Ep. 936 - Here Lies CNN+, May It Rest In Peace
Episode Stats
Words per Minute
174.88074
Summary
It's Mother's Day, and it's time to start thinking about what you want to do to make your mom feel special this holiday season. Today on the Matt Walsh Show, tragedy strikes as CNN's new streaming service crashes and burns right after takeoff. Also, Republicans in Florida officially pass a bill to revoke Disney s special privileges, and AOC warns about another January 6th on the horizon. And Jen Psaki tries to explain why kindergarten teachers might need to talk about gender identity with their students. We'll talk about all that and more today on The Matt WIlliams Show.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Today on the Matt Wall Show, tragedy strikes as CNN's new streaming service crashes and burns
00:00:04.360
right after takeoff. It's a terrible thing. Also, Republicans in Florida officially passed the bill
00:00:08.080
to revoke Disney's special privileges, but some conservatives are uncomfortable with this kind of
00:00:12.160
aggressiveness from the right. And Johnny Depp has audio proving that he is the victim of domestic
00:00:16.640
abuse. AOC warns about another January 6th on the horizon, and Jen Psaki tries to explain why
00:00:22.060
kindergarten teachers might need to talk about gender identity with their students. Her reasoning
00:00:26.920
leaves a lot to be desired. We'll talk about all that and more today on the Matt Wall Show.
00:00:40.200
With Mother's Day coming just around the corner, it's time to start thinking about what you want
00:00:44.100
to do to make your mom feel special. I've been trying to think about what I want to give my mom
00:00:48.180
this Mother's Day season, and all I can think about is the time where I refused to fix her VHS player
00:00:53.400
over this past holiday season, which I admitted to. Now, I'm not going to apologize for that because
00:00:58.140
I refuse to apologize for anything, but instead I'm going to give my mom something that she will
00:01:02.800
be thanking me for, so that she should have to apologize to me at the end of this. I'm going to
00:01:07.840
give her a reason to throw away the VHS player once and for all with Legacy Box. Legacy Box is the
00:01:12.520
best company out there when it comes to digitally preserving all of your sentimental things, but also
00:01:17.680
outdated belongings. That's why they've helped millions of people digitize their belongings over the
00:01:22.220
past decade. Just send Legacy Box all your videotape, film reels, photos, and whatever else
00:01:27.000
you have in their team over of over 200 trained technicians will hand digitize everything. You can
00:01:32.300
track their progress along the way with their online tracking system, and once they're done,
00:01:36.100
they'll send you all your original copies along with digital copies stored on a thumb drive,
00:01:39.620
the cloud, or DVD. Now my mom won't have to worry about having a working VHS player anymore,
00:01:43.980
and she can show all my embarrassing videos and photos to my wife easily over the holidays,
00:01:47.980
although she's already shown all of them to my wife, so it's not going to be any news there. You can do the
00:01:51.760
same for your mom this Mother's Day by visiting LegacyBox.com slash Walsh right now to get 60%
00:01:56.480
off your order. That's LegacyBox.com slash Walsh. Well, it is the first segment of the show on a
00:02:02.360
beautiful Friday, and I wanted to do something fun and lighthearted because I am, of course,
00:02:06.800
known for being fun and lighthearted. That's not going to be possible today, as there has been
00:02:11.780
a deeply tragic event, indeed a series of deeply tragic events that I must address. This has been a week of
00:02:19.640
loss, heartbreak, grief, calamity after calamity, tribulation after tribulation. It all began on
00:02:26.940
Monday with the terrible news that Jon Stewart's new show on Apple is failing. This came as a great
00:02:33.540
shock to the nation, mostly because the nation didn't realize that Jon Stewart had a new show,
00:02:37.980
but he does for now. And just five weeks into its run, the latest episode was viewed only 40,000 times.
00:02:44.340
Yes, 40,000. Now, to put that in perspective, 40,000 is a fraction of the audience that I have
00:02:50.460
for my podcast, and I used to do this thing in my car. In fact, yesterday, I did a 10-minute monologue
00:02:55.420
about a woman whose boyfriend is digging a big hole in the ground, and we clipped that and posted
00:03:00.480
it separately on YouTube for some reason, and even that has more than 40,000 views. More people are
00:03:06.400
interested in hearing me talk about a hole in the ground than are interested in hearing Jon Stewart
00:03:11.460
talk about anything. I'd like to think that's a reflection of my brilliant oratory about holes,
00:03:16.940
but I think it's probably more a statement about the near complete lack of interest in Jon Stewart.
00:03:21.640
No doubt, Jon Stewart himself is flummoxed by all this. After all, he has used every episode
00:03:26.760
of his new show to worship the god of wokeness. He has made all the sacrificial offerings. He's burned
00:03:32.900
the incense and performed the incantations. He's flagellated himself and repented of his whiteness
00:03:38.600
over and over and over again. He's done everything he could, and yet his ratings continue to plummet.
00:03:44.540
Soon he'll have an audience size comparable to what, say, your uncle might get if he did a Facebook
00:03:49.200
live for his 32 friends on Facebook. The whole situation has led to lots of analysis and speculation
00:03:55.240
and, most tragically of all, think pieces. One think piece published in The Atlantic yesterday
00:04:00.160
spends many thousands of words trying to figure out what happened to Jon Stewart and why he isn't as
00:04:04.980
funny and smart as he was back in his Daily Show days. There's been a lot of theorizing about this
00:04:09.900
point, and amid all the discussion and conjecture, somehow nobody has remembered that Daily Show,
00:04:14.540
the Daily Show Jon Stewart was reading lines off of a teleprompter that somebody else wrote for him.
00:04:20.620
So maybe he's not as smart and funny anymore because he was never that smart and funny. His writers were
00:04:25.520
smart and funny, and even then, not nearly as smart and funny as everybody pretended. That's one thought.
00:04:29.880
But whatever the cause of this current situation, it is a terrible thing. And I feel bad, very bad,
00:04:36.460
very bad for Jon Stewart. But the tragedy doesn't end there. The very next day, it was announced,
00:04:42.320
and again, this all happened this week. It was announced that things aren't much better over
00:04:46.480
on Apple TV's main competitor, Netflix. It was revealed that Netflix actually lost subscribers,
00:04:51.520
200,000 total, in the first quarter of 2022. And this news sent Netflix stock tumbling,
00:04:58.840
so that now the company has lost $50 billion. Once again, analysts are flabbergasted.
00:05:05.740
How could Netflix be losing so many subscribers? It's unexplainable. Netflix itself blames the war
00:05:12.340
in Ukraine. They say that it's Putin's fault. And that's not a joke, by the way. That's really what
00:05:17.260
they're saying. Yet another outrage committed by Putin. First, his invasion of Ukraine causes a gas price
00:05:23.220
spike that was already happening before he invaded Ukraine. Then his invasion of Ukraine causes a
00:05:27.960
supply chain crisis that was already happening before he invaded Ukraine. Then his invasion of
00:05:32.200
Ukraine causes inflation that was already happening before he invaded Ukraine. And now he's stealing
00:05:37.140
subscribers from Netflix. I bet he's also the one stopping people from watching Jon Stewart,
00:05:42.360
by the way. Now we know that the subscriber loss can't have anything to do with the product
00:05:48.020
that Netflix is offering, because that product is uniformly spectacular. I mean, for example,
00:05:53.960
just this week, Netflix announced a new film called He's Expecting about a pregnant man.
00:06:01.340
And the trailer for this film, by the way, stipulates that this is a cisgender, quote unquote,
00:06:07.200
pregnant man. Obviously, the sort of material people want to see and would see, if not for Putin.
00:06:14.740
This brings us finally to the tragic grand finale. The week's last indignity. The thing that nearly broke
00:06:23.140
me. The announcement was made at the end of this week. CNN's new streaming service, CNN Plus,
00:06:30.380
which was launched only a month ago, will be shutting down. It lasted for a month.
00:06:35.960
A month. The company invested $300 million into it, and it lasted a month. My God, my God,
00:06:46.360
why have you forsaken CNN Plus? Why did the world forsaken? Reportedly, the service was attracting
00:06:51.800
only 10,000 viewers a day. Only 10,000. They could have literally quadrupled their audience if they
00:06:58.500
hired Jon Stewart. You know, Tim Pool has a live stream of his chicken coop that easily pulls more
00:07:04.020
than 10,000 viewers in a day, his chicken coop. 300 million for 10,000 viewers means that their
00:07:10.800
cost of acquisition per viewer was like $30,000. So by my math, if they wanted to reach the Daily
00:07:16.640
Wire subscriber numbers at 30,000 a pop, it would only cost them about $18 billion. So it's a bad
00:07:24.780
situation, in other words. And now CNN Plus is no more. Once again, though, media analysts are
00:07:32.060
mystified, especially the media analysts at CNN. Why don't people want to watch CNN Plus? Sure,
00:07:37.840
nobody wants to watch regular CNN, but let's try to do some more math here. If nobody wants to watch
00:07:43.340
something, and then you offer more of the thing that nobody wants to watch, shouldn't that equal
00:07:50.260
like a million viewers or something? What's zero times a million? Isn't it a million? I have to check
00:07:55.720
my calculator. However the numbers shake out, this is simply shocking. I mean, CNN Plus had a show with
00:08:01.820
Chris Wallace, and he's the guy who had a Fox show that nobody cared about, and then he left to a
00:08:06.940
network that nobody cares about on a streaming platform that nobody cares about. And somehow,
00:08:10.620
yet again, this failed to generate excitement. The real crucial mistake CNN made was not immediately
00:08:17.840
striking a deal to ensure that CNN Plus is streaming in every airport terminal and dentist office
00:08:22.640
waiting room in the entire country, because that has long been their target demo. Indeed,
00:08:26.540
their only demo. Now look, we can sit here commiserating about the spectacular failures of
00:08:35.640
Jon Stewart, Netflix, CNN. We can hold each other and cry, and we should. But the one thing I've learned
00:08:44.600
from the media this week, and this is the most important takeaway, is that none of this is a reflection
00:08:50.440
on their ideology. Okay? None of this means that people are sick of woke leftist sermonizing.
00:08:58.500
You might think that that's the lesson here, but it's not. That is not the takeaway. Literally
00:09:05.140
anything else is the takeaway. Blame anything but that, but especially blame Putin. And frankly,
00:09:12.800
blame yourselves for not supporting these wonderful endeavors. You are all clearly in league with Putin.
00:09:20.440
And your dastardly plot has caused grave injuries to Jon Stewart and Netflix. And now you have taken the life
00:09:26.460
of CNN Plus. You have blood on your hands, you monsters. Brian Stelter is crying himself to sleep
00:09:33.560
every night because of you. Anderson Cooper is traumatized. Don Lemon is humiliated.
00:09:38.620
Look at what you've done to these great men. Shame on you all. May God have mercy on your souls.
00:09:57.600
The value of the minivan, pickup, sedan, or whatever you drive probably appreciated significantly last
00:10:02.460
year. Take care of your automotive investment and keep more of your money by buying the auto parts you
00:10:07.080
need to maintain and repair your vehicle at rockauto.com. Rockauto.com only sells auto parts
00:10:11.500
and related tools, and they've been doing it for over 20 years. Their unique intuitive catalog includes
00:10:15.780
photos, specs, and installation tips that make it easy to choose the correct parts for your specific
00:10:20.080
vehicle. They not only have the auto parts you need, but will give you a selection of trusted name
00:10:24.140
brands to choose from. You can pick brakes that match how you use your vehicle, whether that's for
00:10:28.440
towing, racing, or just commuting to work. You can get suspension, exhaust, air conditioning, and other
00:10:32.300
kits that provide all the parts you need for a successful repair. Rockauto.com has lots of parts that you
00:10:37.020
might expect would only be available at car dealerships if they're available at all. Parts
00:10:41.180
like the fan inside your seat that cools your tush, which is the word that's being put in this
00:10:46.720
copy for me to read. Rockauto.com, prices are always reliably low. That means they do not change
00:10:53.080
prices based on what the market will bear like many airlines and marketplace sites do. Why would you put
00:10:57.700
tush in? Now that's out there. I actually said that now. Anyway, go to rockauto.com for your auto parts
00:11:03.560
and write Walsh in there. How did you hear about us, Box? So they know that I sent you.
00:11:07.720
Sorry about that. It got a little more emotional than I thought it would. I just, if I feel so bad
00:11:12.160
for these, I feel so bad for them. And by the way, on a positive note, I got to say happy Earth Day to
00:11:19.080
everyone. It is Earth Day, I believe. This is a great day, great holiday, which was invented by a
00:11:23.480
psycho hippie who murdered his girlfriend and put her in a compost bin. Now you might say that this is
00:11:29.460
something in Earth Day's favor because it proves how committed the founder was to recycling. But I
00:11:34.120
think it more just kind of goes to show how modern environmentalism loves all of nature except for
00:11:39.740
human beings. So it's quite appropriate actually that Earth Day was invented by a murderer. And
00:11:45.560
that's my problem with environmentalists, not that they're all murderers, although I suspect probably
00:11:49.060
most of them are, is that I can't give you credit for loving nature if you exclude humanity
00:11:55.660
from your affections. If your love of nature, you know, if you love nature but hate humanity,
00:12:02.160
then what does your love actually mean? Because first of all, nature exists for us. I mean,
00:12:09.360
trees and rivers and flowers are significant because rational creatures give them significance.
00:12:16.280
Like if you found out that a planet in another solar system with no rational life on it,
00:12:21.140
but a bunch of trees and flowers blew up, how would you feel? Would you see it as some great
00:12:26.520
tragedy? It's not like any suffering happened. Only rational creatures can suffer. You could destroy
00:12:31.860
a billion trees and it would cause no suffering at all of any kind unless there are rational beings
00:12:38.480
around to be affected by it. But I think the other thing is this, and we'll get to the headlines in
00:12:45.100
a second, is that loving nature is easy. I mean, we should love nature as long as we don't worship it
00:12:53.040
like the left so often does, as long as we don't love it more than humanity. But in proportion,
00:13:00.300
loving nature is a good thing, but it's easy. I mean, I love nature. I actually love it a whole
00:13:07.720
hell of a lot more than the average urban dwelling environmentalist. You know, those nature lovers who
00:13:12.620
choose to surround themselves every day with concrete and plastic and glass. I don't do that.
00:13:18.300
I could go out on a lake and be out there all day. I'm also, I'm going to start beekeeping again
00:13:24.920
to go along with my new aquarium that I'm getting, as I told you about yesterday. As a beekeeper,
00:13:29.980
I will be doing and have done more to save the planet than any vegan. That's for sure. But all that
00:13:37.280
said, it's easy to love beautiful lakes and mountains and trees and stuff like that.
00:13:43.320
It's mostly a self-serving love. Like you, you love those things because of how they make you feel.
00:13:48.380
Um, you know, you find it beautiful and you like being around beautiful things. And so that's why
00:13:53.640
you love it. And that's fine. But loving people is more difficult because people are complicated.
00:13:59.080
People have their own designs, their own minds. There's conflict with people. People can lie,
00:14:04.140
they can cheat, they can steal. They're also capable of heroism and selflessness. I mean,
00:14:07.580
people make moral choices, often bad, sometimes good though. And I just, what I've noticed is that
00:14:13.500
lots of people in our society have given up on people, on humanity, and they've retreated into
00:14:20.760
this love of nature or loving their pets or whatever at the expense of, or instead of people.
00:14:27.860
And that's my problem with it. Anyway, happy Earth Day. Please don't kill and compost your
00:14:33.700
loved ones today. Um, all right. Yesterday, the Florida house voted finally in favor of revoking
00:14:40.180
Disney's special legal and tax privileges. And, um, that means, and, and Ron DeSantis has already said
00:14:46.360
that he's going to sign it. So it's going to happen. Let's, uh, dip into this and just check out
00:14:51.560
that glorious moment for a moment here. And we will vote on these two bills.
00:14:57.500
It is my hope that we will be able to proceed civilly and with decorum and with respect for one
00:15:03.620
another. Read the next bill. By Senator Bradley, Senate bill 4C, a bill to be entitled an act
00:15:24.020
Representative Fine, you're recognized to explain your bill.
00:15:26.020
What they're screaming in the background there.
00:15:27.660
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. It seems as Mickey and Minnie have joined us.
00:15:34.100
Whatever they're screaming, they're fans of grooming children and they're big Disney fans.
00:15:37.780
And those two things seem to go hand in hand, especially recently.
00:15:42.600
Okay. So they voted, they voted for it. Um, not everyone agrees, as you can tell, to put it mildly.
00:15:48.660
In fact, I got in trouble yesterday by, with media matters for something that I said about this,
00:15:53.020
uh, on, on the show yesterday. Let's put up the tweet from, uh, Jason Campbell, who's the
00:15:58.640
media matters hall monitor. It says daily wire host calls for taking Mickey mouse's head and putting
00:16:05.400
it on a spike. And it's true. It's true that I did say that, but I also said I was speaking
00:16:09.000
metaphorically. You know, I'm talking about decapitating, decapitating Mickey mouse in a
00:16:13.420
strictly metaphorical way. What's wrong with, with metaphorical language? Am I being attacked now
00:16:18.540
for, for, for being a poet? Is that what's going on here? But maybe media matters is right. I mean,
00:16:23.800
this is violent and dangerous rhetoric about a cartoon character. We should not threaten violence
00:16:27.900
against fictional cartoon characters. Just wait until they hear what I would do to those
00:16:32.720
bastards at Paw Patrol, the most annoying cartoon characters of all time. I take them to the vet
00:16:38.840
to be euthanized in a second. I tell you that, but the left, you know, is, is upset about this.
00:16:43.820
And we know that of course, the more important discussion is on the right. Whereas we, as we
00:16:48.680
talked about yesterday, some conservatives, especially in media are also upset about what
00:16:53.460
DeSantis is doing, um, with the actions that he's taking about Disney. And we reviewed some of
00:16:57.880
those arguments yesterday. Now David French has weighed in. And, um, as you might expect,
00:17:02.100
he calls this an about face on free speech. That seems to be the line that the, that some
00:17:06.200
on the right are taking is that by revoking special privileges from Disney, it's an attack
00:17:12.260
on their free speech rights somehow. Jenna Ellis is a conservative who I like and who is often
00:17:19.460
right about things, but she gets this one wrong. Um, here's, here's her take on this. Let's listen.
00:17:23.380
Disney isn't doing anything illegal or immoral in terms of action by their statement. Now is the
00:17:33.280
statement advancing an immoral viewpoint? Yes. But in terms of under the law, Disney isn't doing
00:17:40.240
anything other than exercising constitutionally protected speech. That is the entire point of this
00:17:48.980
conversation. And so people on Twitter have been so outraged saying, no, go salt the earth, go
00:17:56.580
retaliate against Disney, go tear them down. Democrats do this to conservatives all the time. And so Ron
00:18:03.160
DeSantis should finally go after Disney. I'm glad to see a Republican finally exercising the same types
00:18:09.100
of fights that Democrats do. Well, let's think about that for a moment. Just because the Democrats
00:18:14.840
wield unconstitutional power and try to get away with it does not in any way justify Republicans
00:18:21.740
doing the same. Okay. So let's, let's just clear this up here. Um, what they're doing in Florida
00:18:28.680
right now, Republicans are doing is they are taking away special privileges that have been granted to
00:18:34.120
Disney and to no other corporations in the state. They were their own literal kingdom, their own
00:18:42.380
fiefdom and, uh, they were able to govern themselves and they got massive, massive tax breaks out of it
00:18:49.400
that have certainly totaled in the billions of dollars since this, uh, policy was put in place
00:18:54.980
back in the 19, 1967, I think. So that's what we're talking about. Special privileges. So how can it be
00:19:03.140
an attack on free speech to revoke special privileges? Do they have, do they have a right to those
00:19:07.360
privileges? Well, they don't cause that's why they're privileges. Do they have a right to the
00:19:12.200
tax breaks? Do they have a right to, to self govern their 40 square miles of land or whatever they own?
00:19:20.300
Is that a, is that a constitution? Where is that in the constitution? Exactly. Where is it in the
00:19:24.340
constitution that says that Disney has a right to tax breaks?
00:19:30.900
No, you're, you're taking those privileges away that they have no right to. So as far as I'm
00:19:38.140
concerned, um, there goes the free speech argument. It's got nothing to do with free speech.
00:19:44.700
There's not, they're not passing a law saying that, um, Disney as a corporation isn't allowed
00:19:50.240
to express their views in favor of grooming children. That's not what it is.
00:19:55.660
It's just that you're not going to get these privileges anymore. And why aren't you going
00:20:01.280
to get them? Well, I don't see really why there needs to even be a specific reason.
00:20:07.600
You had these privileges, no one else had them. Now you don't get them anymore.
00:20:12.180
Is it a constitutional obligation to justify the revocation of privileges justified in a way
00:20:20.800
that Disney will find sufficient? Is that, is that the constitutional obligation of Ron DeSantis?
00:20:26.160
I don't see how it is, but actually there is a very good reason in this case, um, aside from
00:20:34.260
exacting revenge on Disney, which is the part about it that I like, but that's probably not the,
00:20:41.240
the kind of legal argument that Ron DeSantis would make. I think the only argument you need to make
00:20:47.220
is that it doesn't serve the interest, the public interest anymore to give them these privileges.
00:20:54.220
It does not, um, serve the interests of people in Florida to give these privileges to Disney.
00:21:05.640
Why doesn't it serve the public interest? Well, uh, for one thing, because Disney is using
00:21:10.180
its vast resources, um, to promote the sexual indoctrination and abuse of children.
00:21:21.040
And if they're going to do that, we're not going to provide them a tax sheltered forum and platform
00:21:28.100
to do it. So it does not serve the public interest anymore to give them these privileges.
00:21:34.960
Whether it ever did is a entirely different question. It certainly doesn't now.
00:21:43.660
So it's just, it's hard for me to, for, to tolerate this, you know, on the left,
00:21:50.800
they, they sick the government on, you know, cake bakers who actually are exercising their
00:21:59.160
first amendment rights. They'll go after anybody. And we're not talking mega corporations, which is
00:22:07.040
what Disney is. We're not talking about a multi-billion dollar, uh, global conglomerate.
00:22:14.700
They'll go after just some, some guy baking cakes in Colorado.
00:22:19.740
And relentlessly, they'll never stop. They still haven't stopped.
00:22:22.460
They'll keep going until they destroy you. And that is simply because they don't like your speech
00:22:29.540
and your values. And they can do that. And then we decide simply to revoke special privileges from
00:22:39.160
a mega corporation because they're advocating for the, the sexual grooming of children. And we have
00:22:45.300
people on our own side saying, this makes me uncomfortable. I don't know about this.
00:22:48.920
It's just, it's just, I'm uncomfortable with it. And that's what it is. They're just,
00:22:54.140
they're uncomfortable with it. And they're, they don't know exactly why they're uncomfortable with
00:22:58.160
it. And so they're just like looking for a reason to justify their discomfort. And that's how they fall
00:23:02.520
on this free speech thing, which makes no sense at all because you do not have for the 50th time,
00:23:07.560
you don't have a first amendment right to tax privileges. It is a privilege.
00:23:13.940
So that's what I see is, is you don't really have much of an argument against it, but you're looking
00:23:21.560
for one. And why are you looking for one? I guess because for some people on the right to see others
00:23:30.300
on the right going on the offense, going on the attack, being proactive instead of constantly playing
00:23:37.800
defense. It just, they're not used to it. And, um, and that's what makes them uncomfortable.
00:23:43.160
It's, it's kind of a shock to the system, understandably in some ways, actually,
00:23:56.480
leader, you know, a political leader at, at any level,
00:24:03.400
who's the last one to do something similar to what Ron DeSantis is doing right now?
00:24:09.920
I don't think we've ever seen anything like this.
00:24:13.440
Um, because we're so used to Republicans just being milquetoast and, and, and as we talked about
00:24:19.700
yesterday, just being kind of speed bumps, lying down on the road and, uh, hoping that you can
00:24:24.220
slow the progress of the, of the left slightly as they run right over you. You're used to that.
00:24:29.880
It becomes a shock to the system when you don't see it. And I also think that there are some on the
00:24:34.540
right who, um, actually prefer losing. They prefer to be in the controlled opposition camp and they
00:24:40.960
kind of just, and it's, it's easier to, to do that, to, to lose. There's not as much pressure.
00:24:46.480
You don't have to actually lead. You don't have to have a vision. If all you do is lose
00:24:54.000
and you have your role and you play it. And, uh, and it gives you something to complain about,
00:25:07.220
Well, we're done with that now. Now we're going on the offense. This is great. Okay. Let's go
00:25:11.800
here. Johnny Depp is in a defamation case against his ex-wife, Amber Heard. And, um, I haven't
00:25:17.820
followed the case that closely because I don't care all that much, but I thought this was
00:25:20.580
interesting yesterday. Here's audio of his wife. Um, and they've both got audio and video of each
00:25:28.540
other. They've just been filming and, and documenting each other apparently throughout
00:25:33.620
their marriage, which is really a healthy sign of a healthy marriage is when you're constantly,
00:25:37.220
you've constantly feel a need to secretly record your spouse. So here's one recording of, uh,
00:25:42.080
Johnny Depp's wife, ex-wife now, Amber Heard admitting that she hit him. Although she has a,
00:25:48.460
an interesting distinction that she tries to draw in order to justify the abuse. But listen,
00:25:54.500
I said to you, Hey, tell Travis what just happened. Oh, you told me to do it. You told me to,
00:26:00.600
you said, go do that. I said, no, tell him what just happened. And I lied. And that you punched me in the
00:26:04.780
thing. You figured it out. And you said, no, I didn't. What the
00:26:09.640
you talking about? And I watched you lie. I didn't punch you, by the way. You, I'm sorry that I
00:26:15.500
didn't, uh, uh, hit you across the face in a proper slap, but I was hitting you. It was not
00:26:20.960
punching you. Babe, you're not punched. Don't tell me what it feels like to be punched. You know,
00:26:26.780
even a lot of fights you've been around a long time. I know. Yeah. No, you didn't get punched.
00:26:32.500
You got hit. I'm sorry. I hit you like this, but I did not punch you. I did not deck you.
00:26:38.420
I was hitting you. I don't know what the motion of my actual hand was, but you're fine. I did not
00:26:45.880
hurt you. I did not punch you. I was hitting you. How, what am I supposed to do? Do this?
00:26:51.360
I'm not sitting here about it. Am I? You are. That's the difference between me and you. You're a
00:26:55.820
baby. You are such a baby. Grow the up, Johnny. Okay. I think we heard enough of that. These are
00:27:05.460
just such broken people in Hollywood, broken, empty people, which is why their marriages never work
00:27:13.360
out. You know, you take two broken, empty people and you put them in a marriage together. It's
00:27:18.500
very rarely is going to work. Um, so her argument is that, uh, I didn't punch you. I hit you. So
00:27:25.900
that's, I'm not, I'm not quite sure. I understand the distinction between the two things and a couple
00:27:30.900
of things here. First of all, I know part of Amber Heard's claim is that she was abused and,
00:27:37.780
and, uh, terrorized by and terrified of Johnny Depp. But you listen to audio like that and it's,
00:27:44.500
that's, that's, I don't exactly hear a woman who's terrified of her husband or who's abused when,
00:27:49.700
when she's, uh, admitting to physically striking him and, and, uh, is mocking him.
00:27:59.880
Does that seem like a woman who's afraid of her husband? I just hit you. You're being a big baby.
00:28:05.380
Is that what you say when you're afraid of somebody? But then the other thing, of course,
00:28:09.640
is that, is that the, the massive, the massive glaring double standard. And if there's a double
00:28:18.160
standard with anything, it is with this, is with, uh, situations like this, marital disputes,
00:28:22.780
especially domestic abuse issues. You just imagine that audio the other way. Imagine there's audio of
00:28:31.000
Johnny Depp saying to Amber Heard, oh, I didn't, I didn't punch you. I hit you, you big baby. Can you
00:28:36.740
imagine that if that, if that audio was out there? But we have that of Amber Heard and there are
00:28:42.880
still, there are actually people that still take her side. Because even the people, and indeed,
00:28:50.280
in fact, actually, especially the people who claim that men and women are exactly the same,
00:28:54.600
there's no difference. The distinction is entirely arbitrary.
00:28:57.340
Um, they say that, and yet they just, they do not put male on female, they don't put female on male
00:29:07.200
domestic abuse nearly on the same plane as male on female. That's the fact. Okay. AOC was at a town
00:29:13.500
hall yesterday and she had a lot to say, including, um, about January 6th. She's still panicking about
00:29:19.840
January 6th. And she says that it's not over. You know, they're out there gathering their forces
00:29:26.200
and they're going to invade the Capitol again. Listen to this.
00:29:30.940
If we lose the house, this is no joke. January 6th was a trial run. And a lot of people don't seem
00:29:39.380
to understand that. It was a trial run. And they're going to come back and they win the house. Here's
00:29:47.400
the thing, the technicality of what happened on January 6th. The only reason it wasn't worse was
00:29:52.460
because Democrats had the house and they didn't have the votes in the house. If they take the,
00:29:58.360
if they take the house, then they have the votes to not authorize and legitimize the presidential
00:30:03.240
election, whatever the results are. And so this is very serious.
00:30:08.900
Yeah. She's trying as hard as she can to make this seem like, um,
00:30:14.560
an ongoing threat. Like there's some sort of ongoing threat of, and of course, this is what
00:30:19.480
we hear from, from these people all the time. There's this ongoing threat of violence on the
00:30:23.860
right and rioting. And they're going to do January 6th is going to happen all over again.
00:30:27.680
Obviously saying that while entirely ignoring the fact that, um, on the left, they just kind of
00:30:33.160
riot whenever they feel like it. And it really is. It's, it's, it's, it's really just whenever they feel
00:30:37.460
like it, you know, BLM, whenever they feel like it, they'll riot, they're not writing right now
00:30:40.840
because they don't, it's just, it wouldn't be to their political advantage right now too.
00:30:44.780
And, uh, maybe they're just taking a break. They don't feel like doing it, but whenever they feel
00:30:47.360
like doing it, they just do it on the right. On the other hand, um, this is quite literally the one
00:30:57.560
example of people on the right participating in a riot. So you've got one example that anyone can cite
00:31:05.520
in the last many decades. Um, and we certainly know it's never going to happen again because for
00:31:17.200
one thing, um, there is not this overwhelming proclivity towards that kind of thing on the
00:31:22.600
right, which is why it only happens once in several decades, whereas on the left happens all the time,
00:31:27.140
but also the entire force of the federal government came down on these people and is still raining down
00:31:35.240
on them, throwing the book at them and then throwing some things at them that aren't even in
00:31:40.720
the book, which we know has not happened for the BLM writers. Another quick, uh, piece of audio I want
00:31:46.520
to play for you. Fauci is still on the scene and, um, desperate for relevance. You know, he's,
00:31:53.680
you got to understand how hard it is for him. I mean, we talked about the tragedy of CNN plus
00:31:58.040
and Jon Stewart and the ratings and how they've collapsed, um, in a way Fauci's own ratings,
00:32:02.860
personal ratings have, have collapsed. I mean, he was on TV pretty much every day for two years
00:32:07.900
and he, and he loved it. And, um, now they're not coming to him nearly as often, which is why now
00:32:14.520
he'll appear on, you'll see him. I don't know who he's talking to some mainstream reporter here,
00:32:18.620
but he'll, he'll appear on just like YouTube channels and podcasts with, with 50 listeners
00:32:24.400
because he's so desperate for attention. But finally they come down to ask him his, um, take
00:32:30.100
on the judge, judge striking down the mask mandate on planes. And you'll be shocked by his opinion
00:32:35.940
on the matter. Both surprised and disappointed because those types of things really are the
00:32:41.980
purview of the CDC. This is a public health issue. And for a court to come in. And if you
00:32:48.440
look at the rationale for that, it really is not particularly firm. And we are concerned
00:32:54.120
about that, about courts getting involved in things that are unequivocally public health
00:32:59.360
decisions. I mean, this is a CDC issue, which should not, should not have been a court issue.
00:33:03.440
So we're hoping that the inevitable increase in cases, which we're seeing are not going to be
00:33:09.100
associated with an increase in hospitalizations. So all of these dynamic things going on at the
00:33:14.860
same time, it was perfectly logical for the CDC to say, wait a minute, we were planning on ending
00:33:22.020
this mandate on a certain date. Let's wait a period of time until May 3rd, which was a very sound public
00:33:30.360
health decision. So for a court to come in and interfere in that is really unfortunate. It's
00:33:37.100
unfortunate because it's against public health principles, number one. And number two is because
00:33:42.600
that's no place for the courts to do that. This is a CDC decision. And that's very bad precedent
00:33:47.880
when you have courts making a decision and looking at what the basis of the decision was. It was not
00:33:54.060
sound. No, it's actually not. It's not a CDC. Why should that be a CDC decision? We know over the
00:34:00.920
last two years, the CDC has declared that it has the power of the legislature, the executive branch,
00:34:06.840
the judiciary branch. We know that it has claimed these powers for itself, but
00:34:12.700
it's never had to justify that. Why should the CDC get to set policy on airlines?
00:34:23.180
Well, it shouldn't, of course. But I will tell you one thing.
00:34:29.760
As wonderful as it is to have this mask mandate gone, especially as someone who flies all the time,
00:34:35.960
and I'll be on the road again next week, and I'm looking forward to it as my first experience
00:34:41.580
on an airplane in two years where people aren't wearing masks. And that's going to be a wonderful
00:34:46.840
thing. But you know what? There's also a part of me that says, from a political standpoint,
00:34:51.520
like, I dare you, I hope that you try to challenge this thing and overturn it and put masks on people
00:34:58.680
again on planes. That's, on one hand, I don't want it, and we shouldn't want it. But on the other
00:35:06.620
hand, I feel like we should be saying, yeah, go ahead and make our day. Go ahead and do that.
00:35:10.620
Heading into the midterms, you've already got a lot of nails in the coffin. I'm not sure that we
00:35:15.420
can fit one more, but maybe we can, because that'll be it. Give people a little taste
00:35:21.400
of that freedom and then put the masks on them again. That's why I still, I just can't
00:35:28.560
believe, as cynical as I am, I cannot believe that the Biden administration would be that
00:35:35.020
politically suicidal to actually launch. Now, they'll make a show of it, I understand that,
00:35:40.100
because they have to make a show of it. And they'll at least pretend that they're challenging
00:35:44.740
the ruling and that they're trying to get the mask mandate put in place again. But it's hard for me
00:35:51.600
to believe that they would be that politically suicidal. But we'll see. Speaking of politically
00:35:59.620
suicidal, self-immolation. So one other thing I want to play for you. Rudy Giuliani appeared on this
00:36:07.480
show, The Masked Singer. And that's a show that, every time this show is explained to me, I have to
00:36:15.180
look it up because it always sounds like a joke. I still can't believe this show even exists.
00:36:19.420
But apparently it does, and it's been around for a while now. It's on like, it's, I don't know,
00:36:22.700
it's been around for several seasons. And I guess what the whole show is that somebody shows up in a
00:36:28.060
big costume and they sing, and then the judges have to guess who's in the costume. And that's a show.
00:36:31.740
People watch this show. Rudy Giuliani appeared on the show, and then there was the big reveal,
00:36:36.920
and he took his costume off, and he's singing a song. And one of the hosts was so upset to see
00:36:42.460
Rudy Giuliani that he stormed off the set in the middle of the taping. Let's watch this.
00:36:49.420
Before I met you, I'll break a thousand more, baby, before I am through. I want to be yours,
00:36:58.700
pretty baby, yours and yours alone. I'm here to tell you, honey, that I'm bad to the bone.
00:37:06.920
Bad to the bone. Bad to the bone. I guess everybody involved is embarrassing themselves there.
00:37:16.460
There is no dignity anywhere to be found in that room or anywhere near this show at all,
00:37:22.140
including people who would watch it. But the story of Rudy Giuliani, I mean,
00:37:26.960
utterly disgraced himself. There's no amount of money that they could possibly pay you if you're
00:37:37.120
Rudy Giuliani that would make that worth it. I don't care if they offered you a hundred million
00:37:42.480
dollars to put on that costume and sing that song and pop out of a box singing. There is no way that
00:37:51.300
could possibly be worth it. I mean, a hundred million, maybe. Actually, I'll take a hundred
00:37:55.840
million, but anything less than that, I wouldn't do it. Let's get to the comment section.
00:37:59.740
Who's bringing shopping carts back to the rightful place? We're becoming saints here in the sweet baby
00:38:10.240
gang. Evan says it's not taking revenge on Disney when you remove a bonus privilege that they've been
00:38:19.380
taking for granted. I don't think it's a good thing to be vindictive, but this was not being
00:38:24.020
vindictive. This is just treating them the same as every other corporation. Yeah, look, it's all
00:38:29.860
those things that you said. It's true. We're taking away a bonus privilege. And as I said, I don't even
00:38:36.380
think you need to justify it any more than that. It's a privilege. You don't have any right to it and
00:38:39.560
we could take it away. If it actually is a privilege that was granted to you by the government,
00:38:43.840
not a natural right imbued upon you by God or as part of your natural rights, if it's a privilege
00:38:54.640
given to you by the government, then in fact, they can take it away. So all of that is true,
00:39:01.000
but I also think, at least as far as I'm concerned, I'm not saying this is the legal argument that the
00:39:05.180
Santas make, but I also like it as an act of revenge as well. And I don't think there's anything
00:39:11.640
wrong with that. You know, an act of vengeance against a mega corporation that has gone all in
00:39:20.280
on sexually indoctrinating and grooming children. Vengeance against that? Sure. That's great.
00:39:30.180
Alexandra says, LOL, Matt used the daily cancellation to secretly vent that Mrs. Walsh doesn't
00:39:35.420
want him to spend all that money on an aquarium. You know, when I started writing that monologue
00:39:42.060
yesterday, I didn't originally intend for it to be for the aquarium bit to make its way in there,
00:39:47.500
but it is something that's really on my heart right now is how badly I want an $18,000 aquarium.
00:39:52.800
So it did get in there, I suppose. Trail says, I didn't even know about tunnel digging, but now I
00:39:59.120
must have one. It's going to be the most wonderful tunnel and I can't wait to get started.
00:40:03.180
Robin Yates says, when the digger turns out to be a serial killer, I'm not letting Matt live this
00:40:08.220
down. I have really gone out on a limb for this guy. And that did occur to me again, as we were
00:40:12.460
talking about the, this issue, I did think nothing wrong with digging a tunnel. It's every man's dream.
00:40:18.880
It's great. Um, it's, it's slightly serial killer ish. Like there's a little bit of that. Maybe
00:40:26.680
just slightly, just, just a whiff. That's all. And so if it ends up going that way, then yeah, that,
00:40:35.600
uh, I have gone out on a limb for him. So let's hope that doesn't happen. Um, Jack says, Matt,
00:40:42.680
you said you would never do a prerecorded interview, but you went on Dr. Phil kind of hypocritical.
00:40:46.900
No, see, that's not hypocritical. That's just, um, that's me being, uh, not hypocritical,
00:40:50.920
but stupid because I somehow completely forgot about Dr. Phil when I said that.
00:40:53.940
And it occurred to me afterwards that, okay, I did do a pre, I did do a prerecorded interview.
00:40:58.140
I did Dr. Phil. My point still stands though. Okay. Um, this is where I'm going to give you a
00:41:02.760
yeah, but still thing here because Trump, Trump should not be doing prerecorded interviews with
00:41:08.400
pretty much anyone, especially not Piers Morgan. Um, he shouldn't be doing interviews with Piers
00:41:13.580
Morgan at all because why? Like anytime you do anything as a, as a politician or a candidate or
00:41:21.100
someone in a political world and you, you know, you're doing anything on camera, especially
00:41:25.980
you should always be able to explain what the win is. Like what's the win? How do you, how,
00:41:33.380
how is this a win for you? And I don't see it with a Piers Morgan interview. Now I could see how it's
00:41:39.620
a win for him cause it's ratings, but you don't need Piers Morgan. You're Donald Trump. Um, and even
00:41:45.660
the Dr. Phil segment's actually a good example. That was a prerecorded segment. It was, there was
00:41:50.960
a risk. It was a calculated risk. It wasn't something I went into blind. So doing the Dr.
00:41:56.820
Phil thing, I knew that, yeah, okay, it's prerecorded. So, and you are kind of signing
00:42:01.240
your life away with all the waivers and everything so they can do whatever they want with the footage.
00:42:04.480
And that is the risk. I also was pretty sure that I could trust Dr. Phil to be fair. And now
00:42:10.320
that risk calculation turned out to, you know, worked out. And also I knew that I stood to gain
00:42:16.800
quite a bit and the message stood to gain. So there's a risk, a cost benefit analysis,
00:42:21.720
risk reward analysis. The risk is they completely butchered the footage and they try to make me look
00:42:27.320
like a fool. That is a risk. But if that doesn't happen, then the reward is quite substantial,
00:42:32.720
not just for me personally, but for the message. And it ended up working out. Thank God.
00:42:38.100
Um, but once again, for Donald Trump, what's, you know, what's the risk reward? What's the cost
00:42:44.280
benefit analysis of going and doing all these different interviews, prerecorded interviews?
00:42:55.380
It's not like you're going to gain publicity from a Piers Morgan interview that you didn't already have.
00:43:02.400
But just be nice if there was somebody in Donald Trump's circle who could
00:43:05.080
talk to him about these things, but apparently that doesn't exist.
00:43:08.660
Well, as the beloved author of the bestselling children's LGBTQ plus book, Johnny the Walrus,
00:43:13.340
I am now a very important voice in the transgender conversation. That's why I was invited on Dr.
00:43:17.260
Phil to discuss these most important issues with experts who couldn't, of course, tell me what a
00:43:21.160
woman even was. If you haven't seen it yet, I highly recommend that you check it out. And even more
00:43:24.660
importantly, if you haven't picked up a copy of my bestselling children's book, you should do so
00:43:28.560
immediately. It sold out in 48 hours when it was released, but don't worry, more copies are on the way.
00:43:33.120
So reserve Johnny the Walrus right now on Amazon. Now let's get to our daily cancellation.
00:43:42.160
You know, one thing we've learned from the left during the anti-groomer discourse is that we're
00:43:46.660
all a bunch of paranoid lunatics worried about nothing because nobody's talking to little kids
00:43:51.220
about sex. Also, we've learned that we're all a bunch of bigoted prudes because they are talking
00:43:55.400
to little kids about sex, but that's totally fine. So we've learned both of those things
00:43:59.500
simultaneously. The thing we're complaining about isn't happening and also it is happening and it's
00:44:04.860
okay that it's happening. It's probably my own mental failing that I can't figure out a way to
00:44:08.680
reconcile two completely opposite things or conceptualize how a thing could happen and not
00:44:12.900
happen at the same time. So instead, it's easier to break this down into pieces. And on the it is
00:44:17.660
happening, but it's fine end of the spectrum, a couple of clips from this week are illuminating.
00:44:21.480
The left, again, when they aren't denying that any of this is happening at all,
00:44:24.460
claims that they only want to discuss sexual issues and topics with children in a developmentally
00:44:29.320
appropriate way. But what do they think is developmentally appropriate? Well, we know the
00:44:34.400
answer to that question because we've heard it directly from teachers and we know that what
00:44:38.220
they find developmentally appropriate is in fact horrifying, insane, and perverse. But just to drive
00:44:43.480
that point home, here is Jen Psaki appearing on the dearly departed CNN Plus, may it rest in peace and
00:44:48.400
perpetual light shine upon it, to explain why exactly kindergarten teachers may need to talk about this
00:44:54.100
stuff with their students. Listen. Don't parents have a right to have concern? I mean, we're talking
00:45:00.100
specifically here about teaching about sex in kindergarten through third grade. I have to say
00:45:05.540
as a parent, I would have problems with that. But the law is not about teaching sex education.
00:45:11.460
It's about teaching about gender identity. And so what do you do if a parent or a kid, should I say a kid
00:45:19.040
in one of these elementary schools, says, what about Sally? Sally has two moms. Or I'm not sure if I'm a
00:45:27.040
girl or a boy. I mean, these are kids who are experiencing, you know, these moments in their
00:45:33.120
lives. I also think that these are not, there's not a big record of there being either sex education or
00:45:40.300
extensive gender identity education in these schools. And this is creating a problem or a political
00:45:47.160
cudgel about an issue that I don't think exists. So Psaki claims that kids in kindergarten might
00:45:53.180
say to their teacher, I'm not sure if I'm a girl or a boy. Now, here's the thing about that. First
00:45:57.600
of all, no child is going to say anything like that unless concerted effort has been made to confuse him.
00:46:02.560
So if a child is going to his kindergarten teacher with such a query, it's not because he's reflecting
00:46:07.800
naturally on his identity, but because he's in an environment which intentionally fosters confusion.
00:46:13.380
And if that's the case, the answer from the teacher should be pretty simple.
00:46:15.880
If the child is a boy, then she need only say, you're a boy. If a girl, then you're a girl.
00:46:22.260
And that should be the end of the conversation. Fortunately, there's nothing in the Florida law
00:46:26.620
which would prevent a teacher from telling this fact to a confused child any more than a teacher
00:46:30.340
would be prevented from telling a child how tall he is or how old he is if he was similarly confused
00:46:35.380
about either of those subjects. But speaking of fostering confusion, the very radical and extreme
00:46:41.580
and dangerous libs of TikTok account committed harassment and terrorism once again, this time
00:46:46.960
against a woman yesterday by reposting a video that she posted at TikTok. In the video, this woman,
00:46:52.400
a mother apparently, and tragically, explains what is in her mind a developmentally appropriate way to
00:46:59.680
talk about sex and gender with a young child. Listen.
00:47:02.340
Here's a developmentally appropriate way to talk to toddlers about bodies and gender.
00:47:08.220
You know the body parts that your diaper or your panties or your underwear cover? Those are called
00:47:15.520
privates. Everyone has privates. Private means that they belong to you and only you.
00:47:23.400
In the front, everybody has genitals. But there are different kinds of genitals. Some genitals are
00:47:34.520
called a penis. Some are called a vulva. Others look maybe a little bit like each in some ways or kind of
00:47:46.280
like neither or somewhere in between. People with those kind of genitals are called intersex.
00:47:54.680
When babies are born, parents sometimes guess their gender based on their genitals. They tend to guess
00:48:04.840
boy for babies who have a penis and girl for babies who have a vulva. Sometimes parents guess wrong though.
00:48:12.920
And that's okay. Everybody makes mistakes sometimes.
00:48:18.280
People whose parents guessed wrong about their gender are called transgender.
00:48:24.760
So she says that here's a developmentally appropriate way to talk to toddlers about gender,
00:48:31.400
but she misspoke. What she meant to say is here's an extremely creepy way to confuse a helpless young
00:48:37.000
child with a bunch of insane bulls**t invented by pedophile sexologists in the 1960s. Tomato,
00:48:42.360
tomato, I suppose. I mean, that's what she meant to say. Now, notice how this pink-haired freakazoid
00:48:46.200
starts off right away by introducing intersex to the toddler. Rather than giving the basic,
00:48:52.600
simplest facts to the child, she spends time talking about genetic anomalies that affect like 0.05%
00:48:58.600
of the population. Now, it's true, of course, technically, that a very small minority of people
00:49:04.440
are born with physically ambiguous genitalia. This doesn't mean they don't have a biological sex,
00:49:09.560
but just that determining their sex is a little more difficult in these very, very rare cases.
00:49:14.840
Why would you mention this to a toddler though? It's like if you were on a plane with your three-year-old
00:49:20.200
and you leaned over and said, so Johnny, planes go in the sky. Sometimes they fly all the way through
00:49:25.960
the sky and land safely. Sometimes they crash and everybody dies. Sometimes they blow up in the air.
00:49:31.080
Sometimes they fly into buildings. Now, that would technically be true, but you wouldn't say that
00:49:38.040
to a toddler unless your intention was to traumatize him. Because a child that age doesn't understand
00:49:44.040
statistics or probabilities or the distinction between things that are common and things that
00:49:48.280
are rare. He especially won't understand the distinction when you phrase it in a way that is
00:49:53.080
designed to make it seem like the rare occurrence is just as common as the common occurrence.
00:49:57.960
So you talk to your child about plane crashes that way, if you want him to think that planes crash
00:50:03.640
all the time, and you talk to your child about intersex that way, or at all, if you want him to think
00:50:08.760
that intersex is just as common as normal bodies. From here, the psycho with the crazy eyes goes from
00:50:15.080
misleading her child to straight up lying. She says that parents and doctors guess whether a baby is a boy
00:50:20.920
or a girl based on genitalia. As I told you last week, this guess thing is the new talking point.
00:50:25.720
It's the new euphemism. It used to be sex assigned at birth, which was already misleading enough.
00:50:31.000
Now it's sex guessed at birth. And they go with guess instead of assigned because guess sounds even
00:50:38.360
more arbitrary and baseless. And yet they still admit that most of the time the guess is correct.
00:50:46.440
Well, why would that be the case? Why does it just so happen that parents who guess boy based on a
00:50:53.160
penis are almost always right? Of course, they're not almost always right. They're always right.
00:50:59.320
But I mean, even based on the demented logic we heard in that clip, according to her, the guess,
00:51:05.640
quote unquote, is almost always right. Why is that? If it's a 50-50 guess, and there are billions
00:51:13.400
of guesses being made across the world, then shouldn't the guess be wrong about 50% of the time?
00:51:19.160
Shouldn't 50% of the world be trans? Because trans, by this way of thinking, is simply the result of
00:51:25.880
a wrong guess. That's all. With so many billions of guesses, how can there be so few wrong guesses?
00:51:35.240
Well, these are the kinds of questions that we as critical thinking, rational adults can ask.
00:51:40.840
These are the holes that we can punch in the nonsense that people like this woman are spewing.
00:51:44.780
But even the smartest toddler in the world isn't going to notice these problems.
00:51:51.260
He doesn't have enough information about the world to think critically about this.
00:51:55.660
He'll just accept whatever he's told. And he will become deeply, profoundly, despairingly confused and
00:52:01.740
lost. And that is all by design. That's the plan by these grooming predator ghouls.
00:52:07.420
And that's why they are, once again, canceled. And that'll do it for us today. Thanks for watching.
00:52:13.500
Thanks for listening. Have a great day and a great weekend. Talk to you on Monday. Godspeed.
00:52:37.420
Michael Knowles Show. The Andrew Klavan Show. Thanks for listening.
00:52:40.060
The Matt Wall Show is produced by Sean Hampton. Executive producer, Jeremy Boring. Our supervising
00:52:45.140
producer is Mathis Glover. Production manager, Pavel Wadowski. Our associate producer is McKenna Waters.
00:52:51.040
The show is edited by Robbie Dantzler. Our audio is mixed by Mike Coromina. And hair and makeup is
00:52:55.980
done by Cherokee Heart. The Matt Wall Show is a Daily Wire production. Copyright Daily Wire 2022.
00:53:01.160
Hey, everybody. This is Andrew Klavan, host of The Andrew Klavan Show. You know, some people are depressed
00:53:05.780
because the republic is collapsing, the end of days is approaching, and the moon's turned to blood.
00:53:10.740
But on The Andrew Klavan Show, that's where the fun just gets started. So come on over to The
00:53:14.800
Andrew Klavan Show and laugh your way through the fall of the republic with me, Andrew Klavan.