The Matt Walsh Show - February 10, 2022


Ep. 887 - The Victims Of Emoji-Based Oppression


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 4 minutes

Words per minute

172.55554

Word count

11,068

Sentence count

710

Harmful content

Misogyny

18

sentences flagged

Hate speech

30

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Tax-funded NPR publishes a lengthy investigation into the racial implications of the emojis you use when you text people. Also, trans activists were planning a big protest at my event at Texas A&M last night, and it was canceled. Plus, polls show that viewers are fleeing the NFL because of its political pandering.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Today on the Matt Walsh Show, tax-funded NPR publishes a lengthy investigation into the
00:00:04.960 racial implications of the emojis that you use when you text people. It sounds crazy already,
00:00:09.760 but wait until you hear some of this. It's pretty great. Also, trans activists were planning a big
00:00:13.500 protest at my event at Texas A&M last night. So what happened? I'll tell you about it. Plus,
00:00:18.020 polls show that viewers are fleeing the NFL because of its political pandering. Big surprise
00:00:22.720 there. Plus, a pastor attracts the ire of the mob for promoting modesty. And we know pastors
00:00:28.320 aren't supposed to do that. And Adele gets in trouble herself for saying that she loves being
00:00:32.700 a woman, which we know now is transphobic. And in our daily cancellation, one of my opponents on that
00:00:37.800 Dr. Phil episode appeared on his podcast yesterday to offer her reflections on the experience. And
00:00:43.160 it turns out that she doesn't like me very much. We'll talk about that as well and so much more
00:00:48.220 on the Matt Walsh Show.
00:00:58.320 You know, 40 years ago, Ronald Reagan saw massive inflation unlike anything the country had ever
00:01:02.880 seen before until today. In Reagan's own words, inflation is a is as violent as a mugger, as
00:01:08.360 frightening as an armed robber and as deadly as a hitman. Right now, your retirement accounts are
00:01:12.460 under attack thanks to the inflationary policies of this administration, which means that your future
00:01:19.240 is at stake. It means that we're all vulnerable and you got to do something about it. And here's
00:01:23.640 something you can do. You can call Birch Gold. If you have not yet called Birch Gold,
00:01:27.320 the only people I trust to help you diversify your 401ks and IRAs into gold, then you're missing
00:01:32.700 the boat. And actually, you're you know, you're basically treading water. You're out in the water
00:01:37.380 by yourself in the ocean without a life vest. Birch Gold has your life vest. Let them help you
00:01:43.020 convert an IRA or 401k into a tax sheltered IRA in gold with thousands of satisfied customers and an
00:01:49.000 A plus rating with the Better Business Bureau. You can trust Birch Gold to protect your savings.
00:01:53.100 Text Walsh to nine 98 98 98 to get a free info kit on gold. Reagan knew the biggest threat to our
00:01:59.440 wealth. Protect yours now. Text Walsh to 98 98 98 to get your free info kit now.
00:02:05.280 So, you know, NPR, like most of our corporate media institutions, has been for years deteriorating
00:02:11.940 irrevocably into far left lunacy. The only difference difference between NPR and most other media
00:02:17.840 institutions is that NPR is funded by tax money. Of course, you are you are paying to facilitate
00:02:23.400 this dissent, whether you like it or not. And so it's worth taking a look to see just how bad
00:02:30.260 things have gotten. And what I'm about to share with you is a reflection of both our media's total
00:02:35.840 intellectual bankruptcy and also of the left's rapidly increasing derangement. All of that is
00:02:41.220 present in this one story. And also, I share it with you because, well, it's just really funny.
00:02:46.000 A viral article posted on NPR.org yesterday has this headline.
00:02:51.240 Which skin color emoji should you use? The answer can be more complex than you think.
00:02:57.520 Now, you should know, by the way, that this dissertation on emojis of color has three authors.
00:03:04.580 Three people were needed to write this thing. And their names are Asma Khalid, Alejandra Marquez
00:03:10.020 John Say and Patrick Jaren Wattenanon. So they took all the people with the hardest names to pronounce
00:03:17.600 and they said, we need you on the emoji story. And they all contributed to this article about the
00:03:21.860 about the complexities of emoji skin tones. This is a subject that I confess I have not thought
00:03:27.720 about at all, really, mostly because I'm not insane. Also because I don't use emojis because I
00:03:34.420 am a literate adult human and I prefer to communicate using actual words, which is I wish
00:03:41.720 that most other adults would join me in that. Because through the rampant use of emojis, we have
00:03:46.880 as a society essentially reverted back to caveman days, scribbling pictures on the virtual cave wall
00:03:53.200 to convey our emotions. Rather than, you know, using written language to communicate that we're
00:03:58.040 happy or sad. Instead, we dumbly draw a smiley face or a frowny face. I happy, smiley face,
00:04:06.320 which is what you're really saying when you send a smiley face. So all of this controversy over emoji
00:04:10.380 color could be avoided if everyone simply behaved and communicated as adults and used actual words
00:04:17.280 rather than little pictures and cartoons. In any case, let's go to the article. It's everything that
00:04:24.280 you're hoping it will be. And so much more. So it begins. Heath Rossella identifies as three-quarters
00:04:32.940 white and one-quarter Filipino. Well, hold on a second. He identifies as that or he is that?
00:04:40.180 Because if he is that, then we don't need to know that he identifies as that. This is like if you ask me
00:04:46.860 where I live and I said, oh, I identify as living in Nashville. That's going to leave you with more
00:04:52.720 questions than answers about my actual physical residence. Because if I live there, I don't need
00:04:58.900 to say that I identify as living there. Of course, that's the point, though, of this identifies as
00:05:02.820 qualifier. And it's why you're seeing it applied to, it started with gender and now they apply it to so
00:05:07.920 many other things because it makes everything obscure and confusing and weirdly subjective.
00:05:14.440 Anyway, it says, when texting, he chooses a yellow emoji instead of a skin tone option because he
00:05:20.220 feels it doesn't represent any specific ethnicity or color. He doesn't want people to view his text
00:05:24.920 in a particular way. He wants to go with what he sees as the neutral option and focus on the message.
00:05:30.660 Quote, I present as very pale, very light-skinned. And if I use the white emoji, I feel like I'm
00:05:35.980 betraying the part of myself that's Filipino. But if I use a darker color emoji, which maybe more
00:05:42.100 closely matches what I see when I look at my whole family, it's not what the world sees. And people
00:05:47.080 tend to judge that. I should remind you, by the way, because you might lose sight of this,
00:05:53.000 none of this is meant to be a joke. This man who worries that he is betraying himself and his
00:06:00.040 ancestors by using a certain color emoji. It's not a joke. This is something he's really worried about.
00:06:05.880 And you should respect his struggle and his anxiety. This is a major tax-funded, once-respected
00:06:12.680 news organization, and an article authored by three journalists, which begins with some random guy's
00:06:21.500 anxiety related to the color of the thumbs-up emojis that he uses when texting people.
00:06:27.280 Now, he says that he goes with the yellow option because it's race-neutral, apparently having no
00:06:32.620 concern for the fact that it appropriates from the jaundiced community. Meanwhile, other people feel
00:06:39.540 obliged to find a skin tone which matches and represents them, NPR says. Continuing,
00:06:46.380 in 2015, five skin tone options became available for hand gesture emojis in addition to the default
00:06:51.720 Simpsons-like yellow. Choosing one can be a simple texting shortcut for some, but for others it opens a
00:06:57.960 complex conversation about race and identity. Quote, I use the brown one that matches me, said Sarai
00:07:05.000 Cole, an opera singer in Germany. I have some friends who use the brown ones too, but they're
00:07:10.240 not brown themselves. This confuses me. Where do they even find these people? Where are you finding 0.90
00:07:16.740 the opera singer in Germany to talk about emojis? But it is very confusing, she says. I'm also confused
00:07:24.540 when someone uses a perfectly round cartoon smiley face when they themselves do not have a perfectly
00:07:31.180 round cartoon face. Yesterday someone texted me a smiley face and I said, wait, what is this? Who
00:07:36.740 is this supposed to be? This looks nothing like you. What happened to your face? What's going on? Dear
00:07:41.460 God. This is a totally normal and healthy response to this situation. Let's keep reading. Cole is
00:07:49.600 originally from California and identifies as black and American. Hold on. Cole is originally from
00:07:55.500 California and identifies as black and an American descendant of slavery. So that's another thing 0.99
00:08:02.660 you can identify as, I suppose. Now, you can identify as being a descendant of slavery.
00:08:10.780 Win a lot of victim points for yourself that way. She said that while she was not offended when a
00:08:16.240 non-brown friend used a dark emoji, she would like to understand why. Quote, I think it would be nice
00:08:21.800 if it's their default, but if they're just using it with me or other brown people, I would want to 0.98
00:08:26.320 look into that deeper and know why they're doing that, she said. Okay, so according to Cole, if you
00:08:32.100 don't identify as black or brown, you can use a darker emoji, but only if it's your default. So
00:08:37.900 whenever you want to text an emoji to your black friend, make sure to include a screenshot of a
00:08:42.780 previous emoji that you texted to a non-black friend so that they can run a comparison and see that
00:08:47.500 you're using the same emoji for everybody. Because remember, they might want to look deeper
00:08:53.540 into it. And this, again, is totally normal. Who has not received an emoji from somebody and felt
00:08:59.720 the desire to embark on a thorough investigation into the emoji, their motivations for sending the
00:09:06.360 emoji, their history of emoji usage? We've all been there shortly. Continuing, a 2018 study published
00:09:13.380 by the University of Edinburgh looked at the use of different skin tone emojis, what it referred to
00:09:19.340 as modified emojis on Twitter, to find out if the modifiers contributed to self-representation.
00:09:24.160 Alexander Robertson, an emoji researcher at Google and PhD candidate involved in the study,
00:09:31.060 said the emoji modifiers were used widely, but it was people with darker skin who used them in higher
00:09:35.500 proportions and more often. Instead, some white people may stick with the yellow emoji because they
00:09:40.740 don't want to assert their privilege by adding a light-skinned emoji to a text or to take advantage
00:09:45.580 of something that was created to represent diversity. Perhaps, like Heath Rossella, they simply don't want 0.97
00:09:51.180 to think about how their message can be interpreted. But Zahra Rahman, a researcher and writer in Berlin,
00:09:56.100 argues that the skin tone emojis make white people confront their race as people of color often have to do. 0.91
00:10:02.220 For example, she shared Sarai Cole's confusion when someone who is white uses a brown emoji.
00:10:07.520 So she asked some friends about it. Okay. You know what? I take back everything I ever said
00:10:13.780 about college. See, I had thought that people were wasting years of their lives and hundreds of
00:10:23.020 dollars, hundreds of thousands of dollars, rather, of their parents' money, most likely,
00:10:28.080 for pointless degrees in utterly useless fields. But now that I know PhD candidates are becoming emoji
00:10:34.480 researchers, I've changed my mind. Because we think about this for a second here, guys. If we don't
00:10:41.300 have universities, who is going to prepare the next generation of emoji researchers?
00:10:48.820 If we don't have PhDs, there's not going to be anyone around to research emojis. And the next time
00:10:54.620 someone says, we've got a bunch of emojis here, we need to have them researched, who's going to do it?
00:10:58.980 I can't do it. I don't have a college education. Wrapping up the article, it says,
00:11:04.140 Raman said there was a default in society to associate whiteness with being raceless. And
00:11:08.800 the emojis gave white people an option to make their race explicit. Quote, I completely hear some 1.00
00:11:13.700 people are just exhausted from having to do that. Many people of color have to do that every day and
00:11:18.360 are confronted with race every day, Raman said. But for many white people, they've been able to ignore
00:11:23.200 it, whether that's subconsciously or consciously, their whole lives. Raman admits there's no specific
00:11:27.740 answer to all the questions about emoji use, but said it was an opportunity to think about how
00:11:32.180 people want to represent their identities. I think it's more one of those places where we just have
00:11:37.440 to think about who we are and how we want to represent our identities, she said. And maybe
00:11:42.120 it does change depending on the season, depending on the context.
00:11:48.120 So, if you didn't believe that white people have advantages in society, 0.63
00:11:54.120 hopefully you've been disabused of that notion. Because if you're white, you think you have no
00:12:01.060 advantage. Think about your emoji privilege. Have you ever even thought about that? You probably
00:12:06.980 haven't. Because you're not a slobbering lunatic. So, I think we see two things in this article.
00:12:14.560 Well, three things. The first is that NPR should be defunded, and after it's defunded,
00:12:20.300 it should be launched directly into the sun. Keep in mind, by the way, that, again, we fund NPR,
00:12:26.360 we fund PBS. And this state of affairs has continued, even while Republicans are in charge
00:12:34.920 of the government. They have decided they're going to keep on sending money to these, as well as to
00:12:38.840 the baby killers of Planned Parenthood, by the way. So, that's the first thing. The second is that
00:12:43.760 powerful forces in our society, and yes, NPR counts as a powerful force, unfortunately.
00:12:52.820 Major media institution funded by the government. And forces in our society are very invested
00:12:58.640 in making sure that you experience this kind of insane, incoherent, totally needless racial anxiety.
00:13:07.140 They want you to know that every moment, or they want you to think anyway, that every moment,
00:13:14.300 everything you do, everything you say, everything you think, every interaction in your life,
00:13:19.420 no matter how seemingly innocuous, is completely fraught with racial implications. They are trying
00:13:26.220 to create racial tension where it doesn't exist. That's the kind of sinister underpinning of even
00:13:33.040 something as stupid and admittedly hilarious as this NPR article about emojis. They are going to
00:13:41.120 people who actually, in their everyday life, in reality, experience almost no racial tension at all.
00:13:48.940 There's no problem. They're just living their lives. And whether they're black, white, whatever race 0.96
00:13:53.760 there are, doesn't really come up. It doesn't create any problems for them. And so, you have to go
00:13:59.240 looking for the problems. And looking quite desperately. Picking up every single rock,
00:14:07.020 looking under every rock, looking in every crevice and corner to find something. And then they find
00:14:11.260 it with emojis. And finally, this brings us back in a very neat and symmetrical way, I think, to our
00:14:16.620 first show of the week, where I talked about my recent experience in a third world country,
00:14:20.920 where we were last week. And people there, as I said, you know, they, as comes as no surprise,
00:14:29.620 they live in shacks made of spare sheet metal. They drink water tainted by sewage. They watch their
00:14:34.760 children starve and die from preventable diseases. I mean, they live quite horrifying lives of profound
00:14:42.840 suffering. And this is not just a small minority of people living this way in the world. This, in fact,
00:14:48.340 is how most people live in the world. And it's how most people in history have lived.
00:14:53.660 So, we here in the West, in our comfort and luxury, we are in a small and privileged minority,
00:14:58.820 no matter what your race is. And we live now in obscene, unprecedented comfort and luxury,
00:15:07.820 and now decadence. And rather than be grateful for that, and appreciate it, and say to our own
00:15:16.160 ancestors and the people who built this country, well, geez, thanks for this. You know, thanks for
00:15:21.880 establishing this civilization, this country, where, you know, I can live in a home with air
00:15:28.520 conditioning. And I can do things like turn on my faucet and drink the water, which that alone,
00:15:37.160 you want to talk about privilege, that alone, compared to how most people live, is an enormous
00:15:40.560 privilege. Rather than be grateful for it and say thank you, we go looking for problems. And some of
00:15:48.920 us live lives so devoid of actual problems that we have to become as desperate as this, making a
00:15:55.780 problem out of emojis. And that perhaps tells you everything you need to know about Western
00:16:01.480 culture, and especially about NPR. Now let's get to our five headlines.
00:16:11.680 Well, if you've been to the pump recently, which I'm sure you have, you, I don't need to tell you
00:16:16.060 that gas prices are ridiculously high, and the prices of everything are ridiculously high right
00:16:19.940 now, which means that you got to look for any opportunity to save money. And here's one,
00:16:24.160 GetUpside. My listeners are earning cash back for every gallon of gas every time they fill up.
00:16:29.060 All you have to do is download the GetUpside app in the App Store or Google Play right now.
00:16:34.140 And it's very simple. You're using promo code Walsh for 25 cents per gallon or more on your first fill
00:16:39.360 up cash back. Don't pay full price of the pump anymore. Get cash back using GetUpside. All you
00:16:45.740 got to do is download the free app. Use promo code Walsh for 25 cents per gallon or more on your first
00:16:51.240 tank. And I've talked to people who drive a lot and they're making as much as $200, $300 a year in
00:16:57.160 cash back. And if you're thinking there must be some kind of catch, there's got to be red tape to
00:17:01.480 this thing. What's the fine print? There's no catch. The cash is added right back to your account.
00:17:06.280 You can cash out anytime to your bank account, PayPal. You can get an e-gift card to Amazon.
00:17:10.500 And it's as simple as that, as easy as that. It's free money. Why not take it? Just download the free
00:17:14.260 GetUpside app and use promo code Walsh to get 25 cents per gallon or more cash back on your first tank.
00:17:19.720 That's code Walsh. Well, to begin with, you heard about my Texas A&M event last night,
00:17:27.800 a speech that was supposed to be infiltrated by the left. And we had their whole written out plan
00:17:35.020 that I shared with you. And it was a pretty interesting plan. It was a good plan. They
00:17:39.820 had it all written out. They were going to sneak in. They had the speakers they were going to smuggle
00:17:43.260 in somehow. And they were coming in their heterosexual cisgender uniforms. They were going to 0.69
00:17:48.000 make their way into the crowd and disrupt it. And so I was quite prepared for that. And then,
00:17:52.380 you know, we get to the event. And it's a great event. It's a big, big crowd. You know,
00:17:58.340 I think we had over 500 people, which is great. It's not all that long ago that I would do events
00:18:03.420 and there'd be like 20 people in the crowd. So this is a little bit of a change there. The thing is,
00:18:07.080 people will ask me, oh, do you get nervous speaking in front of large crowds? No, no. The problem is
00:18:13.820 small crowds. Okay. You want to know what nerves are like? Awkwardness when delivering a speech.
00:18:20.760 Be in a large room with like 20 people and a lot of empty seats. That's the problem. Fill all the
00:18:26.160 seats and there's no problem at all. I can speak in front of 10,000 people. No problem. I'd rather
00:18:30.020 speak in front of 10,000 than 10,000, actually. So that was all great. And, you know, I gave the
00:18:38.420 speech. I was waiting at any moment for the leftists, the trans activists to initiate their 0.67
00:18:45.240 plan. And of course, they never did. Nothing happened at all. Much to my disappointment.
00:18:51.520 And then we finally get to the Q&A when, as always, you know, if you want to argue with me,
00:18:59.800 if you disagree with my point of view, if you want to debate me, if you want to try to embarrass me,
00:19:03.680 you know, all of the horrible and bigoted things that I've just said, if you want to
00:19:08.220 point by point, rebut and refute and debunk it, you can do that. And we actually, at every YAF event,
00:19:15.240 people who disagree are invited to the front of the line. So we're going to make sure that you get
00:19:21.160 your chance to say something. And not only do they not stand up and disrupt the event, none of them
00:19:26.720 took the microphone to argue with me. Except for one guy, which was sort of an interesting exchange,
00:19:34.520 someone who identified as trans. And he did. And you could watch it. If you go to YAF's YouTube
00:19:39.780 channel, you could see the video, the whole speech. And then you can also see the Q&A. And you could
00:19:43.400 see this interaction, which was interesting and a little bit confusing. Because this guy comes up and
00:19:49.860 and he is, I mean, I'll say he is not wearing the heterosexual uniform. Exactly. And, but he gets
00:19:58.820 up there and he said, he identifies as trans. But he says he actually agrees with everything that I
00:20:03.080 said, which I was kind of surprised to hear. And then we kind of started going back and forth. And
00:20:08.900 it became clear through the conversation that he actually doesn't agree with me at all.
00:20:12.680 Um, I think what he was trying to say is that, is that he doesn't agree with me, but he doesn't,
00:20:20.080 but he, but he actually, after listening to me, doesn't think that I'm a horrific monster.
00:20:24.200 I think that's what he was trying to get to. But I had this back and forth with him a little bit. And,
00:20:28.400 um, you know, I asked him, uh, well, do you, do you think that there are, because he was,
00:20:35.660 he was accusing me of, uh, of oversimplifying matters and making things too simple, making the
00:20:40.660 issue of sex and gender too simple. And my point is that, no, I'm not simplifying it. It is in fact,
00:20:45.320 just a simple subject. There are two sexes, male and female. It's binary. That's it. So that's a 0.88
00:20:51.260 simple fact. There are a lot of specifics we can get into when we want to get into the specifics of
00:20:56.340 the human body and how the body works. And, you know, that's complicated in a certain way.
00:21:02.600 But the fact of males and females, that is simple. And so I asked him if he, if he thinks that,
00:21:09.040 uh, there are just males and females in the world, or are there other categories? And, uh,
00:21:12.860 and he said, no, there's not just male males and females. It's, it's non-binary. There are other
00:21:16.640 categories. And I said, okay, what other categories are there besides males and females? And he wasn't
00:21:21.320 able to provide one. So we went back and forth and I don't, the conversation didn't really go
00:21:24.700 anywhere because what you, what you find out, and I respect this guy at least for getting up and
00:21:29.960 getting behind the microphone because nobody else was willing to do it on his side. Um, but what you find
00:21:35.280 out when you, when you talk to people who are proponents of gender ideology, it's that they,
00:21:41.820 they really just have no idea what, what they think. They, they have no clue. They're, they're,
00:21:48.400 they're, they're totally confused. They, they don't even really understand what their position is
00:21:55.780 supposed to be. And yet they're never challenged. You know, they kind of exist in this
00:22:04.880 bubble and no one, and it's very easy to, to puncture the bubble, but no one ever does it.
00:22:11.460 And so all you have to do is ask very simple questions and you see, you sort of see their
00:22:17.280 whole worldview shaken and tumble and crumble. All right. Um, this is from Yahoo says the nation's
00:22:26.480 relentless culture wars appear to have taken the toll even on the NFL with a large number of
00:22:31.320 Republicans saying they have soured on the league and expressed disapproval of its efforts
00:22:34.800 to improve the treatment of black players. There's no, there's no bias in the way this
00:22:39.280 is being presented, right? Um, professional football remains extremely popular. The poll
00:22:43.580 just found just more than half of American adults say they regard themselves as fans and an additional
00:22:47.720 15% say they're not fans, but plan to watch the Superbowl, uh, which we played on Sunday
00:22:53.120 about, but the league's popularity has eroded somewhat in recent years. The poll found
00:22:57.940 about one third of those surveyed nationwide said they're less a fan, less of a fan now than they
00:23:03.780 were five years ago compared with about a one in eight who said they're bigger fans. Now the poll
00:23:10.340 can't conclusively say why that decline has occurred, but two questions about the NFL's
00:23:14.260 handling of issues involving race provides some strong hints. People who, who say they are less
00:23:20.160 of a fan now than they were five years ago, more than twice as likely as everyone else to say the NFL
00:23:24.340 is doing quote too much to show respect for its black players. They're also significantly less 0.98
00:23:31.380 likely to approve of the league's ruining rule, which for the last two decades has required NFL
00:23:35.940 teams to interview minority candidates for head coaching positions and certain other high level
00:23:40.740 jobs. So this is, um, talk about media bias. We, you know, we had NPR and now here's Yahoo or whoever,
00:23:48.580 whoever, uh, sent this poll around. I think it was Los Angeles times. Um, yeah, Los Angeles times.
00:23:55.700 The way the question is framed is, um, is the league doing too much to respect black players?
00:24:03.220 And so apparently a lot of Republicans are answering yes on the poll. If you believe the poll results at
00:24:09.300 all, only because they, they know what's really being asked. So the Rooney rule, for example,
00:24:17.220 that's, that's what that question refers to is something like that, but an affirmative action
00:24:21.460 policy in the NFL, affirmative action in the NFL, in a league that is predominantly black already,
00:24:29.860 where the vast majority of the high paid millionaire, famous athletes are black.
00:24:37.140 60% of the NFL is comprised of black athletes, even though black people are 13% of the population.
00:24:44.020 So massive over-representation in the NFL, which is fine. I mean, it's fine with me because I don't
00:24:52.340 think that your job should be determined by your skin color. Um, why all those, uh, 0.98
00:24:59.300 black players who, who make it on those teams and into those positions, why are they there? Well, 0.96
00:25:03.300 because they're really, really good athletes and that's how they, they win those positions.
00:25:09.860 But the problem with the Rooney rule, something like that, is it, is it that, is it, is it that
00:25:14.180 too much is being done to respect black people? Is that the issue?
00:25:19.700 Now that's, that is what the question is referring to. That's what it's actually getting at.
00:25:23.380 It's, but that's of course a, an extremely biased way of, uh, of misleading and
00:25:31.620 absurdly dishonest way of presenting it. The issue isn't that too much is being done to respect black 0.99
00:25:36.260 people. The issue is that a rule like that is totally unnecessary for one thing. Um, it doesn't
00:25:42.180 actually respect black people at all. 1.00
00:25:43.780 Because it treats them as though they need this extra, you know, if, if you were to analyze people
00:25:51.700 just on the merits, they wouldn't get the job. So it's actually quite disrespectful to the people
00:25:55.940 that it's supposedly trying to respect. And of course, it also disrespects white people who are
00:26:01.220 being specifically excluded by rules like this. So even with the poll being biased in the way it
00:26:08.740 presents the information, uh, the truth is that, yeah, people are really tired of having ideology
00:26:16.420 shoved in their face everywhere they go. And especially in sports, this is why it becomes
00:26:21.060 such an issue in sports is because this is one place where for years, for decades, you know,
00:26:27.060 people went to escape all that. It's supposed to be escapism. Um, and when you start putting politics
00:26:34.340 and ideology, even there, it becomes even more frustrating for people because the whole point
00:26:40.180 is to get away from that. That's kind of the, the beauty of sports, I think, or that should be the
00:26:47.380 beauty of it. It's like you go to, um, a stadium, you know, like I've gone, gone to the Raven stadium
00:26:55.460 in Baltimore and everybody there is kind of, they're there for the same reason.
00:27:02.820 And most of the people, your fans are the same team.
00:27:06.980 And there's, I talk about all the time, the problem of there being no unity in this culture,
00:27:10.660 because there's nothing to unite around. Well, when you're in the stadium for three hours,
00:27:14.740 everyone is uniting around the fact that they're a fan of this team. It's a, it's, it's silly.
00:27:18.900 It's kind of frivolous. Um, it's not the kind of unity that you can build a country around.
00:27:23.780 It, once you leave the stadium, it kind of goes away and doesn't matter anymore,
00:27:27.780 but at least for those three hours, it's sort of an escape from everything else.
00:27:31.860 And you're in the, you're, you're in the stadium and you're, you're, everyone's focused on this
00:27:35.540 kind of very simple thing, simple yet entertaining thing. And you can bring your kids there and it's
00:27:44.260 going to be a bonding thing with your fathers and sons and everything else.
00:27:49.780 That's what people like sports for. And the fact that it's being taken away from them makes
00:27:53.060 them even more frustrated. You know, it's even, it's even getting to me at this point. I mean,
00:27:58.500 I'm a huge football fan, as I've said before, and, um, I've confessed in the past that, uh, you know,
00:28:05.700 I've, I've dumped the NBA there. Some, you know, most Hollywood movies I don't watch anymore. I mean,
00:28:11.380 all the, I have no problem leaving most of this stuff behind because I don't want to be preached to.
00:28:16.100 Uh, but the NFL was one of the final things I was kind of holding onto because I've always been such
00:28:22.420 a big football fan. And I was trying to block out all of the, the indoctrination, all the propaganda,
00:28:28.900 because I just want to watch the game. And this year, even me in this, this season,
00:28:36.900 I kind of started to lose interest because it was just, it's just too much. All right. This is
00:28:41.140 from the Daily Wire. It says a Christian pastor from Utah trended nationally on social media for
00:28:45.380 hours on Tuesday over a tweet he posted concerning female modesty. Though pastor Brian Sauvé received
00:28:52.580 much support from men and women alike, he became a target for outraged feminists, 0.86
00:28:56.580 some of whom sent Sauvé racy photos of their breasts and other body parts. So they were
00:29:05.380 trying to dunk on this man by sending naked pictures of themselves. All right. Um, dear lady 0.90
00:29:12.180 started the tweet that set off Twitter. There is no reason whatsoever for you to post pictures of
00:29:16.420 yourself in low cut shirts, bikinis, bra and underwear, or anything similar ever not to show
00:29:21.860 your weight loss journey, not to show your newborn baby, not to document your birth story.
00:29:25.620 The post, the post has signed off your brothers. Um, people didn't like that to say the least,
00:29:34.260 a mocking dear Brian hashtag trended for hours after the post was published and numerous male
00:29:39.060 and female feminists scolded the pastor for having what they characterized as an unwanted opinion 1.00
00:29:43.940 about female modesty. The tweet has been quote tweeted nearly 20,000 times. Here's a taste of the
00:29:50.820 outrage reported by the blaze. Um, MSNBC contributor Katie Fang says, I'm a proud member of the congregation
00:29:58.180 of the Holy Church of mind your own damn business. You should try it sometime. My body, my choice.
00:30:05.220 Well, why don't you mind your business about his opinion?
00:30:09.860 So you, what you wear is none of his business. Well, his opinion about what you're wearing is none of
00:30:15.300 your business by that logic. If you're, if you're committed to this minding your own business thing,
00:30:20.340 well, what do you care with this guy's tweeting? Why do you have to respond to it? Just his opinion.
00:30:24.820 He's not doing anything to you. It's not harming you. He's not preventing you
00:30:30.180 from walking around dressing however you want. If you want to dress like a hussy, he's not, he's not, 0.97
00:30:35.460 he's not physically preventing you from doing so. That's so you mind your own business.
00:30:39.140 This is always my question to people. Anytime I, you get the, you get the, uh, this rejoinder of,
00:30:45.220 oh, why do you care so much? Why do you care that I care? I'll turn it right back around on you.
00:30:52.420 If it's silly for me to care, how much sillier, sillier is it for you that you care that I care?
00:30:58.900 Because now we have two degrees here. Um, John Pavlovitz, who's an anti-Trump author and also claims to be
00:31:07.140 a Christian pastor says pastors like you are why the church is known for misogyny and the subjugation
00:31:12.820 of women more than empathy and equity. You should try the sacred ministry of minding your own damn 1.00
00:31:18.180 business. Liberal author, Tara Dublin says, dear Brian, your invisible sky daddy doesn't care how
00:31:24.420 you like to do it. And neither does anyone else. You repressed weirdo. No one is going to share
00:31:28.580 anything with you perv. Please get therapy on how to treat women as the human beings we are. 0.93
00:31:33.620 Um, and then it goes on from there and lots of other responses now.
00:31:38.500 And, and, and many of the responses, we talk about the incoherence of the left.
00:31:42.260 They're accusing him of being a perv and he needs to mind his own business. And yet they're also
00:31:46.580 sending him their naked photos. Mind your own business, you perv. Here's my naked photo.
00:31:53.220 Now I'm not really interested in the non-Christian response to this. Um,
00:32:02.980 you know, the, the kind of secular response, mocking virtue and that kind of thing.
00:32:09.220 Uh, that, that, that doesn't interest me. I know that sort of the godless heathens are going to react
00:32:15.140 this way to any promotion of Christian virtue. And that's a separate subject. And that is kind
00:32:22.900 of boring. And, and, and I don't really care about that. For me, the bigger issue, when I was looking
00:32:28.180 at the reaction to this guy's tweet about monesty, it's the other Christians, the other professed 0.97
00:32:33.460 Christians, like John Pavlovitz. And there were a lot of others, many of them claiming to be pastors
00:32:39.060 or whatever else. A lot of people, you know, announcing that, well, I'm a Christian and I
00:32:43.140 find this abhorrent. Um, a Christian pastor talking about modesty, this is, this is only scandalous 1.00
00:32:53.140 to us these days in the church as it stands right now. Because many people go to churches where, um,
00:33:01.380 their pastors never challenge them at all. Their pastors never exhort them to holiness at all.
00:33:09.060 Because that's really what he's talking about.
00:33:12.660 This is not holier than thou. It's not, this is not saying I'm better than you. Because that's
00:33:17.940 another thing to keep in mind is that every time someone promotes a virtue or says, Hey, um,
00:33:23.380 here's something that we should be doing. It's, it's not, it's not in and of itself self-righteous
00:33:29.060 or holier than thou. Unless they say, Oh, I'm the perfect example that you all should be following.
00:33:35.380 Hey, Hey everybody, you're not acting like me and you should be follow me as an example.
00:33:40.740 Now, if somebody says that, then yeah, it's holier than thou and self-righteous.
00:33:45.540 But if they simply say, uh, this, here's the appropriate course of action that we should
00:33:50.020 be following. Here's the appropriate behavior. Here's what virtue is. And this is what we should
00:33:53.220 be doing. There's nothing self-righteous about that. And that's what pastors are supposed to do.
00:33:59.860 So in a way, I kind of understand if you're scandalized by this as a Christian and you go to
00:34:05.540 one of these churches where, um, or you, you, you, you allegedly attend one, at least in theory,
00:34:12.740 you attend a church like this. Maybe you're a member of one and you go once every three years
00:34:16.820 or something. But whenever you do show up and the pastor gets up there and, um, he never says
00:34:24.340 anything about sin. He never challenges you for your own behavior. He never condemns evil of any
00:34:30.740 kind. He never exhorts anyone to, to holiness. And so you've, you've, you've never encountered this
00:34:38.180 at all. And then you hear a pastor doing this and you're, you're, you're shocked. But I'm here to tell
00:34:43.620 you that this is what pastors are supposed to do. This is literally their job.
00:34:48.340 That there was a time when every pastor in the church would, would do this. Anytime you go to
00:34:57.300 church on Sunday, you would hear messages like this. You go back 50 years ago. And, uh, even if
00:35:04.820 there was disagreement on the subject, nobody would be shocked that a Christian pastor is promoting
00:35:09.860 modesty, modesty, chastity. These are core virtues.
00:35:14.660 There should be nothing shocking about it. Um, and then especially to have Christian women 1.00
00:35:23.680 mocking men who are trying to live with chastity and, and, and virtue. Because that's part of the
00:35:33.000 message here, right? And again, if you're not a Christian, I understand you can laugh and smirk 1.00
00:35:37.480 at this all you want, but I'm not talking to you. So this is a mind your own damn business sort of
00:35:41.360 conversation now. So you can butt out if you're not in the church. And this is, but if you're,
00:35:47.480 if you are a Christian, then you should know that, that one of our obligations as, um, as Christians
00:35:55.820 is to guard each other's hearts. It's one of our obligations. It's something we should be always
00:36:00.320 trying to do. That's, that's what it means to, to love each other, to love people. Um, it's loving
00:36:08.880 is willing the good of the other loving someone is wanting them to be holy. You know, it's wanting
00:36:15.100 to help them towards holiness. And that's, that's one of the big reasons why we're supposed to exercise
00:36:20.760 modesty and not just in dress either. Okay. Um, you know, for example, if you have a lot of money
00:36:27.960 and you go out of your way to show off your, your money and you're driving around in a really gaudy car
00:36:34.820 and you're just whatever, you're, you're constantly showing off how much money you have. Well, that is
00:36:39.300 immodest. It's also sinful. And for the same reason, largely in this case, you're not, you're not,
00:36:47.640 you're not guarding your brother or your sister's heart. It was what you're doing is you're causing
00:36:52.840 people to feel envy. And, uh, and that's what you're doing it intentionally. You want them to be
00:36:58.240 envious of you. You are trying to get them to tumble into sin, which is a bad thing as a Christian.
00:37:06.300 And that's this pastor's point is that just like you should not be trying to make your fellow
00:37:11.640 Christians envious. You also shouldn't be trying to make, to, um, you know, to, uh, foster feelings 0.97
00:37:19.300 of lust or anything like that. Um, but I think part of the problem here also is that, you know,
00:37:28.460 many women, men and women in the, in, in our culture today have, they have no understanding
00:37:36.460 of each other because we've been told that men and women are exactly the same.
00:37:41.180 And so women have bought, who've bought into this, this is what they think that men are exactly the
00:37:44.420 same as them. And so they don't, they don't understand men. They don't understand male
00:37:48.020 sexuality. They don't understand how sort of visual men are. Um, because they just assume that,
00:37:56.440 well, men are just like me and they hear a message like this and they find it absurd.
00:38:01.420 And finally, one other point here, imagine a bunch of men sending nude and semi-nude photos to a woman
00:38:10.500 on Twitter in order to get back at her for some opinion that she expressed.
00:38:16.160 Imagine that happening. I mean, what's, what's the story there if that happens?
00:38:22.400 The story is that this person is being horribly sexually harassed and everything else.
00:38:29.340 And so here's the, um, here's even more of the incoherence because while we're told that men and
00:38:33.760 women are exactly the same, and for the most part, people have bought into that delusional idea, 1.00
00:38:38.180 still, you know, I were to suggest that this pastor is being sexually harassed by women who
00:38:46.260 are sending nude photos to him, you know, people would laugh at that idea. Even the people who say
00:38:51.840 that men and women are exactly the same and should be treated the same, they'll laugh at it. Because 0.93
00:38:54.800 that's ridiculous. Men can't be sexually harassed. Oh, really? Because if we reverse the roles here,
00:39:00.660 everybody would agree that it's sexual harassment. All right. Are men and women the same or not?
00:39:07.160 You know, is the question. Let's, uh, let's go. This is from page six. It says,
00:39:12.440 Adele is being accused of transphobia for declaring at a woke gender neutral award show that she loves
00:39:18.320 being a woman. Um, this is, uh, the rolling of the deep singer made the remark at Tuesday's Brit
00:39:25.120 awards that she collected the prize for artist of the year, a newly created category, merging the old
00:39:30.860 best male and best female artist awards. So they made sure to make the awards gender neutral. Now
00:39:37.480 there's no best male and best female. And why? Because males and females don't exist.
00:39:41.240 And, uh, and then she wins the award and she gets up there and she commits the grave sin 0.97
00:39:46.520 of, of talking about the fact that she is a woman. And, uh, we have that clip. Listen to this.
00:39:51.440 The name of this award has changed, but I really love being a woman and being a female artist. I do.
00:39:57.700 I do. I'm really proud of us. I really, really am. Thank you so much.
00:40:03.460 That is transphobia because as a woman, now you're not allowed to acknowledge that you are a woman
00:40:11.940 and you're especially not to, not, not permitted to be grateful for the fact that you will be,
00:40:18.940 you're not allowed to have any positive feelings about the fact that you're a woman.
00:40:23.680 And so she's being, she is, she is, she is actually, this is a, this is a thing that she
00:40:28.840 is being condemned for transphobia because of what you just heard there.
00:40:33.460 And as far as I know, Adele has not, uh, as far as I know, she hasn't responded to this
00:40:39.280 controversy yet. Uh, other people have spoken up on, on her behalf, but, uh, she has, she
00:40:46.480 has not said anything. And if this madness is ever going to end, then we need people like Adele to
00:40:53.920 speak up. And she doesn't want to say anything in response to it, but she certainly knows how
00:41:00.320 ridiculous this is. And if, if, if, if, if the word misogyny means anything, then how could it not
00:41:09.760 apply to this? How is that not, you're not, you're not allowed to talk about the fact that you're a
00:41:15.320 woman. You are not allowed to say, I'm grateful to be a woman. Um, we need people like Adele, 0.95
00:41:24.280 just like JK Rowling has to speak up about, about this because she knows that it's ridiculous
00:41:29.740 and it's not going to stop until people like her, you know, it's one thing for people like me,
00:41:35.600 people on the right, people who are expected to have these views. It's one thing for us to go out
00:41:39.700 and ranting and raving about it, which we have to do, but, uh, we need people who are in the
00:41:44.800 mainstream like JK Rowling. She can't be the only one because all of them know how crazy it is.
00:41:50.540 And if there's going to be a change, then it's going to happen with, with them.
00:41:55.760 All right. Finally, we haven't played a woke Tik TOK video in a little while. So here's a,
00:42:00.120 here's a good one. Watch this.
00:42:02.020 So this is just one example of thin privilege and an example of how hard it is for women of size to 1.00
00:42:09.160 find anything to wear. You see all these racks upon racks of straight size clothing,
00:42:14.980 tons of options. And then for plus size women, you have about six racks and even then you have 1.00
00:42:24.320 limited sizing. We need to do better. So there we go. Thin, thin privilege. Um, and also I love the,
00:42:31.880 the phrase women of size, uh, which makes about as much sense as people of color, you know, people of 0.94
00:42:39.880 color, people of size. Well, here's the problem is that, um, everybody has a size. Like if you,
00:42:48.860 if you exist, then you have some sort of size. So we're all people of size and we, and we all also
00:42:54.380 have a color. You know, I'm, I'm actually, I am not, if you, if you look at me, I, I may appear to
00:43:00.680 be pale, but I do have a color. I'm not some sort of like translucent ghost sitting here,
00:43:06.380 despite appearances at times. So thin privilege, which is a part of, part of the story here,
00:43:11.860 people looking desperately for problems in their lives, looking desperately to be victimized.
00:43:16.120 And this is not quite as absurd as resorting to emojis to find your source of victimization,
00:43:21.260 but it's almost there that we know that if you're, if you're plus size, there are options for you.
00:43:27.500 That's kind of the funny thing is she goes over and she shows, Oh, look at there. There are no
00:43:30.480 options for plus size women. What do you mean? There's a whole section there. There's plenty of options. 1.00
00:43:34.640 And, but if, if you want more options and no way of looking at it is to, well, you could lose some
00:43:42.180 weight. It could be an incentive to lose weight, which would be a good thing because it's going
00:43:47.500 to be healthier for you and you'll live longer. Just a, just a suggestion. Let's get now to the
00:43:53.380 comment section. Centurion Laflamme says, I think on a level, his apologies talking about Joe Rogan
00:44:10.540 aren't necessarily to any specific person, but an act more for himself. It's an act of humility and
00:44:16.640 justice to say what you've done, uh, that you think is wrong. It could be unwise timing wise,
00:44:22.860 but I respect it on a moral level. Yeah. Well, a couple of things. First of all,
00:44:28.060 in a perfect world, in a, in a sort of ideal society, uh, all things being equal,
00:44:35.300 you know, there wouldn't be a problem with someone offering an apology, a public apology at worst,
00:44:41.280 it would be sort of useless, but there wouldn't be any real problem with it. Um, but we don't live
00:44:46.500 in that society. And so, as I've tried to explain many times, you know, the, the, the biggest problem
00:44:54.300 with the public apology is that you are, it's the food, right? It's the, it's the fuel that sustains
00:45:00.720 the outrage mob and you are feeding it. This is what they want. This is what they need. Not because
00:45:06.100 they're interested in reconciliation, not because they want to forgive you, not because they're worried
00:45:10.020 about your moral betterment, but because, um, to them, the apology is, uh, is submission. It's
00:45:16.580 surrender. Um, it's kind of their pound of flesh and it is what sustains them and fuels them and
00:45:23.540 ensures that they're going to go off to the next person and the next person, the next person after
00:45:26.860 that, you know, when you stop apologizing, you deprive them of oxygen. You deprive them of the fuel
00:45:34.500 that they need. So that's one point. The other point is, yeah. Um, if you think you did something
00:45:40.000 that was wrong or if you have something in your past that, uh, comes to light and you're embarrassed
00:45:45.720 about it, well, you can, you can acknowledge that it was wrong without apologizing. So I'm
00:45:53.800 not arguing that, um, if you, if the cancel mob comes after you for something that you have
00:45:59.600 to stand by and defend everything you've ever done. You know, if they go digging for something
00:46:06.140 deep in your past and they find something and say, Hey, look at this thing that you did or
00:46:09.260 sad or whatever, um, you don't have to just despite them say, Oh yeah, I'll defend that.
00:46:15.920 I was, I was right to do that. That's not the point. So you can acknowledge that something
00:46:22.240 was stupid or wrong or whatever. Um, if it was, because the other thing you don't want
00:46:28.900 them to do, you don't want them to goad you into defending something that, that, you know,
00:46:35.100 you don't want to defend or that's indefensible. Um, but you can do that without apologizing
00:46:41.840 because who are you apologizing to is always the question.
00:46:49.880 So when, when, when they dig up this thing on Joe Rogan, right, they've combed through,
00:46:54.800 uh, thousands of hours of podcasts over the course of 13 or 14 years. And they find
00:47:01.940 examples of him using bad language and they say, do you, what are you going to stand by
00:47:08.620 this? His response could be, well, do you stand by everything you've ever said in your
00:47:13.380 life? I know I don't stand by it any more than you stand by everything you've ever said.
00:47:21.060 Do I apologize to it? Well, who am I apologizing to? You show me who I'm supposed to apologize
00:47:25.440 to, and I'll think about it, but I'm not going to apologize to you, the mob. You're not hurt by this.
00:47:32.420 Um, let's see. Devin says, Matt Rogan said directly to only apologize. If you regret something,
00:47:41.240 it can be a political hit job and still have Rogan have regrets about what was shown.
00:47:45.700 Rogan is letting people know that he doesn't use the word regardless of context now. So the apology
00:47:50.520 is to anyone that agrees with his current view on the world to let them know where he now stands.
00:47:55.900 Well, once again, that's not okay. You can, you can even express regret about something without it
00:48:01.660 being an apology. So the apology is to anyone who agrees with his current view on the word. What,
00:48:08.320 why do they need an apology? I agree with his current view on the, on the word, I suppose, but,
00:48:12.300 but, uh, uh, uh, you know, in the sense that I agree that people shouldn't use racial slurs,
00:48:20.220 any racial slur, no matter who the, who the targeted group is. So if that's Joe Rogan's view
00:48:27.780 on that word, then I agree with it. I think most people do. Does that mean that I'm owed an apology
00:48:34.680 for him because he used the word in the past? No, it's ridiculous. Z's of on says, Matt, since you
00:48:42.540 asked, um, crack pipes, at least everywhere I know of anyway, are about a buck, literally a single
00:48:49.100 dollar. And then the chore, which is just chore boy kitchen scrubbers, LOL, are another dollar.
00:48:54.880 What? The chore. So it's like two bucks total. And almost no one is out there catching diseases or
00:49:01.280 anything like that from used pipes. There is literally no excuse or reason for any of this.
00:49:08.700 Um, okay. I, and this is, this is not the only person who, who did contact me with information
00:49:14.020 about, uh, about crack and crack pipes. Maybe I should just be clear that it's, it's, I wasn't
00:49:18.720 looking for this info. Some of the information I had people emailing me with like very specific
00:49:22.920 information on the pricing of crack pipes. And I wasn't just to clarify, I was not asking for my own
00:49:28.220 personal benefit. Uh, but it is a question that I have when we hear the Biden administration needs
00:49:34.040 to fund crack pipes, even putting aside how fundamentally insane that is. It's like, what
00:49:40.520 can't, can people not afford to buy a crack pipe, even a crack head, they can't afford that.
00:49:45.220 How expensive can it be? Apparently they're just a dollar. So you can run down to your local dollar
00:49:50.020 store, go to Dollar Tree and, uh, you know, get a pack of five crack pipes for a dollar for five bucks.
00:49:55.600 Uh, finally, Scott says how to escape an escape room. Step one, promote your best-selling LGBT, 1.00
00:50:01.340 LGBT children's book, Johnny the Walrus four times. Step two, start eating frosted miniweeds. 0.99
00:50:06.560 Step three, let Clavin do literally everything. Um, yeah, we did do, you know, the shut-in is
00:50:11.380 premiering tonight and we had a shut-in themed escape room that we, uh, that we did. And you
00:50:16.900 can find that video on Daily Wire's YouTube. Uh, and, um, you can see in that video that I do
00:50:23.940 absolutely nothing at all, including, I make almost no effort to make the video itself entertaining,
00:50:29.560 but I did warn them about that ahead of time. This is the second time I've been roped into doing
00:50:35.600 an escape room. And each time I tell, I'm terrible at them. I'm not going to do anything. I'm not going
00:50:40.840 to be any help at all. I won't even make this entertaining. I'm just going to like wander around
00:50:46.800 and that's it. And for some reason they keep roping me into this. I don't get it,
00:50:52.640 but you can go watch the video tonight is the nights for the Daily Wire. Why? Because not only
00:50:57.960 is it the world premiere of our first original film shut in, but we'll also be releasing two
00:51:02.460 new teaser trailers for new movies coming this year. We could be more excited to be making good
00:51:06.760 on our promise of bringing you real entertainment. And we seriously hope that you tune in shut in is a
00:51:10.980 tale of redemption and an intense suspenseful thriller that delivers riveting action without missing a
00:51:15.980 beat. Check out the trailer.
00:51:17.800 Lady, where have you been? Jessica. I can smell the weakness from you. 0.99
00:51:29.980 No, stop. Let me out, please. Now you must pay. Don't you touch my kids. Your daughter,
00:51:40.980 she's very pretty.
00:51:47.380 I'm scared.
00:51:51.360 The film premieres tonight, February 10th at 9 p.m. Eastern, 8 p.m. Central over at Daily Wire
00:51:55.360 YouTube after this month's episode of Backstage. Make sure you click the link in the description
00:51:59.020 and turn on the notification bell so you don't miss it. Now let's get to our daily cancellation.
00:52:02.340 So today we cancel Dr. Susie Diembo, who you may remember as the mulleted communications professor 0.97
00:52:12.740 who appeared on my episode of Dr. Phil. She has been quite silent publicly ever since that episode
00:52:17.380 aired, probably because she embarrassed herself to such an unfortunate degree. In fact, she embarrassed
00:52:22.140 herself even more than viewers of the show realize because her worst moments were left on the cutting
00:52:27.040 room floor, which she should be grateful for. Well, now she's back, this time on Dr. Phil's
00:52:31.900 podcast, to reflect on that experience and also to explain why I'm such a horrible and wrong and
00:52:36.720 evil person. Now you notice how she waits until I'm 3,000 miles away before she tries to make this 1.00
00:52:41.720 case. With me safely out of the room and out of the state, she can launch her missiles, which she does 1.00
00:52:48.620 throughout the course of an hour-long interview. We'll play just a few clips, starting with this piece
00:52:53.200 from the beginning of the discussion. Listen to this. Why is this such a divisive issue? Because
00:52:58.580 I think it is a divisive issue. Yeah, no, I think you're totally right. And it's good to talk about
00:53:04.020 this example in addition to what you said, because it's an example of how I approach communication and
00:53:10.240 conflict in general. Well, there's at least two reasons it's divisive. First, you have people like
00:53:18.960 Matt Walsh and his team capitalizing and exploiting the very real uncertainty that people can feel and
00:53:26.900 face when there is a culture change like this. For me, I think it makes total sense to have people
00:53:34.320 be fearful around something like gender pronouns or personal pronouns and to feel anxiety
00:53:44.020 when they learn about that because it can question their fundamental core beliefs.
00:53:51.520 So this is an example of how she approaches communication and conflict, she says. She
00:53:57.620 approaches communication and conflict by waiting three weeks to come up with any kind of counter
00:54:02.340 argument to someone. And then at that point, presenting the counter argument while the other
00:54:07.560 person is out of the room. That's her communication and conflict resolution strategy as someone who is an
00:54:13.340 expert in the field. She also, again, as a communications expert, immediately attacks her 1.00
00:54:19.220 opponent's perceived motivations rather than addressing the actual arguments. And you're going
00:54:26.120 to notice that throughout all the clips we play, is that that's all she does, is go after what she
00:54:32.280 perceives to be my motivation while saying nothing about the arguments that I presented. In this case,
00:54:38.480 she says that I'm exploitative. I'm exploiting the fear that people feel when they, quote, learn about
00:54:44.960 personal pronouns because this new information is causing them to, quote, question their core beliefs.
00:54:51.640 Okay, well, first of all, nobody is learning about personal pronouns for the first time.
00:54:56.760 No one learned about pronouns from Dr. Phil. No one is learning about pronouns from the, you know,
00:55:02.540 the, the gender ideologues. We already knew about that. We aren't confused by pronouns or afraid of
00:55:09.780 them. We're all quite familiar with the concept. It is you, Susie, who are confused. See, you think
00:55:15.700 that words are your little pets, which you can take personal ownership of. And you think that the meaning
00:55:23.180 of words is entirely subjective, that each person can make up their own meaning as they go along. But what
00:55:30.040 you don't understand as a communications professor is that if language is entirely subjective, if there's
00:55:36.500 no set definition for these words, then communication is impossible. Because literally the whole point of
00:55:42.820 language has just been removed, causing communication to collapse and break down. You know, there has to be
00:55:49.980 a shared understanding of what the words mean, or there's no way to convey meaning to anybody.
00:55:57.180 If we all have our own meaning for the words that we're using. So when you say that a man is a 0.98
00:56:03.940 she, and I ask you, what do you mean by that? How is that person a she? And you have no answer for
00:56:09.580 that question. You have made communication impossible because you are using words apart from their
00:56:14.460 objective meaning without any idea of what your new meaning even is. You have not put anything forward
00:56:21.880 that causes anyone to question their core beliefs. At no point have you or anyone on your side or
00:56:27.040 anyone who pushes gender ideology ever said anything that makes someone go, wow, that's a
00:56:32.680 great point. I never thought of it like that. Sending them into some kind of existential crisis where
00:56:37.840 they begin to reanalyze everything they thought they knew. This has never happened because nothing
00:56:42.360 that you say means anything. If you're causing people to question their core beliefs, it's not by
00:56:47.320 presenting arguments, but it's by berating and cajoling and threatening and coercing them
00:56:51.740 into giving up their core beliefs out of fear of social alienation and shame.
00:56:59.580 So then, so then who exactly is exploiting fear in this case?
00:57:04.060 Let's listen to the next clip.
00:57:06.060 And it's really frustrating to me too, especially around the, you know, the, the pronoun episode and
00:57:12.060 that react, the reaction that people had to that. So you, you laying out the, how vast your audience
00:57:19.220 is means you are the perfect platform to present multiple viewpoints in my view, because you're
00:57:27.560 reaching the most people. And you, the way we need to hear both of the, or both many different sides
00:57:38.000 of an issue so that people can make a decision for themselves. And when we shut down people are
00:57:44.480 from hearing other kinds of perspectives, it's just productive to me and it's really boring. And
00:57:49.620 it's usually motivated by the need for validation from one side. That's not genuine in my view. I mean,
00:57:57.960 I could go on and on about this especially with regard to our episode, but I don't agree. I mean,
00:58:06.160 I think that providing that platform is a good thing. Some on that, on your show, I wonder if
00:58:11.420 maybe I didn't do my job well enough because they think that he won. And I was like, Hmm,
00:58:16.660 I didn't think that. Yeah. Well, you, I mean, you said it there, not me. If it makes you feel
00:58:21.640 better, Susie, you did have an impossible job. You did lose, you know, the argument, but your job
00:58:27.600 was to defend and legitimize something that is fundamentally incoherent. There's no way to do
00:58:31.720 that. There's no way to win that argument. The only way that you win is if the other side
00:58:35.600 surrenders ahead of time. And that's what you've come to expect from these conversations
00:58:39.560 because it's what most people do. It didn't happen in our case. And that's why you were
00:58:43.720 so flustered. She said in the earlier clip that when she's talking to her students, especially
00:58:48.960 those from rural areas and introducing the gender pronoun concept to them, that she's introducing
00:58:53.820 something that they've never heard before, you know, but that's not true. As we covered,
00:58:58.280 everyone has heard of pronouns before. And the more familiar you are with the concept and with
00:59:03.420 the rules of grammar generally, the more impervious you are to the nonsense that people like Susie
00:59:08.740 and her ilk spew on the subject. But speaking of people being introduced to things for the
00:59:14.040 first time, it is Susie and the people on her side who have literally never been challenged
00:59:18.260 on their views by anyone ever in their lives. That's why they collapse so easily. That's why
00:59:24.020 they run away claiming that they've been traumatized. People on my side, we've all, this is the advantage
00:59:31.060 that we have. We've all heard and confronted gender ideology a million times. We can't escape it. 0.99
00:59:38.380 So you can't surprise us. We've heard all of it. We hear all of this every day, everywhere we go.
00:59:45.160 How could we not? It's everywhere. There is no bubble available where you can go inside it
00:59:50.480 and escape this nonsense. But these people, they all live in bubbles where the opposing side does
00:59:56.960 not exist. That's actually available to them. That's an option most of the time. And that's why
01:00:02.980 they're so unprepared to deal with challenges. The reason people thought that I won the argument is
01:00:08.600 because, well, because I won it. But I won it simply because I asked questions about the opposing
01:00:12.900 side's position, which nobody on the opposing side could answer because they've never been asked those
01:00:18.620 questions before. Because for most of them on that stage and most of them generally, it's probably
01:00:24.260 like the first time they've ever even had a conversation with someone who disagrees with
01:00:28.980 them. Let's listen to one more clip here. You did a good thing by, I didn't really know who
01:00:35.920 Matt Walsh was that well before I went on the show, but I'm real glad that I did that and that you had
01:00:41.100 him on because people need to hear what he is talking about. Now, my dilemma, and I've been thinking
01:00:47.760 about this since the show, and I don't know that I'll have a concrete answer for you yet, but it's
01:00:51.900 been on my mind, is how I think it's important to have him on. And I wish he does. They don't play
01:01:00.580 fair. He's not playing fair. He's yelling. And so I've been sorting through the dilemma of how to get
01:01:08.040 people to actually listen to the words he's saying. And with me, I don't care if you're conservative
01:01:14.680 thinking or you don't like personal pronouns. It's not the outcome. It's how he got to that
01:01:19.520 outcome because his argument made no sense. And it was exploiting fear and it was a lot of
01:01:24.900 generalizations. And that's why I feel like you needed to have him on. So good, because I want
01:01:30.600 people to hear that. And I don't know that that happened. Oh, okay. Well, she wants people to hear
01:01:35.940 my argument, she says. Well, we can agree on that point, at least. I want people to hear them too.
01:01:40.460 Though she says that I didn't play fair because I was yelling. Except I never yelled at any point
01:01:46.720 during that episode. And this is how you know you lost the argument, by the way. If after the fact,
01:01:53.060 you're complaining that your opponent wasn't being fair. It's like I said at the beginning of this,
01:02:00.500 if once you start complaining about the refs, you know, after the games, it wasn't fair. This is,
01:02:06.700 they missed that call. You know that your team lost. Now, if I had run up and snatched all their
01:02:14.340 microphones or something and said, oh, you can't say anything, that might qualify as not playing fair.
01:02:20.940 That also would have been kind of funny. And I might as well have taken their microphones because
01:02:24.380 they weren't saying anything anyway. But far from snatching their microphones, I was actually inviting
01:02:28.620 them to speak more by asking them questions about their position. They could not answer those
01:02:34.620 questions because their position is fundamentally incoherent, which is not my fault. Don't take
01:02:40.000 it out of me, Susie. But for now, I do have to say to Susie Diembo that you are once again canceled.
01:02:47.780 And we'll leave it there for today. Thanks for watching. Thanks for listening. Have a great day.
01:02:50.820 Godspeed.
01:03:20.820 I can smell the weakness from you.
01:03:46.140 No, stop. Let me out, please. Don't you touch my kids? 0.76
01:04:00.720 Your daughter, she's very pretty.
01:04:07.080 I'm scared.