The Matt Walsh Show - April 28, 2022


Ep. 940 - Amazon's Censorship Fails To Defeat Johnny The Walrus


Episode Stats

Length

57 minutes

Words per Minute

177.87149

Word Count

10,165

Sentence Count

682

Misogynist Sentences

18

Hate Speech Sentences

18


Summary

Amazon bans my children's book, but it still manages to become the number 1 book in the entire country. Joe Biden is considering a Hail Mary pass before the midterms, student loan forgiveness. And speaking of horrible ideas, Joe Biden also tells a group of teachers that the kids in their classrooms are their kids, not somebody else s kids. Also, Hollywood actress Megan Fox proudly discusses her satanic blood-drinking rituals. But I was told Satanism in Hollywood is a conspiracy theory. We ll talk about all that and more today on the Matt Wall Show.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Today on the Matt Wall Show, Amazon pulls some dirty tricks to suppress and censor my children's
00:00:04.480 book, but it still manages to become the number one book in the entire country. Also, Joe Biden
00:00:08.600 is considering a Hail Mary pass before the midterms, student loan forgiveness. We'll talk
00:00:13.260 about why that is a horrible idea. And speaking of horrible ideas, Joe Biden also tells a group
00:00:17.480 of teachers that the kids in their classrooms are their kids, not somebody else's kids. The
00:00:22.400 kids belong to them. Also, Hollywood actress Megan Fox proudly discusses her satanic blood-drinking
00:00:28.780 rituals. But I was told Satanism in Hollywood is a conspiracy theory. We'll talk about all
00:00:33.080 that and more today on the Matt Wall Show.
00:00:44.300 Well, in this economy, it's not an easy time for anybody, especially small business owners.
00:00:49.060 And that's why you got to have everything locked down. And especially if you're a small business
00:00:52.580 owner, you know how important it is to have an effective marketing strategy. Constant contact
00:00:58.140 is a digital marketing platform that helps small businesses and nonprofits of all sizes
00:01:01.960 build, grow, and succeed with email marketing, contact management, industry-leading list growth
00:01:08.260 tools, social media ads, and more. Constant contact helps small businesses connect with customers,
00:01:14.060 find new ones, and sell online, all from one easy-to-use platform. That's the name of the game
00:01:19.440 here is that it's easy. They've been trusted by millions of businesses to help improve their
00:01:23.140 marketing with a 97% deliverability rate.
00:01:25.240 You can rest assured that your customers and potential customers are getting the right messages
00:01:29.220 at the right time. With a simple interface, Constant Contacts' easy-to-use platform makes
00:01:34.060 contact management easier than ever. There, list growth tools help you find a bigger audience
00:01:38.560 fast. Lead generation landing pages, text-to-join, and social media ads are proven to grow your list
00:01:43.880 and drive engagement with your brand. With thousands of integrations, you can sync Constant Contacts
00:01:48.700 tools with the tools you're already using. Powerful automation tools help you send the right
00:01:53.100 message to the right person at the right time, every time. To start your free digital marketing
00:01:57.780 trial today, visit ConstantContact.com.
00:02:01.440 You know, there are some who would argue that it's not the smartest long-term career strategy
00:02:05.240 to aggressively antagonize and purposefully make an enemy out of one of the wealthiest and
00:02:09.720 most powerful corporations in the world. And it's even more reckless, you might say, when this
00:02:13.980 corporation happens to control 90% of the book sales in the country and you make part of your
00:02:19.440 living by selling books. And you might be right about all of that, but all I can say is that still,
00:02:25.900 it's totally worth it. There have been a number of big developments since we talked yesterday about
00:02:30.680 the leaked videos over at Amazon of an Amazon meeting where the employees complained and whined
00:02:36.580 and at one point actually cried over my children's book. As much as I'd love to play those clips again,
00:02:41.700 I'm not going to do that, but you can always go and watch them if you want. And they're crying
00:02:45.660 about my children's book, Johnny the Walrus, of course, which is available for sale over at Amazon.
00:02:50.520 You go to johnnythewalrus.com. They call the book triggering, traumatic, problematic, harmful.
00:02:57.840 They were also incensed that the book was originally categorized as an LGBT children's book and even
00:03:02.860 more incensed that I was, as they claimed, bragging about it publicly and trolling them, they claimed.
00:03:10.480 Now, I personally take great exception to any accusation that I have bragged or trolled. That
00:03:16.520 is simply not the kind of thing that I would do. Does that sound like me? Come on. But that's how
00:03:22.440 they interpreted it. And they were very upset. Now, after the show yesterday, some more developments,
00:03:27.920 Amazon sent an email to our publishing division, DW Books, and they informed us that our ads for Johnny
00:03:34.540 the Walrus have been banned from the platform. They said that we were conducting, that they rather were
00:03:40.200 conducting a, quote unquote, periodic review, which just so happens to coincide directly with these
00:03:45.700 embarrassing videos coming out and me making fun of them for it. So just like at the same time,
00:03:51.620 coincidentally, there's this totally random and periodic review that they conducted and they
00:03:56.660 discovered that, oh, we actually can't run ads for the book anymore because it's not appropriate.
00:04:02.160 The ads are inappropriate. Here's what the email actually says. This is what it says exactly.
00:04:07.880 Your ad is not appropriate for all audiences. I mean, in spite of the fact that it's literally a
00:04:13.040 board book for preschoolers. But anyway, to ensure a good customer experience, we reserve the right to
00:04:17.840 restrict ads that contain elements that may not be appropriate for all audiences. This may include
00:04:23.080 erotica, content on sexual preferences such as BDSM, incestuous relationships, sexual contact with
00:04:31.100 persons under the age of 18, self-help content such as dating, get rich quick, or weight loss books,
00:04:36.820 or content that promotes, endorses, or incites potentially dangerous or harmful activities.
00:04:42.320 I have to say, credit where it's due, I do appreciate how they have put self-help books on the same tier
00:04:49.260 as BDSM and incest. Self-help books are just as disgraceful and gross as that, they're saying.
00:04:57.080 And I don't disagree necessarily. But which category does Johnny the Walrus fall into?
00:05:04.180 Like, what do you think Johnny the Walrus is if that's how you're interpreting it?
00:05:10.720 Whatever Amazon thinks, I can assure any potential buyer of this book, there is no BDSM in Johnny the
00:05:16.980 Walrus. There is no incest. There is no sexual content of any kind at all, actually. It also doesn't
00:05:23.880 promote dangerous activities. It promotes the opposite. So what is it? Is it a self-help book?
00:05:30.080 Is that what they're saying? Is it self-help for walruses? Is that the claim? I don't know.
00:05:36.620 The answer, of course, is that the book is none of these things, and they know that it's none of
00:05:40.400 these things. The book and the ad are 100% appropriate for all ages, even by the standards
00:05:44.520 of Amazon's own policies. They're removing it out of revenge. It's an act of revenge, quite explicitly
00:05:51.740 and obviously. And if it wasn't already explicit enough, they also declassified the book from the
00:05:57.860 children's category. So it's no longer listed on Amazon as a children's book. Amazon has put it into
00:06:04.740 the political commentary section of the site. Now, ironically, them placing it in the political
00:06:10.420 commentary section is itself political commentary on their part. It's editorialization about the book.
00:06:16.540 They don't like the book. They don't personally think people should read it to their kids,
00:06:20.440 so they're not going to list it as a children's book, even though it unequivocally is just that.
00:06:27.500 Like, this is not what booksellers are supposed to do. If you're going to carry the book and it's
00:06:35.480 a children's book, then any more than if someone wrote a sci-fi book and you didn't personally think
00:06:41.460 it was great sci-fi, so you're like, I'm not going to put it in that section. I'm going to put it in
00:06:43.900 this section over here. But you might not like it, but that is, without a doubt, the genre of the book.
00:06:50.440 In fact, my book is significantly more age-appropriate than many other children's
00:06:55.520 books on the sites, which are allowed to be advertised as well. But Amazon wasn't done.
00:07:00.620 Next, and again, this all happened yesterday. Next, Amazon turned its sights on my other book,
00:07:05.740 What is a Woman?, which will be released in June and is also available for sale on Amazon. You go to
00:07:10.340 whatisawoman.com. They conducted another conveniently timed periodic review. So these are two periodic
00:07:16.920 reviews that they happened to conduct yesterday while all this was happening. And they sent another
00:07:21.680 email to DAW Books announcing that our ad campaign for that book has been banned as well. Their
00:07:27.800 reasoning was slightly more specific. They say, your ad contains content that appears to infer or claim
00:07:33.660 to diagnose, treat, reverse, or question gender identity or sexual orientation. Now, of course,
00:07:41.240 they haven't read the book, so they couldn't possibly know if it contains those kinds of
00:07:45.700 things. All the book cover does is ask a question, what is a woman? They appear to be admitting,
00:07:52.240 I guess, that the simple question, what is a woman, that question itself may have the effect of
00:07:58.420 reversing gender identity. Like just asking the question, what is a woman? The question itself
00:08:05.920 invalidates gender identity, which appears to be what they're saying. In fact, they're right about that
00:08:12.460 if that is what they're saying. But what does that say about gender identity in that case? As for the
00:08:19.880 content of the actual book, it actually contains mostly my conversations with other people, including
00:08:25.760 several supposed experts, quote unquote, on that side of the conversation. I mean, it's a book with
00:08:31.920 interviews with gender-affirming therapists and gender-affirming pediatricians and gender-affirming
00:08:41.660 surgeons, to use their euphemisms for all those things. But the difference is that I don't blindly
00:08:48.460 accept everything these experts say. I ask them questions, skeptical questions, as questions are
00:08:56.480 supposed to be skeptical by their nature, and apparently that's not allowed.
00:08:59.560 Now, we're not taking any of this lying down, though. Amazon didn't like how Johnny the Walrus was
00:09:06.260 originally classified on their site. So we decided, like, if you didn't like that, then you're really
00:09:12.960 not going to like this, Amazon. We decided to classify my What is a Woman book as a biology text.
00:09:20.300 After all, Kentonji Brown Jackson said that, you know, only a biologist is qualified to speak
00:09:25.300 about this subject. It's a biological subject. And so it made sense that our book is therefore a
00:09:32.060 biology book. It's a biology textbook. And so that's how we listed it. And right now, as you can
00:09:38.580 see, What is a Woman is the best-selling biology book on Amazon, as it currently stands. I'm sure
00:09:46.180 the employees absolutely love that. And they can take it out of that category, which I'm sure they're
00:09:50.300 going to do. But it will forever and always have the distinction as a best-selling biology book.
00:09:55.440 We got it in there. We got the screenshot. There it is. And this means that for the rest of my life,
00:10:02.840 and you know that I'll make good on this, this is a credential that I'm going to bring with me.
00:10:08.360 I can now start any argument I have with someone. Anytime I have to make a point, I can say, well,
00:10:14.220 as the best-selling author of a, or rather as the author of a best-selling biology book,
00:10:21.180 dot, dot, dot. Meanwhile, Johnny the Walrus itself, in spite of the efforts to suppress it by Amazon,
00:10:27.140 became and is still the number one book overall across the entire platform. It is number one
00:10:32.740 on the bestseller list overall. And given that, as mentioned, Amazon controls nearly all of the book
00:10:39.200 sales in America, we can say, without a doubt, that Johnny the Walrus is right now the best-selling
00:10:44.840 book, period, in the entire country. Out of all the books being sold, out of the thousands of books,
00:10:50.220 it is number one. And we achieved this even though no brick-and-mortar stores would go anywhere near
00:10:56.120 this book. And even though Amazon doesn't want it and is doing everything it can to censor it and
00:11:01.580 suppress it, it is still the number one book in America. Now, this is all extremely funny.
00:11:08.440 And I tend to focus a lot on the humor of it because that's the most fun thing to talk about.
00:11:14.820 But we would be missing, I think, a big part of the point if we concentrated solely on the humor of
00:11:20.120 it. The fact is that the number one book in the country is a preschool board book satirizing left-wing
00:11:28.500 gender ideology. Now, that would have been unthinkable up until, well, right now, when it
00:11:34.540 actually happened. And I think this is just another line of evidence that the cultural tide
00:11:41.020 is beginning to turn. That's not to say that the battle is won by any means. As I am constantly
00:11:45.500 reminding everyone and myself, if there's going to be a victory in this war, that victory will be
00:11:52.000 generations down the line. You and I will live and die in a culture that is fundamentally hostile to us.
00:11:58.000 That's the reality. So you might as well strap in and learn to enjoy the fight.
00:12:03.720 That's the advice I give everyone when they tell you, well, how are we going to win?
00:12:06.820 What are we going to do? Just learn to enjoy fighting because that's all you're going to have.
00:12:11.400 That's it. You're not living in peacetime. And you never will be living in those times.
00:12:19.580 Maybe your grandchildren will, though, if you fight hard enough. And that's enough for me.
00:12:24.320 And I can take solace in that. And though victory is far down the line, that doesn't mean we can,
00:12:30.220 that we're not able to make progress towards that end, which I think we are right now.
00:12:35.640 Johnny the Walrus is, even I will admit, a very, very small salvo in the war. But even so,
00:12:44.500 a win is a win. Nothing wrong with enjoying them when they come. I know I am. And in fact,
00:12:51.040 I had a chance to celebrate last night. I was speaking at Wisconsin Superior. And it was a
00:12:57.300 great, great turnout, great speech, great event. Right outside the building, a group of leftist
00:13:05.740 protesters had gathered to scream about how I'm a terrible guy and all the rest of it. And they'd
00:13:11.460 been out there for a while. So they ordered pizza for themselves. And my producer, Sean, went out and
00:13:16.440 got me a slice, as you can see. And I imagine the protesters were not happy to find out that I
00:13:23.140 took some of their pizza. But they should take heart, because they fed a best-selling children's
00:13:31.220 author. And that is an act of charity. And it's another win for both of us, I think.
00:13:38.180 Now let's get to our five headlines.
00:13:46.560 You know, if you've been listening to my show for a while, you know that I am an activist on many
00:13:51.480 topics. But probably first and foremost, and most importantly, I'm an activist against the lazy
00:13:55.820 grocery shoppers who don't put their grocery carts away. Well, here's some tragic news that you might
00:14:01.160 have already heard from me. But I'll tell you again, the grocery carts, they did attack me in my own
00:14:05.780 car in an act of vengeance. When I was pulling out of my parking spot, a rogue grocery cart crashed
00:14:10.400 into my car, leaving my front bumper scratched, almost totaling the car. Well, I mean, it was a
00:14:16.980 scratch, but it's close enough. There are two lessons you could take away from this. One, don't
00:14:21.260 be lazy. Put your shopping carts away. Two, you can solve an issue like mine quickly and without
00:14:25.460 breaking the bank by just visiting rockauto.com. They have touch-up paint and pens that are easy to use
00:14:30.560 as a magic marker. That's how easy they are. And rockauto.com, look,
00:14:35.340 talk about easy, very easy to find everything you need there. It's an online family-owned business
00:14:39.760 that sells all the auto parts you could ever possibly need that are specific to your own
00:14:43.460 vehicle. Their prices are shockingly reasonable and their shipping is quick. So no matter what's
00:14:47.560 going on with your car, you can trust rockauto to get what you need and get it fast. Rockauto.com
00:14:51.600 has a very user-friendly website and they make it easy to pick the right parts for your specific car.
00:14:57.600 You'll see photos, specs, and even installation tips so you can feel confident that you're choosing
00:15:01.700 the correct parts for your vehicle every single time. So what are you waiting for? It's as simple
00:15:06.440 as this. Just go to rockauto.com for all of your auto parts needs today. And remember when you go
00:15:11.580 there to write Walsh in there, how did you hear about us box? So they know that I'm the one that
00:15:15.080 sent you. That's rockauto.com to shop for auto parts today. You know, another thing, just another
00:15:20.580 quick note about this is I was thinking about this today too, and just going back to the more fun thing
00:15:25.760 we talk about, which is just how funny all this is. That is another, that's a kind of underrated
00:15:31.680 cultural shift. It's an underrated, but I think quite significant cultural shift that's happened
00:15:38.580 over the last few years. And that is that on the right now, we are by far and away funnier than the
00:15:48.900 left. And, uh, we're, we're better at mocking and satirizing and trolling than they are miles better
00:15:55.420 at it. And we're having a lot more fun too, at the same time. And that is, that's a, like I said,
00:16:01.100 a very significant change actually. And it has not always been this way. So it's not something you
00:16:06.600 could take for granted by any means. In fact, for most of my life, it was, it was quite the opposite
00:16:12.220 where the right had the stereotype of being this kind of stuffy, self-serious,
00:16:17.980 school marms who, uh, are, you know, aren't laughing about anything, aren't having a good
00:16:21.940 time at all, just constantly complaining about stuff. And that stereotype was, uh, was, was not
00:16:27.100 without some basis, you know, but there's been, things have just changed radically and pretty
00:16:34.760 quickly over the last few years. Where at this point I can't think like, what's the last funny kind
00:16:41.720 of stunt, uh, trolling thing, mockery, even meme. I mean, what's the last funny thing you've seen
00:16:49.840 from the left? I can't even think of, think of what it would be. They're not having any fun at all.
00:16:56.540 I think there's a lot of reasons for that. One is that they're, this is just their, their ideology
00:17:00.440 is suffocating them. And it just, it strangles the humor out of everything. You're just, you're not a
00:17:06.620 laugh. You want to be a pure leftist at this point. You're not allowed to laugh about anything.
00:17:12.840 Everything is off the table. Everything's offensive. And, um, that's part of it. Part of it is also,
00:17:17.980 I think for, for us, the, the advantage of being, um, kind of in the, the, the cultural rebel position,
00:17:28.240 being in the counterculture position where they run all the institutions, they have all the power.
00:17:34.500 So that kind of puts them in automatically as kind of defensive posture where they're
00:17:38.760 defending what they've already gained. And that's just not, it's not as much fun.
00:17:43.960 And, uh, there aren't as many targets for mockery, I guess also. So I think that's also a good thing.
00:17:49.960 All right, let's go. Uh, speaking of things that are really funny, of course, Elon Musk taking over
00:17:53.660 Twitter is just hilarious and everything about it has been great, but he tweeted something yesterday
00:17:59.400 that I, I just wanted to know because I actually disagree with him here. Um, it's a nice in theory,
00:18:05.680 but here's what he says. He says for Twitter to deserve public trust, it must be politically neutral,
00:18:10.100 which effectively means upsetting the far right and the far left equally. Now the first part of this
00:18:17.540 tweet here, I agree with, um, it should be politically neutral. That's what I want it to be.
00:18:21.740 I don't want, I've said all along that we already have, there are social media platforms out there
00:18:27.140 that are quote unquote conservative platforms and they've got a conservative bent and, you know,
00:18:32.980 a conservative mission. And I don't use those platforms. I don't, I don't find them interesting.
00:18:37.760 They're not fun to use. Um, I don't really, I don't need to be, I don't want to be in an echo
00:18:41.520 chamber that takes away almost the entire point for me, or even being on these platforms in the first
00:18:46.320 place. They become culturally irrelevant because you've kind of just, you you've segregated yourself
00:18:52.800 from the cultural conversation. And so I don't like them. And I wouldn't want, there's never any
00:18:58.340 chance of Twitter turning into that, but I wouldn't want that. I, what I, what I actually want Twitter
00:19:02.900 to be is politically neutral. I just don't want Twitter to have any political stance at all. I want
00:19:07.320 it to be basically what it was in the early days and the wild West days of Twitter and of social media
00:19:12.440 generally. I mean, there was a time when pretty much every social media platform was basically
00:19:16.280 this way where, you know, you could kind of go and say what you want. And there were some rules,
00:19:22.520 but not a lot. And everybody knew what the rules were and they were pretty basic. Like you can't
00:19:27.540 go and threaten to kill somebody or do anything like that. So I would like to go back to that
00:19:32.980 actual political neutrality. You get out of the way, you provide the platform and then we let us mix
00:19:40.320 it up and do what we're going to do now. So that, that part, I agree. It's the second part that I
00:19:46.680 don't agree where he says, well, if we're politically neutral, that effectively means upsetting the far
00:19:50.920 right and the far left equally. No, it doesn't. Political neutrality does not upset the far right.
00:19:56.840 I am on the far right. I can't pretend to speak for everybody, uh, in, in my, in my camp,
00:20:03.780 but I certainly am on the far right. I embrace that. And I can tell you that that's not how I
00:20:09.600 see it. It's not, it doesn't upset me. That's exact. That's exactly what I want. And I think in
00:20:15.320 fact, I can speak for most people on the quote far right, because that's a, I have not, I haven't
00:20:19.660 heard from anybody on the far right who wants Twitter to become this conservative, um, vehicle.
00:20:28.560 I haven't heard anyone say they want Twitter to become a vehicle for conservatism.
00:20:33.780 So actually on the right, that's what we want. We just want you to get out of the way
00:20:38.680 and stop trying to referee and police everything. It's the left on the other hand. They are upset
00:20:45.540 by neutrality. They don't want that. They're actually very specific about that. They're not
00:20:52.080 hiding it, but there might've been a time when they hit it, but they don't anymore. They do not
00:20:55.860 want neutrality. This is where the phrase silence is violence comes from. You don't often hear people
00:21:03.360 on the right saying that that is almost in that's if someone is saying that 99 times out of a hundred
00:21:07.440 at somebody on the left saying silence is violence and you don't even need to know the context. You
00:21:11.060 just know that it's somebody on the left. And that's what they mean. If, if, if Twitter were to
00:21:16.600 become actually neutral, that means that Twitter itself is being silent about the issues and that's
00:21:22.920 violence. You know, so for example, a neutral stance would be Twitter allows us to talk about
00:21:32.860 gender. And, um, and so God forbid you could go on Twitter and refer to a male who identifies as a
00:21:42.840 woman and say, well, that's a, that's a man. The neutral position for Twitter is to say nothing about
00:21:48.420 that. Like you can say that then the left can make their claim and say, no, it's actually a woman and
00:21:54.160 we can have the debate. But the left doesn't want that. No, they want Twitter to prevent you from
00:22:02.420 saying that at all. They don't want to have the conversation. They know they can't have the
00:22:07.100 conversation. They can't win the debate. So neutrality is not what they want. Um, there is one side of the
00:22:14.600 ideological divide, which is opposed to neutrality and opposed, actually, actually opposed to free
00:22:22.140 speech. And that is, and that is the left without a question. All right. Let's go here from, uh,
00:22:28.260 CNBC. It says the tens of millions of Americans saddled with student loans may finally hear soon
00:22:33.760 what the Biden administration has decided to do. If anything on debt forgiveness,
00:22:38.040 white house press secretary, Jen Psaki said at Monday's press briefing, not a single person in this
00:22:41.240 country has paid a dime on federal student loans since the president took office.
00:22:43.980 She went on to say that president Joe Biden would make a decision about any cancellation of student
00:22:47.960 debt before the conclusion of that pause on student loans. Um, let's see. Although Biden has
00:22:55.920 expressed skepticism about sweeping student loan forgiveness in the past, another development
00:23:00.160 this week suggests he may be warming up to the idea. When the topic came up Monday with the
00:23:04.220 congressional Hispanic caucus, the president indicated he was currently looking to provide
00:23:07.440 some form of student debt cancellation, according to multiple reports. Democrats and advocates have put
00:23:12.740 intense pressure on the president to act ahead of the midterms, pointing out that student debt
00:23:16.960 cancellation is a campaign promise he can deliver on without Congress while much of his agenda has
00:23:21.880 been stymied in the house and Senate. So he's spoken out in the past and been against the idea of
00:23:26.460 student debt forgiveness, quote unquote cancellation. And both of these terms are euphemisms. Neither of
00:23:33.940 them actually reflect the reality of what this would be. It's not just forgiveness.
00:23:37.560 Um, the government can't, what, what does that even mean for the government to forgive the loan? It's not
00:23:43.140 going to cancel it. This is transferring the debt somewhere else. And there's only one other place it can
00:23:51.080 go. And that is to the taxpayers. I mean, the government can't pay off the debt because the government
00:23:56.960 only has the money that it takes from us. So that's what we're talking about. It's taking the debt.
00:24:04.740 It's not canceling it. Not at all. Um, if it were possible, as I've said before,
00:24:09.040 if there were a magic wand where you could just make the debt go away and that's it,
00:24:16.160 it's just gone. There's no other consequences. No one has to pay it. I'm still not sure that I
00:24:21.300 would support using the magic wand because this is still an agreement that people made that we're
00:24:25.300 just erasing. Um, but at least there's a conversation we could have in that case. If the magic wand
00:24:31.380 existed, it doesn't. And so instead we're talking about taking the debt and transferring it from the
00:24:36.540 person who chose to take on the debt and agreed to it and bought the product and has ostensibly
00:24:45.020 benefited from the product, or at least has the potential to benefit from them from it and
00:24:50.580 transferring that debt to people who did not make that agreement or sign on the dotted line.
00:24:54.920 And also very importantly here, do not have the product that was purchased and the product is the
00:25:02.340 college degree. The fact that so many college degrees end up being basically worthless is true.
00:25:09.660 And that's, that's a separate conversation. And the fact that college degrees are so often worthless,
00:25:16.320 that's, that's the reason why that's not a, that's not an argument for debt forgiveness.
00:25:19.900 That's actually an argument against debt forgiveness. Because another problem with the
00:25:26.940 quote debt forgiveness or debt transferal is that now you're just encouraging more of the bad,
00:25:33.240 stupid, reckless behavior across the board that got us in this position in the first place.
00:25:40.360 When you wave your magic wand, which doesn't even really exist, all you're doing is encouraging more
00:25:44.880 of it, validating it. Um, when the real solution to the college debt loan crisis, as I've said many
00:25:54.340 times is, um, there is, there is no, there is no good solution that's going to do anything to reverse
00:26:00.700 what's already happened in the past, but looking towards the future, the solution is to stop
00:26:07.220 shuffling all, you know, almost every kid into the university system, regardless of whether they're going
00:26:14.620 to benefit from the college education or not. The whole practice of sending 18 year old kids into
00:26:20.840 college when they don't even know what they want to do with their lives, what they're interested in,
00:26:26.220 what their passions are, what they want to study. I mean, we just, we just, we, this is another thing
00:26:32.320 we take for granted, but you know, it's very common, of course, to have college freshmen who have
00:26:40.400 already taken out the loans and they're in college and they've committed to this for four years and
00:26:44.220 they have no idea what they even want to major in. They don't, they don't know what, like they have
00:26:48.020 no clue. They don't know what they want to study. They don't know what, they've certainly have no
00:26:53.360 idea what they want to do with the rest of their lives. And then, and then, and then we say, well,
00:26:58.400 that's normal. That's okay. No, it's, it's not. I mean, it is normal, but it shouldn't be.
00:27:01.740 And it's not, it's not okay. You've made this massive commitment and you don't even know why
00:27:07.760 you made it. That's a huge problem. It's like, you know, it's like if, um, I don't know, you're
00:27:15.920 at some really bizarre flea market and you, you, you stumble across some contraption and you have
00:27:21.160 no idea what this, you could tell that it might do something. It's some kind of machine. You're not
00:27:25.560 sure. We have no idea what it does. And you ask the person, well, how much for that machine? And they
00:27:29.620 say, oh, it'd be $150,000. Who would say that it's a good idea to buy it? You don't know what
00:27:36.320 it does. You don't know how you're going to use it. You don't know if you can use it. You have no
00:27:40.240 idea if it'll benefit you or not. I mean, maybe it'll change your life forever and make everything
00:27:44.500 better. Maybe not, but you're going to spend $150,000 on it. Look, in no other context would we
00:27:52.400 encourage that kind of decision among 18 year old kids or among anybody. I don't care how old you are.
00:27:58.320 This is what we do with, with the colleges. The solution is to stop doing that.
00:28:04.600 And it's still, until we stop doing it, this problem is not going to go away, but
00:28:09.880 I can pretty much guarantee that this debt transferal, some version of it is going to
00:28:15.440 happen because despite what Biden has said in the past, he is now in the Democrats in general are
00:28:22.040 floundering. We're getting towards the midterms and they need to pull a rabbit out of the hat.
00:28:26.520 And this, this is, this is it. This is, this is one of the things is debt forgiveness. Although I
00:28:33.200 think it's going to massively politically backfire for them because debt forgiveness quote unquote is
00:28:40.520 among other things, a welfare program for the upper class.
00:28:44.900 That is by far and away, you know, the, the, the top 50, 40, 30%, they're going to benefit
00:28:58.060 the most from college loan forgiveness because they have most of the college loans.
00:29:03.600 This is certainly not something that's going to predominantly help poor people, lower middle
00:29:11.280 class people, blue collar people, many of whom had didn't go to college and have still been able
00:29:20.540 to find success in life. And now you're going to go to them and say, okay, you have to take on this
00:29:25.280 debt for a product that you didn't even purchase. You, you chose a different path in life. You chose maybe
00:29:30.920 to go into a trade and, um, and, and learn a skill. And now you're working and you're applying
00:29:40.320 that skill and you're providing for your family and you're helping society. That's the decision that
00:29:44.920 you made. It was the right decision. But now I'm going to take the burden of other people's bad
00:29:51.600 decisions and put it on you. I think that's going to be a very politically unpopular decision.
00:29:58.420 Um, and that's all this is, it is welfare for the, for the upper class, for upper class,
00:30:07.140 spoiled brats who made a decision, bought a product and now don't want to live with the
00:30:12.840 consequences. And they want to shirk their responsibilities and they want to, they want
00:30:17.280 to, uh, put the burden, take their burdens and put it on other people, put it on their, their
00:30:22.400 neighbors. All right. Another thing from Biden, speaking of very politically unpopular, here's
00:30:30.560 Biden yesterday addressing teachers. And I want, I want you to listen to what he says here. And
00:30:35.580 speaking of midterms, one thing I'll say is that, uh, I really hope that Joe Biden takes this message
00:30:42.660 and the Democrats, they take this messaging and take it right into the midterms. Please do. I beg you.
00:30:47.060 Listen to this. Have the best educated public in the world. Have our students gain confidence
00:30:56.860 enough to know what they can do to reach in. We have an obligation. We have an obligation to help
00:31:04.680 them teach and reach their potential. You've heard me say it many times about our children,
00:31:12.600 but it's true. They're all our children. And the reason you're the teachers of the year is because
00:31:18.500 you recognize that. They're not somebody else's children. They're like yours when they're in the
00:31:22.880 classroom. You represent a profession that helps them gain the confidence, the confidence they believe
00:31:30.200 they can do anything. They're not somebody else's children. They're yours when they're in the
00:31:39.440 classroom. Please, Joe, that take that, that, that, that's a winner. Yeah. Please take that all
00:31:47.020 the way into the midterms. They're not. And what does he mean by somebody else's? He means the parents.
00:31:52.820 They're not somebody else's, the parents. No, they're your children because they're in the classroom.
00:31:59.960 Um, and that is, that's, this is not a gaffe. You didn't misspeak here. That's exactly what Democrats
00:32:07.000 think. That is precisely the leftist position is that when the kids are in the classroom,
00:32:12.760 they're in the government classrooms, government building, government school system. And that means
00:32:17.540 that they belong to the government. That is their position. They're not usually quite that explicit
00:32:22.100 about it, but they get pretty close. And this is a moment when Joe Biden was very explicit about it.
00:32:27.700 That's how they see it. You send your children to us and they are, they are ours. And not only when
00:32:35.620 they're in the classroom, by the way, but even when they leave, they're still ours.
00:32:41.540 That's how they see it. And it's, it's good. It's, it's very good to know. Now they're,
00:32:46.880 they're wrong about that. Of course you are entrusted. If you're a teacher in a public school
00:32:51.940 classroom, um, you know, depending on what grade level you might, you might have the kids entrusted
00:32:58.500 to you for 45 minutes at a time. You have a different group of kids with 45 minutes and they
00:33:02.160 are entrusted to you for a specific purpose, not as an adoptive parent. It's not as foster care,
00:33:09.020 not even as daycare. At least that's not what, what schools are supposed to be, even though,
00:33:13.480 even though they're treated that way, you are simply entrusted to impart certain information
00:33:19.140 to the kids on a certain subject. That's all you're supposed to be doing. That's the only,
00:33:23.760 that's your whole job. And not, not to say that it's a, that it's a small or minor thing.
00:33:29.280 It's quite a noble job to do and an important one. If you actually do the job you're supposed
00:33:33.880 to do and take it seriously and don't try to do more than that job by taking these children
00:33:39.380 under your wing and turning them into your own kind of de facto children because they're not.
00:33:45.620 But it is, it is crucial for us to understand that, um, this is how the government education
00:33:51.380 system sees it. And when you send your kids to the school, even though they are still your kids,
00:33:56.600 you are sending them into a system that believes that they have ownership, um, of the parental
00:34:04.800 rights that actually belong to you. All right. Speaking of which from the daily wire,
00:34:11.100 Rhode Island Democrats are pushing legislation that would teach children about pleasure-based
00:34:14.940 sexual relations, pleasure-based sexual relations with the support of left-wing groups. The legislation,
00:34:21.760 Senate Bill 2285 would amend current law so that culturally appropriate courses in, quote,
00:34:27.800 family life or sex education are taught to children beginning in sixth grade when students
00:34:31.800 are about 11 or 12 years old. Um, quote, teachings would recognize pleasure-based sexual relations,
00:34:40.720 different sexual orientations, and be inclusive of same-sex relationships. The act would also provide
00:34:45.940 that instruction include gender, gender expression, gender identity, and the harm of negative gender
00:34:51.480 stereotypes. This is what they want to do in, uh, Rhode Island. Rhode Island State Senator Tiara Mack,
00:34:58.420 a Democrat representing Providence, one of the primary sponsors of the bill, has cited her Southern
00:35:03.340 abstinence-only sex education as a reason for pushing SB 2285. She said there was no conversation
00:35:09.740 about what it meant to be gay or what a healthy relationship looked like. Sex education is about learning
00:35:14.800 about gender and gender roles, about what it's like to grow up in a single-parent family. It's about
00:35:18.860 all the things I wish I had gotten. It's about knowing I wasn't alone. That's what she says.
00:35:23.080 And in fact, Tiara Mack, I think we have a, uh, video of her. She's interviewing, talking a little
00:35:27.080 bit about, about this pleasure-based sex ed. And, um, here's what she has to say about that.
00:35:32.800 An opportunity came up to teach sex ed, um, through a program, um, at the university called Sexual Health
00:35:37.840 Advocacy through Peer Educators to teach sex ed, um, to local high school students. And I did that my
00:35:43.100 sophomore year, um, after, um, applying my freshman year and like, well, if I didn't know
00:35:48.420 this, like there are people out there like me who literally have no idea how to talk about
00:35:53.280 their body, how to access agency and how to actually, um, practice autonomy in whatever
00:35:58.520 way they want to do it. And for me, that was unlocking conversations about my body, my sexuality
00:36:03.560 and my identity in a safe and, um, culturally sensitive and respectful environment. And also
00:36:09.440 sharing that with 15 year olds who at the time are yearning to have that conversation. And I taught
00:36:14.740 sex ed all throughout the rest of my, um, college career. And then I went to go on to teach high
00:36:20.360 school math and I still was teaching sex education. And at the time, at the same time, still working
00:36:25.480 on issues surrounding reproductive health rights and access from local abortion funding work and to
00:36:30.880 now being on the board of the abortion fund, um, and being an employee of Planned Parenthood
00:36:34.760 Center in New England. It's been a core of my work. Yeah. So that's what she wants. That's what
00:36:39.820 you think sex ed should be. It should be about, as she said in the, in the article, it's about
00:36:43.980 knowing I'm not alone. It's about, it's about discovering your body or whatever else she's
00:36:48.120 talking about. Um, no sex ed is, is not supposed to be any of that. And in fact, there should,
00:36:55.300 you know, we're at a point now where you just have to get sex ed out of the schools completely
00:36:59.500 for, for every grade level, you know, K through 12, no sex ed of any kind, get it all out. This
00:37:06.220 is not, um, you know, no, no, no. I'm not saying let's have abstinence only education instead of this,
00:37:11.860 instead of the so-called comprehensive sex education. No, I don't want that either. Um,
00:37:16.760 I don't, I don't, I don't need, if I sent my kids to public school, which I don't, but if I did,
00:37:22.440 I wouldn't need teachers talking to my kids about how to abstain from sex and the advantages of
00:37:28.220 that, that's not a conversation that I'm going to trust to strangers. Okay. I can have that
00:37:34.300 conversation. I don't need you to do it. I don't trust you to do it. Um, but of course we're way
00:37:39.760 beyond abstinence education and they want this, which is on the other, the total other end of
00:37:45.180 the spectrum. My point is just take the whole spectrum and throw it out. Um, we just cannot trust
00:37:51.360 these perverts to have conversations with kids about sex at all. Okay. So there should be no
00:38:01.400 subject, no course called sex ed. You want to talk about reproduction, talk about that in biology.
00:38:10.160 You want to talk about the anatomy, talk about that. That's also a science discussion. So you can
00:38:15.440 cover those, but anything beyond that, um, even if in theory, you know, there, there could be a
00:38:26.700 version of a sex ed class that's appropriate in theory, which I haven't even heard what that
00:38:31.000 version would be. Even if you could in theory, figure out such, such a curriculum, you cannot trust
00:38:37.880 the teachers to do it. You just can't, as, as we see here, because they have taken this,
00:38:44.640 keep it, keep something else in mind here that for them, sex and their sex life and their sexual
00:38:50.960 orientation and their gender identity, like that's, that's their whole existence. That's everything.
00:38:57.840 That's all they care about. So, so everything gets wrapped up in that. That's also their religion.
00:39:02.380 And that's why she says, Oh, sex is about, it's about knowing sex is about knowing yourself and
00:39:08.320 knowing you're not alone. And what, what does knowing you're not alone have to do with sex ed?
00:39:13.720 What are you talking about? Well, it's because her whole identity and life and everything is
00:39:19.500 wrapped up in sex. And that's yet another reason why you can't trust these people to talk to kids
00:39:26.000 about sex. Uh, speaking of her whole life being wrapped up in sex is another, another tweet from
00:39:30.080 this Tiara Mack character. If we put this up, um, just to give you an idea of like what her priorities
00:39:34.660 are. So this is what she tweeted a couple of days ago. She says, I'm a single queer, hold on a second.
00:39:40.560 I'm a single queer train advocate. Like what a queer train at. So she's an advocate for queer trains.
00:39:50.560 She doesn't want those, you know, normal hetero, heteronormative trains. She's an advocate for
00:39:55.340 queer trains. Get on the queer train, everybody. She says, I'm a single queer train advocate who's
00:40:01.340 desperate for better train service and high-speed rail options to NYC on the weekends exclusively for
00:40:07.340 the queer dating scene. Better trains now. What? Yet again, exhibit A. No, that's not exhibit A. That's,
00:40:18.060 you know, that's exhibit, uh, 5,772, or whatever of why you can't trust these people to talk to your
00:40:24.440 kids about. So you can't trust them at all with anything. Just these lunatic, absolute lunatics.
00:40:31.080 This is an elected Democrat. I guess if I could decipher this, she's demanding her own train service
00:40:40.280 to facilitate her sex life. She's demanding an exclusive train service so that she can go to New
00:40:48.880 York City and, um, have sex with women. That's what she's saying. This is an elected Democrat.
00:40:58.640 My God. Uh, and that's another one. Democrats take that into the midterms too, please take student loan
00:41:06.320 forgiveness. Uh, they're not your kids and queer trains. I think that should be your platform right
00:41:11.980 there. Bring that right into midterms. Hop on the queer train, go right into midterms with that.
00:41:17.620 Please do. Let's get to the comment section.
00:41:19.680 If you're a man, it's required that you grow a bit. Hey, we're the sweet baby gang.
00:41:32.500 Jasmine says, Daddy Walsh is the actual troll king. He never ceases to top his last troll. His debut as an
00:41:39.500 author and movie maker might even top raising money for AOC's grandma. Well, like I said,
00:41:44.760 we're just, uh, you know, the AOC thing will, it's, it's, uh, smaller, you know, it's a much
00:41:51.480 smaller scale. Some of the other stuff we stuff we've done that might always have pride of place
00:41:56.900 in my own heart. Um, just cause I, I enjoyed that one so much and it was so much fun, but really all
00:42:02.280 this stuff. And, uh, you know, also being a, the one, another one we can add to the list now is being,
00:42:06.980 uh, bestselling biologist. So I'm loving that as well. Um, but Gingy responds to, um, the comment
00:42:16.400 from Jasmine and says, is being the troll king something to be proud of? Doesn't sound like
00:42:22.420 something a genuine Christian would want. Is there anything in, uh, uh, you know, I've, I've read
00:42:29.460 through the gospels quite a bit and I don't remember, maybe it's in the epistles. Is there something in
00:42:34.080 there about thou shalt not troll? Is that, is that a unchristian? No, you know, I, I think what
00:42:43.040 you're getting at is that, um, cause when we talk about trolling now, there's a version of trolling
00:42:48.900 where you're just saying stuff you don't even believe because you want attention. And there's
00:42:55.580 quite a lot of that kind of trolling that goes on the internet. That's not what I'm doing.
00:42:59.620 Okay. That's not the trolling that I engage in and also wholeheartedly support.
00:43:07.460 Um, because everything that I'm saying, I absolutely believe.
00:43:10.660 And when you're in the troll sweet spot, okay. It's when you've really, when you've really threaded
00:43:17.720 the needle is when you're joking about it, but you're also being a hundred percent serious at
00:43:22.760 the same time. And so that's pretty much, that's basically like everything I do. It's I'm joking,
00:43:26.920 but I'm also not at all. Johnny, the walrus, it's a total joke, but also not at all at the same exact
00:43:34.200 time. Okay. And so if you're being genuine and you're standing for what you believe in,
00:43:40.840 then I'm not quite sure. I see how that sort of quote trolling, uh, somehow betrays my Christian
00:43:48.440 faith. Now it's kind of aggressive. Um, it could be, it could take a mocking tone at times.
00:43:57.060 It could be a little bit ruthless, but that is what we need to do. You know, we talk about the,
00:44:06.620 one of the advantages that we have, as I mentioned before, is that on the left, like they're just not
00:44:10.600 funny at all. They're not having any fun. And, um, and that's an advantage to us. But the other
00:44:14.700 advantage is that on the left, you know, these are also, as we saw with the Amazon videos, these are
00:44:20.160 very soft people, uh, many of them quite mentally damaged. And what that means is that if we want to
00:44:28.260 win and have some real victories, there's an opportunity there. If we're smart about it and
00:44:33.840 clever and also, yeah, a little bit ruthless because they're soft and they're sensitive.
00:44:38.820 So we have to be the opposite of that. And that's what it calls for right now. Remember,
00:44:44.380 like I said, this is not, this is not, um, we're not living in peace times. Let's see.
00:44:53.300 The crazy thing is that if Elon Musk was African-American and looked African-American,
00:44:57.760 all the left would be celebrating him taking over Twitter. Well, that's not necessarily true at all.
00:45:03.160 In fact, uh, you're saying if Elon Musk was like actually black, then they would all be celebrating.
00:45:07.840 No, no, they wouldn't. Not necessarily. It depends on his ideology. I mean, if Elon Musk
00:45:12.560 was black and had the ideology of Clarence Thomas, uh, they would not be celebrating that in the least
00:45:19.020 bit. So that's an important point here about, um, you know, they're the kind of racial preferences
00:45:23.840 that they have on the left and they do have them, but that is all filtered through the lens of
00:45:28.540 ideology. And so if you're on the right or perceived to be on the right, or just simply not on the left,
00:45:35.040 they hate you no matter what your skin color is. And in fact, if you're not white, they'll hate you
00:45:39.360 even more because on top of disagreeing with you, they also, there's also this, this sense of betrayal
00:45:43.920 they have because they think that they own you and that you owe yourself to them. And so on top of
00:45:48.480 everything, they also feel betrayed by you and they consider you a race traitor. So you're, they're
00:45:52.880 actually going to hate you more. Just talk to, you know, ask Candace Owens about it. They're going to
00:45:56.420 hate you even more because they think that you owe yourself to them. Um, Dirk says, all my kids
00:46:04.040 genuinely love Johnny the Walrus. The one-year-old is especially fond of pretending to be able to read
00:46:08.360 it, which I feel is thematically appropriate. My daughter, um, legitimately loves the book. Also
00:46:15.240 my, my two-year-old and she has it basically memorized and she actually does love the book.
00:46:21.260 I don't, she doesn't really understand that she's a little bit biased. She doesn't understand that I
00:46:25.840 wrote it. Like she hasn't, she doesn't quite grasp that because she's always bringing the book over to
00:46:29.840 me to show me the book and show me things in the book that she thinks are great. Like it's the first time
00:46:33.600 I've seen it, but she does draw the connection between the zookeeper character and daddy. So
00:46:38.020 she, she sees that daddy is in the book. And so that's one of the reasons she, but even if,
00:46:42.160 but even if without that, I still think it's a book that all kids can love. Um, let's see.
00:46:51.920 Michael says, I love Matt's analogy of men with rough hands. I met a girl and we went on a date
00:46:56.540 and she said that I had smooth hands. I knew that was a lie because I do construction and my hands are
00:47:01.340 basically sandpaper. I never met up with her again. Well, that's the only way to respond to
00:47:05.060 that. I mean, that's, uh, talk about trying to take someone's talk, talk about emasculating someone.
00:47:09.920 There's, there's no better way to do that. So I think you made the right decision, Michael.
00:47:12.720 Let's get down to our daily cancellation.
00:47:18.160 You know, if it seems like Hollywood is infested with Satanists, well, that's because it is.
00:47:23.660 In fact, we can add this to the list, which is a very, very long list to beat at this point
00:47:28.400 of things that are erroneously written off as conspiracy theories, but actually are not.
00:47:33.020 And have turned out to be entirely true. Hollywood is indeed satanic case in point,
00:47:37.420 the actress, Megan Fox. Now, granted I call her an actress, but I couldn't tell you for sure. If she
00:47:42.020 actually has starred in any films over the past 10 years. And even back when she was starring in
00:47:47.720 films, it would be a bit of a stretch to call her an actress, but that's all academic. I suppose Fox was
00:47:52.820 never famous for her acting talent. She, um, you know, her primary skill has always been simply
00:47:58.720 walking around and looking attractive. And to her credit, she's always done a pretty good job on
00:48:03.360 both counts. These days though, she's added another credential to her resume. Um, she has expanded her
00:48:09.960 repertoire and now she also, on top of walking around, looking attractive, she also has a weird
00:48:15.900 boyfriend. And this is kind of like her main thing now. And what seems to be getting her into the
00:48:20.800 headlines is that she has a weird boyfriend. Fox is dating somebody named Machine Gun Kelly. Now I
00:48:25.340 couldn't begin to tell you anything about Machine Gun Kelly, nor whether Machine Gun Kelly is his
00:48:28.940 Christian name. But I do know that Fox has described him as a handsome demonic creature. Unless you think
00:48:37.380 that she meant that ironically in some way, or as a joke, here she is in rather explicit terms in a
00:48:43.440 recent interview, um, talking about their vampiric sexual habits. Listen.
00:48:49.780 Drank each other's blood might mislead people or like people are imagining us with like goblets and
00:48:56.240 we're like Game of Thrones drinking each other's blood. It's just a few drops, but yes, we do consume
00:49:02.000 each other's blood on occasion for ritual purposes only. It is used for a reason and it is controlled
00:49:09.740 where it's like, let's shed a few drops of blood and each drink it. He's much more haphazard and
00:49:15.020 hectic and chaotic where he's willing to just like cut his chest open with broken glass and be like,
00:49:20.140 take my soul. Let me bleed on you. It doesn't not happen. Let me tell you, maybe not exactly like that,
00:49:28.140 but it, a version of that has happened many times.
00:49:35.860 Oh, for ritual purposes only. Well, okay then. As long as you're consuming each other's blood for
00:49:41.300 ritual purposes, then it's not creepy at all. Oh wait, no, right. That's, that's actually the
00:49:45.360 creepiest possible explanation you could have given. Not that there could have been a non-creepy one.
00:49:51.820 Um, Fox admits that she participates in blood drinking rituals with her boyfriend. She doesn't feel
00:49:57.000 embarrassed about sharing this information with the world, partly because she's not capable of
00:50:00.480 shame, but also because she lives and moves in a world where that kind of thing is not considered
00:50:04.660 bizarre. In fact, this only came up because she mentioned matter of factly in an Instagram post
00:50:09.180 a few months ago after a Mr. Machine Gun proposed to her that they went home and drank each other's
00:50:15.240 blood. She just kind of like said that with no explanation, no other context given. She simply assumed
00:50:20.800 that everybody would read that and go, Oh yeah, well they drank each other's blood as one does.
00:50:25.420 When she, what she's describing is quite literally a satanic blood ritual, which should be quite
00:50:33.260 evident, especially because as she says, her boyfriend cuts her chest, his chest open with
00:50:38.180 broken glass and says, take my soul. I mean, you couldn't be more clear. You wouldn't be more clear
00:50:44.220 if you were sacrificing a goat on a satanic altar, which may be something they do as well. It wouldn't
00:50:48.420 surprise me. Now, speaking of a Megan Fox's Satanism, there was more news in that vein yesterday,
00:50:54.740 so to speak. Fox also bragged about dressing her young son up in women's clothes. Here's the Daily
00:51:01.500 Wire. It says, Fox said that when her nine-year-old son Noah started expressing his desire to wear
00:51:06.400 dresses, she decided to educate him with literature made for and made by transgender individuals.
00:51:11.780 I do have a child that suffered, she said, of her son being bullied. I have a lot of worries about that
00:51:15.960 because I just wish that humanity was not like this. Although my kid is so brave and my child is so brave,
00:51:20.060 and I know that they've chosen this journey for a reason, it's just hard as a mom. I bought a bunch
00:51:26.140 of books that sort of address these things and address the full spectrum of what this is, she
00:51:29.700 told the publication. So from the time they were very young, notice how she's using they to refer
00:51:34.880 to her son. I've incorporated those things into their daily lives so that nobody feels like they
00:51:39.820 are weird or strange or different. Some of the books are written by transgender children. Some of the
00:51:43.640 books are just about how you can be a boy and wear a dress. You can express yourself through your
00:51:47.380 clothing however you want. Now in fact, as it turns out, Fox's son didn't just randomly decide
00:51:53.020 to start wearing dresses. She's been pushing this on him for years. Here she is back in 2019 on The
00:51:57.740 View bragging about her son's cross-dressing habit. Listen. He's really into fashion and he's the one
00:52:04.480 like sometimes he'll dress himself and he likes to wear dresses sometimes and he'll, and I send him to
00:52:10.040 a really liberal like hippie school, but even there here in California, he still has little boys
00:52:16.260 going like boys don't wear dresses or boys don't wear pink. And so we're going through that now
00:52:21.500 where I'm trying to teach him to be confident no matter what anyone else says.
00:52:24.800 Yeah, that's right.
00:52:26.620 He just, he finally, he had stopped wearing dresses for a while. He just wore one two days ago to school
00:52:33.840 and he came home and I was like, how was it? Did any of the friends at school have anything to say?
00:52:38.300 And he was like, well, all the boys laughed when I came in, but he's like, but I don't care. I love dresses too much.
00:52:42.940 So Megan Fox didn't want to have just a regular boring boy. She wanted a cross-dresser that she
00:52:50.020 could, you know, parade around like a fashion accessory, show off to all of her friends,
00:52:54.000 talk about during interviews. I can tell you right now that no nine-year-old boy,
00:53:00.320 no six-year-old boy, no boy of any age just randomly decides that he wants to wear dresses
00:53:05.020 to school. That's the product of lifelong conditioning. In fact, in another interview,
00:53:09.900 she said this, she says, when I became pregnant with Noah, I could feel through my mother's
00:53:14.280 intuition that he was not subscribing to gender stereotypes. So I decided to provide an environment
00:53:18.980 for him early on that would allow him to discover how he wanted to express himself. So through her
00:53:23.260 mother's intuition in the womb, she decided that her son is non-binary and provided an environment
00:53:31.140 from birth to facilitate that. And what do you know? Now her kid wears dresses. Who could have guessed?
00:53:37.160 Now she is the bad guy in this scenario, of course, not the other boys at school laughing at her son.
00:53:43.960 I feel bad for her son. I feel really bad for her son on a lot of different levels. I mean, he's got
00:53:48.660 this blood drinking freak of a mother and I feel bad for him. But in terms of getting laughed at at
00:53:55.700 school, like in fact, it is ridiculous for a boy to wear dresses. The other boys are not wrong for
00:54:02.180 finding it silly. On the few occasions when my own children have encountered and seen this kind of
00:54:09.740 thing just out in public and they've talked to me about it and they've said, oh, that's silly. And I
00:54:16.220 said, you're right. It is silly. It's very silly for boys to dress like girls. It's a very silly thing
00:54:21.760 because that's how I want them to understand it. The boys supposedly bullying her son actually have
00:54:31.040 his well-being more in mind than she does, even if they don't realize it, because they're pushing him
00:54:36.420 towards normalcy and masculinity, which is good because he's a boy and that's who he is. And he
00:54:43.920 should be encouraged to accept who he is. She's pulling him the other direction for her own
00:54:50.320 narcissistic, self-serving reasons. That's the common theme here. Narcissism, self-worship. Even
00:54:56.900 though Megan Fox literally participates in blood drinking rituals, she still is not, I mean, probably
00:55:01.580 not anyway, a what we might call theological Satanist. She probably doesn't explicitly worship
00:55:07.660 the theological devil. She might. She probably doesn't. The most common form of Satanism is this,
00:55:14.360 especially in Hollywood. It's self-worship. And that is Satanism in its rawest form. It's not
00:55:21.340 worshiping the devil outright, but worshiping yourself. In that sense, modern leftism is Satanism.
00:55:28.960 It's indistinguishable from Satanism. It puts the self at the center of everything, the center of the
00:55:33.200 universe. Everything and everyone exists to serve, to subordinate itself to the self. And the self
00:55:40.920 itself exists for itself. It has no higher purpose beyond itself. For Megan Fox, even her child exists
00:55:49.760 as a mere prop, a thing to be used, dressed up, paraded around, and so on. And that certainly,
00:55:57.600 first and foremost, is why she is today finally canceled. And we'll leave it there for today.
00:56:02.320 Thanks for watching. Thanks for listening. Have a great day. Godspeed.
00:56:32.320 Our supervising producer is Mathis Glover. Production manager, Pavel Wadowski. Our associate
00:56:37.760 producer is McKenna Waters. The show is edited by Robbie Dantzler. Our audio is mixed by Mike
00:56:42.700 Coromina. And hair and makeup is done by Cherokee Heart. The Matt Wall Show is a Daily Wire production.
00:56:47.360 Copyright Daily Wire 2022.
00:56:48.580 Hey there, this is John Bickley, Daily Wire editor-in-chief and co-host of Morning Wire.
00:56:53.980 On today's episode, the great American migration, Massachusetts' parents sue a school district over
00:56:59.560 its gender identity policies, and what's next for Elon Musk and Twitter. Join us and get the facts
00:57:05.920 first on the news you need to know with our show, Morning Wire.