The Matt Walsh Show - Ep. 883 - The Biden Administration Announces Plan To Abolish All Death And Suffering

00:00:00.000 Today on The Matt Wall Show, the Biden administration has announced its plan to get rid of all traffic

00:00:04.700 accidents and traffic deaths, reduce it to zero. Now, after failing to shut down COVID,

00:00:09.220 they will now attempt to prevent anyone from ever dying of anything ever again.

00:00:13.400 Also, Joe Biden officially begins his search for a new Supreme Court justice. He promises

00:00:16.900 it will be a thorough search and he'll consider a diverse selection of potential nominees as long

00:00:21.260 as they are black, female and liberal. The greatest female Jeopardy contestant of all time,

00:00:25.100 who's actually male, finally loses. And a writer wins praise from the left for publicly announcing

00:00:30.520 that she doesn't like being a mother. And finally, in our daily cancellation,

00:00:34.160 a PhD student attempts to school me on the topic of sex and gender.

00:00:38.600 We'll see how she did today. All of that and more today on The Matt Wall Show.

00:00:41.500 So there are two basic facts about government. One is that whenever it fails at something,

00:00:58.060 its solution for its own failure is always to do exactly what it was already doing,

00:01:02.800 except to do it more and more expensively. The second is that most bureaucrats are useless

00:01:07.840 and the most useless ones are often the ones who do the most and do it loudest because they feel

00:01:14.000 the great compulsion to justify their own existence, which means they'll always look for

00:01:18.620 things to do, even if those things don't need to be done or if doing them would cause more problems

00:01:23.420 than it solves. There are other important realities of government in modern times, but those are the

00:01:27.860 two facts, I think, which must be kept always in mind. And both of them are prominently on display

00:01:33.720 in this story. Pete Buttigieg, a profoundly useless man in the useless position of transportation

00:01:40.800 secretary, is on a mission to convince the public that his job is significant.

00:01:45.880 So after returning from his three-month paternity vacation, he first set out to cure racism by

00:01:50.760 destroying any racist roads or bridges that he could find. It was never exactly clear how he would

00:01:55.940 identify the racist infrastructure, but he huddled with a team of diversity specialists and they

00:02:01.660 figured it out. Somehow their plan did not involve repainting all of the streets white instead of

00:02:06.900 black. So that's still, you know, now every time you drive down the street, you're literally trampling

00:02:12.260 upon blackness, which is deeply traumatizing to black Americans and confusing to children, by the way.

00:02:17.800 In fact, a few weeks ago, my daughter asked me, we were in the car and she said, Daddy, why are all the

00:02:22.120 roads black? And I looked at her and I said, because everyone is racist, sweetie. I hoped I would never have to

00:02:28.100 have that conversation, but I did. At any rate, Buttigieg did something or other about the racist

00:02:33.860 roads. I don't know what. And now he's moved on to his next project, which is, which is even more

00:02:37.940 ambitious. He has now declared that he will reduce traffic deaths to zero. Now the government promised

00:02:45.540 to shut down COVID and ensured that nobody would ever die from a virus again. And having failed at that

00:02:52.040 in spectacular fashion, they will now embark on a project to ensure that nobody dies of anything else

00:02:56.980 ever again. We can be sure that they'll succeed in that arena about as much as they succeeded with

00:03:01.860 COVID. Here's Buttigieg announcing the plan. Listen. Another thing that is going to take in order to

00:03:08.020 change the trajectory of roadway safety in this country is a single ambitious shared goal. And today

00:03:14.780 we commit that our goal is this zero. Our goal is zero deaths. A country where one day nobody has to say

00:03:24.540 goodbye to a loved one because of a traffic crash. I understand the scale of the challenge and the

00:03:30.740 ambition represented by that goal. And I understand that we may not get there during my tenure as

00:03:35.580 secretary, but the decision to commit to that goal in a serious way at a national level changes the way

00:03:42.440 cities and towns design roads. It changes the ways companies build cars. It changes the way people

00:03:48.940 drive them. Oh yeah. It certainly would change all those things. Yes. Zero traffic accidents,

00:03:55.260 zero deaths. Now, some have argued that there's nothing wrong with this goal. This is just the

00:04:00.440 ideal. They say, yes, of course we won't ever actually abolish traffic accidents completely,

00:04:04.960 but we should at least try. They say a quarterback will never have a 100% completion percentage across

00:04:10.840 a whole season, but he still tries to complete every throw. Why can't we do the same thing with this?

00:04:16.080 Well, I'll tell you why. Those in charge of public policy have to engage in risk assessment and risk

00:04:23.780 management. We also have to do this on an individual personal level, but risk management means that

00:04:29.860 you're managing the risk, which means the risk is there. The risk is there. You're simply taking steps

00:04:36.100 to negate it within reason. Every human activity carries risk. The risk is inherent. Flying is very safe

00:04:45.240 generally, but there are still many risks. Why are there risks? Well, because you're 35,000 feet in

00:04:50.060 the sky. The risk is always that you're going to come down from the sky in a non-ideal manner,

00:04:55.860 let's say. You can manage that risk, but to erase the risk, to make it so that there is no risk,

00:05:01.840 to go from risk management to risk abolition, is to effectively abolish the activity itself.

00:05:07.980 The only way to make sure that nobody ever dies in a plane crash is to make sure that nobody ever flies

00:05:12.040 on a plane. If you're allowing people to fly on the plane, you're allowing some amount of risk.

00:05:17.980 You are saying, by allowing people to get on planes, you are saying, it's okay that some people are going

00:05:25.420 to die doing this. Because if it's not okay at all, then nobody should be allowed to do it.

00:05:32.860 Your risk tolerance cannot be zero. The only way to not take any risk when doing something is to not

00:05:40.380 do it. So let's think about what zero risk or near zero risk driving would look like.

00:05:47.220 First of all, highways are gone. They're gone. No more highways. As long as people are driving 60

00:05:52.440 miles an hour, there are going to be fatal car crashes. A national speed limit of 25 miles an hour

00:05:58.760 would have to be established, and that's just the starting point. Also, the driving age would have to be

00:06:04.300 raised to at least 25, which is the age when the prefrontal cortex is fully developed, and

00:06:08.940 you know, you're starting to think a little bit more rationally, and thus you're a better driver.

00:06:12.960 But if you're going to go for zero deaths, then really you want to raise it to probably 30.

00:06:17.800 Maybe 35. So I would just be coming off my learner's permit right now. Next, all forms of

00:06:24.680 distraction in the vehicle must be outlawed. No more drive-thrus. Close them all. Eating while driving

00:06:30.520 is distracting. No more driving with other people in the car, especially kids. Can't have them in the

00:06:36.520 car with you. We'd have to outlaw cell phones entirely because that's the only way to ensure

00:06:42.080 that nobody has them in their car. Also, we're going to need licenses to be renewed and the driver's

00:06:47.060 test to be retaken at least once a year, probably every six months, for the rest of your life.

00:06:53.020 That's just the starting point. More such measures would need to be put in place, but anything less than

00:06:58.120 these measures would mean that thousands of people are still going to die behind the wheel.

00:07:03.040 And even with these measures, or any other you can dream up, still there are going to be fatalities.

00:07:08.280 The only way to really get rid of them is to get rid of driving, along with all other forms of

00:07:13.360 transportation, faster than walking. But even walking could potentially kill you.

00:07:19.080 You know, you could fall down the steps. You've got to get rid of all the steps, too.

00:07:22.640 Later in his speech, Buttigieg said, quote,

00:07:24.780 Really? Certain? We now have the right to be certain of our safety, even while engaging in

00:07:44.260 inherently risky activities? You might as well say that every person eating food should be certain

00:07:50.420 that they won't choke. What does it even mean to say that? Unless you want to eat through a feeding

00:07:55.820 tube for the rest of your life, you can never be certain that you won't choke. In fact, contrary to

00:08:00.720 Buttigieg, we should not be certain of our safety in the car or in any area of life, because the only

00:08:08.420 way to achieve that certitude is either to delude ourselves or to stop living. Now, you know, this stuff

00:08:16.060 about zero car accident fatality, it may seem like the silly ramblings of a bureaucrat with the mental

00:08:21.060 acuity of a carrot, and it is in one sense, but that's not all it is. Now, if I'd heard something

00:08:27.120 like this three years ago, I may have laughed it off and just said, ah, it's ridiculous. But things have

00:08:33.940 changed in recent times, and many Americans have shown a profound willingness to go to extraordinary

00:08:39.480 lengths to embrace previously unimaginable forms of tyranny in order to feel protected from even the

00:08:46.040 smallest risk of harm or death. Millions of parents have been willing even to ruin their children's

00:08:52.220 lives, cause significant emotional and psychological damage on purpose, knowingly, all in the pursuit of

00:08:58.760 this same futile goal. And, you know, the government has noticed this. That's another thing we can know

00:09:06.500 about government. When the people tolerate any form of tyranny, they take note. And they say, oh,

00:09:14.360 you're okay with that, are you? Well, here's some more. And so now we're going to see one plan after

00:09:21.280 another to address one crisis after another. You notice how he described it as a crisis.

00:09:28.180 Car accidents are a crisis. They're not a crisis. There have always been car accidents, as long as

00:09:34.800 there have been highways. And even before that, it's not a crisis. It's just life and death, which is a

00:09:43.080 part of life. But there's going to be one crisis after another to protect us from the risk of one

00:09:50.260 form of death after another. And though none of these plans will be successful, obviously, or will

00:09:55.900 even have the chance of being successful, they will come at the cost of liberty and dignity.

