The Matt Walsh Show - Ep. 968 - The Leftist Plot To Destroy Childhood Innocence

00:00:00.000 Today on the Matt Wall Show, a proposed law in Texas has propelled the left to openly defend

00:00:04.760 child drag shows. One such defender says that childhood innocence is a myth and it's fueled

00:00:10.380 by prejudice. A revealing admission, we'll talk about it. Also, a crazed leftist tries to kill

00:00:15.400 Brett Kavanaugh, but you'd never know about that if you rely on the corporate media for your news.

00:00:19.240 Plus, Joe Biden disintegrates on live TV while talking to Jimmy Kimmel. Joy Behar claims that

00:00:24.420 black people don't have guns. We will fact check that claim. And a Disneyland employee is feeling 0.71

00:00:29.440 the heat for intervening in a marriage proposal. In our daily cancellation, a popular YouTuber

00:00:33.940 debunks my film, What is a Woman? Or So I'm Told. We'll take a look and see how he did all of that

00:00:39.200 and much more today on the Matt Wall Show. Have you ever heard of data brokers? They're the middlemen

00:00:52.320 collecting and selling all those digital footprints you leave online. They can stitch together detailed

00:00:56.860 profiles, which include your browsing history, online searches, location data. Then they sell

00:01:01.200 the profile to a company who delivers you a targeted ad. Well, no biggie. You might think,

00:01:05.980 well, you might be surprised to learn that these same data brokers are also selling your information

00:01:10.760 to the Department of Homeland Security, to the IRS. I, for one, don't want the tax man showing up at my

00:01:16.140 door because of some search I did on my phone. So to mask my digital footprints, I protect myself with

00:01:22.020 ExpressVPN. One of the easiest ways for brokers to aggregate data and tie it back to you is through

00:01:27.420 your device's unique IP address, which also reveals information about your location. When you're

00:01:32.260 connected to ExpressVPN, your IP address is hidden. That makes it much more difficult for data brokers

00:01:36.700 to identify who you are. ExpressVPN also encrypts 100% of your network data to keep your data safe from

00:01:42.580 hackers on public Wi-Fi. That's why I have the ExpressVPN app downloaded on all of my devices, phone,

00:01:47.760 computer, even my home Wi-Fi router. All I do is tap one button to turn it on, and I'm protected.

00:01:53.640 It's really that easy. So make sure your online activity and data is protected with the best VPN

00:01:57.600 money you can buy. Visit expressvpn.com slash Walsh right now. Get three months for free through my

00:02:03.360 special link. That's expressvpn, E-X-P-R-E-S-S, vpn.com slash Walsh, expressvpn.com slash Walsh to learn more.

00:02:11.580 Well, you can't say they didn't warn us. You may remember just a year ago when the Gay Men's Choir in San

00:02:16.760 Francisco went viral with a song promising that they'll convert our children and turn them gay, 0.96

00:02:22.420 and they weren't lying. Of course, that was far from the beginning of the left's efforts to recruit

00:02:28.000 children into the alphabet cult, but they did ramp up their campaign considerably over the past year.

00:02:33.720 We've seen them in the mainstream come out explicitly in favor of teaching kindergartners

00:02:37.660 about gender fluidity and transgenderism. Again, something that was happening before this year,

00:02:42.560 but now the only difference is that they're very open in defending it. And now in response

00:02:46.740 to a proposed bill in Texas to outlaw child drag shows, we're seeing them circle the rainbow 0.92

00:02:52.520 wagons around that particular brand of debauchery, some of the defenses of the practice have come in

00:02:58.640 the form of sort of feigned obtuseness. Well, I don't see what the big deal is. Drag isn't sexual,

00:03:03.620 is it? Someone needs to explain to me why this is so harmful to kids. Now, as I've been arguing now for

00:03:09.260 days, the correct response to that kind of thing is to place the burden back on them. I don't need to

00:03:15.400 and shouldn't have to explain to you why drag shows are harmful to kids. Given that your side is 0.97

00:03:22.740 introducing this concept, you must explain why it is helpful to kids. In what way is a child's life

00:03:29.340 enhanced by putting a dollar bill in the thong of a cross-dressing man while he gyrates around a gay 0.99

00:03:35.020 bar? Tell me why this should exist. See, it's your idea. You have to defend it. But others on the left

00:03:40.660 have been more open and unabashed in their child drag show advocacy. Entertainment Weekly this

00:03:46.340 morning has this headline. It says, drag artists slam Texas bill that could ban minors from drag

00:03:52.180 shows. The article quotes a number of drag artists, quote unquote, the term being used very loosely,

00:03:58.480 as we'll see, who insist that we would be oppressing them if they're prevented from cross-dressing in front

00:04:04.460 of children. They feel a deep and powerful urge to put on women's clothing and dance for young 0.90

00:04:09.180 children. And any interference would be very painful for them, they explain. Not exactly in

00:04:13.820 those words, but just about. One drag queen who has spoken out is named Maxi Glamour and describes 0.98

00:04:21.860 himself as a non-binary drag, quote, demon queen. And you can see from the pictures on his website that 0.97

00:04:28.340 he takes the demon role quite seriously. He posted a tweet saying, kids are future rock stars. They're

00:04:36.440 future painters, future museum curators, or even future critics. It's important that they grow up

00:04:41.960 in a world where art is all around them, because in the future, they'll be the ones keeping it alive.

00:04:48.160 Now, accompanying the caption is footage of him in full drag demon attire performing the flute for a 0.97

00:04:54.840 group of toddlers. The whole scene is like something out of a creepy medieval fable. Let's watch for just a 0.61

00:05:00.900 second here. So there you go. I, I, and I still, I just don't understand why these dudes always look

00:05:19.340 like, you know, zombie Marge Simpsons or something. Now, again, you must explain if you're an advocate

00:05:27.780 for this. Why do kids need that? How does that help them? How are they enriched by a cross-dressing 0.99

00:05:33.940 man in a demon costume playing the flute for them? They call this art, but even just judged on pure

00:05:39.200 aesthetic grounds, it's ugly, gaudy, vulgar. That goes for all drag. I mean, we can't even be tempted 1.00

00:05:45.960 to buy the, it's good to expose your kid to art excuse, because along with being overtly sexual and

00:05:51.220 inappropriate, it's terrible art. Loud, obnoxious, hideous. There's no beauty or talent or skill involved. 0.97

00:05:57.780 If I wanted my kids to be exposed to talentless, distasteful, garish, loud, lurid garbage, 0.87

00:06:03.360 I can simply turn on the TV and flip to almost any channel. So I don't need drag shows for that. 1.00

00:06:07.940 But art, of course, has nothing to do with it. A woman named Natalie Nguyen, who's a YouTuber,

00:06:11.520 a political commentator, she gets to the real heart of the matter. She tweeted yesterday,

00:06:15.940 quote, random drag queens in public spaces pose exactly zero threat to children. These people don't 1.00

00:06:21.680 care about protecting children. They care about protecting, quote, childhood innocence,

00:06:25.740 ignorance, ignorance romanticized, a bullshit fantasy made up by adults reflecting every adult 1.00

00:06:30.920 prejudice. Oh, well, there it is, right? Childhood innocence, she says, is a fantasy. It is romanticized, 1.00

00:06:38.860 something that adults made up because we're prejudiced. She's opposed to childhood innocence,

00:06:44.320 even in theory. She doesn't think that children are innocent or that they should be. This is why she

00:06:50.480 draws a false distinction between protecting children and protecting childhood innocence.

00:06:56.160 Well, they don't want to protect children. They just want to protect childhood innocence,

00:06:59.900 which is like saying to someone, well, you don't care about health. You only care about nutrition.

00:07:07.660 Yes, well, nutrition is an important aspect of health. You can't have good health without good

00:07:12.160 nutrition, just as you can't protect children without protecting their innocence. Now, a child's

00:07:17.340 innocence isn't the only thing we ought to protect. We should protect their physical safety too,

00:07:21.280 of course, but you can't carve out their innocence, throw it on the trash heap, and then claim that you

00:07:26.660 care about protecting children otherwise. This hostility to childhood innocence is, most tragically

00:07:33.980 of all, shared by an increasing number of parents themselves. That's the elephant in the room,

00:07:40.160 the elephant that's watching the drag queen in the room. In every one of these videos, 0.93

00:07:44.200 all of those children have parents, parents who brought them to the event, parents who have

00:07:49.580 dedicated themselves to the destruction of their own child's mind and soul. Parents of this kind

00:07:56.660 will sink to unimaginable depths in an effort to corrupt and destroy their own children. In fact,

00:08:02.480 one rising trend on TikTok right now are videos of parents crowdfunding their children's castration

00:08:09.660 and mutilation. So here's just one. This is a, I'm actually not exactly sure what this is,

00:08:14.300 to be honest, but it's a parent of some kind who is soliciting funds from the internet for this

00:08:21.080 purpose, in order to do this to a child. Watch. So, for those of you who don't know, my name is Lyric.

00:08:28.800 Today, I'm making a video that isn't like the other content that I typically make. Basically,

00:08:35.120 I'm raising money to help fund my son's transition-related costs. I'm sharing this with his

00:08:43.020 permission. Basically, we already have a diagnosis of gender dysphoria for him. We have gotten his 1.00

00:08:50.600 blood work done, and we need to start him on puberty blockers as soon as possible. Now, I personally,

00:08:56.980 I didn't, I transitioned later, so I wasn't familiar with how puberty blockers worked. Basically,

00:09:02.320 my insurance doesn't cover this, which is wonderful, right? Um, the generic version of Lupron

00:09:11.040 that we have a 22.5 milligram dose that is going to cost out-of-pocket $468 per shot, and each shot

00:09:22.260 lasts three months. So, we need four of these a year. Um, it's, what, close to $2,000. Um,

00:09:35.720 I have already exhausted most of my funds. I need help. I want to raise money to help cover his

00:09:44.580 transition-related costs, as, um, it's very difficult to come out with that sort of money

00:09:50.480 on short notice. Um, I know that I'm asking a lot, but I would do anything to make sure that

00:09:58.140 he is able to continue his transition.

00:10:01.720 Oh, you're running out of funds, are you? Well, good. I hope you go bankrupt. I, I wish bankruptcy

00:10:09.560 upon you. Uh, I wish poverty and bankruptcy upon you. That's what I hope. I mean, if that's, if that's

00:10:16.520 the only thing that's going to protect your kid from what you want to do to your child. Uh, we talk

00:10:22.840 about parental rights, but I think we should probably be more specific because this is also a,

00:10:30.920 uh, a claim. Now, this is a response by the left when we talk about, you know, parents bringing their

00:10:36.900 kids to drag shows and parents transitioning their kids. And the left now will, you'll often hear them

00:10:41.240 say, well, I thought you cared about parental rights. Well, I do, but what do, what do you have

00:10:48.840 the right to do as a parent? I mean, what are your parental rights exactly? We would all agree that

00:10:53.400 parents don't have the right to do anything they want with, to, or around their children. I think

00:10:57.520 we would all agree, at least in theory with that. So what do we mean by parental rights? What we mean

00:11:02.580 or should mean is that parents have the right to care for their children, protect their children

00:11:07.100 and love and nurture them. That's what you have the right to do. And as always with rights, it would

00:11:13.340 probably be more helpful and more clarifying to use a different R word responsibility.

00:11:19.720 Okay. You have a responsibility to do all of these things for your child. And with any,

00:11:25.300 with any human rights on the, on the flip side of the coin, there's always responsibility that we

00:11:29.680 should be talking about. And when it comes to parental rights, it's not even on the flip side

00:11:32.580 of the coin. It's the same thing. Whenever you're talking about your parental rights, that is also your

00:11:36.420 responsibility to your child. God has given you this mission. You've been entrusted with that task,

00:11:42.980 but if you won't do it, if you will in fact do the opposite, working to corrupt, pervert, 0.50

00:11:49.600 and destroy the very child that you're called to protect, then you should lose all of your rights.

00:11:54.240 I mean, I talk about, I'm saying all of your rights, your parental rights, you should lose 0.96

00:11:57.200 in every other right and be locked in a prison cell until you die. There are many parents who deserve

00:12:02.820 that treat. This, this is the groomer's secret weapon. He has many parents as allies. Problem

00:12:11.160 begins as always at home. And that's the part of the story, I think that we need to start

00:12:16.260 really talking about. Now let's get to our five headlines.

00:12:19.540 You know, if you've been listening to my show for a while, you know that I've been an activist

00:12:28.340 against the lazy grocery shoppers who don't put their grocery carts away. Well, I have some

00:12:33.520 unfortunate news you've probably heard in some of these other reads. The grocery carts attacked me

00:12:38.720 in my own car. Again, I think we're pretending. Unfortunately, when I was pulling out of my parking

00:12:44.100 spot, a rogue grocery cart crashed into my car, totaling it and nearly killing me. There are two

00:12:50.480 lessons we can take away from this. One, don't be lazy. Put your shopping carts away so I don't have

00:12:54.900 to suffer. And two, you can solve an issue like mine quickly and without breaking the bank by just

00:12:59.700 visiting rockauto.com. They have the touch-up paint and pens that are easy to use and just as easy as a

00:13:05.200 magic marker. Rockauto.com is an online family-owned business that sells all the auto parts you could ever

00:13:09.580 possibly need that are specific to your own vehicle. Their prices are shockingly reasonable and their

00:13:13.480 shipping is quick. So no matter what's going on with your car, you can trust Rock Auto to get you

00:13:18.020 what you need best. Rock Auto has a very user-friendly website and they make it easy for you to pick the

00:13:22.860 right parts for your specific car. You'll see photo specs and even installation tips so you can feel

00:13:26.300 confident that you're choosing the correct parts for your vehicle. So what are you waiting for? Go to

00:13:29.440 rockauto.com for your auto part needs today and write Walsh in their how did you hear about us box so

00:13:34.120 they know that I'm the one that sent you. That's rockauto.com to shop for your auto parts today.

00:13:37.780 Okay, so here's the story. It is the story. It should be the biggest news story of the day,

00:13:45.360 the week, the month. But if you go to, I just, I real quick just pulled up some of these mainstream

00:13:53.340 media sites just to take a look at it. CBS News on right up at the top of the homepage, no mention of

00:14:00.320 it. NBC News, top of the homepage, no mention of it. CNN, no mention of it on the top of the

00:14:09.420 homepage. And you go down from there. Of course, we're talking about the attempted assassination

00:14:14.700 of Brett Kavanaugh. Okay, so this is someone who attempted to assassinate a Supreme Court justice

00:14:20.400 yesterday and the major corporate media outlets today aren't even, it's like it didn't happen.

00:14:27.300 And we can't even say they moved on from it already because they just simply hardly

00:14:33.460 acknowledged it at all, ever. Here's the Daily Wire's report. It says a man allegedly caught lurking

00:14:38.540 near U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh's home early Wednesday has been charged with attempted

00:14:42.960 murder of a federal judge. The Department of Justice confirmed to the Daily Wire. A criminal complaint

00:14:46.980 was filed today against charging Nicholas John Roski, age 26, for federal charges of attempted murder

00:14:53.760 versus Supreme Court justice. He was arrested in a Washington suburb of Chevy Chase, Maryland,

00:15:00.160 early Wednesday. It says that he traveled to Kavanaugh's home armed with weapons and burglary

00:15:05.800 tools with the intent to kill the justice and prevent him from ruling on Second Amendment and

00:15:10.600 abortion cases. So yeah, that's one of the ironies here is that this maniac was going to kill somebody 0.64

00:15:16.800 with a gun, was really concerned about gun control. And he was worried that Brett Kavanaugh would

00:15:23.560 prevent gun control legislation. And also he was worried about the abortion, about Roe v. Wade,

00:15:30.740 protecting Roe v. Wade. And he was willing to kill someone in order to do it. He had, it says, 0.94

00:15:37.160 an inventory search of the seized suitcase and backpack reveal a black tactical chest rig and tactical

00:15:43.220 knife, a Glock 17 pistol with two magazines and ammunition, pepper spray, zip ties, a hammer,

00:15:49.020 a screwdriver, nail punch, crowbar, pistol light, duct tape, hiking boots with padding on the outside

00:15:54.960 of the soles, and other items. So he was fully prepared to do this and was going to do it. And

00:16:01.160 he planned to kill himself after he did it. So this is a murderous lunatic, fully capable of doing 1.00

00:16:07.860 this, had all the tools he needed to carry out this crime, and was willing to give his own life 0.99

00:16:15.280 in the process. You would think a major, major story. And although this does not need to be

00:16:24.120 pointed out and has already, and yet has already been pointed out, I will say it also, that if this

00:16:30.180 was, I mean, you can only imagine if this was one of the liberal justices, if this was someone coming

00:16:35.820 after Sotomayor or Kagan, or if Ruth Bader Ginsburg was still alive and on the court.

00:16:44.300 And there was some crazed right winger who showed up at their house or was on the way to one of their

00:16:50.760 homes with all these weapons and this plan. Can you imagine if it was a pro-lifer, reverse this around,

00:16:58.960 and a pro-lifer upset about an impending ruling in favor of abortion rights on the way to one of 0.98

00:17:09.100 their homes to kidnap them and murder them? It would be the only thing that the media talked about 0.97

00:17:16.420 for the next, I don't know, two months. And even after they moved on to something else,

00:17:23.840 it would constantly be revisited. Like, we would never, ever move on from it as a society.

00:17:30.200 Just like with January 6th. It would be just like that. And they would compare the event to

00:17:36.300 9-11 Pearl Harbor in terms of significance. But in this case, they don't want to talk about it.

00:17:43.660 One of the reasons they don't want to talk about it is because they realize that

00:17:47.220 this is in large part their fault. The media and Democrats going out saying that

00:17:57.740 the conservative justices are going to overturn Roe v. Wade. And overturning Roe v. Wade,

00:18:05.660 it's a clear and present danger to women. They're going to enact a handmaid's tale scenario. Women are 1.00

00:18:12.760 going to be enslaved. Well, when you say that to people who are already predisposed to be violent

00:18:19.200 and crazy, you are inviting them to do exactly what this guy tried to do. Let's go back and remember

00:18:27.220 Chuck Schumer. Chuck Schumer is just a few months ago up in front of a crowd. And let's remember what

00:18:35.480 he said. I want to tell you, Gorsuch, I want to tell you, Kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind

00:18:44.320 and you will pay the price. You won't know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.

00:18:55.920 You will pay the price. Now, what you heard there is far more explicit than anything Donald Trump

00:19:05.880 ever said to the protesters on January 6th. Well, actually, it goes the other way because

00:19:11.860 Donald Trump was explicit in saying that this was going to be a peaceful demonstration.

00:19:16.240 But that, you're going to pay the price. Now, there isn't even an innocent interpretation available

00:19:26.100 for something like that. Now, you could claim that Chuck Schumer, he didn't really mean that he

00:19:32.300 wanted anyone to go kill Justice Kavanaugh. But he also didn't, he didn't not want someone to go

00:19:41.420 kill Justice Kavanaugh. He certainly wasn't going out of his way to make sure that didn't happen.

00:19:46.240 But whatever his intentions were, you're going to pay the price if you arrive at this decision.

00:19:53.920 He's a justice. At best, you're trying to put social and political pressure on a Supreme Court

00:20:00.780 justice. Intimidate them that way in order to change a potential ruling.

00:20:08.060 So, one way or another, that's an open threat.

00:20:10.680 There should be Republicans right now in Congress calling for Chuck Schumer to be brought up on charges

00:20:22.580 of incitement. Look what they're doing to Marjorie Taylor Greene, trying to prevent her from ever

00:20:29.500 running for re-election. She's never done anything close to that. And if she had done that, 0.98

00:20:36.640 if Marjorie Taylor Greene had given a speech targeting liberal justices and saying, you'll 0.64

00:20:42.780 pay the price for this, and then a few months later, some crazed right-winger showed up in one

00:20:46.860 of their homes with guns and duct tape, she'd be in jail. She would go to jail for that, Marjorie Taylor

00:20:52.160 Greene. Being prevented from ever running for office again, that would be the least of her problems. 0.88

00:20:57.280 Republicans need to actually start playing offense on this kind of thing. 0.94

00:21:03.900 There's no reason not to. You'd have the public on your side. This is totally inexcusable.

00:21:10.680 And even after all this happened, even after someone tried to show up to kill Justice Kavanaugh,

00:21:17.220 protesters still showed up at Kavanaugh's house yesterday. I think we have the footage of that.

00:21:21.920 This is after all this happened, and they still showed up. Let's play that.

00:21:27.280 And you see the cops there. They've got

00:21:57.100 Justice Kavanaugh's house surrounded. So they're protecting the house, but they're also just

00:22:02.540 standing there. Why don't you arrest these punks? What they're doing is illegal. This is an attempt 0.91

00:22:06.280 to intimidate a Supreme Court justice after someone just tried to kill him. This is an intimidation

00:22:10.540 tactic, and it's not legal. Not to mention, even if there's no Supreme Court justice, disturbing the

00:22:18.020 peace. You're walking around a residential neighborhood with bullhorns and banging on drums.

00:22:27.100 If I went outside in my own neighborhood with a bullhorn and I was banging on drums,

00:22:30.580 it wouldn't be long before the cops showed up and said, you can't do that here. This is disturbing

00:22:34.800 the peace at a minimum.

00:22:35.680 But they're allowed to basically do what they want. And as far as I know, no Republicans are

00:22:44.460 calling for charges against any of the Democrats who openly called for exactly this.

00:22:52.120 Including whoever leaked that opinion. As far as I'm concerned, the leaker of the Supreme Court opinion

00:22:57.200 should now be brought up, along with whatever other charges you can put on them, should now be

00:23:02.100 brought up on attempted murder charges also, because this was the reason for leaking the opinion.

00:23:09.600 It was throwing this out there so that to prevent, by whatever means, this opinion from going forward.

00:23:20.480 In spite of all this, MSNBC, I said that they kind of ignored this, but they did have,

00:23:26.460 maybe that's not entirely fair, because they did yesterday, they were talking about the problem of

00:23:30.420 violent extremists, domestic terrorism. This is on the same day when, when a left wing terrorist

00:23:37.780 tried to kill Supreme Court justice. And so they're talking about the issue and they are acknowledging

00:23:42.220 it. Let's listen.

00:23:44.260 Replacement theory has become political ideology.

00:23:48.320 Frank, if Mr. Whitfield's mother was killed by foreign terrorists, the Democrats and the Republicans 0.63

00:23:54.820 on the committee would be promising him the moon. Um, what is, I mean, is it as obvious as it seems

00:24:01.520 that domestic violent extremists are an important part of the voting coalition on the right? I mean,

00:24:07.380 what is the structural impediment to pardoning the homeland against domestic violent extremism?

00:24:14.120 Oh, right. I agree. Well, they're talking about the violent extremists on the right.

00:24:18.300 And it, it, it, and she says, in fact, they're a voting block. That's how numerous they are.

00:24:25.480 Which, uh, which again, if they're that numerous, I mean, there's a voting block, thousands, millions.

00:24:34.380 And yet it's just with, it's just very odd that with one exception,

00:24:38.460 every time we have seen mobs of violent people, um, acting out with, with political motivations

00:24:49.240 every single time with one exception, they've been on the left. Isn't that interesting?

00:24:55.180 Well, while this is going on, uh, Joe Biden decided to go down to, uh, California and, and visit with

00:25:00.800 Jimmy Kimmel because that's the priority here. Again, Supreme Court justice was, uh, attempted murder,

00:25:06.420 but he's on Jimmy Kimmel and we'll play a couple of clips here. Here he is talking about

00:25:10.820 the communication problems that the white house has admitting. I think that the white house has

00:25:16.740 some communication problems and even he himself has communication problems. And then this is very

00:25:20.700 helpful. He actually demonstrated his own communication problems while talking about them.

00:25:25.260 So watch. So there's a lot of major things we've done, but what we haven't done is we haven't been

00:25:32.760 able to communicate it in a way that is, uh, um, make me say another way. Well, see, that's kind

00:25:39.660 of perfect. Yeah. I've been able to communicate it. Look how the press has changed. Look how the

00:25:44.920 press has changed. It has changed. Oh, listen, I get it. I know you get, you overstand it. You don't

00:25:49.140 just understand it. You overstand it, but here's the deal. One of the things is that it's very

00:25:55.400 difficult now to have a, um, even with notable exceptions, even though really good reporters,

00:26:04.100 they have to get the number of clicks on, on, on nightly news. So instead of asking a question,

00:26:09.680 anyway, it's just, everything gets, gets sensationalized in ways that, but I'm convinced

00:26:16.080 we can get through this. We have to get through it. And one of the things, look,

00:26:19.680 I'm going to take a break and then we'll talk a little bit more.

00:26:21.820 I don't mind. I'm sorry. We have some of those commercials. We have some biracial commercials

00:26:26.260 we need to show. But, uh, he didn't finish one of those sentences. Do you notice that he started?

00:26:34.960 So that was a collection of sentences that were started and then abandoned before he finished

00:26:41.140 them. That's it. That's a style of speaking now that he starts a sentence and then it trails off

00:26:46.400 and he picks up a new thought, trails off, picks up a new thought. And Jimmy Kimmel sitting there

00:26:51.620 trying his best to help him out. I mean, that real, the whole conversation really reminds me

00:26:56.860 it is, it's very much kind of the tone and tenor of, uh, of, uh, you know, a, a grandson

00:27:05.500 sitting in a nursing home, talking to a senile grand grandfather. That's, that's exactly what's

00:27:12.800 happening here. And that's not even the worst clip. I think the worst one is this. Listen to this.

00:27:17.660 You turn on the TV, look at the ads. When's the last time you saw biracial couples on TV? When's 0.82

00:27:24.100 the last time you saw the way, I mean, people are selling products. They do ads to sell products

00:27:29.540 and they sell products when people, they appeal to people. This generation is going to change 1.00

00:27:34.540 everything. We just got to make sure we don't give up. There's an ability for us to do everything

00:27:40.040 from increase the, the, the access to education, healthcare. Look what we did in healthcare.

00:27:47.460 Yeah. You know, it's really bad when, um, I mean, I, I can't even stand this guy,

00:27:52.380 but I'm so embarrassed for him that I can't, I, it's hard for me to watch it anymore. The

00:27:56.360 secondhand embarrassment is so overwhelming that I can't even watch it. Um, and, and it's like,

00:28:02.520 we should be, I don't like him. So the fact that he's embarrassing himself. And I also think that

00:28:07.280 he's a, that he's just a, he's a bad guy on top of everything else. And as I've said before,

00:28:12.320 the fact that he's going senile in front of the entire world, that is also his fault because he

00:28:17.520 is, was so obsessed with, with, with power that, uh, he just kept grasping for it, even as he knew

00:28:25.580 that he was losing his mental and physical faculties. Um, and, and now he's embarrassing

00:28:30.880 himself in front of the world, totally on him, but it's still really hard to watch because it's so

00:28:36.760 embarrassing. Nevermind the fact that, uh, he's, he's got no sense of, of even what decade we're

00:28:44.720 living in. So he says, when's the last time you saw a biracial couple in an advertisement? Um,

00:28:49.820 I don't know. When's the last time I saw a biracial couple in a, in a TV ad? Well, the last time I saw

00:28:54.380 a TV ad was the last time I saw that because like 95, a better question is when's the last time you saw

00:29:00.080 a straight white couple in a TV commercial? It's pretty rare these days. That's what jumps out at you.

00:29:05.620 If you ever see every once in a while you see it and you're like, wow, I didn't know this was still

00:29:08.440 happening. So I don't know. 95% of a TV couples are, are at least biracial.

00:29:18.940 He's just, uh, he, and then he, he's been in the last clip before that. He talks about the nightly

00:29:23.540 news and he says that the anchors on the night, they need clicks on the nightly news. He's just,

00:29:29.500 he's, he's almost there the click thing, but he's kind of combining that with the nightly news.

00:29:33.400 It's, uh, it is embarrassing and it's, it's long since gotten to the point where it's really not

00:29:42.860 funny anymore because, um, it never actually was all that funny. Even if you feel like all you could

00:29:48.220 do is laugh at times, uh, this person is in charge of the country supposedly anyway. And everyone knows

00:29:55.840 that he's lost his mind. Everyone, including all of our enemies across the world. All right.

00:30:03.520 Here's someone else who's, um, long since lost her mind. Joy Behar had some thoughts about gun laws 0.83

00:30:11.220 on the view. And I thought this was pretty great. And it was an applause line. The audience loved it,

00:30:16.280 but listen to this. Most AR-15 owners are former military 35 plus. So that's all I'm saying is

00:30:22.840 that they're not crazy people. Okay. Here's the thing. Once black people get guns in this country, 1.00

00:30:26.860 the gun laws will change. Trust me. All the train seals clapping for that. Once black people get 1.00

00:30:33.520 guns in this country, I'll tell you what, uh, you know, you can do that with anything. Hey, 0.98

00:30:38.680 once black people have cars in this country, those Republicans, they're going to want to outlaw cars. 0.99

00:30:45.420 Once black people, once black people are eating pancakes in this country, you watch right wingers. 0.99

00:30:51.880 They're going to, they're going to, they're going to shut down all the IHOPs. Once the black people 1.00

00:30:55.560 have the pancakes, once black people are wearing shoes in this country, they're going to shut down 1.00

00:31:02.080 footlocker, the right wingers. What the world is she talking about? I kind of want to see the rest of 0.99

00:31:08.460 that clip because there are two black women on the, on the stage there. And did they, well, 1.00

00:31:12.800 I don't need to see it to know, but I'm sure they didn't correct her on that point. Um, and it's

00:31:17.840 supposed to be, that's supposed to be something in defense of black people. But of course, once again,

00:31:22.380 it's just insulting and patronizing and demeaning. Yeah. Um, punchline here in case you didn't know is

00:31:32.680 that, uh, black people do have guns in this country and, uh, any black person in this country who does 1.00

00:31:38.160 not have a gun. That's not because there's any law preventing them from doing so. At least there's

00:31:44.580 not any law preventing them based on race from doing so. Um, all right. I want to play this for

00:31:50.600 you. So Redskins defensive coordinator, Jack Del Rio, and I am still calling them the Redskins.

00:31:55.700 Uh, I'm going to, I decided I'm going to dead name this team. So, uh, Redskins defensive coordinator,

00:32:01.060 Jack Del Rio tweeted this week, pointing out the inconsistency between how the BLM riots were covered

00:32:07.160 and how they were handled versus the January 6th riots. And, uh, so you know that it, of course,

00:32:14.680 that's going to provoke a lot of backlash and outrage. Everything that you expect came from that.

00:32:19.160 And he addressed the controversy during a press conference. And I was kind of, when I, I knew the,

00:32:24.280 the setup for this, and then I saw the clip and I, and I saw the headline that he was addressing the

00:32:28.580 controversy. I was expecting what we always get, which is the backpedal, the apology. And, um,

00:32:35.200 very pleased to find out that's not exactly what happened. Listen, want to talk about it? I'd talk

00:32:40.060 about it with anybody. Yeah, no problem at any time, but, uh, but they're not, I'm just expressing

00:32:46.480 myself. And, uh, I think we all as Americans have the right to express ourselves, especially if you're

00:32:52.060 being respectful. I'm being respectful. I just asked a simple question. Really? Did I,

00:32:56.900 let's get right down to it. What did I ask? A simple question. Why are we not looking into those

00:33:05.640 things? If we're going to talk about it, why are we not looking into those things? Because it's kind

00:33:11.040 of hard for me to say, I can realistically look at it. I see the images on TV. People's livelihoods

00:33:19.300 are being destroyed. Businesses are being burned down. No problem. And then we have a dustup at the

00:33:26.040 Capitol. Well, there's nothing burned down. And we're not going to talk about, we're going to

00:33:31.140 make that a major deal. I just think it kind of two standards. And if we apply the same standard

00:33:37.140 and we're going to be reasonable with each other, let's have a discussion. That's all it was. Let's

00:33:42.600 have a discussion. We're Americans. Let's talk it through. I'm for, I'm for us, you know,

00:33:48.580 having a great opportunity to have a fulfilled life. Um, like I said, every way, every, which way

00:33:56.440 I can, when I'm here, it's about love and respect. Damn it. I wanted for once to give somebody some 0.99

00:34:04.960 credit because that he said something and the meat sports media is offended by it. Media is offended

00:34:10.840 by how dare you say that compare BLM to January 6th, which, which I agree by the way that you can't

00:34:16.160 really compare the BLM riots of January 6th, only because the BLM riots were a thousand times worse

00:34:20.860 in, by every measure, uh, uh, death toll damage done, you know, uh, and it's easy for the death

00:34:28.800 toll to be worse because there was no death toll from January 6th, except for the, uh, except for

00:34:36.120 Ashley Babbitt, who was killed by a, by a Capitol police officer. Um, so, but he says this and then

00:34:43.100 you heard him there. That's when you expect to get the apology. Instead, he kind of doubles down.

00:34:48.240 Great. And I want to finally give someone credit for not apologizing. And then while that clip is

00:34:53.140 playing, I hadn't done this before. I probably should have. And I looked it up and he did apologize

00:34:57.060 after that. So damn it. I thought we finally had someone. So he tweeted shortly after that clip 0.99

00:35:03.940 went viral, he tweeted this. I made comments earlier today in referencing the attack that took

00:35:08.240 place on the United States Capitol on January 6th, referencing that situation as a dust up was

00:35:12.580 irresponsible and negligent. And I am sorry. I stand by my comments, condemning violence in communities

00:35:16.620 across the country. I say that while also expressing my support as an American citizen for peaceful

00:35:20.360 protests in our country, I have fully supported all peaceful protests in America. I love, respect,

00:35:24.140 and support all my fellow coaches, players, and staff that I work with and respect their views and

00:35:27.780 opinions. I don't know why I'm even disappointed, but you just hope like one of these times, just one

00:35:39.240 person. I'm just waiting for one person to have the cancel mob coming after them and to say, I'm not

00:35:48.240 going to apologize. Even if I was wrong with what I said, I'm still not, and he wasn't wrong. But even

00:36:00.200 if you were, you still don't apologize because these people don't deserve it. They don't deserve

00:36:04.860 your apology. They weren't hurt by anything you said. How many times, I don't know how many times I

00:36:10.320 have to explain this. Apologies are given by someone who has hurt another person, and they are given to

00:36:20.160 the person who was hurt. Okay? If you've done something and nobody was hurt, then good news.

00:36:29.200 You don't owe anybody an apology. You're off the hook. You didn't do anything wrong.

00:36:32.960 If you did somehow hurt another person, then you find that person and you privately apologize to them.

00:36:41.200 But this public apology ritual does nothing but just encourage and fuel this mob, this pitchfork mob 0.95

00:36:52.680 of phonies and losers who are just looking for a reason to pretend to be offended by things. 0.63

00:37:00.620 And you notice that especially in sports and in football, it's like the worst thing, 0.90

00:37:05.700 the greatest offense that somebody in the NFL can commit is to say something, is to say, is to reveal

00:37:13.980 that they have a similar view as the majority of the fans. Like the majority of the NFL fans would

00:37:22.020 probably agree with Jack Del Rio about that. But the media says if you're in the NFL, that you cannot do

00:37:30.280 that you can't agree with most of your fans. You can't say, the worst thing you could do is to say

00:37:34.640 something that your fans agree with. That's the worst offense. Damn it, Jack. Well, maybe the next

00:37:43.660 one. I'll keep, I'll keep hoping. Okay. One other quick thing here. This is from Yahoo. It says a

00:37:48.280 proposal that took place at Disneyland Paris has blown up on Reddit and not in a good way. Reddit

00:37:53.780 user was Gitlon initially posted the proposal video in the I'm a total piece of S forum and claimed to

00:38:01.460 be friends with the man who was proposing. And he captured the clip POS destroyed my best friend's

00:38:06.560 moment. He asked for permission beforehand. So, okay. So in this video, apparently they're at

00:38:11.420 Disneyland Paris. It's this couple and the man wants to propose to the woman. And they're standing in

00:38:18.660 this spot where apparently people propose all the time with the little fake castle in the background.

00:38:23.500 Well, it's a big fake castle, but it is a fake castle. They're standing in the same spot. And this

00:38:28.320 is, and the article goes on to explain that I guess this is one of the top 10 proposal sites in the

00:38:36.240 world. People go here all the time to get the Instagram proposals, but you're not supposed to

00:38:40.960 stand there apparently. So in the middle of the proposal, the Disneyland employee rushes in and

00:38:48.420 takes the ring and moves them to another spot. Let's play the video.

00:39:10.960 I got to say, I kind of, I'm not a defender of Disney by any means whatsoever, but I'm kind of on the

00:39:25.460 Disney employee side on this one. I sort of am. And I'll tell you why. The only reason is because

00:39:31.340 like it's a proposal. So it's hopefully a once in a lifetime thing for a lot of people that ends up

00:39:37.540 not being once in a lifetime, but, but hopefully it should be. And, and so, so why are you going,

00:39:43.320 why would you want to go to the place where a billion other people have done the proposal?

00:39:48.580 It's a top 10 proposal site. So why, why do you want to propose in the most cliche way imaginable

00:39:54.780 so that you can have the same Instagram shot that, that 50 million people also have?

00:40:01.220 So for that reason alone, I'm, I think it's, they did them a favor. You know, how about redo the

00:40:07.420 proposal somewhere else? If you feel like you need to make a thing out of it, like do something

00:40:11.280 unique and interesting. Disneyland of all places, a corporate theme park is where you want to start

00:40:19.720 this journey with, uh, with the, the love of your life. That's the real outrage here. My opinion.

00:40:26.120 Let's get now to the comment section. Val says Matt was unnecessarily, unnecessarily rude to the

00:40:42.520 WNBA players who, by the way, had nothing to do with these shenanigans. I'm usually a fan of you,

00:40:47.220 Matt, but this was low, unconvincing. And part of the reason people are deterred from the right

00:40:50.740 because we keep making unnecessarily hateful comments about historically marginalized people.

00:40:54.660 I'm not trying to cancel you for this or anything. I just hope you see where I'm coming from.

00:40:58.480 Uh, well, I don't Val. And I think that's very unfair to me. Um, I would, I honestly, I'm,

00:41:04.880 I'm shocked that you would accuse me of being rude to WNBA players. I would never, I believe in the

00:41:10.840 golden rule. Okay. I would never, I'm not going to dunk on WNBA players because I would, I know they

00:41:16.940 would never dunk on me because they can't because they can't touch the rim. So I didn't mean to use

00:41:24.360 the video of the protest at the game as an excuse to insult the WNBA. Honestly, I'm just impressed

00:41:30.960 that they actually record the games at all. I figured they would just have like a stenographer

00:41:35.740 or maybe a courtroom sketch artist drawing a picture every time somebody makes a layup. So

00:41:40.300 you only got to draw like two or three pictures in a game. I didn't mean any disrespect. I really

00:41:44.020 didn't. Just to clarify. Um, let's see. Sarah says, I watched what is a woman three times within 0.99

00:41:52.980 the span of two days, and I'm going to watch it again tonight. The obsession over watching morons 1.00

00:41:57.140 spew their nonsense is real. And Matt's poker face is pure gold that never gets old. Well, that's, 1.00

00:42:03.160 that's exactly, that's how this should be done. You don't need to watch it once,

00:42:06.500 watch it multiple times, tell your friends about it, go to whatiswoman.com. Um, LR two three says,

00:42:16.340 Matt, how do you respond to the argument that if children don't belong at drag shows,

00:42:19.880 they also don't belong at places like Hooters? How do I respond? Yeah, I've seen this, this,

00:42:25.440 if you can even call it an argument, it's, it's not an argument, it's a deflection,

00:42:29.020 which is not the same thing as an argument. But, um, how do I respond to that? Well, first of all,

00:42:33.180 who, I guess my first response is, okay, I, yeah, I'm not, I'm not bringing my kids to Hooters.

00:42:42.260 So, okay. Yeah. Don't, I agree. I think we could probably just establish that.

00:42:47.900 No, you probably shouldn't be bringing young kids to Hooters. Fine. Cool. Um, now that we've

00:42:53.080 agreed on that, let's get back to talking about the drag shows because the reason we got to talk

00:42:56.420 about that is that we don't agree on it. Also, um, as far as I know, there's not any big societal

00:43:02.760 push to get kids into Hooters. Uh, I know that sometimes kids are brought into Hooters,

00:43:08.680 but there's not, it's not a thing. Okay. It's not, there's a, there's, there's not a great effort

00:43:13.420 to do that. And, um, and then my third response is that actually it's not even the same kind of thing.

00:43:23.720 Um, I think it's weird to bring young kids into Hooters. I just, I don't know. It's the same kind

00:43:29.840 of response. Like why even do that? There's a lot. If you want to go to a chain restaurant with

00:43:34.000 bad food, there are many of them available to you. Uh, why bring the kids there? So agreed,

00:43:39.500 you know, on that, I'm not bringing my kids to Hooters, but it's not the same. Okay. That's,

00:43:44.340 there's not a moral equivalence there. The drag show for kids is definitely worse. Hooters is not

00:43:51.320 appropriate for kids. Drag show a lot, a lot more inappropriate, a lot more, uh, grotesque,

00:43:57.800 disordered, um, much more overtly sexual, all those things. So it is, it is a lot worse.

00:44:05.700 That's the other. So there's my, there are my three responses that you get for that. Um,

00:44:10.400 let's see. Roger says, Matt, really given the WNBA, the business, of course they could use it.

00:44:18.780 Sir, that's not, that's not funny. I've, I've just said, we're not making jokes about the WNBA

00:44:25.060 on this show. We don't do that here. Roger, you're banned from the show. That's a, that is

00:44:30.260 outrageous, sir. Um, Teresa says, Matt, you're getting close to a million subscribers. Better

00:44:35.780 start practicing the dance. I don't know what you're talking about practicing dance. What do you

00:44:39.180 mean? Um, Nate says the funniest way Matt could die is to get hit by a meteorite while he's doing a

00:44:45.300 plug for Epic will. Uh, I, I actually, and I think I've said this before. I think it'd be a great

00:44:49.840 honor to die by meteorite. That's my number one preferred, um, death. If I, if I get to choose, 0.99

00:44:56.180 you know, if I, if I was able to choose from a menu of options of what, what's ultimately going to

00:45:00.300 take me out. I think a meteorite would be pretty good, especially as a big fan of, uh, of space as

00:45:03.940 I am, I think it'd be a great honor to have something. Let me think about that. You got a meteorite

00:45:07.820 that's been traveling billions of miles, like to this destination to, for this rendezvous with,

00:45:14.660 with you and your head. I think, uh, I'd, I'd actually be okay with that. And, uh, let's see.

00:45:22.640 I think there was one other here. Shelly says, Matt, I read the interview in the UK magazine. I

00:45:27.900 thought the interview interviewer made a good point. These feminists are complaining about not 1.00

00:45:31.320 being included in your film, but have they included you in anything? Uh, no, they haven't. That was,

00:45:36.920 that was a good point. I mentioned, I did an interview in a magazine in the UK and, uh, uh,

00:45:42.280 some of the interview was about this, this debate in the UK among, uh, British feminists about the 0.95

00:45:48.220 film and about me. And they, they feel that they've been somehow marginalized because they

00:45:52.780 weren't included in the film. And, um, and that is, that is one of many responses to that is, uh,

00:45:59.920 yeah, I, there were no feminists and haven't been any at any point that are knocking on my door, 1.00

00:46:05.660 trying to include me in any projects. And also just the, the gumption, the narcissism to get

00:46:14.780 offended that you're not in a movie that someone in a different country who you don't know and don't

00:46:21.060 even like made. I, that's a, that's a, that is a sense of entitlement that is beyond anything I can

00:46:27.980 even comprehend. It would never occur to me. It would never occur to me to watch a movie or a

00:46:33.340 documentary that somebody else made. And I'm sitting there watching and thinking, why am I

00:46:37.780 not in this? What? Who, why should you be in it? I mean, why should you specifically?

00:46:46.480 And also in our film, what is a woman? If you're someone who's, uh, you know, been in this fight for,

00:46:52.140 against gender ideology madness. And so you think you should have been in the movie,

00:46:56.000 um, who in the movie should, should have been taken out to make room for you? It's a 90 minute

00:47:01.440 film. So, and we use every minute of that 90 minutes and it goes, it actually goes a little bit

00:47:06.300 over 90 minutes. So who should be taken out to make room for you? Because I think that every

00:47:10.600 interview we did helped to tell the story and each interview was powerful in its own way. Um,

00:47:17.060 oftentimes powerful in ways that the interviewee didn't intend. So who are we taking out? That's the

00:47:22.320 other question. You let me know that feminists. And then, uh, you know, maybe I'll go back and 1.00

00:47:27.120 we could just reshoot the entire movie for you. You tell me what movie I should have made and I'll

00:47:31.240 just make it at your behest. Sure. What is a woman is a huge success. So we really thank you for that

00:47:37.960 this week. The film became the number one, most popular movie at home on Rotten Tomatoes, which is

00:47:42.500 just really mind boggling with over 2,500 ratings and an audience score of 97%. This is a must-see film

00:47:48.820 that everybody's talking about from National Review, uh, to a lot of conservative influencers

00:47:52.780 like Zuby. They, they're talking about how important the film is and why people have to

00:47:56.620 watch it. We're changing the gender ideology conversation and fighting back in the culture. 0.94

00:48:01.300 Many of the people who hate the film, despite likely not having actually seen it, still are not

00:48:05.480 able to offer any definition of what a woman is or if you, any of the absurdity that the film points

00:48:09.860 out, they simply have no meaningful response because we're winning. But without your support,

00:48:14.260 none of this would be possible. So from all of us at the Daily Wire, thank you for that.

00:48:17.640 Go to whatiswoman.com to become a member and watch the film today. Now let's get to our daily

00:48:22.460 cancellation. Today for our daily cancellation, we will respond to a video from, um, a YouTuber

00:48:32.000 named Professor Dave of the channel Professor Dave Explains, where presumably Professor Dave

00:48:37.180 explains things. The channel has an impressive 2 million subscribers and this video was sent to me

00:48:41.340 by several people promising that it contains a formidable argument against my position on gender

00:48:45.800 ideology. One person in fact says that Professor Dave debunks my movie, What is a Woman? And I'm

00:48:51.380 quite interested to see that. So let's go through this together.

00:48:55.980 Everybody seems to be furious about trans people. Half of us are furious that they exist and the other

00:49:02.320 half are furious about what the other half is saying. I would like to jump in and see if I can clear

00:49:06.980 up some of the ways that people are talking past each other. Now it's no secret that I'm a bit on the

00:49:12.380 liberal side, but rest assured the left is not going to get away scot-free on this one. They're

00:49:18.060 missing the mark on a few key points, but as tends to be the case, it's bigots on the right who are

00:49:23.380 the main problem. So let's start there. We're off to a rough start. Putting aside Dave's smug,

00:49:29.700 know-it-all tone and demeanor, something that seems to be a matter of instinct for people like him,

00:49:33.340 so I'm not going to hold it against him. The real problem is that in the very first sentence,

00:49:36.800 he's already wildly and intentionally mischaracterizing his opponents. In 30 seconds,

00:49:41.540 he gives us a straw man and an ad hominem. He's doing that in the first 30 seconds. He's beginning

00:49:46.720 this way, which signals that he doesn't have much to offer beyond this point, because if he actually

00:49:52.220 planned on making a compelling argument, he wouldn't come out of the gate breezily dismissing

00:49:57.140 millions of people as bigots. Sorry, not millions, billions. Because anybody who has a problem with

00:50:02.480 basic concepts of gender ideology is a bigot, he says, which means that almost everybody in the

00:50:08.620 world and who has ever existed in the world is a bigot. Professor Dave begins the proceedings with

00:50:14.480 that declaration. He also lies about the nature of the opposing argument, and he does it in the

00:50:19.040 laziest and frankly dumbest way imaginable. He says that the people on the other side are furious that 0.98

00:50:24.840 trans people exist. Now, in reality, as he's well aware, we're not furious that trans people exist,

00:50:30.520 but rather we deny the underlying premise of gender ideology. If we're furious about anything,

00:50:36.600 it's that this ideology is being imposed on society and especially on children, and it's causing great

00:50:41.660 harm in the process. By saying that we're furious that trans people exist, he gets to dismiss all of

00:50:46.560 us as a bunch of angry, spittle-flecked rage clowns, when he is also quite well aware that when it comes 0.96

00:50:52.740 to this subject, nearly all of the angry, spittle-flecked rage clowns are on the other side of the 0.92

00:50:57.720 discussion. Take, for example, the people threatening to kill me and accusing me of genocide for making 0.98

00:51:02.160 a documentary, a documentary where I am only visibly angry one time briefly when addressing

00:51:07.180 a school board that covered up the rape of a student, so perhaps you'll excuse my emotions

00:51:10.820 in that case. But the other point of this mischaracterization is to pretend that we're

00:51:16.300 angry at trans people personally rather than critical of the claims made by trans activists.

00:51:22.720 Overall, it's a mess, and we're only 30 seconds in. Let's continue.

00:51:28.120 The primary issue is people who deny transgenderism. These are the people who spew the tired Fox News

00:51:34.640 talking points. Liberals say there are 89 genders and anyone can identify as a hamster,

00:51:40.360 that sort of thing. It's a deliberate caricature of reality peddled by all the angry conservative

00:51:45.460 dudes popping up in my feed lately who claim that nobody can define a woman. Let's all take a moment

00:51:50.920 to acknowledge the problems that go along with the ambiguity of language. Sex and gender are

00:51:57.020 different words that refer to different things. If you did not know that, now you do.

00:52:03.940 So we have another common rhetorical tactic from the left, and honestly, I'm quite disappointed to

00:52:08.500 hear common rhetorical tactics when I was promised an utter destruction of my worldview, and I was looking

00:52:13.960 forward to it. Professor Dave says it's a tired Fox News talking point that there are a lot of genders, 0.91

00:52:19.840 but that's not Fox's talking point. That's his talking point. This is indeed the official

00:52:25.700 position of the gender ideologue. They may disagree on how many genders, but they all agree that there

00:52:30.840 are a lot more than two. Some say there are infinite numbers. Facebook says there are 58. If this sounds

00:52:35.940 insane, that's not Fox's fault. As for sex and gender being two different things, I totally agree. 0.93

00:52:42.580 Sex refers to biology, while gender is a linguistic term that refers to words, but was co-opted by a

00:52:48.120 pedophile sexologist named John Money and applied to people in a vague and ambiguous way.

00:52:53.180 Dave never mentions that point. He doesn't seem to know where his own ideas came from, or else he

00:52:57.640 doesn't want you to know. Ignorant or deceptive, you decide. From here, Professor Dave provides a 0.96

00:53:02.840 basically correct definition of sex with a long digression into intersexuality, and then gets around

00:53:07.840 talking about gender. Let's listen to that. Gender is a different phenomenon. It is still 0.97

00:53:14.240 biological, but it is a neurochemical construct. This means that ultimately it is still genetic in

00:53:20.180 basis, but it absolutely is not determined merely by the sex chromosomes. It is tremendously more

00:53:26.060 complicated, and researchers are still working to understand the biological basis of gender identity.

00:53:31.280 Human psychology is complex. People need to deal with that. Thoughts and feelings are ultimately

00:53:37.920 chemical phenomena. We all have a neurochemical profile that guides how we think and feel,

00:53:43.620 and part of that is gender identity. The reason that we are just now becoming equipped to differentiate

00:53:49.040 between the two phenomena is that in the vast majority of humans, somewhere between 99 and 99.9%

00:53:57.120 of all people, gender identity aligns with biological sex. So gender identity has a neurochemical basis 0.92

00:54:05.640 because it's a feeling, and feelings can be traced back to brain activity. Okay, sure, I'll buy that.

00:54:14.780 The question is whether those feelings reflect reality. That's the question. An anorexic person feels that

00:54:21.940 she's overweight. The feeling is a biological phenomenon in the sense that it's happening in her brain,

00:54:26.980 in the same sense that a man feels like a woman, but we understand in her case that the feelings are

00:54:31.660 disordered, incorrect, wrong, delusional, and so we work to treat her brain, her feelings, to more

00:54:37.220 accurately align them with reality. We don't say that the anorexic is trans-obese, and we don't call

00:54:43.440 actually obese people cis-obese. We understand that there is physical reality and then feelings,

00:54:49.400 and sometimes feelings are out of step with reality, and when that's the case, we usually understand

00:54:54.200 that the feelings are the issue. They are the problem to be solved, and so we try to solve

00:54:58.880 them. Will Professor Dave address that objection in this video? Spoiler, no, he won't. In fact,

00:55:04.080 he won't honestly engage with literally any objection raised by the opponents of his ideology

00:55:07.860 at all. Won't even try. Common theme with these people, but let's keep listening anyway.

00:55:14.140 The unfortunate linguistic coincidence is that we use terms like man and woman or male and female

00:55:22.460 in describing both of these phenomena. That is where the confusion arises when people insist

00:55:28.660 that one term must encapsulate both phenomena at once. So when someone asks what is a woman expecting

00:55:36.160 to get a very simple answer that children can understand, they are sorely mistaken. The answer

00:55:41.800 requires a discussion of genetics and neurochemistry.

00:55:47.680 Well, I'm sorry you find it offensive, Dave, but yes, I do deny the concept of gender as it was 0.99

00:55:53.500 conceived by John Money. You accept that concept as gospel. You're offended that anybody disagrees with

00:55:58.860 it. That's your problem. Meanwhile, you say that the definition of the word woman is complicated,

00:56:04.720 but please note that it's complicated is not a definition, so you still haven't defined it.

00:56:11.800 I never insisted on a simple definition. I simply insist on a definition, any kind of definition,

00:56:17.360 some sort of meaning. You can give me a complicated one. That's fine. Go ahead. Try me. Give me a

00:56:21.540 complicated definition. I'm perfectly fine with that. But you must have some definition, whereas you

00:56:27.620 provide none at all. See, this is a major problem for you, Dave, and let me try to explain why.

00:56:32.580 It's a problem because, and listen closely, you are using the word. Do you see why that's an issue?

00:56:40.580 You say the word woman is complicated and apparently ambiguous and hard to understand, yet you use it.

00:56:47.920 You refer to women. You talk about women. I bet you'd even say that you believe in women's rights.

00:56:52.140 Would you say that? I bet you would. This must mean that you have some solid, comprehensible idea of

00:56:58.400 what a woman is, yet you never explain that idea. That's a very big problem for you, Dave.

00:57:03.300 You're using a word that you cannot or will not define, which means either that you're hopelessly

00:57:07.460 confused and we should dismiss you and your arguments for that reason, or you're evasive

00:57:11.620 and disingenuous and we should dismiss you and your arguments for that reason. Either way,

00:57:15.500 you and your arguments are in really bad shape right now. Let's continue.

00:57:18.720 The acceptance for suppressed sexual orientations came first because around 10% of people are gay,

00:57:26.440 whereas a much smaller percentage of people are trans. But this is the natural progression of 0.98

00:57:31.920 societal evolution. Nearly every binary has been shown to actually be a spectrum and it doesn't

00:57:37.940 matter how uncomfortable it makes conservative people. Wait, what? Nearly every binary is a spectrum?

00:57:44.660 Like what? No, I'm not uncomfortable with that. I just think it's nonsense. I mean, in a certain

00:57:51.900 way, I'm uncomfortable around people saying stupid things, but that's all we mean by that. 0.97

00:57:57.500 What are the binaries that turned out to be spectrums? Don't say gender because that's begging 0.99

00:58:01.540 the question. I don't agree with John Money's concept of gender at all. It's not that I think

00:58:06.260 gender is a binary. It's that I think it's a totally useless and incoherent concept that should be put 1.00

00:58:10.900 back into the world of linguistics and grammar where it belongs. As for sex, if that's not a binary,

00:58:15.720 then what is it? There are males and females. There are those who are of the nature to become

00:58:20.740 pregnant and those who are of the nature to impregnate. There's no third sex. It's a binary. So where is 0.91

00:58:26.300 the spectrum that everyone thought was a binary? Can you give one example? As for the claim that 10%

00:58:32.180 of people are gay, where did you come up with that? Where'd you get that from? Well, I'll tell you 1.00

00:58:35.900 where you got it from. You got that from Alfred Kinsey, who made that claim in his book, Sexual

00:58:40.500 Behavior of the Human Male, which is the same book that contains a chart documenting the orgasms of

00:58:44.700 infants. He arrives at his arguments and his figures about human sexuality by interviewing sex offenders

00:58:50.020 and prison inmates and lying and pretending that he surveyed a cross-section of the population,

00:58:54.380 but he didn't. So that's where you're getting your information, professor. I just thought you might

00:58:58.160 like to know that. Let's watch a little bit more.

00:59:00.300 Now, as promised, with the indictment of conservatives complete, I turn to liberals

00:59:05.880 and the missteps they are enacting that are preventing resolution.

00:59:10.460 Number one, please stop saying things like gender is a social construct. No, it is not. It is a

00:59:17.700 biological construct. Society can't turn you trans any more than it can turn you gay. Gender is 0.93

00:59:24.960 determined biologically.

00:59:26.500 His indictment of conservatives was complete without ever approaching the vicinity of any

00:59:33.040 one of our actual arguments. And then he turns to criticize liberals to prove how fair and objective

00:59:37.340 he is by slamming them for not being liberal enough. He also says that society can't turn you

00:59:44.020 trans, totally ignoring the fact that in our society currently, and only in our society, only in the 0.99

00:59:49.120 West, there has been a many-fold increase in trans identification. If that's not society turning 0.99

00:59:53.520 people trans, what is it, Dave? Now, I don't know what you'd say to that, because as always, 1.00

00:59:58.820 and like literally every other gender ideologue I've ever spoken to, and I guarantee I've spoken

01:00:03.100 personally to many more people on your side than you've spoken to on my side, but like all of them,

01:00:08.180 you don't attempt to grapple with any of the logical inconsistencies of your position.

01:00:12.460 But I ask again anyway, if society can't turn you trans, why are we experiencing an unprecedented, 1.00

01:00:17.560 skyrocketing rise in trans identifications? If you say that there have always been this many 1.00

01:00:23.840 trans people, but they were all in the closet, you'll then have to explain why there was never, 1.00

01:00:28.680 ever, at any point, ever, a mass epidemic of people committing suicide because they were not

01:00:33.360 affirmed in their gender identity. After all, staple doctrine on the left is that lack of affirmation

01:00:38.240 is dangerous because it causes suicide. Well, then why was that never happening back when there were

01:00:44.360 millions and millions of supposed unaffirmed trans people? Indeed, why is the suicide epidemic

01:00:51.320 happening now when trans people are so affirmed? Here's my answer. Gender ideology is a modern 0.97

01:00:59.280 Western social construct that didn't exist until it was invented by psychoanalytical quacks and then 1.00

01:01:04.640 parroted mindlessly by people like you. Further, while pretending that it affirms and nurtures people,

01:01:09.820 it actually leads them into self-destruction and despair. The evidence bears that out.

01:01:14.580 The evidence is entirely on my side, in fact, and not at all on your side because on this topic,

01:01:20.080 you are wrong about nearly everything and your underlying claims are so nonsensical and incoherent

01:01:25.180 that you can't begin to explain them or defend them and that's why you don't even try.

01:01:30.920 Which is a long way of saying, Professor Dave, that you are today canceled.

01:01:35.940 And that'll do it for us. Thanks for watching. Thanks for listening. Have a great day. Godspeed.

01:01:40.140 Well, if you enjoyed this episode, don't forget to subscribe. And if you want to help spread the

01:01:48.860 word, please give us a five-star review. Also, tell your friends to subscribe as well. We're

01:01:53.260 available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, wherever you listen to podcasts. We're there. Also, be sure to

01:01:57.860 check out the other Daily Wire podcasts, including The Ben Shapiro Show, Michael Knowles Show,

01:02:01.760 The Andrew Klavan Show. Thanks for listening.

01:02:03.420 The Matt Walsh Show is produced by Sean Hampton, executive producer Jeremy Boring. Our supervising

01:02:08.540 producer is Mathis Glover, production manager Pavel Wadowski. Our associate producer is McKenna

01:02:13.660 Waters. The show is edited by Robbie Dantzler. Our audio is mixed by Mike Cormina, and hair and makeup

01:02:19.220 is done by Cherokee Heart. The Matt Walsh Show is a Daily Wire production, copyright Daily Wire 2022.

01:02:24.560 John Bickley here, Daily Wire editor-in-chief. Wake up every morning with our show, Morning Wire,

01:02:29.980 where we bring you all the news that you need to know in 15 minutes or less.

01:02:34.440 Join me and my co-host, Georgia Howe, for daily coverage of all the biggest stories on Morning Wire.

The Matt Walsh Show - June 09, 2022

Ep. 968 - The Leftist Plot To Destroy Childhood Innocence

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript