Ep. 968 - The Leftist Plot To Destroy Childhood Innocence
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 2 minutes
Words per Minute
174.29074
Summary
A proposed law in Texas has propelled the left to openly defend child drag shows. One such defender says that childhood innocence is a myth and it s fueled by prejudice. A revealing admission. Also, a crazed leftist tries to kill Brett Kavanaugh, but you d never know about that if you rely on the corporate media for your news. Plus, Joe Biden disintegrates on live TV while talking to Jimmy Kimmel, plus, Joy Behar claims that black people don t have guns. We will fact check that claim. And a Disneyland employee is feeling the heat for intervening in a marriage proposal. In our daily cancellation, a popular YouTuber debunks my film, What is a Woman? or So I'm Told? We ll take a look and see how he did it.
Transcript
00:00:00.000
Today on the Matt Wall Show, a proposed law in Texas has propelled the left to openly defend
00:00:04.760
child drag shows. One such defender says that childhood innocence is a myth and it's fueled
00:00:10.380
by prejudice. A revealing admission, we'll talk about it. Also, a crazed leftist tries to kill
00:00:15.400
Brett Kavanaugh, but you'd never know about that if you rely on the corporate media for your news.
00:00:19.240
Plus, Joe Biden disintegrates on live TV while talking to Jimmy Kimmel. Joy Behar claims that
00:00:24.420
black people don't have guns. We will fact check that claim. And a Disneyland employee is feeling
00:00:29.440
the heat for intervening in a marriage proposal. In our daily cancellation, a popular YouTuber
00:00:33.940
debunks my film, What is a Woman? Or So I'm Told. We'll take a look and see how he did all of that
00:00:39.200
and much more today on the Matt Wall Show. Have you ever heard of data brokers? They're the middlemen
00:00:52.320
collecting and selling all those digital footprints you leave online. They can stitch together detailed
00:00:56.860
profiles, which include your browsing history, online searches, location data. Then they sell
00:01:01.200
the profile to a company who delivers you a targeted ad. Well, no biggie. You might think,
00:01:05.980
well, you might be surprised to learn that these same data brokers are also selling your information
00:01:10.760
to the Department of Homeland Security, to the IRS. I, for one, don't want the tax man showing up at my
00:01:16.140
door because of some search I did on my phone. So to mask my digital footprints, I protect myself with
00:01:22.020
ExpressVPN. One of the easiest ways for brokers to aggregate data and tie it back to you is through
00:01:27.420
your device's unique IP address, which also reveals information about your location. When you're
00:01:32.260
connected to ExpressVPN, your IP address is hidden. That makes it much more difficult for data brokers
00:01:36.700
to identify who you are. ExpressVPN also encrypts 100% of your network data to keep your data safe from
00:01:42.580
hackers on public Wi-Fi. That's why I have the ExpressVPN app downloaded on all of my devices, phone,
00:01:47.760
computer, even my home Wi-Fi router. All I do is tap one button to turn it on, and I'm protected.
00:01:53.640
It's really that easy. So make sure your online activity and data is protected with the best VPN
00:01:57.600
money you can buy. Visit expressvpn.com slash Walsh right now. Get three months for free through my
00:02:03.360
special link. That's expressvpn, E-X-P-R-E-S-S, vpn.com slash Walsh, expressvpn.com slash Walsh to learn more.
00:02:11.580
Well, you can't say they didn't warn us. You may remember just a year ago when the Gay Men's Choir in San
00:02:16.760
Francisco went viral with a song promising that they'll convert our children and turn them gay,
00:02:22.420
and they weren't lying. Of course, that was far from the beginning of the left's efforts to recruit
00:02:28.000
children into the alphabet cult, but they did ramp up their campaign considerably over the past year.
00:02:33.720
We've seen them in the mainstream come out explicitly in favor of teaching kindergartners
00:02:37.660
about gender fluidity and transgenderism. Again, something that was happening before this year,
00:02:42.560
but now the only difference is that they're very open in defending it. And now in response
00:02:46.740
to a proposed bill in Texas to outlaw child drag shows, we're seeing them circle the rainbow
00:02:52.520
wagons around that particular brand of debauchery, some of the defenses of the practice have come in
00:02:58.640
the form of sort of feigned obtuseness. Well, I don't see what the big deal is. Drag isn't sexual,
00:03:03.620
is it? Someone needs to explain to me why this is so harmful to kids. Now, as I've been arguing now for
00:03:09.260
days, the correct response to that kind of thing is to place the burden back on them. I don't need to
00:03:15.400
and shouldn't have to explain to you why drag shows are harmful to kids. Given that your side is
00:03:22.740
introducing this concept, you must explain why it is helpful to kids. In what way is a child's life
00:03:29.340
enhanced by putting a dollar bill in the thong of a cross-dressing man while he gyrates around a gay
00:03:35.020
bar? Tell me why this should exist. See, it's your idea. You have to defend it. But others on the left
00:03:40.660
have been more open and unabashed in their child drag show advocacy. Entertainment Weekly this
00:03:46.340
morning has this headline. It says, drag artists slam Texas bill that could ban minors from drag
00:03:52.180
shows. The article quotes a number of drag artists, quote unquote, the term being used very loosely,
00:03:58.480
as we'll see, who insist that we would be oppressing them if they're prevented from cross-dressing in front
00:04:04.460
of children. They feel a deep and powerful urge to put on women's clothing and dance for young
00:04:09.180
children. And any interference would be very painful for them, they explain. Not exactly in
00:04:13.820
those words, but just about. One drag queen who has spoken out is named Maxi Glamour and describes
00:04:21.860
himself as a non-binary drag, quote, demon queen. And you can see from the pictures on his website that
00:04:28.340
he takes the demon role quite seriously. He posted a tweet saying, kids are future rock stars. They're
00:04:36.440
future painters, future museum curators, or even future critics. It's important that they grow up
00:04:41.960
in a world where art is all around them, because in the future, they'll be the ones keeping it alive.
00:04:48.160
Now, accompanying the caption is footage of him in full drag demon attire performing the flute for a
00:04:54.840
group of toddlers. The whole scene is like something out of a creepy medieval fable. Let's watch for just a
00:05:00.900
second here. So there you go. I, I, and I still, I just don't understand why these dudes always look
00:05:19.340
like, you know, zombie Marge Simpsons or something. Now, again, you must explain if you're an advocate
00:05:27.780
for this. Why do kids need that? How does that help them? How are they enriched by a cross-dressing
00:05:33.940
man in a demon costume playing the flute for them? They call this art, but even just judged on pure
00:05:39.200
aesthetic grounds, it's ugly, gaudy, vulgar. That goes for all drag. I mean, we can't even be tempted
00:05:45.960
to buy the, it's good to expose your kid to art excuse, because along with being overtly sexual and
00:05:51.220
inappropriate, it's terrible art. Loud, obnoxious, hideous. There's no beauty or talent or skill involved.
00:05:57.780
If I wanted my kids to be exposed to talentless, distasteful, garish, loud, lurid garbage,
00:06:03.360
I can simply turn on the TV and flip to almost any channel. So I don't need drag shows for that.
00:06:07.940
But art, of course, has nothing to do with it. A woman named Natalie Nguyen, who's a YouTuber,
00:06:11.520
a political commentator, she gets to the real heart of the matter. She tweeted yesterday,
00:06:15.940
quote, random drag queens in public spaces pose exactly zero threat to children. These people don't
00:06:21.680
care about protecting children. They care about protecting, quote, childhood innocence,
00:06:25.740
ignorance, ignorance romanticized, a bullshit fantasy made up by adults reflecting every adult
00:06:30.920
prejudice. Oh, well, there it is, right? Childhood innocence, she says, is a fantasy. It is romanticized,
00:06:38.860
something that adults made up because we're prejudiced. She's opposed to childhood innocence,
00:06:44.320
even in theory. She doesn't think that children are innocent or that they should be. This is why she
00:06:50.480
draws a false distinction between protecting children and protecting childhood innocence.
00:06:56.160
Well, they don't want to protect children. They just want to protect childhood innocence,
00:06:59.900
which is like saying to someone, well, you don't care about health. You only care about nutrition.
00:07:07.660
Yes, well, nutrition is an important aspect of health. You can't have good health without good
00:07:12.160
nutrition, just as you can't protect children without protecting their innocence. Now, a child's
00:07:17.340
innocence isn't the only thing we ought to protect. We should protect their physical safety too,
00:07:21.280
of course, but you can't carve out their innocence, throw it on the trash heap, and then claim that you
00:07:26.660
care about protecting children otherwise. This hostility to childhood innocence is, most tragically
00:07:33.980
of all, shared by an increasing number of parents themselves. That's the elephant in the room,
00:07:40.160
the elephant that's watching the drag queen in the room. In every one of these videos,
00:07:44.200
all of those children have parents, parents who brought them to the event, parents who have
00:07:49.580
dedicated themselves to the destruction of their own child's mind and soul. Parents of this kind
00:07:56.660
will sink to unimaginable depths in an effort to corrupt and destroy their own children. In fact,
00:08:02.480
one rising trend on TikTok right now are videos of parents crowdfunding their children's castration
00:08:09.660
and mutilation. So here's just one. This is a, I'm actually not exactly sure what this is,
00:08:14.300
to be honest, but it's a parent of some kind who is soliciting funds from the internet for this
00:08:21.080
purpose, in order to do this to a child. Watch. So, for those of you who don't know, my name is Lyric.
00:08:28.800
Today, I'm making a video that isn't like the other content that I typically make. Basically,
00:08:35.120
I'm raising money to help fund my son's transition-related costs. I'm sharing this with his
00:08:43.020
permission. Basically, we already have a diagnosis of gender dysphoria for him. We have gotten his
00:08:50.600
blood work done, and we need to start him on puberty blockers as soon as possible. Now, I personally,
00:08:56.980
I didn't, I transitioned later, so I wasn't familiar with how puberty blockers worked. Basically,
00:09:02.320
my insurance doesn't cover this, which is wonderful, right? Um, the generic version of Lupron
00:09:11.040
that we have a 22.5 milligram dose that is going to cost out-of-pocket $468 per shot, and each shot
00:09:22.260
lasts three months. So, we need four of these a year. Um, it's, what, close to $2,000. Um,
00:09:35.720
I have already exhausted most of my funds. I need help. I want to raise money to help cover his
00:09:44.580
transition-related costs, as, um, it's very difficult to come out with that sort of money
00:09:50.480
on short notice. Um, I know that I'm asking a lot, but I would do anything to make sure that
00:10:01.720
Oh, you're running out of funds, are you? Well, good. I hope you go bankrupt. I, I wish bankruptcy
00:10:09.560
upon you. Uh, I wish poverty and bankruptcy upon you. That's what I hope. I mean, if that's, if that's
00:10:16.520
the only thing that's going to protect your kid from what you want to do to your child. Uh, we talk
00:10:22.840
about parental rights, but I think we should probably be more specific because this is also a,
00:10:30.920
uh, a claim. Now, this is a response by the left when we talk about, you know, parents bringing their
00:10:36.900
kids to drag shows and parents transitioning their kids. And the left now will, you'll often hear them
00:10:41.240
say, well, I thought you cared about parental rights. Well, I do, but what do, what do you have
00:10:48.840
the right to do as a parent? I mean, what are your parental rights exactly? We would all agree that
00:10:53.400
parents don't have the right to do anything they want with, to, or around their children. I think
00:10:57.520
we would all agree, at least in theory with that. So what do we mean by parental rights? What we mean
00:11:02.580
or should mean is that parents have the right to care for their children, protect their children
00:11:07.100
and love and nurture them. That's what you have the right to do. And as always with rights, it would
00:11:13.340
probably be more helpful and more clarifying to use a different R word responsibility.
00:11:19.720
Okay. You have a responsibility to do all of these things for your child. And with any,
00:11:25.300
with any human rights on the, on the flip side of the coin, there's always responsibility that we
00:11:29.680
should be talking about. And when it comes to parental rights, it's not even on the flip side
00:11:32.580
of the coin. It's the same thing. Whenever you're talking about your parental rights, that is also your
00:11:36.420
responsibility to your child. God has given you this mission. You've been entrusted with that task,
00:11:42.980
but if you won't do it, if you will in fact do the opposite, working to corrupt, pervert,
00:11:49.600
and destroy the very child that you're called to protect, then you should lose all of your rights.
00:11:54.240
I mean, I talk about, I'm saying all of your rights, your parental rights, you should lose
00:11:57.200
in every other right and be locked in a prison cell until you die. There are many parents who deserve
00:12:02.820
that treat. This, this is the groomer's secret weapon. He has many parents as allies. Problem
00:12:11.160
begins as always at home. And that's the part of the story, I think that we need to start
00:12:16.260
really talking about. Now let's get to our five headlines.
00:12:19.540
You know, if you've been listening to my show for a while, you know that I've been an activist
00:12:28.340
against the lazy grocery shoppers who don't put their grocery carts away. Well, I have some
00:12:33.520
unfortunate news you've probably heard in some of these other reads. The grocery carts attacked me
00:12:38.720
in my own car. Again, I think we're pretending. Unfortunately, when I was pulling out of my parking
00:12:44.100
spot, a rogue grocery cart crashed into my car, totaling it and nearly killing me. There are two
00:12:50.480
lessons we can take away from this. One, don't be lazy. Put your shopping carts away so I don't have
00:12:54.900
to suffer. And two, you can solve an issue like mine quickly and without breaking the bank by just
00:12:59.700
visiting rockauto.com. They have the touch-up paint and pens that are easy to use and just as easy as a
00:13:05.200
magic marker. Rockauto.com is an online family-owned business that sells all the auto parts you could ever
00:13:09.580
possibly need that are specific to your own vehicle. Their prices are shockingly reasonable and their
00:13:13.480
shipping is quick. So no matter what's going on with your car, you can trust Rock Auto to get you
00:13:18.020
what you need best. Rock Auto has a very user-friendly website and they make it easy for you to pick the
00:13:22.860
right parts for your specific car. You'll see photo specs and even installation tips so you can feel
00:13:26.300
confident that you're choosing the correct parts for your vehicle. So what are you waiting for? Go to
00:13:29.440
rockauto.com for your auto part needs today and write Walsh in their how did you hear about us box so
00:13:34.120
they know that I'm the one that sent you. That's rockauto.com to shop for your auto parts today.
00:13:37.780
Okay, so here's the story. It is the story. It should be the biggest news story of the day,
00:13:45.360
the week, the month. But if you go to, I just, I real quick just pulled up some of these mainstream
00:13:53.340
media sites just to take a look at it. CBS News on right up at the top of the homepage, no mention of
00:14:00.320
it. NBC News, top of the homepage, no mention of it. CNN, no mention of it on the top of the
00:14:09.420
homepage. And you go down from there. Of course, we're talking about the attempted assassination
00:14:14.700
of Brett Kavanaugh. Okay, so this is someone who attempted to assassinate a Supreme Court justice
00:14:20.400
yesterday and the major corporate media outlets today aren't even, it's like it didn't happen.
00:14:27.300
And we can't even say they moved on from it already because they just simply hardly
00:14:33.460
acknowledged it at all, ever. Here's the Daily Wire's report. It says a man allegedly caught lurking
00:14:38.540
near U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh's home early Wednesday has been charged with attempted
00:14:42.960
murder of a federal judge. The Department of Justice confirmed to the Daily Wire. A criminal complaint
00:14:46.980
was filed today against charging Nicholas John Roski, age 26, for federal charges of attempted murder
00:14:53.760
versus Supreme Court justice. He was arrested in a Washington suburb of Chevy Chase, Maryland,
00:15:00.160
early Wednesday. It says that he traveled to Kavanaugh's home armed with weapons and burglary
00:15:05.800
tools with the intent to kill the justice and prevent him from ruling on Second Amendment and
00:15:10.600
abortion cases. So yeah, that's one of the ironies here is that this maniac was going to kill somebody
00:15:16.800
with a gun, was really concerned about gun control. And he was worried that Brett Kavanaugh would
00:15:23.560
prevent gun control legislation. And also he was worried about the abortion, about Roe v. Wade,
00:15:30.740
protecting Roe v. Wade. And he was willing to kill someone in order to do it. He had, it says,
00:15:37.160
an inventory search of the seized suitcase and backpack reveal a black tactical chest rig and tactical
00:15:43.220
knife, a Glock 17 pistol with two magazines and ammunition, pepper spray, zip ties, a hammer,
00:15:49.020
a screwdriver, nail punch, crowbar, pistol light, duct tape, hiking boots with padding on the outside
00:15:54.960
of the soles, and other items. So he was fully prepared to do this and was going to do it. And
00:16:01.160
he planned to kill himself after he did it. So this is a murderous lunatic, fully capable of doing
00:16:07.860
this, had all the tools he needed to carry out this crime, and was willing to give his own life
00:16:15.280
in the process. You would think a major, major story. And although this does not need to be
00:16:24.120
pointed out and has already, and yet has already been pointed out, I will say it also, that if this
00:16:30.180
was, I mean, you can only imagine if this was one of the liberal justices, if this was someone coming
00:16:35.820
after Sotomayor or Kagan, or if Ruth Bader Ginsburg was still alive and on the court.
00:16:44.300
And there was some crazed right winger who showed up at their house or was on the way to one of their
00:16:50.760
homes with all these weapons and this plan. Can you imagine if it was a pro-lifer, reverse this around,
00:16:58.960
and a pro-lifer upset about an impending ruling in favor of abortion rights on the way to one of
00:17:09.100
their homes to kidnap them and murder them? It would be the only thing that the media talked about
00:17:16.420
for the next, I don't know, two months. And even after they moved on to something else,
00:17:23.840
it would constantly be revisited. Like, we would never, ever move on from it as a society.
00:17:30.200
Just like with January 6th. It would be just like that. And they would compare the event to
00:17:36.300
9-11 Pearl Harbor in terms of significance. But in this case, they don't want to talk about it.
00:17:43.660
One of the reasons they don't want to talk about it is because they realize that
00:17:47.220
this is in large part their fault. The media and Democrats going out saying that
00:17:57.740
the conservative justices are going to overturn Roe v. Wade. And overturning Roe v. Wade,
00:18:05.660
it's a clear and present danger to women. They're going to enact a handmaid's tale scenario. Women are
00:18:12.760
going to be enslaved. Well, when you say that to people who are already predisposed to be violent
00:18:19.200
and crazy, you are inviting them to do exactly what this guy tried to do. Let's go back and remember
00:18:27.220
Chuck Schumer. Chuck Schumer is just a few months ago up in front of a crowd. And let's remember what
00:18:35.480
he said. I want to tell you, Gorsuch, I want to tell you, Kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind
00:18:44.320
and you will pay the price. You won't know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.
00:18:55.920
You will pay the price. Now, what you heard there is far more explicit than anything Donald Trump
00:19:05.880
ever said to the protesters on January 6th. Well, actually, it goes the other way because
00:19:11.860
Donald Trump was explicit in saying that this was going to be a peaceful demonstration.
00:19:16.240
But that, you're going to pay the price. Now, there isn't even an innocent interpretation available
00:19:26.100
for something like that. Now, you could claim that Chuck Schumer, he didn't really mean that he
00:19:32.300
wanted anyone to go kill Justice Kavanaugh. But he also didn't, he didn't not want someone to go
00:19:41.420
kill Justice Kavanaugh. He certainly wasn't going out of his way to make sure that didn't happen.
00:19:46.240
But whatever his intentions were, you're going to pay the price if you arrive at this decision.
00:19:53.920
He's a justice. At best, you're trying to put social and political pressure on a Supreme Court
00:20:00.780
justice. Intimidate them that way in order to change a potential ruling.
00:20:10.680
There should be Republicans right now in Congress calling for Chuck Schumer to be brought up on charges
00:20:22.580
of incitement. Look what they're doing to Marjorie Taylor Greene, trying to prevent her from ever
00:20:29.500
running for re-election. She's never done anything close to that. And if she had done that,
00:20:36.640
if Marjorie Taylor Greene had given a speech targeting liberal justices and saying, you'll
00:20:42.780
pay the price for this, and then a few months later, some crazed right-winger showed up in one
00:20:46.860
of their homes with guns and duct tape, she'd be in jail. She would go to jail for that, Marjorie Taylor
00:20:52.160
Greene. Being prevented from ever running for office again, that would be the least of her problems.
00:20:57.280
Republicans need to actually start playing offense on this kind of thing.
00:21:03.900
There's no reason not to. You'd have the public on your side. This is totally inexcusable.
00:21:10.680
And even after all this happened, even after someone tried to show up to kill Justice Kavanaugh,
00:21:17.220
protesters still showed up at Kavanaugh's house yesterday. I think we have the footage of that.
00:21:21.920
This is after all this happened, and they still showed up. Let's play that.
00:21:57.100
Justice Kavanaugh's house surrounded. So they're protecting the house, but they're also just
00:22:02.540
standing there. Why don't you arrest these punks? What they're doing is illegal. This is an attempt
00:22:06.280
to intimidate a Supreme Court justice after someone just tried to kill him. This is an intimidation
00:22:10.540
tactic, and it's not legal. Not to mention, even if there's no Supreme Court justice, disturbing the
00:22:18.020
peace. You're walking around a residential neighborhood with bullhorns and banging on drums.
00:22:27.100
If I went outside in my own neighborhood with a bullhorn and I was banging on drums,
00:22:30.580
it wouldn't be long before the cops showed up and said, you can't do that here. This is disturbing
00:22:35.680
But they're allowed to basically do what they want. And as far as I know, no Republicans are
00:22:44.460
calling for charges against any of the Democrats who openly called for exactly this.
00:22:52.120
Including whoever leaked that opinion. As far as I'm concerned, the leaker of the Supreme Court opinion
00:22:57.200
should now be brought up, along with whatever other charges you can put on them, should now be
00:23:02.100
brought up on attempted murder charges also, because this was the reason for leaking the opinion.
00:23:09.600
It was throwing this out there so that to prevent, by whatever means, this opinion from going forward.
00:23:20.480
In spite of all this, MSNBC, I said that they kind of ignored this, but they did have,
00:23:26.460
maybe that's not entirely fair, because they did yesterday, they were talking about the problem of
00:23:30.420
violent extremists, domestic terrorism. This is on the same day when, when a left wing terrorist
00:23:37.780
tried to kill Supreme Court justice. And so they're talking about the issue and they are acknowledging
00:23:44.260
Replacement theory has become political ideology.
00:23:48.320
Frank, if Mr. Whitfield's mother was killed by foreign terrorists, the Democrats and the Republicans
00:23:54.820
on the committee would be promising him the moon. Um, what is, I mean, is it as obvious as it seems
00:24:01.520
that domestic violent extremists are an important part of the voting coalition on the right? I mean,
00:24:07.380
what is the structural impediment to pardoning the homeland against domestic violent extremism?
00:24:14.120
Oh, right. I agree. Well, they're talking about the violent extremists on the right.
00:24:18.300
And it, it, it, and she says, in fact, they're a voting block. That's how numerous they are.
00:24:25.480
Which, uh, which again, if they're that numerous, I mean, there's a voting block, thousands, millions.
00:24:34.380
And yet it's just with, it's just very odd that with one exception,
00:24:38.460
every time we have seen mobs of violent people, um, acting out with, with political motivations
00:24:49.240
every single time with one exception, they've been on the left. Isn't that interesting?
00:24:55.180
Well, while this is going on, uh, Joe Biden decided to go down to, uh, California and, and visit with
00:25:00.800
Jimmy Kimmel because that's the priority here. Again, Supreme Court justice was, uh, attempted murder,
00:25:06.420
but he's on Jimmy Kimmel and we'll play a couple of clips here. Here he is talking about
00:25:10.820
the communication problems that the white house has admitting. I think that the white house has
00:25:16.740
some communication problems and even he himself has communication problems. And then this is very
00:25:20.700
helpful. He actually demonstrated his own communication problems while talking about them.
00:25:25.260
So watch. So there's a lot of major things we've done, but what we haven't done is we haven't been
00:25:32.760
able to communicate it in a way that is, uh, um, make me say another way. Well, see, that's kind
00:25:39.660
of perfect. Yeah. I've been able to communicate it. Look how the press has changed. Look how the
00:25:44.920
press has changed. It has changed. Oh, listen, I get it. I know you get, you overstand it. You don't
00:25:49.140
just understand it. You overstand it, but here's the deal. One of the things is that it's very
00:25:55.400
difficult now to have a, um, even with notable exceptions, even though really good reporters,
00:26:04.100
they have to get the number of clicks on, on, on nightly news. So instead of asking a question,
00:26:09.680
anyway, it's just, everything gets, gets sensationalized in ways that, but I'm convinced
00:26:16.080
we can get through this. We have to get through it. And one of the things, look,
00:26:19.680
I'm going to take a break and then we'll talk a little bit more.
00:26:21.820
I don't mind. I'm sorry. We have some of those commercials. We have some biracial commercials
00:26:26.260
we need to show. But, uh, he didn't finish one of those sentences. Do you notice that he started?
00:26:34.960
So that was a collection of sentences that were started and then abandoned before he finished
00:26:41.140
them. That's it. That's a style of speaking now that he starts a sentence and then it trails off
00:26:46.400
and he picks up a new thought, trails off, picks up a new thought. And Jimmy Kimmel sitting there
00:26:51.620
trying his best to help him out. I mean, that real, the whole conversation really reminds me
00:26:56.860
it is, it's very much kind of the tone and tenor of, uh, of, uh, you know, a, a grandson
00:27:05.500
sitting in a nursing home, talking to a senile grand grandfather. That's, that's exactly what's
00:27:12.800
happening here. And that's not even the worst clip. I think the worst one is this. Listen to this.
00:27:17.660
You turn on the TV, look at the ads. When's the last time you saw biracial couples on TV? When's
00:27:24.100
the last time you saw the way, I mean, people are selling products. They do ads to sell products
00:27:29.540
and they sell products when people, they appeal to people. This generation is going to change
00:27:34.540
everything. We just got to make sure we don't give up. There's an ability for us to do everything
00:27:40.040
from increase the, the, the access to education, healthcare. Look what we did in healthcare.
00:27:47.460
Yeah. You know, it's really bad when, um, I mean, I, I can't even stand this guy,
00:27:52.380
but I'm so embarrassed for him that I can't, I, it's hard for me to watch it anymore. The
00:27:56.360
secondhand embarrassment is so overwhelming that I can't even watch it. Um, and, and it's like,
00:28:02.520
we should be, I don't like him. So the fact that he's embarrassing himself. And I also think that
00:28:07.280
he's a, that he's just a, he's a bad guy on top of everything else. And as I've said before,
00:28:12.320
the fact that he's going senile in front of the entire world, that is also his fault because he
00:28:17.520
is, was so obsessed with, with, with power that, uh, he just kept grasping for it, even as he knew
00:28:25.580
that he was losing his mental and physical faculties. Um, and, and now he's embarrassing
00:28:30.880
himself in front of the world, totally on him, but it's still really hard to watch because it's so
00:28:36.760
embarrassing. Nevermind the fact that, uh, he's, he's got no sense of, of even what decade we're
00:28:44.720
living in. So he says, when's the last time you saw a biracial couple in an advertisement? Um,
00:28:49.820
I don't know. When's the last time I saw a biracial couple in a, in a TV ad? Well, the last time I saw
00:28:54.380
a TV ad was the last time I saw that because like 95, a better question is when's the last time you saw
00:29:00.080
a straight white couple in a TV commercial? It's pretty rare these days. That's what jumps out at you.
00:29:05.620
If you ever see every once in a while you see it and you're like, wow, I didn't know this was still
00:29:08.440
happening. So I don't know. 95% of a TV couples are, are at least biracial.
00:29:18.940
He's just, uh, he, and then he, he's been in the last clip before that. He talks about the nightly
00:29:23.540
news and he says that the anchors on the night, they need clicks on the nightly news. He's just,
00:29:29.500
he's, he's almost there the click thing, but he's kind of combining that with the nightly news.
00:29:33.400
It's, uh, it is embarrassing and it's, it's long since gotten to the point where it's really not
00:29:42.860
funny anymore because, um, it never actually was all that funny. Even if you feel like all you could
00:29:48.220
do is laugh at times, uh, this person is in charge of the country supposedly anyway. And everyone knows
00:29:55.840
that he's lost his mind. Everyone, including all of our enemies across the world. All right.
00:30:03.520
Here's someone else who's, um, long since lost her mind. Joy Behar had some thoughts about gun laws
00:30:11.220
on the view. And I thought this was pretty great. And it was an applause line. The audience loved it,
00:30:16.280
but listen to this. Most AR-15 owners are former military 35 plus. So that's all I'm saying is
00:30:22.840
that they're not crazy people. Okay. Here's the thing. Once black people get guns in this country,
00:30:26.860
the gun laws will change. Trust me. All the train seals clapping for that. Once black people get
00:30:33.520
guns in this country, I'll tell you what, uh, you know, you can do that with anything. Hey,
00:30:38.680
once black people have cars in this country, those Republicans, they're going to want to outlaw cars.
00:30:45.420
Once black people, once black people are eating pancakes in this country, you watch right wingers.
00:30:51.880
They're going to, they're going to, they're going to shut down all the IHOPs. Once the black people
00:30:55.560
have the pancakes, once black people are wearing shoes in this country, they're going to shut down
00:31:02.080
footlocker, the right wingers. What the world is she talking about? I kind of want to see the rest of
00:31:08.460
that clip because there are two black women on the, on the stage there. And did they, well,
00:31:12.800
I don't need to see it to know, but I'm sure they didn't correct her on that point. Um, and it's
00:31:17.840
supposed to be, that's supposed to be something in defense of black people. But of course, once again,
00:31:22.380
it's just insulting and patronizing and demeaning. Yeah. Um, punchline here in case you didn't know is
00:31:32.680
that, uh, black people do have guns in this country and, uh, any black person in this country who does
00:31:38.160
not have a gun. That's not because there's any law preventing them from doing so. At least there's
00:31:44.580
not any law preventing them based on race from doing so. Um, all right. I want to play this for
00:31:50.600
you. So Redskins defensive coordinator, Jack Del Rio, and I am still calling them the Redskins.
00:31:55.700
Uh, I'm going to, I decided I'm going to dead name this team. So, uh, Redskins defensive coordinator,
00:32:01.060
Jack Del Rio tweeted this week, pointing out the inconsistency between how the BLM riots were covered
00:32:07.160
and how they were handled versus the January 6th riots. And, uh, so you know that it, of course,
00:32:14.680
that's going to provoke a lot of backlash and outrage. Everything that you expect came from that.
00:32:19.160
And he addressed the controversy during a press conference. And I was kind of, when I, I knew the,
00:32:24.280
the setup for this, and then I saw the clip and I, and I saw the headline that he was addressing the
00:32:28.580
controversy. I was expecting what we always get, which is the backpedal, the apology. And, um,
00:32:35.200
very pleased to find out that's not exactly what happened. Listen, want to talk about it? I'd talk
00:32:40.060
about it with anybody. Yeah, no problem at any time, but, uh, but they're not, I'm just expressing
00:32:46.480
myself. And, uh, I think we all as Americans have the right to express ourselves, especially if you're
00:32:52.060
being respectful. I'm being respectful. I just asked a simple question. Really? Did I,
00:32:56.900
let's get right down to it. What did I ask? A simple question. Why are we not looking into those
00:33:05.640
things? If we're going to talk about it, why are we not looking into those things? Because it's kind
00:33:11.040
of hard for me to say, I can realistically look at it. I see the images on TV. People's livelihoods
00:33:19.300
are being destroyed. Businesses are being burned down. No problem. And then we have a dustup at the
00:33:26.040
Capitol. Well, there's nothing burned down. And we're not going to talk about, we're going to
00:33:31.140
make that a major deal. I just think it kind of two standards. And if we apply the same standard
00:33:37.140
and we're going to be reasonable with each other, let's have a discussion. That's all it was. Let's
00:33:42.600
have a discussion. We're Americans. Let's talk it through. I'm for, I'm for us, you know,
00:33:48.580
having a great opportunity to have a fulfilled life. Um, like I said, every way, every, which way
00:33:56.440
I can, when I'm here, it's about love and respect. Damn it. I wanted for once to give somebody some
00:34:04.960
credit because that he said something and the meat sports media is offended by it. Media is offended
00:34:10.840
by how dare you say that compare BLM to January 6th, which, which I agree by the way that you can't
00:34:16.160
really compare the BLM riots of January 6th, only because the BLM riots were a thousand times worse
00:34:20.860
in, by every measure, uh, uh, death toll damage done, you know, uh, and it's easy for the death
00:34:28.800
toll to be worse because there was no death toll from January 6th, except for the, uh, except for
00:34:36.120
Ashley Babbitt, who was killed by a, by a Capitol police officer. Um, so, but he says this and then
00:34:43.100
you heard him there. That's when you expect to get the apology. Instead, he kind of doubles down.
00:34:48.240
Great. And I want to finally give someone credit for not apologizing. And then while that clip is
00:34:53.140
playing, I hadn't done this before. I probably should have. And I looked it up and he did apologize
00:34:57.060
after that. So damn it. I thought we finally had someone. So he tweeted shortly after that clip
00:35:03.940
went viral, he tweeted this. I made comments earlier today in referencing the attack that took
00:35:08.240
place on the United States Capitol on January 6th, referencing that situation as a dust up was
00:35:12.580
irresponsible and negligent. And I am sorry. I stand by my comments, condemning violence in communities
00:35:16.620
across the country. I say that while also expressing my support as an American citizen for peaceful
00:35:20.360
protests in our country, I have fully supported all peaceful protests in America. I love, respect,
00:35:24.140
and support all my fellow coaches, players, and staff that I work with and respect their views and
00:35:27.780
opinions. I don't know why I'm even disappointed, but you just hope like one of these times, just one
00:35:39.240
person. I'm just waiting for one person to have the cancel mob coming after them and to say, I'm not
00:35:48.240
going to apologize. Even if I was wrong with what I said, I'm still not, and he wasn't wrong. But even
00:36:00.200
if you were, you still don't apologize because these people don't deserve it. They don't deserve
00:36:04.860
your apology. They weren't hurt by anything you said. How many times, I don't know how many times I
00:36:10.320
have to explain this. Apologies are given by someone who has hurt another person, and they are given to
00:36:20.160
the person who was hurt. Okay? If you've done something and nobody was hurt, then good news.
00:36:29.200
You don't owe anybody an apology. You're off the hook. You didn't do anything wrong.
00:36:32.960
If you did somehow hurt another person, then you find that person and you privately apologize to them.
00:36:41.200
But this public apology ritual does nothing but just encourage and fuel this mob, this pitchfork mob
00:36:52.680
of phonies and losers who are just looking for a reason to pretend to be offended by things.
00:37:00.620
And you notice that especially in sports and in football, it's like the worst thing,
00:37:05.700
the greatest offense that somebody in the NFL can commit is to say something, is to say, is to reveal
00:37:13.980
that they have a similar view as the majority of the fans. Like the majority of the NFL fans would
00:37:22.020
probably agree with Jack Del Rio about that. But the media says if you're in the NFL, that you cannot do
00:37:30.280
that you can't agree with most of your fans. You can't say, the worst thing you could do is to say
00:37:34.640
something that your fans agree with. That's the worst offense. Damn it, Jack. Well, maybe the next
00:37:43.660
one. I'll keep, I'll keep hoping. Okay. One other quick thing here. This is from Yahoo. It says a
00:37:48.280
proposal that took place at Disneyland Paris has blown up on Reddit and not in a good way. Reddit
00:37:53.780
user was Gitlon initially posted the proposal video in the I'm a total piece of S forum and claimed to
00:38:01.460
be friends with the man who was proposing. And he captured the clip POS destroyed my best friend's
00:38:06.560
moment. He asked for permission beforehand. So, okay. So in this video, apparently they're at
00:38:11.420
Disneyland Paris. It's this couple and the man wants to propose to the woman. And they're standing in
00:38:18.660
this spot where apparently people propose all the time with the little fake castle in the background.
00:38:23.500
Well, it's a big fake castle, but it is a fake castle. They're standing in the same spot. And this
00:38:28.320
is, and the article goes on to explain that I guess this is one of the top 10 proposal sites in the
00:38:36.240
world. People go here all the time to get the Instagram proposals, but you're not supposed to
00:38:40.960
stand there apparently. So in the middle of the proposal, the Disneyland employee rushes in and
00:38:48.420
takes the ring and moves them to another spot. Let's play the video.
00:39:10.960
I got to say, I kind of, I'm not a defender of Disney by any means whatsoever, but I'm kind of on the
00:39:25.460
Disney employee side on this one. I sort of am. And I'll tell you why. The only reason is because
00:39:31.340
like it's a proposal. So it's hopefully a once in a lifetime thing for a lot of people that ends up
00:39:37.540
not being once in a lifetime, but, but hopefully it should be. And, and so, so why are you going,
00:39:43.320
why would you want to go to the place where a billion other people have done the proposal?
00:39:48.580
It's a top 10 proposal site. So why, why do you want to propose in the most cliche way imaginable
00:39:54.780
so that you can have the same Instagram shot that, that 50 million people also have?
00:40:01.220
So for that reason alone, I'm, I think it's, they did them a favor. You know, how about redo the
00:40:07.420
proposal somewhere else? If you feel like you need to make a thing out of it, like do something
00:40:11.280
unique and interesting. Disneyland of all places, a corporate theme park is where you want to start
00:40:19.720
this journey with, uh, with the, the love of your life. That's the real outrage here. My opinion.
00:40:26.120
Let's get now to the comment section. Val says Matt was unnecessarily, unnecessarily rude to the
00:40:42.520
WNBA players who, by the way, had nothing to do with these shenanigans. I'm usually a fan of you,
00:40:47.220
Matt, but this was low, unconvincing. And part of the reason people are deterred from the right
00:40:50.740
because we keep making unnecessarily hateful comments about historically marginalized people.
00:40:54.660
I'm not trying to cancel you for this or anything. I just hope you see where I'm coming from.
00:40:58.480
Uh, well, I don't Val. And I think that's very unfair to me. Um, I would, I honestly, I'm,
00:41:04.880
I'm shocked that you would accuse me of being rude to WNBA players. I would never, I believe in the
00:41:10.840
golden rule. Okay. I would never, I'm not going to dunk on WNBA players because I would, I know they
00:41:16.940
would never dunk on me because they can't because they can't touch the rim. So I didn't mean to use
00:41:24.360
the video of the protest at the game as an excuse to insult the WNBA. Honestly, I'm just impressed
00:41:30.960
that they actually record the games at all. I figured they would just have like a stenographer
00:41:35.740
or maybe a courtroom sketch artist drawing a picture every time somebody makes a layup. So
00:41:40.300
you only got to draw like two or three pictures in a game. I didn't mean any disrespect. I really
00:41:44.020
didn't. Just to clarify. Um, let's see. Sarah says, I watched what is a woman three times within
00:41:52.980
the span of two days, and I'm going to watch it again tonight. The obsession over watching morons
00:41:57.140
spew their nonsense is real. And Matt's poker face is pure gold that never gets old. Well, that's,
00:42:03.160
that's exactly, that's how this should be done. You don't need to watch it once,
00:42:06.500
watch it multiple times, tell your friends about it, go to whatiswoman.com. Um, LR two three says,
00:42:16.340
Matt, how do you respond to the argument that if children don't belong at drag shows,
00:42:19.880
they also don't belong at places like Hooters? How do I respond? Yeah, I've seen this, this,
00:42:25.440
if you can even call it an argument, it's, it's not an argument, it's a deflection,
00:42:29.020
which is not the same thing as an argument. But, um, how do I respond to that? Well, first of all,
00:42:33.180
who, I guess my first response is, okay, I, yeah, I'm not, I'm not bringing my kids to Hooters.
00:42:42.260
So, okay. Yeah. Don't, I agree. I think we could probably just establish that.
00:42:47.900
No, you probably shouldn't be bringing young kids to Hooters. Fine. Cool. Um, now that we've
00:42:53.080
agreed on that, let's get back to talking about the drag shows because the reason we got to talk
00:42:56.420
about that is that we don't agree on it. Also, um, as far as I know, there's not any big societal
00:43:02.760
push to get kids into Hooters. Uh, I know that sometimes kids are brought into Hooters,
00:43:08.680
but there's not, it's not a thing. Okay. It's not, there's a, there's, there's not a great effort
00:43:13.420
to do that. And, um, and then my third response is that actually it's not even the same kind of thing.
00:43:23.720
Um, I think it's weird to bring young kids into Hooters. I just, I don't know. It's the same kind
00:43:29.840
of response. Like why even do that? There's a lot. If you want to go to a chain restaurant with
00:43:34.000
bad food, there are many of them available to you. Uh, why bring the kids there? So agreed,
00:43:39.500
you know, on that, I'm not bringing my kids to Hooters, but it's not the same. Okay. That's,
00:43:44.340
there's not a moral equivalence there. The drag show for kids is definitely worse. Hooters is not
00:43:51.320
appropriate for kids. Drag show a lot, a lot more inappropriate, a lot more, uh, grotesque,
00:43:57.800
disordered, um, much more overtly sexual, all those things. So it is, it is a lot worse.
00:44:05.700
That's the other. So there's my, there are my three responses that you get for that. Um,
00:44:10.400
let's see. Roger says, Matt, really given the WNBA, the business, of course they could use it.
00:44:18.780
Sir, that's not, that's not funny. I've, I've just said, we're not making jokes about the WNBA
00:44:25.060
on this show. We don't do that here. Roger, you're banned from the show. That's a, that is
00:44:30.260
outrageous, sir. Um, Teresa says, Matt, you're getting close to a million subscribers. Better
00:44:35.780
start practicing the dance. I don't know what you're talking about practicing dance. What do you
00:44:39.180
mean? Um, Nate says the funniest way Matt could die is to get hit by a meteorite while he's doing a
00:44:45.300
plug for Epic will. Uh, I, I actually, and I think I've said this before. I think it'd be a great
00:44:49.840
honor to die by meteorite. That's my number one preferred, um, death. If I, if I get to choose,
00:44:56.180
you know, if I, if I was able to choose from a menu of options of what, what's ultimately going to
00:45:00.300
take me out. I think a meteorite would be pretty good, especially as a big fan of, uh, of space as
00:45:03.940
I am, I think it'd be a great honor to have something. Let me think about that. You got a meteorite
00:45:07.820
that's been traveling billions of miles, like to this destination to, for this rendezvous with,
00:45:14.660
with you and your head. I think, uh, I'd, I'd actually be okay with that. And, uh, let's see.
00:45:22.640
I think there was one other here. Shelly says, Matt, I read the interview in the UK magazine. I
00:45:27.900
thought the interview interviewer made a good point. These feminists are complaining about not
00:45:31.320
being included in your film, but have they included you in anything? Uh, no, they haven't. That was,
00:45:36.920
that was a good point. I mentioned, I did an interview in a magazine in the UK and, uh, uh,
00:45:42.280
some of the interview was about this, this debate in the UK among, uh, British feminists about the
00:45:48.220
film and about me. And they, they feel that they've been somehow marginalized because they
00:45:52.780
weren't included in the film. And, um, and that is, that is one of many responses to that is, uh,
00:45:59.920
yeah, I, there were no feminists and haven't been any at any point that are knocking on my door,
00:46:05.660
trying to include me in any projects. And also just the, the gumption, the narcissism to get
00:46:14.780
offended that you're not in a movie that someone in a different country who you don't know and don't
00:46:21.060
even like made. I, that's a, that's a, that is a sense of entitlement that is beyond anything I can
00:46:27.980
even comprehend. It would never occur to me. It would never occur to me to watch a movie or a
00:46:33.340
documentary that somebody else made. And I'm sitting there watching and thinking, why am I
00:46:37.780
not in this? What? Who, why should you be in it? I mean, why should you specifically?
00:46:46.480
And also in our film, what is a woman? If you're someone who's, uh, you know, been in this fight for,
00:46:52.140
against gender ideology madness. And so you think you should have been in the movie,
00:46:56.000
um, who in the movie should, should have been taken out to make room for you? It's a 90 minute
00:47:01.440
film. So, and we use every minute of that 90 minutes and it goes, it actually goes a little bit
00:47:06.300
over 90 minutes. So who should be taken out to make room for you? Because I think that every
00:47:10.600
interview we did helped to tell the story and each interview was powerful in its own way. Um,
00:47:17.060
oftentimes powerful in ways that the interviewee didn't intend. So who are we taking out? That's the
00:47:22.320
other question. You let me know that feminists. And then, uh, you know, maybe I'll go back and
00:47:27.120
we could just reshoot the entire movie for you. You tell me what movie I should have made and I'll
00:47:31.240
just make it at your behest. Sure. What is a woman is a huge success. So we really thank you for that
00:47:37.960
this week. The film became the number one, most popular movie at home on Rotten Tomatoes, which is
00:47:42.500
just really mind boggling with over 2,500 ratings and an audience score of 97%. This is a must-see film
00:47:48.820
that everybody's talking about from National Review, uh, to a lot of conservative influencers
00:47:52.780
like Zuby. They, they're talking about how important the film is and why people have to
00:47:56.620
watch it. We're changing the gender ideology conversation and fighting back in the culture.
00:48:01.300
Many of the people who hate the film, despite likely not having actually seen it, still are not
00:48:05.480
able to offer any definition of what a woman is or if you, any of the absurdity that the film points
00:48:09.860
out, they simply have no meaningful response because we're winning. But without your support,
00:48:14.260
none of this would be possible. So from all of us at the Daily Wire, thank you for that.
00:48:17.640
Go to whatiswoman.com to become a member and watch the film today. Now let's get to our daily
00:48:22.460
cancellation. Today for our daily cancellation, we will respond to a video from, um, a YouTuber
00:48:32.000
named Professor Dave of the channel Professor Dave Explains, where presumably Professor Dave
00:48:37.180
explains things. The channel has an impressive 2 million subscribers and this video was sent to me
00:48:41.340
by several people promising that it contains a formidable argument against my position on gender
00:48:45.800
ideology. One person in fact says that Professor Dave debunks my movie, What is a Woman? And I'm
00:48:51.380
quite interested to see that. So let's go through this together.
00:48:55.980
Everybody seems to be furious about trans people. Half of us are furious that they exist and the other
00:49:02.320
half are furious about what the other half is saying. I would like to jump in and see if I can clear
00:49:06.980
up some of the ways that people are talking past each other. Now it's no secret that I'm a bit on the
00:49:12.380
liberal side, but rest assured the left is not going to get away scot-free on this one. They're
00:49:18.060
missing the mark on a few key points, but as tends to be the case, it's bigots on the right who are
00:49:23.380
the main problem. So let's start there. We're off to a rough start. Putting aside Dave's smug,
00:49:29.700
know-it-all tone and demeanor, something that seems to be a matter of instinct for people like him,
00:49:33.340
so I'm not going to hold it against him. The real problem is that in the very first sentence,
00:49:36.800
he's already wildly and intentionally mischaracterizing his opponents. In 30 seconds,
00:49:41.540
he gives us a straw man and an ad hominem. He's doing that in the first 30 seconds. He's beginning
00:49:46.720
this way, which signals that he doesn't have much to offer beyond this point, because if he actually
00:49:52.220
planned on making a compelling argument, he wouldn't come out of the gate breezily dismissing
00:49:57.140
millions of people as bigots. Sorry, not millions, billions. Because anybody who has a problem with
00:50:02.480
basic concepts of gender ideology is a bigot, he says, which means that almost everybody in the
00:50:08.620
world and who has ever existed in the world is a bigot. Professor Dave begins the proceedings with
00:50:14.480
that declaration. He also lies about the nature of the opposing argument, and he does it in the
00:50:19.040
laziest and frankly dumbest way imaginable. He says that the people on the other side are furious that
00:50:24.840
trans people exist. Now, in reality, as he's well aware, we're not furious that trans people exist,
00:50:30.520
but rather we deny the underlying premise of gender ideology. If we're furious about anything,
00:50:36.600
it's that this ideology is being imposed on society and especially on children, and it's causing great
00:50:41.660
harm in the process. By saying that we're furious that trans people exist, he gets to dismiss all of
00:50:46.560
us as a bunch of angry, spittle-flecked rage clowns, when he is also quite well aware that when it comes
00:50:52.740
to this subject, nearly all of the angry, spittle-flecked rage clowns are on the other side of the
00:50:57.720
discussion. Take, for example, the people threatening to kill me and accusing me of genocide for making
00:51:02.160
a documentary, a documentary where I am only visibly angry one time briefly when addressing
00:51:07.180
a school board that covered up the rape of a student, so perhaps you'll excuse my emotions
00:51:10.820
in that case. But the other point of this mischaracterization is to pretend that we're
00:51:16.300
angry at trans people personally rather than critical of the claims made by trans activists.
00:51:22.720
Overall, it's a mess, and we're only 30 seconds in. Let's continue.
00:51:28.120
The primary issue is people who deny transgenderism. These are the people who spew the tired Fox News
00:51:34.640
talking points. Liberals say there are 89 genders and anyone can identify as a hamster,
00:51:40.360
that sort of thing. It's a deliberate caricature of reality peddled by all the angry conservative
00:51:45.460
dudes popping up in my feed lately who claim that nobody can define a woman. Let's all take a moment
00:51:50.920
to acknowledge the problems that go along with the ambiguity of language. Sex and gender are
00:51:57.020
different words that refer to different things. If you did not know that, now you do.
00:52:03.940
So we have another common rhetorical tactic from the left, and honestly, I'm quite disappointed to
00:52:08.500
hear common rhetorical tactics when I was promised an utter destruction of my worldview, and I was looking
00:52:13.960
forward to it. Professor Dave says it's a tired Fox News talking point that there are a lot of genders,
00:52:19.840
but that's not Fox's talking point. That's his talking point. This is indeed the official
00:52:25.700
position of the gender ideologue. They may disagree on how many genders, but they all agree that there
00:52:30.840
are a lot more than two. Some say there are infinite numbers. Facebook says there are 58. If this sounds
00:52:35.940
insane, that's not Fox's fault. As for sex and gender being two different things, I totally agree.
00:52:42.580
Sex refers to biology, while gender is a linguistic term that refers to words, but was co-opted by a
00:52:48.120
pedophile sexologist named John Money and applied to people in a vague and ambiguous way.
00:52:53.180
Dave never mentions that point. He doesn't seem to know where his own ideas came from, or else he
00:52:57.640
doesn't want you to know. Ignorant or deceptive, you decide. From here, Professor Dave provides a
00:53:02.840
basically correct definition of sex with a long digression into intersexuality, and then gets around
00:53:07.840
talking about gender. Let's listen to that. Gender is a different phenomenon. It is still
00:53:14.240
biological, but it is a neurochemical construct. This means that ultimately it is still genetic in
00:53:20.180
basis, but it absolutely is not determined merely by the sex chromosomes. It is tremendously more
00:53:26.060
complicated, and researchers are still working to understand the biological basis of gender identity.
00:53:31.280
Human psychology is complex. People need to deal with that. Thoughts and feelings are ultimately
00:53:37.920
chemical phenomena. We all have a neurochemical profile that guides how we think and feel,
00:53:43.620
and part of that is gender identity. The reason that we are just now becoming equipped to differentiate
00:53:49.040
between the two phenomena is that in the vast majority of humans, somewhere between 99 and 99.9%
00:53:57.120
of all people, gender identity aligns with biological sex. So gender identity has a neurochemical basis
00:54:05.640
because it's a feeling, and feelings can be traced back to brain activity. Okay, sure, I'll buy that.
00:54:14.780
The question is whether those feelings reflect reality. That's the question. An anorexic person feels that
00:54:21.940
she's overweight. The feeling is a biological phenomenon in the sense that it's happening in her brain,
00:54:26.980
in the same sense that a man feels like a woman, but we understand in her case that the feelings are
00:54:31.660
disordered, incorrect, wrong, delusional, and so we work to treat her brain, her feelings, to more
00:54:37.220
accurately align them with reality. We don't say that the anorexic is trans-obese, and we don't call
00:54:43.440
actually obese people cis-obese. We understand that there is physical reality and then feelings,
00:54:49.400
and sometimes feelings are out of step with reality, and when that's the case, we usually understand
00:54:54.200
that the feelings are the issue. They are the problem to be solved, and so we try to solve
00:54:58.880
them. Will Professor Dave address that objection in this video? Spoiler, no, he won't. In fact,
00:55:04.080
he won't honestly engage with literally any objection raised by the opponents of his ideology
00:55:07.860
at all. Won't even try. Common theme with these people, but let's keep listening anyway.
00:55:14.140
The unfortunate linguistic coincidence is that we use terms like man and woman or male and female
00:55:22.460
in describing both of these phenomena. That is where the confusion arises when people insist
00:55:28.660
that one term must encapsulate both phenomena at once. So when someone asks what is a woman expecting
00:55:36.160
to get a very simple answer that children can understand, they are sorely mistaken. The answer
00:55:41.800
requires a discussion of genetics and neurochemistry.
00:55:47.680
Well, I'm sorry you find it offensive, Dave, but yes, I do deny the concept of gender as it was
00:55:53.500
conceived by John Money. You accept that concept as gospel. You're offended that anybody disagrees with
00:55:58.860
it. That's your problem. Meanwhile, you say that the definition of the word woman is complicated,
00:56:04.720
but please note that it's complicated is not a definition, so you still haven't defined it.
00:56:11.800
I never insisted on a simple definition. I simply insist on a definition, any kind of definition,
00:56:17.360
some sort of meaning. You can give me a complicated one. That's fine. Go ahead. Try me. Give me a
00:56:21.540
complicated definition. I'm perfectly fine with that. But you must have some definition, whereas you
00:56:27.620
provide none at all. See, this is a major problem for you, Dave, and let me try to explain why.
00:56:32.580
It's a problem because, and listen closely, you are using the word. Do you see why that's an issue?
00:56:40.580
You say the word woman is complicated and apparently ambiguous and hard to understand, yet you use it.
00:56:47.920
You refer to women. You talk about women. I bet you'd even say that you believe in women's rights.
00:56:52.140
Would you say that? I bet you would. This must mean that you have some solid, comprehensible idea of
00:56:58.400
what a woman is, yet you never explain that idea. That's a very big problem for you, Dave.
00:57:03.300
You're using a word that you cannot or will not define, which means either that you're hopelessly
00:57:07.460
confused and we should dismiss you and your arguments for that reason, or you're evasive
00:57:11.620
and disingenuous and we should dismiss you and your arguments for that reason. Either way,
00:57:15.500
you and your arguments are in really bad shape right now. Let's continue.
00:57:18.720
The acceptance for suppressed sexual orientations came first because around 10% of people are gay,
00:57:26.440
whereas a much smaller percentage of people are trans. But this is the natural progression of
00:57:31.920
societal evolution. Nearly every binary has been shown to actually be a spectrum and it doesn't
00:57:37.940
matter how uncomfortable it makes conservative people. Wait, what? Nearly every binary is a spectrum?
00:57:44.660
Like what? No, I'm not uncomfortable with that. I just think it's nonsense. I mean, in a certain
00:57:51.900
way, I'm uncomfortable around people saying stupid things, but that's all we mean by that.
00:57:57.500
What are the binaries that turned out to be spectrums? Don't say gender because that's begging
00:58:01.540
the question. I don't agree with John Money's concept of gender at all. It's not that I think
00:58:06.260
gender is a binary. It's that I think it's a totally useless and incoherent concept that should be put
00:58:10.900
back into the world of linguistics and grammar where it belongs. As for sex, if that's not a binary,
00:58:15.720
then what is it? There are males and females. There are those who are of the nature to become
00:58:20.740
pregnant and those who are of the nature to impregnate. There's no third sex. It's a binary. So where is
00:58:26.300
the spectrum that everyone thought was a binary? Can you give one example? As for the claim that 10%
00:58:32.180
of people are gay, where did you come up with that? Where'd you get that from? Well, I'll tell you
00:58:35.900
where you got it from. You got that from Alfred Kinsey, who made that claim in his book, Sexual
00:58:40.500
Behavior of the Human Male, which is the same book that contains a chart documenting the orgasms of
00:58:44.700
infants. He arrives at his arguments and his figures about human sexuality by interviewing sex offenders
00:58:50.020
and prison inmates and lying and pretending that he surveyed a cross-section of the population,
00:58:54.380
but he didn't. So that's where you're getting your information, professor. I just thought you might
00:58:58.160
like to know that. Let's watch a little bit more.
00:59:00.300
Now, as promised, with the indictment of conservatives complete, I turn to liberals
00:59:05.880
and the missteps they are enacting that are preventing resolution.
00:59:10.460
Number one, please stop saying things like gender is a social construct. No, it is not. It is a
00:59:17.700
biological construct. Society can't turn you trans any more than it can turn you gay. Gender is
00:59:26.500
His indictment of conservatives was complete without ever approaching the vicinity of any
00:59:33.040
one of our actual arguments. And then he turns to criticize liberals to prove how fair and objective
00:59:37.340
he is by slamming them for not being liberal enough. He also says that society can't turn you
00:59:44.020
trans, totally ignoring the fact that in our society currently, and only in our society, only in the
00:59:49.120
West, there has been a many-fold increase in trans identification. If that's not society turning
00:59:53.520
people trans, what is it, Dave? Now, I don't know what you'd say to that, because as always,
00:59:58.820
and like literally every other gender ideologue I've ever spoken to, and I guarantee I've spoken
01:00:03.100
personally to many more people on your side than you've spoken to on my side, but like all of them,
01:00:08.180
you don't attempt to grapple with any of the logical inconsistencies of your position.
01:00:12.460
But I ask again anyway, if society can't turn you trans, why are we experiencing an unprecedented,
01:00:17.560
skyrocketing rise in trans identifications? If you say that there have always been this many
01:00:23.840
trans people, but they were all in the closet, you'll then have to explain why there was never,
01:00:28.680
ever, at any point, ever, a mass epidemic of people committing suicide because they were not
01:00:33.360
affirmed in their gender identity. After all, staple doctrine on the left is that lack of affirmation
01:00:38.240
is dangerous because it causes suicide. Well, then why was that never happening back when there were
01:00:44.360
millions and millions of supposed unaffirmed trans people? Indeed, why is the suicide epidemic
01:00:51.320
happening now when trans people are so affirmed? Here's my answer. Gender ideology is a modern
01:00:59.280
Western social construct that didn't exist until it was invented by psychoanalytical quacks and then
01:01:04.640
parroted mindlessly by people like you. Further, while pretending that it affirms and nurtures people,
01:01:09.820
it actually leads them into self-destruction and despair. The evidence bears that out.
01:01:14.580
The evidence is entirely on my side, in fact, and not at all on your side because on this topic,
01:01:20.080
you are wrong about nearly everything and your underlying claims are so nonsensical and incoherent
01:01:25.180
that you can't begin to explain them or defend them and that's why you don't even try.
01:01:30.920
Which is a long way of saying, Professor Dave, that you are today canceled.
01:01:35.940
And that'll do it for us. Thanks for watching. Thanks for listening. Have a great day. Godspeed.
01:01:40.140
Well, if you enjoyed this episode, don't forget to subscribe. And if you want to help spread the
01:01:48.860
word, please give us a five-star review. Also, tell your friends to subscribe as well. We're
01:01:53.260
available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, wherever you listen to podcasts. We're there. Also, be sure to
01:01:57.860
check out the other Daily Wire podcasts, including The Ben Shapiro Show, Michael Knowles Show,
01:02:03.420
The Matt Walsh Show is produced by Sean Hampton, executive producer Jeremy Boring. Our supervising
01:02:08.540
producer is Mathis Glover, production manager Pavel Wadowski. Our associate producer is McKenna
01:02:13.660
Waters. The show is edited by Robbie Dantzler. Our audio is mixed by Mike Cormina, and hair and makeup
01:02:19.220
is done by Cherokee Heart. The Matt Walsh Show is a Daily Wire production, copyright Daily Wire 2022.
01:02:24.560
John Bickley here, Daily Wire editor-in-chief. Wake up every morning with our show, Morning Wire,
01:02:29.980
where we bring you all the news that you need to know in 15 minutes or less.
01:02:34.440
Join me and my co-host, Georgia Howe, for daily coverage of all the biggest stories on Morning Wire.