00:10:01.000 A price that many people in this country have shown themselves tragically willing to pay.

00:10:08.000 Now let's get to our five headlines.

00:10:15.980 You know, the thing about kids is, as everyone knows, of course, they hate going to bed.

00:10:21.220 And it's always a struggle, especially in my house. I don't know how it is for most parents. But

00:10:25.860 in my house, bedtimes is just to keep them in the room at night when you put them down.

00:10:30.160 And they're always looking for reasons to come out. And so that's the challenge. It's

00:10:35.120 especially the case with my daughter. I mean, you have like two forms with kids. There's two

00:10:39.640 versions of this. There are the kids who you put them to bed and they're bouncing off the

00:10:43.320 walls for 30 minutes and they just fall asleep. That's the boys. And then there's my daughter

00:10:47.460 who's kind of quiet, but she'll stay up for like three hours and she'll keep trying to find

00:10:50.120 reasons to come out. And she gets kind of creative with it sometimes. So yesterday, last night,

00:10:53.640 it was like 1030 at night and she comes barreling out of her room and she's like, mommy, dad,

00:11:01.380 I got to tell you something. And I thought it was like an emergency or something. I don't

00:11:04.320 know what it was. I got to tell you something. I said, okay, what is it? Did you know that

00:11:08.840 snails have 15,000 teeth? And also dolphins have more teeth than sharks? No, I didn't know

00:11:17.120 that. Thank you for the update. I'll make sure to keep that in mind. Now, please go

00:11:21.920 to bed. And then later I went and Googled it and it's actually true. Snails have 15,000

00:11:26.220 teeth. Learn something new every day from your kids at 1030 at night. All right. So Joe Biden

00:11:31.280 officially announced the Supreme Court vacancy yesterday. And after it was, it was announced

00:11:36.780 unofficially with Justice Breyer's, apparently not his consent originally, at least the announcement

00:11:43.600 was not with his consent. So they kind of gave him the nudge and said, hey, we're

00:11:47.100 announcing your retirement. Congratulations. You're retiring. I guess you're learning about

00:11:51.480 it too, at the same time everybody else is. So Joe Biden officially announced it yesterday.

00:11:55.200 He addressed the nation and once again, reiterated his pledge to forbid any white man from taking

00:12:01.520 the position. Listen.

00:12:03.460 Our process is going to be rigorous. I will select a nominee worthy of Justice Breyer's legacy of

00:12:10.400 excellence and decency. While I've been studying candidates' backgrounds and writings, I've made

00:12:16.300 no decision except one. The person I will nominate will be someone with extraordinary qualifications,

00:12:24.760 character, experience, and integrity. And that person will be the first black woman ever nominated

00:12:31.240 to the United States Supreme Court. It's long overdue in my view.

00:12:35.020 It's going to be a thorough process. And he's going to look at all the candidates as long as they're

00:12:42.580 the same race and they're all female. And of course, they're all on the far left. So a thorough and

00:12:50.140 rigorous process that will involve, you know, about like four, four potential nominees.

00:12:57.560 That's what passes for, that's a, it's not only a rigorous process. It's also, it's also a diverse

00:13:03.820 process. You know, there was this, this concept of diversity and there was a, for a while I used to

00:13:14.560 say that kind of the Democrat notion of diversity, when they say diverse diversity, what they, what they

00:13:20.740 really have in mind are a bunch of people who look different and have different skin pigments,

00:13:29.460 different shades of skin, a bunch of people all in a room saying the same thing, speaking in unison

00:13:36.200 with the same exact beliefs. That was, I used to think that that's, that's their idea of diversity

00:13:41.120 where everybody, everybody looks different, at least skin deep, but they all think exactly the same

00:13:46.960 way because there's rigorous, uh, intellectual conformity on the left. But now, now that's not

00:13:53.860 even true. I think that's probably giving them too much credit because now diverse, a diverse group

00:14:00.180 or diversity, that means a bunch of people in a room who all look the same and also think the same

00:14:05.400 way. Because as we talked about diversity now is code for not white. And that's, that's how they

00:14:15.080 could get away with like talking about an individual person and saying, whenever they, whenever they

00:14:19.920 select whichever black woman it's going to be, whichever liberal far left black woman is going

00:14:23.140 to be, uh, they're going to say, this is our, this is a diverse selection. Well, how could a single

00:14:27.760 person be diverse? That only makes sense when you understand that by diverse, they mean non-white.

00:14:33.480 So every time you hear that, just sub in non-white and all of a sudden the sentence kind of makes

00:14:38.580 sense. Um, but there, there is this, this kind of awkward reality for people on the left when they

00:14:45.780 want to make a big deal out of this. Oh, we're going to get a, we're going to get a black, uh,

00:14:48.700 nominee, uh, black female nominee. Well, we've already, we've already had female court, uh,

00:14:54.240 justices on the court and there's currently a black justice on the court. Does he not count?

00:14:59.060 Well, as the ladies of the view agreed yesterday, um, in fact, he does not count. No.

00:15:03.400 Susan Collins. Well, cause you should have the votes.

00:15:05.660 Considering the uneven kind of, uh, court we have right now, it's so important that

00:15:10.560 this is happening on a, in a time where we can get another liberal. And of course,

00:15:14.560 the representation more than anything you pointed out first black woman,

00:15:17.600 there's only been two black men in it that those numbers are a little shock.

00:15:22.060 And one doesn't really represent the black community. No, no, no. But my, my whole point is

00:15:27.400 that, but addition to additional diversity, I think is important that I just noticed as we talked

00:15:32.740 about this is whenever they talk about a potential justice, we talk about the Ivy league.

00:15:37.080 He doesn't represent the black community, by the way, the, the woman talking right there

00:15:41.260 is, is, is she, is she supposed to be the cons? I think she's supposed to be the conservative

00:15:45.020 on, am I, am I wrong? Is she supposed to be the conservative representative on the view?

00:15:50.180 Um, but Clarence Thomas, she, she represents conservatism, I guess that lady, but Clarence Thomas

00:15:57.480 does not, he's not representative of, of black people. Like, what does that even mean to begin

00:16:02.460 with? Doesn't represent black. It's a, is, is that your, your job as a, as a, as a black man is to

00:16:10.620 constantly represent, uh, are you not an individual? Do you not have your own identity? Everything you

00:16:17.260 do has to represent and represent in what way? Is there some established consensus among all black

00:16:25.300 people about what, uh, what they all are supposed to think and feel? And so your job as a black man

00:16:31.260 is to never think or feel anything outside of that. Just removing the individual identity from

00:16:39.560 people. That's another part of the diversity plan on the left. All right. Um, here's another diverse

00:16:45.560 person, uh, from the New York post, Amy Schneider's jeopardy winning streak has finally come to an end

00:16:50.660 last week. The 42 year old made history when, and I'm reading, I'm just reading the language

00:16:55.480 from this article. Um, otherwise I wouldn't be choosing this language myself last week. The 42

00:17:02.360 year old made history when she won her 39th game and became number two on the game show's consecutive

00:17:09.000 winning list and the winningest woman of all time. But her time at the top ended Wednesday when she lost

00:17:16.040 to, uh, Roan Talsma, a librarian from Chicago. Um, and lots of jokes can be made here and have

00:17:25.160 already been made. So I'm late to it saying maybe the final category was what is a woman? It wasn't

00:17:29.220 the final category was countries of the world. And, um, and then, uh, now Schneider trails only Ken

00:17:35.500 Jennings, 74 wins on the long running game shows consecutive wins list. But she quote unquote is now,

00:17:43.980 uh, the, the number one champion woman contestant of all time. And the second place, uh, woman

00:17:52.480 trying to find her on here. There was a quote, maybe I cut it off. The second place woman who's

00:17:57.300 really the first woman, she, she, the actual, she congratulated the fake she for, you know,

00:18:04.480 supplanting her as the, the top female jeopardy contestant of all time, because that's what she

00:18:09.680 has to do. Do you think the, the, the woman who actually is the best female jeopardy contestant

00:18:15.520 of all time, you think she's happy about this, that her place has been taken from her by a man?

00:18:21.440 No, but she has to pretend that way. So now she's the top, uh, uh, now she's number two and the man

00:18:27.040 is number one for, for female, um, uh, contestants. And I have to just complain about this again,

00:18:34.640 because the New York post, I guess would consider it to self to be a just kind of mainstream media

00:18:41.220 outlet, but I've read plenty of articles in supposedly conservative outlets about this story

00:18:49.080 about, uh, Amy Schneider. And in the vast majority of them, even these conservative outlets are using

00:18:57.000 the preferred pronoun for Amy Schneider for, for calling a man, a woman. And they do this as I've

00:19:05.840 complained about many times, they do this, many of these conservative outlets, even while pretending

00:19:11.580 to oppose this, they'll report on Leah Thomas over at, uh, university of Pennsylvania, crushing the female

00:19:19.800 competition and report on it in a negative way. Like this is a bad thing.

00:19:25.120 Female sports are being destroyed by this, everything else. And yet they'll still use the

00:19:33.100 preferred pronoun. I've read plenty of commentary pieces by conservatives saying, this is terrible.

00:19:39.180 Females, women's sports are under attack because of people like Leah Thomas. She is crushing the

00:19:47.420 competition. Well, do you see you've just destroyed your argument? You've, you've surrendered the

00:19:52.340 point. It's over now. The moment you agree with the language you choose to use, the moment that you

00:20:00.200 agree that this in fact is a woman, it's what is, what are you arguing about?

00:20:08.140 Just immense cowardice, even among conservatives. And I, I use that, I use that phrase conservative,

00:20:15.400 uh, very, very loosely. I think we need to put, we need to put scare quotes around that. Like we do

00:20:18.980 around she when talking about Amy Schneider or Leah Thomas, because this is not just compromising

00:20:25.380 with the left. This is not you. There's plenty of that has happened in recent years, but this is

00:20:32.420 you adopting far, far left radical ideas and not just far left radical ideas, but far left radical ideas

00:20:41.840 about basic facts of existence. You are, you are adopting their premise in the most extreme ways

00:20:52.420 about basic facts of reality. The moment you do that, you're on their side. I don't care what else

00:20:59.080 you have to say. I don't care what your other positions are. I would go so far as to say, I don't,

00:21:05.900 you could be strongly in favor of, of, uh, gun rights. You could be anti-immigration. Uh, you

00:21:12.320 don't like high taxes, small government, all that kind of stuff. You can even call yourself pro-life

00:21:18.220 and go to the March for life. But if you're going to start calling a man, a woman, then you're on the

00:21:26.360 left because you have agreed with their version of reality. And it's a version of reality where,

00:21:38.040 you know, all of their other ideological points sprout from that. This is, this is the root here

00:21:45.460 and everything else is a branch from that root because leftism is all about relativism. It's the

00:21:52.960 worship of the self. That's why this gender stuff is so important to them because they want to

00:21:59.500 establish that reality itself is subject to an individual's whims. If I feel a certain way,

00:22:06.900 I can change reality. Reality will change itself according to my whims. If you agree with that

00:22:16.080 by calling a man, a woman, because that's what they want to be called,

00:22:19.640 then you've given up the whole game. You are in no coherent way, a conservative at that point.

00:22:28.520 What are you conserving? I think there are many things that need to be conserved in this culture,

00:22:33.900 but to begin with, we have to conserve reality. If we're not conserving that, then, then we lose

00:22:38.920 everything. So you can't say, okay, I'll give up reality, but I really care about gun rights.

00:22:44.760 Well, good for you. Go to Antifa meeting and tell them about that. You're not on our side.

00:22:54.320 All right. This is a video that I played for you probably almost a year ago and it's going viral

00:22:59.060 again for whatever reason. So I want to play it again because any, any, any excuse to play this,

00:23:05.880 I think is, uh, is worthwhile. This is trans affirming Dr. Johanna Olson Kennedy. She's very

00:23:12.080 prominent in her field. And this is her talking about, um, performing these surgeries, these

00:23:18.220 mutilation procedures on, on kids and explaining why it's actually perfectly fine to do. And it's

00:23:22.740 all good. Listen, actually people make life altering decisions in adolescence all the time,

00:23:31.980 all the time. And honestly, most of them are good. It's just the bad ones that we talk about.

00:23:37.180 Oh my God, the cinnamon challenge. Right? I mean, why do we know about it? Cause it's,

00:23:41.880 it's a thing and it's, it's not, it's not common. Like most teenagers aren't eating cinnamon,

00:23:46.120 right? But some are and they're on YouTube and that's stupid, but we don't put on YouTube the

00:23:51.120 things that are really good decisions. Right? Oh my gosh, my kid took the essay teens, not a very

00:23:57.620 exciting afterschool special. Right? But so what we do know is that adolescents actually have

00:24:04.320 the capacity to make a reason, logical decision. And here's the other thing about chest surgery.

00:24:10.620 If you want breasts at a later point in your life, you can go and get them.

00:24:17.680 It's a, I've heard that clip many times. It's, it doesn't get any less horrifying,

00:24:22.100 especially when you consider that this, this is not some fringe character here. This is a prominent

00:24:29.380 person in this, in this field of mutilating kids. And what does she say? She says, uh, Hey,

00:24:36.320 kids, kids, kids make responsible decisions all the time. They take the SATs,

00:24:42.340 which is pretty revealing that that's the example she gives for responsible decisions made by kids.

00:24:48.940 Cause guess what? That's not a decision that kids make their parents make that for them.

00:24:54.620 I took the SATs. You think I wanted to, if it were up to me, I would not have taken them.

00:25:02.900 Um, but my parents said, you got to take the SATs.

00:25:06.700 So that is something that is forced on you as a kid. And even the kids who want to take the SATs or

00:25:13.500 quote unquote, want to do responsible things. It's only because they've been conditioned that way,

00:25:19.760 conditioned in a good way by their parents.

00:25:21.820 That's part of parenting is not only telling kids what to do, but, but, uh, getting them to a point

00:25:33.140 through moral formation where they want to do the good things.

00:25:39.080 But as a parent, you say, even if you don't want to do it, even if you're so immature that you still

00:25:44.220 don't want to do this, this very good thing, that's going to help you. I still am going to force

00:25:47.740 you to do it because it's for your own good. That's what we do with kids. Um, but Dr. Olson

00:25:58.500 Kennedy says that, well, kids, they can, they can make life altering decisions. And why? Well,

00:26:04.660 because you can always reverse it. She says, which is not true by the way, you know, when you chop off

00:26:10.720 a part of your body, it does, you don't get it back. We don't grow it back. We're not lizards

00:26:14.880 regrowing a tail or whatever. So what they can do, and there are a great many former train quote

00:26:23.780 unquote trans kids who are now adults and are, and are looking into procedures like this because

00:26:28.460 they're experiencing regret. And we haven't even seen the half of it yet. We haven't even seen a

00:26:33.920 fraction of what's coming because the, the adults now who are called D transitioners who are experiencing

00:26:42.620 regret. Um, and they transitioned as kids, they were still pretty early in the fad. You know,

00:26:50.820 if they transitioned, whatever, eight years ago, seven, eight years ago, right now there is a whole,

00:26:56.920 there is an avalanche that's coming because the kids today are the ones who are growing up. You

00:27:04.200 know, a, a, a five-year-old today is among the, the, the, the first group of five-year-olds to grow

00:27:11.540 up in, in a, in a culture where this stuff is fed to them at that young of an age. And so there's

00:27:19.280 going to be a lot more coming in the future. And what they're going to discover is that actually you,

00:27:24.060 you cannot regrow. You can't, you can't reverse that. You know, when you go in and you have your

00:27:31.300 breasts chopped off, that was a part of your body that is now gone, not getting it back.

00:27:38.420 What they can try to do is refashion using, you know, cosmetic procedures, some semblance of what

00:27:45.340 you had before, but it's not going to be the real thing. But she's, she's totally dismissive,

00:27:53.160 of course, of any concern that this might be bad for kids. And if you are not totally opposed to

00:27:58.940 what you just heard in that clip there, if you are not absolutely diametrically opposed to it

00:28:04.060 in every fiber of your being, then you're not on my side. I don't know whose side you're on.

00:28:11.380 This is a, you're with us or against us type of thing.

00:28:16.540 You know, when you, when you use the preferred pronouns, that woman there, that's who you're helping.

00:28:20.220 You're helping her. You're on her side. You're doing what she wants you to do.

00:28:27.700 All right. Let's look at this. A writer, Ariana Rebellini was the latest woman to try to earn

00:28:33.760 sympathy and victim points by talking about how much she hates her kids. Just wanted to show this

00:28:39.300 to you. Um, this is also becoming a trend. Uh, Ariana Rebellini says, I've been opening up about how I do

00:28:45.980 not enjoy being a mom thinking about why I feel so passionately about talking about it. And I think a

00:28:51.860 large part is my belief that normalizing slash celebrating the decision to be child free can

00:28:57.200 lead to more communal childcare. Now what we're, what we're told and people were criticizing her for

00:29:06.080 this and rightly so. And her justification was, Hey, I just being honest. And, uh, I'm just,

00:29:13.340 I'm saying what so many other people think and I'm, why can't I be honest? Well, I'll tell you why

00:29:19.420 you can't be quote unquote honest about it. First of all, this is a very, this is not honesty.

00:29:24.160 It's not honesty at all because this is you trying to fool yourself, trying to make yourself feel

00:29:31.220 better, trying to delude yourself. You have this bad thoughts, which, which, which,

00:29:39.300 which grows from a character flaw. Now, look, we all have moments as parents when, um, the parenting

00:29:47.720 job is not very enjoyable. Like when it's 10 30 at night and your kids out there talking about snails

00:29:53.360 having 15,000 teeth teeth and you just want them to go to bed so you can hang out with your spouse,

00:29:56.760 right? Like those are moments when it's not super enjoyable in those moments. But if you just hate

00:30:03.060 parenting altogether, you hate the whole thing, that is a, that's a character flaw. That's a,

00:30:10.140 that's a you problem. It's not your kid's fault. And no, it's, I have news for you. It's not normal

00:30:16.500 and it shouldn't be. That's not how most parents feel.

00:30:22.980 Many parents struggle with aspects of parenting. It can be difficult, but most parents derive a great

00:30:27.940 amount of joy out of being a parent. And if they could snap their fingers and reverse the clock

00:30:35.600 and not be parents anymore, they wouldn't do it. That's most parents. So the reason why you feel

00:30:41.560 this way is because you're so intensely selfish. So this is coming from your selfishness and that's

00:30:49.400 not a good thing. That's a character flaw. Why does she put it out there in the open? Um, and she's

00:30:54.540 being honest. Well, yeah, maybe she's being honest about how she feels, but she wants to fool herself.

00:31:01.620 And so she puts it out there so that other people who are also selfish can say, Oh, I feel the same

00:31:06.100 way. And she can take solace in the fact that there are other selfish, miserable people out there

00:31:11.600 and they can form their own little community, their own support group. This, this is one of the,

00:31:17.900 one of the great problems with the internet, by the way, is that people can take any dark,

00:31:23.600 twisted thought idea desire that they have, and they can just go out into the internet and find

00:31:32.140 other people who, who, uh, share in that darkness with them and then convince themselves that it's

00:31:39.020 not darkness at all. It's perfectly normal because there are other people. Whereas in the past, there's

00:31:44.580 so much that, you know, in the past without the internet, um, you know, you probably, if you felt this

00:31:50.600 way, you hated being a parent, you weren't going to go around in public and announce that to people

00:31:55.460 directly face to face. You just keep it to yourself like you should. And you would feel alone in that

00:32:01.880 feeling and it'd be very isolating, but that's good. And there would be, there'd be a stigma attached

00:32:08.180 to it. And that's also good because it would, it would maybe propel you to make the changes that

00:32:12.740 you need. So you don't feel that way anymore. Because by the way, yeah, oftentimes your feelings

00:32:18.600 are your fault. You know, you have indulged in your selfishness. And so that's why you feel this

00:32:24.720 way about parenting. That's on you. And of course, the other problem is that your kids are going to

00:32:30.680 see that one day. So maybe something all parents should keep in mind before you go out in public on

00:32:36.660 the internet complaining bitterly about your kids and how you wish you weren't a parent.

00:32:42.960 Your kids maybe can't read right now, but one day they will. And they're going to see, oh, mom,

00:32:47.080 uh, mom hated me. And you know, here's what's going to happen. Your kids are going to see that

00:32:52.960 and start to really realize it. And in fact, even if you don't announce it on the internet,

00:32:57.900 if you hate your kids and you hate parenting, your kids eventually will come to understand that about

00:33:03.000 you. And when they come to understand it, it's going to be right around the time when, you know,

00:33:11.260 they're, they, they're not as challenging to have around because young, usually parents complain like

00:33:16.940 this when their kids are younger and they have, they're very needy. They have a lot of needs and

00:33:20.440 you're selfish. So you don't have to meet anybody else's needs. Well, as kids get older and they become

00:33:25.480 like adults, now they don't have those same needs. And now it could be a lot more fun to be a parent

00:33:31.580 then you have to start having grandkids in the mix. And that's really fun. I'm told,

00:33:35.740 but it's going to be right around that time when your kids are going to start to look back.

00:33:42.220 And in this case, now they're going to see the old tweets or whatever. They're going to start

00:33:45.240 reflecting. They're going to realize, oh, she, this was a, this was a miserable parent who never

00:33:48.980 wanted me around. And now they're knocking at my door and saying, let's have a relationship.

00:33:54.000 Let's bond. Sorry. No, that's out the window. Now you had the chance to bond with me and establish

00:34:00.100 that relationship through my entire childhood. You were too immersed in your own selfishness to

00:34:04.080 do it. And it's too late now. So that's, what's going to happen. Um, one other video I want to

00:34:10.340 play before we get to reading the comments. Uh, here's a scene on an elevator that I I've encountered

00:34:19.140 situations like this on elevators, but never quite to this extent. Here's a man. Apparently this guy

00:34:23.900 tried to get on an air or I think he was already on an elevator without a mask on. And then these two

00:34:27.900 women, uh, get on the elevator next. And they have masks and they're very upset that he's not

00:34:32.560 wearing one. And so here's what happens.

00:34:34.560 you need to stop. Oh, I'm not getting out. I was here.

00:34:41.840 Black Lives Matter. That is so on the nose.

00:35:09.340 When I first saw that, I thought, is this some kind of parody?

00:35:11.280 That is too on the nose for these two white women paranoid about COVID

00:35:16.040 while they're trying to kick a black man off the elevator

00:35:18.380 because he's not wearing a mask.

00:35:19.780 They start chanting Black Lives Matter.

00:35:21.840 Apparently, this is real, I guess, and it's quite believable

00:35:24.620 because, like I said, I've encountered not quite to that extent,

00:35:29.360 but elevators have become and have been since the start of all this

00:35:33.120 sources of this kind of tension, especially.

00:35:37.480 I mean, I told you it was like a year ago

00:35:38.780 where I had one of the only times I ever got yelled at

00:35:42.600 by someone for not wearing a mask.

00:35:44.620 There's maybe been three occasions, and one of them,

00:35:46.980 and I think it was the first one,

00:35:48.040 is when I got on an elevator not wearing a mask at a hotel,

00:35:51.200 and the guy was on the elevator with a mask with his,

00:35:53.840 I guess it was his wife, and started yelling at me,

00:35:56.820 get off the elevator.

00:35:57.620 I was like, you know, I'm not going to get off.

00:35:59.860 You can get off.

00:36:00.500 And so he did, and he stormed away.

00:36:04.300 And there was a time early on when it kind of felt

00:36:06.780 elevators were really uncomfortable for that reason,

00:36:10.180 because I'm not going to wear the mask.

00:36:12.360 I'm not going to play the game.

00:36:13.920 But now I'm getting into this enclosed environment

00:36:15.660 with this other person, and it's quiet,

00:36:17.480 and elevators are already awkward.

00:36:19.480 But now we had the extra awkwardness.

00:36:21.100 But then after a while, you learn to enjoy it,

00:36:23.240 because this is character building.

00:36:24.780 That's how I started to look at it.

00:36:26.660 Get onto an elevator without a mask.

00:36:28.200 The person's on the elevator, has a mask on.

00:36:31.100 I know how uncomfortable I'm making them.

00:36:32.960 I know it.

00:36:34.860 But I started to appreciate it,

00:36:36.040 because it's character building for them.

00:36:39.580 You know, it's in their discomfort.

00:36:42.840 Maybe they can start to realize how irrational they're being.

00:36:46.540 So in a way, I'm doing them a favor,

00:36:48.360 as the man in that video did.

00:36:50.560 So well done.

00:36:51.940 Let's get to the comment section.

00:36:53.160 Who makes Twitter mob fly off the handle with rage?

00:36:59.200 Who's to blame?

00:37:02.320 It's a sweet baby gang.

00:37:06.340 All right.

00:37:07.200 Let's go to the video comments,

00:37:09.260 and dailywire.com slash sweetbabycomments

00:37:12.420 is where you can find them.

00:37:14.160 Let's go to clip number one here.

00:37:15.960 Okay, what do you call...

00:37:23.720 Let me see that video again.

00:37:25.200 I don't know what happened.

00:37:25.960 What do you call a man who gets himself into this predicament?

00:37:28.960 Let's see.

00:37:29.460 Oh, okay.

00:37:31.320 Is that a man?

00:37:32.060 Do we know that's a man behind the wheel?

00:37:34.020 So the guy is wedged up on the median strip between the two.

00:37:37.640 I guess he was trying to make a left turn,

00:37:39.200 and he cut it way too close,

00:37:42.460 and now he's wedged on the median strip.

00:37:45.560 Now, I guess trying to make a point here

00:37:48.100 that bad drivers come in both sexes,

00:37:50.520 but I don't see any proof that that's a man.

00:37:54.360 And of course, how dare you assume his gender?

00:37:58.340 That's...

00:37:58.940 There's no coming back from that as a man.

00:38:01.840 That is a permanent revocation of your man card,

00:38:04.160 and you'll never, ever get it back.

00:38:05.600 You might as well transition at that point.

00:38:08.340 Usually, I'm not in favor of that,

00:38:09.640 but this is one occasion where you might as well,

00:38:12.220 and then go on Jeopardy, you know?

00:38:14.500 All right, let's watch the next one.

00:38:16.640 All hail to the self-described, handsome, and brilliant,

00:38:19.640 theocratic, fascist, philanthropist,

00:38:22.380 trans-Virginian, best-selling LGBTQ children's author.

00:38:25.220 I personally identify as a vaccinated, schizophrenic train.

00:38:28.400 My pronouns are Choo Choo.

00:38:30.880 Two things.

00:38:31.440 First, I know you canceled selfies,

00:38:33.200 but hopefully you make an exception for these video comments.

00:38:35.680 Because if not, then we're all in trouble.

00:38:37.720 And then second, would you be opposed to the idea

00:38:40.400 that cereal is actually just breakfast soup?

00:38:43.020 This is one of the greatest debates in modern society,

00:38:45.520 and obviously your opinion is never wrong about anything ever.

00:38:49.540 SBG for life.

00:38:50.320 Have a great day.

00:38:51.280 Godspeed.

00:38:52.420 Okay, first of all,

00:38:53.440 there's a couple things you got wrong here.

00:38:54.480 First of all,

00:38:55.180 if you're going to respect my self-identification,

00:38:57.860 you cannot say self-described

00:38:59.860 and then give my preferred adjectives and pronouns.

00:39:04.020 It doesn't, no, no, no.

00:39:06.320 A man identifies as a woman.

00:39:07.640 You cannot refer to him as self-described woman.

00:39:10.140 That's deeply offensive

00:39:11.180 and invalidating to me.

00:39:13.940 Second,

00:39:15.000 is cereal just breakfast soup?

00:39:16.860 It's obviously not.

00:39:18.580 It shows how little you know about this subject

00:39:21.080 and food categories.

00:39:23.220 Cereal is a stew.

00:39:24.720 It's a breakfast stew,

00:39:25.860 not a soup.

00:39:26.920 And the difference between a stew and a soup

00:39:28.480 is that with a soup,

00:39:29.860 the broth is sort of the main ingredient.

00:39:31.840 It's the star of the show, right?

00:39:34.240 With a stew,

00:39:35.180 it's not the broth.

00:39:36.200 It's the ingredients that are within the broth.

00:39:40.440 So really,

00:39:40.980 the broth is just a forum

00:39:42.200 for the ingredients that you put in it.

00:39:43.460 And when you're eating cereal,

00:39:44.380 of course,

00:39:44.620 the cereal is the point,

00:39:45.440 not the milk, right?

00:39:46.140 Okay.

00:39:47.280 Let's watch one more.

00:39:48.000 Hey, Matt.

00:39:49.800 My name's Beau from New Jersey.

00:39:51.040 And yes,

00:39:51.540 Jersey is just as bad

00:39:52.680 as you and the other hosts say it is.

00:39:53.980 I'm getting out of here soon.

00:39:55.120 But anyway,

00:39:55.600 I'm a speech language pathology major.

00:39:57.400 And I just wanted to give some insight

00:39:58.880 on what you were saying yesterday.

00:40:00.720 Not only will masks affect children

00:40:03.560 and cause speech delays

00:40:05.800 and speech language disorders,

00:40:07.820 children can't learn without facial stimuli.

00:40:10.780 They need those expressions.

00:40:11.860 They study your tongue.

00:40:12.660 They study your lips like you said.

00:40:14.240 And I just have a study fresh in my mind.

00:40:15.840 I forget who it's by,

00:40:16.660 but there was three groups.

00:40:18.680 One of toddlers who had educators

00:40:21.240 and were being taught directly.

00:40:22.760 One who just had audio

00:40:24.500 and just had headphones

00:40:25.300 and one that had audio,

00:40:26.720 but also saw videos like toys and stuff

00:40:28.580 to keep them engaged.

00:40:29.740 And obviously the educated group did the best.

00:40:32.140 They had that facial expression

00:40:33.540 and not only those facial expressions,

00:40:35.500 they build bonds with their caretakers.

00:40:37.420 If you can't see their face,

00:40:38.720 if you can't see what's making those sounds,

00:40:40.860 you're not going to be able to build

00:40:42.020 the right bonds with your caregivers.

00:40:44.600 So anyway,

00:40:45.180 I just wanted to throw that out there

00:40:47.060 and I love you

00:40:48.040 and I love the Sweet Baby Gang for life.

00:40:51.280 Yeah, great insight there.

00:40:52.600 And a great point also at the end there

00:40:53.920 about it interferes with the bond that you need.

00:40:56.160 And that's not just a problem for speech therapists.

00:40:59.700 I imagine it's a special problem for speech therapists,

00:41:02.200 but it's a problem for anyone

00:41:04.640 who's in a position of trying to care for children,

00:41:07.060 for teachers.

00:41:07.720 You know, the teachers that want to,

00:41:11.340 if you really want your students to pay attention to you,

00:41:14.580 they have to have some kind of bond,

00:41:16.320 some kind of connection with you.

00:41:18.040 They have to care about what you think

00:41:20.600 and what you have to say.

00:41:21.760 And so there has to be some form of connection

00:41:23.880 between you and your students.

00:41:25.540 And the good teachers are the ones

00:41:28.200 who are good at establishing that kind of connection.

00:41:31.380 Where even students, lazy students like I was,

00:41:35.360 still they'll sit down,

00:41:36.420 they actually want to listen to you.

00:41:37.700 They want to hear what you have to say

00:41:38.820 because they respect you

00:41:39.980 and they feel some kind of connection with you.

00:41:42.300 But you put masks on,

00:41:43.500 it's very hard to do.

00:41:44.580 It's hard to establish any connection between people

00:41:46.580 when you're just a faceless phantom floating around, right?

00:41:53.040 Going to the written comments here,

00:41:54.900 Joanna the artist says,

00:41:55.820 I'm half deaf

00:41:56.540 and it's been incredibly difficult to understand others

00:41:58.540 as I found out that I naturally read lips.

00:42:02.600 This is a comment I've seen from many people

00:42:04.400 who are deaf or hard of hearing.

00:42:07.640 And it's just a really infuriating irony

00:42:10.820 because we hear all this talk

00:42:12.440 about how we have to be inclusive

00:42:14.240 and we don't want to be ableist

00:42:16.600 and discriminate against people who are disabled.

00:42:18.620 Well, here is an example

00:42:19.880 of people suffering from a disability

00:42:23.560 who are actually being excluded from society now.

00:42:28.540 Because they can't understand,

00:42:30.160 they can't communicate.

00:42:33.100 So, I would never non-ironically call anything ableism.

00:42:38.300 But if you did,

00:42:39.560 if you were tempted to use that term

00:42:41.440 in a non-ironic way,

00:42:42.700 this might be an area

00:42:44.180 where you could actually use it.

00:42:45.340 And Dirty South Jr. says,

00:42:52.300 Matt really did try the shaming tactic

00:42:54.920 of calling men who are smart enough

00:42:56.680 not to enter into a contract

00:42:58.180 their partner is rewarded for breaking,

00:43:00.500 higher than 50% divorce rate

00:43:01.960 initiated by the wife 80% of the time,

00:43:03.740 not real men.

00:43:05.540 FYI, that holds as much weight these days

00:43:07.600 as being called sexist or racist.

00:43:09.940 Well, no one can be right about every topic.

00:43:11.860 Like, that's not exactly what I said.

00:43:15.140 If you don't want to get married,

00:43:16.480 I'm not going to tell you

00:43:17.380 you have to get married.

00:43:20.000 And it's, you know,

00:43:22.080 we talked about,

00:43:23.860 I think it was on Backstage recently.

00:43:27.060 You know, is everyone called to be a parent?

00:43:29.920 And on one hand, you would say,

00:43:31.380 well, obviously not.

00:43:32.160 There are people who can't be parents.

00:43:34.040 They were, you know,

00:43:35.260 they're just,

00:43:35.800 because of whatever physical reason,

00:43:39.140 they're not able to conceive.

00:43:41.080 There are also people

00:43:41.900 who enter into religious life, for example.

00:43:43.780 I obviously have great respect for that.

00:43:46.560 But I would still say

00:43:47.720 that everyone is called to,

00:43:49.860 you know,

00:43:50.280 every man is called to fatherhood

00:43:52.440 in some form.

00:43:54.240 And for most of us,

00:43:55.280 it's the traditional kind of biological form,

00:43:57.600 but there are other forms of it.

00:44:00.000 One of them is going into religious life.

00:44:01.580 You go and be a missionary.

00:44:04.920 You know,

00:44:05.540 that's kind of a form of fatherhood,

00:44:08.220 of serving others

00:44:10.060 in a kind of paternal way.

00:44:12.840 Another way of putting it

00:44:13.580 is we're all called to service, right?

00:44:15.460 As men,

00:44:16.000 we're called to a special kind of service.

00:44:17.400 Women are called to another kind of service.

00:44:20.160 Even if that doesn't come all the time

00:44:22.360 in that traditional biological kind of way.

00:44:25.280 So I would certainly say

00:44:26.840 that that holds true for everyone.

00:44:30.120 And if you end up getting,

00:44:31.120 not getting married,

00:44:32.040 okay,

00:44:32.960 there are also men

00:44:34.780 who want to get married

00:44:35.620 and sadly,

00:44:36.820 it never ends up happening

00:44:37.940 and that's a terrible thing as well.

00:44:39.780 But nobody is called

00:44:41.060 to live their entire lives

00:44:42.280 for themselves.

00:44:44.820 Nobody's called

00:44:45.480 to serve only themselves

00:44:46.740 for their entire lives.

00:44:49.520 That's not what human existence

00:44:50.640 is supposed to be

00:44:51.380 and it's not going to be

00:44:52.340 a fulfilling existence

00:44:53.120 and you're not going to find

00:44:54.120 any real joy in it.

00:44:57.280 But at any rate,

00:44:58.120 what I was really referring to

00:45:00.400 is the comment

00:45:01.080 from the guy yesterday

00:45:01.800 who said that,

00:45:03.720 well,

00:45:03.820 marriage doesn't work.

00:45:05.460 It just doesn't work.

00:45:06.720 It's not natural.

00:45:09.240 Making this statement

00:45:10.160 for everybody

00:45:11.140 because he can't do it.

00:45:13.420 And that's why

00:45:14.240 I question your manhood

00:45:15.080 because that's weak.

00:45:17.160 That's cowardly.

00:45:18.560 If you can't do something

00:45:19.900 or don't want to

00:45:20.780 or whatever

00:45:21.200 or it appears to be

00:45:22.840 too challenging to you,

00:45:23.720 whatever your reasons are.

00:45:25.480 And so you try

00:45:26.260 to fool yourself

00:45:27.040 by saying,

00:45:27.640 well,

00:45:27.740 no one can do it.

00:45:28.880 Obviously,

00:45:29.320 no one can do it.

00:45:30.100 And the people

00:45:30.520 who are doing it,

00:45:31.460 they all hate it.

00:45:32.460 They just won't say it.

00:45:34.060 That's weakness

00:45:34.760 to try to fool yourself

00:45:36.240 that way.

00:45:37.780 At least confront the reality.

00:45:39.000 That's what a man does.

00:45:41.100 Because the reality is

00:45:42.260 lots of men get married

00:45:43.500 and get married successfully.

00:45:48.260 I've been married

00:45:48.900 for 10 years.

00:45:50.400 Wouldn't want it

00:45:50.960 any other way.

00:45:51.860 My dad's been married

00:45:52.520 for 40 years.

00:45:54.160 We are not

00:45:55.440 outliers either.

00:45:57.540 Millions and millions

00:45:58.220 of men throughout history

00:45:59.220 have gotten married

00:46:00.360 and been married successfully.

00:46:02.800 So when you try to,

00:46:03.900 you can make whatever decision

00:46:04.860 you want in your own life,

00:46:05.500 but when you try to claim,

00:46:06.180 oh, it doesn't work,

00:46:06.860 it can't happen,

00:46:07.420 it doesn't work,

00:46:08.400 give me a break.

00:46:10.060 Make your own choice.

00:46:10.940 Don't try to put it

00:46:11.460 on the rest of us.

00:46:12.060 That's weakness.

00:46:13.100 If you haven't seen it yet,

00:46:13.900 the latest episode

00:46:14.620 of Adam Corolla's

00:46:15.340 Daily Wire exclusive

00:46:16.260 comedy series,

00:46:16.940 Truth Yeller,

00:46:17.480 is streaming now

00:46:18.160 and it might be

00:46:18.840 just the best one yet.

00:46:19.940 Adam takes on Hunter Biden

00:46:21.580 and is joined by comedian

00:46:22.520 T.J. Miller,

00:46:23.300 who dropped some comedy gold

00:46:24.400 and proves that he's

00:46:25.400 the real deal.

00:46:26.120 Go to dailywire.com

00:46:27.500 slash subscribe

00:46:28.160 and use code Miller

00:46:28.980 for 25% off your membership

00:46:30.260 and get ready

00:46:31.020 for some serious laughs.

00:46:32.860 If there's anyone

00:46:33.800 that the Biden administration

00:46:34.940 and the mainstream media

00:46:35.880 and Big Pharma

00:46:36.360 don't want you to hear,

00:46:37.460 it's the voice of

00:46:38.080 Dr. Robert Malone.

00:46:39.220 Malone is an American

00:46:39.900 virologist, immunologist,

00:46:41.760 and a pioneer

00:46:42.280 of mRNA vaccines

00:46:43.640 who was removed

00:46:44.400 from Twitter

00:46:44.940 and most social media platforms

00:46:46.380 for his public skepticism

00:46:47.640 of the COVID-19 vaccine

00:46:48.680 and then went viral

00:46:49.720 for his interview

00:46:50.220 on Joe Rogan's podcast.

00:46:51.560 In any sane society,

00:46:52.440 his background would qualify him

00:46:53.660 as an expert

00:46:54.240 whose opinion should be heard,

00:46:55.880 but we're not living

00:46:56.420 in a sane society

00:46:57.060 and so he is receiving

00:46:58.000 the opposite treatment.

00:46:58.880 He's being censored.

00:46:59.960 That's why our very own

00:47:00.660 Candace Owens sat down

00:47:01.640 for a three and a half hour

00:47:02.720 interview with Dr. Malone

00:47:03.900 and does not leave

00:47:05.440 any stone unturned.

00:47:06.720 Together,

00:47:07.080 they touch on some

00:47:07.660 of the most alarming statistics,

00:47:09.240 questions,

00:47:09.600 and trends

00:47:10.020 that the mainstream media

00:47:10.940 and big tech

00:47:11.500 don't want you to know

00:47:12.860 or don't want to acknowledge.

00:47:14.000 This is an incredibly

00:47:14.540 important interview

00:47:15.140 and will be available

00:47:16.080 exclusively at

00:47:16.780 dailywire.com

00:47:17.560 this Tuesday, February 1st.

00:47:19.580 If you don't already have

00:47:20.400 a Daily Wire membership,

00:47:21.820 join now

00:47:22.460 to catch Tuesday's episode

00:47:23.960 of Candace

00:47:24.460 premiering this Tuesday

00:47:25.320 at 9 p.m. Eastern,

00:47:26.540 8 p.m. Central.

00:47:27.300 Now let's get to

00:47:27.800 our daily cancellation.

00:47:32.600 Ever since the infamous

00:47:33.760 episode of Dr. Phil aired,

00:47:34.860 I have been forced

00:47:35.620 to endure the onslaught

00:47:36.760 from an army of smug,

00:47:38.300 liberal fart sniffers

00:47:39.380 who, though they appear

00:47:40.240 to have no understanding

00:47:41.180 of even the most basic

00:47:42.100 facts of life,

00:47:42.880 are nonetheless high

00:47:43.660 on their own fumes

00:47:44.360 and impressed with

00:47:44.940 their own intellect,

00:47:45.840 and they demand

00:47:46.260 that the rest of us

00:47:46.820 admire them as much

00:47:47.660 as they admire themselves.

00:47:49.200 Now these people

00:47:49.700 are quite sure that I'm wrong

00:47:50.960 and are anxious to tell me

00:47:51.860 how wrong I am,

00:47:52.540 and yet none of them

00:47:53.200 have been able to actually

00:47:54.140 explain why I'm wrong.

00:47:55.840 I've had many exchanges

00:47:56.740 with these types

00:47:57.400 over the past week,

00:47:58.160 but today for the Daily

00:47:58.760 Cancellation,

00:47:59.320 we're going to focus

00:48:00.080 on just one such interaction.

00:48:02.300 I think this back and forth

00:48:03.220 manages to exemplify

00:48:04.280 nearly everything

00:48:04.920 that's wrong

00:48:05.460 with much of what passes

00:48:06.780 for debating

00:48:07.480 in modern times.

00:48:08.920 It's as if this person

00:48:10.020 had a checklist

00:48:10.720 of all of the fallacious,

00:48:13.800 evasive,

00:48:14.400 and ad hominem tactics

00:48:15.700 possible and made sure

00:48:16.820 to check every single

00:48:17.700 one of them off.

00:48:18.860 It's quite impressive

00:48:19.780 in a certain kind of way.

00:48:22.120 So Steph Frosch

00:48:23.420 is apparently

00:48:24.660 some kind of social media

00:48:25.620 influencer type,

00:48:26.540 and also she says

00:48:27.420 in her bio,

00:48:28.360 America's gay sweetheart

00:48:29.700 as well as a PhD student.

00:48:31.420 And it's very obvious

00:48:32.060 from her social media presence

00:48:33.140 as it will become

00:48:34.140 apparent very quickly

00:48:35.420 in her response to me

00:48:36.900 that she's very proud

00:48:38.240 of both being gay

00:48:39.320 and of being a PhD student.

00:48:40.660 Indeed,

00:48:41.280 these two facts

00:48:42.000 appear to be

00:48:42.400 the sum total

00:48:43.180 of her personality

00:48:44.100 and also the source

00:48:45.400 of her superiority

00:48:46.240 over everyone else

00:48:47.300 on earth.

00:48:48.780 Now, surely Steph

00:48:49.640 can school me easily.

00:48:52.100 She's a gay woman,

00:48:53.760 PhD student.

00:48:55.300 I'm a straight white male

00:48:56.640 with one semester

00:48:57.540 of community college

00:48:58.280 under my belt.

00:48:59.120 How could I possibly

00:49:00.040 win an argument

00:49:00.920 about sex and gender

00:49:02.500 with an authority figure

00:49:03.920 such as herself?

00:49:05.140 Well, let's see.

00:49:06.580 Yesterday,

00:49:07.180 in a reaction

00:49:07.820 to one of the Dr. Phil clips,

00:49:09.340 Steph tweeted,

00:49:09.760 the fact that Dr. Phil

00:49:11.920 used his platform

00:49:12.780 to exploit

00:49:13.600 two non-binary guests

00:49:15.060 that he invited

00:49:15.600 on his show

00:49:16.060 to discuss pronouns

00:49:16.820 by inviting

00:49:17.700 a transphobic

00:49:18.800 cretinous troll

00:49:19.900 on stage

00:49:20.520 to mock the suffering

00:49:21.580 and oppression

00:49:22.040 of trans people

00:49:22.920 immediately after

00:49:24.120 is disgusting.

00:49:25.760 And so is he.

00:49:27.880 Yes, Dr. Phil

00:49:28.360 should be ashamed

00:49:28.920 for exploiting

00:49:29.800 these two, quote,

00:49:30.700 non-binary people

00:49:31.620 by inviting them

00:49:32.460 on his show,

00:49:33.180 giving them an entire

00:49:33.860 segment to themselves

00:49:34.920 to make their case

00:49:35.640 unchallenged.

00:49:37.060 And yes,

00:49:37.520 he did put the poor,

00:49:38.480 fragile little baby deers

00:49:39.780 on stage

00:49:40.260 with a transphobic

00:49:40.960 cretinous troll

00:49:41.480 like myself afterwards.

00:49:42.620 But that was an opportunity

00:49:43.660 to shut me down,

00:49:44.960 to debunk my arguments,

00:49:46.680 to humiliate me

00:49:47.620 in front of the entire world.

00:49:49.040 They weren't able

00:49:49.760 to take advantage

00:49:50.420 of the opportunity,

00:49:51.220 perhaps because

00:49:51.680 their entire worldview

00:49:52.560 is flimsy and brittle

00:49:53.600 and can easily be broken apart

00:49:54.920 like uncooked spaghetti,

00:49:56.120 but they still had

00:49:56.980 the opportunity.

00:49:58.200 So this was not exploitation,

00:49:59.620 it was failure

00:50:00.240 on their part.

00:50:01.760 But I want to get into

00:50:02.640 all that with Steph,

00:50:03.380 so instead I invited her

00:50:04.400 to stop whining

00:50:05.320 and simply define

00:50:06.200 the word woman for me.

00:50:07.220 And she responded

00:50:08.840 that a woman is

00:50:09.680 an identity derived

00:50:11.380 from the arbitrary

00:50:12.080 construct of gender

00:50:13.280 or a person

00:50:14.640 who would never find

00:50:15.460 you sexually appealing,

00:50:17.100 your choice.

00:50:18.900 Now there are a number

00:50:19.640 of problems with this.

00:50:20.560 First of all,

00:50:21.200 even if this statement

00:50:22.000 was valid and coherent,

00:50:23.360 which obviously it isn't,

00:50:24.520 it still doesn't tell me

00:50:25.480 anything about what

00:50:26.060 a woman is.

00:50:27.040 I'm not asking

00:50:27.660 where the identity

00:50:28.360 comes from,

00:50:29.060 I'm asking what it is.

00:50:30.680 What does it mean

00:50:31.480 to be that thing?

00:50:33.220 This is like if I asked

00:50:34.360 you to define

00:50:34.960 the word happy

00:50:35.740 and you said

00:50:36.680 that it's an emotion

00:50:37.480 derived from the brain.

00:50:39.480 Now in that case,

00:50:40.360 at least the statement

00:50:41.020 would be correct,

00:50:42.040 but it still doesn't work

00:50:42.960 as a definition

00:50:43.520 of the word

00:50:44.360 because it doesn't offer

00:50:45.820 any clarifying information

00:50:47.140 about the term in question.

00:50:48.580 There are many emotions

00:50:49.600 derived from the brain.

00:50:50.920 What makes happiness

00:50:51.840 distinct from sadness

00:50:53.000 or anger?

00:50:55.160 Similarly for women,

00:50:56.300 even if it is just

00:50:57.100 an arbitrary construct,

00:50:58.200 which it isn't,

00:50:59.220 what makes it distinct

00:51:00.280 from other arbitrary constructs?

00:51:02.300 And also,

00:51:03.260 if it is an arbitrary construct,

00:51:05.380 then isn't it true

00:51:06.060 to say that the statement

00:51:06.940 trans women are women

00:51:08.200 is arbitrary?

00:51:09.720 And if it's arbitrary,

00:51:10.800 how can you demand

00:51:11.560 that I believe it

00:51:12.500 or accept it

00:51:13.180 or affirm it?

00:51:14.760 As for the second part

00:51:15.780 of the tweet,

00:51:16.160 we see again

00:51:16.700 the overwhelming

00:51:17.340 leftist compulsion

00:51:18.380 to sexualize everything

00:51:20.900 and everyone

00:51:21.420 in every conversation.

00:51:23.200 No woman would ever find

00:51:24.140 me sexually appealing,

00:51:25.160 she says.

00:51:25.980 Of course,

00:51:26.520 how could she even

00:51:27.180 make that statement

00:51:27.860 if she doesn't know

00:51:29.100 what a woman is?

00:51:29.680 It's like saying

00:51:30.220 that no flipper doodle

00:51:31.340 or thing-a-ling

00:51:32.200 would ever find me attractive.

00:51:33.660 The word woman

00:51:34.220 is essentially nonsense

00:51:35.340 after all,

00:51:35.800 according to her.

00:51:37.180 And at any rate,

00:51:38.540 one thing that these

00:51:39.220 lonely weirdos

00:51:39.980 don't understand

00:51:40.660 is that as a married man,

00:51:42.500 you can't hurt my feelings

00:51:44.200 by calling me unattractive

00:51:45.700 or claiming that no woman

00:51:46.700 would find me attractive.

00:51:49.040 The only woman

00:51:49.960 whose sexual attraction

00:51:50.760 I care about

00:51:51.520 is the mother

00:51:52.000 of my four children.

00:51:53.060 I've already got her.

00:51:54.020 I won the game.

00:51:55.620 Even if it were true

00:51:56.640 that every other woman

00:51:57.400 on earth finds me repulsive,

00:51:58.680 that would only make

00:51:59.500 me feel better

00:52:00.580 about having found

00:52:02.080 and married

00:52:02.480 the one who doesn't.

00:52:04.360 This is like going up

00:52:05.080 to a guy who won

00:52:05.780 $100 million in the lottery

00:52:06.980 and saying,

00:52:07.420 oh yeah?

00:52:08.300 If you didn't win that money,

00:52:09.380 you'd be broke.

00:52:10.960 Okay, well,

00:52:11.540 I guess it's good

00:52:12.020 I won the lottery then.

00:52:14.400 Now,

00:52:14.980 I explained some of this

00:52:15.840 to Steph,

00:52:16.360 simplifying as much

00:52:17.040 as I could,

00:52:17.520 because I know

00:52:17.880 that PhD students

00:52:18.800 often struggle

00:52:19.780 with complex ideas.

00:52:21.560 And she responded

00:52:22.220 by retreating

00:52:22.920 even further

00:52:23.600 into the intellectual fog.

00:52:24.960 She says,

00:52:25.360 quote,

00:52:25.480 language as a whole

00:52:27.240 is arbitrary.

00:52:28.300 That's contemporary

00:52:28.960 sociology 101.

00:52:30.740 Though I will not

00:52:31.400 be surprised

00:52:31.940 if you're unfamiliar

00:52:32.660 with the subject

00:52:33.420 considering classical theory

00:52:34.860 fails to grasp

00:52:35.700 the concept of change.

00:52:37.080 But who knows?

00:52:37.780 Maybe you're lacking

00:52:38.460 knowledge in that field

00:52:39.380 as well.

00:52:40.820 Now here we arrive

00:52:42.900 at the inevitable point

00:52:43.720 in the conversation

00:52:44.280 of this sort

00:52:44.740 where the other party

00:52:45.840 begins randomly listing

00:52:46.900 college courses

00:52:47.660 that she took.

00:52:48.880 She can't respond

00:52:49.720 to any of the points

00:52:50.400 being raised,

00:52:50.900 so instead she hopes

00:52:51.460 to dazzle us

00:52:52.340 with her academic resume.

00:52:53.580 In a subsequent tweet,

00:52:55.400 she claims that

00:52:56.000 she was not listing

00:52:56.780 her college credits

00:52:57.420 to impress me,

00:52:58.320 though.

00:52:59.880 Perhaps that's true.

00:53:01.500 This could just be

00:53:02.080 the weirdest

00:53:02.480 and most embarrassing

00:53:03.360 form of Tourette's

00:53:04.180 I've ever seen.

00:53:05.380 Also, it's worth noting

00:53:06.160 that she didn't even

00:53:07.260 list the right subjects.

00:53:09.040 Basic facts about language

00:53:10.340 would be linguistics 101,

00:53:12.040 not contemporary sociology 101.

00:53:15.060 I've never even taken

00:53:16.120 any university courses

00:53:17.380 on any subject,

00:53:18.620 and yet I appear

00:53:19.240 to know them better

00:53:20.540 than she does.

00:53:22.000 But what about this claim

00:53:23.180 that language is arbitrary?

00:53:25.680 Well,

00:53:26.520 linguistic expert

00:53:28.140 over there

00:53:28.620 might want to understand

00:53:30.060 that arbitrary

00:53:31.140 is not the right word here

00:53:32.580 because arbitrary

00:53:33.620 is something done

00:53:34.560 on a whim

00:53:35.240 and not according

00:53:36.600 to any kind of system.

00:53:38.740 Language is a system.

00:53:41.340 I think what she means

00:53:42.340 to say is that language

00:53:43.400 is a construct

00:53:44.440 and a convention.

00:53:46.180 By the way,

00:53:47.220 you know you aren't

00:53:47.780 doing very well

00:53:48.340 in a debate

00:53:48.760 when the guy

00:53:49.280 on the other side

00:53:49.840 has to improve

00:53:50.580 your argument for you

00:53:51.820 just so that he can

00:53:53.080 proceed to debunk it.

00:53:54.560 Not a good sign.

00:53:56.020 So,

00:53:56.720 language is a construct.

00:53:58.120 Yeah.

00:53:58.800 Language is a symbol.

00:54:01.040 But the thing

00:54:02.540 that a word symbolizes

00:54:03.980 is not itself

00:54:05.420 a symbol

00:54:06.040 or a construct.

00:54:07.160 So,

00:54:07.880 for example,

00:54:08.940 the word gravity

00:54:09.780 is a construct.

00:54:11.520 The word is.

00:54:12.880 We use that particular

00:54:14.160 collection of syllables

00:54:15.040 in the English language

00:54:15.980 to denote the thing

00:54:17.040 that we call gravity,

00:54:18.040 but we could use

00:54:18.700 any collection of syllables.

00:54:19.940 There's no reason

00:54:20.820 why it had to be

00:54:21.620 that particular combination.

00:54:23.360 In other languages,

00:54:24.100 they use different syllables.

00:54:25.880 And yet,

00:54:26.280 gravity itself,

00:54:27.920 the thing itself,

00:54:28.800 the actual physical phenomenon,

00:54:30.320 is not a construct

00:54:31.400 or a symbol.

00:54:32.220 And it certainly

00:54:32.700 isn't arbitrary.

00:54:34.440 The sleight-of-hand trick

00:54:35.780 that Steph

00:54:36.440 is trying to pull here,

00:54:37.440 and it's the same

00:54:38.380 sleight-of-hand trick

00:54:38.980 that her side always attempts,

00:54:40.700 is to conflate

00:54:41.540 the word

00:54:42.260 with the thing itself,

00:54:45.000 arguing that

00:54:45.560 because the word woman

00:54:46.820 is a construct,

00:54:47.540 therefore the thing

00:54:48.600 that the word signifies

00:54:49.880 is also a construct.

00:54:52.440 This is the game

00:54:53.180 they play with pronouns.

00:54:54.100 They say,

00:54:54.420 hey, language evolves,

00:54:55.560 so there's nothing wrong

00:54:56.280 with calling a he or she,

00:54:58.440 except that they aren't

00:54:59.180 just trying to change

00:55:00.040 the language.

00:55:00.680 They're trying to change

00:55:01.420 our perception

00:55:02.300 of the physical reality

00:55:04.260 that the language

00:55:05.100 points to and conveys.

00:55:08.100 Again, I might be talking

00:55:09.040 over the head

00:55:09.440 of the PhD student.

00:55:10.680 So I gave her

00:55:11.120 one last chance

00:55:11.820 to define the word.

00:55:13.020 What does the word

00:55:13.680 woman signify?

00:55:14.440 What does it convey?

00:55:15.300 I don't need any more

00:55:17.120 half-baked dissertations

00:55:18.300 on the nature of language.

00:55:19.280 I want to know

00:55:19.680 about the thing itself.

00:55:21.360 What is it?

00:55:23.200 Now, this led

00:55:23.720 to her final volley,

00:55:24.680 her last attempt

00:55:25.320 to evade the question

00:55:26.420 while pretending

00:55:26.920 to answer it.

00:55:27.980 She said,

00:55:29.000 quote,

00:55:29.460 the term has evolved.

00:55:31.040 Women used to be defined

00:55:32.040 as property

00:55:32.640 or second-class citizens.

00:55:34.220 Some people say

00:55:34.920 that there are people

00:55:35.900 who can carry kids,

00:55:36.940 but what about women

00:55:37.700 who are infertile?

00:55:38.740 Are they suddenly men?

00:55:40.080 What about the fact

00:55:40.620 that people can be born

00:55:42.080 with the external anatomy

00:55:43.220 of a female,

00:55:43.740 but have the internal

00:55:44.800 anatomy of a male?

00:55:46.100 What if a woman

00:55:47.020 was assigned female

00:55:47.900 at birth,

00:55:48.460 presents as masculine,

00:55:49.320 and doesn't have children?

00:55:50.780 If that isn't a woman,

00:55:52.680 doesn't that contradict

00:55:53.460 your theory

00:55:54.100 regarding transgender identities?

00:55:57.140 Well,

00:55:57.840 there is no definition there

00:55:59.660 or even an attempt at one.

00:56:02.160 This poor girl

00:56:03.140 is paying hundreds

00:56:04.340 of thousands of dollars

00:56:05.180 for an education,

00:56:05.920 and after all of that schooling,

00:56:07.760 she still can't answer

00:56:08.800 one question

00:56:09.680 from a podcast host

00:56:11.000 with a high school diploma.

00:56:12.080 No doubt she'll be crying

00:56:14.540 for student loan forgiveness

00:56:15.740 in a few years.

00:56:17.160 As for the point she raised,

00:56:19.100 infertile women

00:56:19.820 are females

00:56:21.000 who suffer

00:56:21.600 from medical conditions.

00:56:23.440 This does not invalidate

00:56:25.040 the claim

00:56:25.580 that women are females,

00:56:28.440 and also that females

00:56:30.860 in principle

00:56:31.640 have the capacity

00:56:32.660 to reproduce.

00:56:34.120 It's also accurate to say

00:56:35.180 human beings

00:56:36.300 have two lungs.

00:56:37.660 The fact that some

00:56:38.520 human beings

00:56:38.940 have one lung

00:56:39.660 doesn't mean

00:56:40.420 that we have to radically

00:56:41.420 rethink our understanding

00:56:42.520 of human anatomy.

00:56:44.340 I also claim

00:56:45.200 that humans

00:56:45.560 have two arms.

00:56:46.960 If you lose one

00:56:47.980 in a woodchipper accident,

00:56:49.180 you haven't presented

00:56:49.840 any challenge

00:56:50.700 to my claim.

00:56:52.480 There is, in fact,

00:56:53.520 a difference

00:56:54.160 between saying

00:56:55.140 humans have two arms

00:56:56.980 and every human

00:56:58.860 has two arms.

00:57:01.080 So,

00:57:01.700 there's a difference

00:57:02.540 between saying

00:57:03.100 women give birth

00:57:04.980 to children

00:57:05.540 and every woman

00:57:07.820 gives birth

00:57:08.440 to children.

00:57:10.060 You see,

00:57:11.060 I'm making the former

00:57:12.300 claim,

00:57:12.760 not the latter.

00:57:13.820 And if you can't

00:57:14.640 see the distinction,

00:57:16.000 then, again,

00:57:16.880 I weep for your years

00:57:17.740 wasted in formal schooling.

00:57:20.760 What about the very rare

00:57:21.920 cases of intersex

00:57:22.880 birth defects?

00:57:23.860 Well, again,

00:57:24.660 those are defects,

00:57:25.520 deformities,

00:57:26.100 medical abnormalities.

00:57:27.400 We're able to identify

00:57:29.120 them and call them

00:57:30.360 defects precisely

00:57:31.600 because we know

00:57:32.900 how the human body

00:57:33.800 is supposed to work

00:57:34.800 and what it's supposed

00:57:35.920 to look like.

00:57:37.940 This is what's known

00:57:38.920 as an exception

00:57:39.740 that proves the rule.

00:57:42.700 As for Steph

00:57:43.620 being a shallow

00:57:44.900 and slow-witted thinker,

00:57:46.020 you know,

00:57:46.260 I wish I could say

00:57:47.240 that she's the exception

00:57:48.100 among college graduates,

00:57:49.280 but I don't think she is.

00:57:50.740 She's much closer

00:57:51.540 to the norm.

00:57:53.200 I'm also afraid

00:57:53.800 that I must say to her

00:57:54.620 finally today,

00:57:55.500 you're canceled.

00:57:58.860 And that'll do it

00:57:59.920 for us today

00:58:01.000 and this week.

00:58:01.720 Next week's going to be

00:58:02.280 a little bit different.

00:58:02.840 I'm taking a few days,

00:58:05.040 a few shows off.

00:58:06.120 I'm going on a journey

00:58:07.960 that I can't explain

00:58:09.280 right now,

00:58:09.860 but one day I'll be able

00:58:10.800 to tell you about it

00:58:11.580 in due time.

00:58:13.460 And when you do find out

00:58:14.820 about it,

00:58:15.160 when I can talk about it,

00:58:16.140 it will make a lot of people

00:58:17.140 very upset.

00:58:17.820 I can promise you that.

00:58:19.260 So until next time,

00:58:20.880 Godspeed.

00:58:26.620 Well, if you enjoyed

00:58:27.340 this episode,

00:58:27.900 don't forget to subscribe

00:58:28.800 and if you want to help

00:58:29.760 spread the word,

00:58:30.480 please give us

00:58:31.160 a five-star review.

00:58:32.240 Also, tell your friends

00:58:33.160 to subscribe as well.

00:58:34.460 We're available

00:58:34.860 on Apple Podcasts,

00:58:36.060 Spotify,

00:58:36.680 wherever you listen

00:58:37.300 to podcasts.

00:58:38.020 We're there.

00:58:38.520 Also, be sure to check out

00:58:39.500 the other Daily Wire podcasts

00:58:40.620 including the Ben Shapiro show,

00:58:42.140 Michael Knowles show,

00:58:43.080 the Andrew Klavan show.

00:58:44.120 Thanks for listening.

00:58:44.740 The Matt Wall show is produced

00:58:46.260 by Sean Hampton,

00:58:47.520 executive producer,

00:58:48.400 Jeremy Boring.

00:58:49.400 Our supervising producer

00:58:50.500 is Mathis Glover.

00:58:51.680 Our technical director

00:58:52.580 is Austin Stevens.

00:58:53.880 Production manager,

00:58:54.600 Pavel Wadowski.

00:58:55.720 The show is edited

00:58:56.340 by Robbie Dantzler.

00:58:57.800 Our audio is mixed

00:58:58.520 by Mike Coromina.

00:58:59.800 Hair and makeup

00:59:00.220 is done by Cherokee Heart.

00:59:01.580 And our production coordinator

00:59:02.800 is McKenna Waters.

00:59:04.140 The Matt Wall show

00:59:04.640 is a Daily Wire production,

00:59:05.660 copyright Daily Wire 2022.

00:59:06.880 Hey everybody,

00:59:08.480 this is Andrew Klavan,

00:59:09.440 host of the Andrew Klavan show.

00:59:11.140 You know,

00:59:11.480 some people are depressed

00:59:12.540 because the republic

00:59:13.380 is collapsing,

00:59:14.300 the end of days

00:59:15.060 is approaching,

00:59:15.820 and the moon's turned to blood.

00:59:17.480 But on the Andrew Klavan show,

00:59:19.000 that's where the fun

00:59:19.720 just gets started.

00:59:20.720 So come on over

00:59:21.380 to the Andrew Klavan show

00:59:22.340 and laugh your way

00:59:23.180 through the fall of the republic

00:59:24.340 with me, Andrew Klavan.

The Matt Walsh Show - January 28, 2022

Ep. 883 - The Biden Administration Announces Plan To Abolish All Death And Suffering

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript