Ep. 796 - AOC Takes Brave Stand Against Rich Elites By Partying With Them
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 1 minute
Words per Minute
169.89975
Summary
As the ruling class got together at the Met Gala last night to celebrate their wealth, AOC was on the scene in a Tax the Rich dress. Was it a courageous and rebellious display by the congresswoman, or was it rank shameless hypocrisy? Also, a new poll shows that an increasing number of vaccinated Americans are cutting off ties with unvaccinated friends. Plus, a male MMA fighter enters the ring with a female fighter and proceeds to beat her into submission.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Today on the Matt Wall Show, the ruling class got together at the Met Gala last night to
00:00:04.140
celebrate their wealth. AOC was on the scene in a tax the rich dress. Was it a courageous
00:00:08.600
and rebellious display by the congresswoman or was it rank shameless hypocrisy? We'll discuss.
00:00:14.280
Also, a new poll shows that an increasing number of vaccinated Americans are cutting off ties
00:00:19.040
with unvaccinated friends. Plus, Secretary of State Blinken admits that many of those
00:00:23.660
SIV applicant Afghans were admitting it to the country are not actually SIV applicants at all.
00:00:28.780
And a male MMA fighter enters the ring with a female fighter and then proceeds to beat her
00:00:34.080
into submission. This is being celebrated as a brave and beautiful moment in sports history.
00:00:38.940
But I have a different take, as you might expect. All of that and more today on the Matt Wall Show.
00:00:51.040
You know, one of my great struggles in life is that I am extremely forgetful. And this is a problem
00:00:56.300
when traveling, as you know, I've talked about traveling the last couple of weeks. I always
00:01:00.340
forget at least five important things. And most recently traveling for the last two weeks, I forgot
00:01:05.980
my relief band and I paid the consequences because we were taking a lot of, you know, Ubers and
00:01:12.480
everything around a lot of a lot of a lot of stop and starts and going around cities and lots of
00:01:17.140
unpaved roads in New York City because I guess they've decided that paving is, you know, just not
00:01:21.680
not worth the time. And and I was feeling pretty motion sick. And I wish that I had had my relief
00:01:27.300
band because relief band is the number one FDA cleared anti-nausea wristband that has been
00:01:31.340
clinically proven to quickly relieve and effectively prevent nausea and vomiting associated with motion
00:01:35.360
sickness, anxiety, migraine, hangover, morning sickness, chemotherapy, and so much more. The
00:01:39.920
product is 100% drug free, non-drowsy and provides all natural relief with zero side effects for as long
00:01:45.300
as you need. And it really does work. I can tell you that myself. So ensure that nausea is never the
00:01:49.340
reason to miss out on life's important moments. Right now, relief band has an exclusive offer just
00:01:53.200
for Matt Walsh listeners. If you go to reliefband.com and use promo code Walsh, you'll receive 20%
00:01:57.780
off plus free shipping and a no questions asked 30 day money back guarantee. So head to R-E-L-I-E-F-B-A-N-D.com
00:02:04.720
and use our promo code Walsh for 20% off. AOC's abuela, as far as we know, is still languishing in her
00:02:12.280
unfurnished Puerto Rican shack with water pouring from the ceiling and collecting in tin buckets strewn across
00:02:18.420
the floor. Infamously, the congresswoman would not allow me to step in and rescue the poor woman from
00:02:23.920
her dire situation. And I can tell you that I am still personally haunted by that. I still wake up
00:02:28.840
at some nights in a cold sweat shouting, abuela, I'm sorry, I tried abuela. AOC, one can assume, has
00:02:35.740
slept like a baby this entire time, on the other hand. Now, I bring this up again because I thought
00:02:41.420
about abuela last night when I saw the picture circulating online of her negligent granddaughter cavorting
00:02:48.000
with her fellow rich people at the Met Gala in New York. Tickets for the opulent event cost
00:02:53.960
somewhere around $30,000 a piece. And if you want to buy a table inside the hall to advertise your
00:02:59.440
brand, something to keep in mind for next year, if you're thinking about this for your business,
00:03:02.900
it'll run you about a quarter of a million dollars. So it is a garish extravaganza, the ostensible
00:03:09.400
purpose of which is to raise money for the Metropolitan Museum of Art. But in actuality, the point is to
00:03:14.980
celebrate and revel in the ostentatious wealth of the Hollywood government and media elites in
00:03:20.680
attendance. Now, it may seem rather hypocritical for AOC to show up at this carnival of affluence.
00:03:26.620
But don't worry, the expensive designer dress she donned for the occasion, which appears to have
00:03:31.660
been inspired by a Chick-fil-A takeout bag, had the words tax the rich scrawled across it.
00:03:37.820
Those words change everything we're supposed to believe. Normally, it would be hypocritical for a
00:03:41.860
woman who constantly rants about rich people to attend a lavish ball with rich people so that she
00:03:47.020
could rub elbows with those same rich people. But in this case, we're told her attendance is a bold
00:03:52.580
and brave and rebellious statement, all because of those words on her dress. Here she is explaining
00:03:59.180
My God, tax the rich. What a model, AOC. I didn't know you model as well.
00:04:06.960
Damn. When Aurora and I were first kind of partnered, we really started having a conversation about what
00:04:13.100
it means to be working class women of color at the Met. And we said, you know, we can't just
00:04:20.720
play along, but we need to break the fourth wall and challenge some of the institutions.
00:04:25.000
And, you know, while the Met is known for its spectacle, we should have a conversation about
00:04:32.960
Ah. Yeah, have a conversation. Now, here's a general rule. Anytime somebody justifies a particular action
00:04:41.020
that they've taken by claiming that they've done it because they want to start a conversation,
00:04:45.700
it means 100% of the time that they're full of s**t. That's what it means. Case in point,
00:04:51.040
later that night on Twitter, AOC further defended her attendance saying, quote,
00:04:55.540
proud to work with Aurora James as a sustainable focused black woman immigrant designer who went
00:05:01.160
from starting her dream at a flea market in Brooklyn to winning the CFDA against all odds
00:05:06.100
and then work together to kick the doors open at the Met. The time is now for child care,
00:05:11.200
health care and climate action for all. Tax the rich. Quick, quick fact check on some of this.
00:05:17.540
Aurora James, the immigrant woman in AOC's phrase is from Ontario. Now, she may technically
00:05:24.260
be an immigrant, but a fashion designer moving a few hundred miles from Canada to New York
00:05:28.440
isn't exactly the picture that AOC wants us to have in mind when she uses the phrase
00:05:32.680
black immigrant woman. Also, when she says kick the doors open at the Met, what she means is that
00:05:38.820
she took pictures on the red carpet and then drank cocktails with her rich friends. That's kicking
00:05:44.320
the doors open. Not exactly Jesus overturning the tables and driving the money changers away
00:05:50.800
with a whip. If she had done that, totally different story. And when she says child care
00:05:57.300
and health care, keep in mind that health care for children, as far as the Congresswoman is concerned,
00:06:01.260
can often include crushing their skulls and throwing them into a medical waste dumpster.
00:06:06.860
So other than those minor details, I'd say that her description was pretty accurate.
00:06:10.500
Now, with that established, I think there are a few other more general points to be made here. First,
00:06:17.100
the problem, let's talk about this tax the rich slogan for a second. The problem is that the
00:06:22.400
slogan is, you know, it seems to suggest that the rich right now are not taxed. That's why you say
00:06:28.620
tax the rich, because according to you, they're not. If they were being taxed, then the slogan
00:06:34.740
wouldn't make sense. It'd be redundant. But that's not true. The rich pay taxes. They pay lots
00:06:41.940
of taxes. They pay the most taxes. They pay the vast majority of taxes. Tax the rich? Sure, I agree.
00:06:50.480
Of course we should tax the rich. Now, I don't think there are very many people saying that we
00:06:55.140
shouldn't tax the rich at all. So here's the good news. We do. A lot. That's a fact. If you hear that
00:07:03.060
the rich don't pay taxes and you believe it, that must mean that you, first of all, don't read very
00:07:07.860
much and aren't in the habit of researching claims made by partisans before deciding to believe them.
00:07:13.280
It also means, presumably, that you don't make much money yourself, because if you'd ever had the
00:07:18.160
experience of making a small amount of money and then managing to climb up the ladder a ways,
00:07:23.220
I'm not talking about all the way up to Elon Musk level. I just mean you made a little bit of money
00:07:27.180
and then you had some more success and you made some more money. If you've ever done that
00:07:30.960
and achieved greater financial success relative to where you began, you'll have noticed that as
00:07:37.180
you earn more money, the government takes more money from you. It's a pretty inescapable thing.
00:07:44.940
It's pretty obvious. And at a certain point, you'll observe with alarm, they begin to take so
00:07:51.580
much of your income that you question whether the climb was worth it to begin with. That's the case
00:07:56.500
right now. This may come as a shock to anybody who previously believed that the government rewards
00:08:02.960
higher income earners by politely declining to harvest their income, but that's not the case.
00:08:08.720
That's not even close to the case. As it turns out, the government quite enjoys taking people's money.
00:08:15.060
And the more money you have, the more it will want to stick its greasy hands into your pockets.
00:08:20.500
And when Joe Biden is running the government, the hand may even linger there in your pocket for an
00:08:24.600
uncomfortable and unnecessary length of time. So considering that the rich pay most of the
00:08:31.600
taxes, vast, vast majority of the taxes are paid by the rich. Where did this idea come from that
00:08:38.200
they pay no taxes? Well, here's a good example of how the propaganda works. This is a CBS news
00:08:43.940
headline from back in June. It says, quote, is it, it's just the headline says richest 25 Americans
00:08:50.780
have a true tax rate of almost nothing. Wow. Almost nothing. Almost nothing. What? That doesn't
00:08:58.680
sound fair. Jeff Bezos doesn't, he pays almost nothing. I mean, what is that all about? Well,
00:09:04.680
let's read on. It says the U S tax system is designed to be progressive, meaning that the
00:09:09.000
wealthiest citizens pay a greater share of their income than the less fortunate, but a new pro-publical
00:09:13.880
analysis of tax data on some of the nation's richest Americans comes to the conclusion that the
00:09:18.580
richest 25 people in the U S have a true tax rate of almost nothing. The pro-publical report focuses
00:09:24.680
on what it calls the true tax rate, which it defines as how much in taxes were paid by the
00:09:29.460
wealthiest Americans annually versus the estimated growth in their wealth during that time. For
00:09:35.060
instance, Amazon CEO, Jeff Bezos paid $1.4 billion in personal federal taxes between 2006 and 2018
00:09:43.420
on 6.5 billion that he reported in income, while his wealth increased by 127 billion during that
00:09:50.660
same period. By pro-publica's calculation, that reflects a true tax rate of 1.1%. But some,
00:09:58.660
continuing, but some tax experts noted that the analysis compares what they say are apples to
00:10:03.760
oranges, income versus wealth. The IRS collects taxes on earned income and income received through
00:10:09.460
stock sales dividends and other income provided by investments. It doesn't levy taxes on unrealized
00:10:14.740
gains or the paper value of a person's assets. Ah, okay. There it is. When they say that Jeff Bezos
00:10:21.880
pays almost nothing, what they mean is that he paid $1.4 billion. Nothing? 1.4 billion is almost
00:10:32.580
nothing. They justify this claim through a little sleight of hand trick where they equate net worth
00:10:39.440
with income. Those two things are not the same. And it's a damn good thing that the federal government
00:10:45.160
doesn't tax your net worth like it taxes your income, because that would be a disaster for anyone
00:10:50.560
who has any kind of net worth at all. Can you imagine that if that's what you were doing at the
00:10:56.420
come tax time? You had to assess not only your income for the year, but your entire net worth
00:11:03.600
and pay on that? Of course, many of the people in the peanut gallery, not to be confused with the
00:11:10.140
elites like AOC, who shout tax the rich, don't have any net worth, have never owned anything. And so these
00:11:16.840
are distinctions and points that go over their head. Now I say all this, but it's not because I care
00:11:22.980
deeply about protecting Jeff Bezos from higher tax rates. Frankly, I don't care if his taxes go up a
00:11:28.900
little bit. It doesn't bother me. My main problem with raising taxes on anyone is that the government
00:11:35.720
already rakes in $3 or $4 trillion a year in tax revenue and squanders almost all of it.
00:11:44.240
Now, I think it's like it's $3.5 trillion, I think they're up to, or maybe more,
00:11:47.680
that they bring in tax revenue every single year. And yet there are people saying they need more
00:11:55.060
to do what with? What problem can the government solve potentially that they can't already solve
00:12:02.580
with $3 trillion a year? There is no problem that can be solved by giving even more money to this
00:12:11.760
giant, lumbering, corrupt, wasteful behemoth. Raises taxes if you want, whatever, but just know that
00:12:19.720
it will solve nothing and that the policy is being pushed based on lies and bad faith arguments. And
00:12:25.420
it's being believed by idiots who don't understand the first thing about how the economy works and
00:12:30.720
don't even understand the distinction between income and net worth. Second point, why do you think
00:12:37.840
that the rich love AOC? Why do they love the tax the rich slogan? You know, showing up to the Met Gala
00:12:45.700
in a tax the rich dress, that's not like if I showed up to a Planned Parenthood fundraiser in a
00:12:52.440
t-shirt that said, imprison abortionists, which actually sounds like a great thing to do. Maybe I'll do
00:12:58.120
that. But AOC, you know, she was embraced and applauded. If I did that, I'd be assaulted by security
00:13:04.800
and thrown out into the street. The rich are fine with the tax the rich stuff because many of them
00:13:12.300
really don't mind paying a bit more in taxes. That's not because they're generous. I mean,
00:13:16.880
if they were generous, they'd be forgoing, they'd forgo the $200,000 designer outfit and the expensive
00:13:22.580
costume ball and donate that extra wealth to the poor. If you wondered that, I mean, all these rich
00:13:28.820
people say, oh yeah, tax us, we should be paying more. They say while wearing an outfit that costs
00:13:35.560
more than your house. They could just give up one outfit in their wardrobe and they could put,
00:13:42.100
you know, a family of five in a home and they choose not to do that.
00:13:48.820
No, they go along with the tax the rich stuff and they call for higher taxes themselves because for
00:13:53.780
one thing, it's an easy and relatively cheap way to virtue signal. And more importantly,
00:13:58.500
it gets them closer to the levers of power. So what are the, what do all of the people at the
00:14:03.200
Met Gala have in common? They're all in the ruling class. AOC, the other politicians in attendance,
00:14:09.580
the Hollywood degenerates who are there, all of them are in the ruling class together. They have a
00:14:13.840
shared interest. They have shared goals. And that is mainly to maintain and extend their own
00:14:19.620
influence. Sure. They'll pay a little more in taxes. What do they care? They know those taxes
00:14:24.800
are being spent by their comrades to advance their own ideological interests anyway, and their own
00:14:30.300
financial interests. So for them, for the people at the Met Gala or the people who were at the VMAs the
00:14:37.620
night before, big, big week for, for Hollywood degenerates, by the way, they could bring it, break out
00:14:43.520
all their ugly costumes. But for those people paying taxes, that's an investment for them.
00:14:51.100
They get something in return for it. I mean, they get an entire system, an entire political system
00:14:58.360
that works at their behest. That's what they get in return. That's why our objective shouldn't be
00:15:05.320
simply to tax the rich, but rather to dethrone the ruling class. You'll notice AOC, she didn't put that
00:15:11.920
on her dress because that's the last thing she wants to do. Third point, finally, the rich also
00:15:19.300
aren't too worried about AOC's tax the rich sloganeering because they know it isn't serious
00:15:24.240
anyway. She wasn't the only one who showed up last night with bumper sticker jargon emblazoned on her
00:15:30.060
outfit. There were plenty of, you know, celebrities wearing gaudy, but basically non-political outfits
00:15:34.140
like Lil Nas X was there. He could be seen here dressed like a C-3PO's gay cousin. But there was also
00:15:41.760
Cara Delevingne, whoever that is, wearing what looks to be a fake bulletproof vest with
00:15:47.020
Peg the Patriarchy written on it. And then Carolyn B. Maloney, whoever that is, with equal rights
00:15:53.680
for women printed on a robe that looks like something that a lesbian Episcopal bishop might
00:15:57.280
wear. And then Megan Rapinoe with a handbag featuring the words, in gay we trust. You know,
00:16:04.100
the other thing you see in all these pictures are the wide-eyed starstruck reporters in the background
00:16:09.940
wearing face masks and hungrily snapping pictures.
00:16:14.860
Now the celebrities, they're not wearing face masks.
00:16:18.000
That's actually the greatest hypocrisy on display in this entire thing.
00:16:21.540
None of them are wearing face masks. Why aren't they wearing face masks? Because that would ruin their
00:16:30.600
And it's true. You look ridiculous in a face mask. Everybody does.
00:16:33.660
It's one of the many reasons why I don't wear them.
00:16:41.040
But all the reporters. So the, you know, the servants are all wearing masks.
00:16:47.640
And the reporters, who are also servants for the ruling class, they're all in masks.
00:16:57.080
This is really the whole thing in a nutshell, isn't it?
00:17:02.020
Because truly, nothing says modern leftism like a gaggle of rich elitists at a $30,000 per ticket gala
00:17:09.660
walking around in hideous designer dresses with shallow political slogans emblazoned across them
00:17:14.660
while an adoring press looks on drooling into their muzzles.
00:17:20.620
They're all just cosplaying as political revolutionaries.
00:17:25.740
None of them believe in anything but their own power and their own influence.
00:17:33.160
And last night was the perfect illustration of that fact.
00:17:45.400
Now a quick word from our friends over at Mack Weldon.
00:17:48.820
You know, I've become something of a fashion designer myself recently
00:17:56.460
And I take inspiration from Mack Weldon in my new role as a fashion designer.
00:18:02.800
Not to blame them for the Sweet Baby Gang t-shirts.
00:18:06.300
But listen, the Mack Weldon, they've got something called the Daily Wear System.
00:18:10.120
The Daily Wear System is a selection of clothes rooted in smart design,
00:18:13.400
made with performance fabrics, and built to work together.
00:18:15.700
From breathable t-shirts and polos to stylish button-ups and shorts, underwear, and beyond,
00:18:20.300
Mack Weldon makes it easy for you to dress for work, leisure, or play.
00:18:23.760
For the Ultimate Lazy Sunday, their Ace Sweatshorts have modern tailoring
00:18:27.900
and pair perfectly with their ultra-soft, ultra-upgraded Pima tees.
00:18:31.640
For weekend travels, both near and far, their silver knit polo and radius shorts
00:18:37.020
are the perfect, high-tech, highly packable combo.
00:18:40.340
They've got it all at Mack Weldon, so you can buy some time this fall
00:18:45.980
For 20% off your first order, visit MackWeldon.com slash Walsh
00:19:02.620
I think about Abuela regularly, and I wonder how she's doing.
00:19:08.540
However she's doing, she's not doing nearly as well as her granddaughter.
00:19:16.960
Secretary of State Blinken testified before Congress
00:19:19.500
about the efforts to get Americans out of Afghanistan
00:19:26.680
because right now everything is kind of on its head, right?
00:19:31.600
We're bringing Afghans to America while leaving Americans there.
00:19:36.300
Everything is upside down and backwards and topsy-turvy.
00:19:40.200
But here is, we'll start with a couple of clips here.
00:19:42.380
This is Secretary of State Blinken during his testimony
00:19:45.360
when he was asked how many of the Afghans that we brought here
00:19:50.800
do not meet the requirements for special immigrant visas
00:19:54.160
because we've been told that these are all SIV applicants,
00:19:59.240
special immigrant visas, and many of them are translators.
00:20:03.760
We apparently had a lot of translators in Afghanistan.
00:20:11.200
You know, there's only, we had 2,500 troops there
00:20:21.480
had a whole team of translators just surrounding him
00:20:25.080
And Blinken was asked about this and here's what he said.
00:20:31.600
How many Afghans not meeting the qualifications of SIV
00:20:35.480
have been brought to the United States prior to,
00:20:40.240
I want to know how many Afghan citizens came to the United States
00:20:43.480
that had not met the qualifications for special immigrant visa?
00:20:57.780
we will have brought a total of approximately 60,000.
00:21:05.800
some of those will have been through the SIV process.
00:21:10.260
will have gone through rigorous security checks
00:21:12.060
first at the transit point outside of the United States.
00:21:14.600
It'd be nice if that was done before we brought these people
00:21:21.920
and he's not going to say how many of them actually meet the requirements
00:21:28.500
And the actual answer that he won't give is, well, we don't care.
00:21:34.760
You know, if we make them citizens, well, they vote Democrat.
00:21:51.100
He says he's very focused, Alan, on the fate of the LGBT community.
00:21:56.720
As you know, Mr. Secretary, the LGBTQI community in Afghanistan
00:22:00.640
is extremely vulnerable to punitive actions from the Taliban.
00:22:04.380
It's important, in my view, that we take steps to ensure that those
00:22:09.600
because of their sexual orientation or gender identity are safe.
00:22:12.960
The Council for Global Equality, the Human Rights Campaign,
00:22:17.760
released a 10-point plan to protect Afghan LGBTQI refugees.
00:22:23.760
And if so, is the administration prepared to implement it?
00:22:27.180
And is it consistent with the presidential memorandum of early 2021
00:22:30.880
that speaks of the responsibility to help Afghan refugees
00:22:35.160
that may get to neighboring states, as outlined in that memorandum?
00:22:38.280
Well, thank you for rightly putting the spotlight on concerns
00:22:45.280
and the particular threat that they may find themselves under.
00:22:50.240
I have not personally seen the report that you referred to.
00:22:56.200
But I'll take a look at that myself, and I thank you for sending it to us.
00:23:03.760
I mean, there is no point to anything that this empty-headed moron says
00:23:09.500
But LGBTQI plus, you know, he has to get the whole acronym.
00:23:23.820
So, you know, part of the concern is we're focused on the fate of intersex people in Afghanistan.
00:23:29.920
Is that, like, a major concern of the U.S. government, intersex people in Afghanistan?
00:23:40.060
The fact that the I gets included at all, but it has nothing to do.
00:23:47.000
You know, being intersex, it's a medical condition
00:23:50.360
that has to do with the appearance of your genitals.
00:24:03.480
And the way that we put them in, the LGBT, it's got nothing to do with it at all.
00:24:19.080
You know, I often wonder how intersex people feel about being
00:24:25.240
included, of course, you don't hear from them very often
00:24:30.260
This is a very, very, thankfully, a very, very rare condition.
00:24:47.380
I'm not sure I'd be a fan of just being appropriated in this way.
00:24:51.000
Talk about appropriation and being lumped in with some group that,
00:24:59.500
Well, the answer is the reason why I'm asking all this rhetorically.
00:25:05.060
The answer is that intersex people are useful to trans people.
00:25:08.740
And like we talked about yesterday, trans people,
00:25:10.200
the top of the victimhood pyramid and whatever they say goes.
00:25:14.400
And so if you're intersex and trans people say,
00:25:20.060
I'm not, I'm just, this is a medical condition.
00:25:25.860
Because of the, of this false equivalency that they can draw.
00:25:37.760
You know, they got to go all the way to the rare cases
00:25:41.800
So you talk to anyone on the left about transgenderism
00:25:48.380
they're going to be bringing up intersex people,
00:25:55.080
with a biological male who identifies as a woman.
00:26:12.480
and you say to me, well, how can you be a woman?
00:26:17.440
They have a genetic, they have a medical condition.