The Matt Walsh Show - Ep. 814 - Sane People Are The Most Marginalized Community In America

00:00:00.000 Today on The Matt Wall Show, the backlash against Dave Chappelle grows as the media insists that

00:00:04.880 any and all jokes about or criticisms of LGBT people are out of bounds and automatically bigoted.

00:00:10.840 They say that LGBT people are marginalized, and that's why you can't make these jokes. But if

00:00:15.300 you aren't allowed to joke about a group of people, isn't that an indication that they are

00:00:18.300 the exact opposite of marginalized? Also, the high school student who shot a teacher and two

00:00:23.620 classmates on Wednesday was released on bail on Thursday, less than 24 hours later. What's going

00:00:28.840 on there? And the New York Times claims that 900,000 children have been hospitalized with COVID,

00:00:34.220 which is not even close to true. And also a new study confirms that women are attracted to men

00:00:38.880 who can provide for them financially. What does it say about our society that we needed a study

00:00:43.680 to confirm that obvious fact? We'll talk about all of that and more today on The Matt Wall Show.

00:00:47.580 You know, everybody has been talking about abortion lately with what's been happening in the news and

00:01:01.900 down in Texas. And it's good that this conversation is happening. It's great with what's the law down

00:01:07.200 in Texas. But the problem is for a lot of us, we just don't know exactly what to say, how to engage

00:01:13.820 with these arguments. And that's why if you're struggling on what to say or how to say it when

00:01:18.500 abortion is a topic of conversation, you need to check out a recent new book, What to Say When,

00:01:22.540 the complete new guide to discussing abortion. It's already been a number one Amazon new release

00:01:27.580 and a number two Amazon bestseller. And it's on second printing already. So it tells you how popular

00:01:31.500 this book has been. And for good reason, because it's a very easy book to use. It tells you what to

00:01:35.380 say, what not to say. And it's proven arguments that have worked with everyone. I mean, 40 Days for Life,

00:01:40.820 they have even been able to connect with and convert abortion workers, people at Planned Parenthood,

00:01:47.000 221 abortion workers have seen the light, thanks in large part to a lot of these same arguments here.

00:01:52.540 So go to the experts, go to the people that know exactly what to say. It's called What to Say When,

00:01:56.960 the complete new guide to discussing abortion, how to change minds and convert hearts in a brave new world.

00:02:01.000 Go to Amazon or get it directly from 40 Days for Life at 40daysforlife.com.

00:02:04.680 To begin with, I must request, well, not request, but instruct, demand that you sign up for my

00:02:10.120 newsletter if you haven't already. Go to mattwalshreport.com. It's free, so you are without

00:02:15.060 excuse. Don't make me ask again. I am warning you. Now, on to the topic at hand. The fallout

00:02:21.460 continues from Dave Chappelle's Netflix comedy special where he dared to crack one or two jokes

00:02:27.460 at the expense of the LGBT alphabet squad. Most recently, the showrunner for Netflix's anti-white

00:02:33.720 series called Dear White People says that he, who identifies now as a she, will be boycotting 1.00

00:02:39.840 the network. By the way, this showrunner, who now goes by Jacqueline Moore, is white. So this is a 0.68

00:02:45.860 white man who identifies as a woman and makes an anti-white show about black people boycotting a

00:02:51.180 black man for telling jokes about trans people. It is a tangled web of intersectionality there.

00:02:57.040 Here's what Variety reports. They say, quote, Jacqueline Moore has always considered Dave Chappelle

00:03:01.440 one of her comic heroes. Quote, his shadow is huge, says Moore, who was a writer and showrunner

00:03:07.780 on Netflix's Dear White People. He's a brilliant, goofy comedian. He's brilliant as a political

00:03:12.180 comedian. He's been brilliant for so, so long. But I also don't think because you've been brilliant

00:03:17.520 means that you're always brilliant. After the Chappelle special, I can't do this anymore. I won't

00:03:22.560 work for Netflix again as long as they keep promoting and profiting from dangerous transphobic

00:03:27.280 content. She also tweeted, she, in quotes here, I'm reading from Variety. That's what the word

00:03:34.700 they're using. I love so many of the people I've worked with at Netflix, brilliant people and

00:03:39.560 executives who have been collaborative and fought for important art. But I've been thrown against

00:03:43.340 walls because I'm not a real woman. I've had beer bottles thrown at me. So, Netflix, I'm done.

00:03:50.400 We should note that Moore, apparently, according to Variety, transitioned into a woman during the

00:03:56.300 pandemic. So, you know, in the last several months. And already, he's incensed at the suggestion that

00:04:01.760 he's not a real woman. There have been many other reactions along these lines. GLAAD, for example,

00:04:07.300 released a statement saying, Dave Chappelle's brand has been synonymous with ridiculing trans people

00:04:13.400 and other marginalized communities. Negative reviews and viewers loudly condemning his latest special is

00:04:18.860 a message to the industry that audiences don't support platforming anti-LGBTQ diatribes. We agree. 0.96

00:04:25.520 And an LGBT group called the National Black Justice Coalition weighed in, saying,

00:04:31.000 with 2021 on track to be the deadliest year on record for transgender people in the U.S., 0.92

00:04:35.100 the majority of whom are black transgender people, Netflix should know better. Perpetuating 1.00

00:04:39.220 transphobia perpetuates violence. Netflix should immediately pull the closer from its platform

00:04:43.900 and directly apologize to the transgender community. Of course, the claim that there's some kind of

00:04:49.500 epidemic of anti-trans murders, much less that these murders are propelled by comedy specials,

00:04:55.180 is pure fiction. The vast majority of trans murders are drug or prostitution related, or they're due to 1.00

00:05:01.140 domestic violence. But the LGBT lobby, you know, reflexively lies about everything. So this is to be 1.00

00:05:09.440 expected. The media has likewise been breathless in its condemnations. Here's the headline from NPR.

00:05:15.580 says, for Dave Chappelle, punchlines are dares. But his new special, The Closer, goes too far.

00:05:23.100 And from the Hill, Chappelle called out for hostile transphobia and homophobia in Netflix special.

00:05:29.380 And The Guardian says, Dave Chappelle, Ricky Gervais, and comedy's ironic bigotry problem.

00:05:34.500 And the Daily Beast, Dave Chappelle's pointless transphobia and homophobia. And so on.

00:05:39.640 Now, before we continue, it probably makes sense to actually listen to the segments of the special

00:05:45.160 that have provoked all of this ire. There are primarily two that seem to have caused all this

00:05:49.720 trouble. The first we played a few days ago. We'll play it again, just to remind you. Here is

00:05:53.440 Chappelle pointing out that when it comes to deciding what to be offended by, we seem to have our priorities

00:05:59.320 a bit out of whack in our culture. Let's listen.

00:06:02.380 A lot of the LBGTQ community doesn't know the baby's history. He's a wild guy. 1.00

00:06:09.540 He once shot a n*** and killed him in Walmart. 1.00

00:06:16.920 Oh, this is true. Google it. The baby shot and killed a n*** in Walmart in North Carolina. 1.00

00:06:21.520 You know, nothing bad happened to his career.

00:06:30.160 Do you see where I'm going with this?

00:06:35.020 In our country, you can shoot and kill a n***, but you better not hurt a gay person's feelings. 0.98

00:06:40.940 I guess I should have clarified, a bit of setup there was probably necessary, that he's talking

00:06:49.140 about a rapper named DaBaby. He's not referring to an actual baby who shot and killed someone at

00:06:53.960 Walmart. Though, you know, I think I have seen babies walking around with handguns at Walmart,

00:06:59.360 but this is a rapper. His name is DaBaby. And in fairness, DaBaby, who, you know, of course,

00:07:05.080 I'm a big fan of all of his work, says, he says that he shot the guy in self-defense

00:07:10.840 in the Walmart. The guy was trying to rob him in the middle of a Walmart. Yeah, I don't know. I

00:07:18.080 don't know if he did or didn't. But I do know that DaBaby brags in his music about murdering people

00:07:24.220 all the time. I mean, he, like most rappers, glorifies murder, drug dealing, violent crime,

00:07:29.440 and so on. So even if he hadn't actually killed the guy himself, still, it would seem

00:07:33.740 far more offensive to promote actual murder than to make insulting comments about gays.

00:07:40.760 So the point from Chappelle stands, no matter the particulars of that case there at Walmart.

00:07:46.300 But I think it's Chappelle's comments about gender and trans people that have gotten

00:07:49.860 most of the attention and have caused most of the backlash of people calling for him to be

00:07:55.620 canceled. And here they are here.

00:07:58.360 They canceled J.K. Rowling. My God, J.K. Rowling wrote all the Harry Potter books by herself.

00:08:06.400 She sold so many books, the Bible worries about her.

00:08:12.400 And they canceled it because she said in an interview, and this is not exactly what she said,

00:08:16.260 but effectually, she said, gender was a fact. And then the trans community got mad. They started 0.76

00:08:23.680 calling her a TERF. I didn't even know what the fuck that was. But I know that trans people make up 1.00

00:08:30.160 words to win arguments. So I looked it up. TERF is an acronym. Stands for Trans Exclusionary Radical 0.97

00:08:42.540 Feminist. This is a real thing. This is a group of women that hate transgender. They don't hate 0.96

00:08:48.220 transgender women, but they look at trans women the way we blacks might look at blackface. It offends

00:08:53.240 them like, oh, this is doing an impression of me. Look at it like this. Caitlyn Jenner,

00:09:00.860 whom I've met, wonderful person. Caitlyn Jenner was voted woman of the year. Her first year as a

00:09:11.460 woman. Ain't that something? Beat every in Detroit. She's better than all of you. Gender is a fact. This 1.00

00:09:17.900 is a fact. Every human being in this room, every human being on earth had to pass through the

00:09:23.040 legs of a woman to be on earth. That is a fact. 0.99

00:09:28.600 Now, a couple of points. In fact, you notice one thing that kind of stands out. Even in the

00:09:39.600 context of making the points that he makes here, he's still respecting the pronouns. He still calls

00:09:46.820 Caitlyn Jenner her and a she. And that's what you find, that it's so rare, even the people who are 1.00

00:09:56.140 willing and it takes guts to do it. I give him credit for it. So it's not, I'm not trying to

00:10:00.060 take anything away from her split hairs here, but it's not really splitting hairs. Even the people

00:10:06.080 who are willing to stand up and point out some of the truth and, um, you know, and, and make some of

00:10:15.280 these criticisms. Most of them are not willing to go all the way. Very few people, very few are willing

00:10:22.320 to go all the way on this and totally reject left-wing gender ideology completely. There are

00:10:29.760 very few people willing to do that. Um, a couple other points. First, you know, Chappelle has made

00:10:36.480 jokes about all different groups and demographics. He jokes about white people all the time. Uh, he's 0.93

00:10:41.960 a comedian. That's what comedians are supposed to do. Most of the people offended by the two clips I just

00:10:46.160 played would not be offended and have not been offended by any of his jokes about literally any other

00:10:51.660 group of people. None of them. Should the alphabet squad really be exempt from all mockery? Should

00:10:59.100 they be the one single group that nobody ever makes fun of? The answer, according to his critics

00:11:05.520 is yes. That's, that is their answer. You can make fun of anybody, just not them. And the reason they

00:11:15.220 give for that is that, uh, they say that, uh, attacking LGBT people or, or not even attacking,

00:11:21.720 but making jokes about them is a punching down. It's punching down. But the actual reason

00:11:27.620 is exactly the opposite of that. You know, there's that old saying, I don't remember who coined it

00:11:33.600 originally, but, um, that you can tell who has the power in any society based on who you're not allowed

00:11:39.400 to criticize. And that's a rule that will rarely steer you wrong. And it certainly does not here.

00:11:46.260 The reason you can criticize everybody except LGBT people is that they hold the cultural power. 0.88

00:11:53.520 You get canceled for making jokes about the alphabet squad simply because the alphabet squad has

00:11:58.060 the power to cancel people. They're the ones who can do it. They can, they could choose, they could

00:12:03.580 choose to tolerate such mockery or not. And they certainly choose not to because you're not going to

00:12:08.860 find much in the way of self-deprecating humility among LGBT leftists or among any, any form of 0.83

00:12:14.920 leftist. Um, when it comes to leftism, narcissism is part of the game. And a narcissist is not going

00:12:22.260 to be happy with you making any jokes about them at all. Corporate America, uh, the media, academia,

00:12:30.700 the government, school system, Hollywood, all bow in service, bow in submission to the LGBT lobby. 0.94

00:12:41.160 All are largely run by the LGBT lobby. We're told that LGBT people are marginalized, but if you want

00:12:48.380 to know what marginalized actually means and what it looks like, then look at LGBT and imagine the

00:12:55.620 precise opposite of that. They have way outsized influence and power relative to their numbers.

00:13:03.900 That's not what marginalized means. You don't want to marginalized this. You know, you know who the

00:13:08.800 marginalized people are? The people who listened to that last segment from Chappelle and agree with it. 1.00

00:13:15.360 They're the marginalized ones. The people who know that biological sex is a fact, the people who know

00:13:25.360 that only women give birth and who would prefer to live in a society that recognizes that fact 1.00

00:13:31.680 and a society that, uh, that, that cherishes women and femininity because it is unique and special

00:13:41.480 and not anyone can partake in it just because they identify with it in their heads. Those are the

00:13:48.900 people who are marginalized. And how do you know they're marginalized? Because they're in the majority,

00:13:55.040 but their influence is way undersized, um, relative to their numbers.

00:14:04.620 That's what it means to be marginalized. It means you're pushed to the peripheral.

00:14:12.380 It means that you're ignored. Okay. When you're ignored and pushed to the peripheral,

00:14:17.600 you're being marginalized. Who could anyone with a straight face? Well, they can apparently.

00:14:27.040 Uh, but it's, it's kind of mind boggling that they can with a straight face that anyone with a straight

00:14:32.100 face could claim that LGBT people are marginalized, pushed to the peripheral, ignored. Really?

00:14:42.620 I mean, they get their own month and I think we're in the middle of another month right now,

00:14:46.280 because right now I believe is LGBT history month. I could be wrong. So, you know,

00:14:49.820 every month in some ways, a celebration. Again, the, the opposite of marginalized.

00:14:56.120 Marginalized. Marginalized are the people who agree with Dave Chappelle there. They're being

00:15:03.940 marginalized. And that's exactly why, even though what Chappelle is saying, especially at the very

00:15:10.380 end, that everybody who's on earth today or has ever been born had to pass through a woman in order 0.99

00:15:16.480 to be born. Like I said yesterday, if someone had told you back in 2000, like 20 years ago,

00:15:24.060 you know, if you could have looked into the future, if you could have been flipping through

00:15:28.740 the channels and stumbled on a channel that was broadcasting from 20 years in the future,

00:15:33.560 and you saw that segment and someone told you that that would be considered controversial 20

00:15:37.500 years from now, you would be filled with, with, you wouldn't believe it. And you, and if you did,

00:15:42.600 you'd be filled with dread and terror. And like, are you, so we, we, you're, you're saying society

00:15:47.200 completely loses its mind. Well, yeah, in the future, but the reason why it becomes kind of a

00:15:56.460 big deal is because the vast majority of people recognize that this is true, that biological sex

00:16:05.800 is a fact, uses the word gender. They're really, what he means is biological sex. Gender is a,

00:16:10.200 you know, gender as it relates to people is an invention. Um, biological sex is a fact. Only 1.00

00:16:19.260 women give birth. Like this, this is something that everyone recognizes. Most people, the vast

00:16:23.060 majority. And the reason why, you know, they celebrate someone like Dave Chappelle is because

00:16:33.440 a lot of people, even though they recognize these basic truths, they've been, they've been pushed to the

00:16:39.040 margins and now they feel like they need permission. They need someone who's in the mainstream, some

00:16:47.100 prominent person to say whatever, what, what they all recognize to be true. And it's sad that people

00:16:56.180 are waiting for permission to speak basic truths, but that's where we are. And that's what it means

00:17:02.280 to be marginalized. Now let's get to our five headlines.

00:17:09.040 Maybe you've had this experience before of, uh, you know, you got a call or text or an email from

00:17:16.960 someone posing as an IRS agent or a police officer at the power company demanding payment by a gift

00:17:22.800 card. Well, if you have, you're probably being targeted for a gift card scam. These fraudsters trick

00:17:27.860 victims into sending online gift cards or reading the numbers from a gift card over the phone. Uh, I mean,

00:17:33.440 it should be a pretty good, if someone in the IRS is saying, send me a gift card or a cop is calling

00:17:37.860 you up, it should be a pretty good indication that it's a scam, but sometimes the scams are not

00:17:42.080 always obvious. And that's why it's so important to understand how cyber crime and identity theft are

00:17:46.240 affecting our lives every day. Every day we put our information at risk on the internet in an instant,

00:17:50.820 a cyber criminal could harm what's yours, your finances, your credit, everything. Well, it's a good

00:17:55.820 thing. There's LifeLock. LifeLock helps detect a wide range of identity threats. And if they detect your

00:18:00.620 information that's potentially been compromised, they're going to send you an alert and help you

00:18:03.840 get everything back to normal. Look, nobody can prevent all identity theft or monitor all

00:18:07.940 transactions at all businesses, but you can keep what's yours with LifeLock by Norton. Join now and

00:18:12.760 save 25% off your first year at LifeLock.com slash Walsh. That's LifeLock.com slash Walsh for 25% off.

00:18:19.360 So this is pretty funny. Uh, it's, it's funny until it's used as a basis for, uh, further censorship,

00:18:27.180 which it will be, but apparently Twitter has rolled out a new warning. So they've got, you know,

00:18:34.060 they've got the, uh, misinformation warnings, which really the way the misinformation warnings

00:18:39.460 are applied, it's oftentimes like inconvenient information they call misinformation. So if

00:18:45.900 you're talking about COVID and you're not in line with the COVID cult, they're going to put a

00:18:49.240 misinformation warning. They got, they got different kinds of warnings that they'll put on your, um,

00:18:53.720 on your content potentially. Here's a new one that they just unveiled. And I found out about it

00:18:58.120 because they put it on one of mine. Uh, now they have on Twitter and I'm pretty sure this is not

00:19:03.960 meant to be a joke. They have intensity warnings. So if you're tweeting, if you put out an intense

00:19:11.540 tweet, then they'll put a warning on it, a heads up, letting everybody know that this is a little bit

00:19:16.440 intense. So yesterday I tweeted about, um, like we discussed on the show yesterday, vaccinating

00:19:23.540 kids. And I said, I'm not, I'm not going to vaccinate my kids. And I have very good science

00:19:27.860 scientifically based reasons for that because COVID is not, and we'll, we'll get more into this

00:19:34.460 in a minute, but COVID is not a serious threat to them. That's why I'm not getting vaccinated.

00:19:37.980 And someone responded to me and said, uh, there's, well, there's plenty of good reasons to

00:19:41.760 vax your kids, even though they aren't at risk. And I responded and said, okay, please give me one

00:19:46.660 good reason. Pretty fair response. That person, by the way, never gave a good reason. Instead,

00:19:51.880 they put their account on private. I've said, give me one good reason. I'm really curious.

00:19:57.240 If you're admitting that kids are not at risk from COVID, they're at effectively at no risk.

00:20:05.380 The risk is so small that it's, you know, effectively nil. Um, if, but if you admit that

00:20:12.940 and then you still say there's a good reason to get the vaccine, well, what is it? Tell me what the

00:20:16.000 reason is. I'd love to hear it. Well, this person didn't respond, but on that tweet responding to

00:20:22.680 that guy, Twitter put a warning. It says, heads up conversations like this can be intense.

00:20:32.920 Is anyone going to see a warning like that and say, Oh, I don't want any of the intense stuff.

00:20:37.280 I'm going to keep scrolling here. It is true. I do have some intense tweets.

00:20:43.700 There's no denying that. All right. So this is from the post-millennial says

00:20:47.360 is the student who allegedly injured four people in a school shooting at his Arlington, Texas high

00:20:53.000 school. He's been released. Um, and he was released on Thursday afternoon after posting $75,000 in bail.

00:21:00.120 Okay. So this guy, not a kid, he's 18 years old. This man shot, uh, multiple people in a school

00:21:10.280 on Wednesday. And on Thursday, 24 hours later, he's walking out of there on only $75,000 bail.

00:21:19.380 Uh, Simpkins will be confined to his home pending his trial under the conditions of the bail agreement.

00:21:23.460 He'll also be closely monitored by GPS and we'll have to undergo regular testing for alcohol and other

00:21:27.620 drugs. Um, he faces three counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. Uh, and, um,

00:21:35.580 two teachers were hurt in the incident. One was shot. He was shot in the back and has a collapsed

00:21:41.080 lung, broken ribs. Uh, and then there were two other people who, who were injured from gunfire.

00:21:48.620 Now, so he's getting out on bail after, I mean, this is a school shooting. I think if you shoot,

00:21:54.560 people get shot in a school, that counts as a school shooting.

00:21:57.620 Um, and he's walking out of there on $75,000 bail a day later. Um, now the family though,

00:22:08.080 they're insisting that, well, this is different from your, your typical school school shooting.

00:22:12.880 It's not the same kind of thing. This is from Fox. It says the family of an 18 year old student

00:22:17.020 suspected of opening fire and injuring four people at a Texas high school Wednesday claims that he was

00:22:20.460 being bullied and brought the handgun to protect himself. Um, and the details of the, of the fight,

00:22:30.500 what they say is that, uh, Arlington police said cell phone video shows a fight breaking out

00:22:35.100 before Simpkins fired the gun. Um, the claim is that the video shows Simpkins was being attacked.

00:22:43.240 And there is a video that I've seen floating around online of, and the claim is that this is

00:22:48.900 the fight that happened. It's not really a fight. There's one guy being brutally assaulted while

00:22:53.700 someone else just wails on him. It's not really what you see in the video anyway, is not really a

00:22:56.700 fight. It's also not clear who's doing the wailing on, on who, uh, based on that video. So I'm not sure

00:23:01.480 about that. But what police are saying is that, um, is that this altercation, this fight, this assault

00:23:10.140 happened. And then, uh, the, the teacher stepped in to break it up and it seemed like everything was

00:23:19.820 calmed down. And that's when allegedly Simpkins went into his backpack, pulled the gun out and started

00:23:25.840 firing. And if that's what happened, then number one, that's not self-defense.

00:23:34.180 You know, something happens in the moment you're being assaulted and you shoot somebody,

00:23:37.480 then that's self-defense, but the it's over. And that person is, is being restrained

00:23:41.860 and the fight's over. And then you pull it out and shoot. That's, that's revenge. That's not,

00:23:48.520 that's not self-defense and a school shooting because someone was bullied and they're looking

00:23:56.220 for revenge. Uh, that's not all that unique. That's very often what you find with these school

00:24:02.400 shootings. Fortunately, nobody was killed in this case. It looks like, uh, you know, everyone who

00:24:08.320 was injured is going to recover from their injuries. And from what it sounds like, he wasn't,

00:24:13.100 he didn't just start randomly executing, um, his classmates, thank God, but he brought the gun to

00:24:21.220 school and then he fired it apparently after the fight was over seemingly to get revenge because he

00:24:29.460 was angry. Not, not, not all that different from, uh, from the, the, you know, the, what leads up to

00:24:36.480 many different school shootings. And yet he's walking out of there on $75,000 bail a day later.

00:24:44.060 And we have to mention here that the school shooter in this case, uh, is a black guy.

00:24:50.460 And the reason why we have to mention that is because it is repeatedly insisted that from BLM

00:24:58.080 and, uh, and the left generally and the media that white suspects get preferential treatment.

00:25:04.380 How often have we heard, I'm sure you've heard this a million times, especially if you spend any

00:25:08.560 time on social media, anytime there's a shooting or, um, especially a police shooting, what you

00:25:14.580 always hear is about, um, Dylan roof, you know, the, uh, the, the church shooter got, was arrested

00:25:23.440 and then got Burger King. And they claim he's of course a white, white man shooting, uh, black

00:25:29.300 people. And so they claim, oh, this is, this is what they do for white shooters. He killed all

00:25:34.560 these people and they, and they brought him to Burger King. Well, no, they didn't bring him,

00:25:39.340 they don't like bring him to the, they didn't go on, on the way, you know, to jail. They didn't

00:25:44.060 stop at Burger King and sit down with him. Um, no, they brought him to the interrogation room

00:25:50.200 and, uh, and they, they brought him like a hamburger or something. They just went down

00:25:54.860 the street to get the cheapest hamburger they could find. And they gave it to him because they

00:25:57.540 have to, you, you have to, you have to feed suspects after you arrest them. You can't withhold

00:26:03.100 food. If you do that, you know, it could interfere with the whole case. It's going to interfere

00:26:10.940 with your ability to convict this person and get the sentence that he deserves.

00:26:17.360 If his defense attorney can claim that, uh, this is cruel, unusual punishment, you were,

00:26:22.180 you're refusing to feed him and all that kind of stuff. So they're legally required. They do this

00:26:27.480 for everyone. You may be shocked to learn that in, that in every prison in America, they provide food

00:26:33.660 to everybody. Convicted murderers and serial killers, they give them food. They have to do that.

00:26:38.860 Uh, and then Dylan Roof as he deserves was convicted and sentenced to death.

00:26:47.520 So I'm just, I'm trying to imagine if this was exact same circumstances, but this was a white 0.99

00:26:55.820 school shooter let out on bail 24 hours after being arrested on $75,000 bail. What would we be hearing

00:27:06.240 right now from the media? I think we all know what we'd be hearing. And it is kind of interesting

00:27:14.280 because we have this case along with an exact same week, as we discussed yesterday, uh, a gang

00:27:20.100 shooting in Chicago where gang members are shooting at each other in the middle of the day, someone is

00:27:25.220 killed. And, uh, and, and the DA decides to press no charges at all. They all just walk out scot-free.

00:27:33.240 Right. And yet there's some sort of pro-white systemic bias in the, in the court system.

00:27:44.200 Well, this is certainly not what you would expect to see, is it based on the theory of pro-white 0.57

00:27:49.520 systemic bias in the court system? All right. Biden, uh, president Biden gave a speech about

00:27:53.900 the importance of vaccine mandates yesterday. And at one point he launched into a story and,

00:27:59.340 uh, I don't know. I, I just couldn't tell what he was trying to get across here. So maybe you can tell

00:28:03.420 me. Jerry, every company, uh, needs people like you, every single one, someone who knows, uh, what

00:28:11.220 my dad taught me. And a lot of people who know me well, including the, uh, governor's sister who I

00:28:17.580 worked closely with for eight years. My dad used to have an expression. He used to say, everyone's

00:28:22.640 entitled to be treated with dignity. And Joey, a job's a hell of a lot more than about a paycheck.

00:28:29.140 It's about your dignity. It's about your place in the community. It's about being able to look

00:28:34.020 your kid in the eye and say, honey, everything's going to be okay. That's the God's truth. He said

00:28:39.000 every time, ever since he lost, things went south in Scranton, Pennsylvania when I was a kid and coal

00:28:43.840 shut down. My dad was not a coal miner. I had a great grandfather, a coal miner engineer, but

00:28:49.580 you know, he, he was a salesperson. Everything. We moved down to Wilmington, Delaware, a little

00:28:54.740 town called Claymont, a little steel town where there's no steel anymore, but right on the border

00:28:59.360 of Pennsylvania. And, uh, it was always about the dignity of work. And what you've been doing here

00:29:07.140 about this pandemic is about protecting the dignity, the dignity of your fellow Americans. You know,

00:29:13.600 uh, you stayed in an operations mode, lining up protective equipment for the rest of the country.

00:29:19.580 Uh, what? I'm not exactly sure what he was trying to say there as he, as he took us along this windy,

00:29:30.420 windy path of whatever that story was supposed to be. I did pick up on the part about the dignity of

00:29:35.720 work and, you know, everybody should have a job and there's dignity in that. And he tells that story.

00:29:42.500 If we can recall it a story, uh, that, that, that, that mishmash of, of sentences all jumbled together.

00:29:49.540 He tells that while selling this idea of a vaccine mandates at on the job.

00:29:58.660 So everyone, you know, has a right to a job and there's the dignity of work. Meanwhile, if you don't

00:30:05.020 inject this substance into your body, whether you need it or not, maybe you have natural immunity,

00:30:10.040 but even if you, whether you need it or not, if you don't, if you don't inject this substance into

00:30:13.080 your body, we're going to take that job away from you. That's a policy, a mandate you come up with 0.99

00:30:18.980 because you respect the dignity of work. Where's the dignity in that? Forcing a drug into people's

00:30:25.100 bodies as a condition of employment. That's dignity. It's not just dignity. He says it's also economic

00:30:33.820 stimulus, but here's what wall street's saying. Goldman Sachs quote, vaccination will have a

00:30:39.900 positive impact on employment. It means less spread of COVID-19, which will help people return to work

00:30:44.640 Moody's and wall street vaccination means fewer infections, hospitalizations, and death.

00:30:50.780 In turn, it means a stronger economy. One economist called vaccine requirements. And I quote the single 0.86

00:30:58.420 most powerful, I didn't say single, the most powerful economic stimulus ever enacted. End of

00:31:04.720 quote. Third point I'd like to make report shows that vaccination requirements have broad public

00:31:10.640 support. Well, that economist, if he exists is a moron. So firing people from their jobs is economic

00:31:17.900 stimulus. It's also the way that we protect the dignity of work.

00:31:21.920 You know, that's actually the dignity of work and human, human dignity generally.

00:31:31.380 That's one of my primary arguments against the vaccine mandate as a condition of employment.

00:31:38.440 Yeah, there's a matter of, of basic freedom and liberty here.

00:31:43.920 But to me, even more importantly, it's dignity. You're not treating human beings with dignity.

00:31:52.880 When you tell someone we're going to take away your ability to feed your family, unless you

00:31:57.060 comply with us and put this substance into your body again, whether you need it or not.

00:32:02.740 Speaking of people who don't need it, this is from, uh, the blaze and about, uh, the New York

00:32:07.220 times doing a little bit of fear mongering and then having to issue one of their, um, standard

00:32:14.060 traditional retractions. It says the New York times issued a lengthy correction after numerous

00:32:18.580 mistakes in an article about coronavirus vaccinations for children, including the egregious exaggeration

00:32:22.620 of coronavirus hospitalizations among U.S. children. Uh, the article by Epivora Mandevilli

00:32:28.440 documented how the U.S. is forging ahead on full vaccination for children while other countries

00:32:32.600 are experimenting with just one shot after weighing the risks. Um, but in documenting the

00:32:39.240 extent of the coronavirus pandemic among children in the U.S., Mandevilli missed the mark by a wide

00:32:44.580 margin. The times issued a correction, noting several issues with the article. This is their

00:32:49.180 correction. Part of it. Anyway, it says the article, uh, misstated the number of COVID hospitalizations

00:32:53.860 in U.S. children. It is more than 63,000 from August, 2020 to October, 2021, not 900,000 since the

00:33:01.180 beginning of the pandemic. And then they also were wrong about, uh, vaccination policies in Sweden and

00:33:08.100 Denmark. They were wrong. I mean, they, they, they got five or six details wrong in this article,

00:33:13.120 which means you shouldn't be issuing a, a correction. This should be just be a full

00:33:17.260 retraction because the, the basis for this article article is wrong. Everything is wrong. You should

00:33:23.280 be retracting it, but instead they, they just issue the correction. You're never going to convince me

00:33:27.620 that this isn't intentional. I mean, there's, there's no way you could be how, where did 900,000,

00:33:33.580 900,000 hospitalizations of, of children from COVID. And the real number is 63,000. It's not

00:33:43.120 even as though they added an additional zero by accident, like a typo. Where did you get that number?

00:33:49.800 It, it, one second on Google will tell you the truth there. And I'm supposed to believe that's an

00:33:56.020 accident. It's not. They get the falsehood out there. It implants in people's minds. And then they

00:34:02.180 know the correction is never as widely seen as the original claim. They know that. So there's lots

00:34:09.700 of people now who have that 900,000 figure in their head when the real number is a fraction of that.

00:34:18.720 And this article is all supposed to be, you know, it, it does, it admits that in most other countries

00:34:25.380 around the world, you know, they are not nearly as eager to start putting kids on full vaccination

00:34:33.480 schedules. They're also not masking kids to the same, to nearly the same extent that we are.

00:34:41.320 Okay. We, we are one of the only countries in the world that has decided to act as though

00:34:47.700 children are just as susceptible to the virus as everybody else. Most other countries are not doing

00:34:54.560 that. We are among the only ones to do it. Even countries that broadly speaking, their lockdowns

00:35:04.460 and their COVID policies have been stricter than ours. Still, most of them recognize that children

00:35:09.100 just are not susceptible. You could put it this way. There is no pandemic for kids. Okay. For kids,

00:35:19.040 as far as our kids are concerned, there is no pandemic. That's how small the risk is to them.

00:35:26.500 In fact, if you look at it, uh, you look at all the deaths, all the deaths among children

00:35:33.220 over the last year, you know, year or two years, what you'll find is that less than 1%, less than 1%

00:35:41.220 of all child deaths during that period are attributed to COVID. Less than 1%. Less than 0.0006%, 0.0006%

00:35:55.640 of the child population as a whole in this country has died of COVID over the last two years.

00:36:01.180 That's not a pandemic. That's not an, that's not an epidemic. That's, that's just, just not

00:36:04.900 a great many risks, um, are, are, you know, are, are more fatal to kids than COVID is.

00:36:18.680 And we've just decided to ignore that fact. What I've been told, and someone just told me this on

00:36:25.560 Twitter a couple hours ago, when trying to justify the fact that we're, you know, coming up with

00:36:31.660 policies, pretending that kids are as acceptable as everybody else. And what I've, you know, we've

00:36:36.160 heard this many times, but, uh, once again, I was told that, um, that, uh, you know, one child is

00:36:42.680 too many. And, uh, what if my child, yeah, yeah, it's only 0.0006%, but, uh, what if my child was in

00:36:49.760 that 0.006%? How would I feel about it then? Well, yeah, if, if my, if one of my children had been

00:36:57.980 one of the very, very, very few to die of COVID, then yeah, I'd probably be singing a very different

00:37:04.720 tune. Just like if, if I had a child who God forbid drowned in a pool, I'd probably say we

00:37:14.160 should ban all pools. If I had a child who choked to death on a chicken nugget, I'd be saying,

00:37:20.100 let's ban all chicken nuggets. You know, I would certainly wish that I could go back in time

00:37:27.760 and erase, you know, if it were up to me past these sweeping laws, you know, to keep my child alive.

00:37:34.640 Of course I'd want to do that. You know, personally, as a parent, there's probably no tyranny

00:37:42.260 that I, that I wouldn't visit upon you and the world in order to save my children's lives.

00:37:50.100 There's probably nothing that I wouldn't do to save my own children's lives.

00:37:57.920 And I admit that, but when it comes to making public policy, you cannot make public policy

00:38:06.140 with, from, while assuming the mentality of a desperately grieving parent.

00:38:12.980 Because emotionally for me to feel this way about my own kids is entirely justifiable and

00:38:21.560 understandable, but it is not a basis for public policy. Obviously.

00:38:27.300 Yeah. If I, if I, whoever, anyone listening right now,

00:38:33.400 if I knew that locking you specifically in your home for the rest of your life is what I needed to

00:38:40.320 do for some reason to keep one of my kids alive, I would do it. I would take away all your liberty 0.90

00:38:47.260 to keep my kid alive. I recognize that emotionally.

00:38:52.320 But does that mean that we should make policy that way? No.

00:38:59.840 All right. Here's a Terry McAuliffe in my former home state of Virginia.

00:39:06.900 Now, Terry McAuliffe has said that the critical race theory is not being taught in schools.

00:39:12.220 So all this stuff in this, the school board meetings and everything, this is all, it's actually

00:39:17.140 racist. He says this campaign against critical race theory is racist in and of itself because

00:39:24.120 critical race theory isn't being taught at all. This is all a dog whistle. But then he's asked

00:39:28.460 in this interview with local media if he can even tell us what critical race theory is and he can't.

00:39:34.020 Listen.

00:39:35.240 So how do you define it?

00:39:37.520 Anita, it is not taught here in Virginia.

00:39:40.020 But how do you define it?

00:39:41.260 Doesn't matter. It's not taught here in Virginia.

00:39:43.280 So I'm not going to spend my time.

00:39:44.520 Your thoughts on what it is.

00:39:45.780 I'm not even spending my time because the school board and everyone else has come out and said it's not taught.

00:39:50.200 It's racist. It's a dog whistle.

00:39:52.760 But if we don't have a definition, how can we say it's racist? I just want a definition from you.

00:39:56.900 But it's not taught here in Virginia.

00:39:59.160 We can ask about any topic.

00:40:00.740 Here's what I've said all along.

00:40:02.580 And it really bothers me.

00:40:04.000 You know, it really bothers me.

00:40:06.340 This whole idea of stirring parents up to create divisions.

00:40:09.840 Our children are going through such challenges today because of COVID.

00:40:13.780 And we're talking about something here today, wasting precious viewers' time.

00:40:18.580 And so he has, of course, and you can always, this is always a fun thing to do when you're dealing with Democrats or any leftist.

00:40:30.100 Just the first thing you should do, whatever term they're using, get them to define it.

00:40:34.920 What exactly are you talking about?

00:40:38.200 And they'll always treat it as some sort of trick question.

00:40:41.780 That you, you, you, you simply, they're using words and you want to know what they mean by those words.

00:40:47.220 And they're going to do, well, what do you mean?

00:40:48.720 Listen, what is this?

00:40:50.800 A gotcha?

00:40:51.400 There's a game of gotcha.

00:40:52.440 No, this is a game of, I want to understand what the hell you're saying.

00:40:55.980 That's what the game is.

00:40:57.000 So he has no idea what critical race theory is, and yet he's, he doesn't know what it is, yet he's quite certain that it's not in the school system.

00:41:10.080 When, of course, it is.

00:41:11.880 When, when kids are taught from a young age in school, as they are now, that America is systemically racist.

00:41:20.060 You know, that it was, that it was, that it's racist at its very core.

00:41:23.840 That all white people are, have privilege by nature of their race. 0.66

00:41:30.380 That all white people are inherently racist.

00:41:33.900 That no black person or, or person, you know, non-white person can be racist because race is based on power and privilege.

00:41:43.020 Power plus, plus prejudice equals racism.

00:41:45.400 When kids are taught that, all of that, that is critical race theory.

00:41:50.120 That is critical, that's sort of a, it's a distillation.

00:41:53.840 A boiled down version of critical race theory.

00:41:57.500 So, glad I could help you out, McAuliffe.

00:41:59.020 Oh, one more thing here before we get to reading the comments.

00:42:00.800 This is from CNN.

00:42:03.460 Sad news.

00:42:05.200 Apparently sad news, supposedly.

00:42:07.340 It says, the ivory-billed woodpecker, along with 22 other species of birds, fish, mussels, and other wildlife,

00:42:13.080 is set to be declared extinct and removed from the endangered species list, according to U.S. wildlife officials.

00:42:18.720 It says, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said,

00:42:22.160 quote, for the species proposed for delisting today, the protections of the Endangered Species Act came too late,

00:42:27.280 with most either extinct, functionally extinct, or in steep decline at the time of listing.

00:42:32.460 Also slated for delisting are the Bachmann's warbler, two species of freshwater fishes,

00:42:38.040 eight species of southeastern freshwater mussels, and 11 species from Hawaii and Pacific Island.

00:42:42.900 Sorry, I'm scrolling through this thing eagerly, trying to see if they list pandas on this, and they don't.

00:42:49.040 No, the pandas are still lingering along.

00:42:50.960 Well, yeah, I don't know what we're going to do without the Bachmann's warbler.

00:42:56.800 That's a great tragedy.

00:42:59.140 The Bachmann's warbler isn't going to be joining us on Earth anymore.

00:43:04.160 I'm sorry.

00:43:05.180 Who cares?

00:43:07.720 Why does it...

00:43:08.800 Who cares that these species are going extinct?

00:43:10.660 What do we need them for?

00:43:12.900 This one version of a woodpecker isn't going to be around anymore.

00:43:18.200 Oh, okay.

00:43:19.060 Well, there's other woodpeckers around that can fill their place, I'm sure.

00:43:21.740 They can pick up the woodpecker baton.

00:43:24.440 They can't really pick it up, but metaphorically speaking.

00:43:29.000 And if we're told that climate change is going to kill us all,

00:43:35.280 then why are we trying to keep other species around that are emitting, you know, with their carbon emissions?

00:43:41.940 It adds up.

00:43:44.180 So should we be celebrating this, kind of thinning the herd a little bit?

00:43:47.860 I don't know, but for climate change and environmentalists, they want to thin the herd among people,

00:43:52.000 not among the Bachmann's warbler or the ivory-headed woodpecker.

00:43:58.240 That's what they want to do.

00:44:01.800 So when they hear...

00:44:02.900 This is how twisted these people...

00:44:04.280 I know when I say, oh, I don't care if these species are going extinct,

00:44:07.460 people hear that and they're horrified by it.

00:44:09.560 It sounds like I'm some sort of sociopath.

00:44:12.160 And maybe I am.

00:44:14.500 But consider the fact that for a lot of other people,

00:44:16.720 when they hear about human populations declining,

00:44:21.480 they're happy about that.

00:44:23.460 They're more upset about the decline of the Bachmann's warbler

00:44:26.940 than they are about people

00:44:28.600 declining in population numbers.

00:44:33.040 So if you could do that with...

00:44:35.520 If you could say, as so many people do,

00:44:37.880 about their own species,

00:44:39.860 what do we need so many of us for?

00:44:42.540 You could say that about your own species.

00:44:44.160 I can't say it about a...

00:44:45.200 About a species of muscle or...

00:44:47.780 Or some kind of clam or whatever, you know,

00:44:52.220 horned owl in the forest.

00:44:56.500 I'm sorry.

00:44:57.140 I just don't...

00:44:57.620 I don't care.

00:44:59.000 It's fine.

00:44:59.680 They can go extinct.

00:45:01.020 Here, listen.

00:45:03.300 Millions of animal species

00:45:06.000 went extinct

00:45:09.620 before human civilization ever existed.

00:45:14.680 Okay, we've had human civilization for...

00:45:16.900 I don't know.

00:45:18.520 10,000 years, let's say.

00:45:21.060 Millions.

00:45:22.740 Billions of animal species

00:45:24.740 went extinct before that ever happened.

00:45:29.020 Before we were even building...

00:45:30.980 You know, before pyramids had even been built.

00:45:34.220 Millions of animal species went extinct.

00:45:37.700 Was that some kind of great tragedy?

00:45:41.140 Now it's like...

00:45:43.300 Species extinction is part of the cycle of life.

00:45:47.780 And now, every single species that goes extinct,

00:45:50.480 it's our fault?

00:45:52.240 If we weren't around,

00:45:53.960 many of these species would still be going extinct.

00:45:56.140 And, you know, some kind of...

00:45:56.920 Now that we're here, it's a tragedy.

00:45:58.800 And we've got to keep them...

00:45:59.520 We have to hold all of these...

00:46:01.460 Do our best to hold all of these

00:46:03.000 different warblers and woodpeckers

00:46:04.700 into existence.

00:46:06.060 Hold them in the palm of our hand.

00:46:07.380 Oh, no, we can't lose any of them.

00:46:09.160 Why?

00:46:12.900 All right.

00:46:13.640 I'm getting probably more passionate about this

00:46:15.300 than I need to.

00:46:16.480 I just...

00:46:17.080 I have a thing.

00:46:17.860 You know, I don't like pandas

00:46:18.840 and I don't like the Bachman's warbler either.

00:46:21.300 Good riddance.

00:46:23.880 Let's get now to reading the comments.

00:46:26.680 Who's rocking polka dot 0.51

00:46:28.080 and flannel shirts without shame?

00:46:31.720 Do you know their name?

00:46:35.360 They're the sweet baby gang.

00:46:39.800 Crystal says,

00:46:40.640 Matt, isn't the fact that the dog

00:46:41.960 was wary towards an unfamiliar man

00:46:43.660 a good thing since you wanted it

00:46:45.160 as protection for your family?

00:46:47.100 That was your only reasoning

00:46:48.440 for wanting a dog at all, right?

00:46:51.720 Yeah, I'm glad that he's protective,

00:46:54.080 but my issue is

00:46:55.560 I'm not going to tolerate

00:46:56.740 disrespect in my own home.

00:47:00.400 Okay?

00:47:00.860 And the dog doesn't get off the hook.

00:47:03.500 Hold everyone to the same standard.

00:47:09.040 Let's see.

00:47:09.740 Lou says,

00:47:10.760 is Walsh going to rent places

00:47:12.800 throughout the U.S.

00:47:13.520 so he can attend local school board meetings?

00:47:15.400 Walsh would criticize

00:47:16.620 some Hollywood celebrity

00:47:18.580 if they crashed a local school board meeting

00:47:20.280 where they don't live,

00:47:21.200 but it's fine if he does it.

00:47:23.020 Local people are perfectly capable

00:47:24.360 of speaking for themselves.

00:47:25.660 They don't need Walsh

00:47:26.360 riding in as their spokesman.

00:47:28.140 But of course,

00:47:28.720 Walsh knows that this is good publicity

00:47:30.260 for himself and his bottom line.

00:47:32.040 Now Walsh is hawking

00:47:33.480 some quack treatment for puffy eyes.

00:47:35.860 He's a real man of principle.

00:47:38.260 Listen, Lou.

00:47:39.960 You can slander me all you want,

00:47:41.900 but I will not have you

00:47:43.760 saying these things

00:47:44.640 about GenuCell by Shamanics,

00:47:47.420 which can solve

00:47:50.400 under-eye puffiness

00:47:53.800 in a matter of days.

00:47:57.600 How dare you, sir?

00:48:00.760 David says,

00:48:03.220 Matt, what is your favorite

00:48:05.060 Bible translation?

00:48:06.260 Did I already answer this one?

00:48:07.660 I'm having a deja vu.

00:48:10.740 Well, anyway,

00:48:12.460 favorite Bible translation.

00:48:14.420 I'm not especially loyal

00:48:16.900 to one particular translation

00:48:19.920 or another.

00:48:21.400 And if you don't know Hebrew

00:48:23.940 or Greek,

00:48:26.140 which are the languages

00:48:28.480 that the Old and New Testament

00:48:30.000 respectively were written in,

00:48:31.800 if you don't know those languages,

00:48:33.080 like if you know those languages

00:48:34.180 and you can read

00:48:35.980 the scriptures

00:48:37.160 in their original languages,

00:48:38.380 then do that.

00:48:39.680 I mean, that's the best thing

00:48:40.220 you can do.

00:48:41.160 But if you don't,

00:48:42.940 then unfortunately

00:48:43.600 you are relegated to,

00:48:44.920 and this is the case

00:48:45.480 for any kind of translation,

00:48:46.420 even if it's not the Bible.

00:48:47.280 I mean, you could be reading

00:48:47.780 Russian literature or something.

00:48:49.780 If you don't know

00:48:50.700 the original languages,

00:48:51.480 you're left with somewhat

00:48:52.400 of a pale imitation

00:48:53.280 of what there really is.

00:48:56.100 And there's always

00:48:56.820 this kind of balance

00:48:57.700 that translators

00:48:58.340 have to strike between,

00:49:00.000 do we literally

00:49:01.340 translate the words

00:49:02.600 or do we try to capture

00:49:04.280 the overall meaning?

00:49:05.260 Because that's not always

00:49:05.940 the same thing.

00:49:06.480 That's the way language works.

00:49:08.720 And so with any translation,

00:49:10.480 again, Bible

00:49:11.000 or any kind of book,

00:49:12.540 there are going to be

00:49:12.900 some translations

00:49:13.480 that are more literal,

00:49:14.400 some that are more

00:49:15.120 focused on meaning,

00:49:16.520 and then some that are

00:49:17.120 just terrible.

00:49:18.160 And so with,

00:49:20.000 you know,

00:49:20.260 so I kind of,

00:49:21.180 it depends on

00:49:22.060 what book of the Bible

00:49:23.780 I'm reading.

00:49:25.400 You know,

00:49:25.920 that might determine

00:49:26.540 which translation I prefer.

00:49:28.520 The flowery language

00:49:29.580 of the KJV,

00:49:30.980 King James Version.

00:49:32.600 It certainly does not

00:49:35.900 really capture the act,

00:49:37.640 especially for the Gospels

00:49:38.660 and the New Testament.

00:49:40.020 I mean,

00:49:40.200 the Gospels,

00:49:41.980 the epistles,

00:49:43.800 these were written

00:49:44.560 in plain language

00:49:45.560 for ordinary people.

00:49:48.040 They weren't written

00:49:48.760 in the,

00:49:49.480 you know,

00:49:49.920 in the equivalent

00:49:50.540 of Shakespearean

00:49:51.680 eloquent prose,

00:49:53.640 right?

00:49:55.440 So I don't really like that

00:49:56.800 for the New Testament.

00:49:57.860 But I'll,

00:49:58.760 you know,

00:49:58.980 for Old Testament,

00:49:59.740 I kind of think it works.

00:50:01.140 So that's my answer,

00:50:03.320 which isn't really

00:50:03.700 an answer at all.

00:50:04.280 I'm equivocating.

00:50:05.660 And finally,

00:50:06.420 Robert says,

00:50:07.040 Matt,

00:50:07.260 I believe duels

00:50:08.020 were more of a daybreak

00:50:09.040 kind of thing.

00:50:09.800 High noon seems like

00:50:10.800 a sheriff slash outlaw deal.

00:50:12.820 At any rate,

00:50:13.440 this culture is screwed.

00:50:15.600 Yeah,

00:50:16.000 well,

00:50:16.240 daybreak is way too early

00:50:17.220 for a duel.

00:50:17.780 I need a little bit of time.

00:50:18.700 I need to have some coffee

00:50:19.400 if I'm going to participate

00:50:20.160 in a duel.

00:50:20.640 And the thing is,

00:50:21.140 I'm actually not,

00:50:21.820 I think I've advocated before

00:50:23.160 for legalizing dueling.

00:50:25.320 I think there's,

00:50:25.720 there's an argument

00:50:26.260 you can be,

00:50:26.920 that can be made for that.

00:50:27.840 But if you're going to do it,

00:50:30.560 then you have to really do it.

00:50:31.800 And what they've done

00:50:32.640 in Chicago

00:50:33.140 is they've kind of

00:50:34.560 just done it in effect.

00:50:35.720 They've in effect

00:50:36.480 decriminalized dueling.

00:50:39.560 And if you're also

00:50:40.080 going to have a duel,

00:50:40.620 there have to be rules

00:50:41.600 that you respect.

00:50:43.680 Right?

00:50:44.040 You've got,

00:50:44.500 it's not going to be five,

00:50:45.400 five on five,

00:50:46.280 just spraying bullets

00:50:47.040 all over the place.

00:50:47.820 You know,

00:50:49.360 there's a certain,

00:50:50.160 you're going

00:50:50.680 certain number of paces apart.

00:50:54.280 It's timed.

00:50:55.220 You figure out

00:50:55.820 what the rules are

00:50:56.540 and you settle

00:50:58.140 your differences that way.

00:51:00.940 I think you could

00:51:01.860 make an argument

00:51:02.320 that a society

00:51:02.960 that has legalized dueling

00:51:04.120 is going to be

00:51:05.000 a much more polite society.

00:51:08.020 It's going to be a society

00:51:08.880 where you put

00:51:09.280 your shopping carts back

00:51:10.180 if you know that

00:51:10.760 I could challenge you

00:51:11.320 to a duel

00:51:11.760 if you don't.

00:51:14.720 But what they've done

00:51:15.440 in Chicago is stiff.

00:51:16.340 It's not really

00:51:16.980 legalized dueling.

00:51:17.880 It's just legalized

00:51:18.560 utter total chaos

00:51:19.780 where gangs can shoot

00:51:21.760 each other

00:51:22.260 willy-nilly in the street

00:51:23.460 hitting innocent bystanders

00:51:25.920 in the process potentially

00:51:26.880 and they're not going to be

00:51:28.120 charged with any crime.

00:51:29.420 This coming Tuesday,

00:51:30.240 October 12th,

00:51:30.880 we're taking backstage

00:51:32.080 to an entirely new level.

00:51:33.600 Instead of the usual

00:51:34.500 Daily Wire studio,

00:51:35.600 we'll be live streaming

00:51:36.360 our conversation on stage

00:51:37.600 at the famous

00:51:38.140 Ryman Auditorium

00:51:38.900 right here in Nashville

00:51:39.580 doing what we do best,

00:51:41.400 making sense.

00:51:42.120 This will be an event

00:51:42.860 and a live stream

00:51:43.720 unlike any we've done before

00:51:45.140 and we're thrilled

00:51:46.000 to be able to share it

00:51:46.700 with all of you.

00:51:47.560 Plus,

00:51:47.840 we'll be making some

00:51:48.380 extremely exciting announcements

00:51:49.660 which you will not want to miss

00:51:51.580 so be sure to tune in.

00:51:53.420 Join myself,

00:51:53.980 Ben Shapiro,

00:51:54.480 Candace Owens,

00:51:55.500 Jeremy Boring,

00:51:56.160 Michael Knowles,

00:51:56.720 Andrew Klavan,

00:51:57.380 and our live audience

00:51:58.460 for a backstage

00:51:59.220 like never before.

00:52:00.460 Tuesday's live stream

00:52:01.180 will begin at 8.30 p.m.

00:52:02.500 Eastern,

00:52:02.840 7.30 p.m. Central

00:52:03.680 so head to dailywire.com

00:52:05.140 or Daily Wire YouTube

00:52:06.040 to catch the show.

00:52:07.960 And also,

00:52:08.300 this is a reminder

00:52:08.860 to everyone listening

00:52:09.680 that as the Daily Wire

00:52:10.800 continues to grow,

00:52:11.940 we're seeking talented candidates

00:52:13.360 for open positions

00:52:14.400 across several departments

00:52:15.360 within the company.

00:52:16.880 Our current list

00:52:17.540 of open positions

00:52:18.260 on the team here

00:52:19.140 at Daily Wire

00:52:19.640 includes but is not limited to

00:52:21.080 video editor,

00:52:23.380 writer and reporter,

00:52:24.300 publicity manager,

00:52:25.340 sales representative,

00:52:26.520 social media content creator,

00:52:28.420 podcast marketing manager,

00:52:31.300 conversion rate optimization specialist,

00:52:33.220 and 2 p.m. podcast host.

00:52:36.660 That's not a good sign.

00:52:38.200 If you think you've got

00:52:38.960 what it takes to join

00:52:39.840 one of the fastest growing

00:52:40.860 conservative media companies

00:52:41.960 in America,

00:52:42.640 we want to hear from you.

00:52:44.000 For a full list of job openings

00:52:46.260 and open positions

00:52:46.940 and position details

00:52:47.920 and to apply,

00:52:48.680 please visit

00:52:49.280 dailywire.com

00:52:50.920 slash careers.

00:52:52.060 Now let's get to

00:52:52.740 our daily cancellation.

00:52:57.640 You know,

00:52:58.200 we've been conditioned

00:52:58.760 not to trust

00:52:59.640 our own common sense anymore,

00:53:01.080 which is why we so often

00:53:02.200 need studies

00:53:02.920 to confirm the obvious,

00:53:04.180 but most of us

00:53:04.720 don't trust studies either

00:53:06.320 and for good reason

00:53:07.120 in most cases,

00:53:08.080 so that's not much help.

00:53:09.940 But here's one study

00:53:11.300 that I think

00:53:11.780 we can take to the bank,

00:53:13.060 so to speak.

00:53:14.000 There's a pun there

00:53:14.880 which will make more sense

00:53:15.700 as we proceed.

00:53:16.940 Reading now from an article

00:53:17.820 on the Institute

00:53:18.800 for Family Studies website

00:53:20.160 written by

00:53:20.640 Rosemary L. Hopcroft,

00:53:22.700 which sounds like a character

00:53:23.800 in an Agatha Christie novel,

00:53:25.140 and I don't mean that

00:53:25.660 as an insult.

00:53:27.560 She writes,

00:53:28.340 quote,

00:53:28.980 in 21st century America,

00:53:30.860 over half of all married couples

00:53:32.180 are dual earner families

00:53:33.440 and men are no longer

00:53:34.360 expected to be

00:53:34.940 the sole source

00:53:35.700 of financial support

00:53:36.500 for their families.

00:53:37.580 It seems, therefore,

00:53:38.280 that possession of means

00:53:39.140 would no longer matter

00:53:40.080 as much for men's

00:53:40.900 marriage prospects,

00:53:42.040 while at the same time

00:53:42.740 it may matter more

00:53:43.680 for women's marriage prospects.

00:53:45.200 Yet my new research,

00:53:46.180 published in the journal

00:53:47.060 Evolution and Human Behavior,

00:53:49.040 shows that possession

00:53:49.740 of means still matters

00:53:51.260 when it comes to marriage

00:53:52.200 and family formation

00:53:53.680 for men,

00:53:54.420 but not for women.

00:53:56.280 In other words,

00:53:57.040 men are going to have 1.00

00:53:58.040 an easier time getting married

00:53:59.040 if they have money,

00:54:00.260 but for women, 0.99

00:54:01.040 it doesn't matter much

00:54:02.220 one way or another.

00:54:03.440 Continuing, it says,

00:54:04.360 for men,

00:54:05.200 as income increases,

00:54:06.240 the probability of marriage

00:54:07.120 also increases,

00:54:07.780 such that men

00:54:08.440 in the highest income category

00:54:09.580 are about 57 percentage points

00:54:11.360 more likely to marry

00:54:12.280 than men in the lowest income category.

00:54:14.060 The same is not true for women. 0.99

00:54:16.320 High-income men

00:54:17.200 are more likely

00:54:17.900 than low-income men

00:54:18.820 to marry,

00:54:19.300 while income is unrelated

00:54:20.340 to marriage for women.

00:54:22.020 Given that marriage

00:54:22.720 involves choice

00:54:23.520 on both the man

00:54:24.220 and the woman's part, 0.99

00:54:25.320 these results suggest

00:54:26.100 that women are more likely

00:54:27.060 to choose to marry men

00:54:28.300 with good financial prospects,

00:54:29.840 while a woman's 0.97

00:54:30.720 financial prospects

00:54:31.400 are less important to men

00:54:32.720 when choosing

00:54:33.480 a marriage partner.

00:54:34.920 Now, every broke single guy

00:54:36.260 listening to this right now

00:54:37.180 is certainly well aware

00:54:38.080 of this dynamic,

00:54:39.440 all too familiar with it,

00:54:40.940 but again,

00:54:41.600 these days,

00:54:42.040 we need this kind of research

00:54:42.960 to tell us

00:54:43.500 what we already know,

00:54:44.940 though many of us

00:54:45.600 have chosen to pretend

00:54:46.240 we don't know it.

00:54:47.580 A little more

00:54:48.040 from the article,

00:54:48.580 it says,

00:54:48.920 not only are high-income men

00:54:50.200 more likely to marry,

00:54:51.520 they're more likely

00:54:52.060 to stay married, too.

00:54:53.020 Figure 2,

00:54:53.700 talking about the chart,

00:54:55.160 shows the probability

00:54:56.020 of divorce

00:54:56.620 for those who have been

00:54:57.460 married at least once

00:54:58.320 and reveals that for men,

00:54:59.520 the probability of divorce

00:55:00.340 declines as income rises,

00:55:02.400 such that men

00:55:03.060 in the highest-income category

00:55:04.000 are about 37 percentage points

00:55:05.340 less likely to divorce

00:55:06.360 than men in the lowest-income category.

00:55:08.840 For women,

00:55:09.400 the probability of divorce

00:55:10.260 increases as income rises,

00:55:12.300 perhaps mostly due

00:55:13.060 to reverse causality

00:55:14.020 and the fact that

00:55:14.880 divorced women 0.95

00:55:16.460 are more likely

00:55:16.960 to have to support

00:55:17.600 themselves financially.

00:55:18.740 For men,

00:55:19.380 the results suggest

00:55:20.540 that women are more likely

00:55:21.620 to divorce low-income men 0.99

00:55:22.980 than high-income men.

00:55:25.240 Now,

00:55:27.460 the cynical interpretation

00:55:28.420 of all of this

00:55:29.080 is that women 1.00

00:55:29.680 are materialistic

00:55:30.600 and superficial,

00:55:31.360 and some women are, 1.00

00:55:33.060 just like some men are,

00:55:33.920 but that doesn't explain

00:55:35.500 these trends.

00:55:37.300 Generally speaking,

00:55:38.260 as the study demonstrates

00:55:39.320 and thousands of years

00:55:40.220 of human experience

00:55:41.000 confirms,

00:55:42.600 women are looking 1.00

00:55:43.160 for stability.

00:55:44.020 They're looking

00:55:44.320 for a provider.

00:55:45.880 They value ambition.

00:55:47.760 They value work ethic

00:55:49.140 in a man.

00:55:49.780 And that's anything

00:55:51.600 but superficial

00:55:52.320 to value those things.

00:55:53.540 On the other hand,

00:55:54.220 men,

00:55:55.500 simply for the most part,

00:55:56.540 don't care about

00:55:57.340 a woman's career ambitions. 0.99

00:55:58.920 They don't want a lazy

00:56:00.060 bump on a log either,

00:56:01.400 but they value

00:56:02.040 and are attracted

00:56:02.720 to a different sort

00:56:04.120 of energy

00:56:05.040 and ambition in women. 0.98

00:56:07.520 I've said before

00:56:08.080 that my wife

00:56:08.640 is extremely talented,

00:56:09.720 has many skills,

00:56:10.380 more skills than I have,

00:56:11.460 and is quite ambitious,

00:56:12.840 but she doesn't have

00:56:13.340 a professional career.

00:56:14.320 She parents ambitiously.

00:56:16.400 She mothers ambitiously. 1.00

00:56:17.740 She pours her energy

00:56:19.480 into her family.

00:56:20.400 She has many creative talents

00:56:21.640 and always finds

00:56:22.440 different outlets for them.

00:56:23.580 Sometimes she'll find

00:56:24.300 outlets that earn money,

00:56:25.200 sometimes not.

00:56:26.640 But the money

00:56:27.140 doesn't really matter to me.

00:56:29.540 I didn't marry her

00:56:30.760 in hopes that she would 0.52

00:56:31.680 provide an income for me.

00:56:34.900 No man gets married 1.00

00:56:36.440 for that reason.

00:56:37.740 Even men who are married 0.81

00:56:38.820 to working women,

00:56:39.700 as plenty are,

00:56:40.860 still didn't choose

00:56:42.060 those women 0.99

00:56:42.580 because of their

00:56:43.360 income potential.

00:56:45.320 Women hopefully 1.00

00:56:45.900 aren't choosing men

00:56:46.660 solely on income,

00:56:47.540 but the man's ability

00:56:48.380 to provide for his family

00:56:49.360 will be a major factor

00:56:51.080 in her decision.

00:56:52.700 For men,

00:56:53.360 it's just not.

00:56:54.880 Men are not 0.99

00:56:55.680 thinking about that.

00:56:57.300 They're not thinking

00:56:58.140 when they're with a woman 0.91

00:56:59.580 and thinking about marriage.

00:57:00.320 Well, she would do great

00:57:01.760 at providing an income

00:57:03.400 for the family.

00:57:06.200 If they think that she can,

00:57:07.360 they may see that

00:57:07.800 as a bonus,

00:57:08.360 but they're not making

00:57:09.000 decisions based on that.

00:57:11.420 And it also doesn't mean,

00:57:12.380 by the way,

00:57:12.660 that low-income men, 0.96

00:57:13.720 low-income single men

00:57:14.680 are out of luck.

00:57:15.580 A woman is also

00:57:16.300 assessing potential.

00:57:17.940 So even if you aren't

00:57:18.760 making much money now,

00:57:20.520 she might still consider

00:57:21.400 you an excellent match

00:57:22.200 if she sees that you

00:57:22.980 work hard and have

00:57:23.720 aspirations and a drive

00:57:25.520 to achieve them.

00:57:26.780 Women are good at this, 1.00

00:57:27.560 by the way.

00:57:28.020 They have a natural

00:57:28.680 intuition about

00:57:29.480 these sorts of things.

00:57:30.960 A good wife will often 1.00

00:57:32.080 have a clearer idea

00:57:33.020 of her husband's

00:57:33.620 career potential

00:57:34.140 than he does.

00:57:35.280 She can't anticipate

00:57:36.180 his future success

00:57:37.120 even if his predictions

00:57:37.980 about his own future

00:57:38.780 are far more modest

00:57:40.540 than hers.

00:57:42.020 What this all means,

00:57:43.480 boiled down,

00:57:45.200 is that men and women

00:57:45.940 are different

00:57:46.440 and they want

00:57:47.440 different things.

00:57:48.820 Our cultural institutions

00:57:50.040 have spent years

00:57:50.840 and decades

00:57:51.300 trying to collapse

00:57:52.160 these two categories

00:57:52.980 into one ambiguous,

00:57:54.960 indistinguishable mess

00:57:56.260 and yet in spite of that,

00:57:58.480 still these fundamental

00:57:59.920 differences remain.

00:58:01.600 Girls are told

00:58:02.140 from a young age,

00:58:02.980 I mean it's hammered

00:58:03.700 into their heads,

00:58:04.460 that they shouldn't

00:58:05.980 look to men 0.97

00:58:06.880 to be providers.

00:58:08.380 And boys are told

00:58:09.360 that they shouldn't

00:58:09.840 see themselves

00:58:10.500 in that role.

00:58:12.160 And yet,

00:58:12.860 both groups

00:58:13.900 gravitate this way

00:58:15.480 anyway.

00:58:17.520 Attempts are made

00:58:18.260 to evade these differences,

00:58:19.520 get around them,

00:58:20.680 and most of these

00:58:21.700 attempts end in disaster.

00:58:23.440 Note how a woman's 1.00

00:58:24.440 likelihood of divorce

00:58:25.320 increases

00:58:26.120 as her income increases,

00:58:28.220 while the trend

00:58:29.100 is exactly the opposite

00:58:30.100 for men.

00:58:31.420 And that's because

00:58:32.560 women are attracted 1.00

00:58:34.340 to men who provide.

00:58:36.300 So if he pours himself

00:58:37.460 into that role

00:58:38.140 as provider,

00:58:39.360 the woman's attraction 1.00

00:58:40.320 will grow stronger

00:58:41.380 and deeper.

00:58:42.620 Of course,

00:58:43.020 some men can go too far,

00:58:44.120 they prioritize their careers

00:58:45.220 over their families,

00:58:46.580 and many divorces

00:58:47.880 have happened

00:58:48.260 as a result of that,

00:58:49.100 but as long as he's

00:58:49.800 putting his family first

00:58:50.880 and valuing his job

00:58:52.200 in large part

00:58:53.320 because he values

00:58:54.340 his family

00:58:54.880 and takes his provider

00:58:55.760 role seriously,

00:58:56.760 then it should only

00:58:57.480 strengthen his marriage.

00:58:59.240 Yet a woman 1.00

00:58:59.780 who invests herself

00:59:00.620 more and more

00:59:01.140 into her career

00:59:02.180 is not going to find

00:59:03.820 that it has the same

00:59:04.600 positive effect

00:59:05.340 on her marriage

00:59:05.880 necessarily

00:59:06.460 because her husband 0.67

00:59:07.560 doesn't fundamentally

00:59:08.300 see her as a provider.

00:59:10.080 He may support

00:59:10.960 her career,

00:59:11.700 but he doesn't find

00:59:13.220 her career ambition

00:59:14.080 attractive

00:59:14.740 in the same way

00:59:15.700 that a woman 0.98

00:59:16.120 does for a man.

00:59:18.880 And there are a lot

00:59:20.140 of men who listen

00:59:20.720 to this right now

00:59:21.860 and feel like

00:59:22.780 they have to disagree

00:59:23.500 with me

00:59:23.900 and say,

00:59:24.280 no,

00:59:24.440 it's not true.

00:59:25.500 My wife is

00:59:27.640 very ambitious

00:59:29.000 in her career

00:59:29.600 and a great businesswoman, 0.67

00:59:30.600 and I just find

00:59:32.200 it so sexy

00:59:32.840 and attractive.

00:59:34.640 No,

00:59:35.160 you don't.

00:59:35.540 Not really.

00:59:36.540 I mean,

00:59:36.720 you're saying that

00:59:37.440 because you think

00:59:37.940 you have to,

00:59:38.620 but you don't really.

00:59:41.660 Again,

00:59:42.240 thousands and thousands

00:59:43.120 of years

00:59:43.660 of human behavior

00:59:45.540 tell us the truth here.

00:59:48.160 And also,

00:59:48.840 if the woman 0.98

00:59:49.180 becomes more successful

00:59:50.320 in her career

00:59:50.880 than the man is,

00:59:52.260 in his,

00:59:53.120 it can lead to resentment

00:59:54.040 because the man

00:59:54.800 will begin to feel

00:59:55.640 that he has no

00:59:56.140 essential role,

00:59:56.940 that he's no longer

00:59:57.420 necessary.

00:59:58.340 This is not me

00:59:59.220 prescribing how

01:00:00.060 things should be.

01:00:00.840 I'm just describing

01:00:01.580 how they are

01:00:02.340 and always have been.

01:00:04.260 We've been conditioned

01:00:04.960 to recoil from

01:00:05.880 the notion of gender roles.

01:00:07.260 The term almost always

01:00:08.220 is used in a pejorative

01:00:09.080 way now.

01:00:10.240 But at their root,

01:00:11.740 gender roles 0.99

01:00:12.320 were never rules.

01:00:14.020 It wasn't society

01:00:14.800 saying what men

01:00:15.520 and women should do 1.00

01:00:16.960 or must do.

01:00:18.180 Gender roles 0.99

01:00:18.620 were our way

01:00:19.160 of categorizing

01:00:19.960 what men and women

01:00:20.960 already naturally

01:00:21.940 tend to do.

01:00:23.740 And it's good

01:00:24.220 to have a grasp on that

01:00:25.160 because without it,

01:00:26.600 couples go into marriage

01:00:27.440 not sure what to do

01:00:28.460 or what their role

01:00:29.120 should be.

01:00:30.300 Invariably,

01:00:30.780 they end up stepping

01:00:31.340 on each other's toes,

01:00:32.560 competing with,

01:00:33.620 rather than complimenting

01:00:34.660 each other.

01:00:35.940 This is why it's good

01:00:36.780 to have a healthy

01:00:37.240 understanding of

01:00:37.960 and respect for

01:00:38.500 traditional gender roles,

01:00:39.780 quote unquote,

01:00:40.640 even if you're going

01:00:41.440 to do something

01:00:42.000 different in your own family.

01:00:44.640 It's good to know

01:00:45.420 what the original recipe is

01:00:46.820 before you come up

01:00:47.540 with your variation of it.

01:00:49.520 What happens these days

01:00:50.520 is that both the man

01:00:51.320 and the woman 0.95

01:00:51.660 stand in the kitchen

01:00:52.440 dumping all kinds

01:00:53.580 of competing ingredients

01:00:54.660 into the bowl,

01:00:55.740 mixing it together,

01:00:56.380 and the end result

01:00:57.060 is confused

01:00:57.720 and weird

01:00:58.160 and rarely successful.

01:01:00.840 And that's the result

01:01:01.780 of trying to deny

01:01:02.700 what we all inherently

01:01:03.660 know to be true.

01:01:06.220 So who are we

01:01:06.920 canceling today?

01:01:07.460 We're not canceling

01:01:08.020 gender roles 0.99

01:01:08.620 because those can't

01:01:09.740 be canceled,

01:01:10.320 not completely.

01:01:12.440 Instead, I guess

01:01:13.120 this is another

01:01:13.540 reverse cancellation.

01:01:14.480 We're canceling the people

01:01:15.380 who have tried

01:01:16.140 to cancel the gender roles 0.82

01:01:17.260 because that's just

01:01:19.340 never actually

01:01:20.340 going to work.

01:01:23.060 And we'll leave it

01:01:23.700 there for today.

01:01:24.160 Thanks for watching.

01:01:25.440 Thanks for listening.

01:01:26.480 Have a great day.

01:01:27.080 Godspeed.

01:01:27.420 Well, if you enjoyed

01:01:33.260 this episode,

01:01:33.820 don't forget to subscribe.

01:01:34.960 And if you want to

01:01:35.560 help spread the word,

01:01:36.400 please give us

01:01:37.080 a five-star review.

01:01:38.280 Also, tell your friends

01:01:39.080 to subscribe as well.

01:01:40.380 We're available

01:01:40.780 on Apple Podcasts,

01:01:41.980 Spotify,

01:01:42.600 wherever you listen

01:01:43.220 to podcasts.

01:01:43.880 We're there.

01:01:44.420 Also, be sure to check out

01:01:45.420 the other Daily Wire

01:01:46.120 podcasts, including

01:01:46.820 The Ben Shapiro Show,

01:01:48.040 Michael Knowles Show,

01:01:48.980 The Andrew Klavan Show.

01:01:50.060 Thanks for listening.

01:01:51.400 The Matt Walsh Show

01:01:52.060 is produced by Sean Hampton,

01:01:53.920 executive producer

01:01:54.600 Jeremy Boring,

01:01:55.340 our supervising producer

01:01:56.980 is Mathis Glover,

01:01:58.380 our technical director

01:01:59.380 is Austin Stevens,

01:02:00.920 production manager

01:02:01.620 Pavel Vodovsky,

01:02:02.840 the show is edited

01:02:03.600 by Ali Hinkle,

01:02:05.260 our audio is mixed

01:02:06.060 by Mike Coromina,

01:02:07.540 hair and makeup

01:02:08.180 is done by Cherokee Heart,

01:02:09.800 and our production

01:02:10.400 coordinator is McKenna Waters.

01:02:12.380 The Matt Walsh Show

01:02:12.940 is a Daily Wire production,

01:02:13.960 copyright Daily Wire 2021.

01:02:16.000 Hey, everybody.

01:02:16.500 This is Andrew Klavan,

01:02:17.480 host of The Andrew Klavan Show.

01:02:19.180 You know,

01:02:19.540 some people are depressed

01:02:20.640 because the republic

01:02:21.460 is collapsing,

01:02:22.360 the end of days

01:02:23.120 is approaching,

01:02:23.900 and the moon's

01:02:24.540 turned to blood.

01:02:25.560 But on The Andrew Klavan Show,

01:02:27.060 that's where the fun

01:02:27.760 just gets started.

01:02:28.820 So come on over

01:02:29.420 to The Andrew Klavan Show

01:02:30.400 and laugh your way

01:02:31.240 through the fall

01:02:31.780 of the republic

01:02:32.400 with me,

01:02:33.340 Andrew Klavan.

01:02:33.820 The Andrew Klavan Show.

01:02:34.440 The Andrew Klavan Show.

01:02:36.440 The Andrew Klavan Show.

The Matt Walsh Show - October 08, 2021

Ep. 814 - Sane People Are The Most Marginalized Community In America

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript