opposite of that.

00:23:32.360 Governor Greg Abbott, he was on Fox News last night, and he was talking about the Texas Democrats who have fled the state to prevent not only legislation on voting rights, but many other issues as well.

00:23:52.360 He was talking about them, and then he gets into the issue of voter suppression and who are the real voter suppressors in this country, and here's what he says. Let's listen.

00:24:03.100 But, Laura, I have to point this out. The thesis that they are operating under is completely false because what the Texas law does doesn't hinder anybody's ability to vote.

00:24:11.960 In fact, interestingly, what Texas is seeking to do is to add additional hours to vote.

00:24:19.280 Texas has 12 days of early voting and the hours of which will be expanded, and we will ensure that hours are expanded on Election Day also, so their entire thesis is completely wrong.

00:24:29.280 And compare early voting in Texas with early voting that we have in Delaware.

00:24:33.780 Texas has 12 days of early voting. Delaware has zero days of early voting.

00:24:38.620 Why am I picking on Delaware? Because that is where the president himself voted in the last election.

00:24:44.820 And if anybody wants to talk about voter suppression, they should be talking about Delaware, not Texas.

00:24:51.380 Yeah, the Dems are the true vote suppressors.

00:24:55.680 That old thing for Republicans. That is what we're getting from Republicans.

00:24:59.560 It's true what he just said, that Republicans are actually, they're trying to expand it.

00:25:04.360 They're, you know, in Texas, they're, you know, provide more hours to go vote, expanding early voting and all that kind of thing.

00:25:10.800 That's what you're getting from Republicans.

00:25:14.200 They actually agree with the Democrats on this issue, while the Democrats accuse them of not agreeing.

00:25:20.940 And the Republicans' response, as always, is to say, no, no, no, we do agree. We do agree. I promise.

00:25:25.280 We should be expanding the hours of voting, expanding early voting.

00:25:32.620 I don't want to hear Republicans brag about, oh, we've got more early voting than Delaware does.

00:25:39.860 There should be no early voting at all.

00:25:42.560 You have election day, voting day. Go and vote on that day.

00:25:50.300 And if we're talking about a presidential election, you've got four years to plan for it.

00:25:56.140 Everyone knows what day it's going to be. We all know. There's no surprise.

00:25:59.620 When it comes time for the 2024 presidential election, we all know when that vote is going to be.

00:26:04.020 And you know where you have to go, depending on where you live, to cast your vote.

00:26:08.140 You're telling me you can't schedule the time with this much notice?

00:26:15.160 That's the way it should be, but we are heading in the opposite direction.

00:26:20.340 So, as always, when it comes to voting and how easy it should be,

00:26:25.320 really, Republican Democrats are basically on the same side with only just slight differences.

00:26:31.640 Now, speaking of the Democrat lawmakers leaving the state, reading now from the Daily Wire,

00:26:39.140 it says, Texas Democrat lawmakers absconded from the state on Monday in a theatrical fashion

00:26:42.820 as they subverted democracy by denying the legislature a quorum needed to approve bills

00:26:47.440 in Governor Greg Abbott's special session agenda.

00:26:52.040 Quote, private planes carry more than 50 Democrats.

00:26:55.660 There they are there on their private plane.

00:26:57.260 They left Austin for Dulles International Airport mid-afternoon, skipping town just days before the Texas House of Representatives.

00:27:03.940 It was expected to give early approval to sweeping new voter integrity laws in the special legislative session,

00:27:09.440 according to the Associated Press.

00:27:10.960 The numbers meant the House would not have enough lawmakers in attendance to conduct business

00:27:15.020 and could not, at least for now, vote on the bill.

00:27:17.920 This is the second time the Texas Democrats have bolted from the state to stop measures from becoming law

00:27:22.220 because they have no path to permanently block the voting measure

00:27:24.660 or a list of other contentious GOP-backed proposals up for debate, according to the report.

00:27:29.740 So there you see them there on their private chartered flight.

00:27:33.780 And they tweeted this out, or at least a reporter tweeted this out.

00:27:38.420 On plane to D.C., Texas Democratic lawmakers are leaving state to break quorum to stop Republican voting bill.

00:27:44.260 Veteran Capitol observers say this is unchartered territory.

00:27:48.840 This photo was taken by a Democrat on the plane.

00:27:50.900 As many people have observed, you see them there on the plane, and none of them are wearing masks at all.

00:27:57.700 The excuse we're given is that this was a private chartered plane,

00:28:01.080 which raises a whole bunch of questions in and of itself.

00:28:04.880 Where are you getting this private plane from?

00:28:08.260 Where are all of these supposed public servants?

00:28:13.580 Where are they getting all their flying private all the time?

00:28:17.180 How are they doing that?

00:28:19.080 Where are they getting this money?

00:28:20.160 Nobody asks that.

00:28:23.040 Or at least anyone asking it is not going to get an answer to the question.

00:28:26.640 Okay, so you're on private, and technically then, because it's not any kind of public transportation, you don't have to wear the mask.

00:28:34.560 Okay.

00:28:35.740 So what these Texas Democrats are telling us is that the only reason we wear masks on commercial airlines is because we have to.

00:28:45.380 Why do we have to?

00:28:47.980 Well, because we have to.

00:28:48.680 There's no actual underlying reason.

00:28:51.120 If there was any underlying reason for the rule saying we have to wear the mask, then they'd be wearing the mask voluntarily on a private plane.

00:29:00.360 But they're not.

00:29:02.140 Because they have their own rules.

00:29:05.520 Texas State Representative James Tallarico tweeted,

00:29:09.440 Just landed in Memphis on our way to D.C.

00:29:12.060 Thank you all for your well wishes.

00:29:14.720 We left behind our families, our livelihoods, and our beloved Texas.

00:29:18.100 But our sacrifice is nothing compared to the sacrifices brave Americans have made throughout history to protect the sacred right to vote.

00:29:26.640 You're correct that your sacrifice is nothing.

00:29:28.500 I agree with you on that part because there's no sacrifice at all.

00:29:30.980 You're going on an apparently paid vacation.

00:29:35.800 Leaving work.

00:29:37.700 Can I do that?

00:29:38.620 I wonder how that would fly with the bosses here at the Daily Wire.

00:29:44.900 No notice.

00:29:45.920 Don't take any vacation time.

00:29:47.300 I just get on a plane and fly.

00:29:51.760 And then I say, hey, hey, don't worry, guys.

00:29:54.500 My sacrifice.

00:29:56.260 I get a call.

00:29:57.260 What are you doing, Matt?

00:29:57.940 You got to do the show.

00:29:58.880 Hey, listen.

00:29:59.700 My sacrifice.

00:30:00.800 I know this is a sacrifice, but don't thank me for my sacrifice.

00:30:06.360 There are other pictures of them on their bus.

00:30:08.620 Because they took a bus, and then they took a plane, and then they took another bus.

00:30:12.240 And they're taking selfie videos the whole time and bragging about it and talking about their great sacrifice.

00:30:16.740 In one of the photos, you can clearly see there's like an 18 or 30 pack of Miller Lite there.

00:30:23.000 So they're going on a little booze cruise.

00:30:25.340 What a great sacrifice.

00:30:28.400 And, of course, these tasteless hacks bring Miller Lite, of all things, with them. 0.95

00:30:34.740 So hypocrisies abound. 0.85

00:30:36.520 You know, they're not wearing masks. 0.93

00:30:38.620 They're obstructing democracy while accusing everyone else of being obstructionist.

00:30:46.180 They are the carbon footprint.

00:30:51.520 Are they worried about that?

00:30:53.320 All of this fossil fuel they're burning?

00:30:55.080 A lot of hypocrisy, a lot of double standards.

00:31:00.000 But, as always, the double standard and hypocrisy is part of the point.

00:31:04.480 Because that's the power that they have.

00:31:06.840 That's the message that they're sending. 0.97

00:31:08.220 And in a certain way, you know, it's, it's, even though there's so much hypocrisy and it's a double standard, and this is nothing but a self-congratulatory, ridiculous stunt. 0.94

00:31:21.420 And, and I despise Democrats with my whole soul, even in spite of that, it's hard for me to get very angry at them about this.

00:31:33.980 Because this is the kind of thing I wish Republicans would do.

00:31:38.840 I mean, this is hardball.

00:31:40.020 This, this is Democrats saying, you know what, we're not going to go along with you at all. 0.82

00:31:43.800 Even when we legally have to, even like, even when it seems we have no power here at all, we still, we're not going to give you a damn inch.

00:31:53.840 We're not, we're going to give you nothing.

00:31:58.860 That part of it, I kind of respect.

00:32:00.460 I got to be honest with you.

00:32:01.320 And I wish Republicans would have the same attitude.

00:32:03.040 Now, granted, it's easier to do that when you have the media on your side, because we know if it was Republicans doing this, all the headlines would be Republican fugitives obstructing democracy.

00:32:17.780 There'd be 57 headlines just about the fact that they're not wearing masks on the plane.

00:32:24.200 So we know that.

00:32:25.780 It is, it's a lot easier when you've got the media on your side, but even so.

00:32:29.200 Uh, I can't hate them too much for playing hardball.

00:32:34.160 I can't because it's what I want Republicans to do.

00:32:38.540 All right, next.

00:32:39.340 I can certainly hate this staying with the Biden administration.

00:32:42.340 Here's something that seems to have somehow flown under the radar.

00:32:45.240 And this is from Politico.

00:32:46.280 I'm going to read this to you and you tell me if anything jumps out at you.

00:32:50.720 There's anything here that raises a red flag.

00:32:52.880 I don't know.

00:32:54.880 Um, it says.

00:32:56.120 Uh, the Biden administration is casting conservative opponents of his COVID, of its COVID-19 vaccine campaign as dangerous and extreme, adopting a more aggressive political posture in an attempt to maneuver through the public health conundrum.

00:33:10.800 Well, this is nothing new.

00:33:12.160 It's not like this is a new strategy.

00:33:13.520 In a new strategy, liberals are casting their opponents as dangerous extremists.

00:33:18.560 It's an interesting new strategy.

00:33:24.020 We'll put, we'll see if it pays off, but it continues.

00:33:26.240 The White House has decided to hit back harder on misinformation, quote unquote, misinformation and scare tactics after Republican lawmakers and conservative activists pledged to fight the administration's stated plans to go door to door to increase vaccination rates.

00:33:37.920 The pushback will include directly calling out social media platforms and conservative news shows that promote such tactics.

00:33:44.820 Listen to this part.

00:33:45.840 Uh, Biden-allied groups, including the Democratic National Committee, are also planning to engage fact checkers more aggressively and work with SMS carriers to dispel misinformation about vaccines that is sent over social media and text messages.

00:34:04.700 The goal is to ensure that people who have, uh, who may have difficulty getting a vaccination because of issues like transportation, see those barriers lessened or removed entirely.

00:34:13.420 Now, I don't know, call me crazy, but it seems as though they're saying that the DNC is going to be colluding with fact checkers to monitor our private text messages.

00:34:32.940 All in an effort to, uh, head off misinformation.

00:34:38.680 You know, it's for our own good.

00:34:40.400 That's all.

00:34:41.600 You got to understand that.

00:34:43.420 If the DNC is checking in on your text messages, maybe your emails, whatever, it's all for your own good.

00:34:52.360 If the NSA is doing it, it's all for your own good.

00:34:55.900 Because there might be dangerous extremists out there who are trying to, uh, you know, talk to you and, and, and convince you of things. 1.00

00:35:02.200 And you're too stupid, of course, just like I, and we're all too stupid to be able to practice discernment. 1.00

00:35:09.080 And that's why we need big brother who can swoop in and, uh, and save the day. 1.00

00:35:14.420 Now, how is, so I, I saw this report in Politico and then I was Googling to see if there's been other headlines about this and there hasn't been anything.

00:35:24.220 How is this not a big deal at least?

00:35:30.280 That's the report that they're going to be monitoring our private text messages.

00:35:33.520 I guess, uh, you know, if you have a problem with it, just start your own cell phone carrier.

00:35:40.020 That's all.

00:35:41.400 Start your own Verizon.

00:35:42.540 You don't like it?

00:35:43.200 Private company, start your own Verizon.

00:35:44.680 That I'm sure will be, um, the response.

00:35:50.420 All right, moving on.

00:35:51.540 I think it's time for, it's a bit a little heavy today.

00:35:54.100 Um, maybe it's time for another musical break.

00:35:58.840 A time to appreciate the, uh, the, some, some true art.

00:36:02.460 Talk about art too.

00:36:04.020 True musical art.

00:36:05.700 So here is, uh, I don't think it requires any more setup.

00:36:09.280 Here it is from, uh, from our friends at TikTok.

00:36:11.840 It's vaccination day.

00:36:12.900 It's vaccination day.

00:36:19.940 It's time for vaccine shot number two.

00:36:22.760 I've got my mask with Pikachu.

00:36:25.040 But I am running seven minutes late.

00:36:28.860 I hope they'll jab me anyway.

00:36:31.140 I really want this shot today. 0.96

00:36:33.780 Now my fear of COVID can abate.

00:36:37.680 I'll see actual real life people.

00:36:40.320 It'll be totally strange.

00:36:42.260 Wow.

00:36:42.900 Am I so ready for this change?

00:36:46.240 And for the first time in forever, I'll emerge from my lockdown.

00:36:52.940 For the first time in forever, I'll go catch Pokemon downtown.

00:36:59.660 My right wing friends might think I'm crazy.

00:37:01.780 All right, let's stop it there.

00:37:03.580 I thought, uh, you had to see that.

00:37:06.720 You had to hear it because I did.

00:37:08.920 Now I do not mean to stereotype.

00:37:10.540 I am not one, you know, I would never do that.

00:37:12.600 I'm against stereotyping.

00:37:14.160 But if this guy does not live with his mom, uh, I, I, I will be shocked.

00:37:20.620 That's all I'll say about that.

00:37:21.800 But let's move on to reading the YouTube comments.

00:37:23.600 This is from Phyllis says, not in a million years.

00:37:25.580 Could anyone convince me that Jenner is a conservative or is a Republican or is a woman for that matter?

00:37:31.060 Well said, Phyllis.

00:37:32.460 And needless to say, I agree.

00:37:34.640 Angie says, Kamala is so out of touch. 1.00

00:37:36.760 It's pathetic or really she's just a liar and a bad one at that. 1.00

00:37:39.640 I live in a rural town that only has one K through 12 school for three towns. 0.99

00:37:44.420 It only have to drive about six miles to a place that'll make copies.

00:37:47.340 But even better, I can just walk into another room in my house where we have a scanner, printer, and a computer.

00:37:53.140 Shocking, I know.

00:37:55.600 You had a scanner slash printer and a computer?

00:38:00.280 In your house in rural America?

00:38:02.200 Yeah.

00:38:06.400 If someone can't figure out how to make a copy of their ID, I'm not sure I want them voting anyway, she finishes.

00:38:13.640 Yeah, well, that's one of the great reasons for the voter ID laws, I think.

00:38:21.280 Because I would love to have the voting test where we just test your basic knowledge on civics, on American history, and that sort of thing.

00:38:29.440 Can you make it to like a fifth grade level?

00:38:31.080 I would love to have that.

00:38:31.940 But if we can't have that, then this stuff functions as kind of a test in and of itself.

00:38:36.520 A basic competency test.

00:38:39.400 Can you at least figure out how to make a photocopy of your ID and send it in?

00:38:42.740 Can you follow those instructions?

00:38:44.060 If you can't, then you're definitely someone we don't need.

00:38:47.280 Even if you're not trying to commit voter fraud. 1.00

00:38:51.640 If you're so insanely incompetent and stupid that you can't figure that out, then I agree with you. 1.00

00:38:58.080 I don't think we need you in the voting booth. 1.00

00:39:00.040 Another comment says, I don't think we should be using the phrase identifies as because it implies that this is a thing someone can do legitimately.

00:39:08.740 I would use the terms say they are or perhaps even pretends to be.

00:39:12.540 This is more direct and to the point if we're trying to maintain truth, legitimacy of language, and a baseline reality.

00:39:18.920 I get your point.

00:39:21.080 I think identifies as still.

00:39:23.240 It can be an accurate description.

00:39:26.320 This is someone who is identifying themselves.

00:39:29.000 You can identify yourself as anything.

00:39:30.840 I can identify myself as an elephant if I want.

00:39:32.780 It's just, it's a, it's a claim that I am making about myself.

00:39:38.260 And it may even be a feeling that I have, a deluded feeling I have about myself.

00:39:42.060 So when I say that this is a man who identifies as a woman, I'm not agreeing with the claim.

00:39:48.860 I'm just saying that is the claim they're making.

00:39:50.720 Let's see.

00:39:56.880 Jared says, Matt, now we demand first rule of Sweet Baby Gang is you do not talk about Sweet Baby Gang merchandise.

00:40:02.420 You brought this upon yourself.

00:40:03.720 Well, speaking of Sweet Baby Gang merchandise, and we could go many different places with Sweet Baby Gang merchandise,

00:40:09.700 but we can start with the T-shirt that I've showed you.

00:40:13.920 And there is now, I didn't do this, but someone put together, you can see it here.

00:40:18.300 I think this is a change.org petition.

00:40:21.280 Someone made a petition calling on the Daily Wire to put the Sweet Baby Gang merchandise on sale.

00:40:28.200 And it looks like they wanted, what do they want, 200?

00:40:31.960 They wanted 100 signatures, and they already have 89.

00:40:35.960 So the people have spoken.

00:40:39.600 I don't know if this is going to result on the merchandise, and the merchandise is actually going on sale.

00:40:43.240 I can't, I can't promise that.

00:40:44.460 I think petitions generally have no result whatsoever because they carry no legal weight.

00:40:52.980 But I just want you to know, I'm on your side on this thing, okay?

00:40:56.540 If it were up to me, you'd be able to buy this today at a very high premium.

00:41:04.820 But it's not up to me, and nothing is up to me.

00:41:06.600 But there it is.

00:41:07.140 If you want to sign, if you want to cry out, let your voice be heard the Democratic way, then go find that petition and sign it.

00:41:15.500 One thing I hear from people all the time when I meet people in public is they say to me,

00:41:20.620 Matt, you are a fashion god, and I really want to hear you talk more about fashion and your own sense of style.

00:41:27.740 Nobody ever says that to me at all.

00:41:31.780 And that's probably good, because I don't know a lot about fashion, but I'll tell you who does.

00:41:34.540 Mack Weldon.

00:41:35.160 Mack Weldon is, you know, there's so much more than just underwear.

00:41:38.600 That's how they kind of started.

00:41:40.180 But now they've got a full collection, including T-shirts, polos, button-ups, shorts, pants, swimsuits, and so much more.

00:41:46.580 With light and breathable fabric technology, Mack Weldon keeps you cool and comfortable all summer.

00:41:51.300 Which is really good, because I've discovered in Tennessee in the south, it's actually really hot, it turns out.

00:41:55.840 I didn't know that.

00:41:56.880 So I've been using a lot of Mack Weldon, especially their T-shirts, which are really comfortable.

00:42:01.220 And the great thing about Mack Weldon is that you don't have to decide between being comfortable or looking stylish.

00:42:05.520 You can actually accomplish both, and with little effort, which is very good for me.

00:42:10.420 So you've got to try Mack Weldon.

00:42:12.380 For 20% off your first order, visit MackWeldon.com slash Walsh and enter promo code Walsh.

00:42:17.080 That's MackWeldon.com slash Walsh, promo code Walsh for 20% off Mack Weldon reinventing men's basics.

00:42:25.300 You know, if there was a superlative for most likely to be trending on Twitter, it would be, I think it'd be me, you know, honestly.

00:42:33.240 No, it wouldn't be me.

00:42:34.940 It actually says in the copy that it wouldn't be me.

00:42:37.800 I'm not the guy.

00:42:38.940 Candace Owens, she's the one who would be most likely to trend.

00:42:41.300 I think I trend on Twitter a fair amount, maybe not as much as Candace, but.

00:42:44.200 And this is where I find my worth as a person, is in how often I trend on Twitter.

00:42:49.560 So it's really a competition.

00:42:50.540 Anyway, Candace Owens is who we're talking about here, not myself.

00:42:53.620 She has a new episode of her show, Candace, dropping tonight, Tuesday the 13th at 9 p.m. Eastern, 8 p.m. Central.

00:42:58.780 In tonight's episode, she discusses the protests in Cuba and weighs in on Marxism with MMA fighter Benil Dariush.

00:43:05.660 So watch Candace live tonight at 9 p.m. Eastern, 8 p.m. Central, only on dailywire.com slash Candace.

00:43:11.660 Now let's get to our daily cancellation.

00:43:14.200 Today for our daily cancellation, we turn to something that somehow manages to be so ludicrous

00:43:21.300 that I had to spend about 30 minutes Googling it just to make sure that it wasn't some kind of joke or parody.

00:43:25.940 It is, as it turns out, no joke, at least not intentionally.

00:43:29.480 The Washington Free Beacon reports on the news, and I'll give you some of the background before we get to the really good stuff.

00:43:34.860 Reading from the Free Beacon report, it says,

00:43:36.620 Top geologists condemn systemic white supremacy in the field of geoscience, which concerns the study of earth and rocks,

00:43:43.400 in a manifesto published at the scientific journal Nature Communications.

00:43:47.080 The manifesto, which was spearheaded by Fort Hayes State University geology professor Hendrata Ali and signed by 20 academics,

00:43:54.980 asserts that the lack of black geologists demonstrates the bigoted roots of the science.

00:43:59.280 They called on colleagues to quash the racist, quote,

00:44:02.660 expectations around manners, clothing, hair, professional attire, language, and diction

00:44:06.780 in an effort to boost diversity in the field.

00:44:10.000 Quote, racism has led to the geosciences becoming one of the least diverse among all science and engineering fields.

00:44:15.820 Racism thrives in geoscience.

00:44:17.660 Geoscience organizes organizations function alongside the same racist ideologies and practices shaping society.

00:44:23.740 So they're addressing the lack of black people in the field of geology.

00:44:30.220 This is no doubt a problem that has plagued your mind and haunted your dreams.

00:44:34.560 I know that it has for me.

00:44:35.380 I often wake up in a cold sweat, tossing and turning, my eyes wet with tears.

00:44:41.020 My wife will turn to me and say, well, what's wrong?

00:44:43.080 What is it?

00:44:44.360 And I'll say, there's not enough.

00:44:45.400 There's not enough.

00:44:47.140 And she'll say, not enough what?

00:44:48.640 Black geologists. 0.93

00:44:50.680 We need more diversity in the geological sciences.

00:44:53.740 This happens like three times a week.

00:44:57.920 I'm seeing a therapist about it.

00:44:59.820 Now, it's good that the people who published this paper are finally dealing with this problem.

00:45:03.900 But as I said, this is only the background.

00:45:06.560 We haven't gotten to the real headline here.

00:45:08.360 And before we do, a little more from this paper.

00:45:10.900 Speaking in general terms about the need for more anti-racism education among those who study rocks.

00:45:16.080 It says, quote,

00:45:16.640 Indeed, focusing on only one axis of diversity

00:45:46.640 white women working as geoscientists, but has not increased the participation of BIPOC and other marginalized peoples.

00:45:54.960 Okay.

00:45:55.720 So this is your standard issue racial grievance mongering so far.

00:46:00.280 The grievance mongers have identified a certain very specific area of society.

00:46:05.140 In this case, the field of geology. 0.93

00:46:08.100 And decided arbitrarily that there should be more black people involved in it.

00:46:12.600 And then they decided just as arbitrarily that the lack of black people is due to racism. 0.59

00:46:18.220 It couldn't just be that not as many black people feel like studying rocks for a living. 0.90

00:46:23.140 Can't say I blame them. 0.92

00:46:25.280 No, no, no.

00:46:25.680 It has to be racism.

00:46:26.860 That's what it is.

00:46:28.480 This is all, as I said, pretty standard fare.

00:46:30.760 And then we get to this.

00:46:32.840 Listen very closely.

00:46:33.680 And this, again, is real.

00:46:37.640 Access implies that individuals can obtain the resources they need to safely pursue their scientific endeavors.

00:46:44.160 Regardless of location, instrumentation, site accessibility, and their identity.

00:46:49.460 Historically, access has been limited to mostly able-bodied white cisgender heterosexual men.

00:46:55.380 As the geosciences strive to be more accessible,

00:46:57.860 The community must recognize that BIPOC and other marginalized geoscientists are not always safe in geoscience spaces.

00:47:15.480 Because, for example, holding objects, for example, a rock hammer, has been viewed as suspicious and continues to be used as a reason to call the police on black people,

00:47:27.760 which can lead to the death of black individuals entirely because of racial profiling and an unjustified fear of black people. 0.90

00:47:34.660 Okay. 0.97

00:47:34.780 You heard that right. 0.99

00:47:38.000 Geology is racist because black people are afraid of holding hammers. 1.00

00:47:44.940 This makes me, among other things, feel bad for the black cashier who rang up my items at Home Depot last week. 0.98

00:47:50.620 I mean, imagine the psychological trauma he must suffer on a daily basis. 0.97

00:47:53.820 And why are black people afraid of hammers? 0.99

00:47:56.900 Well, because if they hold one, somebody might call the cops, and then the cops will come and shoot them. 0.97

00:48:04.400 In fact, this is a problem, we're told, with all physical objects in general.

00:48:08.260 According to the paper, any activity that requires holding an object of any kind can be construed as racist because of how it endangers black lives.

00:48:16.760 You might not have known this, but if you have ever worked at, say, the concession stand at a movie theater,

00:48:20.860 and you handed a black customer his large bucket of popcorn after he paid for it, you just put his life in jeopardy.

00:48:29.500 Somebody should have come and smacked that popcorn out of your hands and said, no, don't do that. 0.99

00:48:34.300 You're going to kill this man. 0.99

00:48:37.100 What are you doing? 1.00

00:48:37.800 That's an object.

00:48:38.660 He can't hold an object.

00:48:41.900 I mean, you should know better, honestly, than to go around giving objects to people of color. 1.00

00:48:45.800 It is your unique privilege as a white person to hold objects. 0.68

00:48:49.020 Other races of people don't have that ability.

00:48:52.520 They just don't.

00:48:54.780 Now, you may ask many questions, such as, has there ever been a case?

00:49:03.300 Has there ever been a case ever in history, even once, of a black geologist being shot by the cops for using a hammer to break open some rocks?

00:49:13.840 The paper would seem to indicate that this is an epidemic.

00:49:15.860 I know it's not an epidemic.

00:49:16.940 I'm just wondering, has it ever happened at all at any point?

00:49:22.360 Since the inception of the field of geology, has any geologist of any color or race been killed by the police in the course of their duty for using a hammer?

00:49:35.600 And by the way, if geology excludes black people because of how it requires the use of hammers, what about the construction field?

00:49:44.660 If people of color avoid geology because they don't want to risk their lives by holding objects, what are they doing in construction? 0.94

00:49:52.020 I mean, in that field, white people are underrepresented.

00:49:54.080 Almost 20% of construction workers are Hispanic and 12% are black, which is proportional with the general population.

00:50:01.140 If anyone was going to be shot for using a hammer on the job, you'd think it'd be construction workers who oftentimes are working in cities and populated areas.

00:50:10.020 Not geologists out chipping away at some limestone in the desert somewhere.

00:50:14.060 But here I am replying rational thought to what is wholly irrational.

00:50:20.740 The leftist religion dictates that everything, everywhere, must be racist.

00:50:25.920 And it's up to them to, you know, fill in the blanks and explain the hows and whys.

00:50:30.340 And in fairness to them, it's not easy to find racism in geology of all things.

00:50:34.520 And this is basically the best they could do.

00:50:36.800 It was an admirable attempt, we must say.

00:50:40.420 But still insane.

00:50:41.720 And for that, they are, of course, today, canceled.

00:50:46.680 And we'll leave it there.

00:50:48.040 Thanks for watching.

00:50:48.740 Thanks for listening.

00:50:51.000 Godspeed.

00:51:11.720 Michael Knowles Show, the Andrew Klavan Show.

00:51:13.980 Thanks for listening.

00:51:15.000 The Matt Walsh Show is produced by Sean Hampton, executive producer Jeremy Boring.

00:51:19.320 Our supervising producers are Mathis Glover and Robert Sterling.

00:51:22.300 Our technical director is Austin Stevens.

00:51:24.740 Production manager, Pavel Vadosky.

00:51:26.660 The show is edited by Sasha Tolmachov.

00:51:29.040 Our audio is mixed by Mike Coromina.

00:51:31.160 Hair and makeup is done by Nika Geneva.

00:51:33.360 And our production coordinator is McKenna Waters.

00:51:35.800 The Matt Walsh Show is a Daily Wire production.

00:51:37.700 Copyright Daily Wire 2021.

00:51:39.140 Cubans take to the streets to protest communism.

00:51:42.600 Hunter Biden sells his doodles for half a million bucks.

00:51:46.060 And a genius of the public health establishment promises to make life very hard for the unvaccinated. 0.91

00:51:53.560 Check it out on The Michael Knowles Show.

00:51:54.840 The blockade Ain't going to own the woodwork. 1.00

00:51:58.200 We're going to turn around.

00:51:59.760 We're going to turn around.

00:52:00.440 We're going to be a little bit more to a million bucks.

00:52:00.800 We're going to be a bit more to turn around.

00:52:02.620 We're going to be a little bit more to a million bucks.

00:52:03.760 We're going to turn around.

00:52:04.920 We're going to turn around.

00:52:05.500 We're going to turn around.

00:52:06.200 We're going to turn around.

00:52:06.840 We're going to turn around.

00:52:08.020 We're going to turn around.

00:52:08.820 We're going to turn around.

00:52:08.960 We're going to turn around.

00:52:09.860 We're going to turn around.

00:52:10.800 We're going to turn around.

00:52:11.900 We're going to turn around toسaphing.

00:52:13.020 Drawing around.

00:52:13.880 We're going to turn around for this episode.

00:52:14.680 Hey relief for all the stars to make life.

The Matt Walsh Show - July 13, 2021

Ep. 752 - The War On American History

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript