The Matt Walsh Show - February 16, 2022


Ep. 891 - BLM Assassin Joins Waukesha Killer In The Memory Hole


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 2 minutes

Words per minute

185.78651

Word count

11,649

Sentence count

761

Harmful content

Misogyny

17

sentences flagged

Toxicity

38

sentences flagged

Hate speech

21

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

An activist attempted to assassinate a politician in a major American city. Also, the new mayor of New York is getting a lot of props from people on the right, but he s as much of a race hustler as any other Democrat. And a man who says women who don t want to see their penis in the locker room are misogynists.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Today on the Matt Wall Show, an activist attempted to assassinate a politician in a major American
00:00:04.160 city. This happened yesterday and already is out of the news. You may have already guessed
00:00:07.900 why, but we'll discuss today. Also, the new mayor of New York is getting a lot of props
00:00:11.540 from people on the right, but he's as much of a race hustler as any other Democrat.
00:00:15.200 I'll play a clip that proves that. And the CEO of YouTube did an interview where she called on
00:00:19.460 governments across the world to pass more laws restricting speech, plus a bipartisan bill meant
00:00:24.660 to protect children on the Internet. I usually say that the worst kinds of bills are the bipartisan
00:00:28.740 ones, but is this an exception to the rule? We'll take a look. Finally, we'll cancel a man who says
00:00:33.200 that women who don't want to see his penis in the locker room are misogynists. All of that and more 0.99
00:00:38.420 today on the Matt Wall Show. You know, the pro-life movement must maintain its momentum now more than
00:00:52.240 ever. And what better way to help than by supporting the charities and causes that you care about? Even
00:00:56.480 if the Supreme Court were to strike down Roe v. Wade, abortion would still exist in America. 0.99
00:01:01.260 It would still remain legal in many states, including the most populated states in the
00:01:04.640 country, most of them anyway. Charity Mobile is the pro-life phone company. They partner with you
00:01:09.880 to automatically support the pro-life, pro-family charity of your choice with 5% of your monthly
00:01:14.080 plan price. And they've sent millions of dollars to charities so far and will send millions more over
00:01:19.200 the years ahead. New activations and eligible accounts get a free cell phone with free activation and
00:01:23.220 free shipping. When you mention offer code Walsh, certain restrictions apply. Charity Mobile makes
00:01:27.300 it easy to switch. You could keep your existing phone number. You might even be able to keep your
00:01:30.460 existing phone. But if you need a new phone, no problem. Charity Mobile has a variety of options
00:01:34.480 from the latest 5G phones to low-cost smartphones and basic phones as well. All of their monthly plans
00:01:39.980 include unlimited domestic minutes and messages. And it can be shared by up to eight lines on a family
00:01:45.620 plan. There are no contracts, there are no termination fees, and no risk with their 30-day guarantee.
00:01:49.600 So switch to Charity Mobile and support the causes you care about. Call them at 1-877-474-3662
00:01:55.620 or chat with them online at charitymobile.com and mention offer code Walsh.
00:02:01.340 So in May of 2021, a prominent BLM activist, black nationalist, and future attempted assassin 0.62
00:02:07.920 Quintez Brown wrote another op-ed for the Louisville Courier-Journal titled, 0.90
00:02:12.980 Louisville's huge police budget is the real boogeyman traumatizing black people.
00:02:17.120 Now in the piece, he talks about all the ways that he as a black man has suffered because of 0.71
00:02:22.040 the police in his city. And the best way to heal his trauma, he argues, and rescue the city from
00:02:27.680 violence is to reduce the police budget. And he claims that Louisville police are not good at
00:02:33.480 preventing crime anyway. And so the best way to solve that problem is to give them fewer resources
00:02:38.080 to work with. It's actually a familiar argument, always coming from the same people who say that
00:02:43.080 every problem in the education system can be solved by increasing the budget. So to review,
00:02:49.160 if police aren't doing their jobs effectively, give them less money. If teachers aren't doing
00:02:53.600 their jobs effectively, give them more. Striking logic, you must admit. But this article from Brown
00:02:58.560 was the last that he would write for the publication. One of the first back in 2019 was a lamentation about
00:03:03.680 the lack of gun control in Kentucky and across the country. Brown claimed that, quote,
00:03:08.320 Kentucky's concealed carry law shows your life doesn't matter to gun-loving Republicans. 0.69
00:03:14.600 In between this article and his arrest this past weekend for trying to shoot and kill a white mayoral
00:03:19.080 candidate in the city, Brown was intricately involved in BLM activism. And he was honored for
00:03:24.440 his activism, actually hailed by Barack Obama's foundation as a rising face in the social justice
00:03:30.660 movement. He became a member of the Youth Violence Prevention League, if you can believe it. And he was a
00:03:36.540 local political candidate for Metro Council District 5. So this guy, this guy got around. A couple of
00:03:41.800 years ago, he was given a platform on MSNBC where Joy Reid interviewed him about this same problem
00:03:48.060 of gun violence. Listen to this. You're from the home state of the Senate Majority Leader. What do you
00:03:53.280 want him to know? Well, I want you to know that, you know, we are here and we want common sense gun
00:03:59.340 reform. And if you're not going to give us that, then we're going to get everyone out here to vote and
00:04:04.220 we're going to vote you out of office. So if you want to keep your job, then, you know, give us
00:04:07.800 what we not, what we want, but what we need, what humans need. We need common sense gun reform.
00:04:12.620 Get rid of assault rifles. Come on. Like, yeah. When are you guys going to turn 18? I'll turn 18
00:04:17.400 September 25th. I'm already registered. You're in time and already registered. I'm 29, so we're
00:04:21.680 registered. And you guys are making the connection. You believe that this is about being in the voting
00:04:26.100 booth. Definitely. Emma Gonzalez, she already put an emphasis on it. Like, because we do have some 1.00
00:04:31.960 very inflexible congressmen, so maybe we won't get gun reform like the next day. But nonviolent
00:04:37.960 direct action takes time. It's not going to happen overnight. So one thing that we can do is get
00:04:42.640 people out here voting, because even if we don't get gun reform, we're going to vote the people in
00:04:46.420 office out. And we're going to vote people who want gun reform, who care about us. We're going to put
00:04:50.800 them in office. Nonviolent direct action takes time. And he gave it about, I don't know, 18 months
00:04:57.780 before he started shooting people. But Quintez Brown, he's tired of gun violence, he says. So
00:05:01.420 tired of it that he allegedly walked into mayoral candidate Craig Greenberg's office and shot at
00:05:06.040 him at close range and missed every shot somehow. Now, in fairness, Brown does say in the clip that
00:05:10.500 he wants to get rid of assault rifles, whatever those are. He doesn't say anything about a nine
00:05:13.920 millimeter, which is what he used in his assassination attempt. So, you know, talk about a loophole.
00:05:18.780 But no matter what sort of gun he used, the end result is that a prominent and celebrated
00:05:23.480 black nationalist BLM activist tried to assassinate a politician in a major American city. This
00:05:28.660 happened yesterday morning, and it's already out of the headlines. Because this is the part of the
00:05:34.180 story that comes as no surprise. It's the part of the story where the story disappears. Already,
00:05:37.980 you can check the homepages of CNN, MSNBC, NBC News, etc., all the usual suspects, and find no mention
00:05:44.640 at all anywhere of Quintez Brown. The memory hole is dark and deep, and it does not suck things into
00:05:51.000 itself slowly like quicksand. Instead, it will obliterate unwanted facts and events in the blink
00:05:56.420 of an eye. The media, of course, has gotten very good at quickly and quietly snuffing out stories
00:06:01.460 of black nationalists and BLM activists committing politically motivated murders because they've had
00:06:06.680 a lot of practice. It was only a few months ago that another member of this ideological group
00:06:11.080 plowed his car into dozens of white people in a parade, intentionally targeting them, injuring over
00:06:16.960 60 people, killing six, including a child, in Waukesha. That story was on its way to getting
00:06:23.120 tossed into the pit as soon as the race of the perpetrator was known. And then when his politics
00:06:27.500 came into focus, its fate was sealed. But before Waukesha and in the same year, a Capitol police
00:06:34.500 officer was murdered when a black nationalist named Noah Green rammed his car into a barricade and
00:06:39.640 attacked cops with a knife. Officer Brian Sicknick was not actually killed by rioters on January 6th,
00:06:46.160 though you know his name because the media attempted to connect the two events. But in
00:06:50.880 this case, a Capitol police officer was actually murdered by a political extremist. Straight up
00:06:56.200 murder. You don't know his name. It was William Evans, by the way, because his death was not useful
00:07:01.160 to the narrative. You also probably don't remember the so-called black Hebrew Israelites who shot up a
00:07:06.560 Jewish deli in New Jersey. It was only a couple of years ago, then got into a shootout with the cops,
00:07:11.000 ultimately left six people dead. Hopefully, though, you remember the extremists who assassinated
00:07:15.880 five police officers with a sniper rifle at a BLM rally in Dallas in 2016, though the media is so
00:07:21.860 effective at erasing these events from the public consciousness that even that massacre seems to have
00:07:26.700 been mostly forgotten by the public. You know, we hear quite a lot about the looming threat of white
00:07:32.620 nationalism. And yet the majority of murderers in this country and the majority of murders are 0.60
00:07:38.560 carried out by people who don't quite fit that description. And even if we were to narrow the
00:07:43.680 category down to ideologically or politically or racially motivated violence, still, most culprits
00:07:49.700 don't exactly look like white nationalists. BLM itself and its various ideological cousins and
00:07:55.880 offshoots is by far and away the most dangerous and violent organization in America, second only to
00:08:01.980 Planned Parenthood, perhaps. BLM activists have been involved in targeted acts of violence like this
00:08:08.200 assassination attempt. Also, large scale campaigns of brutal chaos and anarchy. Entire neighborhoods and
00:08:15.220 cities have been consumed by this whirlwind for days and weeks on end. Now, violent political
00:08:21.420 movements and organizations have always existed in this country and always will in this country and
00:08:28.680 across the world and everywhere for all time. As long as there's politics, as long as there's human
00:08:35.140 society, there are going to be violent political movements and violent people. Now, in some ways,
00:08:41.080 you might argue that BLM isn't much different from the ones that came before it or will come after it
00:08:45.740 in that way. But the difference and what makes BLM so uniquely dangerous is that it has systemic support.
00:08:53.220 We hear a lot about the problems in the system, systemic. Well, it has systemic support. It's propped
00:08:59.060 up, encouraged, funded, facilitated by the most powerful institutions in the country. Now, this is
00:09:06.080 also why right-wing extremists, so-called, could never be as dangerous as BLM, even if they wanted to
00:09:12.680 be. And I'm sure that some of them do. I'm sure some of them look at BLM and say, I wish we could do
00:09:18.920 that. But they can't. Because no matter what they do, they can't get Amazon on their side or Facebook
00:09:25.840 or the education system or the government. BLM has all of that. And it has the media, of course.
00:09:34.380 And the media's most important job on BLM's behalf is to make sure that we all have very short
00:09:39.780 memories. Now, let's get to our five headlines.
00:09:49.220 Well, with the ever-increasing numbers of car makes and models, it's now impossible to stock all
00:09:53.880 the parts you need in a traditional chain storefront. Why go there and endure the torture
00:09:58.680 of walking around and trying to find what you need and being asked all of these intimidating
00:10:04.040 questions about cars, which are very intimidating for someone like me, about the specifications of
00:10:10.700 your vehicle, only to have the guy behind the counter order the parts on his computer anyway.
00:10:15.040 You could cut out the middleman and just do that yourself. You have computers with access to
00:10:18.900 rockauto.com at your home, in your pocket. Rockauto.com is a family business. They've been
00:10:23.920 serving auto parts customers online for 20 years. You can go to rockauto.com to shop for auto and body
00:10:28.340 parts from hundreds of manufacturers. They have everything you might need from engine control
00:10:32.260 modules, brake parts, tail lamps, motor oil, even new carpet. Whether it's your classic or daily
00:10:38.480 driver, get everything you need in a few easy clicks delivered directly to your door. The rockauto.com
00:10:43.160 catalog is unique and very easy to navigate. And best of all, it's all of the prices are very
00:10:48.660 affordable. It's the best prices you're going to find anywhere. So go to rockauto.com right now
00:10:52.720 and see all the parts available for your car or truck. And remember to write Walsh in their
00:10:56.880 how did you hear about us box so they know that we sent you. All right. So we'll start with this.
00:11:02.260 Eric Adams is the new mayor of New York, and we could say that he's better than Bill de Blasio,
00:11:08.920 which he is. It's like damning with faint praise. It's like saying that a woman is hotter than Nancy
00:11:15.520 Pelosi or something. But he gets credit from the right for some reason. Maybe part of it is because
00:11:21.760 the bar has been so low. In some ways, this is the best job in the world is to come in right after
00:11:27.720 Bill de Blasio. The bar is, at this point, under the earth. All you have to do is walk on the ground
00:11:32.600 and you're getting over the bar. You don't even have to raise your legs up that high. So part of it
00:11:37.560 might be that. Some of it is the kind of the lip service that he's paid to law and order and
00:11:45.340 everything else. But the fact is that he's still firmly on the left. And he attacks. He also goes
00:11:52.740 after the left. He goes after Democrats. But he does it from the left. So here's a good example.
00:11:58.860 This is the mayor of New York that even a lot of conservatives seem to like lecturing the media
00:12:04.800 yesterday on diversity. Before we play this clip, even this clip, what I'm about to play
00:12:10.020 for you, the reason that I saw this is because other conservatives on Twitter were sharing this
00:12:16.040 and saying, yeah, go Eric Adams. Because of this lecture on diversity in the media. Let's listen
00:12:24.160 to some of this. I'm a black man. That's the mayor. But my story has been interpreted by people that don't
00:12:32.380 look like me. We got to be honest about that. How many blacks are in the editorial boards?
00:12:40.700 How many blacks are determined how these stories are being written? How many Asians? How many East 0.61
00:12:48.200 Indians? How many South Asians? Everybody talks about my government being diversified.
00:12:54.540 What's the diversification in the newsrooms? So everybody go back with their predispositions.
00:13:01.100 And my role as mayor is being interpreted through the prism.
00:13:04.380 Okay, pause it there. Pause it there for one second. He says, where's the diversity in the
00:13:09.000 newsrooms? I mean, there's, where are the black people and the Asian people in newsrooms? I don't
00:13:13.580 know, all over the place? What are you talking about? The newsrooms are actually
00:13:18.140 pretty diverse. But listen to what he says. Why does it matter? Okay, he's a black man who's
00:13:24.160 the mayor. We've noticed. Great. And he says that, well, but I need black people to be covering 1.00
00:13:31.440 me because no one else can do it fairly. And when he's given a press conference, he wants the entire
00:13:36.340 room to look like him. And why is that? Why do you need? Why does it matter? You know, whenever a
00:13:45.660 story is, whenever I see a headline or story in the media about me, I know that it's always
00:13:51.740 going to be negative, but it doesn't really matter to me. I don't check to see the race 0.97
00:13:56.180 of the person. Is this a white person? Can they relate to my lived experience? Because
00:14:01.800 I know no matter what they look like, it's going to be negative. They're going to be tearing
00:14:05.760 me apart. So why exactly do you need them to look like you? Let's keep listening. Maybe
00:14:10.020 Eric Adams will explain. The role as mayor is being interpreted through the prisms of your
00:14:15.880 realities and not mine. So when you write stories, you're not writing stories for people who was
00:14:22.700 almost homeless like me. You're not writing stories for people who were arrested and beat by police
00:14:27.780 officers. You're not writing stories from those who are dealing with high crime. You're writing from
00:14:33.920 your prisms. And I'm not saying this to attack. But my administration is going to be about saying
00:14:41.100 the obvious that other people are uncomfortable with saying. Discomfort is growth. So I say that to
00:14:46.580 all your owners of your papers, your editorials, diversify your newsroom so I can look out and see
00:14:54.120 people that look like me and say, we're going to write stories based on the prisms that we have,
00:15:00.160 based on the prism of this young man, based on the prism of being the first black woman. That's
00:15:05.000 the speaker or Jumaane Williams, based on the prisms of his realities. It's not what we're getting.
00:15:15.260 That's not what we're getting. And that's why I'm covered the way I'm covered.
00:15:20.960 And I'm not comfortable with it. 0.90
00:15:23.240 The negative headlines are because he's black. So that's, and he's saying, 0.85
00:15:27.500 uh, look, I'm going to say the things that other people won't say. I'm going to sit up here and
00:15:31.740 talk tough. And I'm going to say things that other people aren't comfortable saying. What are you
00:15:35.780 talking about? This? Everybody says this calling for more diversity. I'm I, you know what? I'm going
00:15:42.640 to tell it like it is. I'm going to say the things that nobody will say. And here it is. We need more
00:15:46.860 diversity, dude. Literally everyone, every person in front of a camera says that except for me and like
00:15:54.360 three other people. Okay. Everyone says that, but why, why does it matter? Why, why, why this
00:16:00.600 obsession with all? When I look out here, I don't see people who look like me. Who cares if they look
00:16:03.800 like you or not? Difference does that make? How does that, how does that affect their ability to
00:16:09.140 cover you fairly or unfairly? Well, because he says that, um, if you're white, you're his exact
00:16:17.780 wording, you're writing through the prism of your reality and not mine. Well, yes, that's true. But
00:16:25.440 you see the problem, Eric, is that's the only way that any of us can engage with the world. That's
00:16:31.880 the only way that any, any of us can do anything. We are all operating within, as you say, the prism of
00:16:39.460 our own reality. Now that doesn't mean we all get our own reality. We don't all get our own truth,
00:16:45.460 but we are all coming from our own perspectives. That's the only perspective we can have. It's the
00:16:52.060 only one available to us. Unless you have split personality disorder and you have multiple
00:16:56.120 perspectives bouncing around in your head. Most of us who are not mentally ill have just the one. 0.86
00:17:02.460 That's it. We're all conscious beings and we have our own perspective, but there's still,
00:17:07.080 there's still one shared reality. And so the goal of everybody should be to, to better understand
00:17:13.880 the reality that we're all a part of and to sort of hone your, your perspective so that it comports
00:17:22.780 with reality and that it's, it's, it is based in reality. What he's, what he's, what he's saying is
00:17:32.300 that you, you have really no right to talk about him unless you have his perspective.
00:17:41.540 Which number one, there's the assumption that everybody with his skin color has exactly his
00:17:45.760 perspective on life, which is incredibly degrading, demeaning and dehumanizing that, that assumption. And
00:17:52.140 we know, of course, it's not accurate. Uh, you know, I'm assuming he says he wants people to look
00:17:57.980 like him in the newsroom, uh, covering him. I, you know, I'm guessing that if Candace Owens walked 0.94
00:18:02.160 in there, he would say, well, no, no, not her. I don't want her. So someone else who looks like me, 0.79
00:18:07.100 but also the, the incredibly arrogant assumption that everyone has to adopt your perspective on reality
00:18:15.100 just because it's yours and they can't say anything about you unless they have your perspective.
00:18:22.560 Exactly. Of course, there's a lot of that kind of thing going around, going around today. And we'll,
00:18:27.820 we'll get into some of that again and the other cancellation. Um, I've had this clip for a few
00:18:31.660 days and we haven't played it. We'll play it now. I've just been waiting. I've been waiting for an
00:18:34.860 opportunity. Whenever we get to a chance, we're dumping on Eric Adams. We'll just throw this in as
00:18:38.400 well because here he is a couple of days ago, not quite as important, but he's speaking out about,
00:18:43.220 um, about the value of plant-based diets, because this is an important thing that we need the mayor
00:18:49.420 of New York to be talking about. Uh, let's listen to that. You brought up your eating habits. I just
00:18:54.500 want to clarify something. How often do you eat fish and do you eat any other animal proteins?
00:19:00.360 I eat a plant-based centered life. Some people want to call me vegan. Vegans eat Oreos and they drink
00:19:08.700 Coca-Cola. I don't, I eat a plant-based centered life. And those who are the food police for me,
00:19:17.020 uh, they can food police all the time. I eat a plant-based centered life.
00:19:24.900 I eat a plant-based centered life and I'm not going down that. Hold on, hold on, hold on,
00:19:30.100 hold on. Please don't do that. Yelling out stuff with me. I don't do it to you. Don't do it to me.
00:19:34.540 I eat a plant-based centered life. And I'm not going down this rabbit hole of what do you eat?
00:19:41.260 If you eat cake and it has eggs in it, that you analyze it. I'm not doing that. The more plant-based
00:19:46.480 you eat, the better and healthy you are. That is my question to those who are following me around
00:19:52.040 in restaurants, wondering what I'm ordering. Listen, I'm not doing that. That's noise to me.
00:19:57.180 I got to get New Yorkers to eat a plant-based centered life.
00:20:01.460 To eat what again? I didn't, I didn't catch it. He didn't mention it enough times. What was it?
00:20:05.860 Oh, a plant-based centered life. What is with the mayors of New York, by the way,
00:20:09.920 and their obsession with controlling what people eat? I mean, he's certainly not, it's,
00:20:12.820 it seems to be a sickness that they all, there's something there in a town hall. I don't know what
00:20:16.440 it is. Some, some kind of virus. And as soon as they become mayors, they, they think it's their
00:20:19.560 business to tell everyone what they should be eating. Uh, so he has a plant-based centered life.
00:20:24.340 By the way, I'm glad we played that clip because, um, perfect, perfect follow-up to the thing before
00:20:31.220 it. This guy's complaining about the way the media covers him as if they're so hard on him.
00:20:35.240 This is what you're complaining about. Their question was, uh, tell us more about your,
00:20:39.260 your diet mayor. Hey mayor, uh, say, I've heard you like salads. Can you tell us more about that?
00:20:46.400 Those are the difficult questions you're whining about.
00:20:48.740 By the way, plant-based centered life, veganism is, is, uh, completely unnatural. It's, it's really
00:20:56.080 in, in many ironic ways, like the most inorganic way to live. Um, we were not, we're not built.
00:21:02.260 We're not made to eat only vegetables, to eat, to eat a plant-based centered life. That's not how
00:21:07.160 we're, it's our, our teeth aren't the way they are so that we can only chop on celery and lettuce.
00:21:12.140 Uh, we are supposed to be omnivores. We eat meat and vegetables. And, um, if, if all human beings
00:21:19.880 through history going back into time led plant-based centered lives, then the human race would be
00:21:25.580 extinct. We wouldn't exist anymore. So maybe that's, maybe that's not a coincidence. Like ultimate,
00:21:31.720 like the vegans, they're, they're proposing a way of life, which by the way, is a very, very privileged.
00:21:37.160 This is, this is, veganism only exists among the most privileged and wealthy people.
00:21:42.140 It is just like gender theory, gender ideology, just like so many other things, critical race
00:21:45.920 theory. It's another invention of the left that can only exist in the context of white Western 0.68
00:21:50.860 privilege because you go anywhere else in the world, go to any third world country,
00:21:55.600 you go to anywhere, anywhere else, you see the way other people live. This is not an option.
00:21:59.520 Okay. They're, they're, they're living off of, uh, off of cows and livestock. They have to hunt. 0.67
00:22:05.120 If they tried to lead a plant-based centered life, they would die. So if everyone becomes vegan,
00:22:09.440 vegan, then within three months, uh, 3 billion people are probably dead because they would starve
00:22:15.420 to death. And if everyone was always vegan from the beginning of time, then none of us would be
00:22:19.220 here. Maybe that's not a coincidence. The veganism is, uh, is, uh, this is my conspiracy theory.
00:22:25.800 Veganism is a population control tactic. It's anti-human. It's wrong. And it's stupid.
00:22:32.980 That's my position. Um, all right, moving on. I want to play this for you. The CEO of YouTube, 1.00
00:22:38.060 uh, was interviewed. I'm not sure where, what, what show she was on, but this is quite troubling
00:22:44.940 in a number of ways, and it should be getting more headlines than it is, but she was interviewed.
00:22:49.220 And, uh, here she is talking about the ways that YouTube will suppress speech at the behest of the
00:22:56.300 government. But she, she, she wants to suppress speech, but her point is that she needs the 1.00
00:23:02.120 government. She needs governments around the world to help her and sort of team up with her in this 1.00
00:23:06.440 effort to suppress speech. Let's listen to that. We work around the globe and you're right. Certainly
00:23:11.460 there are many different laws in many different, um, jurisdictions. And we, um, we enforce the laws
00:23:18.460 of the various jurisdictions around speech or what's considered safe or not safe. Um, that's true
00:23:25.000 for, for democratically elected governments. Um, it might get a little bit more complicated in,
00:23:29.620 in non-democratically elected governments. Um, and, and for the most part, you know, so basically we,
00:23:36.300 we enforce those laws. Um, that actually hasn't been the controversial part. What has been the
00:23:42.800 controversial part has been when there is content that would be deemed as harmful, but yet is not
00:23:48.720 illegal. Um, so an example of that, for example, would be COVID. I'm not aware of there being laws by
00:23:57.360 governments saying around COVID in terms of not being able to debate the efficacy of masks or where
00:24:03.840 the virus came from or the right treatment or proposal, but yet there was a lot of pressure
00:24:08.820 and concern about us, um, distributing misinformation that went against what was considered the standard
00:24:17.060 and accepted medical knowledge. Um, and so this category of harmful, but not, um, but, but legal has
00:24:26.580 been, I think where most of the discussion has been. And, you know, for us, we look at that content and we
00:24:33.480 think about the, the role that we play in society. Um, we want to be doing the right thing for our users
00:24:39.100 and for our creators. Um, we also generate revenue from advertisers. And if we are serving content that
00:24:45.660 is seen by our advertising community as not benefiting society, um, no advertiser is going to want to appear
00:24:53.420 on that. And they're certainly not going to even want to appear on a different, you know, content that
00:24:58.540 is positive if they think the platform as a whole is not being responsible. So we are generally very
00:25:03.800 aligned, like responsibility is really, is good for our business. And we, uh, you know, we have over
00:25:10.400 2 million creators on our platform that we share revenue with. So if we're not generating revenue
00:25:16.480 for them, then, you know, that's a problem for our creators. Um, they create, you know, beautiful and
00:25:22.920 incredible content and we share the majority of revenue with them. So, um, yeah, so, so basically that's
00:25:29.880 like, you know, so I think governments like can, can always, you know, our, our recommendation, if
00:25:34.720 governments want to have more control over online speech is to, to pass laws, to have that be very
00:25:40.440 cleanly and clearly defined such that we can implement it.
00:25:44.560 Well, I had to get all the way to the end there, to that, to that part, because that was important. Um, first of
00:25:49.140 all, uh, I agree with some of what she said about YouTube creators making beautiful and amazing content, like
00:25:55.540 for example, this content. So I appreciate that, Susan, thank you for that.
00:25:58.820 Um, but notice also, as she says that it's, it's, it's really pretty troubling on a number of levels.
00:26:04.280 Uh, she says that, of course that we're, we want to get rid of content that's harmful, which is, um,
00:26:09.800 as always an extremely broad category. And, uh, it is, you want to talk about operating through your
00:26:16.080 own prism, the prism of your reality, as Eric Adams says, um, that's going to, it's going to depend
00:26:20.500 very much on the prism of your reality, um, what you consider to be harmful. And so you, you put that
00:26:28.380 into, in the terms of service and say, oh yeah, well, we'll allow all speech unless it's harmful
00:26:33.020 and what's harmful. It's what, what literally whatever we say is harmful is harmful. And in,
00:26:39.480 in, in whatever way, it doesn't matter. It's, it's totally up to us. But then she goes so far
00:26:44.280 as to say that we want to make sure that the content benefits society and, and makes the rather
00:26:51.060 hilarious claim that advertisers are worried about benefiting society, that advertisers only want
00:26:57.900 to be associated with things that benefit society. And we, we know, of course, when it comes to
00:27:03.180 marketing departments and, uh, you know, I've, I've been in marketing meetings before and, uh, that's
00:27:07.980 of course in every marketing advertising meeting, the first thing anyone talks about is how is this
00:27:12.620 going to benefit society? Right. Um, if, if by society, we just mean like the, their bottom line,
00:27:19.200 that's the only thing, of course, they're worried about. So we want to make sure that the content
00:27:22.180 benefits society, she says, but, and, and she's, she's very willing and eager to suppress content
00:27:31.200 that does not quote benefit society or is not harmful, but it's helpful for helpful for her if
00:27:36.820 governments will pass laws and give her that cover. And so she's, she's asking, she's asking
00:27:43.500 governments of the world to pass laws, ostensibly restricting her and her company. She wants those 1.00
00:27:49.960 laws because it gives her the cover she needs to suppress the content. So there is this, this
00:27:54.600 unholy matrimony between big tech and governments of the world, which is why this is not a simple
00:28:03.820 issue of, uh, of private property. This is not a simple issue of private businesses, you know,
00:28:10.340 being able to control their own business and decide who they do business with and who they associate
00:28:14.400 with. That applies exactly to the situations where the left refuses to apply it. Like for example,
00:28:20.960 small independent bakeries in Colorado who don't want to make gay wedding cakes. Okay. 1.00
00:28:26.860 A small bakery in Colorado who says to a gay couple, I will sell you anything in the store. You can have
00:28:32.360 anything you want. You can even have a wedding cake. What I can't do is make a customized wedding cake
00:28:37.620 where I put the little, the, the two little male figures on top of the wedding cake that I can't
00:28:42.360 do. I can sell you the cake. You could go somewhere else and get the little figurines and put it on
00:28:46.180 there. And you're going to, or you can go to any of the 50 other bakeries within a five mile radius
00:28:50.600 and get exactly what you want. Um, now that situation, which of course is not a hypothetical
00:28:56.760 situation. That's the masterpiece cake shop case. Uh, that is a totally private business
00:29:02.240 who should have the ability and the right to decide who they associate with and who they do
00:29:07.440 business with and what kind of business they do. And if they say we're a bakery and we make different
00:29:13.100 kinds of customized cakes, but we don't make cakes for gay weddings, they should have the right to do 1.00
00:29:16.680 that. Now the left though says, Oh, that doesn't cause that's a, you know, this is a, uh, this is an
00:29:22.900 accommodation. This is a service that everyone has a right to. And, uh, it causes great damage to the
00:29:29.240 gay couples if they're not able to get the service that they want at this particular bakery. Um,
00:29:34.800 but then when it comes to YouTube, a multi-billion dollar conglomerate, now they say, Oh, it's a
00:29:42.300 private business. They can do what they want. It is exactly reversed. The, the, the bakery has no,
00:29:50.360 it has no institutional power. There's has no relationship with government. In fact, the government
00:29:54.360 is against the bakery. There's like this conspiracy of governments on every level
00:29:58.760 from the local to the state to federal trying to take down masterpiece cake shop. And they've
00:30:03.520 been doing it for years now. So they have no power from the government. There's no relationship
00:30:08.100 there. And also no harm is really done on a societal level. If, uh, if a gay couple can't 1.00
00:30:16.820 get a cake from this particular, can't get one particular type of cake from this one particular
00:30:20.460 bakery over on YouTube though, or Facebook or Twitter, you have extraordinarily powerful
00:30:28.360 institutions that are in direct, um, conversation with the government. There's this alliance between
00:30:36.020 these are not independent institutions anymore. There's this alliance between them and the
00:30:41.240 government. Um, and what's, what's the penalty? If these supposed private businesses decide that
00:30:49.140 they don't want to do business with you with, with the bakery, the penalty is, okay, you just got
00:30:54.600 to go down the shop to another bakery and get exactly the same cake you wanted. And you're fine.
00:30:58.200 So it's a, it's a slight inconvenience, but with YouTube and Facebook and Twitter, if they decide
00:31:04.480 they want to de-platform you, they are erasing you from the modern public square, which is on the
00:31:09.060 internet. They're, they are taking your voice out of the conversation. They're basically, they are
00:31:12.820 erasing your perspective and your opinion, and they're depriving you of the ability to participate
00:31:17.180 in the national conversation so-called. Um, which is why the private business thing doesn't, shouldn't
00:31:26.960 apply to them. It's a very different sort of situation. All right. Um, let's go right into this. I
00:31:33.180 think it's an interesting, interesting follow-up. This is from the daily wire. It says a bill with
00:31:36.580 bipartisan support will be introduced in the Senate on Wednesday that would require social media
00:31:41.240 companies to add additional steps to protect children under the age of 16. The kids online
00:31:46.700 safety act co-sponsored by Tennessee Republican senators, our Senator Marsha Blackburn and
00:31:51.720 Connecticut Democrat Senator Richard Blumenthal seeks to increase safety standards in the wake of
00:31:57.160 child safety concerns. The proposed bill requires social media platforms to provide a safe default
00:32:02.460 environment and to help prevent potentially destructive impacts. Um, a statement from Blumenthal's office
00:32:08.920 says the legislation also requires independent audits and supports public scrutiny from experts and
00:32:13.860 academic researchers to ensure that parents and policymakers know whether social media platforms are
00:32:17.920 taking meaningful steps to address risks to kids. Blackburn added protecting our kids and teens online
00:32:23.220 is critically important, particularly since COVID increased our reliance on, on technology. Um,
00:32:29.140 the, uh, let's see. Blumenthal also highlighted the importance of internet safety as a top priority for
00:32:33.960 children. He said the kids online safety act would finally give kids and their parents the tools and
00:32:37.980 safeguards. They need to protect against toxic content and hold big tech accountable for deeply
00:32:42.160 dangerous algorithms. Um, now this is another thing, you know, you, the people who say that we
00:32:52.040 can't put any restrictions on YouTube, um, you know, or the, the, the people that talk about private
00:32:58.920 businesses and, and what sort of restrictions we should have on them. You know, this is now we have a
00:33:03.760 breakdown here and there's a lot of inconsistencies with, um, what kind of rules can we put in place
00:33:07.980 for children. What I would say there is, is first of all, um, I think we, I think we have to acknowledge
00:33:14.780 number one, and this is, this is my only problem. My only issue with trying to make social media,
00:33:20.620 uh, safer for kids. My only issue with it is that social media is, is inherently dangerous for kids.
00:33:31.000 So there is, there is no way to actually make it safer. It's an unsafe thing to do. So if you have,
00:33:36.840 if you have your, uh, 15 year old on Instagram or TikTok, yeah, it could be safer than it is right now
00:33:46.660 because right now they're subjected to just this. It's like a, it's like a broken sewage line
00:33:52.480 spraying directly in their face every time they go on the internet and they have access to all of
00:33:57.060 the worst content in the world, bombarding them at, at, uh, the speed of light, right? So it could be
00:34:04.040 better, but it can never actually be safe. So I go back to the analogy of, you know, it's like,
00:34:08.580 it's like recommending that a drunk driver put their seatbelt on. It's safer if you're going to drink
00:34:15.080 and drive. It's definitely safer to have your seatbelt on, but it's, it's not a safe activity.
00:34:18.580 The better thing is just to not drink and drive in the first place. And the better thing for kids
00:34:22.280 is to not let them on social media to begin with really keep them away from the internet as much
00:34:27.540 as possible. But the reality is that a lot of parents are allowing this, even though they shouldn't.
00:34:33.860 And, um, so can we make the internet a little bit safer for kids? I think obviously we should.
00:34:37.780 And so there, there are two categories, you know, there's, um, restrictions put in place to,
00:34:45.900 to protect adults from so-called harmful content. And then, as I said, there's always this subjective
00:34:52.180 nature of a, what do you mean by harmful exactly? That's one conversation, but with kids, you know,
00:34:59.280 society has a special duty to protect children. And this is a responsibility that, that almost all
00:35:06.500 societies throughout history have recognized without even really needing to talk about it.
00:35:12.320 Um, it's only in modern society where this is, where this is a discussion where we actually have
00:35:17.400 to talk about whether we should do that or not, whether we should protect kids.
00:35:22.460 We're, we're in a position right now where an eight year old kid can just go on the internet
00:35:28.780 and go to Google. And in two seconds, he is bombarded with all of the worst filth. I mean,
00:35:36.820 the kinds of images and things and ideas and acts that, um, even adults prior to modern age never
00:35:43.860 would have encountered. And a kid at eight is exposed to this stuff and continually exposed to it
00:35:49.660 all through his formative years. 0.99
00:35:51.960 And we're so stupid that we actually have a conversation about whether we should do anything 0.99
00:35:59.040 to try to prevent that from happening. We actually have a conversation about whether 1.00
00:36:04.140 there should be any laws in place at all, um, to control these companies and to make sure they
00:36:10.980 put safeguards in place so that at least eight year olds aren't exposed to this filth. We shouldn't
00:36:16.840 need to talk about it. Of course there should be laws. And I think this is a good start.
00:36:19.280 All right. Um, here's the latest on the Kim and Kanye drama from Buzzfeed.
00:36:26.780 I don't know why I'm reading this, but we'll read some of it. Uh, it says fans are expressing
00:36:30.980 concern on social media after Kanye West leaked some distressing messages allegedly from Kim
00:36:35.940 Kardashian. But I'm reading this because everyone's talking about this. And so I assume it must be
00:36:40.580 important because people on the internet don't talk about anything that isn't important. I've learned,
00:36:44.180 but before we get into fans responses, here's a quick reminder of how we reach this point,
00:36:47.940 says Buzzfeed. As I'm sure you're aware, Kim filed for divorce from Kanye who legally changed
00:36:53.660 his name to yay. Did he way back in February, 2021, citing irreconcilable differences. The pair
00:37:00.880 who share four children together, their names are North Saint Chicago and Psalm. This sounds like
00:37:08.180 coordinates on a map. That doesn't sound like names of a kids, um, appeared to be functioning
00:37:12.040 amicably as co-parents in the initial wake of the split. However, things took a turn a few months
00:37:16.880 down the line in October after room. Okay. Who cares? So what's the latest on this? I guess,
00:37:21.060 um, Kim Kardashian is sending Kanye West messages because Kanye West has been going after Kim
00:37:26.800 because she's, uh, as I'm talking about this, I'm wondering why I'm Kim Kardashian is dating Pete
00:37:31.780 Davidson, the SNL guy. And Kanye West is dating some other, some, some other chicks, some, some model
00:37:36.100 and, uh, Kanye West doesn't like Pete Davidson. And so Kim Kardashian has been messaging Kanye
00:37:42.600 saying, please stop talking about this publicly. And then Kanye proceeds to post all of those text
00:37:47.860 messages on Instagram of his wife, his ex-wife begging him to keep everything private. And, um,
00:37:53.840 so it's been a big topic of conversation. People taking both sides of it. Here's what I'll say about
00:37:58.600 this. Um, a couple of general principles. And the first is there is very rarely a clear cut good guy
00:38:08.880 in, in, in a marital dispute. I'm not saying there, there never is. I mean, there are certainly
00:38:15.180 occasions where one person in the relationship is obviously the villain and you can pin the blame
00:38:21.920 on him or her for why everything fell apart. That's the case sometimes, but most of the time it isn't.
00:38:30.020 And, uh, you, you can tell that this is the case because if you've ever been in the proximity
00:38:35.720 of a relationship that's falling apart and maybe you're, you know, you're, you're, you're getting
00:38:40.900 the gossip from one member of that relationship and they're telling you everything and you're 1.00
00:38:44.520 thinking, oh, this other person's a scumbag. I had no idea. And then you think at some point to 0.99
00:38:49.380 talk to the other person and you hear their side of it and you're thinking, well, okay, well, there's
00:38:53.180 a lot of details there that the other person left out. That's almost always the way that it goes
00:38:57.000 because human relationships are very complicated. And when you've got two people, they're married,
00:39:01.860 they've lived together for a long time. Um, they, uh, things start going sour.
00:39:07.940 You're usually, I mean, it takes two people to get married and usually it takes two people,
00:39:12.400 uh, for the marriage to fall apart. It takes the, usually takes the consent of both people in some
00:39:16.940 way. And normally that's because, um, when you listen to both sides, you realize that, oh,
00:39:22.620 both of these people are selfish a-holes. Both of these people are incredibly selfish. We're only 0.99
00:39:28.620 focused on themselves the entire time and that's why everything fell apart. I suspect that's probably
00:39:34.640 the case here. In fact, I'm quite certain it is, um, because they, I don't know all the particulars
00:39:41.380 of their relationship, but before you go on the internet and take sides in something like this, 0.99
00:39:46.420 which is a stupid thing to do, even when you know the people, it could be stupid because you 0.94
00:39:52.240 don't know everything that went on, uh, in that relationship. But when you don't know them and 0.99
00:39:56.080 they're celebrities, it's even dumber to take sides, especially in this case, because here's 0.81
00:40:00.060 what we know. Um, they have four kids and they got divorced. So that's strike one against them. 0.96
00:40:07.460 You know, you have, you have kids now really once you get married, the deal should be sealed
00:40:13.220 because you've made that pledge to your betrothed in sickness and health for life and you get divorced
00:40:19.320 and you're breaking that promise. But when you have four kids, then you just got to suck it up.
00:40:25.780 And if you go through, you go through a rough spot in your marriage, um, that's just something
00:40:29.880 that you deal with. You go to counseling or something, um, instead of throwing your kids
00:40:36.720 into this turmoil. So they've both done that. And also they both immediately went and found other
00:40:42.860 people and are parading around in public with their, with this other person while their kids
00:40:47.080 are watching and aware of all of it. Kanye West is doing that. Kim Kardashian is doing that.
00:40:51.360 So there are no good guys here. I'm afraid to say. All right, let's get now to the comment section.
00:41:11.260 Hey, dailywire.com slash sweet baby comments. If you want to leave a video comment, let's, um,
00:41:16.160 okay, we have a comment here taking issue with my stance, I think on sandwiches. Let's listen to
00:41:21.580 that first. Hey, sweet day Wallace. Just wanted to say, I totally agree that Jersey Mike's absolutely
00:41:29.140 at the top of the chain sandwich restaurant chain, but I disagree where you put Arby's on the list.
00:41:35.900 Arby's should absolutely be number two on the list. It should go Jersey Mike's, Arby's,
00:41:42.460 and then Jimmy John's. If you don't agree with me, cancel me, bro. SBG for life.
00:41:49.880 Um, well, yeah, thanks for that. And I mean, it is an important, an important conversation. Um,
00:41:54.600 you know, normally I'm very quick to ban anyone from the show for being wrong. You are wrong, but,
00:41:58.940 um, you've aired on the right side. I think you've aired on the pro Arby side. And so I'm,
00:42:04.600 I'm, that's acceptable. I'll, I'll, I will allow that. Um, I was ready to get very upset when you,
00:42:11.620 when you first started talking about Arby's, cause I thought you were going to tell me as
00:42:14.480 many people have that they don't even deserve to be in the conversation for best sandwich chain.
00:42:18.980 Uh, and I find that deeply offensive. I mean, Arby's is number one, take sandwich chains out
00:42:23.780 of it when it comes to just sort of like dry fast food drive-through, uh, the kind that you,
00:42:28.480 you know, you might see a sign for on when you're, when you're going down the highway.
00:42:31.460 Um, I put Arby's at the top of that list, certainly above McDonald's, Wendy's, I put them above all
00:42:36.000 that. Uh, you, you always know there's a certain consistent quality with Arby's that you always know
00:42:41.580 you're going to get. Um, so if you want to put them up higher on the list, I'm not going to
00:42:45.680 take issue with that actually. So I won't ban you from the show. I mean, you are wrong
00:42:48.520 because it's, it's still superior when you can go into the sandwich chain and you can actually
00:42:55.820 watch them assemble, uh, the sandwich and then you're not going to have the same sogginess and
00:43:00.040 stuff with the bread and everything. But now we're getting into particulars and, uh, uh, but that's,
00:43:04.540 that's fine. All right, let's go to a clip nine here.
00:43:07.000 Hey Matt, I'm so glad my husband listens to your show. This is my Valentine's gift. I was so excited.
00:43:15.860 I instantly knew who gave him the idea. Sweet baby gang for life.
00:43:20.880 So she's holding, this is a, this is a happy wife with a very attentive and romantic husband who has
00:43:27.700 given her apparently, um, 409 cleaner, some Clorox wipes, uh, Clorox wipes. And then I can't tell
00:43:33.840 what she's, Oh, uh, some rubber gloves, some cleaning supplies. So it look, I, I, you can tell
00:43:39.620 from, from her expression, this might be the smile of a woman who just, if you were to pan the camera
00:43:45.980 a little bit, you would see her husband dead on the floor and his blood is spoiling on the floor.
00:43:50.520 Maybe that's why she has the, uh, the rubber gloves there. Cause she's cleaning it up. That 1.00
00:43:53.500 might be the smile we're seeing there. I don't know, but look women. Um, if I've learned anything, 0.70
00:43:59.780 I've been, as you know, married for 10 years, I'm an, I'm a love guru. I'm an expert in this
00:44:03.480 live women. They spend a lot of time in the kitchen, spend a lot of time cleaning. And, 1.00
00:44:08.460 uh, they, when it comes to gifts, they always value practicality. So that's why, you know,
00:44:14.940 you know, they don't want jewelry. What are you gonna do with jewelry? What are you gonna do
00:44:17.580 with flowers? They want things that they can use vacuum toaster cleaning supplies. Take it from me. 1.00
00:44:24.480 All right. Um, this is from two sides. One stone says, I never understood the sticks and stones
00:44:32.780 narrative ever since I was a child, physical assault slash abuse has proven to be far easier
00:44:37.560 to overcome than psychological abuse. We have a need for more and better psychologists for a reason
00:44:43.440 while, while physical therapists are a dime a dozen, it's a coward's way out to pass the responsibility
00:44:49.140 onto the child because the adult doesn't have the guts to, to discipline children or approach
00:44:54.340 parents of other children. You're being bullied. Not me. Here's a catchy tune. So I don't have to
00:44:58.900 do anything. Now leave me alone. Then kids commit suicide and no one saw it coming shifting blame yet
00:45:04.680 again. Okay. Um, first of all, I would take, uh, the, the abuse of a child by an adult. We're going to
00:45:14.620 put that into, obviously I think into a separate category here. Um, if a, if a child is, is the victim
00:45:22.540 of a sustained abuse by an adult, then no one is going to look at that child and say sticks and
00:45:27.180 stones, right? Of course, what we're talking about is, um, the kind of run of the mill things that you
00:45:35.140 run into as a human being in the world, an adult with another adult who says something mean to you,
00:45:41.200 or as a child, when you're at school and kids say mean things to you, that's just part of being a
00:45:46.040 human being. And that's where the sticks and stones rhyme. I think actually does apply. It's
00:45:51.880 a good reminder and it's true. Now you say kids, kids commit suicide, um, at alarming rates and they 0.94
00:45:58.660 do. And oftentimes we link that to bullying at school and that sort of thing, but kids don't
00:46:04.860 commit suicide because of words that are said to them. Okay. There's no, there's not a direct causal
00:46:11.400 link there or, or at the very least you're leaving something out, a really important ingredient.
00:46:17.440 They commit suicide because of the weight that they put on those words, the weight that they put
00:46:25.560 on the approval of their peers. That's why we're seeing this, um, uptick in childhood suicide. And
00:46:33.000 I say uptick because, you know, 60, 70 years ago, you just, this kind of thing, it almost never
00:46:38.380 happened. You just didn't hear about it happening. And now it's quite common. Um,
00:46:44.440 and why is that kids these days depend on their peers approval to a really obsessive, overwhelming
00:46:53.000 degree. And I don't blame the kids for that. It's not their fault. They didn't create the society
00:46:59.360 that they're in now, but they're thrust into an environment. First of all, many of them, they go to
00:47:04.960 school. Um, and they're with their peers physically for, you know, six or seven hours a day, five days
00:47:11.320 a week, nine months a year for 12 or 13 years. So they, this is, they spend most of their time
00:47:15.160 with their peers and they feel like it's, it's, it's almost survival. They need their, their peers
00:47:19.760 to approve, approve of them. Um, and kids also, they're not very good at, at looking at things
00:47:26.640 longterm. Adults aren't good at it either. So a kid, you know, you might tell him that, Hey, look,
00:47:32.880 you're going to graduate high school and you're never going to see most of these people ever
00:47:35.620 again. And a lot of the bullies are going to look back 10 years after you graduate and their
00:47:39.540 lives are miserable and everything. You can tell them that, but they just can't, they can't see
00:47:42.640 that. All they see is what's right in front of them and this environment that they're in every
00:47:45.720 day. And so they, they need the approval of the people that they spend all this time with.
00:47:49.480 And then you add to that, um, the internet and social media, where even after they leave
00:47:56.660 the physical school building, they're still in this peer culture. They're still, they still carry
00:48:02.720 their friends around with them in their pockets and they can't escape it ever. And it becomes
00:48:07.360 suffocating. It's overwhelming. Um, and because they depend so much, then psychologically on their
00:48:13.980 peers approval, when they get mean comments, when they, when that approval is taken away from them,
00:48:18.180 it becomes this catastrophe. The point of sticks and stones is to emphasize though, that a person's
00:48:24.620 words only have the power that you give it. So there, there, there is an important message there
00:48:30.560 that yeah, a person might say something mean to you and they might want to hurt you, but it only,
00:48:37.260 it can only hurt you if you care about that person's opinion. If you choose to put weight on that person's
00:48:44.760 words, that's the only way you can be hurt by what they say to you. And it's the reason why people say
00:48:50.220 mean things to me all the time. And none of it hurts me because I don't care what any of them
00:48:55.360 think. Their opinions mean nothing to me. And that's the point of the message. If somehow you
00:49:01.220 missed the world premiere of shut in this past weekend, head to dailywire.com slash subscribe
00:49:05.640 and get a membership today. The film is now exclusively streaming for daily wire members
00:49:09.640 and currently has a critic score of a hundred percent audience score of 97%. So this is wide acclaim
00:49:15.320 from both critic and audience audiences, which is a pretty rare these days. We are creating more and
00:49:21.180 more great entertainment without a leftist agenda. And it's all thanks to our dailywire members. You
00:49:25.120 guys make this possible. So head to dailywire.com slash subscribe today. So you can watch shut in.
00:49:30.660 And then we've also got other movies coming out, Hyperion's Gina's new movie coming out this summer.
00:49:34.260 All of that is available. Go to dailywire.com slash subscribe. And the best way, you know,
00:49:38.680 to fight the insidious attack on America is to expose the source from within introducing one of the 0.63
00:49:43.940 daily wire's newest projects, the enemy within our new series, featuring acclaimed journalist and
00:49:48.560 expert in national threats, Lee Smith in the show. Smith uncovers a political coup orchestrated by
00:49:53.720 America's ruling elites to generate their own wealth and power at the expense of the American
00:49:57.560 people's safety and freedom from Fauci to our educational system to Hollywood and everything
00:50:01.640 in between each episode will take you deep into what's going on behind the scenes. What those who
00:50:06.360 are supposed to be protecting you don't want you to know, check out the trailer.
00:50:09.680 What if everything we think we know about our leaders,
00:50:14.300 our society and our relations with the rest of the world is wrong?
00:50:22.300 America is facing two major challenges. One is the Chinese Communist Party. However, 0.98
00:50:28.200 the most significant threat comes from within. You're trying to obscure responsibility for 4
00:50:35.300 million people dying around the world. Okay, Senator Paul, you do not know what you are talking about.
00:50:40.980 We've already seen evidence of how the elites want to run the United States. They're modeling
00:50:46.180 themselves after Chinese autocracy. For over a decade, the People's Republic of China
00:50:52.280 has stood publicly accused of acts of cruelty and wickedness that match the cruelty and wickedness
00:51:01.720 of many evil torturers and executions. Diane Feinstein had a Chinese spy as her driver for 20 years.
00:51:12.920 We're not talking about one person infiltrating senior levels at the CIA or the White House. We're
00:51:19.960 talking about an entire elite class throughout the political, corporate, academic, cultural and media
00:51:27.480 established. My name is Lee Smith. I've been a journalist for more than 30 years. This is the most
00:51:34.200 astonishing espionage and infiltration operation in history. What you're going to see in this series
00:51:42.040 will shock you. This is the Enemy Within.
00:51:57.480 The Enemy Within will start streaming this Friday, February 18th, exclusively at Daily Wire. So if
00:52:02.560 you're not a member, now's the time to change that. Head to dailywire.com slash subscribe to join us
00:52:07.340 today. Now let's get to our daily cancellation.
00:52:14.120 Today we cancel a gentleman by the name of James Rose. Sorry, I suppose I should refer to him as a
00:52:20.040 gentleman rather than man because he identifies as a they, as multiple people. On his website,
00:52:25.340 James says that he is a gender fluid actor living in New York City and also includes this note.
00:52:31.120 James writes about gender liberation, eating disorders, trauma, sex, their feelings and their
00:52:37.140 exes on Instagram where they intend to leave the world a little better than they found it.
00:52:41.920 Because, you know, there's no better way to improve the world than by talking about your
00:52:44.360 feelings on Instagram. But James is not just a gender fluid actor and Instagram diarist. He's also
00:52:49.160 a self-described gender educator. Now you may have noticed that literally anyone can describe
00:52:53.680 themselves as an educator these days, which is no surprise because literally anyone can describe
00:52:57.500 themselves as literally anything these days. No labels have any meaning. Words are all empty in
00:53:02.500 this utopia of ours. So shoot for the moon. I mean, speaking of which, I'm going to start describing
00:53:06.080 myself as an astronaut. In fact, I'm a gender astronaut. What does that mean? Well, it's up to
00:53:12.440 me to decide. Your job is to listen and nod your head respectfully as if you know what I'm even trying
00:53:17.420 to say. That brings us back to James, who in his role as gender educator will often post TikTok videos
00:53:22.420 lecturing cis women, as he calls them, about all of their many failures and foibles. Most recently, 0.99
00:53:28.140 he posted a video explaining to women that they're not allowed to feel uncomfortable when penises are 0.98
00:53:33.200 flying around in front of their faces in the locker room. Listen to him. A lot of cis women share this 0.96
00:53:37.600 sentiment, and I do want to break it down. This may be uncomfortable to sit through and to listen to,
00:53:41.420 and I think that's why it's important that we do this. Feeling like trans people are a threat to you 1.00
00:53:45.660 in a space like a bathroom or a locker room is actually a version of internalized misogyny,
00:53:49.820 which is not necessarily your fault because it's impossible to divorce our socialization from the
00:53:54.320 prevalence of patriarchy, but it also does mean it's our responsibility to unlearn it for the safety
00:53:58.460 of fellow women, especially trans women. In my experience as a gender educator, the majority of
00:54:03.020 cis women who have experienced violence at the hands of men or just patriarchy or living in today's
00:54:07.900 world see anything that codes to them as remotely masculine, male, etc., and fear it, which in many
00:54:14.480 ways is a survival tactic that makes sense. The difference is when we code trans people as the
00:54:19.400 wrong gender, we're actually doing them way more a disservice than we are protecting ourselves because 0.99
00:54:23.600 you're ostracizing and further alienating trans people. The false media narrative and trope around
00:54:29.000 trans people is that we are predators that are tricking people into thinking that we're something
00:54:32.760 that we're not, which is of course not true. Watch the documentary Disclosure on Netflix if you want
00:54:36.960 more on that. So being uncomfortable with trans people in your space is something that you were taught,
00:54:41.360 and you can unlearn that. It's important to recognize that we can't tell someone's gender by their
00:54:45.360 presentation, by their genitals, by the way that they look. All of that can be changed. All of that is 0.78
00:54:50.340 arbitrary. None of that is central to your identity necessarily. You know, if the word
00:54:55.460 mansplaining has any application at all, that would have to be it, I think. So let me translate. Here's what
00:55:01.200 our friend James is saying to the ladies out there. He's saying, shut up, you stupid girls, and let him get 1.00
00:55:06.500 naked in front of you. And people like this often get away with saying the most hideous things and being 1.00
00:55:10.960 absolute tyrannical bullies and predators, because for one thing, they're in an improved victim group,
00:55:16.720 but also because of this grating, irritating, faux-compassionate tone they use. Now, any 0.77
00:55:22.120 semi-aware person can recognize that this smug little bastard is being condescending and patronizing as 0.99
00:55:28.280 hell, and that he's doing it in an effort to emotionally black male women into allowing men to 1.00
00:55:33.720 sexually harass them. But the dumber, non-aware people, a large demographic in this culture these 1.00
00:55:38.900 days, unfortunately, will hear this and they'll say, well, he sounds like he's being nice. We 0.99
00:55:42.580 should listen to whatever he says. The interesting thing is that James's message, which is often the
00:55:48.660 message of trans activists, is that your feelings as a woman are not valid. He all but comes out and 0.73
00:55:54.860 says that. Your feelings don't matter. You need to change your feelings. In fact, he knows more about
00:56:01.600 your feelings than you do. He's conducted a therapeutic diagnosis of all the women in the country all at 0.93
00:56:06.760 once, and he's decided that your discomfort with strange penis in a locker room is internalized 0.99
00:56:12.380 misogyny. Did you get that? So if you, as a woman, do not want to see him as a male get naked in front 0.99
00:56:19.580 of you, you are a misogynist. You are now essentially the man in that exchange, not him, and he is the
00:56:26.600 victim of your misogyny. This is coercion of the most twisted kind, all in an effort to compel women
00:56:32.920 to sit quietly while men expose themselves. Louis C.K. was canceled with righteous fury by the mob
00:56:39.900 when he exposed himself in front of women, except that in his case, he asked for permission ahead of
00:56:45.220 time. Doesn't make it okay, but he did. Still, it was argued that even with consent, there was
00:56:51.340 implicit coercion because of the power that he had over the women in the interaction. Well, what about men
00:56:58.580 who do not ask for permission before exposing themselves and who apply explicit coercion to
00:57:04.840 shame women into silence and acquiescence? By the standard already applied to many high-profile men
00:57:11.380 in much more ambiguous circumstances, these guys are sex predators. Now, the simplified view of our
00:57:19.460 cultural ethos is that feelings are given first priority. Feelings matter above all else.
00:57:24.220 I've often said this myself as recently as yesterday. And it's true, but the statement
00:57:29.940 needs qualification because it's more accurate to say that some people's feelings matter above all
00:57:35.140 else. If feelings in general were given pride of place, then James Rose would be roundly condemned
00:57:41.620 by everybody for recording videos lecturing women about the illegitimacy of their feelings.
00:57:48.700 He's allowed to do this because his feelings as a member of the LGBT camp are of utmost importance.
00:57:54.660 Primary importance. But the feelings of a woman, especially a white cisgender woman, quote-unquote,
00:58:00.720 don't necessarily rank at all. And when her feelings are made to contest with the feelings of the sacred
00:58:06.380 alphabet people, her feelings are then ascribed a negative value. Her feelings aren't just unimportant,
00:58:12.660 they're bad, they're shameful. They are a sin that must be punished, a disease that must be cured.
00:58:17.860 See, if the left put an overemphasis on everybody's feelings and they were obsessively concerned with
00:58:23.980 making sure that nobody ever felt sad or uncomfortable, that would still be bad and
00:58:28.300 dangerous in its own way. But at least we could call them well-intentioned. We could even say that their
00:58:32.020 problem is an overabundance of compassion or a kind of misdirected, misappropriated compassion.
00:58:37.860 Either way, they would be good people. They'd be nice people. A little bit too nice. Just
00:58:44.140 misguided. That's not the case, though. On balance, it turns out that they care less about
00:58:51.140 feelings than even I do. Because there's only a very select group of people whose feelings rank
00:58:56.860 at all, and everybody else can go to hell, they say. Let's look at one more clip from James as
00:59:02.200 he now responds to some of the comments taking issue with the video we just played. Listen to this.
00:59:07.320 See, you've caught me at the time when I'm not feeling diplomatic and I'm just going to yell.
00:59:10.260 This is a horrible comment. And I don't need to defend any of my behavior, aka walking down the
00:59:14.620 street as a freaking non-binary woman. But I'm gonna. Feeling uncomfortable with trans people walking 1.00
00:59:19.020 down the street is just your transphobia. Because as a fellow femme, I understand the danger and the
00:59:23.980 terror and the fear of walking around on the street, especially at night. I live in New York
00:59:28.220 City. Don't even get me started. And because I'm aware of what it feels like to be on the receiving
00:59:32.200 end of that as a femme and as a non-binary woman, when I see another potentially feminine presenting 1.00
00:59:37.660 person in front of me, I will say things like, coming behind on your left or just don't want to
00:59:42.340 scare you, coming behind on your right. Something that lets them know that I'm there so they don't
00:59:45.980 feel fear. And I do this as a courtesy on the off chance they misgender me and think I'm a man.
00:59:50.000 That's just camaraderie and looking out for each other. The fact that you feel like I would be
00:59:53.680 unsafe on the street is literally just a coding for I don't conceptualize you as a non-binary person
00:59:58.780 or as a woman. I don't need that energy on my page. Get out. So somehow we've gone from talking 0.97
01:00:03.800 about locker rooms to walking down the street. I'm not sure when that shift in the conversation
01:00:08.300 happened. But even so, first of all, note how he, a male, identifies as a non-binary woman.
01:00:15.560 Now, non-binary, if it means anything at all, which it doesn't, means that someone is not a man or a
01:00:21.160 woman. So he, a male, is also a woman, but also neither a man nor a woman, but also a man.
01:00:26.880 And not only does he hold this incoherent jumble of self-identities in his confused head,
01:00:31.360 but it also is your responsibility as a woman to know that just by looking at him as he passes by
01:00:38.320 in the street. Now, James and his generosity, he will give you permission as a woman to be nervous
01:00:44.880 when you're alone at night and a man walks by. He will allow that. So you should say thank you to
01:00:51.680 James for that because he's going to let you have that feeling. Say thank you, Mr. James or Miss James
01:00:56.860 or whatever. But if the man walking by identifies as a woman, or if he identifies as a woman who
01:01:03.360 identifies as neither a man nor a woman, but is a man, then you must not feel nervous.
01:01:09.460 You must intuit his self-perception in that moment. You must absorb it into your being in a split
01:01:15.980 second. And if you don't, then you're a transphobe. This is the way the world works,
01:01:21.720 according to this pompous, overbearing, megalomaniacal ass. You must conform to his 1.00
01:01:28.860 version of the world. That's what you have to do. Or you can simply tell this person and every
01:01:35.020 bullying narcissist like him to piss off. And also you can tell him that he is canceled. And that's 0.97
01:01:40.780 what I would recommend. And we'll leave it there for today. Thanks for watching. Thanks for listening.
01:01:44.660 Have a great day. Godspeed.
01:01:50.540 Well, if you enjoyed this episode, don't forget to subscribe. And if you want to help spread the
01:01:54.640 word, please give us a five-star review. Also, tell your friends to subscribe as well. We're available
01:01:59.320 on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, wherever you listen to podcasts. We're there. Also, be sure to check out
01:02:03.980 the other Daily Wire podcasts, including the Ben Shapiro Show, Michael Knowles Show,
01:02:07.560 the Andrew Klavan Show. Thanks for listening. The Matt Wall Show is produced by Sean Hampton,
01:02:12.000 executive producer Jeremy Boring. Our supervising producer is Mathis Glover. Our technical director
01:02:17.040 is Austin Stevens. Production manager, Pavel Vodowski. The show is edited by Robbie Dantzler.
01:02:22.280 Our audio is mixed by Mike Coromina. Hair and makeup is done by Cherokee Heart. And our production
01:02:26.760 coordinator is McKenna Waters. The Matt Wall Show is a Daily Wire production. Copyright Daily Wire 2022.
01:02:31.360 Today on the Ben Shapiro Show, three San Francisco school board members lose their jobs in a recall
01:02:37.300 and the left prepares its next war on dissent with debanking efforts. That's today on the Ben Shapiro
01:02:41.480 Show. Give it a listen.