In this episode, we discuss a new term that has been introduced in the Safe Sex Guide, "the front hole." What does this mean? What does it mean and how can it be used in safe sex guides? And what does it have to do with gender?
00:00:00.000I want to bring your attention to a couple of things here.
00:00:03.020First, we have the popular health information website Healthline, which I think gets like 80 million visitors a month or something along those lines.
00:00:11.000And it has a safe sex guide, which is supposed to guide you in the ways of having safe sex.
00:00:20.020But in that guide, it has introduced a new term, which is supposed to take the place of an old term.
00:00:27.000And I want to read a bit of this guide to you, okay?
00:00:31.720These guides, talking about other safe sex guides, these guides often unnecessarily gender body parts as being male parts and female parts and refer to sex with women or sex with men, excluding those who identify as non-binary.
00:02:49.760By using the word parts to talk about genitals and using medical terms for anatomy without attaching a gender to it,
00:02:56.560we become much more able to effectively discuss safe sex in a way that's clear and inclusive.
00:03:02.200For the purposes of this guide, we'll refer to the vagina as the front hole instead of solely using the medical term vagina.
00:03:11.300This is gender-inclusive language that's considerate of the fact that some trans people don't identify with the labels the medical community attaches to their genitals.
00:05:51.900It's kind of like the choice that we have is we can ignore this kind of stuff.
00:05:57.100And we can let this insanity happen where body parts are being renamed in order to indulge the fantasies of mentally disordered individuals.
00:06:11.160We can just let that happen and say fine and not acknowledge it.
00:06:15.360Or we can engage with it and address it and oppose it.
00:06:21.160But in doing so, we're forced to have these kinds of conversations.
00:06:26.380And I think that latter option is the correct option.
00:08:33.540After more than a century behind bars, the beasts on boxes of animal crackers are roaming free.
00:08:40.800Mondela's International, parent company of Nabisco, has redesigned the packaging of its Barnum's animal crackers after relenting to pressure from people for the ethical treatment of animals.
00:08:50.580PETA, which has been protesting the use of animals in circuses for more than 30 years, wrote a letter to the company in the spring of 2016 calling for a redesign.
00:09:00.220Given the egregious cruelty inherent in circuses that use animals and the public's swelling opposition to the exploitation of animals used for entertainment,
00:09:07.640we urge Nabisco to update its packaging in order to show animals who are free to roam in their natural habitats.
00:09:14.940What PETA wanted to do is they wanted to free the caged animal crackers from their cages and have the box redesigned so that it's not offensive anymore,
00:09:26.400and the company decided to actually go ahead and do that.
00:11:27.920And it simply wants to destroy what was old, what existed before, and replace it with something new.
00:11:33.680The manipulation of language is a perfect example of this.
00:11:37.480They want to get rid of old words and replace them with new words for no other reason than the fact that the new word is new and the old one is old.
00:11:48.080You notice with this front hole thing, they never explain what exactly—even if I were to accept the idea that the word vagina is offensive to trans people,
00:12:01.000and therefore it has to be changed, how is front hole better?
00:12:04.720What actually makes that less offensive?
00:12:16.180And I think even in—even in—just by saying front hole, every time you say front hole, you lose five IQ points.
00:12:22.240That's what—I've said it now ten times, and I've lost 50 IQ points.
00:12:25.780By the time I'm done doing this video, I'm going to be—I'm going to be brain dead, laying—just laying here, because that's how stupid it is.
00:12:36.580But it's a new word, and that's what progressives do.
00:12:39.380They just take the old thing and put a new thing in its place.
00:12:42.720It doesn't matter if the new thing's an improvement, and it doesn't even matter if the new thing actually addresses whatever problems allegedly existed with the old thing.
00:12:52.940The new thing could have the same problems, but even worse.
00:12:56.400But it's put in place just because it's new.
00:12:59.640New is always better, so we always need new things.
00:13:03.240All the old stuff has to be tossed in the fire.
00:13:05.500That is—that is—that's what progressivism is doing.
00:13:10.340Just barreling forward in whatever direction it's going and destroying whatever is in its path and replacing it with new things.
00:13:19.660And as progressivism moves and moves and moves, it gets further and further away from anything that even vaguely resembles truth or reason or rationality, and it descends further into insanity.
00:13:35.120And now it has descended all the way into an animal cracker box, and it is finding reasons to fight over animal crackers.
00:13:49.100And so we can, as conservatives, it's kind of a double-edged sword because, on one hand, we can look at that and we can say—we can point out to everyone else.
00:14:02.640We can say, well, look at what progressivism—look at what it's become.
00:14:05.220Look at what kind of arguments they're having.
00:14:06.860Look at what kind of things they're fighting for now.
00:14:09.180Look at what they consider to be a victory now, renaming the vagina into the front hole.
00:14:15.980And we can point that out to try to guide people away from progressivism.
00:14:22.240And we should be, because it works to our benefit that progressivism has become so completely, utterly insane.
00:14:29.900But on the other hand, the only reason that they've gotten to this point is that they've been so successful and that they've won every other battle.
00:14:47.800And that's how they've moved on to these sorts of things.
00:14:57.080If you think about it, they already redefined human life through abortion, disqualifying all unborn children from having the title of human being.
00:15:11.660That was an enormous accomplishment that they achieved decades ago.
00:15:17.780They accomplished redefining marriage, which even 20 years ago was an unthinkable thing, but they've accomplished that.
00:15:25.940So they've been going through and redefining, tearing out what was old, what was traditional, tossing it in the fire, putting something new in its place.
00:15:35.500And they've done that with these huge things.
00:15:40.160And because they've already achieved that, now they can move on to these really small, crazy issues.
00:15:50.960So we should point to that and say, look, you don't want to be on that side.
00:15:54.180You don't want to be on the side of front holes and fighting over animal crackers.
00:15:58.220But at the same time, we should remember, they only got to this point because of our failures as conservatives to defend the definition of human life, the sanctity of marriage, and on and on and on.